Airworthiness Directives; AeroSpace Technologies of Australia Pty Ltd Models N22B, N22S, and N24A Airplanes, 54498-54501 [E9-25443]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 203 / Thursday, October 22, 2009 / Proposed Rules
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on October 8,
2009.
Larry M. Kelly,
Acting Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E9–25439 Filed 10–21–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–C
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2009–0987; Directorate
Identifier 2009–CE–054–AD]
dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; AeroSpace
Technologies of Australia Pty Ltd
Models N22B, N22S, and N24A
Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:06 Oct 21, 2009
Jkt 220001
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above that would
supersede an existing AD. This
proposed AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information
(MCAI) originated by an aviation
authority of another country to identify
and correct an unsafe condition on an
aviation product. The MCAI describes
the unsafe condition as:
Late in 2002 the manufacturer advised
CASA of another Nomad accident which was
possibly caused by aileron flutter with the
E:\FR\FM\22OCP1.SGM
22OCP1
EP22OC09.005
54498
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 203 / Thursday, October 22, 2009 / Proposed Rules
flaps at 38 degrees. This, along with the other
flutter incidents, has resulted in the
manufacturer issuing ANMD–57–18 Issue 1
as a precautionary measure while they
further investigate the issue.
The manufacturer has now completed their
investigation and issued Alert Service
Bulletin ANMD–27–53 to modify flap
actuation linkages to restore the necessary
rigidity to the outboard flap, and hence the
aileron. The unacceptable flexibility of the
outboard flap mechanism allows flutter to
occur in extreme circumstances.
The proposed AD would require actions
that are intended to address the unsafe
condition described in the MCAI.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by December 7, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD because of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
regulations.gov, including any personal
information you provide. We will also
post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
On October 13, 2006, we issued AD
2006–21–12, Amendment 39–14797 (71
FR 61636; October 19, 2006). That AD
required actions intended to address an
unsafe condition on the products listed
above.
Since we issued AD 2006–21–12, the
manufacturer completed their flutter
investigation and issued Nomad Alert
Service Bulletin ANMD–27–53, dated
February 20, 2008, to modify flap
actuation linkages. This modification
restores the necessary rigidity to the
outboard flap, and hence the aileron.
The Civil Aviation Safety Authority,
which is the aviation authority for
Australia, has issued AD number AD/
GAF–N22/69 Amdt 6, dated September
10, 2009 (referred to after this as ‘‘the
MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe condition
for the specified products. The MCAI
states:
dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Office
(telephone (800) 647–5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Doug Rudolph, Aerospace Engineer,
FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901
Locust, Room 301, Kansas City,
Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 329–
4059; fax: (816) 329–4090; e-mail:
doug.rudolph@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Late in 2002 the manufacturer advised
CASA of another Nomad accident which was
possibly caused by aileron flutter with the
flaps at 38 degrees. This, along with the other
flutter incidents, has resulted in the
manufacturer issuing ANMD–57–18 Issue 1
as a precautionary measure while they
further investigate the issue.
The manufacturer has now completed their
investigation and issued Alert Service
Bulletin ANMD–27–53 to modify flap
actuation linkages to restore the necessary
rigidity to the outboard flap, and hence the
aileron. The unacceptable flexibility of the
outboard flap mechanism allows flutter to
occur in extreme circumstances.
This amendment mandates Alert Service
Bulletin ANMD–27–53, which requires
modifications to the aircraft, but terminates
the limitations imposed by earlier
amendments.
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2009–0987; Directorate Identifier
2009–CE–054–AD’’ at the beginning of
Relevant Service Information
AeroSpace Technologies of Australia
Pty Ltd has issued Nomad Alert Service
Bulletin ANMD–27–53, dated February
20, 2008. The actions described in this
service information are intended to
correct the unsafe condition identified
in the MCAI.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:06 Oct 21, 2009
Jkt 220001
You may obtain further information by
examining the MCAI in the AD docket.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
54499
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of the Proposed AD
This product has been approved by
the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation
in the United States. Pursuant to our
bilateral agreement with this State of
Design Authority, they have notified us
of the unsafe condition described in the
MCAI and service information
referenced above. We are proposing this
AD because we evaluated all
information and determined the unsafe
condition exists and is likely to exist or
develop on other products of the same
type design.
