Direct Final Rule; Safety and Security Zones: Pilgrim Nuclear Power Plant, Plymouth, MA, 50922-50925 [E9-23754]
Download as PDF
50922
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 190 / Friday, October 2, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
Changeover points
From
To
Distance
From
§ 95.8003 VOR Federal Airway Changeover Points
Airway Segment V–259 Is Amended To Add Changeover Point
Grand Strand, SC VORTAC ...........................................
[FR Doc. E9–23752 Filed 10–1–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2009–0311]
RIN 1625–AA00
Direct Final Rule; Safety and Security
Zones: Pilgrim Nuclear Power Plant,
Plymouth, MA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Direct final rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with RULES
ACTION:
SUMMARY: By this direct final rule, the
Coast Guard is amending existing
regulations with a set of coordinates
which will better reflect the safety and
security zone around the Pilgrim
Nuclear Power Plant. This action will
prohibit entry into, or movement
within, the safety and security zones
located in Cape Cod Bay and adjacent
shore areas. This action is necessary to
ensure public safety and prevent
sabotage or terrorist acts. The safety and
security zones will close certain waters
of Cape Cod Bay near the Pilgrim
Nuclear Power Plant and land adjacent
to those waters.
DATES: This rule is effective December
31, 2009, unless an adverse comment, or
notice of intent to submit an adverse
comment, is either submitted to our
online docket via https://
www.regulations.gov on or before
December 1, 2009 or reaches the Docket
Management Facility by that date. If an
adverse comment, or notice of intent to
submit an adverse comment, is received
by December 1, 2009, we will withdraw
this direct final rule and publish a
timely notice of withdrawal in the
Federal Register.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2009–0311 using any one of the
following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:30 Oct 01, 2009
Jkt 220001
Florence, SC VORTAC ...................................................
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility
(M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail
address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The telephone number
is 202–366–9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only
one of these four methods. See the
‘‘Public Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for instructions on submitting
comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, e-mail
or call Chief Eldridge McFadden, U.S.
Coast Guard, Sector Boston, Waterways
Management Division; telephone 617–
223–5160, e-mail
Eldridge.C.McFadden@uscg.mil. If you
have questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
A. Submitting Comments
B. Viewing Comments and Documents
C. Privacy Act
D. Public Meeting
II. Abbreviations
III. Regulatory Information
IV. Background
V. Discussion of the Rule
VI. Regulatory Analyses
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
B. Small Entities
C. Assistance for Small Entities
D. Collection of Information
E. Federalism
F. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
G. Taking of Private Property
H. Civil Justice Reform
I. Protection of Children
J. Indian Tribal Governments
K. Energy Effects
L. Technical Standards
M. Environment
I. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
25
Grand Strand
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted,
without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
A. Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG–2009–0311),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You
may submit your comments and
material online, or by fax, mail or hand
delivery, but please use only one of
these means. We recommend that you
include your name and a mailing
address, an e-mail address, or a phone
number in the body of your document
so that we can contact you if we have
questions regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, click on the
‘‘submit a comment’’ box, which will
then become highlighted in blue. In the
‘‘Document Type’’ drop down menu
select ‘‘Proposed Rule’’ and insert
‘‘USCG–2009–0311’’ in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box. Click ‘‘Search’’ then click on the
balloon shape in the ‘‘Actions’’
column.If you submit your comments by
mail or hand delivery, submit them in
an unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2
by 11 inches, suitable for copying and
electronic filing. If you submit them by
mail and would like to know that they
reached the Facility, please enclose a
stamped, self-addressed postcard or
envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during
the comment period.
B. Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, click on the
‘‘read comments’’ box, which will then
become highlighted in blue. In the
‘‘Keyword’’ box insert ‘‘USCG–2009–
0311’’ and click ‘‘Search.’’ Click the
‘‘Open Docket Folder’’ in the ‘‘Actions’’
column. If you do not have access to the
internet, you may also view the docket
online by visiting the Docket
Management Facility in Room W12–140
E:\FR\FM\02OCR1.SGM
02OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 190 / Friday, October 2, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
on the ground floor of the Department
of Transportation West Building, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. We have an agreement with
the Department of Transportation to use
the Docket Management Facility.
C. Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic
form of comments received into any of
our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding our public dockets
in the January 17, 2008 issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
D. Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
for one to the docket using one of the
methods specified under ADDRESSES. In
your request, explain why you believe a
public meeting would be beneficial. If
we determine that one would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time
and place announced by a later notice
in the Federal Register.
pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with RULES
II. Abbreviations
DHS Department of Homeland
Security;
FR Federal Register;
§ Section symbol;
U.S.C. United States Code.
