Medicare Program; Inpatient Hospital Deductible and Hospital and Extended Care Services Coinsurance Amounts for Calendar Year 2010, 54579-54581 [E9-25372]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 203 / Thursday, October 22, 2009 / Notices
IV. Waiver of Proposed Notice
ACTION:
The statute requires publication of the
monthly actuarial rates and the Part B
premium amounts. We ordinarily use
general notices, rather than notice and
comment rulemaking procedures, to
make such announcements. In doing so,
we note that, under the Administrative
Procedure Act, interpretive rules,
general statements of policy, and rules
of agency organization, procedure, or
practice are excepted from the
requirements of notice and comment
rulemaking.
We considered publishing a proposed
notice to provide a period for public
comment. However, we may waive that
procedure if we find, for good cause,
that prior notice and comment are
impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest. We find that the
procedure for notice and comment is
unnecessary because the formulas used
to calculate the Part B premiums are
statutorily directed, and we can exercise
no discretion in applying those
formulas. Moreover, the statute
establishes the time period for which
the premium rates will apply, and
delaying publication of the Part B
premium rate such that it would not be
published before that time would be
contrary to the public interest.
Therefore, we find good cause to waive
publication of a proposed notice and
solicitation of public comments.
SUMMARY: This notice announces the
inpatient hospital deductible and the
hospital and extended care services
coinsurance amounts for services
furnished in calendar year (CY) 2010
under Medicare’s Hospital Insurance
Program (Medicare Part A). The
Medicare statute specifies the formulae
used to determine these amounts. For
CY 2010, the inpatient hospital
deductible will be $1,100. The daily
coinsurance amounts for CY 2010 will
be—(a) $275 for the 61st through 90th
day of hospitalization in a benefit
period; (b) $550 for lifetime reserve
days; and (c) $137.50 for the 21st
through 100th day of extended care
services in a skilled nursing facility in
a benefit period.
DATES: Effective Date: This notice is
effective on January 1, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Clare McFarland, (410) 786–6390 for
general information. Gregory J. Savord,
(410) 786–1521 for case-mix analysis.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program No. 93.773, Medicare—Hospital
Insurance; and Program No. 93.774,
Medicare—Supplementary Medical
Insurance Program)
Dated: October 14, 2009.
Charlene Frizzera,
Acting Administrator, Centers for Medicare
& Medicaid Services.
Approved: October 16, 2009.
Kathleen Sebelius,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9–25370 Filed 10–16–09; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4120–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services
[CMS–8037–N]
dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
RIN 0938–AP42
Medicare Program; Inpatient Hospital
Deductible and Hospital and Extended
Care Services Coinsurance Amounts
for Calendar Year 2010
AGENCY: Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:13 Oct 21, 2009
Jkt 220001
Notice.
I. Background
Section 1813 of the Social Security
Act (the Act) provides for an inpatient
hospital deductible to be subtracted
from the amount payable by Medicare
for inpatient hospital services furnished
to a beneficiary. It also provides for
certain coinsurance amounts to be
subtracted from the amounts payable by
Medicare for inpatient hospital and
extended care services. Section
1813(b)(2) of the Act requires us to
determine and publish each year the
amount of the inpatient hospital
deductible and the hospital and
extended care services coinsurance
amounts applicable for services
furnished in the following CY.
II. Computing the Inpatient Hospital
Deductible for CY 2010
Section 1813(b) of the Act prescribes
the method for computing the amount of
the inpatient hospital deductible. The
inpatient hospital deductible is an
amount equal to the inpatient hospital
deductible for the preceding CY,
adjusted by our best estimate of the
payment-weighted average of the
applicable percentage increases (as
defined in section 1886(b)(3)(B) of the
Act) used for updating the payment
rates to hospitals for discharges in the
fiscal year (FY) that begins on October
1 of the same preceding CY, and
adjusted to reflect changes in real casemix. The adjustment to reflect real casemix is determined on the basis of the
most recent case-mix data available. The
amount determined under this formula
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
54579
is rounded to the nearest multiple of $4
(or, if midway between two multiples of
$4, to the next higher multiple of $4).
