Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 737-300, -400, and -500 Series Airplanes, 57564-57567 [E9-26581]
Download as PDF
57564
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 215 / Monday, November 9, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 1—MATERIAL INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE—Continued
Service information title
Page(s)
Revision
PIAGGIO AERO PIAGGIO P.180 AVANTI Maintenance Manual, Report No. 9066, 32–50–00.
PIAGGIO AERO PIAGGIO P.180 AVANTI II Maintenance Manual, Report No. 180–MAN–0200–
01105, 32–50–00.
PIAGGIO AERO PIAGGIO P.180 AVANTI II Maintenance Manual, Report No. 180–MAN–0200–
01105, 32–50–00.
PIAGGIO AERO PIAGGIO P.180 AVANTI II Maintenance Manual, Report No. 180–MAN–0200–
01105, 32–50–00.
PIAGGIO AERO PIAGGIO P.180 AVANTI II Maintenance Manual, Report No. 180–MAN–0200–
01105, 32–50–00.
PIAGGIO AERO PIAGGIO P.180 AVANTI II Maintenance Manual, Report No. 180–MAN–0200–
01105, 32–50–00.
PIAGGIO AERO PIAGGIO P.180 AVANTI II Maintenance Manual, Report No. 180–MAN–0200–
01105, 32–50–00.
501 through 506 .............
Not Applicable ....................
March 1, 2006.
Cover ..............................
No. A3 ................................
Revised December 19, 2008.
1 through 8 .....................
Not Applicable ....................
June 30, 2005.
201, 202, and 207
through 209.
Not Applicable ....................
December 19, 2008.
203 and 205 ...................
Not Applicable ....................
June 30, 2005.
204, 206, and 210
through 216.
Not Applicable ....................
September 14, 2007.
501 through 506 .............
Not Applicable ....................
June 30, 2005.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on
October 7, 2009.
Scott A. Horn,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E9–24651 Filed 11–6–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2009–1026; Directorate
Identifier 2009–NM–197–AD; Amendment
39–16084; AD 2009–23–10]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing
Model 737–300, –400, and –500 Series
Airplanes
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule; request for
comments.
SUMMARY: The FAA is superseding an
existing airworthiness directive (AD)
that applies to all Boeing Model 737–
300, –400, and –500 series airplanes.
The existing AD currently requires
inspecting to determine if certain
carriage spindles are installed, repetitive
inspections for corrosion and
indications of corrosion on affected
carriage spindles, and if necessary,
related investigative and corrective
actions. The existing AD also provides
optional terminating action. For certain
airplanes, this new AD would reinstate
the requirements of the existing AD.
This AD results from the exclusion of
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:01 Nov 06, 2009
Jkt 220001
certain carriage spindles from the
requirements of the existing AD, and
additional reports of corrosion found on
carriage spindles that are located on the
outboard trailing edge flaps. We are
issuing this AD to detect and correct
corrosion of the carriage spindle, which
could result in fracture. Fracture of both
the inboard and outboard carriage
spindles, in the forward ends through
the large diameters, on a flap, could
adversely affect the airplane’s continued
safe flight and landing.
DATES: This AD becomes effective
November 24, 2009.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain publication listed in the AD
as of November 24, 2009.
On August 5, 2008 (73 FR 42259, July
21, 2008), the Director of the Federal
Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain other publication
listed in the AD.
We must receive any comments on
this AD by December 24, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Date
For service information identified in
this AD, contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services
Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H–65,
Seattle, Washington 98124–2207;
telephone 206–544–5000, extension 1,
fax 206–766–5680; e-mail me.boecom@
boeing.com; Internet https://
www.myboeingfleet.com.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://www.regulations.
gov; or in person at the Docket
Management Facility between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for
the Docket Office (telephone 800–647–
5527) is in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments will be available in the AD
docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nancy Marsh, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM–120S, FAA,
Seattle Aircraft Certification Office,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone
(425) 917–6440; fax (425) 917–6590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
On July 10, 2008, we issued AD 2008–
15–05, amendment 39–15617 (73 FR
42259, July 21, 2008). That AD applies
to all Boeing Model 737–300, –400, and
–500 series airplanes. That AD requires
inspecting to determine if certain
carriage spindles are installed, repetitive
inspections for corrosion and
indications of corrosion on affected
carriage spindles, and if necessary,
E:\FR\FM\09NOR1.SGM
09NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 215 / Monday, November 9, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
related investigative action and
corrective action. That AD also provides
optional terminating action. That AD
resulted from a report of corrosion
found on carriage spindles that are
located on the outboard trailing edge
flaps. The actions specified in that AD
are intended to detect and correct
corrosion of the carriage spindle, which
could result in fracture. Fracture of both
the inboard and outboard carriage
spindles, in the forward ends through
the large diameters, on a flap, could
adversely affect the airplane’s continued
safe flight and landing.
