Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Listing the Salmon-Crested Cockatoo as Threatened Throughout Its Range with Special Rule, 56770-56791 [E9-26131]
Download as PDF
56770
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 211 / Tuesday, November 3, 2009 / Proposed Rules
Species
Common
name
Scientific
name
*
Vertebrate
population where
endangered or
threatened
Historic
range
*
*
*
When
listed
Status
Critical
habitat
Special
rules
*
*
*
*
*
*
BIRDS
*
*
*
*
Goshawk,
Queen
Charlotte
Accipiter
gentilis
laingi
Canada (That portion of British Columbia that includes Vancouver Island
and its surrounding islands, the mainland coast west of the crest of the
Coast Range, and the Queen Charlotte Islands)
Entire, except Queen
Charlotte Islands
T
NA
NA
Goshawk,
Queen
Charlotte
Accipiter
gentilis
laingi
Canada (That portion of British Columbia that includes Vancouver Island
and its surrounding islands, the mainland coast west of the crest of the
Coast Range, and the Queen Charlotte Islands)
Queen Charlotte Islands
E
NA
NA
*
*
*
Dated: October 20, 2009.
Sam D. Hamilton,
Director, Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. E9–26154 Filed 11–2–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–S
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 17
[Docket No. FWS-R9-IA-2009-0056]
[90100-1660-1FLA B6]
[RIN 1018-AW00]
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants; Listing the Salmon-Crested
Cockatoo as Threatened Throughout
Its Range with Special Rule
dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), propose to
list the salmon-crested cockatoo
(Cacatua moluccensis) as threatened,
with a special rule, under the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (Act). This proposal, if made
final, would extend the Act’s
protections to this species and amend
the regulations at 50 CFR part 17 to
create a special rule under authority of
section 4(d) of the Act that provides
measures that are necessary and
advisable for the conservation of the
salmon-crested cockatoo. The Service
seeks data and comments from the
public on this proposed listing and
special rule.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:14 Nov 02, 2009
Jkt 220001
*
*
DATES: We will accept comments
received or postmarked on or before
February 1, 2010. We must receive
requests for public hearings, in writing,
at the address shown in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section by
December 18, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by one of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments
on Docket No. FWS-R9-IA-2009-0056.
• U.S. mail or hand-delivery: Public
Comments Processing, Attn: FWS-R9IA-2009-0056; Division of Policy and
Directives Management; U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service; 4401 N. Fairfax Drive,
Suite 222; Arlington, VA 22203.
We will not accept e-mails or faxes.
We will post all comments on https://
www.regulations.gov. This generally
means that we will post any personal
information you provide us (see the
Public Comments section below for
more information).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Douglas Krofta, Chief, Branch of Listing,
Endangered Species Program, U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service, 4401 N. Fairfax
Drive, Room 420, Arlington, VA 22203;
telephone 703–358–2171; facsimile
703–358–1735. If you use a
telecommunications devise for the deaf
(TDD), call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 800–877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Comments
We intend that any final action
resulting from this proposal will be as
accurate and as effective as possible.
Therefore, we are requesting comments
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
*
*
from other government agencies, the
scientific community, industry, or any
other interested party concerning this
proposed rule. We particularly seek
comments concerning:
• Biological, commercial trade, or
other relevant data concerning any
threats (or lack thereof) to this species
and regulations that may be addressing
those threats;
• Additional information concerning
the range, distribution, and population
size of this species;
• Any information on the biological or
ecological requirements of this species;
• Current or planned activities in the
areas occupied by this species and
possible impacts of these activities on
this species;
• Any information concerning the
effects of climate change on this species
or its habitats;
• Any information concerning
numbers of this species held in captivity
in the United States, breeding success,
and types of activities that should be
addressed in the special rule; and
• The appropriate conservation status
for the salmon-crested cockatoo.
If you submit a comment via https://
www.regulations.gov, your entire
comment—including any personal
identifying information—will be posted
on the Web site. If you submit a
hardcopy comment that includes
personal identifying information, you
may request at the top of your document
that we withhold this information from
public review. However, we cannot
guarantee that we will be able to do so.
We will post all hardcopy comments on
https://www.regulations.gov.
E:\FR\FM\03NOP1.SGM
03NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 211 / Tuesday, November 3, 2009 / Proposed Rules
Comments and materials we receive,
as well as supporting documentation we
used in preparing this proposed rule,
will be available for public inspection
on https://www.regulations.govor by
appointment, during normal business
hours, at the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, 4401 N. Fairfax Drive, Room
420, Arlington, VA 22203; telephone
703–358–2171.
dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Background
Section 4(b)(3)(A) of the Act requires
us to make a finding (known as a ‘‘90–
day finding’’) on whether a petition to
add a species to, remove a species from,
or reclassify a species on the Federal
Lists of Endangered or Threatened
Wildlife and Plants has presented
substantial information indicating that
the requested action may be warranted.
To the maximum extent practicable, we
make the finding within 90 days
following receipt of the petition and
publish our finding promptly in the
Federal Register. If we find that the
petition has presented substantial
information indicating that the
requested action may be warranted (a
positive finding), section 4(b)(3)(A) of
the Act requires us to commence a
status review of the species if one has
not already been initiated under our
internal candidate assessment process.
In addition, section 4(b)(3)(B) of the Act
requires us to make a finding within 12
months following receipt of the petition
on whether the requested action is
warranted, not warranted, or warranted
but precluded by higher priority listing
actions (this finding is referred to as the
‘‘12–month finding’’). Section 4(b)(3)(C)
of the Act requires that a finding of
warranted but precluded for petitioned
species should be treated as having been
resubmitted on the date of such finding,
and is, therefore, subject to a new
finding within 1 year and subsequently
thereafter until we take action on a
proposal to list or withdraw our original
finding. The Service publishes an
annual notice of review (ANOR) of
findings on resubmitted petitions for all
foreign species for which listings were
previously found to be warranted but
precluded.
Previous Federal Action
On May 6, 1991, we received a
petition (1991 petition) from the
International Council for Bird
Preservation to add 53 foreign birds to
the List of Endangered and Threatened
Wildlife, including the salmon-crested
cockatoo. In response to the 1991
petition, we published a substantial 90–
day finding on December 16, 1991 (56
FR 65207), for all 53 species, and
initiated a status review. On March 28,
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:14 Nov 02, 2009
Jkt 220001
1994 (59 FR 14496), we published a 12–
month finding on the 1991 petition,
along with a proposed rule to list 30
African birds under the Act, which
included 15 species from the 1991
petition. In that document, we
announced our finding that listing the
remaining 38 species from the 1991
petition, including the salmon-crested
cockatoo, was warranted but precluded
by higher priority listing actions. We
made a subsequent warranted-butprecluded finding for all outstanding
foreign species from the 1991 petition,
including the salmon-crested cockatoo,
as published in our ANOR on May 21,
2004 (69 FR 29354).
Per the Service’s listing priority
guidelines (September 21, 1983; 48 FR
43098), our 2007 ANOR identified the
listing priority numbers (LPNs) (ranging
from 1 to 12) for all outstanding foreign
species. The LPN for the salmon-crested
cockatoo was LPN 2. With the exception
of listing priority ranking of 1, which
addresses monotypic genera that face
imminent threats of high magnitude,
category 2 represents the Service’s
highest priority.
On July 29, 2008 (73 FR 44062), we
published in the Federal Register a
notice announcing our annual petition
findings for foreign species. We
announced that listing was warranted
for 30 foreign bird species, including the
salmon-crested cockatoo, which is the
subject of this proposed rule, and stated
that we would ‘‘promptly publish
proposals to list these 30 taxa.’’
On September 8, 2008, the Service
received a 60–day notice of intent to sue
from the Center for Biological Diversity
(CBD) and Peter Galvin regarding
alleged violations of section 4 of the Act
for the failure to promptly publish
listing proposals for the 30 ‘‘warranted’’
species identified in our 2008 ANOR.
Under a settlement agreement approved
by the U.S. District Court for the
Northern District of California on June
15, 2009 (CBD, et al. v. Salazar, 09-cv02578-CRB), the Service must submit to
the Federal Register a proposed listing
rule for the salmon-crested cockatoo by
October 30, 2009. Below, we summarize
our analysis of the best available
scientific and commercial data on the
status of this species.
Species Description
Cockatoos are a distinct group of
parrots (order Psittaciformes),
distinguished by the presence of an
erectile crest (Cameron 2007, p. 1; Collar
1989, p. 5) and the lack of dyck texture
in their feathers, which produces blue
and green coloration in the plumage of
other parrots (Brown & Toft 1999, p.
141). The salmon-crested cockatoo (also
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
56771
known as the Seram, Moluccan, pinkcrested, or rose-crested cockatoo) is the
largest and the most striking of
Indonesia’s white cockatoos (Kinnaird
2000, p. 14). Its body length is 46–52
centimeters (cm) (15.6–20 inches (in)),
and its plumage varies from pale
salmon-pink to whitish-pink. It has a
long backward-curving, deep salmonpink crest; the bill is large and grayblack; and the underwing and undertail
are yellow-orange (BirdLife
International (BLI) 2000, p. 242;
Forshaw 1989, p. 141; Juniper & Parr
1998, pp. 280–281; Sweeney 2000, p.
130). Sexual dimorphism is exhibited by
iris color (del Hoya et al. 1997, p. 278;
Forshaw1989, p. 141; Peratino 1979, p.
125).
Taxonomy
In 1751, Edwards described and
pictorially delineated the salmoncrested cockatoo (Lint 1951, p. 223) and,
in 1788, J.F. Gmelin named the species
Psittacus moluccensis (Forshaw 1989, p.
141; Lint 1951, p. 223). In 1937, Peters
(1937, p. 175) used the name Kakatoe
moluccensis (Gmelin) in the Check-list
of Birds of the World. In 1992, Andrew
(1992, p. 21) used the name Cacatua
moluccensis in the first published
checklist of the birds of Indonesia. This
name continues to be the recognized
scientific name (Integrated Taxonomic
Information System (ITIS) 2008, p. 1;
Sibley & Monroe 1990, p. 112), and the
alternative genus name Kakatoe is now
obsolete (del Hoya et al. 1997, p. 278).
Some references (ITIS 2008, p. 1;
Sibley & Monroe 1990, p. 112) place
cockatoos in the family Psittacidae with
lories and true parrots, whereas others
(Cameron 2007, p. 1; Convention on
International Trade in Endangered
Species of Wild Fauna and Flora
(CITES) 2008a, p. 1) place cockatoos in
a separate family, Cacatuidae. Of the 21
cockatoo species, 11 are in the genus
Cacatua (Cameron 2007, pp. 1–3).
The closest relatives of the salmoncrested cockatoo, which is restricted to
the South Moluccas, Indonesia (in the
east central Indonesian island chain),
are the umbrella cockatoo, which is
restricted to the North Moluccas, and
the blue-eyed cockatoo, which is
restricted to the island of New Britain
off the northeast coast of New Guinea
(Cameron 2007, pp. 38–39, 51). In a
biogeographic analysis of the
mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA)
phylogeny, Brown and Toft (1999, pp.
150–151) suggest that these three
species may have had a common
ancestor that occupied an ancient
landmass comprising Halmahera (a
North Moluccan island) and Bismarck.
The breakup of this landmass created
E:\FR\FM\03NOP1.SGM
03NOP1
56772
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 211 / Tuesday, November 3, 2009 / Proposed Rules
two populations, and the subsequent
dispersal of cockatoos from the North
Moluccas to the South Moluccas created
another population, which became the
salmon-crested cockatoo (Cameron
2007, p. 56).
dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Range and Distribution
Cockatoos are only found in
Australasia—a few archipelagos in
Southeast Asia (Philippines, Indonesia,
East Timor, Tanimbar, Bismarck, and
Solomon), New Guinea, and Australia—
suggesting that the modern species arose
after the breakup of Gondwanaland, a
southern supercontinent that existed
200–500 million years ago. The 19th
century naturalist Alfred Russel Wallace
was among the first to note the break in
Australasian and Asian fauna. Wallace’s
line runs between the islands of Bali
and Lombok, Borneo and Sulawesi, and
south of the Philippines. Cockatoos are
present on Lombok and Sulawesi, but
not on Bali and Borneo. The line
represents the western edge of a zone of
overlap between Australasian and Asian
fauna (known as Wallacea), with the
eastern edge defined by the Australian
continental shelf (Lydekker’s Line)
(Cameron 2007, pp. 1–3; White & Bruce
1986, p. 32).
The oceanic islands of Wallacea have
a high level of endemism, which
resulted in many islands being
identified as Endemic Bird Areas (EBA)
(Cameron 2007, p. 56). BLI designates
EBAs by mapping bird species with
restricted ranges of less than 50,000
square kilometers (km2) (19,300 square
miles (mi2)) that overlap. The unique
biodiversity concentrated in these small
areas is particularly vulnerable; thus,
EBAs represent priority areas for global
biodiversity conservation (BLI 2008i, p.
1; Collar 2000, p. 27; Stattersfield et al.
1998, pp. 39, 45). The salmon-crested
cockatoo is included in the Seram EBA
(BLI 2003, p. 1; Stattersfield et al. 1998,
pp. 528–531).
Seram. The salmon-crested cockatoo
is endemic to the island of Seram
(alternate spelling, Ceram), with records
from adjacent islands of Haruku,
Saparua, and Ambon (formerly called
Ambonia) in the South Moluccas (BLI
2001, p. 1662; Forshaw 1989, p. 141;
Juniper & Parr 1998, p. 281; Peters 1937,
p. 175). The species resides in lowland
rain forests up to 1,000 meters (m)
(3,608 feet (ft)), remains locally common
in Manusela National Park, and appears
to be mostly distributed in the eastern
part of the island (BLI 2008a, p. 2;
Isherwood et al. 1998, p. 18). For a
listing of specific distribution records of
the salmon-crested cockatoo, see BLI
(2001, p. 1662).
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:14 Nov 02, 2009
Jkt 220001
Ambon. Whether this species is native
or introduced to Ambon is uncertain.
Stresemann (1934, p. 16) reported that
the salmon-crested cockatoo did not
occur on Ambon. Thus, some scientists
follow the view that the species may
have been introduced to this island
(Forshaw 1989, p. 141; Lever 1987, p.
245; Long 1981, p. 247; Smiet 1985, p.
189; van Bemmel 1948, as cited in
White & Bruce 1986, p. 212). The
salmon-crested cockatoo was formerly
traded in significant numbers, and
shipments of birds from Seram transited
through Ambon (the capital of the
Maluku Province), where undoubtedly
some birds escaped. Other scientists
suggest that the cockatoos may well be
wild birds (Marsden 1992, pp. 12–13;
Poulsen & Jepson 1996, pp. 159–160),
with the persistence of a small
population in northeast Ambon
(Poulsen & Jepson 1996, p. 159).
Haruku and Saparua. The status of
the salmon-crested cockatoo on Haruku
and Saparua is unknown (Metz 1998, p.
10), and the species may be extinct on
these two islands (Metz 2002, p. 1;
Snyder et al. 2000, p. 68). For Haruku,
there is one unspecified locality and
date of observation reported
(Stresemann 1934, p. 16), but Poulsen
and Jepson (1996, p. 160) did not find
the species in 1994 or 1996. For
Saparua, there is one specimen in the
RMNH (Rijksmuseum van Natuurlijke
Histoire (Leiden, Netherlands)) recorded
in 1923 (BLI 2001, p. 1663).
For purposes of this proposal, we
consider the salmon-crested cockatoo’s
natural range to include Seram and the
three islands of Ambon, Haruku, and
Saparua. Although the status of the
salmon-crested cockatoo is unknown on
Haruku and Saparua, the species has
been reported from these islands, and
we are unaware of any survey that has
conclusively found that the species no
longer occurs there.
Habitat
The salmon-crested cockatoo is
believed to be a specialist of primary
lowland forests (Kinnarid et al. 2003, p.
228). It occurs at altitudes between 100
and 1,000–1,200 m (328 and 3,608–
3,926 ft) (BLI 2008a, p. 2; Bowler &
Taylor 1993, p. 149; Juniper & Parr
1998, p. 281), but rarely occurs above
600–900 m (1,968–2,952 ft) (Cameron
2007, p. 77; Marsden 1992, p. 11;
Juniper & Parr 1998, p. 281; Smiet 1985,
p. 189). Marsden (1992, p. 11) found
that cockatoos tended to be recorded in
mature, open-canopied lowland forests
with some very large, tall trees and
some low vegetation. Kinnaird et al.
(2003, p. 227) found that cockatoo
abundance was significantly associated
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
with the presence of potential nest trees
(Octomeles sumatranus) and strangling
figs (Ficus spp.). Cameron (2007, pp.
77–78) noted that island cockatoos
prefer lowland forests over montane
forests because lowland forests contain
greater plant diversity and, thus, have a
more diverse and abundant food supply.
They also support larger trees, which
are more likely to have cavities needed
for nesting—a critical resource because
cockatoos are incapable of excavating
their own nest cavities. The salmoncrested cockatoo prefers flat or gently
sloping terrain.
The highest densities of birds occur in
little-disturbed, lowland forests below
300 m (984 ft), and the lowest densities
occur in recently logged forests and in
non-forested areas (Marsden 1992, p. 9;
Marsden 1998, p. 608). However,
Marsden and Fielding (1999, p. 444)
were unable to find differences in the
species’ presence based on habitat
associations, and Kinnaird et al. (2003,
p. 227) found densities did not
correspond closely to habitat differences
across study sites. Marsden (1992, p. 11)
suggested that the apparent differences
in cockatoo densities between young
logged forests and secondary forests,
which have similar vegetation
parameters, may be caused by
differential trapping pressures and
patterns of disturbance, differences in
tree species compositions and overall
habitat heterogeneity, and differences in
cockatoo densities in areas before
logging.
Lower densities of birds occur in
transition and submontane forests and
on the edges of cultivated areas. Birds
also occur in open canopy forests with
low vegetation and in riverine forests
(Juniper & Parr 1998, p. 281). Despite
trapping pressure, birds still occur in
mature lowland forests near settlements
(Juniper & Parr 1998, p. 281; Marsden
1992, p. 11), but they are rarely seen
near human habitation (Smiet 1985, p.
189). Marsden (1992, pp. 9, 11) found
cockatoos to be rare or irregular in other
habitats, including plantations,
grassland, rank scrub, and agricultural
lands. The species previously occurred
in coastal areas (Juniper & Parr 1998, p.
281), before land was converted to
human uses (FAO 1981, as cited in
Marsden 1992, p. 7). Small numbers of
salmon-crested cockatoo have been
observed in forested hills on Ambon. No
other information was available on the
habitat of this species on Ambon,
Haruku, and Saparua.
Topography. Seram is a densely
wooded island (Metz 1998, p. 10) of
18,625 km2 (7,189 mi2) (Smiet 1985, p.
183)—about the size of New Jersey
(Morrison 2001, p. 1). The topography is
E:\FR\FM\03NOP1.SGM
03NOP1
56773
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 211 / Tuesday, November 3, 2009 / Proposed Rules
extremely variable and the interior of
the island is rugged and mostly
mountainous (Kinnaird et al. 2003, p.
228). The island lies between latitudes
2o 46’ and 3o 53’ south of the Equator.
It is approximately 340 kilometers (km)
(211 miles (mi)) long and 55–70 km (34–
43 mi) wide in the center. Its highest
point is Gunung Binaiya at
approximately 3,027 m (9,929 ft) above
sea level. It is the second largest island
in the Moluccas. This group of about
1,000 islands is also known as the Spice
Islands, because they include the
original home of both nutmeg (Myristica
fragrans) and cloves (Syzgium
aromaticum) (Edwards 1993, p. 1).
Forests. Seram’s wet climate supports
mainly evergreen forests (Marsden 1998,
p. 606). The alluvial plains originally
supported tall lowland forests
characterized by the only endemic
dipterocarp on the island, Shorea
selanica (‘meranti’), and also Canarium,
Elaeocarpus sphaericus, Calophyllum,
Intsia, and Myristica (Coates & Bishop
1997, pp. 16–17; Smiet & Siallagan
1981, p. 7). Shorea selanica has
developed remarkable dominance in the
lowland forests of north Seram,
representing about 30 percent of
individual trees and 76 percent of the
basal area (Edwards et al. 1993, p. 66).
The forest is relatively open-crowned
with a sparse understory, with the floor
being swept clean by floods during the
wet season. Along the major rivers, the
lowland forest is characterized by
Octomeles sumatrana, Eucalyptus
deglupta, Pometia pinnata, Casuarina
equisetifolia, Ficus, Litsea, and Eugenia
(Coates & Bishop 1997, pp. 16–17).
Climate. Most of Seram receives
between 2,500 and 3,000 millimeters
(mm) (97.5 and 117 inches (in)) of rain
per year, with more in the east and
northeast. The long monsoonal seasons
(Metz 1998, p. 11; White & Bruce 1986,
p. 24) and mountainous terrain affect
the amount of rainfall. Annual and
monthly rainfall is not uniform and
varies by region (Kinnaird et al. 2003, p.
228). The island lies outside the main
zone of cyclonic storms (Coates &
Bishop 1997, p. 22). The lowlands have
a humid tropical climate with
temperatures at sea level of 25–30
oCelsius (C) (77–86 oFahrenheit (F)).
Temperature decreases with altitude,
with a fall of approximately 6 oC (10.8
oF) for every rise of 1,000 m (3,280 ft),
leading to a marked temperature
gradient within the mountain areas
(Edwards 1993, p. 6).
Land use. The human population of
Seram is concentrated in low-lying areas
along the coast and in the west. The
mountainous interior supports very few
villages (Edwards 1993, p. 7). The
majority of Seram is lowland forest or
montane forest (see Table 1). While only
about 11 percent of the island has been
converted to agricultural lands,
settlements, and plantations or is
considered unproductive, logging
concessions cover nearly 50 percent of
the island. About 85 percent of Seram
lies below 600 m (1,968 ft) and another
10 percent lies between 600 and 1,000
m (1,968 and 3,280 ft). Within this
elevation where cockatoos occur,
‘‘...most of the forest has been classified
as production or conversion forest,
categories that permit land clearing and
forest disturbance’’ (Kinnaird et al.
2003, p. 230).
TABLE 1. HABITAT AND LAND USE FOR SERAM AND ESTABLISHED AND PROPOSED PROTECTED AREAS
(data are based on landsat images from late 1989 and early 1990) (NP=National Park; NR=Nature Reserve) (Kinnaird et al. 2003, p. 230).
Area
Habitat/Land Use
Seram
Manusela NP
Gunung Sahuwai NR
Proposed Wai Bula NR
Lowland Forest
14,026.5 km2(5,414.2 mi2)
1,522.5 km2(587.7 mi2)
118.9 km2 (45.9 mi2)
561.8 km2 (216.9 mi2)
Mangrove Forest
77.6 km2 (30 mi2)
—
—
9.6 km2 (3.7 mi2)
Montane Forest
1,065.3 km2 (411.2 mi2)
693.9 km2 (267.8 mi2)
—
Swamp Forest
203.5
km2
(78.6
mi2)
—
—
—
14.6
km2
(5.6 mi2)
Water Body
1.2 mi2(3.0 km2)
—
—
—
Agriculture
789.1 km2 (304.6 mi2)
50 km2 (19.3 mi2)
—
9.6 km2 (3.7 mi2)
Plantation
22.0 km2 (8.5 mi2)
—
—
—
Settlement
21.3 km2 (8.2 mi2)
3.2 km2 (1.2 mi2)
—
0.5 km2 (0.2 mi2)
1,082.2 km2 (417.7 mi2)
53.6 km2 (20.7 mi2)
3.9 km2 (1.5 mi2)
Unproductive Lands
dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Total
17,288.7
km2
(6,676.0
Important Bird Areas (IBAs)
BLI (2008b, p. 2) has identified five
IBAs that include the salmon-crested
cockatoo. A site is recognized as an IBA
when it meets criteria ‘‘...based on the
occurrence of key bird species that are
vulnerable to global extinction or whose
populations are otherwise
irreplaceable.’’ These key sites for
conservation are small enough to be
conserved in their entirety and large
enough to support self-sustaining
populations of the key bird species.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:14 Nov 02, 2009
Jkt 220001
mi2)
2,323.2
km2
(896.8
mi2)
122.8
IBAs are a way to identify conservation
priorities (BLI 2008j, pp. 1–2). The
following briefly describes the IBAs for
the salmon-crested cockatoo:
Gunung Sahuwai. Located on the
western peninsula of Seram, Gunung
Sahuwai contains 122.8 km2 (47.4 mi2)
of land that was declared a Nature
Reserve on November 30, 1993 (SK
Menteri Kehutanan No. 805/Kpts-II/
1993) (BLI 2008c, p. 2). The Nature
Reserve contains 96.8 percent lowland
forest and 3.2 percent unproductive
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
km2
(47.4
mi2)
—
596.1
km2
(230.1 mi2)
lands (see Table 1) (Kinnaird et al. 2003,
p. 230). The number of cockatoos here
is unknown. The coastal area contains
14 settlements. Most people work as
farmers and fishermen. The main
commodities are cloves, nutmeg, and
coconut for copra. The local people
hunt and collect forest products.
