Purified Carboxymethylcellulose From Mexico: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 52178-52180 [E9-24462]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
52178
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 195 / Friday, October 9, 2009 / Notices
CERTAIN TISSUE PAPER PRODUCTS FROM THE PRC
Weightedaverage percent
margin
(percent)
Individually reviewed exporter 2007–2008 administrative review
Max Fortune Industrial Limited .......................................................................................................................................................
PRC-wide rate
Margin (percent)
PRC-wide rate (including Guilin Qifeng Paper Co., Ltd. and Vietnam Quijiang Paper Co., Ltd.) .................................................
Cash Deposit Requirements
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), the
Department will determine, and CBP
shall assess, antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries. The Department
intends to issue assessment instructions
to CBP 15 days after the date of
publication of these final results of
review. In accordance with 19 CFR
351.212(b)(1), for Max Fortune, we
calculated importer (or customer)specific assessment rates for the
merchandise subject to this review.
Because we do not have entered values
on the record for Max Fortune’s sales,
we calculated a per-unit assessment rate
by aggregating the antidumping duties
due for all U.S. sales to each importer
(or customer) and dividing this amount
by the total quantity sold to that
importer (or customer). See 19 CFR
351.212(b)(1). To determine whether the
duty assessment rates are de minimis, in
accordance with the requirement set
forth in 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2), we
calculated importer (or customer)specific ad valorem ratios based on the
estimated entered value. Where an
importer (or customer)-specific ad
valorem rate is zero or de minimis, we
will instruct CBP to liquidate
appropriate entries without regard to
antidumping duties. See 19 CFR
351.106(c)(2).
With respect to the PRC-wide entity
(including Vietnam Quijiang and Guilin
Qifeng), we will instruct CBP to
liquidate appropriate entries at the PRCwide rate of 112.64 percent.3
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Assessment
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective upon
publication of the notice of final results
of the administrative review for all
shipments of certain tissue paper
products from the PRC entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the date of
publication, as provided by section
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) A cash
deposit rate of 14.25 percent will be
required for certain tissue paper
products from the PRC exported by Max
Fortune; (2) for previously reviewed or
investigated companies not listed above
that have separate rates, the cashdeposit rate will continue to be the
company-specific rate published for the
most recent period; (3) for all other PRC
exporters of subject merchandise, which
have not been found to be entitled to a
separate rate, the cash-deposit rate will
be PRC-wide rate of 112.64 percent; and
(4) for all non-PRC exporters of subject
merchandise, the cash-deposit rate will
be the rate applicable to the PRC
exporter that supplied that non-PRC
exporter. These deposit requirements,
when imposed, shall remain in effect
until further notice.
3 In the final determination of the circumvention
inquiry involving Vietnam Quijiang (see Certain
Tissue Paper Products from the People’s Republic
of China: Affirmative Final Determination of
Circumvention of the Antidumping Duty Order, 73
FR 57591 (October 3, 2008), the Department stated
that if Vietnam Quijiang did not participate in this
administrative review, we would immediately
revoke the certification program relevant to its
entries of certain tissue paper products from
Vietnam, thereby presuming all of its entries to be
of PRC origin regardless of whether they are
declared to be Vietnamese or PRC origin. See
October 24, 2008, Memorandum entitled
‘‘Discontinuation of Certification Program.’’
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:05 Oct 08, 2009
Jkt 220001
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as the final
reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)
to file a certificate regarding the
reimbursement of antidumping duties
prior to liquidation of the relevant
entries during this review period.
Failure to comply with this requirement
could result in the Secretary’s
presumption that reimbursement of
antidumping duties occurred and in the
subsequent assessment of double
antidumping duties.
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice serves as the only
reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of
their responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
14.25
Sfmt 4703
112.64
written notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and the terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
We are issuing and publishing these
final results of review in accordance
with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of
the Act and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5).
