Black Bayou Lake National Wildlife Refuge, Ouachita Parish, LA, 50237-50239 [E9-23559]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 188 / Wednesday, September 30, 2009 / Notices
requirements outlined within the plan
are accomplished. The draft PDM Plan
proposes to conduct monitoring
annually for at least 10 years. Postdelisting monitoring of the brown
pelican will consist primarily of annual
collection of information on colony
occupancy and number of nesting pairs.
Information on contaminants will also
be collected at 5-year intervals
beginning with the first year.
Post-delisting monitoring of the
brown pelican will be focused along the
Gulf coast of Louisiana and Texas; the
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and the
U.S. Virgin Islands in the West Indies;
the Pacific coast of southern California
and Baja California, Mexico; and the
Gulf of California. We will be
monitoring these areas because: (1)
Existing population data are available
for these areas for comparison with data
to be collected during post-delisting
monitoring; (2) these populations were
among some of the largest (outside of
those in Peru) prior to listing (73 FR
9408); and (3) these populations
suffered the greatest declines in
productivity and abundance that led to
the listing of the species. Additionally,
we have no evidence that brown
pelicans outside these areas ever
suffered declines in response to
persistent organic pesticides. We are
also interested in any information that
may suggest a new or increasing threat
that may impact the brown pelican in
other parts of its range proposed for
delisting under the Act but not covered
by this Draft Monitoring Plan.
CPrice-Sewell on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Request for Public Comments
We solicit written comments on the
Draft Monitoring Plan described in this
notice. All comments received by the
date specified above will be considered
in development of a final post-delisting
monitoring plan for the brown pelican.
We will take into consideration the
relevant comments, suggestions, or
objections that we receive by the
comment due date indicated above in
the DATES section. These comments,
suggestions, or objections, and any
additional information we receive, may
lead us to adopt a final PDM Plan that
differs from this draft PDM Plan.
Comments merely stating support or
opposition to the draft PDM Plan
without providing supporting data are
not as helpful. We particularly seek
comments concerning:
(1) Information and data on
contaminants from brown pelicans or
other seabirds near pelican nesting
colonies throughout the range of the
brown pelican that may affect our
selection of the areas to be monitored;
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:56 Sep 29, 2009
Jkt 217001
(2) The appropriateness of assaying
contaminants in brown pelicans and/or
their eggs every 5 years and reasons, if
any, for increasing or decreasing the
frequency of analysis; and
(3) The appropriateness of the areas
selected for monitoring and reasons, if
any, for modifying the survey areas,
including information related to the
number of nesting pairs and population
trends of brown pelicans outside the
survey areas in the Draft Monitoring
Plan.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone
number, electronic mail address, or
other personal identifying information
in your comment, you should be aware
that your entire document—including
your personal identifying information—
may be publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comments
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Authority: The authority for this action is
the Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
Alexandra Pitts,
Acting Regional Director, Fish and Wildlife
Service, Pacific Southwest Region.
[FR Doc. E9–23557 Filed 9–29–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R4–R–2009–N0117; 40136–1265–
0000–S3]
Black Bayou Lake National Wildlife
Refuge, Ouachita Parish, LA
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability: draft
comprehensive conservation plan and
environmental assessment; request for
comments.
SUMMARY: We, the Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service), announce the
availability of a draft comprehensive
conservation plan and environmental
assessment (Draft CCP/EA) for Black
Bayou Lake National Wildlife Refuge
(Black Bayou Lake NWR) for public
review and comment. In this Draft CCP/
EA, we describe the alternative we
propose to use to manage this refuge for
the 15 years following approval of the
final CCP.
DATES: To ensure consideration, we
must receive your written comments by
October 30, 2009.
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
50237
ADDRESSES: Send comments, questions,
and requests for information to: Ms.
Tina Chouinard, Refuge Planner, Fish
and Wildlife Service, 6772 Highway 76
South, Stanton, TN 38069, or by e-mail
to: tina_chouinard@fws.gov. The Draft
CCP/EA is available on compact disk or
in hard copy. The Draft CCP/EA may
also be accessed and downloaded from
the Service’s Internet Site: https://
southeast.fws.gov/planning.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Tina Chouinard; telephone: 731–432–
0981.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Introduction
With this notice, we continue the CCP
process for Black Bayou Lake NWR. We
started the process through a notice in
the Federal Register on May 8, 2008 (73
FR 26139).
