Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Corrections to the Arizona and Nevada State Implementation Plans, 57051-57054 [E9-26325]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 211 / Tuesday, November 3, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2009–0435; FRL–8976–3]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; Corrections to
the Arizona and Nevada State
Implementation Plans
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES4
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
SUMMARY: EPA is deleting certain
statutes and rules that were erroneously
approved by EPA under the Clean Air
Act as part of the Arizona and Nevada
state implementation plans. The statutes
that are the subject of this rule are from
the Arizona state implementation plan.
The rules that are the subject of this rule
were adopted by the Pima County
Health Department in Arizona and the
State Environmental Commission, Clark
County District Board of Health, and
Washoe County District Board of Health
in Nevada. The statutes and rules that
EPA is deleting relate to general
declarations of policy, advisory
committees, variances, and incidental
fees and nuisance odors. EPA has
determined that the continued presence
of these statutory provisions and rules
in the applicable state implementation
plans is potentially confusing and thus
harmful to affected sources, the state,
local agencies, the general public and to
EPA. The intended effect of this action
is to delete these statutes and rules from
the Arizona and Nevada state
implementation plans. EPA is also
correcting certain clerical and
typographical errors in the codification
of the Pima County portion of the
Arizona plan.
DATES: This rule is effective on January
4, 2010 without further notice, unless
EPA receives adverse comments by
December 3, 2009. If we receive such
comments, we will publish a timely
withdrawal in the Federal Register to
notify the public that this direct final
rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments,
identified by docket number EPA–R09–
OAR–2009–0435, by one of the
following methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line
instructions.
2. E-mail: allen.cynthia@epa.gov.
3. Mail or deliver: Cynthia Allen
(AIR–4), U.S. Environmental Protection
1 Section 110(k)(6) of the Clean Air Act, as
amended in 1990, provides, ‘‘Whenever the
Administrator determines that the Administrator’s
action approving, disapproving, or promulgating
VerDate Nov<24>2008
19:04 Nov 02, 2009
Jkt 220001
Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street,
San Francisco, CA 94105–3901.
Instructions: All comments will be
included in the public docket without
change and may be made available
online at https://www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Information that
you consider CBI or otherwise protected
should be clearly identified as such and
should not be submitted through https://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The
https://www.regulations.gov portal is an
‘‘anonymous access’’ system, and EPA
will not know your identity or contact
information unless you provide it in the
body of your comment. If you send
e-mail directly to EPA, your e-mail
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the public
comment. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification,
EPA may not be able to consider your
comment.
Docket: The index to the docket for
this action is available electronically at
https://www.regulations.gov and in hard
copy at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne
Street, San Francisco, California. While
all documents in the docket are listed in
the index, some information may be
publicly available only at the hard copy
location (e.g., copyrighted material), and
some may not be publicly available in
either location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the
hard copy materials, please schedule an
appointment during normal business
hours with the contact listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cynthia Allen, Rules Office (AIR–4),
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Region IX, (415) 947–4120,
allen.cynthia@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
57051
implementation plans (SIPs) in order to
fulfill the new federal requirements. In
many cases, states submitted entire
regulatory air pollution programs,
including many elements not required
by the Act. Due to time and resource
constraints, EPA’s review of these
submittals focused primarily on the new
substantive requirements, and we
approved many other elements into the
SIP with minimal review.
We now recognize that many of these
elements were not appropriate for
approval into the SIPs because they are
not required for SIPs and are not related
to the SIPs’ purpose under CAA section
110(a) of implementing, maintaining,
and enforcing the national ambient air
quality standards. Examples of
inappropriately-approved SIP elements
include statutes and rules that consist of
general statements of policy; that govern
local advisory boards; that specify
incidental fees, method of payment, and
refunds; and that regulate nuisance
odors. Most of the statutes and rules we
are deleting in today’s action fall under
one of these categories.
In addition, we are deleting certain
variance-related provisions that were
orphaned by a previous EPA rulemaking
deleting most such provisions from the
Nevada Division of Environmental
Protection (NDEP) portion of the Nevada
SIP and the Pima County portion of the
Arizona SIP. See EPA’s proposed rule at
61 FR 38664 (July 25, 1996) and final
rule at 62 FR 34641 (June 27, 1997) for
the rationale concerning the
inappropriateness of variance
provisions in a SIP. As explained in
EPA’s 1996 rule proposing to remove
various variance-related provisions,
variance provisions are generally
prohibited by, and are not legally
enforceable pursuant to, section 110(i)
of the Act.
Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA.
II. What statutory provisions and rules
are being deleted?
Table of Contents
The Clean Air Act (CAA or ‘‘Act’’)
was first enacted in 1970. In the 1970s
and early 1980s, thousands of state and
local agency regulations were submitted
to EPA for incorporation into state
EPA has determined that the statutes
and rules listed in the tables below were
inappropriate for inclusion in the SIP,
but were previously approved into the
SIP in error. Dates that these statutes
and rules were submitted by Arizona
and Nevada and approved by EPA are
provided. We are deleting these statutes
and rules from the Arizona and Nevada
SIPs under CAA section 110(k)(6) 1 as
inconsistent with the requirements of
CAA section 110(a).
any plan or plan revision (or part thereof), area
designation, redesignation, classification or
reclassification was in error, the Administrator may
in the same manner as the approval, disapproval,
or promulgation revise such action as appropriate
without requiring any further submission from the
State. Such determination and the basis thereof
shall be provided to the State and the public.’’
I. Why is EPA correcting the SIPs?
II. What rules are being deleted?
III. Public Comment and Final Action
IV. Administrative Requirements
I. Why is EPA correcting the SIPs?
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\03NOR4.SGM
03NOR4
57052
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 211 / Tuesday, November 3, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES
Statute No.
Title
Submittal date
36–770 .......................
36–776 .......................
36–777 .......................
Declaration of Policy ...................................................................................
Authorization to Accept Funds or Grants ...................................................
Advisory Council .........................................................................................
07/13/81
07/13/81
07/13/81
Approval date/FR cite
06/18/82; 47 FR 26382.
06/18/82; 47 FR 26382.
06/18/82; 47 FR 26382.
PIMA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
Rule No.
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
164
181
182
205
214
245
246
247
248
Title
.............................
.............................
.............................
.............................
.............................
.............................
.............................
.............................
.............................
.............................
.............................
.............................
.............................
.............................
.............................
.............................
Submittal date
Establishment .............................................................................................
Composition ................................................................................................
Terms: Nominations ...................................................................................
Function ......................................................................................................
Officers; Procedures ...................................................................................
Meetings; Special Studies; Hearings .........................................................
Compensation; Absences ...........................................................................
Copies .........................................................................................................
Legal Authority ............................................................................................
General Procedures ...................................................................................
Conditional Permits (Variances) .................................................................
Permit Fee Payments .................................................................................
Conditional Permit (Variance) Fees ...........................................................
Payment of Permit Fees .............................................................................
Refund of Permit Fees ...............................................................................
Fees for Duplicate Permits .........................................................................
10/09/79
10/09/79
10/09/79
10/09/79
10/09/79
10/09/79
10/09/79
10/09/79
10/09/79
10/09/79
10/09/79
10/09/79
10/09/79
10/09/79
10/09/79
10/09/79
Approval date/FR cite
04/16/82;
04/16/82;
04/16/82;
04/16/82;
04/16/82;
04/16/82;
04/16/82;
04/16/82;
04/16/82;
04/16/82;
04/16/82;
04/16/82;
04/16/82;
04/16/82;
04/16/82;
04/16/82;
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
16326.
16326.
16326.
16326.
16326.
16326.
16326.
16326.
16326.
16326.
16326.
16326.
16326.
16326.
16326.
16326.
NEVADA STATE REGULATIONS
Rule No.
Title
Submittal date
2.11.7 .........................
Untitled, but related to judicial review of variances ....................................
12/29/78
Approval date/FR cite
08/27/81; 46 FR 43141.
CLARK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF AIR QUALITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Rule No.
Title
Submittal date
Section 3, rule 3.1 .....
Air Pollution Control Committee .................................................................
07/24/79
Approval date/FR cite
08/27/81; 46 FR 43141.
WASHOE COUNTY DISTRICT HEALTH DEPARTMENT, AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DIVISION
Title
020.020 ......................
