Employee Stock Purchase Plans Under Internal Revenue Code Section 423, 59074-59087 [E9-27452]
Download as PDF
59074
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 220 / Tuesday, November 17, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
that does not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. Therefore,
neither an environmental assessment
nor an environmental impact statement
is required.
This rule does not meet the definition
of ‘‘rule’’ in 5 U.S.C. 804(3)(A) because
it is a rule of ‘‘particular applicability.’’
Therefore, it is not subject to the
congressional review requirements in 5
U.S.C. 801–808.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 529
Animal drugs.
Therefore, under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner
of Food and Drugs and redelegated to
the Center for Veterinary Medicine, 21
CFR part 529 is amended as follows:
■
PART 529—CERTAIN OTHER DOSAGE
FORM NEW ANIMAL DRUGS
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR
part 529 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 360b.
2. Section 529.1940 is revised to read
as follows:
■
§ 529.1940
inserts.
Progesterone intravaginal
(a) Specifications. Each insert
contains:
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES
(1) 1.38 grams (g) progesterone in
molded silicone over a nylon spine.
(2) 0.3 g progesterone in molded
silicone over a flexible nylon spine.
(b) Sponsor. See No. 000009 in
§ 510.600(c) of this chapter for use of the
product described in paragraph (a)(1) of
this section as in paragraph (e)(1) of this
section; and the product described in
paragraph (a)(2) of this section as in
paragraph (e)(2) of this section.
(c) Related tolerances. See
§ 556.540(a) of this chapter.
(d) Special considerations—(1) Cows
and ewes. Product labeling shall bear
the following warnings: ‘‘Avoid contact
with skin by wearing protective gloves
when handling inserts. Store removed
inserts in a sealable container until they
can be disposed of in accordance with
applicable local, state, and Federal
regulations.’’
(2) Cows. This product is approved
with the concurrent use of dinoprost
solution on day 6 of the 7-day
administration period when used for
indications listed in paragraph
(e)(1)(ii)(A) of this section. See
§ 522.690(c) of this chapter.
(e) Conditions of use—(1) Cows—(i)
Amount. Administer one intravaginal
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:56 Nov 16, 2009
Jkt 220001
insert per animal for 7 days. When used
for indications listed in paragraph
(e)(1)(ii)(A) of this section, administer
25 milligrams (mg) dinoprost (5
milliliters (mL) of 5 mg/mL solution as
in § 522.690(a) of this chapter) as a
single intramuscular injection one day
prior to insert removal.
(ii) Indications for use—(A) For
synchronization of estrus in suckled
beef cows and replacement beef and
dairy heifers, for advancement of first
postpartum estrus in suckled beef cows,
and for advancement of first pubertal
estrus in replacement beef heifers.
(B) For synchronization of the return
to estrus in lactating dairy cows
inseminated at the immediately
preceding estrus.
(iii) Limitations. Do not use in
animals with abnormal, immature, or
infected genital tracts; or in beef cows
that are fewer than 20 days postpartum;
or in beef or dairy heifers of insufficient
size or age for breeding. Do not use an
insert more than once. To prevent the
potential transmission of venereal and
bloodborne diseases, the inserts should
be disposed after a single use.
Administration of vaginal inserts for
periods greater than 7 days may result
in reduced fertility. Dinoprost solution
provided by No. 000009 in § 510.600(c)
of this chapter.
(2) Ewes—(i) Amount. Administer one
intravaginal insert per animal for 5 days.
(ii) Indications for use. For induction
of estrus in ewes (sheep) during
seasonal anestrus.
(iii) Limitations. Do not use in
animals with abnormal, immature, or
infected genital tracts; or in ewes that
have never lambed. Do not use an insert
more than once. To prevent the
potential transmission of venereal and
bloodborne diseases, the inserts should
be disposed after a single use. A preslaughter withdrawal period is not
required when this product is used
according to directions.
Dated: November 3, 2009.
Bernadette Dunham,
Director, Center for Veterinary Medicine.
[FR Doc. E9–27497 Filed 11–16–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[TD 9471]
RIN 1545–BH68
Employee Stock Purchase Plans Under
Internal Revenue Code Section 423
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Final regulations.
SUMMARY: This document contains the
final regulations relating to options
granted under an employee stock
purchase plan as defined in section 423
of the Internal Revenue Code (Code).
These final regulations affect certain
taxpayers who participate in the transfer
of stock pursuant to the exercise of
options granted under an employee
stock purchase plan. These final
regulations provide guidance to assist
taxpayers in complying with section 423
in addition to clarifying certain rules
regarding options granted under an
employee stock purchase plan. This
document also contains final regulations
under sections 421, 422 and 424 of the
Code.
DATES: Effective Date: These regulations
are effective on November 17, 2009.
Applicability Date: These regulations
apply as of January 1, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Thomas Scholz or Ilya Enkishev at (202)
622–6030 (not a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
This document contains final
amendments to the Income Tax
Regulations (26 CFR part 1) under
sections 421, 422, 423 and 424 of the
Code.
Section 423 was added to the Code by
section 221(a) of the Revenue Act of
1964, Public Law 88–272 (78 Stat. 63
(1964)). Changes to the applicable law
concerning section 423 were made by
sections 1402(b)(1)(C) and 1402(b)(2) of
the Tax Reform Act of 1976, Public Law
94–455 (90 Stat. 1731 and 1732–1733
(1976)); section 1001(b)(5) of the Deficit
Reduction Act of 1984, Public Law 98–
369 (98 Stat. 1011 (1984)); section 1114
of the Tax Reform Act of 1986, Public
Law 99–514 (100 Stat. 2451 (1986)); and
sections 11801(c)(9)(D)(i), (ii) and
11801(c)(9)(E) of the Omnibus Budget
Reconciliation Act of 1990, Public Law
101–508 (104 Stat. 1388–525 (1990)).
Regulations under section 423 were
published in the Federal Register on
June 23, 1966 (TD 6887). These
E:\FR\FM\17NOR1.SGM
17NOR1
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 220 / Tuesday, November 17, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
regulations were amended on
September 27, 1979 (TD 7645), October
31, 1980 (TD 7728), and December 1,
1988 (TD 8235). In Notice 2004–55
(2004–34 IRB 319 (August 23, 2004))
(see § 601.601(d)(2)(ii)(b)), the IRS and
the Treasury Department requested
comments concerning whether the
existing regulations under section 423
should be amended, and if so, what
issues should be addressed.
On July 29, 2008, the Treasury
Department published a notice of
proposed rulemaking (REG–106251–08)
in the Federal Register (73 FR 43875)
under section 423. A public hearing on
the proposed regulations was held on
January 15, 2009. Written and electronic
comments responding to the notice of
proposed rulemaking were received.
After consideration of these comments,
the Treasury Department adopts the
proposed regulations as final
regulations, with the modifications set
forth in this Treasury decision. The
significant revisions are discussed in
this preamble.
In general, the income tax treatment
of the grant of an option to purchase
stock in connection with the
performance of services and of the
transfer of stock pursuant to the exercise
of the option is determined under
section 83 and the regulations
thereunder. However, section 421
provides special rules for determining
the income tax treatment of the transfer
of shares of stock pursuant to the
exercise of an option if the requirements
of sections 422(a) or 423(a), as
applicable, are met. Section 422 applies
to incentive stock options and section
423 applies to options granted under an
employee stock purchase plan
(collectively, statutory options).
Under section 421, if a share of stock
is transferred to an individual pursuant
to the exercise of a statutory option,
there is no income at the time of
exercise of the option with respect to
the transfer and no deduction under
section 162 is allowed to the employer
corporation with respect to the transfer.
Section 423(a) provides that section
421 applies to the transfer of stock to an
individual pursuant to the exercise of an
option granted under an employee stock
purchase plan if: (i) No disposition of
the stock is made within two years from
the date of grant of the option or within
one year from the date of transfer of the
share, and (ii) at all times during the
period beginning on the date of grant
and ending on the day three months
before the exercise of the option, the
individual is an employee of either the
corporation granting the option or a
parent or subsidiary of such
corporation, or a corporation (or a
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:56 Nov 16, 2009
Jkt 220001
parent or subsidiary of such
corporation) issuing or assuming a stock
option in a transaction to which section
424(a) applies. Section 423(b) sets forth
several requirements that must be met
for a plan to qualify as an employee
stock purchase plan. Section 423(c)
provides a special rule that is applicable
where the option exercise price is
between 85 and 100 percent of the fair
market value of the stock at the time the
option was granted.
Explanation of Provisions
These final regulations provide a
comprehensive set of rules governing
stock options issued under an employee
stock purchase plan and incorporate
substantially all of the rules contained
in the existing regulations under section
423. These final regulations are
comprised of two sections: Section
1.423–1, applicability of section 421(a);
and § 1.423–2, employee stock purchase
plan defined. The modifications to the
proposed regulations that are included
in these final regulations reflect
consideration of the comments
submitted by taxpayers.
1. General Requirements
The proposed regulations provide that
an employee stock purchase plan must
meet the requirements of paragraphs (i)
through (ix) of § 1.423–2(a)(2) to qualify
as an employee stock purchase plan
under section 423(b). The proposed
regulations also provide that the
requirements of paragraphs (iii) through
(ix) of § 1.423–2(a)(2) may be satisfied
by the terms of the plan or an offering
made under the plan. The final
regulations adopt these requirements of
the proposed regulations, although the
numerical designation of the
requirements is modified. To emphasize
that the requirements of paragraphs (iii)
through (ix) of § 1.423–2(a)(2) of the
proposed regulations may be satisfied
by the terms of the plan or an offering
made under the plan, these final
regulations separately list these
requirements in § 1.423–2(a)(3).
Commenters requested clarification of
whether options with terms that are
inconsistent with the terms of the plan
will be eligible for the special tax
treatment of section 421. As provided in
§ 1.423–2(a)(3) of the proposed
regulations, § 1.423–2(a)(4) of these final
regulations provides that, if the terms of
an option are inconsistent with the
terms of the employee stock purchase
plan or an offering under the plan, then
the option will not be treated as granted
under an employee stock purchase plan.
However, an option may still qualify for
the special tax treatment of section 421,
even if the terms of the plan are
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
59075
inconsistent with any of the
requirements in § 1.423–2(a)(3) of these
final regulations, if the option is granted
under an offering with terms that
comply with the requirements of
§ 1.423–2(a)(3). Example 2 of § 1.423–
2(e)(6) of these final regulations
illustrates this principle.
2. Offerings Under an Employee Stock
Purchase Plan
These final regulations provide
further guidance for employee stock
purchase plans under which more than
one offering is made. As set forth in
§ 1.423–2(a)(1) of these final regulations,
one or more offerings may be made
under a plan and the offerings may be
consecutive or overlapping. Further,
pursuant to section 423(b) and its flush
language, the terms of each offering
need not be identical. Although the
terms of each offering need not be
identical, the terms of the plan and each
offering together must satisfy the
requirements of § 1.423–2(a)(2) and (3)
of these final regulations. For example,
if overlapping offerings are made under
an employee stock purchase plan, then
each offering may contain different
terms, provided that the terms of each
offering (together with the plan) satisfy
the requirements of § 1.423–2(a)(3) of
these final regulations. Furthermore,
when a parent corporation adopts an
employee stock purchase plan, it may
establish separate offerings with
different terms under the plan and
designate which subsidiary corporations
of the parent corporation may
participate in a particular offering,
provided that the terms of each offering
(together with the plan) satisfy the
requirements of § 1.423–2(a)(3). The
terms ‘‘parent corporation’’ and
‘‘subsidiary corporation’’ are defined in
§ 1.424–1(f) of the regulations.
a. Employees Covered by the Plan
Paragraphs (i) through (iv) of § 1.423–
2(e)(1) of the proposed regulations and
these final regulations set forth the
categories of employees that may be
excluded from coverage under an
employee stock purchase plan or an
offering under the plan. The proposed
regulations provide that the exclusions
for various categories of employees must
be applied in an identical manner to all
employees of every corporation whose
employees are granted options under
the plan. Commenters noted that the
requirement of identical exclusions for
all offerings under a plan constrains the
ability to make future and overlapping
offerings that are more (or less)
inclusive than prior offerings under the
plan. Commenters suggested that the
final regulations should permit multiple
E:\FR\FM\17NOR1.SGM
17NOR1
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES
59076
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 220 / Tuesday, November 17, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
offerings under a plan with different
exclusions applicable to the one or more
corporations whose employees
participate in the particular offering
under the plan.
These final regulations generally
adopt the approach suggested by the
commenters. Pursuant to these final
regulations, whether the terms of a plan
and offering satisfy the requirements of
§ 1.423–2(e) is made on an offering-byoffering basis. The terms of each offering
under a plan may be different, provided
the plan and offering together satisfy the
requirements of § 1.423–2(a)(2) and (3)
of these final regulations. With respect
to satisfying the requirements of
§ 1.423–2(e), the terms of each offering
may provide different exclusions of
employees, as permitted and within the
limitations described in § 1.423–2(e)(1),
(2) and (3) of these final regulations. The
exclusions established with respect to a
particular offering must be applied in an
identical manner to all employees of
every corporation whose employees are
granted options under that particular
offering. Examples 7 and 8 of § 1.423–
2(e)(6) of these final regulations
illustrate these principles.
Some commenters suggested that the
final regulations permit employers to
exclude from plan participation
employees who are nonresident aliens
and who receive no earned income that
constitutes income from sources within
the United States. Other commenters
suggested that the final regulations
permit employers to exclude from plan
participation employees under a
specified age. The IRS and the Treasury
Department are aware of the
complexities often associated with
participation in an employee stock
purchase plan by nonresident aliens and
employees under a specified age, such
as the age of majority. However, section
423 does not provide exclusions for
nonresident aliens or employees under
a specified age. Accordingly, the IRS
and the Treasury Department are
constrained by statutory authority from
providing a general exclusion from plan
participation for employees who are
nonresident aliens or employees under
a specified age.
One commenter suggested that the
final regulations provide additional
flexibility by permitting employers to
exclude from plan participation highly
compensated employees (HCEs) (within
the meaning of section 414(q)) on any
basis. Section 1.423–2(e)(2)(ii) of the
proposed regulations provides that the
terms of an employee stock purchase
plan may exclude HCEs: (a) with
compensation above a certain level, or
(b) who are officers or subject to the
disclosure requirements of section 16(a)
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:56 Nov 16, 2009
Jkt 220001
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
provided the exclusion is applied in an
identical manner to all HCEs of every
corporation whose employees are
granted options under the plan. These
final regulations do not adopt the
suggestion that HCEs may be excluded
from participation in an employee stock
purchase plan on any basis. Instead,
these final regulations offer some
additional flexibility by providing that,
with respect to the exclusion of HCEs,
the terms of each offering made under
a plan need not be identical with
respect to the HCEs, provided the HCEs
are excluded as permitted and within
the limitations described in § 1.423–
2(e)(2)(ii) of these final regulations.
b. Equal Rights and Privileges
Commenters further suggested that
the final regulations provide flexibility
by permitting employers to make
multiple offerings with different rights
and privileges applicable to the
participants of each offering under a
plan. These final regulations generally
adopt the approach suggested by the
commenters. Pursuant to these final
regulations, the determination of
whether the terms of an offering satisfy
the requirements of § 1.423–2(f) is made
on an offering-by-offering basis. The
terms of each offering under a plan may
be different, provided the plan and
offering together satisfy the
requirements of § 1.423–2(a)(2) and (3)
of these final regulations. However, the
rights and privileges established with
respect to a particular offering must be
applied in an identical manner to all
employees of every corporation whose
employees are granted options under
that particular offering. Examples 4 and
5 of § 1.423–2(f)(7) of these final
regulations illustrate these principles.
3. Maximum Number of Shares That
May Be Purchased By an Employee
Commenters asked whether the
designation of a maximum number of
shares that may be purchased by an
employee during the offering is
necessary in order for the first day of the
offering period to be the date of grant.
Consistent with the proposed
regulations, § 1.423–2(h)(3) of these
final regulations provides that the date
of grant will be the first day of an
offering period if the terms of an
employee stock purchase plan or
offering designate a maximum number
of shares that may be purchased by each
employee during the offering. Similarly,
the date of grant will be the first day of
an offering if the terms of the plan or
offering require the application of a
formula to establish, on the first day of
the offering, the maximum number of
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
shares that may be purchased by each
employee during the offering.
However, § 1.423–2(h)(3) of these
final regulations does not require that an
employee stock purchase plan or
offering designate a maximum number
of shares that may be purchased by each
employee during the offering or
incorporate a formula to establish a
maximum number of shares that may be
purchased by each employee during the
offering. If the maximum number of
shares that can be purchased under an
option is not fixed or determinable until
the date the option is exercised, then the
date of exercise will be the date of grant
of the option. As discussed in the
preamble to the proposed regulations,
the $25,000 limit under section
423(b)(8) and the limit on the aggregate
number of shares that may be issued
under an employee stock purchase plan
are not sufficient to establish the
maximum number of shares that can be
purchased by an employee under an
option so that the date of grant will be
the first day of the offering. Examples 1,
2, 3 and 4 in § 1.423–2(h)(4) of these
final regulations illustrate these
principles.
Commenters also asked whether any
particular number of shares is necessary
to satisfy the requirement to designate a
maximum number of shares that may be
purchased during the offering in order
for the first day of the offering period to
be the date of grant. No particular
number of shares is necessary to satisfy
this requirement and establish the first
day of the offering period as the date of
grant for the option. These final
regulations adopt § 1.423–2(h)(3) of the
proposed regulations to provide that the
designation of any maximum number of
shares is sufficient to establish the first
day of the offering period as the date of
grant for the option.
