Refinement of Income and Rent Determination Requirements in Public and Assisted Housing Programs: Implementation of Enterprise Income Verification, 52931-52937 [E9-24809]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 198 / Thursday, October 15, 2009 / Proposed Rules
the provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3507)
are inapplicable.
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 19 U.S.C. 66,
1202 (General Note 3(i), Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States), 1313, 1624;
*
Signing Authority
The amendments contained in this
document are being issued by CBP in
accordance with § 0.1(a)(1) of title 19 of
the CFR (19 CFR 0.1(a)(1)), pertaining to
the authority of the Secretary of the
Treasury (or his/her delegate) to
approve regulations related to certain
CBP revenue functions.
List of Subjects
*
*
*
*
4. Section 191.32 is amended:
a. At the end of paragraph (b)(2), by
removing the word ‘‘and’’;
b. At the end of paragraph (b)(3), by
removing the period and adding, in its
place, ‘‘; and’’; and
c. By adding a new paragraph (b)(4) to
read as follows:
§ 191.32
Substitution drawback.
*
19 CFR Part 113
Bonds, Customs duties and
inspection, Exports, Imports, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
19 CFR Part 191
Administrative practice and
procedure, Bonds, Claims, Commerce,
Customs duties and inspection,
Drawback, Exports, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Proposed Amendments to the
Regulations
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, CBP and the Treasury
Department propose to amend 19 CFR
parts 113 and 191 as set forth below:
PART 113—CUSTOMS BONDS
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(4) For purposes of drawback of
internal revenue tax imposed under
Chapters 32, 38, 51, and 52 of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended (IRC), drawback granted on
the export or destruction of substituted
merchandise will be limited to the
amount of taxes paid (and not returned
by refund, credit, or drawback) on the
substitute merchandise.
*
*
*
*
*
Approved: October 8, 2009.
Jayson P. Ahern,
Acting Commissioner, U.S. Customs and
Border Protection.
Timothy E. Skud,
Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Treasury.
[FR Doc. E9–24789 Filed 10–14–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–14–P
1. The general authority citation for
part 113 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 19 U.S.C. 66, 1623, 1624.
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
2. Section 113.62 is amended by
redesignating paragraph (m) as
paragraph (n) and adding a new
paragraph (m) to read as follows:
24 CFR Parts 5 and 908
[Docket No. FR–5351–P–01]
RIN 2501–AD48
*
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
§ 113.62 Basic importation and entry bond
conditions.
Refinement of Income and Rent
Determination Requirements in Public
and Assisted Housing Programs:
Implementation of Enterprise Income
Verification
*
*
*
*
(m) Agreement to comply with CBP
regulations applicable to substitution
drawback claims. In the case of
imported merchandise that is subject to
internal revenue tax imposed under the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended (IRC), the principal agrees not
to file, or to transfer to a successor the
right to file, a substitution drawback
claim involving such tax if the
substituted merchandise has been, or
will be, the subject of a removal from
bonded premises without payment of
tax, or the subject of a claim for refund
or drawback of tax, under any provision
of the IRC.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 191—DRAWBACK
3. The general authority citation for
part 191 continues to read as follows:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:05 Oct 14, 2009
Jkt 220001
Office of the Secretary, HUD.
Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: On January 27, 2009, HUD
issued a final rule that revised the
regulations for HUD’s public and
assisted housing programs to require the
use of HUD’s Enterprise Income
Verification system by public housing
agencies and multifamily housing
owners and management agents when
verifying the employment and income
of program participants. Consistent with
Administration policy to review rules
issued during the transition from one
Administration to another, HUD reopened the January 27, 2009, final rule
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
52931
for public comment, and specifically
solicited public comment on extending
the effective date of the rule. While
HUD remains committed to full
implementation of the Enterprise
Income Verification system, the public
comments submitted on the January 27,
2009, final rule highlighted for HUD
certain regulatory provisions that
require further clarification, and ones
that were extraneous to the purpose of
the rule, which is full implementation
of the Enterprise Income Verification
system.
By final rule published on August 28,
2009, HUD delayed the effective date of
the January 27, 2009, final rule to
January 31, 2010. During this period
before the final rule takes effect, HUD
submits for public comment, through
this proposed rule, regulatory revisions
designed to make certain provisions in
the January 27, 2009, final rule more
clear, and return other regulatory
provisions to their pre-January 2009
final rule content.
DATES: Comment Due Date:
November 16, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit comments regarding
this proposed rule to the Regulations
Division, Office of General Counsel,
Department of Housing and Urban
Development, 451 Seventh Street, SW.,
Room 10276, Washington, DC 20410–
0500. Communications must refer to the
above docket number and title. There
are two methods for submitting public
comments. All submissions must refer
to the above docket number and title.
1. Submission of Comments by Mail.
Comments may be submitted by mail to
the Regulations Division, Office of
General Counsel, Department of
Housing and Urban Development, 451
Seventh Street, SW., Room 10276,
Washington, DC 20410–0500.
2. Electronic Submission of
Comments. Interested persons may
submit comments electronically through
the Federal eRulemaking Portal at
www.regulations.gov. HUD strongly
encourages commenters to submit
comments electronically. Electronic
submission of comments allows the
commenter maximum time to prepare
and submit a comment, ensures timely
receipt by HUD, and enables HUD to
make them immediately available to the
public. Comments submitted
electronically through the
www.regulations.gov Web site can be
viewed by other commenters and
interested members of the public.
Commenters should follow the
instructions provided on that site to
submit comments electronically.
E:\FR\FM\15OCP1.SGM
15OCP1
52932
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 198 / Thursday, October 15, 2009 / Proposed Rules
Note: To receive consideration as public
comments, comments must be submitted
through one of the two methods specified
above. Again, all submissions must refer to
the docket number and title of the rule.
No Facsimile Comments. Facsimile
(FAX) comments are not acceptable.
Public Inspection of Public
Comments. All properly submitted
comments and communications
submitted to HUD will be available for
public inspection and copying between
8 a.m. and 5 p.m. weekdays at the above
address. Due to security measures at the
HUD Headquarters building, an
appointment to review the public
comments must be scheduled in
advance by calling the Regulations
Division at 202–708–3055 (this is not a
toll-free number). Individuals with
speech or hearing impairments may
access this number via TTY by calling
the Federal Information Relay Service at
800–877–8339. Copies of all comments
submitted are available for inspection
and downloading at
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
Office of Public and Indian Housing
programs, contact Nicole Faison,
Program Advisor for the Office of Public
Housing and Voucher Programs,
Department of Housing and Urban
Development, 451 7th Street, SW.,
Room 4214, Washington, DC 20410,
telephone number 202–402–4267. For
Office of Housing Programs, contact Gail
Williamson, Director of the Housing
Assistance Policy Division, Department
of Housing and Urban Development,
451 7th Street, SW., Room 6138,
Washington, DC 20410, telephone
number 202–402–2473. (These are not
toll-free numbers.) Persons with hearing
or speech impairments may access these
numbers through TTY by calling the
toll-free Federal Information Relay
Service at 800–877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
I. Background
On January 27, 2009 (74 FR 4832),
HUD published a final rule, entitled
‘‘Refinement of Income and Rent
Determination Requirements in Public
and Assisted Housing Programs’’ (Final
Rule). The Final Rule revised HUD’s
public and assisted housing program
regulations to implement the upfront
income verification process for program
participants and to require the use of
HUD’s Enterprise Income Verification
(EIV) system by public housing agencies
(PHAs) and owners and management
agents. The Final Rule followed
publication of a June 19, 2007 (72 FR
33844) proposed rule, and took into
consideration the public comments
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:05 Oct 14, 2009
Jkt 220001
received on the June 2007 proposed
rule.
The Final Rule was originally
scheduled to become effective on March
30, 2009. On February 11, 2009 (74 FR
6839), HUD published a notice in the
Federal Register seeking public
comment on whether to delay the
effective date of the Final Rule. The
February 11, 2009, notice was issued in
accordance with the memorandum of
January 20, 2009, from the assistant to
the President and Chief of Staff, entitled
‘‘Regulatory Review’’ and subsequently
published in the Federal Register on
January 26, 2009 (74 FR 4435). The
notice explained that HUD was
considering a temporary 60-day delay in
the effective date to allow the
Department an opportunity for further
review and consideration of new
regulations, consistent with the Chief of
Staff memorandum. In addition to
soliciting comments specifically
delaying the effective date, the February
11, 2009, notice also requested comment
generally on the Final Rule.
The comment period on the February
11, 2009, notice closed on March 13,
2009. HUD received 50 public
comments. Comments were submitted
by a variety of organizations including
PHAs, property owners, management
agents, legal aid organizations,
community development organizations,
and public interest organizations. The
majority of comments were supportive
of a delayed effective date. The
commenters not only supported a delay
but sought clarification or changes by
HUD of certain aspects of the Final
Rule, about which questions and
comments were raised. Among other
issues, commenters requested that HUD
address the need to revise the definition
of ‘‘annual income,’’ and clarify the
verification procedures applicable to
noncitizens and participants who may
experience difficulty obtaining social
security numbers for their children.
