Small Business Size Standards: Size Standards Methodology, 53940-53941 [E9-25196]
Download as PDF
53940
*
*
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 202 / Wednesday, October 21, 2009 / Proposed Rules
*
*
*
Dated: October 9, 2009.
Karen G. Mills,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. E9–25193 Filed 10–20–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025–01–P
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
13 CFR Part 121
Small Business Size Standards: Size
Standards Methodology
pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with PROPOSALS
AGENCY: U.S. Small Business
Administration.
ACTION: Notice of Availability of White
Paper on Size Standards Methodology.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Small Business
Administration (SBA) is advising the
public that it is making available a
White Paper putting forth and
explaining how it establishes, reviews
and modifies (when appropriate) small
business size standards. The document,
entitled ‘‘Size Standards Methodology,’’
is available on SBA’s Web site where
any interested party can review and/or
download it. Elsewhere in this issue of
the Federal Register SBA has published
three proposed rules that would, if
adopted, modify a number of size
standards in three North American
Industry Classification System (NAICS)
Sectors, namely: Sector 44–45, Retail
Trade; Sector 72, Accommodation and
Food Services; and Sector 81, Other
Services. SBA has applied ‘‘Size
Standards Methodology’’ to those three
proposed rules and will apply it to
future regulatory actions that relate to
establishing, reviewing and modifying
size standards. The Agency welcomes
comments on ‘‘Size Standards
Methodology’’ and on the three
proposed rules elsewhere in this issue
of the Federal Register. ‘‘Size Standards
Methodology,’’ is available
electronically from the SBA’s Web site
at: https://www.sba.gov/size.
ADDRESSES: The size standards
methodology white paper is available
electronically on SBA’s Web site at
https://www.sba.gov/size. You may
submit comments on ‘‘Size Standards
Methodology,’’ identified by Docket
number SBA–2009–0008 by one of the
following methods: (1) Federal
eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments;
or (2) Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier: U.S.
Small Business Administration, Khem
R. Sharma, Chief, Size Standards
Division, 409 Third Street, SW., Mail
Code 6530, Washington, DC 20416.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:49 Oct 20, 2009
Jkt 220001
SBA will post all comments on
www.regulations.gov. If you wish to
submit confidential business
information (CBI) as defined in the User
Notice at www.regulations.gov, please
submit the information to Khem R.
Sharma, Chief, Office of Size Standards,
409 Third Street, SW., Mail Code 6530,
Washington, DC 20416, or send an email to sizestandards@sba.gov.
Highlight the information that you
consider to be CBI and explain why you
believe SBA should hold this
information as confidential. SBA will
review the information and make the
final determination of whether it will
publish the information or not.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carl
J. Jordan, Program Analyst, Size
Standards Division, (202) 205–6618 or
sizestandards@sba.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: To
determine eligibility for Federal small
business assistance programs, SBA
establishes small business definitions
(referred to as size standards) for private
sector industries in the United States.
SBA’s existing size standards use two
primary measures of business size—
receipts and number of employees.
Financial assets, electric output, and
refining capacity are used as size
measures for a few specialized
industries. In addition, SBA’s Small
Business Investment Company (SBIC)
and the Certified Development
Company (CDC) Programs determine
small business eligibility using either
the industry based size standards or net
worth and net income size standards.
Currently, SBA’s size standards consist
of 45 different size levels, covering
1,141 NAICS industries and 17 subindustry activities. Of these size levels,
32 are based on average annual receipts,
eight are based on number of
employees, and five are based on other
measures. In addition, SBA has
established 11 other size standards for
its financial and procurement programs.
