Purified Carboxymethylcellulose From Mexico: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 52178-52180 [E9-24462]

Download as PDF 52178 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 195 / Friday, October 9, 2009 / Notices CERTAIN TISSUE PAPER PRODUCTS FROM THE PRC Weightedaverage percent margin (percent) Individually reviewed exporter 2007–2008 administrative review Max Fortune Industrial Limited ....................................................................................................................................................... PRC-wide rate Margin (percent) PRC-wide rate (including Guilin Qifeng Paper Co., Ltd. and Vietnam Quijiang Paper Co., Ltd.) ................................................. Cash Deposit Requirements Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), the Department will determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. The Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of these final results of review. In accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), for Max Fortune, we calculated importer (or customer)specific assessment rates for the merchandise subject to this review. Because we do not have entered values on the record for Max Fortune’s sales, we calculated a per-unit assessment rate by aggregating the antidumping duties due for all U.S. sales to each importer (or customer) and dividing this amount by the total quantity sold to that importer (or customer). See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). To determine whether the duty assessment rates are de minimis, in accordance with the requirement set forth in 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2), we calculated importer (or customer)specific ad valorem ratios based on the estimated entered value. Where an importer (or customer)-specific ad valorem rate is zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties. See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). With respect to the PRC-wide entity (including Vietnam Quijiang and Guilin Qifeng), we will instruct CBP to liquidate appropriate entries at the PRCwide rate of 112.64 percent.3 mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES Assessment The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the notice of final results of the administrative review for all shipments of certain tissue paper products from the PRC entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) A cash deposit rate of 14.25 percent will be required for certain tissue paper products from the PRC exported by Max Fortune; (2) for previously reviewed or investigated companies not listed above that have separate rates, the cashdeposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recent period; (3) for all other PRC exporters of subject merchandise, which have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash-deposit rate will be PRC-wide rate of 112.64 percent; and (4) for all non-PRC exporters of subject merchandise, the cash-deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC exporter that supplied that non-PRC exporter. These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. 3 In the final determination of the circumvention inquiry involving Vietnam Quijiang (see Certain Tissue Paper Products from the People’s Republic of China: Affirmative Final Determination of Circumvention of the Antidumping Duty Order, 73 FR 57591 (October 3, 2008), the Department stated that if Vietnam Quijiang did not participate in this administrative review, we would immediately revoke the certification program relevant to its entries of certain tissue paper products from Vietnam, thereby presuming all of its entries to be of PRC origin regardless of whether they are declared to be Vietnamese or PRC origin. See October 24, 2008, Memorandum entitled ‘‘Discontinuation of Certification Program.’’ VerDate Nov<24>2008 16:05 Oct 08, 2009 Jkt 220001 Notification to Importers This notice also serves as the final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and in the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Notification to Interested Parties This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4703 14.25 Sfmt 4703 112.64 written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. We are issuing and publishing these final results of review in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5). Dated: October 5, 2009. Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. Appendix—List of Issues Comment 1: Max Fortune’s Request for Revocation from the Antidumping Duty Order Comment 2: Incorporating Negative Dumping Margins in the Calculation of the Overall Antidumping Margin Comment 3: Selection of Plastic Bag Surrogate Value Comment 4: Valuing Containerization Expenses Separately From Brokerage and Handling Expenses Comment 5: Selection of Financial Statements for Surrogate Financial Ratio Calculations Comment 6: Reclassifications and Adjustments to Surrogate Financial Ratio Calculations Comment 7: Appropriate Labor Rate Comment 8: Excluding Indian Imports From Hong Kong in WTA-Sourced Surrogate Value Calculations Comment 9: Revisions to Plastic Bag Consumption [FR Doc. E9–24463 Filed 10–8–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–201–834] Purified Carboxymethylcellulose From Mexico: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On April 10, 2009, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published the preliminary E:\FR\FM\09OCN1.SGM 09OCN1 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 195 / Friday, October 9, 2009 / Notices mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on purified carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) from Mexico. See Purified Carboxymethylcellulose From Mexico: Notice of Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 74 FR 16359 (April 10, 2009) (Preliminary Results). The review covers one producer/exporter, Quimica Amtex, S.A. de C.V. (Amtex). The period of review (POR) is July 1, 2007, through June 30, 2008. We invited interested parties to comment on our Preliminary Results. The Department received comments concerning our Preliminary Results from respondents only. Based on our analysis of the comments received, we have made certain changes in the margin calculations. Therefore, the final results differ from the Preliminary Results. The final weighted–average dumping margin for the reviewed firm is listed below in the section entitled ‘‘Final Results of Review.’’ DATES: Effective Date: October 9, 2009. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Flessner or Robert James, AD/CVD Operations Office 7, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–6312 or (202) 482– 0649, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On April 10, 2009, the Department published the preliminary results of this review in the Federal Register. See Preliminary Results. We invited parties to comment on the Preliminary Results. Since the Preliminary Results, we received a case brief from respondent Amtex on May 11, 2009. No brief was received from petitioner, Aqualon Company (a division of Hercules Incorporated). Amtex originally reported as many as three entered values for some of its constructed export price (CEP) sales; these particular sales quantities had been blended from various lots of CMC held in Amtex USA’s U.S. inventory. In order for the Department to calculate importer–specific ad valorem assessment rates, we directed Amtex to report a single weighted entered value for each reported CEP sale in a supplemental questionnaire. See ‘‘Purified Carboxymethylcellulose from Mexico: Supplemental Section C Questionnaire,’’ dated July 17, 2009. Amtex fully complied with this request in its ‘‘Quimica Amtex, S.A. de C.V. Supplemental Section C Questionnaire VerDate Nov<24>2008 16:05 Oct 08, 2009 Jkt 220001 Response,’’ dated August 5, 2009. At our instruction, Amtex allocated its entered value to report a single weighted– average entered value for each CEP transaction. On August 5, 2009, the Department published in the Federal Register an extension of the time limit for the final results until October 7, 2009. See Purified Carboxymethylcellulose from Mexico: Extension of Time Limit for Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 74 FR 39054 (August 5, 2009). Scope of the Order The merchandise covered by the order is all purified carboxymethylcellulose (CMC), sometimes also referred to as purified sodium CMC, polyanionic cellulose, or cellulose gum, which is a white to off–white, non–toxic, odorless, biodegradable powder, comprising sodium CMC that has been refined and purified to a minimum assay of 90 percent. Purified CMC does not include unpurified or crude CMC, CMC Fluidized Polymer Suspensions, and CMC that is cross–linked through heat treatment. Purified CMC is CMC that has undergone one or more purification operations which, at a minimum, reduce the remaining salt and other by–product portion of the product to less than ten percent. The merchandise subject to this order is classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States at subheading 3912.31.00. This tariff classification is provided for convenience and customs purposes; however, the written description of the scope of the order is dispositive. Changes Since the Preliminary Results Based on our analysis of the comments received, we have made certain changes to the margin calculations. In its case brief, Amtex alleged that the Department had failed to make several conversions from pounds to kilograms for those sales originally invoiced in pounds. See ‘‘Purified Carboxymethylcellulose from Mexico (A–201–834): Case Brief for the Final Results,’’ dated May 11, 2009, at pages 1–5. The comparison market database fields affected were inland freight charges (INLFTCH) and variable cost of manufacture (VCOMH). Id., at 1– 4. The U.S. market database fields affected were variable cost of manufacture (VCOMU), total cost of manufacture (TCOMU), and packing (PACKU and PACK1U). Id., at 1–5. After analyzing the databases and the programming used in the Preliminary Results, we agreed with Amtex. Therefore, we added two lines of programming to the comparison market PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 52179 program stipulating that if the quantity unit reporting was in pounds, then the following adjustments to the comparison market program were appropriate: ‘‘INLFTCH = INLFTCH * 2.204’’ and ‘‘VCOMH = VCOMH * 2.204.’’ We also added three lines of programming to the U.S. market program stipulating that if the quantity unit reporting was in pounds, then the following adjustments to the U.S. market program were appropriate: ‘‘VCOMU = VCOMU * 2.204’’ and ‘‘TCOMU = TCOMU * 2.204’’ and ‘‘PACKU = PACK1U’’ (PACK1U reported the PACKU value as converted into kilograms). Final Results of Review The final weighted–average dumping margin for the period July 1, 2007, through June 30, 2008, is as follows: Producer/Exporter Quimica Amtex, S.A. de C.V. ........................... Weighted–Average Margin (Percentage) 2.94 Assessment The Department shall determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. We have calculated importer–specific ad valorem duty assessment rates based on the ratio of the total amount of antidumping duties calculated for the examined sales to the total entered value of the sales. We will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review if any importer–specific assessment rate calculated in the final results of this review is above de minimis (i.e., less than 0.50 percent). The Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of these final results of review. The Department clarified its ‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on May 6, 2003. See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). This clarification will apply to entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by companies included in these final results of review for which the reviewed companies did not know their merchandise was destined for the United States. In such instances, we will instruct CBP to liquidate un–reviewed entries at the all–others rate established in the less–than-fair–value (LTFV) investigation if there is no rate for the intermediate company or companies involved in the