Following publication of the February
11, 2009, Federal Register notice, HUD
issued a final rule on March 27, 2009
(74 FR 13339), that extended the
effective date of the Final Rule to
September 30, 2009. The purpose of this
extension was to provide HUD with
time to review the public comments
received in response to the February 11,
2009, notice. On August 28, 2009 (74 FR
44285), HUD published a final rule that
further extended the effective date of the
Final Rule to January 31, 2010. The
further extension was undertaken to
allow the two HUD Assistant
Secretaries, who have responsibility for
the programs affected by the rule, and
only recently confirmed, sufficient time
to review the subject matter of the Final
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Rule, and to review and consider the
public comments received on HUD’s
February 11, 2009, Federal Register
notice.
II. This Proposed Rule
As noted in the Summary to this
proposed rule, the Department remains
committed to the full and effective
implementation of the EIV system. The
use of upfront income verification will
help identify and cure inaccuracies in
public and assisted housing subsidy
determinations, which benefits public
and assisted housing providers, tenants,
and taxpayers. Following a thorough
review of the subject matter of the Final
Rule and the issues raised by the
comments on the February 11, 2009,
notice, HUD is proposing, through this
rule, to make certain changes to the
Final Rule, which HUD believes will
address the issues and concerns raised
by the public commenters, and defer
other issues, to subsequent rulemaking.
To provide stakeholders, residents,
and other interested members of the
public with the opportunity to offer
feedback on the proposed regulatory
changes, HUD is undertaking additional
rulemaking and soliciting comments on
the proposed amendments for a period
of 30 days. The regulatory changes
proposed by this rule are few and
focused, and HUD believes that, in light
of the prior public comment on the
Final Rule, a 30-day period presents
sufficient time to review and comment
on the changes.
HUD welcomes public comment on
all aspects of the proposed rule;
however given the privacy concerns
surrounding the disclosure of social
security numbers (SSNs), the
Department specifically requests
comments on those proposed regulatory
requirements pertaining to SSN
disclosure. All public comments will be
considered by HUD in the development
of a final rule that will, depending upon
public comments received in response
to this proposed rule, and further
consideration of issues by HUD,
supersede provisions of the Final Rule
that would otherwise take effect on
January 31, 2010.
The following presents a summary of
the key changes made to the Final Rule,
and these changes are directed to:
deferring changes to the definition of
annual income to separate rulemaking
that may address broader rent and
income reforms; deferring any changes
to HUD’s noncitizen regulations, which,
given the importance of this issue,
should be addressed by separate
rulemaking; and simplifying SSN
disclosure and verification processes, to
the extent feasible, and consistent with
E:\FR\FM\15OCP1.SGM
15OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 198 / Thursday, October 15, 2009 / Proposed Rules
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
maintaining confidentiality of these
processes.
A. Proposed Amendments to 24 CFR
Part 5, Subpart B—Disclosure and
Verification of Social Security Numbers
and Employer Identification Numbers;
Procedures for Obtaining Income
Information
1. Applicability of the Social Security
Number disclosure requirements. HUD’s
regulations at 24 CFR 5.216 establish
requirements regarding SSN disclosure
and verification. This proposed rule
would clarify that the SSN disclosure
requirements apply to applicants and
participants in HUD’s public and
assisted housing programs subject to the
requirements of 24 CFR part 5, subpart
B; however, the disclosure requirements
are inapplicable to individuals who do
not contend eligible immigration status
under HUD’s noncitizens regulations at
24 CFR part 5, subpart E. The disclosure
requirements for such individuals
continue to be found at 24 CFR 5.508 of
the noncitizens regulations. As noted
above in this preamble, the Final Rule
was not directed to addressing the
noncitizens requirements. Given the
significance of the issues involved, HUD
believes that any changes deemed
necessary to the noncitizens
requirements would more appropriately
be the subject of a separate rulemaking.
2. Participant SSN disclosure
requirements—‘‘grandfathering’’ of
participants 62 years of age or older and
exemption for individuals who have
already disclosed a valid SSN. This
proposed rule would also streamline the
SSN disclosure requirements for current
participants in HUD rental assistance
programs. Specifically, the proposed
rule would exempt current participants
62 years of age or older as of January 31,
2010, from having to disclose an SSN.
The Department is sympathetic to the
burden that such a disclosure
requirement might impose on elderly
residents, many of whom have been
residing in their units for many years
and are otherwise in compliance with
all program requirements. The proposed
rule would also reduce administrative
burden by exempting those participants
who have previously disclosed a valid
SSN from having to re-provide their
SSN for duplicative verification. Under
proposed § 5.216(e)(1), only those
individuals who have not previously
disclosed a valid SSN or who have been
issued a new SSN would be subject to
the SSN disclosure and verification
procedures. The proposed changes
would reduce administrative burden,
and enhance privacy protections for
individuals and households who have
already disclosed valid SSNs, as well as
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:05 Oct 14, 2009
Jkt 220001
reduce the administrative burden for the
covered housing providers that must
collect this information.
3. Required documentation. Proposed
§ 5.216(g)(1) would permit compliance
with the SSN disclosure requirements
through submission of a valid SSN card
issued by the Social Security
Administration or an original document
issued by a federal or state government
agency that provides the SSN of the
individual along with other identifying
information. In addition, the proposed
rule provides for HUD to prescribe other
acceptable evidence of a SSN through
administrative instructions. The public
comments received in response to the
February 2009, notice noted the possible
unforeseen circumstances that might
delay issuance of a SSN card, even
where the individual has a valid SSN
number. The proposed changes would
address such concerns and reduce
administrative burden by authorizing
reliance on the SSN documentation
provided by another government
agency. However, HUD notes that such
SSN data provided by participants
would still be subject to verification by
PHAs and owners and management
agents through use of the EIV system.
4. Addition of new household
members under the age of six. The
proposed rule would also revise and
clarify the applicability of the SSN
disclosure requirements for households
adding new household members under
the age of six. Public comments on the
February 2009, notice made HUD
cognizant that there may be unforeseen
circumstances outside the control of a
household that may delay the issuance
of a SSN for such children under the age
of six. To address these concerns,
proposed § 5.216(e)(2)(ii) would provide
participants with 90 days to provide a
SSN for new household members under
the age of six. The processing entity
shall grant an extension of one
additional 90-day period if the
processing entity, in its discretion,
determines that the participant’s failure
to provide documentation of a SSN for
the child under six was due to
circumstances that could not have
reasonably been foreseen and were
outside the control of the participant.
During the period that the processing
entity is awaiting documentation of a
SSN, the child is entitled to all the
benefits of being a member of the
household. Failure of the participant to
provide documentation of a SSN for the
child under six by the deadline, will
result in applicable penalties as
described in § 5.218.
5. Disclosure requirements upon
assignment of new SSN. The proposed
rule would provide processing entities
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
52933
with additional flexibility to determine
the timing of disclosure of a newly
assigned SSN, by providing that if a
participant has been assigned a new
SSN, the participant must disclose the
SSN at either the time of receipt of the
new SSN; at the next interim or
regularly scheduled reexamination or
recertification of family composition or
income, or other reexamination or
recertification; or at such earlier time
specified by the processing entity.
Under the regulations currently in effect
the participant is not required to
disclose a newly assigned SSN until a
reexamination or recertification of
family composition and income.
6. Exception to required termination
of assistance or tenancy due to
unforeseen circumstances. Under the
current regulations in effect, a
processing entity must terminate the
assistance or tenancy, or both, of a
participant who does not meet the SSN
disclosure requirements (see § 5.218(c)).
As noted above in this preamble, HUD
is aware that unforeseen circumstances
may sometimes delay the issuance of a
SSN. Accordingly, the proposed rule
would revise § 5.218(c) to allow the
processing entity to defer termination
and provide the participant with an
additional 90 days to disclose a valid
SSN, but only if the processing entity
determines that: (1) failure to comply
with the SSN requirements was due to
circumstances that could not have
reasonably been foreseen and were
outside the control of the household;
and (2) there is a reasonable likelihood
that the participant will be able to
disclose a SSN by the deadline. Failure
of the participant to disclose a SSN by
the deadline will result in termination.
7. Required use of EIV—no deferred
implementation date for multifamily
owners and management agents.
Consistent with the Final Rule, this
proposed rule would continue the
required use of the EIV system by PHAs
and multifamily owners and
management agents (see § 5.233 of the
Final Rule). However, the proposed rule
would no longer provide for deferred
EIV implementation for owners and
management agents. Although PHAs
have long had experience with EIV, the
system was relatively new for owners
and management agents at the time the
Final Rule was originally published.
Accordingly, HUD provided multifamily
owners and management agents with an
additional six months from the rule’s
effective date to comply with EIV use.
The deferral was intended to provide
owners and management agents with
the necessary time to become familiar
with the EIV system. Given the
extension of time for implementation
E:\FR\FM\15OCP1.SGM
15OCP1
52934
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 198 / Thursday, October 15, 2009 / Proposed Rules
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
that is now provided by extending the
effective date of the use of EIV to
January 31, 2010, HUD determined that
a deferral is no longer necessary.
8. Required use of EIV in its entirety.
Several commenters on the February 11,
2009, notice questioned whether the use
of the EIV system was required only for
income verification or in its entirety. As
previously noted, HUD is committed to
the full and effective implementation of
the EIV system, and continues to believe
that the use of upfront income
verification will help identify and cure
inaccuracies in public and assisted
housing subsidy determinations, which
benefits public and assisted housing
providers, tenants, and taxpayers. In
response to the comments, this
proposed rule would clarify that
processing entities must use the EIV
system in its entirety as a third-party
source to verify tenant employment and
income information during mandatory
reexaminations or recertifications of
family composition and income and
also to reduce administrative and
subsidy payment errors in accordance
with HUD administrative guidance.
