Ulocladium oudemansii (U3 Strain); Exemption from the Requirement of a Tolerance, 55454-55458 [E9-25969]
Download as PDF
55454
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 207 / Wednesday, October 28, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40106,
40113, 40114, 40120, 44502, 44514, 44701,
44719, 44721–44722.
2. Part 97 is amended to read as
follows:
■
AIRAC date
State
City
Airport
HURON REGIONAL .............
MARION COUNTY–RANKIN
FITE.
SNOHOMISH COUNTY
(PAINE FLD).
SNOHOMISH COUNTY
(PAINE FLD).
19–Nov–09
19–Nov–09
SD
AL
HURON .................
HAMILTON ............
17–Dec–09
WA
EVERETT ..............
17–Dec–09
WA
EVERETT ..............
[FR Doc. E9–25489 Filed 10–27–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2008–0760; FRL–8436–6]
Ulocladium oudemansii (U3 Strain);
Exemption from the Requirement of a
Tolerance
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes an
exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance for residues of the microbial
fungicide, Ulocladium oudemansii (U3
Strain), in or on all food commodities
when applied or used pre-harvest only,
and excluding applications made postharvest or to processed commodities.
Botry-Zen, Ltd. submitted a petition to
EPA under the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), requesting an
exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance. This regulation eliminates the
need to establish a maximum
permissible level for residues of
Ulocladium oudemansii (U3 Strain).
DATES: This regulation is effective
October 28, 2009. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received
on or before December 28, 2009, and
must be filed in accordance with the
instructions provided in 40 CFR part
178 (see also Unit I.C. of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under docket
identification (ID) number EPA–HQ–
OPP–2008–0760. All documents in the
docket are listed in the docket index
available at https://www.regulations.gov.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., Confidential Business Information
VerDate Nov<24>2008
By amending: § 97.23 VOR, VOR/
DME, VOR or TACAN, and VOR/DME
or TACAN; § 97.25 LOC, LOC/DME,
LDA, LDA/DME, SDF, SDF/DME;
§ 97.27 NDB, NDB/DME; § 97.29 ILS,
14:04 Oct 27, 2009
Jkt 220001
FDC No.
Sfmt 4700
Subject
RNAV (GPS) RWY 30, AMDT 1.
RNAV (GPS) RWY 18, ORIG–A.
9/3976
10/7/09
VOR/DME RWY 16R, ORIG.
9/3977
10/7/09
VOR RWY 16R, ORIG.
A. Does this Action Apply to Me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you are an agricultural
producer, food manufacturer, or
pesticide manufacturer. Potentially
affected entities may include, but are
not limited to:
• Crop production (NAICS code
111).
• Animal production (NAICS code
112).
• Food manufacturing (NAICS code
311).
• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS
code 32532).
This listing is not intended to be
exhaustive, but rather provides a guide
for readers regarding entities likely to be
affected by this action. Other types of
entities not listed in this unit could also
be affected. The North American
Industrial Classification System
Fmt 4700
FDC date
9/22/09
10/3/09
I. General Information
Frm 00014
Effective Upon Publication
9/2314
9/2958
(CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available in the electronic docket at
https://www.regulations.gov, or, if only
available in hard copy, at the OPP
Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S–
4400, One Potomac Yard (South Bldg.),
2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. The
Docket Facility is open from 8:30 a.m.
to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. The Docket
Facility telephone number is (703) 305–
5805.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Denise Greenway, Biopesticides and
Pollution Prevention Division (7511P),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001; telephone number:
(703) 308–8263; e-mail address:
greenway.denise@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
ILS/DME, MLS, MLS/DME, MLS/RNAV;
§ 97.31 RADAR SIAPs; § 97.33 RNAV
SIAPs; and § 97.35 COPTER SIAPs,
Identified as follows:
(NAICS) codes have been provided to
assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to
certain entities. If you have any
questions regarding the applicability of
this action to a particular entity, consult
the person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
B. How Can I Access Electronic Copies
of this Document?
In addition to accessing electronically
available documents at https://
www.regulations.gov, you may access
this Federal Register document
electronically through the EPA Internet
under the ‘‘Federal Register’’ listings at
https://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr. You may
also access a frequently updated
electronic version of 40 CFR part 180
through the Government Printing
Office’s e-CFR site at https://
www.gpoaccess.gov/ecfr.
C. Can I File an Objection or Hearing
Request?
Under section 408(g) of FFDCA, 21
U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an
objection to any aspect of this regulation
and may also request a hearing on those
objections. The EPA procedural
regulations which govern the
submission of objections and requests
for hearings appear in 40 CFR part 178.
You must file your objection or request
a hearing on this regulation in
accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure
proper receipt by EPA, you must
identify docket ID number EPA–HQ–
OPP–2008–0760 in the subject line on
the first page of your submission. All
requests must be in writing, and must be
mailed or delivered to the Hearing Clerk
on or before December 28, 2009.
In addition to filing an objection or
hearing request with the Hearing Clerk
as described in 40 CFR part 178, please
submit a copy of the filing that does not
contain any CBI for inclusion in the
public docket that is described in
ADDRESSES. Information not marked
E:\FR\FM\28OCR1.SGM
28OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 207 / Wednesday, October 28, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
confidential pursuant to 40 CFR part 2
may be disclosed publicly by EPA
without prior notice. Submit your
copies, identified by docket ID number
EPA–HQ–OPP–2008–0760, by one of
the following methods.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
• Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs
(OPP) Regulatory Public Docket (7502P),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001.
• Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public
Docket (7502P), Environmental
Protection Agency, Rm. S–4400, One
Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S.
Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. Deliveries
are only accepted during the Docket
Facility’s normal hours of operation
(8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays).
Special arrangements should be made
for deliveries of boxed information. The
Docket Facility telephone number is
(703) 305–5805.
II. Background and Statutory Findings
In the Federal Register of November
14, 2008 (73 FR 67512) (FRL–8388–3),
EPA issued a notice pursuant to section
408(d)(3) of FFDCA, 21 U.S.C.
346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a
pesticide tolerance petition (PP 7F7269)
by Botry-Zen, Ltd., 21 Willis St., P.O.
