Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Status Review of Arctic Grayling (Thymallus arcticus, 55524-55525 [E9-25990]
Download as PDF
55524
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 207 / Wednesday, October 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
§ 745.324(h) of this part but no later
than 1 year after the effective date of the
revisions.
(3) A State or Tribe submitting its
application for approval of a renovation
program on or after the effective date of
the revisions must demonstrate in its
application that it meets the
requirements of the new renovation
program requirements in subparts E and
L of this part.
[FR Doc. E9–25986 Filed 10–23–09; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–S
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 17
[FWS-R6-ES-2009-0065]
[MO 9221050083-B2]
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants; Status Review of Arctic
Grayling (Thymallus arcticus) in the
Upper Missouri River System
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of intent to conduct
status review.
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), under the
authority of the Endangered Species Act
of 1973, as amended (Act), give notice
of our intent to conduct a status review
of Arctic grayling (Thymallus arcticus)
in the upper Missouri River system. We
conduct status reviews to determine
whether the entity should be listed as
endangered or threatened under the Act.
Through this notice, we encourage all
interested parties to provide us
information regarding Arctic grayling in
the upper Missouri River basin.
DATES: We must receive information no
later than November 27, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may submit
information by one of the following
methods:
• Via e-mail to:
fw6_arcticgrayling@fws.gov
• U.S. mail or hand-delivery: Arctic
Grayling Status Review, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, Montana Field Office,
585 Shepard Way, Helena, Montana
59601.
We will not accept faxes.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mark Wilson, Montana Field Office;
telephone (406) 449-5225. Individuals
who are hearing-impaired or speechimpaired may call the Federal Relay
Service at 1-800-877-8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:11 Oct 27, 2009
Jkt 220001
Request for Information
To ensure that the status review is
based on the best available scientific
and commercial information and to
provide an opportunity to any interested
parties to provide information for
consideration during the status
assessment, we are requesting
information concerning Arctic grayling
in the upper Missouri River system. We
request information be provided within
30 days. We request information from
the public, other concerned
governmental agencies, Native
American tribes, the scientific
community, industry, and any other
interested party. We are seeking:
(1) General information concerning
the taxonomy, biology, ecology,
genetics, and status of the Arctic
grayling of the upper Missouri River
system;
(2) Specific information relevant to
the consideration of the potential
distinct population segment (DPS)
status of Arctic grayling in the upper
Missouri River system in accordance
with our Policy Regarding the
Recognition of Distinct Vertebrate
Population Segments (61 FR 4722,
February 7, 1996) (known as the DPS
Policy), which specifically considers
two elements: (i) discreteness of the
population segment in relation to the
remainder of the species to which it
belongs; and (ii) the significance of the
population segment to the species to
which it belongs. Per our recent
settlement, we will consider various
DPS designations that include different
life histories of Arctic grayling in the
upper Missouri River system.
Specifically, we may consider DPS
configurations that include the fluvial
(relating to, or inhabiting, a river or
stream) and/or adfluvial (fish that live
in lakes and migrate into streams to
spawn) Arctic grayling in the upper
Missouri River system;
(3) Specific information on the
conservation status of Arctic grayling in
the upper Missouri River system,
including information on distribution,
abundance, and population trends;
(4) Specific information on threats to
Arctic grayling in the upper Missouri
River, including: (i) the present or
threatened destruction, modification, or
curtailment of its habitat or range; (ii)
overutilization for commercial,
recreational, scientific, or educational
purposes; (iii) disease or predation; (iv)
the inadequacy of existing regulatory
mechanisms; and (v) other natural or
manmade factors affecting its continued
existence; and
(5) Specific information on
conservation actions designed to
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
improve Arctic grayling habitat or
reduce threats to grayling in the upper
Missouri River system.
If you submit information, we request
you support it with documentation such
as data, maps, bibliographic references,
methods used to gather and analyze the
data, or copies of any pertinent
publications, reports, or letters by
knowledgeable sources.
Section 4(b)(1)(A) of the Act directs
that determinations as to whether any
species is an endangered or threatened
species must be made ‘‘solely on the
basis of the best scientific and
commercial data available.’’
You may submit your information
concerning this status review by one of
the methods listed in the ADDRESSES
section. If you submit information that
includes personal identifying
information, you may request at the top
of your document that we withhold this
personal identifying information from
public review. However, we cannot
guarantee that we will be able to do so.
Information and supporting
documentation that we receive and use
in preparing this finding will be
available for you to review by
appointment during normal business
hours at the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, Montana Field Office (see FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT).
