Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) or Superfund, Section 128(a); Notice of Grant Funding Guidance for State and Tribal Response Programs, 59163-59172 [E9-27568]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 220 / Tuesday, November 17, 2009 / Notices
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David Yogi, Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response, Assessment and
Remediation Division, (5204 P),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460; telephone number: (703)
347–8835; fax number: (703) 603–9112;
e-mail address: yogi.david@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA has
submitted the following ICR to OMB for
review and approval according to the
procedures prescribed in 5 CFR 1320.12.
On June 17, 2009 (74 FR 28693), EPA
sought comments on this ICR pursuant
to 5 CFR 1320.8(d). EPA received no
comments. Any additional comments on
this ICR should be submitted to EPA
and OMB within 30 days of this notice.
EPA has established a public docket
for this ICR under Docket ID No. EPA–
HQ–SFUND–2004–0008, which is
available for online viewing at https://
www.regulations.gov, or in person
viewing at the Superfund Docket in the
EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA
West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution
Ave., NW., Washington, DC. The EPA/
DC Public Reading Room is open from
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The
telephone number for the Reading Room
is 202–566–1744, and the telephone
number for the Superfund Docket is
202–566–9744.
Use EPA’s electronic docket and
comment system at
www.regulations.gov, to submit or view
public comments, access the index
listing of the contents of the docket, and
to access those documents in the docket
that are available electronically. Once in
the system, select ‘‘docket search,’’ then
key in the docket ID number identified
above. Please note that EPA’s policy is
that public comments, whether
submitted electronically or in paper,
will be made available for public
viewing at https://www.regulations.gov
as EPA receives them and without
change, unless the comment contains
copyrighted material, confidential
business information (CBI), or other
information whose public disclosure is
restricted by statute. For further
information about the electronic docket,
go to https://www.regulations.gov.
Title: Cooperative Agreements and
Superfund State Contracts for
Superfund Response Actions (Renewal).
ICR numbers: EPA ICR No. 1487.10,
OMB Control No. 2050–0179.
ICR Status: This ICR is scheduled to
expire on December 31, 2009. Under
OMB regulations, the Agency may
continue to conduct or sponsor the
collection of information while this
submission is pending at OMB. An
VerDate Nov<24>2008
20:50 Nov 16, 2009
Jkt 220001
Agency may not conduct or sponsor,
and a person is not required to respond
to, a collection of information, unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number. The OMB control numbers for
EPA’s regulations in title 40 of the CFR,
after appearing in the Federal Register
when approved, are listed in 40 CFR
part 9, are displayed either by
publication in the Federal Register or
by other appropriate means, such as on
the related collection instrument or
form, if applicable. The display of OMB
control numbers in certain EPA
regulations is consolidated in 40 CFR
part 9.
Abstract: This ICR authorizes the
collection of information under 40 CFR
part 35, subpart O, which establishes
the administrative requirements for
cooperative agreements funded under
the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act (CERCLA) for State, federallyrecognized Indian tribal governments,
intertribal consortiums, and political
subdivision response actions. This
regulation also codifies the
administrative requirements for
Superfund State Contracts for non-State
lead remedial responses. This regulation
includes only those provisions
mandated by CERCLA, required by
OMB Circulars, or added by EPA to
ensure sound and effective financial
assistance management under this
regulation. The information is collected
from applicants and/or recipients of
EPA assistance and is used to make
awards, pay recipients, and collect
information on how federal funds are
being utilized. EPA requires this
information to meet its federal
stewardship responsibilities. Recipient
responses are required to obtain a
benefit (federal funds) under 40 CFR
part 31, ‘‘Uniform Administrative
Requirements for Grants and
Cooperative Agreements to State and
Local Governments’’ and under 40 CFR
part 35, ‘‘State and Local Assistance.’’
Burden Statement: The annual public
reporting and recordkeeping burden for
this collection of information is
estimated to average 7 hours per
response. Burden means the total time,
effort, or financial resources expended
by persons to generate, maintain, retain,
or disclose or provide information to or
for a Federal agency. This includes the
time needed to review instructions;
develop, acquire, install, and utilize
technology and systems for the purposes
of collecting, validating, and verifying
information, processing and
maintaining information, and disclosing
and providing information; adjust the
existing ways to comply with any
previously applicable instructions and
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
59163
requirements which have subsequently
changed; train personnel to be able to
respond to a collection of information;
search data sources; complete and
review the collection of information;
and transmit or otherwise disclose the
information.
Respondents/Affected Entities: State;
Local; or Tribal governments.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
568.
Frequency of Response: On occasion.
Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden:
4,189.
Estimated Total Annual Cost:
$128,466.67, includes no costs for
annualized capital or O&M costs.
Changes in the Estimates: There is a
decrease of 884 hours in the total
estimated burden currently identified in
the OMB Inventory of Approved ICR
Burdens. This decrease reflects a
decrease in the estimated number of
respondents from the previous ICR.
Dated: November 9, 2009.
John Moses,
Director, Collection Strategies Division.
[FR Doc. E9–27618 Filed 11–16–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–HQ–SFUND–2009–0827; FRL–8980–6]
Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation and Liability
Act (CERCLA) or Superfund, Section
128(a); Notice of Grant Funding
Guidance for State and Tribal
Response Programs
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: EPA will begin to accept
requests, from December 1, 2009
through January 31, 2010, for grants to
supplement State and Tribal Response
Programs. This notice provides
guidance on eligibility for funding, use
of funding, grant mechanisms and
process for awarding funding, the
allocation system for distribution of
funding, and terms and reporting under
these grants. EPA has consulted with
state and tribal officials in developing
this guidance.
The primary goal of this funding is to
ensure that state and tribal response
programs include, or are taking
reasonable steps to include, certain
elements and a public record. Another
goal is to provide funding for other
activities that increase the number of
response actions conducted or overseen
by a state or tribal response program.
E:\FR\FM\17NON1.SGM
17NON1
59164
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 220 / Tuesday, November 17, 2009 / Notices
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
This funding is not intended to supplant
current state or tribal funding for their
response programs. Instead, it is to
supplement their funding to increase
their response capacity.
For fiscal year 2010, EPA will
consider funding requests up to a
maximum of $1.5 million per state or
tribe. Subject to the availability of
funds, EPA regional personnel will be
available to provide technical assistance
to states and tribes as they apply for and
carry out these grants.
DATES: This action is effective as of
December 1, 2009. EPA expects to make
non-competitive grant awards to states
and tribes which apply during fiscal
year 2010.
ADDRESSES: Mailing addresses for U.S.
EPA Regional Offices and U.S. EPA
Headquarters can be located at
www.epa.gov/brownfields.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The
U.S. EPA’s Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response, Office of
Brownfields and Land Revitalization;
(202) 566–2777.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Section 128(a) of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act
(CERCLA), as amended, authorizes a
noncompetitive $50 million grant
program to establish and enhance state 1
and tribal 2 response programs.
Generally, these response programs
address the assessment, cleanup, and
redevelopment of brownfields sites and
other sites with actual or perceived
contamination. Section 128(a)
cooperative agreements are awarded and
administered by EPA’s regional offices.
This document provides guidance that
will enable states and tribes to apply for
and use Fiscal Year 2010 section 128(a)
funds.3
Requests for funding will be accepted
from December 1, 2009 through January
31, 2010. Requests received after
January 31, 2010 will not be considered
for FY 2010 funding. Information
required to be submitted with the
funding request is on pages 27–32.
States or tribes that do not submit the
request in the appropriate manner may
forfeit their ability to request funds.
First time requestors are strongly
encouraged to contact their Regional
1 The term ‘‘state’’ is defined in this document as
defined in CERCLA section 101(27).
2 The term ‘‘Indian tribe’’ is defined in this
document as it is defined in CERCLA section
101(36). Intertribal consortia, as defined in the
Federal Register Notice at 67 FR 67181, Nov. 4,
2002, are also eligible for funding under CERCLA
section 128(a).
3 The Agency may waive any provision of this
guidance that is not required by statute, regulation,
Executive Order or overriding Agency policies.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
20:50 Nov 16, 2009
Jkt 220001
Brownfields Coordinator (see page 34)
prior to submitting their funding
request.
Requests submitted by the January 31,
2010 request deadline are preliminary;
final cooperative agreement work plans
and budgets will be negotiated with the
regional offices once final allocation
determinations are made. As in prior
years, EPA will place special emphasis
on reviewing a cooperative agreement
recipient’s use of prior section 128(a)
funding in making allocation decisions.
States and tribes requesting funds are
required to provide a Dun and
Bradstreet Data Universal Numbering
System (DUNS) number with their final
cooperative agreement package. For
more information, please go to
www.grants.gov.
The Catalogue of Federal Domestic
Assistance entry for the section 128(a)
State and Tribal Response Program
cooperative agreements is 66.817. This
grant program is eligible to be included
in state and tribal Performance
Partnership Grants, with the exception
of funds used to capitalize a revolving
loan fund for brownfield remediation
under section 104(k)(3); or purchase
insurance or develop a risk sharing
pool, an indemnity pool, or insurance
mechanism to provide financing for
response actions under a State or Tribal
response program.
I. Background
State and tribal response programs
oversee assessment and cleanup
activities at the majority of brownfields
sites across the country. The depth and
breadth of state and tribal response
programs vary. Some focus on CERCLA
related activities, while others are multifaceted, for example, addressing sites
regulated by both CERCLA and the
Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act (RCRA). Many state programs also
offer accompanying financial incentive
programs to spur cleanup and
redevelopment. In passing section
128(a) 4, Congress recognized the
accomplishments of state and tribal
response programs in cleaning up and
redeveloping brownfields sites. Section
128(a) also provides EPA with an
opportunity to strengthen its
partnership with states and tribes.
The primary goal of this funding is to
ensure that state and tribal response
programs include, or are taking
reasonable steps to include, certain
elements and a ‘‘public record.’’ The
secondary goal is to provide funding for
other activities that increase the number
4 Section 128(a) was added to CERCLA in 2002 by
the Small Business Liability Relief and Brownfields
Revitalization Act (Brownfield Amendments).
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
of response actions conducted or
overseen by a state or tribal response
program. This funding is not intended
to supplant current state or tribal
funding for their response programs.
Instead, it is to supplement their
funding to increase their response
program’s capacity.
Subject to the availability of funds,
EPA regional personnel will be available
to provide technical assistance to states
and tribes as they apply for and carry
out section 128(a) cooperative
agreements.
II. Eligibility For Funding
To be eligible for funding under
CERCLA section 128(a), a state or tribe
must:
—demonstrate that its response program
includes, or is taking reasonable steps
to include, the four elements of a
response program, described below;
or be a party to voluntary response
program Memorandum of Agreement
(VRP MOA) 5 with EPA;
and
—maintain and make available to the
public a record of sites at which
response actions have been completed
in the previous year and are planned
to be addressed in the upcoming year,
see CERCLA section 128(b)(1)(C).
III. Matching Funds/Cost-Share
States and tribes are not required to
provide matching funds for cooperative
agreements awarded under section
128(a), with the exception of the section
128(a) funds a state or tribe uses to
capitalize a Brownfields Revolving Loan
Fund under CERCLA section 104(k)(3).
IV. The Four Elements—Section 128(A)
Section 128(a) recipients that do not
have a VRP MOA with EPA must
demonstrate that their response program
includes, or is taking reasonable steps to
include, the four elements.
Achievement of the four elements
should be viewed as a priority. Section
128(a) authorizes funding for activities
necessary to establish and enhance the
four elements and to establish and
maintain the public record requirement.
Generally, the four elements are:
(1) Timely survey and inventory of
brownfields sites in state or tribal land.
EPA’s goal in funding activities under
this element is to enable the state or
tribe to establish or enhance a system or
process that will provide a reasonable
5 The legislative history of the Brownfields
Amendments indicates that Congress intended to
encourage states and tribes to enter into MOAs for
their voluntary response programs. States or tribes
that are parties to VRP MOAs and that maintain and
make available a public record are automatically
eligible for Section 128(a) funding.
