Proposed Collection; Comment Request- Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act; Consumer Product Conformity Assessment Body Registration Form, 55817-55819 [E9-26070]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 208 / Thursday, October 29, 2009 / Notices
The
purpose of these meetings is to
recommend the 2010 recreational
management measures for the summer
flounder, scup, and black sea bass
fisheries.
Although non-emergency issues not
contained in this agenda may come
before these groups for discussion, in
accordance with the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management
Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act), those
issues may not be the subject of formal
action during these meetings. Actions
will be restricted to those issues
specifically identified in this notice and
any issues arising after publication of
this notice that require emergency
action under Section 305(c) of the
Magnuson-Stevens Act, provided the
public has been notified of the Council’s
intent to take final action to address the
emergency.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Special Accommodations
The meetings are physically
accessible to people with disabilities.
Requests for sign language
interpretation or other auxiliary aids
should be directed to M. Jan Bryan,
(302) 674–2331 extension 18, at the
Council Office at least 5 days prior to
the meeting date.
Dated: October 26, 2009.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E9–26047 Filed 10–28–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–533–502]
dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Certain Welded Carbon Steel Standard
Pipes and Tubes From India:
Rescission of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review in Part
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On June 24, 2009, in response
to requests from the Wheatland Tube
Company (the petitioner), the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) published a notice of
initiation of administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on certain
welded carbon steel standard pipes and
tubes from India. The period of review
is May 1, 2008, through April 30, 2009.
The Department is rescinding this
review in part.
DATES: Effective Date: October 29, 2009.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:20 Oct 28, 2009
Jkt 220001
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Catherine Cartsos, AD/CVD Operations,
Office 5, Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–1757.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On June 24, 2009, in response to a
request from the petitioner, the
Department published a notice of
initiation of administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on certain
welded carbon steel standard pipes and
tubes from India. See Initiation of
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews and Requests
for Revocation in Part, 74 FR 30052
(June 24, 2009). The Department
selected two mandatory respondents,
Lloyds Metals and Engineers Limited
(Lloyds Metals) and Jindal Industries
Ltd. (Jindal). See Memorandum to
Laurie Parkhill entitled ‘‘Antidumping
Duty Order on Certain Welded Carbon
Steel Standard Pipes and Tubes from
India—Respondent Selection’’ dated
July 28, 2009. On September 22, 2009,
the petitioner withdrew its request for
an administrative review of Jindal. See
letter from the petitioner entitled
‘‘Certain Welded Carbon Steel Standard
Pipes and Tubes from India—
Withdrawal of Request For
Administrative Review of Jindal’’ dated
September 22, 2009.
Rescission of Review in Part
In accordance with 19 CFR
351.213(d)(1) the Department will
rescind an administrative review ‘‘if a
party that requested a review withdraws
the request within 90 days of the date
of publication of notice of initiation of
the requested review.’’ We received the
petitioner’s withdrawal letter within the
90-day time limit. Because the
Department received no other requests
for review of Jindal Industries Ltd., the
Department is rescinding the review in
part with respect to certain welded
carbon steel standard pipes and tubes
from India from Jindal. This
administrative review will continue
with respect to Lloyds Metals. This
rescission is pursuant to 19 CFR
351.213(d)(1). The Department intends
to issue appropriate assessment
instructions to U.S. Customs and Border
Protection 15 days after publication of
this notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
55817
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this review period. Failure to
comply with this requirement could
result in the Secretary’s assumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and subsequent assessment of
double antidumping duties.
We are issuing and publishing this
rescission in accordance with section
777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4).
Dated: October 23, 2009.
John M. Andersen,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations.
[FR Doc. E9–26103 Filed 10–28–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY
COMMISSION
[CPSC Docket No. CPSC–2009–0088]
Proposed Collection; Comment
Request—Consumer Product Safety
Improvement Act; Consumer Product
Conformity Assessment Body
Registration Form
AGENCY: Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: As required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the Consumer Product
Safety Commission (‘‘CPSC’’ or
‘‘Commission’’) requests comments on a
proposed collection of information
regarding a form that will be used to
identify third party conformity
assessment bodies that meet the
requirements to test for compliance to
specified children’s product safety
rules. Third party conformity
assessment bodies found to meet the
requirements will be listed on the CPSC
Web site. The Commission will consider
all comments received in response to
this notice before requesting approval of
this collection of information from the
Office of Management and Budget.