Conservation concerns relate to the
clearance of natural habitat for
plantation, shifting agriculture, and
collection of birds (BLI 2008c, pp. 1–2).
E:\FR\FM\03NOP1.SGM
03NOP1
dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
56774
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 211 / Tuesday, November 3, 2009 / Proposed Rules
Gunung Salahutu. The habitat is
forest, and the topography is hilly up to
1,038 m (3,405 ft). The cockatoo was
found in this area at one time, but is
probably extinct here now. The coastal
area contains two villages. Most of the
people work as dry land farmers and
fishermen. The main commodities are
clove, nutmeg, cacao, and marine
products. Conservation concerns relate
to forest clearance for plantation,
firewood collection, and hunting of
animals for consumption or pets (BLI
2008d, pp. 1–2).
Manusela. This area consists of forests
and wetlands (BLI 2008e, pp. 1–2).
Manusela National Park is located in the
central part of Seram and stretches from
the north coast to within 5 km (3 mi) of
the south coast (Edwards 1993, p. 6). It
is 2,323.2 km2 (896.8 mi2) in size and
covers approximately 10 to 11 percent
of Seram (BLI 2008e, p. 2; Bowler &
Taylor 1993, p. 158; Kinnaird et al.
2003, p. 228; Marsden 1992, p. 7; Smiet
& Siallagan 1981, p. 3). It was declared
a national park in 1982 (SK Menteri
Pertanian No. 736/Mentan/X/1982 on
October 14, 1982) (BLI 2008e, p. 2).
Based on landsat images from late 1989
and early 1990, habitat and land use for
Manusela National Park can be
summarized as: 65.5 percent lowland
forest; 29.9 percent montane forest; and
4.6 percent agriculture, settlement, and
unproductive lands (see Table 1)
(Kinnaird et al. 2003, p. 230).
Approximately, 26 percent of the park is
above 1,000 m (3,608 ft), an altitude
where the salmon-crested cockatoo
generally does not occur, and only 27
percent is below 500 m (1,640 ft), an
altitude preferred by the salmon-crested
cockatoo (Marsden 1992, p. 7). A road
has been built through the park, which
increases the risks of logging (Metz
1998, p. 10). Five villages of indigenous
people exist as an enclave of the park.
Most of the people work as dry land
farmers; they also hunt and collect
forest products, such as sago, rattan,
resin, eaglewood, and parrots (BlI
2008e, p. 1). In 1980, 999 people lived
within the park boundaries, and 19,102
lived within 10 km (6 mi) of its
boundaries (Smiet & Siallagan 1981,
App. 6). Clearing of the land for
agriculture and gardens has resulted in
a patchwork of cleared fields, secondary
vegetation (including large bamboo
thickets), old growth forests, and
undisturbed primary forests.
Conservation concerns relate to logging,
road development, encroachment by
plantation companies, mining
(MacKinnon & Artha 1981; Monk et al.
1997, as cited in BLI 2008e, p. 2),
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:14 Nov 02, 2009
Jkt 220001
shifting agriculture, and parrot catching
for trade (BLI 2008e, pp. 1–2).
Pegunungan Taunusa. The habitat is
forest and the area has a mountain with
the highest peak in Seram. The southern
coastal area contains five villages. Most
of the people work as farmers and
fishermen. Main products are coconut
for copra, clove, and cacao (BLI 2008f,
p. 1). The Service was unable to find
information on the number of salmoncrested cockatoos in this area or
activities that may be affecting the
conservation of the species in
Pegunungan Taunusa.
Wai Bula. The habitat is forest in
northeastern Seram. BLI (2008f, p. 1)
estimates that Wae Wufa, an area inside
Wai Bula that is primary lowland and
lower montane evergreen forests, has
around 40–60 salmon-crested cockatoos.
Approximately 596.1 km2 (230.1 mi2) of
Wai Bula was proposed as a Nature
Reserve in 1981, but the area has never
been officially designated as a reserve
(Kinnaird et al. 2003, p. 228). Land use
for the proposed Nature Reserve can be
summarized as follows: 94.2 percent
lowland forest; 1.6 percent mangrove
forest; 2.4 percent swamp forest; and 2.5
percent agriculture and settlement (see
Table 1). Based on density estimates
derived from surveys in western Seram,
researchers estimated that the area
provides habitat for a minimum of 2,500
cockatoos (Kinnaird et al. 2003, pp. 230,
233) (see Factor A for discussion). This
estimate differs significantly from the
number of cockatoos estimated by BLI to
occur inside Wae Wufa. We were unable
to reconcile these estimates because we
could not find information on the area
of Wae Wufa, how much of the
cockatoo’s suitable habitat within Wai
Bula occurs in Wae Wufa, and the basis
for the BLI estimate. The coast contains
four villages. Most people work as
farmers and fishermen. The main
plantation products are coconut for
copra, cacao, and coffee. The
conservation concern relates to logging
(BLI 2008g, pp. 1–2).
Natural History
Behavior. The salmon-crested
cockatoo is most active in early morning
and late afternoon (Juniper & Parr 1998,
p. 281; Metz et al. 2007, p. 36), calling
loudly when leaving and returning to
roost. The cockatoo’s call is a wailing
cry, which can be heard from a distance
of 1 km (0.6 mi), and roosts can easily
be located due to the noise. The species
is shy and flies off when disturbed.
Birds move slowly through the canopy
in the early morning and are usually not
seen or heard during the heat of the day.
They are found in groups of up to 16
birds, although the size of non-breeding
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
flocks appear to have been dramatically
reduced due to the recent population
decline (Juniper & Parr 1998, p. 281).
They fly using a few rapid wing beats,
followed by gliding, and then a few
more wing beats (Forshaw 1989, p. 141;
Juniper & Parr 1998, p. 281).
Food. This species feeds on fruit of
the kenari tree (Canarium commune, C.
vulgare, and C. indicum) (Metz et al.
2007, p. 37), nuts, seeds, berries, and
insects (Forshaw 1989, p. 141; Juniper &
Parr 1998, p. 281). Their abundance is
positively related to the density of
strangling figs, a potentially important
food resource (Kinnaird et al. 2003, p.
233). Research by O’Brien et al. (1998,
p. 668) showed that figs may be a
keystone plant resource for many fruiteating birds. On the average, figs contain
calcium levels 3.2 times higher than
other fruits, promoting eggshell
deposition and bone growth. Salmoncrested cockatoos are suspected of
taking Pandanus spp. fruits (Bishop in
prep., as cited in BLI 2001, p. 1665).
They pick larvae from fallen, rotting tree
trunks (Metz et al. 2007, p. 37). They
also eat young coconuts (Cocos
nucifera) by chewing through the tough
outer covering to get at the pulp and
water inside (Forshaw 1989, p. 141;
Juniper & Parr 1998, p. 281; Wallace
1864, p. 279). In general, island
cockatoos are thought to need to exploit
all the available food in order to
maintain a healthy population because
islands typically contain fewer plant
species and the quantity of food is
restricted by an islands’ relatively small
size (Cameron 2007, p. 83).
Breeding. Its favored nest tree is
Octomeles sumatranus (Kinnaird et al.
2003, p. 230). During times of nest
building, brooding, and fledging, birds
stay close to the nest tree (Metz et al.
2007, p. 36). Courtship display can last
up to 20 minutes, with the male and
female perched in the top of an
emergent or dead forest tree, raising and
lowering their crests, fanning their large
face and neck feathers forward to
increase the size of the head (Cameron
2007, p. 57), calling loudly, breaking
twigs, and making short, weak,
fluttering flights. The nest is a high hole
in a mature tree (Juniper & Parr 1998, p.
281). The salmon-crested cockatoo
removes the bark immediately
surrounding the entrance to help
prevent predators, such as snakes or
monitor lizards, from gaining access to
the eggs or chicks, and may also clear
the surrounding foliage perhaps to have
a better view for the brooding hen. The
nest site is fiercely guarded from
competitors, such as the Eclectus parrot
(Eclectus roratus) (Metz et al. 2007, p.
37).
E:\FR\FM\03NOP1.SGM
03NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 211 / Tuesday, November 3, 2009 / Proposed Rules
dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Little is known about seasonality and
breeding biology of the salmon-crested
cockatoo in the wild (Kinnaird et al.
2003, p. 228), or other demographic
information, such as reproductive effort
and success and age-specific mortality
rates—information that is important to
determine where the primary weak
points in the life equation lie (Snyder et
al. 2000, p. 9). The cockatoo is thought
to breed between July and August or
September, and probably a second time
at the beginning of the year (Metz &
Zimmermann n.d., p. 1). Stresemann
(1914, p. 86) observed a pair in a nesting
cavity about 25 m (82 ft) up the truck
of a living tree in early May. The
cockatoo lines the cavity with wood
chips, and usually lays two white eggs,
although only one is raised (Metz &
Zimmermann n.d., p. 1). Both parents
help to incubate the eggs during the 28–
day incubation period. Young birds take
4–5 years to reach maturity (Juniper &
Parr 1998, p. 281).
Population Estimates
Seram—historical population
estimates. Historically, there are few
quantitative observations of this species
in the wild. In 1864, Wallace (1864, p.
279) described the salmon-crested
cockatoo as ‘‘abundant’’ on Seram. In
1911, Stresemann (1914, p. 86) reported
that the species was fairly common in
coastal regions. The species was
regarded as locally common in 1970
(Juniper & Parr 1998, p. 281). During
1980 and 1981 (Forshaw 1989, p. 141),
Smiet (1985, p. 189) observed that this
species was locally common in primary
forests up to 900 m (2,952 ft) in the
interior and in undisturbed forests,
where 10 to 16 birds were seen
congregating in roosting trees. He did
not see any birds on the western part of
the island, although the cockatoo was
said to be common there until about
1970. In 1980, small flocks were
observed in the south of the island
(White & Bruce 1986, p. 212), and
cockatoos were frequently seen
throughout Manusela National Park
below 900 m, except in the southern
part of the Mual Plains in the center of
the park where they were not common
(Smiet & Siallagan 1981, p. 9). In
September 1983, Bishop (1992, p. 2)
observed four cockatoos in secondary
woodland in southwest Seram.
Rangers at the Manusela National
Park commented on a dramatic decline
in the species in the mid-1980s (Collar
& Andrew 1988, p. 69). By 1987, it was
the rarest parrot in Manusela National
Park (Bishop 1992, p. 2). Due to the
international pet trade, Bishop
considered the species to be endangered
and in need of critical management to
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:14 Nov 02, 2009
Jkt 220001
avoid imminent extinction (Bishop
1992, p. 1). Between July 20 and
September 25, 1987, an Operation
Raleigh team found the species to be
‘‘very scarce and absent from large tracts
of suitable habitat’’ in Manusela
National Park (Bowler 1988, p. 6).
During 40 days of field work, they made
54 sightings, resulting in a maximum of
20 individual birds in prime habitat. In
addition, birds were observed either
singly or in pairs, never in flocks.
Encounter rates were the lowest of any
parrot species at 0.3 birds per hour in
lowland rain forests around Solea at
about 100 m (328 ft) and 0.1 per hour
in the Kineka area at 600–900 m (1,968–
2,952 ft) (Bowler 1988, p. 6; Bowler &
Taylor 1989, p. 17). Marsden (1992, pp.
11–12) suggested that the densities of
cockatoos, which Bowler and Taylor
found in the Manusela National Park
enclave, may be naturally low because
the forest has been heavily disturbed
and the area is at the upper end of the
species’ altitudinal range. He found it
difficult to relate Bowler and Taylor’s
low figures for lowland forests around
Solea to what he found in 1989 (see
below). BLI also questioned the validity
of the numbers, because Bowler and
Taylor are now judged to have worked
mainly at higher elevations in Manusela
(BLI 2001, pp. 1664, 1668). Metz (1998,
p. 10) suggested that the stronghold of
this cockatoo is likely on Seram, almost
exclusively outside of the borders of the
national park.
During 5 weeks from December 19,
1989, Marsden (1992, pp. 7–8; Marsden
1998, p. 606) collected field data in
Manusela National Park and in lowland
habitats in central and northeast Seram,
using the variable circular plot method
to estimate densities of the salmoncrested cockatoo. Encounter rates were
1.0 bird per hour in primary forests, 2.5
birds in disturbed primary forests, and
0.4 birds in secondary and in recently
logged forests. While cockatoo densities
were similar in primary (9.1 birds per 1
km2 (0.386 mi2)) and disturbed primary
forests (9.8 birds), densities were lower
in secondary forests (6.4 birds), and
much lower in recently logged forests
(1.9 birds), suggesting that large-scale
logging might adversely affect the
species’ population.
Between July and September 1996,
the Wai Bula ’96 (a conservation
expedition from Cambridge University
and Universitas Pattimura, Ambon)
found the salmon-crested cockatoo to be
widely dispersed in northeast Seram in
the Wae Fufa Valley (primary lowland
and lower montane evergreen forests)
and in degraded coastal forests near
Hoti (coastal secondary lowland forests),
where pairs and small flocks were a
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
56775
common sight. They suggested that the
bulk of the population probably occurs
in eastern Seram (Isherwood et al. 1998,
p. 18). Juniper & Parr (1998, p. 281)
reported that the world population was
‘‘thought still to be above 8,000.’’
Seram—recent population estimates.
The most recent research (Kinnaird et
al. 2003, p. 232) estimated the total
salmon-crested cockatoo population to
be 110,385 birds (with confidence limits
of a minimum 62,416 and a maximum
of 195,242). Based on the research
assumptions (see below), we agree with
BLI (2001, p. 1664) that ‘‘...the figure of
62,400 is chosen as the appropriate
population figure.’’
These numbers were generated by
joint population surveys conducted by
the Wildlife Conservation Society
Indonesia Program, BLI Indonesia
Program, and Pelastarian Hutan Dan
Konservasi Alam, Ministry of Forestry,
Government of Indonesia in May–
September 1998. Cockatoo censuses
were conducted at seven sites in
western and central Seram using linetransect methods (Kinnaird et al. 2003,
pp. 228, 230, 234). Five of the sites were
considered primary lowland forest and
two had been previously logged or were
disturbed by humans (Kinnaird et al.
2003, p. 228). Cockatoos were observed
at all sites as single individuals or pairs.
Estimates of density varied widely
among locations, ranging from 0.93
birds per 1 km2 (0.386 mi2) at Kawa to
17.25 birds per 1 km2 at Roho. The
mean density was 7.87 birds per 1 km2,
which was considered indicative of all
sites because it included estimates from
primary and logged forests. The
researchers were unable to complete the
census before the outbreak of civil war;
thus, data from the western part of
Seram were used to estimate the number
of cockatoos on all of Seram.
The estimated population was
generated by working with GIS-based
estimates of lowland forest habitat on
Seram (14,026 km2 (5,414.2 mi2)) below
600 m (1,968 ft) and assuming that all
lowland forests provide adequate
habitat for cockatoos and that densities
remain constant across the island
(Kinnaird et al. 2003, p. 232). Because
these assumptions are unlikely,
Kinnaird (2000, p. 15) explained the
scenarios considered by the researchers.
Cockatoos are fairly tolerant of degraded
habitat, but they still need nesting trees
and have a preference for areas with lots
of large strangling figs. So, the first
scenario looked at involved the number
and extent of logging concessions
operating on Seram during the 10–yearperiod from 1989–1999, which resulted
in a reduction of 1,200 km2 (463 mi2) of
lowland forest habitat for cockatoos.
E:\FR\FM\03NOP1.SGM
03NOP1
dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
56776
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 211 / Tuesday, November 3, 2009 / Proposed Rules
The population estimate still hovered
between 90,000 and 100,000 birds. The
second scenario looked at continued
logging and habitat loss during the next
decade, projecting that the population
size would decline by another 10
percent. These estimates may have
underestimated cockatoo population
size because many logging concessions
are not working at full capacity. On the
other hand, the estimates ignored
additional losses due to the capturing of
birds for the pet trade. The population
estimate also ignored the variability in
how logging companies harvest their
concessions (i.e., greater or less than the
legal maximum intensity). If logging
concessions harvest timber in a
conventional manner of up to 1,000
hectare (ha) (2,470 acre (ac)) per year,
Kinnaird et al. (2008, p. 233) assumed
that cockatoos will persist but at
possibly lower densities.
In 1985, Smiet (1985, pp. 193–194)
suggested that the relative resilience of
most Moluccan parrots under trade
pressure and habitat destruction can be
attributed to a combination of factors,
including: (1) A great reproductive
capacity (especially in the smaller
species); (2) adaptability to habitat
alteration (which tends to provide a
relative abundance of flowering and
fruiting plants); (3) persistence of some
original, undisturbed habitat; and (4)
island isolation and lack of predators,
parasites, and competitive species. Metz
(2005, p. 34), however, cautioned that
the current population estimate should
not be a ‘‘cause for complacency.’’ He
suggested that the number of birds
capable of breeding, or the breeding
success rate, might be low for this
species since: they have a long life span,
and many birds might be past breeding
age; there is a very high poaching
pressure and trappers mostly take adult
birds, which depletes the number of
breeding birds; and the salmon-crested
cockatoo has a slow reproductive cycle
and unknown, but possibly low,
fledging success rate. These opinions
point out the need for further research
on this species to better understand its
population size and its ability to adapt
to the habitat destruction and trade that
is occurring on Seram.
Ambon. Very small numbers of
salmon-crested cockatoos are thought to
occur in remaining natural forests in the
more remote regions of Ambon (Poulsen
& Jepson 1996, p. 160). While Smiet
(1985, p. 189) lived on the island from
1980 to 1981, he did not see the species
there; however, he wrote that the
species was said to be common on
Ambon until about 10 years ago. In
1992, Marsden (1992, pp. 12–13)
reported seeing eight salmon-crested
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:14 Nov 02, 2009
Jkt 220001
cockatoos and three unidentified
cockatoos during brief searches of
remaining forest patches on Ambon. He
suggested that most free flying salmoncrested cockatoos on Ambon may be
wild birds, either resident and possibly
breeding or visiting birds from Seram.
Local people told him that cockatoos
were still present in the area, but rare in
other forested areas on the island.
Poulsen and Jepson (1996, pp. 159–160)
confirmed that wild populations of
salmon-crested cockatoos occur on
Ambon. On May 28 and June 11, 1995,
they observed six to eight cockatoos, in
forested hills behind Hila on the north
coast of the Hitu Peninsula, overlooking
a forested valley at about 300 m (984 ft)
and in forest edge around shifting
cultivation at about 500 m (1,640 ft).
Conservation Status
The salmon-crested cockatoo is
protected from capture and trade under
Indonesian laws (Republic of Indonesia
Law No. 5, 1990, and Law No. 7, 1999)
(Kinnaird 2000, p. 14; Kinnaird et al.
2003, p. 228). Intentional violations may
lead to imprisonment of up to 5 years
and fines up to 100 million IDR
(Indonesian rupiah) (which amounts to
approximately 10,000 USD (U.S.
dollar)). Negligent violations may lead
to imprisonment of up to 1 year and
fines up to 50 million IDR (5,000 USD).
The government may seize and
confiscate specimens of protected
animals. The Department of Forest
Protection and Nature Conservation is
responsible for implementing the law,
and the Natural Resources Conservation
Agency, working with police, Customs,
and other enforcement agencies, is
responsible for enforcing the law
(Shepherd et al. 2004, p. 4).
The species is listed on the IUCN
(International Union for Conservation of
Nature) Red List as ‘Vulnerable’ because
it has suffered a rapid population
decline as a result of trapping for the pet
bird trade and because of deforestation
in its small range. BLI (2004, p. 1)
projects that the decline will continue
and perhaps accelerate. Current
populations are estimated at 62,400
individuals (Kinnaird et al. 2003, p.
232), with a decreasing population
trend; the decline for the past and the
future 10 years or 3 generations is
estimated at 30 to 49 percent (BLI
2008b, p. 1). The current trend is
justified by the suspected rapid decline
of the species due to ongoing and
prolific capture for the domestic pet
trade (BLI 2008b, p. 2). Ongoing threats
are habitat loss and degradation due to
selective logging and clear-cutting,
agriculture, infrastructure development
(settlement and hydroelectric projects),
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
and harvesting (hunting and gathering
for the domestic and international pet
trade) (BLI 2004, pp. 1–2).
The cockatoo is also protected by
CITES, one of the most important means
of controlling international trade in wild
animals and plants. CITES is an
international agreement where countries
work together to ensure that
international trade in CITES-listed
animals and plants is not detrimental to
the survival of wild populations by
regulating import, export, and re-export.
Although almost all Psittaciformes
species were included in CITES
Appendix II in 1981 (CITES 2008a, p. 1),
the salmon-crested cockatoo was
transferred to CITES Appendix I
effective January 18, 1990, because
populations were declining rapidly due
to uncontrolled trapping for the pet bird
trade (CITES 1989a, pp. 1–7). An
Appendix-I listing includes species
threatened with extinction whose trade
is permitted only under exceptional
circumstances, which generally
precludes commercial trade. The import
of an Appendix-I species requires the
issuance of both an import and export
permit. Import permits are issued only
if findings are made that the import
would be for purposes that are not
detrimental to the survival of the
species and that the specimen will not
be used for primarily commercial
purposes (CITES Article III(3)). Export
permits are issued only if findings are
made that the specimen was legally
acquired and trade is not detrimental to
the survival of the species (CITES
Article III(2)). The United States and
Indonesia, along with 173 other
countries, are members to CITES (CITES
2009, p. 1).
The import of salmon-crested
cockatoos into the United States is also
regulated by the Wild Bird Conservation
Act (WBCA) (16 U.S.C. 4901 et seq.),
which was enacted on October 23, 1992.
The purpose of the WBCA is to promote
the conservation of exotic birds by
ensuring that all trade involving the
United States is sustainable and is not
detrimental to the species. Permits may
be issued to allow import of listed birds
for scientific research, zoological
breeding or display, or personal pet
purposes when certain criteria are met.
The Service may approve cooperative
breeding programs and subsequent
import permits under such programs.
Wild-caught birds may be imported into
the United States if they are subject to
Service-approved management plans for
sustainable use. At this time, the
salmon-crested cockatoo is not part of a
Service-approved cooperative breeding
program and does not have an approved
E:\FR\FM\03NOP1.SGM
03NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 211 / Tuesday, November 3, 2009 / Proposed Rules
management plan for wild-caught birds
(FWS 2008, p. 1).
The IUCN Status Survey and
Conservation Action Plan 2000–2004 for
Parrots (Snyder et al. 2000, p. 66)
identified a need to clarify the status of
the salmon-crested cockatoo in the wild,
including: (1) determining the species’
relative abundance in each habitat type
and (2) collecting information on the
size and distribution of habitat types,
trapping, timber extraction, and
breeding success of cockatoos in
primary and secondary forests because
it is unknown if the salmon-crested
cockatoo will survive in degraded
secondary forests in the long term. At
present, inadequate information on the
species, its habitat, and the effects of
human activities on the species makes
it difficult to make recommendations on
regional development, such as reserve
boundaries, land-use zoning, and
possible new provincial forestry and
agriculture policies, to ensure the
species’ survival. The information
would also provide a baseline for
monitoring and determining the degree
to which trade affects the status of this
species (Snyder et al. 2000, pp. 66, 69).
dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Species Information and Factors
Affecting the Salmon-crested Cockatoo
Under section 4(a) of the Act (16
U.S.C. 1533(a)(1)) and regulations
promulgated to implement the listing
provisions of the Act (50 CFR part 424),
we may list a species as threatened and
endangered on the basis of five factors.
The five factors are: (A) Present or
threatened destruction, modification, or
curtailment of its habitat or range; (B)
overutilization for commercial,
recreational, scientific, or educational
purposes; (C) disease or predation; (D)
inadequacy of existing regulatory
mechanisms; or (E) other natural or
manmade factors affecting its continued
existence. Listing actions may be
warranted based on any of the above
threat factors, singly or in combination.
Below is the Service’s five-factor
analysis for the salmon-crested
cockatoo.
Foreseeable Future
Although section 3 of the Act uses the
term ‘‘foreseeable future’’ in the
definition of a threatened species, it
does not define the term. For purpose of
this proposed rule, we defined
‘‘foreseeable future’’ to be the extent to
which, given the amount and quality of
available data, we can anticipate events
or effects, or extrapolate trends of a
threat, such that reliable predictions can
be made concerning the future of the
species. In the analysis of the five
factors below, we consider and describe
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:14 Nov 02, 2009
Jkt 220001
how the foreseeable future relates to the
status of the salmon-crested cockatoo in
view of population trends and threats to
the species.
Factor A. The Present or Threatened
Destruction, Modification, or
Curtailment of the Species’ Habitat or
Range
The lowland forest habitat of the
salmon-crested cockatoo is being
impacted by logging (including the
failure to use wise logging practices
during selective logging), illegal logging,
conversion of forests to agriculture and
plantations, transmigration of people,
oil exploration, and infrastructure
development.
Logging. Commercial timber
extraction is listed by the IUCN Red List
to be a continuing major threat to the
salmon-crested cockatoo, with a
medium impact and a slow decline of
the species (BLI 2008b, p. 3). Research
that looked at species-area relationship
suggested that deforestation affects
endemic bird species restricted to single
islands most severely (Brooks et al.
1997, p. 392).
