Energy Conservation Program: Repeal of Test Procedures for Televisions, 53640-53643 [E9-25170]
Download as PDF
53640
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 201 / Tuesday, October 20, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
maintain, and test scales according to
the requirements of the 2009 edition of
NIST Handbook 44, and use scales that
are in good condition and equipped
with a printing device to record weight
values. Since regulated entities are
required under State law to comply with
NIST Handbook 44, there are no new
costs or burden to comply.
Executive Order 12866 and Regulatory
Flexibility Act
The Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) has designated this rule as not
significant for the purposes of Executive
Order 12866.
Pursuant to the requirements set forth
in the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.), GIPSA has
considered the economic impact of this
action on small entities. The purpose of
the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the
scale of businesses subject to such
actions in order that small businesses
will not be unduly or disproportionately
burdened.
The Small Business Administration
(SBA) defines small businesses by their
North American Industry Classification
System Codes (NAICS).1 This final rule
affects swine contractors, most of which
are either slaughterers or processors of
swine with more than 500 employees
(NAICS code 311611), or are producers
with more than $750,000 in annual sales
(NAICS code 112210), and do not meet
the applicable size standards for small
entities under the Small Business Act
(13 CFR 121.201). Therefore, we have
determined that this final rule will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities as
defined in the RFA and are not
providing an initial regulatory flexibility
analysis.
cprice-sewell on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
Executive Order 12988
This final rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. These actions are not
intended to have retroactive effect. This
final rule will not pre-empt state or local
laws, regulations, or policies, unless
they present an irreconcilable conflict
with this rule. There are no
administrative procedures that must be
exhausted prior to any judicial
challenge to the provisions of this final
rule.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This final rule does not contain new
or amended information collection
requirements subject to the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.). It does not involve collection of
1 See: https://www.sba.gov/idc/groups/public/
documents/sba_homepage/serv_sstd_tablepdf.pdf.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:44 Oct 19, 2009
Jkt 220001
new or additional information by the
federal government.
E-Government Act Compliance
GIPSA is committed to complying
with the E-Government Act, to promote
the use of the internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
List of Subjects in 9 CFR Part 201
Swine, Hogs, Livestock, Measurement
standards, Incorporation by reference.
■ For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, we amend 9 CFR part 201 to
read as follows:
PART 201—REGULATIONS UNDER
THE PACKERS AND STOCKYARDS
ACT
1. The authority citation for part 201
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 181–229c.
2. In § 201.71, paragraphs (a), (b) and
(d) are revised to read as follows:
■
§ 201.71 Scales; accurate weights, repairs,
adjustments or replacements after
inspection.
(a) All scales used by stockyard
owners, swine contractors, market
agencies, dealers, packers, and live
poultry dealers to weigh livestock,
livestock carcasses, live poultry, or feed
for the purposes of purchase, sale,
acquisition, payment, or settlement
shall be installed, maintained, and
operated to ensure accurate weights.
Such scales shall meet applicable
requirements contained in the General
Code, Scales Code, and Weights Code of
the 2009 edition of the National
Institute of Standards and Technology
(NIST) Handbook 44, ‘‘Specifications,
Tolerances, and Other Technical
Requirements for Weighing and
Measuring Devices,’’ which is hereby
incorporated by reference. This
incorporation by reference was
approved by the Director of the Federal
Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. These
materials are incorporated as they exist
on the date of approval and a notice of
any change in these materials will be
published in the Federal Register. All
approved material is available for
inspection at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA). For
more information on the availability of
this material at NARA, call 202–741–
6030 or go to https://www.archives.gov/
federal_register/
code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html. Also, it is available
for inspection at USDA, GIPSA, P&SP,
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
1400 Independence Ave., SW.,
Washington, DC 20250, (202) 720–7363.
The handbook is for sale by the National
Conference of Weights & Measures
(NCWM), 1135 M Street, Suite-110,
Lincoln, Nebraska, 68508. Information
on these materials may be obtained from
NCWM by calling 402–434–4880, by
e-mailing nfo@ncwm.net, or on the
Internet at https://www.nist.gov/owm.
(b) All scales used by stockyard
owners, swine contractors, market
agencies, dealers, packers, and live
poultry dealers to weigh livestock,
livestock carcasses, live poultry, or feed
for the purpose of purchase, sale,
acquisition, payment, or settlement of
livestock or live poultry and all scales
used for the purchase, sale acquisition,
payment, or settlement of livestock on a
carcass weight basis shall be equipped
with a printing device which shall
record weight values on a scale ticket or
other document.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) No scales shall be operated or used
by any stockyard owners, swine
contractors, market agencies, dealers,
packers, or live poultry dealers to weigh
livestock, livestock carcasses, live
poultry, or feed for the purposes of
purchase, sale, acquisition, payment, or
settlement of livestock, livestock
carcasses or live poultry unless it has
been found upon test and inspection, as
specified in § 201.72, to be in a
condition to give accurate weight. If a
scale is inspected or tested and
adjustments or replacements are made
to a scale, it shall not be used until it
has been inspected and tested and
determined to meet all accuracy
requirements specified in the
regulations in this section.