020.030 ......................
020.075 ......................
030.3105 ....................
030.3107 ....................
030.3108 ....................
040.055 ......................
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES4
Rule No.
Adoption, Amending Regulations ...............................................................
Hearing Board—Powers and Duties ..........................................................
Technical Reports and Fees ......................................................................
Hazardous Materials Processes .................................................................
Untitled, but related to the cost for permit transfer ....................................
Untitled, but related to the cost for permit replacement .............................
Nuisance—Odorous or Gaseous Contaminants ........................................
We are also taking this opportunity to
correct certain clerical and
typographical errors in a certain
paragraph from the Arizona subpart of
part 52 (‘‘Approval and promulgation of
implementation plans’’) listing
approved rules from the Pima County
Health Department as submitted by
Arizona on October 9, 1979, and
approved by EPA on April 18, 1982 (47
FR 16326). The subject paragraph is 40
CFR 52.120(c)(38)(i)(A). In our 1982
final rule approving certain Pima
County rules, we inadvertently
identified the rules approved under
VerDate Nov<24>2008
19:04 Nov 02, 2009
Jkt 220001
Submittal date
‘‘Regulation 21’’ as ‘‘Rules 221–225.’’
The correct listing for the approved
rules under ‘‘Regulation 21’’ is ‘‘Rules
211–215.’’
In addition, as noted in an EPA final
rule published at 69 FR 2509 (January
16, 2004), beginning with the 1993
version of the Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR), the Government
Printing Office (GPO) inadvertently
omitted two lines of codified rules from
40 CFR 52.120(c)(38)(i)(A), the same
paragraph listing the Pima County rules
approved by us in 1982. Our 2004
correcting amendment replaced most of
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
06/12/72
06/12/72
06/12/72
07/24/79
07/24/79
07/24/79
06/12/72
Approval date/FR cite
07/27/72;
07/27/72;
07/27/72;
08/27/81;
08/27/81;
08/27/81;
07/27/72;
37
37
37
46
46
46
37
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
15080.
15080.
15080.
43141.
43141.
43141.
15080.
the Pima County rules inadvertently
omitted by the GPO but inadvertently
failed to include ‘‘Regulation 21, Rules
221–225,’’ which, as noted above,
should read: ‘‘Regulation 21: Rules 211–
215.’’
In addition, beginning with the 2004
version of the CFR, the paragraph (that
omitted certain Pima County rules) that
was intended to be replaced in its
entirety through our 2004 correcting
amendment has been published in
addition to the replacement paragraph.
In this action, we are correcting all of
these errors with a revision to 40 CFR
E:\FR\FM\03NOR4.SGM
03NOR4
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 211 / Tuesday, November 3, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
52.120(c)(38)(i)(A) that correctly lists
the rules approved under ‘‘Regulation
21’’ and that deletes the paragraph that
we intended to replace in 2004.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES4
III. Public Comment and Final Action
EPA has reviewed the statutes and
rules listed in the tables above and
determined that they were previously
approved into the respective SIPs in
error. Deletion of these rules will not
relax the applicable SIP and is
consistent with the Act. Therefore, EPA
is deleting these statutes and rules
under section 110(k)(6) of the Act,
which provides EPA authority to
remove these statutes and rules without
additional State submission. EPA is also
correcting certain clerical and
typographical errors in the codification
of the Pima County portion of the
Arizona SIP.
We do not think anyone will object to
this approval, so we are finalizing it
without proposing it in advance.
However, in the Proposed Rules section
of this Federal Register, we are
simultaneously proposing approval of
the same action. If we receive adverse
comments by December 3, 2009, we will
publish a timely withdrawal in the
Federal Register to notify the public
that the direct final approval will not
take effect and we will address the
comments in a subsequent final action
based on the proposal. If we do not
receive timely adverse comments, the
direct final approval will be effective
without further notice on January 4,
2010.
IV. Administrative Requirements
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, EPA’s role is to approve
state choices, provided that they meet
the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely corrects
previous actions approving state law as
meeting Federal requirements and does
not impose additional requirements
beyond those imposed by state law. For
that reason, this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
VerDate Nov<24>2008
19:04 Nov 02, 2009
Jkt 220001
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have
tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the state, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by January 4, 2010.
