Notice of Public Information Collection Being Submitted to the Office of Management and Budget for Review and Approval, Comments Requested, 50796-50798 [E9-23664]
Download as PDF
50796
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 189 / Thursday, October 1, 2009 / Notices
EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE
UNITED STATES
Economic Impact Policy
This notice is to inform the public
that the Export-Import Bank of the
United States has received an
application to finance approximately
$260 million for the U.S. export of
approximately $268 million worth of
power equipment and services to a
buyer in the United Arab Emirates
(UAE). The U.S. exports will enable the
UAE company to produce aluminum.
Production is scheduled to commence
in 2010, with full production beginning
in 2011. The UAE company will have an
initial production capacity of 718,000
metric tons of aluminum per year, with
efficiency gains expected to increase
production capacity up to 750,000
metric tons per year. The total value of
the aluminum producing facility is
estimated to be $7.2 billion. It is
envisioned this new aluminum
production will be primarily sold to
customers in Algeria, Bahrain, Egypt,
Germany, Japan, South Korea, Libya,
Malaysia, Saudi Arabia, Singapore,
Thailand, Taiwan, and Vietnam. Some
of the new aluminum will also be sold
domestically within the UAE. Interested
parties may submit comments on this
transaction by email to
economic.impact@exim.gov or by mail
to 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., Room
1238, Washington, DC 20571, within 14
days of the date this notice appears in
the Federal Register.
Helene S. Walsh,
Vice President, Policy Analysis Division.
[FR Doc. E9–23609 Filed 9–30–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690–01–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
Notice of Public Information Collection
Being Submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget for Review
and Approval, Comments Requested
PWALKER on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
September 25, 2009.
SUMMARY: The Federal Communications
Commission, as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork burden
invites the general public and other
Federal agencies to take this
opportunity to comment on the
following information collection(s), as
required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501–3520. An
agency may not conduct or sponsor a
collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid control
number. No person shall be subject to
any penalty for failing to comply with
VerDate Nov<24>2008
19:32 Sep 30, 2009
Jkt 217001
a collection of information subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that
does not display a valid control number.
Comments are requested concerning (a)
whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
Commission, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the Commission’s
burden estimate; (c) ways to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information collected; and (d) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of
information on the respondents,
including the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
DATES: Persons wishing to comment on
this information collection should
submit comments on November 2, 2009.
If you anticipate that you will be
submitting comments, but find it
difficult to do so within the period of
time allowed by this notice, you should
advise the contact listed below as soon
as possible.
ADDRESSES: Direct all PRA comments to
Nicholas A. Fraser, Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), via fax
at (202) 395–5167, or via the Internet at
Nicholas_A._Fraser@omb.eop.gov and
to Cathy Williams, Federal
Communications Commission (FCC).
445 12th Street SW, Washington DC
20554. To submit your comments by e–
mail send then to: PRA@fcc.gov and to
Cathy Williams@fcc.gov. To view a copy
of this information collection request
(ICR) submitted to OMB: (1) Go to web
page: https://www.reginfo.gov/public/
do/PRAMain, (2) look for the section of
the web page called ‘‘Currently Under
Review’’, (3) click on the downward–
pointing arrow in the ‘‘Select Agency’’
box below the ‘‘Currently Under
Review’’ heading, (4) select ‘‘Federal
Communications Commission’’ from the
list of agencies presented in the ‘‘Select
Agency’’ box, (5) click the ‘‘Submit’’
button to the right of the ‘‘Select
Agency’’ box, and (6) when the FCC list
appears, look for the title of this ICR (or
its OMB Control Number, if there is one)
and then click on the ICR.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
additional information about the
information collection(s) send an e–mail
to PRA@fcc.gov or contact Cathy
Williams on (202) 418–2918.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
OMB Control Number: 3060–1089.
Title: Telecommunications Relay
Services and Speech–to–Speech
Services for Individuals with Hearing
and Speech Disabilities; E911
Requirements for IP–Enabled Service
Providers, CG Docket No. 03–123 and
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
WC Docket No. 05– 196, FCC 08151 and
FCC 08–275.
