Financial Crimes Enforcement Network; Amendment to the Bank Secrecy Act Regulations-Administrative Ruling System, 59096-59098 [E9-27449]
Download as PDF
59096
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 220 / Tuesday, November 17, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
September 16, 2006. Bankruptcy
proceedings are pending, for this
purpose, if a contributing sponsor has
filed or has had filed against it a petition
seeking liquidation or reorganization in
a case under title 11, United States
Code, or under any similar Federal law
or law of a State or political subdivision,
and the case has not been dismissed as
of the termination date of the plan.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 4022—BENEFITS PAYABLE IN
TERMINATED SINGLE–EMPLOYER
PLANS
3. The authority citation for part 4022
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 29 U.S.C. 1302, 1322, 1322b,
1341(c)(3)(D), and 1344.
4. In § 4022.2, amend the first
paragraph by removing the words ‘‘plan
year, proposed termination date,
substantial owner’’ and adding in their
place ‘‘plan year, PPA 2006 bankruptcy
termination, proposed termination date,
statutory hybrid plan, substantial
owner.’’
■ 5. Add new § 4022.11 to subpart A to
read as follows:
■
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES
§ 4022.11 Guarantee of benefits relating to
uniformed service.
This section applies to a benefit of a
participant who becomes reemployed
after service in the uniformed services
that is covered by the Uniformed
Services Employment and
Reemployment Rights Act of 1994
(USERRA).
(a) A benefit described in paragraph
(b) of this section that would satisfy the
requirements of § 4022.3(a) and (c)
(together with any benefit earned for the
period preceding military service)
except for the fact that the participant
was not reemployed on or before the
termination date will be deemed to
satisfy those requirements if PBGC
determines, based upon a demonstration
by the participant or otherwise, that he
or she became reemployed after the
termination date and entitled to the
benefit under USERRA.
(b) A benefit described in this
paragraph (b) is a benefit attributable to
a period of service commencing before
the termination date and ending on the
termination date during which the
participant was serving in the
uniformed services as defined in 38
U.S.C. 4303(13) (or was in a subsequent
reemployment eligibility period) and to
which the participant is entitled under
USERRA.
(c) Example: A plan’s vesting
requirement is 5 years of service with
the employer. A participant has
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:56 Nov 16, 2009
Jkt 220001
completed 4 years of service when he
leaves employment for uniformed
service. The plan terminates while the
participant is in military service. As of
the termination date, the participant
would have had 5 years of service and
5 years of benefit accruals if he had
remained continuously employed. Upon
reemployment after the termination date
but within the time limits set by
USERRA, the participant would have
had 6 years of service under the plan for
vesting and benefit accrual purposes, if
the plan had not terminated. PBGC
would treat the participant as having a
vested, nonforfeitable plan benefit with
5 years of vesting service and benefit
accruals as of the termination date.
(d) In the case of a PPA 2006
bankruptcy termination, ‘‘bankruptcy
filing date’’ is substituted for
‘‘termination date’’ each place that
‘‘termination date’’ appears in this
section.
Issued in Washington, DC, this 10th day of
November 2009.
Vincent K. Snowbarger,
Acting Director, Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation.
Issued on the date set forth above pursuant
to a resolution of the Board of Directors
authorizing publication of this final rule.
Judith R. Starr,
Secretary, Board of Directors, Pension Benefit
Guaranty Corporation.
[FR Doc. E9–27573 Filed 11–16–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7709–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
31 CFR Part 103
RIN 1506–AB03
Financial Crimes Enforcement
Network; Amendment to the Bank
Secrecy Act Regulations—
Administrative Ruling System
AGENCY: Financial Crimes Enforcement
Network (‘‘FinCEN’’), Treasury.
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: FinCEN is issuing this final
rule to amend the procedures for
publicly issuing an administrative
ruling1 relating to the Bank Secrecy Act
(‘‘BSA’’). Reliance on these
administrative rulings is limited to
persons who are similarly situated to
the original recipient of an applicable
administrative ruling. To disseminate its
interpretations in a more timely and
efficient manner, FinCEN will use its
1 ‘‘Administrative ruling’’ is the title FinCEN uses
to represent documents commonly referred to as
interpretative rules.
