Pistachios Grown in California; Changes to Handling Regulations, 56526-56532 [E9-26148]
Download as PDF
56526
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 210 / Monday, November 2, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
esculentum’’ each time they occur and
adding the words Solanum
lycopersicum’’ in their place.
■ 3. Section 319.56–28 is amended as
follows:
■ a. In paragraph (a) introductory text
and paragraph (b) introductory text, by
removing the words Lycopersicon
esculentum’’ each time they occur and
adding the words Solanum
lycopersicum’’ in their place.
■ b. By revising paragraph (c)
introductory text to read as set forth
below.
■ c. In paragraph (c)(4), by removing the
semicolon after the word ‘‘request’’ and
adding a period in its place, and by
adding at the end of the paragraph the
sentence ‘‘The trapping records must be
maintained for 1 year for APHIS
review;’’
■ d. In paragraph (d) introductory text,
paragraph (e) introductory text, and
paragraph (f) introductory text, by
removing the words Lycopersicon
esculentum’’ each time they occur and
adding the words Solanum
lycopersicum’’ in their place.
■ e. By adding a new paragraph (g) to
read as set forth below.
■ f. By revising the OMB citation at the
end of the section to read as set forth
below.
§ 319.56–28
countries.
Tomatoes from certain
dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Tomatoes (fruit) (Solanum
lycopersicum) from the provinces of El
Jadida or Safi in Morocco and the
province of Dahkla in Western Sahara.
Pink tomatoes may be imported into the
United States from the provinces of El
Jadida or Safi in Morocco and the
province of Dahkla in Western Sahara
only in accordance with this section and
other applicable provisions of this
subpart.7
*
*
*
*
*
(g) Tomatoes (fruit) (Solanum
lycopersicum) from the Souss-MassaDraa region of Morocco. Pink tomatoes
may be imported into the United States
from the region of Souss-Massa-Draa in
Morocco only in accordance with this
section and other applicable provisions
of this subpart.8
(1) The tomatoes must be grown in
approved production sites within the
region of Souss-Massa-Draa in Morocco
in pest-exclusionary structures
registered with, and inspected by, the
Moroccan Ministry of Agriculture,
Division of Plant Protection, Inspection,
and Enforcement (DPVCTRF).
Production sites will be approved
7
8
See footnote 5 to paragraph (a) of this section.
See footnote 5 to paragraph (a) of this section.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:13 Oct 30, 2009
Jkt 220001
jointly by DPVCTRF and APHIS.
DPVCTRF will visit and inspect the
production sites starting 2 months
before harvest and continuing until the
end of the shipping season. APHIS may
monitor the production sites at any time
during this period;
(2) The tomatoes may be shipped from
the Souss-Massa-Draa region of Morocco
only between December 1 and April 30,
inclusive;
(3) Beginning 2 months prior to the
start of the shipping season and
continuing through the end of the
shipping season, DPVCTRF must set
and maintain Mediterranean fruit fly
(Medfly) traps baited with trimedlure, or
other approved protein bait, inside the
pest-exclusionary structures at a rate of
8 traps per hectare, with a minimum of
4 traps per pest-exclusionary structure.
Traps must also be placed outside
registered pest-exclusionary structures
within a 2-kilometer radius at a rate of
4 traps per square kilometer. All traps
must be checked every 7 days;
(4) DPVCTRF must maintain records
of trap placement, trap maintenance,
and any Medfly captures, and make the
records available to APHIS upon
request. DPVCTRF must maintain an
APHIS-approved quality control
program to monitor or audit the
trapping program. The trapping records
must be maintained for 1 year for APHIS
review;
(5) Capture of a single Medfly in a
registered pest-exclusionary structure
during the 2 months prior to export and
continuing through the duration of the
harvest, or detection of a Medfly in a
consignment that is traced back to a
registered pest-exclusionary structure,
will immediately result in cancellation
of exports from that pest-exclusionary
structure until the source of the
infestation is determined, the Medfly
infestation has been eradicated, and
measures are taken to preclude any
future infestation. Exports will not be
reinstated until APHIS and DPVCTRF
mutually determine that risk mitigation
has been achieved. Capture of a single
Medfly within 200 meters of a registered
pest-exclusionary structure will
necessitate increasing trap density in
order to determine whether there is a
reproducing population in the area. Six
additional traps must be placed within
a radius of 200 meters surrounding the
trap where the Medfly was captured.
Capture of two Medflies within 200
meters of a registered pest-exclusionary
structure and within a 1-month time
period will necessitate Malathion bait
sprays in the area every 7 to 10 days for
60 days to ensure eradication;
(6) No Medfly host material is
permitted within 50 meters of the entry
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
door of the pest-exclusionary structure
or the packinghouse;
(7) The tomatoes must be packed
within 24 hours of harvest and must be
pink at the time of packing. They must
be safeguarded by an insect-proof mesh
screen or plastic tarpaulin while in
transit to the packinghouse and while
awaiting packing. They must be packed
in insect-proof cartons or containers, or
covered by insect-proof mesh or plastic
tarpaulin for transit to the airport or
ship and export to the United States.
These safeguards must be intact upon
arrival in the United States. Sea
containers must be kept closed if stored
within 20 meters of Medfly host
materials prior to loading;
(8) During the time the packinghouse
is in use for exporting fruit to the United
States, the packinghouse may only
accept fruit from registered approved
production sites; and
(9) The Moroccan Ministry of
Agriculture, Fresh Product Export
(EACCE) is responsible for export
certification inspection and issuance of
phytosanitary certificates. Each
consignment of tomatoes must be
accompanied by a phytosanitary
certificate issued by EACCE and bearing
the declaration, ‘‘These tomatoes were
grown in registered pest-exclusionary
structures in Souss-Massa-Draa Region,
Morocco, and were pink at the time of
packing.’’
(Approved by the Office of
Management and Budget under control
numbers 0579–0049, 0579–0131, 0579–
0316, 0579–0286, and 0579–0345)
§ 319.56–34
[Amended]
4. In § 319.56–34, paragraph (j)(2),
footnote 8 is redesignated as footnote 9.
■
Done in Washington, DC, this 26th day of
October 2009.
Kevin Shea
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. E9–26308 Filed 10–30–09: 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE: 3410–34–S
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 983
[Doc. No. AMS–FV–09–0031; FV09–983–1
FR]
Pistachios Grown in California;
Changes to Handling Regulations
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
E:\FR\FM\02NOR1.SGM
02NOR1
dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 210 / Monday, November 2, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
SUMMARY: This rule changes the
handling regulations prescribed under
Marketing Agreement and Order No.
983 (order), which regulate the handling
of pistachios grown in California,
Arizona, and New Mexico. The changes
were recommended by the
Administrative Committee for
Pistachios (committee), which is
responsible for local administration of
the order. The changes bring the
handling regulations into conformance
with amendments to the order by
including certain regulatory language
previously contained in the order’s
provisions in the order’s administrative
rules and regulations, lifting the
suspension of certain language,
removing obsolete language, and
revising references to renumbered order
provisions.
DATES: Effective Date: November 3,
2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Martin Engeler, Marketing Order
Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 2202
Monterey Street, Suite 102–B, Fresno,
California 93721; Telephone: (559) 487–
5110, Fax: (559) 487–5906, or E-mail:
Martin.Engeler@ams.usda.gov; or Laurel
May, Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., Stop 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 205–
2830, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or E-mail:
Laurel.May@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., Stop 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, E-mail:
Jay.Guerber@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This final
rule is issued under Marketing
Agreement and Order No. 983, both as
amended (7 CFR part 983), regulating
the handling of pistachios grown in
California, Arizona, and New Mexico.
The order is effective under the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act
of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674),
hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order
12866.
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. This rule is not intended to
have retroactive effect.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:13 Oct 30, 2009
Jkt 220001
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the
order, or any obligation imposed in
connection with the order, is not in
accordance with law and may request a
modification of the order or to be
exempted therefrom. A handler is
afforded the opportunity for a hearing
on the petition. After the hearing, USDA
would rule on the petition. The Act
provides that the district court of the
United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his
or her principal place of business, has
jurisdiction to review USDA’s ruling on
the petition, provided an action is filed
not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This final rule makes changes to the
administrative rules and regulations
contained in the order. The changes will
bring the current handling regulations
into conformance with amendments to
the order by including certain regulatory
language previously contained in the
order’s provisions in the order’s
administrative rules and regulations,
lifting the suspension of certain
language, removing obsolete language,
and revising references to renumbered
order provisions. These changes were
recommended by the committee and
submitted to USDA on May 28, 2008.