9. Technical and conforming
amendments. The proposed rule would
also make several technical, nonsubstantive changes, to the regulations
at 24 CFR part 5, subpart B. These
changes include updating crossreferences to other regulatory provisions
that would be revised by the proposed
rule, and removing outdated references
to HUD programs no longer in existence
(for example, the obsolete reference to
the Section 215 program at
§ 5.216(b)(3)(i)(A)). HUD believes that
these changes, although technical and
conforming in nature, will help
eliminate confusion, and contribute to
clarity.
B. Withdrawal of Amendments to 24
CFR Part 5, Subpart E—Restrictions on
Assistance to Noncitizens
The Final Rule would have made
several revisions to the documentation
requirements in HUD’s noncitizens
regulations, primarily to conform to the
other amendments pertaining to use of
the EIV system. As noted elsewhere in
this preamble, the intent of the Final
Rule was not directed to revising or
updating the noncitizens requirements.
Many of the comments submitted in
response to the February 11, 2009,
notice requested clarification regarding
the verification procedures applicable to
noncitizens and posed questions
concerning the intent of the regulatory
changes contained in the Final Rule.
Given the sensitivity and significance of
the issues involved, HUD has decided
that should any future changes to the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:05 Oct 14, 2009
Jkt 220001
noncitizens requirements be deemed
necessary, they would more
appropriately be the subject of a
separate rulemaking focused exclusively
on these policies and procedures and
providing the public with additional
opportunity to comment. Accordingly,
through this rule, HUD proposes to
withdraw the January 27, 2009,
amendments to the noncitizens
regulations, and leaves in place the
requirements codified in 24 CFR part 5,
subpart E, prior to revision by the Final
Rule.
C. Withdrawal of Amendments to 24
CFR Part 5, Subpart F (Family Income
and Payment Requirements) and 24 CFR
Part 92 (HOME Investment Partnerships
Program)
The Final Rule would have revised
the definition of annual income for
HUD’s public and assisted housing
programs codified at § 5.609.
Specifically, the Final Rule would have
added new provisions regarding the use
of historical income amounts for
purposes of determining annual income,
and made other technical changes to the
determination of annual income. The
Final Rule would also have made a
conforming change to the annual
income provisions of the HOME
Investment Partnership program at 24
CFR 92.203.
Many of the comments on HUD’s
February 11, 2009, notice questioned
the annual income provisions of the
Final Rule, and requested additional
clarification and revisions. Given the
comments received on the issue
expressing uncertainty about the
changes to annual income in the Final
Rule, the possibility of legislation that
would make, within the near future,
statutory changes to annual income
provisions, and the fact that such
changes are not necessary to
implementation of the EIV system, the
Department has decided to maintain the
definition of annual income currently in
effect; that is, this proposed rule leaves
the content of § 5.609 as it was prior to
amendment by the January 27, 2009,
final rule. Should HUD determine that
additional rulemaking on the subject of
annual income is necessary or
appropriate, HUD will provide the
public with the opportunity to comment
on any proposed changes to the
regulations.
III. Findings and Certifications
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review
The Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) reviewed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 12866 (entitled
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
‘‘Regulatory Planning and Review’’).
OMB determined that this proposed rule
is a ‘‘significant regulatory action,’’ as
defined in section 3(f) of the Order
(although not economically significant,
as provided in section 3(f)(1) of the
Order).
The January 27, 2009, final rule was
determined an economically significant
rule based on full implementation of
EIV, which the January 27, 2009, final
rule would achieve by mandating its use
by all HUD housing providers. The
rulemaking initiated by this proposed
rule does not propose to alter full use of
EIV. As stated earlier in this preamble,
HUD is committed to full
implementation of EIV. This proposed
rule is limited to address certain
regulatory amendments in the January
27, 2009, final rule that caused
confusion and which amendments were
not central or necessary to full
implementation of EIV. The
clarifications made by this rule do not
result in an impact on the economy of
$100 million or more.
The docket file is available for public
inspection in the Regulations Division,
Office of General Counsel, Department
of Housing and Urban Development,
451 Seventh Street, SW., Room 10276,
Washington, DC 20410–0500. Due to
security measures at the HUD
Headquarters building, please schedule
an appointment to review the docket file
by calling the Regulations Division at
(202) 402–3055 (this is not a toll-free
number). Individuals with speech or
hearing impairments may access this
number via TTY by calling the Federal
Information Relay Service at 800–877–
8339.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The information collection
requirements in this proposed rule have
been approved by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501–3520) and assigned
OMB Control Numbers 2577–0220 and
2502–0204. In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act, HUD may not
conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to, a collection of
information, unless the collection
displays a currently valid OMB Control
Number.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) generally requires
an agency to conduct a regulatory
flexibility analysis of any rule subject to
notice and comment rulemaking
requirements, unless the agency certifies
that the rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
E:\FR\FM\15OCP1.SGM
15OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 198 / Thursday, October 15, 2009 / Proposed Rules
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
number of small entities.
Implementation of HUD’s EIV system,
which the Refinement of Income and
Rent Determination rulemaking
addresses is concerned with those
entities that are responsible for making
eligibility determinations and income
reexaminations or recertifications under
sections 3 and 5 of the United States
Housing Act of 1937, and tenant-based
and project-based housing assistance
under section 8 of the United States
Housing Act of 1937. The purpose of
this proposed rule is not to interfere
with full implementation of HUD’s EIV
system, now scheduled to take effect on
January 31, 2010, but is limited to
clarifying certain regulatory
amendments of the January 27, 2009,
final rule that required further
clarification, and proposing to remove
other regulatory amendments that were
determined not necessary for
implementation of EIV. Accordingly,
this proposed rule does not alter the
small entity impact analysis made in the
January 27, 2009, final rule nor does this
proposed rule, which makes certain
clarifying amendments, result in a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Notwithstanding HUD’s
determination that this rule does not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities,
HUD invites comments from all entities,
including small entities, regarding less
burdensome alternatives to this rule that
will meet HUD’s objectives as described
in this preamble.
Environmental Impact
This proposed rule involves
statutorily required and/or discretionary
establishment and review of interest
rates, loan limits, building cost
estimates, prototype costs, fair market
rent schedules, HUD-determined
prevailing wage rates, income limits and
exclusions with regard to eligibility for
or calculation of HUD housing
assistance or rental assistance, and
similar rate and cost determinations and
related external administrative or fiscal
requirements or procedures that do not
constitute a development decision
affecting the physical condition of
specific project areas or building sites.
Accordingly, under 24 CFR 50.19(c)(6),
this proposed rule is categorically
excluded from environmental review
under the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et
seq.)
Executive Order 13132, Federalism
Executive Order 13132 (entitled
‘‘Federalism’’) prohibits, to the extent
practicable and permitted by law, an
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:05 Oct 14, 2009
Jkt 220001
agency from promulgating a regulation
that has federalism implications and
either imposes substantial direct
compliance costs on state and local
governments and is not required by
statute, or preempts state law, unless the
relevant requirements of section 6 of the
Executive Order are met. This rule does
not have federalism implications and
does not impose substantial direct
compliance costs on state and local
governments or preempt state law
within the meaning of the Executive
Order.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–
1538) (UMRA) establishes requirements
for Federal agencies to assess the effects
of their regulatory actions on State,
local, and tribal governments, and on
the private sector. This proposed rule
would not impose any Federal mandate
on any State, local, or tribal government,
or on the private sector, within the
meaning of the UMRA.
List of Subjects
24 CFR Part 5
Administrative practice and
procedure, Aged, Claims, Crime,
Government contracts, Grant
programs—housing and community
development, Individuals with
disabilities, Intergovernmental relations,
Loan programs—housing and
community development, Low and
moderate income housing, Mortgage
insurance, Penalties, Pets, Public
housing, Rent subsidies, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Social
Security, Unemployment compensation,
Wages.
24 CFR Part 908
Computer technology, Grant
programs—housing and community
development, Rent subsidies, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
Accordingly, for the reasons described
in the preamble, HUD proposes to
amend 24 CFR parts 5 and 908, as
amended in the final rule published on
January 27, 2009, at 74 FR 4832, as
follows:
PART 5—GENERAL HUD PROGRAM
REQUIREMENTS; WAIVERS
1. The authority citation for part 5
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 1437a, 1437c, 1437d,
1437f, 1437n, 3535(d), and Sec. 327, Pub. L.
109–115, 119 Stat. 2936.
2. Revise § 5.216 to read as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
52935
§ 5.216 Disclosure and verification of
Social Security and Employer Identification
Numbers.
(a) General. The requirements of this
section apply to applicants and
participants as described in this section,
except this section is inapplicable to
individuals who do not contend eligible
immigration status under subpart E of
this part (see § 5.508).
(b) Disclosure required of assistance
applicants. Each assistance applicant
must submit the following information
to the processing entity when the
assistance applicant’s eligibility under
the program involved is being
determined.
(1) The complete and accurate SSN
assigned to the assistance applicant and
to each member of the assistance
applicant’s household; and
(2) The documentation referred to in
paragraph (g)(1) of this section to verify
each such SSN.