Alan R. Christian,
Acting Administrator, Grain Inspection,
Packers and Stockyards Administration.
[FR Doc. E9–25040 Filed 10–19–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–KD–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
10 CFR Part 430
[Docket No. EERE–2009–BT–TP–0020]
RIN 1904–AC09
Energy Conservation Program: Repeal
of Test Procedures for Televisions
AGENCY: Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy, Department of
Energy.
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of
Energy (DOE) repeals the regulatory
E:\FR\FM\20OCR1.SGM
20OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 201 / Tuesday, October 20, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
provisions establishing the test
procedure for televisions under the
Energy Policy and Conservation Act
(EPCA). The test procedure has been
made obsolete by the transition from
analog to digital television in the United
States, effective June 13, 2009.
DATES: Effective Date: This rule is
effective October 20, 2009.
ADDRESSES: The public may review
copies of all materials related to this
rulemaking at the U.S. Department of
Energy, Resource Room of the Building
Technologies Program, 950 L’Enfant
Plaza, SW., Suite 600, Washington, DC
(202) 586–2945, between 9 a.m. and 4
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. Please call Ms. Brenda
Edwards at the above telephone number
for additional information regarding
visiting the Resource Room.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ron
Lewis, U.S. Department of Energy,
Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy, Building
Technologies Program, EE–2J, 950
L’Enfant Plaza, SW., Room 6057,
Washington, DC 20585–0121, (202) 586–
8423, e-mail: Ronald.Lewis@ee.doe.gov.
Eric Stas, Esq., GC–72, U.S.
Department of Energy, Office of General
Counsel, 1000 Independence Avenue,
SW., Washington, DC 20585, (202) 586–
5827, e-mail: Eric.Stas@hq.doe.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
cprice-sewell on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
I. Authority and Background
II. Discussion
III. Procedural Requirements
A. Executive Order 12866
B. Administrative Procedure Act
C. National Environmental Policy Act
D. Regulatory Flexibility Act
E. Paperwork Reduction Act
F. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
G. Treasury and General Government
Appropriations Act, 1999
H. Executive Order 13132
I. Executive Order 12988
J. Treasury and General Government
Appropriations Act, 2001
K. Executive Order 13211
L. Executive Order 12630
M. Section 32 of the Federal Energy
Administration Act of 1974
N. Congressional Notification
IV. Approval of the Office of the Secretary
I. Authority and Background
Title III of the Energy Policy and
Conservation Act (42 U.S.C. 6291 et
seq.; EPCA) sets forth a variety of
provisions designed to improve energy
efficiency. Part A 1 of title III (42 U.S.C.
6291–6309) establishes the ‘‘Energy
Conservation Program for Consumer
1 This part was originally titled Part B; however,
it was redesignated Part A after Part B was repealed
by Public Law 109–58.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:44 Oct 19, 2009
Jkt 220001
Products Other Than Automobiles.’’ The
consumer products subject to this
program (hereafter ‘‘covered products’’)
include televisions. Under EPCA, the
overall program consists essentially of
testing, labeling, and Federal energy
conservation standards.
Section 323 of EPCA (42 U.S.C. 6293)
sets forth generally applicable criteria
and procedures for DOE’s adoption and
amendment of test procedures. It states,
for example, that ‘‘[a]ny test procedures
prescribed or amended under this
section shall be reasonably designed to
produce test results which measure
energy efficiency, energy use, * * * or
estimated annual operating cost of a
covered product during a representative
average use cycle or period of use, as
determined by the Secretary [of Energy],
and shall not be unduly burdensome to
conduct.’’ (42 U.S.C. 6293(b)(3))
Manufacturers of covered products must
use test procedures prescribed under
EPCA as the basis for establishing and
certifying to DOE that their products
comply with energy conservation
standards adopted under EPCA. (42
U.S.C. 6295(s))
EPCA also specifies that State law
providing for the disclosure of
information with respect to any measure
of energy consumption is superseded to
the extent that such law requires testing
or the use of any measure of energy
consumption or energy descriptor in
any manner other than provided under
section 323 of EPCA. (42 U.S.C.
6297(a)(1)(A); 42 U.S.C. 6297(f)(3)(G))
Therefore, in the absence of a Federal
test procedure or accompanying
conservation standard, States may
prescribe their own test procedures and
standards pursuant to applicable State
law. Id.
II. Discussion
The existing test procedure to
measure the energy efficiency of
television sets is codified at 10 CFR
430.23(h) and 10 CFR Subpart B,
Appendix H, and the sampling plan,
that is, the specific requirements for the
number of units to be tested, is set forth
at 10 CFR 430.24(h).
The existing test procedure is
appropriate for measuring the energy
efficiency of only analog television sets.
