Suitability, 56747-56748 [E9-26448]
Download as PDF
56747
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 74, No. 211
Tuesday, November 3, 2009
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL
MANAGEMENT
5 CFR Part 731
RIN 3206–AL90
Suitability
dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
AGENCY: U.S. Office of Personnel
Management.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Office of Personnel
Management (OPM) is issuing proposed
regulations to assist agencies in carrying
out new requirements to reinvestigate
individuals in public trust positions
under Executive Order 13488, Granting
Reciprocity on Excepted Service and
Federal Contractor Employee Fitness
and Reinvestigating Individuals in
Positions of Public Trust, to ensure their
continued employment is appropriate.
This proposed rule would implement
the suitability reinvestigation provisions
of E.O. 13488.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before January 4, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by ‘‘3206–AL90,’’ using either
of the following methods: Federal
eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
All submissions received through the
Portal must include the agency name
and docket number or Regulation
Identifier Number (RIN) for this
rulemaking. All Mail: Ana Mazzi,
Deputy Associate Director, Center for
Workforce Relations and Accountability
Policy, U.S. Office of Personnel
Management, Room 7H28, 1900 E
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20415–
8200.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa
McGlasson, Senior Advisor, U.S. Office
of Personnel Management, Center for
Workforce Relations and Accountability
Policy, 1900 E St., NW., Room 7H28,
Washington, DC 20415–4000; fax to
202–606–2613; e-mail to
CWRAP@opm.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:14 Nov 02, 2009
Jkt 220001
Background
On January 16, 2009, President George
W. Bush signed Executive Order 13488,
which provides that individuals in
public trust positions shall be subject to
reinvestigation under standards
determined by the Director of the Office
of Personnel Management (OPM) to
ensure their continued employment is
appropriate. The order provides that the
standards issued by OPM shall include
the frequency of reinvestigations. E.O.
13488 is distinct from but complements
E.O. 13467, concerning alignment, to
the extent possible, of security and
suitability standards.
Public Trust Positions
Public trust positions are those
covered by 5 CFR part 731 which an
agency head, under 5 CFR 731.106, has
designated at a moderate or high risk
level, based on the position’s potential
for adverse impact on the efficiency or
integrity of the service. Such positions
may involve policy making, major
program responsibility, public safety
and health, law enforcement duties,
fiduciary responsibilities, or other
duties demanding a significant degree of
public trust, or access to or operation or
control of financial records, with a
significant risk for causing damage or
realizing personal gain. Designation of
public trust positions and their risk
level is made by agencies following
OPM guidance and taking into account
the specific duties of each position.
Frequency of Reinvestigations
While a reinvestigation typically will
be more limited than the initial
investigation, that reinvestigation must
occur frequently if agencies are to carry
out the purpose of the Executive order—
to ensure that continued employment of
persons in public trust positions
remains appropriate. Accordingly, the
proposed rule would require, at 5 CFR
731.106(d)(1), that a person occupying a
public trust position be reinvestigated at
least once every five years. Contingent
on future investigative and resource
capacities, OPM supplementary
guidance will adjust investigative
frequencies within this 5-year period
based on the level of trust (i.e., either
moderate or high risk) associated with a
person’s position. We specifically solicit
comment on whether a periodic
reinvestigation cycle of 5 or fewer years
is appropriate, considering the risk
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
posed by employment in public trust
positions, and the availability of
investigative and adjudicative resources.
We will consider comments on this
proposed rule and consult with affected
agencies in developing supplemental
guidance on investigative frequency.
At 5 CFR 731.106(d)(2), the proposed
rule would provide that an investigation
or reevaluation to determine a person’s
initial or continued eligibility for access
to classified information, which is
conducted at an equal or higher level
than required for their public trust
reinvestigation, satisfies the 5-year
reinvestigation requirement for that
person. The agency is not required to
conduct an additional investigation in
such circumstances, and the completed
security clearance investigation restarts
the 5-year schedule (or other schedule
as future guidance might require) for a
new public trust reinvestigation.
Assessments Resulting From
Reinvestigations
The regulation at 5 CFR 731.106(f)
would be modified to more clearly
reflect the broader authority and
obligation of agencies to make decisions
following investigations. The current
language provides that a completed
investigation must result in a
‘‘determination’’ by the agency. As
discussed below, an agency’s decision
on a reinvestigation of an employee in
a public trust position will rarely be a
suitability determination that results in
a suitability action under this part.
Thus, the potentially misleading word
‘‘determination’’ would be replaced
with the word ‘‘assessment.’’