(c) Disclosure required of individual
owner applicants. Each individual
owner applicant must submit the
following information to the processing
entity when the individual owner
applicant’s eligibility under the program
involved is being determined:
(1) The complete and accurate SSN
assigned to the individual owner
applicant and to each member of the
individual owner applicant’s household
who will be obligated to pay the debt
evidenced by the mortgage or loan
documents; and
(2) The documentation referred to in
paragraph (g)(1) of this section to verify
each such SSN.
(d) Disclosure required of certain
officials of entity applicants. Each
officer, director, principal stockholder,
or other official of an entity applicant
must submit the following information
to the processing entity when the entity
applicant’s eligibility under the program
involved is being determined:
(1) The complete and accurate SSN
assigned to each such individual; and
(2) The documentation referred to in
paragraph (g)(1) of this section to verify
each SSN.
(e) Disclosure required of participants.
(1) Initial disclosure. (i) Each
participant, except those age 62 or older
as of January 31, 2010, whose initial
determination of eligibility under the
program involved was begun before
January 31, 2010, must submit the
information described in paragraph
(e)(1)(ii) of this section, if the
participant has:
(A) Not previously disclosed a SSN;
(B) Previously disclosed a SSN that
HUD or the SSA determined was
invalid; or
(C) Been issued a new SSN.
E:\FR\FM\15OCP1.SGM
15OCP1
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
52936
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 198 / Thursday, October 15, 2009 / Proposed Rules
(ii) Each participant subject to the
disclosure requirements under
paragraph (e)(1)(i) of this section must
submit the following information to the
processing entity at the next interim or
regularly scheduled reexamination or
recertification of family composition or
income, or other reexamination or
recertification for the program involved:
(A) The complete and accurate SSN
assigned to the participant and to each
member of the participant’s household;
and
(B) The documentation referred to in
paragraph (g)(1) of this section to verify
each such SSN.
(2) Subsequent disclosure. Once a
participant has disclosed and the
processing entity has verified each SSN,
the following rules apply:
(i) Addition of new household who is
at least six years of age. When the
participant requests to add a new
household member who is at least six
years of age, the participant must
provide the following to the processing
entity at the time of the request, or at the
time of processing the interim
reexamination or recertification of
family composition that includes the
new member(s):
(A) The complete and accurate SSN
assigned to each new member; and
(B) The documentation referred to in
paragraph (g)(1) of this section to verify
the SSN for each new member.
(ii) Addition of household member
who is under the age of six. (A) When
a participant seeks to include or add a
household member who is under the age
of six and who has no SSN, the
participant shall be required to provide
the complete and accurate SSN assigned
to each new child and the
documentation referred to in paragraph
(g)(1) of this section to verify the SSN
for each new child within 90 calendar
days of the child being added to the
household.
(B) The processing entity shall grant
an extension of one additional 90-day
period if the processing entity, in its
discretion, determines that the
participant’s failure to comply was due
to circumstances that could not have
reasonably been foreseen and were
outside the control of the participant.
During the period that the processing
entity is awaiting documentation of a
SSN, the processing entity shall include
the child as part of the assisted
household and the child shall be
entitled to all the benefits of being a
household member. If upon expiration
of the provided time period, the
participant fails to produce a SSN, the
processing entity shall follow the
provisions of § 5.218.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:05 Oct 14, 2009
Jkt 220001
(iii) Assignment of new SSN. If the
participant or any member of the
participant’s household has been
assigned a new SSN, the participant
must submit the following to the
processing entity at either the time of
receipt of the new SSN; at the next
interim or regularly scheduled
reexamination or recertification of
family composition or income, or other
reexamination or recertification; or at
such earlier time specified by the
processing entity:
(A) The complete and accurate SSN
assigned to the participant or household
member involved; and
(B) The documentation referred to in
paragraph (g)(1) of this section to verify
the SSN of each individual.
(f) Disclosure required of entity
applicants. Each entity applicant must
submit the following information to the
processing entity when the entity
applicant’s eligibility under the program
involved is being determined:
(1) Any complete and accurate EIN
assigned to the entity applicant; and
(2) The documentation referred to in
paragraph (g)(2) of this section to verify
the EIN.
(g) Required documentation. (1) SSN.
The documentation necessary to verify
the SSN of an individual who is
required to disclose his or her SSN
under paragraphs (a) through (e) of this
section is:
(i) A valid SSN card issued by the
SSA;
(ii) An original document issued by a
federal or state government agency,
which contains the name of the
individual and the SSN of the
individual, along with other identifying
information of the individual; or
(ii) Such other evidence of the SSN as
HUD may prescribe in administrative
instructions.
(2) EIN. The documentation necessary
to verify an EIN of an entity applicant
that is required to disclose its EIN under
paragraph (f) of this section is the
official, written communication from
the Internal Revenue Service (IRS)
assigning the EIN to the entity
applicant, or such other evidence of the
EIN as HUD may prescribe in
administrative instructions.
(h) Effect on assistance applicants. (1)
Except as provided in paragraph (h)(2)
of this section, if the processing entity
determines that the assistance applicant
is otherwise eligible to participate in a
program, the assistance applicant may
retain its place on the waiting list for the
program, but cannot become a
participant until it can provide:
(i) The complete and accurate SSN
assigned to each member of the
household; and
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(ii) The documentation referred to in
paragraph (g)(1) of this section to verify
the SSN of each such member.
(2) For applicants to the Section 8
Moderate Rehabilitation Single Room
Occupancy (SRO) Program for Homeless
Individuals under 24 CFR part 882,
subpart H, the documentation required
in paragraph (h)(1) of this section must
be provided to the processing entity
within 90 days from the date of
admission into the program. The
processing entity shall grant an
extension of one additional 90-day
period if the processing entity, in its
discretion, determines that the
applicant’s failure to comply was due to
circumstances that could not have
reasonably been foreseen and were
outside the control of the applicant. If
upon expiration of the provided time
period, the individual fails to produce a
SSN, the processing entity shall follow
the provisions of § 5.218.
(i) Rejection of documentation. The
processing entity must not reject
documentation referred to in paragraph
(g) of this section, except as HUD may
otherwise prescribe through publicly
issued notice.
3. Amend § 5.218 by revising
paragraphs (a), (b) and (c) to read as
follows:
§ 5.218 Penalties for failing to disclose and
verify Social Security and Employer
Identification Numbers.
(a) Denial of eligibility of assistance
applicants and individual owner
applicants. The processing entity must
deny the eligibility of an assistance
applicant or individual owner applicant
in accordance with the provisions
governing the program involved, if the
assistance or individual owner
applicant does not meet the applicable
SSN disclosure, documentation, and
verification requirements as specified in
§ 5.216.
(b) Denial of eligibility of entity
applicants. The processing entity must
deny the eligibility of an entity
applicant in accordance with the
provisions governing the program
involved; if:
(1) The entity applicant does not meet
the EIN disclosure, documentation, and
verification requirements specified in
§ 5.216; or
(2) Any of the officials of the entity
applicant referred to in § 5.216(d) does
not meet the applicable SSN disclosure,
and documentation and verification
requirements specified in § 5.216.
(c) Termination of assistance or
termination of tenancy of participants.
(1) The processing entity must terminate
the assistance or terminate the tenancy,
or both, of a participant, in accordance
E:\FR\FM\15OCP1.SGM
15OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 198 / Thursday, October 15, 2009 / Proposed Rules
with the provisions governing the
program involved, if the participant
does not meet the applicable SSN
disclosure, documentation, and
verification requirements specified in
§ 5.216.
(2) The processing entity may defer
termination and provide the participant
with an additional 90 days to disclose
a SSN, but only if unless the processing
entity, in its discretion, determines that:
(i) The failure to meet these
requirements was due to circumstances
that could not have reasonably been
foreseen and were outside the control of
the participant; and
(ii) There is a reasonable likelihood
that the participant will be able to
disclose a SSN by the deadline.
(3) Failure of the participant to
disclose a SSN by the deadline specified
in paragraph (c)(2) of this section will
result in termination of the assistance or
tenancy, or both, of the participant.
*
*
*
*
*
4. Add a new § 5.233 to read as
follows:
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
§ 5.233 Mandated use of HUD’s Enterprise
Income Verification (EIV) System.
(a) Programs subject to this section
and requirements. (1) The requirements
of this section apply to entities
administering assistance under the:
(i) Public Housing program under 24
CFR part 960;
(ii) Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher
(HCV) program under 24 CFR part 982;
(iii) Moderate Rehabilitation program
under 24 CFR part 882;
(iv) Project-based Voucher program
under 24 CFR part 983;
(v) Project-based Section 8 programs
under 24 CFR parts 880, 881, 883, 884,
886, and 891;
(vi) Section 202 of the Housing Act of
1959 (12 U.S.C. 1701q);
(vii) Section 811 of the CranstonGonzalez National Affordable Housing
Act (42 U.S.C. 8013);
(viii) Sections 221(d)(3) and 236 of the
National Housing Act (12 U.S.C.
1715l(d)(3) and 1715z–1); and
(ix) Rent Supplement program under
section 101 of the Housing and Urban
Development Act of 1965 (12 U.S.C.
1701s).
(2) Processing entities must use
HUD’s EIV system in its entirety:
(i) As a third-party source to verify
tenant employment and income
information during mandatory
reexaminations or recertifications of
family composition and income, in
accordance with § 5.236 and
administrative guidance issued by HUD;
and
(ii) To reduce administrative and
subsidy payment errors in accordance
with HUD administrative guidance.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:05 Oct 14, 2009
Jkt 220001
(b) Penalties for noncompliance.