Under section 1886(b)(3)(B)(i)(XX) of
the Act, the percentage increase used to
update the payment rates for FY 2010
for hospitals paid under the inpatient
prospective payment system is the
market basket percentage increase,
otherwise known as the market basket
update. Under section 1886(b)(3)(B)(viii)
of the Act, hospitals will receive the full
market basket update only if they
submit quality data as specified by the
Secretary. The market basket update for
hospitals that do not submit this data is
reduced by 2.0 percentage points. We
are estimating that after accounting for
those hospitals receiving the lower
market basket update in the paymentweighted average update, the calculated
deductible will remain the same.
Under section 1886(b)(3)(B)(ii)(VIII) of
the Act, the percentage increase used to
update the payment rates for FY 2010
for hospitals excluded from the
prospective payment system is the
market basket percentage increase,
defined according to section
1886(b)(3)(B)(iii) of the Act.
The market basket percentage increase
for 2010 is 2.1 percent, as announced in
the final rule with comment period
published in the Federal Register on
August 27, 2009 entitled, ‘‘Medicare
Program; Changes to the Hospital
Inpatient Prospective Payment Systems
for Acute Care Hospitals and Fiscal Year
2010 Rates; and Changes to the LongTerm Care Hospital Prospective
Payment System and Rate Years 2010
and 2009 Rates (IPPS/RY 2010 LTCH
PPS) (74 FR 43754).’’ Therefore, the
percentage increase for hospitals paid
under the prospective payment system
is 2.1 percent. The average payment
percentage increase for hospitals
excluded from the prospective payment
system is 2.5 percent. Weighting these
percentages in accordance with
payment volume, our best estimate of
the payment-weighted average of the
increases in the payment rates for FY
2010 is 2.15 percent.
To develop the adjustment to reflect
changes in real case-mix, we first
calculated for each hospital an average
case-mix that reflects the relative
costliness of that hospital’s mix of cases
compared to those of other hospitals.
We then computed the change in
average case-mix for hospitals paid
under the Medicare prospective
payment system in FY 2009 compared
to FY 2008. (We excluded from this
calculation hospitals whose payments
are not based on the Acute care
prospective payment system because
their payments are based on alternate
E:\FR\FM\22OCN1.SGM
22OCN1
54580
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 203 / Thursday, October 22, 2009 / Notices
prospective payment systems or
reasonable costs.) We used Medicare
bills from prospective payment
hospitals that we received as of June
2009. These bills represent a total of
about 9.0 million Medicare discharges
for FY 2009 and provide the most recent
case-mix data available at this time.
Based on these bills, the change in
average case-mix in FY 2009 is 2.5
percent. Based on these bills and past
experience, we expect the overall case
mix change to be 3.1 percent as the year
progresses and more FY 2009 data
become available.
Section 1813 of the Act requires that
the inpatient hospital deductible be
adjusted only by that portion of the
case-mix change that is determined to
be real. In the FY 2010 IPPS/RY 2010
LTCH PPS final rule with comment
period, we indicated that we believe the
adoption of the Medicare severity-based
diagnosis-related groups (MS–DRGs) led
to increases in aggregate payments
without a corresponding increase in
actual patient severity of illness due to
the incentives for improved
documentation and coding. In that final
rule with comment period, we estimated
that changes in coding or classification
that do not reflect real change in casemix would be 2.3 percent for FY 2009.
Therefore, since we are expecting
overall case mix to increase by 3.1
percent and 2.3 percent of that to be
caused by coding changes, real case-mix
changes resulted in an increase of 0.8
percent for FY 2009.
Thus, the estimate of the paymentweighted average of the applicable
percentage increases used for updating
the payment rates is 2.15 percent, and
the real case-mix adjustment factor for
the deductible is 0.8 percent. Therefore,
under the statutory formula, the
inpatient hospital deductible for
services furnished in CY 2010 is $1,100.
This deductible amount is determined
by multiplying $1,068 (the inpatient
hospital deductible for CY 2009) by the
payment-weighted average increase in
the payment rates of 1.0215 multiplied
by the increase in real case-mix of 1.008,
which equals $1,099.69 and is rounded
to $1,100.
III. Computing the Inpatient Hospital
and Extended Care Services
Coinsurance Amounts for CY 2010
The coinsurance amounts provided
for in section 1813 of the Act are
defined as fixed percentages of the
inpatient hospital deductible for
services furnished in the same CY. The
increase in the deductible generates
increases in the coinsurance amounts.
