Qualification of Drivers; Exemption Applications; Diabetes, 53583-53585 [E9-25101]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 200 / Monday, October 19, 2009 / Notices
Agency will evaluate any adverse
evidence submitted and, if safety is
being compromised or if continuation of
the exemption would not be consistent
with the goals and objectives of 49
U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, FMCSA will
take immediate steps to revoke the
exemption of a driver.
Issued on: October 8, 2009.
Larry W. Minor,
Associate Administrator for Policy and
Program Development.
[FR Doc. E9–25069 Filed 10–16–09; 8:45 am]
year period if it finds ‘‘such exemption
would likely achieve a level of safety
that is equivalent to, or greater than, the
level that would be achieved absent
such exemption.’’ The statute also
allows the Agency to renew exemptions
at the end of the 2-year period. The
comment period ended on September
18, 2009.
Discussion of Comments
FMCSA received no comments in this
proceeding.
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
Conclusion
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration
[Docket No. FMCSA–1998–4334; FMCSA–
2000–7165; FMCSA–2002–13411; FMCSA–
2005–20560; FMCSA–2006–25246; FMCSA–
2007–27897]
Qualification of Drivers; Exemption
Renewals; Vision
AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of final disposition.
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY: FMCSA previously
announced its decision to renew the
exemptions from the vision requirement
in the Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Regulations for 44 individuals. FMCSA
has statutory authority to exempt
individuals from the vision requirement
if the exemptions granted will not
compromise safety. The Agency has
concluded that granting these
exemptions will provide a level of safety
that will be equivalent to, or greater
than, the level of safety maintained
without the exemptions for these
commercial motor vehicle (CMV)
drivers.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
Mary D. Gunnels, Director, Medical
Programs, (202)–366–4001,
fmcsamedical@dot.gov, FMCSA,
Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Room W64–
224, Washington, DC 20590–0001.
Office hours are from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Electronic Access
You may see all the comments online
through the Federal Document
Management System (FDMS) at https://
www.regulations.gov.
Background
Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315,
FMCSA may grant an exemption for a 2-
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:51 Oct 16, 2009
Jkt 220001
The Agency has not received any
adverse evidence on any of these drivers
that indicates that safety is being
compromised. Based upon its
evaluation of the 44 renewal
applications, FMCSA renews the
Federal vision exemptions for Eddie
Alejandro, John W. Black, III. John A.
Bridges, Eddie M. Brown, Edward G.
Brown, Edwin L. Bupp, Charles E.
Castle, Joel C. Conrad, Duane C.
Conway, Brian W. Curtis, Roger D.
Davidson, Sr., Richard A. Davis, Sr.,
Robin C. Duckett, Marco A. Esquivel,
Tomie L. Estes, Raymond L. Herman,
Jesse R. Hillhouse, Jr., Billy R. Holdman,
Ray C. Johnson, Terry R. Jones, Randall
H. Keil, James A. Kneece, Paul G.
Mathes, John T. McWilliams, Robert A.
Miller, Stuart T. Miller, James J.
Mitchell, Andrew M. Nurnberg,
Kenneth R. Pedersen, Joshua R. Perkins,
Ronald F. Prezzia, Eligio M. Ramirez,
Victor C. Richert, Garry L. Rogers, Craig
R. Saari, Jerry L. Schroder, Gerald J.
Shamla, Timothy L. Shorey, William C.
Smith, Larry D. Steiner, Robert S.
Swaen, Anthony T. Truiolo, Gregory A.
VanLue, and Kevin W. Wunderlin.
In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e)
and 31315, each renewal exemption will
be valid for 2 years unless revoked
earlier by FMCSA. The exemption will
be revoked if:
(1) The person fails to comply with
the terms and conditions of the
exemption; (2) the exemption has
resulted in a lower level of safety than
was maintained before it was granted; or
(3) continuation of the exemption would
not be consistent with the goals and
objectives of 49 U.S.C. 31136 and 31315.
Issued on: October 6, 2009.
Larry W. Minor,
Associate Administrator for Policy and
Program Development.
[FR Doc. E9–25070 Filed 10–16–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
PO 00000
Frm 00122
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
53583
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration
[FMCSA Docket No. FMCSA–2009–0207]
Qualification of Drivers; Exemption
Applications; Diabetes
AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of final disposition.
