Privacy Act; Implementation, 55778-55779 [E9-26030]
Download as PDF
55778
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 208 / Thursday, October 29, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
Dated: October 23, 2009.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer,
Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. E9–26038 Filed 10–28–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
[Docket ID: DOD–2009–OS–0043]
32 CFR Part 311
Privacy Act; Implementation
Office of the Secretary of
Defense, DoD.
ACTION: Final rule with request for
comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Office of the Secretary of
Defense shall exempt those records
contained in DWHS E06, Enterprise
Correspondence Control System (ECCS),
when an exemption has been previously
claimed for the records in another
Privacy Act system of records. The
exemption is intended to preserve the
exempt status of the records when the
purposes underlying the exemption for
the original records are still valid and
necessary to protect the contents of the
records. The Privacy Act system of
records notice has already been
published on August 19, 2009 (74 FR
41870).
The rule will be effective on
December 28, 2009 unless comments are
received that would result in a contrary
determination. Comments will be
accepted on or before December 28,
2009.
DATES:
You may submit comments,
identified by docket number and title,
by any of the following methods.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Federal Docket management
System Office, 1160 Defense Pentagon,
Room 3C843, Washington, DC 20301–
1160.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number or Regulatory
Information Number (RIN) for this
Federal Register document. The general
policy for comments and other
submissions from members of the public
is to make these submissions available
for public viewing on the Internet at
https://www.regulations.gov as they are
received without change, including any
personal identifiers or contact
information.
dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:45 Oct 28, 2009
Jkt 220001
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ms.
Cindy Allard at (703) 588–6830.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review’’
It has been determined that Privacy
Act rules for the Department of Defense
are not significant rules. The rules do
not (1) have an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more or
adversely affect in a material way the
economy; a sector of the economy;
productivity; competition; jobs; the
environment; public health or safety; or
State, local, or tribal governments or
communities; (2) create a serious
inconsistency or otherwise interfere
with an action taken or planned by
another Agency; (3) materially alter the
budgetary impact of entitlements,
grants, user fees, or loan programs, or
the rights and obligations of recipients
thereof; or (4) raise novel legal or policy
issues arising out of legal mandates, the
President’s priorities, or the principles
set forth in this Executive order.
Public Law 96–354, ‘‘Regulatory
Flexibility Act’’ (5 U.S.C. Chapter 6)
It has been determined that Privacy
Act rules for the Department of Defense
do not have significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities
because they are concerned only with
the administration of Privacy Act
systems of records within the
Department of Defense.
Public Law 96–511, ‘‘Paperwork
Reduction Act’’ (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35)
It has been determined that Privacy
Act rules for the Department of Defense
impose no information requirements
beyond the Department of Defense and
that the information collected within
the Department of Defense is necessary
and consistent with 5 U.S.C. 552a,
known as the Privacy Act of 1974.
Section 202, Public Law 104–4,
‘‘Unfunded Mandates Reform Act’’
It has been determined that the
Privacy Act rules for the Department of
Defense do not involve a Federal
mandate that may result in the
expenditure by State, local and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
and that such rulemaking will not
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments.
Executive Order 13132, ‘‘Federalism’’
It has been determined that the
Privacy Act rules for the Department of
Defense do not have federalism
implications. The rules do not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
on the relationship between the
National Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 323
Privacy.
■ Accordingly, 32 CFR part 311 is
amended as follows:
PART 311—OSD PRIVACY PROGRAM
1. The authority citation for 32 CFR
part 311 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: Privacy Act of 1974, Pub. L.
93–579, Stat. 1896 (5 U.S.C. 552a).
2. Section 311.8 is amended to add
paragraph (b)(16) to read as follows:
■
§ 311.8
Procedures for exemptions.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(16) System identifier and name:
DWHS E06, Enterprise Correspondence
Control System (ECCS).
(i) Exemption: During the staffing and
coordination of actions to, from, and
within components in conduct of daily
business, exempt materials from other
systems of records may in turn become
part of the case record in this document
control system. To the extent that copies
of exempt records from those ‘‘other’’
systems of records are entered into this
system, the Office of the Secretary of
Defense hereby claims the same
exemptions for the records from those
‘‘other’’ systems that are entered into
this system, as claimed for the original
primary system of which they are a part.
(ii) Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552a (j)(2) and
(k)(1) through (k)(7).
(iii) Records are only exempt from
pertinent provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a to
the extent such provisions have been
identified and an exemption claimed for
the original record and the purposes
underlying the exemption for the
original record still pertain to the record
which is now contained in this system
of records. In general, the exemptions
were claimed in order to protect
properly classified information relating
to national defense and foreign policy,
to avoid interference during the conduct
of criminal, civil, or administrative
actions or investigations, to ensure
protective services provided the
President and others are not
compromised, to protect the identity of
confidential sources incident to Federal
employment, military service, contract,
and security clearance determinations,
to preserve the confidentiality and
integrity of Federal testing materials,
and to safeguard evaluation materials
used for military promotions when
furnished by a confidential source. The
E:\FR\FM\29OCR1.SGM
29OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 208 / Thursday, October 29, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
exemption rule for the original records
will identify the specific reasons why
the records are exempt from specific
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a.