Failure to use the EIV system in its
entirety may result in the imposition of
sanctions and/or the assessment of
disallowed costs associated with any
resulting incorrect subsidy or tenant
rent calculations, or both.
§ 5.236
[Amended]
5. In § 5.236(b)(3)(i)(A), remove
‘‘215’’.
PART 908—ELECTRONIC
TRANSMISSION OF REQUIRED
FAMILY DATA FOR PUBLIC HOUSING,
INDIAN HOUSING, AND THE SECTION
8 RENTAL CERTIFICATE, RENTAL
VOUCHER, AND MODERATE
REHABILITATION PROGRAMS
6. The authority citation for part 908
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 1437f, 3535d, 3543,
3544, and 3608a.
7. Revise § 908.101 to read as follows:
§ 908.101
Purpose.
The purpose of this part is to require
Public Housing Agencies (PHAs),
including Moving to Work (MTW)
PHAs, that operate Public Housing,
Indian Housing, or Section 8 Rental
Certificate, Housing Choice Voucher
(HCV), Rental Voucher, and Moderate
Rehabilitation programs to
electronically submit certain data to
HUD for those programs. These
electronically submitted data are
required for HUD forms: HUD–50058,
including the Family Self-Sufficiency
(FSS) Addendum. Applicable program
entities must retain at a minimum, the
last three years of the form HUD–50058,
and supporting documentation, during
the term of each assisted lease, and for
a period of at least 3 years from the end
of participation (EOP) date, to support
billings to HUD and to permit an
effective audit. Electronic retention of
form HUD–50058 and HUD–50058–FSS
and supporting documentation fulfills
the retention requirement under this
section.
Dated: September 23, 2009.
Shaun Donovan,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9–24809 Filed 10–14–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
52937
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade
Bureau
27 CFR Parts 28 and 44
[Docket No. TTB–2009–0005; Notice No.
100]
RIN 1513–AB77
Drawback of Internal Revenue Taxes
AGENCY: Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and
Trade Bureau, Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
SUMMARY: The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax
and Trade Bureau proposes to amend its
regulations to clarify the relationship
between tax payment under the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986 and drawback of
tax under the Tariff Act of 1930. The
proposal provides conforming
amendments to reflect proposed
Customs and Border Protection
regulations stating that domestic
merchandise on which no tax is paid
under the Internal Revenue Code may
not be substituted for imported
merchandise for purposes of claims for
drawback of tax under the customs laws
and regulations.
DATES: We must receive your written
comments on or before December 14,
2009.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments on
this notice to one of the following
addresses:
• https://www.regulations.gov: Use the
comment form for this notice on the
Federal e-rulemaking portal,
Regulations.gov, to submit comments
via the Internet;
• Mail: Director, Regulations and
Rulings Division, Alcohol and Tobacco
Tax and Trade Bureau, P.O. Box 14412,
Washington, DC 20044–4412.
• Hand Delivery/Courier in Lieu of
Mail: Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and
Trade Bureau, 1310 G Street, NW., Suite
200–E, Washington, DC 20005.
See the Public Participation section of
this notice for specific instructions and
requirements for submitting comments,
and for information on how to request
a public hearing.
You may view copies of this notice,
selected supporting materials, and the
comments we receive about this
proposal within Docket No. TTB–2009–
0005 at https://www.regulations.gov. A
direct link to this docket is posted on
the TTB Web site at https://www.ttb.gov/
regulations_laws/all_rulemaking.shtml
under Notice No. 100. You also may
view copies of this notice, all
supporting materials, and the comments
we receive about this proposal by
E:\FR\FM\15OCP1.SGM
15OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 198 (Thursday, October 15, 2009)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 52931-52937]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-24809]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
24 CFR Parts 5 and 908
[Docket No. FR-5351-P-01]
RIN 2501-AD48
Refinement of Income and Rent Determination Requirements in
Public and Assisted Housing Programs: Implementation of Enterprise
Income Verification
AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, HUD.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On January 27, 2009, HUD issued a final rule that revised the
regulations for HUD's public and assisted housing programs to require
the use of HUD's Enterprise Income Verification system by public
housing agencies and multifamily housing owners and management agents
when verifying the employment and income of program participants.
Consistent with Administration policy to review rules issued during the
transition from one Administration to another, HUD re-opened the
January 27, 2009, final rule for public comment, and specifically
solicited public comment on extending the effective date of the rule.
While HUD remains committed to full implementation of the Enterprise
Income Verification system, the public comments submitted on the
January 27, 2009, final rule highlighted for HUD certain regulatory
provisions that require further clarification, and ones that were
extraneous to the purpose of the rule, which is full implementation of
the Enterprise Income Verification system.
By final rule published on August 28, 2009, HUD delayed the
effective date of the January 27, 2009, final rule to January 31, 2010.
During this period before the final rule takes effect, HUD submits for
public comment, through this proposed rule, regulatory revisions
designed to make certain provisions in the January 27, 2009, final rule
more clear, and return other regulatory provisions to their pre-January
2009 final rule content.
DATES: Comment Due Date: November 16, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit comments regarding
this proposed rule to the Regulations Division, Office of General
Counsel, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 Seventh
Street, SW., Room 10276, Washington, DC 20410-0500. Communications must
refer to the above docket number and title. There are two methods for
submitting public comments. All submissions must refer to the above
docket number and title.
1. Submission of Comments by Mail. Comments may be submitted by
mail to the Regulations Division, Office of General Counsel, Department
of Housing and Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street, SW., Room 10276,
Washington, DC 20410-0500.
2. Electronic Submission of Comments. Interested persons may submit
comments electronically through the Federal eRulemaking Portal at
www.regulations.gov. HUD strongly encourages commenters to submit
comments electronically. Electronic submission of comments allows the
commenter maximum time to prepare and submit a comment, ensures timely
receipt by HUD, and enables HUD to make them immediately available to
the public. Comments submitted electronically through the
www.regulations.gov Web site can be viewed by other commenters and
interested members of the public. Commenters should follow the
instructions provided on that site to submit comments electronically.
[[Page 52932]]
Note: To receive consideration as public comments, comments must
be submitted through one of the two methods specified above. Again,
all submissions must refer to the docket number and title of the
rule.
No Facsimile Comments. Facsimile (FAX) comments are not acceptable.
Public Inspection of Public Comments. All properly submitted
comments and communications submitted to HUD will be available for
public inspection and copying between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. weekdays at the
above address. Due to security measures at the HUD Headquarters
building, an appointment to review the public comments must be
scheduled in advance by calling the Regulations Division at 202-708-
3055 (this is not a toll-free number). Individuals with speech or
hearing impairments may access this number via TTY by calling the
Federal Information Relay Service at 800-877-8339. Copies of all
comments submitted are available for inspection and downloading at
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For Office of Public and Indian
Housing programs, contact Nicole Faison, Program Advisor for the Office
of Public Housing and Voucher Programs, Department of Housing and Urban
Development, 451 7th Street, SW., Room 4214, Washington, DC 20410,
telephone number 202-402-4267. For Office of Housing Programs, contact
Gail Williamson, Director of the Housing Assistance Policy Division,
Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 7th Street, SW., Room
6138, Washington, DC 20410, telephone number 202-402-2473. (These are
not toll-free numbers.) Persons with hearing or speech impairments may
access these numbers through TTY by calling the toll-free Federal
Information Relay Service at 800-877-8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On January 27, 2009 (74 FR 4832), HUD published a final rule,
entitled ``Refinement of Income and Rent Determination Requirements in
Public and Assisted Housing Programs'' (Final Rule). The Final Rule
revised HUD's public and assisted housing program regulations to
implement the upfront income verification process for program
participants and to require the use of HUD's Enterprise Income
Verification (EIV) system by public housing agencies (PHAs) and owners
and management agents. The Final Rule followed publication of a June
19, 2007 (72 FR 33844) proposed rule, and took into consideration the
public comments received on the June 2007 proposed rule.
The Final Rule was originally scheduled to become effective on
March 30, 2009. On February 11, 2009 (74 FR 6839), HUD published a
notice in the Federal Register seeking public comment on whether to
delay the effective date of the Final Rule. The February 11, 2009,
notice was issued in accordance with the memorandum of January 20,
2009, from the assistant to the President and Chief of Staff, entitled
``Regulatory Review'' and subsequently published in the Federal
Register on January 26, 2009 (74 FR 4435). The notice explained that
HUD was considering a temporary 60-day delay in the effective date to
allow the Department an opportunity for further review and
consideration of new regulations, consistent with the Chief of Staff
memorandum. In addition to soliciting comments specifically delaying
the effective date, the February 11, 2009, notice also requested
comment generally on the Final Rule.
The comment period on the February 11, 2009, notice closed on March
13, 2009. HUD received 50 public comments. Comments were submitted by a
variety of organizations including PHAs, property owners, management
agents, legal aid organizations, community development organizations,
and public interest organizations. The majority of comments were
supportive of a delayed effective date. The commenters not only
supported a delay but sought clarification or changes by HUD of certain
aspects of the Final Rule, about which questions and comments were
raised. Among other issues, commenters requested that HUD address the
need to revise the definition of ``annual income,'' and clarify the
verification procedures applicable to noncitizens and participants who
may experience difficulty obtaining social security numbers for their
children.
Following publication of the February 11, 2009, Federal Register
notice, HUD issued a final rule on March 27, 2009 (74 FR 13339), that
extended the effective date of the Final Rule to September 30, 2009.