Background
The CCP Process
The National Wildlife Refuge System
Improvement Act of 1997 (16 U.S.C.
668dd–668ee) (Improvement Act),
which amended the National Wildlife
Refuge System Administration Act of
1966, requires us to develop a CCP for
each national wildlife refuge. The
purpose for developing a CCP is to
provide refuge managers with a 15-year
strategy for achieving refuge purposes
and contributing toward the mission of
the National Wildlife Refuge System,
consistent with sound principles of fish
and wildlife management, conservation,
legal mandates, and our policies. In
addition to outlining broad management
direction on conserving wildlife and
their habitats, CCPs identify wildlifedependent recreational opportunities
available to the public, including
opportunities for hunting, fishing,
wildlife observation, wildlife
photography, and environmental
education and interpretation. We will
review and update the CCP at least
every 15 years in accordance with the
Improvement Act.
Black Bayou Lake NWR is a unit of
the North Louisiana National Wildlife
Refuge Complex. Other refuges in the
Complex include: D’Arbonne, Upper
Ouachita, Handy Brake, and Red River,
and the Louisiana Wetlands
Management District. Each refuge has
unique issues and has had separate
planning efforts and public
involvement.
Black Bayou Lake NWR, established
in 1997, is 3 miles north of the city of
Monroe, just east of Highway 165 in
Ouachita Parish, Louisiana. It contains
4,522 acres of wetland, bottomland
hardwood, and upland mixed pine/
E:\FR\FM\30SEN1.SGM
30SEN1
50238
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 188 / Wednesday, September 30, 2009 / Notices
CPrice-Sewell on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
hardwood habitats. Although the
suburban sprawl of the city of Monroe
abuts much of its boundary, the refuge
itself represents many habitat types and
is home to a diversity of plants and
animals. Black Bayou Lake NWR is
situated in the Mississippi Flyway, the
Mississippi Alluvial Valley Bird
Conservation Region, and the Lower
Mississippi River Ecosystem. The refuge
plays an important role regionally in
fulfilling the goals of the National
Wildlife Refuge System. Its close
proximity to the city of Monroe gives
the public opportunities to participate
in educational programs that promote
wildlife stewardship.
Black Bayou Lake NWR was
established for ‘‘* * * the conservation
of the wetlands of the Nation in order
to maintain the public benefits they
provide and to help fulfill international
obligations contained in various
migratory bird treaties and conventions
* * *’’ (16 U.S.C. 3901 (b)) (Wetlands
Resources Act).
The central physical feature of the
refuge is the lake itself. Black Bayou
Lake, consisting of approximately 1,500
acres, is studded with bald cypress and
water tupelo trees. The western half of
the lake is open and deeper, unlike the
eastern side, which is thick with trees
and emergent vegetation. The lake is
owned by the city of Monroe, which
manages the lake’s water level as a
secondary source of municipal water.
The Service has a 99-year free lease on
the lake and some of its surrounding
land, consisting of a total of 1,620 acres.
The refuge owns the remaining 2,902
acres, consisting of upland pine/
hardwood and bottomland hardwood
forests.
Significant issues addressed in this
Draft CCP/EA include: (1) Managing for
invasive species and species of special
concern, such as the alligator snapping
turtle; (2) managing mixed pine upland
and bottomland hardwood forests; (3)
land protection; (4) urban development
and wildlife management; (5)
maintaining the excellent
environmental education and
interpretation programs; and (6)
increasing resources.
CCP Alternatives, Including Our
Proposed Alternative
We developed three alternatives for
managing the refuge and chose
Alternative B as the proposed
alternative. A full description of each
alternative is in the Draft CCP/EA. We
summarize each alternative below.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:56 Sep 29, 2009
Jkt 217001
Alternative A—Current Management
Direction (No Action Alternative)
Black Bayou Lake NWR is part of the
Lower Mississippi River Ecosystem and
is considered to be in the Mississippi
Alluvial Valley Bird Conservation
Region. As such, Black Bayou Lake
NWR is a component of many regional
and ecosystem conservation planning
initiatives. Under Alternative A, we
would continue management of the
refuge at its current level of
participation in these initiatives
throughout the 15-year duration of the
CCP. Current approaches to managing
wildlife and habitats, protecting
resources, and allowing for public use
would remain unchanged.
