Privacy Act; Implementation, 57414-57415 [E9-26746]
Download as PDF
57414
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 214 / Friday, November 6, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
Note 2: This may be done by inserting a
copy of AvCraft TR ALD–028, dated October
15, 2003, in the AvCraft 328JET ALD. When
this TR has been included in general
revisions of the AvCraft 328JET ALD, the TR
no longer needs to be inserted into the
revised Airworthiness Limitations document.
Restatement of the Requirments of AD 2009–
01–06, With No Changes
Revised Initial Compliance Time
(i) For Sub-tasks 28–00–00–02 and 28–00–
00–03 (‘‘Detailed Inspection of Outer and
Inner Fuel Tank Harness Internal’’), as
identified in AvCraft TR ALD–028, dated
October 15, 2003; or Section G, ‘‘Fuel Tank
System Limitations,’’ of the AvCraft Dornier
328JET ALD TM–ALD–010599–ALL,
Revision 2, dated January 31, 2005; the initial
compliance time is within 8 years after April
3, 2009. Thereafter, except as provided by
paragraph (k) of this AD, these tasks must be
accomplished at the repetitive interval
specified in Section G, ‘‘Fuel Tank System
Limitations,’’ of the AvCraft Dornier 328JET
ALD TM–ALD–010599–ALL, Revision 2,
dated January 31, 2005.
No Alternative Inspections, Inspection
Intervals, or Critical Design Configuration
Control Limitations (CDCCLs)
(j) After accomplishing the actions
specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h), and
the initial inspections in paragraph (i) of this
AD, no alternative inspections, inspection
intervals, or CDCCLs may be used unless the
inspections, intervals, or CDCCLs are
approved as an alternative method of
compliance (AMOC) in accordance with the
procedures specified in paragraph (k) of this
AD.
New Information
Explanation of CDCCL Requirements
Note 3: Notwithstanding any other
maintenance or operational requirements,
components that have been identified as
airworthy or installed on the affected
airplanes before the revision of the
Airworthiness Limitations section, as
required by paragraph (h) of this AD, do not
need to be reworked in accordance with the
CDCCLs. However, once the Airworthiness
Limitations section has been revised, future
maintenance actions on these components
must be done in accordance with the
CDCCLs.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(k) The Manager, International Branch,
ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate,
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs
for this AD, if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to
ATTN: Tom Groves, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057–
3356; telephone (425) 227–1503; fax (425)
227–1149. Before using any approved AMOC
on any airplane to which the AMOC applies,
notify your principal maintenance inspector
(PMI) or principal avionics inspector (PAI),
as appropriate, or lacking a principal
inspector, your local Flight Standards District
Office. The AMOC approval letter must
specifically reference this AD.
Related Information
(l) European Aviation Safety Agency
Airworthiness Directive 2006–0197
[Corrected], dated July 11, 2006, also
addresses the subject of this AD.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(m) You must use the service information
contained in Table 3 of this AD, as
applicable, to do the actions required by this
AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
TABLE 3—ALL MATERIAL INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Service information
AvCraft
AvCraft
AvCraft
Section
Revision
Service Bulletin SB–328J–00–197, including Price Information Sheet ......................................
Service Bulletin SB–328J–00–198, including Price Information Sheet ......................................
Temporary Revision ALD–028 to the AvCraft 328JET Airworthiness Limitations Document ....
G of the AvCraft Dornier 328JET ALD TM–ALD–010599–ALL .................................................
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
previously approved the incorporation by
reference of Section G, ‘‘Fuel Tank System
Limitations,’’ of the AvCraft Dornier 328JET
ALD TM–ALD–010599–ALL, Revision 2,
dated January 31, 2005, on April 3, 2009 (74
FR 8853, February 27, 2009).
(2) The Director of the Federal Register
previously approved the incorporation by
reference of the service information
Date
Original ..................
Original ..................
Original ..................
2 .............................
August 23, 2004.