4. Annual $25,000 Limitation
Section 423(b)(8) provides that an
employee stock purchase plan must, by
its terms, provide that no employee may
be permitted to accrue the right to
purchase stock under all the employee
stock purchase plans of his or her
employer corporation and its related
corporations at a rate which exceeds
$25,000 in fair market value of the stock
(determined on the date of grant) for
each calendar year in which an option
granted to the employee is outstanding.
Section 423(b)(8)(A) provides that the
right to purchase stock under an option
accrues when the option first becomes
exercisable.
In drafting the proposed regulations,
the Treasury Department and the IRS
were aware that taxpayers were
interpreting the $25,000 limitation
E:\FR\FM\17NOR1.SGM
17NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 220 / Tuesday, November 17, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES
inconsistently. Certain taxpayers
interpreted section 423(b)(8) to mean
that the limit increases by $25,000 for
each calendar year during which the
option is outstanding and exercisable;
other taxpayers interpreted the sections
to mean that such limit increases for
each calendar year during which the
option is simply outstanding. Consistent
with comments received by the
Treasury Department and the IRS in
response to Notice 2004–55 (2004–34
IRB 319 (August 23, 2004)), (see
§ 601.601(d)(2)(ii)(b)), the proposed
regulations adopted an approach that
was generally consistent with the
$100,000 limitation for incentive stock
options and interpreted section
423(b)(8) to mean that the limit
increases by $25,000 for each calendar
year during which the option is
outstanding and exercisable.
In response to the proposed
regulations, several commenters
suggested that the Treasury Department
and the IRS reconsider the calculation
of the $25,000 limitation in section
423(b)(8). Commenters suggested that
the regulations adopt an approach that
permits an option to accrue at a rate of
$25,000 for each calendar year that the
option is simply outstanding.
Specifically, even though section
423(b)(8)(A) provides that the right to
purchase stock actually accrues when
the option first becomes exercisable
during a calendar year, the first sentence
of section 423(b)(8) provides that the
limit on accruals is $25,000 ‘‘for each
year in which such option is
outstanding.’’ Upon further
consideration and in response to the
foregoing comments, these final
regulations modify § 1.423–2(i) of the
proposed regulations to provide that the
limit increases by $25,000 for each
calendar year that an option is
outstanding. Example 5 in § 1.423–
2(i)(5) of these final regulations has been
modified to illustrate this principle.
5. Stockholder Approval Requirements
To qualify as an employee stock
purchase plan, section 423(b)(2)
requires that the plan be approved by
the stockholders of the granting
corporation within 12 months before or
after the date the plan is adopted. These
final regulations clarify that new
stockholder approval is required if there
is a change in the shares with respect to
which options are issued or a change in
the granting corporation. In particular,
these final regulations clarify that the
stockholders of a subsidiary corporation
include the parent corporation and any
other stockholders of the subsidiary.
Accordingly, these final regulations
adopt Example 1(iii) in § 1.423–2(c)(5)
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:56 Nov 16, 2009
Jkt 220001
and Example 1(iii) in § 1.422–2(b)(6) of
the proposed regulations.
One commenter to the proposed
regulations suggested that a conforming
change be made to Example 9(iii) in
§ 1.424–1(a)(10) which addresses the
substitution of options in the context of
an acquisition. Example 9(iii) in
§ 1.424–1(a)(10), as previously set forth
in the regulations, requires the
stockholders of an acquiring company to
approve an amendment of the option
plan of an acquired corporate subsidiary
to issue parent stock instead of
subsidiary stock. The commenter
proposed that the example be amended
to require the acquiring company
(instead of its stockholders) to approve
the amendment of the option plan to
issue parent stock instead of subsidiary
stock. This amendment is consistent
with Example 1(iii) in § 1.423–2(c)(5)
and Example 1(iii) in § 1.422–2(b)(6) of
these final regulations. Accordingly,
Example 9(iii) in § 1.424–1(a)(10) of
these final regulations has been
modified to reflect the adoption of the
commenter’s suggestion.
Effective/Applicability Date
These regulations apply as of January
1, 2010, and will apply to any statutory
option granted on or after that date.
Taxpayers may rely on these final
regulations for the treatment of any
statutory option granted prior to January
1, 2010.
Special Analyses
It has been determined that this
Treasury decision is not a significant
regulatory action as defined in
Executive Order 12866. Therefore, a
regulatory assessment is not required. It
also has been determined that section
553(b) of the Administrative Procedure
Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 5) does not apply
to these regulations and because the
regulations do not impose a collection
of information on small entities, the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
chapter 6) does not apply. Pursuant to
section 7805(f) of the Code, the notice
of proposed rulemaking preceding these
regulations was submitted to the Chief
Counsel for Advocacy of the Small
Business Administration for comment
on its impact on small business.
Drafting Information
The principal authors of these
regulations are Thomas Scholz and Ilya
Enkishev, Office of the Division
Counsel/Associate Chief Counsel (Tax
Exempt and Government Entities).
However, other personnel from the IRS
and the Treasury Department
participated in their development.
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
59077
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1
Income taxes, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Adoption of Amendments to the
Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is
amended as follows:
■
PART 1—INCOME TAXES
Paragraph 1. The authority citation
for part 1 continues to read in part as
follows:
■
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805.
Par. 2. Section 1.421–1, paragraphs
(c)(1) and (j)(1) are revised to read as
follows:
■
§ 1.421–1
terms.
Meaning and use of certain
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Time and date of granting option.
(1) For purposes of this section and
§§ 1.421–2 through 1.424–1, the
language ‘‘the date of the granting of the
option’’ and ‘‘the time such option is
granted,’’ and similar phrases refer to
the date or time when the granting
corporation completes the corporate
action constituting an offer of stock for
sale to an individual under the terms
and conditions of a statutory option.
Except as set forth in § 1.423–2(h)(2), a
corporate action constituting an offer of
stock for sale is not considered complete
until the date on which the maximum
number of shares that can be purchased
under the option and the minimum
option price are fixed or determinable.
*
*
*
*
*
(j) Effective/applicability date—(1) In
general. Except for paragraph (c)(1) of
this section, the regulations under this
section are effective on August 3, 2004.
Paragraph (c)(1) of this section is
effective on November 17, 2009.
Paragraph (c)(1) of this section applies
to statutory options granted on or after
January 1, 2010.
*
*
*
*
*
Par. 3. Section 1.422–2, paragraph
(b)(6), Example 1 (iii) is revised to read
as follows:
■
§ 1.422–2
*
Incentive stock options defined.
*
*
(b) * * *
(6) * * *
*
*
Example 1. * * *
(iii) Assume the same facts as in paragraph
(i) of this Example 1, except that the plan was
adopted on January 1, 2010. Assume further
that the plan was approved by the
stockholders of S (in this case, P) on March
1, 2010. On January 1, 2012, S changes the
plan to provide that incentive stock options
for P stock will be granted to S employees
E:\FR\FM\17NOR1.SGM
17NOR1
59078
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 220 / Tuesday, November 17, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
under the plan. Because there is a change in
the stock available for grant under the plan,
the change is considered the adoption of a
new plan that must be approved by the
stockholder of S (in this case, P) within 12
months before or after January 1, 2012.
effective on November 17, 2009. The
regulations under this section apply to
options granted under an employee
stock purchase plan on or after January
1, 2010.
*
■
*
*
*
Par. 6. Section 1.423–2 is revised to
read as follows:
*
Par. 4. Section 1.422–5, paragraph
(f)(1) is revised to read as follows:
■
§ 1.422–5
§ 1.423–2
defined.
Permissible provisions.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) Effective/applicability date—(1) In
general. Except for § 1.422–2(b)(6)
Example 1 (iii), the regulations under
this section are effective on August 3,
2004. Section 1.422–2(b)(6) Example 1
(iii) is effective on November 17, 2009.
Section 1.422–2(b)(6) Example 1 (iii)
applies to statutory options granted on
or after January 1, 2010.
*
*
*
*
*
Par. 5. Section 1.423–1 is revised to
read as follows:
■
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES
§ 1.423–1
Applicability of section 421(a).
(a) General rule. Subject to the
provisions of section 423(c) and
§ 1.423–2(k), the special rules of income
tax treatment provided in section 421(a)
apply with respect to the transfer of a
share of stock to an individual pursuant
to the individual’s exercise of an option
granted under an employee stock
purchase plan, as defined in § 1.423–2,
if the following conditions are
satisfied—
(1) The individual makes no
disposition of such share before the later
of the expiration of the two-year period
from the date of the grant of the option
pursuant to which such share was
transferred or the expiration of the oneyear period from the date of transfer of
such share to the individual; and
(2) At all times during the period
beginning on the date of the grant of the
option and ending on the day three
months before the date of exercise, the
individual was an employee of the
corporation granting the option, a
related corporation, or a corporation (or
a related corporation) substituting or
assuming the stock option in a
transaction to which section 424(a)
applies.
(b) Cross-references. For rules relating
to the requisite employment
relationship, see § 1.421–1(h). For rules
relating to the effect of a disqualifying
disposition, see section 421(b) and
§ 1.421–2(b). For the definition of the
term ‘‘disposition,’’ see section 424(c)
and § 1.424–1(c). For the definition of
the term ‘‘related corporation,’’ see
§ 1.421–1(i).
(c) Effective/applicability date. The
regulations under this section are
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:56 Nov 16, 2009
Jkt 220001
Employee stock purchase plan
(a) In general—(1) The term
‘‘employee stock purchase’’ plan means
a plan that meets the requirements of
paragraphs (a)(2) and (a)(3) of this
section. If the terms of the plan do not
satisfy the requirements of paragraph
(a)(3) of this section, then such
requirements may be satisfied by the
terms of an offering made under the
plan. However, where the requirements
of paragraph (a)(3) of this section are
satisfied by the terms of an offering,
such requirements will be treated as
satisfied only with respect to options
exercised under that offering. One or
more offerings may be made under an
employee stock purchase plan. Offerings
may be consecutive or overlapping, and
the terms of each offering need not be
identical provided the terms of the plan
and the offering together satisfy the
requirements of paragraphs (a)(2) and
(a)(3) of this section. The plan and the
terms of an offering must be in writing
or electronic form, provided that such
writing or electronic form is adequate to
establish the terms of the plan or
offering, as applicable.
(2) To satisfy the requirements of this
paragraph (a)(2) and § 1.423–1, the plan
must meet both of the following
requirements—
(i) The plan must provide that options
can be granted only to employees of the
employer corporation or of a related
corporation (as defined in paragraph (i)
of § 1.421–1) to purchase stock in any
such corporation (see paragraph (b) of
this section); and
(ii) The plan must be approved by the
stockholders of the granting corporation
within 12 months before or after the
date the plan is adopted (see paragraph
(c) of this section).
(3) To satisfy the requirements of this
paragraph (a)(3) and § 1.423–1, the
terms of the plan or offering must meet
all of the following requirements—
(i) An employee cannot be granted an
option if, immediately after the option
is granted, the employee owns stock
possessing 5 percent or more of the total
combined voting power or value of all
classes of stock of the employer
corporation or of a related corporation
(see paragraph (d) of this section);
(ii) Options must be granted to all
employees of any corporation whose
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
employees are granted any options by
reason of their employment by the
corporation (see paragraph (e) of this
section);
(iii) All employees granted options
must have the same rights and
privileges (see paragraph (f) of this
section);
(iv) The option price cannot be less
than the lesser of—
(A) An amount equal to 85 percent of
the fair market value of the stock at the
time the option is granted, or
(B) An amount not less than 85
percent of the fair market value of the
stock at the time the option is exercised
(see paragraph (g) of this section).
(v) Options cannot be exercised after
the expiration of—
(A) Five years from the date the
option is granted if, under the terms of
such plan, the option price cannot be
less than 85 percent of the fair market
value of the stock at the time the option
is exercised, or
(B) Twenty-seven months from the
date the option is granted, if the option
price is not determined in the manner
described in paragraph (a)(3)(v)(A) of
this section (see paragraph (h) of this
section).
(vi) No employee may be granted an
option that permits the employee’s
rights to purchase stock under all
employee stock purchase plans of the
employer corporation and its related
corporations to accrue at a rate that
exceeds $25,000 of fair market value of
the stock (determined at the time the
option is granted) for each calendar year
in which the option is outstanding at
any time (see paragraph (i) of this
section); and
(vii) Options are not transferable by
the optionee other than by will or the
laws of descent and distribution, and
are exercisable, during the lifetime of
the optionee, only by the optionee (see
paragraph (j) of this section).
(4) The determination of whether a
particular option is an option granted
under an employee stock purchase plan
is made at the time the option is
granted. If the terms of an option are
inconsistent with the terms of the
employee stock purchase plan or the
offering under the plan pursuant to
which the option is granted, the option
will not be treated as granted under an
employee stock purchase plan. If an
option with terms that are inconsistent
with the terms of the plan or an offering
under the plan is granted to an
employee who is entitled to the grant of
an option under the terms of the plan or
offering, and the employee is not
granted an option under the offering
that qualifies as an option granted under
an employee stock purchase plan, the
E:\FR\FM\17NOR1.SGM
17NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 220 / Tuesday, November 17, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES
offering will not meet the requirements
of paragraph (e) of this section.
Accordingly, none of the options
granted under the offering will be
eligible for the special tax treatment of
section 421. However, if an option with
terms that are inconsistent with the
terms of the plan or an offering under
the plan is granted to an individual who
is not entitled to the grant of an option
under the terms of the plan or offering,
the option will not be treated as an
option granted under an employee stock
purchase plan but the grant of the
option will not disqualify the options
granted under the plan or offering. If, at
the time of grant, an option qualifies as
an option granted under an employee
stock purchase plan, but after the time
of grant one or more of the requirements
of paragraph (a)(3) of this section is not
satisfied with respect to the option, the
option will not be treated as granted
under an employee stock purchase plan
but this failure to comply with the terms
of the option will not disqualify the
other options granted under the plan or
offering.
(5) Examples. The following examples
illustrate the principles of paragraph (a):
Example 1. Corporation A operates an
employee stock purchase plan under which
options for A stock are granted to employees
of A. The terms of an offering provide that
the option price will be 90 percent of the fair
market value of A stock on the date of
exercise. A grants an option under the
offering to Employee Z, an employee of A.
The terms of the option provide that the
option price will be 85 percent of the fair
market value of A stock on the date of
exercise. Because the terms of Z’s option are
inconsistent with the terms of the offering,
the option granted to Z will not be treated as
an option granted under the employee stock
purchase plan. Further, unless Z is granted
an option under the offering that qualifies as
an option granted under the employee stock
purchase plan, the offering will not meet the
requirements of paragraph (e) of this section
and none of the options granted under the
offering will be eligible for the special tax
treatment of section 421.
Example 2. Corporation B operates an
employee stock purchase plan that provides
that options for B stock may only be granted
to employees of B. Under the terms of the
plan, options may not be granted to
consultants and other non-employees. B
grants an option to Consultant Y, a
consultant of B. Because Y is ineligible to
receive an option under the plan because Y
is not an employee, the grant of the option
to Y is inconsistent with the terms of the plan
and the option granted to Y will not be
treated as an option granted under the
employee stock purchase plan. However, the
grant of the option to Y will not disqualify
the options granted under the plan or any
offering because Y was not entitled to the
grant of an option under the plan.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:56 Nov 16, 2009
Jkt 220001
Example 3. Corporation C operates an
employee stock purchase plan under which
options for C stock are granted to employees
of C. C grants an option pursuant to an
offering under the plan to Employee X, an
employee of C who is a highly compensated
employee. The terms of the employee stock
purchase plan exclude highly compensated
employees from participation in the plan.
Because X is ineligible to receive an option
under the plan by reason of X’s exclusion
from participation in the plan, the option
granted to X will not be treated as an option
granted under the employee stock purchase
plan. However, the grant of the option to X
will not disqualify the options granted under
the plan or offering because X was not
entitled to the grant of an option under the
plan.
Example 4. Corporation D operates an
employee stock purchase plan under which
options for D stock are granted to employees
of D. D grants an option pursuant to an
offering under the plan to Employee W, an
employee of D. The terms of the option
provide that the option price will be 90
percent of the fair market value of D stock on
the date of exercise. On the date of exercise,
W pays only 85 percent of the fair market
value of D stock. Because the terms of W’s
option are not satisfied, the option granted to
W will not be treated as an option granted
under the employee stock purchase plan.
However, the failure to comply with the
terms of the option granted to W will not
disqualify the options granted under the plan
or offering.
(b) Options restricted to employees.
An employee stock purchase plan must
provide that options can be granted only
to employees of the employer
corporation (or employees of its related
corporations) to purchase stock in the
employer corporation (or one of its
related corporations). If such a provision
is not included in the terms of the plan,
the plan will not be an employee stock
purchase plan and options granted
under the plan will not qualify for the
special tax treatment of section 421. For
rules relating to the employment
requirement, see § 1.421–1(h).
(c) Stockholder approval—(1) An
employee stock purchase plan must be
approved by the stockholders of the
granting corporation within 12 months
before or after the date such plan is
adopted. The approval of the
stockholders must comply with all
applicable provisions of the corporate
charter and bylaws and of applicable
State law prescribing the method and
degree of stockholder approval required
for the issuance of corporate stock or
options. If the applicable State law does
not prescribe a method and degree of
stockholder approval, then an employee
stock purchase plan must be approved—
(i) By a majority of the votes cast at
a duly held stockholder’s meeting at
which a quorum representing a majority
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
59079
of all outstanding voting stock is, either
in person or by proxy, present and
voting on the plan; or
(ii) By a method and in a degree that
would be treated as adequate under
applicable State law in the case of an
action requiring stockholder approval
(such as, an action on which
stockholders would be entitled to vote
if the action were taken at a duly held
stockholders’ meeting).
