Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request for Review of a Revised Information Collection, 52991-52992 [E9-24849]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 198 / Thursday, October 15, 2009 / Notices
5.0
Environmental Consideration
The amendment[s] change[s] a
requirement with respect to the
installation or use of a facility
component located within the restricted
area as defined in 10 CFR part 20 or
surveillance requirements. The NRC
staff has determined that the
amendment involves no significant
increase in the amounts, and no
significant change in the types, of any
effluents that may be released offsite,
and that there is no significant increase
in individual or cumulative
occupational radiation exposure. The
Commission has previously issued a
proposed finding that the amendment
involves no significant hazards
consideration and there has been no
public comment on such finding
published [DATE] ([ ] FR [ ]).
Accordingly, the amendment meets the
eligibility criteria for categorical
exclusion set forth in 10 CFR
51.22(c)(9). Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b),
no environmental impact statement or
environmental assessment need be
prepared in connection with the
issuance of the amendment.
6.0
Conclusion
The NRC staff has concluded, based
on the considerations discussed above,
that: (1) There is reasonable assurance
that the health and safety of the public
will not be endangered by operation in
the proposed manner; (2) such activities
will be conducted in compliance with
the Commission’s regulations; and (3)
the issuance of the amendments will not
be inimical to the common defense and
security or to the health and safety of
the public.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
7.0
References
1. License Amendment Request dated
[DATE], [Title of Amendment
Request], ADAMS Accession No.
[MLXXXXXXXXX].
2. Federal Register Notice of
Availability for TSTF Traveler-448
Revision 3, ‘‘Control Room
Habitability,’’ dated January 17,
2007 (72 FR 2022).
3. Federal Register Notice of
Availability for TSTF Traveler-508,
Revision 1, ‘‘Revise Control Room
Habitability Actions to Address
Lessons Learned from TSTF–448
Implementation,’’ dated [DATE] ([ ]
FR [ ]).].
VerDate Nov<24>2008
19:13 Oct 14, 2009
Jkt 220001
Proposed Model No Significant Hazards
Consideration Determination for PlantSpecific Adoption of TSTF Traveler508, Revision 1, ‘‘Revise Control Room
Habitability Actions To Address
Lessons Learned From TSTF–448
Implementation’’
Description of Amendment Request:
[Plant name] requests adoption of an
approved change to the standard
technical specifications (STS), as
amended by Technical Specification
Task Force (TSTF) Standard Technical
Specification Change Traveler-448,
Revision 3, ‘‘Control Room Habitability’’
and TSTF Traveler-508, Revision 1,
‘‘Revise Control Room Habitability
Actions to Address Lessons Learned
from TSTF–448 Implementation.’’ TSTF
Traveler-508, Revision 1, revised the
STS, as previously amended by TSTF
Traveler-448, Revision 3, to address
inconsistencies with TSTF Traveler-448,
Revision 3. The licensee’s proposed
changes are consistent with NRCapproved TSTF Traveler-508, Revision
1.
Basis for proposed no significant
hazards consideration determination: As
required by Title10 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Section
50.91(a), the [LICENSEE] analysis of the
issue of no significant hazards
consideration is presented below:
Criterion 1: Does the Proposed Change
Involve a Significant Increase in the
Probability or Consequences of an Accident
Previously Evaluated?
Response: No.
The proposed changes do not adversely
affect accident initiators or precursors nor
alter the design assumptions, conditions, or
configuration of the facility. The proposed
changes do not alter or prevent the ability of
structures, systems, and components (SSCs)
to perform their intended function to mitigate
the consequences of an initiating event
within the assumed acceptance limits. This
is a revision to the TSs for the control room
ventilation system, which is a mitigation
system designed to minimize unfiltered air
inleakage into the control room envelope
(CRE) and to filter the CRE atmosphere to
protect the CRE occupants following
accidents previously analyzed. An important
part of the system is the CRE boundary.
Under the proposed change, the movement of
irradiated fuel and operations with the
potential to drain the reactor vessel may be
resumed following confirmation that the CRE
occupants will be protected in the event of
a DBA. This ensures that the consequences
of an accident previously evaluation are not
significantly increased. The CRE ventilation
system is not an initiator or precursor to any
accident previously evaluated. Therefore, the
probability of any accident previously
evaluated is not increased. The consequences
of an accident during the proposed Actions
are not significantly increased as the Actions
require verification that the CRE occupants
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
52991
are protected by the required mitigating
actions.
Therefore, the proposed change does not
involve a significant increase in the
probability or consequences of an accident
previously evaluated.
Criterion 2: Does the Proposed Change
Create the Possibility of a New or Different
Kind of Accident from any Previously
Evaluated?
Response: No.
This revision will not impact the accident
analysis. The changes will not alter the
requirements of the CRE ventilation system
or its function during accident conditions.