For inpatient hospital and extended care
services furnished in CY 2010, in
accordance with the fixed percentages
defined in the law, the daily
coinsurance for the 61st through 90th
day of hospitalization in a benefit
period will be $275 (one-fourth of the
inpatient hospital deductible); the daily
coinsurance for lifetime reserve days
will be $550 (one-half of the inpatient
hospital deductible); and the daily
coinsurance for the 21st through 100th
day of extended care services in a
skilled nursing facility in a benefit
period will be $137.50 (one-eighth of
the inpatient hospital deductible).
IV. Cost to Medicare Beneficiaries
Table 1 below summarizes the
deductible and coinsurance amounts for
CYs 2009 and 2010, as well as the
number of each that is estimated to be
paid.
TABLE 1—PART A DEDUCTIBLE AND COINSURANCE AMOUNTS FOR CALENDAR YEARS 2009 AND 2010
Value
Number paid
(in millions)
Type of cost sharing
2009
Inpatient hospital deductible ........................................................................
Daily coinsurance for 61st–90th day ...........................................................
Daily coinsurance for lifetime reserve days .................................................
SNF coinsurance .........................................................................................
dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
The estimated total increase in costs
to beneficiaries is about $730 million
(rounded to the nearest $10 million) due
to—(1) the increase in the deductible
and coinsurance amounts; and (2) the
change in the number of deductibles
and daily coinsurance amounts paid.
V. Waiver of Proposed Notice and
Comment Period
The Medicare statute, as discussed
previously, requires publication of the
Medicare Part A inpatient hospital
deductible and the hospital and
extended care services coinsurance
amounts for services for each CY. The
amounts are determined according to
the statute. As has been our custom, we
use general notices, rather than notice
and comment rulemaking procedures, to
make the announcements. In doing so,
we acknowledge that, under the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA),
interpretive rules, general statements of
policy, and rules of agency organization,
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:13 Oct 21, 2009
Jkt 220001
$1068
267
534
133.50
procedure, or practice are excepted from
the requirements of notice and comment
rulemaking.
We considered publishing a proposed
notice to provide a period for public
comment. However, we may waive that
procedure if we find good cause that
prior notice and comment are
impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest. We find that the
procedure for notice and comment is
unnecessary because the formulae used
to calculate the inpatient hospital
deductible and hospital and extended
care services coinsurance amounts are
statutorily directed, and we can exercise
no discretion in following the formulae.
Moreover, the statute establishes the
time period for which the deductible
and coinsurance amounts will apply
and delaying publication would be
contrary to the public interest.
Therefore, we find good cause to waive
publication of a proposed notice and
solicitation of public comments.
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2010
2009
$1100
275
550
137.50
2010
8.70
2.27
1.12
40.79
8.80
2.30
1.13
41.74
VI. Collection of Information
Requirements
This document does not impose
information collection and
recordkeeping requirements.
Consequently, it need not be reviewed
by the Office of Management and
Budget under the authority of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 35).
VII. Regulatory Impact Statement
We have examined the impacts of this
final rule as required by Executive
Order 12866 on Regulatory Planning
and Review (September 30, 1993), the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
(September 19, 1980, Pub. L. 96–354),
section 1102(b) of the Social Security
Act, section 202 of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L.
104–4), Executive Order 13132 on
Federalism (August 4, 1999), and the
E:\FR\FM\22OCN1.SGM
22OCN1
dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 203 / Thursday, October 22, 2009 / Notices
Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C.
804(2)).
Executive Order 12866 directs
agencies to assess all costs and benefits
of available regulatory alternatives and,
if regulation is necessary, to select
regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential
economic, environmental, public health
and safety effects, distributive impacts,
and equity). A regulatory impact
analysis (RIA) must be prepared for
major rules with economically
significant effects ($100 million or more
in any 1 year). As stated in section IV
of this notice, we estimate that the total
increase in costs to beneficiaries
associated with this notice is about $730
million due to—(1) The increase in the
deductible and coinsurance amounts;
and (2) the change in the number of
deductibles and daily coinsurance
amounts paid. Therefore, this notice is
a major rule as defined in Title 5,
United States Code, section 804(2), and
is an economically significant rule
under Executive Order 12866.
