Proposed Significant New Use Rules on Certain Chemical Substances, 57430-57436 [E9-26818]
Download as PDF
57430
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 214 / Friday, November 6, 2009 / Proposed Rules
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 0023.1
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is one of a category of
actions which do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. A preliminary
environmental analysis checklist
supporting this determination is
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. This rule is
categorically excluded from certain
documentation requirements under
figure 2–1, paragraph (34)(g), of the
Instruction because the rule involves
establishment of a safety zone. We seek
any comments or information that may
lead to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this
proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
PWALKER on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with PROPOSALS
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Public Law 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:23 Nov 05, 2009
Jkt 220001
2. Add § 165.T11–244 to read as
follows:
§ 165.T11–244 Safety Zone; Coast Guard
Use of Force Training Exercises, San Pablo
Bay, CA.
Dated: October 16, 2009.
P.M. Gugg,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port San Francisco.
[FR Doc. E9–26792 Filed 11–5–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
(a) Location. The following area is a
safety zone: All waters of San Pablo Bay
from the surface to the seafloor,
encompassed by lines connecting the
following points: Beginning at 38°05′11″
N, 122°22′10″ W; thence to 38°03′44″ N,
122°20′12″ W; thence to 38°00′41″ N,
122°25′28″ W; thence to 38°01′45″ N,
122°26′38″ W; thence returning to
38°05′11″ N, 122°22′10″ W (NAD 83).
(b) Effective period. The Coast Guard
will notify the public via a Broadcast to
Mariners prior to the activation of this
safety zone. The Coast Guard may
activate the safety zone anytime from 9
a.m. through 11:59 p.m. every Tuesday,
Thursday, and Friday, every week of
every month. If the exercises conclude
prior to the scheduled termination time,
the Coast Guard will cease enforcement
of this safety zone and will announce
that fact via Broadcast Notice to
Mariners. Persons and vessels may also
contact the Coast Guard to determine
the status of the safety zone on VHF–16
or the 24-hour Command Center via
telephone at (415) 399–3547.
(c) Definitions. As used in this
section, designated representative
means a Coast Guard Patrol
Commander, including a Coast Guard
coxswain, petty officer, or other officer
operating a Coast Guard vessel and a
Federal, State, or local officer
designated by or assisting the Captain of
the Port San Francisco (COTP) in the
enforcement of the safety zone.
(d) Regulations. (1) Under the general
regulations in § 165.23, entry into,
transiting, or anchoring within this
safety zone is prohibited unless
authorized by the COTP or the COTP’s
designated representative.
(2) The safety zone is closed to all
vessel traffic, except as may be
permitted by the COTP or the COTP’s
designated representative.
(3) Vessel operators desiring to enter
or operate within the safety zone must
contact the COTP or the COTP’s
representative to obtain permission to
do so. Vessel operators given permission
to enter or operate in the safety zone
must comply with all directions given to
them by the COTP or the COTP’s
designated representative. Persons and
vessels may request permission to enter
the safety zone on VHF–16 or the 24hour Command Center via telephone at
(415) 399–3547.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 721
[EPA–HQ–OPPT–2008–0252; FRL–8436–8]
RIN 2070–AB27
Proposed Significant New Use Rules
on Certain Chemical Substances
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing significant
new use rules (SNURs) under section
5(a)(2) of the Toxic Substances Control
Act (TSCA) for two chemical substances
which were the subject of
premanufacture notices. The two
substances are identified generically as
multi-walled carbon nanotubes (P–08–
177) and single-walled carbon
nanotubes (P–08–328). These substances
are subject to TSCA section 5(e) consent
orders issued by EPA. The consent
orders require protective measures to
limit exposures or otherwise mitigate
the potential unreasonable risk. The
proposed SNURs on these substances
are based on and consistent with the
provisions in the underlying consent
orders. The proposed SNURs designate
as a ‘‘significant new use’’ the absence
of the protective measures required in
the corresponding consent orders. This
action would require persons who
intend to manufacture, import, or
process either of these two substances
for an activity that is designated as a
significant new use by this proposed
rule to notify EPA at least 90 days before
commencing that activity. The required
notification would provide EPA with
the opportunity to evaluate the intended
use and, if necessary, to prohibit or limit
that activity before it occurs.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before December 7, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPPT–2008–0252, by
one of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Document Control Office
(7407M), Office of Pollution Prevention
and Toxics (OPPT), Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
E:\FR\FM\06NOP1.SGM
06NOP1
PWALKER on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 214 / Friday, November 6, 2009 / Proposed Rules
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460–
0001.
• Hand Delivery: OPPT Document
Control Office (DCO), EPA East Bldg.,
Rm. 6428, 1201 Constitution Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC. Attention: Docket ID
Number EPA–HQ–OPPT–2008–0252.
The DCO is open from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the
DCO is (202) 564–8930. Such deliveries
are only accepted during the DCO’s
normal hours of operation, and special
arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPPT–
2008–0252. EPA’s policy is that all
comments received will be included in
the docket without change and may be
made available on-line at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through regulations.gov or email. The regulations.gov website is an
‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA without going through
regulations.gov, your e-mail address
will be automatically captured and
included as part of the comment that is
placed in the docket and made available
on the Internet. If you submit an
electronic comment, EPA recommends
that you include your name and other
contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD-ROM
you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification,
EPA may not be able to consider your
comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form
of encryption, and be free of any defects
or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the docket index available
at https://www.regulations.gov. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
will be publicly available only in hard
copy. Publicly available docket
materials are available electronically at
https://www.regulations.gov, or, if only
available in hard copy, at the OPPT
Docket. The OPPT Docket is located in
the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC) at Rm.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:23 Nov 05, 2009
Jkt 220001
3334, EPA West Bldg., 1301
Constitution Ave., NW., Washington,
DC. The EPA/DC Public Reading Room
hours of operation are 8:30 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding
legal holidays. The telephone number of
the EPA/DC Public Reading Room is
(202) 566–1744, and the telephone
number for the OPPT Docket is (202)
566–0280. Docket visitors are required
to show photographic identification,
pass through a metal detector, and sign
the EPA visitor log. All visitor bags are
processed through an X-ray machine
and subject to search. Visitors will be
provided an EPA/DC badge that must be
visible at all times in the building and
returned upon departure.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
general information contact: Colby
Lintner, Regulatory Coordinator,
Environmental Assistance Division
(7408M), Office of Pollution Prevention
and Toxics, Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone
number: (202) 554–1404; e-mail address:
TSCA-Hotline@epa.gov.
For technical information contact: Jim
Alwood, Chemical Control Division
(7405M), Office of Pollution Prevention
and Toxics, Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone
number: (202) 564–8974; e-mail address:
alwood.jim@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this Action Apply to Me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you manufacture, import,
process, or use the chemical substances
contained in this proposed rule.
Potentially affected entities may
include, but are not limited to:
• Manufacturers, importers, or
processors of one or both subject
chemical substances (NAICS codes 325
and 324110), e.g., chemical
manufacturing and petroleum refineries.
This listing is not intended to be
exhaustive, but rather provides a guide
for readers regarding entities likely to be
affected by this action. Other types of
entities not listed in this unit could also
be affected. The North American
Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes have been provided to
assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to
certain entities. To determine whether
you or your business may be affected by
this action, you should carefully
examine the applicability provisions in
§ 721.5. If you have any questions
regarding the applicability of this action
to a particular entity, consult the
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
57431
technical person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
This action may also affect certain
entities through pre-existing import
certification and export notification
rules under TSCA. Chemical importers
are subject to the TSCA section 13 (15
U.S.C. 2612) import certification
requirements promulgated at 19 CFR
12.118 through 12.127 and 19 CFR
127.28 (the corresponding EPA policy
appears at 40 CFR part 707, subpart B).
Chemical importers must certify that the
shipment of the chemical substance
complies with all applicable rules and
orders under TSCA. Importers of
chemicals subject to a final SNUR must
certify their compliance with the SNUR
requirements. In addition, any persons
who export or intend to export a
chemical substance that is the subject of
this proposed rule on or after December
7, 2009 are subject to the export
notification provisions of TSCA section
12(b) (15 U.S.C. 2611(b)) (see § 721.20),
and must comply with the export
notification requirements in 40 CFR part
707, subpart D.
B. What Should I Consider as I Prepare
My Comments for EPA?
1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this
information to EPA through
regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly mark
the part or all of the information that
you claim to be CBI. For CBI
information in a disk or CD-ROM that
you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the
disk or CD-ROM that you mail to EPA,
mark the outside of the disk or CD-ROM
as CBI and then identify electronically
within the disk or CD-ROM the specific
information that is claimed as CBI. In
addition to one complete version of the
comment that includes information
claimed as CBI, a copy of the comment
that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for
inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be
disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
2. Tips for preparing your comments.
When submitting comments, remember
to:
i. Identify the document by docket ID
number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal
Register date and page number).
ii. Follow directions. The Agency may
ask you to respond to specific questions
or organize comments by referencing a
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part
or section number.
iii. Explain why you agree or disagree;
suggest alternatives and substitute
language for your requested changes.
