Guidance on Energy-Efficiency Enforcement Regulations, 52793-52795 [E9-24666]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 197 / Wednesday, October 14, 2009 / Notices
[FR Doc. E9–24538 Filed 10–13–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–KF–C
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Adjusted Indemnification Amount
Department of Energy.
Notice of adjusted
indemnification amount.
AGENCY:
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Department of Energy
(DOE) is announcing the adjusted
amount of indemnification provided
under subsection 170d. of the Atomic
Energy Act of 1954 (AEA), 42 U.S.C.
2210d., commonly known as the PriceAnderson Act, consistent with section
607 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005,
Public Law 109–58 (EPAct 2005).
Section 607 (‘‘Inflation Adjustment’’) of
EPAct 2005 amended subsection 170t.
of the AEA by requiring the adjustment
of the indemnification amount not less
than once during each 5-year period
following July 1, 2003, in accordance
with the aggregate percentage change in
the Consumer Price Index (CPI) since
that date. This notice announces
$11.961 billion as the inflation-adjusted
amount based on the aggregate
percentage change in the CPI during the
initial 5-year period.
DATES: This action is effective October
14, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
S. Boulden III, Acting Director (HS–40),
Office of Enforcement, Office of Health,
Safety and Security, U.S. Department of
Energy, 19901 Germantown Road,
Germantown, Maryland 20874, (301)
903–2178; or Sophia Angelini, Attorney
Advisor (GC–52), Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. Department of Energy,
1000 Independence Ave., SW.,
Washington, DC 20585, (202) 586–6975.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The Price-Anderson Act, section 170
of the AEA (42 U.S.C. 2210), establishes
a system of financial protection for
persons who may be liable for and
persons who may be injured by a
‘‘nuclear incident,’’ as defined at section
11q. of the AEA (42 U.S.C. 2014q.). The
Price-Anderson Act is administered by
DOE with respect to the nuclear
activities of DOE contractors acting on
its behalf. Subsection 170d. provides
that the Secretary of Energy shall enter
into agreements of indemnification with
any person who may conduct activities
under a contract with DOE that involve
the risk of public liability and that are
not subject to the financial protection
requirements of the Nuclear Regulatory
Commission. DOE’s Price-Anderson Act
indemnification contract provisions are
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:35 Oct 13, 2009
Jkt 220001
codified in the Department of Energy
Acquisition Regulation (DEAR), which
sets forth a standard nuclear
indemnification clause, the Nuclear
Hazard Indemnity Agreement at 48 CFR
952.250–70, that is incorporated into all
DOE contracts and subcontracts
involving source, special nuclear, or byproduct material.
The Price-Anderson Amendments Act
of 2005 (PAAA 2005), enacted as part of
EPAct 2005, sections 601 through 610,
altered the indemnity provisions in
several ways. Specifically, the PAAA
2005 altered the amount of the
indemnification by: (1) Specifying $10
billion as the amount of the
indemnification for nuclear incidents
within the United States resulting from
contractual activities on behalf of DOE
(section 604); (2) directing the
adjustment of this indemnification
amount not less than once during each
five-year period in accordance with the
aggregate percentage change in the CPI
(section 607); and (3) increasing the
indemnification amount for nuclear
incidents outside the United States from
$100 million to $500 million (section
605).
With regard to the inflation
adjustment for indemnification, the
AEA subsection 170t. was amended by
adding a new provision requiring the
adjustment of ‘‘the amount of
indemnification provided under an
agreement of indemnification under
subsection d. not less than once during
each 5-year period following July 1,
2003, in accordance with the aggregate
percentage change in the Consumer
Price Index since—(A) that date, in the
case of the first adjustment under this
paragraph; or (B) the previous
adjustment under this paragraph.’’
Under the AEA subsection 170t.(3), the
term ‘‘Consumer Price Index’’ is defined
to mean the CPI for all urban consumers
published by the Secretary of Labor. The
CPI in July 2003 was 183.9. In July 2008,
the CPI was 219.964. This represents an
increase of approximately 19.61%.