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
Actions Since Existing AD Was Issued
Since we issued AD 2008–15–05, we
approved an alternative method of
compliance (AMOC), dated December 8,
2008, to exclude certain carriage spindle
serial numbers from the inspection
requirements. This approval was given
based on information received from
Boeing indicating that only one supplier
of the carriage spindles produced
discrepant coatings, and that the
carriages produced by the second
supplier did not have this unsafe
condition.
Subsequent to the AMOC approval,
we were advised that the carriages
produced by the second supplier may
have been incorrectly finished, leading
to over-grinding of the high velocity
oxy-fuel (HVOF) coating on the spindle.
The over-grinding of the HVOF coating
leads to exposure of the base metal,
which is susceptible to corrosion. We
also received additional reports of
corrosion found on the carriage spindles
that were excluded from the inspection
requirements in the existing AD.
Investigation of those carriage spindles
revealed that discrepant surface
finishing of the HVOF coating during
the production process had exposed the
base metal. The exposed base metal is
susceptible to corrosion.
Subsequently, we have determined
that it is necessary to reinstate the
inspections of certain carriage spindles
because those spindles are subject to the
same unsafe condition.
Relevant Service Information
We have reviewed Boeing Service
Bulletin 737–57A1304, Revision 1,
dated August 11, 2009. (We referred to
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737–
57A1304, dated June 2, 2008, as the
appropriate source of service
information for accomplishing the
required actions of AD 2008–15–05.)
The actions specified in Revision 1 are
essentially identical to those in Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 737–57A1304,
dated June 2, 2008. Revision 1
references the effect of the AMOC letter
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:01 Nov 06, 2009
Jkt 220001
discussed previously and adds a new
table (Table 3) to reflect certain serial
numbers that also are subject to the
unsafe condition, but were excluded
from the inspection requirements under
the AMOC discussed previously.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of This AD
The unsafe condition described
previously is likely to exist or develop
on other airplanes of the same type
design. For this reason, we are issuing
this AD to supersede AD 2008–15–05.
This new AD retains certain
requirements of the existing AD. This
AD would also require accomplishing
the actions specified in the Relevant
Service Information described
previously.
Interim Action
We consider this AD interim action.
We are currently considering requiring
replacement of all HVOF-coated carriage
spindles, which will constitute
terminating action for the repetitive
inspections required by this AD.
However, the planned compliance time
for the replacement would allow enough
time to provide notice and opportunity
for prior public comment on the merits
of the replacement.
Change to Existing AD
This AD would retain certain
requirements of AD 2008–15–05;
however, the inspection report required
by paragraph (h) of the existing AD is
not required by this AD.
Since AD 2008–15–05 was issued, a
new paragraph (d) was added to provide
the Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America subject code. This code was
added to make this AD parallel with
other new AD actions.
Since AD 2008–15–05 was issued, the
AD format has been revised, and certain
paragraphs have been rearranged. As a
result, the corresponding paragraph
identifiers have changed in this AD, as
listed in the following table:
REVISED PARAGRAPH IDENTIFIERS
Corresponding
requirement in
this AD
Requirement in AD
2008–15–05
paragraph
paragraph
paragraph
paragraph
paragraph
paragraph
(d) .......................
(e) .......................
(f) ........................
(g) .......................
(i) ........................
(j) ........................
paragraph
paragraph
paragraph
paragraph
paragraph
paragraph
(e).
(f).
(g).
(h).
(j).
(k).
FAA’s Justification and Determination
of the Effective Date
We received additional reports of
corrosion found on carriage spindles
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
57565
that are located on the outboard trailing
edge flaps and were removed from the
inspection requirements in the existing
AD. Investigation of those carriage
spindles revealed that discrepant
surface finishing of the HVOF coating
done during the production process had
exposed the base metal. The exposed
base metal is susceptible to corrosion.
Corrosion occurring on the exposed base
metal can quickly lead to cracking and
full fracture of the carriage spindle.
