Fresh Prunes Grown in Designated Counties in Washington and in Umatilla County, OR; Increased Assessment Rate, 48848-48850 [E9-23153]

Download as PDF 48848 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 185 / Friday, September 25, 2009 / Rules and Regulations Dated: September 21, 2009. Rayne Pegg, Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service. [FR Doc. E9–23152 Filed 9–24–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–02–P DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Agricultural Marketing Service 7 CFR Part 924 [Doc. No. AMS–FV–09–0040; FV09–924–1 FR] Fresh Prunes Grown in Designated Counties in Washington and in Umatilla County, OR; Increased Assessment Rate AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA. ACTION: Final rule. CPrice-Sewell on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES SUMMARY: This rule increases the assessment rate established for the Washington-Oregon Fresh Prune Marketing Committee (Committee) for the 2009–10 and subsequent fiscal periods from $1.00 to $2.00 per ton for fresh prunes. The Committee is responsible for local administration of the marketing order regulating the handling of fresh prunes grown in designated counties in Washington and in Umatilla County, Oregon. Assessments upon handlers of fresh prunes are used by the Committee to fund reasonable and necessary expenses of the program. The fiscal period for the marketing order began April 1 and ends March 31. The assessment rate will remain in effect indefinitely unless modified, suspended or terminated. DATES: Effective Date: September 26, 2009. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert J. Curry or Gary D. Olson, Northwest Marketing Field Office, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1220 SW., Third Avenue, Suite 385, Portland, OR 97204; Telephone: (503) 326–2724; Fax: (503) 326–7440; or E-mail: Robert.Curry@ams.usda.gov or GaryD.Olson@ams.usda.gov. Small businesses may request information on complying with this regulation by contacting Jay Guerber, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence, SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250– 0237; Telephone: (202) 720–2491; Fax: (202) 720–8938; or E-mail: Jay.Guerber@ams.usda.gov. VerDate Nov<24>2008 14:49 Sep 24, 2009 Jkt 217001 This final rule is issued under Marketing Agreement and Order No. 924 (7 CFR part 924), regulating the handling of fresh prunes grown in designated counties in Washington and in Umatilla County, Oregon, hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘order.’’ The order is effective under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674), hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’ The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this rule in conformance with Executive Order 12866. This final rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform. Under the marketing order now in effect, Washington-Oregon prune handlers are subject to assessments. Funds to administer the order are derived from such assessments. It is intended that the assessment rate will be applicable to all assessable Washington-Oregon prunes beginning April 1, 2009, and continue until amended, suspended, or terminated. The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. Such handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition. After the hearing USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides that the district court of the United States in any district in which the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of business, has jurisdiction to review USDA’s ruling on the petition, provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of the entry of the ruling. This final rule increases the assessment rate established by the Committee for the 2009–10 and subsequent fiscal periods from $1.00 to $2.00 per ton for Washington-Oregon prunes handled under the order. The order provides authority for the Committee, with the approval of USDA, to formulate an annual budget of expenses and collect assessments from handlers to administer the program. The members of the Committee are producers and handlers of prunes in designated counties in Washington and in Umatilla County, Oregon. They are familiar with the Committee’s needs and with the costs for goods and services in SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 their local area and are thus in a position to formulate an appropriate budget and assessment rate. The assessment rate is formulated and discussed at a public meeting. Thus, all directly affected persons have an opportunity to participate and provide input. For the 2007–08 and subsequent fiscal periods, the Committee recommended, and the USDA approved, an assessment rate of $1.00 per ton of prunes handled. This rate continues in effect from fiscal period to fiscal period unless modified, suspended, or terminated by USDA upon recommendation and information submitted by the Committee or other information available to USDA. The Committee met on June 2, 2009, and unanimously recommended 2009– 10 expenditures