Apricots Grown in Designated Counties in Washington; Decreased Assessment Rate, 53400-53402 [E9-25121]
Download as PDF
53400
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 200 / Monday, October 19, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
State and local officials. (See 7 CFR part
3015, subpart V.)
Executive Order 12988
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. This rule: (1) Preempts all State
and local laws and regulations that are
inconsistent with this rule; (2) has no
retroactive effect; and (2) does not
require administrative proceedings
before parties may file suit in court
challenging this rule.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This interim rule contains no
information collection or recordkeeping
requirements under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.).
List of Subjects
7 CFR Part 360
Imports, Plants (Agriculture),
Quarantine, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements,
Transportation, Weeds.
7 CFR Part 361
Agricultural commodities, Imports,
Labeling, Quarantine, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Seeds,
Vegetables, Weeds.
■ Accordingly, we are amending 7 CFR
parts 360 and 361 as follows:
PART 360–NOXIOUS WEED
REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 360
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7701-7772 and 77817786; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.3.
§ 360.200
[Amended]
2. In § 360.200, the list in paragraph
(c) is amended by adding, in
alphabetical order, entries for
‘‘Lygodium flexuosum (Linnaeus)
Swartz (maidenhair creeper)’’ and
‘‘Lygodium microphyllum (Cavanilles)
R. Brown (Old World climbing fern)’’.
■ 3. A new § 360.400 is added to read
as follows:
■
cprice-sewell on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES
§ 360.400
laws.
Preemption of State and local
(a) Under section 436 of the Plant
Protection Act (7 U.S.C. 7756), a State
or political subdivision of a State may
not regulate in foreign commerce any
noxious weed in order to control it,
eradicate it, or prevent its
dissemination. A State or political
subdivision of a State also may not
impose prohibitions or restrictions upon
the movement in interstate commerce of
noxious weeds if the Secretary has
issued a regulation or order to prevent
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:53 Oct 16, 2009
Jkt 220001
the dissemination of the noxious weed
within the United States. The only
exceptions to this are:
(1) If the prohibitions or restrictions
issued by the State or political
subdivision of a State are consistent
with and do not exceed the regulations
or orders issued by the Secretary; or
(2) If the State or political subdivision
of a State demonstrates to the Secretary
and the Secretary finds that there is a
special need for additional prohibitions
or restrictions based on sound scientific
data or a thorough risk assessment.
(b) Therefore, in accordance with
section 436 of the Plant Protection Act,
the regulations in this part preempt all
State and local laws and regulations that
are inconsistent with or exceed the
regulations in this part unless a special
need request has been granted in
accordance with the regulations in §§
301.1 through 301.13 of this chapter.
PART 361–IMPORTATION OF SEED
AND SCREENINGS UNDER THE
FEDERAL SEED ACT
4. The authority citation for part 361
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1581-1610; 7 CFR 2.22,
2.80, and 371.3.
5. In § 361.2, the section heading is
revised and paragraphs (a) through (d)
are redesignated as paragraphs (b)
through (e), respectively, and a new
paragraph (a) is added to read as
follows:
■
§ 361.2 Preemption of State and local
laws; general restrictions on the
importation of seed and screenings.
(a) The regulations in this part
preempt State and local laws regarding
seed and screenings imported into the
United States while the seed and
screenings are in foreign commerce.
Seed and screenings imported for
immediate distribution and sale to the
consuming public remain in foreign
commerce until sold to the ultimate
consumer. The question of when foreign
commerce ceases in other cases must be
considered on a case-by-case basis.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 361.6
[Amended]
6. In § 361.6, paragraph (a)(1) is
amended by adding, in alphabetical
order, entries for ‘‘Lygodium flexuosum
(Linnaeus) Swartz (maidenhair
creeper)’’ and ‘‘Lygodium microphyllum
(Cavanilles) R. Brown (Old World
climbing fern)’’.
■
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Done in Washington, DC, this 6th day
of October, 2009.