No new or different accidents result from
performing the new surveillance or following
the new program. The changes do not involve
a physical alteration of the plant (i.e., no new
or different type of equipment will be
installed) or a significant change in the
methods governing normal plant operation.
The changes do not alter assumptions made
in the safety analysis. The proposed changes
are consistent with the safety analysis
assumptions and current plant operating
practice.
Therefore, the proposed amendment does
not create the possibility of a new or different
kind of accident from any accident
previously evaluated.
Criterion 3: Does the Proposed Change
Involve a Significant Reduction in the Margin
of Safety?
Response: No.
The proposed changes do not alter the
manner in which safety limits, limiting safety
system settings or limiting conditions for
operation are determined. The safety analysis
acceptance criteria are not affected by these
changes. The proposed changes will not
result in plant operation in a configuration
outside the design basis. Compensatory
measures are required to be established in
order to maintain plant operation in a
configuration that is within the design basis.
The proposed changes do not adversely affect
systems that respond to safely shutdown the
plant and to maintain the plant in a safe
shutdown condition.
Therefore, the proposed amendment would
not involve a significant reduction in a
margin of safety.
Based on the NRC staff’s review of the
licensee’s analysis, the NRC staff concludes
that the proposed amendment presents no
significant hazards consideration under the
standards set forth in 10 CFR 50.92(c) and,
accordingly, a finding of ‘‘no significant
hazards consideration’’ is justified.
[FR Doc. E9–24773 Filed 10–14–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL
MANAGEMENT
[(OMB Control No. 3206–0138; Form RI 30–
9)]
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request for Review of a
Revised Information Collection
AGENCY: Office of Personnel
Management.
E:\FR\FM\15OCN1.SGM
15OCN1
52992
ACTION:
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 198 / Thursday, October 15, 2009 / Notices
Notice.
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL
MANAGEMENT
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub.
L. 104–13, May 22, 1995), this notice
announces that the Office of Personnel
Management (OPM) has submitted to
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) a request for review of a revised
information collection. This information
collection, ‘‘Reinstatement of Disability
Annuity Previously Terminated Because
of Restoration to Earning Capacity’’
(OMB Control No. 3206–0138; Form RI
30–9), informs former disability
annuitants of their right to request
restoration under title 5, U.S.C. Sections
8337 and 8455. It also specifies the
conditions to be met and the
documentation required for a person to
request reinstatement.
We estimate 200 forms are completed
annually. The form takes approximately
60 minutes to respond, including a
medical examination. The annual
estimated burden is 200 hours. Burden
may vary depending on the time
required for a medical examination.
For copies of this proposal, contact
Cyrus S. Benson on (202) 606–4808,
FAX (202) 606–0910 or via E-mail to
Cyrus.Benson@opm.gov. Please include
a mailing address with your request.
DATES: Comments on this proposal
should be received within 30 calendar
days from the date of this publication.
ADDRESSES:
Send or deliver comments
to—
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
James K. Freiert, Deputy Assistant
Director, Retirement Services
Program, Center for Retirement and
Insurance Services, U.S. Office of
Personnel Management, 1900 E Street,
NW., Room 3305, Washington, DC
20415–3500; and
OMB Desk Officer, Office of Information
& Regulatory Affairs, Office of
Management and Budget, New
Executive Office Building, NW., 725
17th Street, NW., Room 10235,
Washington, DC 20503.
For information regarding
administrative coordination contact:
Cyrus S. Benson, Team Leader,
Publications Team, RIS Support
Services/Support Group, U.S. Office of
Personnel Management, 1900 E Street,
NW., Room 4H28, Washington, DC
20415, (202) 606–0623.
Office of Personnel Management.
John Berry,
Director.
[FR Doc. E9–24849 Filed 10–14–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325–P
VerDate Nov<24>2008
19:13 Oct 14, 2009
Jkt 220001
[OMB Control No. 3206–0042; RI 25–15]
Office of Personnel Management.
John Berry,
Director.
[FR Doc. E9–24850 Filed 10–14–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325–38–P
Submission for OMB Review; Request
for Review of a Revised Information
Collection
Office of Personnel
Management.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Sunshine Act
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub.
L. 104–13, May 22, 1995 and 5 CFR
1320), this notice announces that the
Office of Personnel Management (OPM)
has submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) a
request for review of a revised
information collection. This information
collection, ‘‘Notice of Change in
Student’s Status’’ (OMB Control No.
3206–0042; Form RI 25–15), is used to
collect sufficient information from adult
children of deceased Federal employees
or annuitants to assure that the child
continues to be eligible for payments
from OPM.
We estimate 2,500 certifications are
processed annually. Each form takes
approximately 20 minutes to complete.
The annual estimated burden is 835
hours.
For copies of this proposal, contact
Cyrus S. Benson by telephone (202)
606–4808, FAX (202) 606–0910 or by email to Cyrus.Benson@opm.gov. Please
include a mailing address with your
request.