Fracture of both the inboard and
outboard carriage spindles, in the
forward ends through the large
diameters, on a single flap, could
adversely affect the airplane’s continued
safe flight and landing. Because of our
requirement to promote safe flight of
civil aircraft and thus, the critical need
to assure the structural integrity of the
carriage spindle and the short
compliance time involved with this
action, this AD must be issued
immediately.
Because an unsafe condition exists
that requires the immediate adoption of
this AD, we find that notice and
opportunity for prior public comment
hereon are impracticable and that good
cause exists for making this amendment
effective in less than 30 days.
Comments Invited
This AD is a final rule that involves
requirements affecting flight safety, and
we did not provide you with notice and
an opportunity to provide your
comments before it becomes effective.
However, we invite you to send any
written data, views, or arguments about
this AD. Send your comments to an
address listed under the ADDRESSES
section. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–
2009–1026; Directorate Identifier 2009–
NM–197–AD’’ at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this AD. We will consider all
comments received by the closing date
and may amend this AD because of
those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this AD.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
Section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
E:\FR\FM\09NOR1.SGM
09NOR1
57566
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 215 / Monday, November 9, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701,
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this AD will
not have federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132. This AD will
not have a substantial direct effect on
the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that the regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
See the ADDRESSES section for a location
to examine the regulatory evaluation.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends part 39 of the Federal
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as
follows:
■
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by
removing amendment 39–15617 (73 FR
42259, July 21, 2008) and adding the
following new AD:
■
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:01 Nov 06, 2009
Jkt 220001
2009–23–10 Boeing: Docket No. FAA–2009–
1026; Directorate Identifier 2009–NM–
197–AD; Amendment 39–16084.
Effective Date
(a) This AD becomes effective November
24, 2009.
Affected ADs
(b) This AD supersedes AD 2008–15–05,
Amendment 39–15617.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to all Boeing Model
737–300, –400, and –500 series airplanes,
certificated in any category.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 57: Wings.
Unsafe Condition
(e) This AD results from the exclusion of
certain carriage spindles from the
requirements of the existing AD, and
additional reports of corrosion found on
carriage spindles that are located on the
outboard trailing edge flaps. The Federal
Aviation Administration is issuing this AD to
detect and correct corrosion of the carriage
spindle, which could result in fracture.
Fracture of both the inboard and outboard
carriage spindles, in the forward ends
through the large diameters, on a flap, could
adversely affect the airplane’s continued safe
flight and landing.
Compliance
(f) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Restatement of Requirements of AD 2008–
15–05, With New Service Information
Inspection To Determine Affected Carriage
Spindle
(g) For all airplanes: Within 30 days after
August 5, 2008 (the effective date of AD
2008–15–05), inspect the carriage subassembly to determine whether an affected
carriage spindle with a high velocity oxy-fuel
(HVOF) thermal coating is installed, in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
737–57A1304, dated June 2, 2008. A review
of airplane maintenance records is acceptable
in lieu of this inspection if the part number
and/or serial number of the carriage can be
conclusively determined from that review. If
no affected carriage spindle is installed, no
further action is required by this paragraph.
Repetitive Inspections, Related Investigative
Actions, and Corrective Action
(h) For airplanes on which any affected
carriage spindle was determined to be
installed in accordance with Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 737–57A1304, dated June 2,
2008, as of the effective date of this AD; and
the spindle is identified in Table 2 of Boeing
Service Bulletin 737–57A1304, Revision 1,
dated August 11, 2009: At the later of the
times specified in paragraphs (h)(1) and
(h)(2) of this AD, do a detailed inspection (or,
as an option for the forward end of the
spindle only, a borescope inspection
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
technique may be used) of the spindle for
corrosion and potential indications of
corrosion of the carriage spindle, and do all
applicable related investigative and
corrective actions, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 737–57A1304, dated June 2,
2008; or Boeing Service Bulletin 737–
57A1304, Revision 1, dated August 11, 2009.
Do all applicable related investigative and
corrective actions before further flight.
Repeat the detailed inspection (or, as an
option for the forward end of the spindle
only, the borescope inspection) and certain
related investigative actions (i.e., the gapcheck or optional non-destructive test (NDT)
ultrasonic inspection) at the applicable
compliance times specified in paragraph 1.E.
of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737–
57A1304, dated June 2, 2008; or Boeing
Service Bulletin 737–57A1304, Revision 1,
dated August 11, 2009.