Kevin Shea,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. E9–25119 Filed 10–16–09: 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE: 3410–34–S
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 922
[Doc. No. AMS–FV–09–0038; FV09–922–1
FIR]
Apricots Grown in Designated
Counties in Washington; Decreased
Assessment Rate
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Affirmation of interim final rule
as final rule.
SUMMARY: The Department of
Agriculture (USDA) is adopting, as a
final rule, without change, an interim
final rule which decreased the
assessment rate established for the
Washington Apricot Marketing
Committee (Committee) for the 2009–
2010 and subsequent fiscal periods from
$2.00 to $1.00 per ton of apricots
handled. The Committee locally
administers the marketing order, which
regulates the handling of apricots grown
in designated counties in Washington.
The decreased assessment rate is
necessary to align the Committee’s
expected revenue with its proposed
2009–2010 budget.
DATES: Effective Date: October 20, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert Curry or Gary D. Olson,
Northwest Marketing Field Office,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1220 SW. Third Avenue,
suite 385, Portland, OR 97204;
telephone: (503) 326–2724, fax: (503)
326–7440; or e-mail:
Robert.Curry@ams.usda.gov or
GaryD.Olson@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may obtain
information on complying with this and
other marketing order regulations by
viewing a guide at the following Web
site: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
AMSv1.0/ams.fetchTemplateData.do?
template=TemplateN&page=Marketing
OrdersSmallBusinessGuide; or by
contacting Jay Guerber, Marketing Order
Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW., STOP
0237, Washington, DC 20250–0237;
E:\FR\FM\19OCR1.SGM
19OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 200 / Monday, October 19, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
telephone: (202) 720–2491; fax: (202)
720–8938; or e-mail:
Jay.Guerber@ams.usda.gov.
This rule
is issued under Marketing Agreement
and Order No. 922 (7 CFR part 922),
regulating the handling of apricots
grown in designated counties in
Washington, hereinafter referred to as
the ‘‘order.’’ The order is effective under
the Agricultural Marketing Agreement
Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–
674), hereinafter referred to as the
‘‘Act.’’
USDA is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order
12866.
Under the order, Washington apricot
handlers are subject to assessments,
which provide funds to administer the
order. Assessment rates issued under
the order are intended to be applicable
to all assessable apricots for the entire
fiscal period, and continue indefinitely
until amended, suspended, or
terminated. The Committee’s fiscal
period begins on April 1 and ends on
March 31.
In an interim final rule published in
the Federal Register on July 29, 2009,
and effective July 30, 2009 (74 FR
37496, Doc. No. AMS–FV–09–0038;
FV09–922–1 IFR), § 922.235 was
amended by decreasing the assessment
rate established for the Committee for
the 2009–2010 and subsequent fiscal
periods from $2.00 to $1.00 per ton of
apricots handled. Because of the
projections of a large crop this season,
the Committee recommended the
assessment rate decrease in order to
maintain assessment income at a level
proportionate to the current budget.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
cprice-sewell on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
601–612), the Agricultural Marketing
Service (AMS) has considered the
economic impact of this rule on small
entities. Accordingly, AMS has
prepared this final regulatory flexibility
analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order
that small businesses will not be unduly
or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are
unique in that they are brought about
through group action of essentially
small entities acting on their own
behalf.
There are approximately 300
producers of fresh apricots in the
regulated production area and
approximately 22 handlers subject to
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:53 Oct 16, 2009
Jkt 220001
regulation under the order. Small
agricultural producers are defined by
the Small Business Administration (13
CFR 121.201) as those having annual
receipts of less than $750,000, and small
agricultural service firms are defined as
those whose annual receipts are less
than $7,000,000.
Based on information compiled by the
National Agricultural Statistics Service,
the value of Washington’s total apricot
production in 2008 was $6,601,000.
Based on 300 apricot producers, the
average annual producer revenue from
the sale of Washington apricots last year
was approximately $22,000 per
producer. In addition, based on
Committee records and 2008 f.o.b.
prices ranging from $20.00 to $26.00 per
24-pound loose-pack carton as reported
by AMS Market News Service, the
average annual revenue per handler in
2008 was $357,197. Therefore, the
majority of Washington apricot
producers and handlers may be
classified as small entities.