A Secretary’s decision, which
describes the proposed amendments to
the order, was published in the Federal
Register on August 6, 2009 (74 FR
39230). A copy of the Secretary’s
decision may be viewed at: https://
www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/
home.html#document
Detail?R=0900006480a02766. An order
amending the order implementing the
amendments is also scheduled to be
published in the Federal Register on the
date this rule is published.
Amendments to the order’s provisions
will expand the production area subject
to regulation under the order to include
the States of Arizona and New Mexico
in addition to California. Additional
amendments to the order will modify
existing provisions regarding aflatoxin
and quality regulations, revise various
administrative procedures under the
order, authorize the committee to
recommend research projects, and make
other related changes. The amendments
were approved by producers
participating in a referendum conducted
during the period August 10 through
August 22, 2009; thus, conforming
changes to the order’s administrative
rules and regulations are necessary.
Among other things, specific
regulatory language contained in the
order’s aflatoxin and quality provisions
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
56527
is being removed. To avoid a lapse in
regulation, the committee recommended
that specific order provisions
concerning aflatoxin tolerance levels
and testing procedures be added to the
order’s administrative rules and
regulations section at the same time the
amendments are effectuated. This will
provide a seamless transition and will
assure that pistachios continue to be
handled under the same regulations
previously in place for California
pistachios under the order. This rule
implements those conforming changes.
It is intended that finalization of this
rule correspond with the issuance of the
order amending the order upon
publication in the Federal Register.
Section 983.38 of the order previously
specified the maximum aflatoxin
tolerance level for domestic shipments
of pistachios for human consumption.
This section also specified aflatoxin
testing and certification procedures.
Section 983.39 of the order, which was
suspended on December 10, 2007 (72 FR
69141), specified minimum quality
levels for domestic shipments of
pistachios for human consumption.
Testing and certification procedures to
verify pistachio quality were also
specified in this section. Section
983.46(c) of the order authorized the
committee to recommend administrative
rules and regulations implementing the
provisions of §§ 983.38 and 983.39.
The order as amended includes
amendments to §§ 983.38 and 983.39
that removes specific regulatory
language from those provisions and
replaces it with general authority to
recommend and establish aflatoxin and
quality regulations through the informal
rulemaking process. Sections 983.38
and 983.39 are also being redesignated
as §§ 983.50 and 983.51, respectively.
Such changes require the addition of
new regulatory sections to the order’s
administrative rules and regulations,
render certain other sections obsolete,
and require the revision of other
sections to reflect changes to the order
provisions, including references to
renumbered sections.
As a result of the amendment of
§ 983.38, certain specific handling
requirements concerning aflatoxin
levels and testing procedures previously
provided in that section are being
moved to a new § 983.150—Aflatoxin
Regulations, which is added to the
order’s rules and regulations. Section
983.150 specifies an aflatoxin tolerance
level of 15 ppb, which is the aflatoxin
tolerance previously provided under the
order. Section 983.150 also specifies the
same aflatoxin sampling, testing, and
certification procedures previously
contained in the order, with some
E:\FR\FM\02NOR1.SGM
02NOR1
dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES
56528
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 210 / Monday, November 2, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
modifications. For instance, the
regulation requires that at least eight
members of the committee recommend,
and the Secretary approve, any
alternative aflatoxin analysis methods.
The regulation also requires accredited
laboratories performing aflatoxin testing
to certify that every lot of production
area pistachios shipped domestically
does not exceed the maximum aflatoxin
tolerance level specified under the
regulations. Additionally, handlers are
required to maintain testing and
shipping records for three years beyond
the production year of their
applicability. Finally, section references
throughout the section are updated to
reflect renumbered order provisions.
Section 983.138 of the order’s
administrative rules and regulations
concerns the drawing of samples for
aflatoxin testing in accordance with
requirements in § 983.38. Because
updated sampling procedures are
contained in new § 983.150, this section
would be obsolete under the amended
order. Therefore, the committee
recommended removing this section.
Due to amendment of § 983.39, the
order will no longer contain specific
regulations regarding minimal pistachio
quality or testing. The committee will
have general authority to consider and
recommend minimal quality regulations
and testing procedures. Certain
references to the provisions of § 983.39
will also be obsolete. Therefore, the
committee recommended that affected
sections be revised to reflect proposed
amendments to that section.
Section 983.141 outlines procedures
for exempting handlers from minimum
quality testing. This section has been
suspended since December 10, 2007 (72
FR 69141), when the minimum quality
provision of the order was also
suspended. This section will be obsolete
under the amended order. Therefore, the
committee recommended lifting the
suspension of § 983.141 and removing
the section.
The order amendments include a
change to § 983.40 that removes specific
regulations regarding rework procedures
for lots of pistachios failing aflatoxin
and minimum quality testing. Those
regulations are being replaced with
general authority to recommend rework
procedures for failed lots. Specific
regulations describing rework
provisions for lots failing aflatoxin
testing are being moved to a new
§ 983.152—Failed lots/rework
procedure. Conforming changes to the
text of the current regulations are being
made in § 983.152 to reference aflatoxin
regulations in the amended order
provisions, and references to
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:13 Oct 30, 2009
Jkt 220001
renumbered sections are also being
changed.
The order amendments include a
change to § 983.41 that removes a
quality testing exemption for handlers
handling fewer than 1,000,000 pounds
of pistachios annually and replaces it
with general authority to recommend
testing procedures for minimum
quantities. Section 983.41 is also being
redesignated as § 983.53. Section 983.47
previously provided for the collection of
necessary reports from regulated
handlers. As a result of the
amendments, § 983.47 is being
redesignated as § 983.64. Paragraph (d)
of § 983.147 describes Form ACP–5—
‘‘Minimal Testing Form,’’ for use by
handlers handling fewer than 1,000,000
pounds of pistachios annually. That
paragraph has been suspended since
December 10, 2007 (72 FR 69141), when
the minimum quality provision of the
order was also suspended. The
committee recommended revising that
paragraph to specify that handlers may
use Form ACP–5 to request permission
to handle minimum quantities of
pistachios according to the provisions of
redesignated § 983.53. To remain
consistent with the redesignation of
§ 983.47 as § 983.64, this rule
redesignates § 983.147 as § 983.164.
The order amendments include a
change to § 983.70, which previously
provided an exemption from certain
handling regulations under the order for
handlers of fewer than 1,000 pounds of
pistachios and authorized the
committee to recommend revised
exemption levels. The amendment
raises the exemption level to 5,000
pounds. The section is also being
redesignated as § 983.92. As authorized
under § 983.70, § 983.170 of the order’s
administrative rules and regulations
previously provided an exemption for
handlers of fewer than 5,000 pounds. As
a result of the amendment to § 983.70,
§ 983.170 is redundant. Therefore, the
committee recommended that § 983.170
be removed. Additionally, a reference to
§ 983.170 in § 983.143 is revised to
reference the exemption level in
redesignated § 983.92. Finally,
amendments to § 983.43 redesignate that
section as § 983.55. To remain
consistent with that redesignation, this
rule also redesignates § 983.143 as
§ 983.155.
Section 983.53 of the order authorizes
the collection of assessments from
handlers on receipts of pistachios. Such
assessments are used to fund expenses
of the committee. Section 983.253
specifies the current assessment rate
established for California pistachios. As
explained above, the order amendments
include expanding the production area
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
to include the States of Arizona and
New Mexico, in addition to California.
Therefore, the committee recommended
that paragraph (b) of § 983.253 be
revised to establish an assessment rate
applicable to all production area
pistachios. To conform to the definition
of the committee’s ‘‘production year’’
contained in the order, the language of
paragraph (b) of § 983.253 is also being
revised to specify that assessments are
due to the committee by December 15 of
the applicable production year.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5
U.S.C. 601–612), the Agricultural
Marketing Service (AMS) has
considered the economic impact of this
action on small entities. Accordingly,
AMS has prepared this final regulatory
flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order
that small businesses will not be unduly
or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
Act, and rules issued thereunder, are
unique in that they are brought about
through group action of essentially
small entities acting on their own
behalf.
Small business firms, which include
handlers regulated under the order,
have been defined by the Small
Business Administration (SBA) (13 CFR
121.201) as those having annual receipts
of less than $7,000,000. Small
agricultural producers have been
defined as those with annual receipts of
less than $750,000.
There are approximately 29 handlers
and 875 producers of pistachios in
California, Arizona, and New Mexico.