Dated: October 5, 2009.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
Appendix—List of Issues
Comment 1: Max Fortune’s Request for
Revocation from the Antidumping Duty
Order
Comment 2: Incorporating Negative Dumping
Margins in the Calculation of the Overall
Antidumping Margin
Comment 3: Selection of Plastic Bag
Surrogate Value
Comment 4: Valuing Containerization
Expenses Separately From Brokerage and
Handling Expenses
Comment 5: Selection of Financial
Statements for Surrogate Financial Ratio
Calculations
Comment 6: Reclassifications and
Adjustments to Surrogate Financial Ratio
Calculations
Comment 7: Appropriate Labor Rate
Comment 8: Excluding Indian Imports From
Hong Kong in WTA-Sourced Surrogate
Value Calculations
Comment 9: Revisions to Plastic Bag
Consumption
[FR Doc. E9–24463 Filed 10–8–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–201–834]
Purified Carboxymethylcellulose From
Mexico: Final Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On April 10, 2009, the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) published the preliminary
E:\FR\FM\09OCN1.SGM
09OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 195 / Friday, October 9, 2009 / Notices
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
results of the administrative review of
the antidumping duty order on purified
carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) from
Mexico. See Purified
Carboxymethylcellulose From Mexico:
Notice of Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review, 74 FR 16359 (April 10, 2009)
(Preliminary Results). The review covers
one producer/exporter, Quimica Amtex,
S.A. de C.V. (Amtex). The period of
review (POR) is July 1, 2007, through
June 30, 2008. We invited interested
parties to comment on our Preliminary
Results. The Department received
comments concerning our Preliminary
Results from respondents only. Based
on our analysis of the comments
received, we have made certain changes
in the margin calculations. Therefore,
the final results differ from the
Preliminary Results. The final
weighted–average dumping margin for
the reviewed firm is listed below in the
section entitled ‘‘Final Results of
Review.’’
DATES: Effective Date: October 9, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mark Flessner or Robert James, AD/CVD
Operations Office 7, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–6312 or (202) 482–
0649, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On April 10, 2009, the Department
published the preliminary results of this
review in the Federal Register. See
Preliminary Results. We invited parties
to comment on the Preliminary Results.
Since the Preliminary Results, we
received a case brief from respondent
Amtex on May 11, 2009. No brief was
received from petitioner, Aqualon
Company (a division of Hercules
Incorporated).
Amtex originally reported as many as
three entered values for some of its
constructed export price (CEP) sales;
these particular sales quantities had
been blended from various lots of CMC
held in Amtex USA’s U.S. inventory. In
order for the Department to calculate
importer–specific ad valorem
assessment rates, we directed Amtex to
report a single weighted entered value
for each reported CEP sale in a
supplemental questionnaire. See
‘‘Purified Carboxymethylcellulose from
Mexico: Supplemental Section C
Questionnaire,’’ dated July 17, 2009.
Amtex fully complied with this request
in its ‘‘Quimica Amtex, S.A. de C.V.
Supplemental Section C Questionnaire
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:05 Oct 08, 2009
Jkt 220001
Response,’’ dated August 5, 2009. At our
instruction, Amtex allocated its entered
value to report a single weighted–
average entered value for each CEP
transaction.
On August 5, 2009, the Department
published in the Federal Register an
extension of the time limit for the final
results until October 7, 2009. See
Purified Carboxymethylcellulose from
Mexico: Extension of Time Limit for
Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review, 74 FR 39054
(August 5, 2009).
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by the order
is all purified carboxymethylcellulose
(CMC), sometimes also referred to as
purified sodium CMC, polyanionic
cellulose, or cellulose gum, which is a
white to off–white, non–toxic, odorless,
biodegradable powder, comprising
sodium CMC that has been refined and
purified to a minimum assay of 90
percent. Purified CMC does not include
unpurified or crude CMC, CMC
Fluidized Polymer Suspensions, and
CMC that is cross–linked through heat
treatment. Purified CMC is CMC that
has undergone one or more purification
operations which, at a minimum, reduce
the remaining salt and other by–product
portion of the product to less than ten
percent. The merchandise subject to this
order is classified in the Harmonized
Tariff Schedule of the United States at
subheading 3912.31.00. This tariff
classification is provided for
convenience and customs purposes;
however, the written description of the
scope of the order is dispositive.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on our analysis of the
comments received, we have made
certain changes to the margin
calculations. In its case brief, Amtex
alleged that the Department had failed
to make several conversions from
pounds to kilograms for those sales
originally invoiced in pounds. See
‘‘Purified Carboxymethylcellulose from
Mexico (A–201–834): Case Brief for the
Final Results,’’ dated May 11, 2009, at
pages 1–5. The comparison market
database fields affected were inland
freight charges (INLFTCH) and variable
cost of manufacture (VCOMH). Id., at 1–
4. The U.S. market database fields
affected were variable cost of
manufacture (VCOMU), total cost of
manufacture (TCOMU), and packing
(PACKU and PACK1U). Id., at 1–5.
After analyzing the databases and the
programming used in the Preliminary
Results, we agreed with Amtex.
