Pesticide Inert Ingredients; Revocation of Tolerance Exemption for Sperm Oil, 57076-57078 [E9-26540]
Download as PDF
57076
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 212 / Wednesday, November 4, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
(3) Barclays Official California Code
of Regulations, Title 17 Public Health,
Division 3 Air Resources, Chapter 1 Air
Resources Board, Subchapter 8.5
Consumer Products, Article 3 Aerosol
Coating Products, amendment filed 11–
8–2007, operative 12–8–2007.
[FR Doc. E9–26417 Filed 11–3–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2007–1125; FRL–8350–6]
Pesticide Inert Ingredients; Revocation
of Tolerance Exemption for Sperm Oil
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
I. General Information
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY: EPA is issuing this final rule
to revoke the existing obsolete tolerance
exemption for residues of sperm oil
conforming to 21 CFR 172.210. There
have not been any active Federal
Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide
Act (FIFRA) pesticide product
registrations containing this inert
ingredient for many years. In addition,
the sperm whale (from which sperm oil
is derived) is a federally listed
endangered species, and taking (or
harming) this species is prohibited
under the U.S. Endangered Species Act.
Therefore, since this exemption
corresponds to uses no longer current or
registered under FIFRA in the United
States, EPA is revoking the existing
tolerance exemption under 40 CFR
180.910 because it is no longer
necessary.
DATES: This regulation is effective
November 4, 2009. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received
on or before January 4, 2010, and must
be filed in accordance with the
instructions provided in 40 CFR part
178 (see also Unit I.C. of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under docket
identification (ID) number EPA–HQ–
OPP–2007–1125. All documents in the
docket are listed in the docket index
available at https://www.regulations.gov.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., Confidential Business Information
(CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:16 Nov 03, 2009
Jkt 220001
Publicly available docket materials are
available in the electronic docket at
https://www.regulations.gov, or, if only
available in hard copy, at the OPP
Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S–
4400, One Potomac Yard (South Bldg.),
2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. The
Docket Facility is open from 8:30 a.m.
to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. The Docket
Facility telephone number is (703) 305–
5805.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Karen Samek, Registration Division
(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001; telephone number:
(703) 347–8825; e-mail address:
samek.karen@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Does this Action Apply to Me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you are an agricultural
producer, food manufacturer, or
pesticide manufacturer. Potentially
affected entities may include, but are
not limited to:
• Crop production (NAICS code 111).
• Animal production (NAICS code
112).
• Food manufacturing (NAICS code
311).
• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS
code 32532).
This listing is not intended to be
exhaustive, but rather provides a guide
for readers regarding entities likely to be
affected by this action. Other types of
entities not listed in this unit could also
be affected. The North American
Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes have been provided to
assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to
certain entities. If you have any
questions regarding the applicability of
this action to a particular entity, consult
the person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
B. How Can I Access Electronic Copies
of this Document?
In addition to accessing an electronic
copy of this Federal Register document
through the electronic docket at https://
www.regulations.gov, you may access
this Federal Register document
electronically through the EPA Internet
under the ‘‘Federal Register’’ listings at
https://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr. You may
also access a frequently updated
electronic version of 40 CFR part 180
through the Government Printing
Office’s pilot e-CFR site at https://
www.gpoaccess.gov/ecfr.
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
C. Can I File an Objection or Hearing
Request?
Under section 408(g) of the Federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, (FFDCA),
21 U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an
objection to any aspect of this regulation
and may also request a hearing on those
objections. You must file your objection
or request a hearing on this regulation
in accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure
proper receipt by EPA, you must
identify docket ID number EPA–HQ–
OPP–2007–1125 in the subject line on
the first page of your submission. All
requests must be in writing, and must be
mailed or delivered to the Hearing Clerk
as required by 40 CFR part 178 on or
before January 4, 2010.
In addition to filing an objection or
hearing request with the Hearing Clerk
as described in 40 CFR part 178, please
submit a copy of the filing that does not
contain any CBI for inclusion in the
public docket that is described in
ADDRESSES. Information not marked
confidential pursuant to 40 CFR part 2
may be disclosed publicly by EPA
without prior notice. Submit your
copies, identified by docket ID number
EPA–HQ–OPP–2007–1125, by one of
the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs
(OPP) Regulatory Public Docket (7502P),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001.
• Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public
Docket (7502P), Environmental
Protection Agency, Rm. S–4400, One
Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S.
Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. Deliveries
are only accepted during the Docket’s
normal hours of operation (8:30 a.m. to
4 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays). Special
arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information. The
Docket Facility telephone number is
(703) 305–5805.
II. Background and Statutory Findings
A. What Action Is the Agency Taking?
EPA is revoking the existing tolerance
exemption under 40 CFR 180.910 for
residues of sperm oil conforming to 21
CFR 172.210 as part of a broader
administrative effort to correct errors
and clarify permitted uses of pesticide
inert ingredients in the Code of Federal
Regulations. It is EPA’s general practice
to revoke tolerances and tolerance
exemptions for pesticide chemical
residues (which include both active and
inert ingredients) for which there are no
E:\FR\FM\04NOR1.SGM
04NOR1
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 212 / Wednesday, November 4, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
associated active registered uses under
FIFRA, or for which there are no
registered products to which the
tolerance or tolerance exemption
applies, or for tolerances or tolerance
exemptions that have been superseded.
EPA has historically been concerned
that retention of tolerances and
tolerance exemptions that are not
necessary to cover residues in or on
legally treated foods may encourage
misuse of pesticides within the United
States. Thus, it is EPA’s policy to issue
a final rule revoking those tolerances
and tolerance exemptions for residues of
pesticide chemicals for which there are
no active registrations or uses under
FIFRA.
Generally, EPA will proceed with the
revocation of these tolerance and
tolerance exemptions on the grounds
discussed in Unit II if one of the
following conditions applies:
1. Prior to EPA’s issuance of a section
408(f) order requesting additional data
or issuance of a section 408(d) or (e)
order revoking the tolerances or
tolerance exemptions on other grounds,
commenters retract the comment
identifying a need for the tolerance to be
retained.
2. EPA independently verifies that the
tolerance or tolerance exemption is no
longer needed.
3. The tolerance or tolerance
exemption is not supported by data that
demonstrate that the tolerance or
tolerance exemption meets the
requirements under FQPA.
EPA issued a proposed rule in the
Federal Register of May 16, 2008 (73 FR
28391) (FRL–8363–6) proposing to
revoke the tolerance exemption under
40 CFR 180.910 for residues of sperm oil
conforming to 21 CFR 172.210. There
were no comments received in response
to the proposed rule.
EPA believes it is appropriate to
revoke the tolerance exemption
associated with this inert ingredient
because there are no longer any active
FIFRA pesticide product registrations
for pesticide products containing sperm
oil. Additionally, since sperm oil is
derived from the sperm whale and the
sperm whale is a federally listed
endangered species, taking (or harming)
this species to obtain sperm oil is
prohibited by the Endangered Species
Act. EPA does not expect there to be
existing stocks of pesticides containing
sperm oil in the hands of users because
the sperm whale has been listed as an
endangered species since 1970. Also,
EPA is not aware of any food or feed
commodities treated with pesticides
containing sperm oil imported into the
United States.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:16 Nov 03, 2009
Jkt 220001
Therefore, for the reasons stated
herein, EPA is revoking the existing
exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance for residues of sperm oil
conforming to 21 CFR 172.210 under 40
CFR 180.910.
B. What is the Agency’s Authority for
Taking this Action?
This rule is issued pursuant to section
408(l) of FFDCA (21 U.S.C. 346a(l)).
Section 408(l) of FFDCA authorizes the
establishment of tolerances, exemptions
from the requirement of a tolerance,
modifications in tolerances, and
revocation of tolerances for residues of
pesticide chemicals in or on raw
agricultural commodities and processed
foods. Without a tolerance or tolerance
exemption, food containing pesticide
residues is considered to be unsafe and
therefore ‘‘adulterated’’ under section
402(a) of the FFDCA. If food containing
pesticide residues is found to be
adulterated, the food may not be
distributed in interstate commerce (21
U.S.C. 331(a) and 342(a)).
EPA’s general practice is to revoke
tolerances and tolerance exemptions for
residues of pesticide chemicals on crops
for which FIFRA registrations no longer
exist and on which the pesticide may
therefore no longer be used in the
United States. EPA has historically been
concerned that retention of tolerances
and tolerance exemptions that are not
necessary to cover residues in or on
legally treated foods may encourage
misuse of pesticides within the United
States. Nonetheless, EPA will establish
and maintain tolerances and tolerance
exemptions even when corresponding
domestic uses are canceled if the
tolerances, which EPA refers to as
‘‘import tolerances,’’ are necessary to
allow importation into the United States
of food containing such pesticide
residues. However, where there are no
imported commodities that require
these import tolerances, the Agency
believes it is appropriate to revoke
tolerances and tolerance exemptions for
unregistered pesticide chemicals in
order to prevent potential misuse.