(2) For purposes of the stockholder
approval required by this paragraph (c),
ordinarily, a plan is adopted when it is
approved by the granting corporation’s
board of directors, and the date of the
board’s action is the reference point for
determining whether stockholder
approval occurs within the applicable
24-month period. However, if the
board’s action is subject to a condition
(such as stockholder approval) or the
happening of a particular event, the
plan is adopted on the date the
condition is met or the event occurs,
unless the board’s resolution fixes the
date of adoption as the date of the
board’s action.
(3) An employee stock purchase plan,
as adopted and approved, must
designate the maximum aggregate
number of shares that may be issued
under the plan, and the corporations or
class of corporations whose employees
may be offered options under the plan.
A plan that merely provides that the
number of shares that may be issued
under the plan may not exceed a stated
percentage of the shares outstanding at
the time of each offering or grant under
the plan does not satisfy the
requirements of this paragraph (c)(3).
However, the maximum aggregate
number of shares that may be issued
under the plan may be stated in terms
of a percentage of the authorized,
issued, or outstanding shares on the
date of the adoption of the plan. The
plan may specify that the maximum
aggregate number of shares available for
grants under the plan may increase
annually by a specified percentage of
the authorized, issued, or outstanding
shares on the date of the adoption of the
plan. A plan that provides that the
maximum aggregate number of shares
that may be issued as options under the
plan may change based on any other
specific circumstances satisfies the
requirements of this paragraph only if
the stockholders approve an
immediately determinable maximum
number of shares that may be issued
under the plan in any event. If there is
more than one employee stock purchase
plan under which options may be
granted and stockholders of the granting
corporation merely approve a maximum
aggregate number of shares that are
E:\FR\FM\17NOR1.SGM
17NOR1
59080
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 220 / Tuesday, November 17, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES
available for issuance under the plans,
the stockholder approval requirements
described in paragraph (c)(1) of this
section are not satisfied. A separate
maximum aggregate number of shares
available for issuance pursuant to
options must be specified and approved
for each plan.
(4) Once an employee stock purchase
plan is approved by the stockholders of
the granting corporation, the plan need
not be reapproved by the stockholders
of the granting corporation unless the
plan is amended or changed in a
manner that is considered the adoption
of a new plan, in which case the plan
must be reapproved within the
prescribed 24-month period. Any
increase in the aggregate number of
shares that may be issued under the
plan (other than an increase merely
reflecting a change in the number of
outstanding shares, such as a stock
dividend or stock split) will be
considered the adoption of a new plan
requiring stockholder approval within
the prescribed 24-month period.
Similarly, a change in the designation of
corporations whose employees may be
offered options under the plan will be
considered the adoption of a new plan
requiring stockholder approval within
the prescribed 24-month period unless
the plan provides that designations of
participating corporations may be made
from time to time from among a group
consisting of the granting corporation
and its related corporations. The group
from among which such changes and
designations are permitted without
additional stockholder approval may
include corporations having become
parents or subsidiaries of the granting
corporation after the adoption and
approval of the plan. In addition, a
change in the granting corporation or
the stock available for purchase under
the plan will be considered the adoption
of a new plan requiring stockholder
approval within the prescribed 24month period. Any other changes in the
terms of an employee stock purchase
plan are not considered the adoption of
a new plan and, thus, do not require
stockholder approval.
(5) Examples. The following examples
illustrate the principles of this
paragraph (c):
Example 1. (i) Corporation E is a subsidiary
of Corporation F, a publicly traded
corporation. On January 1, 2010, E adopts an
employee stock purchase plan under which
options for E stock are granted to E
employees.
(ii) To meet the requirements of paragraph
(c)(1) of this section, the plan must be
approved by the stockholders of E (in this
case, F) within 12 months before or after
January 1, 2010.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:56 Nov 16, 2009
Jkt 220001
(iii) Assume the same facts as in paragraph
(i) of this Example 1, except that the plan was
approved by the stockholders of E (in this
case, F) on March 1, 2010. On January 1,
2012, E changes the plan to provide that
options for F stock will be granted to E
employees under the plan. Because there is
a change in the stock available for grant
under the plan, under paragraph (c)(4) of this
section, the change is considered the
adoption of a new plan that must be
approved by the stockholders of E (in this
case, F) within 12 months before or after
January 1, 2012.
Example 2. (i) Assume the same facts as in
paragraph (i) of Example 1, except that on
March 15, 2011, F completely disposes of its
interest in E. Thereafter, E continues to grant
options for E stock to E employees under the
plan.
(ii) The new E options are granted under
a plan that meets the stockholder approval
requirements of paragraph (c)(1) of this
section without regard to whether E seeks
approval of the plan from the stockholders of
E after F disposes of its interest in E.
(iii) Assume the same facts as in paragraph
(i) of this Example 2, except that under the
plan as adopted on January 1, 2010, only
options for F stock are granted to E
employees. Assume further that, after F
disposes of its interest in E, E changes the
plan to provide for the grant of options for
E stock to E employees. Because there is a
change in the stock available for purchase or
grant under the plan, under paragraph (c)(4)
of this section, the stockholders of E must
approve the plan within 12 months before or
after the change to the plan to meet the
stockholder approval requirements of
paragraph (c) of this section.
Example 3. (i) Corporation G maintains an
employee stock purchase plan providing
options for G stock. Corporation H does not
maintain an employee stock purchase plan.
On May 15, 2010, G and H consolidate under
State law to form one corporation. The new
corporation is named Corporation H. The
consolidation agreement describes the G
plan, including the maximum aggregate
number of shares available for issuance
under the plan after the consolidation.
Additionally, the consolidation agreement
states that the plan will be continued by H
after the consolidation. The consolidation
agreement is approved by the stockholders of
G and H on May 1, 2010. H assumes the plan
formerly maintained by G and continues to
grant options under the plan to all eligible
employees, but the options are for H stock.
(ii) Because there is a change in the
granting corporation (from G to H) and the
stock available for purchase, under paragraph
(c)(4) of this section, H is considered to have
adopted a new plan. Because the plan is fully
described in the consolidation agreement,
including the maximum aggregate number of
shares available for issuance under the plan,
the approval of the consolidation agreement
by the stockholders constitutes approval of
the plan. Thus, the stockholder approval of
the consolidation agreement satisfies the
stockholder approval requirements of
paragraph (c)(1) of this section, and the plan
is considered to be adopted by H and
approved by its stockholders on May 1, 2010.
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Example 4. Corporation I adopts an
employee stock purchase plan on November
1, 2010. On that date, there are two million
shares of I stock outstanding. The plan
provides that the maximum aggregate
number of shares that may be issued under
the plan may not exceed 15 percent of the
number of shares of I stock outstanding on
November 1, 2010. Because the maximum
aggregate number of shares that may be
issued under the plan is designated in the
plan, the requirements of paragraph (c)(3) of
this section are met.
Example 5. (i) Corporation J adopts an
employee stock purchase plan on March 15,
2010. The plan provides that the maximum
aggregate number of shares of J stock
available for issuance under the plan is
50,000, increased on each anniversary date of
the adoption of the plan by 5 percent of the
then outstanding shares. Because the
maximum aggregate number of shares is not
designated under the plan, the requirements
of paragraph (c)(3) of this section are not met.
(ii) Assume the same facts as in paragraph
(i) of this Example 5, except that the plan
provides that the maximum aggregate
number of shares available under the plan is
the lesser of (a) 50,000 shares, increased each
anniversary date of the adoption of the plan
by 5 percent of the then-outstanding shares,
or (b) 200,000 shares. Because the maximum
aggregate number of shares that may be
issued under the plan is designated as the
lesser of two numbers, one of which provides
an immediately determinable maximum
aggregate number of shares that may be
issued under the plan in any event, the
requirements of paragraph (c)(3) of this
section are met.
(d) Options granted to certain
shareholders—(1) An employee stock
purchase plan or offering must, by its
terms, provide that an employee cannot
be granted an option if the employee,
immediately after the option is granted,
owns stock possessing 5 percent or more
of the total combined voting power or
value of all classes of stock of the
employer corporation or a related
corporation. In determining whether the
stock ownership of an employee equals
or exceeds this 5 percent limit, the rules
of section 424(d) (relating to attribution
of stock ownership) shall apply, and
stock that the employee may purchase
under outstanding options (whether or
not the options qualify for the special
tax treatment afforded by section 421(a))
shall be treated as stock owned by the
employee. An option is outstanding for
purposes of this paragraph (d) although
under its terms it may be exercised only
in installments or after the expiration of
a fixed period of time. If an option is
granted to an employee whose stock
ownership (as determined under this
paragraph (d)) exceeds the limitation set
forth in this paragraph (d), no portion of
the option will be treated as having been
granted under an employee stock
purchase plan.
E:\FR\FM\17NOR1.SGM
17NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 220 / Tuesday, November 17, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES
(2) The determination of the
percentage of the total combined voting
power or value of all classes of stock of
the employer corporation (or a related
corporation) that is owned by the
employee is made by comparing the
voting power or value of the shares
owned (or treated as owned) by the
employee to the aggregate voting power
or value of all shares actually issued and
outstanding immediately after the grant
of the option to the employee. The
aggregate voting power or value of all
shares actually issued and outstanding
immediately after the grant of the option
does not include the voting power or
value of treasury shares or shares
authorized for issue under outstanding
options held by the employee or any
other person.
(3) Examples. The following examples
illustrate the principles this paragraph
(d):
Example 1. Employee V, an employee of
Corporation K, owns 6,000 shares of K
common stock, the only class of K stock
outstanding. K has 100,000 shares of its
common stock outstanding. Because V owns
6 percent of the combined voting power or
value of all classes of K stock, K cannot grant
an option to V under K’s employee stock
purchase plan. If V’s father and brother each
owned 3,000 shares of K stock and V did not
own any K stock, then the result would be
the same because, under section 424(d), an
individual is treated as owning stock held by
the person’s father and brother. Similarly, the
result would be the same if, instead of
actually owning 6,000 shares, V merely held
an option on 6,000 shares of K stock,
irrespective of whether the transfer of stock
under the option could qualify for the special
tax treatment of section 421, because this
paragraph (d) provides that stock the
employee may purchase under outstanding
options is treated as stock owned by such
employee.
Example 2. Assume the same facts as in
Example 1, except that K is a 50 percent
subsidiary corporation of Corporation L.
Irrespective of whether V owns any L stock,
V cannot receive an option from L under L’s
employee stock purchase plan because he
owns 5 percent of the total combined voting
power of all classes of stock of a subsidiary
of L, in this example, K. An employee who
owns (or is treated as owning) stock in excess
of the limitation of this paragraph (d), in any
corporation in a group of related
corporations, consisting of a parent and its
subsidiary corporations, cannot receive an
option under an employee stock purchase
plan from any corporation in the group.
Example 3. Employee U is an employee of
Corporation M. M has only one class of stock,
of which 100,000 shares are issued and
outstanding. Assuming U does not own (and
is not treated as owning) any stock in M or
in any related corporation of M, M may grant
an option to U under its employee stock
purchase plan for 4,999 shares, because
immediately after the grant of the option, U
would not own 5 percent or more of the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:56 Nov 16, 2009
Jkt 220001
combined voting power or value of all classes
of M stock actually issued and outstanding at
such time. The 4,999 shares that U would be
treated as owning under this paragraph (d)
would not be added to the 100,000 shares
actually issued and outstanding immediately
after the grant for purposes of determining
whether U’s stock ownership exceeds the
limitation of this paragraph (d).
Example 4. Assume the same facts as in
Example 3 but instead of an option for 4,999
shares, M grants U an option, purportedly
under its employee stock purchase plan, for
5,000 shares. No portion of this option will
be treated as granted under an employee
stock purchase plan because U’s stock
ownership exceeds the limitation of this
paragraph (d).
(e) Employees covered by plan—(1)
Subject to the provisions of this
paragraph (e) and the limitations of
paragraphs (d), (f) and (i) of this section,
an employee stock purchase plan or
offering must, by its terms, provide that
options are to be granted to all
employees of any corporation whose
employees are granted any of such
options by reason of their employment
by that corporation, except that one or
more of the following categories of
employees may be excluded from the
coverage of the plan or offering—
(i) Employees who have been
employed less than two years;
(ii) Employees whose customary
employment is 20 hours or less per
week;
(iii) Employees whose customary
employment is for not more than five
months in any calendar year; and
(iv) Highly compensated employees
(within the meaning of section 414(q)).
(2) A plan or offering does not fail to
satisfy the coverage provision of
paragraph (e)(1) of this section in the
following circumstances—
(i) The plan or offering excludes
employees who have completed a
shorter period of service or whose
customary employment is for fewer
hours per week or fewer months in a
calendar year than is specified in
paragraphs (e)(1)(i), (ii) and (iii) of this
section, provided the exclusion is
applied in an identical manner to all
employees of every corporation whose
employees are granted options under
the plan or offering.
(ii) The plan or offering excludes
highly compensated employees (within
the meaning of section 414(q)) with
compensation above a certain level or
who are officers or subject to the
disclosure requirements of section 16(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
provided the exclusion is applied in an
identical manner to all highly
compensated employees of every
corporation whose employees are
granted options under the plan or
offering.
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
59081
(3) Notwithstanding paragraph (e)(1)
of this section, employees who are
citizens or residents of a foreign
jurisdiction (without regard to whether
they are also citizens of the United
States or resident aliens (within the
meaning of section 7701(b)(1)(A))) may
be excluded from the coverage of an
employee stock purchase plan or
offering under the following
circumstances—
(i) The grant of an option under the
plan or offering to a citizen or resident
of the foreign jurisdiction is prohibited
under the laws of such jurisdiction; or
(ii) Compliance with the laws of the
foreign jurisdiction would cause the
plan or offering to violate the
requirements of section 423.
(4) No option granted under a plan or
offering that excludes from participation
any employees, other than those who
may be excluded under this paragraph
(e), and those barred from participation
by reason of paragraphs (d), (f) and (i)
of this section, can be regarded as
having been granted under an employee
stock purchase plan. If an option is not
granted to any employee who is entitled
to the grant of an option under the terms
of the plan or offering, none of the
options granted under such offering will
be treated as having been granted under
an employee stock purchase plan.
However, a plan that, by its terms,
permits all eligible employees to elect to
participate in an offering will not violate
the requirements of this paragraph
solely because eligible employees who
elect not to participate in the offering
are not granted options pursuant to such
offering.
(5) For purposes of this paragraph (e),
the existence of the employment
relationship between an individual and
the corporation participating under the
plan will be determined under § 1.421–
1(h).
(6) Examples. The following examples
illustrate the principles of this
paragraph (e):
Example 1. Corporation N has a stock
purchase plan that meets all the requirements
of paragraphs (a)(2) and (a)(3) of this section
except that options are not required to be
granted to employees whose weekly rate of
pay is less than $1,000. As a matter of
corporate practice, however, N grants options
under its plan to all employees, irrespective
of their weekly rate of pay. Even though N’s
plan is operated in compliance with the
requirements of this paragraph (e), N’s plan
is not an employee stock purchase plan
because the terms of the plan exclude a
category of employees that is not permitted
under this paragraph (e).
Example 2. Assume the same facts as in
Example 1, except that the first offering
under N’s plan provides that options will be
granted to all employees of N. The terms of
E:\FR\FM\17NOR1.SGM
17NOR1
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES
59082
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 220 / Tuesday, November 17, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
the first offering will be treated as part of the
terms of N’s plan, but only for purposes of
the first offering. Because the terms of the
first offering satisfy the requirements of this
paragraph (e), stock transferred pursuant to
options exercised under the first offering will
be treated as stock transferred pursuant to the
exercise of options granted under an
employee stock purchase plan for purposes
of section 421.
Example 3. Corporation O has a stock
purchase plan that excludes from
participation all employees who have been
employed less than one year. Assuming all
other requirements of paragraphs (a)(2) and
(a)(3) of this section are satisfied, O’s plan
qualifies as an employee stock purchase plan
under section 423.
Example 4. Corporation P has a stock
purchase plan that excludes from
participation clerical employees who have
been employed less than two years. However,
non-clerical employees with less than two
years of service are permitted to participate
in the plan. P’s plan is not an employee stock
purchase plan because the exclusion of
employees who have been employed less
than two years applies only to certain
employees of P and is not applied in an
identical manner to all employees of P. If,
instead, P’s plan excludes from participation
all employees (both clerical and non-clerical)
who have been employed less than two years,
then P’s plan would qualify as an employee
stock purchase plan under section 423
assuming all other requirements of
paragraphs (a)(2) and (a)(3) of this section are
satisfied.
Example 5. Corporation Q has a stock
purchase plan that excludes from
participation all officers who are highly
compensated employees (within the meaning
of section 414(q)). Assuming all other
requirements of paragraphs (a)(2) and (a)(3)
of this section are satisfied, Q’s plan qualifies
as an employee stock purchase plan under
section 423.
Example 6. Corporation R maintains an
employee stock purchase plan that excludes
from participation all highly compensated
employees (within the meaning of section
414(q)), except highly compensated
employees who are officers of R. R’s plan is
not an employee stock purchase plan because
the exclusion of all highly compensated
employees except highly compensated
employees who are officers of R is not a
permissible exclusion under paragraph
(e)(2)(ii) of this section.
Example 7. Corporation S is the parent
corporation of Subsidiary YY and Subsidiary
ZZ. S maintains an employee stock purchase
plan with both YY and ZZ participating in
the same offering under the plan. Under the
terms of the offering under the plan, all
employees of YY and ZZ are permitted to
participate in the plan with the exception of
ZZ’s highly compensated employees with
annual compensation greater than $300,000.
