Agency Information Collection Activities: Notice of Request for Extension of Currently Approved Information Collection, 57387-57390 [E9-26669]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 213 / Thursday, November 5, 2009 / Notices
services will impact motor vehicle and
highway safety and health outcomes?
(B5) How can the development and
implementation of crash notification
technologies (i.e., automatic advanced
crash notification) and crash victim
triage protocols impact health outcomes
related to motor vehicle crashes?
(B6) What changes do you envision in
automation, information management,
and workplace alternatives (e.g.,
telecommuting)? How will these
activities impact highway safety and
commuting and travel behaviors?
(B7) What changes in law
enforcement practices and technologies
might impact highway safety?
(B8) How will technology affect
driving behavior? What issues related to
vehicle/driver interaction could affect
safety? What issues should NHTSA
research?
C. Institutional Relationships
(C1) How do you and/or your
organization (include organization’s
name) interact with NHTSA? Please
explain the dynamics of this
relationship.
(C2) How could NHTSA strengthen its
relationship with your organization and
with other organizations and
institutions engaged in traffic safety
programs?
D. NHTSA’s Role and Mission
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
(D1) In your view, should there be
major changes in NHTSA’s role/mission
in the future?
(D2) What are NHTSA’s strengths and
weaknesses?
(D3) How can NHTSA have a greater
impact in the reduction of injury and
loss of life on the nation’s highways?
(D4) What is NHTSA doing well and
not well? How can NHTSA improve the
way it does business or provides
customer service? Please identify
possible improvements or ideas for
doing better.
(D5) What should NHTSA’s role in
international highway safety be? How
should NHTSA be involved in
international global road safety efforts?
What opportunities exist for NHTSA to
learn from highway safety initiatives in
other countries?
(D6) What mechanisms should
NHTSA consider using for
communication with the public?
Request for Comments
How Do I Prepare and Submit
Comments?
Your comments must be written and
in English. To ensure that your
comments are correctly filed in the
Docket, please include the Docket
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:57 Nov 04, 2009
Jkt 220001
number of this document (2010–2015
Strategic Planning, XXXX) in your
comments.
Please send two paper copies of your
comments to Docket Management or
submit them electronically. The mailing
address is Docket Management Facility;
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590. If you submit
your comments electronically, log onto
the Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments.
How Can I Be Sure That My Comments
Were Received?
If you wish Docket Management to
notify you upon its receipt of your
comments, enclose a self-addressed,
stamped postcard in the envelope
containing your comments. Upon
receiving your comments, Docket
Management will return the postcard by
mail.
How Do I Submit Confidential Business
Information?
If you wish to submit any information
under a claim of confidentiality, send
three copies of your complete
submission, including the information
you claim to be confidential business
information, to the Chief Counsel, NCC–
01, National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Include a cover letter supplying the
information specified in our
confidential business information
regulation (49 CFR Part 512).
In addition, send two copies from
which you have deleted the claimed
confidential business information to
Docket Management Facility; U.S.
Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590.
Will the Agency Consider Late
Comments?
NHTSA will consider all comments
that Docket Management receives before
the close of business on the comment
closing date indicated above under
DATES. To the extent possible, we will
also consider comments that Docket
Management receives after that date.
Please note that even after the
comment closing date, we will continue
to file relevant information in the
Docket as it becomes available. Some
people may submit late comments.
Accordingly, we recommend that you
periodically check the Docket for new
material.
PO 00000
Frm 00103
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
57387
How Can I Read the Comments
Submitted by Other People?
You may read the comments by
visiting Docket Management Facility;
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC from 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
Holidays. You may also see the
comments on the Internet by taking the
following steps:
(1) Go to https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) On that page, in the field marked
‘‘search,’’ type in the docket number
provided at the top of this document.
(3) The next page will contain results
for that docket number; it may help you
to sort by ‘‘Date Posted: Oldest to
Recent.’’
(4) On the results page, click on the
desired comments. You may download
the comments. However, since the
comments are imaged documents
instead of word processing documents,
the downloaded comments may not be
word searchable.