The RFA requires agencies to analyze
options for regulatory relief of small
businesses, if a rule has a significant
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. For purposes of the RFA, small
entities include small businesses,
nonprofit organizations, and
government agencies. Most hospitals
and most other providers and suppliers
are small entities, either by nonprofit
status or by having revenues of $7.0
million to $34.5 million in any 1 year.
Individuals and States are not included
in the definition of a small entity. We
have determined that this notice will
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities. Therefore, we are not preparing
an analysis under the RFA.
In addition, section 1102(b) of the Act
requires us to prepare a regulatory
impact analysis if a rule may have a
significant impact on the operations of
a substantial number of small rural
hospitals. This analysis must conform to
the provisions of section 604 of the
RFA. For purposes of section 1102(b) of
the Act, we define a small rural hospital
as a hospital that is located outside of
a Metropolitan Statistical Area and has
fewer than 100 beds. The Secretary has
determined that this notice will not
have a significant impact on the
operations of a substantial number of
small rural hospitals. Therefore, we are
not preparing an analysis under section
1102(b) of the Act.
Section 202 of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA)
requires that agencies assess anticipated
costs and benefits before issuing any
rule whose mandates require spending
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:13 Oct 21, 2009
Jkt 220001
in any 1 year of $100 million in 1995
dollars, updated annually for inflation.
In 2009, that threshold is approximately
$133 million. This notice has no
consequential effect on State, local, or
Tribal governments or on the private
sector. However, States may be required
to pay the deductibles and coinsurance
for dually-eligible beneficiaries.
Executive Order 13132 establishes
certain requirements that an agency
must meet when it promulgates a
proposed rule (and subsequent final
rule) that imposes substantial direct
requirement costs on State and local
governments, preempts State law, or
otherwise has Federalism implications.
This notice will not have a substantial
effect on State or local governments.
In accordance with the provisions of
Executive Order 12866, this notice was
reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program No. 93.773, Medicare—Hospital
Insurance)
Dated: September 1, 2009.
Charlene Frizzera,
Acting Administrator, Centers for Medicare
& Medicaid Services.
Dated: September 17, 2009.
Kathleen Sebelius,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9–25372 Filed 10–16–09; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4120–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services
[CMS–8038–N]
RIN 0938–AP43
Medicare Program; Part A Premium for
Calendar Year 2010 for the Uninsured
Aged and for Certain Disabled
Individuals Who Have Exhausted Other
Entitlement
AGENCY: Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: This annual notice announces
Medicare’s Hospital Insurance (Part A)
premium for uninsured enrollees in
calendar year (CY) 2010. This premium
is paid by enrollees age 65 and over who
are not otherwise eligible for benefits
under Medicare Part A (hereafter known
as the ‘‘uninsured aged’’) and by certain
disabled individuals who have
exhausted other entitlement. The
monthly Part A premium for the 12
months beginning January 1, 2010 for
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
54581
these individuals will be $461. The
reduced premium for certain other
individuals as described in this notice
will be $254.
DATES: Effective Date: This notice is
effective on January 1, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Clare McFarland, (410) 786–6390.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Section 1818 of the Social Security
Act (the Act) provides for voluntary
enrollment in the Medicare Hospital
Insurance Program (Medicare Part A),
subject to payment of a monthly
premium, of certain persons aged 65
and older who are uninsured under the
Old-Age, Survivors, and Disability
Insurance (OASDI) program or the
Railroad Retirement Act and do not
otherwise meet the requirements for
entitlement to Medicare Part A. (Persons
insured under the OASDI program or
the Railroad Retirement Act and certain
others do not have to pay premiums for
Medicare Part A.)
Section 1818A of the Act provides for
voluntary enrollment in Medicare Part
A, subject to payment of a monthly
premium of certain disabled individuals
who have exhausted other entitlement.
These are individuals who were entitled
to coverage due to a disabling
impairment under section 226(b) of the
Act, but are no longer entitled to
disability benefits and free Medicare
Part A coverage because they have gone
back to work and their earnings exceed
the statutorily defined ‘‘substantial
gainful activity’’ amount (section
223(d)(4) of the Act).
Section 1818A(d)(2) of the Act
specifies that the provisions relating to
premiums under section 1818(d)
through section 1818(f) of the Act for
the aged will also apply to certain
disabled individuals as described above.