None of the options granted under the
offering will be considered granted under an
employee stock purchase plan because the
exclusion of highly compensated employees
with annual compensation greater than
$300,000 is not applied in an identical
manner to all employees of YY and ZZ
granted options in the same offering.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:56 Nov 16, 2009
Jkt 220001
Example 8. Assume the same facts as in
Example 7, except that Corporation S
establishes separate offerings under the plan
for YY and ZZ. Under the terms of the
separate offering for YY, all employees of YY
are permitted to participate in the plan.
Under the terms of the separate offering
established for ZZ, all employees of ZZ are
permitted to participate in the plan with the
exception of ZZ’s highly compensated
employees with annual compensation greater
than $300,000. The options granted under the
separate offering for YY will be considered
granted under an employee stock purchase
plan. Further, the options granted under the
separate offering for ZZ will be considered
granted under an employee stock purchase
plan because the exclusion of highly
compensated employees with annual
compensation greater than $300,000 is
applied in an identical manner to all
employees of ZZ granted options in the same
offering.
Example 9. The laws of Country A require
that options granted to residents of Country
A be transferable during the lifetime of the
option recipient. Corporation T has a stock
purchase plan that excludes residents of
Country A from participation in the plan.
Because compliance with the laws of Country
A would cause options granted to residents
of Country A to violate paragraph (j) of this
section, T may exclude residents of Country
A from participation in the plan. Assuming
all other requirements of paragraph (a)(2) of
this section are satisfied, T’s plan qualifies as
an employee stock purchase plan under
section 423.
(f) Equal rights and privileges—(1)
Except as otherwise provided in
paragraphs (f)(2) through (f)(6) of this
section, an employee stock purchase
plan or offering must, by its terms,
provide that all employees granted
options under the plan or offering shall
have the same rights and privileges.
Thus, the provisions applying to one
option under an offering (such as the
provisions relating to the method of
payment for the stock and the
determination of the purchase price per
share) must apply to all other options
under the offering in the same manner.
If all the options granted under a plan
or offering do not, by their terms, give
the respective optionees the same rights
and privileges, none of the options will
be treated as having been granted under
an employee stock purchase plan for
purposes of section 421.
(2) The requirements of this paragraph
(f) do not prevent the maximum amount
of stock that an employee may purchase
from being determined on the basis of
a uniform relationship to the total
compensation, or the basic or regular
rate of compensation, of all employees.
(3) A plan or offering will not fail to
satisfy the requirements of this
paragraph (f) because the plan or
offering provides that no employee may
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
purchase more than a maximum amount
of stock fixed under the plan or offering.
(4) A plan or offering will not fail to
satisfy the requirements of this
paragraph (f) if, in order to comply with
the laws of a foreign jurisdiction, the
terms of an option granted under a plan
or offering to citizens or residents of
such foreign jurisdiction (without regard
to whether they are also citizens of the
United States or resident aliens (within
the meaning of section 7701(b)(1)(A)))
are less favorable than the terms of
options granted under the same plan or
offering to employees resident in the
United States.
(5)(i) Except as provided in this
paragraph and paragraph (f)(5)(ii) of this
section, a plan or offering permitting
one or more employees to carry forward
amounts that were withheld but not
applied toward the purchase of stock
under an earlier plan or offering and
apply the amounts towards the purchase
of additional stock under a subsequent
plan or offering will be a violation of the
equal rights and privileges under
paragraph (f)(1) of this section.
However, the carry forward of amounts
withheld but not applied toward the
purchase of stock under an earlier plan
or offering will not violate the equal
rights and privileges requirement of
paragraph (f)(1) of this section, if all
other employees participating in the
current plan or offering are permitted to
make direct payments toward the
purchase of shares under a subsequent
plan or offering in an amount equal to
the excess of the greatest amount which
any employee is allowed to carry
forward from an earlier plan or offering
over the amount, if any, the employee
will carry forward from an earlier plan
or offering.
(ii) A plan or offering will not fail to
satisfy the requirements of this section
merely because employees are permitted
to carry forward amounts representing a
fractional share, that were withheld but
not applied toward the purchase of
stock under an earlier plan or offering
and apply the amounts toward the
purchase of additional stock under a
subsequent plan or offering.
(6) Paragraph (f) does not prohibit the
delaying of the grant of an option to any
employee who is barred from being
granted an option solely by reason of the
employee’s failing to meet a minimum
service requirement set forth in
paragraph (e)(1) of this section until the
employee meets such requirement.
(7) Examples. The following examples
illustrate the principles of this
paragraph (f):
Example 1. Corporation U has an
employee stock purchase plan that provides
E:\FR\FM\17NOR1.SGM
17NOR1
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 220 / Tuesday, November 17, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
that the maximum amount of stock that each
employee may purchase under the offering is
one share for each $100 of annual gross pay.
The plan meets the requirements of this
paragraph (f).
Example 2. Corporation V has an
employee stock purchase plan that provides
that the maximum amount of stock that each
employee may purchase under the offering is
one share for each $100 of annual gross pay
up to and including $10,000, and two shares
for each $100 of annual gross pay in excess
of $10,000. The plan will not meet the
requirements of this paragraph (f) because the
amount of stock that may be purchased under
the plan is not based on a uniform
relationship to the total compensation of all
employees.
Example 3. Corporation W has an
employee stock purchase plan that provides
that options to purchase stock in an amount
equal to ten percent of an employee’s annual
salary at a price equal to 85 percent of the
fair market value on the first day of the
offering will be granted to all employees
other than those who have been employed
less than 18 months. In addition, the plan
provides that employees who have not yet
met the minimum service requirements on
the first day of the offering will be granted
similar options on the date the 18 month
service requirement has been attained. The
plan meets the requirements of this
paragraph (f).
Example 4. Corporation X is the parent
corporation of Subsidiary AA, Subsidiary BB
and Subsidiary CC. X maintains an employee
stock purchase plan with AA, BB and CC
participating in the same offering under the
plan. Under the terms of the offering under
the plan, options to purchase stock at a price
equal to 90 percent of the fair market value
at the time the option is exercised will be
granted to all employees. Certain employees
of AA are residents of Country B. The laws
of Country B provide that options granted to
employees who are residents of Country B
must have a purchase price not less than 95
percent of the fair market value at the time
the option is exercised. The plan will not fail
to satisfy the requirements of this paragraph
(f) merely because the residents of Country B
are granted options under the plan to
purchase stock at a price equal to 95 percent
of the fair market value at the time the option
is exercised.
Example 5. Assume the same facts as in
Example 4, except that Corporation X
establishes two separate offerings under the
plan: A separate offering for the employees
of AA and a separate offering for the
employees of BB and CC. Under the separate
offering for the employees of BB and CC,
options are granted to all employees with an
exercise price equal to 90 percent of the fair
market value at the time the option is
exercised. Under the separate offering for the
employees of AA, options are granted to all
employees with an exercise price equal to 95
percent of the fair market value at the time
the option is exercised. The plan does not
violate the equal rights and privileges
requirement of this paragraph (f) merely
because the exercise price of options granted
under one offering is less than the exercise
price of options granted under a separate
offering.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:56 Nov 16, 2009
Jkt 220001
Example 6. Corporation Y maintains an
employee stock purchase plan. Employee T
is employed by Y. T is granted an option
under the current offering to purchase a
maximum of 100 shares of Y stock at an
option price equal to 85 percent of the fair
market value of the stock at exercise. The
plan permits the carry forward of withheld
but unused amounts from an earlier offering.
Prior to the exercise date, $2000 of T’s salary
has been withheld and is available to be
applied toward the purchase of Y stock. On
the exercise date, the fair market value of Y
stock is $20 per share. T is able to purchase
100 shares of Y stock at $17 per share for an
aggregate purchase price of $1700. T can
carry forward $300 to the subsequent
offering. Each employee in the subsequent
offering other than T will be permitted to
make direct payments toward the purchase of
shares under the subsequent offering in a
maximum amount of $300 less any amount
the employee has carried forward from an
earlier offering. The plan does not violate the
equal rights and privileges requirement of
this paragraph (f).
(g) Option price—(1) An employee
stock purchase plan or offering must, by
its terms, provide that the option price
will not be less than the lesser of—
(i) An amount equal to 85 percent of
the fair market value of the stock at the
time the option is granted, or
(ii) An amount that under the terms
of the option may not be less than 85
percent of the fair market value of the
stock at the time the option is exercised.
(2) For purposes of determining the
option price, the fair market value of the
stock may be determined in any
reasonable manner, including the
valuation methods permitted under
§ 20.2031–2. However, the option price
must meet the minimum pricing
requirements of this paragraph (g). For
general rules relating to the option
price, see § 1.421–1(e). For rules relating
to the determination of when an option
is granted, see §§ 1.421–1(c) and 1.423–
2(h)(2). Any option that does not meet
the minimum pricing requirements of
this paragraph (g) will not be treated as
an option granted under an employee
stock purchase plan irrespective of
whether the plan or offering satisfies
those requirements. If an option that
does not meet the minimum pricing
requirements is granted to an employee
who is entitled to the grant of an option
under the terms of the plan or offering,
and the employee is not granted an
option under such offering that qualifies
as an option granted under an employee
stock purchase plan, the offering will
not meet the requirements of paragraph
(e) of this section. Accordingly, none of
the options granted under the offering
will be eligible for the special tax
treatment of section 421.
(3) The option price may be stated
either as a percentage or as a dollar
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
59083
amount. If the option price is stated as
a dollar amount, then the requirement of
this paragraph (g) can only be met by a
plan or offering in which the price is
fixed at not less than 85 percent of the
fair market value of the stock at the time
the option is granted. If the fixed price
is less than 85 percent of the fair market
value of the stock at grant, then the
option cannot meet the requirement of
this paragraph (g) even if a decline in
the fair market value of the stock results
in such fixed price being not less than
85 percent of the fair market value of the
stock at the time the option is exercised,
because that result was not certain to
occur under the terms of the option.
(4) Examples. The following examples
illustrate the principles of this
paragraph (g):
Example 1. Corporation Z has an employee
stock purchase plan that provides that the
option price will be 85 percent of the fair
market value of the stock on the first day of
the offering (which is the date of grant in this
case), or 85 percent of the fair market value
of the stock at exercise, whichever amount is
the lesser. Upon the exercise of an option
issued under Z’s plan, Z agrees to accept an
option price that is less than the minimum
amount allowable under the terms of such
plan. Notwithstanding that the option was
issued under an employee stock purchase
plan, the transfer of stock pursuant to the
exercise of such option does not satisfy the
requirement of this paragraph (g) and cannot
qualify for the special tax treatment of
section 421.
Example 2. Corporation AA has an
employee stock purchase plan that provides
that the option price is set at 85 percent of
the fair market value of AA stock at exercise,
but not less than $80 per share. On the first
day of the offering (which is the date of grant
in this case), the fair market value of AA
stock is $100 per share. The option satisfies
the requirement of this paragraph (g), and can
qualify for the special tax treatment of
section 421.
Example 3. Assume the same facts as in
Example 2, except that the option price is set
at 85 percent of the fair market value of AA
stock at exercise, but not more than $80 per
share. This option cannot satisfy the
requirement of this paragraph (g) irrespective
of whether, at the time the option is
exercised, 85 percent of the fair market value
of AA stock is $80 or less.
(h) Option period—(1) An employee
stock purchase plan or offering must, by
its terms, provide that options granted
under the plan cannot be exercised after
the expiration of 27 months from the
date of grant unless, under the terms of
the plan or offering, the option price is
not less than 85 percent of the fair
market value of the stock at the time of
the exercise of the option. If the option
price is not less than 85 percent of the
fair market value of the stock at the time
the option is exercised, then the option
period provided under the plan must
E:\FR\FM\17NOR1.SGM
17NOR1
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES
59084
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 220 / Tuesday, November 17, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
not exceed five years from the date of
grant. If the requirements of this
paragraph (h) are not met by the terms
of the plan or offering, then options
issued under such plan or offering will
not be treated as options granted under
an employee stock purchase plan
irrespective of whether the options, by
their terms, are exercisable beyond the
period allowable under this paragraph
(h). An option that provides that the
option price is not less than 85 percent
of the fair market value of the stock at
exercise may have an option period of
5 years irrespective of whether the fair
market value of the stock at exercise is
more or less than the fair market value
of the stock at grant. However, if the
option provides that the option price is
85 percent of the fair market value of the
stock at exercise, but not more than
some other fixed amount determined in
accordance with the provisions of
paragraph (g) of this section, then
irrespective of the price paid on
exercise, the option period must not be
more than 27 months.
(2) Section 1.421–1(c) provides that,
for purposes of §§ 1.421–1 through
1.424–1, the language ‘‘the date of the
granting of the option’’ and the ‘‘time
such option is granted,’’ and similar
phrases refer to the date or time when
the granting corporation completes the
corporate action constituting an offer of
stock for sale to an individual under the
terms and conditions of a statutory
option. With respect to options granted
under an employee stock purchase plan,
the principles of § 1.421–1(c) shall be
applied without regard to the
requirement that the minimum option
price must be fixed or determinable in
order for the corporate action
constituting an offer of stock to be
considered complete.
(3) The date of grant will be the first
day of an offering if the terms of an
employee stock purchase plan or
offering designate a maximum number
of shares that may be purchased by each
employee during the offering. Similarly,
the date of grant will be the first day of
an offering if the terms of the plan or
offering require the application of a
formula to establish, on the first day of
the offering, the maximum number of
shares that may be purchased by each
employee during the offering. It is not
required that an employee stock
purchase plan or offering designate a
maximum number of shares that may be
purchased by each employee during the
offering or incorporate a formula to
establish a maximum number of shares
that may be purchased by each
employee during the offering. If the
maximum number of shares that can be
purchased under an option is not fixed
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:56 Nov 16, 2009
Jkt 220001
or determinable until the date the
option is exercised, then the date of
exercise will be the date of grant of the
option.
(4) Examples. The following examples
illustrate the principles of this
paragraph (h):
Example 1. (i) Corporation BB has an
employee stock purchase plan that provides
that the option price will be the lesser of 85
percent of the fair market value of the stock
on the first day of an offering or 85 percent
of the fair market value of the stock on the
last day of the offering. Options are exercised
on the last day of the offering. One million
shares of BB stock are reserved for issuance
under the plan. The plan provides that no
employee may be permitted to purchase
stock under the plan at a rate that exceeds
$25,000 in fair market value of the BB stock
(determined on the date of grant) for each
calendar year during which an option
granted to the employee is outstanding. The
terms of each option granted under an
offering provide that a maximum of 500
shares may be purchased by the option
recipient during the offering. Because the
maximum number of shares that can be
purchased under the option is fixed and
determinable on the first day of the offering,
the date of grant for the option is the first day
of the offering.
(ii) Assume the same facts as in paragraph
(i) of Example 1, except that BB’s plan
excludes all employees who have been
employed less than 18 months. The plan
provides that employees who have not yet
met the minimum service requirements on
the first day of an offering will be granted an
option on the date the 18-month service
requirement has been attained. With respect
to those employees who have been employed
less than 18 months on the first day of an
offering, the date of grant for the option is the
date the 18-month service requirement has
been attained.
Example 2. Assume the same facts as in
paragraph (i) of Example 1, except that the
terms of each option granted do not provide
that a maximum of 500 shares may be
purchased by the option recipient during the
offering. Notwithstanding the fixed number
of shares reserved for issuance under the
plan and the $25,000 limitation set forth in
the plan, the maximum number of shares that
can be purchased under the option is not
fixed or determinable until the last day of the
offering when the option is exercised.
Therefore the date of grant for the option is
the last day of the offering when the option
is exercised.
Example 3. Corporation CC has an
employee stock purchase plan that provides
that the option price will be 85 percent of the
fair market value of the stock on the last day
of the offering. Options are exercised on the
last day of the offering. Each offering under
the plan begins on January 1 and ends on
December 31 of the same calendar year. The
terms of each option granted under an
offering provide that the maximum number
of shares that may be purchased by any
employee during the offering equals $25,000
divided by the fair market value of the stock
on the first day of the offering. The maximum
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
number of shares that can be purchased
under the option is fixed and determinable
on the first day of the offering and therefore
the date of grant for the option is the first day
of the offering.
Example 4. Assume the same facts as in
Example 3 except that the terms of each
option granted under an offering provide that
the maximum number of shares that may be
purchased by any employee during the
offering equals 10 percent of the employee’s
annual salary (determined as of January 1 of
the year in which the offering commences)
divided by the fair market value of the stock
on the first day of the offering. The maximum
number of shares that can be purchased
under the option is fixed and determinable
on the first day of the offering and therefore
the date of grant for the option is the first day
of the offering.
(i) Annual $25,000 limitation—(1) An
employee stock purchase plan or
offering must, by its terms, provide that
no employee may be permitted to
purchase stock under all the employee
stock purchase plans of the employer
corporation and its related corporations
at a rate that exceeds $25,000 in fair
market value of the stock (determined at
the time the option is granted) for each
calendar year in which any option
granted to the employee is outstanding
at any time. In applying the foregoing
limitation—
(i) The right to purchase stock under
an option accrues when the option (or
any portion thereof) first becomes
exercisable during the calendar year;
(ii) The right to purchase stock under
an option accrues at the rate provided
in the option, but in no case may such
rate exceed $25,000 of fair market value
of such stock (determined at the time
such option is granted) for any one
calendar year; and
(iii) A right to purchase stock that has
accrued under one option granted
pursuant to the plan may not be carried
over to any other option.
