Domestic Dates Produced or Packed in Riverside County, CA; Increased Assessment Rate, 56697-56699 [E9-26369]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 211 / Tuesday, November 3, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
file with the Board, on CWB Form No.
7, a report of the receipt of such
walnuts. The report shall be filed as
follows: On or before December 5 for
such walnuts received during the period
September 1 to November 30; on or
before March 5 for such walnuts
received during the period December 1
to February 28 (February 29 in a leap
year); on or before June 5 for such
walnuts received during the period
March 1 to May 31; and on or before
September 5 for such walnuts received
during the period June 1 to August 31.
The report shall include the quantity of
such walnuts received, the country of
origin for such walnuts, and whether
such walnuts are inshell or shelled.
With each report, the handler shall
submit a copy of a product tag issued by
a DFA of California inspector for each
receipt of such walnuts that includes
the name of the person from whom such
walnuts were received, the date such
walnuts were received by the handler,
the number of containers and the U.S.
Custom’s Service entry number,
whether such walnuts are inshell or
shelled, the quantity of such walnuts
received, the country of origin for such
walnuts, the name of the DFA of
California inspector who issued the
product tag, and the date such tag was
issued.
■ 8. Amend § 984.480 by revising
paragraph (d) to read as follows:
§ 984.480
Books and other records.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) The quantities held on September
1, January 1, and April 1 of each
marketing year.
Dated: October 27, 2009.
Rayne Pegg,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. E9–26368 Filed 11–2–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 987
[Doc. No. AMS–FV–09–0045; FV09–987–2
FR]
dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES
Domestic Dates Produced or Packed in
Riverside County, CA; Increased
Assessment Rate
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: This rule increases the
assessment rate established for the
California Date Administrative
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:13 Nov 02, 2009
Jkt 220001
Committee (Committee) for the 2009–10
and subsequent crop years from $0.60 to
$0.75 per hundredweight of dates
handled. The Committee locally
administers the marketing order which
regulates the handling of dates grown or
packed in Riverside County, California.
Assessments upon date handlers are
used by the Committee to fund
reasonable and necessary expenses of
the program. The crop year begins
October 1 and ends September 30. The
assessment rate will remain in effect
indefinitely unless modified,
suspended, or terminated.
DATES: Effective Date: November 4,
2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Terry Vawter, Senior Marketing
Specialist, or Kurt J. Kimmel, Regional
Manager, California Marketing Field
Office, Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487–
5901, Fax: (559) 487–5906, or E-mail:
Terry.Vawter@ams.usda.gov or
Kurt.Kimmel@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or E-mail:
Jay.Guerber@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule
is issued under Marketing Order No.
987, as amended (7 CFR part 987),
regulating the handling of dates grown
or packed in Riverside County,
California, hereinafter referred to as the
‘‘order.’’ The order is effective under the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act
of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674),
hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order
12866.
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. Under the marketing order now
in effect, California date handlers are
subject to assessments. Funds to
administer the order are derived from
such assessments. It is intended that the
assessment rate as issued herein will be
applicable to all assessable dates
beginning October 1, 2009, and continue
until amended, suspended, or
terminated.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
56697
with USDA a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law
and request a modification of the order
or to be exempted therefrom. Such
handler is afforded the opportunity for
a hearing on the petition. After the
hearing, USDA would rule on the
petition. The Act provides that the
district court of the United States in any
district in which the handler is an
inhabitant, or has his or her principal
place of business, has jurisdiction to
review USDA’s ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than
20 days after the date of the entry of the
ruling.
This rule increases the assessment
rate established for the Committee for
the 2009–10 and subsequent crop years
from $0.60 to $0.75 per hundredweight
of dates handled.
The California date marketing order
provides authority for the Committee,
with the approval of USDA, to formulate
an annual budget of expenses and
collect assessments from handlers to
administer the program. The members
of the Committee are producers and
handlers of California dates. They are
familiar with the Committee’s needs and
with the costs for goods and services in
their local area, and are thus in a
position to formulate an appropriate
budget and assessment rate. The
assessment rate is formulated and
discussed in a public meeting. Thus, all
directly affected persons have an
opportunity to participate and provide
input.