The mix of habitats on the refuge,
including bottomland hardwood and
upland pine hardwood forests, would be
restored and managed appropriately. We
would continue to work with partners to
acquire lands within the current refuge
boundary. We would continue to
provide habitat for native wildlife
species, wintering waterfowl, and yearround habitat for nesting wood ducks.
We would also maintain the current
habitat mix to benefit other migratory
birds. We would continue existing
surveys to monitor long-term population
trends and health of migratory and
resident species.
We would work with volunteers to
maintain the current public use and
environmental education programs on
the refuge. We would continue to serve
the public and the Complex with a
quality wildlife-dependent visitor
services program.
Alternative B—Optimize Biological
Program and Visitor Services (Proposed
Alternative)
Under Alternative B, we would strive
to optimize both our biological program
and visitor services program. We would
continue to provide habitat for resident
wildlife species and would aim to
increase our knowledge of migratory
birds, reptiles, amphibians,
invertebrates, and species of special
concern, such as the alligator snapping
turtle, by developing and implementing
monitoring programs. We would use our
resources to create and/or maintain a
variety of habitats compatible with
historic habitat types. Efforts to control
invasive species would increase.
Under Alternative B, land acquisition,
bottomland hardwood forest
management, and resource protection
would be intensified. In the Private
Lands Program, we would work with
private landowners on adjacent tracts to
manage and improve habitats.
Under Alternative B, we would hire a
fulltime law enforcement officer, a
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
refuge operations specialist, a
maintenance worker, and a park ranger
(visitor services). With regard to cultural
resources, including those of an
archaeological or historical nature,
within 15 years of CCP approval, we
would develop and begin to implement
a Cultural Resources Management Plan.
Public use and environmental
education programs would be enhanced
with the addition of two park rangers
(visitor services and law enforcement).
Within 3 years of CCP completion, we
would develop a Visitor Services Plan to
guide us in maintaining quality public
use facilities and opportunities on the
refuge.
Over the 15-year life of the CCP, we
would increase environmental
education and interpretation
opportunities to emphasize the
importance of the refuge’s habitats and
resources.
Alternative C—Minimize Management
and Public Use Management
This alternative would minimize
wildlife and habitat management and
the public use program. Baseline
inventorying and monitoring programs
would be eliminated; monitoring for
changes in trends would not be
necessary to achieve the purposes of the
refuge.
Public use would be maintained and
monitored for impacts to wildlife.
Fishing, environmental education, and
wildlife observation and photography
would be accommodated the same as
under the No Action Alternative.
Waterfowl hunting would be
eliminated. Staffing would remain the
same as under the No Action
Alternative.
Next Step
After the comment period ends, we
will analyze the comments and address
them.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone
number, e-mail address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Authority
This notice is published under the
authority of the National Wildlife
Refuge System Improvement Act of
1997, Public Law 105–57.
E:\FR\FM\30SEN1.SGM
30SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 188 / Wednesday, September 30, 2009 / Notices
Dated: July 13, 2009.
Cynthia K. Dohner,
Acting Regional Director.
[FR Doc. E9–23559 Filed 9–29–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R8–ES–2009–N141; 80221–1112–
0000–F2]
Amendment of the Clark County
Multiple Species Habitat Conservation
Plan and Issuance of an Amended
Incidental Take Permit, Clark County,
NV
CPrice-Sewell on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS);
and notice of public scoping meetings.
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), are advising
the public that we intend to gather
information necessary to prepare an EIS,
under the National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA), on the proposed
amendment of the Clark County
Multiple Species Habitat Conservation
Plan (MSHCP) and Incidental Take
Permit (ITP). The proposed amendment
is being prepared under section
10(a)(1)(B) of the Endangered Species
Act of 1973, as amended. The
Permittees are proposing to increase the
amount of species habitat disturbance
that is authorized under the existing
MSHCP and ITP, expand the
conservation program to minimize and
mitigate for the increased disturbance,
reduce the number of covered species,
and revise the permit term of the
MSHCP Amendment to 50 years. We
provide this notice to obtain
suggestions, comments, and useful
information from other agencies and the
public on the scope of the document,
including the significant issues
deserving of study, the range of
alternatives, and the range of impacts to
be considered.
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before October 30, 2009.