Background
The Arctic grayling is a fish belonging
to the family Salmonidae (salmon, trout,
charr, whitefishes), subfamily
Thymallinae (graylings), and is
represented by a single genus,
Thymallus (Scott and Crossman 1973,
pp. 301–302; Behnke 2002, pp. 327–
331). Arctic grayling have long, thin
bodies with deeply forked tails, and
adults typically average 254 to 330
millimeters (10 to 13 inches) in length.
Coloration varies from silvery or
iridescent blue and lavender, to dark
blue (Behnke 2002, pp. 327–328). Arctic
grayling have a prominent sail-like
dorsal fin, which is large and vividly
colored with rows of orange to bright
green spots, and often has an orange
border. Dark spots often appear on the
body toward the head (Behnke 2002, pp.
327–328).
Arctic grayling are native to Arctic
Ocean drainages of northwestern
Canada and Alaska; the Peace,
Saskatchewan, and Athabasca River
drainages in Alberta, eastward to
Hudson Bay and westward to the Bering
Straits; and eastern Siberia and northern
Eurasia (Scott and Crossman 1973, pp.
301–302). Arctic grayling also are native
to Pacific coast drainages of Alaska and
Canada as far south as the Stikine River
in British Columbia (Scott and
E:\FR\FM\28OCP1.SGM
28OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 207 / Wednesday, October 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Crossman 1973, pp. 301–302; Nelson
and Paetz 1991, pp. 253–256; Behnke
2002, pp. 327–331).
Pleistocene glaciations isolated two
North American populations of Arctic
grayling outside of Canada and Alaska
(Vincent 1962, pp. 23–31). One
population occurred in streams and
rivers of the Great Lakes region of
northern Michigan, but was extirpated
in the 1930s (Hubbs and Lagler 1949, p.
44; Scott and Crossman 1973, p. 301).
The second population (Arctic grayling
of the upper Missouri River) inhabits
watersheds in the upper Missouri River
basin upstream of Great Falls, Montana.
This population is the subject of our
status review.
Previous Federal Actions
We have published a number of
documents on Arctic grayling, and we
describe our actions relevant to this
notice below:
We initiated a status review for the
Montana Arctic grayling (Thymallus
arcticus montanus) in a Federal
Register notice on December 30, 1982
(47 FR 58454). In that notice, we
designated the purported subspecies
Montana Arctic grayling as a Category 2
species. At that time, we designated a
species as Category 2 if a listing as
endangered or threatened was possibly
appropriate, but we did not have
sufficient data to support a proposed
rule to list the species.
On October 9, 1991, the Biodiversity
Legal Foundation and George
Wuerthner petitioned us to list the
fluvial Arctic grayling in the upper
Missouri River basin as an endangered
species throughout its historical range
in the coterminous United States.
We published a notice of a 90–day
finding in the January 19, 1993, Federal
Register (58 FR 4975), concluding the
petitioners presented substantial
information indicating that listing the
fluvial Arctic grayling of the upper
Missouri River in Montana and
northwestern Wyoming may be
warranted. This finding noted that
taxonomic recognition of the Montana
Arctic grayling (Thymallus arcticus
montanus) as a subspecies (previously
designated as a category 2 species) was
not widely accepted and that the
scientific community generally
considered this population a
geographically isolated member of the
wider species (T. arcticus).
On July 25, 1994, we published a
notice of a 12–month finding in the
Federal Register (59 FR 37738)
concluding that listing the DPS of
fluvial Arctic grayling in the upper
Missouri River was warranted but
precluded by other higher priority
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:11 Oct 27, 2009
Jkt 220001
listing actions (it should be noted that
this DPS determination predated our
DPS policy (61 FR 4722, February 7,
1996), so it did not undergo a formal
DPS analysis as required by the policy).
This finding placed fluvial Arctic
grayling of the upper Missouri River on
the candidate list and assigned it a
listing priority of 9. On May 4, 2004, we
elevated the listing priority number of
the fluvial Arctic grayling to 3 (69 FR
24881).
On May 31, 2003, the Center for
Biological Diversity and Western
Watersheds Project (Plaintiffs) filed a
complaint in U.S. District Court in
Washington, D.C., challenging our
‘‘warranted but precluded’’
determinations. On July 22, 2004, the
Plaintiffs amended their complaint to
challenge our failure to emergency list
this population. We settled with the
Plaintiffs in August 2005, and we agreed
to submit a final determination on
whether this population warranted
listing as endangered or threatened to
the Federal Register on or before April
16, 2007.