E:\FR\FM\17NON1.SGM
17NON1
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 220 / Tuesday, November 17, 2009 / Notices
estimate of the number, likely locations,
and the general characteristics of
brownfields sites in their state or tribal
lands.
EPA recognizes the varied scope of
state and tribal response programs and
will not require states and tribes to
develop a ‘‘list’’ of brownfields sites.
However, at a minimum, the state or
tribe should develop and/or maintain a
system or process that can provide a
reasonable estimate of the number,
likely location, and general
characteristics of brownfields sites
within their state or tribal lands.
Given funding limitations, EPA will
negotiate work plans with states and
tribes to achieve this goal efficiently and
effectively, and within a realistic time
frame. For example, many of EPA’s
Brownfields Assessment cooperative
agreement recipients conduct
inventories of brownfields sites in their
communities or jurisdictions. EPA
encourages states and tribes to work
with these cooperative agreement
recipients to obtain the information that
they have gathered and include it in
their survey and inventory.
(2) Oversight and enforcement
authorities or other mechanisms and
resources. EPA’s goal in funding
activities under this element is to have
state and tribal response programs that
include oversight and enforcement
authorities or other mechanisms, and
resources that are adequate to ensure
that:
—a response action will protect human
health and the environment and be
conducted in accordance with
applicable federal and state law; and
—the necessary response activities are
completed if the person conducting
the response activities fails to
complete the necessary response
activities (this includes operation and
maintenance or long-term monitoring
activities).
(3) Mechanisms and resources to
provide meaningful opportunities for
public participation6. EPA’s goal in
funding activities under this element is
to have states and tribes include in their
response program mechanisms and
resources for meaningful public
participation, at the local level,
including, at a minimum:
—Public access to documents and
related materials that a state, tribe, or
party conducting the cleanup is
relying on or developing in making
cleanup decisions or conducting site
activities;
6 States and tribes establishing this element may
find useful information on public participation on
EPA’s community involvement Web site at https://
www.epa.gov/superfund/community/policies.htm.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
20:50 Nov 16, 2009
Jkt 220001
—Prior notice and opportunity for
public comment on cleanup plans and
site activity; and
—A mechanism by which a person who
is, or may be, affected by a release or
threatened release of a hazardous
substance, pollutant, or contaminant
at a brownfields site—located in the
community in which the person
works or resides—may request that a
site assessment be conducted. The
appropriate state or tribal official
must consider this request and
appropriately respond.
(4) Mechanisms for approval of a
cleanup plan and verification and
certification that cleanup is complete.
EPA’s goal in funding activities under
this element is to have states and tribes
include in their response program
mechanisms to approve cleanup plans
and to verify that response actions are
complete, including a requirement for
certification or similar documentation
from the state, the tribe, or a licensed
site professional to the person
conducting the response action that the
response action is complete. Written
approval by a state or tribal response
program official of a proposed cleanup
plan is an example of an approval
mechanism.
V. Public Record Requirement
In order to be eligible for section
128(a) funding, states and tribes
(including those with MOAs) must
establish and maintain a public record
system, described below, in order to
receive funds. Specifically, under
section 128(b)(1)(C), states and tribes
must:
—Maintain and update, at least
annually or more often as appropriate,
a record of sites that includes the
name and location of sites at which
response actions have been completed
during the previous year;
—Maintain and update, at least
annually or more often as appropriate,
a record of sites that includes the
name and location of sites at which
response actions are planned to be
addressed in the next year; and
—Identify in the public record whether
or not the site, upon completion of the
response action, will be suitable for
unrestricted use. If not, the public
record must identify the institutional
controls relied on in the remedy.
Section 128(a) funds may be used to
maintain and make available a public
record system that meets the
requirements discussed above.
A. Distinguishing the ‘‘survey and
inventory’’ element from the ‘‘public
record.’’ It is important to note that the
public record requirement differs from
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
59165
the ‘‘timely survey and inventory’’
element described in the ‘‘Four
Elements’’ section above. The public
record addresses sites at which response
actions have been completed in the
previous year and are planned to be
addressed in the upcoming year. In
contrast, the ‘‘timely survey and
inventory’’ element, described above,
refers to a general approach to
identifying brownfields sites.
B. Making the public record easily
accessible. EPA’s goal is to enable states
and tribes to make the public record and
other information, such as information
from the ‘‘survey and inventory’’
element, easily accessible. For this
reason, EPA will allow states and tribes
to use section 128(a) funding to make
the public record, as well as other
information, such as information from
the ‘‘survey and inventory’’ element,
available to the public via the internet
or other means. For example, the
Agency would support funding state
and tribal efforts to include detailed
location information in the public
record such as the street address and
latitude and longitude information for
each site.7
In an effort to reduce cooperative
agreement reporting requirements and
increase public access to the public
record, EPA encourages states and tribes
to place their public record on the
internet. If a state or tribe places the
public record on the internet, maintains
the substantive requirements of the
public record, and provides EPA with
the link to that site, EPA will, for
purposes of cooperative agreement
funding only, deem the public record
reporting requirement met.
C. Long-term maintenance of the
public record. EPA encourages states
and tribes to maintain public record
information, including data on
institutional controls, on a long term
basis (more than one year) for sites at
which a response action has been
completed. Subject to EPA regional
office approval, states or tribes may
include development and operation of
systems that ensure long term
maintenance of the public record,
including information on institutional
controls, in their work plans.8
7 For further information on latitude and
longitude information, please see EPA’s data
standards Web site available at https://
iaspub.epa.gov/sor_internet/registry/datastds/
findadatastandard/epaapproved/latitudelongitude
8 States and tribes may find useful information on
institutional controls on EPA’s institutional
controls Web site at https://www.epa.gov/
superfund/policy/ic/index.htm
E:\FR\FM\17NON1.SGM
17NON1
59166
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 220 / Tuesday, November 17, 2009 / Notices
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
VI. Use Of Funding
A. Overview
Section 128(a)(1)(B) describes the
eligible uses of cooperative agreement
funds by states and tribes. In general, a
state or tribe may use a cooperative
agreement to ‘‘establish or enhance’’
their response programs, including
elements of the response program that
include activities related to responses at
brownfields sites with petroleum
contamination. Eligible activities
include, but are not limited to, the
following:
—Develop legislation, regulations,
procedures, ordinances, guidance, etc.
that would establish or enhance the
administrative and legal structure of
their response programs;
—Establish and maintain the required
public record described above. EPA
considers activities related to
maintaining and monitoring
institutional controls to be eligible
costs under section 128(a);
—Conduct limited site-specific
activities, such as assessment or
cleanup, provided such activities
establish and/or enhance the response
program and are tied to the four
elements. In addition to the
requirement per CERCLA section
128(a)(2)(C)(ii) to obtain public
comment on cleanup plans and site
activities, EPA strongly encourages
states and tribes to seek public input
regarding the priority of sites to be
addressed and solicit input from local
communities, especially potential
environmental justice communities,
communities with a health risk
related to exposure to hazardous
waste or other public health concerns,
economically disadvantaged or
remote areas, and communities with
limited experience working with
government agencies. EPA will not
provide section 128(a) funds solely for
assessment or cleanup of specific
brownfields sites; site specific
activities must be an incidental part of
an overall section 128(a) work plan
that includes funding for other
activities that establish or enhance the
four elements;
—Capitalize a revolving loan fund (RLF)
for brownfields cleanup under
CERCLA section 104(k)(3). These
RLFs are subject to the same statutory
requirements and cooperative
agreement terms and conditions
applicable to RLFs awarded under
section 104(k)(3). Requirements
include a 20 percent match on the
amount of section 128(a) funds used
for the RLF, a prohibition on using
EPA cooperative agreement funds for
administrative costs relating to the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
20:50 Nov 16, 2009
Jkt 220001
RLF, and a prohibition on using RLF
loans or subgrants for response costs
at a site for which the recipient may
be potentially liable under section 107
of CERCLA. Other prohibitions
contained in CERCLA section
104(k)(4) also apply; or
—Purchase environmental insurance or
develop a risk-sharing pool,
indemnity pool, or insurance
mechanism to provide financing for
response actions under a state or
tribal response program.
B. Uses Related to ‘‘Establishing’’ a
State or Tribal Response Program
Under CERCLA section 128(a),
‘‘establish’’ includes activities necessary
to build the foundation for the four
elements of a state or tribal response
program and the public record
requirement. For example, a state or
tribal response program may use section
128(a) funds to develop regulations,
ordinances, procedures, or guidance.
For more developed state or tribal
response programs, ‘‘establish’’ may also
include activities that keep their
program at a level that meets the four
elements and maintains a public record
required as a condition of funding under
CERCLA section 128(b)(1)(C).
C. Uses Related to ‘‘Enhancing’’ a State
or Tribal Response Program
Under CERCLA section 128(a),
‘‘enhance’’ is related to activities that
add to or improve a state or tribal
response program or increase the
number of sites at which response
actions are conducted under a state or
tribal response program.
The exact ‘‘enhancement’’ uses that
may be allowable depend upon the
work plan negotiated between the EPA
regional office and the state or tribe. For
example, regional offices and states or
tribes may agree that section 128(a)
funds may be used for outreach and
training directly related to increasing
awareness of its response program, and
improving the skills of program staff. It
may also include developing better
coordination and understanding of other
state response programs, e.g., RCRA or
USTs. As another example, states and
tribal response programs enhancement
activities can include outreach to local
communities to increase their awareness
and knowledge regarding the
importance of monitoring engineering
and institutional controls. Other
‘‘enhancement’’ uses may be allowable
as well.
D. Uses Related to Site-Specific
Activities
States and tribes may use section
128(a) funds for activities that improve
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
state or tribal capacity to increase the
number of sites at which response
actions are conducted under the state or
tribal response program.
Eligible uses of funds include, but are
not limited to, site-specific activities
such as:
—Conducting assessments or cleanups
at brownfields sites (see next section
for additional information);
—oversight of response action;
—technical assistance to federal
brownfields cooperative agreement
recipients;
—development and/or review of sitespecific quality assurance project
plans (QAPPs);
—preparation and submission of
Property Profile Forms; and
—auditing site cleanups to verify the
completion of the cleanup.
E. Uses Related to Site-Specific
Assessment and Cleanup Activities
Site-specific assessment and cleanup
activities should establish and/or
enhance the response program and be
tied to the four elements. In addition to
the requirement per CERCLA section
128(a)(2)(C)(ii) to obtain public
comment on cleanup plans and site
activities, EPA strongly encourages
states and tribes to seek public input
regarding the priority of sites to be
addressed and solicit input from local
communities, especially potential
environmental justice communities,
communities with a health risk related
to exposure to hazardous waste or other
public health concerns, economically
disadvantaged or remote areas, and
communities with limited experience
working with government agencies. EPA
will not provide section 128(a) funds
solely for assessment or cleanup of
specific brownfields sites; site-specific
activities must be an incidental part of
an overall section 128(a) work plan that
includes funding for other activities that
establish or enhance the four elements.
Site-specific assessments and cleanups
must comply with all applicable federal
and state laws and are subject to the
following restrictions:
—Section 128(a) funds can only be used
for assessments or cleanups at sites
that meet the definition of a
brownfields site at CERCLA section
101(39);
—Absent EPA approval, no more than
$200,000 per site can be funded for
assessments with section 128(a)
funds, and no more than $200,000 per
site can be funded for cleanups with
section 128(a) funds; and
—Absent EPA approval, the state/tribe
may not use funds awarded under this
agreement to assess and clean up sites
owned or operated by the recipient.
E:\FR\FM\17NON1.SGM
17NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 220 / Tuesday, November 17, 2009 / Notices
Assessments and cleanups cannot be
conducted at sites where the state/tribe
is a potentially responsible party
pursuant to CERCLA section 107,
except:
—at brownfields sites contaminated by
a controlled substance as defined in
CERCLA section 101(39)(D)(ii)(I); or
—when the recipient would satisfy all
of the elements set forth in CERCLA
section 101(40) to qualify as a bona
fide prospective purchaser except that
the date of acquisition of the property
was on or before January 11, 2002.