Over the years, SBA has received
comments that its size standards have
not kept up with changes in the
economy and, in particular, that they do
not reflect the changes in the Federal
contracting marketplace. Therefore, SBA
has undertaken a complete review of all
small business size standards. The last
overall review of size standards
occurred during the late 1970s to early
1980s. Since then, most reviews of size
standards have been limited to in-depth
analyses of specific industries in
response to requests from the public and
Federal agencies. SBA also makes
periodic inflation adjustments to its
monetary based size standards. The
latest inflation adjustment to size
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
standards was published in the Federal
Register on July 18, 2008 (73 FR 41237).
SBA has, in the past, included its
methodology for reviewing size
standards in its proposed and final rules
that related to the industry or industries
under examination. In the course of its
comprehensive review of all small
business size standards SBA has now
developed and formalized its small
business size standards processes. ‘‘Size
Standards Methodology’’ describes how
SBA establishes, evaluates and adjusts
its small business size standards
pursuant to the Small Business Act
(Act) and related legislative guidelines.
Under the Act (Pub. L. 85–236, as
amended), the SBA Administrator
(Administrator) has authority to
establish small business size standards
for Federal government programs.
Congress left to administrative
discretion precisely how the
Administrator should establish small
business size standards or what they
should be. ‘‘Size Standards
Methodology’’ provides a brief review of
the legal authority, early legislative
history and regulatory history of small
business size standards, a detailed
description of the size standards
methodology, and concludes with a
discussion of numerous policy issues
regarding the objectives and direction of
size standards. An appendix at the end
of the document summarizes the
detailed analytical steps involved in the
evaluation of size standard for an
industry.
In establishing size standards, the Act
and its legislative history highlight two
considerations. First, size standards
should vary to account for differences
among industries. Second, the policies
of the Agency should assist small
businesses as a means of encouraging
and strengthening their competitiveness
in the economy. These two
considerations form the basis for the
SBA current methodology for
establishing small business size
standards.
SBA examines the structural
characteristics of an industry as a way
to assess industry differences and the
overall degree of competitiveness of an
industry and of firms within the
industry. ‘‘Size Standards
Methodology’’ describes more fully how
SBA examines industry structure and
analyzes five primary factors—average
firm size, degree of competition within
an industry, start up costs and entry
barriers, distribution of firms by size,
and small business share in Federal
contracts. SBA also considers other
secondary factors as they relate to the
industries and the interests of small
businesses, including technological
E:\FR\FM\21OCP1.SGM
21OCP1
pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 202 / Wednesday, October 21, 2009 / Proposed Rules
change, competition among industries,
industry growth trends, and impacts on
SBA programs.
SBA conducts a statistical analysis of
data on the primary factors, and
secondary factors as appropriate, to
establish a size standard for a specific
industry. As a starting point, SBA
presumes $7.0 million as an appropriate
size standard for the services, retail
trade, construction, and other industries
with receipts based size standards; 500
employees for the manufacturing,
mining and other industries with
employee based size standards; and 100
employees for the wholesale trade
industries. These three levels, referred
to as ‘‘anchor size standards,’’ are not
minimum size standards, but rather
benchmarks or starting points. To the
extent an industry displays ‘‘differing
industry characteristics,’’ a size
standard higher, or in some cases lower,
than an anchor size standard is
supportable. ‘‘Size Standards
Methodology’’ includes an extensive
discussion of the statistical analyses
involved in size standards
determination.
SBA welcomes comments from the
public on a number of issues. SBA is
aware that different choices among size
standards can involve complex tradeoffs
among relevant variables; SBA invites
comments on how to identify and weigh
those variables. Suggestions are invited
on alternative methodologies for
determining small businesses; on how
these size standards affect competition
in general and within the specific
industry; on alternative or additional
factors that SBA should consider; on
whether SBA’s approach to small
business size standards makes sense in
the current economic environment; on
whether SBA’s using anchor size
standards is appropriate in the current
economy; on whether there are gaps in
SBA’s methodology because of the lack
of comprehensive data; and on
alternative datasets SBA should
consider for a specific sector.