E:\FR\FM\06NOP1.SGM
06NOP1
57432
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 214 / Friday, November 6, 2009 / Proposed Rules
iv. Describe any assumptions and
provide any technical information and/
or data that you used.
v. If you estimate potential costs or
burdens, explain how you arrived at
your estimate in sufficient detail to
allow for it to be reproduced.
vi. Provide specific examples to
illustrate your concerns and suggest
alternatives.
vii. Explain your views as clearly as
possible, avoiding the use of profanity
or personal threats.
viii. Make sure to submit your
comments by the comment period
deadline identified.
II. Background
PWALKER on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with PROPOSALS
A. What Action is the Agency Taking?
EPA is proposing significant new use
rules (SNURs) under section 5(a)(2) of
TSCA for two chemical substances
which were the subject of
premanufacture notices (PMNs). The
two substances are identified
generically as multi-walled carbon
nanotubes (P–08–177) and single-walled
carbon nanotubes (P–08–328). These
substances are subject to TSCA section
5(e) consent orders issued by EPA,
which require protective measures to
limit exposures or otherwise mitigate
the potential unreasonable risk. The
proposed SNURs on these substances
are based on and consistent with the
provisions in the underlying consent
orders. The proposed SNURs designate
as a ‘‘significant new use’’ the absence
of the protective measures required in
the corresponding consent orders. These
SNURs would require persons who
intend to manufacture, import, or
process either of these two substances
for an activity that is designated as a
significant new use to notify EPA at
least 90 days before commencing that
activity.
In the Federal Register of June 24,
2009 (74 FR 29982) (FRL–8417–6), EPA
issued direct final SNURs on these two
substances in accordance with the
procedures at § 721.160(c)(3)(i). EPA
received a notice of intent to submit
adverse comments on these SNURs.
Therefore, as required by
§ 721.160(c)(3)(ii), in the Federal
Register of August 21, 2009 (74 FR
42177) (FRL–8433–9), EPA withdrew
the direct final SNURs and is now
issuing this proposed rule on the two
substances. The record for the direct
final SNURs on these substances was
established as docket EPA–HQ–OPPT–
2008–0252. That record includes
information considered by the Agency
in developing the direct final rules and
the notice of intent to submit adverse
comments.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:23 Nov 05, 2009
Jkt 220001
B. What is the Agency’s Authority for
Taking this Action?
Section 5(a)(2) of TSCA (15 U.S.C.
2604(a)(2)) authorizes EPA to determine
that a use of a chemical substance is a
‘‘significant new use.’’ EPA must make
this determination by rule after
considering all relevant factors,
including those listed in TSCA section
5(a)(2). Once EPA determines that a use
of a chemical substance is a significant
new use, TSCA section 5(a)(1)(B)
requires persons to submit a significant
new use notice (SNUN) to EPA at least
90 days before they manufacture,
import, or process the chemical
substance for that use. The mechanism
for reporting under this requirement is
established under § 721.5.
C. Applicability of General Provisions
General provisions for SNURs appear
in 40 CFR part 721, subpart A. These
provisions describe persons subject to
the rule, recordkeeping requirements,
exemptions to reporting requirements,
and applicability of the rule to uses
occurring before the effective date of the
final rule. Provisions relating to user
fees appear at 40 CFR part 700.
According to § 721.1(c), persons subject
to these SNURs must comply with the
same notice requirements and EPA
regulatory procedures as submitters of
PMNs under TSCA section 5(a)(1)(A). In
particular, these requirements include
the information submission
requirements of TSCA section 5(b) and
5(d)(1), the exemptions authorized by
TSCA section 5(h)(1), (h)(2), (h)(3), and
(h)(5), and the regulations at 40 CFR
part 720. Once EPA receives a SNUN,
EPA may take regulatory action under
TSCA section 5(e), 5(f), 6, or 7 to control
the activities for which it has received
the SNUN. If EPA does not take action,
EPA is required under TSCA section
5(g) to explain in the Federal Register
its reasons for not taking action.
Chemical importers are subject to the
TSCA section 13 (15 U.S.C. 1612)
import certification requirements
promulgated at 19 CFR 12.118 through
12.127, and 19 CFR 127.28 (the
corresponding EPA policy appears at 40
CFR part 707, subpart B). Chemical
importers must certify that the shipment
of the chemical substance complies with
all applicable rules and orders under
TSCA. Importers of chemical substances
subject to a final SNUR must certify
their compliance with the SNUR
requirements. In addition, any persons
who export or intend to export a
chemical substance identified in a final
SNUR are subject to the export
notification provisions of TSCA section
12(b) (15 U.S.C. 2612 (b)) (see § 721.20),
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
and must comply with the export
notification requirements in 40 CFR part
707, subpart D.
III. Significant New Use Determination
Section 5(a)(2) of TSCA states that
EPA’s determination that a use of a
chemical substance is a significant new
use must be made after consideration of
all relevant factors, including:
• The projected volume of
manufacturing and processing of a
chemical substance.
• The extent to which a use changes
the type or form of exposure of human
beings or the environment to a chemical
substance.
• The extent to which a use increases
the magnitude and duration of exposure
of human beings or the environment to
a chemical substance.
• The reasonably anticipated manner
and methods of manufacturing,
processing, distribution in commerce,
and disposal of a chemical substance.
In addition to these factors
enumerated in TSCA section 5(a)(2), the
statute authorized EPA to consider any
other relevant factors.
To determine what would constitute a
significant new use for the two chemical
substances that are the subject of these
proposed SNURs, EPA considered
relevant information about the toxicity
of the chemical substances, likely
human exposures and environmental
releases associated with possible uses,
and the above four factors listed in
TSCA section 5(a)(2).
IV. Substances Subject to this Proposed
Rule
EPA is proposing to establish
significant new use and recordkeeping
requirements for two chemical
substances in 40 CFR part 721, subpart
E. In this unit, EPA provides the
following information for each chemical
substance:
• PMN number.
• Chemical name (generic name if the
specific name is claimed as CBI).
• CAS number (if assigned for nonconfidential chemical identities).
• Basis for the TSCA section 5(e)
consent order.
• Toxicity concerns.
• Tests recommended by EPA to
provide sufficient information to
evaluate the chemical substance (see
Unit VII. for more information).
• CFR citation assigned in the
regulatory text section of this proposed
rule.
The regulatory text section of this
proposed rule specifies the activities
designated as significant new uses.
Certain new uses, including production
limits and other uses designated in this
E:\FR\FM\06NOP1.SGM
06NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 214 / Friday, November 6, 2009 / Proposed Rules
PWALKER on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with PROPOSALS
proposed rule, may be claimed as CBI.
Unit VIII. discusses a procedure
companies may use to ascertain whether
a proposed use constitutes a significant
new use.
This proposed rule concerns two
PMN substances that are subject to
‘‘risk-based’’ consent orders under
TSCA section 5(e)(1)(A)(ii)(I) where EPA
determined that activities associated
with the PMN substances may present
unreasonable risk to human health.
Those consent orders require protective
measures to limit exposure or otherwise
mitigate the potential unreasonable risk.
The so-called proposed ‘‘5(e) SNURs’’
on these PMN substances are issued
pursuant to § 721.160, and are based on
and consistent with the provisions in
the underlying consent orders. The
proposed 5(e) SNURs would designate
as a ‘‘significant new use’’ the absence
of the protective measures required in
the corresponding consent orders.
PMN Number P–08–177
Chemical name: Multi-walled carbon
nanotubes (generic).
CAS number: Not available.
Effective date of TSCA section 5(e)
consent order: September 1, 2009
(amended).
Basis for TSCA section 5(e) consent
order: The PMN states that the generic
(non-confidential) use of the substance
will be as a property modifier in
electronic applications and as a
property modifier in polymer
composites. The order was issued under
sections 5(e)(1)(A)(i) and 5(e)(1)(A)(ii)(I)
of TSCA. Based on test data on
analogous respirable, poorly soluble
particulates and on other carbon
nanotubes (CNTs), EPA believes that the
PMN substance may cause lung effects.
To protect against this risk, the consent
order requires use of a National Institute
for Occupational Safety and Health
(NIOSH)-approved full-face respirator
with N–100 cartridges. Based on
physical properties of the PMN
substance, EPA believes it may cause
health effects via dermal exposure. To
protect against this risk, the consent
order requires that workers wear gloves
and protective clothing impervious to
the chemical substance. The consent
order also prohibits any predictable or
purposeful release of the PMN
substance into the waters of the United
States. The proposed SNUR would
designate as a ‘‘significant new use’’ the
absence of these protective measures.