Box 5664, Dunedin, New Zealand. The
petition requested that 40 CFR part 180
be amended by establishing an
exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance for residues of Ulocladium
oudemansii (U3 Strain). This notice
stated that a summary of the petition
prepared by the petitioner, Botry-Zen,
Ltd., was included in the docket. In
response to EPA’s notice announcing
the filing of this petition, one comment
was received from an anonymous
person. The commenter complained of
perceived inadequacy regarding the
Agency’s assessment of the subject
petition, expressed dissatisfaction with
the Agency’s overall history concerning
pesticide petition approvals, EPA’s
ability to protect the health of the
American public, and opined that
human testing should be conducted on
the subject active ingredient. The
commenter did not provide, however,
any information in support of his/her
position or specify the desired human
studies assessment parameter(s). Before
issuing any tolerance exemption, the
Agency examines the potential effects of
the pesticide on humans and the
environment. For this particular
microbial pesticide, EPA conducted a
comprehensive assessment of
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:04 Oct 27, 2009
Jkt 220001
Ulocladium oudemansii (U3 Strain),
including a review of the acceptable
studies and other supporting
information addressing the potential
effects of this pesticide. EPA’s review of
these data and information indicated
that the active ingredient is not toxic to
test animals when administered via the
oral, dermal, or intraperitoneal routes of
exposure and is unlikely under the
conditions of use to be a human health
hazard by the pulmonary route because
the large aggregated fungal spore
material is not respirable. Also, there
was no evidence that the active
ingredient is a mutagen. In addition, the
active ingredient was not infective or
pathogenic to test animals when
administered via the oral, dermal or
intravenous routes. Moreover, growth
temperature analysis has shown that
Ulocladium oudemansii (U3 strain) does
not grow above 30 °C, making infection
of humans and other mammals having
normal body temperatures above 37 °C
unlikely. No reports of hypersensitivity
have been recorded in personnel
working with this organism. Based on
these data, the Agency has concluded
that there is a reasonable certainty that
no harm will result from dietary
exposure to residues of Ulocladium
oudemansii (U3 Strain), when applied
or used pre-harvest only in or on all
food commodities (excluding
applications made post-harvest or to
processed commodities). Thus, under
the standard in FFDCA section
408(c)(2), an exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance is
appropriate.
Section 408(c)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA
allows EPA to establish an exemption
from the requirement for a tolerance (the
legal limit for a pesticide chemical
residue in or on a food) only if EPA
determines that the exemption is ‘‘safe.’’
Section 408(c)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA
defines ‘‘safe’’ to mean that ‘‘there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will
result from aggregate exposure to the
pesticide chemical residue, including
all anticipated dietary exposures and all
other exposures for which there is
reliable information.’’ This includes
exposure through drinking water and in
residential settings, but does not include
occupational exposure. Pursuant to
section 408(c)(2)(B) of FFDCA, in
establishing or maintaining in effect an
exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance, EPA must take into account
the factors set forth in section
408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA, which require
EPA to give special consideration to
exposure of infants and children to the
pesticide chemical residue in
establishing a tolerance and to ‘‘ensure
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
55455
that there is a reasonable certainty that
no harm will result to infants and
children from aggregate exposure to the
pesticide chemical residue.... ’’
Additionally, section 408(b)(2)(D) of
FFDCA requires that the Agency
consider ‘‘available information
concerning the cumulative effects of a
particular pesticide’s residues ’’ and
‘‘other substances that have a common
mechanism of toxicity.’’
EPA performs a number of analyses to
determine the risks from aggregate
exposure to pesticide residues. First,
EPA determines the toxicity of
pesticides. Second, EPA examines
exposure to the pesticide through food,
drinking water, and through other
exposures that occur as a result of
pesticide use in residential settings.
III. Toxicological Profile
Consistent with section 408(b)(2)(D)
of FFDCA, EPA has reviewed the
available scientific data and other
relevant information in support of this
action and considered its validity,
completeness, and reliability and the
relationship of this information to
human risk. EPA has also considered
available information concerning the
variability of the sensitivities of major
identifiable subgroups of consumers,
including infants and children.
Ulocladium oudemansii is a naturally
occurring soil saprophyte found
worldwide. The subject of this tolerance
exemption, Ulocladium oudemansii (U3
strain), was originally isolated from
kiwifruit leaf litter debris in 1995 from
a Massey University kiwifruit research
plot in New Zealand. The active
ingredient is the asexual spore of the
soil saprophytic fungus Ulocladium
oudemansii. Ulocladium oudemansii
(U3 Strain) is a fungicide intended for
the control of the plant pathogens,
Botrytis cinerea and Sclerotinia
sclerotiorumn, when applied preharvest to growing fruit and vegetable
crops or ornamental plants. The
organism controls the pathogens by
occupying their ecological niche, in
dead and senescent plant material, and
out-competing them for space and
nutrients. Ulocladium oudemansii (U3
strain) is non-invasive and does not
damage living plant tissue.
An acceptable acute oral toxicity/
pathogenicity study performed in rats
(MRID 472465–03) demonstrated the
lack of mammalian toxicity at tested
levels of exposure to Ulocladium
oudemansii (U3 Strain). In this study,
Ulocladium oudemansii (U3 Strain) was
not toxic, infective nor pathogenic to
rats given an oral dose of 1 x 108 colony
forming units (CFU) per animal. The
study resulted in a classification of
E:\FR\FM\28OCR1.SGM
28OCR1
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
55456
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 207 / Wednesday, October 28, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
Toxicity Category IV for this strain of
Ulocladium oudemansii.
An acceptable acute intraperitoneal
injection toxicity/pathogenicity study in
rats (MRID 472465–02) demonstrated
that Ulocladium oudemansii (U3 Strain)
was neither toxic, pathogenic nor
infective to rats dosed intraperitoneally
with greater than 107 CFU of the test
material.
An acceptable acute dermal toxicity/
pathogenicity study in rats (MRID
472465–04) demonstrated that
Ulocladium oudemansii (U3 Strain) was
not toxic, infective nor pathogenic to
rats when treated dermally at 1 x 108
CFU/animal. There were no treatmentrelated clinical signs, dermal irritation,
necropsy findings or changes in body
weight. No test organism was recovered
from blood, brain, kidney, liver, cervical
lymph nodes or spleen of any animal.
The study resulted in a classification of
Toxicity Category III for this strain of
Ulocladium oudemansii.
An acceptable acute eye irritation
study in rabbits (MRID 472465–06)
demonstrated that Ulocladium
oudemansii (U3 Strain) administered at
a purity of not less than 2 x 108 CFU/
gram (g) and a minimum spore viability
of 90% at 0.1 milliliter (ml)/animal is
non-irritating. The study resulted in a
classification of Toxicity Category IV for
this strain of Ulocladium oudemansii.