DATES: Written comments must be
received by the Office of the Secretary
not later than December 28, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by Docket No. CPSC–2009–
0088, by any of the following methods:
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the
following way:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
E:\FR\FM\29OCN1.SGM
29OCN1
55818
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 208 / Thursday, October 29, 2009 / Notices
To ensure timely processing of
comments, the Commission is no longer
accepting comments submitted by
electronic mail (e-mail) except through
https://www.regulations.gov.
Written Submissions
Submit written submissions in the
following way:
Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for
paper, disk, or CD–ROM submissions),
preferably in five copies, to: Office of
the Secretary, Consumer Product Safety
Commission, Room 502, 4330 East West
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814;
telephone (301) 504–7923.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number for this proposed
collection of information. All comments
received may be posted without change,
including any personal identifiers,
contact information, or other personal
information provided to https://
www.regulations.gov. Do not submit
confidential business information, trade
secret information, or other sensitive or
protected information electronically.
Such information should be submitted
in writing.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Linda Glatz, Division of Policy and
Planning, Office of Information
Technology and Technology Services,
Consumer Product Safety Commission,
4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD
20814; (301) 504–7671; e-mail
lglatz@cpsc.gov.
dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Background
The Consumer Product Safety
Improvement Act of 2008 (‘‘CPSIA’’ or
‘‘Act’’) was signed into law on August
14, 2008 (Pub. L. 110–314). Section 102
of the CPSIA mandates that third party
testing be conducted for any children’s
product that is subject to a children’s
product safety rule. Such third party
testing of children’s products must be
completed before importing for
consumption or warehousing or
distributing in commerce. Every
manufacturer of such children’s
products (and the private labeler of such
children’s product if the product bears
a private label) must submit samples for
testing to a third party conformity
assessment body which is accredited
under requirements established by the
Commission. The third party conformity
assessment body will test such samples
for compliance with applicable
children’s product safety rules. Based
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:20 Oct 28, 2009
Jkt 220001
on this testing, the manufacturer or
private labeler must issue a certificate
that certifies that the children’s product
complies with all applicable children’s
product safety rules.
Section 14(f)(2)(A) of the Consumer
Product Safety Act (as amended by
section 102(b) of the CPSIA) defines a
third party conformity assessment body
as one that is not owned, managed, or
controlled by the manufacturer or
private labeler of a product to be
assessed by such conformity assessment
body. A conformity assessment body
that is owned, managed, or controlled
by a manufacturer or a private labeler
may, in certain specified circumstances,
be accredited as a third party conformity
assessment body. The CPSIA also refers
to such entities as ‘‘firewalled
conformity assessment bodies.’’
Additionally, the CPSIA specifies that,
under certain conditions, a third party
conformity assessment body may
include a government-owned or
government-controlled entity.
The CPSIA provides that accreditation
of third party conformity assessment
bodies may be conducted either by the
Commission or by an independent
accreditation organization designated by
the Commission. The Commission must
maintain an up-to-date list of entities
that have been accredited to assess
compliance with children’s product
safety rules on its Web site.
The CPSC uses an online collection
form, CPSC Form 223, to gather
information from third party conformity
assessment bodies voluntarily seeking
recognition by CPSC. The information
collected relates to location,
accreditation, and ownership. This
information will be used by the
Commission to assess:
• A third party conformity
assessment body’s status as either an
independent third party conformity
assessment body, a government-owned
or government-controlled conformity
assessment body, or a firewalled
conformity assessment body;
• Qualifications for recognition by
CPSC to test for compliance to specified
children’s product safety rules; and
• Eligibility for recognition on the
CPSC Web site.
The collection of this information on
CPSC Form 223 is required in three
separate circumstances: (1) Upon initial
application by the third party
conformity assessment body for
recognition by CPSC (‘‘initial
registrations’’); (2) at least every 2 years
as part of a regular audit process (‘‘reregistrations’’); and (3) whenever a
change to accreditation or ownership
information occurs (‘‘information
changes’’).
