Proposed Consent Decree, Clean Air Act Citizen Suit, 51602-51603 [E9-24183]
Download as PDF
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
51602
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 193 / Wednesday, October 7, 2009 / Notices
II. What Action is the Agency Taking?
EPA is providing an opportunity for
public comment on a petition received
from the World Wildlife Fund (WWF)
that asks the Agency to suspend the
registration of Rozol Prairie Dog Bait
(EPA Reg. No. 7173–286) and cancel
certain application sites for the product.
This product is currently registered for
use to control black-tailed prairie dogs
and its active ingredient is the
anticoagulant rodenticide
chlorophacinone.
The primary basis for the petition is
the potential effect of this product on
non-target species, including certain
predators and scavengers of the blacktailed prairie dog. Specifically, the
petition contends that the poisoning
risks to non-target species from the use
of this product are unjustified, given the
availability of alternative products to
control black-tailed prairie dogs.
Petitioners request EPA to require the
completion of an Avian Reproduction
Study before further product use to
control black-tailed prairie dogs is
permitted. The petition also asks EPA to
initiate formal consultation, under
section 7 of the Endangered Species Act,
with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
(FWS) regarding the registration of this
product. Third, it requests that EPA
develop a memorandum of
understanding with FWS to show how
EPA will promote the conservation of
birds protected under the Migratory
Bird Treaty Act. Petitioners ask that
EPA suspend the use of Rozol Prairie
Dog Bait while these activities are
ongoing and also request that the
application of the product be prohibited
in those counties where black-footed
ferrets are present.
As additional background, EPA is
providing a recent letters from FWS and
other interested parties expressing
similar concerns about the potential
impact of Rozol Prairie Dog Bait on nontarget wildlife protected under the
Endangered Species Act and the
Migratory Bird Treaty Act (available in
the public docket accompanying this
notice at EPA–HQ–OPP–2009–0684).
EPA regulates non-food use
pesticides, such as Rozol Prairie Dog
Bait, under the Federal Insecticide,
Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act
(FIFRA). Under FIFRA, EPA registers a
pesticide if it determines that the use of
the pesticide will not cause
‘‘unreasonable adverse effects’’ to
human health or the environment. This
standard involves risk-benefit balancing
when risks exist above EPA’s level of
concern. Both registration decision
under section 3 of FIFRA and
cancellation decisions under section 6
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:25 Oct 06, 2009
Jkt 220001
of FIFRA depend on the outcome of
adverse effects determinations. If this
adverse effects standard is not satisfied,
EPA may not register the pesticide and
existing pesticides are subject to
cancelation. See FIFRA sections 3(c)(5)
and 6(b).
If EPA issues a notice of intent to
cancel a pesticide registration and
further determines that a suspension of
the registration prior to the completion
of the ensuing cancellation proceedings
is necessary to prevent an imminent
hazard, EPA may take steps to suspend
the registration during the pendency of
cancellation proceedings, as described
in section 6(c) of FIFRA. FIFRA defines
an ‘‘imminent hazard’’ as a situation in
which the continued use of a pesticide,
during the time required for a
cancellation hearing, would likely cause
unreasonable adverse effects or will
involve an unreasonable hazard to the
survival of a species listed as threatened
or endangered pursuant to the
Endangered Species Act.
WWF’s petition requests both
suspension of the registration for Rozol
Prairie Dog Bait and cancellation of
certain application sites for the product.
EPA therefore anticipates that its
response to the petition will address its
risk-benefit analysis for this pesticide.
EPA conducted such an analysis at the
time it registered Rozol Prairie Dog Bait
under section 3 of FIFRA. For this
notice, EPA has compiled a list of topics
relevant to EPA’s risk-benefit balancing
decision for Rozol Prairie Dog Bait
(available in the public docket
accompanying this topic at EPA–HQ–
OPP–2009–0684). EPA is providing an
opportunity for public comment and the
submission of additional information
pertinent to these topics (if any is
available), as such information would
further assist the Agency in responding
to the petition.
List of Subjects
Environmental protection, Pesticides
and pests.
Dated: September 24, 2009.
Debra Edwards,
Director, Office of Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. E9–23932 Filed 10–6–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–S
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[FRL–8967–3]
Proposed Consent Decree, Clean Air
Act Citizen Suit
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
ACTION: Notice of proposed consent
decree; request for public comment.