Four public scoping meetings will be
held on:
1. Monday, October 19, 2009, from 6
p.m. to 8 p.m., Las Vegas, NV.
2. Wednesday, October 21, 2009, from
6 p.m. to 8 p.m., Searchlight, NV.
3. Thursday, October 22, 2009, from 6
p.m. to 8 p.m., Henderson, NV.
4. Monday, October 26, 2009, from 6
p.m. to 8 p.m., Overton, NV.
ADDRESSES: Public meetings will be
held at the following locations:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:56 Sep 29, 2009
Jkt 217001
1. Monday, October 19, 2009, at the
Clark County Library, Jewel Box
Theater, 1401 East Flamingo Road, Las
Vegas, NV 89119.
2. Wednesday, October 21, 2009, at
the Searchlight Community Center, 200
Michael Wendell Way, Searchlight, NV
89046.
3. Thursday, October 22, 2009, at the
PBS&J, 2270 Corporate Circle,
Henderson, NV 89074.
4. Monday, October 26, 2009, at the
Moapa Valley Community Center, 320
North Moapa Valley Boulevard,
Overton, NV 89040.
Information, written comments, or
questions related to the preparation of
the EIS and the NEPA process should be
submitted to Robert D. Williams,
Nevada Fish and Wildlife Office, 4701
North Torrey Pines Drive, Las Vegas, NV
89130, facsimile: 702–515–5231.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeri
Krueger, Habitat Conservation Planning
Coordinator, Nevada Fish and Wildlife
Office, 4701 North Torrey Pines Drive,
Las Vegas, NV 89130; telephone: 702–
515–5230.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
notice advises the public that the
Service intends to gather information
necessary to determine the scope of
issues and impacts, and to formulate
alternatives for the EIS related to the
issuance of an amended ITP to Clark
County, Nevada; the cities of Boulder
City, Henderson, Las Vegas, Mesquite,
and North Las Vegas, Nevada (Cities);
and the Nevada Department of
Transportation (NDOT).
Background
Section 9 of the Endangered Species
Act, as amended (Act; 16 U.S.C. 1531 et
seq.) and Federal regulations prohibit
the ‘‘take’’ of a fish or wildlife species
listed as endangered or threatened.
Under the Act, the following activities
are defined as take: To harass, harm,
pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap,
capture or collect listed wildlife species,
or attempt to engage in such conduct (16
U.S.C. 1532). However, under section
10(a)(1)(B) of the Act, we may issue
permits to authorize ‘‘incidental take’’ of
listed wildlife species. Incidental take is
defined by the Act as take that is
incidental to, and not the purpose of,
carrying out an otherwise lawful
activity. Regulations governing permits
for endangered and threatened species
are at 50 CFR 17.22 and 50 CFR 17.32,
respectively.
Clark County, the Cities, and NDOT
currently hold a permit for incidental
take of 78 covered species (Permit #
TE034927–0), including the Federally
threatened desert tortoise (Gopherus
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
50239
agassizii) and the Federally endangered
southwestern willow flycatcher
(Empidonax traillii extimus), by the
development of up to 145,000 acres in
Clark County, Nevada. The Notice of
Availability (65 FR 57366) for the Final
HCP and EIS was published on
September 22, 2000. The permit was
effective as of February 1, 2001, and
expires on January 31, 2031. Activities
included in the MSHCP for the
permitted projects include, but are not
limited to, residential and commercial
development, utility and transportation
facilities and other capital
improvements and operations activities,
flood control, development of urban
parks and recreation facilities.
Multiple Species Habitat Conservation
Plan Amendment
Clark County, the Cities, and NDOT
intend to request a permit amendment
for the incidental take of covered
species on up to 215,000 additional
acres in Clark County, Nevada.
Activities proposed to be covered by the
MSHCP amendment are not likely to
change from the existing MSHCP, and
may include, but are not limited to,
residential and commercial
development, utility and transportation
facilities and other capital
improvements and operations activities,
flood control, and development of urban
parks and recreation facilities.
Section 10(a)(1)(B) of the Act provides
for permitting non-Federal entities to
incidentally take threatened and
endangered species when the entity
submits a conservation plan that
specifies:
(i) The impact which will likely result
from such taking;
(ii) What steps the applicant will take
to minimize and mitigate such impacts,
and the funding that will be available to
implement such steps;
(iii) What alternative actions to such
taking the applicant considered and the
reasons why such alternatives are being
utilized; and
(iv) Such other measures the Service
may require as being necessary or
appropriate for purposes of the plan.