As currently provided at 5 CFR
731.106(f), a person’s employment
status will determine the applicable
agency authority and procedures to be
followed in any action taken based on
the results of the reinvestigation. In
most circumstances, the subject of a
reinvestigation will have been employed
by their agency for more than one year
and, under those circumstances, only
OPM could make a suitability
determination and take a suitability
action under very limited
circumstances. As provided under 5
CFR 731.105(d), OPM could take a
suitability action based on (1) a
material, intentional false statement, or
deception or fraud in examination or
appointment; (2) refusal to furnish
testimony; or (3) a statutory or
E:\FR\FM\03NOP1.SGM
03NOP1
56748
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 211 / Tuesday, November 3, 2009 / Proposed Rules
regulatory bar that prevents the lawful
employment of the person. However,
conduct that surfaces during a
reinvestigation (for example, off-duty
criminal conduct) could form the basis
for an adverse action under 5 CFR part
752.
Consistent with the changes made to
5 CFR 731.106, the reporting
requirements under 5 CFR 731.206
would be modified to require agencies
to report any decisions and actions
taken as a result of a background
investigation or reinvestigation. Here,
the ‘‘level’’ of investigation is replaced
by the ‘‘level or nature’’ of the
investigation as a reporting obligation,
to be consistent with E.O. 13488. The
actual information reported is
unchanged. Section 731.206 of title 5,
Code of Federal Regulations, also would
be clarified to reflect current practice
that agencies follow in reporting the
completion dates of background
investigations. This is important, since
the public trust position reinvestigation
schedule is tied to the completion date
of a relevant investigation.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
This rule will not result in the
expenditure by State, local and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100,000,000 or more
in any one year, and it will not
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments. Therefore, no actions were
deemed necessary under the provisions
of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995.
Congressional Review Act
This action pertains to agency
management, personnel and
organization and does not substantially
affect the rights or obligations of nonagency parties and, accordingly, is not
a ‘‘rule’’ as that term is used by the
Congressional Review Act (Subtitle E of
the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
(SBREFA)). Therefore, the reporting
requirement of 5 U.S.C. 801 does not
apply.
List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 731
Administrative practices and
procedures, Government employees.
classified information or as a result of a
change in risk level as provided in
§ 731.106(e), and that investigation is
conducted at an equal or higher level
than is required for a public trust
reinvestigation, a new reinvestigation is
not required. Such a completed
investigation restarts the cycle for a
public trust reinvestigation for that
person.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) Completed investigations. Any
suitability investigation (or
reinvestigation) completed by an agency
under paragraphs (d) and (e) of this
section must result in an assessment by
the employing agency of whether the
findings of the investigation would
justify an action against the employee,
under this part or under some other
authority, such as 5 CFR 752. § 731.103
addresses whether an action is available
under this part, and whether the matter
must be referred to OPM for debarment
consideration.
3. Revise § 731.206 to read as follows:
§ 731.206
Reporting requirements.
OPM proposes a technical
amendment to the Authorities for this
part to reflect the President’s signing of
Executive Order 13488 on January 16,
2009, which authorizes the Director of
OPM to issue regulations and guidance
implementing the order.
Office of Personnel Management.
John Berry,
Director.
Accordingly, OPM proposes to amend
part 731, title 5, Code of Federal
Regulations, as follows:
Agencies must report to OPM the
level or nature, result, and completion
date of each background investigation or
reinvestigation, each agency decision
based on such investigation or
reinvestigation, and any personnel
action taken based on such investigation
or reinvestigation, as required in OPM
issuances.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
PART 731—SUITABILITY
[FR Doc. E9–26448 Filed 11–2–09; 8:45 am]
Subpart A—Scope
BILLING CODE 6325–39–P
I certify that this regulation will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities
because the regulations pertain only to
Federal employees and agencies.
Technical Amendment
1. The authority citation for part 731
is revised to read as follows:
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 1302, 3301, 7301; E.O.
10577, E.O. 13467, E.O. 13488, 3 CFR, 1954–
1958 Comp., p. 218, as amended, 5 CFR,
parts 1, 2 and 5.
Federal Aviation Administration
2. In § 731.106, revise paragraphs (d)
and (f) to read as follows:
[Docket No. FAA–2009–1025; Directorate
Identifier 2009–CE–055–AD]
E.O. 13132
§ 731.106 Designation of public trust
positions and investigative requirements.
RIN 2120–AA64
This regulation will not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the
National Government and the States, or
on distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, in
accordance with Executive Order 13132,
it is determined that this rule does not
have sufficient federalism implications
to warrant preparation of a Federalism
Assessment.
*
E.O. 12866, Regulatory Review
dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
This proposed rule has been reviewed
by the Office of Management and
Budget under Executive Order 12866.
E.O. 12988—Civil Justice Reform
This regulation meets the applicable
standard set forth in section 3(a) and
(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:14 Nov 02, 2009
Jkt 220001
*
*
*
*
(d) Reinvestigation requirements.
