Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA) Request for Grant Proposals: Near East and South Asia Undergraduate Exchange Program, 57379-57385 [E9-26681]
Download as PDF
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 213 / Thursday, November 5, 2009 / Notices
policies and procedures regarding the
operation, oversight, and accountability
of PSCs.
VI.2 Administrative and National
Policy Requirements:
Terms and Conditions for the
Administration of ECA agreements
include the following:
Office of Management and Budget
Circular A–122, ‘‘Cost Principles for
Nonprofit Organizations.’’
Office of Management and Budget
Circular A–21, ‘‘Cost Principles for
Educational Institutions.’’
OMB Circular A–87, ‘‘Cost Principles
for State, Local and Indian
Governments’’.
OMB Circular No. A–110 (Revised),
Uniform Administrative Requirements
for Grants and Agreements With
Institutions of Higher Education,
Hospitals, and Other Nonprofit
Organizations.
OMB Circular No. A–102, Uniform
Administrative Requirements for
Grants-in-Aid to State and Local
Governments.
OMB Circular No. A–133, Audits of
States, Local Government, and Nonprofit Organizations.
Please reference the following Web
sites for additional information:
https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/
grants.
https://fa.statebuy.state.gov.
VI.3. Reporting Requirements: You
must provide ECA with a hard copy
original plus one copy of the following
reports:
1. Interim reports, as required in the
Bureau grant agreement.
2. A final program and financial
report no more than 90 days after the
expiration of the award.
3. A concise, one-page final program
report summarizing program outcomes
no more than 90 days after the
expiration of the award. This one-page
report will be transmitted to OMB, and
be made available to the public via
OMB’s USAspending.gov Web site—as
part of ECA’s Federal Funding
Accountability and Transparency Act
(FFATA) reporting requirements.
4. A SF–PPR, ‘‘Performance Progress
Report’’ Cover Sheet with all program
reports.
Award recipients will be required to
provide reports analyzing their
evaluation findings to the Bureau in
their regular program reports. Please
refer to IV. Application and Submission
Instructions (IV.3.d.3) above for Program
Monitoring and Evaluation information.
All data collected, including survey
responses and contact information, must
be maintained for a minimum of three
years and provided to the Bureau upon
request.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:57 Nov 04, 2009
Jkt 220001
All reports must be sent to the ECA
Grants Officer and ECA Program Officer
listed in the final assistance award
document.
VII. Agency Contacts
For questions about this
announcement, contact: Carolyn Lantz,
Program Officer, Youth Programs
Division (ECA/PE/C/PY), U.S.
Department of State, SA–5, 3rd Floor,
Washington, DC 20522–0503,
Telephone (202) 632–6421, Fax (202)
632–9355, E-mail: LantzCS@state.gov.
All correspondence with the Bureau
concerning this RFGP should reference
the title, Benjamin Franklin Institute,
and number, ECA/PE/C/PY–10–03.
Please read the complete
announcement before sending inquiries
or submitting proposals. Once the RFGP
deadline has passed, Bureau staff may
not discuss this competition with
applicants until the proposal review
process has been completed.
VIII. Other Information
Notice
The terms and conditions published
in this RFGP are binding and may not
be modified by any Bureau
representative. Explanatory information
provided by the Bureau that contradicts
published language will not be binding.
Issuance of the RFGP does not
constitute an award commitment on the
part of the Government. The Bureau
reserves the right to reduce, revise, or
increase proposal budgets in accordance
with the needs of the program and the
availability of funds. Awards made will
be subject to periodic reporting and
evaluation requirements per section VI.3
above.
Dated: October 26, 2009.
Maura M. Pally,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Educational
and Cultural Affairs, U.S. Department of
State.
[FR Doc. E9–26425 Filed 11–4–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 6801]
Bureau of Educational and Cultural
Affairs (ECA) Request for Grant
Proposals: Near East and South Asia
Undergraduate Exchange Program
Announcement Type: New
Cooperative Agreement.
Funding Opportunity Number: ECA/
A/E/NEA–10–02.
Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance Number: 19.009.
PO 00000
Frm 00095
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
57379
Key Dates
Application Deadline: January 15,
2010.
Executive Summary: The Office of
Academic Exchange Programs of the
Bureau of Educational and Cultural
Affairs announces an open competition
to administer the FY2010 Near East and
South Asia Undergraduate Exchange
Program. Public and private non-profit
organizations meeting the provisions
described in Internal Revenue Code
section 26 USC 501(c)(3) in the United
States may submit proposals to organize
and carry out academic exchange
activities for students from
underrepresented sectors in the Middle
East, North Africa and South Asia
(eligible countries and locales are listed
below in the Purpose section). The
recipient organization will be
responsible for the following aspects of
the program: Placement of no less than
115 foreign students at accredited U.S.
institutions (90 for one academic year,
25 for one semester), student travel to
the U.S., orientation, enrichment
programming, advising, monitoring and
support, pre-return activities,
evaluation, and follow-up with program
alumni. It is anticipated that the total
amount of funding for FY2010
administrative and program costs will
be $3,500,000 pending availability of
funds.
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Authority
Overall grant making authority for
this program is contained in the Mutual
Educational and Cultural Exchange Act
of 1961, Public Law 87–256, as
amended, also known as the FulbrightHays Act. The purpose of the Act is ‘‘to
enable the Government of the United
States to increase mutual understanding
between the people of the United States
and the people of other countries * * *;
to strengthen the ties which unite us
with other nations by demonstrating the
educational and cultural interests,
developments, and achievements of the
people of the United States and other
nations * * * and thus to assist in the
development of friendly, sympathetic
and peaceful relations between the
United States and the other countries of
the world.’’ The funding authority for
the program above is provided through
legislation.
Purpose
The principal objective of the Near
East and South Asia Undergraduate
Exchange Program (herein referred to as
the ‘‘NESA UGRAD’’) is to provide a
substantive exchange experience at a
U.S. college or university to a diverse
E:\FR\FM\05NON1.SGM
05NON1
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
57380
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 213 / Thursday, November 5, 2009 / Notices
group of emerging student leaders from
underrepresented sectors in the Middle
East, North Africa and South Asia. In
this context, the recipient organization
should ensure that participants are able
to enroll full-time in courses at U.S.
institutions alongside U.S. peers, and
provide the participants with
opportunities to understand the U.S.
and U.S. citizens inside and outside the
classroom.
Participants will return to their home
countries at the conclusion of the
exchange program to re-enter colleges
and universities there, and re-integrate
with their home societies.
An objective of the program is to
provide participants with tailored
instruction in the academic skills and
study habits required to be successful at
the undergraduate level as well as be
better prepared for higher level studies
in the U.S. in the future.
The NESA UGRAD will provide no
less than 115 scholarships—90 for one
academic year and 25 for one semester
(Pakistan only)—at U.S. institutions of
higher education to outstanding
students from non-elite sectors from the
Near East (countries/locales may
include Algeria, Bahrain, Egypt, Israel,
Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Libya,
Morocco, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia,
Syria, Tunisia, United Arab Emirates,
Yemen, the Palestinian Territories) and
South Asia (India, Nepal, Pakistan, and
Bangladesh). Additional countries may
be added to meet the overall needs of
the program and availability of funds.
Scholarships will be granted primarily
to students who are currently enrolled
in an undergraduate degree program in
their home country, although students
just completing their final year of high
school will also be eligible. The
recipient organization will place
participants in non-degree programs at
both two- and four-year U.S. colleges
and universities.
The recipient organization should
develop enrichment activities to
enhance the participants’ academic
education, including having students
make local presentations about their
countries, community service, and
internships (for one year students only).
All participants are required to return to
their home countries immediately upon
the conclusion of the program. Transfers
of academic program or visa
sponsorship of participants to another
U.S. institution will not be considered.
ECA will award one cooperative
agreement for this program. Programs
and projects must conform to Bureau
requirements and guidelines outlined in
the Solicitation Package. ECA programs
are subject to the availability of funds.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:57 Nov 04, 2009
Jkt 220001
Programs must comply with J–1 Visa
regulations. Please refer to the
Solicitation Package for further
information.
In a cooperative agreement, the Near
East Asia Programs Branch of the Office
of Academic Exchange Programs in the
Bureau of Educational and Cultural
Affairs (ECA/A/E/NEA) is substantially
involved in program activities above
and beyond routine grant monitoring.
ECA/A/E/NEA activities and
responsibilities for this program are, but
not limited to, the following:
1. Participating in the design and
direction of program activities;
2. Approval of key personnel;
3. Final selection of program
participants;
4. Approval and input for all program
agendas and timelines;
5. Final approval of all student
placements;
6. Final approval of internship
placements;
7. Guidance in execution of all project
components;
8. Arrangement for State Department
speakers during workshops;
9. Assistance with participant
emergencies;
10. Providing background information
related to participants’ home countries
and cultures; and
11. Liaison with Public Affairs
Sections of the U.S. Embassies and
country desk officers at the State
Department.