C. When do These Actions Become
Effective?
This action becomes effective on the
date of publication of this final rule in
the Federal Register. Any commodities
listed in the regulatory text of this
document that are treated with Sperm
oil, and that are in the channels of trade
following the tolerance exemption
revocations, shall be subject to FFDCA
section 408(l)(5), as established by the
FQPA. Under this section, any residues
of this pesticide chemical in or on such
food shall not render the food
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
57077
adulterated so long as it is shown to the
satisfaction of the Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) that:
1. The residue is present as the result
of an application or use of the pesticide
chemical at a time and in a manner that
was lawful under FIFRA.
2. The residue does not exceed the
level that was authorized at the time of
the application or use to be present on
the food under an exemption from
tolerance. Evidence to show that food
was lawfully treated may include
records that verify the dates that the
pesticide chemical was applied to such
food.
III. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
In this final rule, EPA is revoking a
specific tolerance exemption established
under FFDCA section 408. EPA
establishes tolerances under FFDCA
section 408(e), and also modifies and
revokes specific tolerances established
under FFDCA section 408. The Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has
exempted this type of action (i.e., a
tolerance revocation for which
extraordinary circumstances do not
exist) from review under Executive
Order 12866, entitled Regulatory
Planning and Review (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993). Because this rule has
been exempted from review under
Executive Order 12866 due to its lack of
significance, this rule is not subject to
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001). This final rule does not
contain any information collections
subject to OMB approval under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq., or impose any
enforceable duty or contain any
unfunded mandate as described under
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Public
Law 104–4). Nor does it require any
special considerations under Executive
Order 12898, entitled Federal Actions to
Address Environmental Justice in
Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994); or OMB review or any Agency
action under Executive Order 13045,
entitled Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997).
This action does not involve any
technical standards that would require
Agency consideration of voluntary
consensus standards pursuant to section
12(d) of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995
(NTTAA), Public Law 104–113, section
12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note). Pursuant to
E:\FR\FM\04NOR1.SGM
04NOR1
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
57078
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 212 / Wednesday, November 4, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)(5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.), the Agency
previously assessed whether revocations
of tolerances might significantly impact
a substantial number of small entities
and concluded that, as a general matter,
these actions do not impose a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This analysis
was published on December 17, 1997
(62 FR 66020), and was provided to the
Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small
Business Administration. Taking into
account this analysis, and available
information concerning the pesticide
listed in this rule, the Agency hereby
certifies that this final rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Furthermore, for the inert ingredient
named in this final rule, the Agency
knows of no extraordinary
circumstances that exist as to the
present revocation that would change
the EPA’s previous analysis. In addition,
the Agency has determined that this
action will not have a substantial direct
effect on States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government, as
specified in Executive Order 13132,
entitled Federalism (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999). Executive Order
13132 requires EPA to develop an
accountable process to ensure
‘‘meaningful and timely input by State
and local officials in the development of
regulatory policies that have federalism
implications.’’ ‘‘Policies that have
federalism implications’’ is defined in
the Executive order to include
regulations that have ’’substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government.’’ This
final rule directly regulates growers,
food processors, food handlers and food
retailers, not States. This action does not
alter the relationships or distribution of
power and responsibilities established
by Congress in the preemption
provisions of section 408(n)(4) of the
FFDCA. For these same reasons, the
Agency has determined that this rule
does not have any ‘‘tribal implications’’
as described in Executive Order 13175,
entitled Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000). Executive
Order 13175, requires EPA to develop
an accountable process to ensure
‘‘meaningful and timely input by tribal
officials in the development of
regulatory policies that have tribal
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:16 Nov 03, 2009
Jkt 220001
implications.’’ ‘‘Policies that have tribal
implications’’ is defined in the
Executive Order to include regulations
that have ‘‘substantial direct effects on
one or more Indian tribes, on the
relationship between the Federal
Government and the Indian tribes, or on
the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.’’ This
rule will not have substantial direct
effects on tribal governments, on the
relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, as
specified in Executive Order 13175.
Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not
apply to this rule.
IV. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, to each House of
the Congress and to the Comptroller
General of the United States. EPA will
submit a report containing this rule and
other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of this final rule in the
Federal Register. This final rule is not
a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides
and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: October 23, 2009.