(2) If an option is granted under an
employee stock purchase plan that
satisfies the requirement of this
paragraph (i), but the option gives the
optionee the right to buy stock in excess
of the maximum rate allowable under
this paragraph (i), then no portion of the
option will be treated as having been
granted under an employee stock
purchase plan. Furthermore, if the
option was granted to an employee
entitled to the grant of an option under
the terms of the plan or offering, and the
employee is not granted an option under
the offering that qualifies as an option
granted under an employee stock
purchase plan, then the offering will not
meet the requirements of paragraph (e)
of this section. Accordingly, none of the
options granted under the offering will
be eligible for the special tax treatment
of section 421.
E:\FR\FM\17NOR1.SGM
17NOR1
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 220 / Tuesday, November 17, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
(3) The limitation of this paragraph (i)
applies only to options granted under
employee stock purchase plans and
does not limit the amount of stock that
an employee may purchase under
incentive stock options (as defined in
section 422(b)) or any other stock
options except those to which section
423 applies. Stock purchased under
options to which section 423 does not
apply will not limit the amount that an
employee may purchase under an
employee stock purchase plan, except
for purposes of the 5-percent stock
ownership provision of paragraph (d) of
this section.
(4) Under the limitation of this
paragraph (i), an employee may
purchase up to $25,000 of stock (based
on the fair market value of the stock at
the time the option was granted) in each
calendar year during which an option
granted to the employee under an
employee stock purchase plan is
outstanding. Alternatively, an employee
may purchase more than $25,000 of
stock (based on the fair market value of
such stock at the time the option was
granted) in a calendar year, so long as
the total amount of stock that the
employee purchases does not exceed
$25,000 in fair market value of the stock
(determined at the time the option was
granted) for each calendar year in which
any option was outstanding. If, in any
calendar year, the employee holds two
or more outstanding options granted
under employee stock purchase plans of
the employer corporation, or a related
corporation, then the employee’s
purchases of stock attributable to that
year under all options granted under
employee stock purchase plans must not
exceed $25,000 in fair market value of
the stock (determined at the time the
options were granted). Under an
employee stock purchase plan, an
employee may not purchase stock in
anticipation that the option will be
outstanding in some future year. Thus,
the employee may purchase only the
amount of stock that does not exceed
the limitation of this paragraph (i) for
the year of the purchase and for
preceding years during which the
option was outstanding. Thus, the
amount of stock that may be purchased
under an option depends on the number
of years in which the option is actually
outstanding. The amount of stock that
may be purchased under an employee
stock purchase plan may not be
increased by reason of the failure to
grant an option in an earlier year under
such plan, or by reason of the failure to
exercise an earlier option. For example,
if an option is granted to an individual
and expires without having been
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:56 Nov 16, 2009
Jkt 220001
exercised at all, then the failure to
exercise the option does not increase the
amount of stock which such individual
may be permitted to purchase under an
option granted in a year following the
year of such expiration. If an option
granted under an employee stock
purchase plan is outstanding in more
than one calendar year, then stock
purchased pursuant to the exercise of
such an option will be applied first, to
the extent allowable under this
paragraph (i), against the $25,000
limitation for the earliest year in which
the option was outstanding, then,
against the $25,000 limitation for each
succeeding year, in order.
(5) Examples. The following examples
illustrate the principles of this
paragraph (i):
Example 1. Assume that Corporation DD
maintains an employee stock purchase plan
and that Employee S is employed by DD. On
June 1, 2010, DD grants S an option under
the plan to purchase a total of 750 shares of
DD stock at $85 per share. On that date, the
fair market value of DD stock is $100 per
share. The option provides that it may be
exercised at any time but cannot be exercised
after May 31, 2012. Under this paragraph (i),
the option must not permit S to purchase
more than 250 shares of DD stock during the
calendar year 2010, because 250 shares are
equal to $25,000 in fair market value of DD
stock determined at the time of grant. During
the calendar year 2011, S may purchase
under the option an amount of DD stock
equal to the difference between $50,000 in
fair market value of DD stock (determined at
the time the option was granted) and the fair
market value of DD stock (determined at the
time of grant of the option) purchased during
the year 2010. During the calendar year 2012,
S may purchase an amount of DD stock equal
to the difference between $75,000 in fair
market value of the stock (determined at the
time of grant of the option) and the total
amount of the fair market value of the stock
(determined at the time of grant of the
option) purchased under the option during
the calendar years 2010 and 2011. S may
purchase $25,000 of stock for the year 2010,
and $25,000 of stock for the year 2012,
although the option was outstanding for only
a part of each of such years. However, S may
not be granted another option under an
employee stock purchase plan of DD or a
related corporation to purchase stock of DD
or a related corporation during the calendar
years 2010, 2011, and 2012, so long as the
option granted June 1, 2010, is outstanding.
Example 2. Assume the same facts as in
Example 1, except that the option granted to
S in 2010 is terminated in 2011 without any
part of the option having been exercised, and
that subsequent to the termination and
during 2011, S is granted another option
under DD’s employee stock purchase plan.
Under that option, S may be permitted to
purchase $25,000 of stock for 2011. The
failure of S to exercise the option granted to
S in 2010, does not increase the amount of
stock that S may be permitted to purchase
under the option granted to S in 2011.
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
59085
Example 3. Assume the same facts as in
Example 1, except that, on May 31, 2012, S
exercised the option granted to S in 2010,
and purchased 600 shares of DD stock. Five
hundred shares, the maximum amount of
stock that could have been purchased in
2011, under the option, are treated as having
been purchased for the years 2010 and 2011.
Only 100 shares of the stock are treated as
having been purchased for 2012. After S’s
exercise of the option on May 31, 2012, S is
granted another option under DD’s employee
stock purchase plan. S may be permitted
under the new option to purchase for 2012
stock having a fair market value of no more
than $15,000 at the time the new option is
granted.
Example 4. Corporation EE maintains an
employee stock purchase plan and Employee
R is employed by EE. On August 1, 2010, EE
grants R an option under the plan to
purchase 150 shares of EE stock at $85 per
share during each of the calendar years 2010,
2011, and 2012. On that date, the fair market
value of EE stock is $100 per share. The
option provides that it may be exercised at
any time during years 2010, 2011, and 2012.
Because this option permits R to purchase
only $15,000 of EE’s stock for each year the
option is outstanding, R could be granted
another option by EE, or by a related
corporation, in year 2010, permitting R to
purchase an additional $10,000 of stock
during each of the calendar years 2010, 2011,
and 2012.
Example 5. Corporation FF maintains an
employee stock purchase plan and Employee
Q is employed by FF. On September 1, 2010,
FF grants Q an option under the plan that
will be automatically exercised on August 31,
2011, and August 31, 2012. The terms of the
option provide that no more than 150 shares
may be purchased on each date that the
option is automatically exercised. On August
31, 2011, Q may purchase under the option
an amount of FF stock equal to $50,000 in
fair market value of FF stock (determined at
the time the option was granted). On August
31, 2012, Q may purchase under the option
an amount of FF stock equal to the difference
between $75,000 in fair market value of Q
stock (determined at the time the option was
granted) and the fair market value of Q stock
(determined at the time of grant of the
option) purchased during year 2011.
(j) Restriction on transferability. An
employee stock purchase plan or
offering must, by its terms, provide that
options granted under the plan are not
transferable by the optionee other than
by will or the laws of descent and
distribution, and must be exercisable,
during the optionee’s lifetime, only by
the optionee. For general rules relating
to the restriction on transferability
required by this paragraph (j), see
§ 1.421–1(b)(2). For a limited exception
to the requirement of this paragraph (j),
see section 424(h)(3).
(k) Special rule where option price is
between 85 percent and 100 percent of
value of stock—(1)(i) If all the
conditions necessary for the application
of section 421(a) exist, this paragraph (k)
E:\FR\FM\17NOR1.SGM
17NOR1
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES
59086
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 220 / Tuesday, November 17, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
provides additional rules that are
applicable in cases where, at the time
the option is granted, the option price
per share is less than 100 percent (but
not less than 85 percent) of the fair
market value of the share. In that case,
upon the disposition of the share by the
employee after the expiration of the
two-year and the one-year holding
periods, or upon the employee’s death
while owning the share (whether
occurring before or after the expiration
of such periods), there shall be included
in the employee’s gross income as
compensation (and not as gain upon the
sale or exchange of a capital asset) the
lesser of—
(A) The amount, if any, by which the
price paid under the option was
exceeded by the fair market value of the
share at the time the option was granted,
or
(B) The amount, if any, by which the
price paid under the option was
exceeded by the fair market value of the
share at the time of such disposition or
death.
(ii) For purposes of applying the rules
of this paragraph (k), if the option price
is not fixed or determinable at the time
the option is granted, the option price
will be computed as if the option had
been exercised at such time. The
amount of compensation resulting from
the application of this paragraph (k)
shall be included in the employee’s
gross income for the taxable year in
which the disposition occurs, or for the
taxable year closing with the employee’s
death, whichever event results in the
application of this paragraph (k).
(iii) The application of the special
rules provided in this paragraph (k)
shall not affect the rules provided in
section 421(a) with respect to the
employee exercising the option, the
employer corporation, or a related
corporation. Thus, notwithstanding the
inclusion of an amount as compensation
in the gross income of an employee, as
provided in this paragraph (k), no
income results to the employee at the
time the stock is transferred to the
employee, and no deduction under
section 162 is allowable at any time to
the employer corporation or a related
corporation with respect to such
amount.
(iv) If, during the employee’s lifetime,
the employee exercises an option
granted under an employee stock
purchase plan, but the employee dies
before the stock is transferred to the
employee pursuant to the exercise of the
option, then for the purpose of sections
421 and 423, on the employee’s death,
the stock is deemed to be transferred
immediately to the employee, and
immediately thereafter, the employee is
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:56 Nov 16, 2009
Jkt 220001
deemed to have transferred the stock to
the employee’s executor, administrator,
trustee, beneficiary by operation of law,
heir, or legatee, as the case may be.
(2) If the special rules provided in this
paragraph (k) are applicable to the
disposition of a share of stock by an
employee, then the basis of the share in
the employee’s hands at the time of the
disposition, determined under section
1011, shall be increased by an amount
equal to the amount includible as
compensation in the employee’s gross
income under this paragraph (k).
However, the basis of a share of stock
acquired after the death of an employee
by the exercise of an option granted to
the employee under an employee stock
purchase plan shall be determined in
accordance with the rules of section
421(c) and § 1.421–2(c). If the special
rules provided in this paragraph (k) are
applicable to a share of stock upon the
death of an employee, then the basis of
the share in the hands of the estate or
the person receiving the stock by
bequest or inheritance shall be
determined under section 1014, and
shall not be increased by reason of the
inclusion upon the decedent’s death of
any amount in the decedent’s gross
income under this paragraph (k). See
Example (9) of this paragraph (k) with
respect to the determination of basis of
the share in the hands of a surviving
joint owner.
(3) Examples. The following examples
illustrate the principles of this
paragraph (k):
Example 1. On June 1, 2010, Corporation
GG grants to Employee P, an employee of GG,
an option under GG’s employee stock
purchase plan to purchase a share of GG
stock for $85. The fair market value of GG
stock on such date is $100 per share. On June
1, 2011, P exercises the option and on that
date GG transfers the share of stock to P. On
January 1, 2013, P sells the share for $150,
its fair market value on that date. P’s income
tax return is filed on the basis of the calendar
year. The income tax consequences to P and
GG are as follows—
(i) Compensation in the amount of $15 is
includible in P’s gross income for the year
2013, the year of the disposition of the share.
The $15 represents the difference between
the option price ($85) and the fair market
value of the share on the date the option was
granted ($100), because the value is less than
the fair market value of the share on the date
of disposition ($150). For the purpose of
computing P’s gain or loss on the sale of the
share, P’s cost basis of $85 is increased by
$15, the amount includible in P’s gross
income as compensation. Thus, P’s basis for
the share is $100. Because the share was sold
for $150, P realizes a gain of $50, which is
treated as long-term capital gain; and
(ii) GG is not entitled to any deduction
under section 162 at any time with respect
to the share transferred to P.
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Example 2. Assume the same facts as in
Example 1, except that P sells the share of
GG stock on January 1, 2014, for $75, its fair
market value on that date. Because $75 is less
than the option price ($85), no amount in
respect of the sale is includible as
compensation in P’s gross income for the
year 2014. P’s basis for determining gain or
loss on the sale is $85. Because P sold the
share for $75, P realized a loss of $10 on the
sale that is treated as a long-term capital loss.
Example 3. Assume the same facts as in
Example 1, except that the option provides
that the option price shall be 90 percent of
the fair market value of the stock on the day
the option is exercised. On June 1, 2011,
when the option is exercised, the fair market
value of the stock is $120 per share so that
P pays $108 for the share of the stock.
Compensation in the amount of $10 is
includible in P’s gross income for the year
2013, the year of the disposition of the share.
This is determined in the following manner:
The excess of the fair market value of the
stock at the time of the disposition ($150)
over the price paid for the share ($108) is
$42; and the excess of the fair market value
of the stock at the time the option was
granted ($100) over the option price,
computed as if the option had been exercised
at such time ($90), is $10. Accordingly, $10,
the lesser, is includible in gross income. In
this situation, P’s cost basis of $108 is
increased by $10, the amount includible in
P’s gross income as compensation. Thus, P’s
basis for the share is $118. Because the share
was sold for $150, P realizes a gain of $32
that is treated as long-term capital gain.
Example 4. Assume the same facts as in
Example 1, except that the option provides
that the option price shall be the lesser of 95
percent of the fair market value of the stock
on the first day of the offering period and 95
percent of the fair market value of the stock
on the day the option is exercised. On June
1, 2011, when the option is exercised, the fair
market value of the stock is $120 per share.
P pays $95 for the share of the stock.
Compensation in the amount of $5 is
includible in P’s gross income for the year
2013, the year of the disposition of the share.
This is determined in the following manner:
The excess of the fair market value of the
stock at the time of the disposition ($150)
over the price paid for the share ($95) is $55;
and the excess of the fair market value of the
stock at the time the option was granted
($100) over the option price, computed as if
the option had been exercised at such time
($95), is $5. Accordingly, $5, the lesser, is
includible in gross income. In this situation,
P’s cost basis of $95 is increased by $5, the
amount includible in P’s gross income as
compensation. Thus, P’s basis for the share
is $100. Because the share was sold for $150,
P realizes a gain of $50 that is treated as longterm capital gain.
Example 5. Assume the same facts as in
Example 1, except that instead of selling the
share on January 1, 2013, P makes a gift of
the share on that day. In that case $15 is
includible as compensation in P’s gross
income for 2013. P’s cost basis of $85 is
increased by $15, the amount includible in
P’s gross income as compensation. Thus, P’s
basis for the share is $100, which becomes
E:\FR\FM\17NOR1.SGM
17NOR1
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 220 / Tuesday, November 17, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
the donee’s basis, as of the time of the gift,
for determining gain or loss.
Example 6. Assume the same facts as in
Example 2, except that instead of selling the
share on January 1, 2014, P makes a gift of
the share on that date. Because the fair
market value of the share on that day ($75)
is less than the option price ($85), no amount
in respect of the disposition by way of gift
is includible as compensation in P’s gross
income for 2014. P’s basis for the share is
$85, which becomes the donee’s basis, as of
the time of the gift, for the purpose of
determining gain. The donee’s basis for the
purpose of determining loss, determined
under section 1015(a), is $75 (fair market
value of the share at the date of gift).
Example 7. Assume the same facts as in
Example 1, except that after acquiring the
share of stock on June 1, 2011, P dies on
August 1, 2012, at which time the share has
a fair market value of $150. Compensation in
the amount of $15 is includible in P’s gross
income for the taxable year closing with P’s
death, $15 being the difference between the
option price ($85) and the fair market value
of the share when the option was granted
($100), because such value is less than the
fair market value at date of death ($150). The
basis of the share in the hands of P’s estate
is determined under section 1014 without
regard to the $15 includible in the decedent’s
gross income.
Example 8. Assume the same facts as in
Example 7, except that P dies on August 1,
2011, at which time the share has a fair
market value of $150. Although P’s death
occurred within one year after the transfer of
the share to P, the income tax consequences
are the same as in Example 7.
Example 9. Assume the same facts as in
Example 1, except that the share of stock was
issued in the names of P and P’s spouse
jointly with right of survivorship, and that P
and P’s spouse sold the share on June 15,
2012, for $150, its fair market value on that
date. Compensation in the amount of $15 is
includible in P’s gross income for the year
2012, the year of the disposition of the share.
The basis of the share in the hands of P and
P’s spouse for the purpose of determining
gain or loss on the sale is $100, that is, the
cost of $85 increased by the amount of $15
includible as compensation in P’s gross
income. The gain of $50 on the sale is treated
as long-term capital gain, and is divided
equally between P and P’s spouse.
Example 10. Assume the same facts as in
Example 1, except that the share of stock was
issued in the names of P and P’s spouse
jointly with right of survivorship, and that P
predeceased P’s spouse on August 1, 2012, at
which time the share had a fair market value
of $150. Compensation in the amount of $15
is includible in P’s gross income for the
taxable year closing with his death. See
Example 7. The basis of the share in the
hands of P’s spouse as survivor is determined
under section 1014 without regard to the $15
includible in the decedent’s gross income.
Example 11. Assume the same facts as in
Example 10, except that P’s spouse
predeceased P on July 1, 2012. Section 423(c)
does not apply in respect of the death of P’s
spouse. Upon the subsequent death of P on
August 1, 2012, the income tax consequences
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:56 Nov 16, 2009
Jkt 220001
59087
in respect of P’s taxable year closing with the
date of P’s death, and in respect of the basis
of the share in the hands of P’s estate, are the
same as in Example 7. If P had sold the share
on July 15, 2012 (after the death of P’s
spouse), for $150, its fair market value at that
time, the income tax consequences would be
the same as in Example 1.