III. Regulatory Information
We are publishing this direct final
rule under 33 CFR 1.05–55 because we
do not expect an adverse comment. If no
adverse comment or notice of intent to
submit an adverse comment is received
by December 31, 2009, this rule will
become effective as stated in the DATES
section. In that case, approximately 30
days before the effective date, we will
publish a document in the Federal
Register stating that no adverse
comment was received and confirming
that this rule will become effective as
scheduled. However, if we receive an
adverse comment or notice of intent to
submit an adverse comment, we will
publish a document in the Federal
Register announcing the withdrawal of
all or part of this direct final rule. If an
adverse comment applies only to part of
this rule (e.g., to an amendment, a
paragraph, or a section) and it is
possible to remove that part without
defeating the purpose of this rule, we
may adopt, as final, those parts of this
rule on which no adverse comment was
received. We will withdraw the part of
this rule that was the subject of an
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:30 Oct 01, 2009
Jkt 220001
adverse comment. If we decide to
proceed with a rulemaking following
receipt of an adverse comment, we will
publish a separate notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) and provide a new
opportunity for comment.
A comment is considered ‘‘adverse’’ if
the comment explains why this rule or
a part of this rule would be
inappropriate, including a challenge to
its underlying premise or approach, or
would be ineffective or unacceptable
without a change.
IV. Background
Safety and security zones were
established to safeguard the Pilgrim
Nuclear Power Plant in light of terrorist
attacks on New York City and
Washington, DC on September 11, 2001.
The zones were implemented to protect
persons at the facility, the public, and
surrounding communities from sabotage
or other subversive acts, accidents, or
other similar events. The Pilgrim
Nuclear Power Plant is a possible target
of terrorist attack due to the potential
catastrophic impact an attack would
have on such a plant. Established safety
and security zones prohibit entry into or
movement within the specified areas.
The rulemaking regarding this site,
published in the Federal Register [67
FR 37689], established security and
safety zones having identical boundaries
delineated as follows: All waters of
Cape Cod Bay and land adjacent to
those waters enclosed by a line
beginning at position 41°57′5″ N,
070°34′42″ W; then running southeast to
position 41°56′40.5″ N, 070°34′4.5″ W;
then running southwest to position
41°56′55.5″ N, 070°34′52″ W; then
returning to its point of origin. These
positions were incorrect (one of the
positions is in fact 6 miles inland). This
regulation aims to correct the previous
regulation.
Buoy markers, which serve as a visual
reminder of the safety and security zone
surrounding the Nuclear Power Plant,
have already been placed at the
intended coordinates surrounding the
plant. This regulation will amend the
existing coordinates, to reflect the
originally intended parameters.
No person or vessel may enter or
remain in the prescribed safety and
security zones at any time without the
permission of the Captain of the Port.
All persons and vessels in a safety and
security zone must obey all directions
and orders made by the Captain of the
Port, or any other designated on-scene
Coast Guard representative. The Captain
of the Port may take possession and
control of any vessel in a security zone
and/or remove any person, vessel,
article or thing from a security zone. No
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
50923
person may board, take or place any
article or thing on board any vessel, or
waterfront facility, in a security zone
without permission of the Captain of the
Port.
These regulations are issued under
authority contained in 50 U.S.C. 191, 33
U.S.C. 1223, 1225 and 1226. Violations
of safety or security zone described
herein, are punishable by, among others,
civil penalties (not to exceed $25,000
per violation, where each day of a
continuing violation is a separate
violation), criminal penalties
(imprisonment for not more than 10
years and a fine of not more than
$100,000), in rem liability against the
offending vessel, and license sanctions.
V. Discussion of the Rule
The current safety and security zone
regulation is erroneous as it cites
incorrect coordinates. This regulation
will correct the existing one by adding
coordinates which reflect the actual
safety and security zones delineated by
the buoys already put in place by the
Pilgrim Power Plant. The new
regulation will change the safety and
security zone from:
41°57′5″ N, 070°34′42″ W; then
running southeast to position
41°56′40.5″ N, 070°34′4.5″ W; then
running southwest to position
41°56′55.5″ N, 070°34′52″ W; then
returning to its point of origin to:
41°56′59.3″ N, 070°34′58.5″ W; thence
to 41°57′12.2″ N, 070°34′41.9″ W; thence
to 41°56′42.3″ N, 070°34′00.1″ W; thence
to 41°56′29.5″ N, 070°34′14.5″ W.