Form Number: Not Applicable.
Type of Review: Revision of a
currently approved collection.
Respondents: Business or other for–
profit entities; Individuals or
households; Not–for–profit institutions;
State, local or tribal government.
Number of Respondents and
Responses: 12 respondents; 5,608,692
responses.
Estimated Time per Response: 3
minutes (.05 hours) to 1 hour.
Frequency of Response: One–time,
quarterly and on occasion reporting
requirements; Recordkeeping
requirement; Third party disclosure
requirement.
Total Annual Burden: 206,061.
Total Annual Cost: $4,251,635.
Obligation To Respond: Required to
obtain or retain benefits. The statutory
authority for this information collection
is contained in sections 1, 2, 4(i), (4)(j),
225, 251, and 303(r) of the
Communications Act of 1934, as
amended, 47 U.S.C. 151, 152, 154(i),
154(j), 225, 251, and 303(r).
Nature and Extent of Confidentiality:
An assurance of confidentiality is not
offered because the Commission has no
direct involvement in the collection of
personally identifiable information (PII)
from individuals and/or households.
Privacy Impact Assessment: No
impact(s).
Needs and Uses: On November 30,
2005, the Commission released
Telecommunications Relay Services and
Speech–to–Speech Services for
Individuals with Hearing and Speech
Disabilities; Access to Emergency
Services, Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (VRS/IP Relay 911 NPRM),
CG Docket No. 03–123, FCC 05–196,
published at 71 FR 5221 (February 1,
2006), which addressed the issue of
access to emergency services for
Internet–based forms of
Telecommunications Relay Services
(TRS), namely Video Relay Service
(VRS) and Internet Protocol (IP) Relay.
The Commission sought to adopt means
to ensure that such calls promptly reach
the appropriate emergency service
provider.
On May 8, 2006, the Commission
released Telecommunications Relay
Services and Speech–to–Speech
Services for Individuals with Hearing
and Speech Disabilities; Misuse of IP
Relay Service and Video Relay Service,
Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
(IP Relay/VRS Misuse FNPRM), CG
Docket No. 03–123, FCC 06–58
published at 71 FR 31131 (June 1, 2006),
which sought further comment on
whether IP Relay and VRS providers
E:\FR\FM\01OCN1.SGM
01OCN1
PWALKER on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 189 / Thursday, October 1, 2009 / Notices
should be required to implement user
registration systems and what
information users should provide, as a
means of curbing illegitimate IP Relay
and VRS calls.
On May 9, 2006, the Commission
released Telecommunications Relay
Services and Speech–to–Speech
Services for Individuals with Hearing
and Speech Disabilities, Declaratory
Ruling and Further Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (Interoperability
Declaratory Ruling and FNPRM), CG
Docket No. 03–123, FCC 06–57,
published at 71 FR 30818 and 71 FR
30848 (May 31, 2006). In the
Interoperability Declaratory Ruling and
FNPRM, the Commission sought
comment on the feasibility of
establishing a single, open, and global
database of proxy numbers for VRS
users that would be available to all
service providers, so that a hearing
person can call a VRS user through any
VRS provider, without having first to
ascertain the VRS user’s current IP
address.
On June 24, 2008, the Commission
released Telecommunications Relay
Services and Speech–to–Speech
Services for Individuals with Hearing
and Speech Disabilities; E911
Requirements for IP–Enabled Service
Providers, Report and Order and Further
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (First
Numbering Order), CG Docket No. 03–
123 and WC Docket No. 05–196, FCC
08–151, addressing the issues raised in
these notices. The First Numbering
Order establishes a reliable and
consistent means by which others
(including emergency personnel) can
identify or reach VRS and IP Relay users
by, among other things, integrating VRS
and IP Relay users into the ten–digit,
North American Numbering Plan
(NANP) numbering system.
To complete a telephone call to an
Internet–based TRS user, a provider
must have some method of logically
associating the telephone number dialed
by the caller to the Internet–based TRS
user’s device. The method adopted by
the Commission, known as the TRS
Numbering Directory, is a central
database that maps each user’s
telephone number to routing
information needed to find that user’s
device on the Internet. The First
Numbering Order requires VRS and IP
Relay providers to collect and maintain
the routing information from their
registered users and to provision that
information to the TRS Numbering
Directory so that this mapping can
occur.