In Indonesia as a whole, between
2000 and 2005, forest cover declined by
more than 90,000 km2 (34,740 mi2).
Lowland areas, which offer important
habitat for Indonesia’s cockatoos, have
been the most severely impacted
(Cameron 2007, p. 177; Rhee et al. 2004,
chap. 1 p. 2). On the islands of Sumatra
and Kalimantan (Indonesian islands to
the far west of Seram), the World Bank
predicted that all lowland rain forests
outside of protected areas would be
degraded by 2005 and 2010,
respectively (Rhee et al. 2004, p. xviii).
In many areas of Indonesia, most
commercially valuable forests have
already been logged. Thus, major
commercial logging enterprises are now
focused on islands in Maluku Province,
including Seram (BLI 2008k, p. 6; Smiet
1985, p. 181).
The impact of logging has steadily
increased on Seram, with logging
becoming more intense during the 1990s
(BLI 2008k, p. 6). Deforestation in some
areas has been extensive through
selective logging of Shorea spp. (Ellen
1993, p. 201), such that by 2001, about
a fifth of the original forest cover had
been cleared (Morrison 2001, p. 1), with
most of the coastal areas converted to
grassland, agriculture, plantations, or
scrub (Marsden 1992, p. 7). Although
large areas of contiguous, intact forests
remain (Morrison 2001, p. 1), 50 percent
of forest, which are spread over the
island, are under logging concessions.
The north dipterocarp forests are still
dominated by the endemic Shorea
selanica, a tree especially vulnerable to
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
56777
logging as it grows tall and straight and
is much favored by Western and
Japanese markets (Edwards 1993, p. 9).
Once the primary forest is logged,
experience on nearby Indonesian
islands shows that secondary forest is
generally converted to other uses or
logged again rather than being allowed
to return to primary forest (Barr 2001,
pp. 64, 67; Grimmett & Sumarauw 2000,
p. 8; Jepson et al. 2001, p. 859).
Selective logging is the primary
technique for the extraction of timber in
Indonesia (BLI 2008k, p. 6). In selective
logging, the most valuable trees from a
forest are commercially extracted (Johns
1988, p. 31), and the forest is left to
regenerate naturally or usually with
some management until subsequently
logged again. Johns (1988, p. 31),
looking at a West Malaysian dipterocarp
forest, found that mechanized selective
logging in tropical rain forests, which
usually removes a small percent of
timber trees, causes severe incidental
damage. The extraction of 3.3 percent of
trees destroyed 50.9 percent of the
forest. He concluded that this type of
logging reduced the availability of food
sources for frugivores (fruit-eaters).
Edwards (1993, p. 9) observed a similar
problem on Seram. Timber companies,
operating under a selective logging
system, caused considerable damage to
the surrounding forest, both to trees and
soil. Forests selectively logged 15 years
before had an open structure with
skeletons of incidentally killed trees,
serious gulley erosion, and vegetation
on waterlogged sites that had been
compacted by heavy vehicles. Also,
commercial logging uses a network of
roads, which can lead to secondary
problems (BLI 2008k, p. 6), such as
providing access to trappers of parrots.
Since selective logging targets mature
trees, it can have a disproportionate
impact on hole-nesters, such as
cockatoos, because fewer nest sites
remain (BLI 2008k, p. 6). Also,
unsustainable logging practices that
destroy the forest canopy reduce habitat
available to the salmon-crested
cockatoo. Kinnaird et al. (2003, pp. 233–
234) found that the abundance of
cockatoos was positively related to the
density of its favored nest tree,
Octomeles sumatranus, and strangling
figs, a potentially important food
resource. These trees would be
impacted by logging, emphasizing the
need to implement wise logging
practices, such as those based on
reduced-impact logging techniques.
However, these techniques, which are
recommended under Indonesia’s
selective logging system, are seldom
applied because of the lack of control
over harvesting practices, limited
E:\FR\FM\03NOP1.SGM
03NOP1
dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
56778
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 211 / Tuesday, November 3, 2009 / Proposed Rules
understanding of how to implement the
measures, and high financial costs (Sist
et al. 1998, p. 1). Specifically, the preand post-logging inventories are not
conducted properly or are not reported
truthfully; over-cutting above the annual
plan occurs; frequent cutting outside
approved boundaries occurs; re-logging
is more frequent than recommended;
and supervision by the Ministry of
Forestry has been ineffective
(Thompson 1996, p. 9).
The salmon-crested cockatoo is
dependent on little-disturbed lowland
forests. In a field study conducted from
December 19, 1989, for 5 weeks,
Marsden (1992, pp. 7–13) looked at the
distribution, abundance, and habitat
preferences of the salmon-crested
cockatoo on Seram. Results suggested
that while cockatoo densities were
similar in primary and disturbed
primary forests, densities were lower in
secondary forests, and much lower in
recently logged forests (Marsden 1992,
p. 9). In total, 84 cockatoos were
recorded at 132 stations, either singly or
in pairs, on 34 occasions. Groups of
more than 4 birds were recorded 3
times, with the maximum group size of
10. Although cockatoos were found at
different densities in different land-use
types, more cockatoos were present
where habitat alterations occurred on a
small scale. Cockatoos tended to be
recorded in mature, open-canopied
lowland forests with some very large,
tall trees and some low vegetation. Most
significantly, Marsden found that there
may have been a reduction of the
cockatoo population by about 700 birds
for each 100 km2 (86 mi2) of Seram’s
primary forests that had been selectively
logged in the last 6 years. Similarly, the
conversion of 100 km2 of locally
disturbed secondary forests to
plantation could result in the loss of
around 600 birds (Marsden 1992, p. 12).
Marsden (1998, pp. 605–611) also
looked at changes in bird abundance
following selective logging on Seram.
Field work was conducted in forested
areas in the central and northeast parts
of the island. Logged forests usually had
sparser canopy and mid-level vegetation
cover and denser ground cover than
unlogged forests (Marsden 1998, pp.
605, 607–608). Using a point count
method to estimate population
densities, Marsden (1998, p. 608; 1999,
p. 380) found that salmon-crested
cockatoo density estimates in unlogged
forests below 300 m (984 ft) were more
than double those in logged forests.
Because the cockatoo is caught for the
pet trade, Marsden was unable to
separate the effects of habitat change,
such as loss of nest holes, from possible
effects of logging on capture rates (for
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:14 Nov 02, 2009
Jkt 220001
example, increased accessibility to
trappers) (Marsden 1998, p. 610).
Although Kinnaird et al. (2003, p. 233)
found the highest cockatoo densities in
primary forest habitat with good
structure and lower densities in logged
or disturbed sites, they did not find a
statistically significant difference in
cockatoo densities between logged and
unlogged forests. They surmised this
may have been because of the intensity
of logging or, more likely, reflected the
mosaic of habitat types found within
their sampling sites. They speculated
that there is a continuum of cockatoo
densities in logged forests depending on
the intensity of logging and access
provided to trappers.
Logging concessions are spread over
the island, except there are no
concessions in Gunung Sahuai Nature
Reserve and only 15 percent of
Manusela National Park is under
concessions (Kinnaird et al. 2003, p.
231). About half the island (8,271 km2
(3,193 mi2)) is held within logging
concessions, with more than 75 percent
within lowland habitat favored by the
salmon-crested cockatoo (Kinnaird et al.
2003, pp. 227, 233). This means that less
than 30 percent of the island’s lowland
forests (5,096 km2 (1,967 mi2)) is
unoccupied by logging concessions. In
1998, Kinnaird et al. (2003, pp. 233–
234) were unable to find out the area of
land scheduled for logging. However,
Kinnaird (2000, p. 15) was able to obtain
information from the Ministry of
Forestry that showed 12 logging
concessions have been operating on
Seram during the 10–year period from
1989–1999. If the concessions have been
logged at a maximum intensity of 10
km2 (3.86 mi2)/year/concession and that
logging was conducted in a
conventional manner that results in 70
percent damage to the canopy, lowland
forest habitat for cockatoos would be
reduced by 1,200 km2 (463 mi2), or 8.5
percent, in 10 years. The researcher
concluded in 2000 that overall the loss
of habitat has not reached a level where
it is perceived as a serious threat to
cockatoos. However, the cockatoo
remains under threat (Kinnaird 2000, p.
15). We have no reason to believe that
the effects of logging on the species will
be ameliorated in the foreseeable future,
but may increase because commercial
logging enterprises are now focused on
the Moluku Province, including Seram.
The researchers were forced to leave
the island because of civil unrest. They
suggested that the pressure for land
conversion will accelerate dramatically
once social and economic stability
returns to Seram, especially in the
lowlands, and this will be made worse
by the 1999 regional autonomy laws that
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
allow for local authorities to determine
licensing of forest concessions and
exploitation of natural resources. They
concluded that the proper management
of Seram’s logging concessions would
determine the future of the salmoncrested cockatoo (Kinnaird et al. 2003,
p. 234).
Approximately 14 percent of Seram’s
forests (or 11.5 percent of lowland
forests) are protected in Manusela
National Park (2,216.4 km2 (855.5 mi2))
and Gunung Sahuwai Nature Reserve
(118.9 km2 (45.9 mi2)). In Manusela
National Park, 15 percent of the forest
is within logging concessions. In 1981,
Smiet and Siallagan (1981, pp. 11–12,
22) reported that large patches of forest
in the coastal region of the Mual Plains
had been disturbed by logging
activities—forests along the
southeastern boundary of the park had
been cleared up to 400 m (1,312 ft) and
planted with clove and coconut
plantations. They advocated the
development of a buffer zone between
the park and the densely populated
coastal area because more and more
forests at increasing altitudes were being
cleared. Kinnaird et al. (2003, p. 233)
estimated that the protected areas in
Seram provide habitat for a minimum of
7,300 salmon-crested cockatoos based
on density estimates derived from their
surveys. However, logging has recently
occurred inside Manusela National
Park, and, once logging has concluded,
there are pressures to change the land
use to agriculture or plantations (BLI
2008k, p. 7). Kinnaird et al. (2003, p.
233) also estimated that the proposed
Wai Bula nature reserve, 561.8 km2
(216.9 mi2) of lowland forests located in
the northeastern part of Seram, provides
habitat for a minimum of 2,500
cockatoos. We believe that this
population estimate, which is based on
the availability of suitable habitat, may
be an overestimate because the Wai Bula
area is currently not protected (it was
proposed as a nature reserve in 1981
and the probability of it being officially
designed is now low) and 93 percent of
the area is under logging concessions.
Illegal logging. Illegal logging is
considered to be a leading cause of
forest degradation in Indonesia (Rhee et
al. 2004, chap. 6 p. 7). It is pervasive,
and the Indonesian government has
been unable to enforce its own forest
boundaries (Barr 2001, p. 40). Illegal
logging includes overharvesting beyond
legal and sustainable quotas, harvesting
of trees from steep slopes and riparian
habitat, timber harvesting and land
encroachment in conservation areas and
protection forests, and falsification of
documents. Overexploitation of the
forests and illegal logging are driven by
E:\FR\FM\03NOP1.SGM
03NOP1
dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 211 / Tuesday, November 3, 2009 / Proposed Rules
the wood-processing industry, which
consumes at least six times the officially
allowed harvest (Rhee et al. 2004, pp.
xvii, chap. 6 p. 8). Illegal logging in the
national parks also is reported with
regularity, and the persons involved are
armed and ruthless (Whitten et al. 2001,
p. 2).
Although the Indonesian government
issued Presidential Instruction No. 4/
2005 to eradicate illegal logging in forest
areas and distribution throughout
Indonesia (see Factor C) (FAOLEX 2009,
p. 1), illegal logging continues. The
Center for International Forestry
Research estimated that between 55 and
75 percent of logging in Indonesia is
illegal (U.S. Agency for International
Development (USAID) 2004, p. 1).
Contributing factors include poor forest
governance, rapid decentralization of
government, abuse of local political
powers, complicity of the military and
police in some parts of the country,
inconsistent enforcement of the law,
and dwindling power of the central
government (USAID 2004, pp. 3, 9).
Jepson et al. (2001, pp. 859–861) found
illegal logging crews operating freely in
December 2000 in protected areas and
forest concessions in Sumatra and
Kalimantan, Indonesia. Local
government officials were in collusion
with illegal loggers by turning a blind
eye to the practice or providing permits
for timber transport. Some government
officials, who wanted to stop illegal
logging, faced serious intimidation.
Jepson et al. concluded that illegal
logging was becoming semi-legal and
the de facto arrangement for governing
Indonesia’s forests.
Conversion of forests to agriculture
and plantations. Indonesia is a rapidly
developing country with a projected
population of 235 million by 2015
(Snyder et al. 2000, p. 59). A growing
population on Seram has converted
forest into cultivated land, with human
settlements and plantations typically
located in lowland coastal areas (Smiet
1985, pp. 181, 183). Based on data from
landsat images from late 1989 and early
1990 (Kinnaird et al. 2003, p. 230), land
use in Seram is as follows: 4.6 percent
in agriculture, 0.1 percent in
plantations, and 0.1 percent in
settlements (see Table 1 below).
Although these percentages are low,
forests continue to be converted for
agriculture and plantations.
Near the coast, forests have been
replaced with plantations of coconut, oil
palm, and spices. Inland, forests on rich
alluvial soil, once timbered, are liable to
be converted to agricultural fields. Part
of the Indonesian government’s longterm planning strategy is to develop
more efficient agriculture through
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:14 Nov 02, 2009
Jkt 220001
improved and appropriate techniques to
help alleviate poverty. If the plan is
carefully implemented, improved
agricultural techniques could reduce
pressure on areas of natural habitat (BLI
2008k, pp. 7–8). However, Snyder et al.
(2000, p. 66) cautioned that, since most
of Seram’s forests are under timber
concessions, the island’s development
priority could mean that forests over
good soil may be converted to wet rice
cultivation and other crops. The
salmon-crested cockatoo is unable to
exist in this type of habitat (Snyder et
al. 2000, p. 66).
Approximately 6,220 km2 (2,401 mi2)
of Seram’s lowland forest is slated for
conversion to agriculture or plantations
(45 percent within logging concessions).
By 2028, most of this land will probably
be converted to these uses that provide
no habitat for cockatoos, resulting in
habitat loss for at least 31,000 cockatoos
and reducing the total island population
to around 30,400 individuals (Kinnaird
et al. 2003, p. 233).
Transmigration. Indonesia has long
had a policy to resettle people, mainly
from Java, to develop the less populated
regions of the country, with the Maluku
Province being a major destination (BLI
2008k, p. 8). From 1969–1989, some
730,000 families were relocated in
Indonesia (Library of Congress 1992, p.
1). While the scale of transmigration has
been reduced over the past decade, the
recent unrest in Maluku led to largescale movement of people. In some
areas, these movements of people have
had serious negative effects on the
environment, involving land disputes
with indigenous inhabitants (Library of
Congress 1992, p. 1), forest clearance for
agriculture, unsustainable slash-andburn farming (BLI 2008k, p. 8), and
introduction of wet rice cultivation
(Ellen 1993, p. 200).
Oil exploration. In 1993, a significant
oil discovery was made in eastern
Seram—the Non-Bula Block, which
occupies an area of about 4,572 km2
(1,765 mi2). Development was delayed
until 2002 (Lion Energy Limited 2009,
p. 2). The average output from the main
oil field in the first half of 2006 was
4,300 barrels per day (Entrepreneur
2009, p. 1). The main field in the Seram
Non-Bula Block is the Oseil Field. The
gross oil reserves in that field have been
estimated to be about 39 million
barrels—7 million barrels of proven
reserves, 6 million barrels of probable
reserves, and 26 million barrels of
possible reserves (International Business
Times 2009, p. 1). In 2008, oil was
discovered in a new well, which lies 4
km (2.5 mi) from the Oseil Field. The
investment firm is currently petitioning
the Indonesian government to begin
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
56779
production and export operations from
the new field (E&P Magazine 2008, p. 1).
Generally, oil development areas cover
large tracts of land, but the area
occupied by permanent facilities
including pipelines and refineries are
relatively small. However, oil
development can have significant
negative impacts on nearby habitat
through construction of roads and other
buildings, discharge of refineries, and
oil spills and leaks (Rhee et al. 2004,
chap. 6 p. 31).
Infrastructure development. Seram is
remote, with no airport and only
rudimentary ground transportation
(Morrison 2001, p. 5). An essential part
of regional development is the
improvement of roads. However, new
roads can cause serious environmental
problems (BLI 2008k, p. 8), as shown by
the Trans-Seram Highway, which
threatens forest habitat by illegal
logging, land clearance, and soil erosion
(Morrison 2001, p. 5). The excavation of
sand for local road construction has
affected some habitat on Seram.
Previous proposals for a large cement
factory, with a quarry and hydroelectric
dam, close to Manusela National Park
appear to have been abandoned (BLI
2008k, p. 8).
Summary of Factor A
The salmon-crested cockatoo resides
in lowland forests predominately
between 100–600 m (328–1,968 ft)
throughout the island, with the highest
densities of birds occurring in littledisturbed forests. Logging and illegal
logging are primary threats to the habitat
of this species, with the threats
occurring throughout the island in
lowland forests.
Cockatoos are highly impacted by
selective logging of primary forests.
Selective logging, which targets mature
trees, has a negative impact on holenesters, such as the salmon-crested
cockatoo. Research found that the
abundance of cockatoos was positively
related to the density of its favored nest
tree and strangling figs, trees that would
be impacted by logging, especially since
reduced-impact logging techniques are
seldom applied.
Research also found that for every 100
km2 (38.6 mi2) of Seram’s primary
forests that were selectively logged in
the last 6 years, 700 birds were likely
lost from the cockatoo population.
Similarly, for every 100 km2 of locally
disturbed secondary forest that were
converted to plantations, 600 birds were
likely lost from the cockatoo population.
The cockatoo’s density estimates in
logged forests below 300 m (984 ft) were
more than half those in unlogged
forests, although researchers were
E:\FR\FM\03NOP1.SGM
03NOP1
dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
56780
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 211 / Tuesday, November 3, 2009 / Proposed Rules
unable to separate the effects of habitat
change from the possible effects of
logging on trapping rates (see Factor B).
Once the primary forest is logged,
experience on other nearby Indonesian
islands shows that the secondary forest
is generally converted to other uses or
logged again rather than being allowed
to return to primary forest. Therefore,
although cockatoos may continue to
inhabit secondary forests on Seram, the
population will be at a substantially
lower number. The trend of high loss of
primary forests and degradation of
secondary forests is of concern because
little is known about the reproductive
ecology of the salmon-crested cockatoo
in the wild, including breeding success
in mature forests versus secondary
forests, and whether the cockatoo will
survive in degraded forests in the long
term. Also, the size of groups of
cockatoos observed was drastically
smaller in research conducted in 1998,
where 75 percent of birds were observed
as single individuals and 22 percent in
pairs, compared to earlier reports, where
groups of up to 16 birds were seen.
By 2001, approximately 20 percent of
the original forest cover on Seram had
been cleared. About 50 percent of the
island’s forests were held under logging
concessions, with more than 75 percent
within the salmon-crested cockatoo’s
favored lowland habitat. Based on
information from the Ministry of
Forestry in Indonesia, researchers
estimated that the cockatoo lost 1,200
km2 (463 mi2), or 8.5 percent, of habitat
between 1989 and 1999 due to logging.
Although we have no information on
the current status of logging concessions
or actual logging (legal and illegal)
activity on Seram since 1999, we
anticipate that the rate of loss of
cockatoo habitat due to logging will
continue at the 1989-1999 level or
increase because commercial logging
enterprises are now focused on Seram.
We have no information that indicates
that this trend will be reversed in the
foreseeable future.
In addition, approximately 44 percent
of Seram’s lowland forests (6,220 km2
(2,401 mi2)) is designated as conversion
forest, of which 45 percent is within
logging concessions. It is predicted that
by 2028 up to 50 percent of the current
population (at least 31,000 cockatoos)
may be lost as a result of conversion of
forests to agriculture and plantations,
which provide no habitat to the
cockatoo.
Approximately 11.7 percent of
Seram’s lowland forests are protected in
Manusela National Park and Gunung
Sahuwai Nature Reserve. Researchers
estimated that these protected areas
could provide habitat for up to 7,300
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:14 Nov 02, 2009
Jkt 220001
salmon-crested cockatoos. However,
about 15 percent of the national park is
under logging concessions and illegal
logging has been occurring. Once the
land is logged, the land use is often
changed to agriculture.
The resettlement of people on Seram
has had negative effects on the
environment and the habitat of the
salmon-crested cockatoo. These negative
effects include forest clearance for
agriculture, unsustainable slash-andburn farming, and introduction of wet
rice cultivation. The relatively recent
development of oil production on Seram
most likely has adversely affected the
cockatoo’s habitat. Potential
development of such a large part of
Seram (the current Non-Bula Block
occupies one-quarter of the island) is a
concern because at one time the salmoncrested cockatoo appeared to be mostly
distributed in the eastern part of the
island. Although we do not know what
forest habitat has been destroyed, we do
know that oil development on Seram
will have a negative impact on nearby
habitat through road building and other
construction, discharge of refineries,
and oil spills and leaks. Further, an
essential part of regional development is
infrastructure development, primarily
the improvement of roads, which leads
to illegal logging and land clearance, as
well as facilitates bird trapping.
In summary, extensive logging and
conversion of lowland forests to
agriculture and plantations, combined
with transmigratory human
resettlement, oil exploration, and
infrastructure development, are likely to
destroy much of the lowland rain forests
of Seram, the salmon-crested cockatoo’s
habitat by 2025. Therefore, we find that
habitat destruction is a threat to the
continued existence of this species
throughout all of its range in the
foreseeable future.
Factor B. Overutilization for
Commercial, Recreational, Scientific, or
Educational Purposes
The salmon-crested cockatoo is a very
popular pet bird. In the 1980s, it
suffered a rapid population decline due
to trapping largely for international
trade. Below we analyze the impact of
international and domestic trade and
other uses for recreational, scientific, or
educational purposes. We also consider
and describe programs on Seram to
support the conservation of the
cockatoo—the release of confiscated
cockatoos and local involvement.
International and domestic
commercial trade. International wildlife
trade is big business and has been
identified as contributing to the decline
of a number of bird species, including
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
the salmon-crested cockatoo (BLI 2008h,
p. 1). The majority of wild-caught birds
in international trade are sold as pets
(Thomsen et al. 1992, p. 5). In addition,
in Indonesia, pet birds, particularly
parrots, are an important part of the
culture, creating a massive demand for
parrots internationally and domestically
(BLI 2008k, p. 10). In a survey of birdkeeping among households in five major
Indonesian cities, Jepson and Ladle
(2005, pp. 442–448) found that as many
as 2.5 million birds are kept in the five
cities. Of these, 60,230 wild-caught
native parrots were kept by 51,000
households, and 50,590 wild-caught
native parrots were acquired each year
(changed hands, not an indication of
birds taken from the wild each year).
The researchers concluded that the level
of bird-keeping among urban
Indonesians calls for a conservation
intervention.
Parrots have been traded for hundreds
of years by people living in the
Moluccas. Heinroth (1902, p. 120)
reported that at the start of the 20th
century trade significantly impacted the
salmon-crested cockatoo. Bowler (1988,
p. 6) wrote that the salmon-crested
cockatoo was severely threatened by
extensive trapping for the pet bird trade
in the late 1970s, with the government
apparently having little control over the
number of birds taken from the wild. In
the 1980s, extensive trapping of the
salmon-crested cockatoo was the most
important factor in the species’ decline
(BLI 2008k, p. 10; Forshaw 1989, p.
141). Smiet reported that trade in live
birds flourished on Seram. The salmoncrested cockatoo was a popular pet
traded in large numbers, accounting for
15 percent of the export (Smiet 1985,
pp. 181, 189). Smiet (1982, pp. 324–325)
also found live cockatoos readily
available in the Ambon market.
Based on the most recent CITES
annual report data, 74,838 salmoncrested cockatoos were reported as
exported from Indonesia between 1981
and 1990, with international imports
averaging 10,482 annually (UNEPWCMC 2009a, p. 1; 2009b, p. 3). The
species was listed in CITES Appendix II
in 1981, but the high volume of trade
led the CITES Significant Trade
Working Group to identify this species
as one of particular concern (CITES
1989b, p. 121). A review of CITES
annual report trade data available at the
time showed that the level of
international trade of live birds was
having a detrimental effect on wild
populations (Inskipp et al. 1988, pp.
185–186, 188). The trade data showed
imports of live salmon-crested
cockatoos continued to be high in 1986
and 1987, with the 1987 Indonesian
E:\FR\FM\03NOP1.SGM
03NOP1
dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 211 / Tuesday, November 3, 2009 / Proposed Rules
harvest quota being exceeded by 3,661
birds (CITES 1989a, p. 5) or 72 percent.
The Indonesian government decreased
the annual harvest quota from 10,250 in
1984 to 1,000 in 1989, but a CITES’
document suggested that these national
measures to control trade had been
ineffective (CITES 1989b, p. 121). Thus,
the CITES Parties voted to transfer the
salmon-crested cockatoo to CITES
Appendix I, effective January 18, 1990.