In the Digital Television Transition and
Public Safety Act of 2005, 47 U.S.C. 309
note, as amended by the DTV Delay Act
of 2009, 47 U.S.C. 609 note, Congress
directed the Federal Communications
Commission to terminate all licenses for
full-power television stations in the
analog television service, and to require
the cessation of broadcasting by fullpower stations in the analog television
service, by June 13, 2009. Given that the
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
53641
June 2009 deadline set by Congress for
the transition to digital television has
passed, the existing test procedure and
sampling plan are obsolete.
Regulatory definitions of ‘‘television
set’’, ‘‘color television set’’, and
‘‘monochrome television set’’ are set
forth at 10 CFR 430.2. ‘‘Television set’’
is defined simply as ‘‘a color television
set or a monochrome television set’’.
‘‘Color television set’’ is defined as ‘‘an
electrical device designed to convert
incoming broadcast signals into color
television pictures and associated
sound’’, and ‘‘monochrome television
set’’ is defined as ‘‘an electrical device
designed to convert incoming broadcast
signals into monochrome television
pictures and associated sound’’. The
definitions are not affected by the
transition from analog to digital
television in the United States because
the broadcast signals they reference
encompass both analog and digital
signals.
The Department of Energy received
petitions from the California Energy
Commission (Commission or CEC) and
the Consumer Electronics Association
(CEA) related to the existing television
test procedure. The Commission
petitioned for repeal of the regulatory
provisions establishing the test
procedure and defining ‘‘television set’’.
CEA petitioned for replacement of the
existing test procedure with the test
procedure adopted by the International
Electrochemical Commission, IEC
62087–2008(E), published in September
2008.
In response to these petitions, and as
a result of the transition to digital
television discussed above, DOE is
repealing the existing television test
procedure and the regulatory provision
specifying requirements for the number
of units to be tested pursuant to the test
procedure (i.e., the sampling plan). DOE
will maintain the regulatory definitions
because they continue to be appropriate
notwithstanding the transition to digital
television, and because television sets
are listed as a covered product in EPCA.
(42 U.S.C. 6292(12))
DOE will soon begin a rulemaking
process to establish a new Federal test
procedure and a new Federal energyefficiency standard for televisions. In
establishing a new test procedure, DOE
will give serious consideration to the
suggestion made by CEA that DOE adopt
IEC 62087–2008(E).
III. Procedural Requirements
A. Executive Order 12866
Today’s regulatory action is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866,
E:\FR\FM\20OCR1.SGM
20OCR1
53642
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 201 / Tuesday, October 20, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
‘‘Regulatory Planning and Review,’’ 58
FR 51735 (October 4, 1993).
Accordingly, this action was not subject
to review under that Executive Order by
the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs (OIRA) of the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB).
B. Administrative Procedure Act
The Department of Energy finds good
cause to waive notice and comment on
these regulations pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
533(b)(B), and the 30-day delay in
effective date pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
553(d). Notice and comment are
unnecessary and contrary to the public
interest because this final rule is
repealing a test procedure that has been
made obsolete by act of Congress. A
delay in effective date is unnecessary
and contrary to the public interest for
these same reasons. Therefore, these
regulations are being published as final
regulations and are effective October 20,
2009.
certification or the conduct of a
regulatory flexibility analysis for this
rule.
E. Paperwork Reduction Act
This rulemaking imposes no new
information or recordkeeping
requirements. Accordingly, OMB
clearance is not required under the
Paperwork Reduction Act. (44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.)
F. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
cprice-sewell on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
C. National Environmental Policy Act
DOE has determined that this rule
falls into a class of actions that are
categorically excluded from review
under the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et
seq.) and DOE’s implementing
regulations at 10 CFR part 1021. This
rule amends an existing rule without
changing its environmental effect, and,
therefore, is covered by the Categorical
Exclusion A5 found in appendix A to
subpart D, 10 CFR part 1021.
Accordingly, neither an environmental
assessment nor an environmental
impact statement is required.
D. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires preparation
of an initial regulatory flexibility
analysis for any rule that must be
proposed for public comment, unless
the agency certifies that the rule will
have no significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
As required by Executive Order 13272,
‘‘Proper Consideration of Small Entities
in Agency Rulemaking,’’ 67 FR 53461
(August 16, 2002), DOE published
procedures and policies on February 19,
2003, to ensure that the potential
impacts of its rules on small entities are
properly considered during the
rulemaking process. 68 FR 7990. DOE
has made its procedures and policies
available on the Office of the General
Counsel’s Web site at https://
www.gc.doe.gov. Because a notice of
proposed rulemaking is not required
under the Administrative Procedure Act
or other applicable law, the Regulatory
Flexibility Act does not require
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Pub. L.