of $8,893. The major expenditures recommended by the Committee for the 2009–10 fiscal period include $4,800 for the management fee, $800 for Committee travel, $100 for compliance, $2,000 for the financial audit, and $1,193 for equipment maintenance, insurance, bonds, and miscellaneous expenses. In comparison, the $6,893 budget approved for the 2008–09 fiscal period included $4,800 for the management fee, $800 for travel expenses, $100 for compliance, and $1,150 for audits, equipment maintenance, insurance, bonds, and miscellaneous expenses. The major increase in expenses this year is in the audit category. The assessment rate recommended by the Committee was derived by dividing the anticipated expenses of $8,893 by the projected 2009 4,400-ton prune production. Applying the $2.00 per ton assessment rate to this crop estimate should provide $8,800 in assessment income, which, in addition to a small draw of approximately $93.00 from the Committee’s monetary reserve, should adequately cover the budgeted expenditures. The reserve balance at the end of the 2008–09 fiscal period was $5,160. The estimated 2009–10 year-end reserve is $5,067, which is within the order’s limit of approximately one fiscal period’s operational expenses. The Committee recommended the higher assessment rate in order that the budgeted expenditures—$2,000 higher than the 2008–09 approved budget—are adequately covered and that the current reserve balance is maintained. The increased assessment rate will continue in effect indefinitely unless modified, suspended, or terminated by USDA upon recommendation and information submitted by the Committee or other available information. E:\FR\FM\25SER1.SGM 25SER1 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 185 / Friday, September 25, 2009 / Rules and Regulations CPrice-Sewell on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES Although this assessment rate will be effective for an indefinite period, the Committee will continue to meet prior to or during each fiscal period to recommend a budget of expenses and consider recommendations for modification of the assessment rate. The dates and times of the Committee’s meetings are available from the Committee or USDA. The Committee’s meetings are open to the public and interested persons may express their views at these meetings. USDA would evaluate the Committee’s recommendations and other available information to determine whether modification of the assessment rate is needed. Further rulemaking will be undertaken as necessary. The Committee’s 2009–10 budget, and those for subsequent fiscal periods, will be reviewed and, as appropriate, approved by USDA. Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601–612), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has considered the economic impact of this rule on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has prepared this final regulatory flexibility analysis. The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in that they are brought about through group action of essentially small entities acting on their own behalf. There are approximately 215 producers of fresh prunes in the regulated production area and approximately 10 handlers subject to regulation under the order. Small agricultural producers are defined by the Small Business Administration (13 CFR 121.201) as those having annual receipts of less than $750,000, and small agricultural service firms are defined as those whose annual receipts are less than $7,000,000. Based on information compiled by both the Committee and the National Agricultural Statistics Service, the average annual revenue from the sale of fresh prunes was approximately $7,930 per producer in 2008. This estimate is based on 215 producers with a total production of about 3,514 tons of fresh prunes selling for an average of $485 per ton. In addition, based on AMS Market News Service reports that 2008 f.o.b. prices ranged from $17.00 to $19.00 per 30-pound container, the entire VerDate Nov<24>2008 14:49 Sep 24, 2009 Jkt 217001 Washington-Oregon fresh prune industry handled less than $7,000,000 worth of prunes last season. In view of the foregoing, the majority of Washington-Oregon fresh prune producers and handlers may be classified as small entities. This final rule increases the assessment rate established for the Committee and collected from handlers for the 2009–10 and subsequent fiscal periods from $1.00 to $2.00 per ton for prunes handled under the order’s authority. The Committee also unanimously recommended 2009–10 expenditures of $8,893, which is $2,000 higher than the $6,893 budget approved for the 2008–09 fiscal period. When the recommended $2.00 per ton assessment rate is levied against the 2009–10 prune crop estimate of 4,400 tons, the Committee expects assessment income of about $8,800. The Committee recommended the higher assessment rate to help ensure that the 2009–10 budgeted expenses are adequately covered and that the current reserve balance is maintained. With the 4,400 ton crop estimate this year, the Committee would have realized income