Walnuts Grown in California; Changes to Regulations Governing Voting Procedures, 52154-52156 [E9-24299]
Download as PDF
52154
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 74, No. 195
Friday, October 9, 2009
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 984
[Doc. No. AMS–FV–09–0050; FV09–984–5
PR]
Walnuts Grown in California; Changes
to Regulations Governing Voting
Procedures
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
SUMMARY: This rule invites comments
on revisions to the administrative
regulations governing voting procedures
for the California Walnut Board (Board).
The Board locally administers the
marketing order that regulates the
handling of walnuts grown in California
(order). This rule would specify the
voting procedures to be used for
expanded types of non-assembled
meetings and remove voting by
telegraph. This would enable the Board
to conduct business using current
communication methods, which would
result in time and cost savings to the
Board and its members.
DATES: Comments must be received by
December 8, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments
concerning this proposal. Comments
must be sent to the Docket Clerk,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Fax: (202) 720–8938; or
Internet: https://www.regulations.gov. All
comments should reference the
document number and the date and
page number of this issue of the Federal
Register and will be made available for
public inspection in the Office of the
Docket Clerk during regular business
hours, or can be viewed at: https://
www.regulations.gov. All comments
submitted in response to this rule will
be included in the record and will be
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:26 Oct 08, 2009
Jkt 220001
made available to the public. Please be
advised that the identity of the
individuals or entities submitting the
comments will be made public on the
Internet at the address provided above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Debbie Wray, Marketing Specialist, or
Kurt J. Kimmel, Regional Manager,
California Marketing Field Office,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487–
5901, Fax: (559) 487–5906, or E-mail:
Debbie.Wray@ams.usda.gov or
Kurt.Kimmel@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or E-mail:
Jay.Guerber@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
proposal is issued under Marketing
Order No. 984, as amended (7 CFR part
984), regulating the handling of walnuts
grown in California, hereinafter referred
to as the ‘‘order.’’ The order is effective
under the Agricultural Marketing
Agreement Act of 1937, as amended
(7 U.S.C. 601–674), hereinafter referred
to as the ‘‘Act.’’
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order
12866.
This proposal has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This rule is not intended
to have retroactive effect.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law
and request a modification of the order
or to be exempted therefrom. A handler
is afforded the opportunity for a hearing
on the petition. After the hearing, USDA
would rule on the petition. The Act
provides that the district court of the
United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his
or her principal place of business, has
jurisdiction to review USDA’s ruling on
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
the petition, provided an action is filed
not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This proposal invites comments on
revisions to the administrative
regulations governing the Board’s voting
procedures to implement authority from
a recent amendment to the order. It
would expand the current procedures
for voting by allowing voting by e-mail,
facsimile, telephone, and
videoconference, or by other means of
communication. This proposal was
unanimously recommended by the
Board at a meeting on May 18, 2009.
Section 984.45(b) of the California
walnut marketing order specifies the
percentage requirements for quorum
and voting procedures of the Board.
Section 984.45(c) of the order provides
authority for the Board to vote by mail
or telegram, or by any other means of
communication, and to prescribe, with
the approval of USDA, the minimum
number of votes that must be cast, as
well as any other procedures that are
necessary when the voting is by any of
these communication methods. Section
984.45(d) of the order provides
authority for the Board to meet by
telephone or other means of
communication.
Currently, Section 984.445 of the
order’s administrative regulations
prescribes procedures for voting by mail
or telegram but does not include
procedures for voting by other means of
communication, such as e-mail,
facsimile, telephone, or
videoconference.
At its meeting on May 18, 2009, the
Board discussed the need to change the
order’s administrative regulations to
include the use of current
communication technologies to conduct
business at non-assembled meetings, as
authorized by a recent amendment to
the order (73 FR 11328, March 3, 2008).
Prior to the amendment, the Board had
the authority to vote by mail or telegram
upon due notice to all members but not
to hold non-assembled meetings. As
amended, the order provides for nonassembled meetings, but voting
requirements and procedures for all
such communication methods needed to
be recommended by the Board and
established through informal
rulemaking. The Board unanimously
recommended these changes at its
meeting on May 18, 2009.
E:\FR\FM\09OCP1.SGM
09OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 195 / Friday, October 9, 2009 / Proposed Rules
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Using current communication
methods and technology to vote at nonassembled meetings on matters deemed
to be non-controversial, administrative,
or of an emergency nature would result
in cost savings by reducing time and
travel expenses of Board members,
many of whom are walnut producers
and handlers who must travel long
distances within California to attend
meetings. Other Board expenses
associated with holding assembled
meetings, such as reserving meeting
spaces, could also be reduced.