For the 2008–09 and subsequent crop
years, the Committee recommended,
and USDA approved, an assessment rate
that would continue in effect from crop
year to crop year unless modified,
suspended, or terminated by USDA
upon recommendation and information
submitted by the Committee or other
information available to USDA.
The Committee met on June 9, 2009,
and unanimously recommended 2009–
10 expenditures of $200,000 and an
assessment rate of $0.75 per
hundredweight of California dates. In
comparison, last year’s budgeted
expenditures were $176,384. The
assessment rate of $0.75 is $0.15 higher
than the rate currently in effect. The
Committee recommended a higher
assessment rate to cover increased
expenses including increased marketing
and promotion efforts, and nutritional
research. Income generated through the
higher assessment rate combined with
reserve funds should be sufficient to
cover anticipated 2009–10 expenses.
Section 987.72(c) states that the
reserve may not exceed 50 percent of
E:\FR\FM\03NOR1.SGM
03NOR1
56698
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 211 / Tuesday, November 3, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
the average of expenses incurred during
the most recent five preceding crop
years. With higher anticipated expenses,
the reserve at the end of the 2009–10
crop year is not projected to exceed this
limit.
Income from sales of cull dates are
deposited in a surplus account for
subsequent use by the Committee to
cover the surplus pool share of the
Committee’s expenses. Handlers may
also dispose of cull dates of their own
production within their own livestockfeeding operation; otherwise, such cull
dates must be shipped or delivered to
the Committee for sale to non-human
food product outlets. Pursuant to
§ 987.72(b), the Committee is authorized
to temporarily use funds derived from
assessments to defray expenses incurred
in disposing of surplus dates. All such
expenses are required to be deducted
from proceeds obtained by the
Committee from the disposal of surplus
dates. For the 2009–10 crop year, the
Committee estimated that $1,500 from
the surplus account would be needed to
temporarily defray expenses incurred in
disposing of surplus dates.
The major expenditures
recommended by the Committee for the
2009–10 crop year include $60,000 for
general and administrative programs,
$97,000 for promotional programs, and
$28,000 for marketing and media
consulting. The Committee also
budgeted $15,000 to conduct nutritional
research. They also plan a series of
events to commemorate the tenth
anniversary of their annual date Chef’s
competition.
By comparison, expenditures
recommended by the Committee for the
2008–09 crop year included $66,384 for
general and administrative programs,
$82,000 for promotional programs,
$28,000 for marketing and media
consulting.
The assessment rate of $0.75 per
hundredweight of assessable dates was
derived by applying the following
formula
dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES
Where:
A = 2008–09 estimated reserve on 09/30/09
($65,566);
B = 2009–10 estimated reserve on 09/30/10
($39,566);
C = 2009–10 expenses ($200,000);
D = Cull Surplus Fund ($1,500);
F = 2009–10 expected shipments (23,000,000
pounds).
[(C ¥ A + B ¥ D)/F] × 100.
The assessment rate established in
this rule will continue in effect
indefinitely unless modified,
suspended, or terminated by USDA
upon recommendation and information
submitted by the Committee or other
available information.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:13 Nov 02, 2009
Jkt 220001
Although this assessment rate will be
in effect for an indefinite period, the
Committee will continue to meet prior
to or during each crop year to
recommend a budget of expenses and
consider recommendations for
modification of the assessment rate. The
dates and times of Committee meetings
are available from the Committee or
USDA. Committee meetings are open to
the public and interested persons may
express their views at these meetings.
USDA will evaluate Committee
recommendations and other available
information to determine whether
modification of the assessment rate is
needed. Further rulemaking will be
undertaken as necessary.
The Committee’s 2009–10 budget and
those for subsequent crop years will be
reviewed and, as appropriate, approved
by USDA.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), the Agricultural
Marketing Service (AMS) has
considered the economic impact of this
action on small entities. Accordingly,
AMS has prepared this final regulatory
flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order
that small businesses will not be unduly
or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
Act, and rules issued thereunder, are
unique in that they are brought about
through group action of essentially
small entities acting on their own
behalf.