of about $4,400 without the assessment rate increase. This would have forced the Committee to draw approximately $4,493 from its $5,160 reserve fund, leaving an inadequate amount in reserve. The major expenditures recommended by the Committee for the 2009–10 fiscal period include $4,800 for the management fee, $800 for Committee travel, $100 for compliance, $2,000 for the financial audit, and $1,193 for equipment maintenance, insurance, bonds, and miscellaneous expenses. In comparison, the $6,893 budget approved for the 2008–09 fiscal period included $4,800 for the management fee, $800 for travel expenses, $100 for compliance, and $1,193 for audits, equipment maintenance, insurance, bonds, and miscellaneous expenses. The major increase in expenses this year is in the audit category. The Committee discussed alternatives to this recommended assessment increase. Leaving the assessment rate at the current $1.00 per ton was discussed, but not considered since such a rate would not have generated income adequate to maintain the Committee’s reserve at or about the current level. A review of historical information and preliminary information pertaining to the upcoming crop year indicates that the producer price for the 2009–10 season could average about $500 per ton for fresh Washington and Oregon grown prunes. Therefore, the estimated PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 48849 assessment revenue for the 2009–10 fiscal period as a percentage of total producer revenue is 0.4 percent for Washington-Oregon prunes. This action increases the assessment obligation imposed on handlers. While assessments impose some additional costs on handlers, the costs are uniform on all handlers. Some of the additional costs may be passed on to producers. However, these costs will be offset by the benefits derived by the operation of the order. In addition, the Committee’s meeting was widely publicized throughout the Washington prune industry and all interested persons were invited to attend and participate in Committee deliberations on all issues. Like all Committee meetings, the June 2, 2009, meeting was a public meeting and all entities, both large and small, were able to express views on the issues. A proposed rule concerning this action was published in the Federal Register on July 24, 2009 (74 FR 36616). Copies of the rule were made available by the Committee office. Finally, the rule was made available through the Internet by USDA and the Office of the Federal Register. A 30-day comment period, ending August 24, 2009, was provided to allow interested persons to respond to the proposal. No comments were received. This final rule will not impose any additional reporting or recordkeeping requirements on either small or large Washington-Oregon prune handlers. As with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and duplication by industry and public sector agencies. As noted in the initial regulatory flexibility analysis, USDA has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or conflict with this rule. AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote the use of the Internet and other information technologies to provide increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information and services, and for other purposes. A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop marketing agreements and order may be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/ AMSv1.0/ams.fetchTemplateData.do? template=TemplateN& page=MarketingOrders SmallBusinessGuide. Any questions about the compliance guide should be sent to Jay Guerber at the previously mentioned address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. E:\FR\FM\25SER1.SGM 25SER1 48850 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 185 / Friday, September 25, 2009 / Rules and Regulations After consideration of all relevant matter presented, including the information and recommendation submitted by the Committee and other available information, it is hereby found that this rule, as hereinafter set forth, will tend to effectuate the declared policy of the Act. Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it also found and determined that good cause exists for not postponing the effective date of this rule until 30 days after publication in the Federal Register because handlers are already shipping prunes from the 2009–10 crop and the Committee needs to have sufficient funds to pay its expenses, which are incurred on a continuous basis. Further, handlers are aware of this action, which was recommended by the Committee at a public meeting and is similar to other assessment rate actions issued in past years. Finally, a 30-day comment period was provided for in the proposed rule. List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 924 Prunes, Marketing agreements, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 924 is amended as follows: ■ PART 924—PRUNES GROWN IN DESIGNATED COUNTIES IN WASHINGTON 1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 924 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674. 