Kings River Experimental Watershed Forest Health and Research Project, 52740-52741 [E9-24373]
Download as PDF
52740
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 197 / Wednesday, October 14, 2009 / Notices
To file a complaint of discrimination,
write to USDA, Director, Office of
Adjudication and Compliance, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20250–9410, or call
(800) 795–3272 (voice), or (202) 720–
6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal
opportunity provider, employer, and
lender.’’
Dated: September 23, 2009.
Judith A. Canales,
Administrator, Rural Business-Cooperative
Service.
[FR Doc. E9–24612 Filed 10–13–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–XY–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Kings River Experimental Watershed
Forest Health and Research Project
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY: Sierra National Forest, Forest
Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an
environmental impact statement.
SUMMARY: The Forest Service will
prepare a Kings River Experimental
Watershed Forest Health and Research
Project (KREW Project) Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS). The EIS will
evaluate the environmental effects of the
KREW Project which is designed to treat
portions of the Kings River watershed to
improve forest health and to examine
the short- and long-term effects of these
treatments. The research will lead to
information that will be instrumental in
future land management planning for
the Sierra National Forest (SNF) and
other Sierra Nevada forests.
DATES: Comments concerning the scope
of the analysis must be received by
November 13, 2009. The draft
environmental impact statement is
expected December 2009 and the final
environmental impact statement is
expected April 2010.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to
Judi Tapia, SNF, Supervisor’s Office,
1600 Tollhouse Road, Clovis, CA 93611,
Attn: KREW Project.
Comments may also be sent via e-mail
to jetapia@fs.fed.us, or via facsimile to
559–294 4809.
It is important that reviewers provide
their comments at such times and in
such a way that they are useful to the
Agency’s preparation of the EIS. We
intend to use comments received from
the public to help formulate our draft
EIS so please provide any suggestions or
concerns prior to the close of the
comment period.
Comments received in response to
this solicitation, including names and
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:35 Oct 13, 2009
Jkt 220001
addresses of those who comment, will
be part of the public record for this
proposed action. Comments submitted
anonymously will be accepted and
considered, however.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
research information, contact Carolyn
Hunsaker, Ecologist, Pacific Southwest
Research Station (PSW), available by
phone at 559–323–3211 or via e-mail at
chunsaker@fs.fed.us. For forest
management information, contact Judi
Tapia at 559–297–0706 extension 4938
or via e-mail at: jetapia@fs.fed.us.
Information regarding the KREW Project
EIS can be found on the SNF Web site
located at: https://www.fs.fed.us/
sierralprojects/.
Individuals who use
telecommunication devices for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern
Time, Monday through Friday.
The Forest
Service routinely conducts land
management activities to help restore
forests to a healthy, diverse, fireresilient condition by reducing stand
densities and fuel loads. Such
management activities involve thinning
forests to reduce competition among
trees for water, nutrients, and sunlight;
to reduce the continuity of fuels; and to
protect and/or reestablish a resilient,
diverse forest ecosystem.
PSW, in collaboration with the SNF,
propose to complete a land management
project to achieve forest health goals,
part of which is the subject of research
to assess the response of the ecosystem
to these management practices. The
forest management practices are
designed for ecological restoration: for
example, to reduce the effects of
uncharacteristic wildfire, drought,
invasive species and insect attack while
providing habitat for wildlife species
including sensitive species such as
California spotted owl, Pacific fisher,
and Yosemite toad.
The proposed KREW Project
activities, implemented under the SNF
Land and Resources Management Plan
(LRMP) as amended by the 2004 SNF
LRMP Amendment, have two coupled
components: Component 1,
management treatments and Component
2, research to examine ecosystem
response to those treatments. The
research has been underway since 2000
to instrument the subject watersheds
and measure baseline (pre-treatment)
ecological response. Upon completion
of the forest restoration treatments
planned post-treatment data collection
will be completed.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The project area encompasses 3,051
acres and has two separate parts: the
KREW Providence Unit (1,899 acres)
and the KREW Bull Unit (1,152 acres).
The KREW Providence Unit is off of the
Dinkey Creek Road, adjacent to the
Providence Creek Road. The KREW Bull
Unit is on Patterson Mountain adjacent
to the Ross Crossing Road and includes
part of the Teakettle Experimental
Forest.
Much is known about vegetative
responses to thinning in terms of growth
rates, resistance to insect attack, and
resulting fire behavior in treated stands.