Toxicity concern: There is a concern for
lung health effects based on data for
poorly soluble particulates and for other
CNTs, and for lung irritation based on
particle size.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:23 Nov 05, 2009
Jkt 220001
Recommended testing: EPA has
determined that the results of a 90–day
inhalation toxicity study in rats (OPPTS
Harmonized Test Guideline 870.3465 or
Organisation for Economic Co-operation
and Development (OECD) 413 test
guideline) with a post exposure
observation period of up to 3 months,
including bronchoalveolar lavage fluid
(BALF) analysis; and certain material
characterization data would help
characterize possible effects of the PMN
substance. In the consent order, the
PMN submitter has agreed not to exceed
a specified production volume or
production time limit (whichever comes
first) without performing these tests.
CFR citation: 40 CFR 721.10155.
PMN Number P–08–328
Chemical name: Single-walled carbon
nanotubes (generic).
CAS number: Not available.
Effective date of TSCA section 5(e)
consent order: September 1, 2009
(amended).
Basis for TSCA section 5(e) consent
order: The PMN states that the generic
(non-confidential) use of the substance
will be as a property modifier in
electronic applications and as a
property modifier in polymer
composites. The order was issued under
sections 5(e)(1)(A)(i) and 5(e)(1)(A)(ii)(I)
of TSCA. Based on test data on
analogous respirable, poorly soluble
particulates and on other carbon
nanotubes (CNTs), EPA believes that the
PMN substance may cause health
effects. To protect against this risk, the
consent order requires use of a NIOSHapproved full-face respirator with N–
100 cartridges. Based on physical
properties of the PMN substance, EPA
believes it may cause health effects via
dermal exposure. To protect against this
risk, the consent order requires that
workers wear gloves and protective
clothing impervious to the chemical
substance. The consent order also
prohibits any predictable or purposeful
release of the PMN substance into the
waters of the United States. The
proposed SNUR would designate as a
‘‘significant new use’’ the absence of
these protective measures.
Toxicity concern: There is a concern for
health effects based on data for poorly
soluble particulates and for other CNTs,
and for lung irritation based on particle
size.
Recommended testing: EPA has
determined that the results of a 90–day
inhalation toxicity study in rats (OPPTS
Harmonized Test Guideline 870.3465 or
OECD 413 test guideline) with a post
exposure observation period of up to 3
months, including BALF analysis; and
certain material characterization data
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
57433
would help characterize possible effects
of the PMN substance. In the consent
order, the PMN submitter has agreed not
to exceed a specified production volume
or production time limit (whichever
comes first) without performing these
tests.
CFR citation: 40 CFR 721.10156.
V. Rationale and Objectives of the
Proposed Rule
A. Rationale
During review of the PMNs submitted
for these two chemical substances, EPA
concluded that regulation was
warranted under TSCA section 5(e),
pending the development of information
sufficient to make reasoned evaluations
of the human health effects of the
chemical substances. The basis for such
findings is outlined in Unit IV. Based on
these findings, TSCA section 5(e)
consent orders requiring the use of
appropriate exposure controls were
negotiated with the PMN submitters.
The proposed SNUR provisions for
these chemical substances are consistent
with the provisions of the TSCA section
5(e) consent orders including the recent
modifications to the consent orders.
These proposed SNURs are issued
pursuant to § 721.160.
B. Objectives
EPA is proposing these SNURs for
specific chemical substances that have
undergone premanufacture review
because the Agency wants to achieve
the following objectives with regard to
the significant new uses designated in
this proposed rule:
• EPA would receive notice of any
person’s intent to manufacture, import,
or process a listed chemical substance
for the described significant new use
before that activity begins.
• EPA would have an opportunity to
review and evaluate data submitted in a
SNUN before the notice submitter
begins manufacturing, importing, or
processing a listed chemical substance
for the described significant new use.
• EPA would be able to regulate
prospective manufacturers, importers,
or processors of a listed chemical
substance before the described
significant new use of that chemical
substance occurs, provided that
regulation is warranted pursuant to
TSCA sections 5(e), 5(f), 6, or 7.
• EPA would ensure that all
manufacturers, importers, and
processors of the same chemical
substance that is subject to a TSCA
section 5(e) consent order are subject to
similar requirements.
Issuance of a SNUR for a chemical
substance does not signify that the
E:\FR\FM\06NOP1.SGM
06NOP1
57434
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 214 / Friday, November 6, 2009 / Proposed Rules
PWALKER on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with PROPOSALS
chemical substance is listed on the
TSCA Inventory. Guidance on how to
determine if a chemical substance is on
the TSCA Inventory is available on the
Internet at https://www.epa.gov/opptintr/
newchems/pubs/invntory.htm.
VI. Applicability of Proposed Rule to
Uses Occurring Before Effective Date of
the Final Rule
To establish a significant ‘‘new’’ use,
EPA must determine that the use is not
ongoing. The chemical substances
subject to this proposed rule have
undergone premanufacture review and
are subject to TSCA section 5(e) consent
orders. The PMN submitters are
prohibited by these TSCA section 5(e)
consent orders from undertaking
activities which EPA is proposing as
significant new uses. EPA solicits
comments on whether any of the uses
proposed as significant new uses are
ongoing.
As discussed in the Federal Register
of April 24, 1990 (55 FR 17376), EPA
has decided that the intent of TSCA
section 5(a)(1)(B) is best served by
designating a use as a significant new
use as of the date of publication of the
proposed rule rather than as of the
effective date of the final rule. If uses
begun after publication of the proposed
rule were considered ongoing rather
than new, it would be difficult for EPA
to establish SNUR notice requirements
because a person could defeat the SNUR
by initiating the significant new use
before the rule became final, and then
argue that the use was ongoing before
the effective date of the final rule. Thus,
persons who begin commercial
manufacture, import, or processing
activities with the chemical substances
that would be regulated as a ‘‘significant
new use’’ through this proposed rule,
must cease any such activity before the
effective date of the rule if and when
finalized. To resume their activities,
these persons would have to comply
with all applicable SNUR notice
requirements and wait until the notice
review period, including all extensions,
expires.
EPA has promulgated provisions to
allow persons to comply with this
proposed SNUR before the effective
date. If a person were to meet the
conditions of advance compliance
under § 721.45(h), the person would be
considered exempt from the
requirements of the SNUR.
VII. Test Data and Other Information
EPA recognizes that TSCA section 5
does not require developing any
particular test data before submission of
a SNUN, except where the chemical
substance subject to the SNUR is also
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:23 Nov 05, 2009
Jkt 220001
subject to a test rule under TSCA
section 4 (see TSCA section 5(b)).
Persons are required only to submit test
data in their possession or control and
to describe any other data known to or
reasonably ascertainable by them (see §
720.50). However, upon review of PMNs
and SNUNs, the Agency has the
authority to require appropriate testing.
In cases where EPA issued a TSCA
section 5(e) consent order that requires
or recommends certain testing, Unit IV.
lists those tests. Descriptions of tests are
provided for informational purposes.
EPA strongly encourages persons, before
performing any testing, to consult with
the Agency pertaining to protocol
selection. Many OPPTS Harmonized
Test Guidelines are now available on
the Internet. Please go to https://
www.epa.gov/oppts and select ‘‘Test
Methods and Guidelines’’ on the leftside navigation menu. The Organisation
for Economic Co-operation and
Development (OECD) test guidelines are
available from the OECD Bookshop at
https://www.oecdbookshop.org or
SourceOECD at https://
www.sourceoecd.org.
In the TSCA section 5(e) consent
orders for the two chemical substances
regulated under this proposed rule, EPA
has established production volume
limits in view of the lack of data on the
potential health risks that may be posed
by the significant new uses or increased
exposure to the chemical substances.
These limits cannot be exceeded unless
the PMN submitter first submits the
results of toxicity tests that would
permit a reasoned evaluation of the
potential risks posed by these chemical
substances. Under recent TSCA section
5(e) consent orders, each PMN submitter
is required to submit each study at least
14 weeks (earlier TSCA section 5(e)
consent orders required submissions at
least 12 weeks) before reaching the
specified production limit. Listings of
the tests specified in the TSCA section
5(e) consent orders are included in Unit
IV. The SNURs contain the same
production volume limits as the TSCA
section 5(e) consent orders. Exceeding
these production limits is defined as a
significant new use. Persons who intend
to exceed the production limit must
notify the Agency by submitting a
SNUN at least 90 days in advance of
commencement of non-exempt
commercial manufacture, import, or
processing.
The recommended tests may not be
the only means of addressing the
potential risks of the chemical
substance. However, SNUNs submitted
for significant new uses without any test
data may increase the likelihood that
EPA will take action under TSCA
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
section 5(e), particularly if satisfactory
test results have not been obtained from
a prior PMN or SNUN submitter. EPA
recommends that potential SNUN
submitters contact EPA early enough so
that they will be able to conduct the
appropriate tests.
SNUN submitters should be aware
that EPA will be better able to evaluate
SNUNs which provide detailed
information on the following:
• Human exposure and
environmental release that may result
from the significant new use of the
chemical substances.
• Potential benefits of the chemical
substances.