Note: All materials, publicity, and
correspondence related to the program must
acknowledge this as a program of the Bureau
of Educational and Cultural Affairs, U.S.
Department of State. The Bureau will retain
copyright use of and distribute materials
related to this program as it sees fit.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Cooperative
Agreement. ECA’s level of involvement
in this program is listed under number
I above.
Fiscal Year Funds: FY2010.
Approximate Total Funding:
$3,500,000.
Approximate Number of Awards: 1.
Anticipated Award Date: Pending
availability of funds, the anticipated
program start date will be March 1,
2010.
Anticipated Project Completion Date:
December 31, 2011.
Additional Information: Pending
successful implementation of this
program and the availability of funds in
subsequent fiscal years, it is ECA’s
intent to renew this grant for two
additional fiscal years, before openly
competing it again.
PO 00000
Frm 00096
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
III. Eligibility Information
III.1. Eligible Applicants
Applications may be submitted by
public and private non-profit
organizations meeting the provisions
described in Internal Revenue Code
section 26 USC 501(c)(3).
III.2. Cost-Sharing or Matching Funds
There is no minimum or maximum
percentage required for this
competition. However, the Bureau
encourages applicants to provide
maximum levels of cost sharing and
funding in support of its programs.
When cost sharing is offered, it is
understood and agreed that the
applicant must provide the amount of
cost sharing as stipulated in its proposal
and later included in an approved grant
agreement. Cost sharing may be in the
form of allowable direct or indirect
costs. For accountability, you must
maintain written records to support all
costs which are claimed as your
contribution, as well as costs to be paid
by the Federal government. Such
records are subject to audit. The basis
for determining the value of cash and
in-kind contributions must be in
accordance with OMB Circular A–110,
(Revised), Subpart C.23—Cost Sharing
and Matching. In the event you do not
provide the minimum amount of cost
sharing as stipulated in the approved
budget, ECA’s contribution will be
reduced in like proportion.
III.3. Other Eligibility Requirements
(a.) Bureau grant guidelines require
that organizations with less than four
years of experience in conducting
international exchange programs will be
limited to $60,000. ECA anticipates
awarding one grant, in the amount of up
to $3,000,000 to support the program
and administrative costs required to
implement the program. Therefore,
applicant organizations with less than
four years experience in conducting
international exchange programs are
ineligible to apply under this
competition. The Bureau encourages
applications to provide the maximum
levels of cost sharing and funding to in
support of its program.
IV. Application and Submission
Information
Note: Please read the complete
announcement before sending inquiries or
submitting proposals. Once the RFGP
deadline has passed, Bureau staff may not
discuss this competition with applicants
until the proposal review process has been
completed.
E:\FR\FM\05NON1.SGM
05NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 213 / Thursday, November 5, 2009 / Notices
IV.1. Contact Information To Request an
Application Package
Please contact the Near East Asia
Programs Branch, Office of Academic
Exchange Programs, ECA/A/E/NEA,
SA–5 Floor 4, U.S. Department of State,
Washington, DC 20522–0504, 202–632–
3270, Fax: 202–632–9411 or
AlamiLT@state.gov to request a
Solicitation Package. Please refer to the
Funding Opportunity Number ECA/A/
E/NEA–10–02 located at the top of this
announcement when making your
request.
Alternatively, an electronic
application package may be obtained
from grants.gov. Please see section IV.3f
for further information.
The Solicitation Package contains the
Proposal Submission Instruction (PSI)
document which consists of required
application forms, and standard
guidelines for proposal preparation.
It also contains the Project Objectives,
Goals and Implementation (POGI)
document, which provides specific
information, award criteria and budget
instructions tailored to this competition.
Please specify Program Officer, Laura
Alami, and refer to the Funding
Opportunity Number ECA/A/E/NEA–
10–02 on all other inquiries and
correspondence.
IV.2. To Download a Solicitation
Package Via Internet
The entire Solicitation Package may
be downloaded from the Bureau’s Web
site at: https://exchanges.state.gov/
grants/open2.html, or from the
Grants.gov Web site at https://
www.grants.gov.
Please read all information before
downloading.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
IV.3. Content and Form of Submission
Applicants must follow all
instructions in the Solicitation Package.
The application should be submitted
per the instructions under IV.3f.
Application Deadline and Methods of
Submission section below.
IV.3a. You are required to have a Dun
and Bradstreet Data Universal
Numbering System (DUNS) number to
apply for a grant or cooperative
agreement from the U.S. Government.
This number is a nine-digit
identification number, which uniquely
identifies business entities. Obtaining a
DUNS number is easy and there is no
charge. To obtain a DUNS number,
access https://
www.dunandbradstreet.com or call 1–
866–705–5711. Please ensure that your
DUNS number is included in the
appropriate box of the SF–424 which is
part of the formal application package.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:57 Nov 04, 2009
Jkt 220001
IV.3b. All proposals must contain an
executive summary, proposal narrative
and budget.
Please Refer to the Solicitation
Package. It contains the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI)
document and the Project Objectives,
Goals and Implementation (POGI)
document for additional formatting and
technical requirements.
IV.3c. You must have nonprofit status
with the IRS at the time of application.
Please note: Effective January 7, 2009,
all applicants for ECA federal assistance
awards must include in their
application the names of directors and/
or senior executives (current officers,
trustees, and key employees, regardless
of amount of compensation). In
fulfilling this requirement, applicants
must submit information in one of the
following ways:
(1) Those who file Internal Revenue
Service Form 990, ‘‘Return of
Organization Exempt From Income
Tax,’’ must include a copy of relevant
portions of this form.
(2) Those who do not file IRS Form
990 must submit information above in
the format of their choice.
In addition to final program reporting
requirements, award recipients will also
be required to submit a one-page
document, derived from their program
reports, listing and describing their
grant activities. For award recipients,
the names of directors and/or senior
executives (current officers, trustees,
and key employees), as well as the onepage description of grant activities, will
be transmitted by the State Department
to OMB, along with other information
required by the Federal Funding
Accountability and Transparency Act
(FFATA), and will be made available to
the public by the Office of Management
and Budget on its USASpending.gov
website as part of ECA’s FFATA
reporting requirements.
If your organization is a private
nonprofit which has not received a grant
or cooperative agreement from ECA in
the past three years, or if your
organization received nonprofit status
from the IRS within the past four years,
you must submit the necessary
documentation to verify nonprofit status
as directed in the PSI document. Failure
to do so will cause your proposal to be
declared technically ineligible.
IV.3d. Please take into consideration
the following information when
preparing your proposal narrative:
IV.3d.1. Adherence to All Regulations
Governing the J Visa
The Bureau of Educational and
Cultural Affairs is placing renewed
emphasis on the secure and proper
PO 00000
Frm 00097
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
57381
administration of Exchange Visitor (J
visa) Programs and adherence by
grantees and sponsors to all regulations
governing the J visa. Therefore,
proposals should demonstrate the
applicant’s capacity to meet all
requirements governing the
administration of the Exchange Visitor
Programs as set forth in 22 CFR 62,
including the oversight of Responsible
Officers and Alternate Responsible
Officers, screening and selection of
program participants, provision of prearrival information and orientation to
participants, monitoring of participants,
proper maintenance and security of
forms, recordkeeping, reporting and
other requirements.
The award recipient will be
responsible for issuing DS–2019 forms
to participants in this program.
A copy of the complete regulations
governing the administration of
Exchange Visitor (J) programs is
available at https://exchanges.state.gov
or from: Office of Designation, ECA/EC/
D, SA–5, Floor C2, Department of State,
Washington, DC 20522–0582.
Please refer to Solicitation Package for
further information.
IV.3d.2. Diversity, Freedom and
Democracy Guidelines
Pursuant to the Bureau’s authorizing
legislation, programs must maintain a
non-political character and should be
balanced and representative of the
diversity of American political, social,
and cultural life. ‘‘Diversity’’ should be
interpreted in the broadest sense and
encompass differences including, but
not limited to ethnicity, race, gender,
religion, geographic location, socioeconomic status, and physical
challenges. Applicants are strongly
encouraged to adhere to the
advancement of this principle both in
program administration and in program
content. Please refer to the review
criteria under the ‘‘Support for
Diversity’’ section for specific
suggestions on incorporating diversity
into your proposal. Public Law 104–319
provides that ‘‘in carrying out programs
of educational and cultural exchange in
countries whose people do not fully
enjoy freedom and democracy,’’ the
Bureau ‘‘shall take appropriate steps to
provide opportunities for participation
in such programs to human rights and
democracy leaders of such countries.’’
Public Law 106—113 requires that the
governments of the countries described
above do not have inappropriate
influence in the selection process.
Proposals should reflect advancement of
these goals in their program contents, to
the full extent deemed feasible.
