Privacy Act; Implementation, 55782-55783 [E9-26052]
Download as PDF
55782
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 208 / Thursday, October 29, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 323
Privacy.
■ Accordingly, 32 CFR part 323 is
amended as follows:
PART 323—DLA PRIVACY ACT
PROGRAM
1. The authority citation for 32 CFR
part 323 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: Public Law 93–579, 88 Stat.
1896 (5 U.S.C. 552a).
2. Paragraph (b) of Appendix H to 32
CFR part 323 is revised to read as
follows:
■
Appendix H to Part 323—DLA
Exemption Rules
dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
b. ID: S500.20 (Specific exemption).
1. System name: Defense Logistics Agency
Criminal Incident Reporting System Records.
2. Exemption: i. Parts of this system may
be exempt pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2) if
the information is compiled and maintained
by a component of the agency, which
performs as its principal function any
activity pertaining to the enforcement of
criminal laws.
ii. The specific sections of 5 U.S.C. 552a
from which the system is to be exempted are
5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3) and (c)(4), (d), (e)(1),
(e)(2), (e)(3), (e)(4)(G), (H), and (I), (e)(5), (f),
and (g).
3. Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2).
4. Reasons: i. From subsection (c)(3)
because to grant access to an accounting of
disclosures as required by the Privacy Act,
including the date, nature, and purpose of
each disclosure and the identity of the
recipient, could alert the subject to the
existence of the investigation or prosecutive
interest by DLA or other agencies. This could
seriously compromise case preparation by
prematurely revealing its existence and
nature; compromise or interfere with
witnesses or make witnesses reluctant to
cooperate; and lead to suppression,
alteration, or destruction of evidence.
ii. From subsections (c)(4), (d), and (f)
because providing access to this information
could result in the concealment, destruction
or fabrication of evidence and jeopardize the
safety and well being of informants,
witnesses and their families, and law
enforcement personnel and their families.
Disclosure of this information could also
reveal and render ineffectual investigative
techniques, sources, and methods used by
this component and could result in the
invasion of privacy of individuals only
incidentally related to an investigation.
Investigatory material is exempt to the extent
that the disclosure of such material would
reveal the identity of a source who furnished
the information to the Government under an
express promise that the identity of the
source would be held in confidence, or prior
to September 27, 1975 under an implied
promise that the identity of the source would
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:45 Oct 28, 2009
Jkt 220001
be held in confidence. This exemption will
protect the identities of certain sources that
would be otherwise unwilling to provide
information to the Government. The
exemption of the individual’s right of access
to his/her records and the reasons therefor
necessitate the exemptions of this system of
records from the requirements of the other
cited provisions.
iii. From subsection (e)(1) because it is not
always possible to detect the relevance or
necessity of each piece of information in the
early stages of an investigation. In some
cases, it is only after the information is
evaluated in light of other evidence that its
relevance and necessity will be clear.
iv. From subsection (e)(2) because
collecting information to the fullest extent
possible directly from the subject individual
may or may not be practical in a criminal
investigation.
v. From subsection (e)(3) because
supplying an individual with a form
containing a Privacy Act Statement would
tend to inhibit cooperation by many
individuals involved in a criminal
investigation. The effect would be somewhat
adverse to established investigative methods
and techniques.
vi. From subsections (e)(4)(G), (H), and (I)
because it will provide protection against
notification of investigatory material which
might alert a subject to the fact that an
investigation of that individual is taking
place, and the disclosure of which would
weaken the on-going investigation, reveal
investigatory techniques, and place
confidential informants in jeopardy who
furnished information under an express
promise that the sources’ identity would be
held in confidence (or prior to the effective
date of the Act, under an implied promise).
In addition, this system of records is exempt
from the access provisions of subsection (d).
vii. From subsection (e)(5) because the
requirement that records be maintained with
attention to accuracy, relevance, timeliness,
and completeness would unfairly hamper the
investigative process. It is the nature of law
enforcement for investigations to uncover the
commission of illegal acts at diverse stages.
It is frequently impossible to determine
initially what information is accurate,
relevant, timely, and least of all complete.
