Definition of Omission From Gross Income, 49321-49323 [E9-23426]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 186 / Monday, September 28, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 301
[TD 9466]
RIN 1545–BI94
Definition of Omission From Gross
Income
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Final and temporary regulation.
CPrice-Sewell on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY: This document contains
temporary regulations (replacing an
existing final regulation) defining an
omission from gross income for
purposes of the six-year minimum
period for assessment of tax attributable
to partnership items and the six-year
period for assessing tax. The temporary
regulations resolve a continuing issue as
to whether an overstatement of basis in
a sold asset results in an omission from
gross income. The regulations will affect
any taxpayer who overstates basis in a
sold asset creating an omission from
gross income exceeding twenty-five
percent of the income stated in the
return. The text of these temporary
regulations also serves as the text of the
proposed regulations set forth in the
notice of proposed rulemaking on this
subject in the Proposed Rules section in
this issue of the Federal Register.
DATES: Effective date: These regulations
are effective on September 24, 2009.
Applicability date: The rules of this
section apply to taxable years with
respect to which the applicable period
for assessing tax did not expire before
September 24, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
William A. Heard III at (202) 622–4570
(not a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background and Explanation of
Provisions
These temporary regulations amend
the Procedure and Administration
Regulations (26 CFR part 301) relating to
sections 6229(c)(2) and 6501(e). Section
6229(c)(2) provides that if a partnership
‘‘omits from gross income an amount
properly includible therein which is in
excess of 25 percent of the amount of
gross income stated’’ in its return, the
minimum period for assessing tax
attributable to its partnership items is
extended to six years. The quoted
language is identical to language used in
section 6501(e). An omission from gross
income is not further defined in section
6229(c) as it is in section 6501(e)(1)(A).
But, as noted by the courts, section
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:30 Sep 25, 2009
Jkt 217001
6229(c) merely serves to extend the
section 6501 period for each separate
partner to a minimum expiration date
computed from the date the partnership
return is filed or due to be filed,
whichever is later. See section
6501(n)(2). In extending each partner’s
section 6501 period under section 6229,
Congress is presumed to give the
language in section 6229, which is
identical to language in section 6501,
identical meaning. Having defined a
phrase in section 6501, Congress need
not redefine the same phrase when it is
later used to extend that same statute of
limitations. Ascribing a different
interpretation to an identical phrase
would result in partners being treated
differently based on the happenstance of
whether the transaction is reported on a
partnership return rather than on a
partner’s return. For instance, in Son of
Boss transactions described in Notice
2000–44, 2000–2 CB 255 (Sept. 5, 2000),
gross income can be generated by the
partnership when it sells an inflated
basis asset, or directly by the partner if
the asset is first distributed to the
partner before being sold. Thus, section
6501(e)(1)(A) defines an omission from
gross income both for purposes of
section 6501 and for any extension of
section 6501 under section 6229. The
temporary regulations confirm this
point. Further, in light of the different
interpretations given by courts to the
meaning of section 6501(e)(1)(A), the
temporary regulations clarify the
meaning of this section. See
§ 601.601(d)(2)(ii)(b).
Section 6501(e)(1)(A) provides that if
the taxpayer omits from gross income an
amount properly includible therein that
is in excess of 25 percent of the amount
of gross income stated in the return, the
tax may be assessed, or a proceeding in
court for the collection of such tax may
be begun without assessment, at any
time within 6 years after the return was
filed. Subsection (i) of this provision
provides that, in the case of a trade or
business, the term gross income means
the total of the amounts received or
accrued from the sale of goods or
services (if such amounts are required to
be shown on the return) prior to
diminution by the cost of such sales or
services.
These temporary regulations clarify
that, outside of the trade or business
context, gross income for purposes of
sections 6501(e)(1)(A) and 6229(c)(2)
has the same meaning as gross income
as defined in section 61(a). Under
section 61(a), gross income includes
‘‘gains derived from dealings in
property’’ and the regulations under
section 61(a) further explain that gain
equals ‘‘the excess of the amount
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
49321
realized over the unrecovered cost or
other basis for the property sold or
exchanged.’’ Accordingly, outside the
context of a trade or business, any basis
overstatement that leads to an
understatement of gross income under
section 61(a) constitutes an omission
from gross income for purposes of
sections 6501(e)(1)(A) and 6229(c)(2).