Differences Between This Proposed AD
and the MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and
related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But
we might have found it necessary to use
different words from those in the MCAI
to ensure the AD is clear for U.S.
operators and is enforceable. In making
these changes, we do not intend to differ
substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related
service information.
We might also have proposed
different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA
policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a NOTE within the
proposed AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD
will affect 15 products of U.S. registry.
We also estimate that it would take
about 73 work-hours per product to
comply with the basic requirements of
this proposed AD. The average labor
rate is $80 per work-hour. Required
parts would cost about $15,100 per
product.
Based on these figures, we estimate
the cost of the proposed AD on U.S.
operators to be $314,100, or $20,940 per
product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
E:\FR\FM\22OCP1.SGM
22OCP1
54500
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 203 / Thursday, October 22, 2009 / Proposed Rules
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this proposed AD and placed it in the
AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by
removing Amendment 39–14797 (71 FR
61636; October 19, 2006), and adding
the following new AD:
AeroSpace Technologies of Australia Pty
Ltd: Docket No. FAA–2009–0987;
Directorate Identifier 2009–CE–054–AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by
December 7, 2009.
Affected ADs
(b) This AD supersedes AD 2006–21–12
Amendment 39–14797.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:06 Oct 21, 2009
Jkt 220001
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Models N22B, N22S,
and N24A airplanes, all serial numbers,
including airplanes with float/amphibian
configuration, certificated in any category.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association of America
(ATA) Code 27: Flight Controls.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) states:
Late in 2002 the manufacturer advised
CASA of another Nomad accident which was
possibly caused by aileron flutter with the
flaps at 38 degrees. This, along with the other
flutter incidents, has resulted in the
manufacturer issuing ANMD–57–18 Issue 1
as a precautionary measure while they
further investigate the issue.
The manufacturer has now completed their
investigation and issued Alert Service
Bulletin ANMD–27–53 to modify flap
actuation linkages to restore the necessary
rigidity to the outboard flap, and hence the
aileron. The unacceptable flexibility of the
outboard flap mechanism allows flutter to
occur in extreme circumstances.
This amendment mandates Alert Service
Bulletin ANMD–27–53, which requires
modifications to the aircraft, but terminates
the limitations imposed by earlier
amendments.
Actions and Compliance
(f) Unless already done, do the following
actions:
(1) Visually inspect the left-hand and righthand ailerons for damage (i.e., distortion,
bending, impact marks) and repair or replace
any damaged aileron found following
instructions obtained from the typecertificate holder (AeroSpace Technologies of
Australia Pty Ltd) within the following time:
(i) For Models N22B and N24A airplanes:
Inspect within 50 hours time-in-service (TIS)
after December 23, 2003 (the effective date
retained from AD 2003–22–13).
(ii) For Model N22S airplanes: Inspect
within the next 10 hours TIS after November
8, 2006 (the effective date retained from AD
2006–21–12), or within 30 days after
November 8, 2006 (the effective date retained
from AD 2006–21–12), whichever occurs
first.
(iii) For all airplanes: Repair or replace
before further flight after the inspection
where damage is found.
(2) Adjust the engine power lever actuated
landing gear ‘‘up’’ aural warning
microswitches, perform a ground test, and if
deficiencies are detected during the ground
test, make the necessary adjustments
following Nomad Alert Service Bulletin
ANMD–57–18, Rev 1, dated August 14, 2006,
within the following time:
(i) For Models N22B and N24A airplanes:
Within 50 hours TIS after December 23, 2003
(the effective date retained from AD 2003–
22–13), unless already done following
Nomad Alert Service Bulletin ANMD 57–18,
dated December 19, 2002.
(ii) For Model N22S airplanes: Within the
next 10 hours TIS after November 8, 2006
(the effective date retained from AD 2006–
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
21–12), or within 30 days after November 8,
2006 (the effective date retained from AD
2006–21–12), whichever occurs first.