(1) Within 30 days after August 5, 2008.
(2) Within 90 days after the installation of
a new HVOF-coated spindle.
Note 1: Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737–
57A1304, dated June 2, 2008; and Boeing
Service Bulletin 737–57A1304, Revision 1,
dated August 11, 2009; reference Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 737–57A1277,
Revision 1, dated November 25, 2003; for
further guidance on accomplishing the
related investigative actions.
New Requirements of This AD
Repetitive Inspections, Related Investigative
Actions, and Corrective Action for Certain
Airplanes
(i) For airplanes on which a carriage
spindle having a serial number identified in
Table 3 of Appendix A of Boeing Service
Bulletin 737–57A1304, Revision 1, dated
August 11, 2009, is installed: At the latest of
the times specified in paragraphs (i)(1), (i)(2),
and (i)(3) of this AD, as applicable, do a
detailed inspection (or, as an option for the
forward end of the spindle only, a borescope
inspection technique may be used) of the
spindle for corrosion and potential
indications of corrosion of the carriage
spindle, and do all applicable related
investigative and corrective actions, in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 737–
57A1304, Revision 1, dated August 11, 2009.
Do all applicable related investigative and
corrective actions before further flight.
Repeat the detailed inspection (or, as an
option for the forward end of the spindle
only, the borescope inspection) and related
investigative actions (i.e., the gap-check or
optional NDT ultrasonic inspection) at the
applicable compliance times specified in
paragraph 1.E. of Boeing Service Bulletin
737–57A1304, Revision 1, dated August 11,
2009.
(1) Within 30 days after the effective date
of this AD.
(2) Within 90 days after the installation of
a new HVOF-coated spindle identified in
Table 3 of Appendix A of Boeing Service
Bulletin 737–57A1304, Revision 1, dated
August 11, 2009.
(3) Within 90 days after doing an
inspection in accordance with Boeing Alert
E:\FR\FM\09NOR1.SGM
09NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 215 / Monday, November 9, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
Service Bulletin 737–57A1304, dated June 2,
2008.
Optional Terminating Action
(j) Replacement of an HVOF-coated
carriage spindle with a non-HVOF coated
carriage spindle, or with a serviceable HVOFcoated carriage spindle with an ‘R’ suffix on
the serial number, in accordance with Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 737–57A1304, dated
June 2, 2008; or Boeing Service Bulletin 737–
57A1304, Revision 1, dated August 11, 2009;
terminates the requirements of this AD for
that carriage spindle only.
Parts Installation
(k) As of August 5, 2008, an HVOF-coated
spindle without an ‘R’ suffix on the serial
number may be installed on an airplane
provided the actions required by paragraph
(h) or (i) of this AD, as applicable, are done
on that spindle.
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(l)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested using the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN:
Nancy Marsh, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe
Branch, ANM–120S, FAA, Seattle ACO, 1601
Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington
98057–3356; telephone (425) 917–6440; fax
(425) 917–6590. Or, e-mail information to 9–
ANM–Seattle–ACO–AMOC–
Requests@faa.gov.
(2) To request a different method of
compliance or a different compliance time
for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR
39.19. Before using any approved AMOC on
any airplane to which the AMOC applies,
notify your principal maintenance inspector
(PMI) or principal avionics inspector (PAI),
as appropriate, or lacking a principal
inspector, your local Flight Standards District
Office. The AMOC approval letter must
specifically reference this AD.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable
level of safety may be used for any repair
required by this AD, if it is approved by an
Authorized Representative for the Boeing
Commercial Airplanes Delegation Option
Authorization Organization who has been
authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to
make those findings. For a repair method to
be approved, the repair must meet the
certification basis of the airplane.
(4) AMOCs approved previously in
accordance with AD 2008–15–05, are not
approved as AMOCs for this AD.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(m) You must use Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 737–57A1304, dated June 2, 2008;
and Boeing Service Bulletin 737–57A1304,
Revision 1, dated August 11, 2009; as
applicable; to do the actions required by this
AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference of
Boeing Service Bulletin 737–57A1304,
Revision 1, dated August 11, 2009, under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) The Director of the Federal Register
previously approved the incorporation by
reference of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:01 Nov 06, 2009
Jkt 220001
737–57A1304, dated June 2, 2008, on August
5, 2008 (73 FR 42259, July 21, 2008).