Anyone is able to search the
electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (Volume
65, Number 70; Pages 19477–78) or you
may visit https://www.dot.gov/
privacy.html.
Gregory Walter,
Senior Associate Administrator for Policy and
Operations.
[FR Doc. E9–26658 Filed 11–4–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
[Docket No. FHWA 2009–0112]
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Notice of Request for
Extension of Currently Approved
Information Collection
AGENCY: Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), DOT
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
SUMMARY: The FHWA invites public
comments about our intention to request
the Office of Management and Budget’s
(OMB) approval for the renewal of a
currently approved information
collection that is summarized below
E:\FR\FM\05NON1.SGM
05NON1
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
57388
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 213 / Thursday, November 5, 2009 / Notices
under SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. We
are required to publish this notice in the
Federal Register by the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Please submit comments by
January 4, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by DOT Docket ID Number
FHWA–2009–0112, by any of the
following methods:
Web Site: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received go to the Federal
eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 1–202–493–2251.
Mail: Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation,
West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590–0001.
Hand Delivery or Courier: U.S.
Department of Transportation, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m. ET, Monday through Friday,
except on Federal Holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
questions concerning the National
Historic Covered Bridge Preservation
Program (NHCBP), please contact Mr.
Everett Mattias, Office of Bridge
Technology, HIBT–30, at (202) 366–
6712, FAX (202) 366–3077, or e-mail
everett.mattias@dot.gov. For legal
questions, please contact Mr. Robert
Black, Office of the Chief Counsel, (202)
366–1359, robert.black@.dot.gov;
Federal Highway Administration,
Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC 20590. Office hours are from 7:45
a.m. to 4:15 p.m. Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: National Historic Covered
Bridge Preservation Program.
OMB Control Number: 2125–0609.
Frequency: Annual.
Respondents: The 50 State DOTs,
Puerto Rico and the District of
Columbia.
Background: Covered bridges are
unique structures embodying character,
functionality and historical prominence.
The National Historic Covered Bridge
Preservation Program has been
established to find comprehensive and
proven means of maintaining the ability
of these vestiges of our bridge-building
heritage to continue to serve current and
future generations. The program was
originally established under section
1224 of TEA–21 and continued under
Section 1804 of SAFETEA–LU. The
legislation authorizes $10 million
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:57 Nov 04, 2009
Jkt 220001
annually to be appropriated for each
fiscal year between FY 2006 and FY
2009. The program has been authorized
for continuation under the current
continuing resolution. The program is
established to provide grants to States
for rehabilitation, repair and
preservation of historic covered bridges
and to enable the Secretary of
Transportation to perform research and
initiate education programs on historic
covered bridges.
Projects eligible for grants include
rehabilitation and repair together with
preservation through: installation of fire
protection systems, including a
fireproofing or fire detection system and
sprinklers, installation of a system to
prevent vandalism and arson, or
relocation of a bridge to a preservation
site. The statute requires that, to the
maximum extent practicable, grant
projects are carried out in the most
historically appropriate manner,
preserve the existing structure of the
historic covered bridge, and provide for
the replacement of wooden components
with wooden components, unless the
use of wood is impracticable for safety
reasons.
Research and education activities
include the collection and
dissemination of information on historic
covered bridges; conducting educational
programs relating to the history and
construction techniques of historic
covered bridges; conducting research on
the history of historic covered bridges;
and conducting research on, and study
techniques for, protecting historic
covered bridges from rot, fire, natural
disasters, or weight-related damage.
Guidelines and Administration
To administer this program, the
FHWA will collect information
necessary to evaluate and rank projects.
The information collection was
developed considering public input 1
and is intended to only address the
project funding allotted through the
program. Research funding will be
administered separately through the
FHWA Office of Infrastructure Research
and Development (R&D) at the Turner
Fairbank Highway Research Center, who
will also administer the research and
education activities. The FHWA Office
of Bridge Technology will administer
the grant program to assist the States in
their efforts to rehabilitate, repair or
preserve the Nation’s historic covered
bridges, which are listed or eligible for
listing on the National Register of
Historic Places. The FHWA will award
1 Implementation Guidance for the National
Historic Covered Bridge Preservation Program,
August 23, 2000; 65 FR 51401.
