Facilitating the Provision of Fixed and Mobile Broadband Access, Educational and Other Advanced Services in the 2150-2162 and 2500-2690 MHz Bands, 49356-49359 [E9-23331]
Download as PDF
49356
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 186 / Monday, September 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
Date
09/30/2009
10/02/2009
10/08/2009
10/27/2009
10/29/2009
Location
...................
...................
...................
...................
...................
Hotel Monteleone, 214 Rue Royal, New Orleans, LA 70130 ..........................................................
Hilton Garden Inn Chicago Downtown/Magnificent Mile, 10 E. Grand Avenue, Chicago, IL 60611
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1201 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460 .....
TBD, Oakland, CA ............................................................................................................................
TBD, New York, NY ..........................................................................................................................
Written comments and related
material may also be submitted to Coast
Guard personnel specified at those
meetings for inclusion in the official
docket for this rulemaking.
Information on Service for Individuals
with Disabilities
For information on facilities or
services for individuals with disabilities
or to request special assistance at the
public meetings, contact Mr. John
Morris at the telephone number or email address indicated under the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of
this notice.
Dated: September 23, 2009.
F.J. Sturm,
Acting Director of Commercial Regulations
and Standards, U.S. Coast Guard.
[FR Doc. E9–23386 Filed 9–24–09; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 49
[EPA–R01–OAR–2009–0305; A–1–FRL–
8949–7]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Mohegan Tribe of Indians of
Connecticut
CPrice-Sewell on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve
a Tribal Implementation Plan (‘‘TIP’’)
submitted by the Mohegan Tribe of
Indians of Connecticut (‘‘the Tribe’’).
This revision adds new emission units
to the Tribe’s TIP, while maintaining an
enforceable cap on nitrogen oxide
emissions from stationary sources
owned by the Mohegan Tribal Gaming
Authority and located within the
external boundaries of the Mohegan
Reservation. The revision also provides
the Administrator of The Mohegan
Environmental Protection Department
with enforcement authority for
violations of the Mohegan TIP and
establishes a right of appeal to the
Director of Regulation and Compliance
and the Mohegan courts. This action is
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Phone
14:31 Sep 25, 2009
Jkt 217001
intended to help attain the National
Ambient Air Quality Standards
(NAAQS) for ground-level ozone. This
action is being taken in accordance with
the Clean Air Act.
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before October 28, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R01–
OAR–2009–0305 by one of the following
methods:
1. https://www.regulations.gov: Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
2. E-mail: mcdonnell.ida@epa.gov
3. Fax: (617) 918–1653
4. Mail: ‘‘EPA–R01–OAR–2009–
0305’’, Ida McDonnell, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, EPA
New England Regional Office, One
Congress Street, Suite 1100 (mail code
CAP), Boston, MA 02114–2023.
5. Hand Delivery or Courier. Deliver
your comments to: Ida McDonnell, Air
Permits, Toxics and Indoor Air Unit,
Office of Ecosystem Protection, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, EPA
New England Regional Office, One
Congress Street, 11th floor, (CAP),
Boston, MA 02114–2023. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the
Regional Office’s normal hours of
operation. The Regional Office’s official
hours of business are Monday through
Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, excluding legal
holidays.
Please see the direct final rule which
is located in the Rules Section of this
Federal Register for detailed
instructions on how to submit
comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ida
E. McDonnell, Air Permits, Toxics and
Indoor Air Unit, Office of Ecosystem
Protection, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, EPA New England
Regional Office, One Congress Street,
11th floor, (CAP), Boston, MA 02114–
2023, telephone number (617) 918–
1653, fax number (617) 918–0653,
e-mail mcdonnell.ida@epa.gov
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the
Final Rules Section of this Federal
Register, EPA is approving the Tribe’s
TIP submittal as a direct final rule
without prior proposal because the
Agency views this as a noncontroversial
submittal and anticipates no adverse
comments. A detailed rationale for the
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
866–338–4684.
312–595–0000.
202–564–9545.
TBD.
TBD.
approval is set forth in the direct final
rule. If no adverse comments are
received in response to this action rule,
no further activity is contemplated. If
EPA receives adverse comments, the
direct final rule will be withdrawn and
all public comments received will be
addressed in a subsequent final rule
based on this proposed rule. EPA will
not institute a second comment period.
Any parties interested in commenting
on this action should do so at this time.
Please note that if EPA receives adverse
comment on an amendment, paragraph,
or section of this rule and if that
provision may be severed from the
remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt
as final those provisions of the rule that
are not the subject of an adverse
comment.
For additional information, see the
direct final rule which is located in the
Rules Section of this Federal Register.
Dated: August 13, 2009.
Ira Leighton,
Acting Regional Administrator, EPA New
England.
