Special Conditions: Cessna Aircraft Company, Model 525C; Flight Performance, Flight Characteristics, and Operating Limitations, 57060-57061 [E9-26596]
Download as PDF
57060
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 212 / Wednesday, November 4, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
carton is established for Florida
tomatoes.
Dated: October 27, 2009.
Rayne Pegg,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. E9–26462 Filed 11–3–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 23
[Docket No. CE300; Special Conditions No.
23–240–SC]
Special Conditions: Cessna Aircraft
Company, Model 525C; Flight
Performance, Flight Characteristics,
and Operating Limitations
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final special conditions; request
for comments.
SUMMARY: These special conditions are
issued for the Cessna Aircraft Company,
Model 525C airplane. This airplane will
have a novel or unusual design
feature(s) associated with turbofan
engines, engine location, and certain
performance characteristics necessary
for this type of airplane that were not
envisioned by the existing regulations.
The applicable airworthiness
regulations do not contain adequate or
appropriate safety standards for this
design feature. These special conditions
contain the additional safety standards
that the Administrator considers
necessary to establish a level of safety
equivalent to that established by the
existing airworthiness standards.
DATES: The effective date of these
special conditions is November 4, 2009.
We must receive your comments by
December 4, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Mail two copies of your
comments to: Federal Aviation
Administration, Regional Counsel,
ACE–7, Attn: Rules Docket No. CE300,
901 Locust, Kansas City, MO 64106.
You may deliver two copies to the
Regional Counsel at the above address.
Mark your comments: Docket No.
CE300. You may inspect comments in
the Rules Docket weekdays, except
Federal holidays, between 7:30 a.m. and
4 p.m.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Lowell Foster, Federal Aviation
Administration, Small Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:16 Nov 03, 2009
Jkt 220001
City, MO 64106; telephone (816) 329–
4125; facsimile (816) 329–4090.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA
has determined that notice and
opportunity for prior public comment
hereon are impracticable because these
procedures would significantly delay
issuance of the approval design and
thus delivery of the affected aircraft. In
addition, the substance of these special
conditions has been subject to the
public comment process in several prior
instances with no substantive comments
received. The FAA therefore finds that
good cause exists for making these
special conditions effective upon
issuance.
Comments Invited
We invite interested people to take
part in this rulemaking by sending
written comments, data, or views. The
most helpful comments reference a
specific portion of the special
conditions, explain the reason for any
recommended change, and include
supporting data. We ask that you send
us two copies of written comments.
We will file in the docket all
comments we receive, as well as a
report summarizing each substantive
public contact with FAA personnel
about these special conditions. You can
inspect the docket before and after the
comment closing date. If you wish to
review the docket in person, go to the
address in the ADDRESSES section of this
preamble between 7:30 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
We will consider all comments we
receive by the closing date for
comments. We will consider comments
filed late if it is possible to do so
without incurring expense or delay. We
may change these special conditions
based on the comments we receive.
If you want us to let you know we
received your comments on these
special conditions, send us a preaddressed, stamped postcard on which
the docket number appears. We will
stamp the date on the postcard and mail
it back to you.
Background
On June 28, 2007, Cessna Aircraft
Company applied for a type certificate
for their new Model Cessna Model
525C. The Cessna Model 525C is a
commuter category derivative
configuration of the Model 525B
airplane with unique turbofan engines,
engine location, and certain
performance characteristics necessary
for this type of airplane. Unlike similar
commuter category jet projects, these
special conditions reflect the model
history of the model 525 back through
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
normal category for consistency in
training.
Type Certification Basis
Under the provisions of 14 CFR, part
21, § 21.17, Cessna Aircraft Company
must show that the Cessna Model 525C
meets the applicable provisions of part
23, as amended by Amendment 23–1
through 23–59 thereto.
If the Administrator finds that the
applicable airworthiness regulations
(i.e., 14 CFR part 23) do not contain
adequate or appropriate safety standards
for the Model 525C because of a novel
or unusual design feature, special
conditions are prescribed under the
provisions of § 21.16.
In addition to the applicable
airworthiness regulations and special
conditions, the Model 525C must
comply with the fuel vent and exhaust
emission requirements of 14 CFR part
34 and the noise certification
requirements of 14 CFR part 36; and the
FAA must issue a finding of regulatory
adequacy under § 611 of Public Law 92–
574, the ‘‘Noise Control Act of 1972.’’
The FAA issues special conditions, as
defined in § 11.19, under § 11.38 and
they become part of the type
certification basis under § 21.17(a)(2).