• Information on risks posed by the
chemical substances compared to risks
posed by potential substitutes.
VIII. Procedural Determinations
By this action, EPA is proposing
certain significant new uses which have
been claimed as CBI subject to Agency
confidentiality regulations at 40 CFR
part 2 and 40 CFR part 720, subpart E.
Absent a final determination or other
disposition of the confidentiality claim
under 40 CFR part 2 procedures, EPA is
required to keep this information
confidential. EPA promulgated a
procedure to deal with the situation
where a specific significant new use is
CBI. This rule cross-references
§ 721.1725(b)(1) and is similar to that in
§ 721.11 for situations where the
chemical identity of the chemical
substance subject to a SNUR is CBI. This
procedure is cross-referenced in each
SNUR that includes specific significant
new uses that are CBI.
Under these procedures a
manufacturer, importer, or processor
may request EPA to determine whether
a proposed use would be a significant
new use under the rule. The
manufacturer, importer, or processor
must show that it has a bona fide intent
to manufacture, import, or process the
chemical substance and must identify
the specific use for which it intends to
manufacture, import, or process the
chemical substance. If EPA concludes
that the person has shown a bona fide
intent to manufacture, import, or
process the chemical substance, EPA
will tell the person whether the use
identified in the bona fide submission
would be a significant new use under
the rule. Since the chemical identities of
the chemical substances subject to these
SNURs are also CBI, manufacturers,
importers, and processors can combine
the bona fide submission under the
procedure in § 721.1725(b)(1) with that
under § 721.11 into a single step.
If EPA determines that the use
identified in the bona fide submission
E:\FR\FM\06NOP1.SGM
06NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 214 / Friday, November 6, 2009 / Proposed Rules
would not be a significant new use, i.e.,
the use does not meet the criteria
specified in the rule for a significant
new use, that person can manufacture,
import, or process the chemical
substance so long as the significant new
use trigger is not met. In the case of a
production volume trigger, this means
that the aggregate annual production
volume does not exceed that identified
in the bona fide submission to EPA.
Because of confidentiality concerns,
EPA does not typically disclose the
actual production volume that
constitutes the use trigger. Thus, if the
person later intends to exceed that
volume, a new bona fide submission
would be necessary to determine
whether that higher volume would be a
significant new use.
IX. SNUN Submissions
As stated in Unit II.C., according to
§ 721.1(c), persons submitting a SNUN
must comply with the same notice
requirements and EPA regulatory
procedures as persons submitting a
PMN, including submission of test data
on health and environmental effects as
described in § 720.50. SNUNs must be
mailed to the Environmental Protection
Agency, OPPT Document Control Office
(7407M), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460–0001.
Information must be submitted in the
form and manner set forth in EPA Form
No. 7710–25. This form is available
from the Environmental Assistance
Division (7408M), 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001
(see § § 721.25 and 720.40). Forms and
information are also available
electronically at https://www.epa.gov/
opptintr/newchems/pubs/
pmnforms.htm.
X. Economic Analysis
EPA evaluated the potential costs of
establishing SNUN requirements for
potential manufacturers, importers, and
processors of the chemical substances
during the development of the direct
final rule. The Agency’s complete
economic analysis is available in the
public docket.
PWALKER on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with PROPOSALS
XI. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866
This proposed rule would establish
SNURs for several new chemical
substances that were the subject of
PMNs and TSCA section 5(e) consent
orders. The Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) has exempted these types
of actions from review under Executive
Order 12866, entitled Regulatory
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:23 Nov 05, 2009
Jkt 220001
Planning and Review (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993).
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
According to the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq., an Agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to a collection of information
that requires OMB approval under the
PRA, unless it has been approved by
OMB and displays a currently valid
OMB control number. The OMB control
numbers for EPA’s regulations in title 40
of the CFR, after appearing in the
Federal Register, are listed in 40 CFR
part 9, and included on the related
collection instrument or form, if
applicable. EPA would amend the table
in 40 CFR part 9 to list the OMB
approval number for the information
collection requirements contained in
this proposed rule. This listing of the
OMB control numbers and their
subsequent codification in the CFR
satisfies the display requirements of
PRA and OMB’s implementing
regulations at 5 CFR part 1320. This
Information Collection Request (ICR)
was previously subject to public notice
and comment prior to OMB approval,
and given the technical nature of the
table, EPA finds that further notice and
comment to amend it is unnecessary. As
a result, EPA finds that there is ‘‘good
cause’’ under section 553(b)(3)(B) of the
Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(3)(B), to amend this table without
further notice and comment.
The information collection
requirements related to this action have
already been approved by OMB
pursuant to PRA under OMB control
number 2070–0012 (EPA ICR No. 574).
This action would not impose any
burden requiring additional OMB
approval. If an entity were to submit a
SNUN to the Agency, the annual burden
is estimated to average between 30 and
170 hours per response. This burden
estimate includes the time needed to
review instructions, search existing data
sources, gather and maintain the data
needed, and complete, review, and
submit the required SNUN.
Send any comments about the
accuracy of the burden estimate, and
any suggested methods for minimizing
respondent burden, including through
the use of automated collection
techniques, to the Director, Collection
Strategies Division, Office of
Environmental Information (2822T),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001. Please remember to
include the OMB control number in any
correspondence, but do not submit any
completed forms to this address.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
57435
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
Pursuant to section 605(b) of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.), the Agency hereby
certifies that promulgation of these
SNURs would not have a significant
adverse economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The rationale supporting this
conclusion is discussed in this unit. The
requirement to submit a SNUN applies
to any person (including small or large
entities) who intends to engage in any
activity described in the rule as a
‘‘significant new use.’’ Because these
uses are ‘‘new,’’ based on all
information currently available to EPA,
it appears that no small or large entities
presently engage in such activities. A
SNUR requires that any person who
intends to engage in such activity in the
future must first notify EPA by
submitting a SNUN. Although some
small entities may decide to pursue a
significant new use in the future, EPA
cannot presently determine how many,
if any, there may be. However, EPA’s
experience to date is that, in response to
the promulgation of over 1,000 SNURs,
the Agency receives on average only 5
notices per year. Of those SNUNs
submitted from 2006–2008, only one
appears to be from a small entity. In
addition, the estimated reporting cost
for submission of a SNUN (see Unit IX.)
is minimal regardless of the size of the
firm. Therefore, the potential economic
impacts of complying with these SNURs
are not expected to be significant or
adversely impact a substantial number
of small entities. In a SNUR that
published in the Federal Register of
June 2, 1997 (62 FR 29684) (FRL–5597–
1), the Agency presented its general
determination that final SNURs are not
expected to have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities, which was provided to the
Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small
Business Administration.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Based on EPA’s experience with
proposing and finalizing SNURs, State,
local, and Tribal governments have not
been impacted by these rulemakings,
and EPA does not have any reasons to
believe that any State, local, or Tribal
government would be impacted by this
proposed rule. As such, EPA has
determined that this proposed rule
would not impose any enforceable duty,
contain any unfunded mandate, or
otherwise have any affect on small
governments subject to the requirements
of sections 202, 203, 204, or 205 of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(UMRA) (Public Law 104–4).
E:\FR\FM\06NOP1.SGM
06NOP1
57436
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 214 / Friday, November 6, 2009 / Proposed Rules
E. Executive Order 13132
This action would not have a
substantial direct effect on States, on the
relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132, entitled
Federalism (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999).
F. Executive Order 13175
This proposed rule would not have
Tribal implications because it is not
expected to have substantial direct
effects on Indian Tribes. This proposed
rule would not significantly or uniquely
affect the communities of Indian Tribal
governments, nor would it involve or
impose any requirements that affect
Indian Tribes. Accordingly, the
requirements of Executive Order 13175,
entitled Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000), do not apply
to this proposed rule.
G. Executive Order 13045
This action is not subject to Executive
Order 13045, entitled Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997), because this is not an
economically significant regulatory
action as defined by Executive Order
12866, and this action does not address
environmental health or safety risks
disproportionately affecting children.
PWALKER on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with PROPOSALS
H. Executive Order 13211
This proposed rule is not subject to
Executive Order 13211, entitled Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001), because this action is not
expected to affect energy supply,
distribution, or use and because this
action is not a significant regulatory
action under Executive Order 12866.
I. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act
In addition, since this action does not
involve any technical standards, section
12(d) of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995
(NTTAA), Public Law 104–113, section
12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note), does not
apply to this action.
J. Executive Order 12898
This action does not entail special
considerations of environmental justice
related issues as delineated by
Executive Order 12898, entitled Federal
Actions to Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:23 Nov 05, 2009
Jkt 220001
Low-Income Populations (59 FR 7629,
February 16, 1994).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 721
Environmental protection, Chemicals,
Hazardous substances, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: October 26, 2009.
Wendy C. Hamnett,
Acting Director, Office of Pollution Prevention
and Toxics.
Therefore, it is proposed that 40 CFR
part 721 be amended as follows:
PART 721—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 721
would continue to read as follows:
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2604, 2607, and
2625(c).
