Pinsly Railroad Company-Control Exemption-Warren & Saline River Railroad Company, 56913-56914 [E9-26396]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 211 / Tuesday, November 3, 2009 / Notices
By the Board, Anne K. Quinlan, Acting
Secretary.
Kulunie L. Cannon,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. E9–26364 Filed 11–2–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
[STB Finance Docket No. 35293]
Pinsly Railroad Company—Control
Exemption—Warren & Saline River
Railroad Company
By petition filed on September 9,
2009, Pinsly Railroad Company (PRC)
seeks an exemption under 49 U.S.C.
10502 from the prior approval
requirements of 49 U.S.C. 11323–25 to
acquire control of Warren & Saline River
Railroad Company (WSR) through the
purchase of all WSR stock from Potlatch
Land & Lumber, LLC (PLL). PRC seeks
expedited action of this petition.1 The
Board will grant the exemption and the
request for expedited action.
Background
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
PRC is a noncarrier holding company
that currently controls five Class III rail
carriers.2 WSR is a Class III rail carrier,
and wholly-owned subsidiary of PLL,
which owns and operates approximately
5 route miles of rail line extending
south and west from Warren, AR. PLL
is the only active shipper on the WSR
line. PRC states that AKMD leases and
operates a rail line that connects with
WSR at Warren.
PRC states that it executed a Stock
Purchase Agreement with PLL on
September 4, 2009, to acquire all of
WSR’s stock and assume control of
WSR.3 Following consummation, PRC
plans to coordinate the rail operations of
1 PRC concurrently filed a verified notice of
exemption in Pinsly Railroad Company—Control
Exemption—The Prescott and Northwestern
Railroad Company, STB Finance Docket No. 35292
(STB served Sept. 25, 2009), to obtain control of
The Prescott and Northwestern Railroad Company
(PNW), a Class III rail carrier, through the purchase
of all PNW’s stock from PLL. That exemption
became effective on October 9, 2009.
2 These carriers are: Pioneer Valley Railroad
Company, Inc. (PVR), which operates in
Massachusetts; Florida Central Railroad Company,
Inc. (FCR), Florida Midland Railroad Company, Inc.
(FMR), and Florida Northern Railroad Company,
Inc. (FNR), each of which operates in Florida; and
Arkansas Midland Railroad Company, Inc. (AKMD),
which operates several disconnected line segments
in Arkansas.
3 PRC has concurrently filed a motion for
protective order pursuant to 49 CFR 1104.14(b) in
STB Finance Docket No. 35292 to allow PRC to file
the unredacted Stock Purchase Agreement under
seal. The motion was addressed in a separate
decision served on October 6, 2009.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:15 Nov 02, 2009
Jkt 220001
WSR and AKMD, with service
continuing 5 days per week as traffic
warrants. PRC seeks expedited
consideration of the petition so that it
can concurrently finalize its acquisition
of WSR and PNW no later than
December 30, 2009.
In support of its petition, PRC states
that no shipper will lose rail service or
any existing competitive options as a
result of the proposed transaction. PRC
also states that all WSR traffic, which
currently moves over AKMD’s line out
of Warren, will continue to do so after
PRC assumes control of WSR. Finally,
PRC states that it, along with AKMD,
will provide administrative and other
support for WSR’s operations when
WSR and AKMD become affiliated
carriers.
Discussion and Conclusions
The acquisition of control of a rail
carrier by a person that is not a rail
carrier but that controls any number of
rail carriers requires prior approval by
the Board under 49 U.S.C. 11323(a)(5).
Under 49 U.S.C. 10502(a), however, the
Board must exempt a transaction or
service from regulation if it finds that:
(1) Regulation is not necessary to carry
out the rail transportation policy (RTP)
of 49 U.S.C. 10101; and (2) either (a) the
transaction or service is limited in
scope; or (b) regulation is not needed to
protect shippers from the abuse of
market power.