Application of this increase to the initial
$10 billion DOE indemnification
amount results in an inflation-adjusted
indemnification amount of $11.961
billion.
The inflation adjustment under AEA
subsection 170t. applies only to a
nuclear incident within the United
States. Accordingly, the indemnification
amount for a nuclear incident outside
the United States continues to be $500
million.
The next inflation adjustment will be
based on the incremental change in the
CPI between July 1, 2008 and the date
of the adjustment, which will be no later
than July 1, 2013.
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
52793
This notice of indemnification
inflation adjustment is a ‘‘rule’’ as
defined in the Administrative Procedure
Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 551(4)). However,
the APA (5 USC 553(b)(B)) does not
require an agency to use the public
notice and comment process ‘‘when the
agency for good cause finds (and
incorporates the finding and a brief
statement of reasons therefore in the
rules issued) that notice and public
procedure thereon are impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.’’ In this instance, DOE has
concluded that solicitation of public
comment is unnecessary. Congress has
required DOE to adjust the amount of
indemnification provided under an
agreement of indemnification under
section 170d. to reflect inflation in the
initial and each subsequent 5-year
period following July 1, 2003, and
provided no discretion regarding the
substance of the adjustment process.
DOE is required only to perform a
ministerial computation to determine
the relevant inflation adjustment. On
the same basis, DOE finds good cause,
pursuant to 5 USC 553(d)(3) to waive
the requirement for a 30-day delay in
the effective date for this rule. As such,
this rule is effective October 14, 2009.
DOE has determined that this notice
of indemnification inflation adjustment
is the type of action that does not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant impact on the human
environment as set forth in DOE’s
regulations implementing the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321 et seq.). Specifically, the
rule is covered under the categorical
exclusion in paragraph A6 of Appendix
A to subpart D, 10 CFR part 1021, which
applies to rulemakings that are strictly
procedural. Accordingly, neither an
environmental assessment nor an
environmental impact statement is
required.
Dated: Issued in Washington, DC, on
September 22, 2009.
Steven Chu,
Secretary of Energy.
[FR Doc. E9–24718 Filed 10–13–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Guidance on Energy-Efficiency
Enforcement Regulations
AGENCY: Office of the General Counsel,
Department of Energy.
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the
Department of Energy’s (DOE’s)
interpretation of its energy efficiency
E:\FR\FM\14OCN1.SGM
14OCN1
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
52794
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 197 / Wednesday, October 14, 2009 / Notices
enforcement regulations. These
regulations provide for manufacturer
submission of compliance statements
and certification reports to DOE,
maintenance of compliance records by
manufacturers, and the availability of
enforcement actions for improper
certification or upon a determination of
noncompliance. DOE also announces its
intent to randomly select and review
manufacturer compliance with these
requirements and initiate enforcement
actions as appropriate.
DATES: This guidance is effective
October 14, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Stephanie Weiner, Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. Department of Energy,
Forrestal Building, Room 6A–245, 1000
Independence Ave., SW., Washington,
DC 20585; Telephone (202) 586–9648.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Energy Policy and Conservation Act of
1975, as amended, (EPCA or the ‘‘Act’’)
authorizes the Department of Energy
(DOE or the ‘‘Department’’) to enforce
compliance with the energy
conservation standards established for
certain consumer products and
commercial equipment. 42 U.S.C. 6299–
6305 (consumer products), 6316
(commercial and industrial equipment).
To ensure that all covered products
distributed in the United States comply
with DOE’s energy conservation
standards, the Department has
promulgated enforcement regulations,
which include specific certification and
compliance requirements. See 10 CFR
part 430, subpart F; 10 CFR part 431,
subparts B, K, U, and V.