104–4) requires each Federal agency to
assess the effects of Federal regulatory
actions on State, local, and Tribal
governments and the private sector. For
proposed regulatory actions likely to
result in a rule that may cause
expenditures by State, local, and Tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
(adjusted annually for inflation), section
202 of UMRA requires a Federal agency
to publish estimates of the resulting
costs, benefits, and other effects on the
national economy. (2 U.S.C. 1532(a), (b))
The UMRA also requires a Federal
agency to develop an effective process
to permit timely input by elected
officers of State, local, and Tribal
governments on a proposed ‘‘significant
intergovernmental mandate.’’ UMRA
also requires an agency plan for giving
notice and opportunity for timely input
to small governments that may be
affected before establishing a
requirement that might significantly or
uniquely affect them. On March 18,
1997, DOE published a statement of
policy on its process for
intergovernmental consultation under
UMRA (62 FR 12820) (also available at
https://www.gc.doe.gov). Today’s final
rule contains neither an
intergovernmental mandate nor a
mandate that may result in the
expenditure of $100 million or more in
any year, so these requirements do not
apply.
G. Treasury and General Government
Appropriations Act, 1999
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:44 Oct 19, 2009
Jkt 220001
Section 654 of the Treasury and
General Government Appropriations
Act, 1999 (Pub. L. 105–277) requires
Federal agencies to issue a Family
Policymaking Assessment for any rule
that may affect family well-being.
Today’s rule would have no impact on
the autonomy or integrity of the family
as an institution. Accordingly, DOE has
concluded that it is unnecessary to
prepare a Family Policymaking
Assessment.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
H. Executive Order 13132
Executive Order 13132, ‘‘Federalism,’’
64 FR 43255 (August 4, 1999) imposes
certain requirements on agencies
formulating and implementing policies
or regulations that preempt State law or
that have Federalism implications. The
executive order requires agencies to
examine the constitutional and statutory
authority supporting any action that
would limit the policymaking discretion
of the States and to carefully assess the
necessity for such actions. DOE has
examined this final rule and determined
that it would not preempt State law and
would have no substantial direct effect
on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. Executive
Order 13132 requires no further action.
I. Executive Order 12988
With respect to the review of existing
regulations and the promulgation of
new regulations, section 3(a) of
Executive Order 12988, ‘‘Civil Justice
Reform,’’ 61 FR 4729 (February 7, 1996),
imposes on Federal agencies the general
duty to adhere to the following
requirements: (1) Eliminate drafting
errors and ambiguity, (2) write
regulations to minimize litigation, (3)
provide a clear legal standard for
affected conduct rather than a general
standard, and (4) promote simplification
and burden reduction. Regarding the
review required by section 3(a), section
3(b) of Executive Order 12988
specifically requires that Executive
agencies make every reasonable effort to
ensure that the regulation (1) clearly
specifies the preemptive effect, if any;
(2) clearly specifies any effect on
existing Federal law or regulation; (3)
provides a clear legal standard for
affected conduct while promoting
simplification and burden reduction; (4)
specifies the retroactive effect, if any; (5)
adequately defines key terms; and (6)
addresses other important issues
affecting clarity and general
draftsmanship under any guidelines
issued by the Attorney General. Section
3(c) of Executive Order 12988 requires
Executive agencies to review regulations
in light of applicable standards in
sections 3(a) and 3(b) to determine
whether they are met or it is
unreasonable to meet one or more of
them. DOE has completed the required
review and determined that, to the
extent permitted by law, this rule meets
the relevant standards of Executive
Order 12988.
E:\FR\FM\20OCR1.SGM
20OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 201 / Tuesday, October 20, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
J. Treasury and General Government
Appropriations Act, 2001
M. Section 32 of the Federal Energy
Administration Act of 1974
The Treasury and General
Government Appropriations Act, 2001
(44 U.S.C. 3516 note) provides for
agencies to review most disseminations
of information to the public under
guidelines established by each agency
pursuant to general guidelines issued by
OMB. OMB’s guidelines were published
at 67 FR 8452 (February 22, 2002), and
DOE’s guidelines were published at 67
FR 62446 (October 7, 2002). DOE has
reviewed today’s notice under the OMB
and DOE guidelines and has concluded
that it is consistent with applicable
policies in those guidelines.
Under section 301 of the Department
of Energy Organization Act (Pub. L. 95–
91), the Department of Energy must
comply with section 32 of the Federal
Energy Administration Act of 1974
(Pub. L. 93–275), as amended by the
Federal Energy Administration
Authorization Act of 1977 (Pub. L. 95–
70). (15 U.S.C. 788) Section 32 provides
that where a proposed rule authorizes or
requires use of commercial standards,
the notice of proposed rulemaking must
inform the public of the use and
background of such standards. In
addition, section 32(c) requires DOE to
consult with the Department of Justice
and the Federal Trade Commission
concerning the impact of the
commercial or industry standards on
competition. This final rule to repeal the
test procedure for determining the
energy efficiency of television sets does
not authorize or require the use of any
commercial standards. Therefore, no
consultation with either DOJ or FTC is
required.