[FR Doc. E9–23262 Filed 9–25–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 27
[WT Docket Nos. 03–66; RM–10586, FCC
09–70]
Facilitating the Provision of Fixed and
Mobile Broadband Access,
Educational and Other Advanced
Services in the 2150–2162 and 2500–
2690 MHz Bands
AGENCY: Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
SUMMARY: In this document, the
Commission seeks comment on its
proposal to require applicants that win
BRS licenses in Auction 86, and any
subsequent auction, to demonstrate
substantial service on or before four
years from the date of license grant.
Further, the Commission seeks
comment on a proposed clarification to
the substantial service rule applicable to
the Broadband Radio Service and to the
E:\FR\FM\28SEP1.SGM
28SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 186 / Monday, September 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
Educational Broadband Service. The
Commission’s proposals, if adopted,
would ensure that spectrum in the 2.5
GHz band is put in use and would
promote the provision of innovative
services and rapid service to the public.
DATES: Submit comments on or before
October 13, 2009. Submit reply
comments on or before October 23,
2009.
Federal Communications
Commission, 445 12th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20554. You may submit
comments, identified by FCC 09–70, or
by WT Docket No. 03–66, by any of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Federal Communications
Commission’s Web site: https://
www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• People with Disabilities: Contact the
FCC to request reasonable
accommodations (accessible format
documents, sign language interpreters,
CART, etc.) by e-mail: FCC504@fcc.gov
or phone: (202) 418–0530 or TTY: (202)
418–0432.
For detailed instructions for
submitting comments and additional
information on the rulemaking process,
see the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nancy M. Zaczek, Wireless
Telecommunications Bureau,
Broadband Division, Federal
Communications Commission, 445 12th
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554, at
(202) 418–0274 or via the Internet to
Nancy.Zaczek@fcc.gov.
ADDRESSES:
This is a
summary of the Commission’s
Broadband Radio Service/Educational
Broadband Service Third Further Notice
of Proposed Rulemaking (BRS/EBS 3rd
FNPRM), FCC 09–70, adopted on
September 8, 2009, and released on
September 11, 2009. The full text of this
document is available for inspection
and copying during normal business
hours in the FCC Reference Information
Center, Room CY–A257, 445 12th Street,
SW., Washington, DC 20554. The
complete text may be purchased from
the Commission’s duplicating
contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc.
(BCPI), Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW.,
Room CY–B402, Washington, DC 20554,
1–800–378–3160 or via e-mail at
fcc@bcpiweb.com. The complete text is
also available on the Commission’s Web
site at https://wireless.fcc.gov/
edocs_public/attachment/FCC-0970A1doc. This full text may also be
CPrice-Sewell on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:31 Sep 25, 2009
Jkt 217001
downloaded at: https://wireless.fcc.gov/
releases.html. Alternative formats
(computer diskette, large print, audio
cassette, and Braille) are available by
contacting Brian Millin at (202) 418–
7426, TTY (202) 418–7365, or via e-mail
to bmillin@fcc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
BRS/EBS Third FNPRM
1. Background. The Commission’s
general practice has been to adopt
performance requirements associated
with licenses to be met at a deadline
measured in some period of time from
the issue of the license (e.g., a licensee
may have to demonstrate substantial
service 5 years from issue of the
license). Regarding incumbent BRS
licenses, licensees were required to
construct within twelve months of the
date of license grant. Regarding BTA
licenses, the former MDS rules provided
that ‘‘within five years of the grant of a
BTA authorization, the authorization
holder must construct MDS stations to
provide signals * * * that are capable
of reaching at least two-thirds of the
population of the applicable service
area.’’ Subsequently, in April 2006, the
Commission adopted May 1, 2011 as the
uniform date by which all BRS BTA
authorization holders and incumbent
BRS and EBS licensees must
demonstrate substantial service.
2. The Commission adopted May 1,
2011 as the date for BRS licensees to
demonstrate substantial service because
it is the date that renewal applications
for incumbent BRS licenses are due.
Moreover, May 1, 2011 is approximately
five years from the date of release of the
BRS/EBS Second Report and Order,
which gave existing BRS licensees five
years to build out their systems, while
they simultaneously transitioned to the
new band plan and technical rules.
Thus, the Commission concluded,
requiring BRS licensees to demonstrate
substantial service by May 1, 2011
struck the appropriate balance between
ensuring that the band is promptly
placed in use and giving licensees fair
opportunity to transition their facilities.
The Commission then required that BRS
incumbent licensees file their
demonstration of substantial service
with their respective renewal
applications.