The committee has estimated that
approximately 50 per cent of California
handlers would be considered small
businesses, as defined by SBA. The
industry has estimated that one of the
Arizona handlers and all three New
Mexico handlers would also be
considered small businesses.
Data provided by the committee
regarding the size of the 2007 crop, as
well as data reported by the National
Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS),
suggests that the average California
producer revenue for the 2007 crop was
$733,200. It is estimated that 85 percent
of California producers had receipts of
less than $750,000 and would thus be
considered small businesses according
to the SBA definition. Although there is
no official data available, the industry
estimates that the majority of producers
in Arizona and New Mexico would also
be considered small businesses.
E:\FR\FM\02NOR1.SGM
02NOR1
dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 210 / Monday, November 2, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
The order previously regulated only
pistachios produced in California. As a
result of amendments to the order, the
production area is being expanded to
include Arizona and New Mexico.
Additional amendments to the order
will remove specific aflatoxin and
quality regulations and testing
procedures from the order’s provisions
and replace them with general authority
for the committee to recommend
aflatoxin and quality regulations. This
rule makes changes to the order’s
administrative rules and regulations by
adding the specific aflatoxin regulations
previously found in the order’s
provisions and clarifying that the
regulations pertain to handlers
throughout the expanded production
area. Certain language in the
administrative rules and regulations
section that is currently suspended, or
that is redundant or obsolete due to
enactment of the amendments, is being
removed or revised. References to order
sections that have been redesignated are
also revised to reference the renumbered
sections. These changes were
recommended by the committee to
ensure a seamless transition in aflatoxin
regulation when the amendments are
approved and to conform to various
changes to the order’s provisions.
Specifically, this rule removes
§ 983.138—Samples for testing,
§ 983.141—Procedures for exempting
handlers from minimum quality testing,
and § 983.170—Handler exemption,
from the order’s administrative rules
and regulations. Conforming changes
are being made to the language and
references in §§ 983.143, 983.147,
983.253 to reflect amendments to the
order, such as the expansion of the
production area to include Arizona and
New Mexico and the redesignation of
several order sections. Sections 983.143
and 983.147 are being redesignated as
§§ 983.155 and 983.164, respectively.
Finally, two new sections, § 983.150—
Aflatoxin regulations, and § 983.152—
Failed lots/rework procedure, are being
added to incorporate specific
regulations concerning aflatoxin
tolerance levels and testing procedures
that are removed from the order’s
provisions as a result of the
amendments.
The impact of the amendments to the
order on producers and handlers has
been analyzed in the Secretary’s
Decision published in the Federal
Register on August 6, 2009, at 74 FR
39230. It may be generally concluded
from the final regulatory impact analysis
that the order amendments will improve
the operation and functioning of the
marketing order program and that all
producers and handlers will benefit
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:13 Oct 30, 2009
Jkt 220001
regardless of size. The analysis
examined the benefits and costs to
producers and handlers as a result of the
expansion of the production area to
include Arizona and New Mexico and
the regulation of handlers under the
marketing order program, including
aflatoxin certification requirements.
Many of the amendments in this rule
simply change the location of the
regulatory provisions concerning
aflatoxin levels and testing from the
order provisions to the regulations.
Therefore, these changes should have no
effect upon California pistachio
handlers of any size since they are
currently required to comply with those
requirements. With regard to
application of aflatoxin certification
requirements on Arizona and New
Mexico handlers, that impact is fully
considered in the previously referenced
final regulatory flexibility analysis. The
minimum quality provisions of the
order have been suspended since
December 10, 2007 (72 FR 69141), so
there will be no effect on handlers as a
result of removing those provisions. The
revision of certain language,
redesignation of some sections, and
references to redesignated sections of
the order that will be made to conform
to the amended order are administrative
in nature and will have no effect on
producers or handlers of any size.
The changes in this rule are necessary
to conform to amendments to the order.
With regard to alternatives, if the
amendments had not been approved by
producers voting in the referendum,
these changes would not be made and
the proposed rule would have been
withdrawn.
This action will not impose any
additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large
pistachio handlers. As with all Federal
marketing order programs, reports and
forms are periodically reviewed to
reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public
sector agencies.
AMS is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act, to promote the
use of the Internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
USDA has not identified any relevant
Federal rules that duplicate, overlap or
conflict with this rule.
These changes were recommended by
the committee on March 6, 2008, and
submitted to AMS on May 28, 2008. The
committee’s meeting was widely
publicized throughout the pistachio
industry and all interested persons were
invited to attend and participate. All
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
56529
entities, both large and small, were able
to express their views on the effects of
the amendments contained herein.
A proposed rule concerning this
action was published in the Federal
Register on September 4, 2009 (74 FR
45772). Copies of the rule were
provided to interested parties. The rule
was also made available through the
Internet by USDA and the Office of the
Federal Register. A 10-day comment
period ending on September 14, 2009,
was provided to allow interested
persons to respond to the proposal.
One comment was received during
the comment period. The comment was
submitted by the manager of the
committee. The commenter requested
that the implementation of the aflatoxin
regulations be delayed for handlers in
the States of Arizona and New Mexico
(District 4). The commenter points out
that these States will be added to the
production area and subject to
regulation as a result of amendments to
the order. The commenter states that
handlers in Arizona and New Mexico
have not previously been subject to
marketing order requirements and have
not had access to the necessary
inspection services and forms needed to
comply with the marketing order
requirements. In addition, the
committee will need time to consider
implementation of rules and regulations
that could provide reimbursement to
District 4 handlers for additional costs
associated with aflatoxin testing and
certification.
USDA agrees that it may take a period
of time for the handlers in Arizona and
New Mexico to be in a position to meet
these marketing order requirements.
California handlers have been operating
under the requirements since 2005;
however, the Arizona and New Mexico
handlers will need some time to
transition into the program.
USDA believes it is reasonable to
implement the aflatoxin sampling,
testing, and certification requirements
for Arizona and New Mexico handlers
in District 4. Therefore, a change is
made in this final rule that will
implement the aflatoxin regulations for
Arizona and New Mexico handlers on or
after October 30, 2009.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
AMSv1.0/ams.fetch
TemplateData.do?template=
TemplateN&page=MarketingOrders
SmallBusinessGuide. Any questions
about the compliance guide should be
sent to Jay Guerber at the previously
mentioned address in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
E:\FR\FM\02NOR1.SGM
02NOR1
56530
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 210 / Monday, November 2, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
After consideration of all relevant
matters presented, including the
information and recommendation
submitted by the committee and other
available information, it is hereby found
that this rule, as hereinafter set forth,
will tend to effectuate the declared
policy of the Act.
It is further found that good cause
exists for not postponing the effective
date of this rule until 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register (5
U.S.C. 553) because, as stated in the
final rule amending the current order,
the new production year began on
September 1, and these regulations,
which implement the order as amended,
should be in place as soon as possible.
Further, the effective date of this final
rule corresponds to the effective date of
the amended order.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 983
Pistachios, Marketing agreements and
orders, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
■ For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 983 is proposed to
be amended as follows:
PART 983—PISTACHIOS GROWN IN
CALIFORNIA
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 983 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
§ 983.138
■
[Removed]
2. Section 983.138 is removed.
§ 983.141
[Removed]
3. Lift the December 10, 2007,
suspension of § 983.141, and remove the
section.
■
§ 983.143 [Redesignated as § 983.155 and
Amended]
4. Redesignate § 983.143 as § 983.155,
and amend paragraph (b) of that section
■
by removing the words ‘‘§ 983.170’’ and
adding in their place the words
‘‘§ 983.92.’’
§ 983.147
[Redesignated as § 983.164]
5. Lift the December 10, 2007,
suspension of § 983.147(d), redesignate
§ 983.147 as § 983.164.
■ 6. Amend newly redesignated
§ 983.164 by revising paragraph (d) to
read as follows:
■
§ 983.164
Reports.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) ACP–5, Minimal Testing Form.
Each handler who handles less than
1,000,000 pounds of dried weight
pistachios in a production year and who
wishes to request permission to handle
under the minimal quantities provisions
(§ 983.53) of the order shall furnish this
report to the committee office no later
than August 1 of each production year.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 7. Add new § 983.150 to read as
follows:
§ 983.150
Aflatoxin regulations.
(a) Maximum level. No handler shall
ship for domestic human consumption,
pistachios that exceed an aflatoxin level
of 15 ppb; Provided, That the provisions
of this section pertaining to aflatoxin
levels, sampling, testing, and
certification shall apply to handlers in
District 4 on or after October 30, 2009.