K. Executive Order 13211
Executive Order 13211, ‘‘Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use,’’ 66 FR 28355 (May
22, 2001), requires Federal agencies to
prepare and submit to OMB a Statement
of Energy Effects for any proposed
significant energy action. A ‘‘significant
energy action’’ is defined as any action
by an agency that promulgated or is
expected to lead to promulgation a final
rule, and that (1) is a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order
12866, or any successor order; and (2)
is likely to have a significant adverse
effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy; or (3) is designated by the
Administrator of OIRA as a significant
energy action. For any proposed
significant energy action, the agency
must give a detailed statement of any
adverse effects on energy supply,
distribution, or use should the proposal
be implemented, and of reasonable
alternatives to the action and their
expected benefits on energy supply,
distribution, and use. Today’s regulatory
action is not a significant regulatory
action under Executive Order 12866 or
any successor order; would not have a
significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy; and has
not been designated by the
Administrator of OIRA as a significant
energy action. Accordingly, DOE has not
prepared a Statement of Energy Effects.
cprice-sewell on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
L. Executive Order 12630
Pursuant to Executive Order 12630,
‘‘Governmental Actions and Interference
with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights,’’ 53 FR 8859 (March 15, 1988),
DOE has determined that this rule
would not result in any takings that
might require compensation under the
Fifth Amendment to the U.S.
Constitution.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:44 Oct 19, 2009
Jkt 220001
N. Congressional Notification
As required by 5 U.S.C. 801, DOE will
report to Congress on the promulgation
of today’s rule before its effective date.
The report will state that it has been
determined that the rule is not a ‘‘major
rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
IV. Approval of the Office of the
Secretary
The Secretary of Energy has approved
publication of this final rule.
List of Subjects in 10 CFR Part 430
Administrative practice and
procedure, Confidential business
information, Energy conservation,
Household appliances, Imports,
Intergovernmental relations, Small
businesses.
Issued in Washington, DC, on October 2,
2009.
Henry Kelly,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Energy
Efficiency and Renewable Energy.
For the reasons stated in the preamble,
part 430 of chapter II of title 10, Code
of Federal Regulations, is amended as
set forth below:
■
PART 430—ENERGY CONSERVATION
PROGRAM FOR CONSUMER
PRODUCTS
1. The authority citation for Part 430
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6291–6309; 28 U.S.C.
2461 note.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
§ 430.23
53643
[Amended]
2. Section 430.23 is amended by
removing and reserving paragraph (h).
■
§ 430.24
[Amended]
3. Section 430.24 is amended by
removing and reserving paragraph (h).
■
Appendix H [Removed and Reserved]
4. Appendix H to subpart B of part
430 is removed and reserved.
■
[FR Doc. E9–25170 Filed 10–19–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Parts 61, 91, and 141
[Docket No. FAA–2006–26661; Amendment
Nos. 61–124A, 91–309A, and 141–12A]
RIN 2120–AI86
Pilot, Flight Instructor, and Pilot
School Certification; Correction
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule; correction.
SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) is making several
corrections to its ‘‘Pilot, Flight
Instructor, and Pilot School
Certification’’ final rule published in the
Federal Register on August 21, 2009.
The FAA corrections include
standardizing certain part 61 time
period durations from ‘‘60 days’’ to now
read ‘‘2 calendar months.’’ We are also
correcting an omission and errors to the
prerequisite eligibility requirements for
use of flight simulators. Additionally,
we are correcting the duration of a
student pilot certificate to 60 calendar
months for a student pilot seeking a
sport pilot certificate. Finally, we are
correcting a sentence in the preamble to
conform with the final rule regarding
the use of flight training devices.
DATES: These corrections are effective
on October 20, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
D. Lynch, Certification and General
Aviation Operations Branch, AFS–810,
General Aviation and Commercial
Division, Flight Standards Service,
Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20591; telephone (202)
267–3844; e-mail to
john.d.lynch@faa.gov.
For legal interpretative questions
about this final rule, contact: Michael
Chase, AGC–240, Office of Chief
Counsel, Regulations Division, Federal
E:\FR\FM\20OCR1.SGM
20OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 201 (Tuesday, October 20, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 53640-53643]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-25170]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
10 CFR Part 430
[Docket No. EERE-2009-BT-TP-0020]
RIN 1904-AC09
Energy Conservation Program: Repeal of Test Procedures for
Televisions
AGENCY: Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Department of
Energy.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) repeals the regulatory
[[Page 53641]]
provisions establishing the test procedure for televisions under the
Energy Policy and Conservation Act (EPCA). The test procedure has been
made obsolete by the transition from analog to digital television in
the United States, effective June 13, 2009.
DATES: Effective Date: This rule is effective October 20, 2009.
