Request for Information (RFI)-Photovoltaic (PV) Manufacturing Initiative, 48531-48533 [E9-22930]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 183 / Wednesday, September 23, 2009 / Notices
Estuary includes important habitat for
all Columbia Basin salmon and
steelhead species, as well as a wide
variety of other fish and wildlife
species. The MOA is consistent with
and will work in concert with the 2008
Biological Opinion issued by the
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration-Fisheries for the Federal
Columbia River Power System for listed
salmon and steelhead. The MOA also
supports BPA’s implementation of the
Northwest Power and Conservation
Council’s Columbia Basin Fish and
Wildlife Program.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the ROD may be
obtained by calling BPA’s toll-free
document request line, 1–800–622–
4520. The ROD is also available on the
BPA Web site, https://www.bpa.gov/
corporate/pubs/rods/2008/.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sandra Ackley, Bonneville Power
Administration—KEC–4, P.O. Box 3621,
Portland, Oregon, 97208–3621; toll-free
telephone number 1–800–282–3713; fax
number 503–230–5699; or e-mail
sjackley@bpa.gov.
Issued in Portland, Oregon, on September
15, 2009.
Stephen J. Wright,
Administrator and Chief Executive Officer.
[FR Doc. E9–22926 Filed 9–22–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Program Manager/Area
JoAnn Milliken, Acting Program
Manager, Solar Energy Technologies
Program, Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy.
Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy
Request for Information (RFI)—
Photovoltaic (PV) Manufacturing
Initiative
Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy, Department of
Energy (DOE).
ACTION: Request for Information (RFI)—
Photovoltaic (PV) Manufacturing
Initiative.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Department of Energy
(DOE) today gives notice of a Request
for Information on the PV
Manufacturing Initiative. The ‘‘PV
Manufacturing Initiative’’ is intended to
coordinate stakeholders and technology
development efforts across the solar
community to facilitate the
development of a strong PV
manufacturing industry in the United
States. The primary goals of this
initiative include supporting the
creation of a robust United States-based
PV manufacturing technology including
infrastructure and supply chain base,
developing a highly trained workforce
with the critical skills required to meet
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:06 Sep 22, 2009
Jkt 217001
the needs of a rapidly growing industry,
and speeding the implementation of
new cutting edge technologies.
There are three separate models
currently under consideration:
University-Led Consortia, Collaborative
Industry-Led Consortia, and
Manufacturing Development Facilities,
which are described in full detail in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section.
This Request for Information (RFI) seeks
comments on the general concept,
potential benefits or obstacles, the
overall merits of the idea, alternatives,
and the relative priority of this activity.
DOE will evaluate responses to this RFI
to determine the best approach to move
forward.
DATES: Responses to this RFI must be
submitted by 11:59 PM Eastern Time on
September 30, 2009.
ADDRESSES: All responses to this RFI
must be delivered electronically in
Microsoft Word (.doc or .docx) format as
an attachment to an e-mail sent to the
following e-mail address:
PVManufInit@go.doe.gov.
E-mails should have the subject line
‘‘PV Manufacturing Initiative
Response’’.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Any
questions about the content of this RFI
must be sent to the following e-mail
address: PVManufInit@go.doe.gov. Emails should have the subject line
‘‘Question’’.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background and Rationale
The mission of the Department of
Energy’s (DOE) Solar Energy
Technologies Program (SETP) is to
accelerate the wide-spread adoption of
solar electric technologies across the
United States through a program of
applied research and development,
demonstration, and market
transformation activities. This mission
aims to diversify the Nation’s electricity
supply options, increase national
security, and improve the environment.
The SETP mission is consistent with the
Energy Policy Act of 2005 and DOE’s
Strategic Plan.
During the past decade, worldwide
demand for and production of PV
energy systems has been growing at a
compounded annual growth rate of
more than 30%. This growth has taken
place in response to government
supported programs in Germany, Spain,
and other countries outside the United
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
48531
States. This demand for PV products has
the potential to also grow in the United
States due to new and emerging Federal
and State support programs and
favorable solar conditions, as well as
declining system costs. Currently, the
United States, is not a major
manufacturer of PV products and,
therefore, not well-positioned to take
advantage of this opportunity’s potential
to create a strong domestic industry.