SUMMARY: FMCSA announces its
decision to exempt twenty-four
individuals from its rule prohibiting
persons with insulin-treated diabetes
mellitus (ITDM) from operating
commercial motor vehicles (CMVs) in
interstate commerce. The exemptions
will enable these individuals to operate
CMVs in interstate commerce.
DATES: The exemptions are effective
October 19, 2009. The exemptions
expire on October 19, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
Mary D. Gunnels, Director, Medical
Programs, (202) 366–4001,
fmcsamedical@dot.gov, FMCSA, Room
W64–224, Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001. Office hours are from 8:30 a.m. to
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Electronic Access
You may see all the comments online
through the Federal Document
Management System (FDMS) at: https://
www.regulations.gov.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments, go to https://
www.regulations.gov and/or Room
W12–140 on the ground level of the
West Building, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
Privacy Act: Anyone may search the
electronic form of all comments
received into any of DOT’s dockets by
the name of the individual submitting
the comment (or of the person signing
the comment, if submitted on behalf of
an association, business, labor union, or
other entity). You may review DOT’s
complete Privacy Act Statement in the
Federal Register (65 FR 19477, Apr. 11,
2000). This statement is also available at
https://Docketinfo.dot.gov.
Background
On August 17, 2009, FMCSA
published a notice of receipt of Federal
diabetes exemption applications from
E:\FR\FM\19OCN1.SGM
19OCN1
53584
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 200 / Monday, October 19, 2009 / Notices
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
twenty-four individuals, and requested
comments from the public (74 FR
41486). The public comment period
closed on September 16, 2009 and one
comment was received.
FMCSA has evaluated the eligibility
of the twenty-four applicants and
determined that granting the
exemptions to these individuals would
achieve a level of safety equivalent to,
or greater than, the level that would be
achieved by complying with the current
regulation 49 CFR 391.41(b)(3).
Diabetes Mellitus and Driving
Experience of the Applicants
The Agency established the current
standard for diabetes in 1970 because
several risk studies indicated that
diabetic drivers had a higher rate of
crash involvement than the general
population. The diabetes rule provides
that ‘‘A person is physically qualified to
drive a commercial motor vehicle if that
person has no established medical
history or clinical diagnosis of diabetes
mellitus currently requiring insulin for
control’’ (49 CFR 391.41(b)(3)).
FMCSA established its diabetes
exemption program, based on the
Agency’s July 2000 study entitled ‘‘A
Report to Congress on the Feasibility of
a Program to Qualify Individuals with
Insulin-Treated Diabetes Mellitus to
Operate in Interstate Commerce as
Directed by the Transportation Act for
the 21st Century.’’ The report concluded
that a safe and practicable protocol to
allow some drivers with ITDM to
operate CMVs is feasible. The 2003
notice in conjunction with the
November 8, 2005 (70 FR 67777)
Federal Register notice provides the
current protocol for allowing such
drivers to operate CMVs in interstate
commerce.
These twenty-four applicants have
had ITDM over a range of 1 to 27 years.
These applicants report no
hypoglycemic reaction that resulted in
loss of consciousness or seizure, that
required the assistance of another
person, or resulted in impaired
cognitive function without warning
symptoms in the past 5 years (with one
year of stability following any such
episode). In each case, an
endocrinologist has verified that the
driver has demonstrated willingness to
properly monitor and manage their
diabetes, received education related to
diabetes management, and is on a stable
insulin regimen. These drivers report no
other disqualifying conditions,
including diabetes-related
complications. Each meets the vision
standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10).
The qualifications and medical
condition of each applicant were stated
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:51 Oct 16, 2009
Jkt 220001
and discussed in detail in the August
17, 2009, Federal Register notice (74 FR
41486). Therefore, they will not be
repeated in this notice.
Basis for Exemption Determination
Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315,
FMCSA may grant an exemption from
the diabetes standard in 49 CFR
391.41(b)(3) if the exemption is likely to
achieve an equivalent or greater level of
safety than would be achieved without
the exemption. The exemption allows
the applicants to operate CMVs in
interstate commerce.
To evaluate the effect of these
exemptions on safety, FMCSA
considered medical reports about the
applicants’ ITDM and vision, and
reviewed the treating endocrinologist’s
medical opinion related to the ability of
the driver to safely operate a CMV while
using insulin.
Consequently, FMCSA finds that
exempting these applicants from the
diabetes standard in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(3)
is likely to achieve a level of safety
equal to that existing without the
exemption.