Subgrants cannot be provided to
entities that may be potentially
responsible parties (pursuant to
CERCLA section 107) at the site for
which the assessment or cleanup
activities are proposed to be conducted,
except:
—at brownfields sites contaminated by
a controlled substance as defined in
CERCLA section 101(39)(D)(ii)(I); or
—when the recipient would satisfy all
of the elements set forth in CERCLA
section 101(40) to qualify as a bona
fide prospective purchaser except that
the date of acquisition of the property
was on or before January 11, 2002.
F. Costs Incurred for Activities at ‘‘Nonbrownfields’’ Sites
Costs incurred for activities at nonbrownfields sites, e.g., oversight, may be
eligible and allowable if such activities
are included in the state’s or tribe’s
work plan. For example, auditing
completed site cleanups in jurisdictions
where states or tribes use licensed site
professionals, to verify that sites have
been properly cleaned up, may be an
eligible cost under section 128(a). These
costs need not be incurred in
connection with a brownfields site to be
eligible, but must be authorized under
the state’s or tribe’s work plan to be
allowable. Other uses may be eligible
and allowable as well, depending upon
the work plan negotiated between the
EPA regional office and the state or
tribe. However, assessment and cleanup
activities may only be conducted on
eligible brownfields sites, as defined in
CERCLA section 101(39).
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
G. Uses Related to Site-Specific
Activities at Petroleum Brownfields
Sites
States and tribes may use section
128(a) funds for activities that establish
and enhance their response programs,
even if their response programs address
petroleum contamination. Also, the
costs of site-specific activities, such as
site assessments or cleanup at
petroleum contaminated brownfields
sites, defined at CERCLA section
VerDate Nov<24>2008
20:50 Nov 16, 2009
Jkt 220001
101(39)(D)(ii)(II), are eligible and are
allowable if the activity is included in
the work plan negotiated between the
EPA regional office and the state or
tribe. Section 128(a) funds used to
capitalize a Brownfields RLF may be
used at brownfields sites contaminated
by petroleum to the extent allowed
under CERCLA section 104(k)(3).
VII. General Programmatic Guidelines
for Section 128(A) Grant Funding
Requests
Funding authorized under CERCLA
section 128(a) is awarded through a
cooperative agreement 9 with a state or
tribe. The program is administered
under the general EPA grant and
cooperative agreement regulations for
states, tribes, and local governments
found in the Code of Federal
Regulations at 40 CFR part 31. Under
these regulations, the cooperative
agreement recipient for section 128(a)
grant program is the government to
which a cooperative agreement is
awarded and which is accountable for
the use of the funds provided. The
cooperative agreement recipient is the
entire legal entity even if only a
particular component of the entity is
designated in the cooperative agreement
award document.
A. One application per state or tribe.
Subject to the availability of funds, EPA
regional offices will negotiate and enter
into section 128(a) cooperative
agreements with eligible and interested
states or tribes. EPA will accept only one
application from each eligible state or
tribe.
B. Define the State or Tribal Response
Program. States and tribes must define
in their work plan the ‘‘section 128(a)
response program(s)’’ to which the
funds will be applied, and may
designate a component of the state or
tribe that will be EPA’s primary point of
contact for negotiations on their
proposed work plan. When EPA funds
the section 128(a) cooperative
agreement, states and tribes may
distribute these funds among the
appropriate state and tribal agencies that
are part of the section 128(a) response
program. This distribution must be
clearly outlined in their annual work
plan.
C. Separate cooperative agreements
for the capitalization of RLFs using
section 128(a) funds. If a portion of the
9 A cooperative agreement is an assistance
agreement to a state or a tribe that includes
substantial involvement of EPA regional
enforcement and program staff during performance
of activities described in the cooperative agreement
work plan. Examples of this involvement include
technical assistance and collaboration on program
development and site-specific activities.
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
59167
section 128(a) grant funds requested
will be used to capitalize a revolving
loan fund for cleanup, pursuant to
section 104(k)(3), two separate
cooperative agreements must be
awarded, i.e., one for the RLF and one
for non-RLF uses. States and tribes may,
however, submit one initial request for
funding, delineating the RLF as a
proposed use. Section 128(a) funds used
to capitalize an RLF are not eligible for
inclusion into a Performance
Partnership Grant (PPG).
D. Authority to Manage a Revolving
Loan Fund Program. If a state or tribe
chooses to use its secton 128(a) funds to
capitalize a revolving loan fund
program, the state or tribe must have the
authority to manage the program, e.g.,
issue loans. If the agency/department
listed as the point of contact for the
section 128(a) cooperative agreement
does not have this authority, it must be
able to demonstrate that another state or
tribal agency does have the authority to
manage the RLF and is willing to do so.
E. Section 128(a) cooperative
agreements are eligible for inclusion in
the Performance Partnership Grant.
States and tribes may include section
128(a) cooperative agreements in their
PPG. 69 FR 51,756 (2004). Section
128(a) funds used to capitalize an RLF
or purchase insurance or develop a risk
sharing pool, an indemnity pool, or
insurance mechanism to provide
financing for response actions under a
state or tribal response program are not
eligible for inclusion in the PPG.
F. Project Period. EPA regional offices
will determine the project period for
each cooperative agreement. These may
be for multiple years depending on the
regional office’s cooperative agreement
policies. Each cooperative agreement
must have an annual budget period tied
to an annual work plan.
G. Demonstrating the Four Elements.
As part of the annual work plan
negotiation process, states or tribes that
do not have VRP MOAs must
demonstrate that their program
includes, or is taking reasonable steps to
include, the four elements described
above. EPA will not fund, in future
years, state or tribal response program
annual work plans if EPA determines
that these requirements are not met or
reasonable progress is not being made.
EPA may base this determination on the
information the state or tribe provides to
support its work plan, or on EPA’s
review of the state or tribal response
program.
H. Establishing and Maintaining the
Public Record. Prior to funding a state’s
or tribe’s annual work plan, EPA
regional offices will verify and
document that a public record, as
E:\FR\FM\17NON1.SGM
17NON1
59168
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 220 / Tuesday, November 17, 2009 / Notices
described above, exists and is being
maintained 10.
• States or tribes that received initial
funding prior to FY09: Requests for
FY10 funds will not be accepted from
states or tribes that fail to demonstrate,
by the January 31, 2010 request
deadline, that they established and are
maintaining a public record. (Note, this
would potentially impact any state or
tribe that had a term and condition
placed on their FY09 cooperative
agreement that prohibited drawdown of
FY09 funds prior to meeting public
record requirement.) States or tribes in
this situation will not be prevented from
drawing down their prior year funds,
once the public record requirement is
met, but will be restricted from applying
for FY10 funding.
• States or Tribes that received initial
funding in FY09: by the time of the
actual FY10 award, the state or tribe
must demonstrate that they established
and maintained the public record (those
states and tribes that do not meet this
requirement will have a term and
condition placed on their FY10
cooperative agreement that prevents the
drawdown of FY10 funds until the
public record requirement is met).
• Recipients receiving funds for the
first time in FY10: these recipients have
one year to meet this requirement and
may utilize the section 128(a)
cooperative agreement funds to do so.
I. Demonstration of Significant
Utilization of Prior Years’ Funding
During the allocation process, EPA
headquarters places significant
emphasis on the utilization of prior
years’ funding. When submitting your
request for FY10 funds, the following
information must be submitted:
—For those states and tribes with
Superfund VCP Core or Targeted
Brownfields Assessment cooperative
agreements awarded under CERCLA
section 104(d), you must provide, by
agreement number, the amount of
funds that have not been requested for
reimbursement (i.e., those funds that
remain in EPA’s Financial Data
Warehouse) and must provide a
detailed explanation and justification
for why such funds should not be
considered in the funding allocation
process.
—For those states and tribes that
received FY03, FY04, FY05, FY06,
FY07 and/or FY08 section 128(a)
funds, you must provide the amount
of FY03, FY04, FY05, FY06, FY07
and/or FY08 funds that have not been
requested for reimbursement (i.e,
those funds that remain in EPA’s
Financial Data Warehouse). These
funds will be considered in the
funding allocation process.
Note: EPA Regional staff will review EPA’s
Financial Database Warehouse to confirm the
amount of outstanding funds reported. It is
strongly recommended that you work with
your regional counterpart to determine the
amount of funds ‘‘outstanding.’’
J. Demonstration of Need To Receive
Funds Above the FY09 Funding
Distribution
VIII. Information To Be Submitted With
the Funding Request
Due to the limited amount of funding
available, recipients must demonstrate a
specific need when requesting an
amount above the amount allocated to
the state or tribe in FY09.
States and tribes requesting section
128(a) FY10 funds must submit the
following information, as applicable, to
their regional contact on or before
January 31, 2010 (regions may request
additional information, as needed):
K. Allocation System and Process for
Distribution of Funds
—For those states and tribes with prior
Superfund VCP Core or Targeted
Brownfields Assessment funding
awarded under CERCLA section
104(d), provide, by agreement
number, the amount of funds that
have not been requested for
reimbursement (i.e., those funds that
remain in EPA’s Financial Data
Warehouse). EPA will take into
account these funds in the allocation
process.
—For those states and tribes that
received FY08 or prior section 128(a)
funds, you must provide the amount
of FY03, FY04, FY05, FY06 and/or
FY07 funds that have not been
requested for reimbursement (i.e.,
those funds that remain in EPA’s
Financial Data Warehouse). EPA will
take into account these funds in the
allocation process.
All states and tribes requesting FY10
funds must submit a summary of the
planned use of the funds with
associated dollar amounts. Please
provide the request in the following
format:
EPA regional offices will work with
interested states and tribes to develop
their preliminary work plans and
funding requests. Final cooperative
agreement work plans and budgets will
be negotiated with the regional office
once final allocation determinations are
made.
For Fiscal Year 2010, EPA will
consider funding requests up to a
maximum of $1.5 million per state or
tribe. This limit may be changed in
future years based on appropriation
amounts and demand for funding.
EPA will target funding of at least $3
million per year for tribal response
programs. If this funding is not used, it
will be carried over and added to at
least $3 million in the next fiscal year.
It is expected that the funding demand
from tribes will increase through the life
of this cooperative agreement program
and this funding allocation system
should ensure that adequate funding for
tribal response programs is available in
future years.
Funding use
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
After the January 31, 2010 request
deadline, regional offices will submit
summaries of state and tribal requests to
EPA headquarters. Before submitting
requests to EPA headquarters, regional
offices may take into account additional
factors when determining recommended
allocation amounts. Such factors
include, but are not limited to, the
depth and breadth of the state or tribal
program; scope of the perceived need
for the funding, e.g., size of state or
tribal jurisdiction or the proposed work
plan balanced against capacity of the
program, amount of prior funding, and
funds remaining from prior years, etc.
After receipt of the regional
recommendations, EPA headquarters
will consolidate requests and allocate
funds accordingly.
FY09 awarded
FY10 requested
Establish or Enhance the four elements:
1. Timely survey and inventory of brownfields sites;
2. Oversight and enforcement authorities or other
mechanisms;
$XX,XXX
........................
........................
$XX,XXX
........................
........................
10 For purposes of cooperative agreement funding,
the state’s or tribe’s public record applies to that
VerDate Nov<24>2008
20:50 Nov 16, 2009
Jkt 220001
Summary of intended use
(Example uses)
• Inventory and prioritize brownfields sites.
• Develop/enhance ordinances, regulations, procedures for response programs.
state’s or tribe’s response program(s) that utilized
the Section 128(a) funding.
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\17NON1.SGM
17NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 220 / Tuesday, November 17, 2009 / Notices
Funding use
FY09 awarded
FY10 requested
3. Mechanisms and resources to provide meaningful
opportunities for public participation; and
........................
........................
4. Mechanisms or approval of a cleanup plan and
verification and certification that cleanup is complete.
Establish and Maintain the Public Record ...................
........................
........................
$XX,XXX
$XX,XXX
Enhance the Response Program .................................
$XX,XXX
$XX,XXX
Site-specific Activities (amount requested should be
incidental to the workplan, e.g., less than half of the
total funding requested).
$XX,XXX
$XX,XXX
Environmental Insurance ..............................................