Relying on the Supreme Court’s
opinion in Colony v. Commissioner, 357
U.S. 28 (1958), which dealt with an
omission from gross income in the
context of a trade or business, the
United States Court of Appeals for the
Ninth Circuit and Federal Circuit
recently construed section 6501(e)(1)(A)
in cases outside the trade or business
context contrary to the interpretation
provided in these temporary
regulations, holding that an ‘‘omission’’
does not occur by an overstatement of
basis. Bakersfield Energy Partners v.
Commissioner, 568 F.3d 767 (9th Cir.
2009); Salman Ranch Ltd v. United
States, 573 F.3d 1362 (Fed. Cir. 2009).
The Treasury Department and the
Internal Revenue Service disagree with
these courts that the Supreme Court’s
reading of the predecessor to section
6501(e) in Colony applies to sections
6501(e)(1)(A) and 6229(c)(2). When
Congress enacted the 1954 Internal
Revenue Code, it was aware of the
disagreement among the courts that
existed at the time regarding the proper
scope of section 275(c) of the 1939
Internal Revenue Code. The changes
that Congress enacted as part of the
1954 Internal Revenue Code predated
the Supreme Court’s opinion in Colony
and were intended to resolve the matter
for the future. Therefore, by amending
the Internal Revenue Code, including
the addition of a special definition of
‘‘gross income’’ with respect to a trade
or business, Congress effectively limited
what ultimately became the holding in
Colony, to cases subject to section 275(c)
of the 1939 Internal Revenue Code.
Moreover, under section 6501(e)(1)(A)
of the 1954 Internal Revenue Code,
which remains in effect under the 1986
Internal Revenue Code, when outside of
the trade or business context, the
definition of ‘‘gross income’’ in section
61 applies. In this regard, the Treasury
Department and the Internal Revenue
Service agree with the opinions in
Home Concrete & Supply, LLC v. United
States, 599 F.Supp.2d 678, 690
(E.D.N.C. 2008) (overstatement of basis
can constitute an omission from gross
income for purposes of the six-year
period of limitations) and Brandon
Ridge Partners v. United States, 2007–
2 U.S.T.C. (CCH) ¶ 50,573, 100
E:\FR\FM\28SER1.SGM
28SER1
CPrice-Sewell on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
49322
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 186 / Monday, September 28, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5347, 5351–53 (M.D.
Fla. 2007) (same).
Consistent with the Ninth Circuit’s
suggestion in Bakersfield, these
temporary regulations clarify what
constitutes an ‘‘omission from gross
income’’ under sections 6501(e)(1)(A)
and 6229(c)(2), as amended in
connection with the enactment of the
1954 Internal Revenue Code and
continuing in effect under the 1986
Internal Revenue Code. The reasonable
interpretation of the provisions of
sections 6501(e)(1)(A) and 6229(c)(2)
provided in these temporary
regulations, acknowledged by both the
Ninth and Federal Circuits to be
ambiguous, is entitled to deference even
if the agency’s interpretation may run
contrary to the opinions in Bakersfield
and Salman Ranch. See Nat’l Cable &
Telecomms. Ass’n v. Brand X Internet
Servs., 545 U.S. 967, 982–83 (2005);
Swallows Holding, Ltd. v.
Commissioner, 515 F.3d 162, 170 (3rd
Cir. 2008). Because these temporary
regulations are a clarification of the
period of limitations provided in
sections 6501(e)(1)(A) and 6229(c)(2)
and are consistent with the Secretary’s
application of those provisions both
with respect to a trade or business (that
is, gross income means gross receipts),
as well as outside of the trade or
business context (that is, section 61
definition of gross income applies), they
are applicable to all cases with respect
to which the period for assessing tax
under the applicable provisions has not
expired before the date of filing of these
regulations with the Federal Register.