On April 24, 2007, we published a
revised 12–month finding on the
petition to list the upper Missouri River
DPS of fluvial Arctic grayling (72 FR
20305). In this finding, we determined
that fluvial Arctic grayling of the upper
Missouri River did not constitute a
species, subspecies, or DPS under the
Act. Therefore, we found that the upper
Missouri River population of fluvial
Arctic grayling was not a listable entity
under the Act, and as a result listing
was not warranted. With that notice, we
withdrew the fluvial Arctic grayling
from the candidate list.
On November 15, 2007, the Center for
Biological Diversity filed a complaint to
challenge our revised 12–month finding.
We initiated a voluntary remand of our
finding in May 2009. With this notice,
we are initiating a new status review for
Arctic grayling of the upper Missouri
River system. Per our recent settlement,
we will consider various DPS
designations that include different life
histories of Arctic grayling in the upper
Missouri River system. Specifically, we
may consider DPS configurations that
include the fluvial and/or adfluvial
Arctic grayling in the upper Missouri
River system.
For additional information on the
biology or previous Federal actions on
grayling, see the April 24, 2007, revised
12–month finding (72 FR 20305).
References Cited
Behnke, R.J. 2002. Trout and salmon
of North America. The Free Press, New
York.
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
55525
Hubbs, C.L., and K.F. Lagler. 1949.
Fishes of the Great Lakes Region.
Cranbrook Institute of Science. Bulletin
No. 26, Bloomfield Hills, Michigan.
Nelson, J.S., and M.J. Paetz. 1991. The
fishes of Alberta, second edition.
University of Alberta Press, Calgary,
Alberta, Canada.
Scott, W.B., and E.J. Crossman. 1973.
Freshwater fishes of Canada. Fisheries
Research Board of Canada, Bulletin 184,
Ottawa.
Vincent, R.E. 1962. Biogeographical
and ecological factors contributing to
the decline of Arctic grayling,
(Thymallus arcticus), in Michigan and
Montana. PhD Dissertation. University
of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 169
pp.
Author
The primary author of this document
is Douglas Peterson, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, Montana Field Office.
Authority
The authority for this action is the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
Dated: October 20, 2009
Daniel M. Ashe,
Deputy Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service
[FR Doc. E9–25990 Filed 10–27–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–S
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 17
[FWS-R2-ES-2009-0030]
[92210-1111-FY08-B2]
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants; 90-Day Finding on a
Petition to List the Northern Leopard
Frog (Lithobates [=Rana] pipiens) in
the Western United States as
Threatened
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of a 90–day petition
finding; reopening of the information
solicitation period.
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), announce the
reopening of the public information
solicitation period on our July 1, 2009,
initiation of status review and 90–day
finding on a petition to list the western
U.S. population of the northern leopard
frog (Lithobates [=Rana] pipiens) as
threatened under the Endangered
Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act).
This action will provide all interested
E:\FR\FM\28OCP1.SGM
28OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 207 (Wednesday, October 28, 2009)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 55524-55525]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-25990]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 17
[FWS-R6-ES-2009-0065]
[MO 9221050083-B2]
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Status Review of
Arctic Grayling (Thymallus arcticus) in the Upper Missouri River System
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of intent to conduct status review.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), under the
authority of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act), give
notice of our intent to conduct a status review of Arctic grayling
(Thymallus arcticus) in the upper Missouri River system. We conduct
status reviews to determine whether the entity should be listed as
endangered or threatened under the Act. Through this notice, we
encourage all interested parties to provide us information regarding
Arctic grayling in the upper Missouri River basin.
DATES: We must receive information no later than November 27, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may submit information by one of the following methods:
Via e-mail to: fw6_arcticgrayling@fws.gov
U.S. mail or hand-delivery: Arctic Grayling Status Review,
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Montana Field Office, 585 Shepard Way,
Helena, Montana 59601.