If the Service finds, after opportunity
for public comment, with respect to a
permit application and the related
conservation plan that:
(i) The taking will be incidental;
(ii) The applicant will, to the
maximum extent practicable, minimize
and mitigate the impacts of such taking;
(iii) The applicant will ensure that
adequate funding for the plan will be
provided;
(iv) The taking will not appreciably
reduce the likelihood of survival and
recovery of the species in the wild; and
E:\FR\FM\30SEN1.SGM
30SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 188 (Wednesday, September 30, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50237-50239]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-23559]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R4-R-2009-N0117; 40136-1265-0000-S3]
Black Bayou Lake National Wildlife Refuge, Ouachita Parish, LA
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability: draft comprehensive conservation plan
and environmental assessment; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), announce the
availability of a draft comprehensive conservation plan and
environmental assessment (Draft CCP/EA) for Black Bayou Lake National
Wildlife Refuge (Black Bayou Lake NWR) for public review and comment.
In this Draft CCP/EA, we describe the alternative we propose to use to
manage this refuge for the 15 years following approval of the final
CCP.
DATES: To ensure consideration, we must receive your written comments
by October 30, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Send comments, questions, and requests for information to:
Ms. Tina Chouinard, Refuge Planner, Fish and Wildlife Service, 6772
Highway 76 South, Stanton, TN 38069, or by e-mail to: tina_chouinard@fws.gov. The Draft CCP/EA is available on compact disk or in
hard copy. The Draft CCP/EA may also be accessed and downloaded from
the Service's Internet Site: https://southeast.fws.gov/planning.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Tina Chouinard; telephone: 731-
432-0981.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Introduction
With this notice, we continue the CCP process for Black Bayou Lake
NWR. We started the process through a notice in the Federal Register on
May 8, 2008 (73 FR 26139).
Background
The CCP Process
The National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997 (16
U.S.C. 668dd-668ee) (Improvement Act), which amended the National
Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966, requires us to
develop a CCP for each national wildlife refuge. The purpose for
developing a CCP is to provide refuge managers with a 15-year strategy
for achieving refuge purposes and contributing toward the mission of
the National Wildlife Refuge System, consistent with sound principles
of fish and wildlife management, conservation, legal mandates, and our
policies. In addition to outlining broad management direction on
conserving wildlife and their habitats, CCPs identify wildlife-
dependent recreational opportunities available to the public, including
opportunities for hunting, fishing, wildlife observation, wildlife
photography, and environmental education and interpretation. We will
review and update the CCP at least every 15 years in accordance with
the Improvement Act.
Black Bayou Lake NWR is a unit of the North Louisiana National
Wildlife Refuge Complex. Other refuges in the Complex include:
D'Arbonne, Upper Ouachita, Handy Brake, and Red River, and the
Louisiana Wetlands Management District. Each refuge has unique issues
and has had separate planning efforts and public involvement.
Black Bayou Lake NWR, established in 1997, is 3 miles north of the
city of Monroe, just east of Highway 165 in Ouachita Parish, Louisiana.
It contains 4,522 acres of wetland, bottomland hardwood, and upland
mixed pine/
[[Page 50238]]
hardwood habitats. Although the suburban sprawl of the city of Monroe
abuts much of its boundary, the refuge itself represents many habitat
types and is home to a diversity of plants and animals. Black Bayou
Lake NWR is situated in the Mississippi Flyway, the Mississippi
Alluvial Valley Bird Conservation Region, and the Lower Mississippi
River Ecosystem. The refuge plays an important role regionally in
fulfilling the goals of the National Wildlife Refuge System. Its close
proximity to the city of Monroe gives the public opportunities to
participate in educational programs that promote wildlife stewardship.
Black Bayou Lake NWR was established for ``* * * the conservation
of the wetlands of the Nation in order to maintain the public benefits
they provide and to help fulfill international obligations contained in
various migratory bird treaties and conventions * * *'' (16 U.S.C. 3901
(b)) (Wetlands Resources Act).
The central physical feature of the refuge is the lake itself.