In addition, to establish a reliable
means for VRS and IP Relay providers
to automatically know the physical
VerDate Nov<24>2008
19:32 Sep 30, 2009
Jkt 217001
location of their users, the First
Numbering Order requires VRS and IP
Relay providers to collect and maintain
the Registered Location of their
registered users. And to ensure that
emergency personnel can retrieve a
user’s Registered Location (along with
the provider’s name and the
identification number of the
Communications Assistant for call back
purposes), the First Numbering Order
requires VRS and IP Relay providers to
make that information available from or
through the appropriate automatic
location information (ALI) database.
To ensure that VRS and IP Relay users
are aware of their providers’ numbering
and E911 service obligations and to
inform those users of their providers’
E911 capabilities, the First Numbering
Order requires each VRS and IP Relay
provider to post an advisory on its Web
site, and in any promotional materials
directed to consumers, addressing
numbering and E911 services for VRS or
IP Relay. Providers also must obtain and
keep a record of affirmative
acknowledgement from each of their
registered users of having received and
understood the user notification.
On December 19, 2008, the
Commission released the
Telecommunications Relay Services and
Speech–to–Speech Services for
Individuals with Hearing and Speech
Disabilities; E911 Requirements for IP–
Enabled Service Providers, Second
Report and Order and Order on
Reconsideration (Second Numbering
Order), CG Docket No. 03–123 and WC
Docket No. 05–196, FCC 08–275, further
addressing the duties of VRS and IP
Relay providers to supply numbering
and E911 capabilities to their users, as
established in the First Numbering
Order.
The Second Numbering Order revises
the ‘‘User Notification’’ information
collection requirement adopted in the
First Numbering Order. Specifically,
VRS and IP Relay consumer advisories
must explain that: (1) The consumer
may obtain a telephone number from,
and register with, his or her provider of
choice; (2) the consumer may change
default providers while retaining the
same telephone number by porting that
number to the new default provider; (3)
the consumer may make calls through,
and receive calls from, any provider;
and (4) the provider cannot condition
the ongoing use or possession of
equipment, or the receipt of different or
upgraded equipment, on the consumer
continuing to use the provider as his or
her default provider.
The Second Numbering Order also
adds five new information collection
requirements to those adopted in the
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
50797
First Numbering Order. First, once a
VRS or IP Relay user with a ‘‘proxy’’ or
‘‘alias’’ number obtains a NANP
telephone number, the VRS or IP Relay
provider must provide a message
notifying callers of the user’s new
NANP telephone number and advising
callers that, after November 12, 2009,
the user may only be reached by the
NANP telephone number. (Although the
permissive dialing period was
scheduled to end on June 30, 2009, the
Consumer and Governmental Affairs
Bureau later extended this deadline
until after November 12, 2009.) This
notification requirement is intended to
smooth the transition of VRS and IP
Relay users to NANP telephone
numbers by ensuring that a VRS or IP
Relay user can be reached by a calling
party who may not yet know the user’s
new number.
Second, VRS and IP Relay providers
must verify whether a user who places
a call through a provider is registered
with another provider in order to
distinguish a new user who has not yet
registered from an existing user who is
dialing around the default provider with
which he or she is registered. A VRS or
IP Relay provider may do this by
requesting a user’s ten–digit NANP
number and querying the Numbering
Directory using that number.
Third, VRS and IP Relay providers
must institute procedures to verify the
accuracy of registration information,
including the consumer’s name and
mailing address, and include a self
certification component requiring
consumers to verify that they have a
medically recognized hearing or speech
disability necessitating their use of TRS.
These measures will be used by VRS
and IP Relay providers to ensure that
their services are not used for fraudulent
or other purposes not authorized by the
statute or by the Commission’s rules.
Fourth, any VRS or IP Relay provider
wishing to pass through numbering–
related costs to its users must obtain
Commission approval to do so. This
requirement will be used by the
Consumer and Governmental Affairs
Bureau, acting on delegated authority, to
ensure that only customer–specific,
actually incurred costs are passed on to
VRS and IP Relay users.