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
(l) Effective/applicability date. The
regulations under this section are
effective on November 17, 2009. The
regulations under this section apply to
options granted under an employee
stock purchase plan on or after January
1, 2010.
Information Reporting Requirements
Under Internal Revenue Code Section
6039
Par. 6. Section 1.424–1, paragraphs
(a)(10) Example 9 (iii) and (g)(1) are
revised to read as follows:
■
§ 1.424–1 Definition and special rules
applicable to statutory options.
(a) * * *
(10) * * *
Example 9. * * * (iii) Assume the same
facts as in paragraphs (i) and (ii) of this
Example 9. Assume further that as part of the
acquisition, X amends its plan to allow future
grants under the plan to be grants to acquire
Y stock. Because the amendment of the plan
to allow options on a different stock is
considered the adoption of a new plan under
§ 1.422–2(b)(2)(iii), the stockholders of X (in
this case, Y) must approve the plan within
12 months before or after the date of the
amendment of the plan. If the stockholders
of X (in this case, Y) timely approve the plan,
the future grants to acquire Y stock will be
incentive stock options (assuming the other
requirements of § 1.422–2 have been met).
*
*
*
*
*
(g) Effective/applicability date—(1) In
general. Except for § 1.424–1(a)(10)
Example 9 (iii), the regulations under
this section are effective on August 3,
2004. Section 1.424–1(a)(10) Example 9
(iii) is effective on November 17, 2009.
Section 1.424–1(a)(10) Example 9 (iii)
applies to statutory options granted on
or after January 1, 2010.
*
*
*
*
*
Linda E. Stiff,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and
Enforcement.
Approved: November 9, 2009.
Michael F. Mundaca,
Acting Assistant Secretary of the Treasury
(Tax Policy).
[FR Doc. E9–27452 Filed 11–16–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[TD 9470]
RIN 1545–BH69
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Final regulations.
SUMMARY: This document contains the
final regulations relating to the return
and information statement requirements
under section 6039 of the Internal
Revenue Code (Code). These regulations
reflect changes to section 6039 made by
section 403 of the Tax Relief and Health
Care Act of 2006. These regulations
affect corporations that issue statutory
stock options and provide guidance to
assist corporations in complying with
the return and information statement
requirements under section 6039.
DATES: Effective Date: These regulations
are effective on November 17, 2009.
Applicability Date: For dates of
applicability, see §§ 1.6039–1(g) and
1.6039–2(e).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Thomas Scholz or Ilya Enkishev at (202)
622–6030 (not a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Paperwork Reduction Act
The collection of information
contained in these regulations has been
reviewed and approved by the Office of
Management and Budget in accordance
with the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. 3507(d)) under control
number 1545–2129. Responses to this
collection of information are required to
assist taxpayers with the completion of
their income tax returns for the taxable
year in which a disposition of stock
acquired under a statutory option
occurs.
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
unless the collection of information
displays a valid control number
assigned by the Office of Management
and Budget.
Books or records relating to a
collection of information must be
retained as long as their contents may
become material in the administration
of any internal revenue law. Generally,
tax returns and tax return information
are confidential, as required by 26
U.S.C. 6103.
E:\FR\FM\17NOR1.SGM
17NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 220 (Tuesday, November 17, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 59074-59087]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-27452]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[TD 9471]
RIN 1545-BH68
Employee Stock Purchase Plans Under Internal Revenue Code Section
423
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.
ACTION: Final regulations.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document contains the final regulations relating to
options granted under an employee stock purchase plan as defined in
section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code (Code). These final
regulations affect certain taxpayers who participate in the transfer of
stock pursuant to the exercise of options granted under an employee
stock purchase plan. These final regulations provide guidance to assist
taxpayers in complying with section 423 in addition to clarifying
certain rules regarding options granted under an employee stock
purchase plan. This document also contains final regulations under
sections 421, 422 and 424 of the Code.
DATES: Effective Date: These regulations are effective on November 17,
2009.
Applicability Date: These regulations apply as of January 1, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas Scholz or Ilya Enkishev at
(202) 622-6030 (not a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
This document contains final amendments to the Income Tax
Regulations (26 CFR part 1) under sections 421, 422, 423 and 424 of the
Code.
Section 423 was added to the Code by section 221(a) of the Revenue
Act of 1964, Public Law 88-272 (78 Stat. 63 (1964)). Changes to the
applicable law concerning section 423 were made by sections
1402(b)(1)(C) and 1402(b)(2) of the Tax Reform Act of 1976, Public Law
94-455 (90 Stat. 1731 and 1732-1733 (1976)); section 1001(b)(5) of the
Deficit Reduction Act of 1984, Public Law 98-369 (98 Stat. 1011
(1984)); section 1114 of the Tax Reform Act of 1986, Public Law 99-514
(100 Stat. 2451 (1986)); and sections 11801(c)(9)(D)(i), (ii) and
11801(c)(9)(E) of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990, Public
Law 101-508 (104 Stat. 1388-525 (1990)).
Regulations under section 423 were published in the Federal
Register on June 23, 1966 (TD 6887). These
[[Page 59075]]
regulations were amended on September 27, 1979 (TD 7645), October 31,
1980 (TD 7728), and December 1, 1988 (TD 8235). In Notice 2004-55
(2004-34 IRB 319 (August 23, 2004)) (see Sec. 601.601(d)(2)(ii)(b)),
the IRS and the Treasury Department requested comments concerning
whether the existing regulations under section 423 should be amended,
and if so, what issues should be addressed.
On July 29, 2008, the Treasury Department published a notice of
proposed rulemaking (REG-106251-08) in the Federal Register (73 FR
43875) under section 423. A public hearing on the proposed regulations
was held on January 15, 2009. Written and electronic comments
responding to the notice of proposed rulemaking were received. After
consideration of these comments, the Treasury Department adopts the
proposed regulations as final regulations, with the modifications set
forth in this Treasury decision. The significant revisions are
discussed in this preamble.
In general, the income tax treatment of the grant of an option to
purchase stock in connection with the performance of services and of
the transfer of stock pursuant to the exercise of the option is
determined under section 83 and the regulations thereunder. However,
section 421 provides special rules for determining the income tax
treatment of the transfer of shares of stock pursuant to the exercise
of an option if the requirements of sections 422(a) or 423(a), as
applicable, are met. Section 422 applies to incentive stock options and
section 423 applies to options granted under an employee stock purchase
plan (collectively, statutory options).
Under section 421, if a share of stock is transferred to an
individual pursuant to the exercise of a statutory option, there is no
income at the time of exercise of the option with respect to the
transfer and no deduction under section 162 is allowed to the employer
corporation with respect to the transfer.
Section 423(a) provides that section 421 applies to the transfer of
stock to an individual pursuant to the exercise of an option granted
under an employee stock purchase plan if: (i) No disposition of the
stock is made within two years from the date of grant of the option or
within one year from the date of transfer of the share, and (ii) at all
times during the period beginning on the date of grant and ending on
the day three months before the exercise of the option, the individual
is an employee of either the corporation granting the option or a
parent or subsidiary of such corporation, or a corporation (or a parent
or subsidiary of such corporation) issuing or assuming a stock option
in a transaction to which section 424(a) applies. Section 423(b) sets
forth several requirements that must be met for a plan to qualify as an
employee stock purchase plan. Section 423(c) provides a special rule
that is applicable where the option exercise price is between 85 and
100 percent of the fair market value of the stock at the time the
option was granted.
Explanation of Provisions
These final regulations provide a comprehensive set of rules
governing stock options issued under an employee stock purchase plan
and incorporate substantially all of the rules contained in the
existing regulations under section 423. These final regulations are
comprised of two sections: Section 1.423-1, applicability of section
421(a); and Sec. 1.423-2, employee stock purchase plan defined. The
modifications to the proposed regulations that are included in these
final regulations reflect consideration of the comments submitted by
taxpayers.
1. General Requirements
The proposed regulations provide that an employee stock purchase
plan must meet the requirements of paragraphs (i) through (ix) of Sec.
1.423-2(a)(2) to qualify as an employee stock purchase plan under
section 423(b). The proposed regulations also provide that the
requirements of paragraphs (iii) through (ix) of Sec. 1.423-2(a)(2)
may be satisfied by the terms of the plan or an offering made under the
plan. The final regulations adopt these requirements of the proposed
regulations, although the numerical designation of the requirements is
modified. To emphasize that the requirements of paragraphs (iii)
through (ix) of Sec. 1.423-2(a)(2) of the proposed regulations may be
satisfied by the terms of the plan or an offering made under the plan,
these final regulations separately list these requirements in Sec.
1.423-2(a)(3).
Commenters requested clarification of whether options with terms
that are inconsistent with the terms of the plan will be eligible for
the special tax treatment of section 421. As provided in Sec. 1.423-
2(a)(3) of the proposed regulations, Sec. 1.423-2(a)(4) of these final
regulations provides that, if the terms of an option are inconsistent
with the terms of the employee stock purchase plan or an offering under
the plan, then the option will not be treated as granted under an
employee stock purchase plan. However, an option may still qualify for
the special tax treatment of section 421, even if the terms of the plan
are inconsistent with any of the requirements in Sec. 1.423-2(a)(3) of
these final regulations, if the option is granted under an offering
with terms that comply with the requirements of Sec. 1.423-2(a)(3).
Example 2 of Sec. 1.423-2(e)(6) of these final regulations illustrates
this principle.
2. Offerings Under an Employee Stock Purchase Plan
These final regulations provide further guidance for employee stock
purchase plans under which more than one offering is made. As set forth
in Sec. 1.423-2(a)(1) of these final regulations, one or more
offerings may be made under a plan and the offerings may be consecutive
or overlapping. Further, pursuant to section 423(b) and its flush
language, the terms of each offering need not be identical. Although
the terms of each offering need not be identical, the terms of the plan
and each offering together must satisfy the requirements of Sec.
1.423-2(a)(2) and (3) of these final regulations. For example, if
overlapping offerings are made under an employee stock purchase plan,
then each offering may contain different terms, provided that the terms
of each offering (together with the plan) satisfy the requirements of
Sec. 1.423-2(a)(3) of these final regulations. Furthermore, when a
parent corporation adopts an employee stock purchase plan, it may
establish separate offerings with different terms under the plan and
designate which subsidiary corporations of the parent corporation may
participate in a particular offering, provided that the terms of each
offering (together with the plan) satisfy the requirements of Sec.
1.423-2(a)(3). The terms ``parent corporation'' and ``subsidiary
corporation'' are defined in Sec. 1.424-1(f) of the regulations.
a. Employees Covered by the Plan
Paragraphs (i) through (iv) of Sec. 1.423-2(e)(1) of the proposed
regulations and these final regulations set forth the categories of
employees that may be excluded from coverage under an employee stock
purchase plan or an offering under the plan. The proposed regulations
provide that the exclusions for various categories of employees must be
applied in an identical manner to all employees of every corporation
whose employees are granted options under the plan. Commenters noted
that the requirement of identical exclusions for all offerings under a
plan constrains the ability to make future and overlapping offerings
that are more (or less) inclusive than prior offerings under the plan.
Commenters suggested that the final regulations should permit multiple
[[Page 59076]]
offerings under a plan with different exclusions applicable to the one
or more corporations whose employees participate in the particular
offering under the plan.
These final regulations generally adopt the approach suggested by
the commenters. Pursuant to these final regulations, whether the terms
of a plan and offering satisfy the requirements of Sec. 1.423-2(e) is
made on an offering-by-offering basis. The terms of each offering under
a plan may be different, provided the plan and offering together
satisfy the requirements of Sec. 1.423-2(a)(2) and (3) of these final
regulations. With respect to satisfying the requirements of Sec.
1.423-2(e), the terms of each offering may provide different exclusions
of employees, as permitted and within the limitations described in
Sec. 1.423-2(e)(1), (2) and (3) of these final regulations. The
exclusions established with respect to a particular offering must be
applied in an identical manner to all employees of every corporation
whose employees are granted options under that particular offering.
Examples 7 and 8 of Sec. 1.423-2(e)(6) of these final regulations
illustrate these principles.
Some commenters suggested that the final regulations permit
employers to exclude from plan participation employees who are
nonresident aliens and who receive no earned income that constitutes
income from sources within the United States. Other commenters
suggested that the final regulations permit employers to exclude from
plan participation employees under a specified age. The IRS and the
Treasury Department are aware of the complexities often associated with
participation in an employee stock purchase plan by nonresident aliens
and employees under a specified age, such as the age of majority.
However, section 423 does not provide exclusions for nonresident aliens
or employees under a specified age. Accordingly, the IRS and the
Treasury Department are constrained by statutory authority from
providing a general exclusion from plan participation for employees who
are nonresident aliens or employees under a specified age.
One commenter suggested that the final regulations provide
additional flexibility by permitting employers to exclude from plan
participation highly compensated employees (HCEs) (within the meaning
of section 414(q)) on any basis. Section 1.423-2(e)(2)(ii) of the
proposed regulations provides that the terms of an employee stock
purchase plan may exclude HCEs: (a) with compensation above a certain
level, or (b) who are officers or subject to the disclosure
requirements of section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
provided the exclusion is applied in an identical manner to all HCEs of
every corporation whose employees are granted options under the plan.
These final regulations do not adopt the suggestion that HCEs may be
excluded from participation in an employee stock purchase plan on any
basis. Instead, these final regulations offer some additional
flexibility by providing that, with respect to the exclusion of HCEs,
the terms of each offering made under a plan need not be identical with
respect to the HCEs, provided the HCEs are excluded as permitted and
within the limitations described in Sec. 1.423-2(e)(2)(ii) of these
final regulations.
b. Equal Rights and Privileges
Commenters further suggested that the final regulations provide
flexibility by permitting employers to make multiple offerings with
different rights and privileges applicable to the participants of each
offering under a plan. These final regulations generally adopt the
approach suggested by the commenters. Pursuant to these final
regulations, the determination of whether the terms of an offering
satisfy the requirements of Sec. 1.423-2(f) is made on an offering-by-
offering basis. The terms of each offering under a plan may be
different, provided the plan and offering together satisfy the
requirements of Sec. 1.423-2(a)(2) and (3) of these final regulations.
However, the rights and privileges established with respect to a
particular offering must be applied in an identical manner to all
employees of every corporation whose employees are granted options
under that particular offering. Examples 4 and 5 of Sec. 1.423-2(f)(7)
of these final regulations illustrate these principles.
3. Maximum Number of Shares That May Be Purchased By an Employee
Commenters asked whether the designation of a maximum number of
shares that may be purchased by an employee during the offering is
necessary in order for the first day of the offering period to be the
date of grant. Consistent with the proposed regulations, Sec. 1.423-
2(h)(3) of these final regulations provides that the date of grant will
be the first day of an offering period if the terms of an employee
stock purchase plan or offering designate a maximum number of shares
that may be purchased by each employee during the offering. Similarly,
the date of grant will be the first day of an offering if the terms of
the plan or offering require the application of a formula to establish,
on the first day of the offering, the maximum number of shares that may
be purchased by each employee during the offering.
However, Sec. 1.423-2(h)(3) of these final regulations does not
require that an employee stock purchase plan or offering designate a
maximum number of shares that may be purchased by each employee during
the offering or incorporate a formula to establish a maximum number of
shares that may be purchased by each employee during the offering. If
the maximum number of shares that can be purchased under an option is
not fixed or determinable until the date the option is exercised, then
the date of exercise will be the date of grant of the option. As
discussed in the preamble to the proposed regulations, the $25,000
limit under section 423(b)(8) and the limit on the aggregate number of
shares that may be issued under an employee stock purchase plan are not
sufficient to establish the maximum number of shares that can be
purchased by an employee under an option so that the date of grant will
be the first day of the offering. Examples 1, 2, 3 and 4 in Sec.
1.423-2(h)(4) of these final regulations illustrate these principles.
Commenters also asked whether any particular number of shares is
necessary to satisfy the requirement to designate a maximum number of
shares that may be purchased during the offering in order for the first
day of the offering period to be the date of grant. No particular
number of shares is necessary to satisfy this requirement and establish
the first day of the offering period as the date of grant for the
option. These final regulations adopt Sec. 1.423-2(h)(3) of the
proposed regulations to provide that the designation of any maximum
number of shares is sufficient to establish the first day of the
offering period as the date of grant for the option.
4. Annual $25,000 Limitation
Section 423(b)(8) provides that an employee stock purchase plan
must, by its terms, provide that no employee may be permitted to accrue
the right to purchase stock under all the employee stock purchase plans
of his or her employer corporation and its related corporations at a
rate which exceeds $25,000 in fair market value of the stock
(determined on the date of grant) for each calendar year in which an
option granted to the employee is outstanding. Section 423(b)(8)(A)
provides that the right to purchase stock under an option accrues when
the option first becomes exercisable.
In drafting the proposed regulations, the Treasury Department and
the IRS were aware that taxpayers were interpreting the $25,000
limitation
[[Page 59077]]
inconsistently. Certain taxpayers interpreted section 423(b)(8) to mean
that the limit increases by $25,000 for each calendar year during which
the option is outstanding and exercisable; other taxpayers interpreted
the sections to mean that such limit increases for each calendar year
during which the option is simply outstanding. Consistent with comments
received by the Treasury Department and the IRS in response to Notice
2004-55 (2004-34 IRB 319 (August 23, 2004)), (see Sec.
601.601(d)(2)(ii)(b)), the proposed regulations adopted an approach
that was generally consistent with the $100,000 limitation for
incentive stock options and interpreted section 423(b)(8) to mean that
the limit increases by $25,000 for each calendar year during which the
option is outstanding and exercisable.