(3) For all airplanes: Do the following
within the next 10 hours TIS after the
effective date of this AD or within 30 days
after the effective date of this AD, whichever
occurs first:
(i) Incorporate the maximum flap extension
limitations specified in paragraph 2.D. of
Nomad Alert Service Bulletin ANMD–57–18,
Rev 1, dated August 14, 2006, into the
Limitations section of the airplane flight
manual (AFM). To show compliance with
this paragraph of this AD, a copy of page 7
of Nomad Alert Service Bulletin ANMD–57–
18, Rev 1, dated August 14, 2006, may be
inserted into the Limitations section of the
AFM. You may take ‘‘unless already done
credit’’ for this subparagraph if done in
accordance with AD 2006–21–12 and no
further action is required to comply with this
subparagraph.
(ii) Fabricate (using at least 1⁄8-inch letters)
and install placards on the instrument panel
within the pilot’s clear view as specified in
paragraph 2.E. of Nomad Alert Service
Bulletin ANMD–57–18, Rev 1, dated August
14, 2006. You may take ‘‘unless already done
credit’’ for this subparagraph if done in
accordance with AD 2006–21–12 and no
further action is required to comply with this
subparagraph.
(iii) Incorporate the landing performance
information specified in paragraph 2.F. of
Nomad Alert Service Bulletin ANMD–57–18,
Rev 1, dated August 14, 2006, into the
Limitations section and the Performance
section of the AFM.
(4) For all airplanes: Modify the outboard
forward flap linkage (Modification N953) and
modify the outboard aft flap (aileron) mass
balance following Nomad Alert Service
Bulletin ANMD–27–53, dated February 20,
2008, within the next 12 months after the
effective date of this AD. Accomplishment of
all of the actions specified in Nomad Alert
Service Bulletin ANMD–27–53, dated
February 20, 2008, terminates the limitations
requirements and the placard requirements
specified in paragraph (f)(3) of this AD.
FAA AD Differences
Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/
or service information as follows: No
differences.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(g) The following provisions also apply to
this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, Standards Office,
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs
for this AD, if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to
ATTN: Doug Rudolph, Aerospace Engineer,
FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust,
Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri 64106;
telephone: (816) 329–4059; fax: (816) 329–
4090; e-mail: doug.rudolph@faa.gov. Before
using any approved AMOC on any airplane
to which the AMOC applies, notify your
appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the
FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO),
or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
E:\FR\FM\22OCP1.SGM
22OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 203 / Thursday, October 22, 2009 / Proposed Rules
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
actions are considered FAA-approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any
reporting requirement in this AD, under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection
requirements and has assigned OMB Control
Number 2120–0056.
Related Information
(h) Refer to MCAI Civil Aviation Safety
Authority of Australia, AD number AD/GAF–
N22/69 Amdt 6, dated September 10, 2009,
Nomad Alert Service Bulletin ANMD–27–53,
dated February 20, 2008, and Nomad Alert
Service Bulletin ANMD–57–18, Rev 1, dated
August 14, 2006, for related information.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on
October 15, 2009.
Kim Smith,
Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E9–25443 Filed 10–21–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2009–0951; Directorate
Identifier 2007–SW–52–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Eurocopter
France Model AS350B, BA, B1, B2, B3,
C, D, D1, AS355E, F, F1, F2, and N
Helicopters
dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
specified Eurocopter France
(Eurocopter) model helicopters. This
proposed AD results from a mandatory
continuing airworthiness information
(MCAI) AD issued by the European
Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which
is the Technical Agent for the Member
States of the European Community. The
AD MCAI states ‘‘EASA issued
Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2006–
0251 and its revisions following a case
of total failure and a case of a crack
discovered on the support shaft of the
sliding door rear roller. Metallurgical
and metallographic analyses revealed a
nonconformity concerning the heat
treatment of the material. Since then,
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:06 Oct 21, 2009
Jkt 220001
other cases of cracks and failures of the
roller support shaft rear attach fitting
had been reported. This condition, if not
corrected, could lead to the loss of the
sliding door in flight.’’