transaction. E:\FR\FM\09OCN1.SGM 09OCN1 52180 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 195 / Friday, October 9, 2009 / Notices Cash Deposit Requirements Further, the following deposit requirements will be effective for all shipments of purified carboxymethylcellulose from Mexico entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the final results of this administrative review, as provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act): (1) the cash deposit rates for the reviewed companies will be the rates shown above, except if the rate is less than 0.50 percent, de minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), the cash deposit will be zero; (2) for previously– investigated or reviewed companies not listed above, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company–specific rate published for the most recent period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, or the LTFV investigation, but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recent period for the manufacturer of the merchandise; and, (4) the cash deposit rate for all other manufacturers or exporters will continue to be 12.61 percent, the ‘‘all others’’ rate established in the LTFV investigation. See Notice of Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Purified Carboxymethylcellulose from Mexico, 70 FR 28280 (May 17, 2005). These deposit requirements shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility, under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2), to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES Notification to Interested Parties This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of return/ destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. VerDate Nov<24>2008 16:05 Oct 08, 2009 Jkt 220001 This administrative review and notice are issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. International Trade Administration Part, 74 FR 27109 (June 8, 2009) (Preliminary Results). The administrative review covers Xiping Opeck Food Co., Ltd. (Xiping Opeck). We invited interested parties to comment on the preliminary results. On July 8, 2009, we received a case brief from the petitioner, the Crawfish Processors Alliance. We did not receive a rebuttal brief from Xiping Opeck. No interested party has requested a hearing. The Department has conducted this administrative review in accordance with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). [A–570–848] Scope of the Order Freshwater Crawfish Tail Meat From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Rescission of Review in Part The product covered by the antidumping duty order is freshwater crawfish tail meat, in all its forms (whether washed or with fat on, whether purged or un–purged), grades, and sizes; whether frozen, fresh, or chilled; and regardless of how it is packed, preserved, or prepared. Excluded from the scope of the order are live crawfish and other whole crawfish, whether boiled, frozen, fresh, or chilled. Also excluded are saltwater crawfish of any type, and parts thereof. Freshwater crawfish tail meat is currently classifiable in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) under item numbers 1605.40.10.10 and 1605.40.10.90, which are the HTSUS numbers for prepared foodstuffs, indicating peeled crawfish tail meat and other, as introduced by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) in 2000, and HTSUS numbers 0306.19.00.10 and 0306.29.00.00, which are reserved for fish and crustaceans in general. The HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes only. The written description of the scope of the order is dispositive. Dated: October 2, 2009. Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. [FR Doc. E9–24462 Filed 10–8–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On June 8, 2009, the Department of Commerce published the preliminary results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on freshwater crawfish tail meat from the People’s Republic of China. The review covers one exporter. The period of review is September 1, 2007, through August 31, 2008. Based on our analysis of the comments received, we have made no changes to our margin calculations. Therefore, the final results do not differ from the preliminary results. The final weighted–average dumping margin for the reviewed firm is listed below in the section entitled ‘‘Final Results of the Review.’’ DATES: Effective Date: October 9, 2009. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dmitry Vladimirov or Minoo Hatten, AD/CVD Operations, Office 5, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0665 or (202) 482– 1690, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On June 8, 2009, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published the preliminary results of review of the antidumping duty order on freshwater crawfish tail meat from the People’s Republic of China (PRC). See Freshwater Crawfish Tail Meat From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Intent to Rescind Review in PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Rescission of Administrative Review in Part In the Preliminary Results, we preliminarily found that Shanghai Now Again International Trading Co., Ltd. (Shanghai Now Again), and Yancheng Hi–King Agriculture Developing Co., Ltd. (Hi–King), had no shipments of subject merchandise during the period of review and we stated our intent to rescind the administrative review with respect to these companies. See Preliminary Results, 74 FR at 27110. We have received no comments concerning our intent to rescind this administrative review in part. We continue to find that Shanghai Now Again and Hi–King had no shipments of freshwater crawfish tail meat from the PRC during the period of review. In accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), we are rescinding the E:\FR\FM\09OCN1.SGM 09OCN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 195 (Friday, October 9, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52178-52180]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-24462]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-201-834]


