Presumption of Service Connection for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, 57072-57074 [E9-26580]
Download as PDF
57072
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 212 / Wednesday, November 4, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded this action is one of a
category of actions which do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule
involves a regulation establishing a
safety zone. An environmental analysis
checklist and a categorical exclusion
determination are available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:16 Nov 03, 2009
Jkt 220001
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
■ For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
(d) Effective period. This section is
effective from 12:45 p.m. through 9:30
p.m. on November 9, 2009.
Dated: October 10, 2009.
P.M. Gugg,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port San Francisco.
[FR Doc. E9–26574 Filed 11–3–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
■
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
38 CFR Part 3
2. A new temporary § 165.T11–249 is
added to read as follows:
■
§ 165.T11–249 Safety Zone; Corporate
Party on Hornblower Yacht, Fireworks
Display, San Francisco, CA
(a) Location. The following area is a
safety zone: All waters of the San
Francisco Bay from the surface to the
bottom, within a 100 foot radius of the
fireworks launch site located at
37°46′39.90″ N, 122°23′06.78″ W (NAD
83) proximate to Pier 30–32 from 12:45
p.m. until 9 p.m. on November 9, 2009;
and within 1,000 feet of the same
launch site from 9 p.m. until 9:30 p.m.
on November 9, 2009.
(b) Definitions. As used in this
section, ‘‘designated representative’’
means a Coast Guard Patrol
Commander, including a Coast Guard
coxswain, petty officer, or other officer
operating a Coast Guard vessel and a
Federal, State, and local officer
designated by or assisting the Captain of
the Port (COTP) San Francisco in the
enforcement of the safety zone.
(c) Regulations. (1) Under the general
regulations in § 165.23, entry into,
transiting, or anchoring within this
safety zone is prohibited unless
authorized by the COTP or the COTP’s
Representative.
(2) The safety zone is closed to all
vessel traffic, except as may be
permitted by the COTP or a designated
representative.
(3) Vessel operators desiring to enter
or operate within the safety zone must
contact the COTP or a designated
representative to obtain permission to
do so. Vessel operators given permission
to enter or operate in the safety zone
must comply with all directions given to
them by the COTP or the designated
representative. Persons and vessels may
request permission to enter the safety
zones on VHF–16 or through the 24hour Command Center at telephone
(415) 399–3547.
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
RIN 2900–AN05
Presumption of Service Connection for
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: This document adopts as a
final rule the interim final rule
amending the Department of Veterans
Affairs (VA) adjudication regulations to
establish a presumption of service
connection for amyotrophic lateral
sclerosis (ALS) for any veteran who
develops the disease at any time after
separation from service. This
amendment implements the decision by
the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to
establish such a presumption based on
a November 2006 report by the National
Academy of Sciences Institute of
Medicine on the association between
active service and ALS.
DATES: Effective Date: November 4,
2009.
Applicability Date: This final rule
shall apply to all applications for
benefits that are received by VA on or
after September 23, 2008, the effective
date of the interim final rule, and to all
applications for benefits that were
pending before VA, the United States
Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, or
the United States Court of Appeals for
the Federal Circuit on that date.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Thomas J. Kniffen, Chief, Regulations
Staff (211D), Compensation and Pension
Service, Veterans Benefits
Administration, Department of Veterans
Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20420, (202) 461–9366.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
September 23, 2008, VA published in
the Federal Register (73 FR 54691) an
interim final rule that established at
new § 3.318 a presumption of service
connection for ALS for any veteran who
develops the disease at any time after
separation from service.
We provided a 60-day comment
period that ended on November 24,
E:\FR\FM\04NOR1.SGM
04NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 212 / Wednesday, November 4, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
2008. We received comments from 12
members of the general public and 1
each from the ALS Association and the
American Speech-Language-Hearing
Association (ASHA). Most of the
comments from the general public came
from family members of veterans
affected by this disease, expressing
gratitude and the belief that this
decision was long overdue. Based on the
rationale set forth in the interim final
rule and this final rule, we adopt the
provisions of the interim final rule as a
final rule without change.
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
Administrative Procedure Act
This document affirms the
amendment made by the interim final
rule that is already in effect. The
Secretary of Veterans Affairs concluded
that, under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B) and
(d)(3), there was good cause to dispense
with advance public notice and
opportunity to comment on this rule
and good cause to publish the interim
final rule with an immediate effective
date. The interim final rule was
necessary to implement immediately the
Secretary’s decision to establish a
presumption of service connection for
ALS for veterans with that diagnosis.