Finally, each VRS provider that
provisions equipment to a consumer
must make available to the consumer’s
newly selected default provider certain
information about that equipment that
will be used by the new default provider
to perform the functions required of a
default provider, including enabling
point–to–point (non–relay)
communications between VRS users,
when a user switches providers but
E:\FR\FM\01OCN1.SGM
01OCN1
50798
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 189 / Thursday, October 1, 2009 / Notices
wishes to use equipment supplied by
another default provider.
FEDERAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
ADVISORY BOARD
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9–23664 Filed 9–30–09; 8:45 am]
Notice of Release of Exposure Drafts
on Implementation Guidance on
Cleanup Costs Associated With
Equipment, and Asbestos Cleanup
Costs Associated With Facilities and
Installed Equipment
National Institute for Occupational
Safety and Health; Decision To
Evaluate a Petition To Designate a
Class of Employees of Hangar 481, at
Kirtland Air Force Base, Albuquerque,
NM, To Be Included in the Special
Exposure Cohort
BILLING CODE 6712–01–S
AGENCY: Federal Accounting Standards
Advisory Board.
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE
CORPORATION
ACTION:
Sunshine Act; Notice of Agency
Meeting
Notice.
PWALKER on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
Pursuant to the provisions of the
‘‘Government in the Sunshine Act’’ (5
U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that
at 10:34 a.m. on Tuesday, September 29,
2009, the Board of Directors of the
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
met in closed session to consider
matters related to the Corporation’s
supervision and resolution activities.
In calling the meeting, the Board
determined, on motion of Director John
E. Bowman (Acting Director, Office of
Thrift Supervision), seconded by
Director Thomas J. Curry (Appointive),
concurred in by Director John C. Dugan
(Comptroller of the Currency), Vice
Chairman Martin J. Gruenberg, and
Chairman Sheila C. Bair, that
Corporation business required its
consideration of the matters which were
to be the subject of this meeting on less
than seven days’ notice to the public;
that no earlier notice of the meeting was
practicable; that the public interest did
not require consideration of the matters
in a meeting open to public observation;
and that the matters could be
considered in a closed meeting by
authority of subsections (c)(4), (c)(6),
(c)(8), (c)(9)(A)(ii), and (c)(9)(B) of the
‘‘Government in the Sunshine Act’’ (5
U.S.C. 552b(c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(8),
(c)(9)(A)(ii), and (c)(9)(B)).
The meeting was held in the Board
Room of the FDIC Building located at
550—17th Street, NW., Washington, DC.
Dated: September 29, 2009.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9–23814 Filed 9–29–09; 4:15 pm]
Board Action: Pursuant to 31 U.S.C.
3511(d), the Federal Advisory
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92–463), as
amended, and the FASAB Rules of
Procedure, as amended in April, 2004,
notice is hereby given that the Federal
Accounting Standards Advisory Board
(FASAB) has released the Exposure
Draft on Implementation Guidance on
Cleanup Costs Associated With
Equipment.
The exposure draft addresses
important implementation questions
regarding the consistent application of
SFFAS 6 as it relates to cleanup costs
associated with equipment. The Federal
Accounting Standards Advisory Board
(FASAB) also issued the Exposure Draft
on Implementation Guidance on
Asbestos Cleanup Costs Associated With
Facilities and Installed Equipment.
The Exposure Draft addresses
important implementation questions
regarding the consistent application of
TB2006–1 as it relates to asbestos
cleanup costs associated with facilities
and installed equipment.
The Exposure Drafts are available on
the FASAB home page https://
www.fasab.gov/exposure.html. Copies
can be obtained by contacting FASAB at
(202) 512–7350.
Respondents are encouraged to
comment on any part of the exposure
drafts. Written comments are requested
by December 4, 2009, and should be
sent to: Wendy M. Payne, Executive
Director, Federal Accounting Standards
Advisory Board, 441 G Street, NW.,
Suite 6814, Mail Stop 6K17V,
Washington, DC 20548.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
BILLING CODE P
Wendy Payne, Executive Director, at
(202) 512–7350.