The ‘‘PV Manufacturing Initiative’’ is
intended to coordinate stakeholders and
technology development efforts across
the solar community to facilitate the
development of a strong PV
manufacturing industry in the United
States. The primary goals of this
initiative include supporting the
creation of a robust United States-based
PV manufacturing technology including
infrastructure and supply chain base,
developing a highly trained workforce
with the critical skills required to meet
the needs of a rapidly growing industry,
and speeding the implementation of
new cutting edge technologies.
Three separate models are currently
under consideration: (1) University-led
consortia guided by industry that would
conduct industry-relevant
manufacturing research projects; (2)
collaborative industry-led consortia that
will develop and implement
manufacturing research projects with
shared intellectual property (IP); and (3)
manufacturing development efforts,
possibly implemented through common
facilities, for equipment and process
development with individual
companies maintaining exclusive
ownership of IP.
Proposed Strategy
If a Funding Opportunity
Announcement (FOA) is developed
from this RFI, it will enable DOE to
launch a major PV Manufacturing
Initiative that will accelerate
development and provide a strong base
for a domestic United States PV
industry. DOE anticipates that up to
$30M may be available to fund the PV
Manufacturing Initiative in the first
year. Of that, DOE anticipates that
approximately $5M may be devoted to
a single or multiple awards for
University-Led Consortia. The
remaining $25M may be used to fund
single or multiple awards for
Collaborative Industry-led Consortia
and/or Manufacturing Development
Facilities.
All proposals to implement PV
Manufacturing Initiative models would
be evaluated according to a competitive
award process. In all cases, successful
proposals would be expected to
maximize the number of alternative
E:\FR\FM\23SEN1.SGM
23SEN1
48532
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 183 / Wednesday, September 23, 2009 / Notices
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
funding sources, provide geographic
diversity, incorporate a broad base of
the PV industry, and have a detailed
plan for the management of intellectual
property, consortium membership (if a
consortia is proposed), and other
governance issues. All PV technologies
(i.e., wafer, thin film, and concentrator)
and combinations of technologies may
be considered. The Industry-led models
(the Collaborative Industry-led
Consortia and Manufacturing
Development Facilities) are intended to
allow the integration of universities and
workforce development; likewise, the
University-Led Consortia model should
have strong ties to industry. All model
approaches are also intended to allow
for the technical participation of
national laboratories, as defined in
section 2 of the Energy Policy Act of
2005. Regarding financial participation,
each model encourages inclusion of
state economic development or other
funding organizations.
Entities who apply for multiple
awards should be able to demonstrate
that they can complete all the work
proposed.
Below are characteristics of the three
models being considered to implement
the goals of the PV Manufacturing
Initiative.
University-Led Consortia
DOE would maintain a constant level
of funding over the first 5 years for each
University-Led Consortium, with the
option to extend for 5 years either
through an extension of the existing
award, or as a subsequent competitive
opportunity. Additional sources of
funding would be expected by industry
participants and universities. The
consortia would select projects
proposed by the universities in
consultation with industry.
The specific problems to be addressed
will be identified through rigorous
planning and implementation of
industry-relevant collaborative research
plans. Based on the development
opportunities identified, the consortia
will fund development projects with the
expectation of delivering new offerings
to market within 2–5 years.
Participation in standards or roadmap
planning activities could be considered
part of the scope of these consortia.
Successful consortia will provide
interested graduate-level and postdoctoral students with opportunities for
direct experience in research and
development (R&D) projects and handson training in industrially viable
manufacturing processes. The consortia
would also address how its relationship
with the PV industry is expected to
produce graduates from the university
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:06 Sep 22, 2009
Jkt 217001
that have a thorough understanding of
PVs from materials to systems, excellent
proficiency in device, module and
system aspects of PVs, and the technical
communication skills that are highly
valued by the industry.
Collaborative Industry-Led Consortia
DOE support for each Collaborative
Industry-Led Consortium would fund
initial projects in combination with
other funding sources, with the DOE
share of support gradually decreasing
over 5 years and industry and other
parties assuming a greater share over the
same time span. Additionally, it is
expected that all industry participants
would equitably share in the intellectual
property developed through each
consortium.
