Sea Turtle Conservation; Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico, and South Atlantic, 53889-53892 [E9-25359]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 202 / Wednesday, October 21, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not
postpone the effectiveness of such rule
or action. This action may not be
challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements (see section
307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: August 26, 2009.
Laura Yoshii,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code
of Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
■
PART 52—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart F—California
2. Section 52.220 is amended by
adding paragraph (c)(354)(i)(E)(5) to
read as follows:
■
§ 52.220
Identification of plan.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(354) * * *
(i) * * *
(E) * * *
(5) Rule 4703, ‘‘Stationary Gas
Turbines,’’ adopted on September 20,
2007.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. E9–25173 Filed 10–20–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
49 CFR Part 213
[Docket No. FRA–2008–0036]
RIN 2130–AB90
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with RULES
Track Safety Standards; Continuous
Welded Rail (CWR)
AGENCY: Federal Railroad
Administration (FRA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Correcting amendment.
SUMMARY: FRA published a final rule in
the Federal Register on August 25,
2009, revising the Track Safety
Standards. The final rule included
compliance dates for Class I, II, and III
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:30 Oct 20, 2009
Jkt 220001
railroads only. The final rule
inadvertently omitted compliance dates
for commuter railroads, intercity
passenger railroads, and any other
additional railroads that have
continuous welded rail (CWR). This
document corrects the final rule by
including compliance dates for the
omitted railroads and amending a
reference to the effective date in the rule
text.
DATES: Effective date: This correcting
amendment is effective October 21,
2009. Compliance dates: October 9,
2009 for Class I railroads; November 23,
2009 for Class II railroads, commuter
railroads, and intercity passenger
railroads; and February 22, 2010 for
Class III railroads and any other
additional railroads with CWR.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kenneth Rusk, Staff Director, Office of
Railroad Safety, FRA, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590
(telephone: (202) 493–6236); or Sarah
Grimmer Yurasko, Trial Attorney, Office
of the Chief Counsel, FRA, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC
20950 (telephone: (202) 493–6390).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: So that the
agency would be better able to review
CWR plans as required by the final rule
published August 25, 2009 (74 FR
42988), FRA determined that there are
three different compliance dates for
railroads containing CWR, based on the
railroad size.1 In the final rule, FRA
stated that the compliance date for Class
I railroads is October 9, 2009 (45 days
after the publication date), the
compliance date for Class II railroads is
November 23, 2009 (90 days after the
publication date), and the compliance
date is February 22, 2010 (180 days after
the publication date) for Class III
railroads. FRA inadvertently left
commuter railroads, intercity passenger
railroads, and any other additional
railroads with CWR track out of the
compliance schedule; therefore, FRA is
now clarifying that the compliance date
for commuter railroads and intercity
passenger railroads is November 23,
2009, and the compliance date for any
other additional railroads with CWR is
February 22, 2010.
Due to this inadvertent error, FRA is
also changing the date listed at 49 CFR
213.119(c)(2). This paragraph states that,
in the case of a bolted joint installed
during CWR installation after August
25, 2009 (the publication date of the
final rule), within 60 days the track
owner must either: (1) Weld the joint;
(2) install a joint with six bolts; 2 or (3)
49 CFR 1201.1–1(a).
49 CFR 213.121(e), stating that, in the case
of CWR, each rail shall be bolted with at least two
53889
anchor every tie 195 feet in both
directions of the joint.
List of Subjects in 49 CFR Part 213
Penalties, Railroad safety, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
■ Accordingly, 49 CFR part 213 is
corrected by making the following
correcting amendment:
PART 213—TRACK SAFETY
STANDARDS
1. The authority citation for part 213
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 20102–20114 and
20142; 28 U.S.C. 2461, note; and 49 CFR
1.49(m).
§ 213.119
[Amended]
2. In § 213.119(c)(2), remove the date
of ‘‘August 25, 2009’’, and add in its
place ‘‘October 21, 2009’’.
■
Issued in Washington, DC, on September
30, 2009.