Parties with objections to this direct
final rule are encouraged to file a
comment in response to the parallel
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
57053
notice of proposed rulemaking for this
action published in the proposed rules
section of today’s Federal Register,
rather than file an immediate petition
for judicial review of this direct final
rule, so that EPA can withdraw this
direct final rule and address the
comment in the proposed rulemaking.
Filing a petition for reconsideration by
the Administrator of this final rule does
not affect the finality of this action for
the purposes of judicial review nor does
it extend the time within which a
petition for judicial review may be filed,
and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may
not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements (see section
307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: October 19, 2009.
Nancy Lindsay,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code
of Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
■
PART 52—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart D—Arizona
2. Section 52.120 is amended by:
a. Revising paragraph (c)(38)(i)(A);
b. Adding paragraph (c)(38)(i)(A)(1);
and
■ c. Adding paragraph (c)(50)(ii)(A)(1).
The revision and additions read as
follows:
■
■
■
§ 52.120
Identification of plan.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(38) * * *
(i) * * *
(A) New or amended Regulation 10:
Rules 101–103; Regulation 11: Rules
111–113; Regulation 12: Rules 121–123;
Regulation 13: Rules 131–137;
Regulation 14: Rules 141 and 143–147;
Regulation 15: Rule 151; Regulation 16:
Rules 161–165; Regulation 17: Rules
172–174; Regulation 18: Rules 181 and
182; Regulation 20: Rules 201–205;
Regulation 21: Rules 211–215;
Regulation 22: Rules 221–226;
Regulation 23: Rules 231–232;
Regulation 24: Rules 241 and 243–248;
Regulation 25: Rules 251 and 252;
Regulation 30: Rules 301 and 302;
E:\FR\FM\03NOR4.SGM
03NOR4
57054
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 211 / Tuesday, November 3, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES4
Regulation 31: Rules 312–316 and 318;
Regulation 32: Rule 321; Regulation 33:
Rules 331 and 332; Regulation 34: Rules
341–344; Regulation 40: Rules 402 and
403; Regulation 41: 411–413; Regulation
50: Rules 501–503 and 505–507;
Regulation 51: Rules 511 and 512;
Regulation 60: Rule 601; Regulation 61:
Rule 611 (Paragraph A.1 to A.3) and
Rule 612; Regulation 62: Rules 621–624;
Regulation 63: Rule 631; Regulation 64:
Rule 641; Regulation 70: Rules 701–705
and 706 (Paragraphs A to C, D.3, D.4,
and E); Regulation 71: Rules 711–714;
Regulation 72: Rules 721 and 722;
Regulation 80: Rules 801–804;
Regulation 81: Rule 811; Regulation 82:
Rules 821–823; Regulation 90: Rules
901–904; Regulation 91: Rule 911
(except Methods 13–A, 13–B, 14, and
15), and Rules 912 and 913; Regulation
92: Rules 921–924; and Regulation 93:
Rules 931 and 932.
(1) Previously approved on April 16,
1982 in paragraph (c)(38)(i)(A) of this
section and now deleted from the SIP
without replacement Pima County
Health Department Regulations:
Regulation 13: Rules 131–137;
Regulation 16: Rule 164; Regulation 18:
Rules 181 and 182; Regulation 20: Rule
VerDate Nov<24>2008
19:04 Nov 02, 2009
Jkt 220001
205; Regulation 21: Rule 214; and
Regulation 24: Rules 245–248.
*
*
*
*
*
(50) * * *
(ii) * * *
(A) * * *
(1) Previously approved on June 18,
1982 in paragraph (c)(50)(ii)(A) of this
section and now deleted from the SIP
without replacement Arizona Revised
Statutes: sections 36–770, 36–776, and
36–777.
*
*
*
*
*
Subpart DD—Nevada
3. Section 52.1470 is amended by:
a. Adding paragraphs (c)(2)(i),
(c)(14)(vii)(A), (c)(16)(viii)(D), and
(c)(16)(ix)(A) to read as follows:
■
■
§ 52.1470
Identification of plan.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) Previously approved on July 27,
1972 in paragraph (c)(2) of this section
and now deleted from the SIP without
replacement Washoe County Air Quality
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Regulations: Rules 020.020, 020.030,
020.075, and 040.055.