An exemption from the prior approval
requirements of 49 U.S.C. 11323–25 is
consistent with the standards of 49
U.S.C. 10502. Detailed scrutiny of the
proposed transaction through an
application for review and approval
under 49 U.S.C. 11323–25 is not
necessary to carry out the RTP. Rather,
an exemption will promote that policy
by minimizing the need for Federal
regulatory control over the proposed
transaction, promoting a safe and
efficient rail transportation system,
ensuring that a sound rail transportation
system will continue to meet the needs
of the shipping public, and reducing
regulatory barriers to entry [49 U.S.C.
10101(2), (3), (4), and (7)]. Also, by
allowing PRC to integrate WSR into its
existing family of Class III carriers, with
attendant experience, resources, capital,
and administrative support, an
exemption will foster sound economic
conditions in transportation, ensure
effective competition and coordination
between rail carriers, and encourage
efficient management [49 U.S.C.
10101(5) and (9)]. Other aspects of the
RTP will not be adversely affected.
Regulation of this transaction is not
needed to protect shippers from an
abuse of market power. PRC has
PO 00000
Frm 00122
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
56913
indicated that there will be no adverse
impacts on rail transportation or
lessening of rail competition. PRC will
simply be incorporating WSR into its
family of short line carriers without
materially changing the operations of
WSR. As a result, shippers potentially
will benefit from greater efficiencies
while receiving the same service. No
shipper located on WSR’s line is
expected to lose rail service options as
a result of the control transaction. The
more likely result will be enhanced rail
service, as shippers will benefit from the
substantial experience and resources of
PRC and from the connection between
WSR and the other PRC-controlled
carriers. Given our finding regarding the
probable effect of the transaction on
market power, we need not determine
whether the transaction is limited in
scope.
Under 49 U.S.C. 10502(g), the Board
may not use its exemption authority to
relieve a rail carrier of its statutory
obligation to protect the interests of its
employees. Section 11326(c), however,
does not provide for labor protection for
transactions under sections 11324 and
11325 that involve only Class III rail
carriers. Accordingly, the Board may not
impose labor protective conditions here
because all the carriers involved are
Class III rail carriers.
The acquisition of control is exempt
from environmental reporting
requirements under 49 CFR
1105.6(c)(2)(i) because it will not result
in any significant change in carrier
operations. Similarly, the transaction is
exempt from the historic reporting
requirements under 49 CFR 1105.8(b)(3)
because it will not substantially change
the level of maintenance of railroad
properties.
In this proceeding, PRC has requested
expedited handling of its petition to
enable it to consummate the acquisition
of control of WSR in conjunction with
its acquisition of another Class III
carrier, PNW, in a separate proceeding.
PRC has requested that its acquisition of
WSR become effective no later than
December 30, 2009. PRC’s authority to
acquire PNW became effective on
October 9, 2009. PRC’s request is
reasonable in light of the fact that the
acquisition of the two Class III carriers
was finalized under a single Stock
Purchase Agreement. PRC’s request for
expedited action will be granted.
This action will not significantly
affect either the quality of the human
environment or the conservation of
energy resources.
It is ordered:
1. Under 49 U.S.C. 10502, the Board
exempts from the prior approval
E:\FR\FM\03NON1.SGM
03NON1
56914
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 211 / Tuesday, November 3, 2009 / Notices
requirements of 49 U.S.C. 11323–25
PRC’s acquisition of control of WSR.
2. PRC’s request for expedited action
is granted.
3. Notice will be published in the
Federal Register on November 3, 2009.
4. This exemption will be effective on
December 3, 2009. Petitions to stay must
be filed by November 13, 2009. Petitions
to reopen must be filed by November 23,
2009.
By the Board, Chairman Elliot, Vice
Chairman Nottingham, and Commissioner
Mulvey.
Jeffrey Herzig,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. E9–26396 Filed 11–2–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
[FHWA Docket No. FHWA–2009–0106]
Express Lanes Demonstration
Program—Performance Goals for the
Texas Department of Transportation
Express Lanes IH–30 and IH–35E
Express Lanes Projects
AGENCY: Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice; request for comments.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:15 Nov 02, 2009
Jkt 220001
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
questions about this notice, contact Mr.