2. By adding new § 721.10155 to
subpart E to read as follows:
§ 721.10155 Multi-walled carbon
nanotubes (generic).
(a) Chemical substance and
significant new uses subject to reporting.
(1) The chemical substance identified
generically as multi-walled carbon
nanotubes (PMN P–08–177) is subject to
reporting under this section for the
significant new uses described in
paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
(2) The significant new uses are:
(i) Protection in the workplace.
Requirements as specified in § 721.63
(a)(1), (a)(2)(i), (a)(2)(ii), (a)(3), (a)(4),
(a)(5) (National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health
(NIOSH)-approved air-purifying, tightfitting full-face respirator equipped with
N100 filters), (a)(6)(i), and (c).
(ii) Industrial, commercial, and
consumer activities. Requirements as
specified in § 721.80 (k) and (q).
(iii) Release to water. Requirements as
specified in § 721.90 (a)(1), (b)(1), and
(c)(1).
(b) Specific requirements. The
provisions of subpart A of this part
apply to this section except as modified
by this paragraph.
(1) Recordkeeping. Recordkeeping
requirements as specified in § 721.125
(a), (b), (c), (d), (e), (i), and (k) are
applicable to manufacturers, importers,
and processors of this substance.
(2) Limitations or revocation of
certain notification requirements. The
provisions of § 721.185 apply to this
section.
(3) Determining whether a specific use
is subject to this section. The provisions
of § 721.1725(b)(1) apply to this section.
3. By adding new § 721.10156 to
subpart E to read as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
§ 721.10156 Single-walled carbon
nanotubes (generic).
(a) Chemical substance and
significant new uses subject to reporting.
(1) The chemical substance identified
generically as single-walled carbon
nanotubes (PMN P–08–328) is subject to
reporting under this section for the
significant new uses described in
paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
(2) The significant new uses are:
(i) Protection in the workplace.
Requirements as specified in § 721.63
(a)(1), (a)(2)(i), (a)(2)(ii), (a)(3), (a)(4),
(a)(5) (National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health
(NIOSH)-approved air-purifying, tightfitting full-face respirator equipped with
N100 filters), (a)(6)(i), and (c).
(ii) Industrial, commercial, and
consumer activities. Requirements as
specified in § 721.80 (k) and (q).
(iii) Release to water. Requirements as
specified in § 721.90 (a)(1), (b)(1), and
(c)(1).
(b) Specific requirements. The
provisions of subpart A of this part
apply to this section except as modified
by this paragraph.
(1) Recordkeeping. Recordkeeping
requirements as specified in § 721.125
(a), (b), (c), (d), (e), (i), and (k) are
applicable to manufacturers, importers,
and processors of this substance.
(2) Limitations or revocation of
certain notification requirements. The
provisions of § 721.185 apply to this
section.
(3) Determining whether a specific use
is subject to this section. The provisions
of § 721.1725(b)(1) apply to this section.
[FR Doc. E9–26818 Filed 11–5–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Parts 223 and 224
[Docket No. 0812291651–91321–02]
RIN 0648–XM05
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants; Endangered Species Act
Listing Determination for Atlantic
Wolffish
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notification of a listing
determination and availability of a
status review document.
SUMMARY: After we, NMFS, received a
petition to list Atlantic wolffish
E:\FR\FM\06NOP1.SGM
06NOP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 214 (Friday, November 6, 2009)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 57430-57436]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-26818]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 721
[EPA-HQ-OPPT-2008-0252; FRL-8436-8]
RIN 2070-AB27
Proposed Significant New Use Rules on Certain Chemical Substances
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing significant new use rules (SNURs) under
section 5(a)(2) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) for two
chemical substances which were the subject of premanufacture notices.
The two substances are identified generically as multi-walled carbon
nanotubes (P-08-177) and single-walled carbon nanotubes (P-08-328).
These substances are subject to TSCA section 5(e) consent orders issued
by EPA. The consent orders require protective measures to limit
exposures or otherwise mitigate the potential unreasonable risk. The
proposed SNURs on these substances are based on and consistent with the
provisions in the underlying consent orders. The proposed SNURs
designate as a ``significant new use'' the absence of the protective
measures required in the corresponding consent orders. This action
would require persons who intend to manufacture, import, or process
either of these two substances for an activity that is designated as a
significant new use by this proposed rule to notify EPA at least 90
days before commencing that activity. The required notification would
provide EPA with the opportunity to evaluate the intended use and, if
necessary, to prohibit or limit that activity before it occurs.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before December 7, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by docket identification
(ID) number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2008-0252, by one of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Document Control Office (7407M), Office of Pollution
Prevention and Toxics (OPPT), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania
[[Page 57431]]
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001.
Hand Delivery: OPPT Document Control Office (DCO), EPA
East Bldg., Rm. 6428, 1201 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC.
Attention: Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2008-0252. The DCO is open from
8 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The
telephone number for the DCO is (202) 564-8930. Such deliveries are
only accepted during the DCO's normal hours of operation, and special
arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPPT-
2008-0252. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the docket without change and may be made available on-line at
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through regulations.gov or e-
mail. The regulations.gov website is an ``anonymous access'' system,
which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information
unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an e-
mail comment directly to EPA without going through regulations.gov,
your e-mail address will be automatically captured and included as part
of the comment that is placed in the docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the docket index
available at https://www.regulations.gov. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only
in hard copy. Publicly available docket materials are available
electronically at https://www.regulations.gov, or, if only available in
hard copy, at the OPPT Docket. The OPPT Docket is located in the EPA
Docket Center (EPA/DC) at Rm. 3334, EPA West Bldg., 1301 Constitution
Ave., NW., Washington, DC. The EPA/DC Public Reading Room hours of
operation are 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding
legal holidays. The telephone number of the EPA/DC Public Reading Room
is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the OPPT Docket is
(202) 566-0280. Docket visitors are required to show photographic
identification, pass through a metal detector, and sign the EPA visitor
log. All visitor bags are processed through an X-ray machine and
subject to search. Visitors will be provided an EPA/DC badge that must
be visible at all times in the building and returned upon departure.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For general information contact: Colby
Lintner, Regulatory Coordinator, Environmental Assistance Division
(7408M), Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-
0001; telephone number: (202) 554-1404; e-mail address: TSCA-Hotline@epa.gov.
For technical information contact: Jim Alwood, Chemical Control
Division (7405M), Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number: (202) 564-8974; e-mail
address: alwood.jim@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this Action Apply to Me?
You may be potentially affected by this action if you manufacture,
import, process, or use the chemical substances contained in this
proposed rule. Potentially affected entities may include, but are not
limited to:
Manufacturers, importers, or processors of one or both
subject chemical substances (NAICS codes 325 and 324110), e.g.,
chemical manufacturing and petroleum refineries.
This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides
a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be affected by this
action. Other types of entities not listed in this unit could also be
affected. The North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS)
codes have been provided to assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to certain entities. To determine
whether you or your business may be affected by this action, you should
carefully examine the applicability provisions in Sec. 721.5. If you
have any questions regarding the applicability of this action to a
particular entity, consult the technical person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
This action may also affect certain entities through pre-existing
import certification and export notification rules under TSCA. Chemical
importers are subject to the TSCA section 13 (15 U.S.C. 2612) import
certification requirements promulgated at 19 CFR 12.118 through 12.127
and 19 CFR 127.28 (the corresponding EPA policy appears at 40 CFR part
707, subpart B). Chemical importers must certify that the shipment of
the chemical substance complies with all applicable rules and orders
under TSCA. Importers of chemicals subject to a final SNUR must certify
their compliance with the SNUR requirements. In addition, any persons
who export or intend to export a chemical substance that is the subject
of this proposed rule on or after December 7, 2009 are subject to the
export notification provisions of TSCA section 12(b) (15 U.S.C.
2611(b)) (see Sec. 721.20), and must comply with the export
notification requirements in 40 CFR part 707, subpart D.
B. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA?
1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through
regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly mark the part or all of the
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or
CD-ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD-ROM
that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD-ROM as CBI and
then identify electronically within the disk or CD-ROM the specific
information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one complete version
of the comment that includes information claimed as CBI, a copy of the
comment that does not contain the information claimed as CBI must be
submitted for inclusion in the public docket. Information so marked
will not be disclosed except in accordance with procedures set forth in
40 CFR part 2.
2. Tips for preparing your comments. When submitting comments,
remember to:
i. Identify the document by docket ID number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal Register date and page number).
ii. Follow directions. The Agency may ask you to respond to
specific questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) part or section number.
iii. Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives and
substitute language for your requested changes.
[[Page 57432]]
iv. Describe any assumptions and provide any technical information
and/or data that you used.
v. If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how you
arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be
reproduced.
vi. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns and
suggest alternatives.
vii. Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the use of
profanity or personal threats.
viii. Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period
deadline identified.