Authority: Federal Advisory Committee
Act, Pub. L. 92–463.
Dated: September 25, 2009.
Charles Jackson,
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. E9–23663 Filed 9–30–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1610–02–P
VerDate Nov<24>2008
19:32 Sep 30, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
AGENCY: National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health
(NIOSH), Department of Health and
Human Services (HHS).
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: HHS gives notice as required
by 42 CFR 83.12(e) of a decision to
evaluate a petition to designate a class
of employees of Hangar 481, at Kirtland
Air Force Base, Albuquerque, New
Mexico, to be included in the Special
Exposure Cohort under the Energy
Employees Occupational Illness
Compensation Program Act of 2000. The
initial proposed definition for the class
being evaluated, subject to revision as
warranted by the evaluation, is as
follows:
Facility: Hangar 481 at Kirtland Air
Force Base.
Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Job Titles and/or Job Duties: All
employees who worked at Hangar 481,
at Kirtland Air Force Base.
Period of Employment: March 1, 1989
through June 30, 1996.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Larry Elliott, Director, Office of
Compensation Analysis and Support,
National Institute for Occupational
Safety and Health (NIOSH), 4676
Columbia Parkway, MS C–46,
Cincinnati, OH 45226, Telephone
513–533–6800 (this is not a toll-free
number). Information requests can also
be submitted by e-mail to
OCAS@CDC.GOV.
John Howard,
Director, National Institute for Occupational
Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. E9–23685 Filed 9–30–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163–19–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
National Institute for Occupational
Safety and Health; Decision To
Evaluate a Petition To Designate a
Class of Employees for the Hanford
Site, Richland, WA, To Be Included in
the Special Exposure Cohort
AGENCY: National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health
E:\FR\FM\01OCN1.SGM
01OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 189 (Thursday, October 1, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50796-50798]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-23664]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Notice of Public Information Collection Being Submitted to the
Office of Management and Budget for Review and Approval, Comments
Requested
September 25, 2009.
SUMMARY: The Federal Communications Commission, as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork burden invites the general public
and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on the
following information collection(s), as required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501-3520. An agency may not conduct
or sponsor a collection of information unless it displays a currently
valid control number. No person shall be subject to any penalty for
failing to comply with a collection of information subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that does not display a valid control
number. Comments are requested concerning (a) whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the Commission, including whether the information
shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the Commission's
burden estimate; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity
of the information collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on the respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or other forms of information
technology.
DATES: Persons wishing to comment on this information collection should
submit comments on November 2, 2009. If you anticipate that you will be
submitting comments, but find it difficult to do so within the period
of time allowed by this notice, you should advise the contact listed
below as soon as possible.
ADDRESSES: Direct all PRA comments to Nicholas A. Fraser, Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), via fax at (202) 395-5167, or via the
Internet at Nicholas_A._Fraser@omb.eop.gov and to Cathy Williams,
Federal Communications Commission (FCC). 445 12th Street SW, Washington
DC 20554. To submit your comments by e-mail send then to: PRA@fcc.gov
and to Cathy Williams@fcc.gov. To view a copy of this information
collection request (ICR) submitted to OMB: (1) Go to web page: https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain, (2) look for the section of the web
page called ``Currently Under Review'', (3) click on the downward-
pointing arrow in the ``Select Agency'' box below the ``Currently Under
Review'' heading, (4) select ``Federal Communications Commission'' from
the list of agencies presented in the ``Select Agency'' box, (5) click
the ``Submit'' button to the right of the ``Select Agency'' box, and
(6) when the FCC list appears, look for the title of this ICR (or its
OMB Control Number, if there is one) and then click on the ICR.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For additional information about the
information collection(s) send an e-mail to PRA@fcc.gov or contact
Cathy Williams on (202) 418-2918.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
OMB Control Number: 3060-1089.
Title: Telecommunications Relay Services and Speech-to-Speech
Services for Individuals with Hearing and Speech Disabilities; E911
Requirements for IP-Enabled Service Providers, CG Docket No. 03-123 and
WC Docket No. 05- 196, FCC 08151 and FCC 08-275.