E:\FR\FM\05NON1.SGM
05NON1
57382
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 213 / Thursday, November 5, 2009 / Notices
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
IV.3d.3. Program Monitoring and
Evaluation
Proposals must include a plan to
monitor and evaluate the project’s
success, both as the activities unfold
and at the end of the program. The
Bureau recommends that your proposal
include a draft survey questionnaire or
other technique plus a description of a
methodology to use to link outcomes to
original project objectives. The Bureau
expects that the award recipient will
track participants or partners and be
able to respond to key evaluation
questions, including satisfaction with
the program, learning as a result of the
program, changes in behavior as a result
of the program, and effects of the
program on institutions (institutions in
which participants work or partner
institutions). The evaluation plan
should include indicators that measure
gains in mutual understanding as well
as substantive knowledge.
Successful monitoring and evaluation
depend heavily on setting clear goals
and outcomes at the outset of a program.
Your evaluation plan should include a
description of your project’s objectives,
your anticipated project outcomes, and
how and when you intend to measure
these outcomes (performance
indicators). The more that outcomes are
‘‘smart’’ (specific, measurable,
attainable, results-oriented, and placed
in a reasonable time frame), the easier
it will be to conduct the evaluation. You
should also show how your project
objectives link to the goals of the
program described in this RFGP.
Your monitoring and evaluation plan
should clearly distinguish between
program outputs and outcomes. Outputs
are products and services delivered,
often stated as an amount. Output
information is important to show the
scope or size of project activities, but it
cannot substitute for information about
progress towards outcomes or the
results achieved. Examples of outputs
include the number of people trained or
the number of seminars conducted.
Outcomes, in contrast, represent
specific results a project is intended to
achieve and is usually measured as an
extent of change. Findings on outputs
and outcomes should both be reported,
but the focus should be on outcomes.
We encourage you to assess the
following four levels of outcomes, as
they relate to the program goals set out
in the RFGP (listed here in increasing
order of importance):
1. Participant satisfaction with the
program and exchange experience.
2. Participant learning, such as
increased knowledge, aptitude, skills,
and changed understanding and
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:57 Nov 04, 2009
Jkt 220001
attitude. Learning includes both
substantive (subject-specific) learning
and mutual understanding.
3. Participant behavior, concrete
actions to apply knowledge in work or
community; greater participation and
responsibility in civic organizations;
interpretation and explanation of
experiences and new knowledge gained;
continued contacts between
participants, community members, and
others.
4. Institutional changes, such as
increased collaboration and
partnerships, policy reforms, new
programming, and organizational
improvements.
Please note: Consideration should be given
to the appropriate timing of data collection
for each level of outcome. For example,
satisfaction is usually captured as a shortterm outcome, whereas behavior and
institutional changes are normally
considered longer-term outcomes.
Overall, the quality of your
monitoring and evaluation plan will be
judged on how well it (1) specifies
intended outcomes; (2) gives clear
descriptions of how each outcome will
be measured; (3) identifies when
particular outcomes will be measured;
and (4) provides a clear description of
the data collection strategies for each
outcome (i.e., surveys, interviews, or
focus groups). (Please note that
evaluation plans that deal only with the
first level of outcomes [satisfaction] will
be deemed less competitive under the
present evaluation criteria.)
The recipient organization will be
required to provide reports analyzing
their evaluation findings to the Bureau
in their regular program reports. All
data collected, including survey
responses and contact information, must
be maintained for a minimum of three
years and provided to the Bureau upon
request.
IV.3d.4. Describe your plans for: i.e.
Sustainability, overall program
management, staffing, coordination with
ECA and PAS or any other
requirements.
IV.3e. Please take the following
information into consideration when
preparing your budget:
IV.3e.1. Applicants must submit SF–
424A—‘‘Budget Information—NonConstruction Programs’’ along with a
comprehensive budget for the entire
program. There must be a summary
budget as well as breakdowns reflecting
both administrative and program
budgets. Applicants may provide
separate sub-budgets for each program
component, phase, location, or activity
to provide clarification.
IV.3e.2. Allowable costs for the
program include the following:
PO 00000
Frm 00098
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1. Participant expenses.
2. Administrative costs.
Please refer to the Solicitation
Package for complete budget guidelines
and formatting instructions.
IV.3f. Application Deadline and
Methods of Submission
Application Deadline Date: January
15, 2010.
Reference Number: ECA/A/E/NEA–
10–02.
Methods of Submission:
Applications may be submitted in one
of two ways:
(1.) In hard-copy, via a nationally
recognized overnight delivery service
(i.e., Federal Express, UPS, Airborne
Express, or U.S. Postal Service Express
Overnight Mail, etc.), or
(2.) Electronically through https://
www.grants.gov.
Please Note: ECA strongly encourages
organizations interested in applying for this
competition to submit printed, hard copy
applications as outlined in section IV.3f.1.,
below rather than submitting electronically
through Grants.gov. This recommendation is
being made as a result of the anticipated high
volume of grant proposals that will be
submitted via the Grants.gov webportal as
part of the Recovery Act stimulus package.
As stated in this RFGP, ECA bears no
responsibility for data errors resulting from
transmission or conversion processes for
proposals submitted via Grants.gov
Along with the Project Title, all applicants
must enter the above Reference Number in
Box 11 on the SF–424 contained in the
mandatory Proposal Submission Instructions
(PSI) of the solicitation document.
IV.3f. Submitting Printed Applications
Applications must be shipped no later
than the above deadline. Delivery
services used by applicants must have
in-place, centralized shipping
identification and tracking systems that
may be accessed via the Internet and
delivery people who are identifiable by
commonly recognized uniforms and
delivery vehicles. Proposals shipped on
or before the above deadline but
received at ECA more than seven days
after the deadline will be ineligible for
further consideration under this
competition. Proposals shipped after the
established deadlines are ineligible for
consideration under this competition.
ECA will not notify you upon receipt of
application. It is each applicant’s
responsibility to ensure that each
package is marked with a legible
tracking number and to monitor/confirm
delivery to ECA via the Internet.
Delivery of proposal packages may not
be made via local courier service or in
person for this competition. Faxed
documents will not be accepted at any
time. Only proposals submitted as
stated above will be considered.
E:\FR\FM\05NON1.SGM
05NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 213 / Thursday, November 5, 2009 / Notices
Important note: When preparing your
submission please make sure to include one
extra copy of the completed SF–424 form and
place it in an envelope addressed to ‘‘ECA/
EX/PM’’.
The original and eight (8) copies of
the application should be sent to: Office
of Academic Exchange Programs, ECA/
A/E/NEA, SA–5, 4th Floor, 2200 C
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20037.
Applicants submitting hard-copy
applications must also submit the
‘‘Executive Summary’’ and ‘‘Proposal
Narrative’’ sections of the proposal in
text (.txt) format on a PC-formatted disk.
The Bureau will provide these files
electronically to the appropriate Public
Affairs Section(s) at the U.S. embassies
for their review.
IV.3f.2 Submitting Electronic
Applications
Applicants have the option of
submitting proposals electronically
through Grants.gov (https://
www.grants.gov). Complete solicitation
packages are available at Grants.gov in
the ‘‘Find’’ portion of the system.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Please Note: ECA strongly encourages
organizations interested in applying for this
competition to submit printed, hard copy
applications as outlined in section IV.3f.1.
above, rather than submitting electronically
through Grants.gov. This recommendation is
being made as a result of the anticipated high
volume of grant proposals that will be
submitted via the Grants.gov webportal as
part of the Recovery Act stimulus package.
As stated in this RFGP, ECA bears no
responsibility for data errors resulting from
transmission or conversion processes for
proposals submitted via Grants.gov.
Please follow the instructions
available in the ‘Get Started’ portion of
the site (https://www.grants.gov/
GetStarted).
Several of the steps in the Grants.gov
registration process could take several
weeks. Therefore, applicants should
check with appropriate staff within their
organizations immediately after
reviewing this RFGP to confirm or
determine their registration status with
Grants.gov. Once registered, the amount
of time it can take to upload an
application will vary depending on a
variety of factors including the size of
the application and the speed of your
internet connection. In addition,
validation of an electronic submission
via Grants.gov can take up to two
business days.
Therefore, we strongly recommend
that you not wait until the application
deadline to begin the submission
process through Grants.gov.
The Grants.gov Web site includes
extensive information on all phases/
aspects of the Grants.gov process,
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:57 Nov 04, 2009
Jkt 220001
including an extensive section on
frequently asked questions, located
under the ‘‘For Applicants’’ section of
the Web site. ECA strongly recommends
that all potential applicants review
thoroughly the Grants.gov Web site,
well in advance of submitting a
proposal through the Grants.gov system.
ECA bears no responsibility for data
errors resulting from transmission or
conversion processes.
Direct all questions regarding
Grants.gov registration and submission
to: Grants.gov Customer Support,
Contact Center Phone: 800–518–4726.
Business Hours: Monday–Friday, 7AM–
9PM Eastern Time, E-mail:
support@grants.gov.