VI. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order. This rule is not a significant
regulatory action because it seeks only
to update the previous regulation with
the correct and intended coordinates.
These coordinates have already been
marked by buoys, and mariners in the
surrounding area already know to avoid
this zone.
E:\FR\FM\02OCR1.SGM
02OCR1
50924
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 190 / Friday, October 2, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
B. Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
This rule would affect the following
entities, some of which might be small
entities: Fishermen, and the owners or
operators of vessels intending to transit,
fish or anchor in a portion of Cape Cod
Bay, Massachusetts. However, as stated
above, because mariners have already
been maintaining a certain distance
from the plant, with the assistance of
buoys as visual markers, little to no
effect will be realized once the new
regulation is implemented.
Therefore, the Coast Guard certifies
under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities. Comments submitted in
response to this finding will be
evaluated under the criteria in the
‘‘Regulatory Information’’ section of this
preamble.
pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with RULES
C. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule so that they can
better evaluate its effects on them and
participate in the rulemaking. If the rule
will affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please consult Chief
Eldridge McFadden, U.S. Coast Guard,
Sector Boston, Waterways Management
Division; telephone 617–223–5160, email Eldridge.C.McFadden@uscg.mil.
The Coast Guard will not retaliate
against small entities that question or
complain about this rule or any policy
or action of the Coast Guard.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:30 Oct 01, 2009
Jkt 220001
employees of the Coast Guard, call
1–888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247).
D. Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
E. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if the rule has a substantial
direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt
State law or impose a substantial direct
cost of compliance on them. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
have determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
F. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this rule will not result in such
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of
this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
G. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
H. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
I. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
J. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
K. Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
L. Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
M. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded that this action is one
of a category of actions which do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically
excluded under section 2.B.2, figure 2–
1, paragraph (34)(g) of the Instruction.
This rule involves the correction of
safety and security zones which were
implemented in a previous regulation.
An environmental analysis checklist
and a categorical exclusion
determination are available in the
E:\FR\FM\02OCR1.SGM
02OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 190 / Friday, October 2, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
docket where indicated under the
‘‘Public Participation and Request for
Comments’’ section of this preamble.
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
■
■
2. Revise § 165.115(a) to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.115 Safety and Security Zones;
Pilgrim Nuclear Power Plant, Plymouth,
Massachusetts.
enclosed by a line beginning at position
41°56′59.3″ N, 070°34′58.5″ W; thence to
1°57′12.2″ N, 070°34′41.9″ W; thence to
41°56′42.3″ N, 070°34′00.1″ W; thence to
41°56′29.5″ N, 070°34′14.5″ W.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: July 29, 2009.
Nathan E. Knapp,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of
the Port Boston, Acting.
[FR Doc. E9–23754 Filed 10–1–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with RULES
(a) Location. All waters of Cape Cod
Bay and land adjacent to those waters
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:30 Oct 01, 2009
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
50925
E:\FR\FM\02OCR1.SGM
02OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 190 (Friday, October 2, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 50922-50925]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-23754]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2009-0311]
RIN 1625-AA00
Direct Final Rule; Safety and Security Zones: Pilgrim Nuclear
Power Plant, Plymouth, MA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Direct final rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: By this direct final rule, the Coast Guard is amending
existing regulations with a set of coordinates which will better
reflect the safety and security zone around the Pilgrim Nuclear Power
Plant. This action will prohibit entry into, or movement within, the
safety and security zones located in Cape Cod Bay and adjacent shore
areas. This action is necessary to ensure public safety and prevent
sabotage or terrorist acts. The safety and security zones will close
certain waters of Cape Cod Bay near the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Plant and
land adjacent to those waters.
DATES: This rule is effective December 31, 2009, unless an adverse
comment, or notice of intent to submit an adverse comment, is either
submitted to our online docket via https://www.regulations.gov on or
before December 1, 2009 or reaches the Docket Management Facility by
that date. If an adverse comment, or notice of intent to submit an
adverse comment, is received by December 1, 2009, we will withdraw this
direct final rule and publish a timely notice of withdrawal in the
Federal Register.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2009-0311 using any one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202-493-2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone
number is 202-366-9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only one of these four methods.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on
submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule, e-
mail or call Chief Eldridge McFadden, U.S. Coast Guard, Sector Boston,
Waterways Management Division; telephone 617-223-5160, e-mail
Eldridge.C.McFadden@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Public Participation and Request for Comments
A. Submitting Comments
B. Viewing Comments and Documents
C. Privacy Act
D. Public Meeting
II. Abbreviations
III. Regulatory Information
IV. Background
V. Discussion of the Rule
VI. Regulatory Analyses
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
B. Small Entities
C. Assistance for Small Entities
D. Collection of Information
E. Federalism
F. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
G. Taking of Private Property
H. Civil Justice Reform
I. Protection of Children
J. Indian Tribal Governments
K. Energy Effects
L. Technical Standards
M. Environment
I. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted,
without change, to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.
A. Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG-2009-0311), indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and material
online, or by fax, mail or hand delivery, but please use only one of
these means. We recommend that you include your name and a mailing
address, an e-mail address, or a phone number in the body of your
document so that we can contact you if we have questions regarding your
submission.
To submit your comment online, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
click on the ``submit a comment'' box, which will then become
highlighted in blue. In the ``Document Type'' drop down menu select
``Proposed Rule'' and insert ``USCG-2009-0311'' in the ``Keyword'' box.
Click ``Search'' then click on the balloon shape in the ``Actions''
column.If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit
them in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable
for copying and electronic filing. If you submit them by mail and would
like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped,
self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and
material received during the comment period.
B. Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
click on the ``read comments'' box, which will then become highlighted
in blue. In the ``Keyword'' box insert ``USCG-2009-0311'' and click
``Search.'' Click the ``Open Docket Folder'' in the ``Actions'' column.
If you do not have access to the internet, you may also view the docket
online by visiting the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140
[[Page 50923]]
on the ground floor of the Department of Transportation West Building,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. We have an
agreement with the Department of Transportation to use the Docket
Management Facility.
C. Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008 issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
D. Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for one to the docket using one of the methods specified under
ADDRESSES. In your request, explain why you believe a public meeting
would be beneficial. If we determine that one would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time and place announced by a later
notice in the Federal Register.
II. Abbreviations
DHS Department of Homeland Security;
FR Federal Register;
Sec. Section symbol;
U.S.C. United States Code.
III. Regulatory Information
We are publishing this direct final rule under 33 CFR 1.05-55
because we do not expect an adverse comment. If no adverse comment or
notice of intent to submit an adverse comment is received by December
31, 2009, this rule will become effective as stated in the DATES
section. In that case, approximately 30 days before the effective date,
we will publish a document in the Federal Register stating that no
adverse comment was received and confirming that this rule will become
effective as scheduled. However, if we receive an adverse comment or
notice of intent to submit an adverse comment, we will publish a
document in the Federal Register announcing the withdrawal of all or
part of this direct final rule. If an adverse comment applies only to
part of this rule (e.g., to an amendment, a paragraph, or a section)
and it is possible to remove that part without defeating the purpose of
this rule, we may adopt, as final, those parts of this rule on which no
adverse comment was received. We will withdraw the part of this rule
that was the subject of an adverse comment. If we decide to proceed
with a rulemaking following receipt of an adverse comment, we will
publish a separate notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) and provide a
new opportunity for comment.
A comment is considered ``adverse'' if the comment explains why
this rule or a part of this rule would be inappropriate, including a
challenge to its underlying premise or approach, or would be
ineffective or unacceptable without a change.
IV. Background
Safety and security zones were established to safeguard the Pilgrim
Nuclear Power Plant in light of terrorist attacks on New York City and
Washington, DC on September 11, 2001. The zones were implemented to
protect persons at the facility, the public, and surrounding
communities from sabotage or other subversive acts, accidents, or other
similar events. The Pilgrim Nuclear Power Plant is a possible target of
terrorist attack due to the potential catastrophic impact an attack
would have on such a plant. Established safety and security zones
prohibit entry into or movement within the specified areas. The
rulemaking regarding this site, published in the Federal Register [67
FR 37689], established security and safety zones having identical
boundaries delineated as follows: All waters of Cape Cod Bay and land
adjacent to those waters enclosed by a line beginning at position
41[deg]57'5'' N, 070[deg]34'42'' W; then running southeast to position
41[deg]56'40.5'' N, 070[deg]34'4.5'' W; then running southwest to
position 41[deg]56'55.5'' N, 070[deg]34'52'' W; then returning to its
point of origin. These positions were incorrect (one of the positions
is in fact 6 miles inland). This regulation aims to correct the
previous regulation.
Buoy markers, which serve as a visual reminder of the safety and
security zone surrounding the Nuclear Power Plant, have already been
placed at the intended coordinates surrounding the plant. This
regulation will amend the existing coordinates, to reflect the
originally intended parameters.