Form Number: Not Applicable.
Type of Review: Revision of a currently approved collection.
Respondents: Business or other for-profit entities; Individuals or
households; Not-for-profit institutions; State, local or tribal
government.
Number of Respondents and Responses: 12 respondents; 5,608,692
responses.
Estimated Time per Response: 3 minutes (.05 hours) to 1 hour.
Frequency of Response: One-time, quarterly and on occasion
reporting requirements; Recordkeeping requirement; Third party
disclosure requirement.
Total Annual Burden: 206,061.
Total Annual Cost: $4,251,635.
Obligation To Respond: Required to obtain or retain benefits. The
statutory authority for this information collection is contained in
sections 1, 2, 4(i), (4)(j), 225, 251, and 303(r) of the Communications
Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 151, 152, 154(i), 154(j), 225, 251,
and 303(r).
Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: An assurance of
confidentiality is not offered because the Commission has no direct
involvement in the collection of personally identifiable information
(PII) from individuals and/or households.
Privacy Impact Assessment: No impact(s).
Needs and Uses: On November 30, 2005, the Commission released
Telecommunications Relay Services and Speech-to-Speech Services for
Individuals with Hearing and Speech Disabilities; Access to Emergency
Services, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (VRS/IP Relay 911 NPRM), CG
Docket No. 03-123, FCC 05-196, published at 71 FR 5221 (February 1,
2006), which addressed the issue of access to emergency services for
Internet-based forms of Telecommunications Relay Services (TRS), namely
Video Relay Service (VRS) and Internet Protocol (IP) Relay. The
Commission sought to adopt means to ensure that such calls promptly
reach the appropriate emergency service provider.
On May 8, 2006, the Commission released Telecommunications Relay
Services and Speech-to-Speech Services for Individuals with Hearing and
Speech Disabilities; Misuse of IP Relay Service and Video Relay
Service, Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (IP Relay/VRS Misuse
FNPRM), CG Docket No. 03-123, FCC 06-58 published at 71 FR 31131 (June
1, 2006), which sought further comment on whether IP Relay and VRS
providers
[[Page 50797]]
should be required to implement user registration systems and what
information users should provide, as a means of curbing illegitimate IP
Relay and VRS calls.
On May 9, 2006, the Commission released Telecommunications Relay
Services and Speech-to-Speech Services for Individuals with Hearing and
Speech Disabilities, Declaratory Ruling and Further Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (Interoperability Declaratory Ruling and FNPRM), CG Docket
No. 03-123, FCC 06-57, published at 71 FR 30818 and 71 FR 30848 (May
31, 2006). In the Interoperability Declaratory Ruling and FNPRM, the
Commission sought comment on the feasibility of establishing a single,
open, and global database of proxy numbers for VRS users that would be
available to all service providers, so that a hearing person can call a
VRS user through any VRS provider, without having first to ascertain
the VRS user's current IP address.
On June 24, 2008, the Commission released Telecommunications Relay
Services and Speech-to-Speech Services for Individuals with Hearing and
Speech Disabilities; E911 Requirements for IP-Enabled Service
Providers, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
(First Numbering Order), CG Docket No. 03-123 and WC Docket No. 05-196,
FCC 08-151, addressing the issues raised in these notices. The First
Numbering Order establishes a reliable and consistent means by which
others (including emergency personnel) can identify or reach VRS and IP
Relay users by, among other things, integrating VRS and IP Relay users
into the ten-digit, North American Numbering Plan (NANP) numbering
system.
To complete a telephone call to an Internet-based TRS user, a
provider must have some method of logically associating the telephone
number dialed by the caller to the Internet-based TRS user's device.
The method adopted by the Commission, known as the TRS Numbering
Directory, is a central database that maps each user's telephone number
to routing information needed to find that user's device on the
Internet. The First Numbering Order requires VRS and IP Relay providers
to collect and maintain the routing information from their registered
users and to provision that information to the TRS Numbering Directory
so that this mapping can occur.