Dated: October 7, 2009.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer,
Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. E9–26030 Filed 10–28–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
[Docket ID: DoD–2009–OS–0147]
32 CFR Part 322
Privacy Act; Implementation
AGENCY: National Security Agency/
Central Security Services, DoD.
ACTION: Final rule with request for
comment.
SUMMARY: The National Security
Agency/Central Security Services (NSA/
CSS) is adding an exemption rule for the
system of records GNSA 25, ‘‘NSA/CSS
Travel Records.’’ The Privacy Act
system of records notice has already
been published on June 8, 2009 (74 FR
27116).
DATES: The rule will be effective on
December 28, 2009 unless comments are
received that would result in a contrary
determination. Comments will be
accepted on or before December 28,
2009.
You may submit comments,
identified by docket number and/RIN
number and title, by any of the
following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Federal Docket Management
System Office, 1160 Defense Pentagon,
Washington, DC 20301–1160.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number or Regulatory
Information Number (RIN) for this
Federal Register document. The general
policy for comments and other
submissions from members of the public
is to make these submissions available
for public viewing on the Internet at
https://www.regulations.gov as they are
received without change, including any
personal identifiers or contact
information.
dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ms.
Anne Hill at (301) 688–6527.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:45 Oct 28, 2009
Jkt 220001
55779
Executive Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review’’
■
It has been determined that Privacy
Act rules for the Department of Defense
are not significant rules. The rules do
not (1) Have an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more or
adversely affect in a material way the
economy; a sector of the economy;
productivity; competition; jobs; the
environment; public health or safety; or
State, local, or tribal governments or
communities; (2) Create a serious
inconsistency or otherwise interfere
with an action taken or planned by
another Agency; (3) Materially alter the
budgetary impact of entitlements,
grants, user fees, or loan programs, or
the rights and obligations of recipients
thereof; or (4) Raise novel legal or policy
issues arising out of legal mandates, the
President’s priorities, or the principles
set forth in this Executive order.
Public Law 96–354, ‘‘Regulatory
Flexibility Act’’ (5 U.S.C. Chapter 6). It
has been determined that Privacy Act
rules for the Department of Defense do
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities
because they are concerned only with
the administration of Privacy Act
systems of records within the
Department of Defense.
Public Law 95–511, ‘‘Paperwork
Reduction Act’’ (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
It has been determined that Privacy Act
rules for the Department of Defense
impose no information requirements
beyond the Department of Defense and
that the information collected within
the Department of Defense is necessary
and consistent with 5 U.S.C. 552a,
known as the Privacy Act of 1974.
Section 202, Public Law 104–4,
‘‘Unfunded Mandates Reform Act’’. It
has been determined that Privacy Act
rules for the Department of Defense do
not involve a Federal mandate that may
result in the expenditure by State, local
and tribal governments, in the aggregate,
or by the private sector, of $100 million
or more and that such rulemaking will
not significantly or uniquely affect small
governments.
Executive Order 13132, ‘‘Federalism’’.
It has been determined that Privacy Act
rules for the Department of Defense do
not have federalism implications. The
rules do not have substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship
between the National Government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government.
PART 322—NATIONAL SECURITY
AGENCY/CENTRAL SECURITY
SERVICES PRIVACY ACT PROGRAM
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 322
Privacy.
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Accordingly, 32 CFR part 322 is
amended as follows:
1. The authority citation for 32 CFR
part 322 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: Pub. L. 93–579, 88 Stat. 1896
(5 U.S.C. 552a).
2. Section 322.7 is amended by adding
paragraph (r) to read as follows:
■
§ 322.7
Exempt systems of records.
*
*
*
*
*
(r) GNSA 25.
(1) System name: NSA/CSS
Operations Travel Records.
(2) Exemption: (i) Investigatory
material compiled for law enforcement
purposes, other than material within the
scope of subsection 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2),
may be exempt pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
552a(k)(2). However, if an individual is
denied any right, privilege, or benefit for
which he would otherwise be entitled
by Federal law or for which he would
otherwise be eligible, as a result of the
maintenance of the information, the
individual will be provided access to
the information exempt to the extent
that disclosure would reveal the identify
of a confidential source. Note: When
claimed, this exemption allows limited
protection of investigative reports
maintained in a system of records used
in personnel or administrative actions.
(ii) Records maintained solely for
statistical research or program
evaluation purposes and which are not
used to make decisions on the rights,
benefits, or entitlement of an individual
except for census records which may be
disclosed under 13 U.S.C. 8, may be
exempt pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(4).
(3) Authority: 5 U.S.C.
552a(k)(2)(k)(4).
(4) Reasons: (i) From subsection (c)(3)
because the release of the disclosure
accounting would place the subject of
an investigation on notice that they are
under investigation and provide them
with significant information concerning
the nature of the investigation, thus
resulting in a serious impediment to law
enforcement investigations.