Conditions and Requirements
The terms and conditions of the
exemption will be provided to the
applicants in the exemption document
and they include the following: (1) That
each individual submit a quarterly
monitoring checklist completed by the
treating endocrinologist as well as an
annual checklist with a comprehensive
medical evaluation; (2) that each
individual reports within 2 business
days of occurrence, all episodes of
severe hypoglycemia, significant
complications, or inability to manage
diabetes; also, any involvement in an
accident or any other adverse event in
a CMV or personal vehicle, whether or
not they are related to an episode of
hypoglycemia; (3) that each individual
provide a copy of the ophthalmologist’s
or optometrist’s report to the medical
examiner at the time of the annual
medical examination; and (4) that each
individual provide a copy of the annual
medical certification to the employer for
retention in the driver’s qualification
file, or keep a copy in his/her driver’s
qualification file if he/she is selfemployed. The driver must also have a
copy of the certification when driving,
for presentation to a duly authorized
Federal, State, or local enforcement
official.
Discussion of Comments
FMCSA received one comment in this
proceeding. The comment was received
from Mr. Kenneth Youngblood. He
stated that drivers with ITDM are not
PO 00000
Frm 00123
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
second class citizens and that there are
no studies that conclude that they are
more at-risk drivers. Mr. Youngblood
also stated that it is wrong and
discriminatory for drivers with ITDM to
be singled out.
In response to this comment,
FMCSA’s exemption process supports
drivers with ITDM who seek to operate
in interstate commerce. In addition, the
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Regulations (FMCSRs) are not contrary
to the Americans with Disabilities Act
(ADA) of 1990. The mandates of the
ADA do not require that FMCSA alter
the driver qualification requirements
contained in 49 CFR Part 391. The
Senate report on the ADA, submitted by
its Committee on Labor and Human
Resources, included the following
explanation:
With respect to covered entities subject to
rules promulgated by the Department of
Transportation regarding physical
qualifications for drivers of certain
classifications of motor vehicles, it is the
Committee’s intent that a person with a
disability applying for or currently holding a
job subject to these standards must be able
to satisfy these physical qualification
standards in order to be considered a
qualified individual with a disability under
Title I of this legislation. S. Rep. 101–116, at
27 (1989).
FMSCA relies on the expert medical
opinion of the endocrinologist and the
medical examiner, who are required to
analyze individual ability to control and
manage the diabetic condition,
including the individual ability and
willingness of the driver to monitor
blood glucose level on an ongoing basis.
Until the Agency issues a Final Rule,
however, insulin-treated diabetic
drivers must continue to apply for
exemptions from FMCSA, and request
renewals of such exemptions. FMCSA
will grant exemptions only to those
applicants who meet the specific
conditions and comply with all the
requirements of the exemption.
Conclusion
After considering the comments to the
docket, and based upon its evaluation of
the twenty-four exemption applications,
FMCSA exempts, Tawnya E. Benner,
Lowell R. Brown, Gerald R. Claypool,
Robert J. Dupuis, Glenn R. Edwards,
John H. Forchette, Jr., Robert A. Gibson,
Blaine H. Holmes, Gerald E. Huelle,
Edward L. Johnson, Mary V. Johnson,
Roger L. Kaufman, Kenneth A. Leeker,
Paul L. Meier, Clifford L. Rayl, Robert J.
Schafer, Steven J. Shaw, Scott L.
Stamstad, Kendell R. Strassman, Allan
A. Vanderhamm, Maurice L. Wedel,
Michael R. Wellman, Thomas C. Wilson,
and Wayne W. Zander from the ITDM
E:\FR\FM\19OCN1.SGM
19OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 200 / Monday, October 19, 2009 / Notices
standard in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(3), subject
to the conditions listed under
‘‘Conditions and Requirements’’ above.
In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e)
and 31315 each exemption will be valid
for two years unless revoked earlier by
FMCSA. The exemption will be revoked
if: (1) The person fails to comply with
the terms and conditions of the
exemption; (2) the exemption has
resulted in a lower level of safety than
was maintained before it was granted; or
(3) continuation of the exemption would
not be consistent with the goals and
objectives of 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and
31315. If the exemption is still effective
at the end of the 2-year period, the
person may apply to FMCSA for a
renewal under procedures in effect at
that time.
Issued on: October 6, 2009.
Larry W. Minor,
Associate Administrator for Policy and
Program Development.
[FR Doc. E9–25101 Filed 10–16–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
Privacy Act of 1974; System of
Records
AGENCY:
Department of Veterans Affairs
(VA).