Although these temporary regulations
do not provide guidance on this issue,
section 6501(e)(1)(A)(ii) additionally
provides that the amount omitted from
gross income does not include any
amount disclosed on the return, or in a
statement attached to the return, in a
manner adequate to apprise the Internal
Revenue Service of the nature and
amount of the item. This adequate
disclosure exception to the six-year
statute of limitations applies to
omissions from gross income resulting
from basis overstatements (as provided
for in these temporary regulations) in
the same manner as it applies to other
omissions from gross income.
Accordingly, taxpayers who adequately
disclose the nature and amount of the
omissions from gross income resulting
from dealings in property will not be
subject to the extended six-year statute
of limitations.
Special Analyses
It has been determined that these
temporary regulations are not a
significant regulatory action as defined
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:30 Sep 25, 2009
Jkt 217001
in Executive Order 12866. Therefore, a
regulatory assessment is not required. It
also has been determined that section
553(b) of the Administrative Procedure
Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 5) does not apply
to these regulations. For the
applicability of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6) refer
to the Special Analyses section of the
preamble of the cross-reference notice of
proposed rulemaking published in the
Proposed Rules section in this issue of
the Federal Register. Pursuant to
section 7805(f) of the Internal Revenue
Code, these regulations have been
submitted to the Chief Counsel for
Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration for comment on their
impact on small business.
Drafting Information
The principal author of these
regulations is William A. Heard III of
the Office of the Associate Chief
Counsel (Procedure and
Administration).
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 301
Employment taxes, Estate taxes,
Excise taxes, Gift taxes, Income taxes,
Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Amendments to the Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 301 is
amended as follows:
■
PART 301—PROCEDURE AND
ADMINISTRATION
Paragraph 1. The authority citation
for part 301 is amended by adding the
entry in numerical order to read in part
as follows:
■
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Section 301.6229(c)(2)–1T is also issued
under 26 U.S.C. § 6230(k). * * *
Par. 2. Section 301.6229(c)(2)–1T is
added to read as follows:
■
§ 301.6229(c)(2)–1T Substantial omission
of income (temporary).
(a) Partnership return—(1) General
rule. (i) If any partnership omits from
the gross income stated in its return an
amount properly includible therein that
is in excess of 25 percent of the amount
of gross income stated in its return,
subsection (a) of section 6229 shall be
applied by substituting ‘‘6 years’’ for ‘‘3
years.’’
(ii) For purposes of paragraph (a)(1)(i)
of this section, the term gross income, as
it relates to a trade or business, means
the total of the amounts received or
accrued from the sale of goods or
services, to the extent required to be
shown on the return, without reduction
for the cost of those goods or services.
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(iii) For purposes of paragraph (a)(1)(i)
of this section, the term gross income, as
it relates to any income other than from
the sale of goods or services in a trade
or business, has the same meaning as
provided under section 61(a), and
includes the total of the amounts
received or accrued, to the extent
required to be shown on the return. In
the case of amounts received or accrued
that relate to the disposition of property,
and except as provided in paragraph
(a)(1)(ii) of this section, gross income
means the excess of the amount realized
from the disposition of the property
over the unrecovered cost or other basis
of the property. Consequently, except as
provided in paragraph (a)(1)(ii) of this
section, an understated amount of gross
income resulting from an overstatement
of unrecovered cost or other basis
constitutes an omission from gross
income for purposes of section
6229(c)(2).
(iv) An amount shall not be
considered as omitted from gross
income if information sufficient to
apprise the Commissioner of the nature
and amount of the item is disclosed in
the return, including any schedule or
statement attached to the return.
(2) [Reserved]
(b) Effective/applicability date. The
rules of this section apply to taxable
years with respect to which the
applicable period for assessing tax did
not expire before September 24, 2009.
(c) Expiration date. The applicability
of this section expires on or before
September 24, 2012.
§ 301.6501(e)–1
[Removed].
Par. 3. Section 301.6501(e)–1 is
removed.