Black Bayou Lake, consisting of approximately 1,500 acres, is studded
with bald cypress and water tupelo trees. The western half of the lake
is open and deeper, unlike the eastern side, which is thick with trees
and emergent vegetation. The lake is owned by the city of Monroe, which
manages the lake's water level as a secondary source of municipal
water. The Service has a 99-year free lease on the lake and some of its
surrounding land, consisting of a total of 1,620 acres. The refuge owns
the remaining 2,902 acres, consisting of upland pine/hardwood and
bottomland hardwood forests.
Significant issues addressed in this Draft CCP/EA include: (1)
Managing for invasive species and species of special concern, such as
the alligator snapping turtle; (2) managing mixed pine upland and
bottomland hardwood forests; (3) land protection; (4) urban development
and wildlife management; (5) maintaining the excellent environmental
education and interpretation programs; and (6) increasing resources.
CCP Alternatives, Including Our Proposed Alternative
We developed three alternatives for managing the refuge and chose
Alternative B as the proposed alternative. A full description of each
alternative is in the Draft CCP/EA. We summarize each alternative
below.
Alternative A--Current Management Direction (No Action Alternative)
Black Bayou Lake NWR is part of the Lower Mississippi River
Ecosystem and is considered to be in the Mississippi Alluvial Valley
Bird Conservation Region. As such, Black Bayou Lake NWR is a component
of many regional and ecosystem conservation planning initiatives. Under
Alternative A, we would continue management of the refuge at its
current level of participation in these initiatives throughout the 15-
year duration of the CCP. Current approaches to managing wildlife and
habitats, protecting resources, and allowing for public use would
remain unchanged.
The mix of habitats on the refuge, including bottomland hardwood
and upland pine hardwood forests, would be restored and managed
appropriately. We would continue to work with partners to acquire lands
within the current refuge boundary. We would continue to provide
habitat for native wildlife species, wintering waterfowl, and year-
round habitat for nesting wood ducks. We would also maintain the
current habitat mix to benefit other migratory birds. We would continue
existing surveys to monitor long-term population trends and health of
migratory and resident species.
We would work with volunteers to maintain the current public use
and environmental education programs on the refuge. We would continue
to serve the public and the Complex with a quality wildlife-dependent
visitor services program.
Alternative B--Optimize Biological Program and Visitor Services
(Proposed Alternative)
Under Alternative B, we would strive to optimize both our
biological program and visitor services program. We would continue to
provide habitat for resident wildlife species and would aim to increase
our knowledge of migratory birds, reptiles, amphibians, invertebrates,
and species of special concern, such as the alligator snapping turtle,
by developing and implementing monitoring programs. We would use our
resources to create and/or maintain a variety of habitats compatible
with historic habitat types. Efforts to control invasive species would
increase.
Under Alternative B, land acquisition, bottomland hardwood forest
management, and resource protection would be intensified. In the
Private Lands Program, we would work with private landowners on
adjacent tracts to manage and improve habitats.
Under Alternative B, we would hire a fulltime law enforcement
officer, a refuge operations specialist, a maintenance worker, and a
park ranger (visitor services). With regard to cultural resources,
including those of an archaeological or historical nature, within 15
years of CCP approval, we would develop and begin to implement a
Cultural Resources Management Plan.
Public use and environmental education programs would be enhanced
with the addition of two park rangers (visitor services and law
enforcement). Within 3 years of CCP completion, we would develop a
Visitor Services Plan to guide us in maintaining quality public use
facilities and opportunities on the refuge.
Over the 15-year life of the CCP, we would increase environmental
education and interpretation opportunities to emphasize the importance
of the refuge's habitats and resources.
Alternative C--Minimize Management and Public Use Management
This alternative would minimize wildlife and habitat management and
the public use program. Baseline inventorying and monitoring programs
would be eliminated; monitoring for changes in trends would not be
necessary to achieve the purposes of the refuge.
Public use would be maintained and monitored for impacts to
wildlife. Fishing, environmental education, and wildlife observation
and photography would be accommodated the same as under the No Action
Alternative. Waterfowl hunting would be eliminated. Staffing would
remain the same as under the No Action Alternative.
Next Step
After the comment period ends, we will analyze the comments and
address them.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so.
Authority
This notice is published under the authority of the National
Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997, Public Law 105-57.
[[Page 50239]]
Dated: July 13, 2009.
Cynthia K. Dohner,
Acting Regional Director.
[FR Doc. E9-23559 Filed 9-29-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P