An acceptable primary dermal
irritation study in rabbits (MRID
472465–07) demonstrated that
Ulocladium oudemansii (U3 Strain)
administered at a purity of not less than
2 x 108 CFU/g and a minimum spore
viability of 90% at 0.5 ml/animal is nonirritating. The study resulted in a
classification of Toxicity Category IV for
this strain of Ulocladium oudemansii.
An acceptable skin sensitization test
in guinea pigs (MRID 472465–08)
demonstrated that Ulocladium
oudemansii (U3 Strain) administered at
a purity of not less than 2 x 108 CFU/
g and a minimum spore viability of 90%
is not a dermal sensitizer. Furthermore,
there have been no reports of
hypersensitivity associated with
Ulocladium oudemansii (U3 Strain).
Although not triggered by results of
the Tier I toxicology studies, nor
otherwise required, an acceptable
bacterial reverse mutation study was
submitted which showed the active
ingredient to be non-mutagenic under
test conditions in the tested species.
In addition to the acceptable
toxicology studies summarized above,
the Agency considered this other
toxicology data and information in
assessing the petitioner’s tolerance
exemption request.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:04 Oct 27, 2009
Jkt 220001
Pulmonary Toxicity/Pathogenicity. A
submitted acute pulmonary toxicity/
pathogenicity study in rats (MRID
472465–05) did not satisfy the guideline
requirement because the large
aggregated fungal spore test material
could not be manipulated into a particle
size suitable for respiration in an
inhalation study. The Agency notes that
large particles such as these are unlikely
to be inhaled and deposited in the
pulmonary region, while any deposited
in the naso-pharnygeal region are
removed by coughing, sneezing or
physical wiping from the nasal area.
Particles deposited in the
tracheobronchial region are removed by
the mucocillary escalator system.
Particles could be swallowed, but would
represent no human health concern
based on the lack of mammalian toxicity
observed in the acceptable Ulocladium
oudemansii (U3 Strain) acute oral
toxicity/pathogenicity study cited
above. The Agency concludes that,
under conditions of use, Ulocladium
oudemansii (U3 Strain) is unlikely to
present a significant inhalation hazard
to humans because the large aggregated
fungal spore material is not respirable.
In justifying its waiver request for this
guideline study, Botry–Zen, Ltd.
included in its rationale a discussion of
the inability to dose test animals due
both to the large size of the test particles
and their rapid sedimentation in
solution, and argued that any respirable
dust or fines would not be expected to
be toxic or irritating, based upon results
from the acute oral and other submitted
toxicology/pathogenicity studies
summarized in this Unit. The presented
rationale supports the Agency’s decision
to waive this data requirement.
IV. Aggregate Exposures
In examining aggregate exposure,
section 408 of FFDCA directs EPA to
consider available information
concerning exposures from the pesticide
residue in food and all other nonoccupational exposures, including
drinking water from ground water or
surface water and exposure through
pesticide use in gardens, lawns, or
buildings (residential and other indoor
uses).
A. Dietary Exposure
Ulocladium oudemansii, a common
soil fungus, is ubiquitous in the
environment and exists worldwide as a
naturally-occurring saprophyte, i.e., an
organism that lives and feeds on dead
and decaying plant matter. The subject
of this tolerance exemption, Ulocladium
oudemansii (U3 strain), was originally
isolated from kiwifruit leaf litter. Spores
of Ulocladium oudemansii (U3 strain),
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
when deposited under the suitable
environmental conditions on dead or
decaying plant debris, will germinate
and colonize the necrotic plant tissue.
But if such decayed vegetative matter is
not available, or becomes exhausted, the
fungus cannot survive. Therefore,
despite its presence in soils, dietary
exposure from the proposed use of
Ulocladium oudemansii (U3 strain) will
be minimal on food due to its limited
viability in the absence of a decayed
plant material nutrient source. Also,
there are no known mycotoxins
associated with Ulocladium species,
and the submitted toxicological studies
indicate no risk to human health from
dietary exposure to Ulocladium
oudemansii (U3 strain). Furthermore,
the fungus produces no recognized
toxins, enzymes or virulence factors
normally associated with mammalian
invasiveness or toxicity. Additionally,
growth temperature analysis has shown
that Ulocladium oudemansii (U3 strain)
does not grow above 30 °C, making
infection of humans and other mammals
having normal body temperatures at or
above 37 °C unlikely.
1. Food. As discussed above,
Ulocladium oudemansii (U3 Strain)
applied to food crops to control plant
pathogens will not survive except on
dead or decaying plant tissues. Food
crops exhibiting such tissues are of poor
quality, are not commonly consumed,
and are not commercially marketed.
Good quality food free of such decayed
material will not support the fungus and
so Ulocladium oudemansii (U3 Strain)
residues would not be expected. Due to
the limited survivability of Ulocladium
oudemansii (U3 Strain) once its decayed
plant material nutrient source is
exhausted, dietary exposure to the
naturally-occurring microbe from the
proposed pre-harvest applications to
food crops is unlikely. Even if oral
exposure from ingestion of poor-quality
treated crops should occur, the hazard
posed to adults, infants and children
from food-related exposures to
Ulocladium oudemansii (U3 Strain) will
be minimal due to the demonstrated
lack of acute oral toxicity/pathogenicity
associated with the microbial pesticide.
Based on the evaluation of the
submitted data, there are no dietary
risks that exceed the Agency’s level of
concern.
2. Drinking water exposure. Exposure
of humans to residues of Ulocladium
oudemansii (U3 Strain) in consumed
drinking water would be unlikely.
Ulocladium oudemansii (U3 Strain) is
not known to grow or thrive in aquatic
environments. Potential exposure via
surface water would be negligible and
exposure via drinking water would be
E:\FR\FM\28OCR1.SGM
28OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 207 / Wednesday, October 28, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
impossible to measure. Ulocladium
oudemansii (U3 Strain) is intended for
use on agricultural and horticultural
plants, and has limited survival
potential once its carrier nutrient source
is depleted. The risk of the
microorganism passing through soil to
groundwater is minimal to unlikely.
Additionally, the fungus would not
tolerate municipal drinking water
treatment processes, such as
chlorination, pH adjustment, high
temperature and/or anaerobic
conditions. More importantly, even if
oral exposure to this ubiquitous microbe
should occur through drinking water,
due to its demonstrated lack of acute
oral toxicity/pathogenicity, the Agency
concludes that there is a reasonable
certainty that no harm will result from
such exposure.