■ Par. 4. Section 301.6501(e)–1T is
added to read as follows:
■
§ 301.6501(e)–1T
(temporary).
Omission from return
(a) Income taxes—(1) General rule. (i)
If the taxpayer omits from the gross
income stated in the return of a tax
imposed by subtitle A of the Internal
Revenue Code an amount properly
includible therein that is in excess of 25
percent of the gross income so stated,
the tax may be assessed, or a proceeding
in court for the collection of that tax
may be begun without assessment, at
any time within 6 years after the return
was filed.
(ii) For purposes of paragraph (a)(1)(i)
of this section, the term gross income, as
it relates to a trade or business, means
the total of the amounts received or
accrued from the sale of goods or
services, to the extent required to be
shown on the return, without reduction
for the cost of those goods or services.
E:\FR\FM\28SER1.SGM
28SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 186 / Monday, September 28, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
(iii) For purposes of paragraph (a)(1)(i)
of this section, the term gross income, as
it relates to any income other than from
the sale of goods or services in a trade
or business, has the same meaning as
provided under section 61(a), and
includes the total of the amounts
received or accrued, to the extent
required to be shown on the return. In
the case of amounts received or accrued
that relate to the disposition of property,
and except as provided in paragraph
(a)(1)(ii) of this section, gross income
means the excess of the amount realized
from the disposition of the property
over the unrecovered cost or other basis
of the property. Consequently, except as
provided in paragraph (a)(1)(ii) of this
section, an understated amount of gross
income resulting from an overstatement
of unrecovered cost or other basis
constitutes an omission from gross
income for purposes of section
6501(e)(1)(A).
(iv) An amount shall not be
considered as omitted from gross
income if information sufficient to
apprise the Commissioner of the nature
and amount of the item is disclosed in
the return, including any schedule or
statement attached to the return.
(2) [Reserved]
(b) Effective/applicability date. The
rules of this section apply to taxable
years with respect to which the
applicable period for assessing tax did
not expire before September 24, 2009.
(c) Expiration date. The applicability
of this section expires on or before
September 24, 2012.
Linda E. Stiff,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and
Enforcement.
Approved: September 23, 2009.
Michael Mundaca,
Acting Assistant Secretary of the Treasury
(Tax Policy).
[FR Doc. E9–23426 Filed 9–24–09; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
CPrice-Sewell on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
[Docket No. USCG–2009–0202]
RIN 1625–AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulations;
Raritan River, Arthur Kill and Their
Tributaries, Staten Island, NY and
Elizabeth, NJ
Coast Guard, DHS.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:30 Sep 25, 2009
Jkt 217001
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard changed the
drawbridge operating regulations
governing the operation of the Arthur
Kill (AK) Railroad Bridge at mile 11.6,
across Arthur Kill and the New Jersey
Transit (NJTRO) Railroad Bridge at mile
0.5, across the Raritan River. This final
rule is expected to better meet the
present needs of navigation and
enhanced needs of rail traffic resulting
from the resumption of rail traffic across
the Arthur Kill (AK) Bridge.
DATES: This rule is effective October 28,
2009.
ADDRESSES: Comments and related
materials received from the public, as
well as documents mentioned in this
preamble as being available in the
docket, are part of docket (USCG–2009–
0202) and are available online by going
to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting
USCG–2009–0202 in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box, and then clicking ‘‘Search.’’ This
material is also available for inspection
or copying at the Docket Management
Facility (M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, 20590–
0001, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
e-mail Mr. Gary Kassof, Project Officer,
First Coast Guard District, telephone
212–668–7165,e-mail
gary.kassof@uscg.mil. If you have any
questions on viewing the docket, call
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–
9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
On June 24, 2009, we published an
interim rule entitled ‘‘Drawbridge
Operation Regulations’’; Raritan River,
Arthur Kill and their tributaries, Staten
Island and Elizabeth, New Jersey, in the
Federal Register (74 FR 29941). We
received no comments on the interim
rule. No public meeting was requested,
and none was held.