Donald J. Rosenblatt,
Acting Director, Office of Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is
amended as follows:
■
PART 180—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 180
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
§ 180.910
[Amended]
2. Section 180.910 is amended by
removing from the table the entry for
‘‘Sperm oil conforming to 21 CFR
172.210.’’
■
[FR Doc. E9–26540 Filed 11–3–09 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–S
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2007–0261; FRL–8796–1]
Methamidophos; Tolerance Actions
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: EPA is revoking tolerances for
the insecticide methamidophos on
cucumber, eggplant and melon. The
regulatory actions finalized in this
document are in follow-up to the
Agency’s reregistration program under
the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and
Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), and tolerance
reassessment program under section
408(q) of the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (FFDCA).
DATES: This regulation is effective
November 4, 2009. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received
on or before January 4, 2010, and must
be filed in accordance with the
instructions provided in 40 CFR part
178 (see also Unit I.C. of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under docket
identification (ID) number EPA–HQ–
OPP–2007–0261. All documents in the
docket are listed in the docket index
available at https://www.regulations.gov.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., Confidential Business Information
(CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available in the electronic docket at
https://www.regulations.gov, or, if only
available in hard copy, at the OPP
Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S–
4400, One Potomac Yard (South Bldg.),
2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. The
Docket Facility is open from 8:30 a.m.
to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. The Docket
Facility telephone number is (703) 305–
5805.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joy
Schnackenbeck, Pesticide Re-evaluation
Division (7508P), Office of Pesticide
Programs, Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone
number: (703) 308–8072; e-mail address:
schnackenbeck.joy@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\04NOR1.SGM
04NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 212 (Wednesday, November 4, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 57076-57078]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-26540]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA-HQ-OPP-2007-1125; FRL-8350-6]
Pesticide Inert Ingredients; Revocation of Tolerance Exemption
for Sperm Oil
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is issuing this final rule to revoke the existing obsolete
tolerance exemption for residues of sperm oil conforming to 21 CFR
172.210. There have not been any active Federal Insecticide, Fungicide,
and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) pesticide product registrations containing
this inert ingredient for many years. In addition, the sperm whale
(from which sperm oil is derived) is a federally listed endangered
species, and taking (or harming) this species is prohibited under the
U.S. Endangered Species Act. Therefore, since this exemption
corresponds to uses no longer current or registered under FIFRA in the
United States, EPA is revoking the existing tolerance exemption under
40 CFR 180.910 because it is no longer necessary.
DATES: This regulation is effective November 4, 2009. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received on or before January 4, 2010,
and must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40
CFR part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2007-1125. All documents in the
docket are listed in the docket index available at https://www.regulations.gov. Although listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, e.g., Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain
other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the
Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are available in the electronic
docket at https://www.regulations.gov, or, if only available in hard
copy, at the OPP Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S-4400, One Potomac
Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. The Docket
Facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. The Docket Facility telephone number is (703)
305-5805.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen Samek, Registration Division
(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone
number: (703) 347-8825; e-mail address: samek.karen@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this Action Apply to Me?
You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
Potentially affected entities may include, but are not limited to:
Crop production (NAICS code 111).
Animal production (NAICS code 112).
Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).
This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides
a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be affected by this
action. Other types of entities not listed in this unit could also be
affected. The North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS)
codes have been provided to assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to certain entities. If you have any
questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular
entity, consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
B. How Can I Access Electronic Copies of this Document?
In addition to accessing an electronic copy of this Federal
Register document through the electronic docket at https://www.regulations.gov, you may access this Federal Register document
electronically through the EPA Internet under the ``Federal Register''
listings at https://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr. You may also access a
frequently updated electronic version of 40 CFR part 180 through the
Government Printing Office's pilot e-CFR site at https://www.gpoaccess.gov/ecfr.
C. Can I File an Objection or Hearing Request?
Under section 408(g) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act,
(FFDCA), 21 U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an objection to any aspect
of this regulation and may also request a hearing on those objections.
You must file your objection or request a hearing on this regulation in
accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure
proper receipt by EPA, you must identify docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-
2007-1125 in the subject line on the first page of your submission. All
requests must be in writing, and must be mailed or delivered to the
Hearing Clerk as required by 40 CFR part 178 on or before January 4,
2010.