In 1990, field work on Seram revealed
a ‘‘sharp decline in visible trade’’ in the
salmon-crested cockatoo, although small
numbers of birds were still leaving the
island (Taylor 1992, p. 14).
Although CITES annual reports are of
great value in assessing levels of legal
trade and trends of trade, the number of
cockatoos traded is much higher than
the data reflect. The numbers do not
include data from countries that are not
CITES Parties or CITES Parties that did
not submit annual reports (Inskipp et al.
1988, p. viii). Also, the numbers do not
include deaths of birds before export,
birds illegally traded, and birds
domestically traded—doubling the
numbers according to Cameron (2007, p.
163). ProFauna Indonesia, an animal
protection nongovernmental
organization, estimated that parrot
smuggling in North Maluku, Indonesia,
results in approximately 40 percent
mortality (5 percent during glue
trapping, 10 percent during
transportation, and 25 percent during
holding to sell in bird markets
(malnutrition, disease, and stress))
(ProFauna Indonesia 2008, p. 5).
Undocumented illegal trade
(international and domestic) is difficult
to quantify (Pain et al. 2006, p. 322;
Thomsen et al. 1992, p. 3), and a listing
in Appendix I of CITES does not totally
stop illegal trade (Pain et al. 2006, p.
328). Seizures reported to the CITES
Secretariat since 1990, however, are
small—1 live bird seized in Austria in
1997; 25 live birds seized in the United
Arab Emirates in 1998; and 4 live birds
seized in Indonesia in 1999 (John Sellar
2009, pers. comm., p. 2). Since 1999, the
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Office of
Law Enforcement, has seized only two
salmon-crested cockatoos for lack of
proper permits (FWS 2009, p. 1).
While CITES reported trade markedly
fell after 1989 with an average annual
worldwide import of 159 cockatoos
(UNEP-WCMC 2009c, p. 5), illegal
hunting and trade of the salmon-crested
cockatoo continue today, with high
domestic consumption. Extrapolating
from figures obtained during interviews
with parrot trappers in 1998, an
estimated 4,000 salmon-crested
cockatoos are trapped each year on
Seram (BLI 2008k, p. 10; Cameron 2007,
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:14 Nov 02, 2009
Jkt 220001
p. 164), which is approximately 6.4
percent of the population (Kinnaird et
al., in litt., as cited in BLI 2001, p.
1666). Direct evidence of continuing
illegal trade is the sighting of glue traps
(Kinnaird 2000, p. 15). Poachers use
glue traps by cutting a suitable perching
branch out of a tree and replacing that
branch with one that has been smeared
with sticky glue. Then a tame decoy
bird lures wild birds into the glue trap
(ProFauna Indonesia 2008, p. 2). Birds
are also captured using nylon fishingline snares or by tracing adults to their
nesting sites so that the young can be
taken (Bowler 1988, p. 6; Juniper & Parr
1998, p. 218). Metz (2005, p. 35)
described local declines in the salmoncrested cockatoo, based on statements
from trappers. When cockatoos became
scarce on the western part of the island
in 1991–92, poachers moved to the
eastern and northern parts of the island.
Even with government controls, the
commercial hunting of cockatoos (i.e.,
hunting by people to gain at least a
temporary living from the activity) is
relatively common on Seram (Ellen
1993, p. 199). Field research conducted
in 2003–2005 in a small village (320
people, 60 households) located in the
Manusela Valley led to the conclusion
that collecting wild parrots, including
the salmon-crested cockatoo, is a way
for villagers to supplement their income
during times of hardship (Sasaoka 2008,
p. 158; Sasaoka 2009, pers. comm., p. 1).
Most trapping was sporadic and the
number of parrots caught was low.
Traps are set in fruit trees such as
durian (Durio spp.) and breadfruit
(Artocarpus heterophyllus) from January
to May, and traps are set in resting sites
at any time of the year. In 2003, 21
salmon-crested cockatoos were trapped
in the research site by 3 households; in
2004, 25 cockatoos by 5 households;
and in 2005, 26 cockatoos by 10
households. Villagers sometimes kept
the cockatoos for several months while
waiting for the best price, but normally
did not keep them as pets. Trappers
received 70,000–100,000 IDR (7–10
USD) for an adult cockatoo and
200,000–250,000 IDR (20–25 USD) for a
baby cockatoo, selling the birds to
middlemen in coastal areas (Sasaoka
2009, pers. comm., pp. 1–2). In studying
the forest peoples of Seram, social
anthropologists have reported that
parrot catching accounts for 25 to 30
percent of forest people’s cash income,
and that young men among the Halafara
people of the Manusela Valley catch and
sell parrots to raise their bride price (S.
Badcock in litt. 1997 as cited in Snyder
et al. 2000, p. 60).
The scope of the illegal trade in the
salmon-crested cockatoo is unknown.
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
56781
After conducting an investigation from
December 2003 to May 2004, ProFauna
Indonesia reported that smuggling and
trade in protected birds continues
despite legislation that prohibits such
activities. According to the report, at
least 9,600 parrots, including salmoncrested cockatoos (numbers of birds by
species not given in this article), are
caught on Seram and sold to bird
exporters in Jakarta via Ambon each
year (ProFauna 2006, p. 1). The illegal
practice involved Ambon’s largest bird
trader and Seram’s most prominent bird
collector and trader (Jakarta Post 2004,
p. 2). A principal broker on Seram might
have 20–50 salmon-crested cockatoos at
any one time (Metz & Nursahid 2004, p.
8), even though legal trapping quotas are
zero. A single trapper can capture up to
16 cockatoos each month within
Manusela National Park. However,
finding and trapping birds have become
harder, and the price paid trappers has
increased (Metz 2008, pp. 2–3).
Cockatoos are taken to the coast, sold,
and transported to Ambon on boats in
packed cages (Juniper & Parr 1998, p.
281) in hidden compartments
surrounded by legally shipped lories
and lorikeets (Metz & Nursahid 2004, p.
9) or by hiding birds in thermos bottles
(Metz 2005, pp. 35–36; Metz & Nursahid
2004, p. 9) or sections of bamboo
(Cameron 2007, p. 164). Some birds are
flown to Jakarta and may receive a
police escort to the market (Metz &
Nursahid 2004, p. 9). Illegally exported
cockatoos are reported from Indonesian
markets in Medan and Sumatra or
international markets in Singapore and
Bangkok (Kinnaird 2000, p. 15), or they
may pass through Singapore, China,
Taiwan, and Malaysia, with Thailand
now a major importer (Metz n.d., p. 1).
Cockatoos also may be smuggled
directly out of Indonesia and sent by
boat to the Philippines and Singapore,
which act as distribution points for
worldwide illegal trade (Cameron 2007,
p. 164).
Most Indonesian towns have either a
bird market or a stall selling birds
within the main market (Shepherd et al.
2004, p. 2). Birds in Indonesian markets
are most likely sold for domestic use,
although some birds will go into
international trade (Cameron 2007, p.
163). Metz (2007b, p. 2) estimated that
80 percent of salmon-crested cockatoos
illegally traded remain in Indonesia.
Some cockatoos remain as pets where
they are trapped, but most are sold to
homes in the cities in western
Indonesia, where the salmon-crested
cockatoo is a symbol of wealth and
prestige (Metz n.d., p. 1). This cockatoo
is still sold openly in the markets of
Ambon and elsewhere in Indonesia.
E:\FR\FM\03NOP1.SGM
03NOP1
dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
56782
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 211 / Tuesday, November 3, 2009 / Proposed Rules
Cameron (2007, p. 163) noted that in
1998, Margaret Kinnaird and co-workers
saw up to 40 salmon-crested cockatoos
at any time in Ambon markets. In an
analysis of the pet trade in Medan,
Sumatra, between 1997 and 2001,
Shepherd et al. (2004, p. 12) concluded
that the salmon-crested cockatoo was
common in trade in Medan, with 71
cockatoos being recorded in the
markets. Most of the birds at the Medan
market were sold as live pets (Shepherd
et al. 2004, p. 24).
Stopping illegal trade is complicated
by the vast size of Indonesia’s coastline,
government officials with limited
resources and knowledge to deal with
the illegal pet trade and corruption
(Metz 2007c, p. 2). ProFauna claimed
that illegal traders exploited the
religious conflict between Muslims and
Christians in the Maluku Islands in May
of 2004, flooding the markets in Jakarta
with salmon-crested cockatoos. Animal
activist and Chairman of the Balikpapan
Orangutan Survival Foundation, Willie
Smith, suggested that it would be
difficult to stop the illegal trade in
cockatoos because much of the
smuggling was backed or carried out by
the Indonesian military and because the
departments responsible for protecting
natural resources were hampered by
conflicts of interests and a lack of
willingness to take action (Jakarta Post
2004, pp. 3, 4). Until recently, the
wildlife protection laws have not been
vigorously enforced, but this may be
changing. For example, in September
2004, National Park Officers arrested a
long-term bird buyer and confiscated
nine salmon-crested cockatoos. The
buyer was sentenced to 2 months’ jail
time and given a fine (Metz n.d., p. 1).
To combat the illegal wildlife trade,
Southeast Asian countries, including
Indonesia, formed the Association of
South East Asian Nations–Wildlife
Enforcement Network (ASEAN–WEN)
in 2005 to protect the region’s
biodiversity (Gulf Times 2008, p. 1).
ASEAN uses a cooperative approach to
law enforcement (Cameron 2007, p.
164). It focuses on the gathering and
sharing of intelligence, capacity
building, and better cooperation in antismuggling and Customs controls across
Southeast Asia (Lin 2005, p. 192). For
example in 2008, Indonesian police
officers and forestry and Customs
officers participated in an intensive
Wildlife Crime Investigation Course to
help the government tackle poaching
and smuggling (Wildlife Alliance 2008,
p. 2).
Assessing the effects of trade on wild
populations of parrots, such as the
salmon-crested cockatoo, is difficult
because the threats of habitat loss and
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:14 Nov 02, 2009
Jkt 220001
trade occur at the same time (Snyder et
al. 2000, pp. 2, 68). The loss of habitat
due to logging, conversion of forests to
agriculture and plantations, increased
human settlement, and infrastructure
development, leads to more exposure to
bird trapping. Thus, it is difficult to
distinguish between the effects of
habitat loss and trade on the cockatoo.
In addition, little information is
available on the number and age of birds
being taken from the wild and when and
where the birds are being trapped. For
example, the trapping of large numbers
of breeding-age adults from a population
is apt to have a larger overall adverse
impact than the removal of a similar
number of juveniles (Thomsen et al.
1992, p. 10). Coates and Bishop (1997,
pp. 39–41) reported that trapping the
salmon-crested cockatoo for
international and domestic markets, in
combination with ongoing destruction
of lowland forests, was having a major
negative impact on wild populations.
They concluded that, despite the
protection given to the cockatoo by
Manusela National Park, this cockatoo
was being trapped to extinction.
Recreational, scientific, or
educational purposes. While conducting
research in one village in central Seram,
Dr. Sasaoka (pers. comm. 2009, p. 2)
wrote that hunting with air guns for
food started in 2000. Although the use
of air guns was not common in his
research site, about 10 villagers were
using air guns to hunt Columbidae
species (pigeons and doves). If a hunter
encountered a salmon-crested cockatoo
in the forest or garden by chance, the
hunter would shoot it for food. Based on
Dr. Sasaoka’s unpublished field data,
about 40 salmon-crested cockatoos were
shot and killed by air gun hunting in
2003. This information raises questions
on the use of air guns on Seram.
Without additional data, however, we
are unable to assess the possible impact
air gun hunting may be having or will
have on the survival of salmon-crested
cockatoos. We are not aware of any
overutilization of the salmon-crested
cockatoo for recreational, scientific, or
educational purposes that is a threat to
the species now or in the foreseeable
future.
Release of confiscated cockatoos. In
recent years, small numbers of
confiscated salmon-crested cockatoos
have been rehabilitated and released
into the wild. In 2005, the Kembali
Bebas Avian Center for the rescue and
rehabilitation of Indonesian parrots was
established on Northern Seram (IPP
2008c, p. 1; Price 2008, p. 2). In March
2006, three illegally trapped salmoncrested cockatoos, which had been
confiscated from local trappers by
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
forestry officials in 2004, were released
on Seram. The birds were tested for
diseases, observed for wild behaviors,
fitted with a leg band, and tagged with
a microchip to allow for long-term
monitoring (IPP (Indonesian Parrot
Project) 2008a, p. 2). In January 2008,
six more salmon-crested cockatoos were
released, and in February 2008, seven
more were released. The project
provides the government a means of
disposing of confiscated parrots. It also
gives local villagers pride in their native
birds and teaches them the principles of
conservation (ireport 2008, pp. 2–3).
Because releasing birds has the risk of
introducing diseases into wild
populations, the Center uses the IUCN
and CITES guidelines (Metz 2007c, p.
7). However, among some parrot
experts, the release of confiscated birds
is generally the least favorable
conservation option and should be
avoided because of the risk of
introducing diseases into wild
populations (Snyder et al. 2000, pp. 22–
24).
Local involvement. Indonesia is a
culturally diverse country and the
values and perceptions of many
Indonesians may differ from those of
western conservationists. Many rural
villagers are unaware that birds have
restricted distributions and do not
understand the concept of extinction.
Thus, they may think that, when a
population declines, the birds moved
into the hills or are getting smarter and,
therefore, harder to catch. In addition,
using and trading natural resources is a
basic part of Indonesian culture and
economy (Snyder et al. 2000, pp. 60–
61). As a result, one of the most
important components of successful
conservation programs is local
education that promotes optimism,
cooperation, and collaboration and
helps people discover and understand
the underlying causes of environmental
problems (Snyder et al. 2000, pp. 14–
15).
Others also have recognized the need
for a strong awareness campaign
concerning the legal and conservation
status of the salmon-crested cockatoo
(BLI 2001, p. 1668; Metz 1998, p. 11).
The IPP is a nonprofit organization
dedicated to the conservation of wild
Indonesian parrots, with goals to teach
the principles and value of
conservation, replace trapping of parrots
with sustainable economic alternatives,
work with the Indonesian authorities to
rehabilitate and release confiscated
parrots back into the wild, conduct
scientific research, and provide
information (Metz 2007c, p. 6). IPP
started a Conservation-Awareness-Pride
(CAP) program to reach adults and
E:\FR\FM\03NOP1.SGM
03NOP1
dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 211 / Tuesday, November 3, 2009 / Proposed Rules
children in the villages where the birds
are trapped and in the cities where the
birds are most often shipped for sale
(Metz 2007a, p. 1). The program is using
the salmon-crested cockatoo as a
flagship species for conservation to
familiarize the people, especially the
children, of Maluku Province with the
image of its unique endemic parrots (IPP
2008b, p. 1). In 2007, IPP reported that
almost 4,500 students have participated
in the CAP program, which was
showing progress (Metz 2007a, p. 1–2).
A new nongovernmental organization
was formed to help carry out this work
(IPP 2008b, p. 2).
Other anti-poaching programs of the
IPP include providing sustainable
income for local villagers to reduce
trapping and smuggling (IPP 2008c, p.
2). Former parrot poachers earn a living
by providing the day-to-day care of
rescued parrots at the Kembali Bebas
Avian Center for the rescue and
rehabilitation of Indonesian parrots.
Villagers also are employed to collect
and process the nuts of the kenari tree
(Canarium spp.), which are part of the
diet of larger cockatoos. The nuts are
sold to parrot owners outside of
Indonesia and all proceeds are used to
pay workers (Metz 2007c, p. 13).
Ecotourism can provide economic
benefits to local communities and lead
them to value and protect species and
ecosystems (Snyder et al. 2000, p. 16).
The development of tourism is one of
the priorities of Maluku Province. In
1981, Smiet & Siallagan (1981, p. 18)
wrote that the scenic beauty and
colorful wildlife of Seram would be
great tourist attractions. The Proposed
Manusela National Park Management
Plan 1982–1987suggested that tourist
accommodations be developed in the
Manusela Valley of the park (Smiet &
Siallagan 1981, p. 32). However,
Edwards (1993, p. 11) suggested that the
irregular and difficult means of
transportation and lack of infrastructure
and facilities for tourists are unlikely to
encourage large numbers of visitors.
Despite these difficulties, in 2001,
Project Bird Watch led its first eco-tour
of Seram (St. Joan 2005, p. 24), followed
by additional tours (IPP 2009, p. 1).
These tours provide ex-trappers and
other villagers income by acting as bird
guides, porters, and cooks. The local
people see that their birds can attract
people from others parts of the world,
providing money and hopefully
instilling pride in Indonesian birds
(Metz 2007c, p. 12). Other ecotourism
has developed on a small scale. In 2008,
a few Internet sites advertised or
reported on bird watching tours to
Seram (Bird Tour Asia 2008, pp. 1–3;
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:14 Nov 02, 2009
Jkt 220001
Eco-Adventure in Indonesia 2008, p. 1;
King Bird Tours 2007, pp. 1–6).
Summary of Factor B
Keeping pet birds, especially parrots,
plays an important role in Indonesian
culture, creating a massive demand for
parrots internationally and
domestically. By the 1980s,
uncontrolled trapping of salmon-crested
cockatoos for the pet bird trade was
adversely impacting the species. Based
on CITES records, 74,838 birds were
exported from Indonesia between 1981
and 1990, with international imports
averaging 10,482 annually. Because
trade was having a detrimental effect on
wild populations, the CITES countries
voted to transfer the species to CITES
Appendix I, effective January 18, 1990.
An Appendix-I listing generally
precludes commercial trade in wildcaught birds, but it is difficult to
quantify undocumented illegal
international and domestic trade.
Illegal trapping and trade in wildcaught salmon-crested cockatoos
continues today, with high domestic
consumption. Hunting of parrots by
people to supplement their income is
relatively common on Seram. Interviews
in villages suggested that perhaps as
many as 4,000 salmon-crested cockatoos
(approximately 6.4 percent of the
population) are captured annually, with
an estimated 80 percent sold within
Indonesia and 20 percent put in
international trade. The salmon-crested
cockatoo is still sold openly in the
markets of Ambon and elsewhere in
Indonesia. Generally, little is known
about how the domestic trade in birds
in Indonesia is affecting wild
populations. Little information is
available on the number and age of birds
being taken from the wild and when and
where the birds are being trapped. In
addition, it is difficult to assess the
effects of trade on wild populations
because trade is occurring at the same
time as the loss of the species’ habitat.
Illegal trade is difficult to control
because Indonesia has a vast coastline;
government officials have limited
resources and knowledge to deal with
the illegal pet trade, have conflicts of
interest, and lack a willingness to take
action; and there is widespread
corruption. Indonesia is a member of
ASEAN–WEN and has made an effort to
train some of their police, forestry, and
Customs officers in methods to tackle
poaching and smuggling. However,
outside of a recent sting operation
involving the salmon-crested cockatoo,
the wildlife protection laws have not
been vigorously enforced for this
species.
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
56783
Recent information that hunters from
one small village in central Seram used
air guns to kill 40 salmon-crested
cockatoos for food in one year is of
concern. Without additional
information, however, we are unable to
assess the possible impact air gun
hunting may be having or will have on
the survival of the salmon-crested
cockatoo.
In recent years, several programs—
rehabilitation and release of confiscated
parrots, public awareness program,
economic incentive program, and
ecotourism—were established on Seram
to support the conservation of the
salmon-crested cockatoo. It is too soon
to assess if these programs have been
successful in gaining local support and
reducing poaching. At this time,
poaching of the salmon-crested
cockatoos for the commercial pet trade
and use of wild-caught salmon-crested
cockatoos as pets in Indonesia
continues.
In summary, we find that
uncontrolled, illegal domestic and
international trade of salmon-crested
cockatoos as pets is a threat to the
continued existence of this species
throughout all of its range in the
foreseeable future. Although the recent
use of air guns to hunt salmon-crested
cockatoos for food is of concern, based
on the best available information, we
find that overutilization of the cockatoo
for recreational, scientific, or education
purposes is not a threat to the continued
existence of this species in any portion
of its range now or in the foreseeable
future.
Factor C. Disease or Predation
Diseases—general. One of the most
serious diseases found in cockatoo
species is beak and feather disease. All
cockatoo species are likely susceptible
to this disease. The disease affects wild
and captive birds, with chronic
infections resulting in feather loss and
deformities of beak and feathers. Birds
usually become infected in the nest by
ingesting or inhaling virus particles.
Birds develop immunity, die within a
couple of weeks, or become chronically
infected. No vaccine exists to immunize
populations (Cameron 2007, p. 82). In
Indonesia’s Kembali Bebas Rescue and
Rehabilitation Center on Seram, 50
cockatoos have been screened for beak
and feather disease. None of the birds
was found to be positive for the virus,
but a number had positive antibodies to
the virus (Metz 2007b, p. 3).
Another serious disease that has been
reported to infect cockatoos is
proventricular dilatation disease (PDD).
It is a fatal disease that poses a serious
threat to domesticated and wild parrots
E:\FR\FM\03NOP1.SGM
03NOP1
dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
56784
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 211 / Tuesday, November 3, 2009 / Proposed Rules
worldwide, particularly those with very
small populations (Kistler et al. 2008, p.
1; Waugh 1996, p. 112). This contagious
disease causes damage to the nerves of
the upper digestive tract, so that food
digestion and absorption are negatively
affected. The disease has a 100 percent
mortality rate. In 2008, researchers
discovered a genetically diverse set of
novel avian bornaviruses that are
thought to be the causative agents, and
developed diagnostic tests, methods of
treating or preventing bornavirus
infection, and methods for screening for
the anti-bornaviral compounds
(University of California at San
Francisco 2008, p. 1). We are unaware
of any reports that this disease occurs in
salmon-crested cockatoos in the wild.
Disease—avian influenza. Wild birds,
especially waterfowl and shorebirds, are
natural reservoirs of avian influenza.
Most viral strains have low
pathogenicity and cause few clinical
signs in infected birds. However, strains
can mutate into highly pathogenic
forms, which is what happened in 1997
when highly pathogenic avian influenza
H5N1 first appeared in Hong Kong
(USDA et al. 2006, pp. 1–2). The H5N1
virus is mainly propagated by
commercial poultry living in close
quarters with humans. The role of
migratory birds is less clear (Metz
2006a, p. 24). Scientists increasingly
believe that at least some migratory
waterfowl carry the H5N1 virus,
sometimes over long distances, and
introduce the virus to poultry flocks
(WHO 2006, p. 2). The H5N1 virus has
infected and caused death in domestic
poultry, people, and some wild birds in
Asia, Europe, and Africa. About half of
infected people die from the disease
(FWS 2006, p. 1). As of September 10,
2008, Indonesia confirmed its 136th
human case (WHO 2008, p. 26). As of
December 2006, avian influenza was not
present in fowl in the Maluku Province
(Metz 2006b, p. 42).
There has been only one documented
case of avian influenza H5N1 in
parrots—a parrot held in quarantine in
the United Kingdom was diagnosed
with the disease. However, from 2004–
2006 (Metz 2006a, pp. 24–25), fears of
the avian influenza H5N1’s risk to
human health resulted in the culling of
wild and pet birds in Asia and Europe,
including the salmon-crested cockatoo.
In the Philippines, 339 smuggled parrots
were euthanized following confiscation.
In Taiwan, 28 palm and salmon-crested
cockatoos were euthanized at the airport
out of fear that they might harbor the
disease. In Indonesia, Agriculture
officials announced that all birds,
including pet birds, within a given
radius of chickens infected with avian
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:14 Nov 02, 2009
Jkt 220001
influenza would be culled. Except,
when avian influenza struck Ragunan
Zoo in Jakarta, parrots and cockatoos
were not euthanized unless testing
showed they had the disease (IPP 2006,
p. 1).
Predation. Man probably introduced
rats, mice, pigs (Sus celebensis), deer
(Cervus timorensis), civit (Paradoxurus
hermaphroditus), and oriental civit
(Viverra tangalunga) to Seram (Smiet &
Siallagan 1981, p. 8). Goats, horses,
cows, and water buffalo (Bubalus
bubalis) also have been introduced.
Although the deer as grazers have some
adverse effect on low forest brush (Ellen
1993, pp. 193, 201), we are unaware of
an adverse effect to the salmon-crested
cockatoo’s habitat. The cockatoo has
natural predators, such as snakes and
monitor lizards, that raid the nest for
eggs and chicks (Metz et al. 2007, p. 37).
Summary of Factor C
Disease and predation associated with
salmon-crested cockatoos in the wild
are not well documented. Although
some serious diseases—such as beak
and feather disease and PDD—occur in
cockatoos in the wild, we found no
information that these diseases occur in
salmon-crested cockatoos in the wild.
Cases of avian influenza H5N1 are
continuing to occur in Indonesia;
however, parrots generally are not
considered to be natural reservoirs of
this disease. While there is the potential
for captive-held salmon-crested
cockatoos to be euthanized, especially
smuggled ones that have been seized at
ports, the number of birds euthanized is
small and not a threat to the species.
A number of introduced mammals
occur on Seram, but we are unaware of
any predation on the salmon-crested
cockatoo from these introduced
mammals. The salmon-crested cockatoo
has natural predators, but we were
unable to find information that these
natural predators are having any
significant negative impact on the
productivity of this species. Thus, we
find that neither disease nor predation
is a threat to the salmon-crested
cockatoo in any portion of its range now
or in the foreseeable future.