Background and Purpose
The Arthur Kill (AK) Railroad Bridge
at mile 11.6, across Arthur Kill, has a
vertical clearance of 31 feet at mean
high water, and 35 feet at mean low
water in the closed position. The New
Jersey Transit (NJTRO) Railroad Bridge
at mile 0.5, across the Raritan River, has
a vertical clearance of 8 feet at mean
high water and 13 feet at mean low
water in the closed position.
The previous drawbridge operating
regulations listed at 33 CFR 117.747,
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
49323
required the draws of all bridges across
the Raritan River, Arthur Kill and their
tributaries to open on signal at all times;
except that, from 7:30 a.m. to 10 a.m.
and from 5 p.m. to 7:30 p.m., the draws
may be opened for the passage of vessels
for periods no longer than ten minutes
or remain closed for the passage of land
traffic for no longer than ten minutes.
The New Jersey Transit Railroad
Bridge at mile 0.5, across the Raritan
River and the Arthur Kill (AK) Railroad
Bridge at mile 11.6, across Arthur Kill
were the only drawbridges operating
under this regulation.
Rail traffic was suspended for many
years on the rail line that crosses the
Arthur Kill (AK) Bridge. During the time
rail traffic was suspended across Arthur
Kill the Arthur Kill (AK) Railroad
Bridge was locked in the full open
position.
Several years ago the Arthur Kill (AK)
Railroad Bridge was mechanically and
structurally rehabilitated as part of New
York City Economic Development
Corporation’s Full Freight Access
Initiative, and restored to good
operating condition in 2007 enabling
restoration of rail freight service across
the Arthur Kill (AK) Railroad Bridge to
the Staten Island Landfill facility and
the New York Container Terminal,
formerly known as the Howland Hook
Terminal. Rail traffic began crossing the
re-opened bridge in June of 2007.
After a short period of time, it became
apparent, that the then existing
drawbridge operation regulations,
would no longer effectively meet the
present complex needs of navigation
and the revitalized volume of rail traffic
that would be crossing the Arthur Kill
(AK) Railroad Bridge.
The bridge owner, New York City
Economic Development Corporation
(NYCEDC), requested a change to the
drawbridge operation regulations to
help facilitate the resumption of rail
traffic crossing the Arthur Kill (AK)
Railroad Bridge.
As a result of the above described
transition in the needs of commerce, the
Coast Guard conducted an evaluation,
comprised of three temporary test
deviations and an interim rule, with
public comment periods, to help
determine the best drawbridge operation
regulations to meet the present and
future needs of marine and rail
transportation.
Each test deviation modified the
previous test as a result of their
observed effectiveness and comments
received from the public.
After evaluating the results of our
third temporary deviation the Coast
Guard concluded that the operating
procedure tested in the third deviation
E:\FR\FM\28SER1.SGM
28SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 186 (Monday, September 28, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 49321-49323]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-23426]
[[Page 49321]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 301
[TD 9466]
RIN 1545-BI94
Definition of Omission From Gross Income
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.
ACTION: Final and temporary regulation.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document contains temporary regulations (replacing an
existing final regulation) defining an omission from gross income for
purposes of the six-year minimum period for assessment of tax
attributable to partnership items and the six-year period for assessing
tax. The temporary regulations resolve a continuing issue as to whether
an overstatement of basis in a sold asset results in an omission from
gross income. The regulations will affect any taxpayer who overstates
basis in a sold asset creating an omission from gross income exceeding
twenty-five percent of the income stated in the return. The text of
these temporary regulations also serves as the text of the proposed
regulations set forth in the notice of proposed rulemaking on this
subject in the Proposed Rules section in this issue of the Federal
Register.
DATES: Effective date: These regulations are effective on September 24,
2009.