This rule decreases the assessment
rate established for the Committee and
collected from handlers for the 2009–
2010 and subsequent fiscal periods from
$2.00 to $1.00 per ton. The Committee
unanimously recommended 2009–2010
expenditures of $7,843 and the
decreased assessment rate at the May
21, 2009, meeting. The recommended
assessment rate is $1.00 less than the
rate in effect since the beginning of the
2008–2009 fiscal period. With an
estimated 2009–2010 apricot crop of
7,600 tons, assessment income
combined with funds from the
Committee’s monetary reserve should be
adequate to cover budgeted expenses.
The Committee recommended
decreasing the assessment rate by 50
percent due to its estimate that the crop
this season would approximately be
twice the size of the crop actually
harvested last year. With current crop
and expense estimates, the Committee
estimates that its reserve fund at the end
of the 2009–2010 fiscal period will be
about $8,300. This is equal to
approximately one fiscal period’s
operational expenses as authorized by
the order (§ 922.42).
The major expenditures
recommended by the Committee for the
2009–2010 fiscal period include $4,800
for the management fee and $3,043 for
operational expenses. In comparison,
budgeted expenses for the 2008–2009
seasons were $4,800 and $2,293,
respectively.
The Committee discussed alternatives
to this rule. With the potential for a
much larger crop this season,
assessment rates over $1.00 per ton were
not seriously considered because of the
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
53401
potential of generating too much income
and thus increasing the reserve fund to
an amount higher than program
requirements allow.
A review of historical information and
preliminary information pertaining to
the upcoming crop year indicates that
the producer price for the 2009–2010
season could average about $1,000 per
ton. Therefore, the estimated assessment
revenue for the 2009–2010 fiscal period
as a percentage of total producer
revenue could approximate 0.1 percent.
This rule continues in effect the
action that decreased the assessment
obligation imposed on handlers of
Washington apricots. Assessments are
applied uniformly on all handlers, and
some of the costs may be passed on to
producers. However, decreasing the
assessment rate reduces the burden on
handlers, and may reduce the burden on
producers. The Committee’s meeting
was widely publicized throughout the
Washington apricot industry and all
interested persons were invited to
attend and participate in the
Committee’s deliberations on all issues.
Like all Committee meetings, the May
21, 2009, meeting was a public meeting
and all entities, both large and small,
were able to express views on this issue.
This action does not impose
additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on small or large
Washington apricot handlers. As with
all Federal marketing order programs,
reports and forms are periodically
reviewed to reduce information
requirements and duplication by
industry and public sector agencies.
Furthermore, USDA has not identified
any relevant Federal rules that
duplicate, overlap, or conflict with this
rule.
Comments on the interim final rule
were requested by September 28, 2009.
No comments were received. Therefore,
for the reasons given in the interim final
rule, USDA is adopting the interim final
rule as a final rule without change. To
view the interim final rule on the
Internet, navigate to: https://
www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/
home.html#document
Detail?R=09000064809fd6a6.
This action also affirms information
contained in the interim final rule
pertaining to Executive Orders 12866
and 12988, the Paperwork Reduction
Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), and the EGov Act (44 U.S.C. 101).
After consideration of all relevant
material presented, it is found that
finalizing the interim final rule, without
change, as published in the Federal
Register (74 FR 37496, July 29, 2009)
will tend to effectuate the declared
policy of the Act.
E:\FR\FM\19OCR1.SGM
19OCR1
53402
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 200 / Monday, October 19, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 922
Apricots, Marketing agreements,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
PART 922—APRICOTS GROWN IN
DESIGNATED COUNTIES IN
WASHINGTON
Accordingly, the interim final rule
amending 7 CFR part 922, which was
published at 74 FR 37496 on July 29,
2009, is adopted as a final rule without
change.
■
Dated: October 9, 2009.