II. Background
A. What Action is the Agency Taking?
EPA is proposing significant new use rules (SNURs) under section
5(a)(2) of TSCA for two chemical substances which were the subject of
premanufacture notices (PMNs). The two substances are identified
generically as multi-walled carbon nanotubes (P-08-177) and single-
walled carbon nanotubes (P-08-328). These substances are subject to
TSCA section 5(e) consent orders issued by EPA, which require
protective measures to limit exposures or otherwise mitigate the
potential unreasonable risk. The proposed SNURs on these substances are
based on and consistent with the provisions in the underlying consent
orders. The proposed SNURs designate as a ``significant new use'' the
absence of the protective measures required in the corresponding
consent orders. These SNURs would require persons who intend to
manufacture, import, or process either of these two substances for an
activity that is designated as a significant new use to notify EPA at
least 90 days before commencing that activity.
In the Federal Register of June 24, 2009 (74 FR 29982) (FRL-8417-
6), EPA issued direct final SNURs on these two substances in accordance
with the procedures at Sec. 721.160(c)(3)(i). EPA received a notice of
intent to submit adverse comments on these SNURs. Therefore, as
required by Sec. 721.160(c)(3)(ii), in the Federal Register of August
21, 2009 (74 FR 42177) (FRL-8433-9), EPA withdrew the direct final
SNURs and is now issuing this proposed rule on the two substances. The
record for the direct final SNURs on these substances was established
as docket EPA-HQ-OPPT-2008-0252. That record includes information
considered by the Agency in developing the direct final rules and the
notice of intent to submit adverse comments.
B. What is the Agency's Authority for Taking this Action?
Section 5(a)(2) of TSCA (15 U.S.C. 2604(a)(2)) authorizes EPA to
determine that a use of a chemical substance is a ``significant new
use.'' EPA must make this determination by rule after considering all
relevant factors, including those listed in TSCA section 5(a)(2). Once
EPA determines that a use of a chemical substance is a significant new
use, TSCA section 5(a)(1)(B) requires persons to submit a significant
new use notice (SNUN) to EPA at least 90 days before they manufacture,
import, or process the chemical substance for that use. The mechanism
for reporting under this requirement is established under Sec. 721.5.
C. Applicability of General Provisions
General provisions for SNURs appear in 40 CFR part 721, subpart A.
These provisions describe persons subject to the rule, recordkeeping
requirements, exemptions to reporting requirements, and applicability
of the rule to uses occurring before the effective date of the final
rule. Provisions relating to user fees appear at 40 CFR part 700.
According to Sec. 721.1(c), persons subject to these SNURs must comply
with the same notice requirements and EPA regulatory procedures as
submitters of PMNs under TSCA section 5(a)(1)(A). In particular, these
requirements include the information submission requirements of TSCA
section 5(b) and 5(d)(1), the exemptions authorized by TSCA section
5(h)(1), (h)(2), (h)(3), and (h)(5), and the regulations at 40 CFR part
720. Once EPA receives a SNUN, EPA may take regulatory action under
TSCA section 5(e), 5(f), 6, or 7 to control the activities for which it
has received the SNUN. If EPA does not take action, EPA is required
under TSCA section 5(g) to explain in the Federal Register its reasons
for not taking action.
Chemical importers are subject to the TSCA section 13 (15 U.S.C.
1612) import certification requirements promulgated at 19 CFR 12.118
through 12.127, and 19 CFR 127.28 (the corresponding EPA policy appears
at 40 CFR part 707, subpart B). Chemical importers must certify that
the shipment of the chemical substance complies with all applicable
rules and orders under TSCA. Importers of chemical substances subject
to a final SNUR must certify their compliance with the SNUR
requirements. In addition, any persons who export or intend to export a
chemical substance identified in a final SNUR are subject to the export
notification provisions of TSCA section 12(b) (15 U.S.C. 2612 (b)) (see
Sec. 721.20), and must comply with the export notification
requirements in 40 CFR part 707, subpart D.
III. Significant New Use Determination
Section 5(a)(2) of TSCA states that EPA's determination that a use
of a chemical substance is a significant new use must be made after
consideration of all relevant factors, including:
The projected volume of manufacturing and processing of a
chemical substance.
The extent to which a use changes the type or form of
exposure of human beings or the environment to a chemical substance.
The extent to which a use increases the magnitude and
duration of exposure of human beings or the environment to a chemical
substance.
The reasonably anticipated manner and methods of
manufacturing, processing, distribution in commerce, and disposal of a
chemical substance.
In addition to these factors enumerated in TSCA section 5(a)(2),
the statute authorized EPA to consider any other relevant factors.
To determine what would constitute a significant new use for the
two chemical substances that are the subject of these proposed SNURs,
EPA considered relevant information about the toxicity of the chemical
substances, likely human exposures and environmental releases
associated with possible uses, and the above four factors listed in
TSCA section 5(a)(2).
IV. Substances Subject to this Proposed Rule
EPA is proposing to establish significant new use and recordkeeping
requirements for two chemical substances in 40 CFR part 721, subpart E.
In this unit, EPA provides the following information for each chemical
substance:
PMN number.
Chemical name (generic name if the specific name is
claimed as CBI).
CAS number (if assigned for non-confidential chemical
identities).
Basis for the TSCA section 5(e) consent order.
Toxicity concerns.
Tests recommended by EPA to provide sufficient information
to evaluate the chemical substance (see Unit VII. for more
information).
CFR citation assigned in the regulatory text section of
this proposed rule.
The regulatory text section of this proposed rule specifies the
activities designated as significant new uses. Certain new uses,
including production limits and other uses designated in this
[[Page 57433]]
proposed rule, may be claimed as CBI. Unit VIII. discusses a procedure
companies may use to ascertain whether a proposed use constitutes a
significant new use.
This proposed rule concerns two PMN substances that are subject to
``risk-based'' consent orders under TSCA section 5(e)(1)(A)(ii)(I)
where EPA determined that activities associated with the PMN substances
may present unreasonable risk to human health. Those consent orders
require protective measures to limit exposure or otherwise mitigate the
potential unreasonable risk. The so-called proposed ``5(e) SNURs'' on
these PMN substances are issued pursuant to Sec. 721.160, and are
based on and consistent with the provisions in the underlying consent
orders. The proposed 5(e) SNURs would designate as a ``significant new
use'' the absence of the protective measures required in the
corresponding consent orders.
PMN Number P-08-177
Chemical name: Multi-walled carbon nanotubes (generic).
CAS number: Not available.
Effective date of TSCA section 5(e) consent order: September 1, 2009
(amended).
Basis for TSCA section 5(e) consent order: The PMN states that the
generic (non-confidential) use of the substance will be as a property
modifier in electronic applications and as a property modifier in
polymer composites. The order was issued under sections 5(e)(1)(A)(i)
and 5(e)(1)(A)(ii)(I) of TSCA. Based on test data on analogous
respirable, poorly soluble particulates and on other carbon nanotubes
(CNTs), EPA believes that the PMN substance may cause lung effects. To
protect against this risk, the consent order requires use of a National
Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)-approved full-face
respirator with N-100 cartridges. Based on physical properties of the
PMN substance, EPA believes it may cause health effects via dermal
exposure. To protect against this risk, the consent order requires that
workers wear gloves and protective clothing impervious to the chemical
substance. The consent order also prohibits any predictable or
purposeful release of the PMN substance into the waters of the United
States. The proposed SNUR would designate as a ``significant new use''
the absence of these protective measures.
Toxicity concern: There is a concern for lung health effects based on
data for poorly soluble particulates and for other CNTs, and for lung
irritation based on particle size.
Recommended testing: EPA has determined that the results of a 90-day
inhalation toxicity study in rats (OPPTS Harmonized Test Guideline
870.3465 or Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
(OECD) 413 test guideline) with a post exposure observation period of
up to 3 months, including bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) analysis;
and certain material characterization data would help characterize
possible effects of the PMN substance. In the consent order, the PMN
submitter has agreed not to exceed a specified production volume or
production time limit (whichever comes first) without performing these
tests.
CFR citation: 40 CFR 721.10155.
PMN Number P-08-328
Chemical name: Single-walled carbon nanotubes (generic).
CAS number: Not available.
Effective date of TSCA section 5(e) consent order: September 1, 2009
(amended).
Basis for TSCA section 5(e) consent order: The PMN states that the
generic (non-confidential) use of the substance will be as a property
modifier in electronic applications and as a property modifier in
polymer composites. The order was issued under sections 5(e)(1)(A)(i)
and 5(e)(1)(A)(ii)(I) of TSCA. Based on test data on analogous
respirable, poorly soluble particulates and on other carbon nanotubes
(CNTs), EPA believes that the PMN substance may cause health effects.
To protect against this risk, the consent order requires use of a
NIOSH-approved full-face respirator with N-100 cartridges. Based on
physical properties of the PMN substance, EPA believes it may cause
health effects via dermal exposure. To protect against this risk, the
consent order requires that workers wear gloves and protective clothing
impervious to the chemical substance. The consent order also prohibits
any predictable or purposeful release of the PMN substance into the
waters of the United States. The proposed SNUR would designate as a
``significant new use'' the absence of these protective measures.