*
*
*
*
*
(14) * * *
(vii) * * *
(A) Previously approved on August
27, 1981 in paragraph (c)(14)(vii) of this
section and now deleted from the SIP
without replacement Nevada Air
Quality Regulations: Rule 2.11.7.
*
*
*
*
*
(16) * * *
(viii) * * *
(D) Previously approved on August
27, 1981 in paragraph (c)(16)(viii) of this
section and now deleted from the SIP
without replacement Nevada Air
Quality Regulations: Clark County
District Board of Health Air Pollution
Control Regulations: Section 3, Rule 3.1.
(ix) * * *
(A) Previously approved on August
27, 1981 in paragraph (c)(16)(ix) of this
section and now deleted from the SIP
without replacement Washoe County
Air Quality Regulations: Rules
030.3105, 030.3107, and 030.3108.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. E9–26325 Filed 11–2–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
E:\FR\FM\03NOR4.SGM
03NOR4
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 211 (Tuesday, November 3, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 57051-57054]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-26325]
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 211 / Tuesday, November 3, 2009 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 57051]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R09-OAR-2009-0435; FRL-8976-3]
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Corrections to
the Arizona and Nevada State Implementation Plans
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is deleting certain statutes and rules that were
erroneously approved by EPA under the Clean Air Act as part of the
Arizona and Nevada state implementation plans. The statutes that are
the subject of this rule are from the Arizona state implementation
plan. The rules that are the subject of this rule were adopted by the
Pima County Health Department in Arizona and the State Environmental
Commission, Clark County District Board of Health, and Washoe County
District Board of Health in Nevada. The statutes and rules that EPA is
deleting relate to general declarations of policy, advisory committees,
variances, and incidental fees and nuisance odors. EPA has determined
that the continued presence of these statutory provisions and rules in
the applicable state implementation plans is potentially confusing and
thus harmful to affected sources, the state, local agencies, the
general public and to EPA. The intended effect of this action is to
delete these statutes and rules from the Arizona and Nevada state
implementation plans. EPA is also correcting certain clerical and
typographical errors in the codification of the Pima County portion of
the Arizona plan.
DATES: This rule is effective on January 4, 2010 without further
notice, unless EPA receives adverse comments by December 3, 2009. If we
receive such comments, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the
Federal Register to notify the public that this direct final rule will
not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments, identified by docket number EPA-R09-OAR-
2009-0435, by one of the following methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the on-line instructions.
2. E-mail: allen.cynthia@epa.gov.
3. Mail or deliver: Cynthia Allen (AIR-4), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA
94105-3901.
Instructions: All comments will be included in the public docket
without change and may be made available online at https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes Confidential Business Information (CBI) or
other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Information that you consider CBI or otherwise protected should be
clearly identified as such and should not be submitted through https://www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The https://www.regulations.gov portal is
an ``anonymous access'' system, and EPA will not know your identity or
contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send e-mail directly to EPA, your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the public comment. If
EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot
contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your
comment.
Docket: The index to the docket for this action is available
electronically at https://www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at EPA
Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California. While all
documents in the docket are listed in the index, some information may
be publicly available only at the hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted
material), and some may not be publicly available in either location
(e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard copy materials, please schedule an
appointment during normal business hours with the contact listed in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cynthia Allen, Rules Office (AIR-4),
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, (415) 947-4120,
allen.cynthia@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and
``our'' refer to EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Why is EPA correcting the SIPs?
II. What rules are being deleted?
III. Public Comment and Final Action
IV. Administrative Requirements
I. Why is EPA correcting the SIPs?
The Clean Air Act (CAA or ``Act'') was first enacted in 1970. In
the 1970s and early 1980s, thousands of state and local agency
regulations were submitted to EPA for incorporation into state
implementation plans (SIPs) in order to fulfill the new federal
requirements. In many cases, states submitted entire regulatory air
pollution programs, including many elements not required by the Act.
Due to time and resource constraints, EPA's review of these submittals
focused primarily on the new substantive requirements, and we approved
many other elements into the SIP with minimal review.