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
website to make these administrative
rulings available to the public.2
DATES: Effective Date: December 17,
2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Regulatory Policy and Programs
Division, FinCEN (800) 949–2732 and
select option 6.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
A. Statutory and Regulatory Background
The BSA, Titles I and II of Public Law
91–508, as amended, codified at 12
U.S.C. 1829b, 1951–1959, and 31 U.S.C.
5311–5314 and 5316–5332, authorizes
the Secretary of the Treasury (the
‘‘Secretary’’), among other things, to
issue regulations requiring financial
institutions to keep records and file
reports that the Secretary determines
‘‘have a high degree of usefulness in
criminal, tax, or regulatory
investigations or proceedings, or in the
conduct of intelligence or
counterintelligence matters, including
analysis, to protect against international
terrorism.’’ 3 The Secretary’s authority to
administer the BSA and its
implementing regulations has been
delegated to the Director of FinCEN.4
FinCEN has interpreted the BSA
through implementing regulations that
appear at 31 CFR Part 103.
In 1987, the Department of the
Treasury’s Office of Financial
Enforcement 5 established an
administrative ruling system to ensure
uniform guidance and effective and
efficient dissemination of official
Treasury interpretations of the BSA.6
The administrative ruling system was
designed to: provide financial
institutions with binding ruling
interpretations of Part 103; and to
provide interpretations of hypothetical
situations.7 31 CFR 103.85 requires that
the interpretations intended to have
precedential value be published
periodically in the Federal Register and
yearly in the Appendix to Part 103.
2 FinCEN’s criteria for determining whether a
particular ruling will be published is located under
the heading ‘‘Rulings’’ on the FinCEN Web site at
https://www.fincen.gov.
3 31 U.S.C. 5311.
4 See Treasury Order 180–01 (Sept. 26, 2002).
5 The Office of Financial Enforcement originally
had authority to issue regulations implementing the
BSA. In 1994, the Treasury Department merged the
Office of Financial Enforcement with FinCEN and
granted FinCEN the authority to implement the
BSA.
6 See 52 FR 35545 (Sep. 22, 1987) (final rule
instituting an administrative ruling system).
7 If the subject situation is hypothetical, it must
include ‘‘a statement justifying why the particular
situation described warrants the issuance of a
ruling.’’ 31 CFR 103.81(6).
E:\FR\FM\17NOR1.SGM
17NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 220 / Tuesday, November 17, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES
B. Section-by-Section Analysis
FinCEN is amending section 103.85
by removing the requirement that
rulings be published in the Federal
Register before similarly situated
persons other than the recipients of the
rulings can rely upon them. In addition,
FinCEN is no longer publishing these
administrative rulings in an Appendix
to Part 103. Instead, these rulings will
be available on the FinCEN Web site or
by mail per written request.8
Using alternatives to the Federal
Register to provide notice to the public
of administrative rulings is not
uncommon. Many agencies publish
bulletins containing their administrative
rulings including the Office of the
Comptroller of Currency, Internal
Revenue Service (‘‘IRS’’), and U.S.
Customs Service and Border Protection.
Specifically, in July of 1955, the IRS
implemented the Internal Revenue
Bulletin (‘‘IRB’’) under Revenue
Procedure 55–1 to ‘‘* * * promote
uniform application of the tax laws by
Service employees and to assist
taxpayers in attaining maximum
voluntary compliance.’’ 9 At the time,
the IRS determined that the IRB was the
most appropriate forum to provide
notice to the public of its administrative
rulings.
In 1987, when implementing the BSA
administrative ruling system, the
Department of the Treasury did not have
a bulletin for publishing its
determinations concerning the BSA.