SUMMARY: In accordance with section
113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as amended
(‘‘Act’’), 42 U.S.C. 7413(g), notice is
hereby given of a proposed consent
decree, to address a lawsuit filed by
Sierra Club in the United States District
Court for the District of Columbia:
Sierra Club v. Jackson, No. 1:09–cv–
01028–CKK (D.D.C). Plaintiff filed a
deadline suit to compel the
Administrator to respond to an
administrative petition seeking EPA’s
objection to a CAA Title V operating
permit issued by the Kentucky
Department for Environmental
Protection, Division for Air Quality to
the East Kentucky Power Cooperative
William C. Dale Power Station. Under
the terms of the proposed consent
decree, EPA has agreed to respond to
the petition by December 15, 2009.
DATES: Written comments on the
proposed consent decree must be
received by November 6, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID number EPA–
HQ–OGC–2009–0763, online at https://
www.regulations.gov (EPA’s preferred
method); by e-mail to
oei.docket@epa.gov; mailed to EPA
Docket Center, Environmental
Protection Agency, Mailcode: 2822T,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460–0001; or by
hand delivery or courier to EPA Docket
Center, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave., NW., Washington,
DC, between 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m.
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. Comments on a disk or CD–
ROM should be formatted in Word or
ASCII file, avoiding the use of special
characters and any form of encryption,
and may be mailed to the mailing
address above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mark Kataoka, Air and Radiation Law
Office (2344A), Office of General
Counsel, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460; telephone: (202)
564–5584; fax number: (202) 564–5603;
e-mail address: kataoka.mark@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Additional Information About the
Proposed Consent Decree
This proposed consent decree would
resolve a lawsuit alleging that the
Administrator failed to perform a
nondiscretionary duty to grant or deny,
within 60 days of submission, an
administrative petition to object to a
CAA Title V permit issued by the
Kentucky Department for
E:\FR\FM\07OCN1.SGM
07OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 193 / Wednesday, October 7, 2009 / Notices
Environmental Protection, Division for
Air Quality to the East Kentucky Power
Cooperative William C. Dale Power
Station. Under the terms of the
proposed consent decree, EPA has
agreed to respond to the petition by
December 15, 2009. In addition, the
proposed consent decree states that after
EPA fulfills its obligations under the
decree, and the Plaintiff’s claims for
costs of litigation have been resolved,
the case shall be dismissed with
prejudice.
For a period of thirty (30) days
following the date of publication of this
notice, the Agency will accept written
comments relating to the proposed
consent decree from persons who were
not named as parties or intervenors to
the litigation in question. EPA or the
Department of Justice may withdraw or
withhold consent to the proposed
consent decree if the comments disclose
facts or considerations that indicate that
such consent is inappropriate,
improper, inadequate, or inconsistent
with the requirements of the Act. Unless
EPA or the Department of Justice
determines, based on any comment
submitted, that consent to this consent
decree should be withdrawn, the terms
of the decree will be affirmed.
II. Additional Information About
Commenting on the Proposed Consent
Decree
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
A. How Can I Get a Copy of the Consent
Decree?
The official public docket for this
action (identified by Docket ID No.
EPA–HQ–OGC–2009–0763) contains a
copy of the proposed consent decree.
The official public docket is available
for public viewing at the Office of
Environmental Information (OEI) Docket
in the EPA Docket Center, EPA West,
Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave.,
NW., Washington, DC. The EPA Docket
Center Public Reading Room is open
from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744,
and the telephone number for the OEI
Docket is (202) 566–1752.
An electronic version of the public
docket is available through https://
www.regulations.gov. You may use the
https://www.regulations.gov to submit or
view public comments, access the index
listing of the contents of the official
public docket, and to access those
documents in the public docket that are
available electronically. Once in the
system, key in the appropriate docket
identification number then select
‘‘search’’.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:25 Oct 06, 2009
Jkt 220001
It is important to note that EPA’s
policy is that public comments, whether
submitted electronically or in paper,
will be made available for public
viewing online at https://
www.regulations.gov without change,
unless the comment contains
copyrighted material, CBI, or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Information
claimed as CBI and other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute
is not included in the official public
docket or in the electronic public
docket. EPA’s policy is that copyrighted
material, including copyrighted material
contained in a public comment, will not
be placed in EPA’s electronic public
docket but will be available only in
printed, paper form in the official public
docket. Although not all docket
materials may be available
electronically, you may still access any
of the publicly available docket
materials through the EPA Docket
Center.