Delay in the implementation of this
presumption would have been contrary
to the public interest.
Because the survival period for
persons suffering from ALS is generally
5 years or less from the onset of
symptoms, any delay would have been
extremely detrimental to veterans who
are currently afflicted with ALS.
Veterans with ALS may not be taking
alleviating medications, participating in
muscle and speech therapy, or receiving
proper assistance for daily functions
due to financial hardship or their lack
of having service-connected status for
their disability. Moreover, in all
likelihood, some veterans would have
died from this rapidly progressive
disease during a period for prior public
comment. These veterans obviously
would not have received any benefit
from a presumption that is implemented
after a public-comment period.
In order to benefit veterans currently
suffering from ALS as quickly as
possible, it was critical that VA
established this presumption
immediately.
Conditions for Presumptive Service
Connection
The ALS Association expressed
support for this regulation and stated its
belief that 90 continuous days of service
in the military and a diagnosis of ALS
are sufficient to establish presumptive
service connection for that disease. New
§ 3.318 generally establishes
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:16 Nov 03, 2009
Jkt 220001
presumptive service connection for ALS
if a veteran had at least 90 continuous
days of active military, naval, or air
service and developed ALS at any time
after separation from such service. We
made no changes based on this
comment.
Exceptions to the Presumption of
Service Connection
The ALS Association was concerned
that the presumption of service
connection for ALS would not apply
‘‘when there is affirmative evidence that
ALS was not caused by military service
or was caused by a veteran’s own willful
misconduct.’’ However, it conceded that
there is ‘‘very little likelihood that either
of those standards will be met with
regard to any particular claim,’’ as we
stated in the supplementary information
of the interim final rule. We made no
changes based on this comment.
Outreach Services
We received several comments about
VA contacting family survivors of
affected veterans concerning new
§ 3.318, increasing awareness of ALS,
and performing research regarding the
disease. VA is taking steps to inform
both veterans with ALS and family
survivors of veterans with ALS about
this regulation and realizes the
importance of all of these issues. These
issues, however, are beyond the scope of
this rulemaking. We made no changes
based on these comments.
Eligibility for Survivor Benefits
We received comments concerning
the availability of survivor benefits to
survivors of veterans who died from
ALS before the effective date of the
interim final rule. A veteran’s survivor
who establishes that the veteran died
from ALS before September 23, 2008,
may be eligible for dependency and
indemnity compensation pursuant to
new § 3.318, but would not be entitled
to any retroactive benefits before
September 23, 2008 (see discussion
below). The laws concerning survivor
benefits, however, are not specifically
addressed by this rulemaking. For
information about such benefits, those
who are interested may call VA for
assistance at 1–888–GIBILL1 (442–4551)
for education benefits, or at 1–800–827–
1000 for all other VA benefits. They may
also contact VA on the Internet at
https://www.gibill.va.gov for education
claims or at https://iris.va.gov for other
information. We made no changes based
on these comments.
Expedited Claims
The ALS Association recommended
that VA consider adopting formal
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
57073
processes for expediting claims for
veterans with ALS because of the
rapidly progressive and terminal nature
of the disease. VA is aware of the need
for expediting claims for ALS and has
taken steps to assure that this happens.
However, this issue is beyond the scope
of this rulemaking. We made no changes
based on this comment.
Use of Assistive Technology
ASHA commented that it ‘‘strongly
supports this presumption’’ and that
this presumption would help veterans
with ALS receive necessary treatment,
such as the use of a speech-generating
device. We note that VA already
provides assistive technological devices
to veterans to help them overcome
challenges they face in coping with
various diseases. Issues relating to
treatment, however, are not part of this
rulemaking. We made no changes based
on this comment.
Effective Date of Benefits
Several commenters urged VA to
provide benefits for awards based on
new § 3.318 retroactive to the date of
claim, even if the claim was originally
filed and/or denied before September
23, 2008, the effective date of the
interim final rule. New § 3.318 is
applicable prospectively to claims filed
on or after September 23, 2008, and to
all applications for benefits that were
pending before VA, the United States
Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, or
the United States Court of Appeals for
the Federal Circuit on that date. Under
38 U.S.C. 5110(g), the effective date of
any award of disability compensation or
dependency and indemnity
compensation made pursuant to new
§ 3.318 will be assigned in accordance
with the facts found but cannot be
earlier than the effective date of the
interim final rule or the date one year
prior to the date of application,
whichever is later. VA therefore cannot
assign an effective date prior to
September 23, 2008, for an award of
benefits made pursuant to new § 3.318.
We made no changes based on this
comment.