Therefore, we added two lines of
programming to the comparison market
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
52179
program stipulating that if the quantity
unit reporting was in pounds, then the
following adjustments to the
comparison market program were
appropriate: ‘‘INLFTCH = INLFTCH *
2.204’’ and ‘‘VCOMH = VCOMH *
2.204.’’ We also added three lines of
programming to the U.S. market
program stipulating that if the quantity
unit reporting was in pounds, then the
following adjustments to the U.S.
market program were appropriate:
‘‘VCOMU = VCOMU * 2.204’’ and
‘‘TCOMU = TCOMU * 2.204’’ and
‘‘PACKU = PACK1U’’ (PACK1U
reported the PACKU value as converted
into kilograms).
Final Results of Review
The final weighted–average dumping
margin for the period July 1, 2007,
through June 30, 2008, is as follows:
Producer/Exporter
Quimica Amtex, S.A. de
C.V. ...........................
Weighted–Average
Margin
(Percentage)
2.94
Assessment
The Department shall determine, and
CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on
all appropriate entries. We have
calculated importer–specific ad valorem
duty assessment rates based on the ratio
of the total amount of antidumping
duties calculated for the examined sales
to the total entered value of the sales.
We will instruct CBP to assess
antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries covered by this review if any
importer–specific assessment rate
calculated in the final results of this
review is above de minimis (i.e., less
than 0.50 percent). The Department
intends to issue assessment instructions
to CBP 15 days after the date of
publication of these final results of
review.
The Department clarified its
‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on
May 6, 2003. See Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68
FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). This
clarification will apply to entries of
subject merchandise during the POR
produced by companies included in
these final results of review for which
the reviewed companies did not know
their merchandise was destined for the
United States. In such instances, we will
instruct CBP to liquidate un–reviewed
entries at the all–others rate established
in the less–than-fair–value (LTFV)
investigation if there is no rate for the
intermediate company or companies
involved in the transaction.
E:\FR\FM\09OCN1.SGM
09OCN1
52180
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 195 / Friday, October 9, 2009 / Notices
Cash Deposit Requirements
Further, the following deposit
requirements will be effective for all
shipments of purified
carboxymethylcellulose from Mexico
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the
publication date of the final results of
this administrative review, as provided
for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended (the Act): (1)
the cash deposit rates for the reviewed
companies will be the rates shown
above, except if the rate is less than 0.50
percent, de minimis within the meaning
of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), the cash
deposit will be zero; (2) for previously–
investigated or reviewed companies not
listed above, the cash deposit rate will
continue to be the company–specific
rate published for the most recent
period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm
covered in this review, or the LTFV
investigation, but the manufacturer is,
the cash deposit rate will be the rate
established for the most recent period
for the manufacturer of the
merchandise; and, (4) the cash deposit
rate for all other manufacturers or
exporters will continue to be 12.61
percent, the ‘‘all others’’ rate established
in the LTFV investigation. See Notice of
Final Determination of Sales at Less
Than Fair Value: Purified
Carboxymethylcellulose from Mexico,
70 FR 28280 (May 17, 2005). These
deposit requirements shall remain in
effect until further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility,
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2), to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this review period. Failure to
comply with this requirement could
result in the Secretary’s presumption
that reimbursement of antidumping
duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping
duties.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice serves as the only
reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of
their responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of return/
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and the terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:05 Oct 08, 2009
Jkt 220001
This administrative review and notice
are issued and published in accordance
with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of
the Act.
International Trade Administration
Part, 74 FR 27109 (June 8, 2009)
(Preliminary Results). The
administrative review covers Xiping
Opeck Food Co., Ltd. (Xiping Opeck).
We invited interested parties to
comment on the preliminary results. On
July 8, 2009, we received a case brief
from the petitioner, the Crawfish
Processors Alliance. We did not receive
a rebuttal brief from Xiping Opeck. No
interested party has requested a hearing.
The Department has conducted this
administrative review in accordance
with section 751 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (the Act).
[A–570–848]
Scope of the Order
Freshwater Crawfish Tail Meat From
the People’s Republic of China: Final
Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review and Rescission
of Review in Part
The product covered by the
antidumping duty order is freshwater
crawfish tail meat, in all its forms
(whether washed or with fat on,
whether purged or un–purged), grades,
and sizes; whether frozen, fresh, or
chilled; and regardless of how it is
packed, preserved, or prepared.
Excluded from the scope of the order are
live crawfish and other whole crawfish,
whether boiled, frozen, fresh, or chilled.
Also excluded are saltwater crawfish of
any type, and parts thereof.