(3) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services
Management, P. O. Box 3707, MC 2H–65,
Seattle, Washington 98124–2207; telephone
206–544–5000, extension 1; fax 206–766–
5680; e-mail me.boecom@boeing.com;
Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
(4) You may review copies of the service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call
425–227–1221 or 425–227–1152.
(5) You may also review copies of the
service information that is incorporated by
reference at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202–741–6030, or go
to: https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/
code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on October
26, 2009.
Stephen P. Boyd,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E9–26581 Filed 11–6–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2009–0165; Directorate
Identifier 2008–CE–055–AD; Amendment
39–16075; AD 2009–23–03]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Hawker
Beechcraft Corporation (Type
Certificate Previously Held by
Raytheon Aircraft Company) Models
1900, 1900C, and 1900D Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) to
supersede AD 2006–24–11, which
applies to certain Hawker Beechcraft
Corporation (HBC) (Type Certificate
previously held by Raytheon Aircraft
Company) Models 1900, 1900C, and
1900D airplanes. AD 2006–24–11
currently requires you to repetitively
inspect the forward, vertical, and aft
flanges of both the left and right wing
rear spar lower caps for cracks, repair
any cracks found, and report the
inspection results to the manufacturer.
Since we issued AD 2006–24–11, the
manufacturer has developed a
modification kit to install on the wing
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
57567
rear spar lower caps that will terminate
the 200-hour repetitive inspection
required in AD 2006–24–11.
Consequently, this AD requires
installing the new modification kits on
the wing rear spar lower caps and
terminates the repetitive inspections
required in AD 2006–24–11 when the
kits are installed. We are issuing this AD
to prevent fatigue cracks in the wing
rear spar lower caps, which could result
in fatigue failure of the wing rear spar
lower caps. A rear spar failure could
result in complete wing failure and the
wing separating from the airplane.
DATES: This AD becomes effective on
December 14, 2009.
On December 14, 2009, the Director of
the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of Hawker
Beechcraft Mandatory Service Bulletin
57–3816, Issued: January 2008, listed in
this AD.
As of December 11, 2006 (71 FR
70297, December 4, 2006), the Director
of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of Raytheon
Mandatory Service Bulletin 57–3815,
dated Issued: October 2006, listed in
this AD.
ADDRESSES: To get the service
information identified in this AD,
contact Hawker Beechcraft Corporation,
Attn: Airline Technical Support, P.O.
Box 85, Wichita, Kansas 67201;
telephone: (800) 429–5372; fax: (316)
676–8745; Internet: https://
www.hawkerbeechcraft.com.
To view the AD docket, go to U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M–30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC 20590, or on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov. The docket
number is FAA–2009–0165; Directorate
Identifier 2008–CE–055–AD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Steve Potter, Aerospace Engineer, 1801
Airport Road, Room 100, Wichita,
Kansas 67209; telephone: (316) 946–
4124; fax: (316) 946–4107.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
On February 19, 2009, we issued a
proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to
include an AD that would apply to
certain HBC Models 1900, 1900C, and
1900D airplanes. This proposal was
published in the Federal Register as a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
on February 27, 2009 (74 FR 8885). The
NPRM proposed to supersede AD 2006–
24–11 with a new AD that would
require you to install modification kits
on the wing rear spar lower caps. The
E:\FR\FM\09NOR1.SGM
09NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 215 (Monday, November 9, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 57564-57567]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-26581]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2009-1026; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-197-AD;
Amendment 39-16084; AD 2009-23-10]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 737-300, -400, and -500
Series Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA is superseding an existing airworthiness directive
(AD) that applies to all Boeing Model 737-300, -400, and -500 series
airplanes. The existing AD currently requires inspecting to determine
if certain carriage spindles are installed, repetitive inspections for
corrosion and indications of corrosion on affected carriage spindles,
and if necessary, related investigative and corrective actions. The
existing AD also provides optional terminating action. For certain
airplanes, this new AD would reinstate the requirements of the existing
AD. This AD results from the exclusion of certain carriage spindles
from the requirements of the existing AD, and additional reports of
corrosion found on carriage spindles that are located on the outboard
trailing edge flaps. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct
corrosion of the carriage spindle, which could result in fracture.
Fracture of both the inboard and outboard carriage spindles, in the
forward ends through the large diameters, on a flap, could adversely
affect the airplane's continued safe flight and landing.
DATES: This AD becomes effective November 24, 2009.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in the AD as of November 24,
2009.