Revolving Loan Fund ...................................................
$XX,XXX
$XX,XXX
$XX,XXX
$XX,XXX
Total Funding ................................................................
$XXX,XXX
$XXX,XXX
For those states and tribes requesting
amounts above their FY09 allocation, a
Summary of intended use
(Example uses)
•
•
•
•
Develop a community involvement process.
Fund an outreach coordinator.
Issue public notices of site activities.
Review cleanup plans and verify completed actions.
• Maintain public record.
• Create Web site for public record.
• Disseminate public information on how to access
the public record.
• Provide oversight of site assessments and cleanups.
• Attend training and conferences on brownfields
cleanup technologies & other brownfields topics.
• Update and enhance program management activities.
• Negotiate/oversee contracts for response programs.
• Enhance program management & tracking systems.
• Prepare Property Profile Forms/input data into
ACRES database.
• Develop QAPPs.
• Perform site assessments and cleanups.
• Prepare Property Profile Forms/input data into
ACRES database for these sites.
• Review potential uses of environmental insurance.
• Create a cleanup revolving loan fund.
Performance Partnership Grant? Yes b No b
separate explanation of the specific
need(s) and the increased amount that
Explanation of request(s) for funding above FY09 award
triggered the request for that need(s)
must be provided in the format below:
One time 11 request or recurring?
Amount
59169
Explanation/anticipated outcome
Establish or Enhance the four elements:
1. Timely survey and inventory of brownfields sites; 2. Oversight and
enforcement authorities or other mechanisms; 3. Mechanisms and
resources to provide meaningful opportunities for public participation; and/or 4. Mechanisms or approval of a cleanup plan and
verification and certification that cleanup is complete..
Establish and Maintain the Public Record .............................................
$XX,XXX
One Time b
Recurring b
Explanation of need: Anticipated
Outcome:
$XX,XXX
One Time b
Recurring b
Explanation of need:
Enhance the Response Program ...........................................................
$XX,XXX
One Time b
Recurring b
Site-specific Activities (amount requested should be incidental to the
workplan, e.g., less than half of the total funding requested).
$XX,XXX
One Time b
Recurring b
Environmental Insurance ........................................................................
$XX,XXX
One Time b
Recurring b
Revolving Loan Fund ..............................................................................
$XX,XXX
One Time b
Recurring b
Anticipated Outcome:
Explanation of need:
Anticipated Outcome:
Explanation of need:
Anticipated Outcome:
Explanation of need:
Anticipated Outcome:
Explanation of need:
Anticipated Outcome:
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Total Increase Requested ...............................................................
Reporting of Program Activity Levels
$XX,XXX
(October 1, 2008 through September 30,
2009). The following information must
be submitted to your regional project
officer (if no activity occurred in the
particular category, indicate ‘‘N/A’’):
States and tribes must report, by
January 31, 2010, a summary of the
previous federal fiscal year’s work
• Number of properties enrolled in
the response program supported by the
CERCLA section 128(a) funding.
• Number of properties that received
a ‘‘No Further Action’’ (NFA)
11 A one time request is not likely to repeat
whereas a recurring charge is likely to periodically
occur again.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
20:50 Nov 16, 2009
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\17NON1.SGM
17NON1
59170
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 220 / Tuesday, November 17, 2009 / Notices
A list of sites at which response
actions have been completed including:
• Date the response action was
completed.
• Site name.
• Name of owner at time of cleanup,
if known.
• Location of the site (street address,
and latitude and longitude).
• Whether an institutional control is
in place.
• Explain the type of institutional
control in place (e.g., deed restriction,
zoning restriction, local ordinance, state
registries of contaminated property,
deed notices, advisories, etc.).
IX. Terms and Reporting
• Nature of the contamination at the
site (e.g., hazardous substances,
Cooperative agreements for state and
contaminants, or pollutants, petroleum
tribal response programs will include
contamination, etc.).
programmatic and administrative terms
• Size of the site in acres.
and conditions. These terms and
A list of sites planned to be addressed
conditions will describe EPA’s
by the state or tribal response program
substantial involvement including
including:
technical assistance and collaboration
• Site name and the name of owner
on program development and siteat time of cleanup, if known
specific activities.
• Location of the site (street address,
A. Progress Reports. In accordance
and latitude and longitude)
with 40 CFR 31.40, state and tribes must
• To the extent known, whether an
provide progress reports as provided in
institutional control is in place
the terms and conditions of the
• Explain the type of the institutional
cooperative agreement negotiated with
control in place (e.g., deed restriction,
EPA regional offices. State and tribal
zoning restriction, local ordinance, state
costs for complying with reporting
registries of contaminated property,
requirements are an eligible expense
deed notices, advisories, etc.)
under the section 128(a) cooperative
• To the extent known, the nature of
agreement. As a minimum, state or
the contamination at the site (e.g.,
tribal progress reports must include
hazardous substances, contaminants, or
both a narrative discussion and
pollutants, petroleum contamination,
performance data relating to the state’s
etc.)
or tribe’s accomplishments and
• Size of the site in acres
environmental outputs associated with
—Reporting environmental insurance.
the approved budget and workplan and
Recipients with work plans that
should provide an accounting of section
include funding for environmental
128(a) funding. If applicable, the state or
insurance must report:
tribe must include information on
• Number and description of
activities related to establishing or
insurance policies purchased (e.g., type
enhancing the four elements of the
of coverage provided; dollar limits of
state’s or tribe’s response program. All
coverage; any buffers or deductibles;
recipients must provide information
category and identity of insured
relating to establishing or, if already
persons; premium; first dollar or
established, maintaining the public
umbrella; site specific or blanket;
record. Depending upon the activities
occurrence or claims made, etc.)
included in the state’s or tribe’s work
• The number of sites covered by the
plan, an EPA regional office may request insurance
that a progress report include:
• The amount of funds spent on
—Information related to the public
environmental insurance (e.g., amount
record. All recipients must report
dedicated to insurance program, or to
information related to establishing or, insurance premiums)
if already established, maintaining the
• The amount of claims paid by
public record, described above. States insurers to policy holders
and tribes can refer to an already
—Reporting for site-specific assessment
existing public record, e.g., Web site
or cleanup activities. Recipients with
or other public database to meet this
work plans that include funding for
requirement. For the purposes of
brownfields site assessment or
cooperative agreement funding only,
cleanup must input information
and depending upon the activities
required by the OMB-approved
included in the state or tribe’s work
Property Profile Form (PPF) into the
plan, this may include:
Assessment Cleanup and
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
documentation or a Certificate of
Completion (COC) or equivalent, AND
have all required institutional controls
in place.
• Number of properties that received
an NFA or COC or equivalent and do
NOT have all required institutional
controls in place.
• Total number of acres associated
with properties in the second bullet
above.
• (OPTIONAL) Number of properties
where assistance was provided, but the
property was NOT enrolled in the
response program.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
20:50 Nov 16, 2009
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Redevelopment Exchange System
(ACRES) database for each site
assessment and cleanup.
—Reporting for other site-specific
activities. Recipients with work plans
that include funding for other sitespecific related activities must
include a description of the sitespecific activities and the number of
sites at which the activity was
conducted. For example:
• Number and frequency of oversight
audits of licensed site professional
certified cleanups
• Number and frequency of state/
tribal oversight audits conducted
• Number of sites where staff
conducted audits, provided technical
assistance, or conducted other oversight
activities
• Number of staff conducting
oversight audits, providing technical
assistance, or conducting other
oversight activities
—Reporting for RLF uses. Recipients
with work plans that include funding
for Revolving Loan Fund (RLF) must
include the information required by
the terms and conditions for progress
reporting under CERCLA section
104(k)(3) RLF cooperative agreements.
—Reporting for Non-MOA states and
tribes. All recipients without a VRP
MOA must report activities related to
establishing or enhancing the four
elements of the state’s or tribe’s
response program. For each element
state/tribes must report how they are
maintaining the element or how they
are taking reasonable steps to
establish or enhance the element as
negotiated in individual state/tribal
work plans. For example, pursuant to
CERCLA section 128(a)(2)(B), reports
on the oversight and enforcement
authorities/mechanisms element may
include:
• a narrative description and copies
of applicable documents developed or
under development to enable the
response program to conduct
enforcement and oversight at sites. For
example:
Æ legal authorities and mechanisms
(e.g., statutes, regulations, orders,
agreements);
Æ policies and procedures to
implement legal authorities; and other
mechanisms;
• a description of the resources and
staff allocated/to be allocated to the
response program to conduct oversight
and enforcement at sites as a result of
the cooperative agreement;
• a narrative description of how these
authorities or other mechanisms, and
resources, are adequate to ensure that:
Æ a response action will protect
human health and the environment; and
E:\FR\FM\17NON1.SGM
17NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 220 / Tuesday, November 17, 2009 / Notices
be conducted in accordance with
applicable federal and state law; and if
the person conducting the response
action fails to complete the necessary
response activities, including operation
and maintenance or long-term
monitoring activities, the necessary
response activities are completed; and
• a narrative description and copy of
appropriate documents demonstrating
the exercise of oversight and
enforcement authorities by the response
program at a brownfields site.
Where applicable, EPA may require
states/tribes to report specific
performance measures related to the
four elements which can be aggregated
for national reporting to Congress.
The regional offices may also request
other information be added to the
progress reports, as appropriate, to
59171
properly document activities described
by the cooperative agreement work plan.
EPA regions may allow states or tribes
to provide performance data in
appropriate electronic format.
The regional offices will forward
progress reports to EPA Headquarters, if
requested. This information may be
used to develop national reports on the
outcomes of CERCLA section 128(a)
funding to states and tribes.
REGIONAL BROWNFIELDS COORDINATORS
Region
States
Address and phone number
CT, ME, MA, NH,
RI, VT.
EPA Region 2, Alison Devine ...........
NJ, NY, PR, VI .......
EPA Region 3, Tom Stolle ................
DE, DC, MD, PA,
VA, WV.
EPA Region 4, Mike Norman ............
AL, FL, GA, KY,
MS, NC, SC, TN.
EPA Region 5, Deborah Orr .............
IL, IN, MI, MN, OH,
WI.
EPA Region 6, Monica Chapa Smith
AR, LA, NM, OK,
TX.
EPA Region 7, Susan Klein ..............
IA, KS, MO, NE ......
EPA Region 8, Dan Heffernan ..........
CO, MT, ND, SD,
UT, WY.
EPA Region 9, Noemi Emeric-Ford ..
AZ, CA, HI, NV, AS,
GU.
EPA Region 10, Susan Morales .......
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
EPA Region 1, Diane Kelley .............
AK, ID, OR, WA ......
Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews: Under Executive Order 12866
(58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ and is therefore not subject to
OMB review. Because this grant action
is not subject to notice and comment
requirements under the Administrative
Procedures Act or any other statute, it
is not subject to the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) or
Sections 202 and 205 of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1999 (UMRA)
(Pub. L. 104–4). In addition, this action
does not significantly or uniquely affect
small governments. Although this action
does not generally create new binding
legal requirements, where it does, such
VerDate Nov<24>2008
20:50 Nov 16, 2009
Jkt 220001
One Congress Street, Suite 1100
Boston, MA 02114–2023
Phone (617) 918–1424 Fax (617) 918–1291
290 Broadway, 18th Floor
New York, NY 10007
Phone (212) 637–4158 Fax (212) 637–4360
1650 Arch Street
Mail Code 3HS51
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103
Phone (215) 814–3129 Fax (215) 814–5518
Atlanta Federal Center
61 Forsyth Street, S.W, 10TH FL
Atlanta, GA 30303–8960
Phone (404) 562–8792 Fax (404) 562–8439
77 West Jackson Boulevard
Mail Code SE–4J
Chicago, Illinois 60604–3507
Phone (312) 886–7576 Fax (312) 886–7190
First Interstate Bank Tower at Fountain Place
1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200 (6SF–VB)
Dallas, Texas 75202–2733
Phone (214) 665–6780 Fax (214) 665–6660
901 N. 5th Street
Kansas City, Kansas 66101
Phone (913) 551–7786 Fax (913) 551–8688
1595 Wynkoop Street (EPR–B)
Denver, CO 80202–1129
Phone (303) 312–7074 Fax (303) 312–6065
600 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 1460
Mail Code SFD–1
Los Angeles, California 90017
Phone (213) 244–1821 Fax (213) 244–1850
1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900
Mailstop: ECL–112
Seattle, Washington 98101
Phone (206) 553–7299 Fax (206) 553–0124
requirements do not substantially and
directly affect Tribes under Executive
Order 13175 (63 FR 67249, November 9,
2000). Although this grant action does
not have significant Federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999),
EPA consulted with states in the
development of these grant guidelines.