There are approximately 85 producers
of dates in the production area and 9
handlers subject to regulation under the
marketing order. The Small Business
Administration (13 CFR 121.201)
defines small agricultural producers as
those having annual receipts of less than
$750,000, and small agricultural service
firms are defined as those having annual
receipts of less than $7,000,000.
According to the National
Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS),
data for the most-recently completed
crop year, 2008, indicates that about
3.57 tons of dates were produced per
acre. The 2008 grower price published
by NASS was $1,580 per ton. Thus, the
value of date production in 2008
averaged about $5,640 per acre (3.57
tons per acre times $1580 per ton). At
that average price, a producer would
have to harvest 133 acres to receive an
annual income from dates of $750,000
($750,000 divided by $5,640 per acre
equals 133 acres).
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
According to committee staff, the
majority of California date producers
farm fewer than 152 acres. Thus, it can
be concluded that the majority of date
producers could be considered small
entities. According to data from the
Committee, the majority of handlers of
California dates may also be considered
small entities.
This rule increases the assessment
rate established for the Committee and
collected from handlers for the 2009–10
and subsequent crop years from $0.60 to
$0.75 per hundredweight of dates
handled. The Committee unanimously
recommended 2009–10 expenditures of
$200,000 and an assessment rate of
$0.75 per hundredweight of dates. The
assessment rate of $0.75 is $0.15 higher
than the 2008–09 rate currently in
effect. The quantity of assessable dates
for the 2009–10 crop year is estimated
at 11,500 tons or 230,000
hundredweight of dates. Thus, the $0.75
rate should provide $172,500 in
assessment income and, with reserve
funds of $65,566 and the $1,500
contribution from the surplus program,
will be adequate to meet the 2009–10
crop year expenses.
The major expenditures
recommended by the Committee for the
2009–10 crop year include $60,000 for
general and administrative programs,
$97,000 for promotional programs, and
$28,000 for marketing and media
consulting. The Committee also
budgeted $15,000 to conduct nutritional
research. They also plan a series of
events to commemorate the tenth
anniversary of their annual date Chef’s
competition.
The Committee reviewed and
unanimously recommended 2009–10
crop year expenditures of $200,000.
Prior to arriving at this budget, the
Committee considered information from
various sources, such as the
Committee’s Marketing Subcommittee.
Alternative expenditure levels were an
option available to the Committee, but
the Committee ultimately decided that
the recommended levels were
reasonable to properly administer the
order. The assessment rate of $0.75 per
hundredweight of dates was then
derived, based upon the Committee’s
estimates of the incoming reserve,
income, and anticipated expenses.
As previously noted, according to the
NASS data, the average grower price for
2008 crop dates was $1,580 per ton, or
$79 per hundredweight. The average
grower price for the period of 2004–08
was $1,750 per ton, or $87.50 per
hundredweight. No official NASS
estimate is available yet for 2009.
A review of historical information and
preliminary information pertaining to
E:\FR\FM\03NOR1.SGM
03NOR1
dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 211 / Tuesday, November 3, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
the upcoming crop year indicates that
the grower price for the 2009 date crop
could range between $65.50 and
$114.50 per ton. Therefore, the
estimated assessment revenue for the
2009 crop year as a percentage of total
grower revenue could range between 0.7
percent and 1.1 percent.
This action increases the assessment
obligation imposed on handlers. While
assessments impose some additional
costs on handlers, the costs are minimal
and uniform on all handlers. Some of
the additional costs may be passed on
to producers. However, these costs are
offset by the benefits derived from the
operation of the marketing order. In
addition, the Committee’s meeting was
widely publicized throughout the
California date industry and all
interested persons were invited to
attend the meeting and participate in
Committee deliberations on all issues.
Like all Committee meetings, the June 9,
2009, meeting was a public meeting and
all entities, both large and small, were
encouraged to express views on this
issue.