The purpose of this extension was to provide HUD with time to review
the public comments received in response to the February 11, 2009,
notice. On August 28, 2009 (74 FR 44285), HUD published a final rule
that further extended the effective date of the Final Rule to January
31, 2010. The further extension was undertaken to allow the two HUD
Assistant Secretaries, who have responsibility for the programs
affected by the rule, and only recently confirmed, sufficient time to
review the subject matter of the Final Rule, and to review and consider
the public comments received on HUD's February 11, 2009, Federal
Register notice.
II. This Proposed Rule
As noted in the Summary to this proposed rule, the Department
remains committed to the full and effective implementation of the EIV
system. The use of upfront income verification will help identify and
cure inaccuracies in public and assisted housing subsidy
determinations, which benefits public and assisted housing providers,
tenants, and taxpayers. Following a thorough review of the subject
matter of the Final Rule and the issues raised by the comments on the
February 11, 2009, notice, HUD is proposing, through this rule, to make
certain changes to the Final Rule, which HUD believes will address the
issues and concerns raised by the public commenters, and defer other
issues, to subsequent rulemaking.
To provide stakeholders, residents, and other interested members of
the public with the opportunity to offer feedback on the proposed
regulatory changes, HUD is undertaking additional rulemaking and
soliciting comments on the proposed amendments for a period of 30 days.
The regulatory changes proposed by this rule are few and focused, and
HUD believes that, in light of the prior public comment on the Final
Rule, a 30-day period presents sufficient time to review and comment on
the changes.
HUD welcomes public comment on all aspects of the proposed rule;
however given the privacy concerns surrounding the disclosure of social
security numbers (SSNs), the Department specifically requests comments
on those proposed regulatory requirements pertaining to SSN disclosure.
All public comments will be considered by HUD in the development of a
final rule that will, depending upon public comments received in
response to this proposed rule, and further consideration of issues by
HUD, supersede provisions of the Final Rule that would otherwise take
effect on January 31, 2010.
The following presents a summary of the key changes made to the
Final Rule, and these changes are directed to: deferring changes to the
definition of annual income to separate rulemaking that may address
broader rent and income reforms; deferring any changes to HUD's
noncitizen regulations, which, given the importance of this issue,
should be addressed by separate rulemaking; and simplifying SSN
disclosure and verification processes, to the extent feasible, and
consistent with
[[Page 52933]]
maintaining confidentiality of these processes.
A. Proposed Amendments to 24 CFR Part 5, Subpart B--Disclosure and
Verification of Social Security Numbers and Employer Identification
Numbers; Procedures for Obtaining Income Information
1. Applicability of the Social Security Number disclosure
requirements. HUD's regulations at 24 CFR 5.216 establish requirements
regarding SSN disclosure and verification. This proposed rule would
clarify that the SSN disclosure requirements apply to applicants and
participants in HUD's public and assisted housing programs subject to
the requirements of 24 CFR part 5, subpart B; however, the disclosure
requirements are inapplicable to individuals who do not contend
eligible immigration status under HUD's noncitizens regulations at 24
CFR part 5, subpart E. The disclosure requirements for such individuals
continue to be found at 24 CFR 5.508 of the noncitizens regulations. As
noted above in this preamble, the Final Rule was not directed to
addressing the noncitizens requirements. Given the significance of the
issues involved, HUD believes that any changes deemed necessary to the
noncitizens requirements would more appropriately be the subject of a
separate rulemaking.
2. Participant SSN disclosure requirements--``grandfathering'' of
participants 62 years of age or older and exemption for individuals who
have already disclosed a valid SSN. This proposed rule would also
streamline the SSN disclosure requirements for current participants in
HUD rental assistance programs. Specifically, the proposed rule would
exempt current participants 62 years of age or older as of January 31,
2010, from having to disclose an SSN. The Department is sympathetic to
the burden that such a disclosure requirement might impose on elderly
residents, many of whom have been residing in their units for many
years and are otherwise in compliance with all program requirements.
The proposed rule would also reduce administrative burden by exempting
those participants who have previously disclosed a valid SSN from
having to re-provide their SSN for duplicative verification. Under
proposed Sec. 5.216(e)(1), only those individuals who have not
previously disclosed a valid SSN or who have been issued a new SSN
would be subject to the SSN disclosure and verification procedures. The
proposed changes would reduce administrative burden, and enhance
privacy protections for individuals and households who have already
disclosed valid SSNs, as well as reduce the administrative burden for
the covered housing providers that must collect this information.
3. Required documentation. Proposed Sec. 5.216(g)(1) would permit
compliance with the SSN disclosure requirements through submission of a
valid SSN card issued by the Social Security Administration or an
original document issued by a federal or state government agency that
provides the SSN of the individual along with other identifying
information. In addition, the proposed rule provides for HUD to
prescribe other acceptable evidence of a SSN through administrative
instructions. The public comments received in response to the February
2009, notice noted the possible unforeseen circumstances that might
delay issuance of a SSN card, even where the individual has a valid SSN
number. The proposed changes would address such concerns and reduce
administrative burden by authorizing reliance on the SSN documentation
provided by another government agency. However, HUD notes that such SSN
data provided by participants would still be subject to verification by
PHAs and owners and management agents through use of the EIV system.
4. Addition of new household members under the age of six. The
proposed rule would also revise and clarify the applicability of the
SSN disclosure requirements for households adding new household members
under the age of six. Public comments on the February 2009, notice made
HUD cognizant that there may be unforeseen circumstances outside the
control of a household that may delay the issuance of a SSN for such
children under the age of six. To address these concerns, proposed
Sec. 5.216(e)(2)(ii) would provide participants with 90 days to
provide a SSN for new household members under the age of six. The
processing entity shall grant an extension of one additional 90-day
period if the processing entity, in its discretion, determines that the
participant's failure to provide documentation of a SSN for the child
under six was due to circumstances that could not have reasonably been
foreseen and were outside the control of the participant. During the
period that the processing entity is awaiting documentation of a SSN,
the child is entitled to all the benefits of being a member of the
household. Failure of the participant to provide documentation of a SSN
for the child under six by the deadline, will result in applicable
penalties as described in Sec. 5.218.
5. Disclosure requirements upon assignment of new SSN. The proposed
rule would provide processing entities with additional flexibility to
determine the timing of disclosure of a newly assigned SSN, by
providing that if a participant has been assigned a new SSN, the
participant must disclose the SSN at either the time of receipt of the
new SSN; at the next interim or regularly scheduled reexamination or
recertification of family composition or income, or other reexamination
or recertification; or at such earlier time specified by the processing
entity. Under the regulations currently in effect the participant is
not required to disclose a newly assigned SSN until a reexamination or
recertification of family composition and income.
6. Exception to required termination of assistance or tenancy due
to unforeseen circumstances. Under the current regulations in effect, a
processing entity must terminate the assistance or tenancy, or both, of
a participant who does not meet the SSN disclosure requirements (see
Sec. 5.218(c)). As noted above in this preamble, HUD is aware that
unforeseen circumstances may sometimes delay the issuance of a SSN.
Accordingly, the proposed rule would revise Sec. 5.218(c) to allow the
processing entity to defer termination and provide the participant with
an additional 90 days to disclose a valid SSN, but only if the
processing entity determines that: (1) failure to comply with the SSN
requirements was due to circumstances that could not have reasonably
been foreseen and were outside the control of the household; and (2)
there is a reasonable likelihood that the participant will be able to
disclose a SSN by the deadline. Failure of the participant to disclose
a SSN by the deadline will result in termination.
7. Required use of EIV--no deferred implementation date for
multifamily owners and management agents. Consistent with the Final
Rule, this proposed rule would continue the required use of the EIV
system by PHAs and multifamily owners and management agents (see Sec.
5.233 of the Final Rule). However, the proposed rule would no longer
provide for deferred EIV implementation for owners and management
agents. Although PHAs have long had experience with EIV, the system was
relatively new for owners and management agents at the time the Final
Rule was originally published. Accordingly, HUD provided multifamily
owners and management agents with an additional six months from the
rule's effective date to comply with EIV use. The deferral was intended
to provide owners and management agents with the necessary time to
become familiar with the EIV system. Given the extension of time for
implementation
[[Page 52934]]
that is now provided by extending the effective date of the use of EIV
to January 31, 2010, HUD determined that a deferral is no longer
necessary.
8. Required use of EIV in its entirety. Several commenters on the
February 11, 2009, notice questioned whether the use of the EIV system
was required only for income verification or in its entirety. As
previously noted, HUD is committed to the full and effective
implementation of the EIV system, and continues to believe that the use
of upfront income verification will help identify and cure inaccuracies
in public and assisted housing subsidy determinations, which benefits
public and assisted housing providers, tenants, and taxpayers. In
response to the comments, this proposed rule would clarify that
processing entities must use the EIV system in its entirety as a third-
party source to verify tenant employment and income information during
mandatory reexaminations or recertifications of family composition and
income and also to reduce administrative and subsidy payment errors in
accordance with HUD administrative guidance.
9. Technical and conforming amendments. The proposed rule would
also make several technical, non-substantive changes, to the
regulations at 24 CFR part 5, subpart B. These changes include updating
cross-references to other regulatory provisions that would be revised
by the proposed rule, and removing outdated references to HUD programs
no longer in existence (for example, the obsolete reference to the
Section 215 program at Sec. 5.216(b)(3)(i)(A)). HUD believes that
these changes, although technical and conforming in nature, will help
eliminate confusion, and contribute to clarity.