We now recognize that many of these elements were not appropriate
for approval into the SIPs because they are not required for SIPs and
are not related to the SIPs' purpose under CAA section 110(a) of
implementing, maintaining, and enforcing the national ambient air
quality standards. Examples of inappropriately-approved SIP elements
include statutes and rules that consist of general statements of
policy; that govern local advisory boards; that specify incidental
fees, method of payment, and refunds; and that regulate nuisance odors.
Most of the statutes and rules we are deleting in today's action fall
under one of these categories.
In addition, we are deleting certain variance-related provisions
that were orphaned by a previous EPA rulemaking deleting most such
provisions from the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection (NDEP)
portion of the Nevada SIP and the Pima County portion of the Arizona
SIP. See EPA's proposed rule at 61 FR 38664 (July 25, 1996) and final
rule at 62 FR 34641 (June 27, 1997) for the rationale concerning the
inappropriateness of variance provisions in a SIP. As explained in
EPA's 1996 rule proposing to remove various variance-related
provisions, variance provisions are generally prohibited by, and are
not legally enforceable pursuant to, section 110(i) of the Act.
II. What statutory provisions and rules are being deleted?
EPA has determined that the statutes and rules listed in the tables
below were inappropriate for inclusion in the SIP, but were previously
approved into the SIP in error. Dates that these statutes and rules
were submitted by Arizona and Nevada and approved by EPA are provided.
We are deleting these statutes and rules from the Arizona and Nevada
SIPs under CAA section 110(k)(6) \1\ as inconsistent with the
requirements of CAA section 110(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Section 110(k)(6) of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990,
provides, ``Whenever the Administrator determines that the
Administrator's action approving, disapproving, or promulgating any
plan or plan revision (or part thereof), area designation,
redesignation, classification or reclassification was in error, the
Administrator may in the same manner as the approval, disapproval,
or promulgation revise such action as appropriate without requiring
any further submission from the State. Such determination and the
basis thereof shall be provided to the State and the public.''
[[Page 57052]]
Arizona Revised Statutes
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Statute No. Title Submittal date Approval date/FR cite
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
36-770.......................... Declaration of Policy 07/13/81 06/18/82; 47 FR 26382.
36-776.......................... Authorization to 07/13/81 06/18/82; 47 FR 26382.
Accept Funds or
Grants.
36-777.......................... Advisory Council..... 07/13/81 06/18/82; 47 FR 26382.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pima County Department of Environmental Quality
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rule No. Title Submittal date Approval date/FR cite
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
131............................. Establishment........ 10/09/79 04/16/82; 47 FR 16326.
132............................. Composition.......... 10/09/79 04/16/82; 47 FR 16326.
133............................. Terms: Nominations... 10/09/79 04/16/82; 47 FR 16326.
134............................. Function............. 10/09/79 04/16/82; 47 FR 16326.
135............................. Officers; Procedures. 10/09/79 04/16/82; 47 FR 16326.
136............................. Meetings; Special 10/09/79 04/16/82; 47 FR 16326.
Studies; Hearings.
137............................. Compensation; 10/09/79 04/16/82; 47 FR 16326.
Absences.
164............................. Copies............... 10/09/79 04/16/82; 47 FR 16326.
181............................. Legal Authority...... 10/09/79 04/16/82; 47 FR 16326.
182............................. General Procedures... 10/09/79 04/16/82; 47 FR 16326.
205............................. Conditional Permits 10/09/79 04/16/82; 47 FR 16326.
(Variances).
214............................. Permit Fee Payments.. 10/09/79 04/16/82; 47 FR 16326.
245............................. Conditional Permit 10/09/79 04/16/82; 47 FR 16326.
(Variance) Fees.
246............................. Payment of Permit 10/09/79 04/16/82; 47 FR 16326.
Fees.
247............................. Refund of Permit Fees 10/09/79 04/16/82; 47 FR 16326.
248............................. Fees for Duplicate 10/09/79 04/16/82; 47 FR 16326.
Permits.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nevada State Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rule No. Title Submittal date Approval date/FR cite
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2.11.7.......................... Untitled, but related 12/29/78 08/27/81; 46 FR 43141.
to judicial review
of variances.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Clark County Department of Air Quality and Environmental Management
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rule No. Title Submittal date Approval date/FR cite
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 3, rule 3.1............. Air Pollution Control 07/24/79 08/27/81; 46 FR 43141.