Toxicity concern: There is a concern for health effects based on data
for poorly soluble particulates and for other CNTs, and for lung
irritation based on particle size.
Recommended testing: EPA has determined that the results of a 90-day
inhalation toxicity study in rats (OPPTS Harmonized Test Guideline
870.3465 or OECD 413 test guideline) with a post exposure observation
period of up to 3 months, including BALF analysis; and certain material
characterization data would help characterize possible effects of the
PMN substance. In the consent order, the PMN submitter has agreed not
to exceed a specified production volume or production time limit
(whichever comes first) without performing these tests.
CFR citation: 40 CFR 721.10156.
V. Rationale and Objectives of the Proposed Rule
A. Rationale
During review of the PMNs submitted for these two chemical
substances, EPA concluded that regulation was warranted under TSCA
section 5(e), pending the development of information sufficient to make
reasoned evaluations of the human health effects of the chemical
substances. The basis for such findings is outlined in Unit IV. Based
on these findings, TSCA section 5(e) consent orders requiring the use
of appropriate exposure controls were negotiated with the PMN
submitters. The proposed SNUR provisions for these chemical substances
are consistent with the provisions of the TSCA section 5(e) consent
orders including the recent modifications to the consent orders. These
proposed SNURs are issued pursuant to Sec. 721.160.
B. Objectives
EPA is proposing these SNURs for specific chemical substances that
have undergone premanufacture review because the Agency wants to
achieve the following objectives with regard to the significant new
uses designated in this proposed rule:
EPA would receive notice of any person's intent to
manufacture, import, or process a listed chemical substance for the
described significant new use before that activity begins.
EPA would have an opportunity to review and evaluate data
submitted in a SNUN before the notice submitter begins manufacturing,
importing, or processing a listed chemical substance for the described
significant new use.
EPA would be able to regulate prospective manufacturers,
importers, or processors of a listed chemical substance before the
described significant new use of that chemical substance occurs,
provided that regulation is warranted pursuant to TSCA sections 5(e),
5(f), 6, or 7.
EPA would ensure that all manufacturers, importers, and
processors of the same chemical substance that is subject to a TSCA
section 5(e) consent order are subject to similar requirements.
Issuance of a SNUR for a chemical substance does not signify that
the
[[Page 57434]]
chemical substance is listed on the TSCA Inventory. Guidance on how to
determine if a chemical substance is on the TSCA Inventory is available
on the Internet at https://www.epa.gov/opptintr/newchems/pubs/invntory.htm.
VI. Applicability of Proposed Rule to Uses Occurring Before Effective
Date of the Final Rule
To establish a significant ``new'' use, EPA must determine that the
use is not ongoing. The chemical substances subject to this proposed
rule have undergone premanufacture review and are subject to TSCA
section 5(e) consent orders. The PMN submitters are prohibited by these
TSCA section 5(e) consent orders from undertaking activities which EPA
is proposing as significant new uses. EPA solicits comments on whether
any of the uses proposed as significant new uses are ongoing.
As discussed in the Federal Register of April 24, 1990 (55 FR
17376), EPA has decided that the intent of TSCA section 5(a)(1)(B) is
best served by designating a use as a significant new use as of the
date of publication of the proposed rule rather than as of the
effective date of the final rule. If uses begun after publication of
the proposed rule were considered ongoing rather than new, it would be
difficult for EPA to establish SNUR notice requirements because a
person could defeat the SNUR by initiating the significant new use
before the rule became final, and then argue that the use was ongoing
before the effective date of the final rule. Thus, persons who begin
commercial manufacture, import, or processing activities with the
chemical substances that would be regulated as a ``significant new
use'' through this proposed rule, must cease any such activity before
the effective date of the rule if and when finalized. To resume their
activities, these persons would have to comply with all applicable SNUR
notice requirements and wait until the notice review period, including
all extensions, expires.
EPA has promulgated provisions to allow persons to comply with this
proposed SNUR before the effective date. If a person were to meet the
conditions of advance compliance under Sec. 721.45(h), the person
would be considered exempt from the requirements of the SNUR.
VII. Test Data and Other Information
EPA recognizes that TSCA section 5 does not require developing any
particular test data before submission of a SNUN, except where the
chemical substance subject to the SNUR is also subject to a test rule
under TSCA section 4 (see TSCA section 5(b)). Persons are required only
to submit test data in their possession or control and to describe any
other data known to or reasonably ascertainable by them (see Sec.
720.50). However, upon review of PMNs and SNUNs, the Agency has the
authority to require appropriate testing. In cases where EPA issued a
TSCA section 5(e) consent order that requires or recommends certain
testing, Unit IV. lists those tests. Descriptions of tests are provided
for informational purposes. EPA strongly encourages persons, before
performing any testing, to consult with the Agency pertaining to
protocol selection. Many OPPTS Harmonized Test Guidelines are now
available on the Internet. Please go to https://www.epa.gov/oppts and
select ``Test Methods and Guidelines'' on the left-side navigation
menu. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
test guidelines are available from the OECD Bookshop at https://www.oecdbookshop.org or SourceOECD at https://www.sourceoecd.org.
In the TSCA section 5(e) consent orders for the two chemical
substances regulated under this proposed rule, EPA has established
production volume limits in view of the lack of data on the potential
health risks that may be posed by the significant new uses or increased
exposure to the chemical substances. These limits cannot be exceeded
unless the PMN submitter first submits the results of toxicity tests
that would permit a reasoned evaluation of the potential risks posed by
these chemical substances. Under recent TSCA section 5(e) consent
orders, each PMN submitter is required to submit each study at least 14
weeks (earlier TSCA section 5(e) consent orders required submissions at
least 12 weeks) before reaching the specified production limit.
Listings of the tests specified in the TSCA section 5(e) consent orders
are included in Unit IV. The SNURs contain the same production volume
limits as the TSCA section 5(e) consent orders. Exceeding these
production limits is defined as a significant new use. Persons who
intend to exceed the production limit must notify the Agency by
submitting a SNUN at least 90 days in advance of commencement of non-
exempt commercial manufacture, import, or processing.
The recommended tests may not be the only means of addressing the
potential risks of the chemical substance. However, SNUNs submitted for
significant new uses without any test data may increase the likelihood
that EPA will take action under TSCA section 5(e), particularly if
satisfactory test results have not been obtained from a prior PMN or
SNUN submitter. EPA recommends that potential SNUN submitters contact
EPA early enough so that they will be able to conduct the appropriate
tests.
SNUN submitters should be aware that EPA will be better able to
evaluate SNUNs which provide detailed information on the following:
Human exposure and environmental release that may result
from the significant new use of the chemical substances.
Potential benefits of the chemical substances.
Information on risks posed by the chemical substances
compared to risks posed by potential substitutes.
VIII. Procedural Determinations
By this action, EPA is proposing certain significant new uses which
have been claimed as CBI subject to Agency confidentiality regulations
at 40 CFR part 2 and 40 CFR part 720, subpart E. Absent a final
determination or other disposition of the confidentiality claim under
40 CFR part 2 procedures, EPA is required to keep this information
confidential. EPA promulgated a procedure to deal with the situation
where a specific significant new use is CBI. This rule cross-references
Sec. 721.1725(b)(1) and is similar to that in Sec. 721.11 for
situations where the chemical identity of the chemical substance
subject to a SNUR is CBI. This procedure is cross-referenced in each
SNUR that includes specific significant new uses that are CBI.
Under these procedures a manufacturer, importer, or processor may
request EPA to determine whether a proposed use would be a significant
new use under the rule. The manufacturer, importer, or processor must
show that it has a bona fide intent to manufacture, import, or process
the chemical substance and must identify the specific use for which it
intends to manufacture, import, or process the chemical substance. If
EPA concludes that the person has shown a bona fide intent to
manufacture, import, or process the chemical substance, EPA will tell
the person whether the use identified in the bona fide submission would
be a significant new use under the rule. Since the chemical identities
of the chemical substances subject to these SNURs are also CBI,
manufacturers, importers, and processors can combine the bona fide
submission under the procedure in Sec. 721.1725(b)(1) with that under
Sec. 721.11 into a single step.
If EPA determines that the use identified in the bona fide
submission
[[Page 57435]]
would not be a significant new use, i.e., the use does not meet the
criteria specified in the rule for a significant new use, that person
can manufacture, import, or process the chemical substance so long as
the significant new use trigger is not met. In the case of a production
volume trigger, this means that the aggregate annual production volume
does not exceed that identified in the bona fide submission to EPA.
Because of confidentiality concerns, EPA does not typically disclose
the actual production volume that constitutes the use trigger. Thus, if
the person later intends to exceed that volume, a new bona fide
submission would be necessary to determine whether that higher volume
would be a significant new use.