The Department issues this guidance
to make clear that under existing DOE
regulations, a manufacturer’s failure to
properly certify a covered product and
retain records in accordance with DOE
regulations may be subject to
enforcement action, including the
assessment of civil penalties. In
addition, DOE announces its intent to
exercise this enforcement authority
more rigorously, beginning this fall,
with a program to randomly select and
review manufacturers’ compliance with
these certification requirements.
The Department’s rules require
manufacturers of covered consumer
products to ‘‘certify by means of a
compliance statement and a certification
report that each basic model(s) meets
the applicable energy conservation
standard,’’ before distributing it in
commerce within the United States. 10
CFR 430.62. Appendix A to Subpart F
of Part 430 sets forth templates for these
filings. For each basic model, the
certification report must include certain
identifying information, including the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:35 Oct 13, 2009
Jkt 220001
product type, product class,
manufacturer’s name and model
number, as well as a product-specific
energy efficiency levels. Id. Section
430.62(a)(4). The accompanying
compliance report must certify that ‘‘the
basic model(s) complies with the
applicable energy conservation
standard’’ and that ‘‘[a]ll required
testing has been conducted in
conformance’’ with applicable DOE test
procedures. Id. Section 430.62(a)(3)(i)–
(ii). Importantly, the manufacturer must
also certify that all reported certification
information is ‘‘true, accurate, and
complete,’’ and that he or she is ‘‘aware
of the penalties associated with
violations of the Act, the regulations
thereunder, and 18 U.S.C. 1001 which
prohibits knowingly making false
statements to the Federal Government.’’
Id. Section 430.62(a)(3)(iii)–(iv).
In connection with these filings, the
Department’s rules also require
manufacturers to ‘‘establish, maintain,
and retain the records of the underlying
test data for all certification testing.’’ 10
CFR 430.62(d). Further, the records
must be ‘‘organized and indexed in a
fashion which makes them readily
accessible for review by DOE’’ and
‘‘shall include the supporting test data
associated with tests performed on any
test units to satisfy’’ the certification
and compliance requirements. Id.
Under EPCA, the Secretary may take
enforcement action for violations of
these certification requirements. As
relevant here, EPCA makes it unlawful
‘‘for any manufacturer to fail to permit
access to, or copying of, records
required to be supplied under this part,
or fail to make reports or provide other
information required to be supplied
under [the Act].’’ 42 U.S.C. 6302(a)(3).
Implementing that provision, the
Department’s rules prohibit both the
‘‘[f]ailure to permit access to, or copying
of records required to be supplied under
the Act and this rule’’ and the ‘‘failure
to make reports or provide information
required to be supplied under this Act
and this rule.’’ 10 CFR 430.61(a)(1). The
Secretary may bring an injunctive action
for the failure to properly certify
covered products, 42 U.S.C. 6304, or
may assess penalties for knowing
violations of the certification reporting
requirements, id. Section 6303(a). DOE’s
rules establish that, for consumer
products:
If a basic model is not properly certified in
accordance with the requirements of this
subpart, the Secretary may seek, among other
remedies, injunctive action to prohibit
distribution in commerce of such basic
model.
10 CFR 430.71(b).
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
To eliminate uncertainty among
manufacturers subject to these
requirements, the Department hereby
provides its interpretation of the scope
of these rules. Specifically, the
Department clarifies that a failure to
certify covered products in accordance
with the DOE’s rules is an independent
violation of EPCA and DOE’s
implementing regulations that may be
subject to enforcement action. The
Department reads 42 U.S.C. 6302(a)(3)
and 10 CFR 430.61(a)(1) to require not
only that manufacturers make reports
and provide the information required by
the certification regulations, but also
that such submissions be both accurate
and provided in accordance with those
regulations. A failure to do so is a
prohibited act under EPCA and DOE
rules and subject to enforcement action.
A contrary reading would substantially
undermine the purpose of the
certification and compliance
requirements in the first place—to
ensure that all covered products
distributed in commerce comply with
applicable energy-efficiency standards
and have been tested as prescribed by
the rules.
