Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Draft Post-Delisting Monitoring Plan for the Brown Pelican (Pelecanus occidentalis), 50236-50237 [E9-23557]
Download as PDF
50236
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 188 / Wednesday, September 30, 2009 / Notices
We request input as to which issues
affecting management or public use
should be addressed during the
planning process. We are especially
interested in receiving public input in
the following areas:
(a) What do you value most about this
Refuge?
(b) What problems or issues do you
see affecting management of this
Refuge?
(c) What changes, if any, would you
like to see in the management of this
Refuge?
We provide the above questions for your
optional use. We have no requirement
that you provide information; however,
any comments the planning team
receives will be used as part of the
planning process.
Public Meetings
We will give the public an
opportunity to provide input at a public
meeting to be scheduled for fall 2009.
You can obtain the schedule from the
planning team leader or the Refuge
office (see ADDRESSES). Exact dates and
times for these public meetings are yet
to be determined, but will be announced
via local and State media, the Region 6
planning Web site at https://
www.fws.gov/mountain-prairie/
planning/ccp.htm, and a planning
update. If you would like to be notified
of this meeting by mail, please provide
your mailing address to the planning
team leader (ADDRESSES). There will be
additional opportunities to provide
public input once we have prepared a
draft CCP.
Public Availability of Comments
CPrice-Sewell on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Before including your address, phone
number, e-mail address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Dated: September 8, 2009.
Noreen E. Walsh,
Deputy Regional Director.
[FR Doc. E9–23551 Filed 9–29–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R8–ES–2009–N163; 80221–1113–
0000–D3]
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants; Draft Post-Delisting
Monitoring Plan for the Brown Pelican
(Pelecanus occidentalis)
AGENCY: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of document availability
for review and comment.
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), announce the
availability of the draft post-delisting
monitoring plan for the brown pelican
(Pelecanus occidentalis) (draft PDM
Plan, Draft Monitoring Plan). The
Endangered Species Act (Act) requires
that we implement a system, in
cooperation with the States, to monitor
effectively, for at least 5 years, the status
of all species that have been recovered
and no longer need the protection
afforded by the Act (i.e. delisted). The
brown pelican has been proposed to be
removed from the Federal List of
Threatened and Endangered Wildlife
and Plants due to recovery. If the brown
pelican is removed from the list, we
propose to monitor the status of the
brown pelican over a 10-year period
from 2010 through 2020, through annual
evaluation of information collected by
the States of California, Texas, and
Louisiana; the Commonwealth of Puerto
Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands in the
West Indies; Mexico; other partners; and
the Service.
DATES: To ensure consideration, please
send your written comments by October
30, 2009.
ADDRESSES: An electronic copy of the
Draft Monitoring Plan will be available
on the Internet at https://www.fws.gov/
Ventura. Requests for copies of the Draft
Monitoring Plan and submission of
written comments or materials regarding
the plan should be addressed to Field
Supervisor, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, Ventura Fish and Wildlife
Office, 2493 Portola Road, Suite B,
Ventura, CA 93003. The Draft
Monitoring Plan, reference materials,
and submitted comments regarding the
Draft Monitoring Plan will also be
available for inspection, by
appointment, during normal business
hours at the above address. You may
also submit electronic comments on the
Draft Monitoring Plan to:
FW8pelicanmonitoring@fws.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael McCrary, Listing and Recovery
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:56 Sep 29, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Coordinator, at the above address or at
telephone 805–644–1766, extension
372. If you use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD), call the
Federal Information Relay Service
(FIRS) at 800–877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On February 20, 2008, we published
a proposed rule to remove the brown
pelican from the Federal List of
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
(List) due to recovery (73 FR 9408), with
a 60-day comment period that closed on
April 21, 2008. Our proposed rule
concluded that the primary reason for
severe declines in the brown pelican
population in the United States, and for
designating the species as endangered,
was DDT contamination in the 1960s
and early 1970s. Banning of DDT, along
with other recovery actions, has resulted
in increased population numbers and
reproductive success, and information
now indicates that major threats to
brown pelicans have been reduced,
managed, or eliminated. We are
currently reviewing comments we
received on the proposed rule and
preparing responses as appropriate.
Section 4(g) of the Act requires the
Secretary of the Interior to implement a
system in cooperation with the States to
monitor effectively for not less than 5
years the status of any species that is
delisted due to recovery. The intent of
this monitoring is to determine whether
the species should be proposed for
relisting under the normal listing
procedures, relisted under the
emergency listing authority of the Act,
or kept off of the List because it remains
neither threatened nor endangered.
