Privacy Act; Implementation, 51777-51778 [E9-24302]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 194 / Thursday October 8, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
(5) Proceed generally southwest along
the Lake Cachuma Recreation Area
boundary line to its intersection with
the Santa Ynez River to the west of Lake
Cachuma and Bradbury Dam, T6N,
R30W; then
(6) Proceed generally west along the
Santa Ynez River, crossing onto the
Santa Ynez map, and continuing to its
intersection with California State Road
154, northwest of BM 533, T6N, R30W;
then
(7) Proceed north-northwest in a
straight line 1.2 miles to the marked
924-foot elevation point, T6N, R30W;
then
(8) Proceed north-northwest in a
straight line 1.2 miles to the ‘‘Y’’ in an
unimproved road 0.1 mile south of the
800-foot elevation line, west of Happy
Canyon Road, T6N, R30W; then
(9) Proceed north-northwest in a
straight line for 0.5 mile, crossing onto
the Los Olivos map, and continuing to
the marked 1,324-foot elevation point,
0.5 mile southwest of Bar G O Ranch,
T7N, R30W; then
(10) Proceed north-northwest in a
straight line for 2.5 miles crossing over
the marked 1,432-foot elevation point in
section 9, then continue in a straight
line northerly 1.4 miles to the marked
1,721-foot elevation point in section 4,
T7N, R30W; then
(11) Proceed north in a straight line
1.4 miles to the marked 2,334-foot
elevation point, west of a meandering
unimproved road and south of Figueroa
Mountain Road, T8N, R30W; then
(12) Proceed east-northeast in a
straight line, returning to the beginning
point.
Signed: April 27, 2009.
John J. Manfreda,
Administrator.
Approved: June 11, 2009.
Timothy E. Skud,
Deputy Assistant Secretary, (Tax, Trade, and
Tariff Policy).
Editorial Note: This document was
received in the Office of the Federal Register
on October 5, 2009.
[FR Doc. E9–24329 Filed 10–7–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–31–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
Office of the Secretary
31 CFR Part 1
Privacy Act; Implementation
AGENCY: Office of the Secretary,
Treasury.
ACTION: Final rule.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:37 Oct 07, 2009
Jkt 220001
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
requirements of the Privacy Act of 1974,
as amended, the Department of the
Treasury exempts a new Internal
Revenue Service (IRS) system of records
entitled ‘‘Treasury/IRS 50.222—Tax
Exempt/Government Entities (TE/GE)
Case Management Records’’ from certain
provisions of the Privacy Act.
DATES: Effective Date: October 8, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Telephonic inquiries should be directed
to Marianne Davis, Program Analyst,
Internal Revenue Service, TE/GE
Division, at telephone number (949)
389–4304. Written inquiries should be
directed to Robert Brenneman, TE/GE
Reporting and Electronic Examination
System (TREES) Project Manager, at
Internal Revenue Service, TE/GE
Business Systems Planning (SE:T:BSP),
1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Attn:
PE–6M4, Washington, DC 20224.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Department of the Treasury published a
notice of proposed rule on December 7,
2005 (Volume 70, No. 234), pages
72739–72740, exempting the new
system of records from certain
provisions of the Privacy Act of 1974, as
amended. The IRS published the
proposed system notice in its entirety
on December 7, 2005 (Volume 70,
Number 234), pages 72876–72878.
Under 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2), the head of
an agency may promulgate rules to
exempt any system of records within the
agency from certain provisions of the
Privacy Act if the system contains
investigatory material compiled for law
enforcement purposes. Treasury/IRS
52.222—Tax Exempt/Government
Entities (TE/GE) Case Management
Records contains investigatory material
compiled for law enforcement purposes.
The proposed rule requested that
public comments be sent the Office of
Governmental Liaison and Disclosure,
1111 Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20224, no later than
January 6, 2006.