Rayne Pegg,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. E9–25121 Filed 10–16–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
10 CFR Part 50
RIN 3150–AI53
[NRC–2008–0663]
Industry Codes and Standards;
Amended Requirements; Confirmation
of Effective Date
cprice-sewell on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Direct final rule: Confirmation
of effective date.
SUMMARY: The Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is confirming the
effective date of October 19, 2009, for
the direct final rule that was published
in the Federal Register on August 5,
2009. This direct final rule amended the
NRC’s regulations on governing vessel
head inspection requirements. This
amendment revised the upper range of
the percentage of axial flaws permitted
in a specimen set used for the
qualification of nondestructive
examination systems (procedures,
personnel and equipment), which are
used in the performance of inservice
inspection (ISI) of pressurized water
reactor (PWR) upper vessel head
penetrations. This amendment was
made as a result of the withdrawal of a
stakeholder’s recommendation
necessitated by a typographical error in
the original recommendation with
respect to the maximum percentage of
flaws that should be oriented axially.
DATES: The effective date of October 19,
2009, is confirmed for the direct final
rule published August 5, 2009 (74 FR
38890).
ADDRESSES: Documents related to this
rulemaking, including comments
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:53 Oct 16, 2009
Jkt 220001
received, may be examined at the NRC
Public Document Room, Room O–1F23,
11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville,
Maryland 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Manash K. Bagchi, Project Manager,
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation,
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555–0001, telephone
301–415–2905, e-mail
manash.bagchi@nrc.gov.
On August
5, 2009 (74 FR 38890), the NRC
published in the Federal Register a
direct final rule amending its
regulations in 10 CFR Part 50 governing
vessel head inspection requirements.
This amendment revises the upper
range of the percentage of axial flaws
from 40 percent to 60 percent permitted
in a specimen set used for the
qualification of nondestructive
examination systems (procedures,
personnel and equipment), which are
used in the performance of ISI of PWR
upper vessel head penetrations. This
amendment is being made as a result of
the withdrawal of a stakeholder’s
recommendation necessitated by a
typographical error in the original
recommendation with respect to the
maximum percentage of flaws that
should be oriented axially. In the direct
final rule, NRC stated that if no
significant adverse comments were
received, the direct final rule would
become final on October 19, 2009. The
NRC did not receive any comments that
warranted withdrawal of the direct final
rule. Therefore, this rule will become
effective as scheduled.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 13th day
of October, 2009.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Michael T. Lesar,
Chief, Rulemaking and Directives Branch,
Division of Administrative Services, Office
of Administration.
[FR Doc. E9–25049 Filed 10–16–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 71
[Docket No. FAA–2009–0504; Airspace
Docket No. 09–AGL–7]
Amendment of Class E Airspace;
Tioga, ND
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
History
On July 31, 2009, the FAA published
in the Federal Register a notice of
proposed rulemaking to amend Class E
airspace at Tioga, ND, reconfiguring
controlled airspace at Tioga Municipal
Airport, Tioga, ND. (74 FR 38142,
Docket No. FAA–2009–0504). Interested
parties were invited to participate in
this rulemaking effort by submitting
written comments on the proposal to the
FAA. No comments were received. Class
E airspace designations are published in
paragraph 6005 of FAA Order 7400.9T
signed August 27, 2009, and effective
September 15, 2009, which is
incorporated by reference in 14 CFR
Part 71.1. The Class E airspace
designations listed in this document
will be published subsequently in the
Order.
The Rule
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PO 00000
SUMMARY: This action amends Class E
airspace at Tioga, ND. Additional
controlled airspace is necessary to
accommodate Area Navigation (RNAV)
Standard Instrument Approach
Procedures (SIAP) at Tioga Municipal
Airport, Tioga, ND. This action also
amends the geographic coordinates of
Tioga Municipal Airport. The FAA is
taking this action to enhance the safety
and management of Instrument Flight
Rule (IFR) operations at Tioga
Municipal Airport.