Section 1818(d) of the Act requires us
to estimate, on an average per capita
basis, the amount to be paid from the
Federal Hospital Insurance Trust Fund
for services incurred in the following
calendar year (CY) (including the
associated administrative costs) on
behalf of individuals aged 65 and over
who will be entitled to benefits under
Medicare Part A. We must then
determine, during September of each
year, the monthly actuarial rate for the
following year (the per capita amount
estimated above divided by 12) and
publish the dollar amount for the
monthly premium in the succeeding CY.
If the premium is not a multiple of $1,
the premium is rounded to the nearest
multiple of $1 (or, if it is a multiple of
E:\FR\FM\22OCN1.SGM
22OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 203 (Thursday, October 22, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54579-54581]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-25372]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
[CMS-8037-N]
RIN 0938-AP42
Medicare Program; Inpatient Hospital Deductible and Hospital and
Extended Care Services Coinsurance Amounts for Calendar Year 2010
AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice announces the inpatient hospital deductible and
the hospital and extended care services coinsurance amounts for
services furnished in calendar year (CY) 2010 under Medicare's Hospital
Insurance Program (Medicare Part A). The Medicare statute specifies the
formulae used to determine these amounts. For CY 2010, the inpatient
hospital deductible will be $1,100. The daily coinsurance amounts for
CY 2010 will be--(a) $275 for the 61st through 90th day of
hospitalization in a benefit period; (b) $550 for lifetime reserve
days; and (c) $137.50 for the 21st through 100th day of extended care
services in a skilled nursing facility in a benefit period.
DATES: Effective Date: This notice is effective on January 1, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Clare McFarland, (410) 786-6390 for
general information. Gregory J. Savord, (410) 786-1521 for case-mix
analysis.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Section 1813 of the Social Security Act (the Act) provides for an
inpatient hospital deductible to be subtracted from the amount payable
by Medicare for inpatient hospital services furnished to a beneficiary.
It also provides for certain coinsurance amounts to be subtracted from
the amounts payable by Medicare for inpatient hospital and extended
care services. Section 1813(b)(2) of the Act requires us to determine
and publish each year the amount of the inpatient hospital deductible
and the hospital and extended care services coinsurance amounts
applicable for services furnished in the following CY.
II. Computing the Inpatient Hospital Deductible for CY 2010
Section 1813(b) of the Act prescribes the method for computing the
amount of the inpatient hospital deductible. The inpatient hospital
deductible is an amount equal to the inpatient hospital deductible for
the preceding CY, adjusted by our best estimate of the payment-weighted
average of the applicable percentage increases (as defined in section
1886(b)(3)(B) of the Act) used for updating the payment rates to
hospitals for discharges in the fiscal year (FY) that begins on October
1 of the same preceding CY, and adjusted to reflect changes in real
case-mix. The adjustment to reflect real case-mix is determined on the
basis of the most recent case-mix data available. The amount determined
under this formula is rounded to the nearest multiple of $4 (or, if
midway between two multiples of $4, to the next higher multiple of $4).
Under section 1886(b)(3)(B)(i)(XX) of the Act, the percentage
increase used to update the payment rates for FY 2010 for hospitals
paid under the inpatient prospective payment system is the market
basket percentage increase, otherwise known as the market basket
update. Under section 1886(b)(3)(B)(viii) of the Act, hospitals will
receive the full market basket update only if they submit quality data
as specified by the Secretary. The market basket update for hospitals
that do not submit this data is reduced by 2.0 percentage points. We
are estimating that after accounting for those hospitals receiving the
lower market basket update in the payment-weighted average update, the
calculated deductible will remain the same.
Under section 1886(b)(3)(B)(ii)(VIII) of the Act, the percentage
increase used to update the payment rates for FY 2010 for hospitals
excluded from the prospective payment system is the market basket
percentage increase, defined according to section 1886(b)(3)(B)(iii) of
the Act.
The market basket percentage increase for 2010 is 2.1 percent, as
announced in the final rule with comment period published in the
Federal Register on August 27, 2009 entitled, ``Medicare Program;
Changes to the Hospital Inpatient Prospective Payment Systems for Acute
Care Hospitals and Fiscal Year 2010 Rates; and Changes to the Long-Term
Care Hospital Prospective Payment System and Rate Years 2010 and 2009
Rates (IPPS/RY 2010 LTCH PPS) (74 FR 43754).'' Therefore, the
percentage increase for hospitals paid under the prospective payment
system is 2.1 percent. The average payment percentage increase for
hospitals excluded from the prospective payment system is 2.5 percent.