August 23, 2004.
October 15, 2003.
January 31, 2005.
identified in Table 4 of this AD on September
6, 2005 (70 FR 44046, August 1, 2005).
TABLE 4—MATERIAL PREVIOUSLY INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE ON SEPTEMBER 6, 2005
Service information
Date
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
AvCraft Service Bulletin SB–328J–00–197, including Price Information Sheet ...................................................................
AvCraft Service Bulletin SB–328J–00–198, including Price Information Sheet ...................................................................
AvCraft Temporary Revision ALD–028 to the AvCraft 328JET Airworthiness Limitations Document .................................
(3) For service information identified in
this AD, contact 328 Support Services GmbH,
Global Support Center, P.O. Box 1252, D–
82231 Wessling, Federal Republic of
Germany; telephone +49 8153 88111 6666;
fax +49 8153 88111 6565; e-mail
gsc.op@328support.de; Internet https://
www.328support.de.
(4) You may review copies of the service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call
425–227–1221 or 425–227–1152.
(5) You may also review copies of the
service information that is incorporated by
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:06 Nov 05, 2009
Jkt 220001
reference at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202–741–6030, or go
to: https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/
code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on October
26, 2009.
Stephen P. Boyd,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E9–26381 Filed 11–5–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
August 23, 2004.
August 23, 2004.
October 15, 2003.
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Air Force
[Docket ID: USAF–2009–0018]
32 CFR Part 806b
Privacy Act; Implementation
AGENCY:
Department of the Air Force,
DoD.
ACTION: Final rule with request for
comments.
E:\FR\FM\06NOR1.SGM
06NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 214 / Friday, November 6, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
SUMMARY: The Department of Air Force
is updating the Department of Air Force
Privacy Act Program Rules, 32 CFR part
806b, by adding the (k)(1) thru (k)(7)
exemptions to accurately describe the
basis for exempting the records. The
Privacy Act system of records notice,
F051 AF JAA, entitled ‘‘Freedom of
Information Appeal Records’’, was has
already been published on December 12,
2008 (73 FR 75688).
The rule will be effective on
January 5, 2010 unless comments are
received that would result in a contrary
determination. Comments will be
accepted on or before January 5, 2010.
DATES:
You may submit comments,
identified by docket number and title,
by any of the following methods.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Federal Docket management
System Office, 1160 Defense Pentagon,
Room 3C843, Washington, DC 20301–
1160.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number or Regulatory
Information Number (RIN) for this
Federal Register document. The general
policy for comments and other
submissions from members of the public
is to make these submissions available
for public viewing on the Internet at
https://www.regulations.gov as they are
received without change, including any
personal identifiers or contact
information.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr.
Ben Swilley at (703) 696–6648.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
Executive Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review’’
It has been determined that Privacy
Act rules for the Department of Defense
are not significant rules. The rules do
not (1) have an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more or
adversely affect in a material way the
economy; a sector of the economy;
productivity; competition; jobs; the
environment; public health or safety; or
State, local, or tribal governments or
communities; (2) Create a serious
inconsistency or otherwise interfere
with an action taken or planned by
another Agency; (3) Materially alter the
budgetary impact of entitlements,
grants, user fees, or loan programs, or
the rights and obligations of recipients
thereof; or (4) Raise novel legal or policy
issues arising out of legal mandates, the
President’s priorities, or the principles
set forth in this Executive order.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:06 Nov 05, 2009
Jkt 220001
Public Law 96–354, ‘‘Regulatory
Flexibility Act’’ (5 U.S.C. Chapter 6)
It has been determined that Privacy
Act rules for the Department of Defense
do not have significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities
because they are concerned only with
the administration of Privacy Act
systems of records within the
Department of Defense.
Public Law 96–511, ‘‘Paperwork
Reduction Act’’ (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35)
It has been determined that Privacy
Act rules for the Department of Defense
impose no information requirements
beyond the Department of Defense and
that the information collected within
the Department of Defense is necessary
and consistent with 5 U.S.C. 552a,
known as the Privacy Act of 1974.