In addition, to establish a reliable means for VRS and IP Relay
providers to automatically know the physical location of their users,
the First Numbering Order requires VRS and IP Relay providers to
collect and maintain the Registered Location of their registered users.
And to ensure that emergency personnel can retrieve a user's Registered
Location (along with the provider's name and the identification number
of the Communications Assistant for call back purposes), the First
Numbering Order requires VRS and IP Relay providers to make that
information available from or through the appropriate automatic
location information (ALI) database.
To ensure that VRS and IP Relay users are aware of their providers'
numbering and E911 service obligations and to inform those users of
their providers' E911 capabilities, the First Numbering Order requires
each VRS and IP Relay provider to post an advisory on its Web site, and
in any promotional materials directed to consumers, addressing
numbering and E911 services for VRS or IP Relay. Providers also must
obtain and keep a record of affirmative acknowledgement from each of
their registered users of having received and understood the user
notification.
On December 19, 2008, the Commission released the
Telecommunications Relay Services and Speech-to-Speech Services for
Individuals with Hearing and Speech Disabilities; E911 Requirements for
IP-Enabled Service Providers, Second Report and Order and Order on
Reconsideration (Second Numbering Order), CG Docket No. 03-123 and WC
Docket No. 05-196, FCC 08-275, further addressing the duties of VRS and
IP Relay providers to supply numbering and E911 capabilities to their
users, as established in the First Numbering Order.
The Second Numbering Order revises the ``User Notification''
information collection requirement adopted in the First Numbering
Order. Specifically, VRS and IP Relay consumer advisories must explain
that: (1) The consumer may obtain a telephone number from, and register
with, his or her provider of choice; (2) the consumer may change
default providers while retaining the same telephone number by porting
that number to the new default provider; (3) the consumer may make
calls through, and receive calls from, any provider; and (4) the
provider cannot condition the ongoing use or possession of equipment,
or the receipt of different or upgraded equipment, on the consumer
continuing to use the provider as his or her default provider.
The Second Numbering Order also adds five new information
collection requirements to those adopted in the First Numbering Order.
First, once a VRS or IP Relay user with a ``proxy'' or ``alias'' number
obtains a NANP telephone number, the VRS or IP Relay provider must
provide a message notifying callers of the user's new NANP telephone
number and advising callers that, after November 12, 2009, the user may
only be reached by the NANP telephone number. (Although the permissive
dialing period was scheduled to end on June 30, 2009, the Consumer and
Governmental Affairs Bureau later extended this deadline until after
November 12, 2009.) This notification requirement is intended to smooth
the transition of VRS and IP Relay users to NANP telephone numbers by
ensuring that a VRS or IP Relay user can be reached by a calling party
who may not yet know the user's new number.
Second, VRS and IP Relay providers must verify whether a user who
places a call through a provider is registered with another provider in
order to distinguish a new user who has not yet registered from an
existing user who is dialing around the default provider with which he
or she is registered. A VRS or IP Relay provider may do this by
requesting a user's ten-digit NANP number and querying the Numbering
Directory using that number.
Third, VRS and IP Relay providers must institute procedures to
verify the accuracy of registration information, including the
consumer's name and mailing address, and include a self certification
component requiring consumers to verify that they have a medically
recognized hearing or speech disability necessitating their use of TRS.
These measures will be used by VRS and IP Relay providers to ensure
that their services are not used for fraudulent or other purposes not
authorized by the statute or by the Commission's rules.
Fourth, any VRS or IP Relay provider wishing to pass through
numbering-related costs to its users must obtain Commission approval to
do so. This requirement will be used by the Consumer and Governmental
Affairs Bureau, acting on delegated authority, to ensure that only
customer-specific, actually incurred costs are passed on to VRS and IP
Relay users.
Finally, each VRS provider that provisions equipment to a consumer
must make available to the consumer's newly selected default provider
certain information about that equipment that will be used by the new
default provider to perform the functions required of a default
provider, including enabling point-to-point (non-relay) communications
between VRS users, when a user switches providers but
[[Page 50798]]
wishes to use equipment supplied by another default provider.
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-23664 Filed 9-30-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-S