Weighting these percentages in accordance with payment volume, our best
estimate of the payment-weighted average of the increases in the
payment rates for FY 2010 is 2.15 percent.
To develop the adjustment to reflect changes in real case-mix, we
first calculated for each hospital an average case-mix that reflects
the relative costliness of that hospital's mix of cases compared to
those of other hospitals. We then computed the change in average case-
mix for hospitals paid under the Medicare prospective payment system in
FY 2009 compared to FY 2008. (We excluded from this calculation
hospitals whose payments are not based on the Acute care prospective
payment system because their payments are based on alternate
[[Page 54580]]
prospective payment systems or reasonable costs.) We used Medicare
bills from prospective payment hospitals that we received as of June
2009. These bills represent a total of about 9.0 million Medicare
discharges for FY 2009 and provide the most recent case-mix data
available at this time. Based on these bills, the change in average
case-mix in FY 2009 is 2.5 percent. Based on these bills and past
experience, we expect the overall case mix change to be 3.1 percent as
the year progresses and more FY 2009 data become available.
Section 1813 of the Act requires that the inpatient hospital
deductible be adjusted only by that portion of the case-mix change that
is determined to be real. In the FY 2010 IPPS/RY 2010 LTCH PPS final
rule with comment period, we indicated that we believe the adoption of
the Medicare severity-based diagnosis-related groups (MS-DRGs) led to
increases in aggregate payments without a corresponding increase in
actual patient severity of illness due to the incentives for improved
documentation and coding. In that final rule with comment period, we
estimated that changes in coding or classification that do not reflect
real change in case-mix would be 2.3 percent for FY 2009. Therefore,
since we are expecting overall case mix to increase by 3.1 percent and
2.3 percent of that to be caused by coding changes, real case-mix
changes resulted in an increase of 0.8 percent for FY 2009.
Thus, the estimate of the payment-weighted average of the
applicable percentage increases used for updating the payment rates is
2.15 percent, and the real case-mix adjustment factor for the
deductible is 0.8 percent. Therefore, under the statutory formula, the
inpatient hospital deductible for services furnished in CY 2010 is
$1,100. This deductible amount is determined by multiplying $1,068 (the
inpatient hospital deductible for CY 2009) by the payment-weighted
average increase in the payment rates of 1.0215 multiplied by the
increase in real case-mix of 1.008, which equals $1,099.69 and is
rounded to $1,100.
III. Computing the Inpatient Hospital and Extended Care Services
Coinsurance Amounts for CY 2010
The coinsurance amounts provided for in section 1813 of the Act are
defined as fixed percentages of the inpatient hospital deductible for
services furnished in the same CY. The increase in the deductible
generates increases in the coinsurance amounts. For inpatient hospital
and extended care services furnished in CY 2010, in accordance with the
fixed percentages defined in the law, the daily coinsurance for the
61st through 90th day of hospitalization in a benefit period will be
$275 (one-fourth of the inpatient hospital deductible); the daily
coinsurance for lifetime reserve days will be $550 (one-half of the
inpatient hospital deductible); and the daily coinsurance for the 21st
through 100th day of extended care services in a skilled nursing
facility in a benefit period will be $137.50 (one-eighth of the
inpatient hospital deductible).
IV. Cost to Medicare Beneficiaries
Table 1 below summarizes the deductible and coinsurance amounts for
CYs 2009 and 2010, as well as the number of each that is estimated to
be paid.
Table 1--Part A Deductible and Coinsurance Amounts for Calendar Years 2009 and 2010
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Value Number paid (in millions)
Type of cost sharing ---------------------------------------------------------------
2009 2010 2009 2010
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inpatient hospital deductible................... $1068 $1100 8.70 8.80
Daily coinsurance for 61st-90th day............. 267 275 2.27 2.30
Daily coinsurance for lifetime reserve days..... 534 550 1.12 1.13
SNF coinsurance................................. 133.50 137.50 40.79 41.74
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The estimated total increase in costs to beneficiaries is about
$730 million (rounded to the nearest $10 million) due to--(1) the
increase in the deductible and coinsurance amounts; and (2) the change
in the number of deductibles and daily coinsurance amounts paid.