Joseph C. Szabo,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. E9–25278 Filed 10–20–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Parts 223 and 622
[Docket No. 0910141365–91366–01]
RIN 0648–AY21
Sea Turtle Conservation; Fisheries of
the Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico, and
South Atlantic
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: This rule implements an area
closure and associated gear restrictions
applicable to the bottom longline
component of the reef fish fishery in the
exclusive economic zone (EEZ) of the
Gulf of Mexico to reduce incidental take
and mortality of sea turtles. Specifically,
this rule prohibits the use of bottom
longline gear for the harvest of reef fish
shoreward of a line approximating the
35–fathom depth contour in the eastern
Gulf of Mexico and limits bottom
longline vessels operating in the reef
fish fishery east of longitude 85°30′W to
1,000 hooks onboard, of which only 750
1 See
2 See
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
bolts at each joint. This is a total of four bolts
required at each joint.
E:\FR\FM\21OCR1.SGM
21OCR1
53890
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 202 / Wednesday, October 21, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with RULES
may be actively fished or rigged for
fishing.
DATES: This rule is effective on October
16, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Barnette, telephone: 727–551–
5794, fax: 727–824–5309, e-mail:
michael.barnette@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: All sea
turtles that occur in U.S. waters are
listed as either endangered or
threatened under the Endangered
Species Act of 1973 (ESA). The Kemp’s
ridley (Lepidochelys kempii),
leatherback (Dermochelys coriacea), and
hawksbill (Eretmochelys imbricata)
turtles are listed as endangered. The
loggerhead (Caretta caretta) and green
(Chelonia mydas) turtles are listed as
threatened, except for breeding
populations of green turtles in Florida
and on the Pacific coast of Mexico,
which are listed as endangered.
Sea turtles are incidentally taken, and
some are killed, as a result of numerous
activities, including fishery-related
activities in the Gulf of Mexico and
along the Atlantic seaboard. Under the
ESA and its implementing regulations,
the taking of sea turtles is prohibited,
with exceptions identified in 50 CFR
223.206(d), or according to the terms
and conditions of a biological opinion
issued under section 7 of the ESA, or
according to an incidental take permit
issued under section 10 of the ESA.
Background
On February 15, 2005, NMFS
completed a biological opinion for the
Gulf reef fish fishery, as managed under
the Gulf of Mexico Reef Fish Fishery
Management Plan (Reef Fish FMP). The
opinion concluded that the continued
authorization of the Gulf reef fish
fishery was not likely to jeopardize the
continued existence of any listed
species of sea turtles. An incidental take
statement (ITS) was issued specifying
the amount and extent of anticipated
take on a three-year basis, along with
reasonable and prudent measures and
associated terms and conditions deemed
necessary and appropriate to minimize
the impact of these takes. Other listed
species were found not likely to be
adversely affected. No critical habitat
overlapped with the action area, thus
none was affected.
As provided in 50 CFR 402.16,
reinitiation of formal consultation is
required when discretionary
involvement or control over the action
has been retained (or is authorized by
law) and: (1) the amount or extent of the
incidental take is exceeded; (2) new
information reveals effects of the agency
action that may affect listed species or
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:30 Oct 20, 2009
Jkt 220001
critical habitat in a manner or to an
extent not previously considered; (3) the
agency action is subsequently modified
in a manner that causes an effect to the
listed species or critical habitat not
previously considered; or (4) if a new
species is listed or critical habitat
designated that may be affected by the
identified action.
On September 3, 2008, NMFS’
Southeast Regional Office, Sustainable
Fisheries Division, requested
reinitiation of ESA section 7
consultation on the Reef Fish FMP. The
request was based on a preliminary
analysis conducted by the Southeast
Fisheries Science Center (SEFSC) of
recent observer data. The SEFSC’s
preliminary analysis indicated that the
overall amount and extent of incidental
take for sea turtles specified in the
incidental take statement of the 2005
opinion had been exceeded by the
bottom longline component of the
fishery. The final report, ‘‘Estimated
Takes of Sea Turtles in the Bottom
Longline Portion of the Gulf of Mexico
Reef Fish Fishery July 2006 Through
2007 Based on Observer Data,’’ (NMFS
SEFSC 2008) was received on October 8,
2008. The final report confirmed that
loggerhead takes had been substantially
exceeded by the commercial bottom
longline component and that
consultation needed to be reinitiated.