B. How and To Whom Do I Submit
Comments?
You may submit comments as
provided in the ADDRESSES section.
Please ensure that your comments are
submitted within the specified comment
period. Comments received after the
close of the comment period will be
marked ‘‘late.’’ EPA is not required to
consider these late comments.
If you submit an electronic comment,
EPA recommends that you include your
name, mailing address, and an e-mail
address or other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD ROM you submit. This
ensures that you can be identified as the
submitter of the comment and allows
EPA to contact you in case EPA cannot
read your comment due to technical
difficulties or needs further information
on the substance of your comment. Any
identifying or contact information
provided in the body of a comment will
be included as part of the comment that
is placed in the official public docket,
and made available in EPA’s electronic
public docket. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification,
EPA may not be able to consider your
comment.
Use of the https://www.regulations.gov
Web site to submit comments to EPA
electronically is EPA’s preferred method
for receiving comments. The electronic
public docket system is an ‘‘anonymous
access’’ system, which means EPA will
not know your identity, e-mail address,
or other contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
In contrast to EPA’s electronic public
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
51603
docket, EPA’s electronic mail (e-mail)
system is not an ‘‘anonymous access’’
system. If you send an e-mail comment
directly to the Docket without going
through https://www.regulations.gov,
your e-mail address is automatically
captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the official
public docket, and made available in
EPA’s electronic public docket.
Dated: September 29, 2009.
Richard B. Ossias,
Associate General Counsel.
[FR Doc. E9–24183 Filed 10–6–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[FRL–8967–4]
Proposed Consent Decree, Clean Air
Act Citizen Suit
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of proposed consent
decree; request for public comment.
SUMMARY: In accordance with section
113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as amended
(‘‘Act’’), 42 U.S.C. 7413(g), notice is
hereby given of a proposed consent
decree, to address a lawsuit filed by
Environmental Integrity Project and
Sierra Club (collectively ‘‘Plaintiffs’’) in
the United States District Court for the
District of Columbia: Environmental
Integrity Project, et al. v. Jackson, No.
1:09–cv–01025–EGS (D.D.C). On June 2,
2009, Plaintiffs filed a deadline suit to
compel the Administrator to respond to
an administrative petition seeking EPA’s
objection to a CAA Title V operating
permit issued by the Arkansas
Department of Environmental Quality to
Southwestern Electric Power Company
(a unit of American Electric Power) for
the operation of the John W. Turk, Jr.
Power Plant. Under the terms of the
proposed consent decree, EPA has
agreed to respond to the petition by
December 15, 2009.
DATES: Written comments on the
proposed consent decree must be
received by November 6, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID number EPA–
HQ–OGC–2009–0756, online at https://
www.regulations.gov (EPA’s preferred
method); by e-mail to
oei.docket@epa.gov; mailed to EPA
Docket Center, Environmental
Protection Agency, Mailcode: 2822T,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460–0001; or by
hand delivery or courier to EPA Docket
Center, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301
E:\FR\FM\07OCN1.SGM
07OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 193 (Wednesday, October 7, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51602-51603]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-24183]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[FRL-8967-3]
Proposed Consent Decree, Clean Air Act Citizen Suit
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of proposed consent decree; request for public comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as
amended (``Act''), 42 U.S.C. 7413(g), notice is hereby given of a
proposed consent decree, to address a lawsuit filed by Sierra Club in
the United States District Court for the District of Columbia: Sierra
Club v. Jackson, No. 1:09-cv-01028-CKK (D.D.C). Plaintiff filed a
deadline suit to compel the Administrator to respond to an
administrative petition seeking EPA's objection to a CAA Title V
operating permit issued by the Kentucky Department for Environmental
Protection, Division for Air Quality to the East Kentucky Power
Cooperative William C. Dale Power Station. Under the terms of the
proposed consent decree, EPA has agreed to respond to the petition by
December 15, 2009.