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
ACTION: Notice of Amendment to
Systems of Records.
SUMMARY: As required by the Privacy
Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a(e), notice is
hereby given that the Department of
Veterans Affairs (VA) is amending four
existing systems of records 07VA138,
‘‘Department of Medicine and Surgery
Engineering Employee Management
Information Records-VA’’; 20VA138,
‘‘Motor Vehicle Operator Accident
Records-VA’’; 28VA119, ‘‘Personnel
Registration Under Controlled
Substance Act-VA and 33VA113,
‘‘National Prosthetics Patient DatabaseVA’’ to: Add a routine use related to the
release of information from VA to the
Department of Justice (DoJ); add a
routine use related to releasing
information to entities with whom VA
has a contract or subcontract; add a
routine use related to releasing
information to agencies in the event of
fraud or abuse; add a routine use related
to disclosing information when there is
a risk of embarrassment or harm to the
reputations of the record subjects; add a
routine use when a violation of law is
suspected; and add a routine use related
to releasing information for litigation. In
20VA138 existing routine use number
three will be replaced with a new
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:51 Oct 16, 2009
Jkt 220001
routine use which discloses information
related to suspected or reasonably
imminent violation of the law. In
addition, routine uses four through
seven will be renumbered as three
through six.
DATES: Comments on the amendment of
this system of records must be received
no later than November 18, 2009. If no
public comment is received, the
amended system will become effective
November 18, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Written comments may be
submitted through https://
www.Regulation.gov; by mail or handdelivery to Director, Regulations
Management (02REG), Department of
Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue,
NW., Room 1068, Washington, DC
20420; or by fax to (202) 273–9026.
Comments received will be available for
public inspection in the Office of
Regulation Policy and Management,
Room 1063B, between the hours of 8
a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday (except holidays). Please call
(202) 461–4902 (this is not a toll-free
number) for an appointment. In
addition, during the comment period,
comments may be viewed online
through the Federal Docket Management
System (FDMS) at https://
www.Regulation.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Veterans Health Administration (VHA)
Privacy Officer, Department of Veterans
Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20420; telephone (704)
245–2492.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: VA
provides health care services to many of
America’s Veterans through the
Veterans Health Administration. During
the course of providing health care,
VHA collects medical and health
information on Veterans. In order to
protect Veteran’s medical or health
information VHA is adding six routine
uses to four existing systems of records
(07VA138, 20VA138, 28VA119 and
33VA113).
Additional Routine Uses
The first routine use added to
07VA138, 20VA138, 28VA119 and
33VA113 would permit VA to disclose
information from these system of
records to the Department of Justice
(DoJ), either on VA’s initiative or in
response to DoJ’s request for the
information, after either VA or DoJ
determines that such information is
relevant to DoJ’s representation of the
United States or any of its components
in legal proceedings before a court or
adjudicative body, provided that, in
each case, the agency also determines
prior to disclosure that release of the
PO 00000
Frm 00124
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
53585
records to the DoJ is a use of the
information contained in the records
that is compatible with the purpose for
which VA collected the records. VA, on
its own initiative, may also disclose
records in this system of records in legal
proceedings before a court or
administrative body after determining
that the disclosure of the records to the
court or administrative body is a use of
the information contained in the records
that is compatible with the purpose for
which VA collected the records.
According to VA leadership this
mandatory new routine use is added to
comply to new Federal policy and
guidelines.
The second routine use added to
07VA138, 20VA138, 28VA119 and
33VA113 allows VA to disclosure
relevant information made to
individuals, organizations, private or
public agencies, or other entities with
whom VA has a contract or agreement
or where there is a subcontract to
perform such services as VA may deem
practicable for the purposes of laws
administered by VA, in order for the
contractor or subcontractor to perform
the services of the contract or
agreement.
According to VA leadership this
mandatory new routine use is added to
comply to new Federal policy and
guidelines.
The third routine use added to
07VA138, 20VA138, 28VA119 and
33VA113 allows VA to disclosure to
other Federal agencies may be made to
assist such agencies in preventing and
detecting possible fraud or abuse by
individuals in their operations and
programs.
The routine use added to these four
systems of records would permit VA to
disclose information in its files in the
event of fraud or abuse.