On August 5, 2008 (73 FR 42259, July 21, 2008), the Director of the
Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of a certain
other publication listed in the AD.
We must receive any comments on this AD by December 24, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this AD, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management, P.O. Box
3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207; telephone 206-544-5000,
extension 1, fax 206-766-5680; e-mail me.boecom@boeing.com; Internet
https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
the Docket Office (telephone 800-647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nancy Marsh, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
917-6440; fax (425) 917-6590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
On July 10, 2008, we issued AD 2008-15-05, amendment 39-15617 (73
FR 42259, July 21, 2008). That AD applies to all Boeing Model 737-300,
-400, and -500 series airplanes. That AD requires inspecting to
determine if certain carriage spindles are installed, repetitive
inspections for corrosion and indications of corrosion on affected
carriage spindles, and if necessary,
[[Page 57565]]
related investigative action and corrective action. That AD also
provides optional terminating action. That AD resulted from a report of
corrosion found on carriage spindles that are located on the outboard
trailing edge flaps. The actions specified in that AD are intended to
detect and correct corrosion of the carriage spindle, which could
result in fracture. Fracture of both the inboard and outboard carriage
spindles, in the forward ends through the large diameters, on a flap,
could adversely affect the airplane's continued safe flight and
landing.
Actions Since Existing AD Was Issued
Since we issued AD 2008-15-05, we approved an alternative method of
compliance (AMOC), dated December 8, 2008, to exclude certain carriage
spindle serial numbers from the inspection requirements. This approval
was given based on information received from Boeing indicating that
only one supplier of the carriage spindles produced discrepant
coatings, and that the carriages produced by the second supplier did
not have this unsafe condition.
Subsequent to the AMOC approval, we were advised that the carriages
produced by the second supplier may have been incorrectly finished,
leading to over-grinding of the high velocity oxy-fuel (HVOF) coating
on the spindle. The over-grinding of the HVOF coating leads to exposure
of the base metal, which is susceptible to corrosion. We also received
additional reports of corrosion found on the carriage spindles that
were excluded from the inspection requirements in the existing AD.
Investigation of those carriage spindles revealed that discrepant
surface finishing of the HVOF coating during the production process had
exposed the base metal. The exposed base metal is susceptible to
corrosion.
Subsequently, we have determined that it is necessary to reinstate
the inspections of certain carriage spindles because those spindles are
subject to the same unsafe condition.
Relevant Service Information
We have reviewed Boeing Service Bulletin 737-57A1304, Revision 1,
dated August 11, 2009. (We referred to Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
737-57A1304, dated June 2, 2008, as the appropriate source of service
information for accomplishing the required actions of AD 2008-15-05.)
The actions specified in Revision 1 are essentially identical to those
in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-57A1304, dated June 2, 2008.
Revision 1 references the effect of the AMOC letter discussed
previously and adds a new table (Table 3) to reflect certain serial
numbers that also are subject to the unsafe condition, but were
excluded from the inspection requirements under the AMOC discussed
previously.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of This AD
The unsafe condition described previously is likely to exist or
develop on other airplanes of the same type design. For this reason, we
are issuing this AD to supersede AD 2008-15-05. This new AD retains
certain requirements of the existing AD. This AD would also require
accomplishing the actions specified in the Relevant Service Information
described previously.
Interim Action
We consider this AD interim action. We are currently considering
requiring replacement of all HVOF-coated carriage spindles, which will
constitute terminating action for the repetitive inspections required
by this AD. However, the planned compliance time for the replacement
would allow enough time to provide notice and opportunity for prior
public comment on the merits of the replacement.
Change to Existing AD
This AD would retain certain requirements of AD 2008-15-05;
however, the inspection report required by paragraph (h) of the
existing AD is not required by this AD.
Since AD 2008-15-05 was issued, a new paragraph (d) was added to
provide the Air Transport Association (ATA) of America subject code.
This code was added to make this AD parallel with other new AD actions.
Since AD 2008-15-05 was issued, the AD format has been revised, and
certain paragraphs have been rearranged. As a result, the corresponding
paragraph identifiers have changed in this AD, as listed in the
following table:
Revised Paragraph Identifiers
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Corresponding requirement in
Requirement in AD 2008-15-05 this AD
------------------------------------------------------------------------
paragraph (d)........................... paragraph (e).
paragraph (e)........................... paragraph (f).
paragraph (f)........................... paragraph (g).
paragraph (g)........................... paragraph (h).
paragraph (i)........................... paragraph (j).
paragraph (j)........................... paragraph (k).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
FAA's Justification and Determination of the Effective Date
We received additional reports of corrosion found on carriage
spindles that are located on the outboard trailing edge flaps and were
removed from the inspection requirements in the existing AD.