3. On April 24, 2009, the Wireless
Telecommunications Bureau announced
that it intended to auction 78 BRS BTA
licenses, 75 of which will be overlay
licenses that were originally offered in
Auction 6 and are now available as a
result of default, cancellation, or
termination. Three additional licenses
were created by the Commission in the
BRS/EBS Fourth MO&O, when the
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
49357
Commission amended its rules to
establish three Gulf of Mexico Service
Areas for BRS. It is anticipated that the
auction of these 78 BRS licenses will
commence on October 27, 2009. Under
the rules adopted by the Commission in
2006, auction winners of these 78
licenses will also be required to
demonstrate substantial service on or
before May 1, 2011.
4. In response to the Auction 86
Procedures Public Notice, SAL
Spectrum, LLC (SAL Spectrum) asked
the Commission to give applicants that
win BRS licenses in Auction 86 ten
years in which to demonstrate
substantial service. SAL Spectrum
argues that requiring licensees who
receive their licenses in Auction 86 to
demonstrate substantial service by May
1, 2011 ‘‘will discourage participation in
Auction 86 and deflate the amount that
participants will be willing to bid.’’ The
Ad Hoc BRS Applicants Association
supports giving new licensees ten years
to demonstrate substantial service. The
Wireless Communications Association
International, Inc. (WCA) and Clearwire
Corporation (Clearwire) opposed SAL
Spectrum’s proposal. They contend that
it would not be in the public interest to
give new licensees ten years to
demonstrate substantial service because
the spectrum could lie fallow during
that period. WCA recommends that any
additional time ‘‘be an appropriate
balance between the goal of ensuring
that the spectrum is put to good use and
permitting winners a reasonable
opportunity to construct.’’ Clearwire
argues that the existing May 1, 2011
substantial service deadline should
apply.
5. We tentatively conclude that we
should require applicants that win BRS
licenses in Auction 86, and any
subsequent auction of BRS licenses, to
demonstrate substantial service on or
before four years from the date their
respective licenses are granted. We
agree with WCA that the substantial
service deadline should ensure that
spectrum is promptly placed in use
while allowing licensees a reasonable
opportunity to construct.
6. We tentatively conclude that a fouryear time period will allow new
licensees sufficient time to build out
their systems and put the spectrum to
use. Although the May 1, 2011 date
adopted by the Commission in the BRS/
EBS Second Report and Order gave BRS
licensees five years to build out their
systems, during this five-year period
licensees had to simultaneously
transition to the new band plan and
technical rules. Since the adoption of
the BRS/EBS 2nd Report and Order,
however, the transition of the 2500–
E:\FR\FM\28SEP1.SGM
28SEP1
CPrice-Sewell on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
49358
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 186 / Monday, September 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
2690 MHz band has been initiated in
virtually the entire United States and
has been completed in most of the
country. Given that new BRS licensees
will not face issues related to
simultaneous transition and
construction, we tentatively conclude
that requiring new BRS licensees to
build out within four years of license
grant will ensure that the spectrum is
put in use, promote the provision of
innovative services, and promote rapid
service to the public.
7. The proposal to require substantial
service within four years of license grant
is consistent with the decision to
establish initial buildout requirements
within four years of the effective date of
the DTV transition or of license grant in
the 700 MHz band. Therefore, we
tentatively conclude that a four-year
deadline is more appropriate than the
ten-year deadline. We believe that a tenyear deadline is excessive and could
lead to spectrum being unused for an
inordinately long period of time. Also,
we believe the better course of action is
to provide advance notice to potential
bidders regarding their buildout
obligations. Thus, we tentatively
conclude that we should require new
BRS licensees awarded in Auction 86 to
demonstrate substantial service on or
before four years from the date of
license grant. In addition, we note that
the same rationale would apply to any
BRS licensee whose initial license is
granted near the May 1, 2011 substantial
service deadline. Therefore, we
tentatively conclude that we should
adopt a rule that would require any BRS
licensee whose initial license is granted
after the revised rule becomes effective
to demonstrate substantial service on or
before a date four years from the date
the license was granted. We seek
comment on this proposal and
alternatives.
8. We also propose to revise the
introductory text to § 27.14(o) of the
Commission’s rules to more clearly state
the Commission’s intent to allow BRS or
EBS licensees to demonstrate
substantial service if their respective
lessees met one of the safe harbors
adopted by the Commission and to
allow licenses to be combined for
purposes of demonstrating substantial
service under certain circumstances. We
seek comment on this proposal.
Procedural Matters
Ex Parte Rules—Permit-But-Disclose
Proceeding
9. This is a permit-but-disclose notice
and comment rulemaking proceeding.
Ex parte presentations are permitted,
except during the Sunshine Agenda
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:31 Sep 25, 2009
Jkt 217001
period, provided they are disclosed
pursuant to the Commission’s rules.
