Notice of Potential for Oil Shale Development: Call for Nominations-Oil Shale Research, Development and Demonstration Program, 56867-56869 [E9-26440]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 211 / Tuesday, November 3, 2009 / Notices
MINNESOTA
56867
Person County
Roxboro Cotton Mill, 115 Lake Dr., Roxboro,
09000660, LISTED, 8/27/09
20005; or by fax, 202–371–6447. Written
or faxed comments should be submitted
by November 18, 2009.
Wake County
Carolina Coach Garage and Shop, 510 E.
Davie St., Raleigh, 09000661, LISTED,
8/27/09
J. Paul Loether,
Chief, National Register of Historic Places/
National Historic Landmarks Program.
MISSOURI
Wayne County
Yelverton, Dred and Ellen, House, 1979 NC
222 E., Fremont vicinity, 09000662,
LISTED, 8/27/09
Maricopa County
Hubbard, L. Ron, House, 5501 N. 44th St.,
Phoenix, 09000953
Cape Girardeau County
TENNESSEE
NEW YORK
Old Appleton Bridge, Main St. over Apple
Creek, Old Appleton, 09000648, LISTED,
8/25/09
Westchester County
Soundview Manor, 283 Soundview Ave.,
White Plains, 09000957
NEBRASKA
Greene County
Maden Hall Farm, 3225 Kingsport Highway,
Greeneville vicinity, 09000667, LISTED,
8/27/09
Douglas County
VIRGINIA
Northern Natural Gas Building, 2223 Dodge
St., Omaha, 09000649, LISTED, 8/26/09
Culpeper County
South East Street Historic District, S.E., E.
Asher, E. Chandler, and Page Sts., and
Culpeper National Cemetery, Culpeper,
09000663, LISTED, 8/27/09
Hamilton County
Engel Stadium, O’Neal St. and E. 3rd St.,
Chattanooga, 09000954
First Presbyterian Church, 554 McCallie
Ave., Chattanooga, 09000955
McLeod County
Komensky School, 19981 Major Ave.,
Hutchinson vicinity, 09000622, LISTED,
8/20/09
Ramsey County
O’Donnell Shoe Company Building, 509
Sibley St., St. Paul, 09000623, LISTED,
8/20/09
Merrick County
Nelson Farm, 1139 M Rd., Central City
vicinity, 09000650, LISTED, 8/26/09
Loudoun County
Rock Hill Farm, 20775 Airmont Rd.,
Bluemont vicinity, 09000664, LISTED,
8/27/09
NEW JERSEY
Burlington County
Zurburgg Mansion, 531 Delaware Ave.,
Delanco, 09000651, LISTED, 8/28/09
Petersburg Independent City
Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Commercial and
Industrial Historic District, 200–300 W.
Washington, 4–42 S. Market, 100–100
Perry, 200–300 block W. Wythe, 200 block
Brown Sts., Petersburg, 09000665, LISTED,
8/27/09
Hunterdon County
Lebanon Historic District, Main St., Cherry
St., Brunswick Ave., Maple St., High St.,
Lebanon Borough, 09000652, LISTED,
8/26/09
NEW YORK
Chenango County
Emmanuel Episcopal Church Complex, 37 W.
Main St., Norwich, 09000654, LISTED,
8/26/09
TENNESSEE
Knox County
Daylight Building, (Knoxville and Knox
County MPS) 501–517 Union Ave.,
Knoxville, 09000956
Request for REMOVAL has been made for
the following resource:
TENNESSEE
Williamson County
Thompson Store, Duplex Rd. and Lewisbery
Pike, Duplex, 88000359
[FR Doc. E9–26378 Filed 11–2–09; 8:45 am]
Roanoke County
Anderson-Doosing Farm, 7474 VA 785,
Catawba vicinity, 09000666, LISTED,
8/27/09
BILLING CODE P
[FR Doc. E9–26377 Filed 11–2–09; 8:45 am]
Bureau of Land Management
Monroe County
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
BILLING CODE P
Linden-South Historic District, 25–272
Linden St., both sides; 809–835 South
Ave., odd numbers only, Rochester,
09000655, LISTED, 8/26/09
[LLWO–3200000 L13100000.PP0000 L.X.EM
OSHL000.241A]
National Park Service
Suffolk County
Foster-Meeker House, 101 Mill Rd.,
Westhampton Beach, 09000656, LISTED,
8/26/09
National Register of Historic Places;
Notification of Pending Nominations
and Related Actions
Tompkins County
Nominations for the following
properties being considered for listing
or related actions in the National
Register were received by the National
Park Service before October 17, 2009.