This rule imposes no additional
reporting or recordkeeping requirements
on either small or large California date
handlers. As with all Federal marketing
order programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce
information requirements and
duplication by industry and public
sector agencies. As noted in the initial
regulatory flexibility analysis, USDA
has not identified any relevant Federal
rules that duplicate, overlap, or conflict
with this final rule.
AMS is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act, to promote the
use of the Internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
A proposed rule concerning this
action was published in the Federal
Register on August 28, 2009 (74 FR
44304). Copies of the proposed rule
were also provided to all date handlers.
Finally, the proposal was made
available through the Internet by USDA
and the Office of the Federal Register. A
30-day comment period ending
September 28, 2009, was provided for
interested persons to respond to the
proposal. No comments were received.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
AMSv1.0/ams.fetchTemplateData.do
?template=TemplateN&page=Marketing
OrdersSmallBusinessGuide. Any
questions about the compliance guide
should be sent to Jay Guerber at the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:13 Nov 02, 2009
Jkt 220001
previously mentioned address in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
After consideration of all relevant
material presented, including the
information and recommendation
submitted by the Committee and other
available information, it is hereby found
that this rule, as hereinafter set forth,
will tend to effectuate the declared
policy of the Act.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it also found
and determined that good cause exists
for not postponing the effective date of
this rule until 30 days after publication
in the Federal Register because the crop
year began on October 1, 2009; handlers
are already receiving 2009–10 dates
from growers; and the assessment rate
applies to all dates received during the
2009–10 and subsequent seasons.
Further, handlers are aware of this rule,
which was recommended at a public
meeting. Finally, a 30-day comment
period was provided for in the proposed
rule.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 987
Dates, Marketing agreements,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
■ For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 987 is amended as
follows:
PART 987—DOMESTIC DATES
PRODUCED OR PACKED IN
RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 987 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
2. Section 987.339 is revised to read
as follows:
■
§ 987.339
Assessment rate.
On and after October 1, 2009, an
assessment rate of $0.75 per
hundredweight is established for
California dates.
Dated: October 27, 2009.
Rayne Pegg,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. E9–26369 Filed 11–2–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
13 CFR Part 126
RIN 3245–AF44
HUBZone and Government Contracting
AGENCY: U.S. Small Business
Administration.
ACTION: Final rule.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
56699
SUMMARY: This rule amends the U.S.
Small Business Administration’s (SBA’s
or Agency’s) Historically Underutilized
Business Zone (HUBZone) program’s
definition of the term ‘‘employee.’’
DATES: This rule is effective May 3,
2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mariana Pardo, HUBZone Program
Office, at (202) 205–2985 or by e-mail at:
mariana.pardo@sba.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
On January 26, 2007, the SBA
published in the Federal Register, 72 FR
3750, a proposed rule to amend the
HUBZone program’s definition of the
term ‘‘employee.’’ In this proposed rule,
SBA sought to revise the definition of
the term ‘‘employee’’ to: (1) Delete the
full-time equivalency requirement; (2)
specifically allow HUBZone small
business concerns (SBCs) to count
leased or temporary employees or
employees obtained through a
temporary agency, professional
employee organization (PEO)
arrangement or union agreement, as
employees; (3) specifically state that
SBA relies on the totality of
circumstances as further defined by Size
Policy Statement No. 1 when
determining whether individuals are
employees of a concern; (4) explain that
volunteers are not employees; (5) define
volunteers as those persons that receive
no compensation; and (6) address the
status of individuals that own all or part
of the SBC but receive no compensation
for work performed.
The SBA received a total of eight
comments on the proposed rule. Five
comments supported the rule in general
and three opposed the rule. These
comments are discussed in detail below.
Summary of Comments and Response
to Comments
The SBA received one comment
stating that the definition of the term
‘‘employee’’ should specifically address
the issue of deferred compensation. The
commenter wanted the SBA to clarify
that a person that has agreed to defer his
or her compensation will not be
considered an employee.