B. Withdrawal of Amendments to 24 CFR Part 5, Subpart E--Restrictions
on Assistance to Noncitizens
The Final Rule would have made several revisions to the
documentation requirements in HUD's noncitizens regulations, primarily
to conform to the other amendments pertaining to use of the EIV system.
As noted elsewhere in this preamble, the intent of the Final Rule was
not directed to revising or updating the noncitizens requirements. Many
of the comments submitted in response to the February 11, 2009, notice
requested clarification regarding the verification procedures
applicable to noncitizens and posed questions concerning the intent of
the regulatory changes contained in the Final Rule. Given the
sensitivity and significance of the issues involved, HUD has decided
that should any future changes to the noncitizens requirements be
deemed necessary, they would more appropriately be the subject of a
separate rulemaking focused exclusively on these policies and
procedures and providing the public with additional opportunity to
comment. Accordingly, through this rule, HUD proposes to withdraw the
January 27, 2009, amendments to the noncitizens regulations, and leaves
in place the requirements codified in 24 CFR part 5, subpart E, prior
to revision by the Final Rule.
C. Withdrawal of Amendments to 24 CFR Part 5, Subpart F (Family Income
and Payment Requirements) and 24 CFR Part 92 (HOME Investment
Partnerships Program)
The Final Rule would have revised the definition of annual income
for HUD's public and assisted housing programs codified at Sec. 5.609.
Specifically, the Final Rule would have added new provisions regarding
the use of historical income amounts for purposes of determining annual
income, and made other technical changes to the determination of annual
income. The Final Rule would also have made a conforming change to the
annual income provisions of the HOME Investment Partnership program at
24 CFR 92.203.
Many of the comments on HUD's February 11, 2009, notice questioned
the annual income provisions of the Final Rule, and requested
additional clarification and revisions. Given the comments received on
the issue expressing uncertainty about the changes to annual income in
the Final Rule, the possibility of legislation that would make, within
the near future, statutory changes to annual income provisions, and the
fact that such changes are not necessary to implementation of the EIV
system, the Department has decided to maintain the definition of annual
income currently in effect; that is, this proposed rule leaves the
content of Sec. 5.609 as it was prior to amendment by the January 27,
2009, final rule. Should HUD determine that additional rulemaking on
the subject of annual income is necessary or appropriate, HUD will
provide the public with the opportunity to comment on any proposed
changes to the regulations.
III. Findings and Certifications
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) reviewed this proposed
rule under Executive Order 12866 (entitled ``Regulatory Planning and
Review''). OMB determined that this proposed rule is a ``significant
regulatory action,'' as defined in section 3(f) of the Order (although
not economically significant, as provided in section 3(f)(1) of the
Order).
The January 27, 2009, final rule was determined an economically
significant rule based on full implementation of EIV, which the January
27, 2009, final rule would achieve by mandating its use by all HUD
housing providers. The rulemaking initiated by this proposed rule does
not propose to alter full use of EIV. As stated earlier in this
preamble, HUD is committed to full implementation of EIV. This proposed
rule is limited to address certain regulatory amendments in the January
27, 2009, final rule that caused confusion and which amendments were
not central or necessary to full implementation of EIV. The
clarifications made by this rule do not result in an impact on the
economy of $100 million or more.
The docket file is available for public inspection in the
Regulations Division, Office of General Counsel, Department of Housing
and Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street, SW., Room 10276, Washington,
DC 20410-0500. Due to security measures at the HUD Headquarters
building, please schedule an appointment to review the docket file by
calling the Regulations Division at (202) 402-3055 (this is not a toll-
free number). Individuals with speech or hearing impairments may access
this number via TTY by calling the Federal Information Relay Service at
800-877-8339.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The information collection requirements in this proposed rule have
been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520) and assigned OMB
Control Numbers 2577-0220 and 2502-0204. In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act, HUD may not conduct or sponsor, and a person
is not required to respond to, a collection of information, unless the
collection displays a currently valid OMB Control Number.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.)
generally requires an agency to conduct a regulatory flexibility
analysis of any rule subject to notice and comment rulemaking
requirements, unless the agency certifies that the rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial
[[Page 52935]]
number of small entities. Implementation of HUD's EIV system, which the
Refinement of Income and Rent Determination rulemaking addresses is
concerned with those entities that are responsible for making
eligibility determinations and income reexaminations or
recertifications under sections 3 and 5 of the United States Housing
Act of 1937, and tenant-based and project-based housing assistance
under section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937. The purpose
of this proposed rule is not to interfere with full implementation of
HUD's EIV system, now scheduled to take effect on January 31, 2010, but
is limited to clarifying certain regulatory amendments of the January
27, 2009, final rule that required further clarification, and proposing
to remove other regulatory amendments that were determined not
necessary for implementation of EIV. Accordingly, this proposed rule
does not alter the small entity impact analysis made in the January 27,
2009, final rule nor does this proposed rule, which makes certain
clarifying amendments, result in a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Notwithstanding HUD's determination that this rule does not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities,
HUD invites comments from all entities, including small entities,
regarding less burdensome alternatives to this rule that will meet
HUD's objectives as described in this preamble.
Environmental Impact
This proposed rule involves statutorily required and/or
discretionary establishment and review of interest rates, loan limits,
building cost estimates, prototype costs, fair market rent schedules,
HUD-determined prevailing wage rates, income limits and exclusions with
regard to eligibility for or calculation of HUD housing assistance or
rental assistance, and similar rate and cost determinations and related
external administrative or fiscal requirements or procedures that do
not constitute a development decision affecting the physical condition
of specific project areas or building sites. Accordingly, under 24 CFR
50.19(c)(6), this proposed rule is categorically excluded from
environmental review under the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.)
Executive Order 13132, Federalism
Executive Order 13132 (entitled ``Federalism'') prohibits, to the
extent practicable and permitted by law, an agency from promulgating a
regulation that has federalism implications and either imposes
substantial direct compliance costs on state and local governments and
is not required by statute, or preempts state law, unless the relevant
requirements of section 6 of the Executive Order are met. This rule
does not have federalism implications and does not impose substantial
direct compliance costs on state and local governments or preempt state
law within the meaning of the Executive Order.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C.
1531-1538) (UMRA) establishes requirements for Federal agencies to
assess the effects of their regulatory actions on State, local, and
tribal governments, and on the private sector. This proposed rule would
not impose any Federal mandate on any State, local, or tribal
government, or on the private sector, within the meaning of the UMRA.
List of Subjects
24 CFR Part 5
Administrative practice and procedure, Aged, Claims, Crime,
Government contracts, Grant programs--housing and community
development, Individuals with disabilities, Intergovernmental
relations, Loan programs--housing and community development, Low and
moderate income housing, Mortgage insurance, Penalties, Pets, Public
housing, Rent subsidies, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements,
Social Security, Unemployment compensation, Wages.
24 CFR Part 908
Computer technology, Grant programs--housing and community
development, Rent subsidies, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Accordingly, for the reasons described in the preamble, HUD
proposes to amend 24 CFR parts 5 and 908, as amended in the final rule
published on January 27, 2009, at 74 FR 4832, as follows:
PART 5--GENERAL HUD PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS; WAIVERS
1. The authority citation for part 5 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 1437a, 1437c, 1437d, 1437f, 1437n,
3535(d), and Sec. 327, Pub. L. 109-115, 119 Stat. 2936.
2. Revise Sec. 5.216 to read as follows:
Sec. 5.216 Disclosure and verification of Social Security and
Employer Identification Numbers.
(a) General. The requirements of this section apply to applicants
and participants as described in this section, except this section is
inapplicable to individuals who do not contend eligible immigration
status under subpart E of this part (see Sec. 5.508).
(b) Disclosure required of assistance applicants. Each assistance
applicant must submit the following information to the processing
entity when the assistance applicant's eligibility under the program
involved is being determined.
(1) The complete and accurate SSN assigned to the assistance
applicant and to each member of the assistance applicant's household;
and
(2) The documentation referred to in paragraph (g)(1) of this
section to verify each such SSN.
(c) Disclosure required of individual owner applicants. Each
individual owner applicant must submit the following information to the
processing entity when the individual owner applicant's eligibility
under the program involved is being determined:
(1) The complete and accurate SSN assigned to the individual owner
applicant and to each member of the individual owner applicant's
household who will be obligated to pay the debt evidenced by the
mortgage or loan documents; and
(2) The documentation referred to in paragraph (g)(1) of this
section to verify each such SSN.
(d) Disclosure required of certain officials of entity applicants.
Each officer, director, principal stockholder, or other official of an
entity applicant must submit the following information to the
processing entity when the entity applicant's eligibility under the
program involved is being determined:
(1) The complete and accurate SSN assigned to each such individual;
and
(2) The documentation referred to in paragraph (g)(1) of this
section to verify each SSN.
(e) Disclosure required of participants. (1) Initial disclosure.
(i) Each participant, except those age 62 or older as of January 31,
2010, whose initial determination of eligibility under the program
involved was begun before January 31, 2010, must submit the information
described in paragraph (e)(1)(ii) of this section, if the participant
has:
(A) Not previously disclosed a SSN;
(B) Previously disclosed a SSN that HUD or the SSA determined was
invalid; or
(C) Been issued a new SSN.