Therefore, the Department of the
Treasury determined that publishing the
administrative rulings in the Federal
Register ensured proper distribution to
the public. However, since
implementation of the BSA
administrative ruling system, various
electronic and other means of
disseminating information to the public
have become available. In particular,
FinCEN, like many other administrative
agencies, has developed a Web site to
provide notice of agency actions to the
public. The current address for the Web
site is: www.fincen.gov/statutes_regs/
rulings/. Similar to the IRS’s
determination in creating the IRB in
1955, FinCEN, in promoting uniform
application and compliance with the
BSA, has determined that publishing
administrative rulings on the FinCEN
8 Administrative Rulings 88–5, 89–5, 92–1 and
92–2 will be posted on FinCEN’s public Web site.
Administrative Rulings 88–1, 88–3, 88–4, 89–1, and
89–2 have been superseded by changes to 31 CFR
103.22 and 31 U.S.C. 5318 and are hereby formally
rescinded under 31 CFR 103.86(a)(1) and (3). These
administrative rulings will not be available on the
website.
9 See Rev. Proc. 68–44 (July 1968) (Discussion of
the objectives of the IRB).
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:56 Nov 16, 2009
Jkt 220001
website distributes information to the
public more broadly and more
expediently than publication in the
Federal Register. There are a variety of
persons who are affected by the BSA.
The majority of such affected persons
are probably more familiar with the
Internet than with the Federal Register.
Communications with these affected
persons through FinCEN’s regulatory
Helpline has shown that the majority of
callers referred to the FinCEN website as
a source for information. Also, when
responding to questions from affected
persons, FinCEN staff members
regularly refer individuals to the
FinCEN website for information.
Because FinCEN’s website is
specifically tailored to the BSA, affected
persons are not required to sift through
the volumes of information available in
the Federal Register before finding a
relevant interpretive rule addressing the
affected person’s issue. Considering the
time and resources FinCEN allocates to
updating the website and increasing the
website’s usability, FinCEN believes
that it would be inefficient and
unnecessary to also publish
administrative rulings in the Federal
Register.
II. Proposed Location in Chapter X
As discussed in a previous Federal
Register Notice, 73 FR 66414, Nov. 7,
2008, FinCEN is separately proposing to
remove Part 103 of Chapter I of Title 31,
Code of Federal Regulations, and add
Chapter 1000 to 1099 (‘‘Chapter X’’). If
the notice of proposed rulemaking for
Chapter X is finalized, the changes in
the present final rule would be
reorganized according to the proposed
Chapter X. The planned reorganization
will have no substantive effect on the
regulatory changes herein, except that
the words ‘‘part 103’’ in the first
sentence of 31 CFR 103.85 would be
replaced by ‘‘this chapter.’’ The
regulatory changes of this specific
rulemaking would be renumbered
according to the proposed Chapter X as
follows:
(a) 103.85 would be moved to
1010.715.
(b) 103.81 would be moved to
1010.711
(c) Appendix A to Part 103—
Administrative Rulings would be
removed in its entirety and Appendix E
to Chapter X—Administrative Rulings
would not appear.
III. Notice and Comment Under the
Administrative Procedure Act
The administrative ruling procedural
changes at 31 CFR 103.85 will take
effect 30 days after publication in the
Federal Register.
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
59097
The Administrative Procedure Act
(‘‘APA’’) allows an agency to dispense
with notice and comment for ‘‘rules of
agency organization, procedure, or
practice.’’ 10 This amendment
promulgates general statements of
policy, procedures and practices
governing the scope and operation of an
administrative ruling system. Hence,
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(A), notice
and public procedure are unnecessary.
IV. Regulatory Flexibility Act
Since no notice of proposed
rulemaking is required by the APA (5
U.S.C. 551 et seq.), or by any other
statute, this document is not subject to
the provisions of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.).
V. Paperwork Reduction Act
The collection of information
requirements have been reviewed and
approved by the Office of Management
and Budget under section 3507 of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3507(d). (OMB Control No. 1506–
0009). Under the Paperwork Reduction
Act, an agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number.
VI. Executive Order 12866
As this rulemaking primarily deals
with agency management, it has been
determined not to be a significant
regulatory action for purposes of
Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, a
regulatory impact analysis is not
required.