On October 28, 2008, NMFS
presented a summary of the final report
to the Gulf of Mexico Fishery
Management Council (Council), and
informed the Council that the 2005
opinion ITS had been exceeded and that
a new biological opinion needed to be
conducted for the fishery. In response to
this new information, the Council
passed a motion to prepare a scoping
document for Amendment 31 to the
Reef Fish FMP to address sea turtle and
longline interactions, indicating a desire
to consider time/area closures, gear
modifications, alternative baits, observer
program modifications, and effort
limitations. The Council also requested
a temporary emergency rule to reduce
the sea turtle bycatch in the Gulf bottom
longline component of the reef fish
fishery in the short-term while they
continued to develop Amendment 31 to
address the problem in the long-term.
On January 9, 2009, after extensive
review of NMFS SEFSC 2008 and
ongoing activities in the Gulf reef fish
fishery, NMFS determined that
continuing to authorize the fishery
during the reinitiation period would not
violate section 7(a)(2) or section 7(d) of
the ESA.
Per the Council’s request, NMFS
published a temporary emergency rule
on May 1, 2009, to reduce the incidental
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
take and mortality of sea turtles in the
bottom longline component of the reef
fish fishery in the Gulf of Mexico EEZ
while the Council completed
Amendment 31 (74 FR 20229, May 1,
2009). Effective May 18, 2009 through
October 28, 2009, the rule prohibited
the use of bottom longline gear to
harvest reef fish east of 85°30′W
longitude shoreward of a line
approximating the 50–fathom depth
contour until the 2009 deepwater
grouper and tilefish quotas were met,
and in water of all depths east of
85°30′W longitude thereafter. In the
rule, NMFS specified that if it
determined that less restrictive
measures would suffice to adequately
reduce turtle takes by the longline
component of the reef fish fishery,
NMFS could rescind the closure before
the 180-day effective period of the
emergency rule was reached and
potentially implement less restrictive
measures.
On August 13, 2009, the Council
voted in favor of submitting
Amendment 31 to NMFS for Secretarial
review and approval. Amendment 31,
now under Secretarial Review, proposes
the following actions to reduce sea
turtle take by the bottom longline
component of the reef fish fishery east
of Cape San Blas, Florida: (1) A
prohibition on the use of bottom
longline gear shoreward of a line
approximating the 35–fathom contour
from June through August; (2) a
reduction in the number of longline
vessels operating in the fishery through
an endorsement provided only to vessel
permits with a demonstrated history of
landings, on average, of at least 40,000
pounds of reef fish annually with fish
traps or longline gear during 1999–2007;
and (3) restricting the total number of
hooks that may be possessed onboard
each reef fish bottom longline vessel to
1,000, only 750 of which may be rigged
for fishing.
On October 13, 2009, NMFS
completed a biological opinion on the
continued authorization of the Gulf reef
fish fishery, as managed under the Reef
Fish FMP. The biological opinion
considered all Reef Fish FMP
amendments implemented to date, as
well as the regulatory actions included
in this rule and actions proposed in
Amendment 31. The opinion concluded
that the continued authorization of the
Gulf reef fish fishery was likely to
adversely affect sea turtles and sawfish,
but was not likely to jeopardize the
continued existence of any listed
species. An ITS was issued specifying
the amount and extent of anticipated
take on a three-year basis, along with
reasonable and prudent measures and
E:\FR\FM\21OCR1.SGM
21OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 202 / Wednesday, October 21, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with RULES
associated terms and conditions deemed
necessary and appropriate to minimize
the impact of these takes.
The emergency rule currently in place
is set to expire on October 29, 2009. A
final rule implementing Amendment 31,
if approved, is not expected to be
effective until May 2010. Therefore, at a
minimum, an interim action is needed
to reduce the incidental take and
mortality of sea turtles in the bottom
longline component of the reef fish
fishery in the Gulf of Mexico EEZ after
the emergency rule expires but before
Amendment 31 is implemented; this
rule supersedes the current emergency
rule, which expires on October 29, 2009.
The measures implemented through
the current emergency rule have
effectively ended reef fish longline
fishing in the eastern Gulf of Mexico
until the deep-water grouper and tilefish
fishing year starts January 1, 2010. This
has caused economic hardship for the
commercial fishing industry. Should the
current emergency rule be renewed
until regulations developed in
Amendment 31 are implemented, this
economic hardship will continue as
most effort conducted by the longline
component is targeted at shallow-water
grouper species. Analyses of alternatives
for Amendment 31, including those in
the biological opinion, indicate there are
alternatives that would allow longline
operations, albeit with some limitations,
while still providing adequate
protection for sea turtles. Therefore, the
purpose of this rulemaking is to balance
the continued operation of the bottom
longline component of the reef fish
fishery while maintaining adequate
protective measures for sea turtles until
the Council’s preferred management
strategy in Amendment 31 can be
implemented.