V. Waiver of Proposed Notice and Comment Period
The Medicare statute, as discussed previously, requires publication
of the Medicare Part A inpatient hospital deductible and the hospital
and extended care services coinsurance amounts for services for each
CY. The amounts are determined according to the statute. As has been
our custom, we use general notices, rather than notice and comment
rulemaking procedures, to make the announcements. In doing so, we
acknowledge that, under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA),
interpretive rules, general statements of policy, and rules of agency
organization, procedure, or practice are excepted from the requirements
of notice and comment rulemaking.
We considered publishing a proposed notice to provide a period for
public comment. However, we may waive that procedure if we find good
cause that prior notice and comment are impracticable, unnecessary, or
contrary to the public interest. We find that the procedure for notice
and comment is unnecessary because the formulae used to calculate the
inpatient hospital deductible and hospital and extended care services
coinsurance amounts are statutorily directed, and we can exercise no
discretion in following the formulae. Moreover, the statute establishes
the time period for which the deductible and coinsurance amounts will
apply and delaying publication would be contrary to the public
interest. Therefore, we find good cause to waive publication of a
proposed notice and solicitation of public comments.
VI. Collection of Information Requirements
This document does not impose information collection and
recordkeeping requirements. Consequently, it need not be reviewed by
the Office of Management and Budget under the authority of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 35).
VII. Regulatory Impact Statement
We have examined the impacts of this final rule as required by
Executive Order 12866 on Regulatory Planning and Review (September 30,
1993), the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (September 19, 1980, Pub.
L. 96-354), section 1102(b) of the Social Security Act, section 202 of
the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4), Executive
Order 13132 on Federalism (August 4, 1999), and the
[[Page 54581]]
Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 804(2)).
Executive Order 12866 directs agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and equity). A regulatory impact
analysis (RIA) must be prepared for major rules with economically
significant effects ($100 million or more in any 1 year). As stated in
section IV of this notice, we estimate that the total increase in costs
to beneficiaries associated with this notice is about $730 million due
to--(1) The increase in the deductible and coinsurance amounts; and (2)
the change in the number of deductibles and daily coinsurance amounts
paid. Therefore, this notice is a major rule as defined in Title 5,
United States Code, section 804(2), and is an economically significant
rule under Executive Order 12866.
The RFA requires agencies to analyze options for regulatory relief
of small businesses, if a rule has a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities. For purposes of the RFA, small
entities include small businesses, nonprofit organizations, and
government agencies. Most hospitals and most other providers and
suppliers are small entities, either by nonprofit status or by having
revenues of $7.0 million to $34.5 million in any 1 year. Individuals
and States are not included in the definition of a small entity. We
have determined that this notice will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. Therefore, we are not
preparing an analysis under the RFA.
In addition, section 1102(b) of the Act requires us to prepare a
regulatory impact analysis if a rule may have a significant impact on
the operations of a substantial number of small rural hospitals. This
analysis must conform to the provisions of section 604 of the RFA. For
purposes of section 1102(b) of the Act, we define a small rural
hospital as a hospital that is located outside of a Metropolitan
Statistical Area and has fewer than 100 beds. The Secretary has
determined that this notice will not have a significant impact on the
operations of a substantial number of small rural hospitals. Therefore,
we are not preparing an analysis under section 1102(b) of the Act.
Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA)
requires that agencies assess anticipated costs and benefits before
issuing any rule whose mandates require spending in any 1 year of $100
million in 1995 dollars, updated annually for inflation. In 2009, that
threshold is approximately $133 million. This notice has no
consequential effect on State, local, or Tribal governments or on the
private sector. However, States may be required to pay the deductibles
and coinsurance for dually-eligible beneficiaries.
Executive Order 13132 establishes certain requirements that an
agency must meet when it promulgates a proposed rule (and subsequent
final rule) that imposes substantial direct requirement costs on State
and local governments, preempts State law, or otherwise has Federalism
implications. This notice will not have a substantial effect on State
or local governments.
In accordance with the provisions of Executive Order 12866, this
notice was reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.773,
Medicare--Hospital Insurance)
Dated: September 1, 2009.
Charlene Frizzera,
Acting Administrator, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
Dated: September 17, 2009.
Kathleen Sebelius,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-25372 Filed 10-16-09; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4120-01-P