The IRS received one comment on the
proposed rule and the system of records
notice urging the IRS: (1) not to exempt
the system of records from requirements
that its information be relevant and
necessary for its purpose; and, (2) to
limit the scope of its exemptions from
the Privacy act requirements to provide
access and correction rights to
individuals.
After consideration, the IRS
determined that the public comment did
not present any new information that
would be a basis for changes being made
to the proposed rule or system of
records notice because: (1) Relevance
and necessity can only be established
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
51777
with certainty after the information is
evaluated; and, (2) the access
provisions, as written, are consistent
with the language and intent of the
Privacy Act, comport with the Treasury
regulation language for (k)(2), and
explain that the release of information
to the individual covered by the system
would provide the individual or entity
subject to investigation with significant
information concerning the nature of the
investigation and could result in
altering or destruction of documentary
evidence, the improper influencing of
witnesses, and other activities that
could impede or compromise the
investigation. Accordingly, the
Department of the Treasury is hereby
giving notice that the system of records
entitled ‘‘Treasury/IRS 50.222—Tax
Exempt/Government Entities (TE/GE)
Case Management Records’’ is exempt
from certain provisions of the Privacy
Act.
The provisions of the Privacy Act
from which the system of records is
exempt pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2)
are as follows: 552a(c)(3), (d)(1), (2), (3)
and (4), (e)(1), (e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H),
(e)(4)(I), and (f) because the system
contains investigatory material
compiled for law enforcement purposes.
The following are the reasons why
this system of records maintained by the
IRS is exempt pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
552a(k)(2) of the Privacy Act of 1974.
(1) 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3). This provision
of the Privacy Act provides for the
release of the disclosure accounting
required by 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(1) and (2)
to the individual named in the record at
his/her request. The reasons for
exempting this system of records from
the foregoing provision are:
(i) The release of disclosure
accounting would put the tax exempt or
government entity subject to
investigation or individuals connected
with those entities on notice that an
investigation exists and that such
person is the subject of that
investigation.
(ii) Such release would provide the
subject of an investigation with an
accurate accounting of the date, nature,
and purpose of each disclosure and the
name and address of the person or
agency to which disclosure was made.
The release of such information to the
individual covered by the system would
provide the individual or entity subject
to investigation with significant
information concerning the nature of the
investigation and could result in the
altering or destruction of documentary
evidence, the improper influencing of
witnesses, and other activities that
could impede or compromise the
investigation.
E:\FR\FM\08OCR1.SGM
08OCR1
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
51778
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 194 / Thursday October 8, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
(iii) Release to the individual of the
disclosure accounting would alert the
individual as to which agencies were
investigating the tax exempt government
entity subject to investigation, would
provide information concerning the
scope of the investigation, and could aid
the individual in impeding or
compromising investigations by those
agencies.
(2) 5 U.S.C. 552a(d)(1), (2), (3) and (4),
(e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H), and (f). These
provisions of the Privacy Act relate to
an individual’s right to be notified of:
The existence of records pertaining to
such individual; Requirements for
identifying an individual who requested
access to records; the agency procedures
relating to access to records; the content
of the information contained in such
records; and; the civil remedies
available to the individual in the event
of adverse determinations by an agency
concerning access to or amendment of
information contained in record
systems.
The reasons for exempting this system
of records from the foregoing provisions
are as follows:
Notifying an individual (at the
individual’s request) of the existence of
an investigative file pertaining to such
individual or granting access to an
investigative file pertaining to such
individual could: Interfere with
investigative and enforcement
proceedings; deprive co-defendants of a
right to a fair trial or an impartial
adjudication; constitute an unwarranted
invasion of the personal privacy of
others; disclose the identity of
confidential sources and reveal
confidential information supplied by
such sources; or, disclose investigative
techniques and procedures.