Committee.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Washoe County District Health Department, Air Quality Management Division
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rule No. Title Submittal date Approval date/FR cite
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
020.020......................... Adoption, Amending 06/12/72 07/27/72; 37 FR 15080.
Regulations.
020.030......................... Hearing Board--Powers 06/12/72 07/27/72; 37 FR 15080.
and Duties.
020.075......................... Technical Reports and 06/12/72 07/27/72; 37 FR 15080.
Fees.
030.3105........................ Hazardous Materials 07/24/79 08/27/81; 46 FR 43141.
Processes.
030.3107........................ Untitled, but related 07/24/79 08/27/81; 46 FR 43141.
to the cost for
permit transfer.
030.3108........................ Untitled, but related 07/24/79 08/27/81; 46 FR 43141.
to the cost for
permit replacement.
040.055......................... Nuisance--Odorous or 06/12/72 07/27/72; 37 FR 15080.
Gaseous Contaminants.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We are also taking this opportunity to correct certain clerical and
typographical errors in a certain paragraph from the Arizona subpart of
part 52 (``Approval and promulgation of implementation plans'') listing
approved rules from the Pima County Health Department as submitted by
Arizona on October 9, 1979, and approved by EPA on April 18, 1982 (47
FR 16326). The subject paragraph is 40 CFR 52.120(c)(38)(i)(A). In our
1982 final rule approving certain Pima County rules, we inadvertently
identified the rules approved under ``Regulation 21'' as ``Rules 221-
225.'' The correct listing for the approved rules under ``Regulation
21'' is ``Rules 211-215.''
In addition, as noted in an EPA final rule published at 69 FR 2509
(January 16, 2004), beginning with the 1993 version of the Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR), the Government Printing Office (GPO)
inadvertently omitted two lines of codified rules from 40 CFR
52.120(c)(38)(i)(A), the same paragraph listing the Pima County rules
approved by us in 1982. Our 2004 correcting amendment replaced most of
the Pima County rules inadvertently omitted by the GPO but
inadvertently failed to include ``Regulation 21, Rules 221-225,''
which, as noted above, should read: ``Regulation 21: Rules 211-215.''
In addition, beginning with the 2004 version of the CFR, the
paragraph (that omitted certain Pima County rules) that was intended to
be replaced in its entirety through our 2004 correcting amendment has
been published in addition to the replacement paragraph. In this
action, we are correcting all of these errors with a revision to 40 CFR
[[Page 57053]]
52.120(c)(38)(i)(A) that correctly lists the rules approved under
``Regulation 21'' and that deletes the paragraph that we intended to
replace in 2004.
III. Public Comment and Final Action
EPA has reviewed the statutes and rules listed in the tables above
and determined that they were previously approved into the respective
SIPs in error. Deletion of these rules will not relax the applicable
SIP and is consistent with the Act. Therefore, EPA is deleting these
statutes and rules under section 110(k)(6) of the Act, which provides
EPA authority to remove these statutes and rules without additional
State submission. EPA is also correcting certain clerical and
typographical errors in the codification of the Pima County portion of
the Arizona SIP.
We do not think anyone will object to this approval, so we are
finalizing it without proposing it in advance. However, in the Proposed
Rules section of this Federal Register, we are simultaneously proposing
approval of the same action. If we receive adverse comments by December
3, 2009, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register to
notify the public that the direct final approval will not take effect
and we will address the comments in a subsequent final action based on
the proposal. If we do not receive timely adverse comments, the direct
final approval will be effective without further notice on January 4,
2010.
IV. Administrative Requirements
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely corrects previous actions approving
state law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by January 4, 2010. Parties with
objections to this direct final rule are encouraged to file a comment
in response to the parallel notice of proposed rulemaking for this
action published in the proposed rules section of today's Federal
Register, rather than file an immediate petition for judicial review of
this direct final rule, so that EPA can withdraw this direct final rule
and address the comment in the proposed rulemaking. Filing a petition
for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review
nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review
may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements (see section 307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: October 19, 2009.
