Privacy Act; Implementation, 57414-57415 [E9-26746]

Download as PDF 57414 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 214 / Friday, November 6, 2009 / Rules and Regulations Note 2: This may be done by inserting a copy of AvCraft TR ALD–028, dated October 15, 2003, in the AvCraft 328JET ALD. When this TR has been included in general revisions of the AvCraft 328JET ALD, the TR no longer needs to be inserted into the revised Airworthiness Limitations document. Restatement of the Requirments of AD 2009– 01–06, With No Changes Revised Initial Compliance Time (i) For Sub-tasks 28–00–00–02 and 28–00– 00–03 (‘‘Detailed Inspection of Outer and Inner Fuel Tank Harness Internal’’), as identified in AvCraft TR ALD–028, dated October 15, 2003; or Section G, ‘‘Fuel Tank System Limitations,’’ of the AvCraft Dornier 328JET ALD TM–ALD–010599–ALL, Revision 2, dated January 31, 2005; the initial compliance time is within 8 years after April 3, 2009. Thereafter, except as provided by paragraph (k) of this AD, these tasks must be accomplished at the repetitive interval specified in Section G, ‘‘Fuel Tank System Limitations,’’ of the AvCraft Dornier 328JET ALD TM–ALD–010599–ALL, Revision 2, dated January 31, 2005. No Alternative Inspections, Inspection Intervals, or Critical Design Configuration Control Limitations (CDCCLs) (j) After accomplishing the actions specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h), and the initial inspections in paragraph (i) of this AD, no alternative inspections, inspection intervals, or CDCCLs may be used unless the inspections, intervals, or CDCCLs are approved as an alternative method of compliance (AMOC) in accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (k) of this AD. New Information Explanation of CDCCL Requirements Note 3: Notwithstanding any other maintenance or operational requirements, components that have been identified as airworthy or installed on the affected airplanes before the revision of the Airworthiness Limitations section, as required by paragraph (h) of this AD, do not need to be reworked in accordance with the CDCCLs. However, once the Airworthiness Limitations section has been revised, future maintenance actions on these components must be done in accordance with the CDCCLs. Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs) (k) The Manager, International Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Tom Groves, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057– 3356; telephone (425) 227–1503; fax (425) 227–1149. Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your principal maintenance inspector (PMI) or principal avionics inspector (PAI), as appropriate, or lacking a principal inspector, your local Flight Standards District Office. The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this AD. Related Information (l) European Aviation Safety Agency Airworthiness Directive 2006–0197 [Corrected], dated July 11, 2006, also addresses the subject of this AD. Material Incorporated by Reference (m) You must use the service information contained in Table 3 of this AD, as applicable, to do the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. TABLE 3—ALL MATERIAL INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE Service information AvCraft AvCraft AvCraft Section Revision Service Bulletin SB–328J–00–197, including Price Information Sheet ...................................... Service Bulletin SB–328J–00–198, including Price Information Sheet ...................................... Temporary Revision ALD–028 to the AvCraft 328JET Airworthiness Limitations Document .... G of the AvCraft Dornier 328JET ALD TM–ALD–010599–ALL ................................................. (1) The Director of the Federal Register previously approved the incorporation by reference of Section G, ‘‘Fuel Tank System Limitations,’’ of the AvCraft Dornier 328JET ALD TM–ALD–010599–ALL, Revision 2, dated January 31, 2005, on April 3, 2009 (74 FR 8853, February 27, 2009). (2) The Director of the Federal Register previously approved the incorporation by reference of the service information Date Original .................. Original .................. Original .................. 2 ............................. August 23, 2004. August 23, 2004. October 15, 2003. January 31, 2005. identified in Table 4 of this AD on September 6, 2005 (70 FR 44046, August 1, 2005). TABLE 4—MATERIAL PREVIOUSLY INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE ON SEPTEMBER 6, 2005 Service information Date srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES AvCraft Service Bulletin SB–328J–00–197, including Price Information Sheet ................................................................... AvCraft Service Bulletin SB–328J–00–198, including Price Information Sheet ................................................................... AvCraft Temporary Revision ALD–028 to the AvCraft 328JET Airworthiness Limitations Document ................................. (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact 328 Support Services GmbH, Global Support Center, P.O. Box 1252, D– 82231 Wessling, Federal Republic of Germany; telephone +49 8153 88111 6666; fax +49 8153 88111 6565; e-mail gsc.op@328support.de; Internet http:// www.328support.de. (4) You may review copies of the service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221 or 425–227–1152. (5) You may also review copies of the service information that is incorporated by VerDate Nov<24>2008 16:06 Nov 05, 2009 Jkt 220001 reference at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202–741–6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/ code_of_federal_regulations/ ibr_locations.html. Issued in Renton, Washington, on October 26, 2009. Stephen P. Boyd, Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. [FR Doc. E9–26381 Filed 11–5–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–13–P PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 August 23, 2004. August 23, 2004. October 15, 2003. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Department of the Air Force [Docket ID: USAF–2009–0018] 32 CFR Part 806b Privacy Act; Implementation AGENCY: Department of the Air Force, DoD. ACTION: Final rule with request for comments. E:\FR\FM\06NOR1.SGM 06NOR1 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 214 / Friday, November 6, 2009 / Rules and Regulations SUMMARY: The Department of Air Force is updating the Department of Air Force Privacy Act Program Rules, 32 CFR part 806b, by adding the (k)(1) thru (k)(7) exemptions to accurately describe the basis for exempting the records. The Privacy Act system of records notice, F051 AF JAA, entitled ‘‘Freedom of Information Appeal Records’’, was has already been published on December 12, 2008 (73 FR 75688). The rule will be effective on January 5, 2010 unless comments are received that would result in a contrary determination. Comments will be accepted on or before January 5, 2010. DATES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number and title, by any of the following methods. • Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. • Mail: Federal Docket management System Office, 1160 Defense Pentagon, Room 3C843, Washington, DC 20301– 1160. Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name and docket number or Regulatory Information Number (RIN) for this Federal Register document. The general policy for comments and other submissions from members of the public is to make these submissions available for public viewing on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov as they are received without change, including any personal identifiers or contact information. ADDRESSES: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Ben Swilley at (703) 696–6648. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES Executive Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory Planning and Review’’ It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the Department of Defense are not significant rules. The rules do not (1) have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more or adversely affect in a material way the economy; a sector of the economy; productivity; competition; jobs; the environment; public health or safety; or State, local, or tribal governments or communities; (2) Create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by another Agency; (3) Materially alter the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs, or the rights and obligations of recipients thereof; or (4) Raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal mandates, the President’s priorities, or the principles set forth in this Executive order. VerDate Nov<24>2008 16:06 Nov 05, 2009 Jkt 220001 Public Law 96–354, ‘‘Regulatory Flexibility Act’’ (5 U.S.C. Chapter 6) It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the Department of Defense do not have significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities because they are concerned only with the administration of Privacy Act systems of records within the Department of Defense. Public Law 96–511, ‘‘Paperwork Reduction Act’’ (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the Department of Defense impose no information requirements beyond the Department of Defense and that the information collected within the Department of Defense is necessary and consistent with 5 U.S.C. 552a, known as the Privacy Act of 1974. Section 202, Public Law 104–4, ‘‘Unfunded Mandates Reform Act’’ It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the Department of Defense do not involve a Federal mandate that may result in the expenditure by State, local and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100 million or more and that such rulemaking will not significantly or uniquely affect small governments. 57415 part of the case record in this system. To the extent that copies of exempt records from those ‘other’ systems of records are entered into this system, the Department of the Air Force hereby claims the same exemptions for the records from those ‘other’ systems that are entered into this system, as claimed for the original primary system of which they are a part. (ii) Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2), (k)(1), (k)(2), (k)(3), (k)(4), (k)(5), (k)(6), and (k)(7). (iii) Reason: Records are only exempt from pertinent provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a to the extent such provisions have been identified and an exemption claimed for the original record, and the purposes underlying the exemption for the original record still pertain to the record which is now contained in this system of records. In general, the exemptions were claimed in order to protect properly classified information relating to national defense and foreign policy, to avoid interference during the conduct of criminal, civil, or administrative actions or investigations, to ensure protective services provided the President and others are not compromised, to protect the identity of confidential sources incident to Federal employment, military service, contract, and security clearance determinations, and to preserve the confidentiality and integrity of Federal evaluation materials. The exemption rule for the original records will identify the specific reasons why the records are exempt from specific provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a. * * * * * Executive Order 13132, ‘‘Federalism’’ It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the Department of Defense do not have federalism implications. The rules do not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. Dated: November 2, 2009. Patricia L. Toppings, OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense. [FR Doc. E9–26746 Filed 11–5–09; 8:45 am] List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 806b Privacy. ■ Accordingly, 32 CFR part 806b is amended as follows: Coast Guard PART 806b—PRIVACY ACT PROGRAM RIN 1625–AA00 1. The authority citation for 32 CFR part 806b continues to read as follows: Safety Zone; SR 90 Bridge, Assawoman Bay, Isle of Wight and Ocean City, MD ■ Authority: Public Law 93–579, 88 Stat. 1896 (5 U.S.C. 552a). 2. Paragraph (e) of Appendix D to 32 CFR part 806b is amended by adding paragraph (26) to read as follows: ■ Appendix D to Part 806b—General and Specific Exemptions * * * * * (26) System identifier and name: F051 AF JAA, Freedom of Information Appeal Records. (i) Exemption: During the processing of a Privacy Act request, exempt materials from other systems of records may in turn become PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 BILLING CODE 5001–06–P DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY 33 CFR Part 165 [Docket No. USCG–2009–0956] Coast Guard, DHS. Temporary final rule. AGENCY: ACTION: SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone on Assawoman Bay in the vicinity of the SR 90 Bridge (Ocean City Expressway) that connects Isle of Wight and Ocean City, MD. This action will protect mariners and public property on Assawoman Bay from the hazards associated with possible falling debris from the channel span superstructure and facilitates expeditious repairs to the E:\FR\FM\06NOR1.SGM 06NOR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 214 (Friday, November 6, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 57414-57415]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-26746]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Air Force

[Docket ID: USAF-2009-0018]

32 CFR Part 806b


Privacy Act; Implementation

AGENCY: Department of the Air Force, DoD.