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of‘1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C. 1532, that
agencies prepare an assessment of
anticipated costs and benefits before
issuing any rule that may result in an
expenditure by State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
(adjusted annually for inflation) in any
given year. This rule will have no such
effect on State, local, and tribal
governments, or on the private sector.
E:\FR\FM\04NOR1.SGM
04NOR1
57074
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 212 / Wednesday, November 4, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
Executive Order 12866
Executive Order 12866 directs
agencies to assess all costs and benefits
of available regulatory alternatives and,
when regulation is necessary, to select
regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential
economic, environmental, public health
and safety, and other advantages;
distributive impacts; and equity). The
Executive Order classifies a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ requiring review by
the Office of Management and Budget,
as any regulatory action that is likely to
result in a rule that may: (1) Have an
annual effect on the economy of $100
million or more or adversely affect in a
material way the economy, a sector of
the economy, productivity, competition,
jobs, the environment, public health or
safety, or State, local, or tribal
governments or communities; (2) create
a serious inconsistency or interfere with
an action taken or planned by another
agency; (3) materially alter the
budgetary impact of entitlements,
grants, user fees, or loan programs or the
rights and obligations of entitlement
recipients; or (4) raise novel legal or
policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President’s priorities, or
the principles set forth in the Executive
Order.
VA has examined the economic,
interagency, budgetary, legal, and policy
implications of this final rule and has
concluded that it is a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order
12866 because it is likely to result in a
rule that may raise novel legal or policy
issues arising out of legal mandates, the
President’s priorities, or the principles
set forth in the Executive Order.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This document contains no provisions
constituting a collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3521).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Secretary hereby certifies that
this final rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities as they are
defined in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612. The rule could
affect only VA beneficiaries and will not
directly affect small entities. Therefore,
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), this rule is
exempt from the initial and final
regulatory flexibility analyses
requirements of sections 603 and 604.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
The Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance program numbers and titles
for this rule are as follows: 64.109,
Veterans Compensation for ServiceConnected Disability; and 64.110,
Veterans Dependency and Indemnity
Compensation for Service-Connected
Death.
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 3
Administrative practice and
procedure, Claims, Disability benefits,
Health care, Pensions, Radioactive
materials, Veterans, Vietnam.
Approved: October 9, 2009.
John R. Gingrich,
Chief of Staff, Department of Veterans Affairs.
PART 3–ADJUDICATION
Accordingly, the interim rule
amending 38 CFR part 3 which was
published at 73 FR 54691 on September
23, 2008, is adopted as a final rule
without change.
■
[FR Doc. E9–26580 Filed 11–3–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320–01–P
ACTION:
Final rule.
SUMMARY: EPA is finalizing approval of
revisions to the California Air Resources
Board portion of the California State
Implementation Plan (SIP). These
revisions were proposed in the Federal
Register on June 26, 2009 and concern
volatile organic compound (VOC)
emissions from consumer products. We
are approving State rules that regulate
these emission sources under the Clean
Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the
Act).
DATES: Effective Date: This rule is
effective on December 4, 2009.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established docket
number EPA–R09–OAR–2009–0353 for
this action. The index to the docket is
available electronically at https://
www.regulations.gov and in hard copy
at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street,
San Francisco, California. While all
documents in the docket are listed in
the index, some information may be
publicly available only at the hard copy
location (e.g., copyrighted material), and
some may not be publicly available in
either location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the
hard copy materials, please schedule an
appointment during normal business
hours with the contact listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stanley Tong, EPA Region IX, (415)
947–4122, tong.stanley@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA.
Table of Contents
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2009–0353; FRL–8979–9]
Revisions to the California State
Implementation Plan, California Air
Resources Board Consumer Products
Regulations
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
AGENCY:
I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. EPA Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Proposed Action
On June 26, 2009 (74 FR 30481), EPA
proposed to approve the following
regulations into the California SIP.
TABLE 1—SUBMITTED REGULATIONS
Adopted/
amended
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
Regulation
Regulation title
California Code of Regulations Title 17, Division 3,
Chapter 1, Subchapter 8.5—Consumer Products.
California Code of Regulations Title 17, Division 3,
Chapter 1, Subchapter 8.5—Consumer Products.
California Code of Regulations Title 17, Division 3,
Chapter 1, Subchapter 8.5—Consumer Products.
California Air Resources Board—Test Method 310 .....
Article 1—Antiperspirants and Deodorants ..................
05/06/2005
03/27/2008
Article 2—Consumer Products .....................................