Less is known about physical,
biological, and chemical responses to
moderate thinning of trees and
application of prescribed fire at a
watershed scale. The KREW Project
research component is a replicated,
paired-watershed research area for
headwater streams in the southern
Sierra Nevada. The KREW Project
research addresses both basic and
applied science questions regarding
sustainable forests for current and future
conditions. The KREW Project research
component is a formal research project
and has a scientist reviewed study plan
that is periodically updated (https://
www.psw.fs.fed.us/snrc/water/
kingsriver). The Forest Service already
collects data at eight instrumented
watersheds on the following topics to
meet KREW Project research goals:
• Hydrology.
• Meteorology.
• Air quality.
• Sediment & turbidity.
• Soils & geomorphology.
• Water chemistry.
• Biology.
—Stream macroinvertebrates.
—Algae.
—Riparian & upland vegetation & fuels.
—Yosemite toad.
In June of 2009, the Sierra Nevada
Alliance highlighted the need to
monitor, protect and restore Sierra
Nevada headwater resources. The
KREW Project is uniquely positioned to
allow researchers to collect data from an
area where a particular management
practice is applied along with
corresponding data from a similar, but
untreated area. By conducting various
types of thinning and prescribed fire
treatments and comparing data from
paired areas, the proposed research
project is intended to evaluate the
watershed-scale effects of management
activities designed to create a more
sustainable forest in a financially viable
way.
Purpose and Need for Action
The KREW Project has two goals: the
SNF’s goal of forest health treatment for
E:\FR\FM\14OCN1.SGM
14OCN1
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 197 / Wednesday, October 14, 2009 / Notices
the Providence and Bull Units of the
Kings River watershed and PSW’s goal
of information development on
treatment methods. There is an urgent
need to treat headwaters in the Kings
River watershed to improve forest
health and reduce the risk of
catastrophic fire, and while doing so, to
further our understanding of ecological
responses to forest management
activities.
Sierra waters are critical for the health
and welfare of California and yet there
has been minimal attention and
resources dedicated to the protection
and restoration of this headwater
resource. The Sierra Nevada Alliance
reports that 75% of California’s rain and
snow falls in the Sierra which provides
55 to 65% of California’s developed
water. The need for the proposed
research in the Sierra Nevada is
emphasized by financial support to the
KREW Project from the State of
California, CalFed Watershed Program
administered by the California Regional
Water Quality Control Board, and by a
recent report from the Sierra Nevada
Alliance, ‘‘Investing in California’s
Headwaters: The Sierra Nevada.’’ In
addition, the National Science
Foundation is funding university
scientists to perform research to
cooperate with the KREW Project. The
research component of the KREW
Project influenced the siting selection of
the California portions of the National
Ecological Observatory Network. The
KREW Project research component is
designed to be relevant to Federal, State
and private forest land. The KREW
Project will also provide much needed
data for the Southern Sierra Integrated
Regional Water Management Plan.
North and others in 2009 recognized
that ‘‘management practices that help
restore the forest headwaters of Sierran
watersheds will benefit water
production and quality for downstream
users.’’ The SNF and PSW have been
working toward the goal of forest health
treatment in the Kings River watershed
for more than a decade. As each year
goes by, the health of the forest in these
areas has a greater potential to be
impacted by various factors including
drought, uncharacteristic wildfire and
insect infestation. Treatment to enhance
ecological health in the Kings River
watershed has been delayed due to
setbacks in the completion of key
environmental documentation. It is
important that treatments be
accomplished and research information
be available to provide factual
information for the design of future
forest management activities.
The KREW Project objectives include:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:35 Oct 13, 2009
Jkt 220001
• Treat the Providence and the Bull Units
to improve forest ecological health in a
financially viable way.
• Define the variability in and understand
the processes of headwater streams, their
riparian areas, and associated watersheds.
• Evaluate the effects of management
activities (prescribed fire, mechanical
thinning, and commercial tree harvesting)
designed to create a more sustainable forest.
• Provide an instrumented research site to
evaluate regional stresses such as air
pollution and climate change.
• Develop a multidisciplinary database
that is dense enough in time and space for
computer modeling applications.
Proposed Action
The proposed action would apply
treatments on the majority of the acres
in Providence and Bull Units for
ecological restoration and study their
short- and long-term effects at the
watershed scale. The proposed action
includes tree thinning with commercial
tree harvest, underburning,
reforestation, plantation maintenance,
fuels treatments, and herbicide
treatments to plantations and noxious
weeds. Tree removal and retention
emphasizes heterogeneity through a
variable growing space retention based
on aspect, slope position, site
productivity, tree species and
recognition of micro-site conditions.