Under a plain reading of section
430.71(b), moreover, improperly
certifying a covered product is itself a
violation subject to enforcement action.
The Department need not test an
improperly certified product or
otherwise determine its noncompliance
with the applicable standard before
seeking an injunction or assessing civil
penalties. Separate from these
certification requirements, the
Department’s rules also establish both
the process for testing covered
consumer products’ compliance, 10 CFR
430.70, and the Department’s authority
to take enforcement actions in the event
that DOE determines that a covered
product does not comply with an
applicable standard, id. Sections
430.71(a), 430.73. But those regulations
do not restrict the Department from
seeking injunctive relief or civil
penalties for prohibited acts that are not
dependent upon testing or a
determination of noncompliance. See,
e.g., id. Section 430.61(b) (allowing DOE
to seek penalties for acts other than
standards violations). Thus, the
Department has the authority to initiate
enforcement action for improper
certification, separate from any
determination of whether a covered
product does or does not comply with
the applicable energy-conservation
standard.
EPCA’s enforcement provisions
likewise apply to covered commercial
and industrial equipment. See 42 U.S.C.
6316 (providing that the enforcement
E:\FR\FM\14OCN1.SGM
14OCN1
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 197 / Wednesday, October 14, 2009 / Notices
provisions for consumer products apply
‘‘to the same extent and in the same
manner’’ for covered commercial and
industrial equipment). As with
consumer products, the Department has
promulgated certification and
compliance regulations for certain
equipment, including motors and
transformers. See 10 CFR part 431,
subparts B, K, U, and V; See, e.g., 10
CFR 431.385(b) (‘‘If a basic model [of
electric motor] is not properly certified
in accordance with the requirements of
this subpart, the Secretary may seek,
among other remedies, injunctive action
to prohibit distribution in commerce of
such basic model.’’) 1 The Department
interprets its certification regulations
governing covered commercial and
industrial equipment in the same way as
its regulations governing consumer
products. For the reasons set forth
above, the failure to certify a covered
piece of commercial or industrial
equipment in accordance with DOE
rules may be subject to enforcement
action, including the imposition of civil
penalties.
Today, the Department also
announces its intent to exercise its
enforcement authority more rigorously
in the future. In order for DOE’s
efficiency standards to effectively
promote the development and
distribution of energy efficient products
that will save energy and reduce costs
for millions of Americans, DOE must
ensure that these standards are
aggressively and consistently enforced.
Proper certification is a necessary
prerequisite to achieving these goals.
This fall, therefore, DOE will begin this
effort by initiating a compliance review
of certification reports for consumer
products and commercial equipment
covered by DOE regulations. Pursuant to
its existing enforcement authority, the
Department intends to randomly select
previously filed certification reports for
review, to request certification records
from manufacturers as needed, and to
hold manufacturers accountable for any
failure to certify covered products in
accordance with DOE rules.
This guidance represents the
Department’s interpretation of existing
regulations and announcement of the
agency’s general policy with respect to
exercising its existing enforcement
authority. It is not intended to create or
remove any rights or duties, nor is it
1 Additionally, the Department is developing a
final rule to adopt similar certification and
compliance regulations for the remaining types of
covered commercial and industrial equipment
covered by statute. See 64 FR 69598 (December 13,
1999); 71 FR 25104 (April 28, 2006); 71 FR 42193
(July 25, 2006); 71 FR 71341–42 (December 8, 2006).
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:35 Oct 13, 2009
Jkt 220001
intended to affect any other aspect of
EPCA or DOE regulations.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6299–6305; 6316.
Approval of the Office of the Secretary
The Secretary of Energy has approved
publication of this notice.
Issued in Washington, DC, on October 7,
2009.
Scott Harris,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. E9–24666 Filed 10–13–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Guidance on Ex Parte
Communications
AGENCY: Office of the General Counsel,
Department of Energy (DOE).
ACTION: Notice of guidance on ex parte
communications.