ACTION: Final rule with request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 57415]]

SUMMARY: The Department of Air Force is updating the Department of Air 
Force Privacy Act Program Rules, 32 CFR part 806b, by adding the (k)(1) 
thru (k)(7) exemptions to accurately describe the basis for exempting 
the records. The Privacy Act system of records notice, F051 AF JAA, 
entitled ``Freedom of Information Appeal Records'', was has already 
been published on December 12, 2008 (73 FR 75688).

DATES: The rule will be effective on January 5, 2010 unless comments 
are received that would result in a contrary determination. Comments 
will be accepted on or before January 5, 2010.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number and 
title, by any of the following methods.
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Mail: Federal Docket management System Office, 1160 
Defense Pentagon, Room 3C843, Washington, DC 20301-1160.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name 
and docket number or Regulatory Information Number (RIN) for this 
Federal Register document. The general policy for comments and other 
submissions from members of the public is to make these submissions 
available for public viewing on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov as they are received without change, including any 
personal identifiers or contact information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Ben Swilley at (703) 696-6648.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review''

    It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the Department of 
Defense are not significant rules. The rules do not (1) have an annual 
effect on the economy of $100 million or more or adversely affect in a 
material way the economy; a sector of the economy; productivity; 
competition; jobs; the environment; public health or safety; or State, 
local, or tribal governments or communities; (2) Create a serious 
inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by 
another Agency; (3) Materially alter the budgetary impact of 
entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs, or the rights and 
obligations of recipients thereof; or (4) Raise novel legal or policy 
issues arising out of legal mandates, the President's priorities, or 
the principles set forth in this Executive order.

Public Law 96-354, ``Regulatory Flexibility Act'' (5 U.S.C. Chapter 6)

    It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the Department of 
Defense do not have significant economic impact on a substantial number 
of small entities because they are concerned only with the 
administration of Privacy Act systems of records within the Department 
of Defense.

Public Law 96-511, ``Paperwork Reduction Act'' (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35)

    It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the Department of 
Defense impose no information requirements beyond the Department of 
Defense and that the information collected within the Department of 
Defense is necessary and consistent with 5 U.S.C. 552a, known as the 
Privacy Act of 1974.

Section 202, Public Law 104-4, ``Unfunded Mandates Reform Act''

    It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the Department of 
Defense do not involve a Federal mandate that may result in the 
expenditure by State, local and tribal governments, in the aggregate, 
or by the private sector, of $100 million or more and that such 
rulemaking will not significantly or uniquely affect small governments.

Executive Order 13132, ``Federalism''

    It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the Department of 
Defense do not have federalism implications. The rules do not have 
substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between 
the National Government and the States, or on the distribution of power 
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.

List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 806b

    Privacy.

0
Accordingly, 32 CFR part 806b is amended as follows:

PART 806b--PRIVACY ACT PROGRAM

0
1. The authority citation for 32 CFR part 806b continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority:  Public Law 93-579, 88 Stat. 1896 (5 U.S.C. 552a).


0
2. Paragraph (e) of Appendix D to 32 CFR part 806b is amended by adding 
paragraph (26) to read as follows:

Appendix D to Part 806b--General and Specific Exemptions

* * * * *
    (26) System identifier and name: F051 AF JAA, Freedom of 
Information Appeal Records.
    (i) Exemption: During the processing of a Privacy Act request, 
exempt materials from other systems of records may in turn become 
part of the case record in this system. To the extent that copies of 
exempt records from those `other' systems of records are entered 
into this system, the Department of the Air Force hereby claims the 
same exemptions for the records from those `other' systems that are 
entered into this system, as claimed for the original primary system 
of which they are a part.
    (ii) Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2), (k)(1), (k)(2), (k)(3), 
(k)(4), (k)(5), (k)(6), and (k)(7).
    (iii) Reason: Records are only exempt from pertinent provisions 
of 5 U.S.C. 552a to the extent such provisions have been identified 
and an exemption claimed for the original record, and the purposes 
underlying the exemption for the original record still pertain to 
the record which is now contained in this system of records. In 
general, the exemptions were claimed in order to protect properly 
classified information relating to national defense and foreign 
policy, to avoid interference during the conduct of criminal, civil, 
or administrative actions or investigations, to ensure protective 
services provided the President and others are not compromised, to 
protect the identity of confidential sources incident to Federal 
employment, military service, contract, and security clearance 
determinations, and to preserve the confidentiality and integrity of 
Federal evaluation materials. The exemption rule for the original 
records will identify the specific reasons why the records are 
exempt from specific provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a.
* * * * *

    Dated: November 2, 2009.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. E9-26746 Filed 11-5-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P