Comment Period and Procedures
10. Pursuant to §§ 1.415 and 1.419 of
the Commission’s rules, 47 CFR 1.415,
1.419, interested parties may file
comments and reply comments on or
before the dates indicated on the first
page of this document. Comments may
be filed using: (1) The Commission’s
Electronic Comment Filing System
(ECFS), (2) the Federal Government’s
eRulemaking Portal, or (3) by filing
paper copies. See Electronic Filing of
Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings,
63 FR 24121 (1998).
• Electronic Filers: Comments may be
filed electronically using the Internet by
accessing the ECFS: https://www.fcc.gov/
cgb/ecfs/ or the Federal eRulemaking
Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Filers should follow the instructions
provided on the Web site for submitting
comments.
• For ECFS filers, if multiple docket
or rulemaking numbers appear in the
caption of this proceeding, filers must
transmit one electronic copy of the
comments for each docket or
rulemaking number referenced in the
caption. In completing the transmittal
screen, filers should include their full
name, U.S. Postal Service mailing
address, and the applicable docket or
rulemaking number. Parties may also
submit an electronic comment via the
Internet e-mail. To get filing instructions
for e-mail comments, commenters
should send an e-mail to ecfs@fcc.gov,
and include the following words in the
body of the message, ‘‘get form.’’ A
sample form and directions will be sent
in response.
• Paper Filers: Parties who choose to
file by paper must file an original and
four copies of each filing. If more than
one docket or rulemaking number
appears in the caption of this
proceeding, filers must submit two
additional copies for each additional
docket or rulemaking number. Filings
can be sent by hand or messenger
delivery, by commercial overnight
courier, or by first-class or overnight
U.S. Postal Service mail (although we
continue to experience delays in
receiving U.S. Postal Service mail). All
filings must be addressed to the
Commission’s Secretary, Office of the
Secretary, Federal Communications
Commission. The Commission’s
contractor will receive hand-delivered
or messenger-delivered paper filings for
the Commission’s Secretary at 236
Massachusetts Avenue, NE., Suite 110,
Washington, DC 20002. The filing hours
at this location are 8 a.m. to 7 p.m. All
hand deliveries must be held together
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
with rubber bands or fasteners. Any
envelopes must be disposed of before
entering the building. Commercial
overnight mail (other than U.S. Postal
Service Express Mail and Priority Mail)
must be sent to 9300 East Hampton
Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743. U.S.
Postal Service first-class, Express, and
Priority mail must be addressed to 445
12th Street, SW., Washington, DC
20554.
• People with Disabilities: To request
materials in accessible formats for
people with disabilities (braille, large
print, electronic files, audio format),
send an e-mail to fcc504@fcc.gov or call
the Consumer & Governmental Affairs
Bureau at (202) 418–0530 (voice), (202)
418–0432 (tty).
• Availability of Documents: The
public may view the documents filed in
this proceeding during regular business
hours in the FCC Reference Information
Center, Federal Communications
Commission, 445 12th Street, SW.,
Room CY–A257, Washington, DC 20554,
and on the Commission’s Internet Home
Page: https://www.fcc.gov. Copies of
comments and reply comments are also
available through the Commission’s
duplicating contractor: Best Copy and
Printing, Inc., 445 12th Street, SW.,
Room CY–B402, Washington, DC 20554,
1–800–378–3160.
Paperwork Reduction Analysis
11. This document does not contain
proposed information collections
subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995, Public Law 104–13. In addition,
therefore, it does not contain any
proposed information collection burden
‘‘for small business concerns with fewer
than 25 employees,’’ pursuant to the
Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of
2002, Public Law 107–198, see 44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(4).
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
12. The Regulatory Flexibility Act
(RFA) requires that an agency prepare a
regulatory flexibility analysis for noticeand-comment rulemaking proceedings,
unless the agency certifies that ‘‘the rule
will not, if promulgated, have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.’’
The RFA generally defines ‘‘small
entity’’ as having the same meaning as
the terms ‘‘small business,’’ ‘‘small
organization,’’ and ‘‘small governmental
jurisdiction.’’ In addition, the term
‘‘small business’’ has the same meaning
as the term ‘‘small business concern’’
under the Small Business Act. A ‘‘small
business concern’’ is one which: (1) Is
independently owned and operated; (2)
is not dominant in its field of operation;
and (3) satisfies any additional criteria
E:\FR\FM\28SEP1.SGM
28SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 186 / Monday, September 28, 2009 / Proposed Rules
CPrice-Sewell on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
established by the Small Business
Administration (SBA).