This proposal would expand the
procedures currently prescribed for
voting by mail or telegram to include
voting by e-mail and facsimile. In
addition, reference to voting by telegram
would be removed from the regulations
since this communication method
generally has been replaced by newer
technology. Finally, voting by roll call
would be prescribed for meetings
conducted by telephone,
videoconference, or any other method of
communication that enables interaction
of Board members to ensure each
member’s vote by such method is
accurately recorded.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5
U.S.C. 601–612), the Agricultural
Marketing Service (AMS) has
considered the economic impact of this
action on small entities. Accordingly,
AMS has prepared this initial regulatory
flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order
that small businesses will not be unduly
or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are
unique in that they are brought about
through group action of essentially
small entities acting on their own
behalf.
There are currently 58 handlers of
California walnuts subject to regulation
under the marketing order, and there are
approximately 4,500 growers in the
production area. Small agricultural
service firms are defined by the Small
Business Administration (SBA) (13 CFR
121.201) as those having annual receipts
of less than $7,000,000, and small
agricultural growers are defined as those
having annual receipts of less than
$750,000.
USDA’s National Agricultural
Statistics Service (NASS) reports that
California walnuts were harvested from
a total of 223,000 bearing acres during
2008–09. The average yield for the
2008–09 crop was 1.96 tons per acre,
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:26 Oct 08, 2009
Jkt 220001
which is higher than the 1.56 tons per
acre average for the previous five years.
NASS reported the value of the 2008–
09 crop at $1,210 per ton, which is
lower than the previous five-year
average of $1,598 per ton.
At the time of the 2007 Census of
Agriculture, which is the most recent
information available, approximately 89
percent of California’s walnut farms
were smaller than 100 acres. Fifty-four
percent were between 1 and 15 acres. A
100-acre farm with an average yield of
1.96 tons per acre would have been
expected to produce about 196 tons of
walnuts during 2008–09. At $1,210 per
ton, that farm’s production would have
had an approximate value of $237,000.
Assuming that the majority of
California’s walnut farms are still
smaller than 100 acres, it could be
concluded that the majority of the
growers had receipts of less than
$237,000 in 2008–09. This is well below
the SBA threshold of $750,000; thus, the
majority of California’s walnut growers
would be considered small growers
according to SBA’s definition.
Industry information regarding the
value of merchantable walnuts shipped
by handlers during the 2008–09
marketing year is not yet available;
however, the industry reported that
during the 2007–08 marketing year,
approximately two-thirds of California’s
walnut handlers shipped merchantable
walnuts valued under $7,000,000 and
would therefore be considered small
handlers according to the SBA
definition.
This proposal would revise
procedures currently prescribed under
§ 984.445 of the order for voting by mail
and telegram to include other means of
communication, including e-mail,
facsimile, telephone, and
videoconference. This revision to the
regulations would incorporate authority
from a recent amendment to the order
concerning voting procedures and
would allow the Board to conduct
business at non-assembled meetings
using current methods of
communication. Authority for this
action is provided in § 984.45 of the
order.
The majority of the Board’s members
are walnut producers and handlers who
are located at various locations
throughout California, and it can be
difficult to assemble these members in
one location for a meeting, especially
during harvest season. By prescribing
procedures for voting by the
communication methods authorized by
the order, the Board would be able to
vote on non-controversial,
administrative, or emergency matters at
non-assembled meetings, which would
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
52155
reduce travel time and expenses for
producer and handler Board members.
Board expenses associated with holding
assembled meetings, such as the cost of
reserving a meeting room, would also be
reduced.
The Board unanimously
recommended these changes, which are
necessary to implement authority
provided by a recent amendment to the
order. Therefore, no alternatives to these
changes were considered practicable.
This action would not impose any
additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large
walnut handlers. As with all Federal
marketing order programs, reports and
forms are periodically reviewed to
reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public
sector agencies.
AMS is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act, to promote the
use of the Internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
USDA has not identified any relevant
Federal rules that duplicate, overlap or
conflict with this proposed rule.
The Board’s meeting was widely
publicized throughout the walnut
industry, and all interested persons
were invited to attend the meeting and
participate in Board deliberations on all
issues. Like all Board meetings, the May
18, 2009, meeting was a public meeting,
and all entities, both large and small,
were able to express views on this issue.