ADDRESSES: The public may review copies of all materials related to
this rulemaking at the U.S. Department of Energy, Resource Room of the
Building Technologies Program, 950 L'Enfant Plaza, SW., Suite 600,
Washington, DC (202) 586-2945, between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays. Please call Ms. Brenda Edwards
at the above telephone number for additional information regarding
visiting the Resource Room.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ron Lewis, U.S. Department of Energy,
Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Building Technologies
Program, EE-2J, 950 L'Enfant Plaza, SW., Room 6057, Washington, DC
20585-0121, (202) 586-8423, e-mail: Ronald.Lewis@ee.doe.gov.
Eric Stas, Esq., GC-72, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of
General Counsel, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20585,
(202) 586-5827, e-mail: Eric.Stas@hq.doe.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Authority and Background
II. Discussion
III. Procedural Requirements
A. Executive Order 12866
B. Administrative Procedure Act
C. National Environmental Policy Act
D. Regulatory Flexibility Act
E. Paperwork Reduction Act
F. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
G. Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act, 1999
H. Executive Order 13132
I. Executive Order 12988
J. Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act, 2001
K. Executive Order 13211
L. Executive Order 12630
M. Section 32 of the Federal Energy Administration Act of 1974
N. Congressional Notification
IV. Approval of the Office of the Secretary
I. Authority and Background
Title III of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (42 U.S.C. 6291
et seq.; EPCA) sets forth a variety of provisions designed to improve
energy efficiency. Part A \1\ of title III (42 U.S.C. 6291-6309)
establishes the ``Energy Conservation Program for Consumer Products
Other Than Automobiles.'' The consumer products subject to this program
(hereafter ``covered products'') include televisions. Under EPCA, the
overall program consists essentially of testing, labeling, and Federal
energy conservation standards.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ This part was originally titled Part B; however, it was
redesignated Part A after Part B was repealed by Public Law 109-58.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 323 of EPCA (42 U.S.C. 6293) sets forth generally
applicable criteria and procedures for DOE's adoption and amendment of
test procedures. It states, for example, that ``[a]ny test procedures
prescribed or amended under this section shall be reasonably designed
to produce test results which measure energy efficiency, energy use, *
* * or estimated annual operating cost of a covered product during a
representative average use cycle or period of use, as determined by the
Secretary [of Energy], and shall not be unduly burdensome to conduct.''
(42 U.S.C. 6293(b)(3)) Manufacturers of covered products must use test
procedures prescribed under EPCA as the basis for establishing and
certifying to DOE that their products comply with energy conservation
standards adopted under EPCA. (42 U.S.C. 6295(s))
EPCA also specifies that State law providing for the disclosure of
information with respect to any measure of energy consumption is
superseded to the extent that such law requires testing or the use of
any measure of energy consumption or energy descriptor in any manner
other than provided under section 323 of EPCA. (42 U.S.C.
6297(a)(1)(A); 42 U.S.C. 6297(f)(3)(G)) Therefore, in the absence of a
Federal test procedure or accompanying conservation standard, States
may prescribe their own test procedures and standards pursuant to
applicable State law. Id.
II. Discussion
The existing test procedure to measure the energy efficiency of
television sets is codified at 10 CFR 430.23(h) and 10 CFR Subpart B,
Appendix H, and the sampling plan, that is, the specific requirements
for the number of units to be tested, is set forth at 10 CFR 430.24(h).
The existing test procedure is appropriate for measuring the energy
efficiency of only analog television sets. In the Digital Television
Transition and Public Safety Act of 2005, 47 U.S.C. 309 note, as
amended by the DTV Delay Act of 2009, 47 U.S.C. 609 note, Congress
directed the Federal Communications Commission to terminate all
licenses for full-power television stations in the analog television
service, and to require the cessation of broadcasting by full-power
stations in the analog television service, by June 13, 2009. Given that
the June 2009 deadline set by Congress for the transition to digital
television has passed, the existing test procedure and sampling plan
are obsolete.
Regulatory definitions of ``television set'', ``color television
set'', and ``monochrome television set'' are set forth at 10 CFR 430.2.
``Television set'' is defined simply as ``a color television set or a
monochrome television set''. ``Color television set'' is defined as
``an electrical device designed to convert incoming broadcast signals
into color television pictures and associated sound'', and ``monochrome
television set'' is defined as ``an electrical device designed to
convert incoming broadcast signals into monochrome television pictures
and associated sound''. The definitions are not affected by the
transition from analog to digital television in the United States
because the broadcast signals they reference encompass both analog and
digital signals.
The Department of Energy received petitions from the California
Energy Commission (Commission or CEC) and the Consumer Electronics
Association (CEA) related to the existing television test procedure.
The Commission petitioned for repeal of the regulatory provisions
establishing the test procedure and defining ``television set''. CEA
petitioned for replacement of the existing test procedure with the test
procedure adopted by the International Electrochemical Commission, IEC
62087-2008(E), published in September 2008.