13. In the BRS/EBS Third FNPRM, the
Commission has proposed extending the
deadline for demonstrating substantial
service for those licensees that are
granted a BRS license after the adoption
date of a rule in this proceeding. The
Commission proposes this action in
light of its decision to auction 78
available BRS BTA licenses starting on
October 27, 2009. The Commission is
concerned that these licensees, and any
other licensees whose initial license is
granted after the effective date of the
rules adopted in this proceeding, may
not be able to meet the substantial
service deadline adopted by the
Commission on April 12, 2006. This
proposal, if adopted, would not create
any additional burdens for BRS
licensees. All BRS licensees must
demonstrate substantial service. If
adopted, however, this decision would
relieve certain licensees of the burden of
demonstrating substantial service on or
before May 1, 2011, which would, in
many cases, be just over a year from the
date of license grant. Thus the
Commission’s proposal, if adopted,
would relieve licensees granted an
initial license after the effective date of
the rules adopted in this proceeding,
from having to meet the May 1, 2011
deadline, but would require them to
demonstrate substantial service four
years from the date of license grant.
14. The Commission therefore
certifies, pursuant to the RFA, that the
proposals in the BRS/EBS Third
FNPRM, if adopted, will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. If
commenters believe that the proposals
discussed in the BRS/EBS Third FNPRM
require additional RFA analysis, they
should include a discussion of these
issues in their comments and
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:31 Sep 25, 2009
Jkt 217001
additionally label them as RFA
comments.
Ordering Clauses
15. It is ordered that notice is hereby
given of the proposed regulatory
changes described in this Third Further
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, and
that comment is sought on these
proposals.
16. It is further ordered that pursuant
to section 4(i) of the Communications
Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C.154(i), that the
Commission’s Consumer and
Governmental Affairs Bureau, Reference
Information Center, shall send a copy of
this Third Further Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking, including the Initial
Regulatory Certification, to the Chief
Counsel for Advocacy of the Small
Business Administration.
List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 27
Communications common carriers,
Communications equipment, Equal
employment opportunity, Radio,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Satellites, Securities,
Telecommunications.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary, Federal Communications
Commission.
Proposed Rules
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Federal Communications
Commission proposes to amend 47 CFR
part 27 as follows:
PART 27—MISCELLANEOUS
WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS
SERVICES
1. The authority citation for part 27
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 301, 302, 303,
307, 309, 332, 336, and 337 unless otherwise
noted.
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
49359
2. Amend § 27.14 by revising
paragraph (o) introductory text to read
as follows:
§ 27.14 Construction requirements;
Criteria for renewal.
*
*
*
*
*
(o) BRS and EBS licensees originally
issued a BRS or EBS license prior to
[insert effective date of final rule] must
make a showing of substantial service
no later than May 1, 2011. With respect
to initial BRS licenses issued after
[insert effective date of final rule], the
licensee must make a showing of
substantial service within four years
from the date of issue of the license.
Incumbent BRS licensees that are
required to demonstrate substantial
service by May 1, 2011 must file their
substantial service showing with their
renewal applications. ‘‘Substantial
service’’ is defined as service which is
sound, favorable, and substantially
above a level of mediocre service which
just might minimally warrant renewal.
Substantial service for BRS and EBS
licensees is satisfied if a licensee meets
the requirements of paragraph (o)(1),
(o)(2), or (o)(3) of this section. If a
licensee has not met the requirements of
paragraph (o)(1), (o)(2), or (o)(3) of this
section, then demonstration of
substantial service shall proceed on a
case-by-case basis. Except as provided
in paragraphs (o)(4) and (o)(5) of this
section, all substantial service
determinations will be made on a
license-by-license basis. Failure by any
licensee to demonstrate substantial
service will result in forfeiture of the
license and the licensee will be
ineligible to regain it.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. E9–23331 Filed 9–25–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
E:\FR\FM\28SEP1.SGM
28SEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 186 (Monday, September 28, 2009)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 49356-49359]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-23331]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 27
[WT Docket Nos. 03-66; RM-10586, FCC 09-70]
Facilitating the Provision of Fixed and Mobile Broadband Access,
Educational and Other Advanced Services in the 2150-2162 and 2500-2690
MHz Bands
AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In this document, the Commission seeks comment on its proposal
to require applicants that win BRS licenses in Auction 86, and any
subsequent auction, to demonstrate substantial service on or before
four years from the date of license grant. Further, the Commission
seeks comment on a proposed clarification to the substantial service
rule applicable to the Broadband Radio Service and to the
[[Page 49357]]
Educational Broadband Service. The Commission's proposals, if adopted,
would ensure that spectrum in the 2.5 GHz band is put in use and would
promote the provision of innovative services and rapid service to the
public.
DATES: Submit comments on or before October 13, 2009. Submit reply
comments on or before October 23, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20554. You may submit comments, identified by FCC 09-70,
or by WT Docket No. 03-66, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Federal Communications Commission's Web site: https://www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
People with Disabilities: Contact the FCC to request
reasonable accommodations (accessible format documents, sign language
interpreters, CART, etc.) by e-mail: FCC504@fcc.gov or phone: (202)
418-0530 or TTY: (202) 418-0432.