With the passage of time, seemingly
irrelevant or untimely information may
acquire new significance as further
investigation brings new details to light.
viii. From subsection (f) because the
agency’s rules are inapplicable to those
portions of the system that are exempt and
would place the burden on the agency of
either confirming or denying the existence of
a record pertaining to a requesting individual
might in itself provide an answer to that
individual relating to an on-going
investigation. The conduct of a successful
investigation leading to the indictment of a
criminal offender precludes the applicability
of established agency rules relating to
verification of record, disclosure of the
record to the individual and record
amendment procedures for this record
system.
ix. From subsection (g) because this system
of records should be exempt to the extent
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
that the civil remedies relate to provisions of
5 U.S.C. 552a from which this rule exempts
the system.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: October 7, 2009.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer,
Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. E9–26051 Filed 10–28–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
[Docket ID: DoD–2009–OS–0008]
32 CFR Part 323
Privacy Act; Implementation
Defense Logistics Agency, DoD.
Final rule with request for
comments.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Defense Logistics Agency
shall exempt those records contained in
S510.30, Freedom of Information Act/
Privacy Act Requests and
Administrative Appeal Records, when
an exemption has been previously
claimed for the records in another
Privacy Act system of records. The
exemption is intended to preserve the
exempt status of the records when the
purposes underlying the exemption for
the original records are still valid and
necessary to protect the contents of the
records. The Privacy Act system of
records notice has already been
published on January 22, 2009 (74 FR
4009).
DATES: The rule will be effective on
December 28, 2009 unless comments are
received that would result in a contrary
determination. Comments will be
accepted on or before December 28,
2009.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by docket number and title,
by any of the following methods.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Federal Docket Management
System Office, 1160 Defense Pentagon,
Room 3C843, Washington, DC 20301–
1160.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number or Regulatory
Information Number (RIN) for this
Federal Register document. The general
policy for comments and other
submissions from members of the public
is to make these submissions available
for public viewing on the Internet at
https://www.regulations.gov as they are
E:\FR\FM\29OCR1.SGM
29OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 208 / Thursday, October 29, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
received without change, including any
personal identifiers or contact
information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Jody Sinkler at (703) 767–5045.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review’’
It has been determined that Privacy
Act rules for the Department of Defense
are not significant rules. The rules do
not (1) have an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more or
adversely affect in a material way the
economy; a sector of the economy;
productivity; competition; jobs; the
environment; public health or safety; or
State, local, or tribal governments or
communities; (2) create a serious
inconsistency or otherwise interfere
with an action taken or planned by
another Agency; (3) materially alter the
budgetary impact of entitlements,
grants, user fees, or loan programs, or
the rights and obligations of recipients
thereof; or (4) raise novel legal or policy
issues arising out of legal mandates, the
President’s priorities, or the principles
set forth in this Executive order.
Public Law 96–354, ‘‘Regulatory
Flexibility Act’’ (5 U.S.C. Chapter 6)
It has been determined that Privacy
Act rules for the Department of Defense
do not have significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities
because they are concerned only with
the administration of Privacy Act
systems of records within the
Department of Defense.
dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES
Public Law 96–511, ‘‘Paperwork
Reduction Act’’ (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35)
It has been determined that Privacy
Act rules for the Department of Defense
impose no information requirements
beyond the Department of Defense and
that the information collected within
the Department of Defense is necessary
and consistent with 5 U.S.C. 552a,
known as the Privacy Act of 1974.
Section 202, Public Law 104–4,
‘‘Unfunded Mandates Reform Act’’
It has been determined that the
Privacy Act rulemaking for the
Department of Defense does not involve
a Federal mandate that may result in the
expenditure by State, local and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
and that such rulemaking will not
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments.
Executive Order 13132, ‘‘Federalism’’
It has been determined that the
Privacy Act rules for the Department of
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:45 Oct 28, 2009
Jkt 220001
Defense do not have federalism
implications. The rules do not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the
National Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 323
Privacy.