(3) 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(1). This provision
of the Privacy Act requires each agency
to maintain in its records only such
information about an individual as is
relevant and necessary to accomplish a
purpose of the agency required to be
accomplished by statute or executive
order. The reasons for exempting this
system of records from the foregoing are
as follows:
(i) The IRS will limit the system to
those records relevant and necessary for
identifying, monitoring, and responding
to complaints, allegations and other
information received concerning
violations or potential violations of Title
26. However, an exemption from the
foregoing is needed because,
particularly in the early stages of an
investigation, it is not always possible to
determine the relevance or necessity of
specific information.
(ii) Relevance and necessity are
questions of judgment and timing. What
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:37 Oct 07, 2009
Jkt 220001
appears relevant and necessary when
first received may subsequently be
determined to be irrelevant or
unnecessary. It is only after the
information is evaluated that the
relevance and necessity of such
information can be established with
certainty.
(4) 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(4)(I). This
provision of the Privacy Act requires the
publication of the categories of sources
of records in each system of records.
The reasons for exempting this system
of records from the foregoing provision
are as follows:
(i) Revealing categories of sources of
information could disclose investigative
techniques and procedures;
(ii) Revealing categories of sources of
information could cause sources that
supply information to investigators to
refrain from giving such information
because of fear of reprisal, or fear of
breach of promises of anonymity and
confidentiality.
As required by Executive Order
12866, it has been determined that this
rule is not a significant regulatory
action, and therefore, does not require a
regulatory impact analysis.
The regulation will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the Federal
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, it is
determined that this rule does not have
federalism implications under Executive
Order 13132.
Pursuant to the requirements of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–
612, it is hereby certified that these
regulations will not significantly affect a
substantial number of small entities.
The rule imposes no duties or
obligations on small entities.
In accordance with the provisions of
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
the Department of the Treasury has
determined that this rule would not
impose new recordkeeping, application,
reporting, or other types of information
collection requirements.
List of Subjects in 31 CFR Part 1
Privacy.
Part 1, subpart C of title 31 of the Code
of Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
■
PART 1—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 1
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301 and 31 U.S.C. 321.
Subpart A also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552 as
amended. Subpart C also issued under 5
U.S.C. 552a.
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
2. Section 1.36 paragraph (g)(1)(viii) is
amended by adding the following text to
the table in numerical order.
■
§ 1.36 Systems exempt in whole or in part
from provisions of 5 U.S.C. 522a and this
subpart.
*
*
(g) * *
(1) * *
(viii) *
*
*
*
* *
*
*
Number
Name of system
*
*
*
*
*
Treasury/IRS 50.222
Tax Exempt Government Entities Case
Management
Records.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: August 25, 2009.
Elizabeth Cuffe,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Privacy and
Treasury Records.
[FR Doc. E9–24302 Filed 10–7–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[USCG–2009–0816]
Notice of Enforcement of Regulation
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of enforcement of
regulation.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard will enforce
the special local regulations in the
navigable waters of San Francisco Bay
for the annual U.S. Navy and City of San
Francisco sponsored Fleet Week Parade
of Navy Ships, Blue Angels Flight
Demonstrations, and Ship Tours to be
held from October 8, 2009 through
October 12, 2009. This action is
necessary to ensure the safety of event
participants and spectators. During the
enforcement period, no persons or
vessels may enter the regulated area
without permission of the Captain of the
Port (COTP) or his designated
representative.
DATES: The regulations in 33 CFR
100.1105(b)(2), regulated area ‘‘Bravo’’
for the U.S. Navy Blue Angels
Activities, will be enforced from 12:30
p.m. to 5 p.m. on October 8, 2009
through October 11, 2009. If the U.S.
Navy Blue Angels Activities are delayed
by inclement weather, the regulation
E:\FR\FM\08OCR1.SGM
08OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 194 (Thursday, October 8, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 51777-51778]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-24302]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Office of the Secretary
31 CFR Part 1
Privacy Act; Implementation
AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, Treasury.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the requirements of the Privacy Act of
1974, as amended, the Department of the Treasury exempts a new Internal
Revenue Service (IRS) system of records entitled ``Treasury/IRS
50.222--Tax Exempt/Government Entities (TE/GE) Case Management
Records'' from certain provisions of the Privacy Act.