The concluding section of ‘‘Size
Standards Methodology’’ raises a
number of policy questions that SBA
has to address in developing a robust
methodology for establishing, evaluating
and revising its small business size
standards. Examples include how high
of a size standard is too high? Should
there be a single basis for all size
standards (i.e., employees or annual
receipts)? Should there be a fixed
number of ‘‘bands’’ of size standards or
separate standard for each industry?
‘‘Size Standards Methodology’’ includes
several other issues, including some that
tend to be on-going questions.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:49 Oct 20, 2009
Jkt 220001
SBA encourages the public to review
‘‘Size Standards Methodology’’ and to
comment on it either in whole or in
part.
Dated: October 9, 2009.
Karen G. Mills,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. E9–25196 Filed 10–20–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025–01–P
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
13 CFR Part 121
RIN 3245–AF70
Small Business Size Standards: Other
Services Industries
AGENCY: U.S. Small Business
Administration.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
submit confidential business
information (CBI) as defined in the User
Notice at www.regulations.gov, please
submit the information to U.S. Small
Business Administration, Khem R.
Sharma, Chief, Size Standards Division,
409 Third Street, SW., Mail Code 6530,
Washington, DC 20416, or send an email to sizestandards@sba.gov.
Highlight the information that you
consider to be CBI and explain why you
believe SBA should hold this
information as confidential. SBA will
review the information and make the
final determination of whether it will
publish the information or not.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carl
J. Jordan, Program Analyst, Size
Standards Division, (202) 205–6618 or
sizestandards@sba.gov.
To
determine eligibility for Federal small
business assistance programs, SBA
establishes small business definitions
(referred to as size standards) for private
sector industries in the U.S. SBA’s
existing size standards use two primary
measures of business size—receipts and
number of employees. Financial assets,
electric output, and refining capacity are
used as size measures for a few
specialized industries. In addition,
SBA’s Small Business Investment
Company (SBIC) and the Certified
Development Company (CDC) Programs
determine small business eligibility
using either the industry based size
standards or net worth and net income
size standards. Currently, SBA’s size
standards consist of 45 different size
levels, covering 1,141 NAICS industries
and 17 sub-industry activities. Of these
size levels, 32 are based on average
annual receipts, eight are based on
number of employees, and five are
based on other measures. In addition,
SBA has established 11 other size
standards for its financial and
procurement programs.
Over the years, SBA has received
comments that its size standards have
not kept up with changes in the
economy and, in particular, that they do
not reflect the changes in the Federal
contracting marketplace. The last
overall review of size standards
occurred during the late 1970s to early
1980s. Since then, most reviews of size
standards have been limited to in-depth
analyses of specific industries in
response to requests from the public and
Federal agencies. SBA also makes
periodic inflation adjustments to its
monetary based size standards. The
latest inflation adjustment to size
standards was published in the Federal
Register on July 18, 2008 (73 FR 41237).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY: The U.S. Small Business
Administration (SBA) proposes to
increase the small business size
standards for 18 industries in North
American Industry Classification
System (NAICS) Sector 81, Other
Services, and retain the current
standards for the remaining 30
industries in the Sector. As part of its
ongoing initiative to review all size
standards, SBA has evaluated each
industry in Sector 81 to determine
whether the existing size standards
should be retained or revised. This
proposed rule is one of a series of
proposals that will examine industries
grouped by an NAICS Sector. As part of
this series of proposed rules SBA is
publishing concurrently in this issue of
the Federal Register a proposed rule to
modify small business size standards in
Sector 44–45, Retail Trade and, in
Sector 72, Accommodation and Food
Services. SBA has established its ‘‘Size
Standards Methodology’’ and published
elsewhere in this issue of the Federal
Register a notice of its availability on
SBA’s Web site at https://www.sba.gov/
size. SBA has applied ‘‘Size Standards
Methodology’’ to this proposed rule.