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
B. Estimated Burden
The CPSC staff estimates a total
reporting burden of approximately 451
hours. This reporting burden is broken
down into the categories of submissions
as follows: (1) Initial registrations—300
hours, (2) re-registrations—150 hours,
and (3) information changes—.75 hours,
for a total of 450.75 hours, which the
Commission will round up to 451 hours.
Initial Registrations—The
Commission tentatively estimates that
300 third party conformity assessment
bodies will register initially, with each
response taking 1 hour for a total of 300
reporting hours (300 third party
conformity assessment bodies × 1 hour
= 300 hours). The 300 entity estimate is
based on the fact that by June 5, 2009,
153 third party conformity assessment
bodies had already registered with the
CPSC. The Commission expects to
receive additional registrations, which
will be further increased by a notice of
requirement for ‘‘all other children’s
product safety rules’’ pursuant to CPSA
section 14(a)(3)(B)(vi).
Re-Registrations—Under a separate
proposed rule issued by the
Commission on August 13, 2009 (74 FR
40784), third party conformity
assessment bodies would be required to
re-register using CPSC Form 223 every
two years. Because not all third party
conformity assessment bodies will first
submit CPSC Form 223 at the same
time, only some of these entities will reregister using CPSC Form 223 in any
given year. Because the Commission
does not know how many entities will
re-register in any given year, for the
purposes of this analysis, the
Commission estimates that half of the
third party conformity assessment
bodies will re-register using CPSC Form
223 in any given year, for a total of 150
Re-Registrations per year (300 total third
party conformity assessment bodies ×
0.5 = 150 re-registrations per year). The
reporting burden for each re-registration
is estimated to be one hour, making the
total reporting burden for all reregistrations per year 150 hours (150 reregistrations × 1 hour per re-registration
= 150 hours).
Information Changes—Finally, under
the same separate proposed rule noted
above, third party conformity
assessment bodies would be required to
ensure that the information submitted
on CPSC Form 223 remains current.
Any changes in information must be
submitted on a new CPSC Form 223.
Based on current experience, the
Commission estimates that only one
percent of third party conformity
assessment bodies will revise or update
their information yearly, so the
E:\FR\FM\29OCN1.SGM
29OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 208 / Thursday, October 29, 2009 / Notices
dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
estimated number of respondents is 3
(300 third party conformity assessment
bodies × 0.01 = 3 information changes
per year). Because information changes
in most cases will likely only involve
updating a phone number or contact
person, the estimated reporting burden
is 15 minutes per update, for a total
reporting burden of 45 minutes per year
(3 information changes × 0.25 hours =
0.75 hours per year).
Estimated Total Cost Burden on
Respondents—Assuming that CPSC
Form 223 will be submitted by someone
at the level of a general or operations
manager at each third party conformity
assessment body, at a median
compensation (wages and benefits) of
$68 per hour, the total cost burden to
the respondents is estimated to be
$30,668 ($68 × 451 hours).
Estimated Annualized Cost Burden to
the Federal Government—The
Commission estimates 150 reregistrations per year. Re-registrations
will require review by a CPSC staff
member with an average rate of pay of
$67/hour (the approximate hourly
compensation (wages and benefits) of a
GS–13 step 5 employee). Re-registration
review involves a thorough review of
the accreditation certificate and scope
documents provided by the third party
conformity assessment body to ensure,
among other things, that the
accreditations are current, are to the ISO
Standard ISO/IEC 17025:2005, ‘‘General
Requirements for the Competence of
Testing and Calibration Laboratories,’’
and include the appropriate test
methods. The review is estimated to
take an average of 1.75 hours per
submission. Thus, the annualized cost
to the Federal government is estimated
to be approximately $17,588 (150 reregistrations × 1.75 hours × $67 =
$17,587.50 per year).
Additional costs to the Federal
government associated with information
changes submitted on CPSC Form 223
will be negligible. The Commission
estimates that 15 minutes will be spent
reviewing each update. The annualized
cost to the federal government is
estimated to be approximately $50 (3
information changes × 0.25 hours × $67
= $50.25 per year).