B. Other Non-Occupational Exposure
The proposed pesticide uses of
Ulocladium oudemansii (U3 Strain)
being established by this rule are
limited to commercial agricultural and
horticultural settings. There are no
residential uses.
The only other exposure is what
people would normally encounter as
part of the natural environment, not as
a result of pesticide use. There have not
been reports of disease or other effects
from human exposure to Ulocladium
oudemansii (U3 Strain) naturally
present in soils.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
V. Cumulative Effects
Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of FFDCA
requires the Agency, when considering
whether to establish, modify, or revoke
a tolerance, to consider ‘‘available
information’’ concerning the cumulative
effects of pesticide residues and ‘‘other
substances that have a common
mechanism of toxicity.’’ These
considerations include the cumulative
effects of such residues on infants and
children. Because, there is no indication
of mammalian toxicity from Ulocladium
oudemansii (U3 Strain), the Agency
concludes that Ulocladium oudemansii
(U3 Strain) does not share a common
mechanism of toxicity with other
substances. Therefore, section
408(b)(2)(D)(v) does not apply.
VI. Determination of Safety for U.S.
Population, Infants and Children
FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(C), as
amended by the Food Quality Protection
Act (FQPA) of 1996, provides that EPA
shall assess the available information
about consumption patterns among
infants and children, special
susceptibility of infants and children to
pesticide chemical residues and the
cumulative effects on infants and
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:04 Oct 27, 2009
Jkt 220001
children of the residues and other
substances with a common mechanism
of toxicity. In addition, FFDCA section
408(b)(2)(C) also provides that EPA shall
apply an additional tenfold margin of
safety for infants and children in the
case of threshold effects to account for
prenatal and postnatal toxicity and the
completeness of the database unless
EPA determines that a different margin
of safety will be safe for infants and
children.
Based on the toxicity information
discussed in Unit III., EPA concludes
that there is a reasonable certainty that
no harm will result to the U.S.
population, including infants and
children, from aggregate exposure to
residues of Ulocladium oudemansii (U3
Strain). This includes all anticipated
dietary exposures and all other
exposures for which there is reliable
information. The Agency has arrived at
this conclusion because the data
available on Ulocladium oudemansii
(U3 Strain) demonstrate a lack of
toxicity/pathogenicity potential.
Ulocladium oudemansii (U3 Strain) is
not known to produce any recognized
toxins, virulence factors or enzymes
normally associated with mammalian
invasiveness or toxicity. Thus, there are
no threshold effects of concern and, as
a result, the Agency has concluded that
the additional tenfold margin of safety
for infants and children is unnecessary
in this instance.
VII. Other Considerations
A. Endocrine Disruptors
Ulocladium oudemansii is a
ubiquitous organism in the
environment. The subject of this
tolerance exemption, Ulocladium
oudemansii (U3 Strain), is non-toxic to
mammals. To date, there is no evidence
to suggest that Ulocladium oudemansii
(U3 Strain) affects the immune system,
functions in a manner similar to any
known hormone, or that it acts as an
endocrine disruptor. Indeed, the
submitted toxicity/pathogenicity studies
in rodents indicate that, following
several routes of exposure, the immune
system is intact and able to process and
clear the active ingredient. Therefore, it
is unlikely that this organism will have
estrogenic or endocrine effects.
B. Analytical Method(s)
The Agency is establishing an
exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance for residues of Ulocladium
oudemansii (U3 Strain), applied preharvest only, in or on all food
commodities (excluding applications
made post-harvest or to processed
commodities), for the reasons stated
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
55457
above. Because the organism thrives on
dead/decaying plant matter and does
not damage living plant tissues, residues
of Ulocladium oudemansii (U3 Strain)
are not expected on food crops. Even if
food crops carried such residues, the
hazard posed from food-related
exposures to Ulocladium oudemansii
(U3 Strain) will be minimal due to the
demonstrated lack of acute oral toxicity/
pathogenicity associated with the
microbial pesticide. Therefore, the
Agency has concluded that an analytical
method is not required for enforcement
purposes for detecting Ulocladium
oudemansii (U3 Strain) residues
resulting from its pre-harvest use as a
pesticide.
C. Codex Maximum Residue Level
No Codex maximum residue level
exists for the microbial fungicide,
Ulocladium oudemansii (U3 Strain).
VIII. Conclusions
There is a reasonable certainty that no
harm will result from aggregate
exposure to the U.S. population,
including infants and children, to
residues of the Ulocladium oudemansii
(U3 Strain) in or on all food and feed
commodities when Ulocladium
oudemansii (U3 Strain) is used as a preharvest-only microbial fungicide
(thereby excluding applications made
post-harvest or to processed
commodities), in accordance with good
agricultural practices. This includes all
anticipated dietary exposures and all
other exposures for which there is
reliable information. The Agency has
arrived at this conclusion because, as
discussed above, no toxic effects to
mammals have been observed.
IX. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
This final rule establishes an
exemption from tolerance under section
408(d) of FFDCA in response to a
petition submitted to the Agency. The
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) has exempted these types of
actions from review under Executive
Order 12866, entitled Regulatory
Planning and Review (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993). Because this final rule
has been exempted from review under
Executive Order 12866, this final rule is
not subject to Executive Order 13211,
entitled Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001) or Executive Order 13045,
entitled Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997).
This final rule does not contain any
information collections subject to OMB
E:\FR\FM\28OCR1.SGM
28OCR1
55458
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 207 / Wednesday, October 28, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
approval under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq., nor does it require any special
considerations under Executive Order
12898, entitled Federal Actions to
Address Environmental Justice in
Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994).
Since tolerances and exemptions that
are established on the basis of a petition
under section 408(d) of FFDCA, such as
the exemption in this final rule, do not
require the issuance of a proposed rule,
the requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.) do not apply.
This final rule directly regulates
growers, food processors, food handlers,
and food retailers, not States or tribes,
nor does this action alter the
relationships or distribution of power
and responsibilities established by
Congress in the preemption provisions
of section 408(n)(4) of FFDCA. As such,
the Agency has determined that this
action will not have a substantial direct
effect on States or tribal governments,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States or tribal
governments, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian
tribes. Thus, the Agency has determined
that Executive Order 13132, entitled
Federalism (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999) and Executive Order 13175,
entitled Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply
to this final rule. In addition, this final
rule does not impose any enforceable
duty or contain any unfunded mandate
as described under Title II of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(UMRA) (Public Law 104–4).