The specific problems to be addressed
will be identified through rigorous
planning and implementation of
industry relevant collaborative research
plans. Based on the development
opportunities identified, the consortia
will fund development projects with the
expectation of delivering new offerings
to market within 2–5 years. Because of
the anticipated membership of diverse
companies across the PV industry, it
may be desirable for these consortia to
serve as a major resource and leading
contributors to industry-wide standards
and roadmap development.
Manufacturing Development Facilities
DOE funding for Manufacturing
Development Facilities would provide
initial awards to set up the facilities,
with additional funding for these
facilities also expected to come through
the organizing entity, user fees,
equipment providers, as well as other
participants. DOE funding would be
gradually reduced over 1–3 years with
other participants assuming a greater
share. Manufacturing Development
Facility awards could be executed with
an organization with ties to the PV
industry, industry-led consortium, or as
an individual or non-related separate
entity. Either new or retooled
manufacturing development facilities
could be established. These facilities
will assist, potentially, a wide-range of
PV companies in making the transition
to commercial production. In contrast to
the Collaborative Industry-Led
Consortia, IP developed through these
facilities will be owned by user
companies.
Manufacturing Development Facilities
could be implemented with some or all
of the following characteristics: provide
tools with common uses to innovate and
test processing parameters; facilitate
matchmaking between process
innovators and the development
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
facilities of equipment manufacturers;
enable users to access process
development and characterization
capabilities to aid benchmarking and
troubleshooting manufacturing
processes; and give users access to
technical expertise and manufacturing
equipment to speed development of full
commercial manufacturing capability.
Participation in standards or roadmap
planning activities could be considered
part of the scope of work for the
Manufacturing Development Facility
awardees.
Anticipated Award and Financial
Information, if a Funding Opportunity
Results From This RFI
Total Estimated Cost of the Project:
$125,000,000–$200,000,000 (DOE and
Cost share) depending on mix of models
selected.
Total DOE Funding Anticipated:
$100,000,000.
Initial Funding: $30,000,000.
Anticipated Level of Required Cost
Share:
University Led Collaborative Consortia,
20%.
Collaborative Industry Led Consortia,
50%.
Manufacturing Development Facilities,
50%.
Fiscal Year of Initial Funding: FY10.
Estimated Project Period of Awards:
University-Led Consortia, 5 years.
Collaborative Industry-Led Consortia, 5
years.
Manufacturing Development Facilities,
1–3 years.
Qualifications or Restricted Eligibility:
The University-Led Consortia are
restricted to domestic universities.
Industry participants for the
Collaborative Industry-Led Consortia
must have United States-based PV
research facilities and demonstrated
intent for United States manufacturing
within 3 years. All other participants
must be United States-based
organizations.
DOE Laboratory Involvement:
National laboratories may not apply
as prime applicants, but may apply as
team members.
Request for Information Guidelines
Respondents are asked to specifically
comment on the questions below.
Respondents are also encouraged to
comment on the general concept,
potential benefits or obstacles, the
overall merits of this idea, alternatives,
and the relative priority of this activity.
DOE will evaluate responses to this RFI
to determine the best approach to move
forward.
E:\FR\FM\23SEN1.SGM
23SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 183 / Wednesday, September 23, 2009 / Notices
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Questions
(1) Concept:
• Please comment on the three
models comprising the PV
Manufacturing Initiative. How well is
the problem framed, and are the models
identified correct possible solutions?
Will the models identified accomplish
the goals of the Initiative? Are there
other, more expedient approaches to
achieving the goals? Should the models
be modified? Do any of the models have
higher priority? Are there other models
that have not been discussed that
should also be considered?
• What PV technologies would most
likely succeed using these or other
models?
• What are the most likely
organizational barriers that may arise
(e.g. IP sharing issues), and are there
solutions DOE should consider?
(2) Benefits:
• What do you see as the greatest
contributions the PV Manufacturing
Initiative can make to establish a strong
manufacturing base and supply chain
for the United States PV industry?
(3) Eligibility:
• Do you agree with the eligibility
criteria for the leads and participants for
the University-Led Consortia? What
about the Collaborative Industry-Led
Consortia? Manufacturing Development
Facilities?
• Should ‘‘for profit’’ consortia be
considered or only non-profit entities?
• Should there be a minimum
number of partners required by DOE for
award or could a consortium be
contained within one institution with
far-reaching activity?