Purified Carboxymethylcellulose From Mexico: Final Results of 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On April 10, 2009, the Department of Commerce (the Department) 
published the preliminary

[[Page 52179]]

results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on 
purified carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) from Mexico. See Purified 
Carboxymethylcellulose From Mexico: Notice of Preliminary Results of 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 74 FR 16359 (April 10, 2009) 
(Preliminary Results). The review covers one producer/exporter, Quimica 
Amtex, S.A. de C.V. (Amtex). The period of review (POR) is July 1, 
2007, through June 30, 2008. We invited interested parties to comment 
on our Preliminary Results. The Department received comments concerning 
our Preliminary Results from respondents only. Based on our analysis of 
the comments received, we have made certain changes in the margin 
calculations. Therefore, the final results differ from the Preliminary 
Results. The final weighted-average dumping margin for the reviewed 
firm is listed below in the section entitled ``Final Results of 
Review.''

DATES: Effective Date: October 9, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Flessner or Robert James, AD/CVD 
Operations Office 7, Import Administration, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
6312 or (202) 482-0649, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On April 10, 2009, the Department published the preliminary results 
of this review in the Federal Register. See Preliminary Results. We 
invited parties to comment on the Preliminary Results.
    Since the Preliminary Results, we received a case brief from 
respondent Amtex on May 11, 2009. No brief was received from 
petitioner, Aqualon Company (a division of Hercules Incorporated).
    Amtex originally reported as many as three entered values for some 
of its constructed export price (CEP) sales; these particular sales 
quantities had been blended from various lots of CMC held in Amtex 
USA's U.S. inventory. In order for the Department to calculate 
importer-specific ad valorem assessment rates, we directed Amtex to 
report a single weighted entered value for each reported CEP sale in a 
supplemental questionnaire. See ``Purified Carboxymethylcellulose from 
Mexico: Supplemental Section C Questionnaire,'' dated July 17, 2009. 
Amtex fully complied with this request in its ``Quimica Amtex, S.A. de 
C.V. Supplemental Section C Questionnaire Response,'' dated August 5, 
2009. At our instruction, Amtex allocated its entered value to report a 
single weighted-average entered value for each CEP transaction.
    On August 5, 2009, the Department published in the Federal Register 
an extension of the time limit for the final results until October 7, 
2009. See Purified Carboxymethylcellulose from Mexico: Extension of 
Time Limit for Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 
74 FR 39054 (August 5, 2009).

Scope of the Order

    The merchandise covered by the order is all purified 
carboxymethylcellulose (CMC), sometimes also referred to as purified 
sodium CMC, polyanionic cellulose, or cellulose gum, which is a white 
to off-white, non-toxic, odorless, biodegradable powder, comprising 
sodium CMC that has been refined and purified to a minimum assay of 90 
percent. Purified CMC does not include unpurified or crude CMC, CMC 
Fluidized Polymer Suspensions, and CMC that is cross-linked through 
heat treatment. Purified CMC is CMC that has undergone one or more 
purification operations which, at a minimum, reduce the remaining salt 
and other by-product portion of the product to less than ten percent. 
The merchandise subject to this order is classified in the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States at subheading 3912.31.00. This 
tariff classification is provided for convenience and customs purposes; 
however, the written description of the scope of the order is 
dispositive.