For detailed instructions for submitting comments and additional
information on the rulemaking process, see the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nancy M. Zaczek, Wireless
Telecommunications Bureau, Broadband Division, Federal Communications
Commission, 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554, at (202) 418-
0274 or via the Internet to Nancy.Zaczek@fcc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's
Broadband Radio Service/Educational Broadband Service Third Further
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (BRS/EBS 3rd FNPRM), FCC 09-70, adopted
on September 8, 2009, and released on September 11, 2009. The full text
of this document is available for inspection and copying during normal
business hours in the FCC Reference Information Center, Room CY-A257,
445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554. The complete text may be
purchased from the Commission's duplicating contractor, Best Copy and
Printing, Inc. (BCPI), Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY-B402,
Washington, DC 20554, 1-800-378-3160 or via e-mail at fcc@bcpiweb.com.
The complete text is also available on the Commission's Web site at
https://wireless.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachment/FCC-09-70A1doc. This
full text may also be downloaded at: https://wireless.fcc.gov/releases.html. Alternative formats (computer diskette, large print,
audio cassette, and Braille) are available by contacting Brian Millin
at (202) 418-7426, TTY (202) 418-7365, or via e-mail to
bmillin@fcc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
BRS/EBS Third FNPRM
1. Background. The Commission's general practice has been to adopt
performance requirements associated with licenses to be met at a
deadline measured in some period of time from the issue of the license
(e.g., a licensee may have to demonstrate substantial service 5 years
from issue of the license). Regarding incumbent BRS licenses, licensees
were required to construct within twelve months of the date of license
grant. Regarding BTA licenses, the former MDS rules provided that
``within five years of the grant of a BTA authorization, the
authorization holder must construct MDS stations to provide signals * *
* that are capable of reaching at least two-thirds of the population of
the applicable service area.'' Subsequently, in April 2006, the
Commission adopted May 1, 2011 as the uniform date by which all BRS BTA
authorization holders and incumbent BRS and EBS licensees must
demonstrate substantial service.
2. The Commission adopted May 1, 2011 as the date for BRS licensees
to demonstrate substantial service because it is the date that renewal
applications for incumbent BRS licenses are due. Moreover, May 1, 2011
is approximately five years from the date of release of the BRS/EBS
Second Report and Order, which gave existing BRS licensees five years
to build out their systems, while they simultaneously transitioned to
the new band plan and technical rules. Thus, the Commission concluded,
requiring BRS licensees to demonstrate substantial service by May 1,
2011 struck the appropriate balance between ensuring that the band is
promptly placed in use and giving licensees fair opportunity to
transition their facilities. The Commission then required that BRS
incumbent licensees file their demonstration of substantial service
with their respective renewal applications.
3. On April 24, 2009, the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau
announced that it intended to auction 78 BRS BTA licenses, 75 of which
will be overlay licenses that were originally offered in Auction 6 and
are now available as a result of default, cancellation, or termination.
Three additional licenses were created by the Commission in the BRS/EBS
Fourth MO&O, when the Commission amended its rules to establish three
Gulf of Mexico Service Areas for BRS. It is anticipated that the
auction of these 78 BRS licenses will commence on October 27, 2009.
Under the rules adopted by the Commission in 2006, auction winners of
these 78 licenses will also be required to demonstrate substantial
service on or before May 1, 2011.
4. In response to the Auction 86 Procedures Public Notice, SAL
Spectrum, LLC (SAL Spectrum) asked the Commission to give applicants
that win BRS licenses in Auction 86 ten years in which to demonstrate
substantial service. SAL Spectrum argues that requiring licensees who
receive their licenses in Auction 86 to demonstrate substantial service
by May 1, 2011 ``will discourage participation in Auction 86 and
deflate the amount that participants will be willing to bid.'' The Ad
Hoc BRS Applicants Association supports giving new licensees ten years
to demonstrate substantial service. The Wireless Communications
Association International, Inc. (WCA) and Clearwire Corporation
(Clearwire) opposed SAL Spectrum's proposal. They contend that it would
not be in the public interest to give new licensees ten years to
demonstrate substantial service because the spectrum could lie fallow
during that period. WCA recommends that any additional time ``be an
appropriate balance between the goal of ensuring that the spectrum is
put to good use and permitting winners a reasonable opportunity to
construct.'' Clearwire argues that the existing May 1, 2011 substantial
service deadline should apply.
5. We tentatively conclude that we should require applicants that
win BRS licenses in Auction 86, and any subsequent auction of BRS
licenses, to demonstrate substantial service on or before four years
from the date their respective licenses are granted. We agree with WCA
that the substantial service deadline should ensure that spectrum is
promptly placed in use while allowing licensees a reasonable
opportunity to construct.