All shipments must also be covered by
an aflatoxin inspection certificate.
Pistachios that fail to meet the aflatoxin
requirements shall be disposed in such
manner as described in the Failed Lots/
Rework Procedure of this part
(§ 983.152).
(b) Change in level. The committee
may recommend to the Secretary
changes in the aflatoxin level specified
in this section. If the Secretary finds, on
the basis of such recommendation or
other information, that such an
adjustment of the aflatoxin level would
tend to effectuate the declared policy of
the Act, such change shall be made
accordingly.
(c) Transfers between handlers.
Transfers between handlers within the
production area are exempt from the
aflatoxin regulation of this section.
(d) Aflatoxin testing procedures. To
obtain an aflatoxin inspection
certificate, each lot to be certified shall
be uniquely identified, be traceable from
testing through shipment by the
handler, and be subjected to the
following:
(1) Samples for testing. Prior to
testing, a sample shall be drawn from
each lot (‘‘lot samples’’) of sufficient
weight to comply with Table 1 and
Table 2 of this section.
(2) Test samples for aflatoxin. Prior to
submission of samples to an accredited
laboratory for aflatoxin analysis, three
samples shall be created equally from
the pistachios designated for aflatoxin
testing in compliance with the
requirements of Tables 1 and 2 of this
paragraph (‘‘test samples’’). The test
samples shall be prepared by, or under
the supervision of, an inspector, or as
approved under an alternative USDArecognized inspection program. The test
samples shall be designated by an
inspector as Test Sample #1, Test
Sample #2, and Test Sample #3. Each
sample shall be placed in a suitable
container, with the lot number clearly
identified, and then submitted to an
accredited laboratory. The gross weight
of the inshell lot sample for aflatoxin
testing and the number of incremental
samples required are shown in Table 1.
The gross weight of the kernel (shelled)
lot sample for aflatoxin testing and the
number of incremental samples required
is shown in Table 2.
TABLE 1 TO § 983.150(D)(2)—INSHELL PISTACHIO LOT SAMPLING INCREMENTS FOR AFLATOXIN CERTIFICATION
Number of
incremental
samples for
the lot sample
dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES
Lot weight (lbs)
Total weight of
lot sample
(kilograms)
Weight of the
test sample
(kilograms)
10
15
20
30
40
60
80
100
3.0
4.5
6.0
9.0
12.0
18.0
24.0
30.0
1.0
1.5
2.0
3.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
220 or less ...................................................................................................................................
221–440 .......................................................................................................................................
441–1,100 ....................................................................................................................................
1,101–2,200 .................................................................................................................................
2,201–4,400 .................................................................................................................................
4,401–11,000 ...............................................................................................................................
11,001–22,000 .............................................................................................................................
22,001–150,000 ...........................................................................................................................
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:13 Oct 30, 2009
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\02NOR1.SGM
02NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 210 / Monday, November 2, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
56531
TABLE 2 TO § 983.150(D)(2)—SHELLED PISTACHIO KERNEL LOT SAMPLING INCREMENTS FOR AFLATOXIN CERTIFICATION
Number of
incremental
samples for
the lot sample
Lot weight (lbs)
Total weight of
lot sample
(kilograms)
10
15
20
30
40
60
80
100
1.5
2.3
3.0
4.5
6.0
9.0
12.0
15.0
dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES
220 or less .................................................................................................................................
221–440 .....................................................................................................................................
441–1,100 ..................................................................................................................................
1,101–2,200 ...............................................................................................................................
2,201–4,400 ...............................................................................................................................
4,401–11,000 .............................................................................................................................
11,001–22,000 ...........................................................................................................................
22,001–150,000 .........................................................................................................................
(3) Testing of pistachios. Test samples
shall be received and logged by an
accredited laboratory and each test
sample shall be prepared and analyzed
using High Pressure Liquid
Chromatograph (HPLC), Vicam Method
(Aflatest), or other methods as
recommended by not fewer than eight
members of the committee and
approved by the Secretary. The aflatoxin
level shall be calculated on a kernel
weight basis.
(4) Certification of lots ‘‘negative’’ as
to aflatoxin. Lots will be certified as
‘‘negative’’ on the aflatoxin inspection
certificate if Test Sample #1 has an
aflatoxin level at or below 5 ppb. If the
aflatoxin level of Test Sample #1 is
above 25 ppb, the lot fails and the
accredited laboratory shall fill out a
failed lot notification report as specified
in § 983.52. If the aflatoxin level of Test
Sample #1 is above 5 ppb and below 25
ppb, the accredited laboratory may at
the handler’s discretion analyze Test
Sample #2, and the test results of Test
Samples #1 and #2 will be averaged.
Alternatively, the handler may elect to
withdraw the lot from testing, rework
the lot, and resubmit it for testing after
reworking. If the handler directs the
laboratory to proceed with the analysis
of Test Sample #2, the lot will be
certified as negative to aflatoxin and the
laboratory shall issue an aflatoxin
inspection certificate if the averaged
results of Test Sample #1 and Test
Sample #2 are at or below 10 ppb. If the
averaged aflatoxin level of Test Samples
#1 and #2 is at or above 20 ppb, the lot
fails and the accredited laboratory shall
fill out a failed lot notification report as
specified in § 983.52. If the averaged
aflatoxin level of Test Samples #1 and
#2 is above 10 ppb and below 20 ppb,
the accredited laboratory may, at the
handler’s discretion, analyze Test
Sample #3, and the results of Test
Samples #1, #2, and #3 will be averaged.
Alternatively, the handler may elect to
withdraw the lot from testing, rework
the lot, and resubmit it for testing after
reworking. If the handler directs the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:13 Oct 30, 2009
Jkt 220001
laboratory to proceed with the analysis
of Test Sample #3, a lot will be certified
as negative to aflatoxin and the
laboratory shall issue an aflatoxin
inspection certificate if the averaged
results of Test Samples #1, #2, and #3
are at or below 15 ppb. If the averaged
aflatoxin results of Test Samples #1, #2,
and #3 are above 15 ppb, the lot fails
and the accredited laboratory shall fill
out a failed lot notification report as
specified in § 983.52. The accredited
laboratory shall send a copy of the failed
lot notification report to the committee
and to the failed lot’s owner within 10
working days of any failure described in
this section. If the lot is certified as
negative as described in this section, the
aflatoxin inspection certificate shall
certify the lot using a certification form
identifying each lot by weight and date.
The certification expires for the lot or
remainder of the lot after 12 months.
(5) Certification of aflatoxin levels.
Each accredited laboratory shall
complete aflatoxin testing and reporting
and shall certify that every lot of
pistachios shipped domestically does
not exceed the aflatoxin levels as
required in paragraph (a) of this section
or as provided under § 983.50. Each
handler shall keep a record of each test,
along with a record of final shipping
disposition. These records must be
maintained for three years beyond the
production year of their applicability,
and are subject to audit by the Secretary
or the committee at any time.
(6) Test samples that are not used for
analysis. If a handler does not elect to
use Test Samples #2 or #3 for
certification purposes, the handler may
request that the laboratory return them
to the handler.
■ 8. Add new § 983.152 to read as
follows:
§ 983.152
Failed lots/rework procedure.
(a) Inshell rework procedure for
aflatoxin. If inshell rework is selected as
a remedy to meet the aflatoxin
regulations of this part, then 100% of
the product within that lot shall be
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Weight of the
test sample
(kilograms)
0.5
0.75
1.0
1.5
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
removed from the bulk and/or retail
packaging containers and reworked to
remove the portion of the lot that caused
the failure. Reworking shall consist of
mechanical, electronic, or manual
procedures normally used in the
handling of pistachios. After the rework
procedure has been completed, the total
weight of the accepted product and the
total weight of the rejected product shall
be reported to the committee. The
reworked lot shall be sampled and
tested for aflatoxin as specified in
§ 983.150, except that the lot sample
size and the test sample size shall be
doubled. If, after the lot has been
reworked and tested, it fails the
aflatoxin test for a second time, the lot
may be shelled and the kernels
reworked, sampled, and tested in the
manner specified for an original lot of
kernels, or the failed lot may be used for
non-human consumption or otherwise
disposed of.