Applicants have until midnight (12
a.m.), Washington, DC time of the
closing date to ensure that their entire
application has been uploaded to the
Grants.gov site. There are no exceptions
to the above deadline. Applications
uploaded to the site after midnight of
the application deadline date will be
automatically rejected by the grants.gov
system, and will be technically
ineligible.
Please refer to the Grants.gov Web
site, for definitions of various
‘‘application statuses’’ and the
difference between a submission receipt
and a submission validation.
Applicants will receive a validation email from grants.gov upon the
successful submission of an application.
Again, validation of an electronic
submission via Grants.gov can take up
to two business days. Therefore, we
strongly recommend that you not wait
until the application deadline to begin
the submission process through
Grants.gov. ECA will not notify you
upon receipt of electronic applications.
It is the responsibility of all
applicants submitting proposals via the
Grants.gov web portal to ensure that
proposals have been received by
Grants.gov in their entirety, and ECA
bears no responsibility for data errors
resulting from transmission or
conversion processes.
IV.3g. Intergovernmental Review of
Applications Executive Order 12372
does not apply to this program.
V. Application Review Information
V.1. Review Process
The Bureau will review all proposals
for technical eligibility. Proposals will
be deemed ineligible if they do not fully
adhere to the guidelines stated herein
and in the Solicitation Package. All
eligible proposals will be reviewed by
the program office, as well as the Public
Diplomacy section overseas, where
appropriate. Eligible proposals will be
PO 00000
Frm 00099
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
57383
subject to compliance with Federal and
Bureau regulations and guidelines and
forwarded to Bureau grant panels for
advisory review. Proposals may also be
reviewed by the Office of the Legal
Adviser or by other Department
elements. Final funding decisions are at
the discretion of the Department of
State’s Assistant Secretary for
Educational and Cultural Affairs. Final
technical authority for cooperative
agreements resides with the Bureau’s
Grants Officer.
Review Criteria
Technically eligible applications will
be competitively reviewed according to
the criteria stated below. These criteria
are not rank ordered and all carry equal
weight in the proposal evaluation:
1. Quality of the program idea:
Proposals should exhibit originality,
substance, precision, and relevance to
the Bureau’s mission.
2. Ability to achieve program
objectives: Detailed agenda and relevant
work plan should demonstrate
substantive undertakings and logistical
capacity. Agenda and plan should
adhere to the program overview and
guidelines described above. Objectives
should be reasonable, feasible, and
flexible. Proposals should clearly
demonstrate how the institution will
meet the program’s objectives and plan.
3. Multiplier effect/impact: Proposed
programs should strengthen long-term
mutual understanding, including
maximum sharing of information and
establishment of long-term institutional
and individual linkages.
4. Support of Diversity: Proposals
should demonstrate substantive support
of the Bureau’s policy on diversity.
Achievable and relevant features should
be cited in both program administration
(selection of participants, program
venue and program evaluation) and
program content (orientation and wrapup sessions, program meetings, resource
materials and follow-up activities).
5. Institution’s Record/Capacity:
Proposals should demonstrate an
institutional record of successful
exchange programs, including
responsible fiscal management and full
compliance with all reporting
requirements for past Bureau grants as
determined by Bureau Grants Staff. The
Bureau will consider the past
performance of prior recipients and the
demonstrated potential of new
applicants.
6. Project Evaluation and Follow-on:
Proposals should include a plan to
evaluate the activity’s success, both as
the activities unfold and at the end of
the program. A draft survey
questionnaire or other technique plus
E:\FR\FM\05NON1.SGM
05NON1
57384
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 213 / Thursday, November 5, 2009 / Notices
description of a methodology to use to
link outcomes to original project
objectives is recommended. Proposals
should also provide a plan for
continued follow-on activity (with
minimal Bureau support) ensuring that
Bureau supported programs are not
isolated events.
7. Cost-effectiveness/Cost-sharing:
The overhead and administrative
components of the proposal, including
salaries and honoraria, should be kept
as low as possible. All other items
should be necessary and appropriate.
Proposals should maximize cost-sharing
through other private sector support as
well as institutional direct funding
contributions.
8. Value to U.S.-Partner Country
Relations: Proposed projects should
receive positive assessments by the U.S.
Department of State’s geographic area
desk and overseas officers of program
need, potential impact, and significance
in the partner countries.
VI. Award Administration Information
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
VI.1a. Award Notices
Final awards cannot be made until
funds have been appropriated by
Congress, allocated and committed
through internal Bureau procedures.
Successful applicants will receive an
Federal Assistance Award (FAA) from
the Bureau’s Grants Office. The FAA
and the original proposal with
subsequent modifications (if applicable)
shall be the only binding authorizing
document between the recipient and the
U.S. Government. The FAA will be
signed by an authorized Grants Officer,
and mailed to the recipient’s
responsible officer identified in the
application.
Unsuccessful applicants will receive
notification of the results of the
application review from the ECA
program office coordinating this
competition.
VI.1b. The following additional
requirements apply to this project: All
awards made under this competition
must be executed according to all
relevant U.S. laws and policies
regarding assistance to the Palestinian
Authority, and to the West Bank and
Gaza. Organizations must consult with
relevant Public Affairs Offices before
entering into any formal arrangements
or agreements with Palestinian
organizations or institutions.
Note: To assure that planning for the
inclusion of the Palestinian Authority
complies with requirements, please contact
Laura Alami, Tel: 202–632–3270, e-mail:
AlamiLT@state.gov for additional
information.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:57 Nov 04, 2009
Jkt 220001
VI.2. Administrative and National
Policy Requirements
Terms and Conditions for the
Administration of ECA agreements
include the following:
Office of Management and Budget
Circular A–122, ‘‘Cost Principles for
Nonprofit Organizations.’’
Office of Management and Budget
Circular A–21, ‘‘Cost Principles for
Educational Institutions.’’
OMB Circular A–87, ‘‘Cost Principles
for State, Local, and Indian
Governments’’.
OMB Circular No. A–110 (Revised),
Uniform Administrative Requirements
for Grants and Agreements With
Institutions of Higher Education,
Hospitals, and other Nonprofit
Organizations.
OMB Circular No. A–102, Uniform
Administrative Requirements for
Grants-in-Aid to State and Local
Governments.
OMB Circular No. A–133, Audits of
States, Local Government, and Nonprofit Organizations
Please reference the following Web
sites for additional information:
https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants.
https://fa.statebuy.state.gov.
VI.3. Reporting Requirements
You must provide ECA with a hard
copy original plus one copy of the
following reports:
(1.) A final program and financial
report no more than 90 days after the
expiration of the award;
(2.) A concise, one-page final program
report summarizing program outcomes
no more than 90 days after the
expiration of the award. This one-page
report will be transmitted to OMB, and
be made available to the public via
OMB’s USAspending.gov Web site—as
part of ECA’s Federal Funding
Accountability and Transparency Act
(FFATA) reporting requirements.
(3.) A SF–PPR, ‘‘Performance Progress
Report’’ Cover Sheet with all program
reports.
Award recipients will be required to
provide reports analyzing their
evaluation findings to the Bureau in
their regular program reports. (Please
refer to IV. Application and Submission
Instructions (IV.3.d.3) above for Program
Monitoring and Evaluation information.
All data collected, including survey
responses and contact information, must
be maintained for a minimum of three
years and provided to the Bureau upon
request.
All reports must be sent to the ECA
Grants Officer and ECA Program Officer
listed in the final assistance award
document.
PO 00000
Frm 00100
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Optional Program Data Requirements:
Organizations awarded grants will be
required to maintain specific data on
program participants and activities in an
electronically accessible database format
that can be shared with the Bureau as
required. As a minimum, the data must
include the following:
(1) Name, address, contact
information, and biographic sketch of
all persons who travel internationally
on funds provided by the grant or who
benefit from the grant funding but do
not travel. (2) Itineraries of international
and domestic travel, providing dates of
travel and cities in which any exchange
experiences take place. Final schedules
for in-country and U.S. activities must
be received by the ECA Program Officer
at least three work days prior to the
official opening of the activity.
VII. Agency Contacts
For questions about this
announcement, contact: Laura Alami,
Near East Asia Programs Branch, Office
of Academic Exchange Programs, ECA/
A/E/NEA, SA–5 Floor 4, U.S.
Department of State, Washington, DC
20522–0504, 202–632–3270 and Fax:
202–632–9411, https://
www.exchanges.state.gov.
All correspondence with the Bureau
concerning this RFGP should reference
the above title and number ECA/A/E/
NEA–10–02. Please read the complete
announcement before sending inquiries
or submitting proposals. Once the RFGP
deadline has passed, Bureau staff may
not discuss this competition with
applicants until the proposal review
process has been completed.
VIII. Other Information
Notice
The terms and conditions published
in this RFGP are binding and may not
be modified by any Bureau
representative. Explanatory information
provided by the Bureau that contradicts
published language will not be binding.
Issuance of the RFGP does not
constitute an award commitment on the
part of the Government. The Bureau
reserves the right to reduce, revise, or
increase proposal budgets in accordance
with the needs of the program and the
availability of funds. Awards made will
be subject to periodic reporting and
evaluation requirements per section VI.3
above.