Pursuant to section 60.13 of 36 CFR Part
60 written comments concerning the
significance of these properties under
the National Register criteria for
evaluation may be forwarded by United
States Postal Service, to the National
Register of Historic Places, National
Park Service, 1849 C St., NW., (2280),
Washington, DC 20240; by all other
carriers, National Register of Historic
Places, National Park Service, 1201 Eye
St., NW., 8th floor, Washington, DC
Rogues Harbor Inn, 2079 E. Shore Dr.,
Lansing, 09000657, LISTED, 8/26/09
NORTH CAROLINA
Greene County
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
ARIZONA
Snow Hill Historic District (Boundary
Increase), W. Harper St. between W. 6th St.
and W. 4th St., Snow Hill, 09000658,
LISTED, 8/27/09
Nash County
Rocky Mount Central City Historic District
(Boundary Increase and Decrease), Portions
of 26 blocks on Main, Washington, Church,
Battle, Hammond, Hill, Howard, Ivy, Gay,
Goldleaf, and Thomas Sts., Rocky Mount,
09000659, LISTED, 8/27/09
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:15 Nov 02, 2009
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Notice of Potential for Oil Shale
Development: Call for Nominations—
Oil Shale Research, Development and
Demonstration Program
AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land
Management (BLM) solicits the
nomination of parcels to be leased for
Research, Development and
Demonstration (R, D and D) of oil shale
recovery technologies in the States of
Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming.
DATES: Nominations for oil shale R, D
and D leases can be made from
November 3, 2009 through January 4,
2010.
ADDRESSES: Please send nominations to
the BLM State Director for the State in
which the parcel you are nominating is
located: Dave Hunsaker, Acting State
E:\FR\FM\03NON1.SGM
03NON1
56868
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 211 / Tuesday, November 3, 2009 / Notices
Director, BLM, Colorado State Office,
2850 Youngfield Street, Lakewood,
Colorado, 80215–7076; Selma Sierra,
State Director, BLM, Utah State Office,
400 West 200 South, Suite 500, Salt
Lake City, Utah, 84145–0155; or Don
Simpson, State Director, BLM, Wyoming
State Office, 5353 Yellowstone Road,
P.O. Box 1828, Cheyenne, Wyoming,
82003.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Charlie Beecham, BLM, Colorado State
Office, (303) 239–3773; Roger Bankert,
BLM, Utah State Office, (801) 539–4037;
or Robert Janssen, BLM, Wyoming State
Office, (307) 775–6206.
Pursuant
to the authority of the Secretary of the
Interior (Secretary) in section 21 of the
Mineral Leasing Act to lease deposits of
oil shale, on June 9, 2005, the BLM
published in the Federal Register a
notice entitled ‘‘Potential for Oil Shale
Development; Call for Nominations—
Oil Shale Research, Development, and
Demonstration (R, D and D) Program’’
(70 FR 33753). While the BLM was
processing the nominations, Congress
enacted the Energy Policy Act of 2005
(EPAct), which included section 369
(codified at 42 U.S.C. 15927 and
amendments to 30 U.S.C. 241). Section
369 addresses oil shale development
and directs the Secretary to make public
lands available for conducting oil shale
research and development activities. 42
U.S.C. 15927(c). After processing the
nominations received in response to the
2005 notice, the BLM issued six R, D
and D leases, which became effective in
2007.