DATES: Comments on this proposal
should be received within 30 calendar
days from the date of this publication.
ADDRESSES: Send or deliver comments
to—
James K. Freiert, Deputy Assistant
Director, Retirement Services
Program, Center for Retirement and
Insurance Services, U.S. Office of
Personnel Management, 1900 E Street,
NW., Room 3305, Washington, DC
20415–3500; and
OPM Desk Officer, Office of Information
& Regulatory Affairs, Office of
Management and Budget, New
Executive Office Building, 725 17th
Street, NW., Room 10235,
Washington, DC 20503.
For information regarding
administrative coordination contact:
Cyrus S. Benson, Team Leader,
Publications Team, RIS Support
Services/Support Group, U.S. Office of
Personnel Management, 1900 E Street,
NW., Room 4H28, Washington, DC
20415, (202) 606–0623.
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD
Notification of Item Added to the
Agenda, U.S. Railroad Retirement
Board
On October 9, 2009, by recorded vote
the Board has voted to add the following
item to its agenda for the October 14,
2009:
(2) Employer Status Determination
(Decision on Reconsideration)—Trinity
Railway Express—Train Dispatching—
Herzog Transit Services, Inc.
The person to contact for more
information is Beatrice Ezerski,
Secretary to the Board, Phone No. 312–
751–4920.
Dated: October 9, 2009.
Beatrice Ezerski,
Secretary to the Board.
[FR Doc. E9–24904 Filed 10–13–09; 11:15
am]
BILLING CODE 7905–01–P
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
Telegraph Hill Partners SBIC, L.P.,
License No. 09/79–0453; Notice
Seeking Exemption Under Section 312
of the Small Business Investment Act,
Conflicts of Interest
Notice is hereby given that Telegraph
Hill Partners SBIC, L.P., 360 Post Street,
Suite 601, San Francisco, CA 94108, a
Federal Licensee under the Small
Business Investment Act of 1958, as
amended (‘‘the Act’’), in connection
with the financing of a small concern,
has sought an exemption under Section
312 of the Act and Section 107.730,
Financings which Constitute Conflicts
of Interest of the Small Business
Administration (‘‘SBA’’) Rules and
Regulations (13 CFR 107.730).
Telegraph Hill Partners SBIC, L.P.
proposes to provide equity security
financing to AltheaDx, Inc., 3550
Dunhill Street, San Diego, CA 92121.
The financing is contemplated for
working capital and general corporate
purposes.
The financing is brought within the
purview of § 107.730(a)(1) of the
Regulations because Telegraph Hill
Partners II, L.P., THP II Affiliates Fund,
L.P., and THP Affiliates Fund, L.P., all
Associates of Telegraph Hill Partners
E:\FR\FM\15OCN1.SGM
15OCN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 198 (Thursday, October 15, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52991-52992]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-24849]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
[(OMB Control No. 3206-0138; Form RI 30-9)]
Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request for Review of a
Revised Information Collection
AGENCY: Office of Personnel Management.
[[Page 52992]]
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub.
L. 104-13, May 22, 1995), this notice announces that the Office of
Personnel Management (OPM) has submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) a request for review of a revised information
collection. This information collection, ``Reinstatement of Disability
Annuity Previously Terminated Because of Restoration to Earning
Capacity'' (OMB Control No. 3206-0138; Form RI 30-9), informs former
disability annuitants of their right to request restoration under title
5, U.S.C. Sections 8337 and 8455. It also specifies the conditions to
be met and the documentation required for a person to request
reinstatement.
We estimate 200 forms are completed annually. The form takes
approximately 60 minutes to respond, including a medical examination.
The annual estimated burden is 200 hours. Burden may vary depending on
the time required for a medical examination.
For copies of this proposal, contact Cyrus S. Benson on (202) 606-
4808, FAX (202) 606-0910 or via E-mail to Cyrus.Benson@opm.gov. Please
include a mailing address with your request.
DATES: Comments on this proposal should be received within 30 calendar
days from the date of this publication.
ADDRESSES: Send or deliver comments to--
James K. Freiert, Deputy Assistant Director, Retirement Services
Program, Center for Retirement and Insurance Services, U.S. Office of
Personnel Management, 1900 E Street, NW., Room 3305, Washington, DC
20415-3500; and
OMB Desk Officer, Office of Information & Regulatory Affairs, Office of
Management and Budget, New Executive Office Building, NW., 725 17th
Street, NW., Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503.
For information regarding administrative coordination contact:
Cyrus S. Benson, Team Leader, Publications Team, RIS Support Services/
Support Group, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E Street, NW.,
Room 4H28, Washington, DC 20415, (202) 606-0623.
Office of Personnel Management.
John Berry,
Director.
[FR Doc. E9-24849 Filed 10-14-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-P