This action does not involve any
technical standards that would require
Agency consideration of voluntary
consensus standards pursuant to section
12(d) of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995
(NTTAA), Public Law 104–113, section
12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
X. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report to each House of
the Congress and to the Comptroller
General of the United States. EPA will
submit a report containing this rule and
other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:04 Oct 27, 2009
Jkt 220001
publication of this final rule in the
Federal Register. This final rule is not
a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides
and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: October 18, 2009.
Debra Edwards,
Director, Office of Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is
amended as follows:
■
PART 180—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 180
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
2. Section 180.1292 is added to
subpart D to read as follows:
■
§ 180.1292 Ulocladium oudemansii (U3
Strain); exemption from the requirement of
a tolerance.
An exemption from the requirement
of a tolerance is established in/on all
food commodities for residues of
Ulocladium oudemansii (U3 Strain),
when applied or used pre-harvest-only,
excluding applications made postharvest or to processed commodities, as
a microbial fungicide in accordance
with good agricultural practices.
[FR Doc. E9–25969 Filed 10–27–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–S
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
DATES: This regulation is effective
October 28, 2009. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received
on or before December 28, 2009, and
must be filed in accordance with the
instructions provided in 40 CFR part
178 (see also Unit I.C. of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under docket
identification (ID) number EPA–HQ–
OPP–2007–1025. All documents in the
docket are listed in the docket index
available at https://www.regulations.gov.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., Confidential Business Information
(CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available in the electronic docket at
https://www.regulations.gov, or, if only
available in hard copy, at the OPP
Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S-4400,
One Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777
S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. The
Docket Facility is open from 8:30 a.m.
to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. The Docket
Facility telephone number is (703) 305–
5805.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Driss Benmhend, Biopesticides and
Pollution Prevention Division (7511P),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001; telephone number:
(703) 308–9525; e-mail address:
benmhend.driss@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
40 CFR Part 180
I. General Information
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2007–1025; FRL–8434–5]
Cold Pressed Neem Oil; Exemption
from the Requirement of a Tolerance
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes an
exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance for residues of the biochemical
pesticide, cold pressed neem oil on all
food commodities when applied/used
on/in food commodities. Plasma Power
Limited of India submitted a petition to
EPA under the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), requesting an
exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance. This regulation eliminates the
need to establish a maximum
permissible level for residues of cold
pressed neem oil.
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
A. Does this Action Apply to Me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you are an agricultural
producer, food manufacturer, or
pesticide manufacturer. Potentially
affected entities may include, but are
not limited to:
• Crop production (NAICS code
111).
• Animal production (NAICS code
112).
• Food manufacturing (NAICS code
311).
• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS
code 32532).
This listing is not intended to be
exhaustive, but rather provides a guide
for readers regarding entities likely to be
affected by this action. Other types of
entities not listed in this unit could also
be affected. The North American
E:\FR\FM\28OCR1.SGM
28OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 207 (Wednesday, October 28, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 55454-55458]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-25969]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA-HQ-OPP-2008-0760; FRL-8436-6]
Ulocladium oudemansii (U3 Strain); Exemption from the
Requirement of a Tolerance
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes an exemption from the requirement
of a tolerance for residues of the microbial fungicide, Ulocladium
oudemansii (U3 Strain), in or on all food commodities when applied or
used pre-harvest only, and excluding applications made post-harvest or
to processed commodities. Botry-Zen, Ltd. submitted a petition to EPA
under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), requesting an
exemption from the requirement of a tolerance. This regulation
eliminates the need to establish a maximum permissible level for
residues of Ulocladium oudemansii (U3 Strain).
DATES: This regulation is effective October 28, 2009. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received on or before December 28, 2009,
and must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40
CFR part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2008-0760. All documents in the
docket are listed in the docket index available at https://www.regulations.gov. Although listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, e.g., Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain
other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the
Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are available in the electronic
docket at https://www.regulations.gov, or, if only available in hard
copy, at the OPP Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S-4400, One Potomac
Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. The Docket
Facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. The Docket Facility telephone number is (703)
305-5805.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Denise Greenway, Biopesticides and
Pollution Prevention Division (7511P), Environmental Protection Agency,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone
number: (703) 308-8263; e-mail address: greenway.denise@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this Action Apply to Me?
You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
Potentially affected entities may include, but are not limited to:
Crop production (NAICS code 111).
Animal production (NAICS code 112).
Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).
This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides
a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be affected by this
action. Other types of entities not listed in this unit could also be
affected. The North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS)
codes have been provided to assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to certain entities. If you have any
questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular
entity, consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
B. How Can I Access Electronic Copies of this Document?
In addition to accessing electronically available documents at
https://www.regulations.gov, you may access this Federal Register
document electronically through the EPA Internet under the ``Federal
Register'' listings at https://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr. You may also access
a frequently updated electronic version of 40 CFR part 180 through the
Government Printing Office's e-CFR site at https://www.gpoaccess.gov/ecfr.
C. Can I File an Objection or Hearing Request?
Under section 408(g) of FFDCA, 21 U.S.C. 346a, any person may file
an objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request a
hearing on those objections. The EPA procedural regulations which
govern the submission of objections and requests for hearings appear in
40 CFR part 178. You must file your objection or request a hearing on
this regulation in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR
part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must identify docket ID
number EPA-HQ-OPP-2008-0760 in the subject line on the first page of
your submission. All requests must be in writing, and must be mailed or
delivered to the Hearing Clerk on or before December 28, 2009.
In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the
Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of
the filing that does not contain any CBI for inclusion in the public
docket that is described in ADDRESSES. Information not marked
[[Page 55455]]
confidential pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA
without prior notice. Submit your copies, identified by docket ID
number EPA-HQ-OPP-2008-0760, by one of the following methods.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) Regulatory Public
Docket (7502P), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001.
Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public Docket (7502P),
Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. S-4400, One Potomac Yard (South
Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. Deliveries are only
accepted during the Docket Facility's normal hours of operation (8:30
a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays).
Special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed
information. The Docket Facility telephone number is (703) 305-5805.