Applicability date: The rules of this section apply to taxable
years with respect to which the applicable period for assessing tax did
not expire before September 24, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William A. Heard III at (202) 622-4570
(not a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background and Explanation of Provisions
These temporary regulations amend the Procedure and Administration
Regulations (26 CFR part 301) relating to sections 6229(c)(2) and
6501(e). Section 6229(c)(2) provides that if a partnership ``omits from
gross income an amount properly includible therein which is in excess
of 25 percent of the amount of gross income stated'' in its return, the
minimum period for assessing tax attributable to its partnership items
is extended to six years. The quoted language is identical to language
used in section 6501(e). An omission from gross income is not further
defined in section 6229(c) as it is in section 6501(e)(1)(A). But, as
noted by the courts, section 6229(c) merely serves to extend the
section 6501 period for each separate partner to a minimum expiration
date computed from the date the partnership return is filed or due to
be filed, whichever is later. See section 6501(n)(2). In extending each
partner's section 6501 period under section 6229, Congress is presumed
to give the language in section 6229, which is identical to language in
section 6501, identical meaning. Having defined a phrase in section
6501, Congress need not redefine the same phrase when it is later used
to extend that same statute of limitations. Ascribing a different
interpretation to an identical phrase would result in partners being
treated differently based on the happenstance of whether the
transaction is reported on a partnership return rather than on a
partner's return. For instance, in Son of Boss transactions described
in Notice 2000-44, 2000-2 CB 255 (Sept. 5, 2000), gross income can be
generated by the partnership when it sells an inflated basis asset, or
directly by the partner if the asset is first distributed to the
partner before being sold. Thus, section 6501(e)(1)(A) defines an
omission from gross income both for purposes of section 6501 and for
any extension of section 6501 under section 6229. The temporary
regulations confirm this point. Further, in light of the different
interpretations given by courts to the meaning of section
6501(e)(1)(A), the temporary regulations clarify the meaning of this
section. See Sec. 601.601(d)(2)(ii)(b).
Section 6501(e)(1)(A) provides that if the taxpayer omits from
gross income an amount properly includible therein that is in excess of
25 percent of the amount of gross income stated in the return, the tax
may be assessed, or a proceeding in court for the collection of such
tax may be begun without assessment, at any time within 6 years after
the return was filed. Subsection (i) of this provision provides that,
in the case of a trade or business, the term gross income means the
total of the amounts received or accrued from the sale of goods or
services (if such amounts are required to be shown on the return) prior
to diminution by the cost of such sales or services.
These temporary regulations clarify that, outside of the trade or
business context, gross income for purposes of sections 6501(e)(1)(A)
and 6229(c)(2) has the same meaning as gross income as defined in
section 61(a). Under section 61(a), gross income includes ``gains
derived from dealings in property'' and the regulations under section
61(a) further explain that gain equals ``the excess of the amount
realized over the unrecovered cost or other basis for the property sold
or exchanged.'' Accordingly, outside the context of a trade or
business, any basis overstatement that leads to an understatement of
gross income under section 61(a) constitutes an omission from gross
income for purposes of sections 6501(e)(1)(A) and 6229(c)(2).
Relying on the Supreme Court's opinion in Colony v. Commissioner,
357 U.S. 28 (1958), which dealt with an omission from gross income in
the context of a trade or business, the United States Court of Appeals
for the Ninth Circuit and Federal Circuit recently construed section
6501(e)(1)(A) in cases outside the trade or business context contrary
to the interpretation provided in these temporary regulations, holding
that an ``omission'' does not occur by an overstatement of basis.
Bakersfield Energy Partners v. Commissioner, 568 F.3d 767 (9th Cir.
2009); Salman Ranch Ltd v. United States, 573 F.3d 1362 (Fed. Cir.
2009). The Treasury Department and the Internal Revenue Service
disagree with these courts that the Supreme Court's reading of the
predecessor to section 6501(e) in Colony applies to sections
6501(e)(1)(A) and 6229(c)(2). When Congress enacted the 1954 Internal
Revenue Code, it was aware of the disagreement among the courts that
existed at the time regarding the proper scope of section 275(c) of the
1939 Internal Revenue Code. The changes that Congress enacted as part
of the 1954 Internal Revenue Code predated the Supreme Court's opinion
in Colony and were intended to resolve the matter for the future.