C. Request for Comments
The Commission invites written
comments from all interested persons
about the proposed collection of
information. The Commission
specifically invites information relevant
to the following topics:
• Whether the collection of
information described above is
necessary for the proper performance of
the Commission’s functions, including
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:20 Oct 28, 2009
Jkt 220001
whether the information would have
practical utility;
• Whether the estimated burden of
the proposed collection of information
is accurate;
• Whether the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be collected
could be enhanced; and
• Whether the burden imposed by the
collection of information could be
minimized by use of automated,
electronic or other technological
collection techniques, or other forms of
information technology.
Dated: October 23, 2009.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary, Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
[FR Doc. E9–26070 Filed 10–28–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355–01–P
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY
COMMISSION
Proposed Extension of Approval of
Information Collection; Comment
Request; Clothing Textiles, Vinyl
Plastic Film
AGENCY: Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: As required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the Consumer Product
Safety Commission (Commission)
requests comments on a proposed
request for extension of approval of a
collection of information from
manufacturers and importers of
clothing, and textiles and related
materials intended for use in clothing.
This collection of information is
required in regulations implementing
the Standard for the Flammability of
Clothing Textiles (16 CFR Part 1610)
and the Standard for the Flammability
of Vinyl Plastic Film (16 CFR Part 1611).
These regulations establish
requirements for testing and
recordkeeping for manufacturers and
importers who furnish guaranties for
products subject to the flammability
standards for clothing textiles and vinyl
plastic film. The Commission will
consider all comments received in
response to this notice before requesting
an extension of approval of this
collection of information from the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB).
DATES: Written comments must be
received by the Office of the Secretary
not later than December 28, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should
be captioned ‘‘Clothing Textiles and
Film, Collection of Information’’ and emailed to the Office of the Secretary at
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
55819
cpsc-os@cpsc.gov, or mailed to the
Office of the Secretary, Consumer
Product Safety Commission, 4330 EastWest Highway, Bethesda, Maryland
20814. Written comments may also be
sent to the Office of the Secretary by
facsimile at (301) 504–0127.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
information about the proposed
collection of information call or write
Linda Glatz, Division of Policy and
Planning, Office of Information
Technology and Technology Services,
Consumer Product Safety Commission,
4330 East West-Highway, Bethesda, MD
20814; telephone: (301) 504–7671 or by
e-mail to lglatz@cpsc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Background
Clothing and fabrics intended for use
in clothing (except children’s sleepwear
in sizes 0 through 14) are subject to the
Standard for the Flammability of
Clothing Textiles (16 CFR Part 1610).
Clothing made from vinyl plastic film
and vinyl plastic film intended for use
in clothing (except children’s sleepwear
in sizes 0 through 14) are subject to the
Standard for the Flammability of Vinyl
Plastic Film (16 CFR Part 1611). These
standards prescribe a test to assure that
articles of wearing apparel, and fabrics
and film intended for use in wearing
apparel, are not dangerously flammable
because of rapid and intense burning.
(Children’s sleepwear and fabrics and
related materials intended for use in
children’s sleepwear in sizes 0 through
14 are subject to other, more stringent
flammability standards, codified at 16
CFR Parts 1615 and 1616.) The
flammability standards for clothing
textiles and vinyl plastic film were
made mandatory by the Flammable
Fabrics Act of 1953 (FFA) (Pub. L. 83–
88, 67 Stat. 111; June 30, 1953).
Section 8 of the FFA (15 U.S.C. 1197)
provides that a person who receives a
guaranty in good faith that a product
complies with an applicable
flammability standard is not subject to
criminal prosecution for a violation of
the FFA resulting from the sale of any
product covered by the guaranty.
Section 8 of the FFA requires that a
guaranty must be based on ‘‘reasonable
and representative tests.’’ The
Commission estimates that about 1,000
manufacturers and importers of
clothing, and of textiles and vinyl film
intended for use in clothing, issue
guaranties that the products they
produce or import comply with the
applicable standard.