PO 00000
Frm 00104
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
grants based on applications received
and funds available through
accompanying appropriations
legislation.
Information Proposed for Collection
Information recommended under
TEA–21 and proposed for the current
program includes the following:
• State’s Priority Ranking;
• National Bridge Inventory (NBI)
Structure Number;
• Bridge Name;
• Description of Location;
• Congressional District and
Representative;
• Year Built;
• Whether the structure is on or
eligible for listing on the National
Register of Historic Places and
description of the qualities that qualify
the bridge for the National Register;
• Structure description (e.g., number
of spans, length, width, design type,
description of decking, beams/stringers,
sides and roof, wood species, wood
preservation system in use, builder,
traffic carried, etc.);
• General plan and elevation;
• Description of previous repair work
(description, year, etc.);
• Description of proposed work
including wood preservative system,
fire protection, vandalism and arson
prevention systems to be used;
• Indication of whether the State has
a historic bridge inventory/management
plan accepted by the State Historic
Preservation Officer (SHPO). A
programmatic agreement for historic
bridges with the SHPO, FHWA and the
Advisory Counsel on Historic
Preservation (ACHP) may substitute;
• Description of whether the SHPO
has reviewed and certified this project
is warranted in accordance with the
SHPO’s statewide historic preservation
plan; how it benefits statewide
preservation efforts; how it enhances
cultural tourism or enhances the
history/economic development of the
community; and other benefits upon
successful completion of this project;
• Amount of State or local
government matching funds or other
resources (donated materials or labor
may qualify);
• A statement addressing when the
project is completed, and if the bridge
will meet the current State or AASHTO
standards for the roadway classification
that it carries;
• Plan for documentation of the
bridge and the work performed;
• Scheduled start and completion
date for the project (month and year);
and
• Contact information for the State
DOT, Local Agency (if applicable),
FHWA Division Office, and SHPO.
E:\FR\FM\05NON1.SGM
05NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 213 / Thursday, November 5, 2009 / Notices
As indicated above, the FHWA has
developed a template for the
application. The application may be
made based on this template provided
by the FHWA including this
information. This template is available
through the FHWA Division Offices and
through the FHWA Office of Bridge
Technology and is available at the
following URL: https://
www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/
022803a.htm#application. The template
is not required but rather is provided for
convenience of the applicants.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Burden Hours for Information
Collection
Burden hour estimates and
discussions are provided for each item
presented and required within the
application submittal process.
• State’s Priority Ranking; 30
minutes.
Æ The priority ranking will be
performed by the submitting agency.
Given that a small number of
applications will be submitted by an
individual State, the prioritization
process will be limited and 30 minutes
is conservatively assumed to include
any potential discussion.
• NBI Structure Number; 5 minutes.
Æ Projects submitted must be legally
defined as a ‘‘bridge’’ and must be
located on a public road. With this
constraint, each structure will already
have an NBI Structure Number assigned.
• Bridge Name; 5 minutes.
Æ A description of the bridge may be
included in the NBI database; however,
this may or may not be the commonly
referenced name used locally. A burden
of 5 minutes is assumed to permit the
applicant to review the NBI record and
any additional documentation to isolate
the common bridge name.
• Description of Location; 10
minutes.
Æ The location is already included in
the NBI database. A burden of 10
minutes is provided assuming that the
applicant will elaborate on the location
information.
• Congressional District and
Representative; 5 minutes.
Æ The location of the bridge will be
known from the information in the NBI
database. A 5-minute burden is
specified assuming that the applicant
will have to cross reference the location
with Congressional district maps. This
time would be negligible if the State has
employed a GIS system including the
infrastructure information and the
political boundaries.
• Year Built; 5 minutes.
Æ The year built is already recorded
in the National Bridge Inventory.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:57 Nov 04, 2009
Jkt 220001
• Whether the structure is on or
eligible for listing on the National
Register of Historic Places and
description of the qualities that qualify
the bridge for the National Register; 15
minutes.