■ Accordingly, 32 CFR part 323 is
amended as follows:
55783
source. The exemption rule for the original
records will identify the specific reasons why
the records are exempt from specific
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a.
Dated: October 7, 2009.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer,
Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. E9–26052 Filed 10–28–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
PART 323—DLA PRIVACY ACT
PROGRAM
Office of the Secretary
1. The authority citation for 32 CFR
part 323 continues to read as follows:
[Docket ID: DoD–2009–OS–0149]
■
Authority: Privacy Act of 1974, Pub. L.
93–579, 88 Stat. 1896 (5 U.S.C. 552a).
2. Appendix H to 32 CFR part 323 is
amended to add paragraph g. to read as
follows:
■
Appendix H to Part 323—DLA
Exemption Rules
*
*
*
*
*
g. ID: S510.30 (Specific/General
Exemption)
1. System name: Freedom of Information
Act/Privacy Act Requests and Administrative
Appeal Records.
2. Exemption: During the processing of a
Freedom of Information Act/Privacy Act
request (which may include access requests,
amendment requests, and requests for review
for initial denials of such requests), exempt
materials from other systems of records may
in turn become part of the case record in this
system. To the extent that copies of exempt
records from those ‘‘other’’ systems of
records are entered into this system, the
Defense Logistics Agency hereby claims the
same exemptions for the records from those
‘‘other’’ systems that are entered into this
system, as claimed for the original primary
system of which they are a part.
3. Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552a (k)(1) through
(k)(7).
4. Reasons: Records are only exempt from
pertinent provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a to the
extent such provisions have been identified
and an exemption claimed for the original
record and the purposes underlying the
exemption for the original record still pertain
to the record which is now contained in this
system of records. In general, the exemptions
were claimed in order to protect properly
classified information relating to national
defense and foreign policy, to avoid
interference during the conduct of criminal,
civil, or administrative actions or
investigations, to ensure protective services
provided the President and others are not
compromised, to protect the identity of
confidential sources incident to Federal
employment, military service, contract, and
security clearance determinations, to
preserve the confidentiality and integrity of
Federal testing materials, and to safeguard
evaluation materials used for military
promotions when furnished by a confidential
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
32 CFR Part 326
Privacy Act; Implementation
AGENCY: National Reconnaissance
Office, DoD.
ACTION: Final rule with request for
comments.
SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is
updating the National Reconnaissance
Office Privacy Act Program Rules, 32
CFR 326, by adding the (k)(2)and (k)(5),
exemptions to accurately describe the
basis for exempting the records. The
Privacy Act system of records notice,
QNRO–27, entitled ‘‘Legal Records’’, has
already been published on April 30,
2008 (73 FR 23429).
DATES: The rule will be effective on
December 28, 2009 unless comments are
received that would result in a contrary
determination. Comments will be
accepted on or before December 28,
2009.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by docket number and title,
by any of the following methods.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Federal Docket Management
System Office, 1160 Defense Pentagon,
Washington, DC 20301–1160.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number or Regulatory
Information Number (RIN) for this
Federal Register document. The general
policy for comments and other
submissions from members of the public
is to make these submissions available
for public viewing on the Internet at
https://www.regulations.gov as they are
received without change, including any
personal identifiers or contact
information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Privacy Official at (703) 227–9128.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\29OCR1.SGM
29OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 208 (Thursday, October 29, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 55782-55783]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-26052]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
[Docket ID: DoD-2009-OS-0008]
32 CFR Part 323
Privacy Act; Implementation
AGENCY: Defense Logistics Agency, DoD.
ACTION: Final rule with request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Defense Logistics Agency shall exempt those records
contained in S510.30, Freedom of Information Act/Privacy Act Requests
and Administrative Appeal Records, when an exemption has been
previously claimed for the records in another Privacy Act system of
records. The exemption is intended to preserve the exempt status of the
records when the purposes underlying the exemption for the original
records are still valid and necessary to protect the contents of the
records. The Privacy Act system of records notice has already been
published on January 22, 2009 (74 FR 4009).