The SBA agrees with this comment
and believes that if it permitted a nonowner individual to work for no
compensation, or even deferred
compensation, and be considered an
employee for HUBZone program
purposes, it would open up the program
to potential abuse. Finding a person to
be an employee where the individual
has deferred compensation is contrary
to the intent of the HUBZone program,
which is to increase gainful
employment in historically
E:\FR\FM\03NOR1.SGM
03NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 211 (Tuesday, November 3, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 56697-56699]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-26369]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 987
[Doc. No. AMS-FV-09-0045; FV09-987-2 FR]
Domestic Dates Produced or Packed in Riverside County, CA;
Increased Assessment Rate
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule increases the assessment rate established for the
California Date Administrative Committee (Committee) for the 2009-10
and subsequent crop years from $0.60 to $0.75 per hundredweight of
dates handled. The Committee locally administers the marketing order
which regulates the handling of dates grown or packed in Riverside
County, California. Assessments upon date handlers are used by the
Committee to fund reasonable and necessary expenses of the program. The
crop year begins October 1 and ends September 30. The assessment rate
will remain in effect indefinitely unless modified, suspended, or
terminated.
DATES: Effective Date: November 4, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Terry Vawter, Senior Marketing
Specialist, or Kurt J. Kimmel, Regional Manager, California Marketing
Field Office, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487-5901, Fax: (559)
487-5906, or E-mail: Terry.Vawter@ams.usda.gov or
Kurt.Kimmel@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may request information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber, Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202) 720-
2491, Fax: (202) 720-8938, or E-mail: Jay.Guerber@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule is issued under Marketing Order
No. 987, as amended (7 CFR part 987), regulating the handling of dates
grown or packed in Riverside County, California, hereinafter referred
to as the ``order.'' The order is effective under the Agricultural
Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674),
hereinafter referred to as the ``Act.''
The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order 12866.
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. Under the marketing order now in effect, California
date handlers are subject to assessments. Funds to administer the order
are derived from such assessments. It is intended that the assessment
rate as issued herein will be applicable to all assessable dates
beginning October 1, 2009, and continue until amended, suspended, or
terminated.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition
stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and
request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. Such
handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition.
After the hearing, USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides
that the district court of the United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of
business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This rule increases the assessment rate established for the
Committee for the 2009-10 and subsequent crop years from $0.60 to $0.75
per hundredweight of dates handled.
The California date marketing order provides authority for the
Committee, with the approval of USDA, to formulate an annual budget of
expenses and collect assessments from handlers to administer the
program. The members of the Committee are producers and handlers of
California dates. They are familiar with the Committee's needs and with
the costs for goods and services in their local area, and are thus in a
position to formulate an appropriate budget and assessment rate. The
assessment rate is formulated and discussed in a public meeting. Thus,
all directly affected persons have an opportunity to participate and
provide input.
For the 2008-09 and subsequent crop years, the Committee
recommended, and USDA approved, an assessment rate that would continue
in effect from crop year to crop year unless modified, suspended, or
terminated by USDA upon recommendation and information submitted by the
Committee or other information available to USDA.
The Committee met on June 9, 2009, and unanimously recommended
2009-10 expenditures of $200,000 and an assessment rate of $0.75 per
hundredweight of California dates. In comparison, last year's budgeted
expenditures were $176,384. The assessment rate of $0.75 is $0.15
higher than the rate currently in effect. The Committee recommended a
higher assessment rate to cover increased expenses including increased
marketing and promotion efforts, and nutritional research. Income
generated through the higher assessment rate combined with reserve
funds should be sufficient to cover anticipated 2009-10 expenses.
Section 987.72(c) states that the reserve may not exceed 50 percent
of
[[Page 56698]]
the average of expenses incurred during the most recent five preceding
crop years. With higher anticipated expenses, the reserve at the end of
the 2009-10 crop year is not projected to exceed this limit.