Freshwater crawfish tail meat is
currently classifiable in the Harmonized
Tariff Schedule of the United States
(HTSUS) under item numbers
1605.40.10.10 and 1605.40.10.90, which
are the HTSUS numbers for prepared
foodstuffs, indicating peeled crawfish
tail meat and other, as introduced by
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP) in 2000, and HTSUS numbers
0306.19.00.10 and 0306.29.00.00, which
are reserved for fish and crustaceans in
general. The HTSUS subheadings are
provided for convenience and customs
purposes only. The written description
of the scope of the order is dispositive.
Dated: October 2, 2009.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E9–24462 Filed 10–8–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On June 8, 2009, the
Department of Commerce published the
preliminary results of the administrative
review of the antidumping duty order
on freshwater crawfish tail meat from
the People’s Republic of China. The
review covers one exporter. The period
of review is September 1, 2007, through
August 31, 2008.
Based on our analysis of the
comments received, we have made no
changes to our margin calculations.
Therefore, the final results do not differ
from the preliminary results. The final
weighted–average dumping margin for
the reviewed firm is listed below in the
section entitled ‘‘Final Results of the
Review.’’
DATES:
Effective Date: October 9, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dmitry Vladimirov or Minoo Hatten,
AD/CVD Operations, Office 5, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–0665 or (202) 482–
1690, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On June 8, 2009, the Department of
Commerce (the Department) published
the preliminary results of review of the
antidumping duty order on freshwater
crawfish tail meat from the People’s
Republic of China (PRC). See Freshwater
Crawfish Tail Meat From the People’s
Republic of China: Preliminary Results
of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review and Intent to Rescind Review in
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Rescission of Administrative Review in
Part
In the Preliminary Results, we
preliminarily found that Shanghai Now
Again International Trading Co., Ltd.
(Shanghai Now Again), and Yancheng
Hi–King Agriculture Developing Co.,
Ltd. (Hi–King), had no shipments of
subject merchandise during the period
of review and we stated our intent to
rescind the administrative review with
respect to these companies. See
Preliminary Results, 74 FR at 27110. We
have received no comments concerning
our intent to rescind this administrative
review in part. We continue to find that
Shanghai Now Again and Hi–King had
no shipments of freshwater crawfish tail
meat from the PRC during the period of
review. In accordance with 19 CFR
351.213(d)(3), we are rescinding the
E:\FR\FM\09OCN1.SGM
09OCN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 195 (Friday, October 9, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52178-52180]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-24462]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-201-834]
Purified Carboxymethylcellulose From Mexico: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On April 10, 2009, the Department of Commerce (the Department)
published the preliminary
[[Page 52179]]
results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on
purified carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) from Mexico. See Purified
Carboxymethylcellulose From Mexico: Notice of Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 74 FR 16359 (April 10, 2009)
(Preliminary Results). The review covers one producer/exporter, Quimica
Amtex, S.A. de C.V. (Amtex). The period of review (POR) is July 1,
2007, through June 30, 2008. We invited interested parties to comment
on our Preliminary Results. The Department received comments concerning
our Preliminary Results from respondents only. Based on our analysis of
the comments received, we have made certain changes in the margin
calculations. Therefore, the final results differ from the Preliminary
Results. The final weighted-average dumping margin for the reviewed
firm is listed below in the section entitled ``Final Results of
Review.''
DATES: Effective Date: October 9, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Flessner or Robert James, AD/CVD
Operations Office 7, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
6312 or (202) 482-0649, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On April 10, 2009, the Department published the preliminary results
of this review in the Federal Register. See Preliminary Results. We
invited parties to comment on the Preliminary Results.
Since the Preliminary Results, we received a case brief from
respondent Amtex on May 11, 2009. No brief was received from
petitioner, Aqualon Company (a division of Hercules Incorporated).
Amtex originally reported as many as three entered values for some
of its constructed export price (CEP) sales; these particular sales
quantities had been blended from various lots of CMC held in Amtex
USA's U.S. inventory. In order for the Department to calculate
importer-specific ad valorem assessment rates, we directed Amtex to
report a single weighted entered value for each reported CEP sale in a
supplemental questionnaire. See ``Purified Carboxymethylcellulose from
Mexico: Supplemental Section C Questionnaire,'' dated July 17, 2009.
Amtex fully complied with this request in its ``Quimica Amtex, S.A. de
C.V. Supplemental Section C Questionnaire Response,'' dated August 5,
2009. At our instruction, Amtex allocated its entered value to report a
single weighted-average entered value for each CEP transaction.