SUMMARY: The Department of Energy
sets forth guidance on ex parte
communications during informal
rulemaking proceedings. The guidance
is intended to encourage the public to
provide DOE with all information
necessary to develop rules that advance
the public interest, while ensuring that
rulemaking proceedings are not subject
to improper influence from off-therecord communications. As President
Obama stated in a January 21, 2009
memorandum, ‘‘Executive departments
and agencies should offer Americans
increased opportunities to participate in
policymaking and to provide their
Government with the benefits of their
collective expertise and information.’’
(74 FR 4685) DOE intends this guidance
to provide both increased public
participation in the rulemaking process
and additional transparency during that
process.
DATES: This guidance on ex parte
communications is effective on October
14, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Daniel Cohen, Assistant General
Counsel for Legislation and Regulatory
Law, Office of the General Counsel,
Department of Energy, 1000
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20585–0121, e-mail:
expartecommunications@hq.doe.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
following guidance, provided in the
form of answers to ‘‘Frequently Asked
Questions’’, is intended to encourage
stakeholders to meet with, and provide
information and advice to, DOE officials
during the rulemaking process by
setting forth simple and clear
procedures governing meetings, or
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
52795
telephone or electronic contact, with
DOE officials to discuss a pending
rulemaking action. Informal stakeholder
communications other than written
comments on the proposed rule or
presentations at a public hearing that
occur during the public comment period
are generally lawful under section 501
of the Department of Energy
Organization Act and the
Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C.
553). Informal communications,
however, must be disclosed properly to
ensure fairness for all stakeholders, the
integrity of the rulemaking process, and
the adequacy of the record in support of
the final rule.
Frequently Asked Questions on Ex
Parte Communications With DOE
Employees
(1) What is the purpose of DOE’s Ex
Parte Guidance?
The ex parte guidance governs the
manner in which interested parties may
communicate with DOE during its
informal rulemaking proceedings,
termed ‘‘permit-but disclose’’
proceedings for purposes of this
guidance. It is designed to encourage
additional public participation in the
rulemaking process, while ensuring that
all such participation is open and
transparent.
(2) What types of proceedings are
considered ‘‘permit-but-disclose’’
proceedings?
Permit-but-disclose proceedings are
comprised of: (i) Proceedings in
response to petitions for rulemaking; (ii)
informal rulemaking proceedings upon
release of an advanced notice of
proposed rulemaking, a notice of public
meeting or, if neither of those
documents are utilized, the notice of
proposed rulemaking; (iii) proceedings
involving an interim final rule.
(3) Does the ex parte guidance apply
to me?
The ex parte guidance applies to
anyone who engages in the kind of
communications covered by the
guidance.
(4) What types of communications are
covered by the ex parte guidance?
The guidance governs ex parte
presentations to DOE decision makers
during its ‘‘permit-but-disclose’’
proceedings.
(5) What is an ex parte presentation?
An ex parte presentation is a
communication directed to the merits or
outcome of a proceeding that, if written
(including e-mail), is not provided to all
interested parties or, if oral, is made
without advance notice to all interested
parties and without opportunity for
such parties to be present.
E:\FR\FM\14OCN1.SGM
14OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 197 (Wednesday, October 14, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52793-52795]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-24666]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Guidance on Energy-Efficiency Enforcement Regulations
AGENCY: Office of the General Counsel, Department of Energy.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the Department of Energy's (DOE's)
interpretation of its energy efficiency
[[Page 52794]]
enforcement regulations. These regulations provide for manufacturer
submission of compliance statements and certification reports to DOE,
maintenance of compliance records by manufacturers, and the
availability of enforcement actions for improper certification or upon
a determination of noncompliance. DOE also announces its intent to
randomly select and review manufacturer compliance with these
requirements and initiate enforcement actions as appropriate.