In response to the proposed regulations, several commenters
suggested that the Treasury Department and the IRS reconsider the
calculation of the $25,000 limitation in section 423(b)(8). Commenters
suggested that the regulations adopt an approach that permits an option
to accrue at a rate of $25,000 for each calendar year that the option
is simply outstanding. Specifically, even though section 423(b)(8)(A)
provides that the right to purchase stock actually accrues when the
option first becomes exercisable during a calendar year, the first
sentence of section 423(b)(8) provides that the limit on accruals is
$25,000 ``for each year in which such option is outstanding.'' Upon
further consideration and in response to the foregoing comments, these
final regulations modify Sec. 1.423-2(i) of the proposed regulations
to provide that the limit increases by $25,000 for each calendar year
that an option is outstanding. Example 5 in Sec. 1.423-2(i)(5) of
these final regulations has been modified to illustrate this principle.
5. Stockholder Approval Requirements
To qualify as an employee stock purchase plan, section 423(b)(2)
requires that the plan be approved by the stockholders of the granting
corporation within 12 months before or after the date the plan is
adopted. These final regulations clarify that new stockholder approval
is required if there is a change in the shares with respect to which
options are issued or a change in the granting corporation. In
particular, these final regulations clarify that the stockholders of a
subsidiary corporation include the parent corporation and any other
stockholders of the subsidiary. Accordingly, these final regulations
adopt Example 1(iii) in Sec. 1.423-2(c)(5) and Example 1(iii) in Sec.
1.422-2(b)(6) of the proposed regulations.
One commenter to the proposed regulations suggested that a
conforming change be made to Example 9(iii) in Sec. 1.424-1(a)(10)
which addresses the substitution of options in the context of an
acquisition. Example 9(iii) in Sec. 1.424-1(a)(10), as previously set
forth in the regulations, requires the stockholders of an acquiring
company to approve an amendment of the option plan of an acquired
corporate subsidiary to issue parent stock instead of subsidiary stock.
The commenter proposed that the example be amended to require the
acquiring company (instead of its stockholders) to approve the
amendment of the option plan to issue parent stock instead of
subsidiary stock. This amendment is consistent with Example 1(iii) in
Sec. 1.423-2(c)(5) and Example 1(iii) in Sec. 1.422-2(b)(6) of these
final regulations. Accordingly, Example 9(iii) in Sec. 1.424-1(a)(10)
of these final regulations has been modified to reflect the adoption of
the commenter's suggestion.
Effective/Applicability Date
These regulations apply as of January 1, 2010, and will apply to
any statutory option granted on or after that date. Taxpayers may rely
on these final regulations for the treatment of any statutory option
granted prior to January 1, 2010.
Special Analyses
It has been determined that this Treasury decision is not a
significant regulatory action as defined in Executive Order 12866.
Therefore, a regulatory assessment is not required. It also has been
determined that section 553(b) of the Administrative Procedure Act (5
U.S.C. chapter 5) does not apply to these regulations and because the
regulations do not impose a collection of information on small
entities, the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6) does not
apply. Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the Code, the notice of proposed
rulemaking preceding these regulations was submitted to the Chief
Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration for comment
on its impact on small business.
Drafting Information
The principal authors of these regulations are Thomas Scholz and
Ilya Enkishev, Office of the Division Counsel/Associate Chief Counsel
(Tax Exempt and Government Entities). However, other personnel from the
IRS and the Treasury Department participated in their development.
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1
Income taxes, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Adoption of Amendments to the Regulations
0
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is amended as follows:
PART 1--INCOME TAXES
0
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 1 continues to read in
part as follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805.
0
Par. 2. Section 1.421-1, paragraphs (c)(1) and (j)(1) are revised to
read as follows:
Sec. 1.421-1 Meaning and use of certain terms.
* * * * *
(c) Time and date of granting option. (1) For purposes of this
section and Sec. Sec. 1.421-2 through 1.424-1, the language ``the date
of the granting of the option'' and ``the time such option is
granted,'' and similar phrases refer to the date or time when the
granting corporation completes the corporate action constituting an
offer of stock for sale to an individual under the terms and conditions
of a statutory option. Except as set forth in Sec. 1.423-2(h)(2), a
corporate action constituting an offer of stock for sale is not
considered complete until the date on which the maximum number of
shares that can be purchased under the option and the minimum option
price are fixed or determinable.
* * * * *
(j) Effective/applicability date--(1) In general. Except for
paragraph (c)(1) of this section, the regulations under this section
are effective on August 3, 2004. Paragraph (c)(1) of this section is
effective on November 17, 2009. Paragraph (c)(1) of this section
applies to statutory options granted on or after January 1, 2010.
* * * * *
0
Par. 3. Section 1.422-2, paragraph (b)(6), Example 1 (iii) is revised
to read as follows:
Sec. 1.422-2 Incentive stock options defined.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(6) * * *
Example 1. * * *
(iii) Assume the same facts as in paragraph (i) of this Example
1, except that the plan was adopted on January 1, 2010. Assume
further that the plan was approved by the stockholders of S (in this
case, P) on March 1, 2010. On January 1, 2012, S changes the plan to
provide that incentive stock options for P stock will be granted to
S employees
[[Page 59078]]
under the plan. Because there is a change in the stock available for
grant under the plan, the change is considered the adoption of a new
plan that must be approved by the stockholder of S (in this case, P)
within 12 months before or after January 1, 2012.
* * * * *
0
Par. 4. Section 1.422-5, paragraph (f)(1) is revised to read as
follows:
Sec. 1.422-5 Permissible provisions.
* * * * *
(f) Effective/applicability date--(1) In general. Except for Sec.
1.422-2(b)(6) Example 1 (iii), the regulations under this section are
effective on August 3, 2004. Section 1.422-2(b)(6) Example 1 (iii) is
effective on November 17, 2009. Section 1.422-2(b)(6) Example 1 (iii)
applies to statutory options granted on or after January 1, 2010.
* * * * *
0
Par. 5. Section 1.423-1 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 1.423-1 Applicability of section 421(a).
(a) General rule. Subject to the provisions of section 423(c) and
Sec. 1.423-2(k), the special rules of income tax treatment provided in
section 421(a) apply with respect to the transfer of a share of stock
to an individual pursuant to the individual's exercise of an option
granted under an employee stock purchase plan, as defined in Sec.
1.423-2, if the following conditions are satisfied--
(1) The individual makes no disposition of such share before the
later of the expiration of the two-year period from the date of the
grant of the option pursuant to which such share was transferred or the
expiration of the one-year period from the date of transfer of such
share to the individual; and
(2) At all times during the period beginning on the date of the
grant of the option and ending on the day three months before the date
of exercise, the individual was an employee of the corporation granting
the option, a related corporation, or a corporation (or a related
corporation) substituting or assuming the stock option in a transaction
to which section 424(a) applies.
(b) Cross-references. For rules relating to the requisite
employment relationship, see Sec. 1.421-1(h). For rules relating to
the effect of a disqualifying disposition, see section 421(b) and Sec.
1.421-2(b). For the definition of the term ``disposition,'' see section
424(c) and Sec. 1.424-1(c). For the definition of the term ``related
corporation,'' see Sec. 1.421-1(i).
(c) Effective/applicability date. The regulations under this
section are effective on November 17, 2009. The regulations under this
section apply to options granted under an employee stock purchase plan
on or after January 1, 2010.
0
Par. 6. Section 1.423-2 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 1.423-2 Employee stock purchase plan defined.
(a) In general--(1) The term ``employee stock purchase'' plan means
a plan that meets the requirements of paragraphs (a)(2) and (a)(3) of
this section. If the terms of the plan do not satisfy the requirements
of paragraph (a)(3) of this section, then such requirements may be
satisfied by the terms of an offering made under the plan. However,
where the requirements of paragraph (a)(3) of this section are
satisfied by the terms of an offering, such requirements will be
treated as satisfied only with respect to options exercised under that
offering. One or more offerings may be made under an employee stock
purchase plan. Offerings may be consecutive or overlapping, and the
terms of each offering need not be identical provided the terms of the
plan and the offering together satisfy the requirements of paragraphs
(a)(2) and (a)(3) of this section. The plan and the terms of an
offering must be in writing or electronic form, provided that such
writing or electronic form is adequate to establish the terms of the
plan or offering, as applicable.
(2) To satisfy the requirements of this paragraph (a)(2) and Sec.
1.423-1, the plan must meet both of the following requirements--
(i) The plan must provide that options can be granted only to
employees of the employer corporation or of a related corporation (as
defined in paragraph (i) of Sec. 1.421-1) to purchase stock in any
such corporation (see paragraph (b) of this section); and
(ii) The plan must be approved by the stockholders of the granting
corporation within 12 months before or after the date the plan is
adopted (see paragraph (c) of this section).
(3) To satisfy the requirements of this paragraph (a)(3) and Sec.
1.423-1, the terms of the plan or offering must meet all of the
following requirements--
(i) An employee cannot be granted an option if, immediately after
the option is granted, the employee owns stock possessing 5 percent or
more of the total combined voting power or value of all classes of
stock of the employer corporation or of a related corporation (see
paragraph (d) of this section);
(ii) Options must be granted to all employees of any corporation
whose employees are granted any options by reason of their employment
by the corporation (see paragraph (e) of this section);
(iii) All employees granted options must have the same rights and
privileges (see paragraph (f) of this section);
(iv) The option price cannot be less than the lesser of--
(A) An amount equal to 85 percent of the fair market value of the
stock at the time the option is granted, or
(B) An amount not less than 85 percent of the fair market value of
the stock at the time the option is exercised (see paragraph (g) of
this section).
(v) Options cannot be exercised after the expiration of--
(A) Five years from the date the option is granted if, under the
terms of such plan, the option price cannot be less than 85 percent of
the fair market value of the stock at the time the option is exercised,
or
(B) Twenty-seven months from the date the option is granted, if the
option price is not determined in the manner described in paragraph
(a)(3)(v)(A) of this section (see paragraph (h) of this section).
(vi) No employee may be granted an option that permits the
employee's rights to purchase stock under all employee stock purchase
plans of the employer corporation and its related corporations to
accrue at a rate that exceeds $25,000 of fair market value of the stock
(determined at the time the option is granted) for each calendar year
in which the option is outstanding at any time (see paragraph (i) of
this section); and
(vii) Options are not transferable by the optionee other than by
will or the laws of descent and distribution, and are exercisable,
during the lifetime of the optionee, only by the optionee (see
paragraph (j) of this section).
(4) The determination of whether a particular option is an option
granted under an employee stock purchase plan is made at the time the
option is granted. If the terms of an option are inconsistent with the
terms of the employee stock purchase plan or the offering under the
plan pursuant to which the option is granted, the option will not be
treated as granted under an employee stock purchase plan. If an option
with terms that are inconsistent with the terms of the plan or an
offering under the plan is granted to an employee who is entitled to
the grant of an option under the terms of the plan or offering, and the
employee is not granted an option under the offering that qualifies as
an option granted under an employee stock purchase plan, the
[[Page 59079]]
offering will not meet the requirements of paragraph (e) of this
section. Accordingly, none of the options granted under the offering
will be eligible for the special tax treatment of section 421. However,
if an option with terms that are inconsistent with the terms of the
plan or an offering under the plan is granted to an individual who is
not entitled to the grant of an option under the terms of the plan or
offering, the option will not be treated as an option granted under an
employee stock purchase plan but the grant of the option will not
disqualify the options granted under the plan or offering. If, at the
time of grant, an option qualifies as an option granted under an
employee stock purchase plan, but after the time of grant one or more
of the requirements of paragraph (a)(3) of this section is not
satisfied with respect to the option, the option will not be treated as
granted under an employee stock purchase plan but this failure to
comply with the terms of the option will not disqualify the other
options granted under the plan or offering.
(5) Examples. The following examples illustrate the principles of
paragraph (a):
Example 1. Corporation A operates an employee stock purchase
plan under which options for A stock are granted to employees of A.
The terms of an offering provide that the option price will be 90
percent of the fair market value of A stock on the date of exercise.
A grants an option under the offering to Employee Z, an employee of
A. The terms of the option provide that the option price will be 85
percent of the fair market value of A stock on the date of exercise.
Because the terms of Z's option are inconsistent with the terms of
the offering, the option granted to Z will not be treated as an
option granted under the employee stock purchase plan. Further,
unless Z is granted an option under the offering that qualifies as
an option granted under the employee stock purchase plan, the
offering will not meet the requirements of paragraph (e) of this
section and none of the options granted under the offering will be
eligible for the special tax treatment of section 421.
Example 2. Corporation B operates an employee stock purchase
plan that provides that options for B stock may only be granted to
employees of B. Under the terms of the plan, options may not be
granted to consultants and other non-employees. B grants an option
to Consultant Y, a consultant of B. Because Y is ineligible to
receive an option under the plan because Y is not an employee, the
grant of the option to Y is inconsistent with the terms of the plan
and the option granted to Y will not be treated as an option granted
under the employee stock purchase plan. However, the grant of the
option to Y will not disqualify the options granted under the plan
or any offering because Y was not entitled to the grant of an option
under the plan.
Example 3. Corporation C operates an employee stock purchase
plan under which options for C stock are granted to employees of C.
C grants an option pursuant to an offering under the plan to
Employee X, an employee of C who is a highly compensated employee.
The terms of the employee stock purchase plan exclude highly
compensated employees from participation in the plan. Because X is
ineligible to receive an option under the plan by reason of X's
exclusion from participation in the plan, the option granted to X
will not be treated as an option granted under the employee stock
purchase plan. However, the grant of the option to X will not
disqualify the options granted under the plan or offering because X
was not entitled to the grant of an option under the plan.
Example 4. Corporation D operates an employee stock purchase
plan under which options for D stock are granted to employees of D.
D grants an option pursuant to an offering under the plan to
Employee W, an employee of D. The terms of the option provide that
the option price will be 90 percent of the fair market value of D
stock on the date of exercise. On the date of exercise, W pays only
85 percent of the fair market value of D stock. Because the terms of
W's option are not satisfied, the option granted to W will not be
treated as an option granted under the employee stock purchase plan.
However, the failure to comply with the terms of the option granted
to W will not disqualify the options granted under the plan or
offering.
(b) Options restricted to employees. An employee stock purchase
plan must provide that options can be granted only to employees of the
employer corporation (or employees of its related corporations) to
purchase stock in the employer corporation (or one of its related
corporations). If such a provision is not included in the terms of the
plan, the plan will not be an employee stock purchase plan and options
granted under the plan will not qualify for the special tax treatment
of section 421. For rules relating to the employment requirement, see
Sec. 1.421-1(h).
(c) Stockholder approval--(1) An employee stock purchase plan must
be approved by the stockholders of the granting corporation within 12
months before or after the date such plan is adopted. The approval of
the stockholders must comply with all applicable provisions of the
corporate charter and bylaws and of applicable State law prescribing
the method and degree of stockholder approval required for the issuance
of corporate stock or options. If the applicable State law does not
prescribe a method and degree of stockholder approval, then an employee
stock purchase plan must be approved--
(i) By a majority of the votes cast at a duly held stockholder's
meeting at which a quorum representing a majority of all outstanding
voting stock is, either in person or by proxy, present and voting on
the plan; or
(ii) By a method and in a degree that would be treated as adequate
under applicable State law in the case of an action requiring
stockholder approval (such as, an action on which stockholders would be
entitled to vote if the action were taken at a duly held stockholders'
meeting).
(2) For purposes of the stockholder approval required by this
paragraph (c), ordinarily, a plan is adopted when it is approved by the
granting corporation's board of directors, and the date of the board's
action is the reference point for determining whether stockholder
approval occurs within the applicable 24-month period. However, if the
board's action is subject to a condition (such as stockholder approval)
or the happening of a particular event, the plan is adopted on the date
the condition is met or the event occurs, unless the board's resolution
fixes the date of adoption as the date of the board's action.
(3) An employee stock purchase plan, as adopted and approved, must
designate the maximum aggregate number of shares that may be issued
under the plan, and the corporations or class of corporations whose
employees may be offered options under the plan. A plan that merely
provides that the number of shares that may be issued under the plan
may not exceed a stated percentage of the shares outstanding at the
time of each offering or grant under the plan does not satisfy the
requirements of this paragraph (c)(3). However, the maximum aggregate
number of shares that may be issued under the plan may be stated in
terms of a percentage of the authorized, issued, or outstanding shares
on the date of the adoption of the plan. The plan may specify that the
maximum aggregate number of shares available for grants under the plan
may increase annually by a specified percentage of the authorized,
issued, or outstanding shares on the date of the adoption of the plan.
A plan that provides that the maximum aggregate number of shares that
may be issued as options under the plan may change based on any other
specific circumstances satisfies the requirements of this paragraph
only if the stockholders approve an immediately determinable maximum
number of shares that may be issued under the plan in any event. If
there is more than one employee stock purchase plan under which options
may be granted and stockholders of the granting corporation merely
approve a maximum aggregate number of shares that are
[[Page 59080]]
available for issuance under the plans, the stockholder approval
requirements described in paragraph (c)(1) of this section are not
satisfied. A separate maximum aggregate number of shares available for
issuance pursuant to options must be specified and approved for each
plan.
(4) Once an employee stock purchase plan is approved by the
stockholders of the granting corporation, the plan need not be
reapproved by the stockholders of the granting corporation unless the
plan is amended or changed in a manner that is considered the adoption
of a new plan, in which case the plan must be reapproved within the
prescribed 24-month period. Any increase in the aggregate number of
shares that may be issued under the plan (other than an increase merely
reflecting a change in the number of outstanding shares, such as a
stock dividend or stock split) will be considered the adoption of a new
plan requiring stockholder approval within the prescribed 24-month
period. Similarly, a change in the designation of corporations whose
employees may be offered options under the plan will be considered the
adoption of a new plan requiring stockholder approval within the
prescribed 24-month period unless the plan provides that designations
of participating corporations may be made from time to time from among
a group consisting of the granting corporation and its related
corporations. The group from among which such changes and designations
are permitted without additional stockholder approval may include
corporations having become parents or subsidiaries of the granting
corporation after the adoption and approval of the plan. In addition, a
change in the granting corporation or the stock available for purchase
under the plan will be considered the adoption of a new plan requiring
stockholder approval within the prescribed 24-month period. Any other
changes in the terms of an employee stock purchase plan are not
considered the adoption of a new plan and, thus, do not require
stockholder approval.