B. Testing and Recordkeeping
Regulations implementing the
flammability standards for clothing
E:\FR\FM\29OCN1.SGM
29OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 208 (Thursday, October 29, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55817-55819]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-26070]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION
[CPSC Docket No. CPSC-2009-0088]
Proposed Collection; Comment Request--Consumer Product Safety
Improvement Act; Consumer Product Conformity Assessment Body
Registration Form
AGENCY: Consumer Product Safety Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: As required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the Consumer Product Safety Commission (``CPSC'' or
``Commission'') requests comments on a proposed collection of
information regarding a form that will be used to identify third party
conformity assessment bodies that meet the requirements to test for
compliance to specified children's product safety rules. Third party
conformity assessment bodies found to meet the requirements will be
listed on the CPSC Web site. The Commission will consider all comments
received in response to this notice before requesting approval of this
collection of information from the Office of Management and Budget.
DATES: Written comments must be received by the Office of the Secretary
not later than December 28, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. CPSC-2009-
0088, by any of the following methods:
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the following way:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
[[Page 55818]]
To ensure timely processing of comments, the Commission is no longer
accepting comments submitted by electronic mail (e-mail) except through
https://www.regulations.gov.
Written Submissions
Submit written submissions in the following way:
Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for paper, disk, or CD-ROM
submissions), preferably in five copies, to: Office of the Secretary,
Consumer Product Safety Commission, Room 502, 4330 East West Highway,
Bethesda, MD 20814; telephone (301) 504-7923.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and docket number for this proposed collection of information. All
comments received may be posted without change, including any personal
identifiers, contact information, or other personal information
provided to https://www.regulations.gov. Do not submit confidential
business information, trade secret information, or other sensitive or
protected information electronically. Such information should be
submitted in writing.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Linda Glatz, Division of Policy and
Planning, Office of Information Technology and Technology Services,
Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda,
MD 20814; (301) 504-7671; e-mail lglatz@cpsc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Background
The Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008 (``CPSIA'' or
``Act'') was signed into law on August 14, 2008 (Pub. L. 110-314).
Section 102 of the CPSIA mandates that third party testing be conducted
for any children's product that is subject to a children's product
safety rule. Such third party testing of children's products must be
completed before importing for consumption or warehousing or
distributing in commerce. Every manufacturer of such children's
products (and the private labeler of such children's product if the
product bears a private label) must submit samples for testing to a
third party conformity assessment body which is accredited under
requirements established by the Commission. The third party conformity
assessment body will test such samples for compliance with applicable
children's product safety rules. Based on this testing, the
manufacturer or private labeler must issue a certificate that certifies
that the children's product complies with all applicable children's
product safety rules.
Section 14(f)(2)(A) of the Consumer Product Safety Act (as amended
by section 102(b) of the CPSIA) defines a third party conformity
assessment body as one that is not owned, managed, or controlled by the
manufacturer or private labeler of a product to be assessed by such
conformity assessment body. A conformity assessment body that is owned,
managed, or controlled by a manufacturer or a private labeler may, in
certain specified circumstances, be accredited as a third party
conformity assessment body. The CPSIA also refers to such entities as
``firewalled conformity assessment bodies.'' Additionally, the CPSIA
specifies that, under certain conditions, a third party conformity
assessment body may include a government-owned or government-controlled
entity.
The CPSIA provides that accreditation of third party conformity
assessment bodies may be conducted either by the Commission or by an
independent accreditation organization designated by the Commission.
The Commission must maintain an up-to-date list of entities that have
been accredited to assess compliance with children's product safety
rules on its Web site.
The CPSC uses an online collection form, CPSC Form 223, to gather
information from third party conformity assessment bodies voluntarily
seeking recognition by CPSC. The information collected relates to
location, accreditation, and ownership. This information will be used
by the Commission to assess:
A third party conformity assessment body's status as
either an independent third party conformity assessment body, a
government-owned or government-controlled conformity assessment body,
or a firewalled conformity assessment body;
Qualifications for recognition by CPSC to test for
compliance to specified children's product safety rules; and
Eligibility for recognition on the CPSC Web site.
The collection of this information on CPSC Form 223 is required in
three separate circumstances: (1) Upon initial application by the third
party conformity assessment body for recognition by CPSC (``initial
registrations''); (2) at least every 2 years as part of a regular audit
process (``re-registrations''); and (3) whenever a change to
accreditation or ownership information occurs (``information
changes'').
B. Estimated Burden
The CPSC staff estimates a total reporting burden of approximately
451 hours. This reporting burden is broken down into the categories of
submissions as follows: (1) Initial registrations--300 hours, (2) re-
registrations--150 hours, and (3) information changes--.75 hours, for a
total of 450.75 hours, which the Commission will round up to 451 hours.