No person or vessel may enter or remain in the prescribed safety
and security zones at any time without the permission of the Captain of
the Port. All persons and vessels in a safety and security zone must
obey all directions and orders made by the Captain of the Port, or any
other designated on-scene Coast Guard representative. The Captain of
the Port may take possession and control of any vessel in a security
zone and/or remove any person, vessel, article or thing from a security
zone. No person may board, take or place any article or thing on board
any vessel, or waterfront facility, in a security zone without
permission of the Captain of the Port.
These regulations are issued under authority contained in 50 U.S.C.
191, 33 U.S.C. 1223, 1225 and 1226. Violations of safety or security
zone described herein, are punishable by, among others, civil penalties
(not to exceed $25,000 per violation, where each day of a continuing
violation is a separate violation), criminal penalties (imprisonment
for not more than 10 years and a fine of not more than $100,000), in
rem liability against the offending vessel, and license sanctions.
V. Discussion of the Rule
The current safety and security zone regulation is erroneous as it
cites incorrect coordinates. This regulation will correct the existing
one by adding coordinates which reflect the actual safety and security
zones delineated by the buoys already put in place by the Pilgrim Power
Plant. The new regulation will change the safety and security zone
from:
41[deg]57'5'' N, 070[deg]34'42'' W; then running southeast to
position 41[deg]56'40.5'' N, 070[deg]34'4.5'' W; then running southwest
to position 41[deg]56'55.5'' N, 070[deg]34'52'' W; then returning to
its point of origin to:
41[deg]56'59.3'' N, 070[deg]34'58.5'' W; thence to 41[deg]57'12.2''
N, 070[deg]34'41.9'' W; thence to 41[deg]56'42.3'' N, 070[deg]34'00.1''
W; thence to 41[deg]56'29.5'' N, 070[deg]34'14.5'' W.
VI. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order. This rule is not a significant regulatory
action because it seeks only to update the previous regulation with the
correct and intended coordinates. These coordinates have already been
marked by buoys, and mariners in the surrounding area already know to
avoid this zone.
[[Page 50924]]
B. Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
This rule would affect the following entities, some of which might
be small entities: Fishermen, and the owners or operators of vessels
intending to transit, fish or anchor in a portion of Cape Cod Bay,
Massachusetts. However, as stated above, because mariners have already
been maintaining a certain distance from the plant, with the assistance
of buoys as visual markers, little to no effect will be realized once
the new regulation is implemented.
Therefore, the Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that
this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. Comments submitted in response to this
finding will be evaluated under the criteria in the ``Regulatory
Information'' section of this preamble.
C. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule so that they can better evaluate
its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the rule will
affect your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction
and you have questions concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please consult Chief Eldridge McFadden, U.S. Coast Guard,
Sector Boston, Waterways Management Division; telephone 617-223-5160,
e-mail Eldridge.C.McFadden@uscg.mil. The Coast Guard will not retaliate
against small entities that question or complain about this rule or any
policy or action of the Coast Guard.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247).
D. Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
E. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if the rule has a substantial direct effect on State or
local governments and would either preempt State law or impose a
substantial direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this
rule under that Order and have determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
F. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule will not result in such expenditure, we do
discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
G. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
H. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
I. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
J. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
K. Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
L. Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
M. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
that this action is one of a category of actions which do not
individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically excluded under section 2.B.2,
figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g) of the Instruction.
This rule involves the correction of safety and security zones
which were implemented in a previous regulation. An environmental
analysis checklist and a categorical exclusion determination are
available in the
[[Page 50925]]
docket where indicated under the ``Public Participation and Request for
Comments'' section of this preamble.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306,
3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Revise Sec. 165.115(a) to read as follows:
Sec. 165.115 Safety and Security Zones; Pilgrim Nuclear Power Plant,
Plymouth, Massachusetts.
(a) Location. All waters of Cape Cod Bay and land adjacent to those
waters enclosed by a line beginning at position 41[deg]56'59.3'' N,
070[deg]34'58.5'' W; thence to 1[deg]57'12.2'' N, 070[deg]34'41.9'' W;
thence to 41[deg]56'42.3'' N, 070[deg]34'00.1'' W; thence to
41[deg]56'29.5'' N, 070[deg]34'14.5'' W.
* * * * *
Dated: July 29, 2009.
Nathan E. Knapp,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Boston, Acting.
[FR Doc. E9-23754 Filed 10-1-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P