Special conditions are initially
applicable to the model for which they
are issued. Should the type certificate
for that model be amended later to
include any other model that
incorporates the same novel or unusual
design feature, the special conditions
would also apply to the other model.
Novel or Unusual Design Features
The Cessna Model 525C will
incorporate the following novel or
unusual design features: Two aft
mounted Williams International FJ44–
4A turbofan engines rated at 3,400
pounds of thrust with a Full Authority
Digital Engine Control (FADEC) system
and other performance characteristics
that were not envisioned by the
regulations when the Model 525 was
originally certificated.
Applicability
As discussed above, these special
conditions are applicable to the Cessna
Model 525C. Should Cessna Aircraft
Company apply at a later date for a
change to the type certificate to include
another model incorporating the same
novel or unusual design feature, the
special conditions would apply to that
model as well.
Conclusion
This action affects only certain novel
or unusual design features on one model
of airplane. It is not a rule of general
E:\FR\FM\04NOR1.SGM
04NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 212 / Wednesday, November 4, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
applicability and affects only the
applicant who applied to the FAA for
approval of these features on the
airplane.
The substance of these special
conditions has been subjected to the
notice and comment period in several
prior instances and has been derived
without substantive change from those
previously issued. It is unlikely that
prior public comment would result in a
significant change from the substance
contained herein. Therefore, because a
delay would significantly affect the
certification of the airplane, which is
imminent, the FAA has determined that
prior public notice and comment are
unnecessary and impracticable, and
good cause exists for adopting these
special conditions upon issuance. The
FAA is requesting comments to allow
interested persons to submit views that
may not have been submitted in
response to the prior opportunities for
comment described above.
first returning the control to the original
trimmed position, the response of the
airplane must not exhibit any dangerous
characteristics nor be excessive in
relation to the magnitude of the control
force prior to release. Any long-period
oscillation of flight path, phugoid
oscillation, that results must not be so
unstable as to increase the pilot’s
workload or otherwise endanger the
airplane.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on
October 28, 2009.
Margaret Kline,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E9–26596 Filed 11–3–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
15 CFR Part 744
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 23
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Signs and
symbols.
[Docket No. 080211163–91379–03]
Citation
The authority citation for these
special conditions is as follows:
Encryption Simplification
RIN 0694–AE18
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113 and
44701; 14 CFR 21.16 and 21.17; and 14 CFR
11.38 and 11.19.
The Special Conditions
Accordingly, pursuant to the
authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the following special
conditions are issued as part of the type
certification basis for Cessna Model
525C airplanes.
1. SC 23.161, Trim
Instead of the requirements of
§ 23.161(b)(2), the following applies:
(b)(2) For commuter category
airplanes, at all speeds from 1.4 VS1 to
VMO/MMO.
2. SC 23.181, Dynamic stability
Instead of compliance with the
requirements of § 23.181(a), and (d), the
following applies:
(a) Any short period oscillation, not
including combined lateral-directional
oscillations, occurring between 1.2 VS
and the maximum allowable speed
appropriate to the configuration of the
airplane must be heavily damped with
the primary controls—
(1) Free; and
(2) In a fixed position.
(d) During the conditions as specified
in § 23.175, when the longitudinal
control force required to maintain
speeds differing from the trim speed by
at least plus and minus 15 percent or 15
knots, whichever is less, is released after
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:16 Nov 03, 2009
Jkt 220001
AGENCY: Bureau of Industry and
Security, Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule; correcting
amendment.
SUMMARY: The Bureau of Industry and
Security (BIS) published a final rule in
the Federal Register on Thursday,
October 15, 2009 (74 FR 52880) that
amended the Export Administration
Regulations (EAR) to finalize and
correct errors in an interim final rule
entitled ‘‘Encryption Simplification’’ on
October 3, 2008 (73 FR 57495). That
final rule contained one error in the
amendatory instruction used for
revising one section. This error in the
amendatory instruction led to the
unintentional removal of the wrong
sentence. This document corrects that
amendatory instruction error by adding
back the sentence that was removed and
removing the intended sentence from
that section.
In addition, this rule clarifies
references in the preamble to an
amendment to part 736 that should have
been removed. The instruction to amend
part 736 was removed from the rule
prior to publication, because the
amendment had already been made. No
action is necessary to correct this
mistake, as it did not affect the Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR).
DATES: Effective Date: This rule is
effective: November 4, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Although there is no formal
comment period, public comments on
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
57061
this regulation are welcome on a
continuing basis. Comments should be
submitted to Sharron Cook, Office of
Exporter Services, Bureau of Industry
and Security, Department of Commerce,
14th and Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Room 2705, Washington, DC 20230.