Æ The NBI record indicated whether
the structure is located on or eligible for
the National Register of Historic Places.
The 15-minute burden is assumed to
allow the applicant to describe the
qualities that qualify the bridge for the
National Register.
• Structure description (e.g., number
of spans, length, width, design type,
description of decking, beams/stringers,
sides and roof, wood species, wood
preservation system in use, builder,
traffic carried, etc.); 15 minutes.
Æ Most of this information will be
included within the NBI database or on
the inspection reports. 15 minutes is
assumed for the applicant to synthesize
information.
• General plan and elevation; 5
minutes.
Æ This information is available for
structures that have been placed on the
National Register of Historic Places or
for those which are eligible and have
applications complete. This information
is also available for projects that have
completed conceptual and preliminary
engineering and design.
• Description of previous repair work
(description, year, etc.); 15 minutes.
Æ This information is available from
bridge inspection reports and bridge
files located within the State
Transportation Agency. Time estimated
is intended for synthesis of information
from other sources.
• Description of proposed work
including wood preservative system,
fire protection, vandalism and arson
prevention systems to be used; 15
minutes.
Æ This information will be
established by the need when identified
and the details will be identified
through the conceptual and preliminary
engineering process, which is done
independently. A 15-minute burden is
assumed to synthesize the existing
information.
• Indication of whether the State has
a historic bridge inventory/management
plan accepted by the SHPO. A
programmatic agreement for historic
bridges with the SHPO, FHWA and the
ACHP may substitute; 5 minutes.
Æ This item is readily obtained
through contact with the SHPO.
• Description of whether the SHPO
has reviewed and certified this project
is warranted in accordance with the
SHPO’s statewide historic preservation
plan; how it benefits statewide
preservation efforts; how it enhances
PO 00000
Frm 00105
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
57389
cultural tourism or enhances the
history/economic development of the
community; and other benefits upon
successful completion of this project; 45
minutes.
Æ This information is readily
obtained through contact with the
SHPO. A total of 45 minutes includes
time for the State Historic Preservation
Officer to review the project, in relation
to the statewide preservation efforts, to
articulate the benefits, and to document
the findings.
• Amount of State or local
government matching funds or other
resources (donated materials or labor
may qualify); 5 minutes.
Æ A nominal amount of time is
required to document the matching
funds and amounts.
• When the project is complete, will
the bridge meet the current State or
AASHTO standards for the roadway
classification that it carries; 5 minutes.
Æ A nominal amount of time is
required to ascertain and identify
whether the bridge will meet the
standards for the roadway classification
as any exception to the standard will be
identified through the preliminary
engineering process and already
documented.
• Plan for documentation of the
bridge and the work performed; 15
minutes.
Æ A plan for documentation is
encouraged. Typically, each State
Transportation Agency will already
have a process in place to document
work performed. Applicants are
encouraged to identify any additional
requirements warranted for these
historical structures and to articulate the
overall plan within the application.
• Scheduled start and completion
date for the project (month and year); 5
minutes.
Æ This will be determined through
other processes that are performed
independent of this program, including
preliminary engineering and the STIP
process. The available information must
be synthesized on the application,
which takes a nominal amount of time.
• Contact information for the State
DOT, Local Agency (if applicable),
FHWA Division Office, and SHPO: 5
minutes.
Æ This requires providing a list of
contacts and involves a nominal amount
of time.
Individual Respondent Burden: The
total amount of time estimated to
complete the report is 31⁄2 hours.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 105 hours (FHWA estimates
receiving 30 reports from the State
Transportation Departments).
E:\FR\FM\05NON1.SGM
05NON1
57390
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 213 / Thursday, November 5, 2009 / Notices
Public Comments Invited: You are
asked to comment on any aspect of this
information collection, including: (1)
Whether the proposed collection is
necessary for the FHWA’s performance;
(2) the accuracy of estimated burdens;
(3) ways for the FHWA to enhance the
quality, usefulness, and clarity of the
collected information; and (4) ways that
burdens could be minimized, including
use of electronic technology, without
reducing the quality of the collected
information. The agency will summarize
and/or include your comments in the
request for OMB’s clearance of this
information collection.