The fourth routine use added to
07VA138, 20VA138, 28VA119 and
33VA113 allows VA, on its own
initiative, to disclose any information or
records to appropriate agencies, entities,
and persons when (1) VA suspects or
has confirmed that the integrity or
confidentiality of information in the
system of records has been
compromised; (2) the Department has
determined that as a result of the
suspected or confirmed compromise,
there is a risk of embarrassment or harm
to the reputations of the record subjects,
harm to economic or property interests,
identity theft or fraud, or harm to the
security, confidentiality, or integrity of
this system or other systems or
programs (whether maintained by the
Department or another agency or
disclosure is to agencies, entities, or
persons whom VA determines are
E:\FR\FM\19OCN1.SGM
19OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 200 (Monday, October 19, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53583-53585]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-25101]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
[FMCSA Docket No. FMCSA-2009-0207]
Qualification of Drivers; Exemption Applications; Diabetes
AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of final disposition.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: FMCSA announces its decision to exempt twenty-four individuals
from its rule prohibiting persons with insulin-treated diabetes
mellitus (ITDM) from operating commercial motor vehicles (CMVs) in
interstate commerce. The exemptions will enable these individuals to
operate CMVs in interstate commerce.
DATES: The exemptions are effective October 19, 2009. The exemptions
expire on October 19, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Mary D. Gunnels, Director, Medical
Programs, (202) 366-4001, fmcsamedical@dot.gov, FMCSA, Room W64-224,
Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC 20590-0001. Office hours are from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Electronic Access
You may see all the comments online through the Federal Document
Management System (FDMS) at: https://www.regulations.gov.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments, go to https://www.regulations.gov and/or Room W12-140 on the
ground level of the West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
Privacy Act: Anyone may search the electronic form of all comments
received into any of DOT's dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or of the person signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, or other
entity). You may review DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in the
Federal Register (65 FR 19477, Apr. 11, 2000). This statement is also
available at https://Docketinfo.dot.gov.
Background
On August 17, 2009, FMCSA published a notice of receipt of Federal
diabetes exemption applications from
[[Page 53584]]
twenty-four individuals, and requested comments from the public (74 FR
41486). The public comment period closed on September 16, 2009 and one
comment was received.
FMCSA has evaluated the eligibility of the twenty-four applicants
and determined that granting the exemptions to these individuals would
achieve a level of safety equivalent to, or greater than, the level
that would be achieved by complying with the current regulation 49 CFR
391.41(b)(3).
Diabetes Mellitus and Driving Experience of the Applicants
The Agency established the current standard for diabetes in 1970
because several risk studies indicated that diabetic drivers had a
higher rate of crash involvement than the general population. The
diabetes rule provides that ``A person is physically qualified to drive
a commercial motor vehicle if that person has no established medical
history or clinical diagnosis of diabetes mellitus currently requiring
insulin for control'' (49 CFR 391.41(b)(3)).
FMCSA established its diabetes exemption program, based on the
Agency's July 2000 study entitled ``A Report to Congress on the
Feasibility of a Program to Qualify Individuals with Insulin-Treated
Diabetes Mellitus to Operate in Interstate Commerce as Directed by the
Transportation Act for the 21st Century.'' The report concluded that a
safe and practicable protocol to allow some drivers with ITDM to
operate CMVs is feasible. The 2003 notice in conjunction with the
November 8, 2005 (70 FR 67777) Federal Register notice provides the
current protocol for allowing such drivers to operate CMVs in
interstate commerce.
These twenty-four applicants have had ITDM over a range of 1 to 27
years. These applicants report no hypoglycemic reaction that resulted
in loss of consciousness or seizure, that required the assistance of
another person, or resulted in impaired cognitive function without
warning symptoms in the past 5 years (with one year of stability
following any such episode). In each case, an endocrinologist has
verified that the driver has demonstrated willingness to properly
monitor and manage their diabetes, received education related to
diabetes management, and is on a stable insulin regimen. These drivers
report no other disqualifying conditions, including diabetes-related
complications. Each meets the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10).
The qualifications and medical condition of each applicant were
stated and discussed in detail in the August 17, 2009, Federal Register
notice (74 FR 41486). Therefore, they will not be repeated in this
notice.
Basis for Exemption Determination
Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, FMCSA may grant an exemption
from the diabetes standard in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(3) if the exemption is
likely to achieve an equivalent or greater level of safety than would
be achieved without the exemption. The exemption allows the applicants
to operate CMVs in interstate commerce.