Initial Registrations--The Commission tentatively estimates that
300 third party conformity assessment bodies will register initially,
with each response taking 1 hour for a total of 300 reporting hours
(300 third party conformity assessment bodies x 1 hour = 300 hours).
The 300 entity estimate is based on the fact that by June 5, 2009, 153
third party conformity assessment bodies had already registered with
the CPSC. The Commission expects to receive additional registrations,
which will be further increased by a notice of requirement for ``all
other children's product safety rules'' pursuant to CPSA section
14(a)(3)(B)(vi).
Re-Registrations--Under a separate proposed rule issued by the
Commission on August 13, 2009 (74 FR 40784), third party conformity
assessment bodies would be required to re-register using CPSC Form 223
every two years. Because not all third party conformity assessment
bodies will first submit CPSC Form 223 at the same time, only some of
these entities will re-register using CPSC Form 223 in any given year.
Because the Commission does not know how many entities will re-register
in any given year, for the purposes of this analysis, the Commission
estimates that half of the third party conformity assessment bodies
will re-register using CPSC Form 223 in any given year, for a total of
150 Re-Registrations per year (300 total third party conformity
assessment bodies x 0.5 = 150 re-registrations per year). The reporting
burden for each re-registration is estimated to be one hour, making the
total reporting burden for all re-registrations per year 150 hours (150
re-registrations x 1 hour per re-registration = 150 hours).
Information Changes--Finally, under the same separate proposed rule
noted above, third party conformity assessment bodies would be required
to ensure that the information submitted on CPSC Form 223 remains
current. Any changes in information must be submitted on a new CPSC
Form 223. Based on current experience, the Commission estimates that
only one percent of third party conformity assessment bodies will
revise or update their information yearly, so the
[[Page 55819]]
estimated number of respondents is 3 (300 third party conformity
assessment bodies x 0.01 = 3 information changes per year). Because
information changes in most cases will likely only involve updating a
phone number or contact person, the estimated reporting burden is 15
minutes per update, for a total reporting burden of 45 minutes per year
(3 information changes x 0.25 hours = 0.75 hours per year).
Estimated Total Cost Burden on Respondents--Assuming that CPSC Form
223 will be submitted by someone at the level of a general or
operations manager at each third party conformity assessment body, at a
median compensation (wages and benefits) of $68 per hour, the total
cost burden to the respondents is estimated to be $30,668 ($68 x 451
hours).
Estimated Annualized Cost Burden to the Federal Government--The
Commission estimates 150 re-registrations per year. Re-registrations
will require review by a CPSC staff member with an average rate of pay
of $67/hour (the approximate hourly compensation (wages and benefits)
of a GS-13 step 5 employee). Re-registration review involves a thorough
review of the accreditation certificate and scope documents provided by
the third party conformity assessment body to ensure, among other
things, that the accreditations are current, are to the ISO Standard
ISO/IEC 17025:2005, ``General Requirements for the Competence of
Testing and Calibration Laboratories,'' and include the appropriate
test methods. The review is estimated to take an average of 1.75 hours
per submission. Thus, the annualized cost to the Federal government is
estimated to be approximately $17,588 (150 re-registrations x 1.75
hours x $67 = $17,587.50 per year).
Additional costs to the Federal government associated with
information changes submitted on CPSC Form 223 will be negligible. The
Commission estimates that 15 minutes will be spent reviewing each
update. The annualized cost to the federal government is estimated to
be approximately $50 (3 information changes x 0.25 hours x $67 = $50.25
per year).
C. Request for Comments
The Commission invites written comments from all interested persons
about the proposed collection of information. The Commission
specifically invites information relevant to the following topics:
Whether the collection of information described above is
necessary for the proper performance of the Commission's functions,
including whether the information would have practical utility;
Whether the estimated burden of the proposed collection of
information is accurate;
Whether the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected could be enhanced; and
Whether the burden imposed by the collection of
information could be minimized by use of automated, electronic or other
technological collection techniques, or other forms of information
technology.
Dated: October 23, 2009.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission.
[FR Doc. E9-26070 Filed 10-28-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P