On January 15, 2009, the BLM
published in the Federal Register (74
FR 2611) a notice for a call for
nominations for a second round of R, D
and D leasing. On February 27, 2009,
the BLM published in the Federal
Register a notice entitled ‘‘Potential for
Oil Shale Development; Withdrawal of
the Call for Nominations—Oil Shale
Research, Development, and
Demonstration (R, D and D) Program
and Request for Public Comment’’ (74
FR 8983). In withdrawing the January
15, 2009, solicitation of parcels for R, D
and D leases, the Federal Register
notice stated, ‘‘The new administration
intends to review and reconsider certain
aspects of the current solicitation,
including lease acreage and the rules
that would govern conversion of an R,
D and D lease to a commercial lease,
particularly those related to royalty
rates.’’ This notice also requested
comments on the terms and conditions
of any future R, D and D leases the BLM
may issue.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:15 Nov 02, 2009
Jkt 220001
The BLM received 51,685 comments
from entities or individuals that may be
grouped in five principal categories:
Energy industry, academia,
environmental groups, Federal/State/
local government agencies, and citizens/
citizen groups. The energy industry’s
comments generally suggested that (1)
the acreage size for the second round of
R, D and D should be large enough to
allow expansion into potential
commercial operations and (2) the
royalty is too high to encourage
investment. The academic commenters
suggested that additional R, D and D is
needed, particularly to test a low
temperature process that would not
impact water supplies. In general the
environmental groups suggested that no
additional leases be offered until the
results of the current experiments are
known and the BLM has completed a
full, programmatic Environmental
Impact Statement on the current oil
shale R, D and D leases. One
environmental entity suggested a 10year R, D and D lease term, a 12.5
percent royalty rate, and in the event of
a second round of R, D and D leasing,
that acreage size should be limited to
160 acres, with no preference right lease
acreage. Another environmental
commenter recommended that the
Department of the Interior engage in a
mid-term assessment of the five R, D
and D leases in Colorado, and that any
future R, D and D lease offering should
be conservative in size, scope, and lease
terms. Commenters from the Federal/
State/local government agencies
generally stated that because the BLM
has implemented a number of the
provisions in the EPAct to promote oil
shale development, the BLM should not
make more land available for leasing
through a second round of R, D and D.
The citizen commenters were divided in
their opinions. Some supported oil
shale development primarily because
they view oil shale development as an
important component in the country’s
efforts to become energy independent.
Others opposed oil shale development
chiefly because of their concerns about
potential adverse environmental
impacts. One commenter from this
category suggested that the current
Federal royalty regime be abolished and
replaced with an annual fee based on
the value of the oil shale product.
By this notice, the BLM is soliciting
the nomination of parcels, not to exceed
160 acres, for the conduct of oil shale R,
D and D under a 10-year lease
agreement. Applicants may also identify
up to 480 additional, contiguous acres
that the applicant requests the BLM to
reserve for a preference lease area to be
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
included in a commercial lease. Thus,
any resulting commercial lease will be
for a tract of a total of no more than 640
acres. The lease size available for
commercial development is being
reduced from the 5,120 acres in the first
round of leasing because the substantial
reserves represented by 640 acres are
more than adequate for a major oil shale
production operation.
The intent of this second round of R,
D and D leases is to focus on the
technology needed to develop the
resources into marketable liquid fuels.
Knowing the costs and benefits
associated with the new technologies
will inform the Secretary’s future
decisions about whether and when to
move forward with commercial scale
development and allow the Secretary to
assess its impact on the environment,
including an assessment of those
impacts in light of climate change.
The lease form for this round of R, D
and D leases has been revised from the
one published in the Federal Register
on June 9, 2005 (70 FR 33755). The
revised R, D and D lease form is
available at: https://www.blm.gov/wo/st/
en/prog/energy/oilshale_2.html.
The R, D and D nominations will be
reviewed by an Interdisciplinary Review
Team. For this Team, the BLM will
request the participation of a
representative from each of the States of
Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming, as
appropriate, and the Departments of
Defense and Energy. The criteria for
awarding an R, D and D lease will be
the: (1) Potential for a proposal to
advance knowledge of effective
technology; (2) Economic viability of the
applicant; and 3) Means of managing the
environmental effects of oil shale
technology. The BLM will conduct an
analysis under the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of the
proposals prior to awarding any R, D
and D lease. Each applicant will be
responsible for the costs associated with
the NEPA analysis of the R, D and D
lease application. The time required for
analysis and documentation under
NEPA may differ depending on whether
the application is for a tract that has
previously been the subject of NEPA
analysis for oil shale operations, the
method of shale oil extraction, and
whether the application involves
mining or in-place shale oil recovery.
Accordingly, some R, D and D leases
may be awarded prior to others. If the
BLM receives two or more applications
to lease the same lands and determines
that more than one meets the
requirements for R, D and D leases, the
BLM will issue the lease to the qualified
applicant with the superior proposal, as
determined by the BLM, having
E:\FR\FM\03NON1.SGM
03NON1
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 211 / Tuesday, November 3, 2009 / Notices
considered the recommendation of the
Interdisciplinary Review Team.