DATES: This guidance is effective October 14, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Stephanie Weiner, Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. Department of Energy, Forrestal Building, Room
6A-245, 1000 Independence Ave., SW., Washington, DC 20585; Telephone
(202) 586-9648.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Energy Policy and Conservation Act of
1975, as amended, (EPCA or the ``Act'') authorizes the Department of
Energy (DOE or the ``Department'') to enforce compliance with the
energy conservation standards established for certain consumer products
and commercial equipment. 42 U.S.C. 6299-6305 (consumer products), 6316
(commercial and industrial equipment). To ensure that all covered
products distributed in the United States comply with DOE's energy
conservation standards, the Department has promulgated enforcement
regulations, which include specific certification and compliance
requirements. See 10 CFR part 430, subpart F; 10 CFR part 431, subparts
B, K, U, and V.
The Department issues this guidance to make clear that under
existing DOE regulations, a manufacturer's failure to properly certify
a covered product and retain records in accordance with DOE regulations
may be subject to enforcement action, including the assessment of civil
penalties. In addition, DOE announces its intent to exercise this
enforcement authority more rigorously, beginning this fall, with a
program to randomly select and review manufacturers' compliance with
these certification requirements.
The Department's rules require manufacturers of covered consumer
products to ``certify by means of a compliance statement and a
certification report that each basic model(s) meets the applicable
energy conservation standard,'' before distributing it in commerce
within the United States. 10 CFR 430.62. Appendix A to Subpart F of
Part 430 sets forth templates for these filings. For each basic model,
the certification report must include certain identifying information,
including the product type, product class, manufacturer's name and
model number, as well as a product-specific energy efficiency levels.
Id. Section 430.62(a)(4). The accompanying compliance report must
certify that ``the basic model(s) complies with the applicable energy
conservation standard'' and that ``[a]ll required testing has been
conducted in conformance'' with applicable DOE test procedures. Id.
Section 430.62(a)(3)(i)-(ii). Importantly, the manufacturer must also
certify that all reported certification information is ``true,
accurate, and complete,'' and that he or she is ``aware of the
penalties associated with violations of the Act, the regulations
thereunder, and 18 U.S.C. 1001 which prohibits knowingly making false
statements to the Federal Government.'' Id. Section 430.62(a)(3)(iii)-
(iv).
In connection with these filings, the Department's rules also
require manufacturers to ``establish, maintain, and retain the records
of the underlying test data for all certification testing.'' 10 CFR
430.62(d). Further, the records must be ``organized and indexed in a
fashion which makes them readily accessible for review by DOE'' and
``shall include the supporting test data associated with tests
performed on any test units to satisfy'' the certification and
compliance requirements. Id.
Under EPCA, the Secretary may take enforcement action for
violations of these certification requirements. As relevant here, EPCA
makes it unlawful ``for any manufacturer to fail to permit access to,
or copying of, records required to be supplied under this part, or fail
to make reports or provide other information required to be supplied
under [the Act].'' 42 U.S.C. 6302(a)(3). Implementing that provision,
the Department's rules prohibit both the ``[f]ailure to permit access
to, or copying of records required to be supplied under the Act and
this rule'' and the ``failure to make reports or provide information
required to be supplied under this Act and this rule.'' 10 CFR
430.61(a)(1). The Secretary may bring an injunctive action for the
failure to properly certify covered products, 42 U.S.C. 6304, or may
assess penalties for knowing violations of the certification reporting
requirements, id. Section 6303(a). DOE's rules establish that, for
consumer products:
If a basic model is not properly certified in accordance with
the requirements of this subpart, the Secretary may seek, among
other remedies, injunctive action to prohibit distribution in
commerce of such basic model.