2. Section 924.236 is revised to read as follows: ■ § 924.236 Assessment rate. On or after April 1, 2009, an assessment rate of $2.00 per ton is established for the Washington-Oregon Fresh Prune Marketing Committee. Dated: September 21, 2009. Rayne Pegg, Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service. [FR Doc. E9–23153 Filed 9–24–09; 8:45 am] CPrice-Sewell on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES [Corrected] On page 44275, third column, § 600.6, introductory paragraph (c), the phrase ‘‘DOE may award a grant or cooperative agreement on a noncompetitive basis only if the application satisfies one or more of the follow selection criteria:’’ is corrected to read ‘‘DOE may award a grant or cooperative agreement or technology investment agreement on a noncompetitive basis only if the application satisfies one or more of the follow selection criteria:’’. Issued in Washington, DC, on September 21, 2009. Edward R. Simpson, Director, Office of Procurement and Assistance Management, Office of Management, Department of Energy. Joe Waddell, Acting Director, Office of Acquisition and Supply Management, National Nuclear Security Administration. [FR Doc. E9–23188 Filed 9–24–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6450–01–P RIN 1991–AB77 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Department of Energy. Final rule; correction. AGENCY: The Department of Energy (DOE) is correcting a final rule that SUMMARY: Jkt 217001 Confirmation of Effective Date The FAA published this direct final rule with a request for comments in the Federal Register on December 17, 2008 (73 FR 76519), Docket No. FAA–2008– 0986; Airspace Docket No. 08–ASO–15. The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure for a noncontroversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be no adverse public comment. This direct final rule advised the public that no adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written adverse comment, or a written notice of intent to submit such an adverse comment, were received within the comment period, the regulation would become effective on March 12, 2009. No adverse comments were received, and thus this notice confirms that effective date. * * * * * Issued in College Park, Georgia, on September 2, 2009. Barry A. Knight, Manager, Operations Support Group, Eastern Service Center, Air Traffic Organization. [FR Doc. E9–22075 Filed 9–24–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–13–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration [Docket FAA No. FAA–2008–0006; Airspace Docket No. 08–ANM–1] Federal Aviation Administration Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date. AGENCY: Assistance Regulations; Correction direct final rule in the Federal Register, for the Macon County Airport in Franklin, NC. DATES: Effective Date: 0901 UTC, September 25, 2009. The Director of the Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under title 1, Code of Federal Regulations, part 51, subject to the annual revision of FAA Order 7400.9 and publication of conforming amendments. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 14 CFR Part 71 Modification of Class E Airspace; Franklin, NC 10 CFR Parts 600 and 1024 14:49 Sep 24, 2009 § 600.6 [Docket No. FAA–2008–0986; Airspace Docket No. 08–ASO–15] DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY VerDate Nov<24>2008 In FR Doc. E9–20299, appearing on page 44273 in the Federal Register of Friday, August 28, 2009, the following correction is made: SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 14 CFR Part 71 BILLING CODE 3410–02–P ACTION: appeared in the Federal Register of August 28, 2009 (74 FR 44273). In this document, DOE amended its Financial Assistance Regulations to update, streamline, and simplify the general rules, and also removed regulations governing the DOE Financial Assistance Appeals Board. DATES: This correction is effective September 28, 2009. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Jacqueline Kniskern, Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy, U.S. Department of Energy, at 202–287– 1342, or by e-mail at jacqueline.kniskern@hq.doe.gov. SUMMARY: This action confirms the effective date of an airspace action, which was previously published as a PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 Establishment of Class D Airspace and Amendment of Class E Airspace; North Bend, OR AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Final rule; correction. SUMMARY: This action corrects a final rule published in the Federal Register on August 26, 2009. In that rule, errors were made in the legal description and the airport name for North Bend, OR. This action corrects those errors. DATES: Effective Date: 0901 UTC, October 22, 2009. The Director of the E:\FR\FM\25SER1.SGM 25SER1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 185 (Friday, September 25, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 48848-48850]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-23153]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Marketing Service