Lease nominations must, at a
minimum, contain the following
information:
(1) Name, address, and telephone
number of the applicant, and the
representative of the applicant, who will
be responsible for conducting the
operational activities;
(2) Statement of qualifications to hold
a mineral lease under the Mineral
Leasing Act of 1920. Qualification
requirements can be found in 43 CFR
subpart 3902;
(3) Description of the lands, not to
exceed 160 acres, together with any
rights-of-way required to support the
development of the oil shale R, D and
D lease;
(4) A description of any additional
lands you request be reserved for a
preference right lease, adjacent to your
R, D and D lease area and not exceeding
480 acres;
(5) A narrative description of the
proposed methodology for recovering
oil from oil shale, including a
description of all equipment and
facilities needed to support the
proposed technology;
(6) A narrative description of the
results of laboratory and/or field tests of
the proposed technology;
(7) A schedule of operations for the
life of the R, D and D project and
proposed plan for processing,
marketing, and delivering the shale oil
to the market;
(8) A map of existing land use
authorizations on the nominated
acreage;
(9) Estimated shale oil and/or oil
shale resources within the acreage of the
nominated R, D and D parcel and the
preference right area;
(10) The method of shale oil storage
and the method of spent oil shale
disposal;
(11) A description of any interim
environmental mitigation and
reclamation;
(12) The method of final reclamation
and abandonment and associated
projected costs of final reclamation;
(13) Proof of investment capacity to
fund the proposed project;
(14) A description of the
commitments of partners, if any;
(15) A statement from a surety
qualified to furnish bonds to the United
States Government of the bond amount
for which the applicant qualifies under
the surety’s underwriting criteria;
(16) A non-refundable application fee
of $6,500;
(17) Information that demonstrates the
potential to:
(a) Minimize water usage;
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:15 Nov 02, 2009
Jkt 220001
(b) Protect surface and subsurface
waters;
(c) Minimize life cycle greenhouse gas
emissions and air pollution, including
fugitive dust emissions;
(d) Capture and use natural gas onsite;
(e) Employ carbon capture and
sequestration technology;
(f) Employ renewable energy and
energy efficient technologies;
(g) Avoid and minimize impact on
wildlife and habitat; and
(h) Minimize surface disturbance for
roads and infrastructure/facilities.
Applications submitted for lands
within any multi-mineral leasing area
must demonstrate the potential
capability to extract both shale oil and
nahcolite or demonstrate a potential
capability to extract one mineral while
preserving the other for future recovery.
Applicants should prominently note
and segregate any information
submitted with their application that
contains proprietary information, if the
disclosure of this information to the
public would cause commercial or
financial injury to the applicant’s
competitive position. The BLM will
protect the confidentiality of such
information to the extent allowed by
law. Any Freedom of Information Act
requests for such information will be
handled in accordance with the
regulations at 43 CFR 2.23.
The lease terms and conditions for
this round contain substantial diligence
requirements to ensure operational
effectiveness and accountability as well
as to bring the new technology to the
market effectively and efficiently.
Specific timeframes are included within
which to conduct specified/approved
activities such as submitting the Plan of
Development, obtaining state permits,
developing infrastructure, and
submitting required quarterly reports.
As long as the lessee is not selling oil
shale products or producing commercial
quantities from the leasehold, no royalty
will be collected during the lease term.
The BLM may issue a commercial
lease, if at all, only after: (1) The lessee
demonstrates that the applicant’s
technology tested in the original lease of
up to 160 acres has the ability to
produce shale oil in commercial
quantities; (2) The BLM complies with
NEPA and concludes through its
evaluation under NEPA that commercial
scale operations of the applicant’s
technology at that site do not pose
environmental or social risks
unacceptable to the BLM; (3) The lessee
secures adequate bonding to cover all
costs associated with reclamation and
abandonment of the expanded lease
area; (4) The lessee pays a bonus based
on the fair market value of the lease to
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
56869
be determined by the BLM; and (5) The
lessee, in conjunction with BLM,
consults with State and local
governments and affected tribes on a
strategy to mitigate socioeconomic
impacts, including, but not limited to,
the infrastructure to accommodate the
required workforce.
If the BLM issues a commercial lease,
the lessee would have the exclusive
right to acquire, along with the R, D and
D lease area, lease rights to any or all
portions of the preference lease area up
to a total of 640 contiguous acres, upon
compliance with the terms and
conditions specified in the R, D and D
lease agreement. Any commercial lease
shall be subject to payment of rents and
royalties at rates established in
compliance with statutes and
regulations in effect at the time of
conversion.
