Privacy Act; Implementation, 55787 [E9-26036]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 208 / Thursday, October 29, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Air Force
[Docket ID: USAF–2009–0019]
32 CFR Part 806b
Privacy Act; Implementation
AGENCY:
Department of the Air Force,
DoD.
ACTION: Final rule with request for
comments.
SUMMARY: The Department of the Air
Force is updating the Department of the
Air Force Privacy Act Program Rules, 32
CFR part 806b, by adding the (k)(5)
exemption to accurately describe the
basis for exempting the records. The
Privacy Act system of records notice,
F036 AETC X, entitled ‘‘College
Scholarship Program’’, was published
on July 7, 2008 (73 FR 38411). The same
notice was amended on August 22, 2008
(73 FR 49659) requesting a System ID
change.
The rule will be effective on
December 28, 2009 unless comments are
received that would result in a contrary
determination. Comments will be
accepted on or before December 28,
2009.
DATES:
You may submit comments,
identified by docket number and title,
by any of the following methods.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Federal Docket Management
System Office, 1160 Defense Pentagon,
Room 3C843, Washington, DC 20301–
1160.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number or Regulatory
Information Number (RIN) for this
Federal Register document. The general
policy for comments and other
submissions from members of the public
is to make these submissions available
for public viewing on the Internet at
http://www.regulations.gov as they are
received without change, including any
personal identifiers or contact
information.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr.
dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES
Ben Swilley at (703) 696–6648.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review’’
It has been determined that Privacy
Act rules for the Department of Defense
are not significant rules. The rules do
not (1) have an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more or
adversely affect in a material way the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:45 Oct 28, 2009
Jkt 220001
economy; a sector of the economy;
productivity; competition; jobs; the
environment; public health or safety; or
State, local, or tribal governments or
communities; (2) create a serious
inconsistency or otherwise interfere
with an action taken or planned by
another Agency; (3) materially alter the
budgetary impact of entitlements,
grants, user fees, or loan programs, or
the rights and obligations of recipients
thereof; or (4) raise novel legal or policy
issues arising out of legal mandates, the
President’s priorities, or the principles
set forth in this Executive order.
Public Law 96–354, ‘‘Regulatory
Flexibility Act’’ (5 U.S.C. Chapter 6)
It has been determined that Privacy
Act rules for the Department of Defense
do not have significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities
because they are concerned only with
the administration of Privacy Act
systems of records within the
Department of Defense.
Public Law 96–511, ‘‘Paperwork
Reduction Act’’ (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35)
It has been determined that Privacy
Act rules for the Department of Defense
impose no information requirements
beyond the Department of Defense and
that the information collected within
the Department of Defense is necessary
and consistent with 5 U.S.C. 552a,
known as the Privacy Act of 1974.
Section 202, Public Law 104–4,
‘‘Unfunded Mandates Reform Act’’
It has been determined that Privacy
Act rules for the Department of Defense
do not involve a Federal mandate that
may result in the expenditure by State,
local and tribal governments, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector, of
$100 million or more and that such
rulemaking will not significantly or
uniquely affect small governments.
55787
Authority: Public Law 93–579, 88 Stat.
1896 (5 U.S.C. 552a).
2. Paragraph (e) of Appendix D to 32
CFR part 806b is amended by adding
paragraph (24) to read as follows:
■
Appendix D to Part 806b—General and
Specific Exemptions
*
*
*
*
*
(24) System identifier and name: F036
AETC X, College Scholarship Program.
(i) Exemption: Investigatory material
compiled solely for the purpose of
determining suitability * * * the identity of
a confidential source. Therefore, portions of
this system may be exempt pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 552a(k)(5) from the following
subsections of 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3), (d), and
(e)(1).
(ii) Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(5).
(iii) Reasons: (A) From subsection (c)(3)
and (d) and when access to accounting
disclosures and access to or amendment of
records would cause the identity of a
confidential sources to be revealed.
Disclosure of the source’s identity not only
will result in the Department breaching the
promise of confidentiality made to the source
but it will impair the Department’s future
ability to compile investigatory material for
the purpose of determining suitability,
eligibility, or qualifications for Federal
civilian employment, Federal contracts, or
access to classified information. Unless
sources can be assured that a promise of
confidentiality will be honored, they will be
less likely to provide information considered
essential to the Department in making the
required determinations.
(B) From (e)(1) because in the collection of
information for investigatory purposes, it is
not always possible to determine the
relevance and necessity of particular
information in the early stages of the
investigation. In some cases, it is only after
the information is evaluated in light of other
information that its relevance and necessity
becomes clear. Such information permits
more informed decision-making by the
Department when making required
suitability, eligibility, and qualification
determinations.
Executive Order 13132, ‘‘Federalism’’
It has been determined that Privacy
Act rules for the Department of Defense
do not have federalism implications.
The rules do not have substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship
between the National Government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government.
*
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 806b
Privacy.