Wayne Berman, Office of Operations,
(202) 366–4069,
(Wayne.Berman@dot.gov); for legal
questions contact Mr. Michael Harkins,
Attorney Advisor, Office of the Chief
Counsel, (202) 366–4928,
(Michael.Harkins@dot.gov). The FHWA
is located at 1200 New Jersey Avenue,
SE., Washington, DC 20590. Office
hours are from 7:45 a.m. to 4:15 p.m.,
e.t., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Electronic Access
Section 1604(b)(7) of the Safe,
Accountable, Flexible, Efficient
Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for
Users (SAFETEA–LU) (Pub. L. 109–59;
Aug. 10, 2005), authorizes the Secretary
of Transportation (Secretary) to develop
and publish performance goals for each
express lane project accepted under the
Express Lanes Demonstration Program.
This notice lists the Performance Goals,
Monitoring and Reporting Program
requirements for the IH–30 (the Tom
Landry Freeway) Express Lanes project
and IH–35E Express Lanes project in
Dallas in the State of Texas.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before December 3, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Mail or hand deliver
comments to: Docket Management
Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, or
submit electronically at https://
www.regulations.gov, or fax comments
to (202) 493–2251.
All comments should include the
docket number that appears in the
heading of this document. All
comments received will be available for
examination and copying at the above
address from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., e.t.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. Those desiring notification of
SUMMARY:
receipt of comments must include a selfaddressed, stamped postcard or may
print the acknowledgment page that
appears after submitting comments
electronically. Anyone is able to search
the electronic form of all comments in
any one of our dockets by the name of
the individual submitting the comment
(or signing the comment, if submitted
on behalf of an association, business, or
labor union). You may review the DOT’s
complete Privacy Act Statement in the
Federal Register published on April 11,
2000 (Volume 65, Number 70, Pages
19477–78), or you may visit https://
DocketsInfo.dot.gov.
An electronic copy of this document
may be downloaded from the Federal
Register’s home page at: https://
www.archives.gov and the Government
Printing Office’s database at: https://
www.access.gpo.gov/nara.
Background
Section 1604(b) of SAFETEA–LU,
established the Express Lanes
Demonstration Program (ELDP). Under
the ELDP, the Secretary must carry out
15 demonstration projects during the
period of fiscal years 2005 through 2009
to permit States to collect a toll from
motor vehicles at eligible facilities. On
May 28, 2009, the Texas Department of
Transportation (TxDOT) submitted
applications to the FHWA for tolling
authority under the ELDP for the IH–30
(Tom Landry Freeway) Express Lanes
project and the IH–35E Express Lanes
Project, both in the Dallas metropolitan
region. After review and analysis, both
applications were approved on July 1,
2009.
The IH–30 Express Lanes project
corridor is comprised of the segments of
I–30W from the Tarrant County line (to
Bairds Farm Road/Legends Way) to the
Dallas Central Business District (to I–
35E). The project includes mobility
improvements on approximately 17
miles and will ultimately feature
reversible managed lanes for the entire
PO 00000
Frm 00123
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
length of the Corridor. The existing IH–
30 is an intermittent three-to-five-lane
section of operating freeway with
segments that include additional
complementary auxiliary lane sections
to improve operations. The fully
reconstructed Corridor will retain at
least the same number of existing
continuous toll-free general purpose
lanes, will add tolled managed lanes
along certain segments, and will provide
additional mobility improvements. The
managed lanes will allow an alternate
choice for users to select a priced option
to minimize and guarantee their trip
time along the corridor.
The IH–35E Express Lanes Project
corridor is comprised of three segments
of I–35E from I–635 in Dallas County to
north of US 380 in Denton County. The
project includes mobility improvements
on just over 28 miles and will feature
two to four managed lanes (one to two
lanes each way) for the entire corridor
length. The project corridor will retain
the same number of toll-free general
purpose lanes that currently exist and
will add tolled managed lanes. The
managed lanes will allow an alternate
choice for users to select a priced option
to minimize and guarantee their trip
time along the corridor.