Authority: The Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995; 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35, as amended;
and 49 CFR 1.48.
Issued on: October 30, 2009.
Judith Kane,
Acting Chief, Management Programs and
Analysis Division.
[FR Doc. E9–26669 Filed 11–4–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
Notice of Intent To Rule on Request To
Release Airport Property at the
Gunnison-Crested Butte Regional
Airport, Gunnison, CO
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of request to release
airport property.
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to rule and
invite public comment on the release of
land at the Gunnison-Crested Butte
Regional Airport under the provisions of
Section 47125(a) of Title 49 United
States Code (U.S.C.).
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before December 7, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Comments on this
application may be mailed or delivered
to the FAA at the following address: Mr.
Craig A. Sparks, Manager, Federal
Aviation Administration, Northwest
Mountain Region, Airports Division,
Denver Airports District Office, 26805 E.
68th Ave., Suite 224, Denver, Colorado,
80249.
In addition, one copy of any
comments submitted to the FAA must
be mailed or delivered to Mr. John
DeVore, Airport Manager, 519 West Rio
Grande, Gunnison, Colorado 81230.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Chris Schaffer, Project Manager, Federal
Aviation Administration, Northwest
Mountain Region, Airports Division,
Denver Airports District Office, 26805 E.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:57 Nov 04, 2009
Jkt 220001
68th Ave., Suite 224, Denver, Colorado
80249.
The request to release property may
be reviewed in person at this same
location.
The FAA
invites public comment on the request
to release property at the GunnisonCrested Butte Regional Airport under
the provisions of Section 47 125(a) of
Title 49 United States Code (U.S.C.). On
October 16, 2009, the FAA determined
that the request to release property at
the Gunnison-Crested Butte Regional
Airport submitted by the County of
Gunnison, Colorado met the procedural
requirements of the Federal Aviation
Regulations, Part 155. The FAA may
approve the request, in whole or inpart,
no later than December 7, 2009.
The following is a brief overview of
the request:
The County of Gunnison, Colorado
requests the release of 160 acres of nonaeronautical airport property, otherwise
known as Parcel 41 of the GunnisonCrested Butte Regional Airport. The
purpose of this release is to allow nonaviation related development of the
parcel. The sale of this parcel will
provide funds for airport improvements.
Any person may inspect the request
by appointment at the FAA office listed
above under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
In addition, any person may, inspect
the application, notice and other
documents germane to the application
in person at the Gurmison-Crested Butte
Regional Airport, 519 West Rio Grande,
Gunnison, Colorado, 81230.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Issued in Denver, Colorado, on October 16,
2009.
Craig A. Sparks,
Manager, Denver Airports District Office.
[FR Doc. E9–26481 Filed 11–4–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–M
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
Proposed Collection; Comment
Request for Form 8870
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
SUMMARY: The Department of the
Treasury, as part of its continuing effort
to reduce paperwork and respondent
burden, invites the general public and
other Federal agencies to take this
opportunity to comment on proposed
and/or continuing information
PO 00000
Frm 00106
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
Public Law 104–13 (44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A)). Currently, the IRS is
soliciting comments concerning Form
8870, Information Return for Transfers
Associated With Certain Personal
Benefit Contracts.
DATES: Written comments should be
received on or before January 4, 2010 to
be assured of consideration.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments
to Glenn Kirkland Internal Revenue
Service, room 6242, 1111 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20224.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of the form and instructions
should be directed to R. Joseph Durbala
at Internal Revenue Service, room 6129,
1111 Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20224, or at (202) 622–
3634, or through the Internet at
RJoseph.Durbala@irs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Information Return for Transfers
Associated with Certain Personal
Benefit Contracts.
OMB Number: 1545–1702.
Form Number: 8870.
Abstract: Section 537 of the Ticket to
Work and Work Incentives
Improvement Act of 1999 added section
170(f)(10) to the Internal Revenue Code.