Section 202, Public Law 104–4,
‘‘Unfunded Mandates Reform Act’’
It has been determined that Privacy
Act rules for the Department of Defense
do not involve a Federal mandate that
may result in the expenditure by State,
local and tribal governments, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector, of
$100 million or more and that such
rulemaking will not significantly or
uniquely affect small governments.
57415
part of the case record in this system. To the
extent that copies of exempt records from
those ‘other’ systems of records are entered
into this system, the Department of the Air
Force hereby claims the same exemptions for
the records from those ‘other’ systems that
are entered into this system, as claimed for
the original primary system of which they are
a part.
(ii) Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2), (k)(1),
(k)(2), (k)(3), (k)(4), (k)(5), (k)(6), and (k)(7).
(iii) Reason: Records are only exempt from
pertinent provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a to the
extent such provisions have been identified
and an exemption claimed for the original
record, and the purposes underlying the
exemption for the original record still pertain
to the record which is now contained in this
system of records. In general, the exemptions
were claimed in order to protect properly
classified information relating to national
defense and foreign policy, to avoid
interference during the conduct of criminal,
civil, or administrative actions or
investigations, to ensure protective services
provided the President and others are not
compromised, to protect the identity of
confidential sources incident to Federal
employment, military service, contract, and
security clearance determinations, and to
preserve the confidentiality and integrity of
Federal evaluation materials. The exemption
rule for the original records will identify the
specific reasons why the records are exempt
from specific provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a.
*
*
*
*
*
Executive Order 13132, ‘‘Federalism’’
It has been determined that Privacy
Act rules for the Department of Defense
do not have federalism implications.
The rules do not have substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship
between the National Government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government.
Dated: November 2, 2009.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer,
Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. E9–26746 Filed 11–5–09; 8:45 am]
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 806b
Privacy.
■ Accordingly, 32 CFR part 806b is
amended as follows:
Coast Guard
PART 806b—PRIVACY ACT PROGRAM
RIN 1625–AA00
1. The authority citation for 32 CFR
part 806b continues to read as follows:
Safety Zone; SR 90 Bridge,
Assawoman Bay, Isle of Wight and
Ocean City, MD
■
Authority: Public Law 93–579, 88 Stat.
1896 (5 U.S.C. 552a).
2. Paragraph (e) of Appendix D to 32
CFR part 806b is amended by adding
paragraph (26) to read as follows:
■
Appendix D to Part 806b—General and
Specific Exemptions
*
*
*
*
*
(26) System identifier and name: F051 AF
JAA, Freedom of Information Appeal
Records.
(i) Exemption: During the processing of a
Privacy Act request, exempt materials from
other systems of records may in turn become
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2009–0956]
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone on
Assawoman Bay in the vicinity of the
SR 90 Bridge (Ocean City Expressway)
that connects Isle of Wight and Ocean
City, MD. This action will protect
mariners and public property on
Assawoman Bay from the hazards
associated with possible falling debris
from the channel span superstructure
and facilitates expeditious repairs to the
E:\FR\FM\06NOR1.SGM
06NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 214 (Friday, November 6, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 57414-57415]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-26746]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Air Force
[Docket ID: USAF-2009-0018]
32 CFR Part 806b
Privacy Act; Implementation
AGENCY: Department of the Air Force, DoD.
ACTION: Final rule with request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 57415]]
SUMMARY: The Department of Air Force is updating the Department of Air
Force Privacy Act Program Rules, 32 CFR part 806b, by adding the (k)(1)
thru (k)(7) exemptions to accurately describe the basis for exempting
the records. The Privacy Act system of records notice, F051 AF JAA,
entitled ``Freedom of Information Appeal Records'', was has already
been published on December 12, 2008 (73 FR 75688).