Pursuant to section 1604(b)(7) of
SAFETEA–LU, the Secretary, in
cooperation with the State, public
authority, private entity, and other
program participants must develop
performance goals for each project and
publish such goals for public comment.
This notice lists, and solicits public
comment on, the Performance Goals,
Monitoring and Reporting Programs for
the IH–30 and the IH–35E Express Lanes
Projects.
Performance Goals, Monitoring and
Reporting Program
The following describes the agreed
upon ELDP’s Performance Goals,
Monitoring and Reporting Program for
the IH–30 and the IH–35E Express Lanes
Projects. This program has been
developed cooperatively between
TxDOT and FHWA.
A. Performance Goals
The FHWA and TxDOT have
identified the following four
Performance Goals for the project. These
Performance Goals reflect the priorities
for the project at the State and local
levels. The Performance Goals also
reflect the goals of the Express Lanes
Demonstration Project set forth in
Federal law at SAFETEA–LU section
1604(b).
I. Effects on travel, traffic, and air
quality.
E:\FR\FM\03NON1.SGM
03NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 211 (Tuesday, November 3, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 56913-56914]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-26396]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
[STB Finance Docket No. 35293]
Pinsly Railroad Company--Control Exemption--Warren & Saline River
Railroad Company
By petition filed on September 9, 2009, Pinsly Railroad Company
(PRC) seeks an exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502 from the prior approval
requirements of 49 U.S.C. 11323-25 to acquire control of Warren &
Saline River Railroad Company (WSR) through the purchase of all WSR
stock from Potlatch Land & Lumber, LLC (PLL). PRC seeks expedited
action of this petition.\1\ The Board will grant the exemption and the
request for expedited action.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ PRC concurrently filed a verified notice of exemption in
Pinsly Railroad Company--Control Exemption--The Prescott and
Northwestern Railroad Company, STB Finance Docket No. 35292 (STB
served Sept. 25, 2009), to obtain control of The Prescott and
Northwestern Railroad Company (PNW), a Class III rail carrier,
through the purchase of all PNW's stock from PLL. That exemption
became effective on October 9, 2009.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Background
PRC is a noncarrier holding company that currently controls five
Class III rail carriers.\2\ WSR is a Class III rail carrier, and
wholly-owned subsidiary of PLL, which owns and operates approximately 5
route miles of rail line extending south and west from Warren, AR. PLL
is the only active shipper on the WSR line. PRC states that AKMD leases
and operates a rail line that connects with WSR at Warren.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ These carriers are: Pioneer Valley Railroad Company, Inc.
(PVR), which operates in Massachusetts; Florida Central Railroad
Company, Inc. (FCR), Florida Midland Railroad Company, Inc. (FMR),
and Florida Northern Railroad Company, Inc. (FNR), each of which
operates in Florida; and Arkansas Midland Railroad Company, Inc.
(AKMD), which operates several disconnected line segments in
Arkansas.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
PRC states that it executed a Stock Purchase Agreement with PLL on
September 4, 2009, to acquire all of WSR's stock and assume control of
WSR.\3\ Following consummation, PRC plans to coordinate the rail
operations of WSR and AKMD, with service continuing 5 days per week as
traffic warrants. PRC seeks expedited consideration of the petition so
that it can concurrently finalize its acquisition of WSR and PNW no
later than December 30, 2009.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ PRC has concurrently filed a motion for protective order
pursuant to 49 CFR 1104.14(b) in STB Finance Docket No. 35292 to
allow PRC to file the unredacted Stock Purchase Agreement under
seal. The motion was addressed in a separate decision served on
October 6, 2009.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In support of its petition, PRC states that no shipper will lose
rail service or any existing competitive options as a result of the
proposed transaction. PRC also states that all WSR traffic, which
currently moves over AKMD's line out of Warren, will continue to do so
after PRC assumes control of WSR. Finally, PRC states that it, along
with AKMD, will provide administrative and other support for WSR's
operations when WSR and AKMD become affiliated carriers.