Section 170(f)(10)(F) requires an
organization to report annually: (1) Any
premiums paid after February 8, 1999,
to which section 170(f)(10) applies; (2)
the name and taxpayer identification
number (TIN) of each beneficiary under
each contact to which the premiums
related; and (3) any other information
the Secretary of the Treasury may
require. A charitable organization
described in section 170(c) or a
charitable remainder trust described in
section 664(d) that paid premiums after
February 9, 1999, or certain life
insurance, annuity, and endowment
contracts (personal benefit contracts)
must complete and file Form 8870.
Current Actions: There are no changes
being made to the form at this time.
Type of Review: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
Affected Public: Business or other forprofit institutions.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
5,000.
Estimated Time per Respondent: 14
hours, 50 minutes.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 74,200.
The following paragraph applies to all
of the collections of information covered
by this notice:
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
E:\FR\FM\05NON1.SGM
05NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 213 (Thursday, November 5, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57387-57390]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-26669]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
[Docket No. FHWA 2009-0112]
Agency Information Collection Activities: Notice of Request for
Extension of Currently Approved Information Collection
AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT
ACTION: Notice and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FHWA invites public comments about our intention to
request the Office of Management and Budget's (OMB) approval for the
renewal of a currently approved information collection that is
summarized below
[[Page 57388]]
under SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. We are required to publish this notice
in the Federal Register by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Please submit comments by January 4, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by DOT Docket ID Number
FHWA-2009-0112, by any of the following methods:
Web Site: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received go to the Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
Fax: 1-202-493-2251.
Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery or Courier: U.S. Department of Transportation, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. ET, Monday through
Friday, except on Federal Holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For questions concerning the National
Historic Covered Bridge Preservation Program (NHCBP), please contact
Mr. Everett Mattias, Office of Bridge Technology, HIBT-30, at (202)
366-6712, FAX (202) 366-3077, or e-mail everett.mattias@dot.gov. For
legal questions, please contact Mr. Robert Black, Office of the Chief
Counsel, (202) 366-1359, robert.black@.dot.gov; Federal Highway
Administration, Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue,
SE., Washington, DC 20590. Office hours are from 7:45 a.m. to 4:15 p.m.
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: National Historic Covered Bridge Preservation Program.
OMB Control Number: 2125-0609.
Frequency: Annual.
Respondents: The 50 State DOTs, Puerto Rico and the District of
Columbia.
Background: Covered bridges are unique structures embodying
character, functionality and historical prominence. The National
Historic Covered Bridge Preservation Program has been established to
find comprehensive and proven means of maintaining the ability of these
vestiges of our bridge-building heritage to continue to serve current
and future generations. The program was originally established under
section 1224 of TEA-21 and continued under Section 1804 of SAFETEA-LU.
The legislation authorizes $10 million annually to be appropriated for
each fiscal year between FY 2006 and FY 2009. The program has been
authorized for continuation under the current continuing resolution.
The program is established to provide grants to States for
rehabilitation, repair and preservation of historic covered bridges and
to enable the Secretary of Transportation to perform research and
initiate education programs on historic covered bridges.
Projects eligible for grants include rehabilitation and repair
together with preservation through: installation of fire protection
systems, including a fireproofing or fire detection system and
sprinklers, installation of a system to prevent vandalism and arson, or
relocation of a bridge to a preservation site. The statute requires
that, to the maximum extent practicable, grant projects are carried out
in the most historically appropriate manner, preserve the existing
structure of the historic covered bridge, and provide for the
replacement of wooden components with wooden components, unless the use
of wood is impracticable for safety reasons.
Research and education activities include the collection and
dissemination of information on historic covered bridges; conducting
educational programs relating to the history and construction
techniques of historic covered bridges; conducting research on the
history of historic covered bridges; and conducting research on, and
study techniques for, protecting historic covered bridges from rot,
fire, natural disasters, or weight-related damage.
Guidelines and Administration
To administer this program, the FHWA will collect information
necessary to evaluate and rank projects. The information collection was
developed considering public input \1\ and is intended to only address
the project funding allotted through the program. Research funding will
be administered separately through the FHWA Office of Infrastructure
Research and Development (R&D) at the Turner Fairbank Highway Research
Center, who will also administer the research and education activities.