(ii) From subsections (d) and (f)
because providing access to records of a
civil or administrative investigation and
the right to contest the contents of those
records and force changes to be made to
the information contained therein
would seriously interfere with and
thwart the orderly and unbiased
conduct of the investigation and impede
case preparation. Providing access rights
normally afforded under the Privacy Act
would provide the subject with valuable
E:\FR\FM\29OCR1.SGM
29OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 208 (Thursday, October 29, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 55778-55779]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-26030]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
[Docket ID: DOD-2009-OS-0043]
32 CFR Part 311
Privacy Act; Implementation
AGENCY: Office of the Secretary of Defense, DoD.
ACTION: Final rule with request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Office of the Secretary of Defense shall exempt those
records contained in DWHS E06, Enterprise Correspondence Control System
(ECCS), when an exemption has been previously claimed for the records
in another Privacy Act system of records. The exemption is intended to
preserve the exempt status of the records when the purposes underlying
the exemption for the original records are still valid and necessary to
protect the contents of the records. The Privacy Act system of records
notice has already been published on August 19, 2009 (74 FR 41870).
DATES: The rule will be effective on December 28, 2009 unless comments
are received that would result in a contrary determination. Comments
will be accepted on or before December 28, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number and
title, by any of the following methods.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Federal Docket management System Office, 1160
Defense Pentagon, Room 3C843, Washington, DC 20301-1160.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and docket number or Regulatory Information Number (RIN) for this
Federal Register document. The general policy for comments and other
submissions from members of the public is to make these submissions
available for public viewing on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov as they are received without change, including any
personal identifiers or contact information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Cindy Allard at (703) 588-6830.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review''
It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the Department of
Defense are not significant rules. The rules do not (1) have an annual
effect on the economy of $100 million or more or adversely affect in a
material way the economy; a sector of the economy; productivity;
competition; jobs; the environment; public health or safety; or State,
local, or tribal governments or communities; (2) create a serious
inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by
another Agency; (3) materially alter the budgetary impact of
entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs, or the rights and
obligations of recipients thereof; or (4) raise novel legal or policy
issues arising out of legal mandates, the President's priorities, or
the principles set forth in this Executive order.
Public Law 96-354, ``Regulatory Flexibility Act'' (5 U.S.C. Chapter 6)
It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the Department of
Defense do not have significant economic impact on a substantial number
of small entities because they are concerned only with the
administration of Privacy Act systems of records within the Department
of Defense.
Public Law 96-511, ``Paperwork Reduction Act'' (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35)
It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the Department of
Defense impose no information requirements beyond the Department of
Defense and that the information collected within the Department of
Defense is necessary and consistent with 5 U.S.C. 552a, known as the
Privacy Act of 1974.
Section 202, Public Law 104-4, ``Unfunded Mandates Reform Act''
It has been determined that the Privacy Act rules for the
Department of Defense do not involve a Federal mandate that may result
in the expenditure by State, local and tribal governments, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100 million or more and that
such rulemaking will not significantly or uniquely affect small
governments.
Executive Order 13132, ``Federalism''
It has been determined that the Privacy Act rules for the
Department of Defense do not have federalism implications. The rules do
not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship
between the National Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 323
Privacy.
0
Accordingly, 32 CFR part 311 is amended as follows:
PART 311--OSD PRIVACY PROGRAM
0
1. The authority citation for 32 CFR part 311 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: Privacy Act of 1974, Pub. L. 93-579, Stat. 1896 (5
U.S.C. 552a).
0
2. Section 311.8 is amended to add paragraph (b)(16) to read as
follows:
Sec. 311.8 Procedures for exemptions.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(16) System identifier and name: DWHS E06, Enterprise
Correspondence Control System (ECCS).
(i) Exemption: During the staffing and coordination of actions to,
from, and within components in conduct of daily business, exempt
materials from other systems of records may in turn become part of the
case record in this document control system. To the extent that copies
of exempt records from those ``other'' systems of records are entered
into this system, the Office of the Secretary of Defense hereby claims
the same exemptions for the records from those ``other'' systems that
are entered into this system, as claimed for the original primary
system of which they are a part.
(ii) Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552a (j)(2) and (k)(1) through (k)(7).
(iii) Records are only exempt from pertinent provisions of 5 U.S.C.
552a to the extent such provisions have been identified and an
exemption claimed for the original record and the purposes underlying
the exemption for the original record still pertain to the record which
is now contained in this system of records. In general, the exemptions
were claimed in order to protect properly classified information
relating to national defense and foreign policy, to avoid interference
during the conduct of criminal, civil, or administrative actions or
investigations, to ensure protective services provided the President
and others are not compromised, to protect the identity of confidential
sources incident to Federal employment, military service, contract, and
security clearance determinations, to preserve the confidentiality and
integrity of Federal testing materials, and to safeguard evaluation
materials used for military promotions when furnished by a confidential
source. The
[[Page 55779]]
exemption rule for the original records will identify the specific
reasons why the records are exempt from specific provisions of 5 U.S.C.
552a.
Dated: October 7, 2009.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. E9-26030 Filed 10-28-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P