Separation of a sliding door in flight
creates an unsafe condition because the
door could come into contact with the
rotor system. The proposed AD would
require actions that are intended to
address this unsafe condition.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by November 23,
2009.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
You may get the service information
identified in this proposed AD from
American Eurocopter Corporation, 2701
Forum Drive, Grand Prairie, Texas
75053–4005, telephone (972) 641–3460,
fax (972) 641–3527.
Examining the Docket: You may
examine the AD docket on the Internet
at https://www.regulations.gov or in
person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The AD docket contains this proposed
AD, the economic evaluation, any
comments received, and other
information. The street address for the
Docket Operations office (telephone
(800) 647–5527) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in
the AD docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
DOT/FAA Southwest Region, Gary
Roach, ASW–111, Aviation Safety
Engineer, Rotorcraft Directorate,
Regulations and Guidance Group, 2601
Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, Texas
76137, telephone (817) 222–5130, fax
(817) 222–5961.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
54501
FAA–2009–0951; Directorate Identifier
2007–SW–52–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
EASA, which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Community, has issued EASA AD No.
2007–0236, dated August 31, 2007, to
correct an unsafe condition for specified
Eurocopter model helicopters. The
MCAI AD states that EASA issued AD
2006–0251 and its revisions following a
case of total failure and a case of a crack
discovered on the support shaft of the
sliding door rear roller. Metallurgical
and metallographic analyses revealed a
nonconformity concerning the heat
treatment of the material. Since then,
other cases of cracks and failures of the
roller support shaft rear attach fitting
had been reported. EASA AD No. 2007–
0236 supersedes EASA AD No. 2006–
0251R2 but retains the requirements for
repetitive inspections until replacement
of current parts with improved parts.
EASA AD No. 2007–0236 also prohibits
installation of another roller support
fitting part number (P/N) 350A25–1270–
22 on any AS350 or AS355 helicopter.
You may obtain further information by
examining the MCAI AD and service
information in the AD docket.
Related Service Information
On July 18, 2006, Eurocopter issued
Alert Service Bulletin (ASB) No.
52.00.30 for modifying the AS350 series
helicopters and ASB No. 52.00.23 for
modifying the AS355 series helicopters.
These ASBs contained modifications
073298 and 073308. The following day,
Eurocopter issued ASB No. 05.00.45 for
the AS355 model helicopters and No.
05.00.47 for the AS350 model
helicopters, both dated July 19, 2006.
Later, Eurocopter issued Revision 1 to
ASB No. 52.00.23 for the AS355 model
helicopters and No. 52.00.30 for the
AS350 model helicopters, both dated
June 29, 2007, to modify the sliding
door medium roller and fitting. The
actions described in the MCAI AD are
intended to correct the same unsafe
condition as that identified in the
service information.
E:\FR\FM\22OCP1.SGM
22OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 203 (Thursday, October 22, 2009)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 54498-54501]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-25443]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2009-0987; Directorate Identifier 2009-CE-054-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; AeroSpace Technologies of Australia Pty
Ltd Models N22B, N22S, and N24A Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above that would supersede an existing AD. This
proposed AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information
(MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of another country to
identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The
MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:
Late in 2002 the manufacturer advised CASA of another Nomad
accident which was possibly caused by aileron flutter with the
[[Page 54499]]
flaps at 38 degrees. This, along with the other flutter incidents,
has resulted in the manufacturer issuing ANMD-57-18 Issue 1 as a
precautionary measure while they further investigate the issue.
The manufacturer has now completed their investigation and
issued Alert Service Bulletin ANMD-27-53 to modify flap actuation
linkages to restore the necessary rigidity to the outboard flap, and
hence the aileron. The unacceptable flexibility of the outboard flap
mechanism allows flutter to occur in extreme circumstances.
The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address the
unsafe condition described in the MCAI.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by December 7,
2009.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Doug Rudolph, Aerospace Engineer, FAA,
Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri
64106; telephone: (816) 329-4059; fax: (816) 329-4090; e-mail:
doug.rudolph@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2009-0987;
Directorate Identifier 2009-CE-054-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
On October 13, 2006, we issued AD 2006-21-12, Amendment 39-14797
(71 FR 61636; October 19, 2006). That AD required actions intended to
address an unsafe condition on the products listed above.