(4) Funding:
• Would it be better to fund more
awards at lower levels or fewer awards
at higher levels?
• Does the level of funding seem
appropriate given the amount and type
of work anticipated?
• Does the level of cost share seem
appropriate?
DOE will not pay for information
provided under this Request for
Information (RFI), and there is no
guarantee that a project will be
supported as a result of this RFI. This
RFI is not accepting applications for
financial assistance or financial
incentives.
A response to this RFI will not be
viewed as a binding commitment to
develop or pursue the project or ideas
discussed. DOE may also decide at a
later date to issue Funding Opportunity
Announcements (FOAs), based on
consideration of the input received from
this RFI or to not issue this opportunity
at all.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:06 Sep 22, 2009
Jkt 217001
Respondents are requested to provide
the following information at the start of
their response to this RFI:
• Company/institutional name,
• Company/institutional contact,
• Type of Business or Institution,
• Address, phone number, and e-mail
address,
• Brief description of the operations
and mission of business or institution
(several sentences will suffice).
All responses to this RFI must be
delivered electronically in Microsoft
Word (.doc) format as an attachment to
an e-mail sent to the following e-mail
address: PVManufInit@go.doe.gov. Emails should have the subject line ‘‘PV
Manufacturing Initiative Response’’.
Any questions about the content of this
RFI must be sent to the following e-mail
address: PVManufInit@go.doe.gov.
E-mails should have the subject line
‘‘Question’’.
Responses to this RFI must be
submitted by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time
on September 30, 2009. Responses
should be limited to 5 pages. However,
more than one response is allowed per
respondent. Please identify your
answers by responding to a specific
question if possible.
We welcome other comments as well.
Identifying the comment with the item
to which it refers will facilitate
aggregating all the responses. Any
information obtained as a result of this
RFI is intended to be used by the
Government on a non-attribution basis
for program planning and procurement
strategy development. Information or
data that is restricted in any way or
limited for use by the Government is not
solicited and will not be considered.
Please do not respond with any
information that you deem proprietary
or confidential. Responses to this RFI
are not confidential and may be
published publically on a nonattribution basis. DOE has no obligation
to respond to those who submit
comments, and/or give any feedback on
any decision made based on the
comments received, as there is potential
for a future Funding Opportunity
relative to this subject.
DOE thanks you for your assistance
and comments in helping accomplish its
mission.
Issued in Golden, CO, on September 4,
2009.
Andrea K. Lucero,
Contracting Officer.
[FR Doc. E9–22930 Filed 9–22–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
48533
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. CP09–463–000]
ANR Pipeline Company; Notice of
Request Under Blanket Authorization
September 16, 2009.
Take notice that on September 10,
2009, ANR Pipeline Company (ANR),
717 Texas Street, Houston, Texas 77002,
filed in Docket No. CP09–463–000, a
prior notice request pursuant to sections
157.205 and 157.216 of the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission’s
regulations under the Natural Gas Act
for authorization to abandon by sale to
ATP Oil & Gas Corporation (ATP),
approximately 9.67 miles of 6-inch
diameter pipeline, located in offshore
Louisiana, all as more fully set forth in
the application, which is on file with
the Commission and open to public
inspection. The filing may also be
viewed on the web at https://
www.ferc.gov using the ‘‘eLibrary’’ link.
Enter the docket number excluding the
last three digits in the docket number
field to access the document. For
assistance, contact FERC at
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov or call
toll-free, (866) 208–3676 or TTY, (202)
502–8659.
Specifically, ANR proposes to
abandon by sale to ATP, the El 30–34
Facilities, which consist of
approximately 9.67 miles of 6-inch
diameter pipeline bearing Minerals
Management Service Segment No. 8888,
ANR Line No. 795, beginning at a point
on ATP’s Eugene Island Area Block 30
JA Platform and ending at the upstream
side of a subsea 8-inch tap valve located
on ANR’s 20-inch pipeline in Eugene
Island Area Block 34 designated as Line
No. 733, in Federal Waters, offshore
Louisiana. ANR also proposes to
abandon its interest in any
appurtenances and facilities related to
Line No. 795, including, and without
limitation, the pipeline riser, metering
facilities including Meter No. 512202
(excluding any Electronic Gas
Measurement Equipment (EGM)), and
deck piping associated with the El 30–
34 Facilities. ANR states that they will
continue to operate the meter for ATP,
and will continue to own, operate, and
maintain ANR’s existing side valve
assembly on ANR’s Line No. 733, EGM,
and gas sampling equipment.