Factor D. The Inadequacy of Existing
Regulatory Mechanisms
As described below, Indonesia has
laws and regulations in place to
conserve biodiversity, manage forest,
regulate trade, provide species
protection, and develop and manage
protected areas.
Biodiversity. The Indonesian
Government has passed legislation to
control activities that have an adverse
impact on the environment and to
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
conserve biodiversity. In 1991, it drafted
the Biodiversity Action Plan (BAP),
which became a comprehensive
framework for biodiversity
conservation, advocating a wide range
of policy and institutional reforms to
slow the rate of biodiversity loss. In
1997, the government produced Agenda
21-Indonesia, a National Strategy for
Sustainable Development. These two
documents recognize a complex mix of
problems, including increasing
population, poor implementation of
regulations, conversion of forests to
agricultural lands, transmigration
projects, disregard of land tenure,
breakdown of traditional community
management, unsustainable logging, and
poaching.
The main objectives of the BAP are to
slow the loss of primary forests and
other habitats, expand data on
Indonesia’s biodiversity, and foster
sustainable use of biological resources.
Agenda 21-Indonesia broadly develops
the BAP. For example, in situ
conservation would include establishing
an integrated protected area system,
gaining local support for protected
areas, developing sustainable means of
funding for protected areas, and
supporting donor activities to maximize
conservation efforts (Murdoch
University 2000, pp. 1–2).
The U.S. Agency for International
Development (USAID) assessed the
status of biodiversity in Indonesia under
the Foreign Assistance Act and
concluded that threats to biodiversity
had worsened since 1998 and
decentralization had led to increased
exploitation of biodiversity (Rhee et al.
2004, p. xvii). Most managers at the
district level are generally unaware or
uncaring of biodiversity issues (Jepson
et al. 2001, pp. 859–860).
Forest management. The Indonesian
government has laws and regulations in
place to support sustainable forest
management. The primary law is the
Basic Forestry Law (Act No. 41). It
provides for the management of forest
conservation, protection, and
production; defines main forest
functions; and deals with forest
management, planning, research,
development, education, training, and
enforcement (Act 1999, pp. 11–14;
FAOLEX 2008b, p. 1; Rhee et al. 2004,
chap. 2 p. 3). Presidential Instruction
No. 4/2005 describes the duties of the
different responsible government
entities and addresses the eradication of
illegal logging by taking action against
anyone who harvests or collects timber
forest without a license; receives, buys,
or sells timber collected illegally; or
carries, controls, or has timber without
E:\FR\FM\03NOP1.SGM
03NOP1
dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 211 / Tuesday, November 3, 2009 / Proposed Rules
a certificate of legitimacy (Indonesia
2005, pp. 1–3; FAOLEX 2009, p. 1).
Agenda 21-Indonesia identifies the
major shortcomings in the management
of production forests to include current
concession policies and logging
practices (Murdoch University 2000, p.
1). A major threat to Indonesia’s forest
resources is conflict: (1) Among local
communities and between local
communities and concessions over
management and extraction rights; and
(2) between different levels of
government over licensing and
regulation of timber extraction and
forest conversion (Rhee et al. 2004,
chap. 6 p. 9). Land tenure and access in
forests are contentious issues. The
Indonesian government has jurisdiction
over all resources, but has often ignored
the land use or ownership claims of
local peoples (Rhee et al. 2004, chap. 2
pp. 21–22).
In addition, the laws and regulations
are frequently ignored, in part because
of widespread corruption (BLI 2008k, p.
7). The Indonesian economic crisis that
led to the downfall of the Suharto
regime resulted in the government
instituting a rapid and far-reaching
decentralization that gave local
government greater autonomy (Down to
Earth 2000, p. 1). Decentralization
resulted in confusion of roles and
responsibilities, and implementation of
decentralization has been slow and
uncertain because of conflicting
interpretation of policies and priorities
and the lack of capacity or experience
of local governments to manage (Rhee et
al. 2004, chap. 2 p. 20).
USAID also assessed the status of
forests in Indonesia under the Foreign
Assistance Act and concluded that
threats to forests had worsened since
1998 and decentralization had led to
worse forestry practices and increased
conflict over land tenure (Rhee et al.
2004, p. xvii). The responsibility for the
management of forests was placed at the
district level within provinces, but
criteria and standards were still set by
the central government. Most districts
do not have the capacity for planning
for sustainable development and have
limited capacity to govern. Today,
Indonesia is torn apart by economic and
political crises, and the gap between
sustainable forest management and the
reality of current mismanagement is
wide (Jepson et al. 2001, pp. 859–860).
In 2008, the Indonesian Government
reported to the Commission on Crime
Prevention and Criminal Justice on its
strategic plan on forestry, outlining its
priorities of fighting illegal logging,
controlling forest fires, restructuring the
forestry sector, rehabilitating and
conserving forest resources, and
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:14 Nov 02, 2009
Jkt 220001
decentralizing forest management. The
Government said it was committed to
intensifying the fight against illegal
logging by implementing a forest crime
case tracking system, prosecuting forest
crimes, and enhancing collaboration by
sharing information on forest crime and
illegal timber shipments (Commission
on Crime Prevention and Criminal
Justice 2008, p. 4).
International wildlife trade. Indonesia
has been a member of CITES since
December 28, 1978. It has designated
Management, Scientific, and
Enforcement authorities to implement
the treaty (CITES 2008b, p. 1) and has
played an active role in CITES meetings.
Species protection and management
plans. Indonesian Law 5/1990,
Conservation of Biodiversity and
Ecosystems, establishes the basic
principles and general rules for the
management, conservation, and use of
biological resources, natural habitats,
and protected areas. Protected species
may not be captured, collected,
displaced, killed, destroyed,
transported, or traded except for the
purposes of research, science and
safeguarding the plants or animals.
People that violate the Act are subject to
fines and punishment (Act 1990, pp. 1–
44; FAOLEX 2008a, p. 1).
The salmon-crested cockatoo is on the
Indonesian Government list of protected
species (Rhee et al. 2004, chap. 5 pp. 2,
App. VIII). While laws to protect species
are in place, enforcement often is
severely lacking (Shepherd et al. 2004,
p. 4) or difficult, given the thousands of
islands that make up Indonesia (Nichols
et al. 1991, p. 1) and considering that
illegal activities remain socially
acceptable at the local level. Thus, the
law is generally disregarded and only
sporadically enforced (Kinnaird 2000, p.
14). Few enforcement officers are
trained in species identification, and the
enforcement agency lacks capacity and
incentive. To further complicate
enforcement, some bird dealers claim
that members of the Department of
Forest Protection and Nature
Conservation are involved in the trade
(Shepherd et al. 2004, p. 4) (see Factor
B for a discussion of the problems
relating to stopping illegal trade in
salmon-crested cockatoos).
In 1982, Indonesia used the best
principles of conservation biology to
plan a national protected area system,
with the development of a national
conservation plan (NCP) (Jepson et al.
2002, p. 40). Large areas were proposed
as conservation areas. Subsequently,
forests were also allocated for
production, watershed protection, or
conservation, and Indonesia endorsed
the principles of sustainable forest
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
56785
management. However, these principles
were never fully reconciled with
national policy and practice (Jepson et
al. 2001, p. 859). As a result, reserves
generally have not been added to the
proposed network of the NCP, and
existing reserves have not been managed
effectively (Whitten et al. 2001, p. 1).
Agenda 21-Indonesia identifies
problems faced in managing protected
areas, including the ‘‘lack of public
participation, lack of management
framework, the need for regional
income, insufficient funding and lack of
law enforcement’’ (Murdoch University
2000, pp. 1–2).
In reviewing the efficacy of the
protected area system of East
Kalimantan Province, Indonesia, Jepson
et al. (2002, pp. 31, 39–40) found that
key reserves either had not been
established or were degraded (i.e.,
moderate and widespread habitat
modification or populations of key
fauna significantly reduced). They
concluded that turning reserve planning
into practice had failed because of locallevel sociopolitical realities. The ability
of the Indonesian government to manage
and protect reserves or to establish
reserves that were proposed in the NCP
in East Kalimantan, and in Indonesia as
a whole, had been severely constrained
by problems, including insufficient
funding, workforce shortages, weak
penalties, a general lack of support for
conservation in society, corruption, and
the aggressive use of resources by
migrants.
We are unaware of any review of the
efficacy of protected areas in Seram, but
find that the general conclusion of the
East Kalimantan study applies. Wai
Bula, an area in the northeastern part of
Seram (Kinnaird et al. 2003. p. 230),
illustrates the inability of the
Indonesian government to implement
the NCP. Wai Bula, proposed as a nature
reserve in 1981, was never officially
designated and has a low probability of
future protection (Kinnaird et al. 2003,
p. 231). It has been identified as an IBA
(see above) with primary lowland and
lower montane forests and a current
population of cockatoos (BLI 2008f, p.
1). It was proposed as a nature reserve,
but 93 percent is also under logging
concessions (Kinnaird et al. 2003, p.
231). Resolution of these conflicting
land use designations would have a
considerable impact on the amount of
protected habitat available for the
salmon-crested cockatoo (Kinnaird et al.
2003, p. 231).
Habitat protection. The unique
wildlife and plants of Seram are
somewhat protected by Manusela
National Park, an area of 2,323.2 km2
(896.8 mi2) in the center of the country,
E:\FR\FM\03NOP1.SGM
03NOP1
56786
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 211 / Tuesday, November 3, 2009 / Proposed Rules
dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
and Gunung Sahuwai Nature Reserve,
an area of 122.8 km2 (47.4 mi2) on the
western peninsula. Under Act No. 5 of
1990 on the conservation of biological
resources and their ecosystems, the use
of biological resources and their
ecosystems in protected areas is to be
sustainable, and plants and animals are
to be managed with consideration of
their long-term survival and
maintenance of their diversity.
Research, education, improvement of
the species, and recreational activities
are permitted, but other activities are
prohibited (FAOLEX 2008a, pp. 1–2).
Although 14 percent of the forests on
Seram are in protected areas, 15 percent
of Manusela National Park is under
logging concessions and 4.6 percent has
been converted to other land uses. A
road has been built through the park,
which increases the risk of logging and
human encroachment. Five villages of
indigenous people, who mainly work as
dry land farmers and hunt and collect
forest products (including parrots), exist
in the park. In 1980, 999 people lived
within the park boundaries, and 19,102
people lived within 10 km (6 mi) of its
boundaries. We are unaware of logging
concessions in Gunung Sahuai Nature
Reserve, and it has experienced less (3.1
percent) land conversion and human
encroachment (Kinnaird et al. 2003, pp.
230–231).
The regulations and management of
the protected areas are ineffective at
reducing the threats of habitat
destruction (see Factor A) and poaching
for the pet trade (see Factor B). Reserve
management is at the national level—
the responsibility of the Directorate
General of Forest Protection and Nature
Conservation. Effective reserve
management is hampered by a shortage
of staff, expertise, and money, and the
remoteness of protected areas. The
recent civil unrest forced a reduction in
conservation programs, with some
protected areas virtually unsupervised
(BLI 2008k, p. 9).
Summary of Factor D
While Indonesia has a good legal
framework to manage wildlife and their
habitats, implementation of its laws and
regulatory mechanisms has been
inadequate to reduce the threats to the
salmon-crested cockatoo. As discussed
in Factor A, we found that logging and
conversion of forests to agriculture and
plantations are primary threats to the
habitat of the salmon-crested cockatoo.
Laws and regulations are frequently
ignored, and illegal logging is
considered a leading cause of forest
degradation in Indonesia. The
decentralization of government has led
to worse forestry practices, increased
exploitation of resources, and increased
conflict over land tenure. Current
concession policies and logging
practices hamper sustainable forestry.
Because nearly 50 percent of Seram’s
forests are held under logging
concessions, with more than 75 percent
within the salmon-crested cockatoo’s
favored lowland habitat, the proper
management of these logging
concessions could determine the
survival of this species.
The salmon-crested cockatoo is listed
in Appendix I of CITES (see discussion
in Conservation Status above), which
appears generally to have controlled
international trade. However, as
discussed in Factor B, uncontrolled
illegal domestic and international trade
continues to adversely impact the
salmon-crested cockatoo. The species is
on Indonesia’s list of protected species,
and the law provides prohibitions,
including capture and trade, and lays
out fines and punishment. However, the
law is generally ignored and only
sporadically enforced.
Manusela National Park and Gunung
Sahuwai Nature Reserve provide some
protection to the salmon-crested
cockatoo. Management of these
protected areas, however, is hampered
by staff shortages, lack of expertise and
money, and remoteness of the areas.
Another Important Bird Area, Wai Bula,
was proposed as a nature reserve in
1981, but was never officially
designated. Resolution of its designation
would increase the amount of protected
habitat available for the salmon-crested
cockatoo, but the delay in making such
a designation reflects the inability of the
Indonesian government to implement
the national conservation plan.
In summary, we find that the existing
regulatory mechanisms, as
implemented, are inadequate to reduce
or remove the current threats to the
salmon-crested cockatoo. There is no
information available to suggest these
regulatory mechanisms will change in
the foreseeable future.
Factor E. Other Natural or Manmade
Factors Affecting the Continued
Existence of the Species
Forest fires. Fires in tropical forests
are becoming increasingly common
(Cochrane 2003, p. 913; Kinnaird &
O’Brien 1998, p. 954; Uhl & Kauffman
1990, p. 437; Woods 1989, p. 290). For
example, in 1983, disastrous, large-scale
˜
El Nino wildfires occurred in the
tropical forests of Borneo, although
severe droughts had occurred
previously without causing extensive
fires. Woods (1989, p. 290) concluded
that the extensive fires were the result
of forests becoming more fire-prone due
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:14 Nov 02, 2009
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
to logging, road building, and
cultivation. He also found that potential
recovery of forest structure is not good
in logged forests, especially if further
˜
burning occurs. The 1997–98 El Nino
fires in Indonesia devastated vast tracts
of forest, especially in the islands of
Sumatra and Kalimantan (islands to the
far west of Seram) and Irian Jaya (a
neighboring island to the east of Seram)
(Kinnaird & O’Brien 1998, p. 954). The
forest fires were mainly caused by poor
logging practices, burning of agriculture
land, and land clearing for plantations
(Grimmett & Sumarauw 2000, pp. 6, 8;
Kinnaird & O’Brien 1998, p. 954).
˜
Forest fires are often part of El Nino
events, which are expected to increase
in number and severity due to global
climate change. Using a global climate
model that had successfully predicted
˜
the 1997–98 El Nino, Timmermann et
al. (1999, pp. 694–696) looked at the
effect of future greenhouse warming on
˜
El Nino frequency. They concluded that,
if emissions of greenhouse gases
continue to increase, events typical of El
˜
Nino will become more frequent and
variations may become more extreme.
Because more tropical forests are
becoming disturbed and because the
˜
number of El Nino events is predicted
to increase and be more severe, serious
fires in Indonesia, including Seram and
other areas of the tropics, are likely to
remain a critical conservation concern
(Adeney et al. 2006, p. 292).
Fires can lead to the long-term decline
of the rain forest, with destruction of
leaf litter and the seedling-sapling layer,
increased invasion of exotic plants,
increased tree mortality, and changes in
the soil. Although many animals have
the ability to escape direct mortality
from fire, they also may be negatively
affected by loss of food, shelter, and
territory. For example, the number of
frugivorous and omnivorous birds
˜
declined after the 1997–98 El Nino fire
in Indonesia, with helmeted and
rhinoceros hornbills (Buceros
rhinoceros and B. vigil) declining by 50
percent in one study area (Kinnaird &
O’Brien 1998, p. 955).
At the current time, high impact fires
are not adversely affecting the habitat of
the salmon-crested cockatoo. In 1985,
Ellen (1985, p. 567) wrote that fires
seldom get out of hand in Seram when
land is cleared for agriculture. In 1998,
Metz (1998, p. 11) reported that the
˜
1997–98 EL Nino fires in Indonesia are
said to have not affected Seram.
˜
However, because devastating El Nino
fires have been shown to occur more
frequently in logged or disturbed forests
and Seram has extensive logging
planned and ongoing clearing of land
˜
for plantations and agriculture, El Nino-
E:\FR\FM\03NOP1.SGM
03NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 211 / Tuesday, November 3, 2009 / Proposed Rules
related fires will likely have a severe
impact on Seram in the future (Kinnaird
et al. 2003, p. 234).
Civil unrest. Unlike the rest of
Indonesia, which is 90 percent Muslim,
the Moluccas have equal numbers of
Christian and Islamic followers. Under
the Suharto government, primarily
Muslim transmigrants moved to Seram,
and the government assigned officials,
police, and military from outside the
region. Rioting between Muslim and
Christain citizens became an ongoing
problem in Seram. In 1999 and 2001, as
Indonesia plunged into a deep economic
crisis, resentments erupted and
thousands of people were killed
(Javaman 2009, p. 1). It is unknown if
the civil unrest affected the salmoncrested cockatoo, but the violence
temporarily stopped development. On
the other hand, soldiers like parrots, and
a heavy military presence led to a rise
in cockatoo trade (Kinnaird 2000, p. 15).
Persecution. In 1864, Wallace (p. 279)
reported that the salmon-crested
cockatoo was considered a harmful pest
in coconut palms around villages on
Seram. The cockatoos gnawed through
shells of young coconuts to reach the
pulp and water inside. Historically, the
cockatoo was persecuted (BLI 2004, p. 2;
Metz 1998, p. 10), but BLI (2008b, p. 2)
reports this persecution is in the past
and unlikely to return.
dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Summary of Factor E
Forest fires negatively impact birds by
direct mortality or the loss of food,
shelter, and territory. Research has
shown that frugivorous and omnivorous
birds may decline by 50 percent as a
result of fires in areas of disturbed
tropical rain forests. Forest fires are
becoming more common in tropical rain
forests, occurring more frequently in
logged or disturbed areas. As discussed
in Factor A above, logging and
conversion of land to agriculture and
plantations is ongoing and will likely
increase in the future on Seram.
Approximately 75 percent (8,271 km2
(3,193 mi2)) of the lowland habitat
favored by the salmon-crested cockatoo
is under logging concession.
Approximately 44 percent (6,220 km2
(2,401 mi2)) of Seram’s lowland forest is
slated for conversion and, by 2028, most
of this land will be converted to
agriculture or plantations. Therefore, we
find that, even though fires are not
currently adversely affecting the
salmon-crested cockatoo, fires will be a
threat to this species throughout all of
its range in the foreseeable future due to
the extensive planned logging and
clearing of land for agriculture and
plantations and predicted increase in
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:14 Nov 02, 2009
Jkt 220001
˜
number and severity of El Nino events
due to global climate change.
Civil unrest is an ongoing problem on
Seram, but we are unaware that it has
adversely impacted the salmon-crested
cockatoo other than a possible increase
in sporadic illegal trade, which is
discussed under Factor B. The
persecution of salmon-crested cockatoo
as pests in coconut palm groves does
not appear to be a problem today. Thus,
we find that neither civil unrest nor
persecution is a threat to the salmoncrested cockatoo in any portion of its
range now or in the foreseeable future.
Status Determination for the Salmoncrested Cockatoo
We have carefully assessed the best
available scientific and commercial
information regarding the past, present,
and potential future threats faced by the
salmon-crested cockatoo. The species is
at risk of extinction in the foreseeable
future throughout all of its range
primarily due to extensive logging and
conversion of lowland forests to
agricultural lands and plantations
(Factor A) and uncontrolled, illegal
trapping for the domestic and
international pet trade (Factor B). Also,
existing regulatory mechanisms, as
implemented, are inadequate to mitigate
the current threats to the salmon-crested
˜
cockatoo (Factor D). Although El Nino
forest fires are not currently adversely
affecting the salmon-crested cockatoo,
fires will be a threat in the foreseeable
future due to the extensive planned
logging and clearing of land and
predicted increase in number and
severity of El Nio events due to global
climate change (Factor E).
The salmon-crested cockatoo is
endemic to the island of Seram, with
records from three small adjacent
islands. Current populations are
estimated at 62,400 individuals, with a
decreasing population trend. The
cockatoo is largely a resident of lowland
rain forests, predominately between
100–600 m (328–1,968 ft), with the
highest densities of birds occurring in
little-disturbed forests. It requires large,
mature trees for nesting.
Logging and conversion of forests to
agriculture and plantations are primary
threats to the habitat of the salmoncrested cockatoo in the foreseeable
future. By 2001, about 20 percent of the
original forest cover had been cleared.
Nearly 50 percent of the island’s forests
are held under logging concessions, of
which 75 percent are held within
lowland forests, prime salmon-crested
cockatoo habitat. Unsustainable logging
practices destroy the forest canopy and
dramatically reduce habitat available for
cockatoos, especially if large nest trees
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
56787
and strangling figs are harvested.
Between 1980 and 1990, an estimated
1,200 km2 (463 mi2) of the salmoncrested cockatoo’s habitat was lost. In
addition, about 44 percent of lowland
forest is designated as conversion forest.
Researchers predict that by 2028, up to
50 percent of the current salmon-crested
cockatoo population (at least 31,000
cockatoos) may be lost as a result of
conversion of forests to agriculture and
plantations. Although about 14 percent
of the forests are within protected areas,
logging concessions are held in 15
percent of these areas, and small-scale
illegal logging and human
encroachment also occur there. By 2028,
extensive logging and conversion of
lowland forests to agriculture and
plantations, combined with
transmigratory human resettlement, oil
exploration, and infrastructure
development, are likely to destroy much
of the salmon-crested cockatoo’s habitat.
Illegal trapping of the salmon-crested
cockatoo for the pet trade is widespread.
Pet birds are an important part of
Indonesian culture, with large numbers
of wild-caught parrots traded
domestically and internationally. In the
late 1970s, the salmon-crested cockatoo
was extensively trapped for the pet bird
trade. By the 1980s, the pet bird trade
was adversely impacting the species.
Between 1981 and 1990, 74,838 birds
were exported from Indonesia and
international imports averaged 10,482
annually. Although the salmon-crested
cockatoo was transferred to Appendix I
of CITES, trappers reportedly remain
active, and wild-caught birds are openly
sold in domestic markets. Interviews in
villages suggest that perhaps as many as
4,000 birds, or 6.4 percent of the current
estimated population, are still being
captured annually, with 80 percent
traded domestically and 20 percent
internationally. Ending illegal trade is
hampered by Indonesia’s large coastline,
officials with limited resources and
knowledge, and corruption. The
continuing illegal trade of the salmoncrested cockatoo is a threat to the
survival of the species in the foreseeable
future.
Indonesia has a good legal framework
to manage wildlife and their habitats,
but implementation of its laws and
regulatory mechanisms has been
inadequate to address the threats to the
salmon-crested cockatoo. Logging laws
and policies are frequently ignored and
rarely enforced, and illegal logging is
rampant, even occurring in national
parks and nature reserves. Current
concession policies and logging
practices hamper sustainable forestry.
The salmon-crested cockatoo is a
protected species in Indonesia, and the
E:\FR\FM\03NOP1.SGM
03NOP1
56788
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 211 / Tuesday, November 3, 2009 / Proposed Rules
dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
law provides prohibitions on capture
and trade and also provides for fines
and punishment. Again, the law is
generally ignored and only sporadically
enforced. Illegal bird trade is socially
acceptable, making it difficult to enforce
laws. Public awareness programs,
economic incentive programs, and
ecotourism are in their infancy, and it
is too early to tell if they are helping to
control poaching on the island. The
illegal trade of the salmon-crested
cockatoo for the domestic trade, and to
a smaller extent international trade,
continues to occur.
Fires are becoming more common in
tropical rain forests where logging, road
building, and clearing of land for
agriculture occur. Fires can lead to the
long-term decline of the rain forest, and
many animals may be negatively
affected by loss of food, shelter, and
territory. Currently, high impact fires
are not adversely affecting the habitat of
the salmon-crested cockatoo, but due to
future planned extensive logging and
clearing of land for agriculture and
plantations and predicted increase in
˜
number and severity of El Nino events,
fires will be a threat to this species in
the foreseeable future.
Section 3 of the Act defines an
‘‘endangered species’’ as ‘‘any species
which is in danger of extinction
throughout all or a significant portion of
its range’’ and a ‘‘threatened species’’ as
‘‘any species which is likely to become
an endangered species within the
foreseeable future throughout all or a
significant portion of its range.’’ The
salmon-crested cockatoo population
estimate is approximately 62,400 and
the threats of habitat loss and trade are
not at a level to consider the species to
be in danger of extinction at this time.
Densities are highest in primary and
disturbed primary forest, but the
cockatoo persists in secondary forest
although at lower densities. However,
logging and forest conversion continue
to adversely affect the cockatoo’s
habitat. Based on the analysis of the five
factors discussed above, we determine
that the salmon-crested cockatoo is
likely to become an endangered species
within the foreseeable future throughout
all of its range.
Significant Portion of the Range
Analysis
Having determined that the salmoncrested cockatoo meets the definition of
threatened under the Act, we
considered whether there are any
significant portions of the range where
the species is in danger of extinction.