Additional time is required to
implement Amendment 31, in particular
the proposed longline endorsement
provision, and the time constraint
precludes the inclusion of this provision
in this rulemaking. The longline
endorsement would require evaluation
of landings records and subsequent
issuing of endorsements to qualifying
reef fish permit owners. This process
would take several months. Therefore,
the longline endorsement provision will
not be implemented by this action.
Classification
The Assistant Administrator for
Fisheries, NOAA (AA), has determined
that this rule is necessary to balance the
need to reduce the incidental take and
associated mortality of sea turtles with
the need to reduce the ongoing social
and economic hardships in the bottom
longline component of the reef fish
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:30 Oct 20, 2009
Jkt 220001
fishery in the Gulf of Mexico EEZ. The
AA has determined this rule is
consistent with the ESA and other
applicable law.
This rule has been determined to be
not significant for purposes of Executive
Order 12866.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the AA
finds good cause to waive prior notice
and opportunity for public comment.
Prior notice and opportunity to
comment would be contrary to the
public interest, because delaying action
to address threatened and endangered
species interactions in the fishery would
likely result in additional take and
mortality of sea turtle species. Such take
would be in excess of the take analyzed
in the effects analysis for the relevant
time period, and potentially even result
in exceeding the incidental take
statement issued with the most recent
biological opinion. As a result, this
would introduce risk of jeopardizing the
survival and recovery of sea turtle
populations, which is inconsistent with
the requirements of the ESA. While
other more restrictive actions could be
taken to reduce takes in the fishery, in
the absence of any further regulatory
action, the current restrictions in the
fishery will expire on October 29, 2009,
and the bottom longline component of
the fishery will be authorized to occur
in a manner that has been documented
to result in excessive take of sea turtles.
As stated above, such take would not be
in compliance with the ESA, and would
be contrary to the public interest in
protecting threatened and endangered
species populations. Extending the
existing closure would be more
restrictive than necessary to fulfill the
agency’s obligations under the ESA, and
would result in undue social and
economic hardship on participants
using bottom longline gear in the
fishery.
For these same reasons, the AA finds
good cause to waive the 30-day delay in
effective date pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
553(d)(3).
Because prior notice and opportunity
for public comment are not required for
this rule by 5 U.S.C. 553 or any other
law, the analytical requirements of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601
et seq. are inapplicable.
The Endangered Species Act provides
the statutory basis for the rule.
53891
50 CFR Part 622
Fisheries, Fishing, Puerto Rico,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Virgin Islands.
Dated: Ocotber 16, 2009.
James W. Balsiger,
Acting Assistant Administrator for Fisheries,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, 50 CFR parts 223 and 622 are
amended as follows:
■
PART 223—THREATENED MARINE
AND ANADROMOUS SPECIES
1. The authority citation for part 223
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1531 1543; subpart B,
§ 223.201–202 also issued under 16 U.S.C.
1361 et seq.; 16 U.S.C. 5503(d) for
§ 223.206(d)(9).
2. In § 223.206 paragraph (d)
introductory text is revised and
paragraph (d)(12) is added to read as
follows:
■
§ 223.206 Exceptions to prohibitions
relating to sea turtles.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Exception for incidental taking.
The prohibitions against taking in
§ 223.205(a) do not apply to the
incidental take of any member of a
threatened species of sea turtle (i.e., a
take not directed towards such member)
during fishing or scientific research
activities, to the extent that those
involved are in compliance with all
applicable requirements of paragraphs
(d)(1) through (d)(12) of this section, or
in compliance with the terms and
conditions of an incidental take permit
issued pursuant to paragraph (a)(2) of
this section.
*
*
*
*
*
(12) Prohibitions applicable to bottom
longline fishing for Gulf reef fish. (i)
Bottom longlining for Gulf reef fish as
defined in § 622.2 of this title is
prohibited in the portion of the Gulf
EEZ east of 85°30′ W. long. that is
shoreward of rhumb lines connecting, in
order, the following points:
North lat.