This action is not subject to Executive
Order 13211, ‘‘Actions Concerning
Regulations that Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use’’ (66
FR 28355, May 22, 2001), because it is
not a significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866. This action does
not involve technical standards; thus,
the requirements of Section 12(d) of the
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. This action does
not impose an information collection
burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). The Congressional
Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.,
generally provides that before certain
actions may take effect, the agency
promulgating the action must submit a
report, which includes a copy of the
action, to each House of the Congress
and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. Since this grant action,
when finalized, will contain legally
binding requirements, it is subject to the
Congressional Review Act, and EPA will
E:\FR\FM\17NON1.SGM
17NON1
59172
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 220 / Tuesday, November 17, 2009 / Notices
submit its final action in its report to
Congress under the Act.
Dated: November 5, 2009.
David R. Lloyd,
Director, Office of Brownfields and Land
Revitalization, Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response.
[FR Doc. E9–27568 Filed 11–16–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2009–0430; FRL–8977–8]
Final Notice of Data Availability
Concerning Compliance Supplement
Pool Allowance Allocations Under the
Clean Air Interstate Rule Federal
Implementation Plan.
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of data availability
(NODA).
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA is administering—under
the Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR)
Federal Implementation Plans (FIPs)—
the CAIR NOX Annual Trading Program
Compliance Supplement Pool (CAIR
CSP) for the States of Delaware,
Louisiana, Maryland, Pennsylvania, and
Wisconsin. The CAIR FIPs require the
Administrator to determine by order the
CAIR CSP allowance allocations for
units in these States whose owners and
operators requested and qualify for
these allocations and to provide the
public with the opportunity to object to
the determinations of allocations and
denials of allocations. On August 6,
2009, EPA issued a NODA setting forth
such determinations in the Federal
Register and provided an opportunity
for submission of objections. Through
the NODA issued today, EPA is making
available to the public the Agency’s
determinations, after considering all
objections, of CAIR CSP allowance
allocations and denials of such
allocations under the FIPs, as well as
the data upon which the allocations and
denials of allocations were based.
DATES: Under § 97.143(d)(5), EPA must
record, by January 1, 2010, the CSP
allowance allocations, consistent with
this NODA, in the compliance accounts
of units whose owners and operators
successfully applied for a CSP
allowance allocation under the CAIR
FIPs.
Docket: EPA established a docket for
this action at https://
www.regulations.gov under docket ID
No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2009–0430. All
documents in the docket (including
documents showing EPA’s
VerDate Nov<24>2008
20:50 Nov 16, 2009
Jkt 220001
determinations of CAIR CSP allowance
allocations and denials of allocations
and the data upon which the allocations
and denial of allocations were based)
are listed in the https://
www.regulations.gov index. Docket
materials are available either
electronically at https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the EPA Docket Center, EPA West,
Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue,
NW., Washington, DC. The Public
Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to
4:30 p.m, Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. The telephone
number for the Public Reading Room is
(202) 566–1744, and the telephone
number for the Air Docket is (202) 566–
1742.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Questions concerning this action should
be addressed to Robert L. Miller, EPA
Headquarters, CAMD (6204J), 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460, telephone (202) 343–9077,
and e-mail miller.robertl@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
For more background and information
regarding the purpose of the NODA,
requirements for requesting and
receiving CAIR CSP allowances under
the CAIR FIPs, procedures for allocating
such allowances, the application by
EPA of requirements to individual CSP
allocation requests, and the
interpretation the data upon which CSP
allocations and denial of allocations
were based, see the August 6, 2009
NODA (74 FR 39315, Aug. 6, 2009).
EPA received one objection to the
determinations and data in the August
6, 2009 NODA. EPA responded to the
objection in a written response in which
EPA denied the objection (See
Document ID EPA–HQ–OAR–2009–
0430–0006). For the reasons set forth in
the August 6, 2009 NODA, the NODA,
and the response to the objection, EPA
adopts the CSP allocations set forth in
the August 6, 2009 NODA.
EPA is not requesting objections to
the data provided in this final NODA.
This action constitutes a final action for
determining the CAIR CSP allowance
allocations under § 97.143 and the CAIR
FIPs.
Dated: October 27, 2009.
Edward Callahan,
Acting Director, Office of Atmospheric
Programs.
[FR Doc. E9–27614 Filed 11–16–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[FRL–8981–6]
Notice of a Regional Project Waiver of
Section 1605 (Buy American) of the
American Recovery and Reinvestment
Act of 2009 (ARRA) to the Town of
Newburyport, MA
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: The EPA is hereby granting a
waiver of the Buy America requirements
of ARRA Section 1605 under the
authority of Section 1605(b)(2)
[manufactured goods are not produced
in the United States in sufficient and
reasonably available quantities and of a
satisfactory quality] to the Town of
Newburyport, Massachusetts (‘‘Town’’)
for the purchase of a foreign
manufactured rotary sludge dewatering
press. This is a project specific waiver
and only applies to the use of the
specified product for the ARRA project
being proposed. Any other ARRA
recipient that wishes to use the same
product must apply for a separate
waiver based on project specific
circumstances. The Town’s proposed
wastewater treatment facility
improvements will include replacement
of the existing belt filter presses for
sludge generated at the plant. Based
upon information submitted by the
Town and its consultants, it was
determined that two 4-channel rotary
press sludge dewatering units,
manufactured by Fournier Industries of
Quebec, Canada, will meet the Town’s
design and performance specifications.
The Acting Regional Administrator is
making this determination based on the
review and recommendations of the
Municipal Assistance Unit. The Town,
through its consulting engineers, has
provided sufficient documentation to
support their request. The Assistant
Administrator of the Office of
Administration and Resources
Management has concurred on this
decision to make an exception to
Section 1605 of ARRA. This action
permits the purchase of two 4-channel
rotary press sludge dewatering units,
manufactured by Fournier Industries, by
the Town, as specified in its August 13,
2009 request, as part of the
improvements to the wastewater
treatment facility.
DATES: Effective Date: November 3,
2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mark Spinale, Environmental Engineer,
(617) 918–1547, or Katie Connors,
E:\FR\FM\17NON1.SGM
17NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 220 (Tuesday, November 17, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59163-59172]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-27568]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[EPA-HQ-SFUND-2009-0827; FRL-8980-6]
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability
Act (CERCLA) or Superfund, Section 128(a); Notice of Grant Funding
Guidance for State and Tribal Response Programs
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA will begin to accept requests, from December 1, 2009
through January 31, 2010, for grants to supplement State and Tribal
Response Programs. This notice provides guidance on eligibility for
funding, use of funding, grant mechanisms and process for awarding
funding, the allocation system for distribution of funding, and terms
and reporting under these grants. EPA has consulted with state and
tribal officials in developing this guidance.
The primary goal of this funding is to ensure that state and tribal
response programs include, or are taking reasonable steps to include,
certain elements and a public record. Another goal is to provide
funding for other activities that increase the number of response
actions conducted or overseen by a state or tribal response program.
[[Page 59164]]
This funding is not intended to supplant current state or tribal
funding for their response programs. Instead, it is to supplement their
funding to increase their response capacity.
For fiscal year 2010, EPA will consider funding requests up to a
maximum of $1.5 million per state or tribe. Subject to the availability
of funds, EPA regional personnel will be available to provide technical
assistance to states and tribes as they apply for and carry out these
grants.
DATES: This action is effective as of December 1, 2009. EPA expects to
make non-competitive grant awards to states and tribes which apply
during fiscal year 2010.
ADDRESSES: Mailing addresses for U.S. EPA Regional Offices and U.S. EPA
Headquarters can be located at www.epa.gov/brownfields.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The U.S. EPA's Office of Solid Waste
and Emergency Response, Office of Brownfields and Land Revitalization;
(202) 566-2777.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Section 128(a) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), as amended, authorizes a
noncompetitive $50 million grant program to establish and enhance state
\1\ and tribal \2\ response programs. Generally, these response
programs address the assessment, cleanup, and redevelopment of
brownfields sites and other sites with actual or perceived
contamination. Section 128(a) cooperative agreements are awarded and
administered by EPA's regional offices. This document provides guidance
that will enable states and tribes to apply for and use Fiscal Year
2010 section 128(a) funds.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The term ``state'' is defined in this document as defined in
CERCLA section 101(27).
\2\ The term ``Indian tribe'' is defined in this document as it
is defined in CERCLA section 101(36). Intertribal consortia, as
defined in the Federal Register Notice at 67 FR 67181, Nov. 4, 2002,
are also eligible for funding under CERCLA section 128(a).
\3\ The Agency may waive any provision of this guidance that is
not required by statute, regulation, Executive Order or overriding
Agency policies.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Requests for funding will be accepted from December 1, 2009 through
January 31, 2010. Requests received after January 31, 2010 will not be
considered for FY 2010 funding. Information required to be submitted
with the funding request is on pages 27-32. States or tribes that do
not submit the request in the appropriate manner may forfeit their
ability to request funds. First time requestors are strongly encouraged
to contact their Regional Brownfields Coordinator (see page 34) prior
to submitting their funding request.
Requests submitted by the January 31, 2010 request deadline are
preliminary; final cooperative agreement work plans and budgets will be
negotiated with the regional offices once final allocation
determinations are made. As in prior years, EPA will place special
emphasis on reviewing a cooperative agreement recipient's use of prior
section 128(a) funding in making allocation decisions.
States and tribes requesting funds are required to provide a Dun
and Bradstreet Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number with their
final cooperative agreement package. For more information, please go to
www.grants.gov.
The Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance entry for the section
128(a) State and Tribal Response Program cooperative agreements is
66.817. This grant program is eligible to be included in state and
tribal Performance Partnership Grants, with the exception of funds used
to capitalize a revolving loan fund for brownfield remediation under
section 104(k)(3); or purchase insurance or develop a risk sharing
pool, an indemnity pool, or insurance mechanism to provide financing
for response actions under a State or Tribal response program.
I. Background
State and tribal response programs oversee assessment and cleanup
activities at the majority of brownfields sites across the country. The
depth and breadth of state and tribal response programs vary. Some
focus on CERCLA related activities, while others are multi-faceted, for
example, addressing sites regulated by both CERCLA and the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Many state programs also offer
accompanying financial incentive programs to spur cleanup and
redevelopment. In passing section 128(a) \4\, Congress recognized the
accomplishments of state and tribal response programs in cleaning up
and redeveloping brownfields sites. Section 128(a) also provides EPA
with an opportunity to strengthen its partnership with states and
tribes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Section 128(a) was added to CERCLA in 2002 by the Small
Business Liability Relief and Brownfields Revitalization Act
(Brownfield Amendments).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The primary goal of this funding is to ensure that state and tribal
response programs include, or are taking reasonable steps to include,
certain elements and a ``public record.'' The secondary goal is to
provide funding for other activities that increase the number of
response actions conducted or overseen by a state or tribal response
program. This funding is not intended to supplant current state or
tribal funding for their response programs. Instead, it is to
supplement their funding to increase their response program's capacity.
Subject to the availability of funds, EPA regional personnel will
be available to provide technical assistance to states and tribes as
they apply for and carry out section 128(a) cooperative agreements.