Therefore, by amending the Internal Revenue Code, including the
addition of a special definition of ``gross income'' with respect to a
trade or business, Congress effectively limited what ultimately became
the holding in Colony, to cases subject to section 275(c) of the 1939
Internal Revenue Code. Moreover, under section 6501(e)(1)(A) of the
1954 Internal Revenue Code, which remains in effect under the 1986
Internal Revenue Code, when outside of the trade or business context,
the definition of ``gross income'' in section 61 applies. In this
regard, the Treasury Department and the Internal Revenue Service agree
with the opinions in Home Concrete & Supply, LLC v. United States, 599
F.Supp.2d 678, 690 (E.D.N.C. 2008) (overstatement of basis can
constitute an omission from gross income for purposes of the six-year
period of limitations) and Brandon Ridge Partners v. United States,
2007-2 U.S.T.C. (CCH) ] 50,573, 100
[[Page 49322]]
A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5347, 5351-53 (M.D. Fla. 2007) (same).
Consistent with the Ninth Circuit's suggestion in Bakersfield,
these temporary regulations clarify what constitutes an ``omission from
gross income'' under sections 6501(e)(1)(A) and 6229(c)(2), as amended
in connection with the enactment of the 1954 Internal Revenue Code and
continuing in effect under the 1986 Internal Revenue Code. The
reasonable interpretation of the provisions of sections 6501(e)(1)(A)
and 6229(c)(2) provided in these temporary regulations, acknowledged by
both the Ninth and Federal Circuits to be ambiguous, is entitled to
deference even if the agency's interpretation may run contrary to the
opinions in Bakersfield and Salman Ranch. See Nat'l Cable & Telecomms.
Ass'n v. Brand X Internet Servs., 545 U.S. 967, 982-83 (2005); Swallows
Holding, Ltd. v. Commissioner, 515 F.3d 162, 170 (3rd Cir. 2008).
Because these temporary regulations are a clarification of the period
of limitations provided in sections 6501(e)(1)(A) and 6229(c)(2) and
are consistent with the Secretary's application of those provisions
both with respect to a trade or business (that is, gross income means
gross receipts), as well as outside of the trade or business context
(that is, section 61 definition of gross income applies), they are
applicable to all cases with respect to which the period for assessing
tax under the applicable provisions has not expired before the date of
filing of these regulations with the Federal Register.
Although these temporary regulations do not provide guidance on
this issue, section 6501(e)(1)(A)(ii) additionally provides that the
amount omitted from gross income does not include any amount disclosed
on the return, or in a statement attached to the return, in a manner
adequate to apprise the Internal Revenue Service of the nature and
amount of the item. This adequate disclosure exception to the six-year
statute of limitations applies to omissions from gross income resulting
from basis overstatements (as provided for in these temporary
regulations) in the same manner as it applies to other omissions from
gross income. Accordingly, taxpayers who adequately disclose the nature
and amount of the omissions from gross income resulting from dealings
in property will not be subject to the extended six-year statute of
limitations.
Special Analyses
It has been determined that these temporary regulations are not a
significant regulatory action as defined in Executive Order 12866.
Therefore, a regulatory assessment is not required. It also has been
determined that section 553(b) of the Administrative Procedure Act (5
U.S.C. chapter 5) does not apply to these regulations. For the
applicability of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6)
refer to the Special Analyses section of the preamble of the cross-
reference notice of proposed rulemaking published in the Proposed Rules
section in this issue of the Federal Register. Pursuant to section
7805(f) of the Internal Revenue Code, these regulations have been
submitted to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration for comment on their impact on small business.
Drafting Information
The principal author of these regulations is William A. Heard III
of the Office of the Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and
Administration).
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 301
Employment taxes, Estate taxes, Excise taxes, Gift taxes, Income
taxes, Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Amendments to the Regulations
0
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 301 is amended as follows:
PART 301--PROCEDURE AND ADMINISTRATION
0
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 301 is amended by adding
the entry in numerical order to read in part as follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Section 301.6229(c)(2)-1T is also issued under 26 U.S.C. Sec.
6230(k). * * *
0
Par. 2. Section 301.6229(c)(2)-1T is added to read as follows:
Sec. 301.6229(c)(2)-1T Substantial omission of income (temporary).