7 CFR Part 924

[Doc. No. AMS-FV-09-0040; FV09-924-1 FR]


Fresh Prunes Grown in Designated Counties in Washington and in 
Umatilla County, OR; Increased Assessment Rate

AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This rule increases the assessment rate established for the 
Washington-Oregon Fresh Prune Marketing Committee (Committee) for the 
2009-10 and subsequent fiscal periods from $1.00 to $2.00 per ton for 
fresh prunes. The Committee is responsible for local administration of 
the marketing order regulating the handling of fresh prunes grown in 
designated counties in Washington and in Umatilla County, Oregon. 
Assessments upon handlers of fresh prunes are used by the Committee to 
fund reasonable and necessary expenses of the program. The fiscal 
period for the marketing order began April 1 and ends March 31. The 
assessment rate will remain in effect indefinitely unless modified, 
suspended or terminated.

DATES: Effective Date: September 26, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert J. Curry or Gary D. Olson, 
Northwest Marketing Field Office, Marketing Order Administration 
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1220 SW., Third 
Avenue, Suite 385, Portland, OR 97204; Telephone: (503) 326-2724; Fax: 
(503) 326-7440; or E-mail: Robert.Curry@ams.usda.gov or 
GaryD.Olson@ams.usda.gov.
    Small businesses may request information on complying with this 
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber, Marketing Order Administration 
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence, 
SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202) 720-2491; 
Fax: (202) 720-8938; or E-mail: Jay.Guerber@ams.usda.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This final rule is issued under Marketing 
Agreement and Order No. 924 (7 CFR part 924), regulating the handling 
of fresh prunes grown in designated counties in Washington and in 
Umatilla County, Oregon, hereinafter referred to as the ``order.'' The 
order is effective under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 
1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), hereinafter referred to as the 
``Act.''
    The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this rule in 
conformance with Executive Order 12866.
    This final rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, 
Civil Justice Reform. Under the marketing order now in effect, 
Washington-Oregon prune handlers are subject to assessments. Funds to 
administer the order are derived from such assessments. It is intended 
that the assessment rate will be applicable to all assessable 
Washington-Oregon prunes beginning April 1, 2009, and continue until 
amended, suspended, or terminated.
    The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted 
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the 
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition 
stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation 
imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and 
request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. Such 
handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition. 
After the hearing USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides 
that the district court of the United States in any district in which 
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of 
business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition, 
provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of 
the entry of the ruling.
    This final rule increases the assessment rate established by the 
Committee for the 2009-10 and subsequent fiscal periods from $1.00 to 
$2.00 per ton for Washington-Oregon prunes handled under the order.
    The order provides authority for the Committee, with the approval 
of USDA, to formulate an annual budget of expenses and collect 
assessments from handlers to administer the program. The members of the 
Committee are producers and handlers of prunes in designated counties 
in Washington and in Umatilla County, Oregon. They are familiar with 
the Committee's needs and with the costs for goods and services in 
their local area and are thus in a position to formulate an appropriate 
budget and assessment rate. The assessment rate is formulated and 
discussed at a public meeting. Thus, all directly affected persons have 
an opportunity to participate and provide input.
    For the 2007-08 and subsequent fiscal periods, the Committee 
recommended, and the USDA approved, an assessment rate of $1.00 per ton 
of prunes handled. This rate continues in effect from fiscal period to 
fiscal period unless modified, suspended, or terminated by USDA upon 
recommendation and information submitted by the Committee or other 
information available to USDA.
    The Committee met on June 2, 2009, and unanimously recommended 
2009-10 expenditures of $8,893. The major expenditures recommended by 
the Committee for the 2009-10 fiscal period include $4,800 for the 
management fee, $800 for Committee travel, $100 for compliance, $2,000 
for the financial audit, and $1,193 for equipment maintenance, 
insurance, bonds, and miscellaneous expenses. In comparison, the $6,893 
budget approved for the 2008-09 fiscal period included $4,800 for the 
management fee, $800 for travel expenses, $100 for compliance, and 
$1,150 for audits, equipment maintenance, insurance, bonds, and 
miscellaneous expenses. The major increase in expenses this year is in 
the audit category.
    The assessment rate recommended by the Committee was derived by 
dividing the anticipated expenses of $8,893 by the projected 2009 
4,400-ton prune production. Applying the $2.00 per ton assessment rate 
to this crop estimate should provide $8,800 in assessment income, 
which, in addition to a small draw of approximately $93.00 from the 
Committee's monetary reserve, should adequately cover the budgeted 
expenditures. The reserve balance at the end of the 2008-09 fiscal 
period was $5,160. The estimated 2009-10 year-end reserve is $5,067, 
which is within the order's limit of approximately one fiscal period's 
operational expenses. The Committee recommended the higher assessment 
rate in order that the budgeted expenditures--$2,000 higher than the 
2008-09 approved budget--are adequately covered and that the current 
reserve balance is maintained.
    The increased assessment rate will continue in effect indefinitely 
unless modified, suspended, or terminated by USDA upon recommendation 
and information submitted by the Committee or other available 
information.