The term ‘‘significant portion of its
range’’ in the definition of an
‘‘endangered species’’ and ‘‘threatened
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:14 Nov 02, 2009
Jkt 220001
species’’ is not defined by the Act. For
purposes of this finding, a significant
portion of a species’ range is an area that
is important to the conservation of the
species because it contributes
meaningfully to the representation,
resiliency, or redundancy of the species.
The contribution must be at a level such
that its loss would result in a decrease
in the ability to conserve the species.
The first step in determining whether
a species is endangered in a significant
portion of its range is to identify any
portions of the range of the species that
warrant further consideration. The range
of a species can theoretically be divided
into portions in an infinite number of
ways. However, there is no purpose to
analyzing portions of the range that are
not reasonably likely to be significant
and where the species is not in danger
of extinction. To identify those portions
that warrant further consideration, we
determine whether there is substantial
information indicating that (i) the
portions may be significant and (ii) the
species may be in danger of extinction
there. In practice, a key part of this
analysis is whether the threats are
geographically concentrated in some
way. If the threats to the species are
essentially uniform throughout its
range, no portion is likely to warrant
further consideration. Moreover, if any
concentration of threats applies only to
portions of the range that are
unimportant to the conservation of the
species, such portions will not warrant
further consideration.
If we identify any portions that
warrant further consideration, we then
determine whether in fact the species is
threatened or endangered in any
significant portion of its range.
Depending on the biology of the species,
its range, and the threats it faces, it may
be more efficient for the Service to
address the significance question first,
or the status question first. Thus, if the
Service determines that a portion of the
range is not significant, the Service need
not determine whether the species is
threatened or endangered there. If the
Service determines that the species is
not threatened or endangered in a
portion of its range, the Service need not
determine if that portion is significant.
If the Service determines that both a
portion of the range of a species is
significant and the species is threatened
or endangered there, the Service will
specify that portion of the range where
the species is in danger of extinction
pursuant to section 4(c)(1) of the Act.
The terms ‘‘resiliency,’’ redundancy,’’
and ‘‘representation’’ are intended to be
indicators of the conservation value of
portions of the range. Resiliency of a
species allows the species to recover
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
from periodic disturbance. A species
will likely be more resilient if large
populations exist in high-quality habitat
that is distributed throughout the range
of the species in such a way as to
capture the environmental variability
found within the range of the species. In
addition, the portion may contribute to
resiliency for other reasons—for
instance, it may contain an important
concentration of certain types of habitat
that are necessary for the species to
carry out its life-history functions, such
as breeding, feeding, migration,
dispersal, or wintering. Redundancy of
populations may be needed to provide
a margin of safety for the species to
withstand catastrophic events. This
does not mean than any portion that
provides redundancy is a significant
portion of the range of a species. The
idea is to conserve enough areas of the
range such that random perturbations in
the system act on only a few
populations. Therefore, each area must
be examined based on whether that area
provides an increment of redundancy
that is important to the conservation of
the species. Adequate representation
ensures that the species’ adaptive
capabilities are conserved. Specifically,
the portion should be evaluated to see
how it contributes to the genetic
diversity of the species. The loss of
genetically based diversity may
substantially reduce the ability of the
species to respond and adapt to future
environmental changes. A peripheral
population may contribute meaningfully
to representation if there is evidence
that it provides genetic diversity due to
its location on the margin of the species’
habitat requirements.
To determine whether any portion of
the range of the salmon-crested cockatoo
warrants further consideration as
possibly endangered, we reviewed the
entire supporting record for this
proposed listing determination with
respect to the geographic concentration
of threats and the significance of
portions of the range to the conservation
of the species. As previously mentioned,
we evaluated whether substantial
information indicated that (i) the
portions may be significant and (ii) the
species in that portion may be currently
in danger of extinction. The salmoncrested cockatoo is endemic to Seram
and the three small, neighboring
Indonesian islands of Ambon, Haruku,
and Saparua. Very limited information
is available on the status of the species
on Ambon, Haruku, and Saparua.
Whether this species is native or
introduced to Ambon is uncertain, and
a very small number of cockatoos
(sightings of six to eight birds) are
E:\FR\FM\03NOP1.SGM
03NOP1
dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 211 / Tuesday, November 3, 2009 / Proposed Rules
thought to occur in remaining natural
forests in the more remote regions of the
island. The status of the salmon-crested
cockatoo is unknown on Haruku and
Saparua. For Haruku, there is one
unspecified locality and observation
reported in 1934; for Saparua, there is
one specimen recorded for 1923. Even
less information is available on the
habitat and the threats to the species on
these islands. Thus, we find that these
three islands are not significant portions
of the range of the salmon-crested
cockatoo and do not require further
consideration as to whether the species
is endanger of extinction there.
The relatively larger population size
in high-quality habitat on Seram
suggests that this area may be a
significant portion of the range. The
salmon-crested cockatoo primarily
occurs in lowland forests throughout the
island of Seram; its current population
is estimated to be approximately 62,400
birds; and the species persists in high
densities in primary and disturbed
primary forests on Seram. Therefore,
having determined Seram may be a
portion of the range that is significant,
we proceeded to evaluate whether the
species within this portion would
qualify as endangered.
Under our five-factor analysis above,
we determined that the species is
threatened by logging and conversion of
forests to agriculture and plantations,
illegal trapping for the pet trade,
inadequacy or regulatory mechanisms,
˜
and fires resulting from El Nino events
throughout its entire range. The species
is threatened by each of these factors
uniformly throughout Seram. There is
no information to suggest that the
species is currently in danger of
extinction because of the reasonably
large population size of the species on
the island and its occurrence throughout
the lowland forests of Seram in primary
and disturbed primary forest habitat, as
well as secondary forest habitat.
Therefore, the best scientific and
commercial data allows us to make a
determination that there are no
significant portions of the range in
which the salmon-crested cockatoo is
currently in danger of extinction.
Although we do not believe that the
species is currently endangered, we
believe it is likely that the salmoncrested cockatoo will become
endangered throughout its range in the
foreseeable future. Thus, we propose to
list the salmon-crested cockatoo as a
threatened species throughout all of its
range under the Act.
Available Conservation Measures
Conservation measures provided to
species listed as endangered or
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:14 Nov 02, 2009
Jkt 220001
threatened under the Act include
recognition, requirements for Federal
protection, and prohibitions against
certain practices. Recognition through
listing results in public awareness, and
encourages and results in conservation
actions by Federal and State
governments, private agencies and
groups, and individuals.
Section 7(a) of the Act, as amended,
and as implemented by regulations at 50
CFR part 402, requires Federal agencies
to evaluate their actions within the
United States or on the high seas with
respect to any species that is proposed
or listed as endangered or threatened
and with respect to its critical habitat,
if any is being designated. However,
given that the salmon-crested cockatoo
is not native to the United States, we are
not proposing critical habitat for this
species under section 4 of the Act.
Section 8(a) of the Act authorizes the
provision of limited financial assistance
for the development and management of
programs that the Secretary of the
Interior determines to be necessary or
useful for the conservation of
endangered and threatened species in
foreign countries. Sections 8(b) and 8(c)
of the Act authorize the Secretary to
encourage conservation programs for
foreign endangered species and to
provide assistance for such programs in
the form of personnel and the training
of personnel.
The Act and its implementing
regulations set forth a series of general
prohibitions and exceptions that apply
to all endangered and threatened
wildlife. These prohibitions, at 50 CFR
17.21 and 17.31, in part, make it illegal
for any person subject to the jurisdiction
of the United States to ‘‘take’’ (take
includes harass, harm, pursue, hunt,
shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, collect,
or to attempt any of these) within the
United States or upon the high seas;
import or export; deliver, receive, carry,
transport, or ship in interstate or foreign
commerce in the course of commercial
activity; or sell or offer for sale in
interstate or foreign commerce any
endangered wildlife species. It also is
illegal to possess, sell, deliver, carry,
transport, or ship any such wildlife that
has been taken in violation of the Act.
Certain exceptions apply to agents of the
Service and State conservation agencies.
Permits may be issued to carry out
otherwise prohibited activities
involving endangered and threatened
wildlife species under certain
circumstances. Regulations governing
permits are codified at 50 CFR 17.22 for
endangered species and 17.32 for
threatened species. For endangered
wildlife, a permit may be issued for
scientific purposes, to enhance the
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
56789
propagation or survival of the species,
and for incidental take in connection
with otherwise lawful activities. For
threatened species, a permit may be
issued for the same activities, as well as
zoological exhibition, education, and
special purposes consistent with the
Act.
Special Rule
Section 4(d) of the Act states that the
Secretary of the Interior (Secretary) may,
by regulation, extend to threatened
species prohibitions provided for
endangered species under section 9. Our
implementing regulations for threatened
wildlife (50 CFR 17.31) incorporate the
section 9 prohibitions for endangered
wildlife, except when a special rule is
promulgated. For threatened species,
section 4(d) of the Act gives the
Secretary discretion to specify the
prohibitions and any exceptions to
those prohibitions that are appropriate
for the species, provided that those
prohibitions and exceptions are
necessary and advisable to provide for
the conservation of the species. A
special rule allows us to include
provisions that are tailored to the
specific conservation needs of the
threatened species and which may be
more or less restrictive than the general
provisions at 50 CFR 17.31.
The proposed special rule for the
salmon-crested cockatoo, in most
instances, adopts the existing
conservation regulatory requirements of
CITES and the WBCA as the appropriate
regulatory provisions for the import and
export of certain captive salmon-crested
cockatoos. It would also allow interstate
commerce. However, import and export
of birds taken from the wild after
January 18, 1990, take, and foreign
commerce will need to meet the
requirements of 50 CFR 17.31 and 17.32.
‘‘Take’’ under the Act includes both
harm and harass. When applied to
captive wildlife, take does not include
generally accepted animal husbandry
practices, breeding procedures, or
provisions of veterinary care for
confining, tranquilizing, or
anesthetizing, when such practices,
procedures, or provisions are not likely
to result in injury to the wildlife. When
conducting an activity that could take or
incidentally take wildlife, a permit
under the Act is required.
The proposed special rule would, if
adopted, allow import and export of
certain salmon-crested cockatoos and
interstate commerce of this species
without a permit under the Act as
explained below.
Import and export. The proposed
special rule would apply to all
commercial and noncommercial
E:\FR\FM\03NOP1.SGM
03NOP1
dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
56790
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 211 / Tuesday, November 3, 2009 / Proposed Rules
international shipments of live salmoncrested cockatoos and parts and
products, including the import and
export of personal pets and research
samples. It proposes to allow a person
to import or export a specimen that was
held in captivity prior to January 18,
1990 (the date the species was
transferred to CITES Appendix I) or that
was captive-bred provided the import is
authorized under CITES and the WBCA
and export is authorized under CITES.
The terms ‘‘captive-bred’’ and
‘‘captivity’’ used in the proposed special
rule are defined in the regulations at 50
CFR 17.3 and refer to wildlife produced
in a controlled environment that is
intensively manipulated by man from
parents that mated or otherwise
transferred gametes in captivity. The
proposed special rule would apply to
birds captive-bred in the United States
and abroad. Import and export is
allowed without a permit under the Act
provided the provisions of CITES and
WBCA are met. The CITES permit needs
to indicate that the specimen was not
taken from the wild by using a source
code on the face of the permit other than
U (unknown) or W (taken from the
wild). If the specimen was taken from
the wild prior to January 18, 1990, the
importer or exporter needs to
demonstrate that the cockatoo was taken
from the wild prior to that date. Under
the special rule, a person needs to
provide records, receipts, or other
documents when applying for permits
under CITES and WBCA to show the
specimen was held in captivity prior to
January 18, 1990.
We assessed the conservation needs of
the salmon-crested cockatoo in light of
the broad protections provided to the
species under the WBCA and CITES.
The purpose of the WBCA is to promote
the conservation of exotic birds and to
ensure that international trade involving
the United States does not harm exotic
birds (see Conservation Status). The
salmon-crested cockatoo is also
protected by CITES, a treaty which
contributes to the conservation of the
species by monitoring international
trade and ensuring that trade in
Appendix I species is not detrimental to
the survival of the species and is not for
commercial purposes (see Conservation
Status). International trade of the
salmon-crested cockatoo has been
substantially reduced since the listing of
the species in Appendix I under CITES
and protection under the WBCA. A
review of the CITES data, shows that in
the 17 years between 1991 and 2007,
297 salmon-crested cockatoos were
imported into the United States. Many
of these birds are personal pets that
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:14 Nov 02, 2009
Jkt 220001
owners took with them when travelling
out of and returning to the United
States. The best available commercial
data indicates that the current threat to
the salmon-crested cockatoo stems from
illegal trade in the domestic and
international markets of Indonesia and
surrounding countries. Thus, the
general prohibitions on import and
export contained in 50 CFR 17.31,
which only extend within the
jurisdiction of the United States, would
not regulate such activities. The Service
also did not identify how import and
export of salmon-crested cockatoos
under the proposed special rule is
associated with the threat of the species’
habitat destruction. Thus, we find that
the import and export requirements of
the proposed special rule provide the
necessary and advisable conservation
measures that are needed for this
species.
Interstate commerce. Under the
proposed special rule, a person may
deliver, receive, carry, transport, ship,
sell, offer to sell, purchase, or offer to
purchase a salmon-crested cockatoo in
interstate commerce. Although we do
not have current data, we believe there
are a large number of salmon-crested
cockatoos in the United States. Current
ISIS (International Species Information
System) information shows 123 salmoncrested cockatoos are held in U.S. zoos
(ISIS 2008, p. 4). This number is an
underestimate as some zoos do not enter
data into the ISIS database. In addition,
CITES annual report data shows that
58,484 salmon-crested cockatoos were
imported into the United States between
1981 and 1989 (UNEP-WCMC 2009b, p.
2). We believe that a number of these
birds are still held in captivity in the
United States. In 1990 and 1991,
surveys of captive breeding by U.S.
aviculturists showed 820 and 625
salmon-crested cockatoos were held by
239 and 194 survey respondents,
respectively (Allen & Johnson 1991, p.
17; Johnson 1992, p. 46). We have no
information to suggest that interstate
commerce activities are associated with
threats to the salmon-crested cockatoo
or will negatively affect any efforts
aimed at the recovery of wild
populations of the species. At the same
time, the prohibitions on take under 50
CFR 17.31 would apply under this
special rule, and any interstate
commerce activities that could
incidentally take cockatoos would
require a permit under 50 CFR 17.32.
Therefore, we find that it is not
necessary or advisable for the
conservation of the salmon-crested
cockatoo to regulate interstate
commerce of this species.
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Peer Review
In accordance with our policy,
‘‘Notice of Interagency Cooperative
Policy for Peer Review in Endangered
Species Act Activities,’’ that was
published on July 1, 1994 (59 FR
34270), we will seek the expert opinion
of at least three appropriate
independent specialists regarding this
proposed rule. The purpose of such
review is to ensure listing decisions are
based on scientifically sound data,
assumptions, and analysis. We will send
copies of this proposed rule to the peer
reviewers immediately following
publication in the Federal Register.
Public Hearings
The Act provides for one or more
public hearings on this proposal, if we
receive any requests for hearings. We
must receive your request for a public
hearing within 45 days after the date of
this Federal Register publication (see
DATES). Such requests must be made in
writing and be addressed to the Chief of
the Branch of Listing at the address
shown in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section. We will schedule
public hearings on this proposal, if any
are requested, and announce the dates,
times, and places of those hearings, as
well as how to obtain reasonable
accommodations, in the Federal
Register at least 15 days before the first
hearing.
Required Determinations
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule does not contain
any new collections of information that
require approval by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) under
44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. The regulation
will not impose new recordkeeping or
reporting requirements on State or local
governments, individuals, businesses, or
organizations. We may not conduct or
sponsor and you are not required to
respond to a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number.
National Environmental Policy Act
We have determined that
Environmental Assessments and
Environmental Impact Statements, as
defined under the authority of the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969, need not be prepared in
connection with regulations adopted
under section 4(a) of the Act. A notice
outlining our reasons for this
determination was published in the
Federal Register on October 25, 1983
(48 FR 49244).
E:\FR\FM\03NOP1.SGM
03NOP1
56791
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 211 / Tuesday, November 3, 2009 / Proposed Rules
Clarity of the Rule
We are required by Executive Orders
12866 and 12988 and by Presidential
Memorandum of June 1, 1998, to write
all rules in plain language. This means
that each rule we publish must:
(a) Be logically organized;
(b) Use the active voice to address
readers directly;
(c) Use clear language rather than
jargon;
(d) Be divided into short sections and
sentences; and
(e) Use lists and tables wherever
possible.
If you feel that we have not met these
requirements, send us comments by one
of the methods listed in the ADDRESSES
section. To better help us revise the
rule, your comments should be as
specific as possible. For example, you
should tell us the numbers of the
sections or paragraphs that are unclearly
written, which sections or sentences are
too long, the sections where you feel
lists or tables would be useful, etc.
References Cited
A list of the references used to
develop this proposed rule is available
upon request (see FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section).
Author
The primary authors of this notice are
staff members of the Division of
Scientific Authority, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 17
Endangered and threatened species,
Exports, Imports, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements,
Transportation.
Species
*
Scientific name
*
*
Accordingly, we propose to amend
part 17, subchapter B of chapter I, title
50 of the Code of Federal Regulations,
as follows:
PART 17—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 17
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1361-1407; 16 U.S.C.
1531-1544; 16 U.S.C. 4201-4245; Pub. L. 99625, 100 Stat. 3500; unless otherwise noted.
2. Amend §17.11(h) by adding new
entry for ‘‘Cockatoo, salmon-crested’’ in
alphabetical order under Birds to the
List of Endangered and Threatened
Wildlife, as follows:
§17.11 Endangered and threatened
wildlife.
*
Vertebrate
population
where endangered or
threatened
Historic range
Common name
Proposed Regulation Promulgation
*
*
(h) * * *
*
Status
When
listed
*
Critical
habitat
*
*
*
*
*
*
T
NA
Special
rules
BIRDS
*
*
Cockatoo, salmon-crested
*
Cacatua moluccensis
*
*
*
*
*
3. Amend §17.41 by adding paragraph
(c) to read as follows:
§17.41
Special rules—birds.
dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Salmon-crested cockatoo (Cacatua
moluccensis).
(1) Except as noted in paragraphs
(c)(2) and (c)(3) of this section, all
prohibitions and provisions of §§17.31
and 17.32 of this part apply to the
salmon-crested cockatoo.
(2) Import and export. The import or
export of any salmon-crested cockatoo
taken from the wild after January 18,
1990, requires a permit under §17.32.
You may import and export a live
salmon-crested cockatoo and its parts
and products provided:
(i) The import or export of the
specimen is authorized under the Wild
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:14 Nov 02, 2009
Jkt 220001
Seram, Haruku,
Saparua, and
Ambon, Indonesia
Entire
Bird Conservation Act (WBCA, 16
U.S.C. 4901–4916) and the Convention
on International Trade in Endangered
Species of Wild Fauna and Flora
(CITES, TIAS 8249);
(ii) The specimen was captive-bred
and the source code on the CITES
document for the specimen is not U
(unknown) or W (taken from the wild);
or, for a specimen that was held in
captivity prior to January 18, 1990, and
was not captive-bred, you provide
records, receipts, or other documents
when you apply for an import or export
permit under CITES or an import permit
under WBCA to demonstrate that the
specimen was held in captivity prior to
January 18, 1990; and
(iii) The person carrying out the
activity has complied with all terms and
conditions that apply to that activity
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
17.41(c)
under the provisions of the WBCA and
CITES and their implementing
regulations. Violation of WBCA or
CITES would constitute a violation of
the Act.
(3) Interstate commerce. You may
deliver, receive, carry, transport, ship,
sell, offer to sell, purchase, or offer to
purchase in interstate commerce a live
salmon-crested cockatoo and its parts
and products.
(4) All applicable provisions of 50
CFR parts 14, 15, 17, and 23 must be
met.
Dated: October 21, 2009.
Rowan W. Gould,
Deputy Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service.
[FR Doc. E9–26131 Filed 11–2– 09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–S
E:\FR\FM\03NOP1.SGM
03NOP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 211 (Tuesday, November 3, 2009)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 56770-56791]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-26131]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 17
[Docket No. FWS-R9-IA-2009-0056]
[90100-1660-1FLA B6]
[RIN 1018-AW00]
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Listing the
Salmon-Crested Cockatoo as Threatened Throughout Its Range with Special
Rule
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), propose to
list the salmon-crested cockatoo (Cacatua moluccensis) as threatened,
with a special rule, under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (Act). This proposal, if made final, would extend the Act's
protections to this species and amend the regulations at 50 CFR part 17
to create a special rule under authority of section 4(d) of the Act
that provides measures that are necessary and advisable for the
conservation of the salmon-crested cockatoo. The Service seeks data and
comments from the public on this proposed listing and special rule.
DATES: We will accept comments received or postmarked on or before
February 1, 2010. We must receive requests for public hearings, in
writing, at the address shown in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section by December 18, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by one of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments on
Docket No. FWS-R9-IA-2009-0056.
U.S. mail or hand-delivery: Public Comments Processing,
Attn: FWS-R9-IA-2009-0056; Division of Policy and Directives
Management; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; 4401 N. Fairfax Drive,
Suite 222; Arlington, VA 22203.
We will not accept e-mails or faxes. We will post all comments on
https://www.regulations.gov. This generally means that we will post any
personal information you provide us (see the Public Comments section
below for more information).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Douglas Krofta, Chief, Branch of
Listing, Endangered Species Program, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
4401 N. Fairfax Drive, Room 420, Arlington, VA 22203; telephone 703-
358-2171; facsimile 703-358-1735. If you use a telecommunications
devise for the deaf (TDD), call the Federal Information Relay Service
(FIRS) at 800-877-8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Comments
We intend that any final action resulting from this proposal will
be as accurate and as effective as possible. Therefore, we are
requesting comments from other government agencies, the scientific
community, industry, or any other interested party concerning this
proposed rule. We particularly seek comments concerning:
Biological, commercial trade, or other relevant data
concerning any threats (or lack thereof) to this species and
regulations that may be addressing those threats;
Additional information concerning the range, distribution,
and population size of this species;
Any information on the biological or ecological
requirements of this species;
Current or planned activities in the areas occupied by
this species and possible impacts of these activities on this species;
Any information concerning the effects of climate change
on this species or its habitats;
Any information concerning numbers of this species held in
captivity in the United States, breeding success, and types of
activities that should be addressed in the special rule; and
The appropriate conservation status for the salmon-crested
cockatoo.
If you submit a comment via https://www.regulations.gov, your entire
comment--including any personal identifying information--will be posted
on the Web site. If you submit a hardcopy comment that includes
personal identifying information, you may request at the top of your
document that we withhold this information from public review. However,
we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. We will post all
hardcopy comments on https://www.regulations.gov.
[[Page 56771]]
Comments and materials we receive, as well as supporting
documentation we used in preparing this proposed rule, will be
available for public inspection on https://www.regulations.govor by
appointment, during normal business hours, at the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, 4401 N. Fairfax Drive, Room 420, Arlington, VA 22203;
telephone 703-358-2171.
Background
Section 4(b)(3)(A) of the Act requires us to make a finding (known
as a ``90-day finding'') on whether a petition to add a species to,
remove a species from, or reclassify a species on the Federal Lists of
Endangered or Threatened Wildlife and Plants has presented substantial
information indicating that the requested action may be warranted. To
the maximum extent practicable, we make the finding within 90 days
following receipt of the petition and publish our finding promptly in
the Federal Register. If we find that the petition has presented
substantial information indicating that the requested action may be
warranted (a positive finding), section 4(b)(3)(A) of the Act requires
us to commence a status review of the species if one has not already
been initiated under our internal candidate assessment process. In
addition, section 4(b)(3)(B) of the Act requires us to make a finding
within 12 months following receipt of the petition on whether the
requested action is warranted, not warranted, or warranted but
precluded by higher priority listing actions (this finding is referred
to as the ``12-month finding''). Section 4(b)(3)(C) of the Act requires
that a finding of warranted but precluded for petitioned species should
be treated as having been resubmitted on the date of such finding, and
is, therefore, subject to a new finding within 1 year and subsequently
thereafter until we take action on a proposal to list or withdraw our
original finding. The Service publishes an annual notice of review
(ANOR) of findings on resubmitted petitions for all foreign species for
which listings were previously found to be warranted but precluded.
Previous Federal Action
On May 6, 1991, we received a petition (1991 petition) from the
International Council for Bird Preservation to add 53 foreign birds to
the List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife, including the salmon-
crested cockatoo. In response to the 1991 petition, we published a
substantial 90-day finding on December 16, 1991 (56 FR 65207), for all
53 species, and initiated a status review. On March 28, 1994 (59 FR
14496), we published a 12-month finding on the 1991 petition, along
with a proposed rule to list 30 African birds under the Act, which
included 15 species from the 1991 petition. In that document, we
announced our finding that listing the remaining 38 species from the
1991 petition, including the salmon-crested cockatoo, was warranted but
precluded by higher priority listing actions. We made a subsequent
warranted-but-precluded finding for all outstanding foreign species
from the 1991 petition, including the salmon-crested cockatoo, as
published in our ANOR on May 21, 2004 (69 FR 29354).