Finally, interested persons are invited to
submit comments on this proposed rule,
including the regulatory and
informational impacts of this action on
small businesses.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
AMSv1.0/ams.fetchTemplateData.do?
template=TemplateN&page=
MarketingOrdersSmallBusinessGuide.
Any questions about the compliance
guide should be sent to Jay Guerber at
the previously mentioned address in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
A 60-day comment period is provided
to allow interested persons to respond
to this proposal. All written comments
timely received will be considered
before a final determination is made on
this matter.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 984
Marketing agreements, Nuts,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Walnuts.
E:\FR\FM\09OCP1.SGM
09OCP1
52156
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 195 / Friday, October 9, 2009 / Proposed Rules
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 984 is proposed to
be amended as follows:
PART 984—WALNUTS GROWN IN
CALIFORNIA
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 984 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
2. Section 984.445 is revised to read
as follows:
§ 984.445 Procedures for voting by mail, email, telephone, videoconference, facsimile,
or any other means of communication.
(a) Whenever the Board votes upon
any proposition by mail, e-mail, or
facsimile, at least six members or
alternates acting as members must vote
and one dissenting vote shall prevent its
adoption. Each proposition to be voted
upon by mail, e-mail, or facsimile shall
specify a time limit for members to vote,
after which the alternates shall be given
the opportunity to vote.
(b) Whenever the Board conducts
meetings by telephone,
videoconference, or any technology that
enables member interaction, the vote
shall be conducted by roll call.
Dated: October 1, 2009.
Rayne Pegg,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. E9–24299 Filed 10–8–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2009–0938; Directorate
Identifier 2009–CE–052–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; PILATUS
Aircraft Ltd. Model PC–7 Airplanes
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed
AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:26 Oct 08, 2009
Jkt 220001
This Airworthiness Directive (AD) is
prompted due to the discovery of cracks
caused by stress corrosion in the main-gear
support struts. All the main-gear support
struts that had cracks were made from
material AA2024–T351 which has a lower
resistance to stress corrosion cracking.
Such cracks, if undetected, could lead to
the failure of the strut during landing which
could then cause the Main Landing Gear
(MLG) to collapse.
The proposed AD would require actions
that are intended to address the unsafe
condition described in the MCAI.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by November 23,
2009.
You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
ADDRESSES:
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Office
(telephone (800) 647–5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Doug Rudolph, Aerospace Engineer,
FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901
Locust, Room 301, Kansas City,
Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 329–
4059; fax: (816) 329–4090; e-mail:
doug.rudolph@faa.gov.
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD because of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
The Federal Office of Civil Aviation
(FOCA), which is the aviation authority
for Switzerland, has issued FOCA AD
HB–2009–011, dated September 10,
2009 (referred to after this as ‘‘the
MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe condition
for the specified products. The MCAI
states:
This Airworthiness Directive (AD) is
prompted due to the discovery of cracks
caused by stress corrosion in the main-gear
support struts. All the main-gear support
struts that had cracks were made from
material AA2024–T351 which has a lower
resistance to stress corrosion cracking.
Such cracks, if undetected, could lead to
the failure of the strut during landing which
could then cause the Main Landing Gear
(MLG) to collapse.
In order to correct and control the
situation, this AD mandates the identification
of the main-gear support struts to check if
they have rounded clevis lugs and a NonDestructive Inspection (NDI) procedure on
the main-gear support struts if they have
chamfered clevis lugs.
For main-gear support struts with
chamfered clevis lugs that show cracks
during the NDI, the MCAI also requires
replacing any cracked main-gear
support struts with parts of improved
design. You may obtain further
information by examining the MCAI in
the AD docket.
Comments Invited
Relevant Service Information
PILATUS Aircraft Ltd. has issued
PILATUS PC–7 Service Bulletin No. 32–
024, Rev. No. 1, dated November 17,
2008; and PILATUS PC–7 Service
Bulletin No. 32–025, Rev. No. 1, dated
November 17, 2008. The actions
described in this service information are
intended to correct the unsafe condition
identified in the MCAI.
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2009–0938; Directorate Identifier
2009–CE–052–AD’’ at the beginning of
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of the Proposed AD
This product has been approved by
the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation
in the United States. Pursuant to our
bilateral agreement with this State of
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\09OCP1.SGM
09OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 195 (Friday, October 9, 2009)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 52154-52156]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-24299]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 195 / Friday, October 9, 2009 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 52154]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 984
[Doc. No. AMS-FV-09-0050; FV09-984-5 PR]
Walnuts Grown in California; Changes to Regulations Governing
Voting Procedures
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule invites comments on revisions to the administrative
regulations governing voting procedures for the California Walnut Board
(Board). The Board locally administers the marketing order that
regulates the handling of walnuts grown in California (order). This
rule would specify the voting procedures to be used for expanded types
of non-assembled meetings and remove voting by telegraph. This would
enable the Board to conduct business using current communication
methods, which would result in time and cost savings to the Board and
its members.