[[Page 48849]]

    Although this assessment rate will be effective for an indefinite 
period, the Committee will continue to meet prior to or during each 
fiscal period to recommend a budget of expenses and consider 
recommendations for modification of the assessment rate. The dates and 
times of the Committee's meetings are available from the Committee or 
USDA. The Committee's meetings are open to the public and interested 
persons may express their views at these meetings. USDA would evaluate 
the Committee's recommendations and other available information to 
determine whether modification of the assessment rate is needed. 
Further rulemaking will be undertaken as necessary. The Committee's 
2009-10 budget, and those for subsequent fiscal periods, will be 
reviewed and, as appropriate, approved by USDA.

Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

    Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility 
Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-612), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) 
has considered the economic impact of this rule on small entities. 
Accordingly, AMS has prepared this final regulatory flexibility 
analysis.
    The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of 
business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will 
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued 
pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in 
that they are brought about through group action of essentially small 
entities acting on their own behalf.
    There are approximately 215 producers of fresh prunes in the 
regulated production area and approximately 10 handlers subject to 
regulation under the order. Small agricultural producers are defined by 
the Small Business Administration (13 CFR 121.201) as those having 
annual receipts of less than $750,000, and small agricultural service 
firms are defined as those whose annual receipts are less than 
$7,000,000.
    Based on information compiled by both the Committee and the 
National Agricultural Statistics Service, the average annual revenue 
from the sale of fresh prunes was approximately $7,930 per producer in 
2008. This estimate is based on 215 producers with a total production 
of about 3,514 tons of fresh prunes selling for an average of $485 per 
ton. In addition, based on AMS Market News Service reports that 2008 
f.o.b. prices ranged from $17.00 to $19.00 per 30-pound container, the 
entire Washington-Oregon fresh prune industry handled less than 
$7,000,000 worth of prunes last season. In view of the foregoing, the 
majority of Washington-Oregon fresh prune producers and handlers may be 
classified as small entities.
    This final rule increases the assessment rate established for the 
Committee and collected from handlers for the 2009-10 and subsequent 
fiscal periods from $1.00 to $2.00 per ton for prunes handled under the 
order's authority. The Committee also unanimously recommended 2009-10 
expenditures of $8,893, which is $2,000 higher than the $6,893 budget 
approved for the 2008-09 fiscal period. When the recommended $2.00 per 
ton assessment rate is levied against the 2009-10 prune crop estimate 
of 4,400 tons, the Committee expects assessment income of about $8,800. 
The Committee recommended the higher assessment rate to help ensure 
that the 2009-10 budgeted expenses are adequately covered and that the 
current reserve balance is maintained. With the 4,400 ton crop estimate 
this year, the Committee would have realized income of about $4,400 
without the assessment rate increase. This would have forced the 
Committee to draw approximately $4,493 from its $5,160 reserve fund, 
leaving an inadequate amount in reserve.
    The major expenditures recommended by the Committee for the 2009-10 
fiscal period include $4,800 for the management fee, $800 for Committee 
travel, $100 for compliance, $2,000 for the financial audit, and $1,193 
for equipment maintenance, insurance, bonds, and miscellaneous 
expenses. In comparison, the $6,893 budget approved for the 2008-09 
fiscal period included $4,800 for the management fee, $800 for travel 
expenses, $100 for compliance, and $1,193 for audits, equipment 
maintenance, insurance, bonds, and miscellaneous expenses. The major 
increase in expenses this year is in the audit category.
    The Committee discussed alternatives to this recommended assessment 
increase. Leaving the assessment rate at the current $1.00 per ton was 
discussed, but not considered since such a rate would not have 