6. We tentatively conclude that a four-year time period will allow
new licensees sufficient time to build out their systems and put the
spectrum to use. Although the May 1, 2011 date adopted by the
Commission in the BRS/EBS Second Report and Order gave BRS licensees
five years to build out their systems, during this five-year period
licensees had to simultaneously transition to the new band plan and
technical rules. Since the adoption of the BRS/EBS 2nd Report and
Order, however, the transition of the 2500-
[[Page 49358]]
2690 MHz band has been initiated in virtually the entire United States
and has been completed in most of the country. Given that new BRS
licensees will not face issues related to simultaneous transition and
construction, we tentatively conclude that requiring new BRS licensees
to build out within four years of license grant will ensure that the
spectrum is put in use, promote the provision of innovative services,
and promote rapid service to the public.
7. The proposal to require substantial service within four years of
license grant is consistent with the decision to establish initial
buildout requirements within four years of the effective date of the
DTV transition or of license grant in the 700 MHz band. Therefore, we
tentatively conclude that a four-year deadline is more appropriate than
the ten-year deadline. We believe that a ten-year deadline is excessive
and could lead to spectrum being unused for an inordinately long period
of time. Also, we believe the better course of action is to provide
advance notice to potential bidders regarding their buildout
obligations. Thus, we tentatively conclude that we should require new
BRS licensees awarded in Auction 86 to demonstrate substantial service
on or before four years from the date of license grant. In addition, we
note that the same rationale would apply to any BRS licensee whose
initial license is granted near the May 1, 2011 substantial service
deadline. Therefore, we tentatively conclude that we should adopt a
rule that would require any BRS licensee whose initial license is
granted after the revised rule becomes effective to demonstrate
substantial service on or before a date four years from the date the
license was granted. We seek comment on this proposal and alternatives.
8. We also propose to revise the introductory text to Sec.
27.14(o) of the Commission's rules to more clearly state the
Commission's intent to allow BRS or EBS licensees to demonstrate
substantial service if their respective lessees met one of the safe
harbors adopted by the Commission and to allow licenses to be combined
for purposes of demonstrating substantial service under certain
circumstances. We seek comment on this proposal.
Procedural Matters
Ex Parte Rules--Permit-But-Disclose Proceeding
9. This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rulemaking
proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the
Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed pursuant to the
Commission's rules.
Comment Period and Procedures
10. Pursuant to Sec. Sec. 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's
rules, 47 CFR 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and
reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of
this document. Comments may be filed using: (1) The Commission's
Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal Government's
eRulemaking Portal, or (3) by filing paper copies. See Electronic
Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 FR 24121 (1998).
Electronic Filers: Comments may be filed electronically
using the Internet by accessing the ECFS: https://www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/
or the Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Filers
should follow the instructions provided on the Web site for submitting
comments.
For ECFS filers, if multiple docket or rulemaking numbers
appear in the caption of this proceeding, filers must transmit one
electronic copy of the comments for each docket or rulemaking number
referenced in the caption. In completing the transmittal screen, filers
should include their full name, U.S. Postal Service mailing address,
and the applicable docket or rulemaking number. Parties may also submit
an electronic comment via the Internet e-mail. To get filing
instructions for e-mail comments, commenters should send an e-mail to
ecfs@fcc.gov, and include the following words in the body of the
message, ``get form.'' A sample form and directions will be sent in
response.
Paper Filers: Parties who choose to file by paper must
file an original and four copies of each filing. If more than one
docket or rulemaking number appears in the caption of this proceeding,
filers must submit two additional copies for each additional docket or
rulemaking number. Filings can be sent by hand or messenger delivery,
by commercial overnight courier, or by first-class or overnight U.S.
Postal Service mail (although we continue to experience delays in
receiving U.S. Postal Service mail). All filings must be addressed to
the Commission's Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal
Communications Commission. The Commission's contractor will receive
hand-delivered or messenger-delivered paper filings for the
Commission's Secretary at 236 Massachusetts Avenue, NE., Suite 110,
Washington, DC 20002. The filing hours at this location are 8 a.m. to 7
p.m. All hand deliveries must be held together with rubber bands or
fasteners. Any envelopes must be disposed of before entering the
building. Commercial overnight mail (other than U.S. Postal Service
Express Mail and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300 East Hampton
Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743. U.S. Postal Service first-class,
Express, and Priority mail must be addressed to 445 12th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20554.
People with Disabilities: To request materials in
accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print,
electronic files, audio format), send an e-mail to fcc504@fcc.gov or
call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530
(voice), (202) 418-0432 (tty).