(b) Kernel rework procedure for
aflatoxin. If pistachio kernel rework is
selected as a remedy to meet the
aflatoxin regulations in § 983.150, then
100% of the product within that lot
shall be removed from the bulk and/or
retail packaging containers and
reworked to remove the portion of the
lot that caused the failure. Reworking
shall consist of mechanical, electronic,
or manual procedures normally used in
the handling of pistachios. After the
rework procedure has been completed,
the total weight of the accepted product
and the total weight of the rejected
product shall be reported to the
committee. The reworked lot shall be
sampled and tested for aflatoxin as
specified in § 983.150.
§ 983.170
[Removed]
9. § 983.170 is removed.
■ 10. Amend § 983.253 by removing the
word ‘‘California’’ in paragraph (a), and
by revising paragraph (b) to read as
follows:
■
§ 983.253
Assessment rate.
(a) * * *
E:\FR\FM\02NOR1.SGM
02NOR1
56532
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 210 / Monday, November 2, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
(b) Each handler who receives
pistachios for processing shall furnish
the Receipts/Assessment Report and pay
all due assessments to the committee by
December 15 of the applicable
production year.
Dated: October 26, 2009.
Rayne Pegg,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. E9–26148 Filed 10–30–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 983
[Doc. No. AO–FV–08–0147; AMS–FV–08–
0051; FV08–983–1]
Pistachios Grown in California; Order
Amending Marketing Order No. 983
dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: This final rule amends the
marketing agreement and order for
pistachios (order). The amendments
were proposed by the Administrative
Committee for Pistachios (Committee),
which is responsible for local
administration of the order. The
amendments will: Expand the
production area covered under the order
to include Arizona and New Mexico in
addition to California; authorize the
Committee to reimburse handlers for a
portion of their inspection and
certification costs in certain situations;
authorize the Committee to recommend
research projects; modify existing order
authorities concerning aflatoxin and
quality regulations; modify the authority
for interhandler transfers of order
obligations; redesignate several sections
of the order; remove previously
suspended order provisions, and make
other related changes. The amendments
are intended to improve the operation
and functioning of the marketing order
program.
DATES: This rule is effective November
3, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Martin Engeler, Marketing Order
Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 2202
Monterey Street, Suite 102–B, Fresno,
California 93721; Telephone: (559) 487–
5110, Fax: (559) 487–5906, or E-mail:
Martin.Engeler@ams.usda.gov; or Laurel
May, Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
14:13 Oct 30, 2009
Jkt 220001
Prior
documents in this proceeding: Notice of
Hearing issued on July 15, 2008, and
published in the July 18, 2008, issue of
the Federal Register (73 FR 41298); a
Recommended Decision issued on April
29 and published in the May 5, 2009,
issue of the Federal Register (74 FR
20630); and a Secretary’s Decision and
Referendum Order issued on July 29,
2009, and published in the August 6,
2009, issue of the Federal Register (74
FR 39230).
This action is governed by the
provisions of sections 556 and 557 of
Title 5 of the United States Code and is
therefore excluded from the
requirements of Executive Order 12866.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Avenue, SW., Stop 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–
1509, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or E-mail:
Laurel.May@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may request
information on this proceeding by
contacting Jay Guerber, Marketing Order
Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW., Stop 0237,
Washington, DC 20250–0237;
Telephone: (202) 720–2491, Fax: (202)
720–8938, E-mail:
Jay.Guerber@ams.usda.gov.
Preliminary Statement
This final rule was formulated on the
record of a public hearing held on July
29 and 30, 2008, in Fresno, California.
Notice of this hearing was issued on
July 15, 2008, and published in the July
18, 2008, issue of the Federal Register
(73 FR 41298). The hearing was held to
consider proposed amendments to the
order.
The hearing was held pursuant to the
provisions of the Agricultural Marketing
Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7
U.S.C. 601–674), hereinafter referred to
as the ‘‘Act’’, and the applicable rules of
practice and procedure governing the
formulation of marketing agreements
and orders (7 CFR part 900).
The Notice of Hearing contained
several amendment proposals submitted
by the Committee. Upon the basis of
evidence introduced at the hearing and
the record thereof, the Administrator of
AMS on April 29, 2009, filed with the
Hearing Clerk, U.S. Department of
Agriculture, a Recommended Decision
and Opportunity to File Written
Exceptions thereto. This Recommended
Decision was published in the May 5,
2009, issue of the Federal Register (74
FR 39230). No exceptions were filed.
A Secretary’s Decision and
Referendum Order was issued on July
29, 2009, and published in the August
6, 2009, issue of the Federal Register
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(74 FR 39230). This document directed
that a referendum among pistachio
growers be conducted during the period
August 10 through August 22, 2009 to
determine whether they favor the
proposed amendments to the order. To
become effective, the amendments had
to be approved by at least two-thirds of
the volume of pistachios represented by
voters in the referendum. All of the
proposed amendments were favored by
at least 94 percent of those voting in the
referendum and by at least 96 percent of
the volume represented in the
referendum.
The amendments included in this
final order will:
1. Expand the production area to
include the States of Arizona and New
Mexico. The production area covered
under the order was previously limited
to the State of California. This
amendment will revise existing
§ 983.26, Production area, and
redesignate it as § 983.25. It will also
result in corresponding changes being
made to existing § 983.11, Districts;
§ 983.21, Part and subpart; and existing
§ 983.32, Establishment and
membership. Existing sections 983.21
and 983.32 will also be redesignated as
§ 983.20 and § 983.41, respectively.
2. Authorize the Committee to
reimburse handlers for travel and
shipping costs related to aflatoxin
inspection, under certain circumstances.
This amendment will revise existing
§ 983.44, Inspection, certification and
identification, and redesignate it as
§ 983.56.
3. Add a new § 983.46, Research, that
will authorize the Committee to engage
in research projects with the approval of
USDA. This amendment will also
require corresponding changes to
existing § 983.34, Procedure, to establish
voting requirements for Committee
recommendations concerning research.
It will also require corresponding
changes to existing § 983.46,
Modification or suspension of
regulations, and § 983.54, Contributions.
The existing § 983.34, § 983.46, and
§ 983.54 will also be redesignated as
§ 983.43, § 983.59, and § 983.72,
respectively.
4. Provide broad authority for
aflatoxin regulations by revising existing
§ 983.38, Aflatoxin levels, and
redesignating it as § 983.50. This
amendment also requires corresponding
changes to existing § 983.40, and
redesignating that section as § 983.52. It
also requires corresponding changes to
§ 983.1, Accredited laboratory.
5. Provide broad authority for quality
regulations by revising existing § 983.39,
Minimum quality levels, and
redesignating it as § 983.51. It also
E:\FR\FM\02NOR1.SGM
02NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 210 (Monday, November 2, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 56526-56532]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-26148]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 983
[Doc. No. AMS-FV-09-0031; FV09-983-1 FR]
Pistachios Grown in California; Changes to Handling Regulations
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 56527]]
SUMMARY: This rule changes the handling regulations prescribed under
Marketing Agreement and Order No. 983 (order), which regulate the
handling of pistachios grown in California, Arizona, and New Mexico.
The changes were recommended by the Administrative Committee for
Pistachios (committee), which is responsible for local administration
of the order. The changes bring the handling regulations into
conformance with amendments to the order by including certain
regulatory language previously contained in the order's provisions in
the order's administrative rules and regulations, lifting the
suspension of certain language, removing obsolete language, and
revising references to renumbered order provisions.
DATES: Effective Date: November 3, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Martin Engeler, Marketing Order
Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 2202
Monterey Street, Suite 102-B, Fresno, California 93721; Telephone:
(559) 487-5110, Fax: (559) 487-5906, or E-mail:
Martin.Engeler@ams.usda.gov; or Laurel May, Marketing Order
Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW., Stop 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237;
Telephone: (202) 205-2830, Fax: (202) 720-8938, or E-mail:
Laurel.May@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may request information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber, Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., Stop 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202)
720-2491, Fax: (202) 720-8938, E-mail: Jay.Guerber@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This final rule is issued under Marketing
Agreement and Order No. 983, both as amended (7 CFR part 983),
regulating the handling of pistachios grown in California, Arizona, and
New Mexico. The order is effective under the Agricultural Marketing
Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), hereinafter
referred to as the ``Act.''
The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order 12866.
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This rule is not intended to have retroactive effect.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition
stating that the order, or any obligation imposed in connection with
the order, is not in accordance with law and may request a modification
of the order or to be exempted therefrom. A handler is afforded the
opportunity for a hearing on the petition. After the hearing, USDA
would rule on the petition. The Act provides that the district court of
the United States in any district in which the handler is an
inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of business, has
jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition, provided an
action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of the entry of
the ruling.