09/26/2007
03/27/2008
Article 3—Aerosol Coating Products ............................
09/26/2007
03/27/2008
Method 310—Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) in Consumer Products and Reactive
Organic Compounds in Aerosol Coating Products.
05/06/2005
03/27/2008
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:16 Nov 03, 2009
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\04NOR1.SGM
04NOR1
Submitted
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 212 (Wednesday, November 4, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 57072-57074]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-26580]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 3
RIN 2900-AN05
Presumption of Service Connection for Amyotrophic Lateral
Sclerosis
AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document adopts as a final rule the interim final rule
amending the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) adjudication
regulations to establish a presumption of service connection for
amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) for any veteran who develops the
disease at any time after separation from service. This amendment
implements the decision by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to
establish such a presumption based on a November 2006 report by the
National Academy of Sciences Institute of Medicine on the association
between active service and ALS.
DATES: Effective Date: November 4, 2009.
Applicability Date: This final rule shall apply to all applications
for benefits that are received by VA on or after September 23, 2008,
the effective date of the interim final rule, and to all applications
for benefits that were pending before VA, the United States Court of
Appeals for Veterans Claims, or the United States Court of Appeals for
the Federal Circuit on that date.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas J. Kniffen, Chief, Regulations
Staff (211D), Compensation and Pension Service, Veterans Benefits
Administration, Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue,
NW., Washington, DC 20420, (202) 461-9366.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On September 23, 2008, VA published in the
Federal Register (73 FR 54691) an interim final rule that established
at new Sec. 3.318 a presumption of service connection for ALS for any
veteran who develops the disease at any time after separation from
service.
We provided a 60-day comment period that ended on November 24,
[[Page 57073]]
2008. We received comments from 12 members of the general public and 1
each from the ALS Association and the American Speech-Language-Hearing
Association (ASHA). Most of the comments from the general public came
from family members of veterans affected by this disease, expressing
gratitude and the belief that this decision was long overdue. Based on
the rationale set forth in the interim final rule and this final rule,
we adopt the provisions of the interim final rule as a final rule
without change.
Administrative Procedure Act
This document affirms the amendment made by the interim final rule
that is already in effect. The Secretary of Veterans Affairs concluded
that, under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B) and (d)(3), there was good cause to
dispense with advance public notice and opportunity to comment on this
rule and good cause to publish the interim final rule with an immediate
effective date. The interim final rule was necessary to implement
immediately the Secretary's decision to establish a presumption of
service connection for ALS for veterans with that diagnosis. Delay in
the implementation of this presumption would have been contrary to the
public interest.
Because the survival period for persons suffering from ALS is
generally 5 years or less from the onset of symptoms, any delay would
have been extremely detrimental to veterans who are currently afflicted
with ALS. Veterans with ALS may not be taking alleviating medications,
participating in muscle and speech therapy, or receiving proper
assistance for daily functions due to financial hardship or their lack
of having service-connected status for their disability. Moreover, in
all likelihood, some veterans would have died from this rapidly
progressive disease during a period for prior public comment. These
veterans obviously would not have received any benefit from a
presumption that is implemented after a public-comment period.
In order to benefit veterans currently suffering from ALS as
quickly as possible, it was critical that VA established this
presumption immediately.
Conditions for Presumptive Service Connection
The ALS Association expressed support for this regulation and
stated its belief that 90 continuous days of service in the military
and a diagnosis of ALS are sufficient to establish presumptive service
connection for that disease. New Sec. 3.318 generally establishes
presumptive service connection for ALS if a veteran had at least 90
continuous days of active military, naval, or air service and developed
ALS at any time after separation from such service. We made no changes
based on this comment.
Exceptions to the Presumption of Service Connection
The ALS Association was concerned that the presumption of service
connection for ALS would not apply ``when there is affirmative evidence
that ALS was not caused by military service or was caused by a
veteran's own willful misconduct.'' However, it conceded that there is
``very little likelihood that either of those standards will be met
with regard to any particular claim,'' as we stated in the
supplementary information of the interim final rule. We made no changes
based on this comment.
Outreach Services
We received several comments about VA contacting family survivors
of affected veterans concerning new Sec. 3.318, increasing awareness
of ALS, and performing research regarding the disease. VA is taking
steps to inform both veterans with ALS and family survivors of veterans
with ALS about this regulation and realizes the importance of all of
these issues. These issues, however, are beyond the scope of this
rulemaking. We made no changes based on these comments.