Income from sales of cull dates are deposited in a surplus account
for subsequent use by the Committee to cover the surplus pool share of
the Committee's expenses. Handlers may also dispose of cull dates of
their own production within their own livestock-feeding operation;
otherwise, such cull dates must be shipped or delivered to the
Committee for sale to non-human food product outlets. Pursuant to Sec.
987.72(b), the Committee is authorized to temporarily use funds derived
from assessments to defray expenses incurred in disposing of surplus
dates. All such expenses are required to be deducted from proceeds
obtained by the Committee from the disposal of surplus dates. For the
2009-10 crop year, the Committee estimated that $1,500 from the surplus
account would be needed to temporarily defray expenses incurred in
disposing of surplus dates.
The major expenditures recommended by the Committee for the 2009-10
crop year include $60,000 for general and administrative programs,
$97,000 for promotional programs, and $28,000 for marketing and media
consulting. The Committee also budgeted $15,000 to conduct nutritional
research. They also plan a series of events to commemorate the tenth
anniversary of their annual date Chef's competition.
By comparison, expenditures recommended by the Committee for the
2008-09 crop year included $66,384 for general and administrative
programs, $82,000 for promotional programs, $28,000 for marketing and
media consulting.
The assessment rate of $0.75 per hundredweight of assessable dates
was derived by applying the following formula
Where:
A = 2008-09 estimated reserve on 09/30/09 ($65,566);
B = 2009-10 estimated reserve on 09/30/10 ($39,566);
C = 2009-10 expenses ($200,000);
D = Cull Surplus Fund ($1,500);
F = 2009-10 expected shipments (23,000,000 pounds).
[(C - A + B - D)/F] x 100.
The assessment rate established in this rule will continue in
effect indefinitely unless modified, suspended, or terminated by USDA
upon recommendation and information submitted by the Committee or other
available information.
Although this assessment rate will be in effect for an indefinite
period, the Committee will continue to meet prior to or during each
crop year to recommend a budget of expenses and consider
recommendations for modification of the assessment rate. The dates and
times of Committee meetings are available from the Committee or USDA.
Committee meetings are open to the public and interested persons may
express their views at these meetings. USDA will evaluate Committee
recommendations and other available information to determine whether
modification of the assessment rate is needed. Further rulemaking will
be undertaken as necessary.
The Committee's 2009-10 budget and those for subsequent crop years
will be reviewed and, as appropriate, approved by USDA.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-612), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
has considered the economic impact of this action on small entities.
Accordingly, AMS has prepared this final regulatory flexibility
analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued
pursuant to the Act, and rules issued thereunder, are unique in that
they are brought about through group action of essentially small
entities acting on their own behalf.
There are approximately 85 producers of dates in the production
area and 9 handlers subject to regulation under the marketing order.
The Small Business Administration (13 CFR 121.201) defines small
agricultural producers as those having annual receipts of less than
$750,000, and small agricultural service firms are defined as those
having annual receipts of less than $7,000,000.
According to the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS),
data for the most-recently completed crop year, 2008, indicates that
about 3.57 tons of dates were produced per acre. The 2008 grower price
published by NASS was $1,580 per ton. Thus, the value of date
production in 2008 averaged about $5,640 per acre (3.57 tons per acre
times $1580 per ton). At that average price, a producer would have to
harvest 133 acres to receive an annual income from dates of $750,000
($750,000 divided by $5,640 per acre equals 133 acres).
According to committee staff, the majority of California date
producers farm fewer than 152 acres. Thus, it can be concluded that the
majority of date producers could be considered small entities.
According to data from the Committee, the majority of handlers of
California dates may also be considered small entities.
This rule increases the assessment rate established for the
Committee and collected from handlers for the 2009-10 and subsequent
crop years from $0.60 to $0.75 per hundredweight of dates handled. The
Committee unanimously recommended 2009-10 expenditures of $200,000 and
an assessment rate of $0.75 per hundredweight of dates. The assessment
rate of $0.75 is $0.15 higher than the 2008-09 rate currently in
effect. The quantity of assessable dates for the 2009-10 crop year is
estimated at 11,500 tons or 230,000 hundredweight of dates. Thus, the
$0.75 rate should provide $172,500 in assessment income and, with
reserve funds of $65,566 and the $1,500 contribution from the surplus
program, will be adequate to meet the 2009-10 crop year expenses.