[[Page 52936]]
(ii) Each participant subject to the disclosure requirements under
paragraph (e)(1)(i) of this section must submit the following
information to the processing entity at the next interim or regularly
scheduled reexamination or recertification of family composition or
income, or other reexamination or recertification for the program
involved:
(A) The complete and accurate SSN assigned to the participant and
to each member of the participant's household; and
(B) The documentation referred to in paragraph (g)(1) of this
section to verify each such SSN.
(2) Subsequent disclosure. Once a participant has disclosed and the
processing entity has verified each SSN, the following rules apply:
(i) Addition of new household who is at least six years of age.
When the participant requests to add a new household member who is at
least six years of age, the participant must provide the following to
the processing entity at the time of the request, or at the time of
processing the interim reexamination or recertification of family
composition that includes the new member(s):
(A) The complete and accurate SSN assigned to each new member; and
(B) The documentation referred to in paragraph (g)(1) of this
section to verify the SSN for each new member.
(ii) Addition of household member who is under the age of six. (A)
When a participant seeks to include or add a household member who is
under the age of six and who has no SSN, the participant shall be
required to provide the complete and accurate SSN assigned to each new
child and the documentation referred to in paragraph (g)(1) of this
section to verify the SSN for each new child within 90 calendar days of
the child being added to the household.
(B) The processing entity shall grant an extension of one
additional 90-day period if the processing entity, in its discretion,
determines that the participant's failure to comply was due to
circumstances that could not have reasonably been foreseen and were
outside the control of the participant. During the period that the
processing entity is awaiting documentation of a SSN, the processing
entity shall include the child as part of the assisted household and
the child shall be entitled to all the benefits of being a household
member. If upon expiration of the provided time period, the participant
fails to produce a SSN, the processing entity shall follow the
provisions of Sec. 5.218.
(iii) Assignment of new SSN. If the participant or any member of
the participant's household has been assigned a new SSN, the
participant must submit the following to the processing entity at
either the time of receipt of the new SSN; at the next interim or
regularly scheduled reexamination or recertification of family
composition or income, or other reexamination or recertification; or at
such earlier time specified by the processing entity:
(A) The complete and accurate SSN assigned to the participant or
household member involved; and
(B) The documentation referred to in paragraph (g)(1) of this
section to verify the SSN of each individual.
(f) Disclosure required of entity applicants. Each entity applicant
must submit the following information to the processing entity when the
entity applicant's eligibility under the program involved is being
determined:
(1) Any complete and accurate EIN assigned to the entity applicant;
and
(2) The documentation referred to in paragraph (g)(2) of this
section to verify the EIN.
(g) Required documentation. (1) SSN. The documentation necessary to
verify the SSN of an individual who is required to disclose his or her
SSN under paragraphs (a) through (e) of this section is:
(i) A valid SSN card issued by the SSA;
(ii) An original document issued by a federal or state government
agency, which contains the name of the individual and the SSN of the
individual, along with other identifying information of the individual;
or
(ii) Such other evidence of the SSN as HUD may prescribe in
administrative instructions.
(2) EIN. The documentation necessary to verify an EIN of an entity
applicant that is required to disclose its EIN under paragraph (f) of
this section is the official, written communication from the Internal
Revenue Service (IRS) assigning the EIN to the entity applicant, or
such other evidence of the EIN as HUD may prescribe in administrative
instructions.
(h) Effect on assistance applicants. (1) Except as provided in
paragraph (h)(2) of this section, if the processing entity determines
that the assistance applicant is otherwise eligible to participate in a
program, the assistance applicant may retain its place on the waiting
list for the program, but cannot become a participant until it can
provide:
(i) The complete and accurate SSN assigned to each member of the
household; and
(ii) The documentation referred to in paragraph (g)(1) of this
section to verify the SSN of each such member.
(2) For applicants to the Section 8 Moderate Rehabilitation Single
Room Occupancy (SRO) Program for Homeless Individuals under 24 CFR part
882, subpart H, the documentation required in paragraph (h)(1) of this
section must be provided to the processing entity within 90 days from
the date of admission into the program. The processing entity shall
grant an extension of one additional 90-day period if the processing
entity, in its discretion, determines that the applicant's failure to
comply was due to circumstances that could not have reasonably been
foreseen and were outside the control of the applicant. If upon
expiration of the provided time period, the individual fails to produce
a SSN, the processing entity shall follow the provisions of Sec.
5.218.
(i) Rejection of documentation. The processing entity must not
reject documentation referred to in paragraph (g) of this section,
except as HUD may otherwise prescribe through publicly issued notice.
3. Amend Sec. 5.218 by revising paragraphs (a), (b) and (c) to
read as follows:
Sec. 5.218 Penalties for failing to disclose and verify Social
Security and Employer Identification Numbers.
(a) Denial of eligibility of assistance applicants and individual
owner applicants. The processing entity must deny the eligibility of an
assistance applicant or individual owner applicant in accordance with
the provisions governing the program involved, if the assistance or
individual owner applicant does not meet the applicable SSN disclosure,
documentation, and verification requirements as specified in Sec.
5.216.
(b) Denial of eligibility of entity applicants. The processing
entity must deny the eligibility of an entity applicant in accordance
with the provisions governing the program involved; if:
(1) The entity applicant does not meet the EIN disclosure,
documentation, and verification requirements specified in Sec. 5.216;
or
(2) Any of the officials of the entity applicant referred to in
Sec. 5.216(d) does not meet the applicable SSN disclosure, and
documentation and verification requirements specified in Sec. 5.216.
(c) Termination of assistance or termination of tenancy of
participants. (1) The processing entity must terminate the assistance
or terminate the tenancy, or both, of a participant, in accordance
[[Page 52937]]
with the provisions governing the program involved, if the participant
does not meet the applicable SSN disclosure, documentation, and
verification requirements specified in Sec. 5.216.
(2) The processing entity may defer termination and provide the
participant with an additional 90 days to disclose a SSN, but only if
unless the processing entity, in its discretion, determines that:
(i) The failure to meet these requirements was due to circumstances
that could not have reasonably been foreseen and were outside the
control of the participant; and
(ii) There is a reasonable likelihood that the participant will be
able to disclose a SSN by the deadline.
(3) Failure of the participant to disclose a SSN by the deadline
specified in paragraph (c)(2) of this section will result in
termination of the assistance or tenancy, or both, of the participant.
* * * * *
4. Add a new Sec. 5.233 to read as follows:
Sec. 5.233 Mandated use of HUD's Enterprise Income Verification (EIV)
System.
(a) Programs subject to this section and requirements. (1) The
requirements of this section apply to entities administering assistance
under the:
(i) Public Housing program under 24 CFR part 960;
(ii) Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher (HCV) program under 24 CFR
part 982;
(iii) Moderate Rehabilitation program under 24 CFR part 882;
(iv) Project-based Voucher program under 24 CFR part 983;
(v) Project-based Section 8 programs under 24 CFR parts 880, 881,
883, 884, 886, and 891;
(vi) Section 202 of the Housing Act of 1959 (12 U.S.C. 1701q);
(vii) Section 811 of the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable
Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 8013);
(viii) Sections 221(d)(3) and 236 of the National Housing Act (12
U.S.C. 1715l(d)(3) and 1715z-1); and
(ix) Rent Supplement program under section 101 of the Housing and
Urban Development Act of 1965 (12 U.S.C. 1701s).
(2) Processing entities must use HUD's EIV system in its entirety:
(i) As a third-party source to verify tenant employment and income
information during mandatory reexaminations or recertifications of
family composition and income, in accordance with Sec. 5.236 and
administrative guidance issued by HUD; and
(ii) To reduce administrative and subsidy payment errors in
accordance with HUD administrative guidance.
(b) Penalties for noncompliance. Failure to use the EIV system in
its entirety may result in the imposition of sanctions and/or the
assessment of disallowed costs associated with any resulting incorrect
subsidy or tenant rent calculations, or both.
Sec. 5.236 [Amended]
5. In Sec. 5.236(b)(3)(i)(A), remove ``215''.
PART 908--ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF REQUIRED FAMILY DATA FOR
PUBLIC HOUSING, INDIAN HOUSING, AND THE SECTION 8 RENTAL
CERTIFICATE, RENTAL VOUCHER, AND MODERATE REHABILITATION PROGRAMS
6. The authority citation for part 908 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 1437f, 3535d, 3543, 3544, and 3608a.
7. Revise Sec. 908.101 to read as follows:
Sec. 908.101 Purpose.
The purpose of this part is to require Public Housing Agencies
(PHAs), including Moving to Work (MTW) PHAs, that operate Public
Housing, Indian Housing, or Section 8 Rental Certificate, Housing
Choice Voucher (HCV), Rental Voucher, and Moderate Rehabilitation
programs to electronically submit certain data to HUD for those
programs. These electronically submitted data are required for HUD
forms: HUD-50058, including the Family Self-Sufficiency (FSS) Addendum.
Applicable program entities must retain at a minimum, the last three
years of the form HUD-50058, and supporting documentation, during the
term of each assisted lease, and for a period of at least 3 years from
the end of participation (EOP) date, to support billings to HUD and to
permit an effective audit. Electronic retention of form HUD-50058 and
HUD-50058-FSS and supporting documentation fulfills the retention
requirement under this section.
Dated: September 23, 2009.
Shaun Donovan,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-24809 Filed 10-14-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-P