II. Background and Statutory Findings
In the Federal Register of November 14, 2008 (73 FR 67512) (FRL-
8388-3), EPA issued a notice pursuant to section 408(d)(3) of FFDCA, 21
U.S.C. 346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a pesticide tolerance
petition (PP 7F7269) by Botry-Zen, Ltd., 21 Willis St., P.O. Box 5664,
Dunedin, New Zealand. The petition requested that 40 CFR part 180 be
amended by establishing an exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance for residues of Ulocladium oudemansii (U3 Strain). This
notice stated that a summary of the petition prepared by the
petitioner, Botry-Zen, Ltd., was included in the docket. In response to
EPA's notice announcing the filing of this petition, one comment was
received from an anonymous person. The commenter complained of
perceived inadequacy regarding the Agency's assessment of the subject
petition, expressed dissatisfaction with the Agency's overall history
concerning pesticide petition approvals, EPA's ability to protect the
health of the American public, and opined that human testing should be
conducted on the subject active ingredient. The commenter did not
provide, however, any information in support of his/her position or
specify the desired human studies assessment parameter(s). Before
issuing any tolerance exemption, the Agency examines the potential
effects of the pesticide on humans and the environment. For this
particular microbial pesticide, EPA conducted a comprehensive
assessment of Ulocladium oudemansii (U3 Strain), including a review of
the acceptable studies and other supporting information addressing the
potential effects of this pesticide. EPA's review of these data and
information indicated that the active ingredient is not toxic to test
animals when administered via the oral, dermal, or intraperitoneal
routes of exposure and is unlikely under the conditions of use to be a
human health hazard by the pulmonary route because the large aggregated
fungal spore material is not respirable. Also, there was no evidence
that the active ingredient is a mutagen. In addition, the active
ingredient was not infective or pathogenic to test animals when
administered via the oral, dermal or intravenous routes. Moreover,
growth temperature analysis has shown that Ulocladium oudemansii (U3
strain) does not grow above 30 [deg]C, making infection of humans and
other mammals having normal body temperatures above 37 [deg]C unlikely.
No reports of hypersensitivity have been recorded in personnel working
with this organism. Based on these data, the Agency has concluded that
there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result from dietary
exposure to residues of Ulocladium oudemansii (U3 Strain), when applied
or used pre-harvest only in or on all food commodities (excluding
applications made post-harvest or to processed commodities). Thus,
under the standard in FFDCA section 408(c)(2), an exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance is appropriate.
Section 408(c)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA allows EPA to establish an
exemption from the requirement for a tolerance (the legal limit for a
pesticide chemical residue in or on a food) only if EPA determines that
the exemption is ``safe.'' Section 408(c)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA defines
``safe'' to mean that ``there is a reasonable certainty that no harm
will result from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue,
including all anticipated dietary exposures and all other exposures for
which there is reliable information.'' This includes exposure through
drinking water and in residential settings, but does not include
occupational exposure. Pursuant to section 408(c)(2)(B) of FFDCA, in
establishing or maintaining in effect an exemption from the requirement
of a tolerance, EPA must take into account the factors set forth in
section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA, which require EPA to give special
consideration to exposure of infants and children to the pesticide
chemical residue in establishing a tolerance and to ``ensure that there
is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to infants and
children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue....
'' Additionally, section 408(b)(2)(D) of FFDCA requires that the Agency
consider ``available information concerning the cumulative effects of a
particular pesticide's residues '' and ``other substances that have a
common mechanism of toxicity.''
EPA performs a number of analyses to determine the risks from
aggregate exposure to pesticide residues. First, EPA determines the
toxicity of pesticides. Second, EPA examines exposure to the pesticide
through food, drinking water, and through other exposures that occur as
a result of pesticide use in residential settings.
III. Toxicological Profile
Consistent with section 408(b)(2)(D) of FFDCA, EPA has reviewed the
available scientific data and other relevant information in support of
this action and considered its validity, completeness, and reliability
and the relationship of this information to human risk. EPA has also
considered available information concerning the variability of the
sensitivities of major identifiable subgroups of consumers, including
infants and children.
Ulocladium oudemansii is a naturally occurring soil saprophyte
found worldwide. The subject of this tolerance exemption, Ulocladium
oudemansii (U3 strain), was originally isolated from kiwifruit leaf
litter debris in 1995 from a Massey University kiwifruit research plot
in New Zealand. The active ingredient is the asexual spore of the soil
saprophytic fungus Ulocladium oudemansii. Ulocladium oudemansii (U3
Strain) is a fungicide intended for the control of the plant pathogens,
Botrytis cinerea and Sclerotinia sclerotiorumn, when applied pre-
harvest to growing fruit and vegetable crops or ornamental plants. The
organism controls the pathogens by occupying their ecological niche, in
dead and senescent plant material, and out-competing them for space and
nutrients. Ulocladium oudemansii (U3 strain) is non-invasive and does
not damage living plant tissue.
An acceptable acute oral toxicity/pathogenicity study performed in
rats (MRID 472465-03) demonstrated the lack of mammalian toxicity at
tested levels of exposure to Ulocladium oudemansii (U3 Strain). In this
study, Ulocladium oudemansii (U3 Strain) was not toxic, infective nor
pathogenic to rats given an oral dose of 1 x 108 colony
forming units (CFU) per animal. The study resulted in a classification
of
[[Page 55456]]
Toxicity Category IV for this strain of Ulocladium oudemansii.
An acceptable acute intraperitoneal injection toxicity/
pathogenicity study in rats (MRID 472465-02) demonstrated that
Ulocladium oudemansii (U3 Strain) was neither toxic, pathogenic nor
infective to rats dosed intraperitoneally with greater than
107 CFU of the test material.
An acceptable acute dermal toxicity/pathogenicity study in rats
(MRID 472465-04) demonstrated that Ulocladium oudemansii (U3 Strain)
was not toxic, infective nor pathogenic to rats when treated dermally
at 1 x 108 CFU/animal. There were no treatment-related
clinical signs, dermal irritation, necropsy findings or changes in body
weight. No test organism was recovered from blood, brain, kidney,
liver, cervical lymph nodes or spleen of any animal. The study resulted
in a classification of Toxicity Category III for this strain of
Ulocladium oudemansii.
An acceptable acute eye irritation study in rabbits (MRID 472465-
06) demonstrated that Ulocladium oudemansii (U3 Strain) administered at
a purity of not less than 2 x 108 CFU/gram (g) and a minimum
spore viability of 90% at 0.1 milliliter (ml)/animal is non-irritating.
The study resulted in a classification of Toxicity Category IV for this
strain of Ulocladium oudemansii.