Brown pelican populations currently
listed under the Act breed along the
coast of the Gulf of Mexico from
Mississippi to Texas; along the Pacific
Coast from southern California, south
through Mexico into Central and South
America; and in the West Indies
(Shields 2002, pp. 2–4). Additional
information about the brown pelican’s
biology and life history can be found in
the Birds of North America, No. 609
(Shields 2002, pp. 1–36).
The brown pelican draft PDM Plan
was developed in cooperation with the
State resources agencies of California,
Louisiana, and Texas and the
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. If the
brown pelican is removed from the
Federal List of Threatened and
Endangered Wildlife and Plants, our
Ventura Fish and Wildlife Office will be
the lead office responsible for this
monitoring effort, and will coordinate
all phases of implementation of the plan
and ensure that monitoring
E:\FR\FM\30SEN1.SGM
30SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 188 / Wednesday, September 30, 2009 / Notices
requirements outlined within the plan
are accomplished. The draft PDM Plan
proposes to conduct monitoring
annually for at least 10 years. Postdelisting monitoring of the brown
pelican will consist primarily of annual
collection of information on colony
occupancy and number of nesting pairs.
Information on contaminants will also
be collected at 5-year intervals
beginning with the first year.
Post-delisting monitoring of the
brown pelican will be focused along the
Gulf coast of Louisiana and Texas; the
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and the
U.S. Virgin Islands in the West Indies;
the Pacific coast of southern California
and Baja California, Mexico; and the
Gulf of California. We will be
monitoring these areas because: (1)
Existing population data are available
for these areas for comparison with data
to be collected during post-delisting
monitoring; (2) these populations were
among some of the largest (outside of
those in Peru) prior to listing (73 FR
9408); and (3) these populations
suffered the greatest declines in
productivity and abundance that led to
the listing of the species. Additionally,
we have no evidence that brown
pelicans outside these areas ever
suffered declines in response to
persistent organic pesticides. We are
also interested in any information that
may suggest a new or increasing threat
that may impact the brown pelican in
other parts of its range proposed for
delisting under the Act but not covered
by this Draft Monitoring Plan.
CPrice-Sewell on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Request for Public Comments
We solicit written comments on the
Draft Monitoring Plan described in this
notice. All comments received by the
date specified above will be considered
in development of a final post-delisting
monitoring plan for the brown pelican.
We will take into consideration the
relevant comments, suggestions, or
objections that we receive by the
comment due date indicated above in
the DATES section. These comments,
suggestions, or objections, and any
additional information we receive, may
lead us to adopt a final PDM Plan that
differs from this draft PDM Plan.
Comments merely stating support or
opposition to the draft PDM Plan
without providing supporting data are
not as helpful. We particularly seek
comments concerning:
(1) Information and data on
contaminants from brown pelicans or
other seabirds near pelican nesting
colonies throughout the range of the
brown pelican that may affect our
selection of the areas to be monitored;
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:56 Sep 29, 2009
Jkt 217001
(2) The appropriateness of assaying
contaminants in brown pelicans and/or
their eggs every 5 years and reasons, if
any, for increasing or decreasing the
frequency of analysis; and
(3) The appropriateness of the areas
selected for monitoring and reasons, if
any, for modifying the survey areas,
including information related to the
number of nesting pairs and population
trends of brown pelicans outside the
survey areas in the Draft Monitoring
Plan.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone
number, electronic mail address, or
other personal identifying information
in your comment, you should be aware
that your entire document—including
your personal identifying information—
may be publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comments
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Authority: The authority for this action is
the Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
Alexandra Pitts,
Acting Regional Director, Fish and Wildlife
Service, Pacific Southwest Region.
[FR Doc. E9–23557 Filed 9–29–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R4–R–2009–N0117; 40136–1265–
0000–S3]
Black Bayou Lake National Wildlife
Refuge, Ouachita Parish, LA
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability: draft
comprehensive conservation plan and
environmental assessment; request for
comments.
SUMMARY: We, the Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service), announce the
availability of a draft comprehensive
conservation plan and environmental
assessment (Draft CCP/EA) for Black
Bayou Lake National Wildlife Refuge
(Black Bayou Lake NWR) for public
review and comment. In this Draft CCP/
EA, we describe the alternative we
propose to use to manage this refuge for
the 15 years following approval of the
final CCP.