DATES: SBA must receive comments to
this proposed rule on or before
December 21, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by RIN 3245–AF70 by one of
the following methods: (1) Federal
eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments;
or (2) Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier:
Khem R. Sharma, Chief, Size Standards
Division, 409 Third Street, SW., Mail
Code 6530, Washington, DC 20416.
SBA will post all comments on
www.regulations.gov. If you wish to
53941
E:\FR\FM\21OCP1.SGM
21OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 202 (Wednesday, October 21, 2009)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 53940-53941]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-25196]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
13 CFR Part 121
Small Business Size Standards: Size Standards Methodology
AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
ACTION: Notice of Availability of White Paper on Size Standards
Methodology.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) is advising the
public that it is making available a White Paper putting forth and
explaining how it establishes, reviews and modifies (when appropriate)
small business size standards. The document, entitled ``Size Standards
Methodology,'' is available on SBA's Web site where any interested
party can review and/or download it. Elsewhere in this issue of the
Federal Register SBA has published three proposed rules that would, if
adopted, modify a number of size standards in three North American
Industry Classification System (NAICS) Sectors, namely: Sector 44-45,
Retail Trade; Sector 72, Accommodation and Food Services; and Sector
81, Other Services. SBA has applied ``Size Standards Methodology'' to
those three proposed rules and will apply it to future regulatory
actions that relate to establishing, reviewing and modifying size
standards. The Agency welcomes comments on ``Size Standards
Methodology'' and on the three proposed rules elsewhere in this issue
of the Federal Register. ``Size Standards Methodology,'' is available
electronically from the SBA's Web site at: https://www.sba.gov/size.
ADDRESSES: The size standards methodology white paper is available
electronically on SBA's Web site at https://www.sba.gov/size. You may
submit comments on ``Size Standards Methodology,'' identified by Docket
number SBA-2009-0008 by one of the following methods: (1) Federal
eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions
for submitting comments; or (2) Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier: U.S. Small
Business Administration, Khem R. Sharma, Chief, Size Standards
Division, 409 Third Street, SW., Mail Code 6530, Washington, DC 20416.
SBA will post all comments on www.regulations.gov. If you wish to
submit confidential business information (CBI) as defined in the User
Notice at www.regulations.gov, please submit the information to Khem R.
Sharma, Chief, Office of Size Standards, 409 Third Street, SW., Mail
Code 6530, Washington, DC 20416, or send an e-mail to
sizestandards@sba.gov. Highlight the information that you consider to
be CBI and explain why you believe SBA should hold this information as
confidential. SBA will review the information and make the final
determination of whether it will publish the information or not.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carl J. Jordan, Program Analyst, Size
Standards Division, (202) 205-6618 or sizestandards@sba.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: To determine eligibility for Federal small
business assistance programs, SBA establishes small business
definitions (referred to as size standards) for private sector
industries in the United States. SBA's existing size standards use two
primary measures of business size--receipts and number of employees.
Financial assets, electric output, and refining capacity are used as
size measures for a few specialized industries. In addition, SBA's
Small Business Investment Company (SBIC) and the Certified Development
Company (CDC) Programs determine small business eligibility using
either the industry based size standards or net worth and net income
size standards. Currently, SBA's size standards consist of 45 different
size levels, covering 1,141 NAICS industries and 17 sub-industry
activities. Of these size levels, 32 are based on average annual
receipts, eight are based on number of employees, and five are based on
other measures. In addition, SBA has established 11 other size
standards for its financial and procurement programs.
Over the years, SBA has received comments that its size standards
have not kept up with changes in the economy and, in particular, that
they do not reflect the changes in the Federal contracting marketplace.
Therefore, SBA has undertaken a complete review of all small business
size standards. The last overall review of size standards occurred
during the late 1970s to early 1980s. Since then, most reviews of size
standards have been limited to in-depth analyses of specific industries
in response to requests from the public and Federal agencies. SBA also
makes periodic inflation adjustments to its monetary based size
standards. The latest inflation adjustment to size standards was
published in the Federal Register on July 18, 2008 (73 FR 41237).