In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the
Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of
the filing that does not contain any CBI for inclusion in the public
docket that is described in ADDRESSES. Information not marked
confidential pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA
without prior notice. Submit your copies, identified by docket ID
number EPA-HQ-OPP-2007-1125, by one of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) Regulatory Public
Docket (7502P), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001.
Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public Docket (7502P),
Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. S-4400, One Potomac Yard (South
Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. Deliveries are only
accepted during the Docket's normal hours of operation (8:30 a.m. to 4
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays). Special
arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information. The
Docket Facility telephone number is (703) 305-5805.
II. Background and Statutory Findings
A. What Action Is the Agency Taking?
EPA is revoking the existing tolerance exemption under 40 CFR
180.910 for residues of sperm oil conforming to 21 CFR 172.210 as part
of a broader administrative effort to correct errors and clarify
permitted uses of pesticide inert ingredients in the Code of Federal
Regulations. It is EPA's general practice to revoke tolerances and
tolerance exemptions for pesticide chemical residues (which include
both active and inert ingredients) for which there are no
[[Page 57077]]
associated active registered uses under FIFRA, or for which there are
no registered products to which the tolerance or tolerance exemption
applies, or for tolerances or tolerance exemptions that have been
superseded.
EPA has historically been concerned that retention of tolerances
and tolerance exemptions that are not necessary to cover residues in or
on legally treated foods may encourage misuse of pesticides within the
United States. Thus, it is EPA's policy to issue a final rule revoking
those tolerances and tolerance exemptions for residues of pesticide
chemicals for which there are no active registrations or uses under
FIFRA.
Generally, EPA will proceed with the revocation of these tolerance
and tolerance exemptions on the grounds discussed in Unit II if one of
the following conditions applies:
1. Prior to EPA's issuance of a section 408(f) order requesting
additional data or issuance of a section 408(d) or (e) order revoking
the tolerances or tolerance exemptions on other grounds, commenters
retract the comment identifying a need for the tolerance to be
retained.
2. EPA independently verifies that the tolerance or tolerance
exemption is no longer needed.
3. The tolerance or tolerance exemption is not supported by data
that demonstrate that the tolerance or tolerance exemption meets the
requirements under FQPA.
EPA issued a proposed rule in the Federal Register of May 16, 2008
(73 FR 28391) (FRL-8363-6) proposing to revoke the tolerance exemption
under 40 CFR 180.910 for residues of sperm oil conforming to 21 CFR
172.210. There were no comments received in response to the proposed
rule.
EPA believes it is appropriate to revoke the tolerance exemption
associated with this inert ingredient because there are no longer any
active FIFRA pesticide product registrations for pesticide products
containing sperm oil. Additionally, since sperm oil is derived from the
sperm whale and the sperm whale is a federally listed endangered
species, taking (or harming) this species to obtain sperm oil is
prohibited by the Endangered Species Act. EPA does not expect there to
be existing stocks of pesticides containing sperm oil in the hands of
users because the sperm whale has been listed as an endangered species
since 1970. Also, EPA is not aware of any food or feed commodities
treated with pesticides containing sperm oil imported into the United
States.
Therefore, for the reasons stated herein, EPA is revoking the
existing exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for residues of
sperm oil conforming to 21 CFR 172.210 under 40 CFR 180.910.
B. What is the Agency's Authority for Taking this Action?
This rule is issued pursuant to section 408(l) of FFDCA (21 U.S.C.
346a(l)). Section 408(l) of FFDCA authorizes the establishment of
tolerances, exemptions from the requirement of a tolerance,
modifications in tolerances, and revocation of tolerances for residues
of pesticide chemicals in or on raw agricultural commodities and
processed foods. Without a tolerance or tolerance exemption, food
containing pesticide residues is considered to be unsafe and therefore
``adulterated'' under section 402(a) of the FFDCA. If food containing
pesticide residues is found to be adulterated, the food may not be
distributed in interstate commerce (21 U.S.C. 331(a) and 342(a)).
EPA's general practice is to revoke tolerances and tolerance
exemptions for residues of pesticide chemicals on crops for which FIFRA
registrations no longer exist and on which the pesticide may therefore
no longer be used in the United States. EPA has historically been
concerned that retention of tolerances and tolerance exemptions that
are not necessary to cover residues in or on legally treated foods may
encourage misuse of pesticides within the United States. Nonetheless,
EPA will establish and maintain tolerances and tolerance exemptions
even when corresponding domestic uses are canceled if the tolerances,
which EPA refers to as ``import tolerances,'' are necessary to allow
importation into the United States of food containing such pesticide
residues. However, where there are no imported commodities that require
these import tolerances, the Agency believes it is appropriate to
revoke tolerances and tolerance exemptions for unregistered pesticide
chemicals in order to prevent potential misuse.