Restoration of native species
composition is proposed through the
regeneration of pine species; the
retention of existing brush, pine and
oaks consistent with the desired
conditions; enhancement of growing
conditions of existing young pine; and
the eradication of noxious weed species.
The integrated condition of the
streams and their associated watersheds
and riparian areas will be evaluated
with physical, chemical and biological
measurements taken under a formal
research study. The research areas
within the Units, a subset of the entire
proposed treatment area, have been
assigned a treatment type for the
purpose of the experimental design. The
1,899-acre Providence Unit includes
research watersheds of 298 acres of
potential thinning, 327 acres of
underburn, 245 acres of combined
underburning and potential thinning,
and 120 acres of control (untreated). The
1,152-acre Bull Unit includes research
areas of 131 acres of thinning, 342 acres
of underburn, and 412 acres of
combined thinning and underburning.
The 562-acre control area for the Bull
Unit is outside the KREW Project. Only
a portion of the research areas
designated for mechanical thinning will
be thinned. Forest management
treatments also occur outside the
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
52741
research areas and are not constrained
by the research design.
Lead and Cooperating Agencies
The KREW Project is a collaborative
effort between the SNF and the PSW.
The PSW and the SNF share
responsibility as the lead agency.
Responsible Officials
Ed Cole, SNF Forest Supervisor,
Supervisor’s Office, 1600 Tollhouse
Road, Clovis, CA 93611
Peter Stine, Program Manager, PSW,
1731 Research Park Drive, Davis, CA
95618.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
The decision to be made is whether to
implement the planned forest health
treatments and proceed with research
on the effects of those treatments,
alternative forest health treatments, or
select no action.
Scoping Process
This notice of intent initiates the
scoping process, which guides the
development of the environmental
impact statement. Public scoping
meetings will be held at the SNF,
Supervisor’s Office, 1600 Tollhouse
Road, Clovis on Wednesday October
14th at 3 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. and from
6:30 to 8 p.m. on the same date at the
SNF High Sierra Ranger District, 29688
Auberry Road, Prather, CA.
It is important that reviewers provide
their comments at such times and in
such manner that they are useful to the
agency’s preparation of the
environmental impact statement.
Therefore, comments should be
provided prior to the close of the
comment period and should clearly
articulate the reviewer’s concerns and
contentions.
Dated: October 1, 2009.
Edward C. Cole,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. E9–24373 Filed 10–13–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–M
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Notice of Central Idaho Resource
Advisory Committee Meeting
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of meeting.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the authorities in
the Federal Advisory Committee Act
(Pub. L. 92–463) and under the Secure
Rural Schools and Community SelfDetermination Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106–
E:\FR\FM\14OCN1.SGM
14OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 197 (Wednesday, October 14, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52740-52741]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-24373]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Kings River Experimental Watershed Forest Health and Research
Project
AGENCY: Sierra National Forest, Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Forest Service will prepare a Kings River Experimental
Watershed Forest Health and Research Project (KREW Project)
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). The EIS will evaluate the
environmental effects of the KREW Project which is designed to treat
portions of the Kings River watershed to improve forest health and to
examine the short- and long-term effects of these treatments. The
research will lead to information that will be instrumental in future
land management planning for the Sierra National Forest (SNF) and other
Sierra Nevada forests.
DATES: Comments concerning the scope of the analysis must be received
by November 13, 2009. The draft environmental impact statement is
expected December 2009 and the final environmental impact statement is
expected April 2010.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to Judi Tapia, SNF, Supervisor's
Office, 1600 Tollhouse Road, Clovis, CA 93611, Attn: KREW Project.
Comments may also be sent via e-mail to jetapia@fs.fed.us, or via
facsimile to 559-294 4809.
It is important that reviewers provide their comments at such times
and in such a way that they are useful to the Agency's preparation of
the EIS. We intend to use comments received from the public to help
formulate our draft EIS so please provide any suggestions or concerns
prior to the close of the comment period.