The major expenditures recommended by the Committee for the 2009-10
crop year include $60,000 for general and administrative programs,
$97,000 for promotional programs, and $28,000 for marketing and media
consulting. The Committee also budgeted $15,000 to conduct nutritional
research. They also plan a series of events to commemorate the tenth
anniversary of their annual date Chef's competition.
The Committee reviewed and unanimously recommended 2009-10 crop
year expenditures of $200,000. Prior to arriving at this budget, the
Committee considered information from various sources, such as the
Committee's Marketing Subcommittee. Alternative expenditure levels were
an option available to the Committee, but the Committee ultimately
decided that the recommended levels were reasonable to properly
administer the order. The assessment rate of $0.75 per hundredweight of
dates was then derived, based upon the Committee's estimates of the
incoming reserve, income, and anticipated expenses.
As previously noted, according to the NASS data, the average grower
price for 2008 crop dates was $1,580 per ton, or $79 per hundredweight.
The average grower price for the period of 2004-08 was $1,750 per ton,
or $87.50 per hundredweight. No official NASS estimate is available yet
for 2009.
A review of historical information and preliminary information
pertaining to
[[Page 56699]]
the upcoming crop year indicates that the grower price for the 2009
date crop could range between $65.50 and $114.50 per ton. Therefore,
the estimated assessment revenue for the 2009 crop year as a percentage
of total grower revenue could range between 0.7 percent and 1.1
percent.
This action increases the assessment obligation imposed on
handlers. While assessments impose some additional costs on handlers,
the costs are minimal and uniform on all handlers. Some of the
additional costs may be passed on to producers. However, these costs
are offset by the benefits derived from the operation of the marketing
order. In addition, the Committee's meeting was widely publicized
throughout the California date industry and all interested persons were
invited to attend the meeting and participate in Committee
deliberations on all issues. Like all Committee meetings, the June 9,
2009, meeting was a public meeting and all entities, both large and
small, were encouraged to express views on this issue.
This rule imposes no additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large California date handlers. As with
all Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public sector agencies. As noted in the
initial regulatory flexibility analysis, USDA has not identified any
relevant Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or conflict with this
final rule.
AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote
the use of the Internet and other information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information
and services, and for other purposes.
A proposed rule concerning this action was published in the Federal
Register on August 28, 2009 (74 FR 44304). Copies of the proposed rule
were also provided to all date handlers. Finally, the proposal was made
available through the Internet by USDA and the Office of the Federal
Register. A 30-day comment period ending September 28, 2009, was
provided for interested persons to respond to the proposal. No comments
were received.
A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/AMSv1.0/ams.fetchTemplateData.do?template=TemplateN&page=MarketingOrdersSmallBusinessGuide. Any questions about the compliance guide should be sent to
Jay Guerber at the previously mentioned address in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
After consideration of all relevant material presented, including
the information and recommendation submitted by the Committee and other
available information, it is hereby found that this rule, as
hereinafter set forth, will tend to effectuate the declared policy of
the Act.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it also found and determined that good
cause exists for not postponing the effective date of this rule until
30 days after publication in the Federal Register because the crop year
began on October 1, 2009; handlers are already receiving 2009-10 dates
from growers; and the assessment rate applies to all dates received
during the 2009-10 and subsequent seasons. Further, handlers are aware
of this rule, which was recommended at a public meeting. Finally, a 30-
day comment period was provided for in the proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 987
Dates, Marketing agreements, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
0
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 987 is amended as
follows:
PART 987--DOMESTIC DATES PRODUCED OR PACKED IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA
0
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 987 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
0
2. Section 987.339 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 987.339 Assessment rate.
On and after October 1, 2009, an assessment rate of $0.75 per
hundredweight is established for California dates.
Dated: October 27, 2009.
Rayne Pegg,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. E9-26369 Filed 11-2-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P