The BLM will accept only one
application per entity. A lessee may
propose an amended plan of
development if its research indicates
that a different technology would more
effectively achieve production in
commercial quantities.
The non-refundable application
processing fee has increased from
$2,000 to $6,500 per application to
cover the anticipated cost of processing
these applications.
Robert V. Abbey,
Director, Bureau of Land Management.
[FR Doc. E9–26440 Filed 11–2–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–84–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division
United States et al. V. AT&T Inc. et al.;
Proposed Final Judgment and
Competitive Impact Statement
Notice is hereby given pursuant to the
Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act,
15 U.S.C. 16(b)–(h), that a proposed
Final Judgment, Stipulation and
Competitive Impact Statement have
been filed with the United States
District Court for the District of
Columbia in United States of America et
al. v. AT&T et al., Civil Action No. 09–
1932 (HHK). On October 13, 2009, the
United States filed a Complaint alleging
that the proposed acquisition by AT&T
of the mobile wireless
telecommunications business assets of
Centennial Communications Corp.
would violate Section 7 of the Clayton
Act, 15 U.S.C. 18. The proposed Final
Judgment, filed the same time as the
Complaint, requires the divestiture of
mobile wireless telecommunications
E:\FR\FM\03NON1.SGM
03NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 211 (Tuesday, November 3, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 56867-56869]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-26440]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[LLWO-3200000 L13100000.PP0000 L.X.EM OSHL000.241A]
Notice of Potential for Oil Shale Development: Call for
Nominations--Oil Shale Research, Development and Demonstration Program
AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) solicits the nomination of
parcels to be leased for Research, Development and Demonstration (R, D
and D) of oil shale recovery technologies in the States of Colorado,
Utah, and Wyoming.
DATES: Nominations for oil shale R, D and D leases can be made from
November 3, 2009 through January 4, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Please send nominations to the BLM State Director for the
State in which the parcel you are nominating is located: Dave Hunsaker,
Acting State
[[Page 56868]]
Director, BLM, Colorado State Office, 2850 Youngfield Street, Lakewood,
Colorado, 80215-7076; Selma Sierra, State Director, BLM, Utah State
Office, 400 West 200 South, Suite 500, Salt Lake City, Utah, 84145-
0155; or Don Simpson, State Director, BLM, Wyoming State Office, 5353
Yellowstone Road, P.O. Box 1828, Cheyenne, Wyoming, 82003.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charlie Beecham, BLM, Colorado State
Office, (303) 239-3773; Roger Bankert, BLM, Utah State Office, (801)
539-4037; or Robert Janssen, BLM, Wyoming State Office, (307) 775-6206.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to the authority of the Secretary
of the Interior (Secretary) in section 21 of the Mineral Leasing Act to
lease deposits of oil shale, on June 9, 2005, the BLM published in the
Federal Register a notice entitled ``Potential for Oil Shale
Development; Call for Nominations--Oil Shale Research, Development, and
Demonstration (R, D and D) Program'' (70 FR 33753). While the BLM was
processing the nominations, Congress enacted the Energy Policy Act of
2005 (EPAct), which included section 369 (codified at 42 U.S.C. 15927
and amendments to 30 U.S.C. 241). Section 369 addresses oil shale
development and directs the Secretary to make public lands available
for conducting oil shale research and development activities. 42 U.S.C.
15927(c). After processing the nominations received in response to the
2005 notice, the BLM issued six R, D and D leases, which became
effective in 2007.
On January 15, 2009, the BLM published in the Federal Register (74
FR 2611) a notice for a call for nominations for a second round of R, D
and D leasing. On February 27, 2009, the BLM published in the Federal
Register a notice entitled ``Potential for Oil Shale Development;
Withdrawal of the Call for Nominations--Oil Shale Research,
Development, and Demonstration (R, D and D) Program and Request for
Public Comment'' (74 FR 8983). In withdrawing the January 15, 2009,
solicitation of parcels for R, D and D leases, the Federal Register
notice stated, ``The new administration intends to review and
reconsider certain aspects of the current solicitation, including lease
acreage and the rules that would govern conversion of an R, D and D
lease to a commercial lease, particularly those related to royalty
rates.'' This notice also requested comments on the terms and
conditions of any future R, D and D leases the BLM may issue.