Dated: October 30, 2009.
Maura M. Pally
Acting Assistant, Secretary for Educational
and Cultural Affairs U.S. Department of State.
Notice:
The terms and conditions published
in this RFGP are binding and may not
E:\FR\FM\05NON1.SGM
05NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 213 / Thursday, November 5, 2009 / Notices
be modified by any Bureau
representative. Explanatory information
provided by the Bureau that contradicts
published language will not be binding.
Issuance of the RFGP does not
constitute an award commitment on the
part of the Government. The Bureau
reserves the right to reduce, revise, or
increase proposal budgets in accordance
with the needs of the program and the
availability of funds. Awards made will
be subject to periodic reporting and
evaluation requirements per section VI.3
above.
Dated: October 30, 2009.
Maura M. Pally,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Educational
and Cultural Affairs, U.S. Department of
State.
[FR Doc. E9–26681 Filed 11–4–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2009–0171]
2010–2015 Strategic Planning
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice and request for comment.
SUMMARY: The National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA) is
currently seeking public comment on
emerging or potential traffic safety
problems. Public feedback will assist
the agency in preparing to meet the
challenges it faces in the next 5 years on
improving motor vehicle and traffic
safety in the United States. This
foundational work will assist the agency
in shaping its 2010–2015 strategic plan.
This notice invites comments,
suggestions and recommendations from
all individuals and organizations that
have an interest in motor vehicle and
highway safety, consumer programs
(e.g., fuel economy, vehicle theft,
odometer fraud, tire performance)
administered by the agency, and/or
other NHTSA activities. Respondents
can choose to answer any number of
questions proposed in this notice. The
agency values any comments received
and would also like input on the
strategic planning process in general.
Please include any elements believed
important for NHTSA to consider in
shaping its vision and building its
2010–2015 strategic plan.
DATES: Comments must be received no
later than January 4, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by Long Range Strategic
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:57 Nov 04, 2009
Jkt 220001
Planning DOT DMS Docket Number
[XXX] by any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments.
• Fax: 1–202–493–2251.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility;
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal Holidays. Telephone: 1–800–
647–5527.
Instructions: All submissions must
include the agency name and docket
number. It is suggested that comment
submissions be limited to ten (10) pages
with unlimited attachments. Note that
all comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. Please
see the Privacy Act heading below.
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search
the electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (Volume
65, Number 70, pp. 19477–78) or you
may visit https://www.dot.gov/
privacy.html.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
regulations.gov and follow the online
instructions, or visit the Docket
Management Facility at the street
address listed above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dee
Williams, Acting Director, Office of
Strategic Planning, National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration, Room
W40–311, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590. Telephone:
202–366–3503. E-mail:
dee.williams@dot.gov.
NHTSA
was established as the successor to the
National Highway Safety Bureau in
1970, to carry out safety programs under
the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle
Safety Act of 1966 (Chapter 301 of Title
49, United States Code) and the
Highway Safety Act of 1966 (Chapter 4
of Title 23, United States Code). The
agency also administers consumer
programs established by the Motor
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00101
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
57385
Vehicle Information and Cost Saving
Act of 1972 (Part C of Subtitle VI
(Chapters 321, 323, 325, 327, 329 and
331) of Title 49, United States Code).
NHTSA’s mission is to save lives,
prevent injuries, and reduce trafficrelated health care and other economic
costs due to road traffic crashes through
education, research, safety standards,
and enforcement activity. Motor vehicle
crashes are responsible for 95 percent of
all transportation-related fatalities and
are the leading cause of death for people
in the United States of every age from
age 3 through 34 (based on 2006 data).
The economic costs associated with
these crashes also seriously impact the
Nation’s fiscal health. The cost to our
economy of all motor vehicle crashes
was approximately $230 billion in 2000,
or 2.3 percent of the U.S. gross domestic
product. Alcohol-involved crashes cost
over $50 billion, accounting for 22
percent of all crash costs. In 2003,
failure to wear safety belts cost $18
billion. Twenty-six percent of overall
crash costs are paid by those individuals
directly involved in these crashes. The
remaining 74 percent of overall crash
costs is paid by the public through
insurance premiums, taxes, and higher
health care costs.
In order to address these public health
issues and economic costs of highway
crashes, the agency seeks to improve
public health by helping to make
highway travel safer. The agency
develops, promotes and implements
educational, regulatory, enforcement
and emergency medical service
programs aimed at ending preventable
tragedies and reducing the economic
costs associated with motor vehicle use
and highway travel. A multidisciplinary approach that draws upon
diverse fields such as epidemiology,
engineering, biomechanics, emergency
medicine, the social sciences, human
factors, economics, education, law
enforcement, and communication
science to address one of the most
complex and challenging public health
problems facing our society.
NHTSA is a leader in collecting and
analyzing motor vehicle crash data, in
conducting research, and in developing
countermeasures designed to prevent
and mitigate vehicle crashes, thereby
reducing associated fatalities and
traumatic injury. The agency improves
traffic safety through its regulation and
enforcement of motor vehicle and motor
vehicle equipment; develops evidencebased education and enforcement
programs and promotes their use by
States, localities, and other safety
partners; sponsors critical research;
conducts innovative projects to improve
traffic and motor vehicle safety;
E:\FR\FM\05NON1.SGM
05NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 213 (Thursday, November 5, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57379-57385]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-26681]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 6801]
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA) Request for
Grant Proposals: Near East and South Asia Undergraduate Exchange
Program
Announcement Type: New Cooperative Agreement.
Funding Opportunity Number: ECA/A/E/NEA-10-02.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number: 19.009.
Key Dates
Application Deadline: January 15, 2010.
Executive Summary: The Office of Academic Exchange Programs of the
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs announces an open
competition to administer the FY2010 Near East and South Asia
Undergraduate Exchange Program. Public and private non-profit
organizations meeting the provisions described in Internal Revenue Code
section 26 USC 501(c)(3) in the United States may submit proposals to
organize and carry out academic exchange activities for students from
underrepresented sectors in the Middle East, North Africa and South
Asia (eligible countries and locales are listed below in the Purpose
section). The recipient organization will be responsible for the
following aspects of the program: Placement of no less than 115 foreign
students at accredited U.S. institutions (90 for one academic year, 25
for one semester), student travel to the U.S., orientation, enrichment
programming, advising, monitoring and support, pre-return activities,
evaluation, and follow-up with program alumni. It is anticipated that
the total amount of funding for FY2010 administrative and program costs
will be $3,500,000 pending availability of funds.
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Authority
Overall grant making authority for this program is contained in the
Mutual Educational and Cultural Exchange Act of 1961, Public Law 87-
256, as amended, also known as the Fulbright-Hays Act. The purpose of
the Act is ``to enable the Government of the United States to increase
mutual understanding between the people of the United States and the
people of other countries * * *; to strengthen the ties which unite us
with other nations by demonstrating the educational and cultural
interests, developments, and achievements of the people of the United
States and other nations * * * and thus to assist in the development of
friendly, sympathetic and peaceful relations between the United States
and the other countries of the world.'' The funding authority for the
program above is provided through legislation.
Purpose
The principal objective of the Near East and South Asia
Undergraduate Exchange Program (herein referred to as the ``NESA
UGRAD'') is to provide a substantive exchange experience at a U.S.
college or university to a diverse
[[Page 57380]]
group of emerging student leaders from underrepresented sectors in the
Middle East, North Africa and South Asia. In this context, the
recipient organization should ensure that participants are able to
enroll full-time in courses at U.S. institutions alongside U.S. peers,
and provide the participants with opportunities to understand the U.S.
and U.S. citizens inside and outside the classroom.
Participants will return to their home countries at the conclusion
of the exchange program to re-enter colleges and universities there,
and re-integrate with their home societies.
An objective of the program is to provide participants with
tailored instruction in the academic skills and study habits required
to be successful at the undergraduate level as well as be better
prepared for higher level studies in the U.S. in the future.
The NESA UGRAD will provide no less than 115 scholarships--90 for
one academic year and 25 for one semester (Pakistan only)--at U.S.
institutions of higher education to outstanding students from non-elite
sectors from the Near East (countries/locales may include Algeria,
Bahrain, Egypt, Israel, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Libya, Morocco, Oman,
Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Tunisia, United Arab Emirates, Yemen, the
Palestinian Territories) and South Asia (India, Nepal, Pakistan, and
Bangladesh). Additional countries may be added to meet the overall
needs of the program and availability of funds. Scholarships will be
granted primarily to students who are currently enrolled in an
undergraduate degree program in their home country, although students
just completing their final year of high school will also be eligible.
The recipient organization will place participants in non-degree
programs at both two- and four-year U.S. colleges and universities.
The recipient organization should develop enrichment activities to
enhance the participants' academic education, including having students
make local presentations about their countries, community service, and
internships (for one year students only). All participants are required
to return to their home countries immediately upon the conclusion of
the program. Transfers of academic program or visa sponsorship of
participants to another U.S. institution will not be considered.