(a) Partnership return--(1) General rule. (i) If any partnership
omits from the gross income stated in its return an amount properly
includible therein that is in excess of 25 percent of the amount of
gross income stated in its return, subsection (a) of section 6229 shall
be applied by substituting ``6 years'' for ``3 years.''
(ii) For purposes of paragraph (a)(1)(i) of this section, the term
gross income, as it relates to a trade or business, means the total of
the amounts received or accrued from the sale of goods or services, to
the extent required to be shown on the return, without reduction for
the cost of those goods or services.
(iii) For purposes of paragraph (a)(1)(i) of this section, the term
gross income, as it relates to any income other than from the sale of
goods or services in a trade or business, has the same meaning as
provided under section 61(a), and includes the total of the amounts
received or accrued, to the extent required to be shown on the return.
In the case of amounts received or accrued that relate to the
disposition of property, and except as provided in paragraph (a)(1)(ii)
of this section, gross income means the excess of the amount realized
from the disposition of the property over the unrecovered cost or other
basis of the property. Consequently, except as provided in paragraph
(a)(1)(ii) of this section, an understated amount of gross income
resulting from an overstatement of unrecovered cost or other basis
constitutes an omission from gross income for purposes of section
6229(c)(2).
(iv) An amount shall not be considered as omitted from gross income
if information sufficient to apprise the Commissioner of the nature and
amount of the item is disclosed in the return, including any schedule
or statement attached to the return.
(2) [Reserved]
(b) Effective/applicability date. The rules of this section apply
to taxable years with respect to which the applicable period for
assessing tax did not expire before September 24, 2009.
(c) Expiration date. The applicability of this section expires on
or before September 24, 2012.
Sec. 301.6501(e)-1 [Removed].
0
Par. 3. Section 301.6501(e)-1 is removed.
0
Par. 4. Section 301.6501(e)-1T is added to read as follows:
Sec. 301.6501(e)-1T Omission from return (temporary).
(a) Income taxes--(1) General rule. (i) If the taxpayer omits from
the gross income stated in the return of a tax imposed by subtitle A of
the Internal Revenue Code an amount properly includible therein that is
in excess of 25 percent of the gross income so stated, the tax may be
assessed, or a proceeding in court for the collection of that tax may
be begun without assessment, at any time within 6 years after the
return was filed.
(ii) For purposes of paragraph (a)(1)(i) of this section, the term
gross income, as it relates to a trade or business, means the total of
the amounts received or accrued from the sale of goods or services, to
the extent required to be shown on the return, without reduction for
the cost of those goods or services.
[[Page 49323]]
(iii) For purposes of paragraph (a)(1)(i) of this section, the term
gross income, as it relates to any income other than from the sale of
goods or services in a trade or business, has the same meaning as
provided under section 61(a), and includes the total of the amounts
received or accrued, to the extent required to be shown on the return.
In the case of amounts received or accrued that relate to the
disposition of property, and except as provided in paragraph (a)(1)(ii)
of this section, gross income means the excess of the amount realized
from the disposition of the property over the unrecovered cost or other
basis of the property. Consequently, except as provided in paragraph
(a)(1)(ii) of this section, an understated amount of gross income
resulting from an overstatement of unrecovered cost or other basis
constitutes an omission from gross income for purposes of section
6501(e)(1)(A).
(iv) An amount shall not be considered as omitted from gross income
if information sufficient to apprise the Commissioner of the nature and
amount of the item is disclosed in the return, including any schedule
or statement attached to the return.
(2) [Reserved]
(b) Effective/applicability date. The rules of this section apply
to taxable years with respect to which the applicable period for
assessing tax did not expire before September 24, 2009.
(c) Expiration date. The applicability of this section expires on
or before September 24, 2012.
Linda E. Stiff,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and Enforcement.
Approved: September 23, 2009.
Michael Mundaca,
Acting Assistant Secretary of the Treasury (Tax Policy).
[FR Doc. E9-23426 Filed 9-24-09; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P