Discussion and Conclusions
The acquisition of control of a rail carrier by a person that is
not a rail carrier but that controls any number of rail carriers
requires prior approval by the Board under 49 U.S.C. 11323(a)(5). Under
49 U.S.C. 10502(a), however, the Board must exempt a transaction or
service from regulation if it finds that: (1) Regulation is not
necessary to carry out the rail transportation policy (RTP) of 49
U.S.C. 10101; and (2) either (a) the transaction or service is limited
in scope; or (b) regulation is not needed to protect shippers from the
abuse of market power.
An exemption from the prior approval requirements of 49 U.S.C.
11323-25 is consistent with the standards of 49 U.S.C. 10502. Detailed
scrutiny of the proposed transaction through an application for review
and approval under 49 U.S.C. 11323-25 is not necessary to carry out the
RTP. Rather, an exemption will promote that policy by minimizing the
need for Federal regulatory control over the proposed transaction,
promoting a safe and efficient rail transportation system, ensuring
that a sound rail transportation system will continue to meet the needs
of the shipping public, and reducing regulatory barriers to entry [49
U.S.C. 10101(2), (3), (4), and (7)]. Also, by allowing PRC to integrate
WSR into its existing family of Class III carriers, with attendant
experience, resources, capital, and administrative support, an
exemption will foster sound economic conditions in transportation,
ensure effective competition and coordination between rail carriers,
and encourage efficient management [49 U.S.C. 10101(5) and (9)]. Other
aspects of the RTP will not be adversely affected.
Regulation of this transaction is not needed to protect shippers
from an abuse of market power. PRC has indicated that there will be no
adverse impacts on rail transportation or lessening of rail
competition. PRC will simply be incorporating WSR into its family of
short line carriers without materially changing the operations of WSR.
As a result, shippers potentially will benefit from greater
efficiencies while receiving the same service. No shipper located on
WSR's line is expected to lose rail service options as a result of the
control transaction. The more likely result will be enhanced rail
service, as shippers will benefit from the substantial experience and
resources of PRC and from the connection between WSR and the other PRC-
controlled carriers. Given our finding regarding the probable effect of
the transaction on market power, we need not determine whether the
transaction is limited in scope.
Under 49 U.S.C. 10502(g), the Board may not use its exemption
authority to relieve a rail carrier of its statutory obligation to
protect the interests of its employees. Section 11326(c), however, does
not provide for labor protection for transactions under sections 11324
and 11325 that involve only Class III rail carriers. Accordingly, the
Board may not impose labor protective conditions here because all the
carriers involved are Class III rail carriers.
The acquisition of control is exempt from environmental reporting
requirements under 49 CFR 1105.6(c)(2)(i) because it will not result in
any significant change in carrier operations. Similarly, the
transaction is exempt from the historic reporting requirements under 49
CFR 1105.8(b)(3) because it will not substantially change the level of
maintenance of railroad properties.
In this proceeding, PRC has requested expedited handling of its
petition to enable it to consummate the acquisition of control of WSR
in conjunction with its acquisition of another Class III carrier, PNW,
in a separate proceeding. PRC has requested that its acquisition of WSR
become effective no later than December 30, 2009. PRC's authority to
acquire PNW became effective on October 9, 2009. PRC's request is
reasonable in light of the fact that the acquisition of the two Class
III carriers was finalized under a single Stock Purchase Agreement.
PRC's request for expedited action will be granted.
This action will not significantly affect either the quality of the
human environment or the conservation of energy resources.
It is ordered:
1. Under 49 U.S.C. 10502, the Board exempts from the prior approval
[[Page 56914]]
requirements of 49 U.S.C. 11323-25 PRC's acquisition of control of WSR.
2. PRC's request for expedited action is granted.
3. Notice will be published in the Federal Register on November 3,
2009.
4. This exemption will be effective on December 3, 2009. Petitions
to stay must be filed by November 13, 2009. Petitions to reopen must be
filed by November 23, 2009.
By the Board, Chairman Elliot, Vice Chairman Nottingham, and
Commissioner Mulvey.
Jeffrey Herzig,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. E9-26396 Filed 11-2-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P