ECA will award one cooperative agreement for this program. Programs
and projects must conform to Bureau requirements and guidelines
outlined in the Solicitation Package. ECA programs are subject to the
availability of funds.
Programs must comply with J-1 Visa regulations. Please refer to the
Solicitation Package for further information.
In a cooperative agreement, the Near East Asia Programs Branch of
the Office of Academic Exchange Programs in the Bureau of Educational
and Cultural Affairs (ECA/A/E/NEA) is substantially involved in program
activities above and beyond routine grant monitoring. ECA/A/E/NEA
activities and responsibilities for this program are, but not limited
to, the following:
1. Participating in the design and direction of program activities;
2. Approval of key personnel;
3. Final selection of program participants;
4. Approval and input for all program agendas and timelines;
5. Final approval of all student placements;
6. Final approval of internship placements;
7. Guidance in execution of all project components;
8. Arrangement for State Department speakers during workshops;
9. Assistance with participant emergencies;
10. Providing background information related to participants' home
countries and cultures; and
11. Liaison with Public Affairs Sections of the U.S. Embassies and
country desk officers at the State Department.
Note: All materials, publicity, and correspondence related to
the program must acknowledge this as a program of the Bureau of
Educational and Cultural Affairs, U.S. Department of State. The
Bureau will retain copyright use of and distribute materials related
to this program as it sees fit.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Cooperative Agreement. ECA's level of involvement in
this program is listed under number I above.
Fiscal Year Funds: FY2010.
Approximate Total Funding: $3,500,000.
Approximate Number of Awards: 1.
Anticipated Award Date: Pending availability of funds, the
anticipated program start date will be March 1, 2010.
Anticipated Project Completion Date: December 31, 2011.
Additional Information: Pending successful implementation of this
program and the availability of funds in subsequent fiscal years, it is
ECA's intent to renew this grant for two additional fiscal years,
before openly competing it again.
III. Eligibility Information
III.1. Eligible Applicants
Applications may be submitted by public and private non-profit
organizations meeting the provisions described in Internal Revenue Code
section 26 USC 501(c)(3).
III.2. Cost-Sharing or Matching Funds
There is no minimum or maximum percentage required for this
competition. However, the Bureau encourages applicants to provide
maximum levels of cost sharing and funding in support of its programs.
When cost sharing is offered, it is understood and agreed that the
applicant must provide the amount of cost sharing as stipulated in its
proposal and later included in an approved grant agreement. Cost
sharing may be in the form of allowable direct or indirect costs. For
accountability, you must maintain written records to support all costs
which are claimed as your contribution, as well as costs to be paid by
the Federal government. Such records are subject to audit. The basis
for determining the value of cash and in-kind contributions must be in
accordance with OMB Circular A-110, (Revised), Subpart C.23--Cost
Sharing and Matching. In the event you do not provide the minimum
amount of cost sharing as stipulated in the approved budget, ECA's
contribution will be reduced in like proportion.
III.3. Other Eligibility Requirements
(a.) Bureau grant guidelines require that organizations with less
than four years of experience in conducting international exchange
programs will be limited to $60,000. ECA anticipates awarding one
grant, in the amount of up to $3,000,000 to support the program and
administrative costs required to implement the program. Therefore,
applicant organizations with less than four years experience in
conducting international exchange programs are ineligible to apply
under this competition. The Bureau encourages applications to provide
the maximum levels of cost sharing and funding to in support of its
program.
IV. Application and Submission Information
Note: Please read the complete announcement before sending
inquiries or submitting proposals. Once the RFGP deadline has
passed, Bureau staff may not discuss this competition with
applicants until the proposal review process has been completed.
[[Page 57381]]
IV.1. Contact Information To Request an Application Package
Please contact the Near East Asia Programs Branch, Office of
Academic Exchange Programs, ECA/A/E/NEA, SA-5 Floor 4, U.S. Department
of State, Washington, DC 20522-0504, 202-632-3270, Fax: 202-632-9411 or
AlamiLT@state.gov to request a Solicitation Package. Please refer to
the Funding Opportunity Number ECA/A/E/NEA-10-02 located at the top of
this announcement when making your request.
Alternatively, an electronic application package may be obtained
from grants.gov. Please see section IV.3f for further information.
The Solicitation Package contains the Proposal Submission
Instruction (PSI) document which consists of required application
forms, and standard guidelines for proposal preparation.
It also contains the Project Objectives, Goals and Implementation
(POGI) document, which provides specific information, award criteria
and budget instructions tailored to this competition.
Please specify Program Officer, Laura Alami, and refer to the
Funding Opportunity Number ECA/A/E/NEA-10-02 on all other inquiries and
correspondence.
IV.2. To Download a Solicitation Package Via Internet
The entire Solicitation Package may be downloaded from the Bureau's
Web site at: https://exchanges.state.gov/grants/open2.html, or from the
Grants.gov Web site at https://www.grants.gov.
Please read all information before downloading.
IV.3. Content and Form of Submission
Applicants must follow all instructions in the Solicitation
Package. The application should be submitted per the instructions under
IV.3f. Application Deadline and Methods of Submission section below.
IV.3a. You are required to have a Dun and Bradstreet Data Universal
Numbering System (DUNS) number to apply for a grant or cooperative
agreement from the U.S. Government. This number is a nine-digit
identification number, which uniquely identifies business entities.
Obtaining a DUNS number is easy and there is no charge. To obtain a
DUNS number, access https://www.dunandbradstreet.com or call 1-866-705-
5711. Please ensure that your DUNS number is included in the
appropriate box of the SF-424 which is part of the formal application
package.
IV.3b. All proposals must contain an executive summary, proposal
narrative and budget.
Please Refer to the Solicitation Package. It contains the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI) document and the Project
Objectives, Goals and Implementation (POGI) document for additional
formatting and technical requirements.
IV.3c. You must have nonprofit status with the IRS at the time of
application. Please note: Effective January 7, 2009, all applicants for
ECA federal assistance awards must include in their application the
names of directors and/or senior executives (current officers,
trustees, and key employees, regardless of amount of compensation). In
fulfilling this requirement, applicants must submit information in one
of the following ways:
(1) Those who file Internal Revenue Service Form 990, ``Return of
Organization Exempt From Income Tax,'' must include a copy of relevant
portions of this form.
(2) Those who do not file IRS Form 990 must submit information
above in the format of their choice.
In addition to final program reporting requirements, award
recipients will also be required to submit a one-page document, derived
from their program reports, listing and describing their grant
activities. For award recipients, the names of directors and/or senior
executives (current officers, trustees, and key employees), as well as
the one-page description of grant activities, will be transmitted by
the State Department to OMB, along with other information required by
the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA), and
will be made available to the public by the Office of Management and
Budget on its USASpending.gov website as part of ECA's FFATA reporting
requirements.
If your organization is a private nonprofit which has not received
a grant or cooperative agreement from ECA in the past three years, or
if your organization received nonprofit status from the IRS within the
past four years, you must submit the necessary documentation to verify
nonprofit status as directed in the PSI document. Failure to do so will
cause your proposal to be declared technically ineligible.
IV.3d. Please take into consideration the following information
when preparing your proposal narrative:
IV.3d.1. Adherence to All Regulations Governing the J Visa
The Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs is placing renewed
emphasis on the secure and proper administration of Exchange Visitor (J
visa) Programs and adherence by grantees and sponsors to all
regulations governing the J visa. Therefore, proposals should
demonstrate the applicant's capacity to meet all requirements governing
the administration of the Exchange Visitor Programs as set forth in 22
CFR 62, including the oversight of Responsible Officers and Alternate
Responsible Officers, screening and selection of program participants,
provision of pre-arrival information and orientation to participants,
monitoring of participants, proper maintenance and security of forms,
recordkeeping, reporting and other requirements.
The award recipient will be responsible for issuing DS-2019 forms
to participants in this program.
A copy of the complete regulations governing the administration of
Exchange Visitor (J) programs is available at https://exchanges.state.gov or from: Office of Designation, ECA/EC/D, SA-5,
Floor C2, Department of State, Washington, DC 20522-0582.
Please refer to Solicitation Package for further information.
IV.3d.2. Diversity, Freedom and Democracy Guidelines
Pursuant to the Bureau's authorizing legislation, programs must
maintain a non-political character and should be balanced and
representative of the diversity of American political, social, and
cultural life. ``Diversity'' should be interpreted in the broadest
sense and encompass differences including, but not limited to
ethnicity, race, gender, religion, geographic location, socio-economic
status, and physical challenges. Applicants are strongly encouraged to
adhere to the advancement of this principle both in program
administration and in program content. Please refer to the review
criteria under the ``Support for Diversity'' section for specific
suggestions on incorporating diversity into your proposal. Public Law
104-319 provides that ``in carrying out programs of educational and
cultural exchange in countries whose people do not fully enjoy freedom
and democracy,'' the Bureau ``shall take appropriate steps to provide
opportunities for participation in such programs to human rights and
democracy leaders of such countries.'' Public Law 106--113 requires
that the governments of the countries described above do not have
inappropriate influence in the selection process. Proposals should
reflect advancement of these goals in their program contents, to the
full extent deemed feasible.