VII. Unfunded Mandates Act of 1995
Since no notice of proposed
rulemaking is required by the APA (5
U.S.C. 551 et seq.), or by any other
statute, FinCEN has determined that it
is not required to prepare a written
statement under section 202 of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995, Public Law 104–4 (March 22,
1995).
List of Subjects in 31 CFR Part 103
Administrative practice and
procedure, Banks, banking, Brokers,
Currency, Foreign banking, Foreign
currencies, Gambling, Investigations,
Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Securities, Terrorism.
Authority and Issuance
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, part 103 of title 31 of the
■
10 5
U.S.C. § 553(b).
E:\FR\FM\17NOR1.SGM
17NOR1
59098
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 220 / Tuesday, November 17, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
Code of Federal Regulations is amended
as follows:
PART 103—FINANCIAL
RECORDKEEPING AND REPORTING
OF CURRENCY AND FINANCIAL
TRANSACTIONS
1. The authority citation for part 103
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1829b and 1951–
1959; 31 U.S.C. 5311–5314, 5316–5332; title
III, secs. 311, 312, 313, 314, 319, 326, 352,
Public Law 107–56, 115 Stat. 307.
2. Section 103.85 is revised to read as
follows:
■
§ 103.85
Issuing rulings.
The Director, FinCEN, or his designee
may issue a written ruling interpreting
the relationship between part 103 and
each situation for which the ruling has
been requested in conformity with
§ 103.81. A ruling issued under this
section shall bind FinCEN only in the
event that the request describes a
specifically identified actual situation.
A ruling issued under this section shall
have precedential value, and hence may
be relied upon by others similarly
situated, only if FinCEN makes it
available to the public through
publication on the FinCEN website
under the heading ‘‘Administrative
rulings’’ or other appropriate forum. All
rulings with precedential value will be
available by mail to any person upon
written request specifically identifying
the ruling sought. FinCEN will make
every effort to respond to each requestor
within 90 days of receiving a request.
Appendix A—Administrative Rulings
[Removed]
■
3. Appendix A to part 103 is removed.
Dated: November 9, 2009.
James H. Freis, Jr.,
Director, Financial Crimes Enforcement
Network.
[FR Doc. E9–27449 Filed 11–16–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES
[Docket No. USCG–2008–1017]
RIN 1625–AA11
Regulated Navigation Areas; Bars
Along the Coasts of Oregon and
Washington
AGENCY:
Coast Guard, DHS.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:56 Nov 16, 2009
Jkt 220001
ACTION:
Final rule.
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
establishing Regulated Navigation Areas
(RNA) covering specific bars along the
coasts of Oregon and Washington. The
RNAs are necessary to help ensure the
safety of the persons and vessels
operating in those hazardous bar areas.
The RNAs will do so by establishing
clear procedures for restricting and/or
closing the bars and mandating
additional safety requirements for
recreational and small commercial
vessels operating in the RNAs when
certain conditions exist.
DATES: This rule is effective December
17, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material
received from the public, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, are part
of docket USCG–2008–1017 and are
available online by going to https://
www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG–
2008–1017 in the ‘‘Keyword’’ box, and
then clicking ‘‘Search.’’ This material is
also available for inspection or copying
at the Docket Management Facility (M–
30), U.S. Department of Transportation,
West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
e-mail LT Kion Evans, Thirteenth Coast
Guard District, Prevention Division,
Inspections and Investigations Branch;
telephone (206)–220–7232, e-mail
Kion.J.Evans@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing the docket, call
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–
9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
On February 12, 2009, we published
a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) entitled ‘‘Regulated Navigation
Areas; Bars Along the Coasts of Oregon
and Washington’’ in the Federal
Register (74 FR 7022). We received 168
comments on the proposed rule. Public
meetings were requested and three were
held at the following dates and
locations: April 14, 2009 in Astoria,
Oregon; April 15, 2009 in Newport,
Oregon; and June 2, 2009 in Coos Bay,
Oregon.