This final rule makes changes to the administrative rules and
regulations contained in the order. The changes will bring the current
handling regulations into conformance with amendments to the order by
including certain regulatory language previously contained in the
order's provisions in the order's administrative rules and regulations,
lifting the suspension of certain language, removing obsolete language,
and revising references to renumbered order provisions. These changes
were recommended by the committee and submitted to USDA on May 28,
2008.
A Secretary's decision, which describes the proposed amendments to
the order, was published in the Federal Register on August 6, 2009 (74
FR 39230). A copy of the Secretary's decision may be viewed at: https://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480a02766. An order amending the
order implementing the amendments is also scheduled to be published in
the Federal Register on the date this rule is published.
Amendments to the order's provisions will expand the production
area subject to regulation under the order to include the States of
Arizona and New Mexico in addition to California. Additional amendments
to the order will modify existing provisions regarding aflatoxin and
quality regulations, revise various administrative procedures under the
order, authorize the committee to recommend research projects, and make
other related changes. The amendments were approved by producers
participating in a referendum conducted during the period August 10
through August 22, 2009; thus, conforming changes to the order's
administrative rules and regulations are necessary.
Among other things, specific regulatory language contained in the
order's aflatoxin and quality provisions is being removed. To avoid a
lapse in regulation, the committee recommended that specific order
provisions concerning aflatoxin tolerance levels and testing procedures
be added to the order's administrative rules and regulations section at
the same time the amendments are effectuated. This will provide a
seamless transition and will assure that pistachios continue to be
handled under the same regulations previously in place for California
pistachios under the order. This rule implements those conforming
changes. It is intended that finalization of this rule correspond with
the issuance of the order amending the order upon publication in the
Federal Register.
Section 983.38 of the order previously specified the maximum
aflatoxin tolerance level for domestic shipments of pistachios for
human consumption. This section also specified aflatoxin testing and
certification procedures. Section 983.39 of the order, which was
suspended on December 10, 2007 (72 FR 69141), specified minimum quality
levels for domestic shipments of pistachios for human consumption.
Testing and certification procedures to verify pistachio quality were
also specified in this section. Section 983.46(c) of the order
authorized the committee to recommend administrative rules and
regulations implementing the provisions of Sec. Sec. 983.38 and
983.39.
The order as amended includes amendments to Sec. Sec. 983.38 and
983.39 that removes specific regulatory language from those provisions
and replaces it with general authority to recommend and establish
aflatoxin and quality regulations through the informal rulemaking
process. Sections 983.38 and 983.39 are also being redesignated as
Sec. Sec. 983.50 and 983.51, respectively. Such changes require the
addition of new regulatory sections to the order's administrative rules
and regulations, render certain other sections obsolete, and require
the revision of other sections to reflect changes to the order
provisions, including references to renumbered sections.
As a result of the amendment of Sec. 983.38, certain specific
handling requirements concerning aflatoxin levels and testing
procedures previously provided in that section are being moved to a new
Sec. 983.150--Aflatoxin Regulations, which is added to the order's
rules and regulations. Section 983.150 specifies an aflatoxin tolerance
level of 15 ppb, which is the aflatoxin tolerance previously provided
under the order. Section 983.150 also specifies the same aflatoxin
sampling, testing, and certification procedures previously contained in
the order, with some
[[Page 56528]]
modifications. For instance, the regulation requires that at least
eight members of the committee recommend, and the Secretary approve,
any alternative aflatoxin analysis methods. The regulation also
requires accredited laboratories performing aflatoxin testing to
certify that every lot of production area pistachios shipped
domestically does not exceed the maximum aflatoxin tolerance level
specified under the regulations. Additionally, handlers are required to
maintain testing and shipping records for three years beyond the
production year of their applicability. Finally, section references
throughout the section are updated to reflect renumbered order
provisions.
Section 983.138 of the order's administrative rules and regulations
concerns the drawing of samples for aflatoxin testing in accordance
with requirements in Sec. 983.38. Because updated sampling procedures
are contained in new Sec. 983.150, this section would be obsolete
under the amended order. Therefore, the committee recommended removing
this section.
Due to amendment of Sec. 983.39, the order will no longer contain
specific regulations regarding minimal pistachio quality or testing.
The committee will have general authority to consider and recommend
minimal quality regulations and testing procedures. Certain references
to the provisions of Sec. 983.39 will also be obsolete. Therefore, the
committee recommended that affected sections be revised to reflect
proposed amendments to that section.
Section 983.141 outlines procedures for exempting handlers from
minimum quality testing. This section has been suspended since December
10, 2007 (72 FR 69141), when the minimum quality provision of the order
was also suspended. This section will be obsolete under the amended
order. Therefore, the committee recommended lifting the suspension of
Sec. 983.141 and removing the section.
The order amendments include a change to Sec. 983.40 that removes
specific regulations regarding rework procedures for lots of pistachios
failing aflatoxin and minimum quality testing. Those regulations are
being replaced with general authority to recommend rework procedures
for failed lots. Specific regulations describing rework provisions for
lots failing aflatoxin testing are being moved to a new Sec. 983.152--
Failed lots/rework procedure. Conforming changes to the text of the
current regulations are being made in Sec. 983.152 to reference
aflatoxin regulations in the amended order provisions, and references
to renumbered sections are also being changed.
The order amendments include a change to Sec. 983.41 that removes
a quality testing exemption for handlers handling fewer than 1,000,000
pounds of pistachios annually and replaces it with general authority to
recommend testing procedures for minimum quantities. Section 983.41 is
also being redesignated as Sec. 983.53. Section 983.47 previously
provided for the collection of necessary reports from regulated
handlers. As a result of the amendments, Sec. 983.47 is being
redesignated as Sec. 983.64. Paragraph (d) of Sec. 983.147 describes
Form ACP-5--``Minimal Testing Form,'' for use by handlers handling
fewer than 1,000,000 pounds of pistachios annually. That paragraph has
been suspended since December 10, 2007 (72 FR 69141), when the minimum
quality provision of the order was also suspended. The committee
recommended revising that paragraph to specify that handlers may use
Form ACP-5 to request permission to handle minimum quantities of
pistachios according to the provisions of redesignated Sec. 983.53. To
remain consistent with the redesignation of Sec. 983.47 as Sec.
983.64, this rule redesignates Sec. 983.147 as Sec. 983.164.
The order amendments include a change to Sec. 983.70, which
previously provided an exemption from certain handling regulations
under the order for handlers of fewer than 1,000 pounds of pistachios
and authorized the committee to recommend revised exemption levels. The
amendment raises the exemption level to 5,000 pounds. The section is
also being redesignated as Sec. 983.92. As authorized under Sec.
983.70, Sec. 983.170 of the order's administrative rules and
regulations previously provided an exemption for handlers of fewer than
5,000 pounds. As a result of the amendment to Sec. 983.70, Sec.
983.170 is redundant. Therefore, the committee recommended that Sec.
983.170 be removed. Additionally, a reference to Sec. 983.170 in Sec.
983.143 is revised to reference the exemption level in redesignated
Sec. 983.92. Finally, amendments to Sec. 983.43 redesignate that
section as Sec. 983.55. To remain consistent with that redesignation,
this rule also redesignates Sec. 983.143 as Sec. 983.155.
Section 983.53 of the order authorizes the collection of
assessments from handlers on receipts of pistachios. Such assessments
are used to fund expenses of the committee. Section 983.253 specifies
the current assessment rate established for California pistachios. As
explained above, the order amendments include expanding the production
area to include the States of Arizona and New Mexico, in addition to
California. Therefore, the committee recommended that paragraph (b) of
Sec. 983.253 be revised to establish an assessment rate applicable to
all production area pistachios. To conform to the definition of the
committee's ``production year'' contained in the order, the language of
paragraph (b) of Sec. 983.253 is also being revised to specify that
assessments are due to the committee by December 15 of the applicable
production year.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-612), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
has considered the economic impact of this action on small entities.
Accordingly, AMS has prepared this final regulatory flexibility
analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued
pursuant to the Act, and rules issued thereunder, are unique in that
they are brought about through group action of essentially small
entities acting on their own behalf.
Small business firms, which include handlers regulated under the
order, have been defined by the Small Business Administration (SBA) (13
CFR 121.201) as those having annual receipts of less than $7,000,000.
Small agricultural producers have been defined as those with annual
receipts of less than $750,000.