DATES: Comments must be received by December 8, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments
concerning this proposal. Comments must be sent to the Docket Clerk,
Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC
20250-0237; Fax: (202) 720-8938; or Internet: https://www.regulations.gov. All comments should reference the document number
and the date and page number of this issue of the Federal Register and
will be made available for public inspection in the Office of the
Docket Clerk during regular business hours, or can be viewed at: https://www.regulations.gov. All comments submitted in response to this rule
will be included in the record and will be made available to the
public. Please be advised that the identity of the individuals or
entities submitting the comments will be made public on the Internet at
the address provided above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Debbie Wray, Marketing Specialist, or
Kurt J. Kimmel, Regional Manager, California Marketing Field Office,
Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487-5901, Fax: (559) 487-5906, or E-mail:
Debbie.Wray@ams.usda.gov or Kurt.Kimmel@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may request information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber, Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202)
720-2491, Fax: (202) 720-8938, or E-mail: Jay.Guerber@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This proposal is issued under Marketing
Order No. 984, as amended (7 CFR part 984), regulating the handling of
walnuts grown in California, hereinafter referred to as the ``order.''
The order is effective under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act
of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), hereinafter referred to as the
``Act.''
The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order 12866.
This proposal has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This rule is not intended to have retroactive effect.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition
stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and
request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. A
handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition.
After the hearing, USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides
that the district court of the United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of
business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This proposal invites comments on revisions to the administrative
regulations governing the Board's voting procedures to implement
authority from a recent amendment to the order. It would expand the
current procedures for voting by allowing voting by e-mail, facsimile,
telephone, and videoconference, or by other means of communication.
This proposal was unanimously recommended by the Board at a meeting on
May 18, 2009.
Section 984.45(b) of the California walnut marketing order
specifies the percentage requirements for quorum and voting procedures
of the Board. Section 984.45(c) of the order provides authority for the
Board to vote by mail or telegram, or by any other means of
communication, and to prescribe, with the approval of USDA, the minimum
number of votes that must be cast, as well as any other procedures that
are necessary when the voting is by any of these communication methods.
Section 984.45(d) of the order provides authority for the Board to meet
by telephone or other means of communication.
Currently, Section 984.445 of the order's administrative
regulations prescribes procedures for voting by mail or telegram but
does not include procedures for voting by other means of communication,
such as e-mail, facsimile, telephone, or videoconference.
At its meeting on May 18, 2009, the Board discussed the need to
change the order's administrative regulations to include the use of
current communication technologies to conduct business at non-assembled
meetings, as authorized by a recent amendment to the order (73 FR
11328, March 3, 2008). Prior to the amendment, the Board had the
authority to vote by mail or telegram upon due notice to all members
but not to hold non-assembled meetings. As amended, the order provides
for non-assembled meetings, but voting requirements and procedures for
all such communication methods needed to be recommended by the Board
and established through informal rulemaking. The Board unanimously
recommended these changes at its meeting on May 18, 2009.
[[Page 52155]]
Using current communication methods and technology to vote at non-
assembled meetings on matters deemed to be non-controversial,
administrative, or of an emergency nature would result in cost savings
by reducing time and travel expenses of Board members, many of whom are
walnut producers and handlers who must travel long distances within
California to attend meetings. Other Board expenses associated with
holding assembled meetings, such as reserving meeting spaces, could
also be reduced.
This proposal would expand the procedures currently prescribed for
voting by mail or telegram to include voting by e-mail and facsimile.
In addition, reference to voting by telegram would be removed from the
regulations since this communication method generally has been replaced
by newer technology. Finally, voting by roll call would be prescribed
for meetings conducted by telephone, videoconference, or any other
method of communication that enables interaction of Board members to
ensure each member's vote by such method is accurately recorded.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-612), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
has considered the economic impact of this action on small entities.
Accordingly, AMS has prepared this initial regulatory flexibility
analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued
pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in
that they are brought about through group action of essentially small
entities acting on their own behalf.