Comments received in response to this solicitation, including names
and addresses of those who comment, will be part of the public record
for this proposed action. Comments submitted anonymously will be
accepted and considered, however.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For research information, contact
Carolyn Hunsaker, Ecologist, Pacific Southwest Research Station (PSW),
available by phone at 559-323-3211 or via e-mail at
chunsaker@fs.fed.us. For forest management information, contact Judi
Tapia at 559-297-0706 extension 4938 or via e-mail at:
jetapia@fs.fed.us. Information regarding the KREW Project EIS can be
found on the SNF Web site located at: https://www.fs.fed.us/sierralprojects/.
Individuals who use telecommunication devices for the deaf (TDD)
may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern Time, Monday through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Forest Service routinely conducts land
management activities to help restore forests to a healthy, diverse,
fire-resilient condition by reducing stand densities and fuel loads.
Such management activities involve thinning forests to reduce
competition among trees for water, nutrients, and sunlight; to reduce
the continuity of fuels; and to protect and/or reestablish a resilient,
diverse forest ecosystem.
PSW, in collaboration with the SNF, propose to complete a land
management project to achieve forest health goals, part of which is the
subject of research to assess the response of the ecosystem to these
management practices. The forest management practices are designed for
ecological restoration: for example, to reduce the effects of
uncharacteristic wildfire, drought, invasive species and insect attack
while providing habitat for wildlife species including sensitive
species such as California spotted owl, Pacific fisher, and Yosemite
toad.
The proposed KREW Project activities, implemented under the SNF
Land and Resources Management Plan (LRMP) as amended by the 2004 SNF
LRMP Amendment, have two coupled components: Component 1, management
treatments and Component 2, research to examine ecosystem response to
those treatments. The research has been underway since 2000 to
instrument the subject watersheds and measure baseline (pre-treatment)
ecological response. Upon completion of the forest restoration
treatments planned post-treatment data collection will be completed.
The project area encompasses 3,051 acres and has two separate
parts: the KREW Providence Unit (1,899 acres) and the KREW Bull Unit
(1,152 acres). The KREW Providence Unit is off of the Dinkey Creek
Road, adjacent to the Providence Creek Road. The KREW Bull Unit is on
Patterson Mountain adjacent to the Ross Crossing Road and includes part
of the Teakettle Experimental Forest.
Much is known about vegetative responses to thinning in terms of
growth rates, resistance to insect attack, and resulting fire behavior
in treated stands. Less is known about physical, biological, and
chemical responses to moderate thinning of trees and application of
prescribed fire at a watershed scale. The KREW Project research
component is a replicated, paired-watershed research area for headwater
streams in the southern Sierra Nevada. The KREW Project research
addresses both basic and applied science questions regarding
sustainable forests for current and future conditions. The KREW Project
research component is a formal research project and has a scientist
reviewed study plan that is periodically updated (https://www.psw.fs.fed.us/snrc/water/kingsriver). The Forest Service already
collects data at eight instrumented watersheds on the following topics
to meet KREW Project research goals:
Hydrology.
Meteorology.
Air quality.
Sediment & turbidity.
Soils & geomorphology.
Water chemistry.
Biology.
--Stream macroinvertebrates.
--Algae.
--Riparian & upland vegetation & fuels.
--Yosemite toad.
In June of 2009, the Sierra Nevada Alliance highlighted the need to
monitor, protect and restore Sierra Nevada headwater resources. The
KREW Project is uniquely positioned to allow researchers to collect
data from an area where a particular management practice is applied
along with corresponding data from a similar, but untreated area. By
conducting various types of thinning and prescribed fire treatments and
comparing data from paired areas, the proposed research project is
intended to evaluate the watershed-scale effects of management
activities designed to create a more sustainable forest in a
financially viable way.
Purpose and Need for Action
The KREW Project has two goals: the SNF's goal of forest health
treatment for
[[Page 52741]]
the Providence and Bull Units of the Kings River watershed and PSW's
goal of information development on treatment methods. There is an
urgent need to treat headwaters in the Kings River watershed to improve
forest health and reduce the risk of catastrophic fire, and while doing
so, to further our understanding of ecological responses to forest
management activities.
Sierra waters are critical for the health and welfare of California
and yet there has been minimal attention and resources dedicated to the
protection and restoration of this headwater resource. The Sierra
Nevada Alliance reports that 75% of California's rain and snow falls in
the Sierra which provides 55 to 65% of California's developed water.
The need for the proposed research in the Sierra Nevada is emphasized
by financial support to the KREW Project from the State of California,
CalFed Watershed Program administered by the California Regional Water
Quality Control Board, and by a recent report from the Sierra Nevada
Alliance, ``Investing in California's Headwaters: The Sierra Nevada.''