In response to these petitions, and as a result of the transition
to digital television discussed above, DOE is repealing the existing
television test procedure and the regulatory provision specifying
requirements for the number of units to be tested pursuant to the test
procedure (i.e., the sampling plan). DOE will maintain the regulatory
definitions because they continue to be appropriate notwithstanding the
transition to digital television, and because television sets are
listed as a covered product in EPCA. (42 U.S.C. 6292(12))
DOE will soon begin a rulemaking process to establish a new Federal
test procedure and a new Federal energy-efficiency standard for
televisions. In establishing a new test procedure, DOE will give
serious consideration to the suggestion made by CEA that DOE adopt IEC
62087-2008(E).
III. Procedural Requirements
A. Executive Order 12866
Today's regulatory action is not a ``significant regulatory
action'' under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866,
[[Page 53642]]
``Regulatory Planning and Review,'' 58 FR 51735 (October 4, 1993).
Accordingly, this action was not subject to review under that Executive
Order by the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) of the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
B. Administrative Procedure Act
The Department of Energy finds good cause to waive notice and
comment on these regulations pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 533(b)(B), and the
30-day delay in effective date pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(d). Notice and
comment are unnecessary and contrary to the public interest because
this final rule is repealing a test procedure that has been made
obsolete by act of Congress. A delay in effective date is unnecessary
and contrary to the public interest for these same reasons. Therefore,
these regulations are being published as final regulations and are
effective October 20, 2009.
C. National Environmental Policy Act
DOE has determined that this rule falls into a class of actions
that are categorically excluded from review under the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and DOE's
implementing regulations at 10 CFR part 1021. This rule amends an
existing rule without changing its environmental effect, and,
therefore, is covered by the Categorical Exclusion A5 found in appendix
A to subpart D, 10 CFR part 1021. Accordingly, neither an environmental
assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required.
D. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires
preparation of an initial regulatory flexibility analysis for any rule
that must be proposed for public comment, unless the agency certifies
that the rule will have no significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. As required by Executive Order 13272,
``Proper Consideration of Small Entities in Agency Rulemaking,'' 67 FR
53461 (August 16, 2002), DOE published procedures and policies on
February 19, 2003, to ensure that the potential impacts of its rules on
small entities are properly considered during the rulemaking process.
68 FR 7990. DOE has made its procedures and policies available on the
Office of the General Counsel's Web site at https://www.gc.doe.gov.
Because a notice of proposed rulemaking is not required under the
Administrative Procedure Act or other applicable law, the Regulatory
Flexibility Act does not require certification or the conduct of a
regulatory flexibility analysis for this rule.
E. Paperwork Reduction Act
This rulemaking imposes no new information or recordkeeping
requirements. Accordingly, OMB clearance is not required under the
Paperwork Reduction Act. (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.)
F. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Pub.
L. 104-4) requires each Federal agency to assess the effects of Federal
regulatory actions on State, local, and Tribal governments and the
private sector. For proposed regulatory actions likely to result in a
rule that may cause expenditures by State, local, and Tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100
million or more (adjusted annually for inflation), section 202 of UMRA
requires a Federal agency to publish estimates of the resulting costs,
benefits, and other effects on the national economy. (2 U.S.C. 1532(a),
(b)) The UMRA also requires a Federal agency to develop an effective
process to permit timely input by elected officers of State, local, and
Tribal governments on a proposed ``significant intergovernmental
mandate.'' UMRA also requires an agency plan for giving notice and
opportunity for timely input to small governments that may be affected
before establishing a requirement that might significantly or uniquely
affect them. On March 18, 1997, DOE published a statement of policy on
its process for intergovernmental consultation under UMRA (62 FR 12820)
(also available at https://www.gc.doe.gov). Today's final rule contains
neither an intergovernmental mandate nor a mandate that may result in
the expenditure of $100 million or more in any year, so these
requirements do not apply.
G. Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act, 1999
Section 654 of the Treasury and General Government Appropriations
Act, 1999 (Pub. L. 105-277) requires Federal agencies to issue a Family
Policymaking Assessment for any rule that may affect family well-being.
Today's rule would have no impact on the autonomy or integrity of the
family as an institution. Accordingly, DOE has concluded that it is
unnecessary to prepare a Family Policymaking Assessment.
H. Executive Order 13132
Executive Order 13132, ``Federalism,'' 64 FR 43255 (August 4, 1999)
imposes certain requirements on agencies formulating and implementing
policies or regulations that preempt State law or that have Federalism
implications. The executive order requires agencies to examine the
constitutional and statutory authority supporting any action that would
limit the policymaking discretion of the States and to carefully assess
the necessity for such actions. DOE has examined this final rule and
determined that it would not preempt State law and would have no
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government. Executive
Order 13132 requires no further action.