DATES: Effective 0901 UTC, December
17, 2009. The Director of the Federal
Register approves this incorporation by
reference action under 1 CFR Part 51,
subject to the annual revision of FAA
Order 7400.9 and publication of
conforming amendments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Scott Enander, Central Service Center,
Operations Support Group, Federal
Aviation Administration, Southwest
Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort
Worth, TX 76137; telephone (817) 321–
7716.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Sfmt 4700
This action amends Title 14 Code of
Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 71 by
amending Class E airspace at Tioga, ND,
adding additional controlled airspace
extending upward from 700 feet above
the surface at Tioga Municipal Airport,
Tioga, ND, for the safety and
management of IFR operations. This
action also amends the geographic
coordinates of Tioga Municipal Airport.
The FAA has determined that this
regulation only involves an established
body of technical regulations for which
frequent and routine amendments are
necessary to keep them operationally
current. Therefore, this regulation: (1) Is
E:\FR\FM\19OCR1.SGM
19OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 200 (Monday, October 19, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 53400-53402]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-25121]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 922
[Doc. No. AMS-FV-09-0038; FV09-922-1 FIR]
Apricots Grown in Designated Counties in Washington; Decreased
Assessment Rate
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Affirmation of interim final rule as final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is adopting, as a final
rule, without change, an interim final rule which decreased the
assessment rate established for the Washington Apricot Marketing
Committee (Committee) for the 2009-2010 and subsequent fiscal periods
from $2.00 to $1.00 per ton of apricots handled. The Committee locally
administers the marketing order, which regulates the handling of
apricots grown in designated counties in Washington. The decreased
assessment rate is necessary to align the Committee's expected revenue
with its proposed 2009-2010 budget.
DATES: Effective Date: October 20, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Curry or Gary D. Olson,
Northwest Marketing Field Office, Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1220 SW. Third Avenue,
suite 385, Portland, OR 97204; telephone: (503) 326-2724, fax: (503)
326-7440; or e-mail: Robert.Curry@ams.usda.gov or
GaryD.Olson@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may obtain information on complying with this and
other marketing order regulations by viewing a guide at the following
Web site: https://www.ams.usda.gov/AMSv1.0/ams.fetchTemplateData.do?template=TemplateN&page=MarketingOrdersSmallBusinessGuide; or by contacting Jay Guerber, Marketing Order
Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237;
[[Page 53401]]
telephone: (202) 720-2491; fax: (202) 720-8938; or e-mail:
Jay.Guerber@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule is issued under Marketing
Agreement and Order No. 922 (7 CFR part 922), regulating the handling
of apricots grown in designated counties in Washington, hereinafter
referred to as the ``order.'' The order is effective under the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-
674), hereinafter referred to as the ``Act.''
USDA is issuing this rule in conformance with Executive Order
12866.
Under the order, Washington apricot handlers are subject to
assessments, which provide funds to administer the order. Assessment
rates issued under the order are intended to be applicable to all
assessable apricots for the entire fiscal period, and continue
indefinitely until amended, suspended, or terminated. The Committee's
fiscal period begins on April 1 and ends on March 31.
In an interim final rule published in the Federal Register on July
29, 2009, and effective July 30, 2009 (74 FR 37496, Doc. No. AMS-FV-09-
0038; FV09-922-1 IFR), Sec. 922.235 was amended by decreasing the
assessment rate established for the Committee for the 2009-2010 and
subsequent fiscal periods from $2.00 to $1.00 per ton of apricots
handled. Because of the projections of a large crop this season, the
Committee recommended the assessment rate decrease in order to maintain
assessment income at a level proportionate to the current budget.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has
considered the economic impact of this rule on small entities.
Accordingly, AMS has prepared this final regulatory flexibility
analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued
pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in
that they are brought about through group action of essentially small
entities acting on their own behalf.
There are approximately 300 producers of fresh apricots in the
regulated production area and approximately 22 handlers subject to
regulation under the order. Small agricultural producers are defined by
the Small Business Administration (13 CFR 121.201) as those having
annual receipts of less than $750,000, and small agricultural service
firms are defined as those whose annual receipts are less than
$7,000,000.