DATES: To ensure consideration, we
must receive your written comments by
October 30, 2009.
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
50237
ADDRESSES: Send comments, questions,
and requests for information to: Ms.
Tina Chouinard, Refuge Planner, Fish
and Wildlife Service, 6772 Highway 76
South, Stanton, TN 38069, or by e-mail
to: tina_chouinard@fws.gov. The Draft
CCP/EA is available on compact disk or
in hard copy. The Draft CCP/EA may
also be accessed and downloaded from
the Service’s Internet Site: https://
southeast.fws.gov/planning.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Tina Chouinard; telephone: 731–432–
0981.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Introduction
With this notice, we continue the CCP
process for Black Bayou Lake NWR. We
started the process through a notice in
the Federal Register on May 8, 2008 (73
FR 26139).
Background
The CCP Process
The National Wildlife Refuge System
Improvement Act of 1997 (16 U.S.C.
668dd–668ee) (Improvement Act),
which amended the National Wildlife
Refuge System Administration Act of
1966, requires us to develop a CCP for
each national wildlife refuge. The
purpose for developing a CCP is to
provide refuge managers with a 15-year
strategy for achieving refuge purposes
and contributing toward the mission of
the National Wildlife Refuge System,
consistent with sound principles of fish
and wildlife management, conservation,
legal mandates, and our policies. In
addition to outlining broad management
direction on conserving wildlife and
their habitats, CCPs identify wildlifedependent recreational opportunities
available to the public, including
opportunities for hunting, fishing,
wildlife observation, wildlife
photography, and environmental
education and interpretation. We will
review and update the CCP at least
every 15 years in accordance with the
Improvement Act.
Black Bayou Lake NWR is a unit of
the North Louisiana National Wildlife
Refuge Complex. Other refuges in the
Complex include: D’Arbonne, Upper
Ouachita, Handy Brake, and Red River,
and the Louisiana Wetlands
Management District. Each refuge has
unique issues and has had separate
planning efforts and public
involvement.
Black Bayou Lake NWR, established
in 1997, is 3 miles north of the city of
Monroe, just east of Highway 165 in
Ouachita Parish, Louisiana. It contains
4,522 acres of wetland, bottomland
hardwood, and upland mixed pine/
E:\FR\FM\30SEN1.SGM
30SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 188 (Wednesday, September 30, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50236-50237]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-23557]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R8-ES-2009-N163; 80221-1113-0000-D3]
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Draft Post-
Delisting Monitoring Plan for the Brown Pelican (Pelecanus
occidentalis)
AGENCY: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of document availability for review and comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), announce the
availability of the draft post-delisting monitoring plan for the brown
pelican (Pelecanus occidentalis) (draft PDM Plan, Draft Monitoring
Plan). The Endangered Species Act (Act) requires that we implement a
system, in cooperation with the States, to monitor effectively, for at
least 5 years, the status of all species that have been recovered and
no longer need the protection afforded by the Act (i.e. delisted). The
brown pelican has been proposed to be removed from the Federal List of
Threatened and Endangered Wildlife and Plants due to recovery. If the
brown pelican is removed from the list, we propose to monitor the
status of the brown pelican over a 10-year period from 2010 through
2020, through annual evaluation of information collected by the States
of California, Texas, and Louisiana; the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico
and the U.S. Virgin Islands in the West Indies; Mexico; other partners;
and the Service.
DATES: To ensure consideration, please send your written comments by
October 30, 2009.
ADDRESSES: An electronic copy of the Draft Monitoring Plan will be
available on the Internet at https://www.fws.gov/Ventura. Requests for
copies of the Draft Monitoring Plan and submission of written comments
or materials regarding the plan should be addressed to Field
Supervisor, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Ventura Fish and Wildlife
Office, 2493 Portola Road, Suite B, Ventura, CA 93003. The Draft
Monitoring Plan, reference materials, and submitted comments regarding
the Draft Monitoring Plan will also be available for inspection, by
appointment, during normal business hours at the above address. You may
also submit electronic comments on the Draft Monitoring Plan to:
FW8pelicanmonitoring@fws.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael McCrary, Listing and Recovery
Coordinator, at the above address or at telephone 805-644-1766,
extension 372. If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf
(TDD), call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 800-877-
8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On February 20, 2008, we published a proposed rule to remove the
brown pelican from the Federal List of Endangered and Threatened
Wildlife (List) due to recovery (73 FR 9408), with a 60-day comment
period that closed on April 21, 2008. Our proposed rule concluded that
the primary reason for severe declines in the brown pelican population
in the United States, and for designating the species as endangered,
was DDT contamination in the 1960s and early 1970s. Banning of DDT,
along with other recovery actions, has resulted in increased population
numbers and reproductive success, and information now indicates that
major threats to brown pelicans have been reduced, managed, or
eliminated. We are currently reviewing comments we received on the
proposed rule and preparing responses as appropriate.