To evaluate the effect of these exemptions on safety, FMCSA
considered medical reports about the applicants' ITDM and vision, and
reviewed the treating endocrinologist's medical opinion related to the
ability of the driver to safely operate a CMV while using insulin.
Consequently, FMCSA finds that exempting these applicants from the
diabetes standard in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(3) is likely to achieve a level
of safety equal to that existing without the exemption.
Conditions and Requirements
The terms and conditions of the exemption will be provided to the
applicants in the exemption document and they include the following:
(1) That each individual submit a quarterly monitoring checklist
completed by the treating endocrinologist as well as an annual
checklist with a comprehensive medical evaluation; (2) that each
individual reports within 2 business days of occurrence, all episodes
of severe hypoglycemia, significant complications, or inability to
manage diabetes; also, any involvement in an accident or any other
adverse event in a CMV or personal vehicle, whether or not they are
related to an episode of hypoglycemia; (3) that each individual provide
a copy of the ophthalmologist's or optometrist's report to the medical
examiner at the time of the annual medical examination; and (4) that
each individual provide a copy of the annual medical certification to
the employer for retention in the driver's qualification file, or keep
a copy in his/her driver's qualification file if he/she is self-
employed. The driver must also have a copy of the certification when
driving, for presentation to a duly authorized Federal, State, or local
enforcement official.
Discussion of Comments
FMCSA received one comment in this proceeding. The comment was
received from Mr. Kenneth Youngblood. He stated that drivers with ITDM
are not second class citizens and that there are no studies that
conclude that they are more at-risk drivers. Mr. Youngblood also stated
that it is wrong and discriminatory for drivers with ITDM to be singled
out.
In response to this comment, FMCSA's exemption process supports
drivers with ITDM who seek to operate in interstate commerce. In
addition, the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations (FMCSRs) are not
contrary to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990. The
mandates of the ADA do not require that FMCSA alter the driver
qualification requirements contained in 49 CFR Part 391. The Senate
report on the ADA, submitted by its Committee on Labor and Human
Resources, included the following explanation:
With respect to covered entities subject to rules promulgated by
the Department of Transportation regarding physical qualifications
for drivers of certain classifications of motor vehicles, it is the
Committee's intent that a person with a disability applying for or
currently holding a job subject to these standards must be able to
satisfy these physical qualification standards in order to be
considered a qualified individual with a disability under Title I of
this legislation. S. Rep. 101-116, at 27 (1989).
FMSCA relies on the expert medical opinion of the endocrinologist
and the medical examiner, who are required to analyze individual
ability to control and manage the diabetic condition, including the
individual ability and willingness of the driver to monitor blood
glucose level on an ongoing basis. Until the Agency issues a Final
Rule, however, insulin-treated diabetic drivers must continue to apply
for exemptions from FMCSA, and request renewals of such exemptions.
FMCSA will grant exemptions only to those applicants who meet the
specific conditions and comply with all the requirements of the
exemption.
Conclusion
After considering the comments to the docket, and based upon its
evaluation of the twenty-four exemption applications, FMCSA exempts,
Tawnya E. Benner, Lowell R. Brown, Gerald R. Claypool, Robert J.
Dupuis, Glenn R. Edwards, John H. Forchette, Jr., Robert A. Gibson,
Blaine H. Holmes, Gerald E. Huelle, Edward L. Johnson, Mary V. Johnson,
Roger L. Kaufman, Kenneth A. Leeker, Paul L. Meier, Clifford L. Rayl,
Robert J. Schafer, Steven J. Shaw, Scott L. Stamstad, Kendell R.
Strassman, Allan A. Vanderhamm, Maurice L. Wedel, Michael R. Wellman,
Thomas C. Wilson, and Wayne W. Zander from the ITDM
[[Page 53585]]
standard in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(3), subject to the conditions listed under
``Conditions and Requirements'' above.
In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315 each exemption will
be valid for two years unless revoked earlier by FMCSA. The exemption
will be revoked if: (1) The person fails to comply with the terms and
conditions of the exemption; (2) the exemption has resulted in a lower
level of safety than was maintained before it was granted; or (3)
continuation of the exemption would not be consistent with the goals
and objectives of 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315. If the exemption is
still effective at the end of the 2-year period, the person may apply
to FMCSA for a renewal under procedures in effect at that time.
Issued on: October 6, 2009.
Larry W. Minor,
Associate Administrator for Policy and Program Development.
[FR Doc. E9-25101 Filed 10-16-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P