Since we issued AD 2006-21-12, the manufacturer completed their
flutter investigation and issued Nomad Alert Service Bulletin ANMD-27-
53, dated February 20, 2008, to modify flap actuation linkages. This
modification restores the necessary rigidity to the outboard flap, and
hence the aileron.
The Civil Aviation Safety Authority, which is the aviation
authority for Australia, has issued AD number AD/GAF-N22/69 Amdt 6,
dated September 10, 2009 (referred to after this as ``the MCAI''), to
correct an unsafe condition for the specified products. The MCAI
states:
Late in 2002 the manufacturer advised CASA of another Nomad
accident which was possibly caused by aileron flutter with the flaps
at 38 degrees. This, along with the other flutter incidents, has
resulted in the manufacturer issuing ANMD-57-18 Issue 1 as a
precautionary measure while they further investigate the issue.
The manufacturer has now completed their investigation and
issued Alert Service Bulletin ANMD-27-53 to modify flap actuation
linkages to restore the necessary rigidity to the outboard flap, and
hence the aileron. The unacceptable flexibility of the outboard flap
mechanism allows flutter to occur in extreme circumstances.
This amendment mandates Alert Service Bulletin ANMD-27-53, which
requires modifications to the aircraft, but terminates the
limitations imposed by earlier amendments.
You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket.
Relevant Service Information
AeroSpace Technologies of Australia Pty Ltd has issued Nomad Alert
Service Bulletin ANMD-27-53, dated February 20, 2008. The actions
described in this service information are intended to correct the
unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of the Proposed AD
This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with this State of Design Authority, they
have notified us of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and
service information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because
we evaluated all information and determined the unsafe condition exists
and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same type
design.
Differences Between This Proposed AD and the MCAI or Service
Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a NOTE within the proposed AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD will affect 15 products of U.S.
registry. We also estimate that it would take about 73 work-hours per
product to comply with the basic requirements of this proposed AD. The
average labor rate is $80 per work-hour. Required parts would cost
about $15,100 per product.
Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed AD on
U.S. operators to be $314,100, or $20,940 per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures
[[Page 54500]]
the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This
regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses
an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products
identified in this rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by removing Amendment 39-14797 (71 FR
61636; October 19, 2006), and adding the following new AD:
AeroSpace Technologies of Australia Pty Ltd: Docket No. FAA-2009-
0987; Directorate Identifier 2009-CE-054-AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by December 7, 2009.
Affected ADs
(b) This AD supersedes AD 2006-21-12 Amendment 39-14797.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Models N22B, N22S, and N24A airplanes,
all serial numbers, including airplanes with float/amphibian
configuration, certificated in any category.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association of America (ATA) Code 27: Flight
Controls.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
Late in 2002 the manufacturer advised CASA of another Nomad
accident which was possibly caused by aileron flutter with the flaps
at 38 degrees. This, along with the other flutter incidents, has
resulted in the manufacturer issuing ANMD-57-18 Issue 1 as a
precautionary measure while they further investigate the issue.
The manufacturer has now completed their investigation and
issued Alert Service Bulletin ANMD-27-53 to modify flap actuation
linkages to restore the necessary rigidity to the outboard flap, and
hence the aileron. The unacceptable flexibility of the outboard flap
mechanism allows flutter to occur in extreme circumstances.
This amendment mandates Alert Service Bulletin ANMD-27-53, which
requires modifications to the aircraft, but terminates the
limitations imposed by earlier amendments.
Actions and Compliance
(f) Unless already done, do the following actions:
(1) Visually inspect the left-hand and right-hand ailerons for
damage (i.e., distortion, bending, impact marks) and repair or
replace any damaged aileron found following instructions obtained
from the type-certificate holder (AeroSpace Technologies of
Australia Pty Ltd) within the following time:
(i) For Models N22B and N24A airplanes: Inspect within 50 hours
time-in-service (TIS) after December 23, 2003 (the effective date
retained from AD 2003-22-13).