An acceptable primary dermal irritation study in rabbits (MRID
472465-07) demonstrated that Ulocladium oudemansii (U3 Strain)
administered at a purity of not less than 2 x 108 CFU/g and
a minimum spore viability of 90% at 0.5 ml/animal is non-irritating.
The study resulted in a classification of Toxicity Category IV for this
strain of Ulocladium oudemansii.
An acceptable skin sensitization test in guinea pigs (MRID 472465-
08) demonstrated that Ulocladium oudemansii (U3 Strain) administered at
a purity of not less than 2 x 108 CFU/g and a minimum spore
viability of 90% is not a dermal sensitizer. Furthermore, there have
been no reports of hypersensitivity associated with Ulocladium
oudemansii (U3 Strain).
Although not triggered by results of the Tier I toxicology studies,
nor otherwise required, an acceptable bacterial reverse mutation study
was submitted which showed the active ingredient to be non-mutagenic
under test conditions in the tested species.
In addition to the acceptable toxicology studies summarized above,
the Agency considered this other toxicology data and information in
assessing the petitioner's tolerance exemption request.
Pulmonary Toxicity/Pathogenicity. A submitted acute pulmonary
toxicity/pathogenicity study in rats (MRID 472465-05) did not satisfy
the guideline requirement because the large aggregated fungal spore
test material could not be manipulated into a particle size suitable
for respiration in an inhalation study. The Agency notes that large
particles such as these are unlikely to be inhaled and deposited in the
pulmonary region, while any deposited in the naso-pharnygeal region are
removed by coughing, sneezing or physical wiping from the nasal area.
Particles deposited in the tracheobronchial region are removed by the
mucocillary escalator system. Particles could be swallowed, but would
represent no human health concern based on the lack of mammalian
toxicity observed in the acceptable Ulocladium oudemansii (U3 Strain)
acute oral toxicity/pathogenicity study cited above. The Agency
concludes that, under conditions of use, Ulocladium oudemansii (U3
Strain) is unlikely to present a significant inhalation hazard to
humans because the large aggregated fungal spore material is not
respirable. In justifying its waiver request for this guideline study,
Botry-Zen, Ltd. included in its rationale a discussion of the inability
to dose test animals due both to the large size of the test particles
and their rapid sedimentation in solution, and argued that any
respirable dust or fines would not be expected to be toxic or
irritating, based upon results from the acute oral and other submitted
toxicology/pathogenicity studies summarized in this Unit. The presented
rationale supports the Agency's decision to waive this data
requirement.
IV. Aggregate Exposures
In examining aggregate exposure, section 408 of FFDCA directs EPA
to consider available information concerning exposures from the
pesticide residue in food and all other non-occupational exposures,
including drinking water from ground water or surface water and
exposure through pesticide use in gardens, lawns, or buildings
(residential and other indoor uses).
A. Dietary Exposure
Ulocladium oudemansii, a common soil fungus, is ubiquitous in the
environment and exists worldwide as a naturally-occurring saprophyte,
i.e., an organism that lives and feeds on dead and decaying plant
matter. The subject of this tolerance exemption, Ulocladium oudemansii
(U3 strain), was originally isolated from kiwifruit leaf litter. Spores
of Ulocladium oudemansii (U3 strain), when deposited under the suitable
environmental conditions on dead or decaying plant debris, will
germinate and colonize the necrotic plant tissue. But if such decayed
vegetative matter is not available, or becomes exhausted, the fungus
cannot survive. Therefore, despite its presence in soils, dietary
exposure from the proposed use of Ulocladium oudemansii (U3 strain)
will be minimal on food due to its limited viability in the absence of
a decayed plant material nutrient source. Also, there are no known
mycotoxins associated with Ulocladium species, and the submitted
toxicological studies indicate no risk to human health from dietary
exposure to Ulocladium oudemansii (U3 strain). Furthermore, the fungus
produces no recognized toxins, enzymes or virulence factors normally
associated with mammalian invasiveness or toxicity. Additionally,
growth temperature analysis has shown that Ulocladium oudemansii (U3
strain) does not grow above 30 [deg]C, making infection of humans and
other mammals having normal body temperatures at or above 37 [deg]C
unlikely.
1. Food. As discussed above, Ulocladium oudemansii (U3 Strain)
applied to food crops to control plant pathogens will not survive
except on dead or decaying plant tissues. Food crops exhibiting such
tissues are of poor quality, are not commonly consumed, and are not
commercially marketed. Good quality food free of such decayed material
will not support the fungus and so Ulocladium oudemansii (U3 Strain)
residues would not be expected. Due to the limited survivability of
Ulocladium oudemansii (U3 Strain) once its decayed plant material
nutrient source is exhausted, dietary exposure to the naturally-
occurring microbe from the proposed pre-harvest applications to food
crops is unlikely. Even if oral exposure from ingestion of poor-quality
treated crops should occur, the hazard posed to adults, infants and
children from food-related exposures to Ulocladium oudemansii (U3
Strain) will be minimal due to the demonstrated lack of acute oral
toxicity/pathogenicity associated with the microbial pesticide. Based
on the evaluation of the submitted data, there are no dietary risks
that exceed the Agency's level of concern.
2. Drinking water exposure. Exposure of humans to residues of
Ulocladium oudemansii (U3 Strain) in consumed drinking water would be
unlikely. Ulocladium oudemansii (U3 Strain) is not known to grow or
thrive in aquatic environments. Potential exposure via surface water
would be negligible and exposure via drinking water would be
[[Page 55457]]
impossible to measure. Ulocladium oudemansii (U3 Strain) is intended
for use on agricultural and horticultural plants, and has limited
survival potential once its carrier nutrient source is depleted. The
risk of the microorganism passing through soil to groundwater is
minimal to unlikely. Additionally, the fungus would not tolerate
municipal drinking water treatment processes, such as chlorination, pH
adjustment, high temperature and/or anaerobic conditions. More
importantly, even if oral exposure to this ubiquitous microbe should
occur through drinking water, due to its demonstrated lack of acute
oral toxicity/pathogenicity, the Agency concludes that there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will result from such exposure.
B. Other Non-Occupational Exposure
The proposed pesticide uses of Ulocladium oudemansii (U3 Strain)
being established by this rule are limited to commercial agricultural
and horticultural settings. There are no residential uses.
The only other exposure is what people would normally encounter as
part of the natural environment, not as a result of pesticide use.