There are approximately 29 handlers and 875 producers of pistachios
in California, Arizona, and New Mexico. The committee has estimated
that approximately 50 per cent of California handlers would be
considered small businesses, as defined by SBA. The industry has
estimated that one of the Arizona handlers and all three New Mexico
handlers would also be considered small businesses.
Data provided by the committee regarding the size of the 2007 crop,
as well as data reported by the National Agricultural Statistics
Service (NASS), suggests that the average California producer revenue
for the 2007 crop was $733,200. It is estimated that 85 percent of
California producers had receipts of less than $750,000 and would thus
be considered small businesses according to the SBA definition.
Although there is no official data available, the industry estimates
that the majority of producers in Arizona and New Mexico would also be
considered small businesses.
[[Page 56529]]
The order previously regulated only pistachios produced in
California. As a result of amendments to the order, the production area
is being expanded to include Arizona and New Mexico. Additional
amendments to the order will remove specific aflatoxin and quality
regulations and testing procedures from the order's provisions and
replace them with general authority for the committee to recommend
aflatoxin and quality regulations. This rule makes changes to the
order's administrative rules and regulations by adding the specific
aflatoxin regulations previously found in the order's provisions and
clarifying that the regulations pertain to handlers throughout the
expanded production area. Certain language in the administrative rules
and regulations section that is currently suspended, or that is
redundant or obsolete due to enactment of the amendments, is being
removed or revised. References to order sections that have been
redesignated are also revised to reference the renumbered sections.
These changes were recommended by the committee to ensure a seamless
transition in aflatoxin regulation when the amendments are approved and
to conform to various changes to the order's provisions.
Specifically, this rule removes Sec. 983.138--Samples for testing,
Sec. 983.141--Procedures for exempting handlers from minimum quality
testing, and Sec. 983.170--Handler exemption, from the order's
administrative rules and regulations. Conforming changes are being made
to the language and references in Sec. Sec. 983.143, 983.147, 983.253
to reflect amendments to the order, such as the expansion of the
production area to include Arizona and New Mexico and the redesignation
of several order sections. Sections 983.143 and 983.147 are being
redesignated as Sec. Sec. 983.155 and 983.164, respectively. Finally,
two new sections, Sec. 983.150--Aflatoxin regulations, and Sec.
983.152--Failed lots/rework procedure, are being added to incorporate
specific regulations concerning aflatoxin tolerance levels and testing
procedures that are removed from the order's provisions as a result of
the amendments.
The impact of the amendments to the order on producers and handlers
has been analyzed in the Secretary's Decision published in the Federal
Register on August 6, 2009, at 74 FR 39230. It may be generally
concluded from the final regulatory impact analysis that the order
amendments will improve the operation and functioning of the marketing
order program and that all producers and handlers will benefit
regardless of size. The analysis examined the benefits and costs to
producers and handlers as a result of the expansion of the production
area to include Arizona and New Mexico and the regulation of handlers
under the marketing order program, including aflatoxin certification
requirements.
Many of the amendments in this rule simply change the location of
the regulatory provisions concerning aflatoxin levels and testing from
the order provisions to the regulations. Therefore, these changes
should have no effect upon California pistachio handlers of any size
since they are currently required to comply with those requirements.
With regard to application of aflatoxin certification requirements on
Arizona and New Mexico handlers, that impact is fully considered in the
previously referenced final regulatory flexibility analysis. The
minimum quality provisions of the order have been suspended since
December 10, 2007 (72 FR 69141), so there will be no effect on handlers
as a result of removing those provisions. The revision of certain
language, redesignation of some sections, and references to
redesignated sections of the order that will be made to conform to the
amended order are administrative in nature and will have no effect on
producers or handlers of any size.
The changes in this rule are necessary to conform to amendments to
the order. With regard to alternatives, if the amendments had not been
approved by producers voting in the referendum, these changes would not
be made and the proposed rule would have been withdrawn.
This action will not impose any additional reporting or
recordkeeping requirements on either small or large pistachio handlers.
As with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public sector agencies.
AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote
the use of the Internet and other information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information
and services, and for other purposes.
USDA has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate,
overlap or conflict with this rule.
These changes were recommended by the committee on March 6, 2008,
and submitted to AMS on May 28, 2008. The committee's meeting was
widely publicized throughout the pistachio industry and all interested
persons were invited to attend and participate. All entities, both
large and small, were able to express their views on the effects of the
amendments contained herein.
A proposed rule concerning this action was published in the Federal
Register on September 4, 2009 (74 FR 45772). Copies of the rule were
provided to interested parties. The rule was also made available
through the Internet by USDA and the Office of the Federal Register. A
10-day comment period ending on September 14, 2009, was provided to
allow interested persons to respond to the proposal.
One comment was received during the comment period. The comment was
submitted by the manager of the committee. The commenter requested that
the implementation of the aflatoxin regulations be delayed for handlers
in the States of Arizona and New Mexico (District 4). The commenter
points out that these States will be added to the production area and
subject to regulation as a result of amendments to the order. The
commenter states that handlers in Arizona and New Mexico have not
previously been subject to marketing order requirements and have not
had access to the necessary inspection services and forms needed to
comply with the marketing order requirements. In addition, the
committee will need time to consider implementation of rules and
regulations that could provide reimbursement to District 4 handlers for
additional costs associated with aflatoxin testing and certification.
USDA agrees that it may take a period of time for the handlers in
Arizona and New Mexico to be in a position to meet these marketing
order requirements. California handlers have been operating under the
requirements since 2005; however, the Arizona and New Mexico handlers
will need some time to transition into the program.
USDA believes it is reasonable to implement the aflatoxin sampling,
testing, and certification requirements for Arizona and New Mexico
handlers in District 4. Therefore, a change is made in this final rule
that will implement the aflatoxin regulations for Arizona and New
Mexico handlers on or after October 30, 2009.
A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/AMSv1.0/ams.fetchTemplateData.do?template=TemplateN&page=MarketingOrdersSmallBusinessGuide. Any questions about the compliance guide should be sent to
Jay Guerber at the previously mentioned address in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
[[Page 56530]]
After consideration of all relevant matters presented, including
the information and recommendation submitted by the committee and other
available information, it is hereby found that this rule, as
hereinafter set forth, will tend to effectuate the declared policy of
the Act.
It is further found that good cause exists for not postponing the
effective date of this rule until 30 days after publication in the
Federal Register (5 U.S.C. 553) because, as stated in the final rule
amending the current order, the new production year began on September
1, and these regulations, which implement the order as amended, should
be in place as soon as possible. Further, the effective date of this
final rule corresponds to the effective date of the amended order.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 983
Pistachios, Marketing agreements and orders, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
0
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 983 is proposed
to be amended as follows:
PART 983--PISTACHIOS GROWN IN CALIFORNIA
0
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 983 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
Sec. 983.138 [Removed]
0
2. Section 983.138 is removed.
Sec. 983.141 [Removed]
0
3. Lift the December 10, 2007, suspension of Sec. 983.141, and remove
the section.
Sec. 983.143 [Redesignated as Sec. 983.155 and Amended]
0
4. Redesignate Sec. 983.143 as Sec. 983.155, and amend paragraph (b)
of that section by removing the words ``Sec. 983.170'' and adding in
their place the words ``Sec. 983.92.''
Sec. 983.147 [Redesignated as Sec. 983.164]
0
5. Lift the December 10, 2007, suspension of Sec. 983.147(d),
redesignate Sec. 983.147 as Sec. 983.164.
0
6. Amend newly redesignated Sec. 983.164 by revising paragraph (d) to
read as follows:
Sec. 983.164 Reports.
* * * * *
(d) ACP-5, Minimal Testing Form. Each handler who handles less than
1,000,000 pounds of dried weight pistachios in a production year and
who wishes to request permission to handle under the minimal quantities
provisions (Sec. 983.53) of the order shall furnish this report to the
committee office no later than August 1 of each production year.
* * * * *
0
7. Add new Sec. 983.150 to read as follows:
Sec. 983.150 Aflatoxin regulations.
(a) Maximum level. No handler shall ship for domestic human
consumption, pistachios that exceed an aflatoxin level of 15 ppb;
Provided, That the provisions of this section pertaining to aflatoxin
levels, sampling, testing, and certification shall apply to handlers in
District 4 on or after October 30, 2009. All shipments must also be
covered by an aflatoxin inspection certificate. Pistachios that fail to
meet the aflatoxin requirements shall be disposed in such manner as
described in the Failed Lots/Rework Procedure of this part (Sec.