II. Eligibility For Funding
To be eligible for funding under CERCLA section 128(a), a state or
tribe must:
--demonstrate that its response program includes, or is taking
reasonable steps to include, the four elements of a response program,
described below; or be a party to voluntary response program Memorandum
of Agreement (VRP MOA) \5\ with EPA;
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ The legislative history of the Brownfields Amendments
indicates that Congress intended to encourage states and tribes to
enter into MOAs for their voluntary response programs. States or
tribes that are parties to VRP MOAs and that maintain and make
available a public record are automatically eligible for Section
128(a) funding.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
and
--maintain and make available to the public a record of sites at which
response actions have been completed in the previous year and are
planned to be addressed in the upcoming year, see CERCLA section
128(b)(1)(C).
III. Matching Funds/Cost-Share
States and tribes are not required to provide matching funds for
cooperative agreements awarded under section 128(a), with the exception
of the section 128(a) funds a state or tribe uses to capitalize a
Brownfields Revolving Loan Fund under CERCLA section 104(k)(3).
IV. The Four Elements--Section 128(A)
Section 128(a) recipients that do not have a VRP MOA with EPA must
demonstrate that their response program includes, or is taking
reasonable steps to include, the four elements. Achievement of the four
elements should be viewed as a priority. Section 128(a) authorizes
funding for activities necessary to establish and enhance the four
elements and to establish and maintain the public record requirement.
Generally, the four elements are:
(1) Timely survey and inventory of brownfields sites in state or
tribal land. EPA's goal in funding activities under this element is to
enable the state or tribe to establish or enhance a system or process
that will provide a reasonable
[[Page 59165]]
estimate of the number, likely locations, and the general
characteristics of brownfields sites in their state or tribal lands.
EPA recognizes the varied scope of state and tribal response
programs and will not require states and tribes to develop a ``list''
of brownfields sites. However, at a minimum, the state or tribe should
develop and/or maintain a system or process that can provide a
reasonable estimate of the number, likely location, and general
characteristics of brownfields sites within their state or tribal
lands.
Given funding limitations, EPA will negotiate work plans with
states and tribes to achieve this goal efficiently and effectively, and
within a realistic time frame. For example, many of EPA's Brownfields
Assessment cooperative agreement recipients conduct inventories of
brownfields sites in their communities or jurisdictions. EPA encourages
states and tribes to work with these cooperative agreement recipients
to obtain the information that they have gathered and include it in
their survey and inventory.
(2) Oversight and enforcement authorities or other mechanisms and
resources. EPA's goal in funding activities under this element is to
have state and tribal response programs that include oversight and
enforcement authorities or other mechanisms, and resources that are
adequate to ensure that:
--a response action will protect human health and the environment and
be conducted in accordance with applicable federal and state law; and
--the necessary response activities are completed if the person
conducting the response activities fails to complete the necessary
response activities (this includes operation and maintenance or long-
term monitoring activities).
(3) Mechanisms and resources to provide meaningful opportunities
for public participation\6\. EPA's goal in funding activities under
this element is to have states and tribes include in their response
program mechanisms and resources for meaningful public participation,
at the local level, including, at a minimum:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ States and tribes establishing this element may find useful
information on public participation on EPA's community involvement
Web site at https://www.epa.gov/superfund/community/policies.htm.
--Public access to documents and related materials that a state, tribe,
or party conducting the cleanup is relying on or developing in making
cleanup decisions or conducting site activities;
--Prior notice and opportunity for public comment on cleanup plans and
site activity; and
--A mechanism by which a person who is, or may be, affected by a
release or threatened release of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or
contaminant at a brownfields site--located in the community in which
the person works or resides--may request that a site assessment be
conducted. The appropriate state or tribal official must consider this
request and appropriately respond.
(4) Mechanisms for approval of a cleanup plan and verification and
certification that cleanup is complete. EPA's goal in funding
activities under this element is to have states and tribes include in
their response program mechanisms to approve cleanup plans and to
verify that response actions are complete, including a requirement for
certification or similar documentation from the state, the tribe, or a
licensed site professional to the person conducting the response action
that the response action is complete. Written approval by a state or
tribal response program official of a proposed cleanup plan is an
example of an approval mechanism.
V. Public Record Requirement
In order to be eligible for section 128(a) funding, states and
tribes (including those with MOAs) must establish and maintain a public
record system, described below, in order to receive funds.
Specifically, under section 128(b)(1)(C), states and tribes must:
--Maintain and update, at least annually or more often as appropriate,
a record of sites that includes the name and location of sites at which
response actions have been completed during the previous year;
--Maintain and update, at least annually or more often as appropriate,
a record of sites that includes the name and location of sites at which
response actions are planned to be addressed in the next year; and
--Identify in the public record whether or not the site, upon
completion of the response action, will be suitable for unrestricted
use. If not, the public record must identify the institutional controls
relied on in the remedy.
Section 128(a) funds may be used to maintain and make available a
public record system that meets the requirements discussed above.
A. Distinguishing the ``survey and inventory'' element from the
``public record.'' It is important to note that the public record
requirement differs from the ``timely survey and inventory'' element
described in the ``Four Elements'' section above. The public record
addresses sites at which response actions have been completed in the
previous year and are planned to be addressed in the upcoming year. In
contrast, the ``timely survey and inventory'' element, described above,
refers to a general approach to identifying brownfields sites.
B. Making the public record easily accessible. EPA's goal is to
enable states and tribes to make the public record and other
information, such as information from the ``survey and inventory''
element, easily accessible. For this reason, EPA will allow states and
tribes to use section 128(a) funding to make the public record, as well
as other information, such as information from the ``survey and
inventory'' element, available to the public via the internet or other
means. For example, the Agency would support funding state and tribal
efforts to include detailed location information in the public record
such as the street address and latitude and longitude information for
each site.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ For further information on latitude and longitude
information, please see EPA's data standards Web site available at
https://iaspub.epa.gov/sor_internet/registry/datastds/findadatastandard/epaapproved/latitudelongitude
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In an effort to reduce cooperative agreement reporting requirements
and increase public access to the public record, EPA encourages states
and tribes to place their public record on the internet. If a state or
tribe places the public record on the internet, maintains the
substantive requirements of the public record, and provides EPA with
the link to that site, EPA will, for purposes of cooperative agreement
funding only, deem the public record reporting requirement met.
C. Long-term maintenance of the public record. EPA encourages
states and tribes to maintain public record information, including data
on institutional controls, on a long term basis (more than one year)
for sites at which a response action has been completed. Subject to EPA
regional office approval, states or tribes may include development and
operation of systems that ensure long term maintenance of the public
record, including information on institutional controls, in their work
plans.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ States and tribes may find useful information on
institutional controls on EPA's institutional controls Web site at
https://www.epa.gov/superfund/policy/ic/index.htm
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 59166]]
VI. Use Of Funding
A. Overview
Section 128(a)(1)(B) describes the eligible uses of cooperative
agreement funds by states and tribes. In general, a state or tribe may
use a cooperative agreement to ``establish or enhance'' their response
programs, including elements of the response program that include
activities related to responses at brownfields sites with petroleum
contamination. Eligible activities include, but are not limited to, the
following:
--Develop legislation, regulations, procedures, ordinances, guidance,
etc. that would establish or enhance the administrative and legal
structure of their response programs;
--Establish and maintain the required public record described above.
EPA considers activities related to maintaining and monitoring
institutional controls to be eligible costs under section 128(a);
--Conduct limited site-specific activities, such as assessment or
cleanup, provided such activities establish and/or enhance the response
program and are tied to the four elements. In addition to the
requirement per CERCLA section 128(a)(2)(C)(ii) to obtain public
comment on cleanup plans and site activities, EPA strongly encourages
states and tribes to seek public input regarding the priority of sites
to be addressed and solicit input from local communities, especially
potential environmental justice communities, communities with a health
risk related to exposure to hazardous waste or other public health
concerns, economically disadvantaged or remote areas, and communities
with limited experience working with government agencies. EPA will not
provide section 128(a) funds solely for assessment or cleanup of
specific brownfields sites; site specific activities must be an
incidental part of an overall section 128(a) work plan that includes
funding for other activities that establish or enhance the four
elements;
--Capitalize a revolving loan fund (RLF) for brownfields cleanup under
CERCLA section 104(k)(3). These RLFs are subject to the same statutory
requirements and cooperative agreement terms and conditions applicable
to RLFs awarded under section 104(k)(3). Requirements include a 20
percent match on the amount of section 128(a) funds used for the RLF, a
prohibition on using EPA cooperative agreement funds for administrative
costs relating to the RLF, and a prohibition on using RLF loans or
subgrants for response costs at a site for which the recipient may be
potentially liable under section 107 of CERCLA. Other prohibitions
contained in CERCLA section 104(k)(4) also apply; or
--Purchase environmental insurance or develop a risk-sharing pool,
indemnity pool, or insurance mechanism to provide financing for
response actions under a state or tribal response program.
B. Uses Related to ``Establishing'' a State or Tribal Response Program
Under CERCLA section 128(a), ``establish'' includes activities
necessary to build the foundation for the four elements of a state or
tribal response program and the public record requirement. For example,
a state or tribal response program may use section 128(a) funds to
develop regulations, ordinances, procedures, or guidance. For more
developed state or tribal response programs, ``establish'' may also
include activities that keep their program at a level that meets the
four elements and maintains a public record required as a condition of
funding under CERCLA section 128(b)(1)(C).
C. Uses Related to ``Enhancing'' a State or Tribal Response Program
Under CERCLA section 128(a), ``enhance'' is related to activities
that add to or improve a state or tribal response program or increase
the number of sites at which response actions are conducted under a
state or tribal response program.
The exact ``enhancement'' uses that may be allowable depend upon
the work plan negotiated between the EPA regional office and the state
or tribe. For example, regional offices and states or tribes may agree
that section 128(a) funds may be used for outreach and training
directly related to increasing awareness of its response program, and
improving the skills of program staff. It may also include developing
better coordination and understanding of other state response programs,
e.g., RCRA or USTs. As another example, states and tribal response
programs enhancement activities can include outreach to local
communities to increase their awareness and knowledge regarding the
importance of monitoring engineering and institutional controls. Other
``enhancement'' uses may be allowable as well.
D. Uses Related to Site-Specific Activities
States and tribes may use section 128(a) funds for activities that
improve state or tribal capacity to increase the number of sites at
which response actions are conducted under the state or tribal response
program.
Eligible uses of funds include, but are not limited to, site-
specific activities such as:
--Conducting assessments or cleanups at brownfields sites (see next
section for additional information);
--oversight of response action;
--technical assistance to federal brownfields cooperative agreement
recipients;
--development and/or review of site-specific quality assurance project
plans (QAPPs);
--preparation and submission of Property Profile Forms; and
--auditing site cleanups to verify the completion of the cleanup.
E. Uses Related to Site-Specific Assessment and Cleanup Activities
Site-specific assessment and cleanup activities should establish
and/or enhance the response program and be tied to the four elements.
In addition to the requirement per CERCLA section 128(a)(2)(C)(ii) to
obtain public comment on cleanup plans and site activities, EPA
strongly encourages states and tribes to seek public input regarding
the priority of sites to be addressed and solicit input from local
communities, especially potential environmental justice communities,
communities with a health risk related to exposure to hazardous waste
or other public health concerns, economically disadvantaged or remote
areas, and communities with limited experience working with government
agencies. EPA will not provide section 128(a) funds solely for
assessment or cleanup of specific brownfields sites; site-specific
activities must be an incidental part of an overall section 128(a) work
plan that includes funding for other activities that establish or
enhance the four elements. Site-specific assessments and cleanups must
comply with all applicable federal and state laws and are subject to
the following restrictions:
--Section 128(a) funds can only be used for assessments or cleanups at
sites that meet the definition of a brownfields site at CERCLA section
101(39);
--Absent EPA approval, no more than $200,000 per site can be funded for
assessments with section 128(a) funds, and no more than $200,000 per
site can be funded for cleanups with section 128(a) funds; and
--Absent EPA approval, the state/tribe may not use funds awarded under
this agreement to assess and clean up sites owned or operated by the
recipient.
[[Page 59167]]
Assessments and cleanups cannot be conducted at sites where the
state/tribe is a potentially responsible party pursuant to CERCLA
section 107, except:
--at brownfields sites contaminated by a controlled substance as
defined in CERCLA section 101(39)(D)(ii)(I); or
--when the recipient would satisfy all of the elements set forth in
CERCLA section 101(40) to qualify as a bona fide prospective purchaser
except that the date of acquisition of the property was on or before
January 11, 2002.