Section 4(g) of the Act requires the Secretary of the Interior to
implement a system in cooperation with the States to monitor
effectively for not less than 5 years the status of any species that is
delisted due to recovery. The intent of this monitoring is to determine
whether the species should be proposed for relisting under the normal
listing procedures, relisted under the emergency listing authority of
the Act, or kept off of the List because it remains neither threatened
nor endangered.
Brown pelican populations currently listed under the Act breed
along the coast of the Gulf of Mexico from Mississippi to Texas; along
the Pacific Coast from southern California, south through Mexico into
Central and South America; and in the West Indies (Shields 2002, pp. 2-
4). Additional information about the brown pelican's biology and life
history can be found in the Birds of North America, No. 609 (Shields
2002, pp. 1-36).
The brown pelican draft PDM Plan was developed in cooperation with
the State resources agencies of California, Louisiana, and Texas and
the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. If the brown pelican is removed from
the Federal List of Threatened and Endangered Wildlife and Plants, our
Ventura Fish and Wildlife Office will be the lead office responsible
for this monitoring effort, and will coordinate all phases of
implementation of the plan and ensure that monitoring
[[Page 50237]]
requirements outlined within the plan are accomplished. The draft PDM
Plan proposes to conduct monitoring annually for at least 10 years.
Post-delisting monitoring of the brown pelican will consist primarily
of annual collection of information on colony occupancy and number of
nesting pairs. Information on contaminants will also be collected at 5-
year intervals beginning with the first year.
Post-delisting monitoring of the brown pelican will be focused
along the Gulf coast of Louisiana and Texas; the Commonwealth of Puerto
Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands in the West Indies; the Pacific coast
of southern California and Baja California, Mexico; and the Gulf of
California. We will be monitoring these areas because: (1) Existing
population data are available for these areas for comparison with data
to be collected during post-delisting monitoring; (2) these populations
were among some of the largest (outside of those in Peru) prior to
listing (73 FR 9408); and (3) these populations suffered the greatest
declines in productivity and abundance that led to the listing of the
species. Additionally, we have no evidence that brown pelicans outside
these areas ever suffered declines in response to persistent organic
pesticides. We are also interested in any information that may suggest
a new or increasing threat that may impact the brown pelican in other
parts of its range proposed for delisting under the Act but not covered
by this Draft Monitoring Plan.
Request for Public Comments
We solicit written comments on the Draft Monitoring Plan described
in this notice. All comments received by the date specified above will
be considered in development of a final post-delisting monitoring plan
for the brown pelican. We will take into consideration the relevant
comments, suggestions, or objections that we receive by the comment due
date indicated above in the DATES section. These comments, suggestions,
or objections, and any additional information we receive, may lead us
to adopt a final PDM Plan that differs from this draft PDM Plan.
Comments merely stating support or opposition to the draft PDM Plan
without providing supporting data are not as helpful. We particularly
seek comments concerning:
(1) Information and data on contaminants from brown pelicans or
other seabirds near pelican nesting colonies throughout the range of
the brown pelican that may affect our selection of the areas to be
monitored;
(2) The appropriateness of assaying contaminants in brown pelicans
and/or their eggs every 5 years and reasons, if any, for increasing or
decreasing the frequency of analysis; and
(3) The appropriateness of the areas selected for monitoring and
reasons, if any, for modifying the survey areas, including information
related to the number of nesting pairs and population trends of brown
pelicans outside the survey areas in the Draft Monitoring Plan.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone number, electronic mail
address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you
should be aware that your entire document--including your personal
identifying information--may be publicly available at any time. While
you can ask us in your comments to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so.
Authority: The authority for this action is the Act (16 U.S.C.
1531 et seq.).
Alexandra Pitts,
Acting Regional Director, Fish and Wildlife Service, Pacific Southwest
Region.
[FR Doc. E9-23557 Filed 9-29-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P