generated income adequate to maintain the Committee's reserve at or 
about the current level.
    A review of historical information and preliminary information 
pertaining to the upcoming crop year indicates that the producer price 
for the 2009-10 season could average about $500 per ton for fresh 
Washington and Oregon grown prunes. Therefore, the estimated assessment 
revenue for the 2009-10 fiscal period as a percentage of total producer 
revenue is 0.4 percent for Washington-Oregon prunes.
    This action increases the assessment obligation imposed on 
handlers. While assessments impose some additional costs on handlers, 
the costs are uniform on all handlers. Some of the additional costs may 
be passed on to producers. However, these costs will be offset by the 
benefits derived by the operation of the order.
    In addition, the Committee's meeting was widely publicized 
throughout the Washington prune industry and all interested persons 
were invited to attend and participate in Committee deliberations on 
all issues. Like all Committee meetings, the June 2, 2009, meeting was 
a public meeting and all entities, both large and small, were able to 
express views on the issues.
    A proposed rule concerning this action was published in the Federal 
Register on July 24, 2009 (74 FR 36616). Copies of the rule were made 
available by the Committee office. Finally, the rule was made available 
through the Internet by USDA and the Office of the Federal Register. A 
30-day comment period, ending August 24, 2009, was provided to allow 
interested persons to respond to the proposal. No comments were 
received.
    This final rule will not impose any additional reporting or 
recordkeeping requirements on either small or large Washington-Oregon 
prune handlers. As with all Federal marketing order programs, reports 
and forms are periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements 
and duplication by industry and public sector agencies. As noted in the 
initial regulatory flexibility analysis, USDA has not identified any 
relevant Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or conflict with this 
rule.
    AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote 
the use of the Internet and other information technologies to provide 
increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information 
and services, and for other purposes.
    A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and 
specialty crop marketing agreements and order may be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/AMSv1.0/ams.fetchTemplateData.do?template=TemplateN&page=MarketingOrdersSmallBusinessGuide. Any questions about the compliance guide should be sent to 
Jay Guerber at the previously mentioned address in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section.

[[Page 48850]]

    After consideration of all relevant matter presented, including the 
information and recommendation submitted by the Committee and other 
available information, it is hereby found that this rule, as 
hereinafter set forth, will tend to effectuate the declared policy of 
the Act.
    Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it also found and determined that good 
cause exists for not postponing the effective date of this rule until 
30 days after publication in the Federal Register because handlers are 
already shipping prunes from the 2009-10 crop and the Committee needs 
to have sufficient funds to pay its expenses, which are incurred on a 
continuous basis. Further, handlers are aware of this action, which was 
recommended by the Committee at a public meeting and is similar to 
other assessment rate actions issued in past years. Finally, a 30-day 
comment period was provided for in the proposed rule.

List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 924

    Prunes, Marketing agreements, Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements.


0
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 924 is amended as 
follows:

PART 924--PRUNES GROWN IN DESIGNATED COUNTIES IN WASHINGTON

0
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 924 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.


0
2. Section 924.236 is revised to read as follows:


Sec.  924.236  Assessment rate.

    On or after April 1, 2009, an assessment rate of $2.00 per ton is 
established for the Washington-Oregon Fresh Prune Marketing Committee.

    Dated: September 21, 2009.
Rayne Pegg,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. E9-23153 Filed 9-24-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.