On August 5, 2009, the Department published in the Federal Register
an extension of the time limit for the final results until October 7,
2009. See Purified Carboxymethylcellulose from Mexico: Extension of
Time Limit for Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,
74 FR 39054 (August 5, 2009).
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by the order is all purified
carboxymethylcellulose (CMC), sometimes also referred to as purified
sodium CMC, polyanionic cellulose, or cellulose gum, which is a white
to off-white, non-toxic, odorless, biodegradable powder, comprising
sodium CMC that has been refined and purified to a minimum assay of 90
percent. Purified CMC does not include unpurified or crude CMC, CMC
Fluidized Polymer Suspensions, and CMC that is cross-linked through
heat treatment. Purified CMC is CMC that has undergone one or more
purification operations which, at a minimum, reduce the remaining salt
and other by-product portion of the product to less than ten percent.
The merchandise subject to this order is classified in the Harmonized
Tariff Schedule of the United States at subheading 3912.31.00. This
tariff classification is provided for convenience and customs purposes;
however, the written description of the scope of the order is
dispositive.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on our analysis of the comments received, we have made
certain changes to the margin calculations. In its case brief, Amtex
alleged that the Department had failed to make several conversions from
pounds to kilograms for those sales originally invoiced in pounds. See
``Purified Carboxymethylcellulose from Mexico (A-201-834): Case Brief
for the Final Results,'' dated May 11, 2009, at pages 1-5. The
comparison market database fields affected were inland freight charges
(INLFTCH) and variable cost of manufacture (VCOMH). Id., at 1-4. The
U.S. market database fields affected were variable cost of manufacture
(VCOMU), total cost of manufacture (TCOMU), and packing (PACKU and
PACK1U). Id., at 1-5.
After analyzing the databases and the programming used in the
Preliminary Results, we agreed with Amtex. Therefore, we added two
lines of programming to the comparison market program stipulating that
if the quantity unit reporting was in pounds, then the following
adjustments to the comparison market program were appropriate:
``INLFTCH = INLFTCH * 2.204'' and ``VCOMH = VCOMH * 2.204.'' We also
added three lines of programming to the U.S. market program stipulating
that if the quantity unit reporting was in pounds, then the following
adjustments to the U.S. market program were appropriate: ``VCOMU =
VCOMU * 2.204'' and ``TCOMU = TCOMU * 2.204'' and ``PACKU = PACK1U''
(PACK1U reported the PACKU value as converted into kilograms).
Final Results of Review
The final weighted-average dumping margin for the period July 1,
2007, through June 30, 2008, is as follows:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-Average
Producer/Exporter Margin
(Percentage)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quimica Amtex, S.A. de C.V.......................... 2.94
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assessment
The Department shall determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping
duties on all appropriate entries. We have calculated importer-specific
ad valorem duty assessment rates based on the ratio of the total amount
of antidumping duties calculated for the examined sales to the total
entered value of the sales. We will instruct CBP to assess antidumping
duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review if any
importer-specific assessment rate calculated in the final results of
this review is above de minimis (i.e., less than 0.50 percent). The
Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days
after the date of publication of these final results of review.
The Department clarified its ``automatic assessment'' regulation on
May 6, 2003. See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). This
clarification will apply to entries of subject merchandise during the
POR produced by companies included in these final results of review for
which the reviewed companies did not know their merchandise was
destined for the United States. In such instances, we will instruct CBP
to liquidate un-reviewed entries at the all-others rate established in
the less-than-fair-value (LTFV) investigation if there is no rate for
the intermediate company or companies involved in the transaction.
[[Page 52180]]
Cash Deposit Requirements
Further, the following deposit requirements will be effective for
all shipments of purified carboxymethylcellulose from Mexico entered,
or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the
publication date of the final results of this administrative review, as
provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act): (1) the cash deposit rates for the reviewed
companies will be the rates shown above, except if the rate is less
than 0.50 percent, de minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR
351.106(c)(1), the cash deposit will be zero; (2) for previously-
investigated or reviewed companies not listed above, the cash deposit
rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the
most recent period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this
review, or the LTFV investigation, but the manufacturer is, the cash
deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recent period
for the manufacturer of the merchandise; and, (4) the cash deposit rate
for all other manufacturers or exporters will continue to be 12.61
percent, the ``all others'' rate established in the LTFV investigation.
See Notice of Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value:
Purified Carboxymethylcellulose from Mexico, 70 FR 28280 (May 17,
2005). These deposit requirements shall remain in effect until further
notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility, under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2), to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written
notification of return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to
judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with
the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
This administrative review and notice are issued and published in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: October 2, 2009.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E9-24462 Filed 10-8-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