DATES: The rule will be effective on December 28, 2009 unless comments
are received that would result in a contrary determination. Comments
will be accepted on or before December 28, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number and
title, by any of the following methods.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Federal Docket Management System Office, 1160
Defense Pentagon, Room 3C843, Washington, DC 20301-1160.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and docket number or Regulatory Information Number (RIN) for this
Federal Register document. The general policy for comments and other
submissions from members of the public is to make these submissions
available for public viewing on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov as they are
[[Page 55783]]
received without change, including any personal identifiers or contact
information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Jody Sinkler at (703) 767-5045.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review''
It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the Department of
Defense are not significant rules. The rules do not (1) have an annual
effect on the economy of $100 million or more or adversely affect in a
material way the economy; a sector of the economy; productivity;
competition; jobs; the environment; public health or safety; or State,
local, or tribal governments or communities; (2) create a serious
inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by
another Agency; (3) materially alter the budgetary impact of
entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs, or the rights and
obligations of recipients thereof; or (4) raise novel legal or policy
issues arising out of legal mandates, the President's priorities, or
the principles set forth in this Executive order.
Public Law 96-354, ``Regulatory Flexibility Act'' (5 U.S.C. Chapter 6)
It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the Department of
Defense do not have significant economic impact on a substantial number
of small entities because they are concerned only with the
administration of Privacy Act systems of records within the Department
of Defense.
Public Law 96-511, ``Paperwork Reduction Act'' (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35)
It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the Department of
Defense impose no information requirements beyond the Department of
Defense and that the information collected within the Department of
Defense is necessary and consistent with 5 U.S.C. 552a, known as the
Privacy Act of 1974.
Section 202, Public Law 104-4, ``Unfunded Mandates Reform Act''
It has been determined that the Privacy Act rulemaking for the
Department of Defense does not involve a Federal mandate that may
result in the expenditure by State, local and tribal governments, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100 million or more and
that such rulemaking will not significantly or uniquely affect small
governments.
Executive Order 13132, ``Federalism''
It has been determined that the Privacy Act rules for the
Department of Defense do not have federalism implications. The rules do
not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship
between the National Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 323
Privacy.
0
Accordingly, 32 CFR part 323 is amended as follows:
PART 323--DLA PRIVACY ACT PROGRAM
0
1. The authority citation for 32 CFR part 323 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: Privacy Act of 1974, Pub. L. 93-579, 88 Stat. 1896
(5 U.S.C. 552a).
0
2. Appendix H to 32 CFR part 323 is amended to add paragraph g. to read
as follows:
Appendix H to Part 323--DLA Exemption Rules
* * * * *
g. ID: S510.30 (Specific/General Exemption)
1. System name: Freedom of Information Act/Privacy Act Requests
and Administrative Appeal Records.
2. Exemption: During the processing of a Freedom of Information
Act/Privacy Act request (which may include access requests,
amendment requests, and requests for review for initial denials of
such requests), exempt materials from other systems of records may
in turn become part of the case record in this system. To the extent
that copies of exempt records from those ``other'' systems of
records are entered into this system, the Defense Logistics Agency
hereby claims the same exemptions for the records from those
``other'' systems that are entered into this system, as claimed for
the original primary system of which they are a part.
3. Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552a (k)(1) through (k)(7).
4. Reasons: Records are only exempt from pertinent provisions of
5 U.S.C. 552a to the extent such provisions have been identified and
an exemption claimed for the original record and the purposes
underlying the exemption for the original record still pertain to
the record which is now contained in this system of records. In
general, the exemptions were claimed in order to protect properly
classified information relating to national defense and foreign
policy, to avoid interference during the conduct of criminal, civil,
or administrative actions or investigations, to ensure protective
services provided the President and others are not compromised, to
protect the identity of confidential sources incident to Federal
employment, military service, contract, and security clearance
determinations, to preserve the confidentiality and integrity of
Federal testing materials, and to safeguard evaluation materials
used for military promotions when furnished by a confidential
source. The exemption rule for the original records will identify
the specific reasons why the records are exempt from specific
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a.
Dated: October 7, 2009.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. E9-26052 Filed 10-28-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P