Eligibility for Survivor Benefits
We received comments concerning the availability of survivor
benefits to survivors of veterans who died from ALS before the
effective date of the interim final rule. A veteran's survivor who
establishes that the veteran died from ALS before September 23, 2008,
may be eligible for dependency and indemnity compensation pursuant to
new Sec. 3.318, but would not be entitled to any retroactive benefits
before September 23, 2008 (see discussion below). The laws concerning
survivor benefits, however, are not specifically addressed by this
rulemaking. For information about such benefits, those who are
interested may call VA for assistance at 1-888-GIBILL1 (442-4551) for
education benefits, or at 1-800-827-1000 for all other VA benefits.
They may also contact VA on the Internet at https://www.gibill.va.gov
for education claims or at https://iris.va.gov for other information.
We made no changes based on these comments.
Expedited Claims
The ALS Association recommended that VA consider adopting formal
processes for expediting claims for veterans with ALS because of the
rapidly progressive and terminal nature of the disease. VA is aware of
the need for expediting claims for ALS and has taken steps to assure
that this happens. However, this issue is beyond the scope of this
rulemaking. We made no changes based on this comment.
Use of Assistive Technology
ASHA commented that it ``strongly supports this presumption'' and
that this presumption would help veterans with ALS receive necessary
treatment, such as the use of a speech-generating device. We note that
VA already provides assistive technological devices to veterans to help
them overcome challenges they face in coping with various diseases.
Issues relating to treatment, however, are not part of this rulemaking.
We made no changes based on this comment.
Effective Date of Benefits
Several commenters urged VA to provide benefits for awards based on
new Sec. 3.318 retroactive to the date of claim, even if the claim was
originally filed and/or denied before September 23, 2008, the effective
date of the interim final rule. New Sec. 3.318 is applicable
prospectively to claims filed on or after September 23, 2008, and to
all applications for benefits that were pending before VA, the United
States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, or the United States Court
of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on that date. Under 38 U.S.C.
5110(g), the effective date of any award of disability compensation or
dependency and indemnity compensation made pursuant to new Sec. 3.318
will be assigned in accordance with the facts found but cannot be
earlier than the effective date of the interim final rule or the date
one year prior to the date of application, whichever is later. VA
therefore cannot assign an effective date prior to September 23, 2008,
for an award of benefits made pursuant to new Sec. 3.318. We made no
changes based on this comment.
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of`1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C.
1532, that agencies prepare an assessment of anticipated costs and
benefits before issuing any rule that may result in an expenditure by
State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more (adjusted annually for
inflation) in any given year. This rule will have no such effect on
State, local, and tribal governments, or on the private sector.
[[Page 57074]]
Executive Order 12866
Executive Order 12866 directs agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, when regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety,
and other advantages; distributive impacts; and equity). The Executive
Order classifies a ``significant regulatory action'' requiring review
by the Office of Management and Budget, as any regulatory action that
is likely to result in a rule that may: (1) Have an annual effect on
the economy of $100 million or more or adversely affect in a material
way the economy, a sector of the economy, productivity, competition,
jobs, the environment, public health or safety, or State, local, or
tribal governments or communities; (2) create a serious inconsistency
or interfere with an action taken or planned by another agency; (3)
materially alter the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants, user
fees, or loan programs or the rights and obligations of entitlement
recipients; or (4) raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of
legal mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles set forth
in the Executive Order.
VA has examined the economic, interagency, budgetary, legal, and
policy implications of this final rule and has concluded that it is a
significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866 because it is
likely to result in a rule that may raise novel legal or policy issues
arising out of legal mandates, the President's priorities, or the
principles set forth in the Executive Order.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This document contains no provisions constituting a collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3521).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Secretary hereby certifies that this final rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
as they are defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601-
612. The rule could affect only VA beneficiaries and will not directly
affect small entities. Therefore, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), this
rule is exempt from the initial and final regulatory flexibility
analyses requirements of sections 603 and 604.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance program numbers and
titles for this rule are as follows: 64.109, Veterans Compensation for
Service-Connected Disability; and 64.110, Veterans Dependency and
Indemnity Compensation for Service-Connected Death.
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 3
Administrative practice and procedure, Claims, Disability benefits,
Health care, Pensions, Radioactive materials, Veterans, Vietnam.
Approved: October 9, 2009.
John R. Gingrich,
Chief of Staff, Department of Veterans Affairs.
PART 3-ADJUDICATION
0
Accordingly, the interim rule amending 38 CFR part 3 which was
published at 73 FR 54691 on September 23, 2008, is adopted as a final
rule without change.
[FR Doc. E9-26580 Filed 11-3-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P