Background and Purpose
The bars along the coasts of Oregon
and Washington are a maritime
operating environment unique to the
Pacific Northwest. More importantly,
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
the bars can and very often do become
extremely hazardous for all types of
maritime traffic. In fact, a review of
recreational, passenger, and commercial
fishing vessel casualty data shows that
since 1992 there have been 39 vessel
capsizings on or in the vicinity of the
bars, resulting in 66 fatalities. Some
notable recent vessel casualties include
the capsizing of the inspected charter
vessel TAKI–TOOO while trying to
cross the Tillamook Bay bar, resulting in
the deaths of 11 people, and the
capsizing of the uninspected passenger
vessel SYDNEY MAE II while
attempting to cross the Umpqua River
bar, resulting in the deaths of 3 people.
In addition, several commercial fishing
vessels, including the CATHERINE M,
the ASH, the STARRIGAVAN and the
NETWORK have recently capsized on or
in the vicinity of various bars, resulting
in the deaths of 10 people.
As evidenced in part by the tragedies
noted above, the current regulations
governing maritime traffic operating on
and in the vicinity of the bars along the
coasts of Oregon and Washington are
insufficient to ensure the safety of the
persons and vessels operating in those
areas. Additionally, multiple Coast
Guard and National Transportation
Safety Board (NTSB) casualty
investigations have indicated a need for
additional regulations to mitigate the
risks associated with the bars and
enhance the safety of the persons and
vessels operating on and in the vicinity
of them. As such, the Thirteenth Coast
Guard District is establishing this rule to
help ensure the safety of persons and
vessels operating on or in the vicinity of
the bars.
Discussion of Comments and Changes
The Coast Guard received a total of
168 comments, with 122 comments
coming from the 91 documents
submitted to the public docket and 46
comments coming from the public
meetings. Nine comments requested
additional time to comment and/or
public meetings. In response to these
comments the comment period was
extended until June 30, 2009 and an
additional public meeting was held in
Coos Bay, Oregon.
Unsafe Condition Formula
Twenty-five comments were received
about the formula used to determine
what constitutes an Unsafe Condition as
defined in 33 CFR 165.1325(b). The
comments expressed concern that the
formula is too conservative, prevents
smaller recreational and fishing vessels
from crossing the bar in even mild to
moderate conditions, and doesn’t
address all the factors that should be
E:\FR\FM\17NOR1.SGM
17NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 220 (Tuesday, November 17, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 59096-59098]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-27449]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
31 CFR Part 103
RIN 1506-AB03
Financial Crimes Enforcement Network; Amendment to the Bank
Secrecy Act Regulations--Administrative Ruling System
AGENCY: Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (``FinCEN''), Treasury.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: FinCEN is issuing this final rule to amend the procedures for
publicly issuing an administrative ruling\1\ relating to the Bank
Secrecy Act (``BSA''). Reliance on these administrative rulings is
limited to persons who are similarly situated to the original recipient
of an applicable administrative ruling. To disseminate its
interpretations in a more timely and efficient manner, FinCEN will use
its website to make these administrative rulings available to the
public.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ ``Administrative ruling'' is the title FinCEN uses to
represent documents commonly referred to as interpretative rules.
\2\ FinCEN's criteria for determining whether a particular
ruling will be published is located under the heading ``Rulings'' on
the FinCEN Web site at https://www.fincen.gov.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective Date: December 17, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Regulatory Policy and Programs
Division, FinCEN (800) 949-2732 and select option 6.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
A. Statutory and Regulatory Background
The BSA, Titles I and II of Public Law 91-508, as amended, codified
at 12 U.S.C. 1829b, 1951-1959, and 31 U.S.C. 5311-5314 and 5316-5332,
authorizes the Secretary of the Treasury (the ``Secretary''), among
other things, to issue regulations requiring financial institutions to
keep records and file reports that the Secretary determines ``have a
high degree of usefulness in criminal, tax, or regulatory
investigations or proceedings, or in the conduct of intelligence or
counterintelligence matters, including analysis, to protect against
international terrorism.'' \3\ The Secretary's authority to administer
the BSA and its implementing regulations has been delegated to the
Director of FinCEN.\4\ FinCEN has interpreted the BSA through
implementing regulations that appear at 31 CFR Part 103.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ 31 U.S.C. 5311.