SBA has, in the past, included its methodology for reviewing size
standards in its proposed and final rules that related to the industry
or industries under examination. In the course of its comprehensive
review of all small business size standards SBA has now developed and
formalized its small business size standards processes. ``Size
Standards Methodology'' describes how SBA establishes, evaluates and
adjusts its small business size standards pursuant to the Small
Business Act (Act) and related legislative guidelines. Under the Act
(Pub. L. 85-236, as amended), the SBA Administrator (Administrator) has
authority to establish small business size standards for Federal
government programs. Congress left to administrative discretion
precisely how the Administrator should establish small business size
standards or what they should be. ``Size Standards Methodology''
provides a brief review of the legal authority, early legislative
history and regulatory history of small business size standards, a
detailed description of the size standards methodology, and concludes
with a discussion of numerous policy issues regarding the objectives
and direction of size standards. An appendix at the end of the document
summarizes the detailed analytical steps involved in the evaluation of
size standard for an industry.
In establishing size standards, the Act and its legislative history
highlight two considerations. First, size standards should vary to
account for differences among industries. Second, the policies of the
Agency should assist small businesses as a means of encouraging and
strengthening their competitiveness in the economy. These two
considerations form the basis for the SBA current methodology for
establishing small business size standards.
SBA examines the structural characteristics of an industry as a way
to assess industry differences and the overall degree of
competitiveness of an industry and of firms within the industry. ``Size
Standards Methodology'' describes more fully how SBA examines industry
structure and analyzes five primary factors--average firm size, degree
of competition within an industry, start up costs and entry barriers,
distribution of firms by size, and small business share in Federal
contracts. SBA also considers other secondary factors as they relate to
the industries and the interests of small businesses, including
technological
[[Page 53941]]
change, competition among industries, industry growth trends, and
impacts on SBA programs.
SBA conducts a statistical analysis of data on the primary factors,
and secondary factors as appropriate, to establish a size standard for
a specific industry. As a starting point, SBA presumes $7.0 million as
an appropriate size standard for the services, retail trade,
construction, and other industries with receipts based size standards;
500 employees for the manufacturing, mining and other industries with
employee based size standards; and 100 employees for the wholesale
trade industries. These three levels, referred to as ``anchor size
standards,'' are not minimum size standards, but rather benchmarks or
starting points. To the extent an industry displays ``differing
industry characteristics,'' a size standard higher, or in some cases
lower, than an anchor size standard is supportable. ``Size Standards
Methodology'' includes an extensive discussion of the statistical
analyses involved in size standards determination.
SBA welcomes comments from the public on a number of issues. SBA is
aware that different choices among size standards can involve complex
tradeoffs among relevant variables; SBA invites comments on how to
identify and weigh those variables. Suggestions are invited on
alternative methodologies for determining small businesses; on how
these size standards affect competition in general and within the
specific industry; on alternative or additional factors that SBA should
consider; on whether SBA's approach to small business size standards
makes sense in the current economic environment; on whether SBA's using
anchor size standards is appropriate in the current economy; on whether
there are gaps in SBA's methodology because of the lack of
comprehensive data; and on alternative datasets SBA should consider for
a specific sector.
The concluding section of ``Size Standards Methodology'' raises a
number of policy questions that SBA has to address in developing a
robust methodology for establishing, evaluating and revising its small
business size standards. Examples include how high of a size standard
is too high? Should there be a single basis for all size standards
(i.e., employees or annual receipts)? Should there be a fixed number of
``bands'' of size standards or separate standard for each industry?
``Size Standards Methodology'' includes several other issues, including
some that tend to be on-going questions.
SBA encourages the public to review ``Size Standards Methodology''
and to comment on it either in whole or in part.
Dated: October 9, 2009.
Karen G. Mills,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. E9-25196 Filed 10-20-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P