Changes Since the Preliminary Results

    Based on our analysis of the comments received, we have made 
certain changes to the margin calculations. In its case brief, Amtex 
alleged that the Department had failed to make several conversions from 
pounds to kilograms for those sales originally invoiced in pounds. See 
``Purified Carboxymethylcellulose from Mexico (A-201-834): Case Brief 
for the Final Results,'' dated May 11, 2009, at pages 1-5. The 
comparison market database fields affected were inland freight charges 
(INLFTCH) and variable cost of manufacture (VCOMH). Id., at 1-4. The 
U.S. market database fields affected were variable cost of manufacture 
(VCOMU), total cost of manufacture (TCOMU), and packing (PACKU and 
PACK1U). Id., at 1-5.
    After analyzing the databases and the programming used in the 
Preliminary Results, we agreed with Amtex. Therefore, we added two 
lines of programming to the comparison market program stipulating that 
if the quantity unit reporting was in pounds, then the following 
adjustments to the comparison market program were appropriate: 
``INLFTCH = INLFTCH * 2.204'' and ``VCOMH = VCOMH * 2.204.'' We also 
added three lines of programming to the U.S. market program stipulating 
that if the quantity unit reporting was in pounds, then the following 
adjustments to the U.S. market program were appropriate: ``VCOMU = 
VCOMU * 2.204'' and ``TCOMU = TCOMU * 2.204'' and ``PACKU = PACK1U'' 
(PACK1U reported the PACKU value as converted into kilograms).

Final Results of Review

    The final weighted-average dumping margin for the period July 1, 
2007, through June 30, 2008, is as follows:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                       Weighted-Average
                  Producer/Exporter                         Margin
                                                         (Percentage)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quimica Amtex, S.A. de C.V..........................                2.94
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Assessment

    The Department shall determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping 
duties on all appropriate entries. We have calculated importer-specific 
ad valorem duty assessment rates based on the ratio of the total amount 
of antidumping duties calculated for the examined sales to the total 
entered value of the sales. We will instruct CBP to assess antidumping 
duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review if any 
importer-specific assessment rate calculated in the final results of 
this review is above de minimis (i.e., less than 0.50 percent). The 
Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days 
after the date of publication of these final results of review.
    The Department clarified its ``automatic assessment'' regulation on 
May 6, 2003. See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). This 
clarification will apply to entries of subject merchandise during the 
POR produced by companies included in these final results of review for 
which the reviewed companies did not know their merchandise was 
destined for the United States. In such instances, we will instruct CBP 
to liquidate un-reviewed entries at the all-others rate established in 
the less-than-fair-value (LTFV) investigation if there is no rate for 
the intermediate company or companies involved in the transaction.

[[Page 52180]]

Cash Deposit Requirements

    Further, the following deposit requirements will be effective for 
all shipments of purified carboxymethylcellulose from Mexico entered, 
or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the 
publication date of the final results of this administrative review, as 
provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 
amended (the Act): (1) the cash deposit rates for the reviewed 
companies will be the rates shown above, except if the rate is less 
than 0.50 percent, de minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR 
351.106(c)(1), the cash deposit will be zero; (2) for previously-
investigated or reviewed companies not listed above, the cash deposit 
rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the 
most recent period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this 
review, or the LTFV investigation, but the manufacturer is, the cash 
deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recent period 
for the manufacturer of the merchandise; and, (4) the cash deposit rate 
for all other manufacturers or exporters will continue to be 12.61 
percent, the ``all others'' rate established in the LTFV investigation. 
See Notice of Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: 
Purified Carboxymethylcellulose from Mexico, 70 FR 28280 (May 17, 
2005). These deposit requirements shall remain in effect until further 
notice.

Notification to Importers

    This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility, under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2), to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply 
with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of double antidumping duties.

Notification to Interested Parties

    This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under 
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written 
notification of return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to 
judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with 
the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
    This administrative review and notice are issued and published in 
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.

    Dated: October 2, 2009.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E9-24462 Filed 10-8-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S