I. Executive Order 12988
With respect to the review of existing regulations and the
promulgation of new regulations, section 3(a) of Executive Order 12988,
``Civil Justice Reform,'' 61 FR 4729 (February 7, 1996), imposes on
Federal agencies the general duty to adhere to the following
requirements: (1) Eliminate drafting errors and ambiguity, (2) write
regulations to minimize litigation, (3) provide a clear legal standard
for affected conduct rather than a general standard, and (4) promote
simplification and burden reduction. Regarding the review required by
section 3(a), section 3(b) of Executive Order 12988 specifically
requires that Executive agencies make every reasonable effort to ensure
that the regulation (1) clearly specifies the preemptive effect, if
any; (2) clearly specifies any effect on existing Federal law or
regulation; (3) provides a clear legal standard for affected conduct
while promoting simplification and burden reduction; (4) specifies the
retroactive effect, if any; (5) adequately defines key terms; and (6)
addresses other important issues affecting clarity and general
draftsmanship under any guidelines issued by the Attorney General.
Section 3(c) of Executive Order 12988 requires Executive agencies to
review regulations in light of applicable standards in sections 3(a)
and 3(b) to determine whether they are met or it is unreasonable to
meet one or more of them. DOE has completed the required review and
determined that, to the extent permitted by law, this rule meets the
relevant standards of Executive Order 12988.
[[Page 53643]]
J. Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act, 2001
The Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act, 2001 (44
U.S.C. 3516 note) provides for agencies to review most disseminations
of information to the public under guidelines established by each
agency pursuant to general guidelines issued by OMB. OMB's guidelines
were published at 67 FR 8452 (February 22, 2002), and DOE's guidelines
were published at 67 FR 62446 (October 7, 2002). DOE has reviewed
today's notice under the OMB and DOE guidelines and has concluded that
it is consistent with applicable policies in those guidelines.
K. Executive Order 13211
Executive Order 13211, ``Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use,'' 66 FR 28355
(May 22, 2001), requires Federal agencies to prepare and submit to OMB
a Statement of Energy Effects for any proposed significant energy
action. A ``significant energy action'' is defined as any action by an
agency that promulgated or is expected to lead to promulgation a final
rule, and that (1) is a significant regulatory action under Executive
Order 12866, or any successor order; and (2) is likely to have a
significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy; or (3) is designated by the Administrator of OIRA as a
significant energy action. For any proposed significant energy action,
the agency must give a detailed statement of any adverse effects on
energy supply, distribution, or use should the proposal be implemented,
and of reasonable alternatives to the action and their expected
benefits on energy supply, distribution, and use. Today's regulatory
action is not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order
12866 or any successor order; would not have a significant adverse
effect on the supply, distribution, or use of energy; and has not been
designated by the Administrator of OIRA as a significant energy action.
Accordingly, DOE has not prepared a Statement of Energy Effects.
L. Executive Order 12630
Pursuant to Executive Order 12630, ``Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property Rights,'' 53 FR
8859 (March 15, 1988), DOE has determined that this rule would not
result in any takings that might require compensation under the Fifth
Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
M. Section 32 of the Federal Energy Administration Act of 1974
Under section 301 of the Department of Energy Organization Act
(Pub. L. 95-91), the Department of Energy must comply with section 32
of the Federal Energy Administration Act of 1974 (Pub. L. 93-275), as
amended by the Federal Energy Administration Authorization Act of 1977
(Pub. L. 95-70). (15 U.S.C. 788) Section 32 provides that where a
proposed rule authorizes or requires use of commercial standards, the
notice of proposed rulemaking must inform the public of the use and
background of such standards. In addition, section 32(c) requires DOE
to consult with the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade
Commission concerning the impact of the commercial or industry
standards on competition. This final rule to repeal the test procedure
for determining the energy efficiency of television sets does not
authorize or require the use of any commercial standards. Therefore, no
consultation with either DOJ or FTC is required.
N. Congressional Notification
As required by 5 U.S.C. 801, DOE will report to Congress on the
promulgation of today's rule before its effective date. The report will
state that it has been determined that the rule is not a ``major rule''
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
IV. Approval of the Office of the Secretary
The Secretary of Energy has approved publication of this final
rule.
List of Subjects in 10 CFR Part 430
Administrative practice and procedure, Confidential business
information, Energy conservation, Household appliances, Imports,
Intergovernmental relations, Small businesses.
Issued in Washington, DC, on October 2, 2009.
Henry Kelly,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Energy Efficiency and Renewable
Energy.
0
For the reasons stated in the preamble, part 430 of chapter II of title
10, Code of Federal Regulations, is amended as set forth below:
PART 430--ENERGY CONSERVATION PROGRAM FOR CONSUMER PRODUCTS
0
1. The authority citation for Part 430 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6291-6309; 28 U.S.C. 2461 note.
Sec. 430.23 [Amended]
0
2. Section 430.23 is amended by removing and reserving paragraph (h).
Sec. 430.24 [Amended]
0
3. Section 430.24 is amended by removing and reserving paragraph (h).
Appendix H [Removed and Reserved]
0
4. Appendix H to subpart B of part 430 is removed and reserved.
[FR Doc. E9-25170 Filed 10-19-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P