West long.
A
28°58.70′
85°30.00′
B
28°59.25′
85°26.70′
C
28°57.00′
85°13.80′
D
28°47.40′
85°03.90′
List of Subjects
E
28°19.50′
84°43.00′
50 CFR Part 223
F
28°00.80′
84°20.00′
Endangered and threatened species;
Exports; Imports; Transportation.
G
26°48.80′
83°40.00′
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Point
E:\FR\FM\21OCR1.SGM
21OCR1
53892
Point
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 202 / Wednesday, October 21, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
North lat.
West long.
H
25°17.00′
83°19.00′
I
24°54.00′
83°21.00′
J
24°29.50′
83°12.30′
K
24°26.50′
83°00.00′
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with RULES
(ii) Within the prohibited area
specified in paragraph (d)(12)(i) of this
section, a vessel with bottom longline
gear on board may not possess Gulf reef
fish unless the bottom longline gear is
appropriately stowed, and a vessel that
is using bottom longline gear to fish for
species other than Gulf reef fish may not
possess Gulf reef fish. For the purposes
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:30 Oct 20, 2009
Jkt 220001
of paragraph (d)(12) of this section,
appropriately stowed means that a
longline may be left on the drum if all
gangions and hooks are disconnected
and stowed below deck; hooks cannot
be baited; and all buoys must be
disconnected from the gear but may
remain on deck.
(iii) Within the Gulf EEZ east of 85°30′
W. long., a vessel for which a valid Gulf
reef fish permit has been issued under
§ 622.4 of this title and that is fishing
bottom longline gear or has bottom
longline gear on board cannot possess
more than a total of 1,000 hooks
including hooks on board the vessel and
hooks being fished, and cannot possess
more than 750 hooks rigged for fishing
at any given time. For the purpose of
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
this paragraph, ‘‘hooks rigged for
fishing’’ means hooks attached to a line
or other device capable of attaching to
the mainline of the longline.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 622—FISHERIES OF THE
CARIBBEAN, GULF, AND SOUTH
ATLANTIC
3. The authority citation for part 622
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
§ 622.34 [Amended]
■ 4. In § 622.34, paragraph (q) is
removed and reserved.
[FR Doc. E9–25359 Filed 10–16–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
E:\FR\FM\21OCR1.SGM
21OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 202 (Wednesday, October 21, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 53889-53892]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-25359]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Parts 223 and 622
[Docket No. 0910141365-91366-01]
RIN 0648-AY21
Sea Turtle Conservation; Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of
Mexico, and South Atlantic
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule implements an area closure and associated gear
restrictions applicable to the bottom longline component of the reef
fish fishery in the exclusive economic zone (EEZ) of the Gulf of Mexico
to reduce incidental take and mortality of sea turtles. Specifically,
this rule prohibits the use of bottom longline gear for the harvest of
reef fish shoreward of a line approximating the 35-fathom depth contour
in the eastern Gulf of Mexico and limits bottom longline vessels
operating in the reef fish fishery east of longitude 85[deg]30'W to
1,000 hooks onboard, of which only 750
[[Page 53890]]
may be actively fished or rigged for fishing.
DATES: This rule is effective on October 16, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Barnette, telephone: 727-551-
5794, fax: 727-824-5309, e-mail: michael.barnette@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: All sea turtles that occur in U.S. waters
are listed as either endangered or threatened under the Endangered
Species Act of 1973 (ESA). The Kemp's ridley (Lepidochelys kempii),
leatherback (Dermochelys coriacea), and hawksbill (Eretmochelys
imbricata) turtles are listed as endangered. The loggerhead (Caretta
caretta) and green (Chelonia mydas) turtles are listed as threatened,
except for breeding populations of green turtles in Florida and on the
Pacific coast of Mexico, which are listed as endangered.
Sea turtles are incidentally taken, and some are killed, as a
result of numerous activities, including fishery-related activities in
the Gulf of Mexico and along the Atlantic seaboard. Under the ESA and
its implementing regulations, the taking of sea turtles is prohibited,
with exceptions identified in 50 CFR 223.206(d), or according to the
terms and conditions of a biological opinion issued under section 7 of
the ESA, or according to an incidental take permit issued under section
10 of the ESA.