The FHWA Office of Bridge Technology will administer the grant program
to assist the States in their efforts to rehabilitate, repair or
preserve the Nation's historic covered bridges, which are listed or
eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. The
FHWA will award grants based on applications received and funds
available through accompanying appropriations legislation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Implementation Guidance for the National Historic Covered
Bridge Preservation Program, August 23, 2000; 65 FR 51401.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Information Proposed for Collection
Information recommended under TEA-21 and proposed for the current
program includes the following:
State's Priority Ranking;
National Bridge Inventory (NBI) Structure Number;
Bridge Name;
Description of Location;
Congressional District and Representative;
Year Built;
Whether the structure is on or eligible for listing on the
National Register of Historic Places and description of the qualities
that qualify the bridge for the National Register;
Structure description (e.g., number of spans, length,
width, design type, description of decking, beams/stringers, sides and
roof, wood species, wood preservation system in use, builder, traffic
carried, etc.);
General plan and elevation;
Description of previous repair work (description, year,
etc.);
Description of proposed work including wood preservative
system, fire protection, vandalism and arson prevention systems to be
used;
Indication of whether the State has a historic bridge
inventory/management plan accepted by the State Historic Preservation
Officer (SHPO). A programmatic agreement for historic bridges with the
SHPO, FHWA and the Advisory Counsel on Historic Preservation (ACHP) may
substitute;
Description of whether the SHPO has reviewed and certified
this project is warranted in accordance with the SHPO's statewide
historic preservation plan; how it benefits statewide preservation
efforts; how it enhances cultural tourism or enhances the history/
economic development of the community; and other benefits upon
successful completion of this project;
Amount of State or local government matching funds or
other resources (donated materials or labor may qualify);
A statement addressing when the project is completed, and
if the bridge will meet the current State or AASHTO standards for the
roadway classification that it carries;
Plan for documentation of the bridge and the work
performed;
Scheduled start and completion date for the project (month
and year); and
Contact information for the State DOT, Local Agency (if
applicable), FHWA Division Office, and SHPO.
[[Page 57389]]
As indicated above, the FHWA has developed a template for the
application. The application may be made based on this template
provided by the FHWA including this information. This template is
available through the FHWA Division Offices and through the FHWA Office
of Bridge Technology and is available at the following URL: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/022803a.htm#application. The template is not
required but rather is provided for convenience of the applicants.
Burden Hours for Information Collection
Burden hour estimates and discussions are provided for each item
presented and required within the application submittal process.
State's Priority Ranking; 30 minutes.
[cir] The priority ranking will be performed by the submitting
agency. Given that a small number of applications will be submitted by
an individual State, the prioritization process will be limited and 30
minutes is conservatively assumed to include any potential discussion.
NBI Structure Number; 5 minutes.
[cir] Projects submitted must be legally defined as a ``bridge''
and must be located on a public road. With this constraint, each
structure will already have an NBI Structure Number assigned.
Bridge Name; 5 minutes.
[cir] A description of the bridge may be included in the NBI
database; however, this may or may not be the commonly referenced name
used locally. A burden of 5 minutes is assumed to permit the applicant
to review the NBI record and any additional documentation to isolate
the common bridge name.
Description of Location; 10 minutes.
[cir] The location is already included in the NBI database. A
burden of 10 minutes is provided assuming that the applicant will
elaborate on the location information.
Congressional District and Representative; 5 minutes.
[cir] The location of the bridge will be known from the information
in the NBI database. A 5-minute burden is specified assuming that the
applicant will have to cross reference the location with Congressional
district maps. This time would be negligible if the State has employed
a GIS system including the infrastructure information and the political
boundaries.
Year Built; 5 minutes.
[cir] The year built is already recorded in the National Bridge
Inventory.
Whether the structure is on or eligible for listing on the
National Register of Historic Places and description of the qualities
that qualify the bridge for the National Register; 15 minutes.