■ Accordingly, 32 CFR part 806b is
amended as follows:
Department of the Air Force
PART 806b—PRIVACY ACT PROGRAM
Privacy Act; Implementation
1. The authority citation for 32 CFR
part 806b continues to read as follows:
DoD.
■
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
*
*
*
Dated: October 7, 2009.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer,
Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. E9–26036 Filed 10–28–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
[Docket ID: USAF–2009–0011]
32 CFR Part 806b
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\29OCR1.SGM
Department of the Air Force,
29OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 208 (Thursday, October 29, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 55787]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-26036]
[[Page 55787]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Air Force
[Docket ID: USAF-2009-0019]
32 CFR Part 806b
Privacy Act; Implementation
AGENCY: Department of the Air Force, DoD.
ACTION: Final rule with request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of the Air Force is updating the Department of
the Air Force Privacy Act Program Rules, 32 CFR part 806b, by adding
the (k)(5) exemption to accurately describe the basis for exempting the
records. The Privacy Act system of records notice, F036 AETC X,
entitled ``College Scholarship Program'', was published on July 7, 2008
(73 FR 38411). The same notice was amended on August 22, 2008 (73 FR
49659) requesting a System ID change.
DATES: The rule will be effective on December 28, 2009 unless comments
are received that would result in a contrary determination. Comments
will be accepted on or before December 28, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number and
title, by any of the following methods.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Federal Docket Management System Office, 1160
Defense Pentagon, Room 3C843, Washington, DC 20301-1160.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and docket number or Regulatory Information Number (RIN) for this
Federal Register document. The general policy for comments and other
submissions from members of the public is to make these submissions
available for public viewing on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov as they are received without change, including any
personal identifiers or contact information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Ben Swilley at (703) 696-6648.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review''
It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the Department of
Defense are not significant rules. The rules do not (1) have an annual
effect on the economy of $100 million or more or adversely affect in a
material way the economy; a sector of the economy; productivity;
competition; jobs; the environment; public health or safety; or State,
local, or tribal governments or communities; (2) create a serious
inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by
another Agency; (3) materially alter the budgetary impact of
entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs, or the rights and
obligations of recipients thereof; or (4) raise novel legal or policy
issues arising out of legal mandates, the President's priorities, or
the principles set forth in this Executive order.
Public Law 96-354, ``Regulatory Flexibility Act'' (5 U.S.C. Chapter 6)
It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the Department of
Defense do not have significant economic impact on a substantial number
of small entities because they are concerned only with the
administration of Privacy Act systems of records within the Department
of Defense.
Public Law 96-511, ``Paperwork Reduction Act'' (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35)
It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the Department of
Defense impose no information requirements beyond the Department of
Defense and that the information collected within the Department of
Defense is necessary and consistent with 5 U.S.C. 552a, known as the
Privacy Act of 1974.
Section 202, Public Law 104-4, ``Unfunded Mandates Reform Act''
It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the Department of
Defense do not involve a Federal mandate that may result in the
expenditure by State, local and tribal governments, in the aggregate,
or by the private sector, of $100 million or more and that such
rulemaking will not significantly or uniquely affect small governments.
Executive Order 13132, ``Federalism''
It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the Department of
Defense do not have federalism implications. The rules do not have
substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between
the National Government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 806b
Privacy.
0
Accordingly, 32 CFR part 806b is amended as follows:
PART 806b--PRIVACY ACT PROGRAM
0
1. The authority citation for 32 CFR part 806b continues to read as
follows:
Authority: Public Law 93-579, 88 Stat. 1896 (5 U.S.C. 552a).
0
2. Paragraph (e) of Appendix D to 32 CFR part 806b is amended by adding
paragraph (24) to read as follows:
Appendix D to Part 806b--General and Specific Exemptions
* * * * *
(24) System identifier and name: F036 AETC X, College
Scholarship Program.
(i) Exemption: Investigatory material compiled solely for the
purpose of determining suitability * * * the identity of a
confidential source. Therefore, portions of this system may be
exempt pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(5) from the following
subsections of 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3), (d), and (e)(1).
(ii) Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(5).
(iii) Reasons: (A) From subsection (c)(3) and (d) and when
access to accounting disclosures and access to or amendment of
records would cause the identity of a confidential sources to be
revealed. Disclosure of the source's identity not only will result
in the Department breaching the promise of confidentiality made to
the source but it will impair the Department's future ability to
compile investigatory material for the purpose of determining
suitability, eligibility, or qualifications for Federal civilian
employment, Federal contracts, or access to classified information.
Unless sources can be assured that a promise of confidentiality will
be honored, they will be less likely to provide information
considered essential to the Department in making the required
determinations.
(B) From (e)(1) because in the collection of information for
investigatory purposes, it is not always possible to determine the
relevance and necessity of particular information in the early
stages of the investigation. In some cases, it is only after the
information is evaluated in light of other information that its
relevance and necessity becomes clear. Such information permits more
informed decision-making by the Department when making required
suitability, eligibility, and qualification determinations.
* * * * *
Dated: October 7, 2009.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. E9-26036 Filed 10-28-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P