Any questions regarding the
application should be directed to Rene
Staeb, Manager, Project Determinations
& Regulatory Administration, ANR
Pipeline Company, 717 Texas Street,
Houston, Texas 77002, or call at (832)
E:\FR\FM\23SEN1.SGM
23SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 183 (Wednesday, September 23, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48531-48533]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-22930]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy
Request for Information (RFI)--Photovoltaic (PV) Manufacturing
Initiative
AGENCY: Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Department of
Energy (DOE).
ACTION: Request for Information (RFI)--Photovoltaic (PV) Manufacturing
Initiative.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Energy (DOE) today gives notice of a Request
for Information on the PV Manufacturing Initiative. The ``PV
Manufacturing Initiative'' is intended to coordinate stakeholders and
technology development efforts across the solar community to facilitate
the development of a strong PV manufacturing industry in the United
States. The primary goals of this initiative include supporting the
creation of a robust United States-based PV manufacturing technology
including infrastructure and supply chain base, developing a highly
trained workforce with the critical skills required to meet the needs
of a rapidly growing industry, and speeding the implementation of new
cutting edge technologies.
There are three separate models currently under consideration:
University-Led Consortia, Collaborative Industry-Led Consortia, and
Manufacturing Development Facilities, which are described in full
detail in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section. This Request for
Information (RFI) seeks comments on the general concept, potential
benefits or obstacles, the overall merits of the idea, alternatives,
and the relative priority of this activity. DOE will evaluate responses
to this RFI to determine the best approach to move forward.
DATES: Responses to this RFI must be submitted by 11:59 PM Eastern Time
on September 30, 2009.
ADDRESSES: All responses to this RFI must be delivered electronically
in Microsoft Word (.doc or .docx) format as an attachment to an e-mail
sent to the following e-mail address: PVManufInit@go.doe.gov. E-mails
should have the subject line ``PV Manufacturing Initiative Response''.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Any questions about the content of
this RFI must be sent to the following e-mail address:
PVManufInit@go.doe.gov. E-mails should have the subject line
``Question''.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Program Manager/Area
JoAnn Milliken, Acting Program Manager, Solar Energy Technologies
Program, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.
Background and Rationale
The mission of the Department of Energy's (DOE) Solar Energy
Technologies Program (SETP) is to accelerate the wide-spread adoption
of solar electric technologies across the United States through a
program of applied research and development, demonstration, and market
transformation activities. This mission aims to diversify the Nation's
electricity supply options, increase national security, and improve the
environment. The SETP mission is consistent with the Energy Policy Act
of 2005 and DOE's Strategic Plan.
During the past decade, worldwide demand for and production of PV
energy systems has been growing at a compounded annual growth rate of
more than 30%. This growth has taken place in response to government
supported programs in Germany, Spain, and other countries outside the
United States. This demand for PV products has the potential to also
grow in the United States due to new and emerging Federal and State
support programs and favorable solar conditions, as well as declining
system costs. Currently, the United States, is not a major manufacturer
of PV products and, therefore, not well-positioned to take advantage of
this opportunity's potential to create a strong domestic industry.
The ``PV Manufacturing Initiative'' is intended to coordinate
stakeholders and technology development efforts across the solar
community to facilitate the development of a strong PV manufacturing
industry in the United States. The primary goals of this initiative
include supporting the creation of a robust United States-based PV
manufacturing technology including infrastructure and supply chain
base, developing a highly trained workforce with the critical skills
required to meet the needs of a rapidly growing industry, and speeding
the implementation of new cutting edge technologies.
Three separate models are currently under consideration: (1)
University-led consortia guided by industry that would conduct
industry-relevant manufacturing research projects; (2) collaborative
industry-led consortia that will develop and implement manufacturing
research projects with shared intellectual property (IP); and (3)
manufacturing development efforts, possibly implemented through common
facilities, for equipment and process development with individual
companies maintaining exclusive ownership of IP.
Proposed Strategy
If a Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) is developed from this
RFI, it will enable DOE to launch a major PV Manufacturing Initiative
that will accelerate development and provide a strong base for a
domestic United States PV industry. DOE anticipates that up to $30M may
be available to fund the PV Manufacturing Initiative in the first year.