Background
On February 15, 2005, NMFS completed a biological opinion for the
Gulf reef fish fishery, as managed under the Gulf of Mexico Reef Fish
Fishery Management Plan (Reef Fish FMP). The opinion concluded that the
continued authorization of the Gulf reef fish fishery was not likely to
jeopardize the continued existence of any listed species of sea
turtles. An incidental take statement (ITS) was issued specifying the
amount and extent of anticipated take on a three-year basis, along with
reasonable and prudent measures and associated terms and conditions
deemed necessary and appropriate to minimize the impact of these takes.
Other listed species were found not likely to be adversely affected. No
critical habitat overlapped with the action area, thus none was
affected.
As provided in 50 CFR 402.16, reinitiation of formal consultation
is required when discretionary involvement or control over the action
has been retained (or is authorized by law) and: (1) the amount or
extent of the incidental take is exceeded; (2) new information reveals
effects of the agency action that may affect listed species or critical
habitat in a manner or to an extent not previously considered; (3) the
agency action is subsequently modified in a manner that causes an
effect to the listed species or critical habitat not previously
considered; or (4) if a new species is listed or critical habitat
designated that may be affected by the identified action.
On September 3, 2008, NMFS' Southeast Regional Office, Sustainable
Fisheries Division, requested reinitiation of ESA section 7
consultation on the Reef Fish FMP. The request was based on a
preliminary analysis conducted by the Southeast Fisheries Science
Center (SEFSC) of recent observer data. The SEFSC's preliminary
analysis indicated that the overall amount and extent of incidental
take for sea turtles specified in the incidental take statement of the
2005 opinion had been exceeded by the bottom longline component of the
fishery. The final report, ``Estimated Takes of Sea Turtles in the
Bottom Longline Portion of the Gulf of Mexico Reef Fish Fishery July
2006 Through 2007 Based on Observer Data,'' (NMFS SEFSC 2008) was
received on October 8, 2008. The final report confirmed that loggerhead
takes had been substantially exceeded by the commercial bottom longline
component and that consultation needed to be reinitiated.
On October 28, 2008, NMFS presented a summary of the final report
to the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council (Council), and
informed the Council that the 2005 opinion ITS had been exceeded and
that a new biological opinion needed to be conducted for the fishery.
In response to this new information, the Council passed a motion to
prepare a scoping document for Amendment 31 to the Reef Fish FMP to
address sea turtle and longline interactions, indicating a desire to
consider time/area closures, gear modifications, alternative baits,
observer program modifications, and effort limitations. The Council
also requested a temporary emergency rule to reduce the sea turtle
bycatch in the Gulf bottom longline component of the reef fish fishery
in the short-term while they continued to develop Amendment 31 to
address the problem in the long-term. On January 9, 2009, after
extensive review of NMFS SEFSC 2008 and ongoing activities in the Gulf
reef fish fishery, NMFS determined that continuing to authorize the
fishery during the reinitiation period would not violate section
7(a)(2) or section 7(d) of the ESA.
Per the Council's request, NMFS published a temporary emergency
rule on May 1, 2009, to reduce the incidental take and mortality of sea
turtles in the bottom longline component of the reef fish fishery in
the Gulf of Mexico EEZ while the Council completed Amendment 31 (74 FR
20229, May 1, 2009). Effective May 18, 2009 through October 28, 2009,
the rule prohibited the use of bottom longline gear to harvest reef
fish east of 85[deg]30'W longitude shoreward of a line approximating
the 50-fathom depth contour until the 2009 deepwater grouper and
tilefish quotas were met, and in water of all depths east of
85[deg]30'W longitude thereafter. In the rule, NMFS specified that if
it determined that less restrictive measures would suffice to
adequately reduce turtle takes by the longline component of the reef
fish fishery, NMFS could rescind the closure before the 180-day
effective period of the emergency rule was reached and potentially
implement less restrictive measures.
On August 13, 2009, the Council voted in favor of submitting
Amendment 31 to NMFS for Secretarial review and approval. Amendment 31,
now under Secretarial Review, proposes the following actions to reduce
sea turtle take by the bottom longline component of the reef fish
fishery east of Cape San Blas, Florida: (1) A prohibition on the use of
bottom longline gear shoreward of a line approximating the 35-fathom
contour from June through August; (2) a reduction in the number of
longline vessels operating in the fishery through an endorsement
provided only to vessel permits with a demonstrated history of
landings, on average, of at least 40,000 pounds of reef fish annually
with fish traps or longline gear during 1999-2007; and (3) restricting
the total number of hooks that may be possessed onboard each reef fish
bottom longline vessel to 1,000, only 750 of which may be rigged for
fishing.