Per the Service's listing priority guidelines (September 21, 1983;
48 FR 43098), our 2007 ANOR identified the listing priority numbers
(LPNs) (ranging from 1 to 12) for all outstanding foreign species. The
LPN for the salmon-crested cockatoo was LPN 2. With the exception of
listing priority ranking of 1, which addresses monotypic genera that
face imminent threats of high magnitude, category 2 represents the
Service's highest priority.
On July 29, 2008 (73 FR 44062), we published in the Federal
Register a notice announcing our annual petition findings for foreign
species. We announced that listing was warranted for 30 foreign bird
species, including the salmon-crested cockatoo, which is the subject of
this proposed rule, and stated that we would ``promptly publish
proposals to list these 30 taxa.''
On September 8, 2008, the Service received a 60-day notice of
intent to sue from the Center for Biological Diversity (CBD) and Peter
Galvin regarding alleged violations of section 4 of the Act for the
failure to promptly publish listing proposals for the 30 ``warranted''
species identified in our 2008 ANOR. Under a settlement agreement
approved by the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of
California on June 15, 2009 (CBD, et al. v. Salazar, 09-cv-02578-CRB),
the Service must submit to the Federal Register a proposed listing rule
for the salmon-crested cockatoo by October 30, 2009. Below, we
summarize our analysis of the best available scientific and commercial
data on the status of this species.
Species Description
Cockatoos are a distinct group of parrots (order Psittaciformes),
distinguished by the presence of an erectile crest (Cameron 2007, p. 1;
Collar 1989, p. 5) and the lack of dyck texture in their feathers,
which produces blue and green coloration in the plumage of other
parrots (Brown & Toft 1999, p. 141). The salmon-crested cockatoo (also
known as the Seram, Moluccan, pink-crested, or rose-crested cockatoo)
is the largest and the most striking of Indonesia's white cockatoos
(Kinnaird 2000, p. 14). Its body length is 46-52 centimeters (cm)
(15.6-20 inches (in)), and its plumage varies from pale salmon-pink to
whitish-pink. It has a long backward-curving, deep salmon-pink crest;
the bill is large and gray-black; and the underwing and undertail are
yellow-orange (BirdLife International (BLI) 2000, p. 242; Forshaw 1989,
p. 141; Juniper & Parr 1998, pp. 280-281; Sweeney 2000, p. 130). Sexual
dimorphism is exhibited by iris color (del Hoya et al. 1997, p. 278;
Forshaw1989, p. 141; Peratino 1979, p. 125).
Taxonomy
In 1751, Edwards described and pictorially delineated the salmon-
crested cockatoo (Lint 1951, p. 223) and, in 1788, J.F. Gmelin named
the species Psittacus moluccensis (Forshaw 1989, p. 141; Lint 1951, p.
223). In 1937, Peters (1937, p. 175) used the name Kakatoe moluccensis
(Gmelin) in the Check-list of Birds of the World. In 1992, Andrew
(1992, p. 21) used the name Cacatua moluccensis in the first published
checklist of the birds of Indonesia. This name continues to be the
recognized scientific name (Integrated Taxonomic Information System
(ITIS) 2008, p. 1; Sibley & Monroe 1990, p. 112), and the alternative
genus name Kakatoe is now obsolete (del Hoya et al. 1997, p. 278).
Some references (ITIS 2008, p. 1; Sibley & Monroe 1990, p. 112)
place cockatoos in the family Psittacidae with lories and true parrots,
whereas others (Cameron 2007, p. 1; Convention on International Trade
in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) 2008a, p. 1)
place cockatoos in a separate family, Cacatuidae. Of the 21 cockatoo
species, 11 are in the genus Cacatua (Cameron 2007, pp. 1-3).
The closest relatives of the salmon-crested cockatoo, which is
restricted to the South Moluccas, Indonesia (in the east central
Indonesian island chain), are the umbrella cockatoo, which is
restricted to the North Moluccas, and the blue-eyed cockatoo, which is
restricted to the island of New Britain off the northeast coast of New
Guinea (Cameron 2007, pp. 38-39, 51). In a biogeographic analysis of
the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) phylogeny, Brown and Toft (1999, pp. 150-
151) suggest that these three species may have had a common ancestor
that occupied an ancient landmass comprising Halmahera (a North
Moluccan island) and Bismarck. The breakup of this landmass created
[[Page 56772]]
two populations, and the subsequent dispersal of cockatoos from the
North Moluccas to the South Moluccas created another population, which
became the salmon-crested cockatoo (Cameron 2007, p. 56).
Range and Distribution
Cockatoos are only found in Australasia--a few archipelagos in
Southeast Asia (Philippines, Indonesia, East Timor, Tanimbar, Bismarck,
and Solomon), New Guinea, and Australia--suggesting that the modern
species arose after the breakup of Gondwanaland, a southern
supercontinent that existed 200-500 million years ago. The 19\th\
century naturalist Alfred Russel Wallace was among the first to note
the break in Australasian and Asian fauna. Wallace's line runs between
the islands of Bali and Lombok, Borneo and Sulawesi, and south of the
Philippines. Cockatoos are present on Lombok and Sulawesi, but not on
Bali and Borneo. The line represents the western edge of a zone of
overlap between Australasian and Asian fauna (known as Wallacea), with
the eastern edge defined by the Australian continental shelf
(Lydekker's Line) (Cameron 2007, pp. 1-3; White & Bruce 1986, p. 32).
The oceanic islands of Wallacea have a high level of endemism,
which resulted in many islands being identified as Endemic Bird Areas
(EBA) (Cameron 2007, p. 56). BLI designates EBAs by mapping bird
species with restricted ranges of less than 50,000 square kilometers
(km\2\) (19,300 square miles (mi\2\)) that overlap. The unique
biodiversity concentrated in these small areas is particularly
vulnerable; thus, EBAs represent priority areas for global biodiversity
conservation (BLI 2008i, p. 1; Collar 2000, p. 27; Stattersfield et al.
1998, pp. 39, 45). The salmon-crested cockatoo is included in the Seram
EBA (BLI 2003, p. 1; Stattersfield et al. 1998, pp. 528-531).
Seram. The salmon-crested cockatoo is endemic to the island of
Seram (alternate spelling, Ceram), with records from adjacent islands
of Haruku, Saparua, and Ambon (formerly called Ambonia) in the South
Moluccas (BLI 2001, p. 1662; Forshaw 1989, p. 141; Juniper & Parr 1998,
p. 281; Peters 1937, p. 175). The species resides in lowland rain
forests up to 1,000 meters (m) (3,608 feet (ft)), remains locally
common in Manusela National Park, and appears to be mostly distributed
in the eastern part of the island (BLI 2008a, p. 2; Isherwood et al.
1998, p. 18). For a listing of specific distribution records of the
salmon-crested cockatoo, see BLI (2001, p. 1662).
Ambon. Whether this species is native or introduced to Ambon is
uncertain. Stresemann (1934, p. 16) reported that the salmon-crested
cockatoo did not occur on Ambon. Thus, some scientists follow the view
that the species may have been introduced to this island (Forshaw 1989,
p. 141; Lever 1987, p. 245; Long 1981, p. 247; Smiet 1985, p. 189; van
Bemmel 1948, as cited in White & Bruce 1986, p. 212). The salmon-
crested cockatoo was formerly traded in significant numbers, and
shipments of birds from Seram transited through Ambon (the capital of
the Maluku Province), where undoubtedly some birds escaped. Other
scientists suggest that the cockatoos may well be wild birds (Marsden
1992, pp. 12-13; Poulsen & Jepson 1996, pp. 159-160), with the
persistence of a small population in northeast Ambon (Poulsen & Jepson
1996, p. 159).
Haruku and Saparua. The status of the salmon-crested cockatoo on
Haruku and Saparua is unknown (Metz 1998, p. 10), and the species may
be extinct on these two islands (Metz 2002, p. 1; Snyder et al. 2000,
p. 68). For Haruku, there is one unspecified locality and date of
observation reported (Stresemann 1934, p. 16), but Poulsen and Jepson
(1996, p. 160) did not find the species in 1994 or 1996. For Saparua,
there is one specimen in the RMNH (Rijksmuseum van Natuurlijke Histoire
(Leiden, Netherlands)) recorded in 1923 (BLI 2001, p. 1663).
For purposes of this proposal, we consider the salmon-crested
cockatoo's natural range to include Seram and the three islands of
Ambon, Haruku, and Saparua. Although the status of the salmon-crested
cockatoo is unknown on Haruku and Saparua, the species has been
reported from these islands, and we are unaware of any survey that has
conclusively found that the species no longer occurs there.
Habitat
The salmon-crested cockatoo is believed to be a specialist of
primary lowland forests (Kinnarid et al. 2003, p. 228). It occurs at
altitudes between 100 and 1,000-1,200 m (328 and 3,608-3,926 ft) (BLI
2008a, p. 2; Bowler & Taylor 1993, p. 149; Juniper & Parr 1998, p.
281), but rarely occurs above 600-900 m (1,968-2,952 ft) (Cameron 2007,
p. 77; Marsden 1992, p. 11; Juniper & Parr 1998, p. 281; Smiet 1985, p.
189). Marsden (1992, p. 11) found that cockatoos tended to be recorded
in mature, open-canopied lowland forests with some very large, tall
trees and some low vegetation. Kinnaird et al. (2003, p. 227) found
that cockatoo abundance was significantly associated with the presence
of potential nest trees (Octomeles sumatranus) and strangling figs
(Ficus spp.). Cameron (2007, pp. 77-78) noted that island cockatoos
prefer lowland forests over montane forests because lowland forests
contain greater plant diversity and, thus, have a more diverse and
abundant food supply. They also support larger trees, which are more
likely to have cavities needed for nesting--a critical resource because
cockatoos are incapable of excavating their own nest cavities. The
salmon-crested cockatoo prefers flat or gently sloping terrain.
The highest densities of birds occur in little-disturbed, lowland
forests below 300 m (984 ft), and the lowest densities occur in
recently logged forests and in non-forested areas (Marsden 1992, p. 9;
Marsden 1998, p. 608). However, Marsden and Fielding (1999, p. 444)
were unable to find differences in the species' presence based on
habitat associations, and Kinnaird et al. (2003, p. 227) found
densities did not correspond closely to habitat differences across
study sites. Marsden (1992, p. 11) suggested that the apparent
differences in cockatoo densities between young logged forests and
secondary forests, which have similar vegetation parameters, may be
caused by differential trapping pressures and patterns of disturbance,
differences in tree species compositions and overall habitat
heterogeneity, and differences in cockatoo densities in areas before
logging.
Lower densities of birds occur in transition and submontane forests
and on the edges of cultivated areas. Birds also occur in open canopy
forests with low vegetation and in riverine forests (Juniper & Parr
1998, p. 281). Despite trapping pressure, birds still occur in mature
lowland forests near settlements (Juniper & Parr 1998, p. 281; Marsden
1992, p. 11), but they are rarely seen near human habitation (Smiet
1985, p. 189). Marsden (1992, pp. 9, 11) found cockatoos to be rare or
irregular in other habitats, including plantations, grassland, rank
scrub, and agricultural lands. The species previously occurred in
coastal areas (Juniper & Parr 1998, p. 281), before land was converted
to human uses (FAO 1981, as cited in Marsden 1992, p. 7). Small numbers
of salmon-crested cockatoo have been observed in forested hills on
Ambon. No other information was available on the habitat of this
species on Ambon, Haruku, and Saparua.
Topography. Seram is a densely wooded island (Metz 1998, p. 10) of
18,625 km\2\ (7,189 mi\2\) (Smiet 1985, p. 183)--about the size of New
Jersey (Morrison 2001, p. 1). The topography is
[[Page 56773]]
extremely variable and the interior of the island is rugged and mostly
mountainous (Kinnaird et al. 2003, p. 228). The island lies between
latitudes 2\o\ 46' and 3\o\ 53' south of the Equator. It is
approximately 340 kilometers (km) (211 miles (mi)) long and 55-70 km
(34-43 mi) wide in the center. Its highest point is Gunung Binaiya at
approximately 3,027 m (9,929 ft) above sea level. It is the second
largest island in the Moluccas. This group of about 1,000 islands is
also known as the Spice Islands, because they include the original home
of both nutmeg (Myristica fragrans) and cloves (Syzgium aromaticum)
(Edwards 1993, p. 1).
Forests. Seram's wet climate supports mainly evergreen forests
(Marsden 1998, p. 606). The alluvial plains originally supported tall
lowland forests characterized by the only endemic dipterocarp on the
island, Shorea selanica (`meranti'), and also Canarium, Elaeocarpus
sphaericus, Calophyllum, Intsia, and Myristica (Coates & Bishop 1997,
pp. 16-17; Smiet & Siallagan 1981, p. 7). Shorea selanica has developed
remarkable dominance in the lowland forests of north Seram,
representing about 30 percent of individual trees and 76 percent of the
basal area (Edwards et al. 1993, p. 66). The forest is relatively open-
crowned with a sparse understory, with the floor being swept clean by
floods during the wet season. Along the major rivers, the lowland
forest is characterized by Octomeles sumatrana, Eucalyptus deglupta,
Pometia pinnata, Casuarina equisetifolia, Ficus, Litsea, and Eugenia
(Coates & Bishop 1997, pp. 16-17).
Climate. Most of Seram receives between 2,500 and 3,000 millimeters
(mm) (97.5 and 117 inches (in)) of rain per year, with more in the east
and northeast. The long monsoonal seasons (Metz 1998, p. 11; White &
Bruce 1986, p. 24) and mountainous terrain affect the amount of
rainfall. Annual and monthly rainfall is not uniform and varies by
region (Kinnaird et al. 2003, p. 228). The island lies outside the main
zone of cyclonic storms (Coates & Bishop 1997, p. 22). The lowlands
have a humid tropical climate with temperatures at sea level of 25-30
\o\Celsius (C) (77-86 \o\Fahrenheit (F)). Temperature decreases with
altitude, with a fall of approximately 6 \o\C (10.8 \o\F) for every
rise of 1,000 m (3,280 ft), leading to a marked temperature gradient
within the mountain areas (Edwards 1993, p. 6).
Land use. The human population of Seram is concentrated in low-
lying areas along the coast and in the west. The mountainous interior
supports very few villages (Edwards 1993, p. 7). The majority of Seram
is lowland forest or montane forest (see Table 1). While only about 11
percent of the island has been converted to agricultural lands,
settlements, and plantations or is considered unproductive, logging
concessions cover nearly 50 percent of the island. About 85 percent of
Seram lies below 600 m (1,968 ft) and another 10 percent lies between
600 and 1,000 m (1,968 and 3,280 ft). Within this elevation where
cockatoos occur, ``...most of the forest has been classified as
production or conversion forest, categories that permit land clearing
and forest disturbance'' (Kinnaird et al. 2003, p. 230).
Table 1. Habitat and land use for Seram and established and proposed protected areas
(data are based on landsat images from late 1989 and early 1990) (NP=National Park; NR=Nature Reserve) (Kinnaird
et al. 2003, p. 230).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Area
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Habitat/Land Use Proposed Wai Bula
Seram Manusela NP Gunung Sahuwai NR NR
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lowland Forest 14,026.5 1,522.5 118.9 km\2\ (45.9 561.8 km\2\ (216.9
km\2\(5,414.2 km\2\(587.7 mi\2\) mi\2\)
mi\2\) mi\2\)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mangrove Forest 77.6 km\2\ (30 -- -- 9.6 km\2\ (3.7
mi\2\) mi\2\)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Montane Forest 1,065.3 km\2\ 693.9 km\2\ (267.8 -- --
(411.2 mi\2\) mi\2\)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Swamp Forest 203.5 km\2\ (78.6 -- -- 14.6 km\2\ (5.6
mi\2\) mi\2\)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Water Body 1.2 mi\2\(3.0 -- -- --
km\2\)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Agriculture 789.1 km\2\ (304.6 50 km\2\ (19.3 -- 9.6 km\2\ (3.7
mi\2\) mi\2\) mi\2\)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Plantation 22.0 km\2\ (8.5 -- -- --
mi\2\)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Settlement 21.3 km\2\ (8.2 3.2 km\2\ (1.2 -- 0.5 km\2\ (0.2
mi\2\) mi\2\) mi\2\)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unproductive Lands 1,082.2 km\2\ 53.6 km\2\ (20.7 3.9 km\2\ (1.5 --
(417.7 mi\2\) mi\2\) mi\2\)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total 17,288.7 km\2\ 2,323.2 km\2\ 122.8 km\2\ (47.4 596.1 km\2\ (230.1
(6,676.0 mi\2\) (896.8 mi\2\) mi\2\) mi\2\)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Important Bird Areas (IBAs)
BLI (2008b, p. 2) has identified five IBAs that include the salmon-
crested cockatoo. A site is recognized as an IBA when it meets criteria
``...based on the occurrence of key bird species that are vulnerable to
global extinction or whose populations are otherwise irreplaceable.''
These key sites for conservation are small enough to be conserved in
their entirety and large enough to support self-sustaining populations
of the key bird species. IBAs are a way to identify conservation
priorities (BLI 2008j, pp. 1-2). The following briefly describes the
IBAs for the salmon-crested cockatoo:
Gunung Sahuwai. Located on the western peninsula of Seram, Gunung
Sahuwai contains 122.8 km\2\ (47.4 mi\2\) of land that was declared a
Nature Reserve on November 30, 1993 (SK Menteri Kehutanan No. 805/Kpts-
II/1993) (BLI 2008c, p. 2). The Nature Reserve contains 96.8 percent
lowland forest and 3.2 percent unproductive lands (see Table 1)
(Kinnaird et al. 2003, p. 230). The number of cockatoos here is
unknown. The coastal area contains 14 settlements. Most people work as
farmers and fishermen. The main commodities are cloves, nutmeg, and
coconut for copra. The local people hunt and collect forest products.
Conservation concerns relate to the clearance of natural habitat for
plantation, shifting agriculture, and collection of birds (BLI 2008c,
pp. 1-2).
[[Page 56774]]
Gunung Salahutu. The habitat is forest, and the topography is hilly
up to 1,038 m (3,405 ft). The cockatoo was found in this area at one
time, but is probably extinct here now. The coastal area contains two
villages. Most of the people work as dry land farmers and fishermen.
The main commodities are clove, nutmeg, cacao, and marine products.
Conservation concerns relate to forest clearance for plantation,
firewood collection, and hunting of animals for consumption or pets
(BLI 2008d, pp. 1-2).
Manusela. This area consists of forests and wetlands (BLI 2008e,
pp. 1-2). Manusela National Park is located in the central part of
Seram and stretches from the north coast to within 5 km (3 mi) of the
south coast (Edwards 1993, p. 6). It is 2,323.2 km\2\ (896.8 mi\2\) in
size and covers approximately 10 to 11 percent of Seram (BLI 2008e, p.
2; Bowler & Taylor 1993, p. 158; Kinnaird et al. 2003, p. 228; Marsden
1992, p. 7; Smiet & Siallagan 1981, p. 3). It was declared a national
park in 1982 (SK Menteri Pertanian No. 736/Mentan/X/1982 on October 14,
1982) (BLI 2008e, p. 2). Based on landsat images from late 1989 and
early 1990, habitat and land use for Manusela National Park can be
summarized as: 65.5 percent lowland forest; 29.9 percent montane
forest; and 4.6 percent agriculture, settlement, and unproductive lands
(see Table 1) (Kinnaird et al. 2003, p. 230). Approximately, 26 percent
of the park is above 1,000 m (3,608 ft), an altitude where the salmon-
crested cockatoo generally does not occur, and only 27 percent is below
500 m (1,640 ft), an altitude preferred by the salmon-crested cockatoo
(Marsden 1992, p. 7). A road has been built through the park, which
increases the risks of logging (Metz 1998, p. 10). Five villages of
indigenous people exist as an enclave of the park. Most of the people
work as dry land farmers; they also hunt and collect forest products,
such as sago, rattan, resin, eaglewood, and parrots (BlI 2008e, p. 1).
In 1980, 999 people lived within the park boundaries, and 19,102 lived
within 10 km (6 mi) of its boundaries (Smiet & Siallagan 1981, App. 6).
Clearing of the land for agriculture and gardens has resulted in a
patchwork of cleared fields, secondary vegetation (including large
bamboo thickets), old growth forests, and undisturbed primary forests.
Conservation concerns relate to logging, road development, encroachment
by plantation companies, mining (MacKinnon & Artha 1981; Monk et al.
1997, as cited in BLI 2008e, p. 2), shifting agriculture, and parrot
catching for trade (BLI 2008e, pp. 1-2).
Pegunungan Taunusa. The habitat is forest and the area has a
mountain with the highest peak in Seram. The southern coastal area
contains five villages. Most of the people work as farmers and
fishermen. Main products are coconut for copra, clove, and cacao (BLI
2008f, p. 1). The Service was unable to find information on the number
of salmon-crested cockatoos in this area or activities that may be
affecting the conservation of the species in Pegunungan Taunusa.
Wai Bula. The habitat is forest in northeastern Seram. BLI (2008f,
p. 1) estimates that Wae Wufa, an area inside Wai Bula that is primary
lowland and lower montane evergreen forests, has around 40-60 salmon-
crested cockatoos. Approximately 596.1 km\2\ (230.1 mi\2\) of Wai Bula
was proposed as a Nature Reserve in 1981, but the area has never been
officially designated as a reserve (Kinnaird et al. 2003, p. 228). Land
use for the proposed Nature Reserve can be summarized as follows: 94.2
percent lowland forest; 1.6 percent mangrove forest; 2.4 percent swamp
forest; and 2.5 percent agriculture and settlement (see Table 1). Based
on density estimates derived from surveys in western Seram, researchers
estimated that the area provides habitat for a minimum of 2,500
cockatoos (Kinnaird et al. 2003, pp. 230, 233) (see Factor A for
discussion). This estimate differs significantly from the number of
cockatoos estimated by BLI to occur inside Wae Wufa. We were unable to
reconcile these estimates because we could not find information on the
area of Wae Wufa, how much of the cockatoo's suitable habitat within
Wai Bula occurs in Wae Wufa, and the basis for the BLI estimate. The
coast contains four villages. Most people work as farmers and
fishermen. The main plantation products are coconut for copra, cacao,
and coffee. The conservation concern relates to logging (BLI 2008g, pp.
1-2).
Natural History
Behavior. The salmon-crested cockatoo is most active in early
morning and late afternoon (Juniper & Parr 1998, p. 281; Metz et al.
2007, p. 36), calling loudly when leaving and returning to roost. The
cockatoo's call is a wailing cry, which can be heard from a distance of
1 km (0.6 mi), and roosts can easily be located due to the noise. The
species is shy and flies off when disturbed. Birds move slowly through
the canopy in the early morning and are usually not seen or heard
during the heat of the day. They are found in groups of up to 16 birds,
although the size of non-breeding flocks appear to have been
dramatically reduced due to the recent population decline (Juniper &
Parr 1998, p. 281). They fly using a few rapid wing beats, followed by
gliding, and then a few more wing beats (Forshaw 1989, p. 141; Juniper
& Parr 1998, p. 281).
Food. This species feeds on fruit of the kenari tree (Canarium
commune, C. vulgare, and C. indicum) (Metz et al. 2007, p. 37), nuts,
seeds, berries, and insects (Forshaw 1989, p. 141; Juniper & Parr 1998,
p. 281). Their abundance is positively related to the density of
strangling figs, a potentially important food resource (Kinnaird et al.
2003, p. 233). Research by O'Brien et al. (1998, p. 668) showed that
figs may be a keystone plant resource for many fruit-eating birds. On
the average, figs contain calcium levels 3.2 times higher than other
fruits, promoting eggshell deposition and bone growth. Salmon-crested
cockatoos are suspected of taking Pandanus spp. fruits (Bishop in
prep., as cited in BLI 2001, p. 1665). They pick larvae from fallen,
rotting tree trunks (Metz et al. 2007, p. 37). They also eat young
coconuts (Cocos nucifera) by chewing through the tough outer covering
to get at the pulp and water inside (Forshaw 1989, p. 141; Juniper &
Parr 1998, p. 281; Wallace 1864, p. 279). In general, island cockatoos
are thought to need to exploit all the available food in order to
maintain a healthy population because islands typically contain fewer
plant species and the quantity of food is restricted by an islands'
relatively small size (Cameron 2007, p. 83).
Breeding. Its favored nest tree is Octomeles sumatranus (Kinnaird
et al. 2003, p. 230). During times of nest building, brooding, and
fledging, birds stay close to the nest tree (Metz et al. 2007, p. 36).
Courtship display can last up to 20 minutes, with the male and female
perched in the top of an emergent or dead forest tree, raising and
lowering their crests, fanning their large face and neck feathers
forward to increase the size of the head (Cameron 2007, p. 57), calling
loudly, breaking twigs, and making short, weak, fluttering flights. The
nest is a high hole in a mature tree (Juniper & Parr 1998, p. 281). The
salmon-crested cockatoo removes the bark immediately surrounding the
entrance to help prevent predators, such as snakes or monitor lizards,
from gaining access to the eggs or chicks, and may also clear the
surrounding foliage perhaps to have a better view for the brooding hen.
The nest site is fiercely guarded from competitors, such as the
Eclectus parrot (Eclectus roratus) (Metz et al. 2007, p. 37).