There have not been reports of disease or other effects from human
exposure to Ulocladium oudemansii (U3 Strain) naturally present in
soils.
V. Cumulative Effects
Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of FFDCA requires the Agency, when
considering whether to establish, modify, or revoke a tolerance, to
consider ``available information'' concerning the cumulative effects of
pesticide residues and ``other substances that have a common mechanism
of toxicity.'' These considerations include the cumulative effects of
such residues on infants and children. Because, there is no indication
of mammalian toxicity from Ulocladium oudemansii (U3 Strain), the
Agency concludes that Ulocladium oudemansii (U3 Strain) does not share
a common mechanism of toxicity with other substances. Therefore,
section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) does not apply.
VI. Determination of Safety for U.S. Population, Infants and Children
FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(C), as amended by the Food Quality
Protection Act (FQPA) of 1996, provides that EPA shall assess the
available information about consumption patterns among infants and
children, special susceptibility of infants and children to pesticide
chemical residues and the cumulative effects on infants and children of
the residues and other substances with a common mechanism of toxicity.
In addition, FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(C) also provides that EPA shall
apply an additional tenfold margin of safety for infants and children
in the case of threshold effects to account for prenatal and postnatal
toxicity and the completeness of the database unless EPA determines
that a different margin of safety will be safe for infants and
children.
Based on the toxicity information discussed in Unit III., EPA
concludes that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result
to the U.S. population, including infants and children, from aggregate
exposure to residues of Ulocladium oudemansii (U3 Strain). This
includes all anticipated dietary exposures and all other exposures for
which there is reliable information. The Agency has arrived at this
conclusion because the data available on Ulocladium oudemansii (U3
Strain) demonstrate a lack of toxicity/pathogenicity potential.
Ulocladium oudemansii (U3 Strain) is not known to produce any
recognized toxins, virulence factors or enzymes normally associated
with mammalian invasiveness or toxicity. Thus, there are no threshold
effects of concern and, as a result, the Agency has concluded that the
additional tenfold margin of safety for infants and children is
unnecessary in this instance.
VII. Other Considerations
A. Endocrine Disruptors
Ulocladium oudemansii is a ubiquitous organism in the environment.
The subject of this tolerance exemption, Ulocladium oudemansii (U3
Strain), is non-toxic to mammals. To date, there is no evidence to
suggest that Ulocladium oudemansii (U3 Strain) affects the immune
system, functions in a manner similar to any known hormone, or that it
acts as an endocrine disruptor. Indeed, the submitted toxicity/
pathogenicity studies in rodents indicate that, following several
routes of exposure, the immune system is intact and able to process and
clear the active ingredient. Therefore, it is unlikely that this
organism will have estrogenic or endocrine effects.
B. Analytical Method(s)
The Agency is establishing an exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance for residues of Ulocladium oudemansii (U3 Strain), applied
pre-harvest only, in or on all food commodities (excluding applications
made post-harvest or to processed commodities), for the reasons stated
above. Because the organism thrives on dead/decaying plant matter and
does not damage living plant tissues, residues of Ulocladium oudemansii
(U3 Strain) are not expected on food crops. Even if food crops carried
such residues, the hazard posed from food-related exposures to
Ulocladium oudemansii (U3 Strain) will be minimal due to the
demonstrated lack of acute oral toxicity/pathogenicity associated with
the microbial pesticide. Therefore, the Agency has concluded that an
analytical method is not required for enforcement purposes for
detecting Ulocladium oudemansii (U3 Strain) residues resulting from its
pre-harvest use as a pesticide.
C. Codex Maximum Residue Level
No Codex maximum residue level exists for the microbial fungicide,
Ulocladium oudemansii (U3 Strain).
VIII. Conclusions
There is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result from
aggregate exposure to the U.S. population, including infants and
children, to residues of the Ulocladium oudemansii (U3 Strain) in or on
all food and feed commodities when Ulocladium oudemansii (U3 Strain) is
used as a pre-harvest-only microbial fungicide (thereby excluding
applications made post-harvest or to processed commodities), in
accordance with good agricultural practices. This includes all
anticipated dietary exposures and all other exposures for which there
is reliable information. The Agency has arrived at this conclusion
because, as discussed above, no toxic effects to mammals have been
observed.
IX. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
This final rule establishes an exemption from tolerance under
section 408(d) of FFDCA in response to a petition submitted to the
Agency. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these
types of actions from review under Executive Order 12866, entitled
Regulatory Planning and Review (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because
this final rule has been exempted from review under Executive Order
12866, this final rule is not subject to Executive Order 13211,
entitled Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or
Executive Order 13045, entitled Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23,
1997). This final rule does not contain any information collections
subject to OMB
[[Page 55458]]
approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq., nor does it require any special considerations under Executive
Order 12898, entitled Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice
in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations (59 FR 7629,
February 16, 1994).
Since tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis
of a petition under section 408(d) of FFDCA, such as the exemption in
this final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed rule, the
requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.) do not apply.
This final rule directly regulates growers, food processors, food
handlers, and food retailers, not States or tribes, nor does this
action alter the relationships or distribution of power and
responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions
of section 408(n)(4) of FFDCA. As such, the Agency has determined that
this action will not have a substantial direct effect on States or
tribal governments, on the relationship between the national government
and the States or tribal governments, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian tribes. Thus, the Agency has
determined that Executive Order 13132, entitled Federalism (64 FR
43255, August 10, 1999) and Executive Order 13175, entitled
Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply to this final rule. In addition,
this final rule does not impose any enforceable duty or contain any
unfunded mandate as described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Public Law 104-4).
This action does not involve any technical standards that would
require Agency consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant
to section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (NTTAA), Public Law 104-113, section 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272
note).
X. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report to each House of the Congress and to
the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report
containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the
United States prior to publication of this final rule in the Federal
Register. This final rule is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5
U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: October 18, 2009.
Debra Edwards,
Director, Office of Pesticide Programs.
0
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows:
PART 180--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
0
2. Section 180.1292 is added to subpart D to read as follows:
Sec. 180.1292 Ulocladium oudemansii (U3 Strain); exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance.
An exemption from the requirement of a tolerance is established in/
on all food commodities for residues of Ulocladium oudemansii (U3
Strain), when applied or used pre-harvest-only, excluding applications
made post-harvest or to processed commodities, as a microbial fungicide
in accordance with good agricultural practices.
[FR Doc. E9-25969 Filed 10-27-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-S