On October 13, 2009, NMFS completed a biological opinion on the
continued authorization of the Gulf reef fish fishery, as managed under
the Reef Fish FMP. The biological opinion considered all Reef Fish FMP
amendments implemented to date, as well as the regulatory actions
included in this rule and actions proposed in Amendment 31. The opinion
concluded that the continued authorization of the Gulf reef fish
fishery was likely to adversely affect sea turtles and sawfish, but was
not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any listed species.
An ITS was issued specifying the amount and extent of anticipated take
on a three-year basis, along with reasonable and prudent measures and
[[Page 53891]]
associated terms and conditions deemed necessary and appropriate to
minimize the impact of these takes.
The emergency rule currently in place is set to expire on October
29, 2009. A final rule implementing Amendment 31, if approved, is not
expected to be effective until May 2010. Therefore, at a minimum, an
interim action is needed to reduce the incidental take and mortality of
sea turtles in the bottom longline component of the reef fish fishery
in the Gulf of Mexico EEZ after the emergency rule expires but before
Amendment 31 is implemented; this rule supersedes the current emergency
rule, which expires on October 29, 2009.
The measures implemented through the current emergency rule have
effectively ended reef fish longline fishing in the eastern Gulf of
Mexico until the deep-water grouper and tilefish fishing year starts
January 1, 2010. This has caused economic hardship for the commercial
fishing industry. Should the current emergency rule be renewed until
regulations developed in Amendment 31 are implemented, this economic
hardship will continue as most effort conducted by the longline
component is targeted at shallow-water grouper species. Analyses of
alternatives for Amendment 31, including those in the biological
opinion, indicate there are alternatives that would allow longline
operations, albeit with some limitations, while still providing
adequate protection for sea turtles. Therefore, the purpose of this
rulemaking is to balance the continued operation of the bottom longline
component of the reef fish fishery while maintaining adequate
protective measures for sea turtles until the Council's preferred
management strategy in Amendment 31 can be implemented.
Additional time is required to implement Amendment 31, in
particular the proposed longline endorsement provision, and the time
constraint precludes the inclusion of this provision in this
rulemaking. The longline endorsement would require evaluation of
landings records and subsequent issuing of endorsements to qualifying
reef fish permit owners. This process would take several months.
Therefore, the longline endorsement provision will not be implemented
by this action.
Classification
The Assistant Administrator for Fisheries, NOAA (AA), has
determined that this rule is necessary to balance the need to reduce
the incidental take and associated mortality of sea turtles with the
need to reduce the ongoing social and economic hardships in the bottom
longline component of the reef fish fishery in the Gulf of Mexico EEZ.
The AA has determined this rule is consistent with the ESA and other
applicable law.
This rule has been determined to be not significant for purposes
of Executive Order 12866.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the AA finds good cause to waive
prior notice and opportunity for public comment. Prior notice and
opportunity to comment would be contrary to the public interest,
because delaying action to address threatened and endangered species
interactions in the fishery would likely result in additional take and
mortality of sea turtle species. Such take would be in excess of the
take analyzed in the effects analysis for the relevant time period, and
potentially even result in exceeding the incidental take statement
issued with the most recent biological opinion. As a result, this would
introduce risk of jeopardizing the survival and recovery of sea turtle
populations, which is inconsistent with the requirements of the ESA.
While other more restrictive actions could be taken to reduce takes in
the fishery, in the absence of any further regulatory action, the
current restrictions in the fishery will expire on October 29, 2009,
and the bottom longline component of the fishery will be authorized to
occur in a manner that has been documented to result in excessive take
of sea turtles. As stated above, such take would not be in compliance
with the ESA, and would be contrary to the public interest in
protecting threatened and endangered species populations. Extending the
existing closure would be more restrictive than necessary to fulfill
the agency's obligations under the ESA, and would result in undue
social and economic hardship on participants using bottom longline gear
in the fishery.
For these same reasons, the AA finds good cause to waive the 30-day
delay in effective date pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3).