IX. SNUN Submissions
As stated in Unit II.C., according to Sec. 721.1(c), persons
submitting a SNUN must comply with the same notice requirements and EPA
regulatory procedures as persons submitting a PMN, including submission
of test data on health and environmental effects as described in Sec.
720.50. SNUNs must be mailed to the Environmental Protection Agency,
OPPT Document Control Office (7407M), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460-0001. Information must be submitted in the form
and manner set forth in EPA Form No. 7710-25. This form is available
from the Environmental Assistance Division (7408M), 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001 (see Sec. Sec. 721.25 and
720.40). Forms and information are also available electronically at
https://www.epa.gov/opptintr/newchems/pubs/pmnforms.htm.
X. Economic Analysis
EPA evaluated the potential costs of establishing SNUN requirements
for potential manufacturers, importers, and processors of the chemical
substances during the development of the direct final rule. The
Agency's complete economic analysis is available in the public docket.
XI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866
This proposed rule would establish SNURs for several new chemical
substances that were the subject of PMNs and TSCA section 5(e) consent
orders. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these
types of actions from review under Executive Order 12866, entitled
Regulatory Planning and Review (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993).
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
According to the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq., an Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to a collection of information that requires OMB
approval under the PRA, unless it has been approved by OMB and displays
a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's
regulations in title 40 of the CFR, after appearing in the Federal
Register, are listed in 40 CFR part 9, and included on the related
collection instrument or form, if applicable. EPA would amend the table
in 40 CFR part 9 to list the OMB approval number for the information
collection requirements contained in this proposed rule. This listing
of the OMB control numbers and their subsequent codification in the CFR
satisfies the display requirements of PRA and OMB's implementing
regulations at 5 CFR part 1320. This Information Collection Request
(ICR) was previously subject to public notice and comment prior to OMB
approval, and given the technical nature of the table, EPA finds that
further notice and comment to amend it is unnecessary. As a result, EPA
finds that there is ``good cause'' under section 553(b)(3)(B) of the
Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B), to amend this
table without further notice and comment.
The information collection requirements related to this action have
already been approved by OMB pursuant to PRA under OMB control number
2070-0012 (EPA ICR No. 574). This action would not impose any burden
requiring additional OMB approval. If an entity were to submit a SNUN
to the Agency, the annual burden is estimated to average between 30 and
170 hours per response. This burden estimate includes the time needed
to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and
maintain the data needed, and complete, review, and submit the required
SNUN.
Send any comments about the accuracy of the burden estimate, and
any suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden, including
through the use of automated collection techniques, to the Director,
Collection Strategies Division, Office of Environmental Information
(2822T), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460-0001. Please remember to include the OMB control
number in any correspondence, but do not submit any completed forms to
this address.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
Pursuant to section 605(b) of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), the Agency hereby certifies that promulgation
of these SNURs would not have a significant adverse economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities. The rationale supporting this
conclusion is discussed in this unit. The requirement to submit a SNUN
applies to any person (including small or large entities) who intends
to engage in any activity described in the rule as a ``significant new
use.'' Because these uses are ``new,'' based on all information
currently available to EPA, it appears that no small or large entities
presently engage in such activities. A SNUR requires that any person
who intends to engage in such activity in the future must first notify
EPA by submitting a SNUN. Although some small entities may decide to
pursue a significant new use in the future, EPA cannot presently
determine how many, if any, there may be. However, EPA's experience to
date is that, in response to the promulgation of over 1,000 SNURs, the
Agency receives on average only 5 notices per year. Of those SNUNs
submitted from 2006-2008, only one appears to be from a small entity.
In addition, the estimated reporting cost for submission of a SNUN (see
Unit IX.) is minimal regardless of the size of the firm. Therefore, the
potential economic impacts of complying with these SNURs are not
expected to be significant or adversely impact a substantial number of
small entities. In a SNUR that published in the Federal Register of
June 2, 1997 (62 FR 29684) (FRL-5597-1), the Agency presented its
general determination that final SNURs are not expected to have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities,
which was provided to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small
Business Administration.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Based on EPA's experience with proposing and finalizing SNURs,
State, local, and Tribal governments have not been impacted by these
rulemakings, and EPA does not have any reasons to believe that any
State, local, or Tribal government would be impacted by this proposed
rule. As such, EPA has determined that this proposed rule would not
impose any enforceable duty, contain any unfunded mandate, or otherwise
have any affect on small governments subject to the requirements of
sections 202, 203, 204, or 205 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995 (UMRA) (Public Law 104-4).
[[Page 57436]]
E. Executive Order 13132
This action would not have a substantial direct effect on States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132, entitled
Federalism (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999).
F. Executive Order 13175
This proposed rule would not have Tribal implications because it is
not expected to have substantial direct effects on Indian Tribes. This
proposed rule would not significantly or uniquely affect the
communities of Indian Tribal governments, nor would it involve or
impose any requirements that affect Indian Tribes. Accordingly, the
requirements of Executive Order 13175, entitled Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000), do not apply to this proposed rule.
G. Executive Order 13045
This action is not subject to Executive Order 13045, entitled
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks
(62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because this is not an economically
significant regulatory action as defined by Executive Order 12866, and
this action does not address environmental health or safety risks
disproportionately affecting children.
H. Executive Order 13211
This proposed rule is not subject to Executive Order 13211,
entitled Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001),
because this action is not expected to affect energy supply,
distribution, or use and because this action is not a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.
I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act
In addition, since this action does not involve any technical
standards, section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (NTTAA), Public Law 104-113, section 12(d) (15
U.S.C. 272 note), does not apply to this action.
J. Executive Order 12898
This action does not entail special considerations of environmental
justice related issues as delineated by Executive Order 12898, entitled
Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority
Populations and Low-Income Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 721
Environmental protection, Chemicals, Hazardous substances,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: October 26, 2009.
Wendy C. Hamnett,
Acting Director, Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics.
Therefore, it is proposed that 40 CFR part 721 be amended as
follows:
PART 721--[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 721 would continue to read as
follows:
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2604, 2607, and 2625(c).
2. By adding new Sec. 721.10155 to subpart E to read as follows:
Sec. 721.10155 Multi-walled carbon nanotubes (generic).
(a) Chemical substance and significant new uses subject to
reporting. (1) The chemical substance identified generically as multi-
walled carbon nanotubes (PMN P-08-177) is subject to reporting under
this section for the significant new uses described in paragraph (a)(2)
of this section.
(2) The significant new uses are:
(i) Protection in the workplace. Requirements as specified in Sec.
721.63 (a)(1), (a)(2)(i), (a)(2)(ii), (a)(3), (a)(4), (a)(5) (National
Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)-approved air-
purifying, tight-fitting full-face respirator equipped with N100
filters), (a)(6)(i), and (c).
(ii) Industrial, commercial, and consumer activities. Requirements
as specified in Sec. 721.80 (k) and (q).
(iii) Release to water. Requirements as specified in Sec. 721.90
(a)(1), (b)(1), and (c)(1).
(b) Specific requirements. The provisions of subpart A of this part
apply to this section except as modified by this paragraph.
(1) Recordkeeping. Recordkeeping requirements as specified in Sec.
721.125 (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), (i), and (k) are applicable to
manufacturers, importers, and processors of this substance.
(2) Limitations or revocation of certain notification requirements.
The provisions of Sec. 721.185 apply to this section.
(3) Determining whether a specific use is subject to this section.
The provisions of Sec. 721.1725(b)(1) apply to this section.
3. By adding new Sec. 721.10156 to subpart E to read as follows:
Sec. 721.10156 Single-walled carbon nanotubes (generic).
(a) Chemical substance and significant new uses subject to
reporting. (1) The chemical substance identified generically as single-
walled carbon nanotubes (PMN P-08-328) is subject to reporting under
this section for the significant new uses described in paragraph (a)(2)
of this section.
(2) The significant new uses are:
(i) Protection in the workplace. Requirements as specified in Sec.
721.63 (a)(1), (a)(2)(i), (a)(2)(ii), (a)(3), (a)(4), (a)(5) (National
Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)-approved air-
purifying, tight-fitting full-face respirator equipped with N100
filters), (a)(6)(i), and (c).
(ii) Industrial, commercial, and consumer activities. Requirements
as specified in Sec. 721.80 (k) and (q).
(iii) Release to water. Requirements as specified in Sec. 721.90
(a)(1), (b)(1), and (c)(1).
(b) Specific requirements. The provisions of subpart A of this part
apply to this section except as modified by this paragraph.
(1) Recordkeeping. Recordkeeping requirements as specified in Sec.
721.125 (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), (i), and (k) are applicable to
manufacturers, importers, and processors of this substance.
(2) Limitations or revocation of certain notification requirements.
The provisions of Sec. 721.185 apply to this section.
(3) Determining whether a specific use is subject to this section.
The provisions of Sec. 721.1725(b)(1) apply to this section.
[FR Doc. E9-26818 Filed 11-5-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-S