[[Page 57382]]
IV.3d.3. Program Monitoring and Evaluation
Proposals must include a plan to monitor and evaluate the project's
success, both as the activities unfold and at the end of the program.
The Bureau recommends that your proposal include a draft survey
questionnaire or other technique plus a description of a methodology to
use to link outcomes to original project objectives. The Bureau expects
that the award recipient will track participants or partners and be
able to respond to key evaluation questions, including satisfaction
with the program, learning as a result of the program, changes in
behavior as a result of the program, and effects of the program on
institutions (institutions in which participants work or partner
institutions). The evaluation plan should include indicators that
measure gains in mutual understanding as well as substantive knowledge.
Successful monitoring and evaluation depend heavily on setting
clear goals and outcomes at the outset of a program. Your evaluation
plan should include a description of your project's objectives, your
anticipated project outcomes, and how and when you intend to measure
these outcomes (performance indicators). The more that outcomes are
``smart'' (specific, measurable, attainable, results-oriented, and
placed in a reasonable time frame), the easier it will be to conduct
the evaluation. You should also show how your project objectives link
to the goals of the program described in this RFGP.
Your monitoring and evaluation plan should clearly distinguish
between program outputs and outcomes. Outputs are products and services
delivered, often stated as an amount. Output information is important
to show the scope or size of project activities, but it cannot
substitute for information about progress towards outcomes or the
results achieved. Examples of outputs include the number of people
trained or the number of seminars conducted. Outcomes, in contrast,
represent specific results a project is intended to achieve and is
usually measured as an extent of change. Findings on outputs and
outcomes should both be reported, but the focus should be on outcomes.
We encourage you to assess the following four levels of outcomes,
as they relate to the program goals set out in the RFGP (listed here in
increasing order of importance):
1. Participant satisfaction with the program and exchange
experience.
2. Participant learning, such as increased knowledge, aptitude,
skills, and changed understanding and attitude. Learning includes both
substantive (subject-specific) learning and mutual understanding.
3. Participant behavior, concrete actions to apply knowledge in
work or community; greater participation and responsibility in civic
organizations; interpretation and explanation of experiences and new
knowledge gained; continued contacts between participants, community
members, and others.
4. Institutional changes, such as increased collaboration and
partnerships, policy reforms, new programming, and organizational
improvements.
Please note: Consideration should be given to the appropriate
timing of data collection for each level of outcome. For example,
satisfaction is usually captured as a short-term outcome, whereas
behavior and institutional changes are normally considered longer-
term outcomes.
Overall, the quality of your monitoring and evaluation plan will be
judged on how well it (1) specifies intended outcomes; (2) gives clear
descriptions of how each outcome will be measured; (3) identifies when
particular outcomes will be measured; and (4) provides a clear
description of the data collection strategies for each outcome (i.e.,
surveys, interviews, or focus groups). (Please note that evaluation
plans that deal only with the first level of outcomes [satisfaction]
will be deemed less competitive under the present evaluation criteria.)
The recipient organization will be required to provide reports
analyzing their evaluation findings to the Bureau in their regular
program reports. All data collected, including survey responses and
contact information, must be maintained for a minimum of three years
and provided to the Bureau upon request.
IV.3d.4. Describe your plans for: i.e. Sustainability, overall
program management, staffing, coordination with ECA and PAS or any
other requirements.
IV.3e. Please take the following information into consideration
when preparing your budget:
IV.3e.1. Applicants must submit SF-424A--``Budget Information--Non-
Construction Programs'' along with a comprehensive budget for the
entire program. There must be a summary budget as well as breakdowns
reflecting both administrative and program budgets. Applicants may
provide separate sub-budgets for each program component, phase,
location, or activity to provide clarification.
IV.3e.2. Allowable costs for the program include the following:
1. Participant expenses.
2. Administrative costs.
Please refer to the Solicitation Package for complete budget
guidelines and formatting instructions.
IV.3f. Application Deadline and Methods of Submission
Application Deadline Date: January 15, 2010.
Reference Number: ECA/A/E/NEA-10-02.
Methods of Submission:
Applications may be submitted in one of two ways:
(1.) In hard-copy, via a nationally recognized overnight delivery
service (i.e., Federal Express, UPS, Airborne Express, or U.S. Postal
Service Express Overnight Mail, etc.), or
(2.) Electronically through https://www.grants.gov.
Please Note: ECA strongly encourages organizations interested in
applying for this competition to submit printed, hard copy
applications as outlined in section IV.3f.1., below rather than
submitting electronically through Grants.gov. This recommendation is
being made as a result of the anticipated high volume of grant
proposals that will be submitted via the Grants.gov webportal as
part of the Recovery Act stimulus package. As stated in this RFGP,
ECA bears no responsibility for data errors resulting from
transmission or conversion processes for proposals submitted via
Grants.gov
Along with the Project Title, all applicants must enter the
above Reference Number in Box 11 on the SF-424 contained in the
mandatory Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI) of the solicitation
document.
IV.3f. Submitting Printed Applications
Applications must be shipped no later than the above deadline.
Delivery services used by applicants must have in-place, centralized
shipping identification and tracking systems that may be accessed via
the Internet and delivery people who are identifiable by commonly
recognized uniforms and delivery vehicles. Proposals shipped on or
before the above deadline but received at ECA more than seven days
after the deadline will be ineligible for further consideration under
this competition. Proposals shipped after the established deadlines are
ineligible for consideration under this competition. ECA will not
notify you upon receipt of application. It is each applicant's
responsibility to ensure that each package is marked with a legible
tracking number and to monitor/confirm delivery to ECA via the
Internet. Delivery of proposal packages may not be made via local
courier service or in person for this competition. Faxed documents will
not be accepted at any time. Only proposals submitted as stated above
will be considered.
[[Page 57383]]
Important note: When preparing your submission please make sure
to include one extra copy of the completed SF-424 form and place it
in an envelope addressed to ``ECA/EX/PM''.
The original and eight (8) copies of the application should be sent
to: Office of Academic Exchange Programs, ECA/A/E/NEA, SA-5, 4th Floor,
2200 C Street, NW., Washington, DC 20037.
Applicants submitting hard-copy applications must also submit the
``Executive Summary'' and ``Proposal Narrative'' sections of the
proposal in text (.txt) format on a PC-formatted disk. The Bureau will
provide these files electronically to the appropriate Public Affairs
Section(s) at the U.S. embassies for their review.
IV.3f.2 Submitting Electronic Applications
Applicants have the option of submitting proposals electronically
through Grants.gov (https://www.grants.gov). Complete solicitation
packages are available at Grants.gov in the ``Find'' portion of the
system.
Please Note: ECA strongly encourages organizations interested in
applying for this competition to submit printed, hard copy
applications as outlined in section IV.3f.1. above, rather than
submitting electronically through Grants.gov. This recommendation is
being made as a result of the anticipated high volume of grant
proposals that will be submitted via the Grants.gov webportal as
part of the Recovery Act stimulus package. As stated in this RFGP,
ECA bears no responsibility for data errors resulting from
transmission or conversion processes for proposals submitted via
Grants.gov.
Please follow the instructions available in the `Get Started'
portion of the site (https://www.grants.gov/GetStarted).
Several of the steps in the Grants.gov registration process could
take several weeks. Therefore, applicants should check with appropriate
staff within their organizations immediately after reviewing this RFGP
to confirm or determine their registration status with Grants.gov. Once
registered, the amount of time it can take to upload an application
will vary depending on a variety of factors including the size of the
application and the speed of your internet connection. In addition,
validation of an electronic submission via Grants.gov can take up to
two business days.
Therefore, we strongly recommend that you not wait until the
application deadline to begin the submission process through
Grants.gov.
The Grants.gov Web site includes extensive information on all
phases/aspects of the Grants.gov process, including an extensive
section on frequently asked questions, located under the ``For
Applicants'' section of the Web site. ECA strongly recommends that all
potential applicants review thoroughly the Grants.gov Web site, well in
advance of submitting a proposal through the Grants.gov system. ECA
bears no responsibility for data errors resulting from transmission or
conversion processes.
Direct all questions regarding Grants.gov registration and
submission to: Grants.gov Customer Support, Contact Center Phone: 800-
518-4726. Business Hours: Monday-Friday, 7AM-9PM Eastern Time, E-mail:
grants.gov">support@grants.gov.
Applicants have until midnight (12 a.m.), Washington, DC time of
the closing date to ensure that their entire application has been
uploaded to the Grants.gov site. There are no exceptions to the above
deadline. Applications uploaded to the site after midnight of the
application deadline date will be automatically rejected by the
grants.gov system, and will be technically ineligible.