Nancy Lindsay,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
0
Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart D--Arizona
0
2. Section 52.120 is amended by:
0
a. Revising paragraph (c)(38)(i)(A);
0
b. Adding paragraph (c)(38)(i)(A)(1); and
0
c. Adding paragraph (c)(50)(ii)(A)(1).
The revision and additions read as follows:
Sec. 52.120 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(38) * * *
(i) * * *
(A) New or amended Regulation 10: Rules 101-103; Regulation 11:
Rules 111-113; Regulation 12: Rules 121-123; Regulation 13: Rules 131-
137; Regulation 14: Rules 141 and 143-147; Regulation 15: Rule 151;
Regulation 16: Rules 161-165; Regulation 17: Rules 172-174; Regulation
18: Rules 181 and 182; Regulation 20: Rules 201-205; Regulation 21:
Rules 211-215; Regulation 22: Rules 221-226; Regulation 23: Rules 231-
232; Regulation 24: Rules 241 and 243-248; Regulation 25: Rules 251 and
252; Regulation 30: Rules 301 and 302;
[[Page 57054]]
Regulation 31: Rules 312-316 and 318; Regulation 32: Rule 321;
Regulation 33: Rules 331 and 332; Regulation 34: Rules 341-344;
Regulation 40: Rules 402 and 403; Regulation 41: 411-413; Regulation
50: Rules 501-503 and 505-507; Regulation 51: Rules 511 and 512;
Regulation 60: Rule 601; Regulation 61: Rule 611 (Paragraph A.1 to A.3)
and Rule 612; Regulation 62: Rules 621-624; Regulation 63: Rule 631;
Regulation 64: Rule 641; Regulation 70: Rules 701-705 and 706
(Paragraphs A to C, D.3, D.4, and E); Regulation 71: Rules 711-714;
Regulation 72: Rules 721 and 722; Regulation 80: Rules 801-804;
Regulation 81: Rule 811; Regulation 82: Rules 821-823; Regulation 90:
Rules 901-904; Regulation 91: Rule 911 (except Methods 13-A, 13-B, 14,
and 15), and Rules 912 and 913; Regulation 92: Rules 921-924; and
Regulation 93: Rules 931 and 932.
(1) Previously approved on April 16, 1982 in paragraph
(c)(38)(i)(A) of this section and now deleted from the SIP without
replacement Pima County Health Department Regulations: Regulation 13:
Rules 131-137; Regulation 16: Rule 164; Regulation 18: Rules 181 and
182; Regulation 20: Rule 205; Regulation 21: Rule 214; and Regulation
24: Rules 245-248.
* * * * *
(50) * * *
(ii) * * *
(A) * * *
(1) Previously approved on June 18, 1982 in paragraph
(c)(50)(ii)(A) of this section and now deleted from the SIP without
replacement Arizona Revised Statutes: sections 36-770, 36-776, and 36-
777.
* * * * *
Subpart DD--Nevada
0
3. Section 52.1470 is amended by:
0
a. Adding paragraphs (c)(2)(i), (c)(14)(vii)(A), (c)(16)(viii)(D), and
(c)(16)(ix)(A) to read as follows:
Sec. 52.1470 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) Previously approved on July 27, 1972 in paragraph (c)(2) of
this section and now deleted from the SIP without replacement Washoe
County Air Quality Regulations: Rules 020.020, 020.030, 020.075, and
040.055.
* * * * *
(14) * * *
(vii) * * *
(A) Previously approved on August 27, 1981 in paragraph
(c)(14)(vii) of this section and now deleted from the SIP without
replacement Nevada Air Quality Regulations: Rule 2.11.7.
* * * * *
(16) * * *
(viii) * * *
(D) Previously approved on August 27, 1981 in paragraph
(c)(16)(viii) of this section and now deleted from the SIP without
replacement Nevada Air Quality Regulations: Clark County District Board
of Health Air Pollution Control Regulations: Section 3, Rule 3.1.
(ix) * * *
(A) Previously approved on August 27, 1981 in paragraph (c)(16)(ix)
of this section and now deleted from the SIP without replacement Washoe
County Air Quality Regulations: Rules 030.3105, 030.3107, and 030.3108.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. E9-26325 Filed 11-2-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P