(1) Agencies must ensure that
reinvestigations are conducted and an
assessment made regarding continued
employment of persons occupying
public trust positions at least once every
5 years. The nature of these
reinvestigations and any additional
requirements concerning their
frequency will be established in
supplemental guidance issued by OPM.
(2) If, prior to the next required
reinvestigation, a separate investigation
(or reevaluation) is conducted to
determine a person’s eligibility (or
continued eligibility) for access to
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
14 CFR Part 39
Airworthiness Directives; Extra
Flugzeugproduktions- und VertriebsGmbH Models EA–300/200 and
EA–300/L Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed
AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
E:\FR\FM\03NOP1.SGM
03NOP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 211 (Tuesday, November 3, 2009)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 56747-56748]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-26448]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 211 / Tuesday, November 3, 2009 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 56747]]
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
5 CFR Part 731
RIN 3206-AL90
Suitability
AGENCY: U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is issuing
proposed regulations to assist agencies in carrying out new
requirements to reinvestigate individuals in public trust positions
under Executive Order 13488, Granting Reciprocity on Excepted Service
and Federal Contractor Employee Fitness and Reinvestigating Individuals
in Positions of Public Trust, to ensure their continued employment is
appropriate. This proposed rule would implement the suitability
reinvestigation provisions of E.O. 13488.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before January 4, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by ``3206-AL90,'' using
either of the following methods: Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
All submissions received through the Portal must include the agency
name and docket number or Regulation Identifier Number (RIN) for this
rulemaking. All Mail: Ana Mazzi, Deputy Associate Director, Center for
Workforce Relations and Accountability Policy, U.S. Office of Personnel
Management, Room 7H28, 1900 E Street, NW., Washington, DC 20415-8200.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa McGlasson, Senior Advisor, U.S.
Office of Personnel Management, Center for Workforce Relations and
Accountability Policy, 1900 E St., NW., Room 7H28, Washington, DC
20415-4000; fax to 202-606-2613; e-mail to CWRAP@opm.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On January 16, 2009, President George W. Bush signed Executive
Order 13488, which provides that individuals in public trust positions
shall be subject to reinvestigation under standards determined by the
Director of the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) to ensure their
continued employment is appropriate. The order provides that the
standards issued by OPM shall include the frequency of
reinvestigations. E.O. 13488 is distinct from but complements E.O.
13467, concerning alignment, to the extent possible, of security and
suitability standards.
Public Trust Positions
Public trust positions are those covered by 5 CFR part 731 which an
agency head, under 5 CFR 731.106, has designated at a moderate or high
risk level, based on the position's potential for adverse impact on the
efficiency or integrity of the service. Such positions may involve
policy making, major program responsibility, public safety and health,
law enforcement duties, fiduciary responsibilities, or other duties
demanding a significant degree of public trust, or access to or
operation or control of financial records, with a significant risk for
causing damage or realizing personal gain. Designation of public trust
positions and their risk level is made by agencies following OPM
guidance and taking into account the specific duties of each position.
Frequency of Reinvestigations
While a reinvestigation typically will be more limited than the
initial investigation, that reinvestigation must occur frequently if
agencies are to carry out the purpose of the Executive order--to ensure
that continued employment of persons in public trust positions remains
appropriate. Accordingly, the proposed rule would require, at 5 CFR
731.106(d)(1), that a person occupying a public trust position be
reinvestigated at least once every five years. Contingent on future
investigative and resource capacities, OPM supplementary guidance will
adjust investigative frequencies within this 5-year period based on the
level of trust (i.e., either moderate or high risk) associated with a
person's position. We specifically solicit comment on whether a
periodic reinvestigation cycle of 5 or fewer years is appropriate,
considering the risk posed by employment in public trust positions, and
the availability of investigative and adjudicative resources. We will
consider comments on this proposed rule and consult with affected
agencies in developing supplemental guidance on investigative
frequency.
At 5 CFR 731.106(d)(2), the proposed rule would provide that an
investigation or reevaluation to determine a person's initial or
continued eligibility for access to classified information, which is
conducted at an equal or higher level than required for their public
trust reinvestigation, satisfies the 5-year reinvestigation requirement
for that person. The agency is not required to conduct an additional
investigation in such circumstances, and the completed security
clearance investigation restarts the 5-year schedule (or other schedule
as future guidance might require) for a new public trust
reinvestigation.
Assessments Resulting From Reinvestigations
The regulation at 5 CFR 731.106(f) would be modified to more
clearly reflect the broader authority and obligation of agencies to
make decisions following investigations. The current language provides
that a completed investigation must result in a ``determination'' by
the agency. As discussed below, an agency's decision on a
reinvestigation of an employee in a public trust position will rarely
be a suitability determination that results in a suitability action
under this part. Thus, the potentially misleading word
``determination'' would be replaced with the word ``assessment.''