C. When do These Actions Become Effective?
This action becomes effective on the date of publication of this
final rule in the Federal Register. Any commodities listed in the
regulatory text of this document that are treated with Sperm oil, and
that are in the channels of trade following the tolerance exemption
revocations, shall be subject to FFDCA section 408(l)(5), as
established by the FQPA. Under this section, any residues of this
pesticide chemical in or on such food shall not render the food
adulterated so long as it is shown to the satisfaction of the Food and
Drug Administration (FDA) that:
1. The residue is present as the result of an application or use of
the pesticide chemical at a time and in a manner that was lawful under
FIFRA.
2. The residue does not exceed the level that was authorized at the
time of the application or use to be present on the food under an
exemption from tolerance. Evidence to show that food was lawfully
treated may include records that verify the dates that the pesticide
chemical was applied to such food.
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
In this final rule, EPA is revoking a specific tolerance exemption
established under FFDCA section 408. EPA establishes tolerances under
FFDCA section 408(e), and also modifies and revokes specific tolerances
established under FFDCA section 408. The Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) has exempted this type of action (i.e., a tolerance
revocation for which extraordinary circumstances do not exist) from
review under Executive Order 12866, entitled Regulatory Planning and
Review (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because this rule has been
exempted from review under Executive Order 12866 due to its lack of
significance, this rule is not subject to Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This final rule does
not contain any information collections subject to OMB approval under
the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., or impose
any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded mandate as described under
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Public Law
104-4). Nor does it require any special considerations under Executive
Order 12898, entitled Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice
in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations (59 FR 7629,
February 16, 1994); or OMB review or any Agency action under Executive
Order 13045, entitled Protection of Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997). This action does
not involve any technical standards that would require Agency
consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant to section
12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995
(NTTAA), Public Law 104-113, section 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
Pursuant to
[[Page 57078]]
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), the Agency
previously assessed whether revocations of tolerances might
significantly impact a substantial number of small entities and
concluded that, as a general matter, these actions do not impose a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
This analysis was published on December 17, 1997 (62 FR 66020), and was
provided to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration. Taking into account this analysis, and available
information concerning the pesticide listed in this rule, the Agency
hereby certifies that this final rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. Furthermore,
for the inert ingredient named in this final rule, the Agency knows of
no extraordinary circumstances that exist as to the present revocation
that would change the EPA's previous analysis. In addition, the Agency
has determined that this action will not have a substantial direct
effect on States, on the relationship between the national government
and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
among the various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order
13132, entitled Federalism (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999). Executive
Order 13132 requires EPA to develop an accountable process to ensure
``meaningful and timely input by State and local officials in the
development of regulatory policies that have federalism implications.''
``Policies that have federalism implications'' is defined in the
Executive order to include regulations that have ''substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.'' This final
rule directly regulates growers, food processors, food handlers and
food retailers, not States. This action does not alter the
relationships or distribution of power and responsibilities established
by Congress in the preemption provisions of section 408(n)(4) of the
FFDCA. For these same reasons, the Agency has determined that this rule
does not have any ``tribal implications'' as described in Executive
Order 13175, entitled Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). Executive Order 13175,
requires EPA to develop an accountable process to ensure ``meaningful
and timely input by tribal officials in the development of regulatory
policies that have tribal implications.'' ``Policies that have tribal
implications'' is defined in the Executive Order to include regulations
that have ``substantial direct effects on one or more Indian tribes, on
the relationship between the Federal Government and the Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.'' This rule will not have
substantial direct effects on tribal governments, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, as specified in Executive Order 13175.
Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this rule.
IV. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, to each House of the Congress and
to the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this rule and other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General
of the United States prior to publication of this final rule in the
Federal Register. This final rule is not a ``major rule'' as defined by
5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: October 23, 2009.
Donald J. Rosenblatt,
Acting Director, Office of Pesticide Programs.
0
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows:
PART 180--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
Sec. 180.910 [Amended]
0
2. Section 180.910 is amended by removing from the table the entry for
``Sperm oil conforming to 21 CFR 172.210.''
[FR Doc. E9-26540 Filed 11-3-09 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-S