Investigation of those carriage spindles revealed that discrepant
surface finishing of the HVOF coating done during the production
process had exposed the base metal. The exposed base metal is
susceptible to corrosion. Corrosion occurring on the exposed base metal
can quickly lead to cracking and full fracture of the carriage spindle.
Fracture of both the inboard and outboard carriage spindles, in the
forward ends through the large diameters, on a single flap, could
adversely affect the airplane's continued safe flight and landing.
Because of our requirement to promote safe flight of civil aircraft and
thus, the critical need to assure the structural integrity of the
carriage spindle and the short compliance time involved with this
action, this AD must be issued immediately.
Because an unsafe condition exists that requires the immediate
adoption of this AD, we find that notice and opportunity for prior
public comment hereon are impracticable and that good cause exists for
making this amendment effective in less than 30 days.
Comments Invited
This AD is a final rule that involves requirements affecting flight
safety, and we did not provide you with notice and an opportunity to
provide your comments before it becomes effective. However, we invite
you to send any written data, views, or arguments about this AD. Send
your comments to an address listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include
``Docket No. FAA-2009-1026; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-197-AD'' at
the beginning of your comments. We specifically invite comments on the
overall regulatory, economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this
AD. We will consider all comments received by the closing date and may
amend this AD because of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this AD.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more
[[Page 57566]]
detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket. See the ADDRESSES
section for a location to examine the regulatory evaluation.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part
39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by removing amendment 39-15617 (73 FR
42259, July 21, 2008) and adding the following new AD:
2009-23-10 Boeing: Docket No. FAA-2009-1026; Directorate Identifier
2009-NM-197-AD; Amendment 39-16084.
Effective Date
(a) This AD becomes effective November 24, 2009.
Affected ADs
(b) This AD supersedes AD 2008-15-05, Amendment 39-15617.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to all Boeing Model 737-300, -400, and -500
series airplanes, certificated in any category.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 57: Wings.
Unsafe Condition
(e) This AD results from the exclusion of certain carriage
spindles from the requirements of the existing AD, and additional
reports of corrosion found on carriage spindles that are located on
the outboard trailing edge flaps. The Federal Aviation
Administration is issuing this AD to detect and correct corrosion of
the carriage spindle, which could result in fracture. Fracture of
both the inboard and outboard carriage spindles, in the forward ends
through the large diameters, on a flap, could adversely affect the
airplane's continued safe flight and landing.
Compliance
(f) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Restatement of Requirements of AD 2008-15-05, With New Service
Information
Inspection To Determine Affected Carriage Spindle
(g) For all airplanes: Within 30 days after August 5, 2008 (the
effective date of AD 2008-15-05), inspect the carriage sub-assembly
to determine whether an affected carriage spindle with a high
velocity oxy-fuel (HVOF) thermal coating is installed, in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 737-57A1304, dated June 2, 2008. A review of airplane
maintenance records is acceptable in lieu of this inspection if the
part number and/or serial number of the carriage can be conclusively
determined from that review. If no affected carriage spindle is
installed, no further action is required by this paragraph.
Repetitive Inspections, Related Investigative Actions, and
Corrective Action
(h) For airplanes on which any affected carriage spindle was
determined to be installed in accordance with Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 737-57A1304, dated June 2, 2008, as of the effective date
of this AD; and the spindle is identified in Table 2 of Boeing
Service Bulletin 737-57A1304, Revision 1, dated August 11, 2009: At
the later of the times specified in paragraphs (h)(1) and (h)(2) of
this AD, do a detailed inspection (or, as an option for the forward
end of the spindle only, a borescope inspection technique may be
used) of the spindle for corrosion and potential indications of
corrosion of the carriage spindle, and do all applicable related
investigative and corrective actions, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-
57A1304, dated June 2, 2008; or Boeing Service Bulletin 737-57A1304,
Revision 1, dated August 11, 2009. Do all applicable related
investigative and corrective actions before further flight. Repeat
the detailed inspection (or, as an option for the forward end of the
spindle only, the borescope inspection) and certain related
investigative actions (i.e., the gap-check or optional non-
destructive test (NDT) ultrasonic inspection) at the applicable
compliance times specified in paragraph 1.E. of Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 737-57A1304, dated June 2, 2008; or Boeing Service Bulletin
737-57A1304, Revision 1, dated August 11, 2009.