Send comments regarding the collection
of information to Jasmeet Seehra, Office
of Management and Budget (OMB), by
e-mail to jseehra@omb.eop.gov, or by
fax to (202) 395–7285; and to the
Regulatory Policy Division, Bureau of
Industry and Security, U.S. Department
of Commerce, 14th St. & Pennsylvania
Avenue, NW., Room H2705,
Washington, DC 20230.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sharron Cook, Office of Exporter
Services, Bureau of Industry and
Security, U.S. Department of Commerce;
by telephone: (202) 482–2440; or by fax:
202–482–3355.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On October 15, 2009, the final rule,
‘‘Encryption Simplification Rule: Final’’
was published in the Federal Register
(74 FR 52880). BIS intended to remove
the sentence that reads ‘‘Section 744.9
prohibits U.S. persons from providing
technical assistance to certain foreign
persons seeking to develop or
manufacture certain encryption
commodities or software.’’ However,
due to an error in the amendatory
instructions, the incorrect sentence was
removed. This rule corrects that
amendatory instruction error by adding
back the sentence that reads ‘‘Section
744.6 prohibits certain activities by U.S.
persons in support of certain nuclear,
missile, chemical, or biological enduses.’’ and removing the sentence that
was intended to be removed.
Although the Export Administration
Act expired on August 20, 2001, the
President, through Executive Order
13222 of August 17, 2001, 3 CFR, 2001
Comp., p. 783 (2002), as extended by the
Notice of August 13, 2009 (74 FR 41,325
(August 14, 2009)), has continued the
Export Administration Regulations in
effect under the International
Emergency Economic Powers Act.
Rulemaking Requirements
1. This final correction rule has been
determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
2. Notwithstanding any other
provision of law, no person is required
to respond to, nor shall any person be
subject to a penalty for failure to comply
with a collection of information subject
to the requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
E:\FR\FM\04NOR1.SGM
04NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 212 (Wednesday, November 4, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 57060-57061]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-26596]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 23
[Docket No. CE300; Special Conditions No. 23-240-SC]
Special Conditions: Cessna Aircraft Company, Model 525C; Flight
Performance, Flight Characteristics, and Operating Limitations
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final special conditions; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: These special conditions are issued for the Cessna Aircraft
Company, Model 525C airplane. This airplane will have a novel or
unusual design feature(s) associated with turbofan engines, engine
location, and certain performance characteristics necessary for this
type of airplane that were not envisioned by the existing regulations.
The applicable airworthiness regulations do not contain adequate or
appropriate safety standards for this design feature. These special
conditions contain the additional safety standards that the
Administrator considers necessary to establish a level of safety
equivalent to that established by the existing airworthiness standards.
DATES: The effective date of these special conditions is November 4,
2009. We must receive your comments by December 4, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Mail two copies of your comments to: Federal Aviation
Administration, Regional Counsel, ACE-7, Attn: Rules Docket No. CE300,
901 Locust, Kansas City, MO 64106. You may deliver two copies to the
Regional Counsel at the above address. Mark your comments: Docket No.
CE300. You may inspect comments in the Rules Docket weekdays, except
Federal holidays, between 7:30 a.m. and 4 p.m.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Lowell Foster, Federal Aviation
Administration, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, MO 64106; telephone (816)
329-4125; facsimile (816) 329-4090.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA has determined that notice and
opportunity for prior public comment hereon are impracticable because
these procedures would significantly delay issuance of the approval
design and thus delivery of the affected aircraft. In addition, the
substance of these special conditions has been subject to the public
comment process in several prior instances with no substantive comments
received. The FAA therefore finds that good cause exists for making
these special conditions effective upon issuance.
Comments Invited
We invite interested people to take part in this rulemaking by
sending written comments, data, or views. The most helpful comments
reference a specific portion of the special conditions, explain the
reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data. We ask
that you send us two copies of written comments.
We will file in the docket all comments we receive, as well as a
report summarizing each substantive public contact with FAA personnel
about these special conditions. You can inspect the docket before and
after the comment closing date. If you wish to review the docket in
person, go to the address in the ADDRESSES section of this preamble
between 7:30 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
We will consider all comments we receive by the closing date for
comments. We will consider comments filed late if it is possible to do
so without incurring expense or delay. We may change these special
conditions based on the comments we receive.