DATES: Effective Date: October 8, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Telephonic inquiries should be
directed to Marianne Davis, Program Analyst, Internal Revenue Service,
TE/GE Division, at telephone number (949) 389-4304. Written inquiries
should be directed to Robert Brenneman, TE/GE Reporting and Electronic
Examination System (TREES) Project Manager, at Internal Revenue
Service, TE/GE Business Systems Planning (SE:T:BSP), 1111 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Attn: PE-6M4, Washington, DC 20224.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Department of the Treasury published a
notice of proposed rule on December 7, 2005 (Volume 70, No. 234), pages
72739-72740, exempting the new system of records from certain
provisions of the Privacy Act of 1974, as amended. The IRS published
the proposed system notice in its entirety on December 7, 2005 (Volume
70, Number 234), pages 72876-72878.
Under 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2), the head of an agency may promulgate
rules to exempt any system of records within the agency from certain
provisions of the Privacy Act if the system contains investigatory
material compiled for law enforcement purposes. Treasury/IRS 52.222--
Tax Exempt/Government Entities (TE/GE) Case Management Records contains
investigatory material compiled for law enforcement purposes.
The proposed rule requested that public comments be sent the Office
of Governmental Liaison and Disclosure, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20224, no later than January 6, 2006.
The IRS received one comment on the proposed rule and the system of
records notice urging the IRS: (1) not to exempt the system of records
from requirements that its information be relevant and necessary for
its purpose; and, (2) to limit the scope of its exemptions from the
Privacy act requirements to provide access and correction rights to
individuals.
After consideration, the IRS determined that the public comment did
not present any new information that would be a basis for changes being
made to the proposed rule or system of records notice because: (1)
Relevance and necessity can only be established with certainty after
the information is evaluated; and, (2) the access provisions, as
written, are consistent with the language and intent of the Privacy
Act, comport with the Treasury regulation language for (k)(2), and
explain that the release of information to the individual covered by
the system would provide the individual or entity subject to
investigation with significant information concerning the nature of the
investigation and could result in altering or destruction of
documentary evidence, the improper influencing of witnesses, and other
activities that could impede or compromise the investigation.
Accordingly, the Department of the Treasury is hereby giving notice
that the system of records entitled ``Treasury/IRS 50.222--Tax Exempt/
Government Entities (TE/GE) Case Management Records'' is exempt from
certain provisions of the Privacy Act.
The provisions of the Privacy Act from which the system of records
is exempt pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2) are as follows: 552a(c)(3),
(d)(1), (2), (3) and (4), (e)(1), (e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H), (e)(4)(I), and
(f) because the system contains investigatory material compiled for law
enforcement purposes.
The following are the reasons why this system of records maintained
by the IRS is exempt pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2) of the Privacy Act
of 1974.
(1) 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3). This provision of the Privacy Act provides
for the release of the disclosure accounting required by 5 U.S.C.
552a(c)(1) and (2) to the individual named in the record at his/her
request. The reasons for exempting this system of records from the
foregoing provision are:
(i) The release of disclosure accounting would put the tax exempt
or government entity subject to investigation or individuals connected
with those entities on notice that an investigation exists and that
such person is the subject of that investigation.
(ii) Such release would provide the subject of an investigation
with an accurate accounting of the date, nature, and purpose of each
disclosure and the name and address of the person or agency to which
disclosure was made. The release of such information to the individual
covered by the system would provide the individual or entity subject to
investigation with significant information concerning the nature of the
investigation and could result in the altering or destruction of
documentary evidence, the improper influencing of witnesses, and other
activities that could impede or compromise the investigation.