Subgrants cannot be provided to entities that may be potentially
responsible parties (pursuant to CERCLA section 107) at the site for
which the assessment or cleanup activities are proposed to be
conducted, except:
--at brownfields sites contaminated by a controlled substance as
defined in CERCLA section 101(39)(D)(ii)(I); or
--when the recipient would satisfy all of the elements set forth in
CERCLA section 101(40) to qualify as a bona fide prospective purchaser
except that the date of acquisition of the property was on or before
January 11, 2002.
F. Costs Incurred for Activities at ``Non-brownfields'' Sites
Costs incurred for activities at non-brownfields sites, e.g.,
oversight, may be eligible and allowable if such activities are
included in the state's or tribe's work plan. For example, auditing
completed site cleanups in jurisdictions where states or tribes use
licensed site professionals, to verify that sites have been properly
cleaned up, may be an eligible cost under section 128(a). These costs
need not be incurred in connection with a brownfields site to be
eligible, but must be authorized under the state's or tribe's work plan
to be allowable. Other uses may be eligible and allowable as well,
depending upon the work plan negotiated between the EPA regional office
and the state or tribe. However, assessment and cleanup activities may
only be conducted on eligible brownfields sites, as defined in CERCLA
section 101(39).
G. Uses Related to Site-Specific Activities at Petroleum Brownfields
Sites
States and tribes may use section 128(a) funds for activities that
establish and enhance their response programs, even if their response
programs address petroleum contamination. Also, the costs of site-
specific activities, such as site assessments or cleanup at petroleum
contaminated brownfields sites, defined at CERCLA section
101(39)(D)(ii)(II), are eligible and are allowable if the activity is
included in the work plan negotiated between the EPA regional office
and the state or tribe. Section 128(a) funds used to capitalize a
Brownfields RLF may be used at brownfields sites contaminated by
petroleum to the extent allowed under CERCLA section 104(k)(3).
VII. General Programmatic Guidelines for Section 128(A) Grant Funding
Requests
Funding authorized under CERCLA section 128(a) is awarded through a
cooperative agreement \9\ with a state or tribe. The program is
administered under the general EPA grant and cooperative agreement
regulations for states, tribes, and local governments found in the Code
of Federal Regulations at 40 CFR part 31. Under these regulations, the
cooperative agreement recipient for section 128(a) grant program is the
government to which a cooperative agreement is awarded and which is
accountable for the use of the funds provided. The cooperative
agreement recipient is the entire legal entity even if only a
particular component of the entity is designated in the cooperative
agreement award document.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ A cooperative agreement is an assistance agreement to a
state or a tribe that includes substantial involvement of EPA
regional enforcement and program staff during performance of
activities described in the cooperative agreement work plan.
Examples of this involvement include technical assistance and
collaboration on program development and site-specific activities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A. One application per state or tribe. Subject to the availability
of funds, EPA regional offices will negotiate and enter into section
128(a) cooperative agreements with eligible and interested states or
tribes. EPA will accept only one application from each eligible state
or tribe.
B. Define the State or Tribal Response Program. States and tribes
must define in their work plan the ``section 128(a) response
program(s)'' to which the funds will be applied, and may designate a
component of the state or tribe that will be EPA's primary point of
contact for negotiations on their proposed work plan. When EPA funds
the section 128(a) cooperative agreement, states and tribes may
distribute these funds among the appropriate state and tribal agencies
that are part of the section 128(a) response program. This distribution
must be clearly outlined in their annual work plan.
C. Separate cooperative agreements for the capitalization of RLFs
using section 128(a) funds. If a portion of the section 128(a) grant
funds requested will be used to capitalize a revolving loan fund for
cleanup, pursuant to section 104(k)(3), two separate cooperative
agreements must be awarded, i.e., one for the RLF and one for non-RLF
uses. States and tribes may, however, submit one initial request for
funding, delineating the RLF as a proposed use. Section 128(a) funds
used to capitalize an RLF are not eligible for inclusion into a
Performance Partnership Grant (PPG).
D. Authority to Manage a Revolving Loan Fund Program. If a state or
tribe chooses to use its secton 128(a) funds to capitalize a revolving
loan fund program, the state or tribe must have the authority to manage
the program, e.g., issue loans. If the agency/department listed as the
point of contact for the section 128(a) cooperative agreement does not
have this authority, it must be able to demonstrate that another state
or tribal agency does have the authority to manage the RLF and is
willing to do so.
E. Section 128(a) cooperative agreements are eligible for inclusion
in the Performance Partnership Grant. States and tribes may include
section 128(a) cooperative agreements in their PPG. 69 FR 51,756
(2004). Section 128(a) funds used to capitalize an RLF or purchase
insurance or develop a risk sharing pool, an indemnity pool, or
insurance mechanism to provide financing for response actions under a
state or tribal response program are not eligible for inclusion in the
PPG.
F. Project Period. EPA regional offices will determine the project
period for each cooperative agreement. These may be for multiple years
depending on the regional office's cooperative agreement policies. Each
cooperative agreement must have an annual budget period tied to an
annual work plan.
G. Demonstrating the Four Elements. As part of the annual work plan
negotiation process, states or tribes that do not have VRP MOAs must
demonstrate that their program includes, or is taking reasonable steps
to include, the four elements described above. EPA will not fund, in
future years, state or tribal response program annual work plans if EPA
determines that these requirements are not met or reasonable progress
is not being made. EPA may base this determination on the information
the state or tribe provides to support its work plan, or on EPA's
review of the state or tribal response program.
H. Establishing and Maintaining the Public Record. Prior to funding
a state's or tribe's annual work plan, EPA regional offices will verify
and document that a public record, as
[[Page 59168]]
described above, exists and is being maintained \10\.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ For purposes of cooperative agreement funding, the state's
or tribe's public record applies to that state's or tribe's response
program(s) that utilized the Section 128(a) funding.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
States or tribes that received initial funding prior to
FY09: Requests for FY10 funds will not be accepted from states or
tribes that fail to demonstrate, by the January 31, 2010 request
deadline, that they established and are maintaining a public record.
(Note, this would potentially impact any state or tribe that had a term
and condition placed on their FY09 cooperative agreement that
prohibited drawdown of FY09 funds prior to meeting public record
requirement.) States or tribes in this situation will not be prevented
from drawing down their prior year funds, once the public record
requirement is met, but will be restricted from applying for FY10
funding.
States or Tribes that received initial funding in FY09: by
the time of the actual FY10 award, the state or tribe must demonstrate
that they established and maintained the public record (those states
and tribes that do not meet this requirement will have a term and
condition placed on their FY10 cooperative agreement that prevents the
drawdown of FY10 funds until the public record requirement is met).
Recipients receiving funds for the first time in FY10:
these recipients have one year to meet this requirement and may utilize
the section 128(a) cooperative agreement funds to do so.
I. Demonstration of Significant Utilization of Prior Years' Funding
During the allocation process, EPA headquarters places significant
emphasis on the utilization of prior years' funding. When submitting
your request for FY10 funds, the following information must be
submitted:
--For those states and tribes with Superfund VCP Core or Targeted
Brownfields Assessment cooperative agreements awarded under CERCLA
section 104(d), you must provide, by agreement number, the amount of
funds that have not been requested for reimbursement (i.e., those funds
that remain in EPA's Financial Data Warehouse) and must provide a
detailed explanation and justification for why such funds should not be
considered in the funding allocation process.
--For those states and tribes that received FY03, FY04, FY05, FY06,
FY07 and/or FY08 section 128(a) funds, you must provide the amount of
FY03, FY04, FY05, FY06, FY07 and/or FY08 funds that have not been
requested for reimbursement (i.e, those funds that remain in EPA's
Financial Data Warehouse). These funds will be considered in the
funding allocation process.
Note: EPA Regional staff will review EPA's Financial Database
Warehouse to confirm the amount of outstanding funds reported. It is
strongly recommended that you work with your regional counterpart to
determine the amount of funds ``outstanding.''
J. Demonstration of Need To Receive Funds Above the FY09 Funding
Distribution
Due to the limited amount of funding available, recipients must
demonstrate a specific need when requesting an amount above the amount
allocated to the state or tribe in FY09.
K. Allocation System and Process for Distribution of Funds
EPA regional offices will work with interested states and tribes to
develop their preliminary work plans and funding requests. Final
cooperative agreement work plans and budgets will be negotiated with
the regional office once final allocation determinations are made.
For Fiscal Year 2010, EPA will consider funding requests up to a
maximum of $1.5 million per state or tribe. This limit may be changed
in future years based on appropriation amounts and demand for funding.
EPA will target funding of at least $3 million per year for tribal
response programs. If this funding is not used, it will be carried over
and added to at least $3 million in the next fiscal year. It is
expected that the funding demand from tribes will increase through the
life of this cooperative agreement program and this funding allocation
system should ensure that adequate funding for tribal response programs
is available in future years.
After the January 31, 2010 request deadline, regional offices will
submit summaries of state and tribal requests to EPA headquarters.
Before submitting requests to EPA headquarters, regional offices may
take into account additional factors when determining recommended
allocation amounts. Such factors include, but are not limited to, the
depth and breadth of the state or tribal program; scope of the
perceived need for the funding, e.g., size of state or tribal
jurisdiction or the proposed work plan balanced against capacity of the
program, amount of prior funding, and funds remaining from prior years,
etc.
After receipt of the regional recommendations, EPA headquarters
will consolidate requests and allocate funds accordingly.
VIII. Information To Be Submitted With the Funding Request
States and tribes requesting section 128(a) FY10 funds must submit
the following information, as applicable, to their regional contact on
or before January 31, 2010 (regions may request additional information,
as needed):
--For those states and tribes with prior Superfund VCP Core or Targeted
Brownfields Assessment funding awarded under CERCLA section 104(d),
provide, by agreement number, the amount of funds that have not been
requested for reimbursement (i.e., those funds that remain in EPA's
Financial Data Warehouse). EPA will take into account these funds in
the allocation process.
--For those states and tribes that received FY08 or prior section
128(a) funds, you must provide the amount of FY03, FY04, FY05, FY06
and/or FY07 funds that have not been requested for reimbursement (i.e.,
those funds that remain in EPA's Financial Data Warehouse). EPA will
take into account these funds in the allocation process.
All states and tribes requesting FY10 funds must submit a summary
of the planned use of the funds with associated dollar amounts. Please
provide the request in the following format:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary of intended use
Funding use FY09 awarded FY10 requested (Example uses)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Establish or Enhance the four elements: $XX,XXX $XX,XXX
1. Timely survey and inventory of brownfields .............. .............. Inventory and
sites; prioritize brownfields sites.
2. Oversight and enforcement authorities or .............. .............. Develop/enhance
other mechanisms; ordinances, regulations,
procedures for response
programs.
[[Page 59169]]
3. Mechanisms and resources to provide .............. .............. Develop a community
meaningful opportunities for public involvement process.
participation; and Fund an outreach
coordinator.
Issue public notices of
site activities.
4. Mechanisms or approval of a cleanup plan .............. .............. Review cleanup plans
and verification and certification that and verify completed actions.
cleanup is complete.
Establish and Maintain the Public Record...... $XX,XXX $XX,XXX Maintain public record.
Create Web site for
public record.
Disseminate public
information on how to access
the public record.
Enhance the Response Program.................. $XX,XXX $XX,XXX Provide oversight of
site assessments and cleanups.
Attend training and
conferences on brownfields
cleanup technologies & other
brownfields topics.
Update and enhance
program management activities.
Negotiate/oversee
contracts for response
programs.
Enhance program
management & tracking systems.
Prepare Property
Profile Forms/input data into
ACRES database.
Site-specific Activities (amount requested $XX,XXX $XX,XXX Develop QAPPs.
should be incidental to the workplan, e.g., Perform site
less than half of the total funding assessments and cleanups.
requested). Prepare Property
Profile Forms/input data into
ACRES database for these sites.