\4\ See Treasury Order 180-01 (Sept. 26, 2002).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In 1987, the Department of the Treasury's Office of Financial
Enforcement \5\ established an administrative ruling system to ensure
uniform guidance and effective and efficient dissemination of official
Treasury interpretations of the BSA.\6\ The administrative ruling
system was designed to: provide financial institutions with binding
ruling interpretations of Part 103; and to provide interpretations of
hypothetical situations.\7\ 31 CFR 103.85 requires that the
interpretations intended to have precedential value be published
periodically in the Federal Register and yearly in the Appendix to Part
103.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ The Office of Financial Enforcement originally had authority
to issue regulations implementing the BSA. In 1994, the Treasury
Department merged the Office of Financial Enforcement with FinCEN
and granted FinCEN the authority to implement the BSA.
\6\ See 52 FR 35545 (Sep. 22, 1987) (final rule instituting an
administrative ruling system).
\7\ If the subject situation is hypothetical, it must include
``a statement justifying why the particular situation described
warrants the issuance of a ruling.'' 31 CFR 103.81(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 59097]]
B. Section-by-Section Analysis
FinCEN is amending section 103.85 by removing the requirement that
rulings be published in the Federal Register before similarly situated
persons other than the recipients of the rulings can rely upon them. In
addition, FinCEN is no longer publishing these administrative rulings
in an Appendix to Part 103. Instead, these rulings will be available on
the FinCEN Web site or by mail per written request.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ Administrative Rulings 88-5, 89-5, 92-1 and 92-2 will be
posted on FinCEN's public Web site. Administrative Rulings 88-1, 88-
3, 88-4, 89-1, and 89-2 have been superseded by changes to 31 CFR
103.22 and 31 U.S.C. 5318 and are hereby formally rescinded under 31
CFR 103.86(a)(1) and (3). These administrative rulings will not be
available on the website.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using alternatives to the Federal Register to provide notice to the
public of administrative rulings is not uncommon. Many agencies publish
bulletins containing their administrative rulings including the Office
of the Comptroller of Currency, Internal Revenue Service (``IRS''), and
U.S. Customs Service and Border Protection. Specifically, in July of
1955, the IRS implemented the Internal Revenue Bulletin (``IRB'') under
Revenue Procedure 55-1 to ``* * * promote uniform application of the
tax laws by Service employees and to assist taxpayers in attaining
maximum voluntary compliance.'' \9\ At the time, the IRS determined
that the IRB was the most appropriate forum to provide notice to the
public of its administrative rulings.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See Rev. Proc. 68-44 (July 1968) (Discussion of the
objectives of the IRB).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In 1987, when implementing the BSA administrative ruling system,
the Department of the Treasury did not have a bulletin for publishing
its determinations concerning the BSA. Therefore, the Department of the
Treasury determined that publishing the administrative rulings in the
Federal Register ensured proper distribution to the public. However,
since implementation of the BSA administrative ruling system, various
electronic and other means of disseminating information to the public
have become available. In particular, FinCEN, like many other
administrative agencies, has developed a Web site to provide notice of
agency actions to the public. The current address for the Web site is:
www.fincen.gov/statutes_regs/rulings/. Similar to the IRS's
determination in creating the IRB in 1955, FinCEN, in promoting uniform
application and compliance with the BSA, has determined that publishing
administrative rulings on the FinCEN website distributes information to
the public more broadly and more expediently than publication in the
Federal Register. There are a variety of persons who are affected by
the BSA. The majority of such affected persons are probably more
familiar with the Internet than with the Federal Register.
Communications with these affected persons through FinCEN's regulatory
Helpline has shown that the majority of callers referred to the FinCEN
website as a source for information. Also, when responding to questions
from affected persons, FinCEN staff members regularly refer individuals
to the FinCEN website for information. Because FinCEN's website is
specifically tailored to the BSA, affected persons are not required to
sift through the volumes of information available in the Federal
Register before finding a relevant interpretive rule addressing the
affected person's issue. Considering the time and resources FinCEN
allocates to updating the website and increasing the website's
usability, FinCEN believes that it would be inefficient and unnecessary
to also publish administrative rulings in the Federal Register.