If you want us to let you know we received your comments on these
special conditions, send us a pre-addressed, stamped postcard on which
the docket number appears. We will stamp the date on the postcard and
mail it back to you.
Background
On June 28, 2007, Cessna Aircraft Company applied for a type
certificate for their new Model Cessna Model 525C. The Cessna Model
525C is a commuter category derivative configuration of the Model 525B
airplane with unique turbofan engines, engine location, and certain
performance characteristics necessary for this type of airplane. Unlike
similar commuter category jet projects, these special conditions
reflect the model history of the model 525 back through normal category
for consistency in training.
Type Certification Basis
Under the provisions of 14 CFR, part 21, Sec. 21.17, Cessna
Aircraft Company must show that the Cessna Model 525C meets the
applicable provisions of part 23, as amended by Amendment 23-1 through
23-59 thereto.
If the Administrator finds that the applicable airworthiness
regulations (i.e., 14 CFR part 23) do not contain adequate or
appropriate safety standards for the Model 525C because of a novel or
unusual design feature, special conditions are prescribed under the
provisions of Sec. 21.16.
In addition to the applicable airworthiness regulations and special
conditions, the Model 525C must comply with the fuel vent and exhaust
emission requirements of 14 CFR part 34 and the noise certification
requirements of 14 CFR part 36; and the FAA must issue a finding of
regulatory adequacy under Sec. 611 of Public Law 92-574, the ``Noise
Control Act of 1972.''
The FAA issues special conditions, as defined in Sec. 11.19, under
Sec. 11.38 and they become part of the type certification basis under
Sec. 21.17(a)(2).
Special conditions are initially applicable to the model for which
they are issued. Should the type certificate for that model be amended
later to include any other model that incorporates the same novel or
unusual design feature, the special conditions would also apply to the
other model.
Novel or Unusual Design Features
The Cessna Model 525C will incorporate the following novel or
unusual design features: Two aft mounted Williams International FJ44-4A
turbofan engines rated at 3,400 pounds of thrust with a Full Authority
Digital Engine Control (FADEC) system and other performance
characteristics that were not envisioned by the regulations when the
Model 525 was originally certificated.
Applicability
As discussed above, these special conditions are applicable to the
Cessna Model 525C. Should Cessna Aircraft Company apply at a later date
for a change to the type certificate to include another model
incorporating the same novel or unusual design feature, the special
conditions would apply to that model as well.
Conclusion
This action affects only certain novel or unusual design features
on one model of airplane. It is not a rule of general
[[Page 57061]]
applicability and affects only the applicant who applied to the FAA for
approval of these features on the airplane.
The substance of these special conditions has been subjected to the
notice and comment period in several prior instances and has been
derived without substantive change from those previously issued. It is
unlikely that prior public comment would result in a significant change
from the substance contained herein. Therefore, because a delay would
significantly affect the certification of the airplane, which is
imminent, the FAA has determined that prior public notice and comment
are unnecessary and impracticable, and good cause exists for adopting
these special conditions upon issuance. The FAA is requesting comments
to allow interested persons to submit views that may not have been
submitted in response to the prior opportunities for comment described
above.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 23
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Signs and symbols.
Citation
The authority citation for these special conditions is as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113 and 44701; 14 CFR 21.16 and
21.17; and 14 CFR 11.38 and 11.19.
The Special Conditions
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the following special conditions are issued as part of
the type certification basis for Cessna Model 525C airplanes.
1. SC 23.161, Trim
Instead of the requirements of Sec. 23.161(b)(2), the following
applies:
(b)(2) For commuter category airplanes, at all speeds from 1.4
VS1 to VMO/MMO.
2. SC 23.181, Dynamic stability
Instead of compliance with the requirements of Sec. 23.181(a), and
(d), the following applies:
(a) Any short period oscillation, not including combined lateral-
directional oscillations, occurring between 1.2 VS and the
maximum allowable speed appropriate to the configuration of the
airplane must be heavily damped with the primary controls--
(1) Free; and
(2) In a fixed position.
(d) During the conditions as specified in Sec. 23.175, when the
longitudinal control force required to maintain speeds differing from
the trim speed by at least plus and minus 15 percent or 15 knots,
whichever is less, is released after first returning the control to the
original trimmed position, the response of the airplane must not
exhibit any dangerous characteristics nor be excessive in relation to
the magnitude of the control force prior to release. Any long-period
oscillation of flight path, phugoid oscillation, that results must not
be so unstable as to increase the pilot's workload or otherwise
endanger the airplane.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on October 28, 2009.
Margaret Kline,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E9-26596 Filed 11-3-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P