The BLM received 51,685 comments from entities or individuals that
may be grouped in five principal categories: Energy industry, academia,
environmental groups, Federal/State/local government agencies, and
citizens/citizen groups. The energy industry's comments generally
suggested that (1) the acreage size for the second round of R, D and D
should be large enough to allow expansion into potential commercial
operations and (2) the royalty is too high to encourage investment. The
academic commenters suggested that additional R, D and D is needed,
particularly to test a low temperature process that would not impact
water supplies. In general the environmental groups suggested that no
additional leases be offered until the results of the current
experiments are known and the BLM has completed a full, programmatic
Environmental Impact Statement on the current oil shale R, D and D
leases. One environmental entity suggested a 10-year R, D and D lease
term, a 12.5 percent royalty rate, and in the event of a second round
of R, D and D leasing, that acreage size should be limited to 160
acres, with no preference right lease acreage. Another environmental
commenter recommended that the Department of the Interior engage in a
mid-term assessment of the five R, D and D leases in Colorado, and that
any future R, D and D lease offering should be conservative in size,
scope, and lease terms. Commenters from the Federal/State/local
government agencies generally stated that because the BLM has
implemented a number of the provisions in the EPAct to promote oil
shale development, the BLM should not make more land available for
leasing through a second round of R, D and D. The citizen commenters
were divided in their opinions. Some supported oil shale development
primarily because they view oil shale development as an important
component in the country's efforts to become energy independent. Others
opposed oil shale development chiefly because of their concerns about
potential adverse environmental impacts. One commenter from this
category suggested that the current Federal royalty regime be abolished
and replaced with an annual fee based on the value of the oil shale
product.
By this notice, the BLM is soliciting the nomination of parcels,
not to exceed 160 acres, for the conduct of oil shale R, D and D under
a 10-year lease agreement. Applicants may also identify up to 480
additional, contiguous acres that the applicant requests the BLM to
reserve for a preference lease area to be included in a commercial
lease. Thus, any resulting commercial lease will be for a tract of a
total of no more than 640 acres. The lease size available for
commercial development is being reduced from the 5,120 acres in the
first round of leasing because the substantial reserves represented by
640 acres are more than adequate for a major oil shale production
operation.
The intent of this second round of R, D and D leases is to focus on
the technology needed to develop the resources into marketable liquid
fuels. Knowing the costs and benefits associated with the new
technologies will inform the Secretary's future decisions about whether
and when to move forward with commercial scale development and allow
the Secretary to assess its impact on the environment, including an
assessment of those impacts in light of climate change.
The lease form for this round of R, D and D leases has been revised
from the one published in the Federal Register on June 9, 2005 (70 FR
33755). The revised R, D and D lease form is available at: https://www.blm.gov/wo/st/en/prog/energy/oilshale_2.html.
The R, D and D nominations will be reviewed by an Interdisciplinary
Review Team. For this Team, the BLM will request the participation of a
representative from each of the States of Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming,
as appropriate, and the Departments of Defense and Energy. The criteria
for awarding an R, D and D lease will be the: (1) Potential for a
proposal to advance knowledge of effective technology; (2) Economic
viability of the applicant; and 3) Means of managing the environmental
effects of oil shale technology. The BLM will conduct an analysis under
the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of the proposals prior to
awarding any R, D and D lease. Each applicant will be responsible for
the costs associated with the NEPA analysis of the R, D and D lease
application. The time required for analysis and documentation under
NEPA may differ depending on whether the application is for a tract
that has previously been the subject of NEPA analysis for oil shale
operations, the method of shale oil extraction, and whether the
application involves mining or in-place shale oil recovery.
Accordingly, some R, D and D leases may be awarded prior to others. If
the BLM receives two or more applications to lease the same lands and
determines that more than one meets the requirements for R, D and D
leases, the BLM will issue the lease to the qualified applicant with
the superior proposal, as determined by the BLM, having
[[Page 56869]]
considered the recommendation of the Interdisciplinary Review Team.