Based on information compiled by the National Agricultural
Statistics Service, the value of Washington's total apricot production
in 2008 was $6,601,000. Based on 300 apricot producers, the average
annual producer revenue from the sale of Washington apricots last year
was approximately $22,000 per producer. In addition, based on Committee
records and 2008 f.o.b. prices ranging from $20.00 to $26.00 per 24-
pound loose-pack carton as reported by AMS Market News Service, the
average annual revenue per handler in 2008 was $357,197. Therefore, the
majority of Washington apricot producers and handlers may be classified
as small entities.
This rule decreases the assessment rate established for the
Committee and collected from handlers for the 2009-2010 and subsequent
fiscal periods from $2.00 to $1.00 per ton. The Committee unanimously
recommended 2009-2010 expenditures of $7,843 and the decreased
assessment rate at the May 21, 2009, meeting. The recommended
assessment rate is $1.00 less than the rate in effect since the
beginning of the 2008-2009 fiscal period. With an estimated 2009-2010
apricot crop of 7,600 tons, assessment income combined with funds from
the Committee's monetary reserve should be adequate to cover budgeted
expenses. The Committee recommended decreasing the assessment rate by
50 percent due to its estimate that the crop this season would
approximately be twice the size of the crop actually harvested last
year. With current crop and expense estimates, the Committee estimates
that its reserve fund at the end of the 2009-2010 fiscal period will be
about $8,300. This is equal to approximately one fiscal period's
operational expenses as authorized by the order (Sec. 922.42).
The major expenditures recommended by the Committee for the 2009-
2010 fiscal period include $4,800 for the management fee and $3,043 for
operational expenses. In comparison, budgeted expenses for the 2008-
2009 seasons were $4,800 and $2,293, respectively.
The Committee discussed alternatives to this rule. With the
potential for a much larger crop this season, assessment rates over
$1.00 per ton were not seriously considered because of the potential of
generating too much income and thus increasing the reserve fund to an
amount higher than program requirements allow.
A review of historical information and preliminary information
pertaining to the upcoming crop year indicates that the producer price
for the 2009-2010 season could average about $1,000 per ton. Therefore,
the estimated assessment revenue for the 2009-2010 fiscal period as a
percentage of total producer revenue could approximate 0.1 percent.
This rule continues in effect the action that decreased the
assessment obligation imposed on handlers of Washington apricots.
Assessments are applied uniformly on all handlers, and some of the
costs may be passed on to producers. However, decreasing the assessment
rate reduces the burden on handlers, and may reduce the burden on
producers. The Committee's meeting was widely publicized throughout the
Washington apricot industry and all interested persons were invited to
attend and participate in the Committee's deliberations on all issues.
Like all Committee meetings, the May 21, 2009, meeting was a public
meeting and all entities, both large and small, were able to express
views on this issue.
This action does not impose additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on small or large Washington apricot handlers. As with all
Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are periodically
reviewed to reduce information requirements and duplication by industry
and public sector agencies. Furthermore, USDA has not identified any
relevant Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or conflict with this
rule.
Comments on the interim final rule were requested by September 28,
2009. No comments were received. Therefore, for the reasons given in
the interim final rule, USDA is adopting the interim final rule as a
final rule without change. To view the interim final rule on the
Internet, navigate to: https://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=09000064809fd6a6.
This action also affirms information contained in the interim final
rule pertaining to Executive Orders 12866 and 12988, the Paperwork
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), and the E-Gov Act (44 U.S.C.
101).
After consideration of all relevant material presented, it is found
that finalizing the interim final rule, without change, as published in
the Federal Register (74 FR 37496, July 29, 2009) will tend to
effectuate the declared policy of the Act.
[[Page 53402]]
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 922
Apricots, Marketing agreements, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
PART 922--APRICOTS GROWN IN DESIGNATED COUNTIES IN WASHINGTON
0
Accordingly, the interim final rule amending 7 CFR part 922, which was
published at 74 FR 37496 on July 29, 2009, is adopted as a final rule
without change.
Dated: October 9, 2009.
Rayne Pegg,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. E9-25121 Filed 10-16-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P