[[Page 56775]]
Little is known about seasonality and breeding biology of the
salmon-crested cockatoo in the wild (Kinnaird et al. 2003, p. 228), or
other demographic information, such as reproductive effort and success
and age-specific mortality rates--information that is important to
determine where the primary weak points in the life equation lie
(Snyder et al. 2000, p. 9). The cockatoo is thought to breed between
July and August or September, and probably a second time at the
beginning of the year (Metz & Zimmermann n.d., p. 1). Stresemann (1914,
p. 86) observed a pair in a nesting cavity about 25 m (82 ft) up the
truck of a living tree in early May. The cockatoo lines the cavity with
wood chips, and usually lays two white eggs, although only one is
raised (Metz & Zimmermann n.d., p. 1). Both parents help to incubate
the eggs during the 28-day incubation period. Young birds take 4-5
years to reach maturity (Juniper & Parr 1998, p. 281).
Population Estimates
Seram--historical population estimates. Historically, there are few
quantitative observations of this species in the wild. In 1864, Wallace
(1864, p. 279) described the salmon-crested cockatoo as ``abundant'' on
Seram. In 1911, Stresemann (1914, p. 86) reported that the species was
fairly common in coastal regions. The species was regarded as locally
common in 1970 (Juniper & Parr 1998, p. 281). During 1980 and 1981
(Forshaw 1989, p. 141), Smiet (1985, p. 189) observed that this species
was locally common in primary forests up to 900 m (2,952 ft) in the
interior and in undisturbed forests, where 10 to 16 birds were seen
congregating in roosting trees. He did not see any birds on the western
part of the island, although the cockatoo was said to be common there
until about 1970. In 1980, small flocks were observed in the south of
the island (White & Bruce 1986, p. 212), and cockatoos were frequently
seen throughout Manusela National Park below 900 m, except in the
southern part of the Mual Plains in the center of the park where they
were not common (Smiet & Siallagan 1981, p. 9). In September 1983,
Bishop (1992, p. 2) observed four cockatoos in secondary woodland in
southwest Seram.
Rangers at the Manusela National Park commented on a dramatic
decline in the species in the mid-1980s (Collar & Andrew 1988, p. 69).
By 1987, it was the rarest parrot in Manusela National Park (Bishop
1992, p. 2). Due to the international pet trade, Bishop considered the
species to be endangered and in need of critical management to avoid
imminent extinction (Bishop 1992, p. 1). Between July 20 and September
25, 1987, an Operation Raleigh team found the species to be ``very
scarce and absent from large tracts of suitable habitat'' in Manusela
National Park (Bowler 1988, p. 6). During 40 days of field work, they
made 54 sightings, resulting in a maximum of 20 individual birds in
prime habitat. In addition, birds were observed either singly or in
pairs, never in flocks. Encounter rates were the lowest of any parrot
species at 0.3 birds per hour in lowland rain forests around Solea at
about 100 m (328 ft) and 0.1 per hour in the Kineka area at 600-900 m
(1,968-2,952 ft) (Bowler 1988, p. 6; Bowler & Taylor 1989, p. 17).
Marsden (1992, pp. 11-12) suggested that the densities of cockatoos,
which Bowler and Taylor found in the Manusela National Park enclave,
may be naturally low because the forest has been heavily disturbed and
the area is at the upper end of the species' altitudinal range. He
found it difficult to relate Bowler and Taylor's low figures for
lowland forests around Solea to what he found in 1989 (see below). BLI
also questioned the validity of the numbers, because Bowler and Taylor
are now judged to have worked mainly at higher elevations in Manusela
(BLI 2001, pp. 1664, 1668). Metz (1998, p. 10) suggested that the
stronghold of this cockatoo is likely on Seram, almost exclusively
outside of the borders of the national park.
During 5 weeks from December 19, 1989, Marsden (1992, pp. 7-8;
Marsden 1998, p. 606) collected field data in Manusela National Park
and in lowland habitats in central and northeast Seram, using the
variable circular plot method to estimate densities of the salmon-
crested cockatoo. Encounter rates were 1.0 bird per hour in primary
forests, 2.5 birds in disturbed primary forests, and 0.4 birds in
secondary and in recently logged forests. While cockatoo densities were
similar in primary (9.1 birds per 1 km\2\ (0.386 mi\2\)) and disturbed
primary forests (9.8 birds), densities were lower in secondary forests
(6.4 birds), and much lower in recently logged forests (1.9 birds),
suggesting that large-scale logging might adversely affect the species'
population.
Between July and September 1996, the Wai Bula '96 (a conservation
expedition from Cambridge University and Universitas Pattimura, Ambon)
found the salmon-crested cockatoo to be widely dispersed in northeast
Seram in the Wae Fufa Valley (primary lowland and lower montane
evergreen forests) and in degraded coastal forests near Hoti (coastal
secondary lowland forests), where pairs and small flocks were a common
sight. They suggested that the bulk of the population probably occurs
in eastern Seram (Isherwood et al. 1998, p. 18). Juniper & Parr (1998,
p. 281) reported that the world population was ``thought still to be
above 8,000.''
Seram--recent population estimates. The most recent research
(Kinnaird et al. 2003, p. 232) estimated the total salmon-crested
cockatoo population to be 110,385 birds (with confidence limits of a
minimum 62,416 and a maximum of 195,242). Based on the research
assumptions (see below), we agree with BLI (2001, p. 1664) that
``...the figure of 62,400 is chosen as the appropriate population
figure.''
These numbers were generated by joint population surveys conducted
by the Wildlife Conservation Society Indonesia Program, BLI Indonesia
Program, and Pelastarian Hutan Dan Konservasi Alam, Ministry of
Forestry, Government of Indonesia in May-September 1998. Cockatoo
censuses were conducted at seven sites in western and central Seram
using line-transect methods (Kinnaird et al. 2003, pp. 228, 230, 234).
Five of the sites were considered primary lowland forest and two had
been previously logged or were disturbed by humans (Kinnaird et al.
2003, p. 228). Cockatoos were observed at all sites as single
individuals or pairs. Estimates of density varied widely among
locations, ranging from 0.93 birds per 1 km\2\ (0.386 mi\2\) at Kawa to
17.25 birds per 1 km\2\ at Roho. The mean density was 7.87 birds per 1
km\2\, which was considered indicative of all sites because it included
estimates from primary and logged forests. The researchers were unable
to complete the census before the outbreak of civil war; thus, data
from the western part of Seram were used to estimate the number of
cockatoos on all of Seram.
The estimated population was generated by working with GIS-based
estimates of lowland forest habitat on Seram (14,026 km\2\ (5,414.2
mi\2\)) below 600 m (1,968 ft) and assuming that all lowland forests
provide adequate habitat for cockatoos and that densities remain
constant across the island (Kinnaird et al. 2003, p. 232). Because
these assumptions are unlikely, Kinnaird (2000, p. 15) explained the
scenarios considered by the researchers. Cockatoos are fairly tolerant
of degraded habitat, but they still need nesting trees and have a
preference for areas with lots of large strangling figs. So, the first
scenario looked at involved the number and extent of logging
concessions operating on Seram during the 10-year-period from 1989-
1999, which resulted in a reduction of 1,200 km\2\ (463 mi\2\) of
lowland forest habitat for cockatoos.
[[Page 56776]]
The population estimate still hovered between 90,000 and 100,000 birds.
The second scenario looked at continued logging and habitat loss during
the next decade, projecting that the population size would decline by
another 10 percent. These estimates may have underestimated cockatoo
population size because many logging concessions are not working at
full capacity. On the other hand, the estimates ignored additional
losses due to the capturing of birds for the pet trade. The population
estimate also ignored the variability in how logging companies harvest
their concessions (i.e., greater or less than the legal maximum
intensity). If logging concessions harvest timber in a conventional
manner of up to 1,000 hectare (ha) (2,470 acre (ac)) per year, Kinnaird
et al. (2008, p. 233) assumed that cockatoos will persist but at
possibly lower densities.
In 1985, Smiet (1985, pp. 193-194) suggested that the relative
resilience of most Moluccan parrots under trade pressure and habitat
destruction can be attributed to a combination of factors, including:
(1) A great reproductive capacity (especially in the smaller species);
(2) adaptability to habitat alteration (which tends to provide a
relative abundance of flowering and fruiting plants); (3) persistence
of some original, undisturbed habitat; and (4) island isolation and
lack of predators, parasites, and competitive species. Metz (2005, p.
34), however, cautioned that the current population estimate should not
be a ``cause for complacency.'' He suggested that the number of birds
capable of breeding, or the breeding success rate, might be low for
this species since: they have a long life span, and many birds might be
past breeding age; there is a very high poaching pressure and trappers
mostly take adult birds, which depletes the number of breeding birds;
and the salmon-crested cockatoo has a slow reproductive cycle and
unknown, but possibly low, fledging success rate. These opinions point
out the need for further research on this species to better understand
its population size and its ability to adapt to the habitat destruction
and trade that is occurring on Seram.
Ambon. Very small numbers of salmon-crested cockatoos are thought
to occur in remaining natural forests in the more remote regions of
Ambon (Poulsen & Jepson 1996, p. 160). While Smiet (1985, p. 189) lived
on the island from 1980 to 1981, he did not see the species there;
however, he wrote that the species was said to be common on Ambon until
about 10 years ago. In 1992, Marsden (1992, pp. 12-13) reported seeing
eight salmon-crested cockatoos and three unidentified cockatoos during
brief searches of remaining forest patches on Ambon. He suggested that
most free flying salmon-crested cockatoos on Ambon may be wild birds,
either resident and possibly breeding or visiting birds from Seram.
Local people told him that cockatoos were still present in the area,
but rare in other forested areas on the island. Poulsen and Jepson
(1996, pp. 159-160) confirmed that wild populations of salmon-crested
cockatoos occur on Ambon. On May 28 and June 11, 1995, they observed
six to eight cockatoos, in forested hills behind Hila on the north
coast of the Hitu Peninsula, overlooking a forested valley at about 300
m (984 ft) and in forest edge around shifting cultivation at about 500
m (1,640 ft).
Conservation Status
The salmon-crested cockatoo is protected from capture and trade
under Indonesian laws (Republic of Indonesia Law No. 5, 1990, and Law
No. 7, 1999) (Kinnaird 2000, p. 14; Kinnaird et al. 2003, p. 228).
Intentional violations may lead to imprisonment of up to 5 years and
fines up to 100 million IDR (Indonesian rupiah) (which amounts to
approximately 10,000 USD (U.S. dollar)). Negligent violations may lead
to imprisonment of up to 1 year and fines up to 50 million IDR (5,000
USD). The government may seize and confiscate specimens of protected
animals. The Department of Forest Protection and Nature Conservation is
responsible for implementing the law, and the Natural Resources
Conservation Agency, working with police, Customs, and other
enforcement agencies, is responsible for enforcing the law (Shepherd et
al. 2004, p. 4).
The species is listed on the IUCN (International Union for
Conservation of Nature) Red List as `Vulnerable' because it has
suffered a rapid population decline as a result of trapping for the pet
bird trade and because of deforestation in its small range. BLI (2004,
p. 1) projects that the decline will continue and perhaps accelerate.
Current populations are estimated at 62,400 individuals (Kinnaird et
al. 2003, p. 232), with a decreasing population trend; the decline for
the past and the future 10 years or 3 generations is estimated at 30 to
49 percent (BLI 2008b, p. 1). The current trend is justified by the
suspected rapid decline of the species due to ongoing and prolific
capture for the domestic pet trade (BLI 2008b, p. 2). Ongoing threats
are habitat loss and degradation due to selective logging and clear-
cutting, agriculture, infrastructure development (settlement and
hydroelectric projects), and harvesting (hunting and gathering for the
domestic and international pet trade) (BLI 2004, pp. 1-2).
The cockatoo is also protected by CITES, one of the most important
means of controlling international trade in wild animals and plants.
CITES is an international agreement where countries work together to
ensure that international trade in CITES-listed animals and plants is
not detrimental to the survival of wild populations by regulating
import, export, and re-export. Although almost all Psittaciformes
species were included in CITES Appendix II in 1981 (CITES 2008a, p. 1),
the salmon-crested cockatoo was transferred to CITES Appendix I
effective January 18, 1990, because populations were declining rapidly
due to uncontrolled trapping for the pet bird trade (CITES 1989a, pp.
1-7). An Appendix-I listing includes species threatened with extinction
whose trade is permitted only under exceptional circumstances, which
generally precludes commercial trade. The import of an Appendix-I
species requires the issuance of both an import and export permit.
Import permits are issued only if findings are made that the import
would be for purposes that are not detrimental to the survival of the
species and that the specimen will not be used for primarily commercial
purposes (CITES Article III(3)). Export permits are issued only if
findings are made that the specimen was legally acquired and trade is
not detrimental to the survival of the species (CITES Article III(2)).
The United States and Indonesia, along with 173 other countries, are
members to CITES (CITES 2009, p. 1).
The import of salmon-crested cockatoos into the United States is
also regulated by the Wild Bird Conservation Act (WBCA) (16 U.S.C. 4901
et seq.), which was enacted on October 23, 1992. The purpose of the
WBCA is to promote the conservation of exotic birds by ensuring that
all trade involving the United States is sustainable and is not
detrimental to the species. Permits may be issued to allow import of
listed birds for scientific research, zoological breeding or display,
or personal pet purposes when certain criteria are met. The Service may
approve cooperative breeding programs and subsequent import permits
under such programs. Wild-caught birds may be imported into the United
States if they are subject to Service-approved management plans for
sustainable use. At this time, the salmon-crested cockatoo is not part
of a Service-approved cooperative breeding program and does not have an
approved
[[Page 56777]]
management plan for wild-caught birds (FWS 2008, p. 1).
The IUCN Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan 2000-2004 for
Parrots (Snyder et al. 2000, p. 66) identified a need to clarify the
status of the salmon-crested cockatoo in the wild, including: (1)
determining the species' relative abundance in each habitat type and
(2) collecting information on the size and distribution of habitat
types, trapping, timber extraction, and breeding success of cockatoos
in primary and secondary forests because it is unknown if the salmon-
crested cockatoo will survive in degraded secondary forests in the long
term. At present, inadequate information on the species, its habitat,
and the effects of human activities on the species makes it difficult
to make recommendations on regional development, such as reserve
boundaries, land-use zoning, and possible new provincial forestry and
agriculture policies, to ensure the species' survival. The information
would also provide a baseline for monitoring and determining the degree
to which trade affects the status of this species (Snyder et al. 2000,
pp. 66, 69).
Species Information and Factors Affecting the Salmon-crested Cockatoo
Under section 4(a) of the Act (16 U.S.C. 1533(a)(1)) and
regulations promulgated to implement the listing provisions of the Act
(50 CFR part 424), we may list a species as threatened and endangered
on the basis of five factors. The five factors are: (A) Present or
threatened destruction, modification, or curtailment of its habitat or
range; (B) overutilization for commercial, recreational, scientific, or
educational purposes; (C) disease or predation; (D) inadequacy of
existing regulatory mechanisms; or (E) other natural or manmade factors
affecting its continued existence. Listing actions may be warranted
based on any of the above threat factors, singly or in combination.
Below is the Service's five-factor analysis for the salmon-crested
cockatoo.
Foreseeable Future
Although section 3 of the Act uses the term ``foreseeable future''
in the definition of a threatened species, it does not define the term.
For purpose of this proposed rule, we defined ``foreseeable future'' to
be the extent to which, given the amount and quality of available data,
we can anticipate events or effects, or extrapolate trends of a threat,
such that reliable predictions can be made concerning the future of the
species. In the analysis of the five factors below, we consider and
describe how the foreseeable future relates to the status of the
salmon-crested cockatoo in view of population trends and threats to the
species.
Factor A. The Present or Threatened Destruction, Modification, or
Curtailment of the Species' Habitat or Range
The lowland forest habitat of the salmon-crested cockatoo is being
impacted by logging (including the failure to use wise logging
practices during selective logging), illegal logging, conversion of
forests to agriculture and plantations, transmigration of people, oil
exploration, and infrastructure development.
Logging. Commercial timber extraction is listed by the IUCN Red
List to be a continuing major threat to the salmon-crested cockatoo,
with a medium impact and a slow decline of the species (BLI 2008b, p.
3). Research that looked at species-area relationship suggested that
deforestation affects endemic bird species restricted to single islands
most severely (Brooks et al. 1997, p. 392).
In Indonesia as a whole, between 2000 and 2005, forest cover
declined by more than 90,000 km\2\ (34,740 mi\2\). Lowland areas, which
offer important habitat for Indonesia's cockatoos, have been the most
severely impacted (Cameron 2007, p. 177; Rhee et al. 2004, chap. 1 p.
2). On the islands of Sumatra and Kalimantan (Indonesian islands to the
far west of Seram), the World Bank predicted that all lowland rain
forests outside of protected areas would be degraded by 2005 and 2010,
respectively (Rhee et al. 2004, p. xviii). In many areas of Indonesia,
most commercially valuable forests have already been logged. Thus,
major commercial logging enterprises are now focused on islands in
Maluku Province, including Seram (BLI 2008k, p. 6; Smiet 1985, p. 181).
The impact of logging has steadily increased on Seram, with logging
becoming more intense during the 1990s (BLI 2008k, p. 6). Deforestation
in some areas has been extensive through selective logging of Shorea
spp. (Ellen 1993, p. 201), such that by 2001, about a fifth of the
original forest cover had been cleared (Morrison 2001, p. 1), with most
of the coastal areas converted to grassland, agriculture, plantations,
or scrub (Marsden 1992, p. 7). Although large areas of contiguous,
intact forests remain (Morrison 2001, p. 1), 50 percent of forest,
which are spread over the island, are under logging concessions. The
north dipterocarp forests are still dominated by the endemic Shorea
selanica, a tree especially vulnerable to logging as it grows tall and
straight and is much favored by Western and Japanese markets (Edwards
1993, p. 9). Once the primary forest is logged, experience on nearby
Indonesian islands shows that secondary forest is generally converted
to other uses or logged again rather than being allowed to return to
primary forest (Barr 2001, pp. 64, 67; Grimmett & Sumarauw 2000, p. 8;
Jepson et al. 2001, p. 859).
Selective logging is the primary technique for the extraction of
timber in Indonesia (BLI 2008k, p. 6). In selective logging, the most
valuable trees from a forest are commercially extracted (Johns 1988, p.
31), and the forest is left to regenerate naturally or usually with
some management until subsequently logged again. Johns (1988, p. 31),
looking at a West Malaysian dipterocarp forest, found that mechanized
selective logging in tropical rain forests, which usually removes a
small percent of timber trees, causes severe incidental damage. The
extraction of 3.3 percent of trees destroyed 50.9 percent of the
forest. He concluded that this type of logging reduced the availability
of food sources for frugivores (fruit-eaters). Edwards (1993, p. 9)
observed a similar problem on Seram. Timber companies, operating under
a selective logging system, caused considerable damage to the
surrounding forest, both to trees and soil. Forests selectively logged
15 years before had an open structure with skeletons of incidentally
killed trees, serious gulley erosion, and vegetation on waterlogged
sites that had been compacted by heavy vehicles. Also, commercial
logging uses a network of roads, which can lead to secondary problems
(BLI 2008k, p. 6), such as providing access to trappers of parrots.
Since selective logging targets mature trees, it can have a
disproportionate impact on hole-nesters, such as cockatoos, because
fewer nest sites remain (BLI 2008k, p. 6). Also, unsustainable logging
practices that destroy the forest canopy reduce habitat available to
the salmon-crested cockatoo. Kinnaird et al. (2003, pp. 233-234) found
that the abundance of cockatoos was positively related to the density
of its favored nest tree, Octomeles sumatranus, and strangling figs, a
potentially important food resource. These trees would be impacted by
logging, emphasizing the need to implement wise logging practices, such
as those based on reduced-impact logging techniques. However, these
techniques, which are recommended under Indonesia's selective logging
system, are seldom applied because of the lack of control over
harvesting practices, limited
[[Page 56778]]
understanding of how to implement the measures, and high financial
costs (Sist et al. 1998, p. 1). Specifically, the pre- and post-logging
inventories are not conducted properly or are not reported truthfully;
over-cutting above the annual plan occurs; frequent cutting outside
approved boundaries occurs; re-logging is more frequent than
recommended; and supervision by the Ministry of Forestry has been
ineffective (Thompson 1996, p. 9).
The salmon-crested cockatoo is dependent on little-disturbed
lowland forests. In a field study conducted from December 19, 1989, for
5 weeks, Marsden (1992, pp. 7-13) looked at the distribution,
abundance, and habitat preferences of the salmon-crested cockatoo on
Seram. Results suggested that while cockatoo densities were similar in
primary and disturbed primary forests, densities were lower in
secondary forests, and much lower in recently logged forests (Marsden
1992, p. 9). In total, 84 cockatoos were recorded at 132 stations,
either singly or in pairs, on 34 occasions. Groups of more than 4 birds
were recorded 3 times, with the maximum group size of 10. Although
cockatoos were found at different densities in different land-use
types, more cockatoos were present where habitat alterations occurred
on a small scale. Cockatoos tended to be recorded in mature, open-
canopied lowland forests with some very large, tall trees and some low
vegetation. Most significantly, Marsden found that there may have been
a reduction of the cockatoo population by about 700 birds for each 100
km\2\ (86 mi\2\) of Seram's primary forests that had been selectively
logged in the last 6 years. Similarly, the conversion of 100 km\2\ of
locally disturbed secondary forests to plantation could result in the
loss of around 600 birds (Marsden 1992, p. 12).
Marsden (1998, pp. 605-611) also looked at changes in bird
abundance following selective logging on Seram. Field work was
conducted in forested areas in the central and northeast parts of the
island. Logged forests usually had sparser canopy and mid-level
vegetation cover and denser ground cover than unlogged forests (Marsden
1998, pp. 605, 607-608). Using a point count method to estimate
population densities, Marsden (1998, p. 608; 1999, p. 380) found that
salmon-crested cockatoo density estimates in unlogged forests below 300
m (984 ft) were more than double those in logged forests. Because the
cockatoo is caught for the pet trade, Marsden was unable to separate
the effects of habitat change, such as loss of nest holes, from
possible effects of logging on capture rates (for example, increased
accessibility to trappers) (Marsden 1998, p. 610). Although Kinnaird et
al. (2003, p. 233) found the highest cockatoo densities in primary
forest habitat with good structure and lower densities in logged or
disturbed sites, they did not find a statistically significant
difference in cockatoo densities between logged and unlogged forests.
They surmised this may have been because of the intensity of logging
or, more likely, reflected the mosaic of habitat types found within
their sampling sites. They speculated that there is a continuum of
cockatoo densities in logged forests depending on the intensity of
logging and access provided to trappers.
Logging concessions are spread over the island, except there are no
concessions in Gunung Sahuai Nature Reserve and only 15 percent of
Manusela National Park is under concessions (Kinnaird et al. 2003, p.
231). About half the island (8,271 km\2\ (3,193 mi\2\)) is held within
logging concessions, with more than 75 percent within lowland habitat
favored by the salmon-crested cockatoo (Kinnaird et al. 2003, pp. 227,
233). This means that less than 30 percent of the island's lowland
forests (5,096 km\2\ (1,967 mi\2\)) is unoccupied by logging
concessions. In 1998, Kinnaird et al. (2003, pp. 233-234) were unable
to find out the area of land scheduled for logging. However, Kinnaird
(2000, p. 15) was able to obtain information from the Ministry of
Forestry that showed 12 logging concessions have been operating on
Seram during the 10-year period from 1989-1999. If the concessions have
been logged at a maximum intensity of 10 km\2\ (3.86 mi\2\)/year/
concession and that logging was conducted in a conventional manner that
results in 70 percent damage to the canopy, lowland forest habitat for
cockatoos would be reduced by 1,200 km\2\ (463 mi\2\), or 8.5 percent,
in 10 years. The researcher concluded in 2000 that overall the loss of
habitat has not reached a level where it is perceived as a serious
threat to cockatoos. However, the cockatoo remains under threat
(Kinnaird 2000, p. 15). We have no reason to believe that the effects
of logging on the species will be ameliorated in the foreseeable
future, but may increase because commercial logging enterprises are now
focused on the Moluku Province, including Seram.
The researchers were forced to leave the island because of civil
unrest. They suggested that the pressure for land conversion will
accelerate dramatically once social and economic stability returns to
Seram, especially in the lowlands, and this will be made worse by the
1999 regional autonomy laws that allow for local authorities to
determine licensing of forest concessions and exploitation of natural
resources. They concluded that the proper management of Seram's logging
concessions would determine the future of the salmon-crested cockatoo
(Kinnaird et al. 2003, p. 234).
Approximately 14 percent of Seram's forests (or 11.5 percent of
lowland forests) are protected in Manusela National Park (2,216.4 km\2\
(855.5 mi\2\)) and Gunung Sahuwai Nature Reserve (118.9 km\2\ (45.9
mi\2\)). In Manusela National Park, 15 percent of the forest is within
logging concessions. In 1981, Smiet and Siallagan (1981, pp. 11-12, 22)
reported that large patches of forest in the coastal region of the Mual
Plains had been disturbed by logging activities--forest