(1) Within 30 days after August 5, 2008.
(2) Within 90 days after the installation of a new HVOF-coated
spindle.
Note 1: Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-57A1304, dated June 2,
2008; and Boeing Service Bulletin 737-57A1304, Revision 1, dated
August 11, 2009; reference Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-
57A1277, Revision 1, dated November 25, 2003; for further guidance
on accomplishing the related investigative actions.
New Requirements of This AD
Repetitive Inspections, Related Investigative Actions, and
Corrective Action for Certain Airplanes
(i) For airplanes on which a carriage spindle having a serial
number identified in Table 3 of Appendix A of Boeing Service
Bulletin 737-57A1304, Revision 1, dated August 11, 2009, is
installed: At the latest of the times specified in paragraphs
(i)(1), (i)(2), and (i)(3) of this AD, as applicable, do a detailed
inspection (or, as an option for the forward end of the spindle
only, a borescope inspection technique may be used) of the spindle
for corrosion and potential indications of corrosion of the carriage
spindle, and do all applicable related investigative and corrective
actions, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Boeing Service Bulletin 737-57A1304, Revision 1, dated August 11,
2009. Do all applicable related investigative and corrective actions
before further flight. Repeat the detailed inspection (or, as an
option for the forward end of the spindle only, the borescope
inspection) and related investigative actions (i.e., the gap-check
or optional NDT ultrasonic inspection) at the applicable compliance
times specified in paragraph 1.E. of Boeing Service Bulletin 737-
57A1304, Revision 1, dated August 11, 2009.
(1) Within 30 days after the effective date of this AD.
(2) Within 90 days after the installation of a new HVOF-coated
spindle identified in Table 3 of Appendix A of Boeing Service
Bulletin 737-57A1304, Revision 1, dated August 11, 2009.
(3) Within 90 days after doing an inspection in accordance with
Boeing Alert
[[Page 57567]]
Service Bulletin 737-57A1304, dated June 2, 2008.
Optional Terminating Action
(j) Replacement of an HVOF-coated carriage spindle with a non-
HVOF coated carriage spindle, or with a serviceable HVOF-coated
carriage spindle with an `R' suffix on the serial number, in
accordance with Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-57A1304, dated
June 2, 2008; or Boeing Service Bulletin 737-57A1304, Revision 1,
dated August 11, 2009; terminates the requirements of this AD for
that carriage spindle only.
Parts Installation
(k) As of August 5, 2008, an HVOF-coated spindle without an `R'
suffix on the serial number may be installed on an airplane provided
the actions required by paragraph (h) or (i) of this AD, as
applicable, are done on that spindle.
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(l)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to
ATTN: Nancy Marsh, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM-120S,
FAA, Seattle ACO, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-
3356; telephone (425) 917-6440; fax (425) 917-6590. Or, e-mail
information to 9-ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) To request a different method of compliance or a different
compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your principal maintenance inspector (PMI) or
principal avionics inspector (PAI), as appropriate, or lacking a
principal inspector, your local Flight Standards District Office.
The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this AD.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair required by this AD, if it is approved by an
Authorized Representative for the Boeing Commercial Airplanes
Delegation Option Authorization Organization who has been authorized
by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to make those findings. For a repair
method to be approved, the repair must meet the certification basis
of the airplane.
(4) AMOCs approved previously in accordance with AD 2008-15-05,
are not approved as AMOCs for this AD.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(m) You must use Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-57A1304,
dated June 2, 2008; and Boeing Service Bulletin 737-57A1304,
Revision 1, dated August 11, 2009; as applicable; to do the actions
required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of Boeing Service Bulletin 737-57A1304,
Revision 1, dated August 11, 2009, under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.
(2) The Director of the Federal Register previously approved the
incorporation by reference of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-
57A1304, dated June 2, 2008, on August 5, 2008 (73 FR 42259, July
21, 2008).
(3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P. O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207; telephone
206-544-5000, extension 1; fax 206-766-5680; e-mail
me.boecom@boeing.com; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
(4) You may review copies of the service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at
the FAA, call 425-227-1221 or 425-227-1152.
(5) You may also review copies of the service information that
is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on October 26, 2009.
Stephen P. Boyd,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E9-26581 Filed 11-6-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P