As currently provided at 5 CFR 731.106(f), a person's employment
status will determine the applicable agency authority and procedures to
be followed in any action taken based on the results of the
reinvestigation. In most circumstances, the subject of a
reinvestigation will have been employed by their agency for more than
one year and, under those circumstances, only OPM could make a
suitability determination and take a suitability action under very
limited circumstances. As provided under 5 CFR 731.105(d), OPM could
take a suitability action based on (1) a material, intentional false
statement, or deception or fraud in examination or appointment; (2)
refusal to furnish testimony; or (3) a statutory or
[[Page 56748]]
regulatory bar that prevents the lawful employment of the person.
However, conduct that surfaces during a reinvestigation (for example,
off-duty criminal conduct) could form the basis for an adverse action
under 5 CFR part 752.
Consistent with the changes made to 5 CFR 731.106, the reporting
requirements under 5 CFR 731.206 would be modified to require agencies
to report any decisions and actions taken as a result of a background
investigation or reinvestigation. Here, the ``level'' of investigation
is replaced by the ``level or nature'' of the investigation as a
reporting obligation, to be consistent with E.O. 13488. The actual
information reported is unchanged. Section 731.206 of title 5, Code of
Federal Regulations, also would be clarified to reflect current
practice that agencies follow in reporting the completion dates of
background investigations. This is important, since the public trust
position reinvestigation schedule is tied to the completion date of a
relevant investigation.
Technical Amendment
OPM proposes a technical amendment to the Authorities for this part
to reflect the President's signing of Executive Order 13488 on January
16, 2009, which authorizes the Director of OPM to issue regulations and
guidance implementing the order.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
I certify that this regulation will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities because the
regulations pertain only to Federal employees and agencies.
E.O. 12866, Regulatory Review
This proposed rule has been reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget under Executive Order 12866.
E.O. 13132
This regulation will not have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the National Government and the
States, or on distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. Therefore, in accordance with Executive
Order 13132, it is determined that this rule does not have sufficient
federalism implications to warrant preparation of a Federalism
Assessment.
E.O. 12988--Civil Justice Reform
This regulation meets the applicable standard set forth in section
3(a) and (b)(2) of Executive Order 12988.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This rule will not result in the expenditure by State, local and
tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year, and it will not significantly or
uniquely affect small governments. Therefore, no actions were deemed
necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995.
Congressional Review Act
This action pertains to agency management, personnel and
organization and does not substantially affect the rights or
obligations of non-agency parties and, accordingly, is not a ``rule''
as that term is used by the Congressional Review Act (Subtitle E of the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA)).
Therefore, the reporting requirement of 5 U.S.C. 801 does not apply.
List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 731
Administrative practices and procedures, Government employees.
Office of Personnel Management.
John Berry,
Director.
Accordingly, OPM proposes to amend part 731, title 5, Code of
Federal Regulations, as follows:
PART 731--SUITABILITY
Subpart A--Scope
1. The authority citation for part 731 is revised to read as
follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 1302, 3301, 7301; E.O. 10577, E.O. 13467,
E.O. 13488, 3 CFR, 1954-1958 Comp., p. 218, as amended, 5 CFR, parts
1, 2 and 5.
2. In Sec. 731.106, revise paragraphs (d) and (f) to read as
follows:
Sec. 731.106 Designation of public trust positions and investigative
requirements.
* * * * *
(d) Reinvestigation requirements.
(1) Agencies must ensure that reinvestigations are conducted and an
assessment made regarding continued employment of persons occupying
public trust positions at least once every 5 years. The nature of these
reinvestigations and any additional requirements concerning their
frequency will be established in supplemental guidance issued by OPM.
(2) If, prior to the next required reinvestigation, a separate
investigation (or reevaluation) is conducted to determine a person's
eligibility (or continued eligibility) for access to classified
information or as a result of a change in risk level as provided in
Sec. 731.106(e), and that investigation is conducted at an equal or
higher level than is required for a public trust reinvestigation, a new
reinvestigation is not required. Such a completed investigation
restarts the cycle for a public trust reinvestigation for that person.
* * * * *
(f) Completed investigations. Any suitability investigation (or
reinvestigation) completed by an agency under paragraphs (d) and (e) of
this section must result in an assessment by the employing agency of
whether the findings of the investigation would justify an action
against the employee, under this part or under some other authority,
such as 5 CFR 752. Sec. 731.103 addresses whether an action is
available under this part, and whether the matter must be referred to
OPM for debarment consideration.
3. Revise Sec. 731.206 to read as follows:
Sec. 731.206 Reporting requirements.
Agencies must report to OPM the level or nature, result, and
completion date of each background investigation or reinvestigation,
each agency decision based on such investigation or reinvestigation,
and any personnel action taken based on such investigation or
reinvestigation, as required in OPM issuances.
[FR Doc. E9-26448 Filed 11-2-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-39-P