Because prior notice and opportunity for public comment are not
required for this rule by 5 U.S.C. 553 or any other law, the analytical
requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.
are inapplicable.
The Endangered Species Act provides the statutory basis for the
rule.
List of Subjects
50 CFR Part 223
Endangered and threatened species; Exports; Imports;
Transportation.
50 CFR Part 622
Fisheries, Fishing, Puerto Rico, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Virgin Islands.
Dated: Ocotber 16, 2009.
James W. Balsiger,
Acting Assistant Administrator for Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries
Service.
0
For the reasons set out in the preamble, 50 CFR parts 223 and 622 are
amended as follows:
PART 223--THREATENED MARINE AND ANADROMOUS SPECIES
0
1. The authority citation for part 223 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1531 1543; subpart B, Sec. 223.201-202
also issued under 16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.; 16 U.S.C. 5503(d) for
Sec. 223.206(d)(9).
0
2. In Sec. 223.206 paragraph (d) introductory text is revised and
paragraph (d)(12) is added to read as follows:
Sec. 223.206 Exceptions to prohibitions relating to sea turtles.
* * * * *
(d) Exception for incidental taking. The prohibitions against
taking in Sec. 223.205(a) do not apply to the incidental take of any
member of a threatened species of sea turtle (i.e., a take not directed
towards such member) during fishing or scientific research activities,
to the extent that those involved are in compliance with all applicable
requirements of paragraphs (d)(1) through (d)(12) of this section, or
in compliance with the terms and conditions of an incidental take
permit issued pursuant to paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
* * * * *
(12) Prohibitions applicable to bottom longline fishing for Gulf
reef fish. (i) Bottom longlining for Gulf reef fish as defined in Sec.
622.2 of this title is prohibited in the portion of the Gulf EEZ east
of 85[deg]30' W. long. that is shoreward of rhumb lines connecting, in
order, the following points:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point North lat. West long.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
A 28[deg]58.70' 85[deg]30.00
'
------------------------------------------------------------------------
B 28[deg]59.25' 85[deg]26.70
'
------------------------------------------------------------------------
C 28[deg]57.00' 85[deg]13.80
'
------------------------------------------------------------------------
D 28[deg]47.40' 85[deg]03.90
'
------------------------------------------------------------------------
E 28[deg]19.50' 84[deg]43.00
'
------------------------------------------------------------------------
F 28[deg]00.80' 84[deg]20.00
'
------------------------------------------------------------------------
G 26[deg]48.80' 83[deg]40.00
'
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 53892]]
H 25[deg]17.00' 83[deg]19.00
'
------------------------------------------------------------------------
I 24[deg]54.00' 83[deg]21.00
'
------------------------------------------------------------------------
J 24[deg]29.50' 83[deg]12.30
'
------------------------------------------------------------------------
K 24[deg]26.50' 83[deg]00.00
'
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(ii) Within the prohibited area specified in paragraph (d)(12)(i)
of this section, a vessel with bottom longline gear on board may not
possess Gulf reef fish unless the bottom longline gear is appropriately
stowed, and a vessel that is using bottom longline gear to fish for
species other than Gulf reef fish may not possess Gulf reef fish. For
the purposes of paragraph (d)(12) of this section, appropriately stowed
means that a longline may be left on the drum if all gangions and hooks
are disconnected and stowed below deck; hooks cannot be baited; and all
buoys must be disconnected from the gear but may remain on deck.
(iii) Within the Gulf EEZ east of 85[deg]30' W. long., a vessel for
which a valid Gulf reef fish permit has been issued under Sec. 622.4
of this title and that is fishing bottom longline gear or has bottom
longline gear on board cannot possess more than a total of 1,000 hooks
including hooks on board the vessel and hooks being fished, and cannot
possess more than 750 hooks rigged for fishing at any given time. For
the purpose of this paragraph, ``hooks rigged for fishing'' means hooks
attached to a line or other device capable of attaching to the mainline
of the longline.
* * * * *
PART 622--FISHERIES OF THE CARIBBEAN, GULF, AND SOUTH ATLANTIC
0
3. The authority citation for part 622 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Sec. 622.34 [Amended]
0
4. In Sec. 622.34, paragraph (q) is removed and reserved.
[FR Doc. E9-25359 Filed 10-16-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S