(5) Examples. The following examples illustrate the principles of
this paragraph (c):
Example 1. (i) Corporation E is a subsidiary of Corporation F, a
publicly traded corporation. On January 1, 2010, E adopts an
employee stock purchase plan under which options for E stock are
granted to E employees.
(ii) To meet the requirements of paragraph (c)(1) of this
section, the plan must be approved by the stockholders of E (in this
case, F) within 12 months before or after January 1, 2010.
(iii) Assume the same facts as in paragraph (i) of this Example
1, except that the plan was approved by the stockholders of E (in
this case, F) on March 1, 2010. On January 1, 2012, E changes the
plan to provide that options for F stock will be granted to E
employees under the plan. Because there is a change in the stock
available for grant under the plan, under paragraph (c)(4) of this
section, the change is considered the adoption of a new plan that
must be approved by the stockholders of E (in this case, F) within
12 months before or after January 1, 2012.
Example 2. (i) Assume the same facts as in paragraph (i) of
Example 1, except that on March 15, 2011, F completely disposes of
its interest in E. Thereafter, E continues to grant options for E
stock to E employees under the plan.
(ii) The new E options are granted under a plan that meets the
stockholder approval requirements of paragraph (c)(1) of this
section without regard to whether E seeks approval of the plan from
the stockholders of E after F disposes of its interest in E.
(iii) Assume the same facts as in paragraph (i) of this Example
2, except that under the plan as adopted on January 1, 2010, only
options for F stock are granted to E employees. Assume further that,
after F disposes of its interest in E, E changes the plan to provide
for the grant of options for E stock to E employees. Because there
is a change in the stock available for purchase or grant under the
plan, under paragraph (c)(4) of this section, the stockholders of E
must approve the plan within 12 months before or after the change to
the plan to meet the stockholder approval requirements of paragraph
(c) of this section.
Example 3. (i) Corporation G maintains an employee stock
purchase plan providing options for G stock. Corporation H does not
maintain an employee stock purchase plan. On May 15, 2010, G and H
consolidate under State law to form one corporation. The new
corporation is named Corporation H. The consolidation agreement
describes the G plan, including the maximum aggregate number of
shares available for issuance under the plan after the
consolidation. Additionally, the consolidation agreement states that
the plan will be continued by H after the consolidation. The
consolidation agreement is approved by the stockholders of G and H
on May 1, 2010. H assumes the plan formerly maintained by G and
continues to grant options under the plan to all eligible employees,
but the options are for H stock.
(ii) Because there is a change in the granting corporation (from
G to H) and the stock available for purchase, under paragraph (c)(4)
of this section, H is considered to have adopted a new plan. Because
the plan is fully described in the consolidation agreement,
including the maximum aggregate number of shares available for
issuance under the plan, the approval of the consolidation agreement
by the stockholders constitutes approval of the plan. Thus, the
stockholder approval of the consolidation agreement satisfies the
stockholder approval requirements of paragraph (c)(1) of this
section, and the plan is considered to be adopted by H and approved
by its stockholders on May 1, 2010.
Example 4. Corporation I adopts an employee stock purchase plan
on November 1, 2010. On that date, there are two million shares of I
stock outstanding. The plan provides that the maximum aggregate
number of shares that may be issued under the plan may not exceed 15
percent of the number of shares of I stock outstanding on November
1, 2010. Because the maximum aggregate number of shares that may be
issued under the plan is designated in the plan, the requirements of
paragraph (c)(3) of this section are met.
Example 5. (i) Corporation J adopts an employee stock purchase
plan on March 15, 2010. The plan provides that the maximum aggregate
number of shares of J stock available for issuance under the plan is
50,000, increased on each anniversary date of the adoption of the
plan by 5 percent of the then outstanding shares. Because the
maximum aggregate number of shares is not designated under the plan,
the requirements of paragraph (c)(3) of this section are not met.
(ii) Assume the same facts as in paragraph (i) of this Example
5, except that the plan provides that the maximum aggregate number
of shares available under the plan is the lesser of (a) 50,000
shares, increased each anniversary date of the adoption of the plan
by 5 percent of the then-outstanding shares, or (b) 200,000 shares.
Because the maximum aggregate number of shares that may be issued
under the plan is designated as the lesser of two numbers, one of
which provides an immediately determinable maximum aggregate number
of shares that may be issued under the plan in any event, the
requirements of paragraph (c)(3) of this section are met.
(d) Options granted to certain shareholders--(1) An employee stock
purchase plan or offering must, by its terms, provide that an employee
cannot be granted an option if the employee, immediately after the
option is granted, owns stock possessing 5 percent or more of the total
combined voting power or value of all classes of stock of the employer
corporation or a related corporation. In determining whether the stock
ownership of an employee equals or exceeds this 5 percent limit, the
rules of section 424(d) (relating to attribution of stock ownership)
shall apply, and stock that the employee may purchase under outstanding
options (whether or not the options qualify for the special tax
treatment afforded by section 421(a)) shall be treated as stock owned
by the employee. An option is outstanding for purposes of this
paragraph (d) although under its terms it may be exercised only in
installments or after the expiration of a fixed period of time. If an
option is granted to an employee whose stock ownership (as determined
under this paragraph (d)) exceeds the limitation set forth in this
paragraph (d), no portion of the option will be treated as having been
granted under an employee stock purchase plan.
[[Page 59081]]
(2) The determination of the percentage of the total combined
voting power or value of all classes of stock of the employer
corporation (or a related corporation) that is owned by the employee is
made by comparing the voting power or value of the shares owned (or
treated as owned) by the employee to the aggregate voting power or
value of all shares actually issued and outstanding immediately after
the grant of the option to the employee. The aggregate voting power or
value of all shares actually issued and outstanding immediately after
the grant of the option does not include the voting power or value of
treasury shares or shares authorized for issue under outstanding
options held by the employee or any other person.
(3) Examples. The following examples illustrate the principles this
paragraph (d):
Example 1. Employee V, an employee of Corporation K, owns 6,000
shares of K common stock, the only class of K stock outstanding. K
has 100,000 shares of its common stock outstanding. Because V owns 6
percent of the combined voting power or value of all classes of K
stock, K cannot grant an option to V under K's employee stock
purchase plan. If V's father and brother each owned 3,000 shares of
K stock and V did not own any K stock, then the result would be the
same because, under section 424(d), an individual is treated as
owning stock held by the person's father and brother. Similarly, the
result would be the same if, instead of actually owning 6,000
shares, V merely held an option on 6,000 shares of K stock,
irrespective of whether the transfer of stock under the option could
qualify for the special tax treatment of section 421, because this
paragraph (d) provides that stock the employee may purchase under
outstanding options is treated as stock owned by such employee.
Example 2. Assume the same facts as in Example 1, except that K
is a 50 percent subsidiary corporation of Corporation L.
Irrespective of whether V owns any L stock, V cannot receive an
option from L under L's employee stock purchase plan because he owns
5 percent of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock
of a subsidiary of L, in this example, K. An employee who owns (or
is treated as owning) stock in excess of the limitation of this
paragraph (d), in any corporation in a group of related
corporations, consisting of a parent and its subsidiary
corporations, cannot receive an option under an employee stock
purchase plan from any corporation in the group.
Example 3. Employee U is an employee of Corporation M. M has
only one class of stock, of which 100,000 shares are issued and
outstanding. Assuming U does not own (and is not treated as owning)
any stock in M or in any related corporation of M, M may grant an
option to U under its employee stock purchase plan for 4,999 shares,
because immediately after the grant of the option, U would not own 5
percent or more of the combined voting power or value of all classes
of M stock actually issued and outstanding at such time. The 4,999
shares that U would be treated as owning under this paragraph (d)
would not be added to the 100,000 shares actually issued and
outstanding immediately after the grant for purposes of determining
whether U's stock ownership exceeds the limitation of this paragraph
(d).
Example 4. Assume the same facts as in Example 3 but instead of
an option for 4,999 shares, M grants U an option, purportedly under
its employee stock purchase plan, for 5,000 shares. No portion of
this option will be treated as granted under an employee stock
purchase plan because U's stock ownership exceeds the limitation of
this paragraph (d).
(e) Employees covered by plan--(1) Subject to the provisions of
this paragraph (e) and the limitations of paragraphs (d), (f) and (i)
of this section, an employee stock purchase plan or offering must, by
its terms, provide that options are to be granted to all employees of
any corporation whose employees are granted any of such options by
reason of their employment by that corporation, except that one or more
of the following categories of employees may be excluded from the
coverage of the plan or offering--
(i) Employees who have been employed less than two years;
(ii) Employees whose customary employment is 20 hours or less per
week;
(iii) Employees whose customary employment is for not more than
five months in any calendar year; and
(iv) Highly compensated employees (within the meaning of section
414(q)).
(2) A plan or offering does not fail to satisfy the coverage
provision of paragraph (e)(1) of this section in the following
circumstances--
(i) The plan or offering excludes employees who have completed a
shorter period of service or whose customary employment is for fewer
hours per week or fewer months in a calendar year than is specified in
paragraphs (e)(1)(i), (ii) and (iii) of this section, provided the
exclusion is applied in an identical manner to all employees of every
corporation whose employees are granted options under the plan or
offering.
(ii) The plan or offering excludes highly compensated employees
(within the meaning of section 414(q)) with compensation above a
certain level or who are officers or subject to the disclosure
requirements of section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
provided the exclusion is applied in an identical manner to all highly
compensated employees of every corporation whose employees are granted
options under the plan or offering.
(3) Notwithstanding paragraph (e)(1) of this section, employees who
are citizens or residents of a foreign jurisdiction (without regard to
whether they are also citizens of the United States or resident aliens
(within the meaning of section 7701(b)(1)(A))) may be excluded from the
coverage of an employee stock purchase plan or offering under the
following circumstances--
(i) The grant of an option under the plan or offering to a citizen
or resident of the foreign jurisdiction is prohibited under the laws of
such jurisdiction; or
(ii) Compliance with the laws of the foreign jurisdiction would
cause the plan or offering to violate the requirements of section 423.
(4) No option granted under a plan or offering that excludes from
participation any employees, other than those who may be excluded under
this paragraph (e), and those barred from participation by reason of
paragraphs (d), (f) and (i) of this section, can be regarded as having
been granted under an employee stock purchase plan. If an option is not
granted to any employee who is entitled to the grant of an option under
the terms of the plan or offering, none of the options granted under
such offering will be treated as having been granted under an employee
stock purchase plan. However, a plan that, by its terms, permits all
eligible employees to elect to participate in an offering will not
violate the requirements of this paragraph solely because eligible
employees who elect not to participate in the offering are not granted
options pursuant to such offering.
(5) For purposes of this paragraph (e), the existence of the
employment relationship between an individual and the corporation
participating under the plan will be determined under Sec. 1.421-1(h).
(6) Examples. The following examples illustrate the principles of
this paragraph (e):
Example 1. Corporation N has a stock purchase plan that meets
all the requirements of paragraphs (a)(2) and (a)(3) of this section
except that options are not required to be granted to employees
whose weekly rate of pay is less than $1,000. As a matter of
corporate practice, however, N grants options under its plan to all
employees, irrespective of their weekly rate of pay. Even though N's
plan is operated in compliance with the requirements of this
paragraph (e), N's plan is not an employee stock purchase plan
because the terms of the plan exclude a category of employees that
is not permitted under this paragraph (e).
Example 2. Assume the same facts as in Example 1, except that
the first offering under N's plan provides that options will be
granted to all employees of N. The terms of
[[Page 59082]]
the first offering will be treated as part of the terms of N's plan,
but only for purposes of the first offering. Because the terms of
the first offering satisfy the requirements of this paragraph (e),
stock transferred pursuant to options exercised under the first
offering will be treated as stock transferred pursuant to the
exercise of options granted under an employee stock purchase plan
for purposes of section 421.
Example 3. Corporation O has a stock purchase plan that excludes
from participation all employees who have been employed less than
one year. Assuming all other requirements of paragraphs (a)(2) and
(a)(3) of this section are satisfied, O's plan qualifies as an
employee stock purchase plan under section 423.
Example 4. Corporation P has a stock purchase plan that excludes
from participation clerical employees who have been employed less
than two years. However, non-clerical employees with less than two
years of service are permitted to participate in the plan. P's plan
is not an employee stock purchase plan because the exclusion of
employees who have been employed less than two years applies only to
certain employees of P and is not applied in an identical manner to
all employees of P. If, instead, P's plan excludes from
participation all employees (both clerical and non-clerical) who
have been employed less than two years, then P's plan would qualify
as an employee stock purchase plan under section 423 assuming all
other requirements of paragraphs (a)(2) and (a)(3) of this section
are satisfied.
Example 5. Corporation Q has a stock purchase plan that excludes
from participation all officers who are highly compensated employees
(within the meaning of section 414(q)). Assuming all other
requirements of paragraphs (a)(2) and (a)(3) of this section are
satisfied, Q's plan qualifies as an employee stock purchase plan
under section 423.
Example 6. Corporation R maintains an employee stock purchase
plan that excludes from participation all highly compensated
employees (within the meaning of section 414(q)), except highly
compensated employees who are officers of R. R's plan is not an
employee stock purchase plan because the exclusion of all highly
compensated employees except highly compensated employees who are
officers of R is not a permissible exclusion under paragraph
(e)(2)(ii) of this section.
Example 7. Corporation S is the parent corporation of Subsidiary
YY and Subsidiary ZZ. S maintains an employee stock purchase plan
with both YY and ZZ participating in the same offering under the
plan. Under the terms of the offering under the plan, all employees
of YY and ZZ are permitted to participate in the plan with the
exception of ZZ's highly compensated employees with annual
compensation greater than $300,000. None of the options granted
under the offering will be considered granted under an employee
stock purchase plan because the exclusion of highly compensated
employees with annual compensation greater than $300,000 is not
applied in an identical manner to all employees of YY and ZZ granted
options in the same offering.
Example 8. Assume the same facts as in Example 7, except that
Corporation S establishes separate offerings under the plan for YY
and ZZ. Under the terms of the separate offering for YY, all
employees of YY are permitted to participate in the plan. Under the
terms of the separate offering established for ZZ, all employees of
ZZ are permitted to participate in the plan with the exception of
ZZ's highly compensated employees with annual compensation greater
than $300,000. The options granted under the separate offering for
YY will be considered granted under an employee stock purchase plan.
Further, the options granted under the separate offering for ZZ will
be considered granted under an employee stock purchase plan because
the exclusion of highly compensated employees with annual
compensation greater than $300,000 is applied in an identical manner
to all employees of ZZ granted options in the same offering.
Example 9. The laws of Country A require that options granted to
residents of Country A be transferable during the lifetime of the
option recipient. Corporation T has a stock purchase plan that
excludes residents of Country A from participation in the plan.
Because compliance with the laws of Country A would cause options
granted to residents of Country A to violate paragraph (j) of this
section, T may exclude residents of Country A from participation in
the plan. Assuming all other requirements of paragraph (a)(2) of
this section are satisfied, T's plan qualifies as an employee stock
purchase plan under section 423.
(f) Equal rights and privileges--(1) Except as otherwise provided
in paragraphs (f)(2) through (f)(6) of this section, an employee stock
purchase plan or offering must, by its terms, provide that all
employees granted options under the plan or offering shall have the
same rights and privileges. Thus, the provisions applying to one option
under an offering (such as the provisions relating to the method of
payment for the stock and the determination of the purchase price per
share) must apply to all other options under the offering in the same
manner. If all the options granted under a plan or offering do not, by
their terms, give the respective optionees the same rights and
privileges, none of the options will be treated as having been granted
under an employee stock purchase plan for purposes of section 421.
(2) The requirements of this paragraph (f) do not prevent the
maximum amount of stock that an employee may purchase from being
determined on the basis of a uniform relationship to the total
compensation, or the basic or regular rate of compensation, of all
employees.
(3) A plan or offering will not fail to satisfy the requirements of
this paragraph (f) because the plan or offering provides that no
employee may purchase more than a maximum amount of stock fixed under
the plan or offering.
(4) A plan or offering will not fail to satisfy the requirements of
this paragraph (f) if, in order to comply with the laws of a foreign
jurisdiction, the terms of an option granted under a plan or offering
to citizens or residents of such foreign jurisdiction (without regard
to whether they are also citizens of the United States or resident
aliens (within the meaning of section 7701(b)(1)(A))) are less
favorable than the terms of options granted under the same plan or
offering to employees resident in the United States.
(5)(i) Except as provided in this paragraph and paragraph
(f)(5)(ii) of this section, a plan or offering permitting one or more
employees to carry forward amounts that were withheld but not applied
toward the purchase of stock under an earlier plan or offering and
apply the amounts towards the purchase of additional stock under a
subsequent plan or offering will be a violation of the equal rights and
privileges under paragraph (f)(1) of this section. However, the carry
forward of amounts withheld but not applied toward the purchase of
stock under an earlier plan or offering will not violate the equal
rights and privileges requirement of paragraph (f)(1) of this section,
if all other employees participating in the current plan or offering
are permitted to make direct payments toward the purchase of shares
under a subsequent plan or offering in an a