DATES: Written comments on the proposed consent decree must be received
by November 6, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID number EPA-HQ-
OGC-2009-0763, online at https://www.regulations.gov (EPA's preferred
method); by e-mail to oei.docket@epa.gov; mailed to EPA Docket Center,
Environmental Protection Agency, Mailcode: 2822T, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; or by hand delivery or courier to
EPA Docket Center, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC, between 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. Comments on a disk or CD-ROM should be
formatted in Word or ASCII file, avoiding the use of special characters
and any form of encryption, and may be mailed to the mailing address
above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Kataoka, Air and Radiation Law
Office (2344A), Office of General Counsel, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460;
telephone: (202) 564-5584; fax number: (202) 564-5603; e-mail address:
kataoka.mark@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Additional Information About the Proposed Consent Decree
This proposed consent decree would resolve a lawsuit alleging that
the Administrator failed to perform a nondiscretionary duty to grant or
deny, within 60 days of submission, an administrative petition to
object to a CAA Title V permit issued by the Kentucky Department for
[[Page 51603]]
Environmental Protection, Division for Air Quality to the East Kentucky
Power Cooperative William C. Dale Power Station. Under the terms of the
proposed consent decree, EPA has agreed to respond to the petition by
December 15, 2009. In addition, the proposed consent decree states that
after EPA fulfills its obligations under the decree, and the
Plaintiff's claims for costs of litigation have been resolved, the case
shall be dismissed with prejudice.
For a period of thirty (30) days following the date of publication
of this notice, the Agency will accept written comments relating to the
proposed consent decree from persons who were not named as parties or
intervenors to the litigation in question. EPA or the Department of
Justice may withdraw or withhold consent to the proposed consent decree
if the comments disclose facts or considerations that indicate that
such consent is inappropriate, improper, inadequate, or inconsistent
with the requirements of the Act. Unless EPA or the Department of
Justice determines, based on any comment submitted, that consent to
this consent decree should be withdrawn, the terms of the decree will
be affirmed.
II. Additional Information About Commenting on the Proposed Consent
Decree
A. How Can I Get a Copy of the Consent Decree?
The official public docket for this action (identified by Docket ID
No. EPA-HQ-OGC-2009-0763) contains a copy of the proposed consent
decree. The official public docket is available for public viewing at
the Office of Environmental Information (OEI) Docket in the EPA Docket
Center, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington,
DC. The EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to
4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The
telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the
telephone number for the OEI Docket is (202) 566-1752.
An electronic version of the public docket is available through
https://www.regulations.gov. You may use the https://www.regulations.gov
to submit or view public comments, access the index listing of the
contents of the official public docket, and to access those documents
in the public docket that are available electronically. Once in the
system, key in the appropriate docket identification number then select
``search''.
It is important to note that EPA's policy is that public comments,
whether submitted electronically or in paper, will be made available
for public viewing online at https://www.regulations.gov without change,
unless the comment contains copyrighted material, CBI, or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Information
claimed as CBI and other information whose disclosure is restricted by
statute is not included in the official public docket or in the
electronic public docket. EPA's policy is that copyrighted material,
including copyrighted material contained in a public comment, will not
be placed in EPA's electronic public docket but will be available only
in printed, paper form in the official public docket. Although not all
docket materials may be available electronically, you may still access
any of the publicly available docket materials through the EPA Docket
Center.
B. How and To Whom Do I Submit Comments?
You may submit comments as provided in the ADDRESSES section.
Please ensure that your comments are submitted within the specified
comment period. Comments received after the close of the comment period
will be marked ``late.'' EPA is not required to consider these late
comments.
If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name, mailing address, and an e-mail address or other
contact information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD
ROM you submit. This ensures that you can be identified as the
submitter of the comment and allows EPA to contact you in case EPA
cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties or needs further
information on the substance of your comment. Any identifying or
contact information provided in the body of a comment will be included
as part of the comment that is placed in the official public docket,
and made available in EPA's electronic public docket. If EPA cannot
read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you
for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment.
Use of the https://www.regulations.gov Web site to submit comments
to EPA electronically is EPA's preferred method for receiving comments.
The electronic public docket system is an ``anonymous access'' system,
which means EPA will not know your identity, e-mail address, or other
contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment.
In contrast to EPA's electronic public docket, EPA's electronic mail
(e-mail) system is not an ``anonymous access'' system. If you send an
e-mail comment directly to the Docket without going through https://www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address is automatically captured and
included as part of the comment that is placed in the official public
docket, and made available in EPA's electronic public docket.
Dated: September 29, 2009.
Richard B. Ossias,
Associate General Counsel.
[FR Doc. E9-24183 Filed 10-6-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P