Availability of Documents: The public may view the
documents filed in this proceeding during regular business hours in the
FCC Reference Information Center, Federal Communications Commission,
445 12th Street, SW., Room CY-A257, Washington, DC 20554, and on the
Commission's Internet Home Page: https://www.fcc.gov. Copies of comments
and reply comments are also available through the Commission's
duplicating contractor: Best Copy and Printing, Inc., 445 12th Street,
SW., Room CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554, 1-800-378-3160.
Paperwork Reduction Analysis
11. This document does not contain proposed information collections
subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. In
addition, therefore, it does not contain any proposed information
collection burden ``for small business concerns with fewer than 25
employees,'' pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of
2002, Public Law 107-198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4).
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
12. The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) requires that an agency
prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis for notice-and-comment
rulemaking proceedings, unless the agency certifies that ``the rule
will not, if promulgated, have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.'' The RFA generally defines
``small entity'' as having the same meaning as the terms ``small
business,'' ``small organization,'' and ``small governmental
jurisdiction.'' In addition, the term ``small business'' has the same
meaning as the term ``small business concern'' under the Small Business
Act. A ``small business concern'' is one which: (1) Is independently
owned and operated; (2) is not dominant in its field of operation; and
(3) satisfies any additional criteria
[[Page 49359]]
established by the Small Business Administration (SBA).
13. In the BRS/EBS Third FNPRM, the Commission has proposed
extending the deadline for demonstrating substantial service for those
licensees that are granted a BRS license after the adoption date of a
rule in this proceeding. The Commission proposes this action in light
of its decision to auction 78 available BRS BTA licenses starting on
October 27, 2009. The Commission is concerned that these licensees, and
any other licensees whose initial license is granted after the
effective date of the rules adopted in this proceeding, may not be able
to meet the substantial service deadline adopted by the Commission on
April 12, 2006. This proposal, if adopted, would not create any
additional burdens for BRS licensees. All BRS licensees must
demonstrate substantial service. If adopted, however, this decision
would relieve certain licensees of the burden of demonstrating
substantial service on or before May 1, 2011, which would, in many
cases, be just over a year from the date of license grant. Thus the
Commission's proposal, if adopted, would relieve licensees granted an
initial license after the effective date of the rules adopted in this
proceeding, from having to meet the May 1, 2011 deadline, but would
require them to demonstrate substantial service four years from the
date of license grant.
14. The Commission therefore certifies, pursuant to the RFA, that
the proposals in the BRS/EBS Third FNPRM, if adopted, will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
If commenters believe that the proposals discussed in the BRS/EBS Third
FNPRM require additional RFA analysis, they should include a discussion
of these issues in their comments and additionally label them as RFA
comments.
Ordering Clauses
15. It is ordered that notice is hereby given of the proposed
regulatory changes described in this Third Further Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking, and that comment is sought on these proposals.
16. It is further ordered that pursuant to section 4(i) of the
Communications Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C.154(i), that the Commission's
Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau, Reference Information Center,
shall send a copy of this Third Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking,
including the Initial Regulatory Certification, to the Chief Counsel
for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration.
List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 27
Communications common carriers, Communications equipment, Equal
employment opportunity, Radio, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Satellites, Securities, Telecommunications.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary, Federal Communications Commission.
Proposed Rules
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Federal
Communications Commission proposes to amend 47 CFR part 27 as follows:
PART 27--MISCELLANEOUS WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES
1. The authority citation for part 27 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 301, 302, 303, 307, 309, 332, 336, and
337 unless otherwise noted.
2. Amend Sec. 27.14 by revising paragraph (o) introductory text to
read as follows:
Sec. 27.14 Construction requirements; Criteria for renewal.
* * * * *
(o) BRS and EBS licensees originally issued a BRS or EBS license
prior to [insert effective date of final rule] must make a showing of
substantial service no later than May 1, 2011. With respect to initial
BRS licenses issued after [insert effective date of final rule], the
licensee must make a showing of substantial service within four years
from the date of issue of the license. Incumbent BRS licensees that are
required to demonstrate substantial service by May 1, 2011 must file
their substantial service showing with their renewal applications.
``Substantial service'' is defined as service which is sound,
favorable, and substantially above a level of mediocre service which
just might minimally warrant renewal. Substantial service for BRS and
EBS licensees is satisfied if a licensee meets the requirements of
paragraph (o)(1), (o)(2), or (o)(3) of this section. If a licensee has
not met the requirements of paragraph (o)(1), (o)(2), or (o)(3) of this
section, then demonstration of substantial service shall proceed on a
case-by-case basis. Except as provided in paragraphs (o)(4) and (o)(5)
of this section, all substantial service determinations will be made on
a license-by-license basis. Failure by any licensee to demonstrate
substantial service will result in forfeiture of the license and the
licensee will be ineligible to regain it.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. E9-23331 Filed 9-25-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P