(ii) For Model N22S airplanes: Inspect within the next 10 hours
TIS after November 8, 2006 (the effective date retained from AD
2006-21-12), or within 30 days after November 8, 2006 (the effective
date retained from AD 2006-21-12), whichever occurs first.
(iii) For all airplanes: Repair or replace before further flight
after the inspection where damage is found.
(2) Adjust the engine power lever actuated landing gear ``up''
aural warning microswitches, perform a ground test, and if
deficiencies are detected during the ground test, make the necessary
adjustments following Nomad Alert Service Bulletin ANMD-57-18, Rev
1, dated August 14, 2006, within the following time:
(i) For Models N22B and N24A airplanes: Within 50 hours TIS
after December 23, 2003 (the effective date retained from AD 2003-
22-13), unless already done following Nomad Alert Service Bulletin
ANMD 57-18, dated December 19, 2002.
(ii) For Model N22S airplanes: Within the next 10 hours TIS
after November 8, 2006 (the effective date retained from AD 2006-21-
12), or within 30 days after November 8, 2006 (the effective date
retained from AD 2006-21-12), whichever occurs first.
(3) For all airplanes: Do the following within the next 10 hours
TIS after the effective date of this AD or within 30 days after the
effective date of this AD, whichever occurs first:
(i) Incorporate the maximum flap extension limitations specified
in paragraph 2.D. of Nomad Alert Service Bulletin ANMD-57-18, Rev 1,
dated August 14, 2006, into the Limitations section of the airplane
flight manual (AFM). To show compliance with this paragraph of this
AD, a copy of page 7 of Nomad Alert Service Bulletin ANMD-57-18, Rev
1, dated August 14, 2006, may be inserted into the Limitations
section of the AFM. You may take ``unless already done credit'' for
this subparagraph if done in accordance with AD 2006-21-12 and no
further action is required to comply with this subparagraph.
(ii) Fabricate (using at least \1/8\-inch letters) and install
placards on the instrument panel within the pilot's clear view as
specified in paragraph 2.E. of Nomad Alert Service Bulletin ANMD-57-
18, Rev 1, dated August 14, 2006. You may take ``unless already done
credit'' for this subparagraph if done in accordance with AD 2006-
21-12 and no further action is required to comply with this
subparagraph.
(iii) Incorporate the landing performance information specified
in paragraph 2.F. of Nomad Alert Service Bulletin ANMD-57-18, Rev 1,
dated August 14, 2006, into the Limitations section and the
Performance section of the AFM.
(4) For all airplanes: Modify the outboard forward flap linkage
(Modification N953) and modify the outboard aft flap (aileron) mass
balance following Nomad Alert Service Bulletin ANMD-27-53, dated
February 20, 2008, within the next 12 months after the effective
date of this AD. Accomplishment of all of the actions specified in
Nomad Alert Service Bulletin ANMD-27-53, dated February 20, 2008,
terminates the limitations requirements and the placard requirements
specified in paragraph (f)(3) of this AD.
FAA AD Differences
Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows: No differences.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
Standards Office, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send
information to ATTN: Doug Rudolph, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Small
Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri
64106; telephone: (816) 329-4059; fax: (816) 329-4090; e-mail:
doug.rudolph@faa.gov. Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane
to which the AMOC applies, notify your appropriate principal
inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO),
or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from
[[Page 54501]]
a manufacturer or other source, use these actions if they are FAA-
approved. Corrective actions are considered FAA-approved if they are
approved by the State of Design Authority (or their delegated
agent). You are required to assure the product is airworthy before
it is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection requirements and has assigned
OMB Control Number 2120-0056.
Related Information
(h) Refer to MCAI Civil Aviation Safety Authority of Australia,
AD number AD/GAF-N22/69 Amdt 6, dated September 10, 2009, Nomad
Alert Service Bulletin ANMD-27-53, dated February 20, 2008, and
Nomad Alert Service Bulletin ANMD-57-18, Rev 1, dated August 14,
2006, for related information.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on October 15, 2009.
Kim Smith,
Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E9-25443 Filed 10-21-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P