Please refer to the Grants.gov Web site, for definitions of various
``application statuses'' and the difference between a submission
receipt and a submission validation.
Applicants will receive a validation e-mail from grants.gov upon
the successful submission of an application. Again, validation of an
electronic submission via Grants.gov can take up to two business days.
Therefore, we strongly recommend that you not wait until the
application deadline to begin the submission process through
Grants.gov. ECA will not notify you upon receipt of electronic
applications.
It is the responsibility of all applicants submitting proposals via
the Grants.gov web portal to ensure that proposals have been received
by Grants.gov in their entirety, and ECA bears no responsibility for
data errors resulting from transmission or conversion processes.
IV.3g. Intergovernmental Review of Applications Executive Order 12372
does not apply to this program.
V. Application Review Information
V.1. Review Process
The Bureau will review all proposals for technical eligibility.
Proposals will be deemed ineligible if they do not fully adhere to the
guidelines stated herein and in the Solicitation Package. All eligible
proposals will be reviewed by the program office, as well as the Public
Diplomacy section overseas, where appropriate. Eligible proposals will
be subject to compliance with Federal and Bureau regulations and
guidelines and forwarded to Bureau grant panels for advisory review.
Proposals may also be reviewed by the Office of the Legal Adviser or by
other Department elements. Final funding decisions are at the
discretion of the Department of State's Assistant Secretary for
Educational and Cultural Affairs. Final technical authority for
cooperative agreements resides with the Bureau's Grants Officer.
Review Criteria
Technically eligible applications will be competitively reviewed
according to the criteria stated below. These criteria are not rank
ordered and all carry equal weight in the proposal evaluation:
1. Quality of the program idea: Proposals should exhibit
originality, substance, precision, and relevance to the Bureau's
mission.
2. Ability to achieve program objectives: Detailed agenda and
relevant work plan should demonstrate substantive undertakings and
logistical capacity. Agenda and plan should adhere to the program
overview and guidelines described above. Objectives should be
reasonable, feasible, and flexible. Proposals should clearly
demonstrate how the institution will meet the program's objectives and
plan.
3. Multiplier effect/impact: Proposed programs should strengthen
long-term mutual understanding, including maximum sharing of
information and establishment of long-term institutional and individual
linkages.
4. Support of Diversity: Proposals should demonstrate substantive
support of the Bureau's policy on diversity. Achievable and relevant
features should be cited in both program administration (selection of
participants, program venue and program evaluation) and program content
(orientation and wrap-up sessions, program meetings, resource materials
and follow-up activities).
5. Institution's Record/Capacity: Proposals should demonstrate an
institutional record of successful exchange programs, including
responsible fiscal management and full compliance with all reporting
requirements for past Bureau grants as determined by Bureau Grants
Staff. The Bureau will consider the past performance of prior
recipients and the demonstrated potential of new applicants.
6. Project Evaluation and Follow-on: Proposals should include a
plan to evaluate the activity's success, both as the activities unfold
and at the end of the program. A draft survey questionnaire or other
technique plus
[[Page 57384]]
description of a methodology to use to link outcomes to original
project objectives is recommended. Proposals should also provide a plan
for continued follow-on activity (with minimal Bureau support) ensuring
that Bureau supported programs are not isolated events.
7. Cost-effectiveness/Cost-sharing: The overhead and administrative
components of the proposal, including salaries and honoraria, should be
kept as low as possible. All other items should be necessary and
appropriate. Proposals should maximize cost-sharing through other
private sector support as well as institutional direct funding
contributions.
8. Value to U.S.-Partner Country Relations: Proposed projects
should receive positive assessments by the U.S. Department of State's
geographic area desk and overseas officers of program need, potential
impact, and significance in the partner countries.
VI. Award Administration Information
VI.1a. Award Notices
Final awards cannot be made until funds have been appropriated by
Congress, allocated and committed through internal Bureau procedures.
Successful applicants will receive an Federal Assistance Award (FAA)
from the Bureau's Grants Office. The FAA and the original proposal with
subsequent modifications (if applicable) shall be the only binding
authorizing document between the recipient and the U.S. Government. The
FAA will be signed by an authorized Grants Officer, and mailed to the
recipient's responsible officer identified in the application.
Unsuccessful applicants will receive notification of the results of
the application review from the ECA program office coordinating this
competition.
VI.1b. The following additional requirements apply to this project:
All awards made under this competition must be executed according to
all relevant U.S. laws and policies regarding assistance to the
Palestinian Authority, and to the West Bank and Gaza. Organizations
must consult with relevant Public Affairs Offices before entering into
any formal arrangements or agreements with Palestinian organizations or
institutions.
Note: To assure that planning for the inclusion of the
Palestinian Authority complies with requirements, please contact
Laura Alami, Tel: 202-632-3270, e-mail: AlamiLT@state.gov for
additional information.
VI.2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements
Terms and Conditions for the Administration of ECA agreements
include the following:
Office of Management and Budget Circular A-122, ``Cost Principles
for Nonprofit Organizations.''
Office of Management and Budget Circular A-21, ``Cost Principles
for Educational Institutions.''
OMB Circular A-87, ``Cost Principles for State, Local, and Indian
Governments''.
OMB Circular No. A-110 (Revised), Uniform Administrative
Requirements for Grants and Agreements With Institutions of Higher
Education, Hospitals, and other Nonprofit Organizations.
OMB Circular No. A-102, Uniform Administrative Requirements for
Grants-in-Aid to State and Local Governments.
OMB Circular No. A-133, Audits of States, Local Government, and
Non-profit Organizations
Please reference the following Web sites for additional
information: https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants. https://fa.statebuy.state.gov.
VI.3. Reporting Requirements
You must provide ECA with a hard copy original plus one copy of the
following reports:
(1.) A final program and financial report no more than 90 days
after the expiration of the award;
(2.) A concise, one-page final program report summarizing program
outcomes no more than 90 days after the expiration of the award. This
one-page report will be transmitted to OMB, and be made available to
the public via OMB's USAspending.gov Web site--as part of ECA's Federal
Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) reporting
requirements.
(3.) A SF-PPR, ``Performance Progress Report'' Cover Sheet with all
program reports.
Award recipients will be required to provide reports analyzing
their evaluation findings to the Bureau in their regular program
reports. (Please refer to IV. Application and Submission Instructions
(IV.3.d.3) above for Program Monitoring and Evaluation information.
All data collected, including survey responses and contact
information, must be maintained for a minimum of three years and
provided to the Bureau upon request.
All reports must be sent to the ECA Grants Officer and ECA Program
Officer listed in the final assistance award document.
Optional Program Data Requirements:
Organizations awarded grants will be required to maintain specific
data on program participants and activities in an electronically
accessible database format that can be shared with the Bureau as
required. As a minimum, the data must include the following:
(1) Name, address, contact information, and biographic sketch of
all persons who travel internationally on funds provided by the grant
or who benefit from the grant funding but do not travel. (2)
Itineraries of international and domestic travel, providing dates of
travel and cities in which any exchange experiences take place. Final
schedules for in-country and U.S. activities must be received by the
ECA Program Officer at least three work days prior to the official
opening of the activity.
VII. Agency Contacts
For questions about this announcement, contact: Laura Alami, Near
East Asia Programs Branch, Office of Academic Exchange Programs, ECA/A/
E/NEA, SA-5 Floor 4, U.S. Department of State, Washington, DC 20522-
0504, 202-632-3270 and Fax: 202-632-9411, https://www.exchanges.state.gov.
All correspondence with the Bureau concerning this RFGP should
reference the above title and number ECA/A/E/NEA-10-02. Please read the
complete announcement before sending inquiries or submitting proposals.
Once the RFGP deadline has passed, Bureau staff may not discuss this
competition with applicants until the proposal review process has been
completed.
VIII. Other Information
Notice
The terms and conditions published in this RFGP are binding and may
not be modified by any Bureau representative. Explanatory information
provided by the Bureau that contradicts published language will not be
binding. Issuance of the RFGP does not constitute an award commitment
on the part of the Government. The Bureau reserves the right to reduce,
revise, or increase proposal budgets in accordance with the needs of
the program and the availability of funds. Awards made will be subject
to periodic reporting and evaluation requirements per section VI.3
above.
Dated: October 30, 2009.
Maura M. Pally
Acting Assistant, Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs U.S.
Department of State.
Notice:
The terms and conditions published in this RFGP are binding and may
not
[[Page 57385]]
be modified by any Bureau representative. Explanatory information
provided by the Bureau that contradicts published language will not be
binding. Issuance of the RFGP does not constitute an award commitment
on the part of the Government. The Bureau reserves the right to reduce,
revise, or increase proposal budgets in accordance with the needs of
the program and the availability of funds. Awards made will be subject
to periodic reporting and evaluation requirements per section VI.3
above.
Dated: October 30, 2009.
Maura M. Pally,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, U.S.
Department of State.
[FR Doc. E9-26681 Filed 11-4-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P