[[Page 51778]]
(iii) Release to the individual of the disclosure accounting would
alert the individual as to which agencies were investigating the tax
exempt government entity subject to investigation, would provide
information concerning the scope of the investigation, and could aid
the individual in impeding or compromising investigations by those
agencies.
(2) 5 U.S.C. 552a(d)(1), (2), (3) and (4), (e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H),
and (f). These provisions of the Privacy Act relate to an individual's
right to be notified of: The existence of records pertaining to such
individual; Requirements for identifying an individual who requested
access to records; the agency procedures relating to access to records;
the content of the information contained in such records; and; the
civil remedies available to the individual in the event of adverse
determinations by an agency concerning access to or amendment of
information contained in record systems.
The reasons for exempting this system of records from the foregoing
provisions are as follows:
Notifying an individual (at the individual's request) of the
existence of an investigative file pertaining to such individual or
granting access to an investigative file pertaining to such individual
could: Interfere with investigative and enforcement proceedings;
deprive co-defendants of a right to a fair trial or an impartial
adjudication; constitute an unwarranted invasion of the personal
privacy of others; disclose the identity of confidential sources and
reveal confidential information supplied by such sources; or, disclose
investigative techniques and procedures.
(3) 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(1). This provision of the Privacy Act requires
each agency to maintain in its records only such information about an
individual as is relevant and necessary to accomplish a purpose of the
agency required to be accomplished by statute or executive order. The
reasons for exempting this system of records from the foregoing are as
follows:
(i) The IRS will limit the system to those records relevant and
necessary for identifying, monitoring, and responding to complaints,
allegations and other information received concerning violations or
potential violations of Title 26. However, an exemption from the
foregoing is needed because, particularly in the early stages of an
investigation, it is not always possible to determine the relevance or
necessity of specific information.
(ii) Relevance and necessity are questions of judgment and timing.
What appears relevant and necessary when first received may
subsequently be determined to be irrelevant or unnecessary. It is only
after the information is evaluated that the relevance and necessity of
such information can be established with certainty.
(4) 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(4)(I). This provision of the Privacy Act
requires the publication of the categories of sources of records in
each system of records. The reasons for exempting this system of
records from the foregoing provision are as follows:
(i) Revealing categories of sources of information could disclose
investigative techniques and procedures;
(ii) Revealing categories of sources of information could cause
sources that supply information to investigators to refrain from giving
such information because of fear of reprisal, or fear of breach of
promises of anonymity and confidentiality.
As required by Executive Order 12866, it has been determined that
this rule is not a significant regulatory action, and therefore, does
not require a regulatory impact analysis.
The regulation will not have a substantial direct effect on the
States, on the relationship between the Federal Government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. Therefore, it is determined that this
rule does not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5
U.S.C. 601-612, it is hereby certified that these regulations will not
significantly affect a substantial number of small entities. The rule
imposes no duties or obligations on small entities.
In accordance with the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995, the Department of the Treasury has determined that this rule
would not impose new recordkeeping, application, reporting, or other
types of information collection requirements.
List of Subjects in 31 CFR Part 1
Privacy.
0
Part 1, subpart C of title 31 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:
PART 1--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 1 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301 and 31 U.S.C. 321. Subpart A also
issued under 5 U.S.C. 552 as amended. Subpart C also issued under 5
U.S.C. 552a.
0
2. Section 1.36 paragraph (g)(1)(viii) is amended by adding the
following text to the table in numerical order.
Sec. 1.36 Systems exempt in whole or in part from provisions of 5
U.S.C. 522a and this subpart.
* * * * *
(g) * * *
(1) * * *
(viii) * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number Name of system
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
Treasury/IRS 50.222....................... Tax Exempt Government
Entities Case Management
Records.
* * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dated: August 25, 2009.
Elizabeth Cuffe,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Privacy and Treasury Records.
[FR Doc. E9-24302 Filed 10-7-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P