We will not accept faxes.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Wilson, Montana Field Office;
telephone (406) 449-5225. Individuals who are hearing-impaired or
speech-impaired may call the Federal Relay Service at 1-800-877-8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Request for Information
To ensure that the status review is based on the best available
scientific and commercial information and to provide an opportunity to
any interested parties to provide information for consideration during
the status assessment, we are requesting information concerning Arctic
grayling in the upper Missouri River system. We request information be
provided within 30 days. We request information from the public, other
concerned governmental agencies, Native American tribes, the scientific
community, industry, and any other interested party. We are seeking:
(1) General information concerning the taxonomy, biology, ecology,
genetics, and status of the Arctic grayling of the upper Missouri River
system;
(2) Specific information relevant to the consideration of the
potential distinct population segment (DPS) status of Arctic grayling
in the upper Missouri River system in accordance with our Policy
Regarding the Recognition of Distinct Vertebrate Population Segments
(61 FR 4722, February 7, 1996) (known as the DPS Policy), which
specifically considers two elements: (i) discreteness of the population
segment in relation to the remainder of the species to which it
belongs; and (ii) the significance of the population segment to the
species to which it belongs. Per our recent settlement, we will
consider various DPS designations that include different life histories
of Arctic grayling in the upper Missouri River system. Specifically, we
may consider DPS configurations that include the fluvial (relating to,
or inhabiting, a river or stream) and/or adfluvial (fish that live in
lakes and migrate into streams to spawn) Arctic grayling in the upper
Missouri River system;
(3) Specific information on the conservation status of Arctic
grayling in the upper Missouri River system, including information on
distribution, abundance, and population trends;
(4) Specific information on threats to Arctic grayling in the upper
Missouri River, including: (i) the present or threatened destruction,
modification, or curtailment of its habitat or range; (ii)
overutilization for commercial, recreational, scientific, or
educational purposes; (iii) disease or predation; (iv) the inadequacy
of existing regulatory mechanisms; and (v) other natural or manmade
factors affecting its continued existence; and
(5) Specific information on conservation actions designed to
improve Arctic grayling habitat or reduce threats to grayling in the
upper Missouri River system.
If you submit information, we request you support it with
documentation such as data, maps, bibliographic references, methods
used to gather and analyze the data, or copies of any pertinent
publications, reports, or letters by knowledgeable sources.
Section 4(b)(1)(A) of the Act directs that determinations as to
whether any species is an endangered or threatened species must be made
``solely on the basis of the best scientific and commercial data
available.''
You may submit your information concerning this status review by
one of the methods listed in the ADDRESSES section. If you submit
information that includes personal identifying information, you may
request at the top of your document that we withhold this personal
identifying information from public review. However, we cannot
guarantee that we will be able to do so.
Information and supporting documentation that we receive and use in
preparing this finding will be available for you to review by
appointment during normal business hours at the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, Montana Field Office (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT).
Background
The Arctic grayling is a fish belonging to the family Salmonidae
(salmon, trout, charr, whitefishes), subfamily Thymallinae (graylings),
and is represented by a single genus, Thymallus (Scott and Crossman
1973, pp. 301-302; Behnke 2002, pp. 327-331). Arctic grayling have
long, thin bodies with deeply forked tails, and adults typically
average 254 to 330 millimeters (10 to 13 inches) in length. Coloration
varies from silvery or iridescent blue and lavender, to dark blue
(Behnke 2002, pp. 327-328). Arctic grayling have a prominent sail-like
dorsal fin, which is large and vividly colored with rows of orange to
bright green spots, and often has an orange border. Dark spots often
appear on the body toward the head (Behnke 2002, pp. 327-328).
Arctic grayling are native to Arctic Ocean drainages of
northwestern Canada and Alaska; the Peace, Saskatchewan, and Athabasca
River drainages in Alberta, eastward to Hudson Bay and westward to the
Bering Straits; and eastern Siberia and northern Eurasia (Scott and
Crossman 1973, pp. 301-302). Arctic grayling also are native to Pacific
coast drainages of Alaska and Canada as far south as the Stikine River
in British Columbia (Scott and
[[Page 55525]]
Crossman 1973, pp. 301-302; Nelson and Paetz 1991, pp. 253-256; Behnke
2002, pp. 327-331).
Pleistocene glaciations isolated two North American populations of
Arctic grayling outside of Canada and Alaska (Vincent 1962, pp. 23-31).
One population occurred in streams and rivers of the Great Lakes region
of northern Michigan, but was extirpated in the 1930s (Hubbs and Lagler
1949, p. 44; Scott and Crossman 1973, p. 301). The second population
(Arctic grayling of the upper Missouri River) inhabits watersheds in
the upper Missouri River basin upstream of Great Falls, Montana. This
population is the subject of our status review.