Lease nominations must, at a minimum, contain the following
information:
(1) Name, address, and telephone number of the applicant, and the
representative of the applicant, who will be responsible for conducting
the operational activities;
(2) Statement of qualifications to hold a mineral lease under the
Mineral Leasing Act of 1920. Qualification requirements can be found in
43 CFR subpart 3902;
(3) Description of the lands, not to exceed 160 acres, together
with any rights-of-way required to support the development of the oil
shale R, D and D lease;
(4) A description of any additional lands you request be reserved
for a preference right lease, adjacent to your R, D and D lease area
and not exceeding 480 acres;
(5) A narrative description of the proposed methodology for
recovering oil from oil shale, including a description of all equipment
and facilities needed to support the proposed technology;
(6) A narrative description of the results of laboratory and/or
field tests of the proposed technology;
(7) A schedule of operations for the life of the R, D and D project
and proposed plan for processing, marketing, and delivering the shale
oil to the market;
(8) A map of existing land use authorizations on the nominated
acreage;
(9) Estimated shale oil and/or oil shale resources within the
acreage of the nominated R, D and D parcel and the preference right
area;
(10) The method of shale oil storage and the method of spent oil
shale disposal;
(11) A description of any interim environmental mitigation and
reclamation;
(12) The method of final reclamation and abandonment and associated
projected costs of final reclamation;
(13) Proof of investment capacity to fund the proposed project;
(14) A description of the commitments of partners, if any;
(15) A statement from a surety qualified to furnish bonds to the
United States Government of the bond amount for which the applicant
qualifies under the surety's underwriting criteria;
(16) A non-refundable application fee of $6,500;
(17) Information that demonstrates the potential to:
(a) Minimize water usage;
(b) Protect surface and subsurface waters;
(c) Minimize life cycle greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution,
including fugitive dust emissions;
(d) Capture and use natural gas onsite;
(e) Employ carbon capture and sequestration technology;
(f) Employ renewable energy and energy efficient technologies;
(g) Avoid and minimize impact on wildlife and habitat; and
(h) Minimize surface disturbance for roads and infrastructure/
facilities.
Applications submitted for lands within any multi-mineral leasing
area must demonstrate the potential capability to extract both shale
oil and nahcolite or demonstrate a potential capability to extract one
mineral while preserving the other for future recovery.
Applicants should prominently note and segregate any information
submitted with their application that contains proprietary information,
if the disclosure of this information to the public would cause
commercial or financial injury to the applicant's competitive position.
The BLM will protect the confidentiality of such information to the
extent allowed by law. Any Freedom of Information Act requests for such
information will be handled in accordance with the regulations at 43
CFR 2.23.
The lease terms and conditions for this round contain substantial
diligence requirements to ensure operational effectiveness and
accountability as well as to bring the new technology to the market
effectively and efficiently. Specific timeframes are included within
which to conduct specified/approved activities such as submitting the
Plan of Development, obtaining state permits, developing
infrastructure, and submitting required quarterly reports. As long as
the lessee is not selling oil shale products or producing commercial
quantities from the leasehold, no royalty will be collected during the
lease term.
The BLM may issue a commercial lease, if at all, only after: (1)
The lessee demonstrates that the applicant's technology tested in the
original lease of up to 160 acres has the ability to produce shale oil
in commercial quantities; (2) The BLM complies with NEPA and concludes
through its evaluation under NEPA that commercial scale operations of
the applicant's technology at that site do not pose environmental or
social risks unacceptable to the BLM; (3) The lessee secures adequate
bonding to cover all costs associated with reclamation and abandonment
of the expanded lease area; (4) The lessee pays a bonus based on the
fair market value of the lease to be determined by the BLM; and (5) The
lessee, in conjunction with BLM, consults with State and local
governments and affected tribes on a strategy to mitigate socioeconomic
impacts, including, but not limited to, the infrastructure to
accommodate the required workforce.
If the BLM issues a commercial lease, the lessee would have the
exclusive right to acquire, along with the R, D and D lease area, lease
rights to any or all portions of the preference lease area up to a
total of 640 contiguous acres, upon compliance with the terms and
conditions specified in the R, D and D lease agreement. Any commercial
lease shall be subject to payment of rents and royalties at rates
established in compliance with statutes and regulations in effect at
the time of conversion.
The BLM will accept only one application per entity. A lessee may
propose an amended plan of development if its research indicates that a
different technology would more effectively achieve production in
commercial quantities.
The non-refundable application processing fee has increased from
$2,000 to $6,500 per application to cover the anticipated cost of
processing these applications.
Robert V. Abbey,
Director, Bureau of Land Management.
[FR Doc. E9-26440 Filed 11-2-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-84-P