Environmental Insurance....................... $XX,XXX $XX,XXX Review potential uses
of environmental insurance.
Revolving Loan Fund........................... $XX,XXX $XX,XXX Create a cleanup
revolving loan fund.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Funding................................. $XXX,XXX $XXX,XXX Performance Partnership Grant?
Yes [square] No [square]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For those states and tribes requesting amounts above their FY09
allocation, a separate explanation of the specific need(s) and the
increased amount that triggered the request for that need(s) must be
provided in the format below:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ A one time request is not likely to repeat whereas a
recurring charge is likely to periodically occur again.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Explanation of request(s) for funding One time \11\ request Explanation/anticipated
above FY09 award Amount or recurring? outcome
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Establish or Enhance the four elements: $XX,XXX One Time [square] Explanation of need:
1. Timely survey and inventory of Recurring [square] Anticipated Outcome:
brownfields sites; 2. Oversight and
enforcement authorities or other
mechanisms; 3. Mechanisms and resources
to provide meaningful opportunities for
public participation; and/or 4.
Mechanisms or approval of a cleanup plan
and verification and certification that
cleanup is complete..
Establish and Maintain the Public Record. $XX,XXX One Time [square] Explanation of need:
Recurring [square]
.............. Anticipated Outcome:
Enhance the Response Program............. $XX,XXX One Time [square] Explanation of need:
Recurring [square]
.............. Anticipated Outcome:
Site-specific Activities (amount $XX,XXX One Time [square] Explanation of need:
requested should be incidental to the Recurring [square]
workplan, e.g., less than half of the
total funding requested).
.............. Anticipated Outcome:
Environmental Insurance.................. $XX,XXX One Time [square] Explanation of need:
Recurring [square]
.............. Anticipated Outcome:
Revolving Loan Fund...................... $XX,XXX One Time [square] Explanation of need:
Recurring [square]
.............. Anticipated Outcome:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Increase Requested............. $XX,XXX ....................... ............................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reporting of Program Activity Levels
States and tribes must report, by January 31, 2010, a summary of
the previous federal fiscal year's work (October 1, 2008 through
September 30, 2009). The following information must be submitted to
your regional project officer (if no activity occurred in the
particular category, indicate ``N/A''):
Number of properties enrolled in the response program
supported by the CERCLA section 128(a) funding.
Number of properties that received a ``No Further Action''
(NFA)
[[Page 59170]]
documentation or a Certificate of Completion (COC) or equivalent, AND
have all required institutional controls in place.
Number of properties that received an NFA or COC or
equivalent and do NOT have all required institutional controls in
place.
Total number of acres associated with properties in the
second bullet above.
(OPTIONAL) Number of properties where assistance was
provided, but the property was NOT enrolled in the response program.
IX. Terms and Reporting
Cooperative agreements for state and tribal response programs will
include programmatic and administrative terms and conditions. These
terms and conditions will describe EPA's substantial involvement
including technical assistance and collaboration on program development
and site-specific activities.
A. Progress Reports. In accordance with 40 CFR 31.40, state and
tribes must provide progress reports as provided in the terms and
conditions of the cooperative agreement negotiated with EPA regional
offices. State and tribal costs for complying with reporting
requirements are an eligible expense under the section 128(a)
cooperative agreement. As a minimum, state or tribal progress reports
must include both a narrative discussion and performance data relating
to the state's or tribe's accomplishments and environmental outputs
associated with the approved budget and workplan and should provide an
accounting of section 128(a) funding. If applicable, the state or tribe
must include information on activities related to establishing or
enhancing the four elements of the state's or tribe's response program.
All recipients must provide information relating to establishing or, if
already established, maintaining the public record. Depending upon the
activities included in the state's or tribe's work plan, an EPA
regional office may request that a progress report include:
--Information related to the public record. All recipients must report
information related to establishing or, if already established,
maintaining the public record, described above. States and tribes can
refer to an already existing public record, e.g., Web site or other
public database to meet this requirement. For the purposes of
cooperative agreement funding only, and depending upon the activities
included in the state or tribe's work plan, this may include:
A list of sites at which response actions have been completed
including:
Date the response action was completed.
Site name.
Name of owner at time of cleanup, if known.
Location of the site (street address, and latitude and
longitude).
Whether an institutional control is in place.
Explain the type of institutional control in place (e.g.,
deed restriction, zoning restriction, local ordinance, state registries
of contaminated property, deed notices, advisories, etc.).
Nature of the contamination at the site (e.g., hazardous
substances, contaminants, or pollutants, petroleum contamination,
etc.).
Size of the site in acres.
A list of sites planned to be addressed by the state or tribal
response program including:
Site name and the name of owner at time of cleanup, if
known
Location of the site (street address, and latitude and
longitude)
To the extent known, whether an institutional control is
in place
Explain the type of the institutional control in place
(e.g., deed restriction, zoning restriction, local ordinance, state
registries of contaminated property, deed notices, advisories, etc.)
To the extent known, the nature of the contamination at
the site (e.g., hazardous substances, contaminants, or pollutants,
petroleum contamination, etc.)
Size of the site in acres
--Reporting environmental insurance. Recipients with work plans that
include funding for environmental insurance must report:
Number and description of insurance policies purchased
(e.g., type of coverage provided; dollar limits of coverage; any
buffers or deductibles; category and identity of insured persons;
premium; first dollar or umbrella; site specific or blanket; occurrence
or claims made, etc.)
The number of sites covered by the insurance
The amount of funds spent on environmental insurance
(e.g., amount dedicated to insurance program, or to insurance premiums)
The amount of claims paid by insurers to policy holders
--Reporting for site-specific assessment or cleanup activities.
Recipients with work plans that include funding for brownfields site
assessment or cleanup must input information required by the OMB-
approved Property Profile Form (PPF) into the Assessment Cleanup and
Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES) database for each site assessment
and cleanup.
--Reporting for other site-specific activities. Recipients with work
plans that include funding for other site-specific related activities
must include a description of the site-specific activities and the
number of sites at which the activity was conducted. For example:
Number and frequency of oversight audits of licensed site
professional certified cleanups
Number and frequency of state/tribal oversight audits
conducted
Number of sites where staff conducted audits, provided
technical assistance, or conducted other oversight activities
Number of staff conducting oversight audits, providing
technical assistance, or conducting other oversight activities
--Reporting for RLF uses. Recipients with work plans that include
funding for Revolving Loan Fund (RLF) must include the information
required by the terms and conditions for progress reporting under
CERCLA section 104(k)(3) RLF cooperative agreements.
--Reporting for Non-MOA states and tribes. All recipients without a VRP
MOA must report activities related to establishing or enhancing the
four elements of the state's or tribe's response program. For each
element state/tribes must report how they are maintaining the element
or how they are taking reasonable steps to establish or enhance the
element as negotiated in individual state/tribal work plans. For
example, pursuant to CERCLA section 128(a)(2)(B), reports on the
oversight and enforcement authorities/mechanisms element may include:
a narrative description and copies of applicable documents
developed or under development to enable the response program to
conduct enforcement and oversight at sites. For example:
[cir] legal authorities and mechanisms (e.g., statutes,
regulations, orders, agreements);
[cir] policies and procedures to implement legal authorities; and
other mechanisms;
a description of the resources and staff allocated/to be
allocated to the response program to conduct oversight and enforcement
at sites as a result of the cooperative agreement;
a narrative description of how these authorities or other
mechanisms, and resources, are adequate to ensure that:
[cir] a response action will protect human health and the
environment; and
[[Page 59171]]
be conducted in accordance with applicable federal and state law; and
if the person conducting the response action fails to complete the
necessary response activities, including operation and maintenance or
long-term monitoring activities, the necessary response activities are
completed; and
a narrative description and copy of appropriate documents
demonstrating the exercise of oversight and enforcement authorities by
the response program at a brownfields site.
Where applicable, EPA may require states/tribes to report specific
performance measures related to the four elements which can be
aggregated for national reporting to Congress.
The regional offices may also request other information be added to
the progress reports, as appropriate, to properly document activities
described by the cooperative agreement work plan.
EPA regions may allow states or tribes to provide performance data
in appropriate electronic format.
The regional offices will forward progress reports to EPA
Headquarters, if requested. This information may be used to develop
national reports on the outcomes of CERCLA section 128(a) funding to
states and tribes.
Regional Brownfields Coordinators
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Address and phone
Region States number
------------------------------------------------------------------------
EPA Region 1, Diane Kelley.... CT, ME, MA, NH, One Congress Street,
RI, VT. Suite 1100
Boston, MA 02114-2023
Phone (617) 918-1424
Fax (617) 918-1291
EPA Region 2, Alison Devine... NJ, NY, PR, VI... 290 Broadway, 18th
Floor
New York, NY 10007
Phone (212) 637-4158
Fax (212) 637-4360
EPA Region 3, Tom Stolle...... DE, DC, MD, PA, 1650 Arch Street
VA, WV. Mail Code 3HS51
Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania 19103
Phone (215) 814-3129
Fax (215) 814-5518
EPA Region 4, Mike Norman..... AL, FL, GA, KY, Atlanta Federal
MS, NC, SC, TN. Center
61 Forsyth Street,
S.W, 10TH FL
Atlanta, GA 30303-
8960
Phone (404) 562-8792
Fax (404) 562-8439
EPA Region 5, Deborah Orr..... IL, IN, MI, MN, 77 West Jackson
OH, WI. Boulevard
Mail Code SE-4J
Chicago, Illinois
60604-3507
Phone (312) 886-7576
Fax (312) 886-7190
EPA Region 6, Monica Chapa AR, LA, NM, OK, First Interstate Bank
Smith. TX. Tower at Fountain
Place
1445 Ross Avenue,
Suite 1200 (6SF-VB)
Dallas, Texas 75202-
2733
Phone (214) 665-6780
Fax (214) 665-6660
EPA Region 7, Susan Klein..... IA, KS, MO, NE... 901 N. 5th Street
Kansas City, Kansas
66101
Phone (913) 551-7786
Fax (913) 551-8688
EPA Region 8, Dan Heffernan... CO, MT, ND, SD, 1595 Wynkoop Street
UT, WY. (EPR-B)
Denver, CO 80202-1129
Phone (303) 312-7074
Fax (303) 312-6065
EPA Region 9, Noemi Emeric- AZ, CA, HI, NV, 600 Wilshire Blvd,
Ford. AS, GU. Suite 1460
Mail Code SFD-1
Los Angeles,
California 90017
Phone (213) 244-1821
Fax (213) 244-1850
EPA Region 10, Susan Morales.. AK, ID, OR, WA... 1200 Sixth Avenue,
Suite 900
Mailstop: ECL-112
Seattle, Washington
98101
Phone (206) 553-7299
Fax (206) 553-0124
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews: Under Executive Order 12866
(58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this action is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' and is therefore not subject to OMB review. Because
this grant action is not subject to notice and comment requirements
under the Administrative Procedures Act or any other statute, it is not
subject to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) or
Sections 202 and 205 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1999 (UMRA)
(Pub. L. 104-4). In addition, this action does not significantly or
uniquely affect small governments. Although this action does not
generally create new binding legal requirements, where it does, such
requirements do not substantially and directly affect Tribes under
Executive Order 13175 (63 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). Although this
grant action does not have significant Federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999), EPA consulted
with states in the development of these grant guidelines. This action
is not subject to Executive Order 13211, ``Actions Concerning
Regulations that Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or
Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001), because it is not a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order 12866. This action does not
involve technical standards; thus, the requirements of Section 12(d) of
the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. This action does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., generally provides that before certain actions may
take effect, the agency promulgating the action must submit a report,
which includes a copy of the action, to each House of the Congress and
to the Comptroller General of the United States. Since this grant
action, when finalized, will contain legally binding requirements, it
is subject to the Congressional Review Act, and EPA will
[[Page 59172]]
submit its final action in its report to Congress under the Act.
Dated: November 5, 2009.
David R. Lloyd,
Director, Office of Brownfields and Land Revitalization, Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response.
[FR Doc. E9-27568 Filed 11-16-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P