II. Proposed Location in Chapter X
As discussed in a previous Federal Register Notice, 73 FR 66414,
Nov. 7, 2008, FinCEN is separately proposing to remove Part 103 of
Chapter I of Title 31, Code of Federal Regulations, and add Chapter
1000 to 1099 (``Chapter X''). If the notice of proposed rulemaking for
Chapter X is finalized, the changes in the present final rule would be
reorganized according to the proposed Chapter X. The planned
reorganization will have no substantive effect on the regulatory
changes herein, except that the words ``part 103'' in the first
sentence of 31 CFR 103.85 would be replaced by ``this chapter.'' The
regulatory changes of this specific rulemaking would be renumbered
according to the proposed Chapter X as follows:
(a) 103.85 would be moved to 1010.715.
(b) 103.81 would be moved to 1010.711
(c) Appendix A to Part 103--Administrative Rulings would be removed
in its entirety and Appendix E to Chapter X--Administrative Rulings
would not appear.
III. Notice and Comment Under the Administrative Procedure Act
The administrative ruling procedural changes at 31 CFR 103.85 will
take effect 30 days after publication in the Federal Register.
The Administrative Procedure Act (``APA'') allows an agency to
dispense with notice and comment for ``rules of agency organization,
procedure, or practice.'' \10\ This amendment promulgates general
statements of policy, procedures and practices governing the scope and
operation of an administrative ruling system. Hence, pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 553(b)(A), notice and public procedure are unnecessary.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ 5 U.S.C. Sec. 553(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Regulatory Flexibility Act
Since no notice of proposed rulemaking is required by the APA (5
U.S.C. 551 et seq.), or by any other statute, this document is not
subject to the provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
V. Paperwork Reduction Act
The collection of information requirements have been reviewed and
approved by the Office of Management and Budget under section 3507 of
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3507(d). (OMB Control
No. 1506-0009). Under the Paperwork Reduction Act, an agency may not
conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a
collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number.
VI. Executive Order 12866
As this rulemaking primarily deals with agency management, it has
been determined not to be a significant regulatory action for purposes
of Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, a regulatory impact analysis is
not required.
VII. Unfunded Mandates Act of 1995
Since no notice of proposed rulemaking is required by the APA (5
U.S.C. 551 et seq.), or by any other statute, FinCEN has determined
that it is not required to prepare a written statement under section
202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, Public Law 104-4
(March 22, 1995).
List of Subjects in 31 CFR Part 103
Administrative practice and procedure, Banks, banking, Brokers,
Currency, Foreign banking, Foreign currencies, Gambling,
Investigations, Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements,
Securities, Terrorism.
Authority and Issuance
0
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, part 103 of title 31 of the
[[Page 59098]]
Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows:
PART 103--FINANCIAL RECORDKEEPING AND REPORTING OF CURRENCY AND
FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 103 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1829b and 1951-1959; 31 U.S.C. 5311-5314,
5316-5332; title III, secs. 311, 312, 313, 314, 319, 326, 352,
Public Law 107-56, 115 Stat. 307.
0
2. Section 103.85 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 103.85 Issuing rulings.
The Director, FinCEN, or his designee may issue a written ruling
interpreting the relationship between part 103 and each situation for
which the ruling has been requested in conformity with Sec. 103.81. A
ruling issued under this section shall bind FinCEN only in the event
that the request describes a specifically identified actual situation.
A ruling issued under this section shall have precedential value, and
hence may be relied upon by others similarly situated, only if FinCEN
makes it available to the public through publication on the FinCEN
website under the heading ``Administrative rulings'' or other
appropriate forum. All rulings with precedential value will be
available by mail to any person upon written request specifically
identifying the ruling sought. FinCEN will make every effort to respond
to each requestor within 90 days of receiving a request.
Appendix A--Administrative Rulings [Removed]
0
3. Appendix A to part 103 is removed.
Dated: November 9, 2009.
James H. Freis, Jr.,
Director, Financial Crimes Enforcement Network.
[FR Doc. E9-27449 Filed 11-16-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-02-P