There are currently 58 handlers of California walnuts subject to
regulation under the marketing order, and there are approximately 4,500
growers in the production area. Small agricultural service firms are
defined by the Small Business Administration (SBA) (13 CFR 121.201) as
those having annual receipts of less than $7,000,000, and small
agricultural growers are defined as those having annual receipts of
less than $750,000.
USDA's National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) reports that
California walnuts were harvested from a total of 223,000 bearing acres
during 2008-09. The average yield for the 2008-09 crop was 1.96 tons
per acre, which is higher than the 1.56 tons per acre average for the
previous five years. NASS reported the value of the 2008-09 crop at
$1,210 per ton, which is lower than the previous five-year average of
$1,598 per ton.
At the time of the 2007 Census of Agriculture, which is the most
recent information available, approximately 89 percent of California's
walnut farms were smaller than 100 acres. Fifty-four percent were
between 1 and 15 acres. A 100-acre farm with an average yield of 1.96
tons per acre would have been expected to produce about 196 tons of
walnuts during 2008-09. At $1,210 per ton, that farm's production would
have had an approximate value of $237,000. Assuming that the majority
of California's walnut farms are still smaller than 100 acres, it could
be concluded that the majority of the growers had receipts of less than
$237,000 in 2008-09. This is well below the SBA threshold of $750,000;
thus, the majority of California's walnut growers would be considered
small growers according to SBA's definition.
Industry information regarding the value of merchantable walnuts
shipped by handlers during the 2008-09 marketing year is not yet
available; however, the industry reported that during the 2007-08
marketing year, approximately two-thirds of California's walnut
handlers shipped merchantable walnuts valued under $7,000,000 and would
therefore be considered small handlers according to the SBA definition.
This proposal would revise procedures currently prescribed under
Sec. 984.445 of the order for voting by mail and telegram to include
other means of communication, including e-mail, facsimile, telephone,
and videoconference. This revision to the regulations would incorporate
authority from a recent amendment to the order concerning voting
procedures and would allow the Board to conduct business at non-
assembled meetings using current methods of communication. Authority
for this action is provided in Sec. 984.45 of the order.
The majority of the Board's members are walnut producers and
handlers who are located at various locations throughout California,
and it can be difficult to assemble these members in one location for a
meeting, especially during harvest season. By prescribing procedures
for voting by the communication methods authorized by the order, the
Board would be able to vote on non-controversial, administrative, or
emergency matters at non-assembled meetings, which would reduce travel
time and expenses for producer and handler Board members. Board
expenses associated with holding assembled meetings, such as the cost
of reserving a meeting room, would also be reduced.
The Board unanimously recommended these changes, which are
necessary to implement authority provided by a recent amendment to the
order. Therefore, no alternatives to these changes were considered
practicable.
This action would not impose any additional reporting or
recordkeeping requirements on either small or large walnut handlers. As
with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public sector agencies.
AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote
the use of the Internet and other information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information
and services, and for other purposes.
USDA has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate,
overlap or conflict with this proposed rule.
The Board's meeting was widely publicized throughout the walnut
industry, and all interested persons were invited to attend the meeting
and participate in Board deliberations on all issues. Like all Board
meetings, the May 18, 2009, meeting was a public meeting, and all
entities, both large and small, were able to express views on this
issue. Finally, interested persons are invited to submit comments on
this proposed rule, including the regulatory and informational impacts
of this action on small businesses.
A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/AMSv1.0/ams.fetchTemplateData.do?template=TemplateN&page=MarketingOrdersSmallBusinessGuide. Any questions about the compliance guide should be sent to
Jay Guerber at the previously mentioned address in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
A 60-day comment period is provided to allow interested persons to
respond to this proposal. All written comments timely received will be
considered before a final determination is made on this matter.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 984
Marketing agreements, Nuts, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Walnuts.
[[Page 52156]]
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 984 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 984--WALNUTS GROWN IN CALIFORNIA
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 984 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
2. Section 984.445 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 984.445 Procedures for voting by mail, e-mail, telephone,
videoconference, facsimile, or any other means of communication.
(a) Whenever the Board votes upon any proposition by mail, e-mail,
or facsimile, at least six members or alternates acting as members must
vote and one dissenting vote shall prevent its adoption. Each
proposition to be voted upon by mail, e-mail, or facsimile shall
specify a time limit for members to vote, after which the alternates
shall be given the opportunity to vote.
(b) Whenever the Board conducts meetings by telephone,
videoconference, or any technology that enables member interaction, the
vote shall be conducted by roll call.
Dated: October 1, 2009.
Rayne Pegg,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. E9-24299 Filed 10-8-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P