Previous Federal Actions
We have published a number of documents on Arctic grayling, and we
describe our actions relevant to this notice below:
We initiated a status review for the Montana Arctic grayling
(Thymallus arcticus montanus) in a Federal Register notice on December
30, 1982 (47 FR 58454). In that notice, we designated the purported
subspecies Montana Arctic grayling as a Category 2 species. At that
time, we designated a species as Category 2 if a listing as endangered
or threatened was possibly appropriate, but we did not have sufficient
data to support a proposed rule to list the species.
On October 9, 1991, the Biodiversity Legal Foundation and George
Wuerthner petitioned us to list the fluvial Arctic grayling in the
upper Missouri River basin as an endangered species throughout its
historical range in the coterminous United States.
We published a notice of a 90-day finding in the January 19, 1993,
Federal Register (58 FR 4975), concluding the petitioners presented
substantial information indicating that listing the fluvial Arctic
grayling of the upper Missouri River in Montana and northwestern
Wyoming may be warranted. This finding noted that taxonomic recognition
of the Montana Arctic grayling (Thymallus arcticus montanus) as a
subspecies (previously designated as a category 2 species) was not
widely accepted and that the scientific community generally considered
this population a geographically isolated member of the wider species
(T. arcticus).
On July 25, 1994, we published a notice of a 12-month finding in
the Federal Register (59 FR 37738) concluding that listing the DPS of
fluvial Arctic grayling in the upper Missouri River was warranted but
precluded by other higher priority listing actions (it should be noted
that this DPS determination predated our DPS policy (61 FR 4722,
February 7, 1996), so it did not undergo a formal DPS analysis as
required by the policy). This finding placed fluvial Arctic grayling of
the upper Missouri River on the candidate list and assigned it a
listing priority of 9. On May 4, 2004, we elevated the listing priority
number of the fluvial Arctic grayling to 3 (69 FR 24881).
On May 31, 2003, the Center for Biological Diversity and Western
Watersheds Project (Plaintiffs) filed a complaint in U.S. District
Court in Washington, D.C., challenging our ``warranted but precluded''
determinations. On July 22, 2004, the Plaintiffs amended their
complaint to challenge our failure to emergency list this population.
We settled with the Plaintiffs in August 2005, and we agreed to submit
a final determination on whether this population warranted listing as
endangered or threatened to the Federal Register on or before April 16,
2007.
On April 24, 2007, we published a revised 12-month finding on the
petition to list the upper Missouri River DPS of fluvial Arctic
grayling (72 FR 20305). In this finding, we determined that fluvial
Arctic grayling of the upper Missouri River did not constitute a
species, subspecies, or DPS under the Act. Therefore, we found that the
upper Missouri River population of fluvial Arctic grayling was not a
listable entity under the Act, and as a result listing was not
warranted. With that notice, we withdrew the fluvial Arctic grayling
from the candidate list.
On November 15, 2007, the Center for Biological Diversity filed a
complaint to challenge our revised 12-month finding. We initiated a
voluntary remand of our finding in May 2009. With this notice, we are
initiating a new status review for Arctic grayling of the upper
Missouri River system. Per our recent settlement, we will consider
various DPS designations that include different life histories of
Arctic grayling in the upper Missouri River system. Specifically, we
may consider DPS configurations that include the fluvial and/or
adfluvial Arctic grayling in the upper Missouri River system.
For additional information on the biology or previous Federal
actions on grayling, see the April 24, 2007, revised 12-month finding
(72 FR 20305).
References Cited
Behnke, R.J. 2002. Trout and salmon of North America. The Free
Press, New York.
Hubbs, C.L., and K.F. Lagler. 1949. Fishes of the Great Lakes
Region. Cranbrook Institute of Science. Bulletin No. 26, Bloomfield
Hills, Michigan.
Nelson, J.S., and M.J. Paetz. 1991. The fishes of Alberta, second
edition. University of Alberta Press, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Scott, W.B., and E.J. Crossman. 1973. Freshwater fishes of Canada.
Fisheries Research Board of Canada, Bulletin 184, Ottawa.
Vincent, R.E. 1962. Biogeographical and ecological factors
contributing to the decline of Arctic grayling, (Thymallus arcticus),
in Michigan and Montana. PhD Dissertation. University of Michigan, Ann
Arbor, Michigan. 169 pp.
Author
The primary author of this document is Douglas Peterson, U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service, Montana Field Office.
Authority
The authority for this action is the Endangered Species Act of
1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
Dated: October 20, 2009
Daniel M. Ashe,
Deputy Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
[FR Doc. E9-25990 Filed 10-27-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-S