983.152).
(b) Change in level. The committee may recommend to the Secretary
changes in the aflatoxin level specified in this section. If the
Secretary finds, on the basis of such recommendation or other
information, that such an adjustment of the aflatoxin level would tend
to effectuate the declared policy of the Act, such change shall be made
accordingly.
(c) Transfers between handlers. Transfers between handlers within
the production area are exempt from the aflatoxin regulation of this
section.
(d) Aflatoxin testing procedures. To obtain an aflatoxin inspection
certificate, each lot to be certified shall be uniquely identified, be
traceable from testing through shipment by the handler, and be
subjected to the following:
(1) Samples for testing. Prior to testing, a sample shall be drawn
from each lot (``lot samples'') of sufficient weight to comply with
Table 1 and Table 2 of this section.
(2) Test samples for aflatoxin. Prior to submission of samples to
an accredited laboratory for aflatoxin analysis, three samples shall be
created equally from the pistachios designated for aflatoxin testing in
compliance with the requirements of Tables 1 and 2 of this paragraph
(``test samples''). The test samples shall be prepared by, or under the
supervision of, an inspector, or as approved under an alternative USDA-
recognized inspection program. The test samples shall be designated by
an inspector as Test Sample 1, Test Sample 2, and
Test Sample 3. Each sample shall be placed in a suitable
container, with the lot number clearly identified, and then submitted
to an accredited laboratory. The gross weight of the inshell lot sample
for aflatoxin testing and the number of incremental samples required
are shown in Table 1. The gross weight of the kernel (shelled) lot
sample for aflatoxin testing and the number of incremental samples
required is shown in Table 2.
Table 1 to Sec. 983.150(d)(2)--Inshell Pistachio Lot Sampling Increments for Aflatoxin Certification
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of
incremental Total weight Weight of the
Lot weight (lbs) samples for of lot sample test sample
the lot sample (kilograms) (kilograms)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
220 or less..................................................... 10 3.0 1.0
221-440......................................................... 15 4.5 1.5
441-1,100....................................................... 20 6.0 2.0
1,101-2,200..................................................... 30 9.0 3.0
2,201-4,400..................................................... 40 12.0 4.0
4,401-11,000.................................................... 60 18.0 6.0
11,001-22,000................................................... 80 24.0 8.0
22,001-150,000.................................................. 100 30.0 10.0
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 56531]]
Table 2 to Sec. 983.150(d)(2)--Shelled Pistachio Kernel Lot Sampling Increments for Aflatoxin Certification
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of
incremental Total weight Weight of the
Lot weight (lbs) samples for of lot sample test sample
the lot sample (kilograms) (kilograms)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
220 or less..................................................... 10 1.5 0.5
221-440......................................................... 15 2.3 0.75
441-1,100....................................................... 20 3.0 1.0
1,101-2,200..................................................... 30 4.5 1.5
2,201-4,400..................................................... 40 6.0 2.0
4,401-11,000.................................................... 60 9.0 3.0
11,001-22,000................................................... 80 12.0 4.0
22,001-150,000.................................................. 100 15.0 5.0
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(3) Testing of pistachios. Test samples shall be received and
logged by an accredited laboratory and each test sample shall be
prepared and analyzed using High Pressure Liquid Chromatograph (HPLC),
Vicam Method (Aflatest), or other methods as recommended by not fewer
than eight members of the committee and approved by the Secretary. The
aflatoxin level shall be calculated on a kernel weight basis.
(4) Certification of lots ``negative'' as to aflatoxin. Lots will
be certified as ``negative'' on the aflatoxin inspection certificate if
Test Sample 1 has an aflatoxin level at or below 5 ppb. If the
aflatoxin level of Test Sample 1 is above 25 ppb, the lot
fails and the accredited laboratory shall fill out a failed lot
notification report as specified in Sec. 983.52. If the aflatoxin
level of Test Sample 1 is above 5 ppb and below 25 ppb, the
accredited laboratory may at the handler's discretion analyze Test
Sample 2, and the test results of Test Samples 1 and
2 will be averaged. Alternatively, the handler may elect to
withdraw the lot from testing, rework the lot, and resubmit it for
testing after reworking. If the handler directs the laboratory to
proceed with the analysis of Test Sample 2, the lot will be
certified as negative to aflatoxin and the laboratory shall issue an
aflatoxin inspection certificate if the averaged results of Test Sample
1 and Test Sample 2 are at or below 10 ppb. If the
averaged aflatoxin level of Test Samples 1 and 2 is
at or above 20 ppb, the lot fails and the accredited laboratory shall
fill out a failed lot notification report as specified in Sec. 983.52.
If the averaged aflatoxin level of Test Samples 1 and
2 is above 10 ppb and below 20 ppb, the accredited laboratory
may, at the handler's discretion, analyze Test Sample 3, and
the results of Test Samples 1, 2, and 3 will
be averaged. Alternatively, the handler may elect to withdraw the lot
from testing, rework the lot, and resubmit it for testing after
reworking. If the handler directs the laboratory to proceed with the
analysis of Test Sample 3, a lot will be certified as negative
to aflatoxin and the laboratory shall issue an aflatoxin inspection
certificate if the averaged results of Test Samples 1,
2, and 3 are at or below 15 ppb. If the averaged
aflatoxin results of Test Samples 1, 2, and
3 are above 15 ppb, the lot fails and the accredited
laboratory shall fill out a failed lot notification report as specified
in Sec. 983.52. The accredited laboratory shall send a copy of the
failed lot notification report to the committee and to the failed lot's
owner within 10 working days of any failure described in this section.
If the lot is certified as negative as described in this section, the
aflatoxin inspection certificate shall certify the lot using a
certification form identifying each lot by weight and date. The
certification expires for the lot or remainder of the lot after 12
months.
(5) Certification of aflatoxin levels. Each accredited laboratory
shall complete aflatoxin testing and reporting and shall certify that
every lot of pistachios shipped domestically does not exceed the
aflatoxin levels as required in paragraph (a) of this section or as
provided under Sec. 983.50. Each handler shall keep a record of each
test, along with a record of final shipping disposition. These records
must be maintained for three years beyond the production year of their
applicability, and are subject to audit by the Secretary or the
committee at any time.
(6) Test samples that are not used for analysis. If a handler does
not elect to use Test Samples 2 or 3 for
certification purposes, the handler may request that the laboratory
return them to the handler.
0
8. Add new Sec. 983.152 to read as follows:
Sec. 983.152 Failed lots/rework procedure.
(a) Inshell rework procedure for aflatoxin. If inshell rework is
selected as a remedy to meet the aflatoxin regulations of this part,
then 100% of the product within that lot shall be removed from the bulk
and/or retail packaging containers and reworked to remove the portion
of the lot that caused the failure. Reworking shall consist of
mechanical, electronic, or manual procedures normally used in the
handling of pistachios. After the rework procedure has been completed,
the total weight of the accepted product and the total weight of the
rejected product shall be reported to the committee. The reworked lot
shall be sampled and tested for aflatoxin as specified in Sec.
983.150, except that the lot sample size and the test sample size shall
be doubled. If, after the lot has been reworked and tested, it fails
the aflatoxin test for a second time, the lot may be shelled and the
kernels reworked, sampled, and tested in the manner specified for an
original lot of kernels, or the failed lot may be used for non-human
consumption or otherwise disposed of.
(b) Kernel rework procedure for aflatoxin. If pistachio kernel
rework is selected as a remedy to meet the aflatoxin regulations in
Sec. 983.150, then 100% of the product within that lot shall be
removed from the bulk and/or retail packaging containers and reworked
to remove the portion of the lot that caused the failure. Reworking
shall consist of mechanical, electronic, or manual procedures normally
used in the handling of pistachios. After the rework procedure has been
completed, the total weight of the accepted product and the total
weight of the rejected product shall be reported to the committee. The
reworked lot shall be sampled and tested for aflatoxin as specified in
Sec. 983.150.
Sec. 983.170 [Removed]
0
9. Sec. 983.170 is removed.
0
10. Amend Sec. 983.253 by removing the word ``California'' in
paragraph (a), and by revising paragraph (b) to read as follows:
Sec. 983.253 Assessment rate.
(a) * * *
[[Page 56532]]
(b) Each handler who receives pistachios for processing shall
furnish the Receipts/Assessment Report and pay all due assessments to
the committee by December 15 of the applicable production year.
Dated: October 26, 2009.
Rayne Pegg,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. E9-26148 Filed 10-30-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P