DATES: The rule will be effective on January 5, 2010 unless comments
are received that would result in a contrary determination. Comments
will be accepted on or before January 5, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number and
title, by any of the following methods.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Federal Docket management System Office, 1160
Defense Pentagon, Room 3C843, Washington, DC 20301-1160.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and docket number or Regulatory Information Number (RIN) for this
Federal Register document. The general policy for comments and other
submissions from members of the public is to make these submissions
available for public viewing on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov as they are received without change, including any
personal identifiers or contact information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Ben Swilley at (703) 696-6648.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review''
It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the Department of
Defense are not significant rules. The rules do not (1) have an annual
effect on the economy of $100 million or more or adversely affect in a
material way the economy; a sector of the economy; productivity;
competition; jobs; the environment; public health or safety; or State,
local, or tribal governments or communities; (2) Create a serious
inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by
another Agency; (3) Materially alter the budgetary impact of
entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs, or the rights and
obligations of recipients thereof; or (4) Raise novel legal or policy
issues arising out of legal mandates, the President's priorities, or
the principles set forth in this Executive order.
Public Law 96-354, ``Regulatory Flexibility Act'' (5 U.S.C. Chapter 6)
It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the Department of
Defense do not have significant economic impact on a substantial number
of small entities because they are concerned only with the
administration of Privacy Act systems of records within the Department
of Defense.
Public Law 96-511, ``Paperwork Reduction Act'' (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35)
It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the Department of
Defense impose no information requirements beyond the Department of
Defense and that the information collected within the Department of
Defense is necessary and consistent with 5 U.S.C. 552a, known as the
Privacy Act of 1974.
Section 202, Public Law 104-4, ``Unfunded Mandates Reform Act''
It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the Department of
Defense do not involve a Federal mandate that may result in the
expenditure by State, local and tribal governments, in the aggregate,
or by the private sector, of $100 million or more and that such
rulemaking will not significantly or uniquely affect small governments.
Executive Order 13132, ``Federalism''
It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the Department of
Defense do not have federalism implications. The rules do not have
substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between
the National Government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 806b
Privacy.
0
Accordingly, 32 CFR part 806b is amended as follows:
PART 806b--PRIVACY ACT PROGRAM
0
1. The authority citation for 32 CFR part 806b continues to read as
follows:
Authority: Public Law 93-579, 88 Stat. 1896 (5 U.S.C. 552a).
0
2. Paragraph (e) of Appendix D to 32 CFR part 806b is amended by adding
paragraph (26) to read as follows:
Appendix D to Part 806b--General and Specific Exemptions
* * * * *
(26) System identifier and name: F051 AF JAA, Freedom of
Information Appeal Records.
(i) Exemption: During the processing of a Privacy Act request,
exempt materials from other systems of records may in turn become
part of the case record in this system. To the extent that copies of
exempt records from those `other' systems of records are entered
into this system, the Department of the Air Force hereby claims the
same exemptions for the records from those `other' systems that are
entered into this system, as claimed for the original primary system
of which they are a part.
(ii) Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2), (k)(1), (k)(2), (k)(3),
(k)(4), (k)(5), (k)(6), and (k)(7).
(iii) Reason: Records are only exempt from pertinent provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552a to the extent such provisions have been identified
and an exemption claimed for the original record, and the purposes
underlying the exemption for the original record still pertain to
the record which is now contained in this system of records. In
general, the exemptions were claimed in order to protect properly
classified information relating to national defense and foreign
policy, to avoid interference during the conduct of criminal, civil,
or administrative actions or investigations, to ensure protective
services provided the President and others are not compromised, to
protect the identity of confidential sources incident to Federal
employment, military service, contract, and security clearance
determinations, and to preserve the confidentiality and integrity of
Federal evaluation materials. The exemption rule for the original
records will identify the specific reasons why the records are
exempt from specific provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a.
* * * * *
Dated: November 2, 2009.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. E9-26746 Filed 11-5-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P