[cir] The NBI record indicated whether the structure is located on
or eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. The 15-minute
burden is assumed to allow the applicant to describe the qualities that
qualify the bridge for the National Register.
Structure description (e.g., number of spans, length,
width, design type, description of decking, beams/stringers, sides and
roof, wood species, wood preservation system in use, builder, traffic
carried, etc.); 15 minutes.
[cir] Most of this information will be included within the NBI
database or on the inspection reports. 15 minutes is assumed for the
applicant to synthesize information.
General plan and elevation; 5 minutes.
[cir] This information is available for structures that have been
placed on the National Register of Historic Places or for those which
are eligible and have applications complete. This information is also
available for projects that have completed conceptual and preliminary
engineering and design.
Description of previous repair work (description, year,
etc.); 15 minutes.
[cir] This information is available from bridge inspection reports
and bridge files located within the State Transportation Agency. Time
estimated is intended for synthesis of information from other sources.
Description of proposed work including wood preservative
system, fire protection, vandalism and arson prevention systems to be
used; 15 minutes.
[cir] This information will be established by the need when
identified and the details will be identified through the conceptual
and preliminary engineering process, which is done independently. A 15-
minute burden is assumed to synthesize the existing information.
Indication of whether the State has a historic bridge
inventory/management plan accepted by the SHPO. A programmatic
agreement for historic bridges with the SHPO, FHWA and the ACHP may
substitute; 5 minutes.
[cir] This item is readily obtained through contact with the SHPO.
Description of whether the SHPO has reviewed and certified
this project is warranted in accordance with the SHPO's statewide
historic preservation plan; how it benefits statewide preservation
efforts; how it enhances cultural tourism or enhances the history/
economic development of the community; and other benefits upon
successful completion of this project; 45 minutes.
[cir] This information is readily obtained through contact with the
SHPO. A total of 45 minutes includes time for the State Historic
Preservation Officer to review the project, in relation to the
statewide preservation efforts, to articulate the benefits, and to
document the findings.
Amount of State or local government matching funds or
other resources (donated materials or labor may qualify); 5 minutes.
[cir] A nominal amount of time is required to document the matching
funds and amounts.
When the project is complete, will the bridge meet the
current State or AASHTO standards for the roadway classification that
it carries; 5 minutes.
[cir] A nominal amount of time is required to ascertain and
identify whether the bridge will meet the standards for the roadway
classification as any exception to the standard will be identified
through the preliminary engineering process and already documented.
Plan for documentation of the bridge and the work
performed; 15 minutes.
[cir] A plan for documentation is encouraged. Typically, each State
Transportation Agency will already have a process in place to document
work performed. Applicants are encouraged to identify any additional
requirements warranted for these historical structures and to
articulate the overall plan within the application.
Scheduled start and completion date for the project (month
and year); 5 minutes.
[cir] This will be determined through other processes that are
performed independent of this program, including preliminary
engineering and the STIP process. The available information must be
synthesized on the application, which takes a nominal amount of time.
Contact information for the State DOT, Local Agency (if
applicable), FHWA Division Office, and SHPO: 5 minutes.
[cir] This requires providing a list of contacts and involves a
nominal amount of time.
Individual Respondent Burden: The total amount of time estimated to
complete the report is 3\1/2\ hours.
Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 105 hours (FHWA estimates
receiving 30 reports from the State Transportation Departments).
[[Page 57390]]
Public Comments Invited: You are asked to comment on any aspect of
this information collection, including: (1) Whether the proposed
collection is necessary for the FHWA's performance; (2) the accuracy of
estimated burdens; (3) ways for the FHWA to enhance the quality,
usefulness, and clarity of the collected information; and (4) ways that
burdens could be minimized, including use of electronic technology,
without reducing the quality of the collected information. The agency
will summarize and/or include your comments in the request for OMB's
clearance of this information collection.
Authority: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995; 44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35, as amended; and 49 CFR 1.48.
Issued on: October 30, 2009.
Judith Kane,
Acting Chief, Management Programs and Analysis Division.
[FR Doc. E9-26669 Filed 11-4-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-22-P