In addition, the National Science Foundation is funding university
scientists to perform research to cooperate with the KREW Project. The
research component of the KREW Project influenced the siting selection
of the California portions of the National Ecological Observatory
Network. The KREW Project research component is designed to be relevant
to Federal, State and private forest land. The KREW Project will also
provide much needed data for the Southern Sierra Integrated Regional
Water Management Plan.
North and others in 2009 recognized that ``management practices
that help restore the forest headwaters of Sierran watersheds will
benefit water production and quality for downstream users.'' The SNF
and PSW have been working toward the goal of forest health treatment in
the Kings River watershed for more than a decade. As each year goes by,
the health of the forest in these areas has a greater potential to be
impacted by various factors including drought, uncharacteristic
wildfire and insect infestation. Treatment to enhance ecological health
in the Kings River watershed has been delayed due to setbacks in the
completion of key environmental documentation. It is important that
treatments be accomplished and research information be available to
provide factual information for the design of future forest management
activities.
The KREW Project objectives include:
Treat the Providence and the Bull Units to improve
forest ecological health in a financially viable way.
Define the variability in and understand the processes
of headwater streams, their riparian areas, and associated
watersheds.
Evaluate the effects of management activities
(prescribed fire, mechanical thinning, and commercial tree
harvesting) designed to create a more sustainable forest.
Provide an instrumented research site to evaluate
regional stresses such as air pollution and climate change.
Develop a multidisciplinary database that is dense
enough in time and space for computer modeling applications.
Proposed Action
The proposed action would apply treatments on the majority of the
acres in Providence and Bull Units for ecological restoration and study
their short- and long-term effects at the watershed scale. The proposed
action includes tree thinning with commercial tree harvest,
underburning, reforestation, plantation maintenance, fuels treatments,
and herbicide treatments to plantations and noxious weeds. Tree removal
and retention emphasizes heterogeneity through a variable growing space
retention based on aspect, slope position, site productivity, tree
species and recognition of micro-site conditions. Restoration of native
species composition is proposed through the regeneration of pine
species; the retention of existing brush, pine and oaks consistent with
the desired conditions; enhancement of growing conditions of existing
young pine; and the eradication of noxious weed species.
The integrated condition of the streams and their associated
watersheds and riparian areas will be evaluated with physical, chemical
and biological measurements taken under a formal research study. The
research areas within the Units, a subset of the entire proposed
treatment area, have been assigned a treatment type for the purpose of
the experimental design. The 1,899-acre Providence Unit includes
research watersheds of 298 acres of potential thinning, 327 acres of
underburn, 245 acres of combined underburning and potential thinning,
and 120 acres of control (untreated). The 1,152-acre Bull Unit includes
research areas of 131 acres of thinning, 342 acres of underburn, and
412 acres of combined thinning and underburning. The 562-acre control
area for the Bull Unit is outside the KREW Project. Only a portion of
the research areas designated for mechanical thinning will be thinned.
Forest management treatments also occur outside the research areas and
are not constrained by the research design.
Lead and Cooperating Agencies
The KREW Project is a collaborative effort between the SNF and the
PSW. The PSW and the SNF share responsibility as the lead agency.
Responsible Officials
Ed Cole, SNF Forest Supervisor, Supervisor's Office, 1600 Tollhouse
Road, Clovis, CA 93611
Peter Stine, Program Manager, PSW, 1731 Research Park Drive, Davis,
CA 95618.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
The decision to be made is whether to implement the planned forest
health treatments and proceed with research on the effects of those
treatments, alternative forest health treatments, or select no action.
Scoping Process
This notice of intent initiates the scoping process, which guides
the development of the environmental impact statement. Public scoping
meetings will be held at the SNF, Supervisor's Office, 1600 Tollhouse
Road, Clovis on Wednesday October 14th at 3 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. and from
6:30 to 8 p.m. on the same date at the SNF High Sierra Ranger District,
29688 Auberry Road, Prather, CA.
It is important that reviewers provide their comments at such times
and in such manner that they are useful to the agency's preparation of
the environmental impact statement. Therefore, comments should be
provided prior to the close of the comment period and should clearly
articulate the reviewer's concerns and contentions.
Dated: October 1, 2009.
Edward C. Cole,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. E9-24373 Filed 10-13-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M