10 CFR 430.71(b).
To eliminate uncertainty among manufacturers subject to these
requirements, the Department hereby provides its interpretation of the
scope of these rules. Specifically, the Department clarifies that a
failure to certify covered products in accordance with the DOE's rules
is an independent violation of EPCA and DOE's implementing regulations
that may be subject to enforcement action. The Department reads 42
U.S.C. 6302(a)(3) and 10 CFR 430.61(a)(1) to require not only that
manufacturers make reports and provide the information required by the
certification regulations, but also that such submissions be both
accurate and provided in accordance with those regulations. A failure
to do so is a prohibited act under EPCA and DOE rules and subject to
enforcement action. A contrary reading would substantially undermine
the purpose of the certification and compliance requirements in the
first place--to ensure that all covered products distributed in
commerce comply with applicable energy-efficiency standards and have
been tested as prescribed by the rules.
Under a plain reading of section 430.71(b), moreover, improperly
certifying a covered product is itself a violation subject to
enforcement action. The Department need not test an improperly
certified product or otherwise determine its noncompliance with the
applicable standard before seeking an injunction or assessing civil
penalties. Separate from these certification requirements, the
Department's rules also establish both the process for testing covered
consumer products' compliance, 10 CFR 430.70, and the Department's
authority to take enforcement actions in the event that DOE determines
that a covered product does not comply with an applicable standard, id.
Sections 430.71(a), 430.73. But those regulations do not restrict the
Department from seeking injunctive relief or civil penalties for
prohibited acts that are not dependent upon testing or a determination
of noncompliance. See, e.g., id. Section 430.61(b) (allowing DOE to
seek penalties for acts other than standards violations). Thus, the
Department has the authority to initiate enforcement action for
improper certification, separate from any determination of whether a
covered product does or does not comply with the applicable energy-
conservation standard.
EPCA's enforcement provisions likewise apply to covered commercial
and industrial equipment. See 42 U.S.C. 6316 (providing that the
enforcement
[[Page 52795]]
provisions for consumer products apply ``to the same extent and in the
same manner'' for covered commercial and industrial equipment). As with
consumer products, the Department has promulgated certification and
compliance regulations for certain equipment, including motors and
transformers. See 10 CFR part 431, subparts B, K, U, and V; See, e.g.,
10 CFR 431.385(b) (``If a basic model [of electric motor] is not
properly certified in accordance with the requirements of this subpart,
the Secretary may seek, among other remedies, injunctive action to
prohibit distribution in commerce of such basic model.'') \1\ The
Department interprets its certification regulations governing covered
commercial and industrial equipment in the same way as its regulations
governing consumer products. For the reasons set forth above, the
failure to certify a covered piece of commercial or industrial
equipment in accordance with DOE rules may be subject to enforcement
action, including the imposition of civil penalties.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Additionally, the Department is developing a final rule to
adopt similar certification and compliance regulations for the
remaining types of covered commercial and industrial equipment
covered by statute. See 64 FR 69598 (December 13, 1999); 71 FR 25104
(April 28, 2006); 71 FR 42193 (July 25, 2006); 71 FR 71341-42
(December 8, 2006).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Today, the Department also announces its intent to exercise its
enforcement authority more rigorously in the future. In order for DOE's
efficiency standards to effectively promote the development and
distribution of energy efficient products that will save energy and
reduce costs for millions of Americans, DOE must ensure that these
standards are aggressively and consistently enforced. Proper
certification is a necessary prerequisite to achieving these goals.
This fall, therefore, DOE will begin this effort by initiating a
compliance review of certification reports for consumer products and
commercial equipment covered by DOE regulations. Pursuant to its
existing enforcement authority, the Department intends to randomly
select previously filed certification reports for review, to request
certification records from manufacturers as needed, and to hold
manufacturers accountable for any failure to certify covered products
in accordance with DOE rules.
This guidance represents the Department's interpretation of
existing regulations and announcement of the agency's general policy
with respect to exercising its existing enforcement authority. It is
not intended to create or remove any rights or duties, nor is it
intended to affect any other aspect of EPCA or DOE regulations.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6299-6305; 6316.
Approval of the Office of the Secretary
The Secretary of Energy has approved publication of this notice.
Issued in Washington, DC, on October 7, 2009.
Scott Harris,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. E9-24666 Filed 10-13-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P