Of that, DOE anticipates that approximately $5M may be devoted to a
single or multiple awards for University-Led Consortia. The remaining
$25M may be used to fund single or multiple awards for Collaborative
Industry-led Consortia and/or Manufacturing Development Facilities.
All proposals to implement PV Manufacturing Initiative models would
be evaluated according to a competitive award process. In all cases,
successful proposals would be expected to maximize the number of
alternative
[[Page 48532]]
funding sources, provide geographic diversity, incorporate a broad base
of the PV industry, and have a detailed plan for the management of
intellectual property, consortium membership (if a consortia is
proposed), and other governance issues. All PV technologies (i.e.,
wafer, thin film, and concentrator) and combinations of technologies
may be considered. The Industry-led models (the Collaborative Industry-
led Consortia and Manufacturing Development Facilities) are intended to
allow the integration of universities and workforce development;
likewise, the University-Led Consortia model should have strong ties to
industry. All model approaches are also intended to allow for the
technical participation of national laboratories, as defined in section
2 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005. Regarding financial participation,
each model encourages inclusion of state economic development or other
funding organizations.
Entities who apply for multiple awards should be able to
demonstrate that they can complete all the work proposed.
Below are characteristics of the three models being considered to
implement the goals of the PV Manufacturing Initiative.
University-Led Consortia
DOE would maintain a constant level of funding over the first 5
years for each University-Led Consortium, with the option to extend for
5 years either through an extension of the existing award, or as a
subsequent competitive opportunity. Additional sources of funding would
be expected by industry participants and universities. The consortia
would select projects proposed by the universities in consultation with
industry.
The specific problems to be addressed will be identified through
rigorous planning and implementation of industry-relevant collaborative
research plans. Based on the development opportunities identified, the
consortia will fund development projects with the expectation of
delivering new offerings to market within 2-5 years. Participation in
standards or roadmap planning activities could be considered part of
the scope of these consortia.
Successful consortia will provide interested graduate-level and
post-doctoral students with opportunities for direct experience in
research and development (R&D) projects and hands-on training in
industrially viable manufacturing processes. The consortia would also
address how its relationship with the PV industry is expected to
produce graduates from the university that have a thorough
understanding of PVs from materials to systems, excellent proficiency
in device, module and system aspects of PVs, and the technical
communication skills that are highly valued by the industry.
Collaborative Industry-Led Consortia
DOE support for each Collaborative Industry-Led Consortium would
fund initial projects in combination with other funding sources, with
the DOE share of support gradually decreasing over 5 years and industry
and other parties assuming a greater share over the same time span.
Additionally, it is expected that all industry participants would
equitably share in the intellectual property developed through each
consortium.
The specific problems to be addressed will be identified through
rigorous planning and implementation of industry relevant collaborative
research plans. Based on the development opportunities identified, the
consortia will fund development projects with the expectation of
delivering new offerings to market within 2-5 years. Because of the
anticipated membership of diverse companies across the PV industry, it
may be desirable for these consortia to serve as a major resource and
leading contributors to industry-wide standards and roadmap
development.
Manufacturing Development Facilities
DOE funding for Manufacturing Development Facilities would provide
initial awards to set up the facilities, with additional funding for
these facilities also expected to come through the organizing entity,
user fees, equipment providers, as well as other participants. DOE
funding would be gradually reduced over 1-3 years with other
participants assuming a greater share. Manufacturing Development
Facility awards could be executed with an organization with ties to the
PV industry, industry-led consortium, or as an individual or non-
related separate entity. Either new or retooled manufacturing
development facilities could be established. These facilities will
assist, potentially, a wide-range of PV companies in making the
transition to commercial production. In contrast to the Collaborative
Industry-Led Consortia, IP developed through these facilities will be
owned by user companies.
Manufacturing Development Facilities could be implemented with some
or all of the following characteristics: provide tools with common uses
to innovate and test processing parameters; facilitate matchmaking
between process innovators and the development facilities of equipment
manufacturers; enable users to access process development and
characterization capabilities to aid benchmarking and troubleshooting
manufacturing processes; and give users access to technical expertise
and manufacturing equipment to speed development of full commercial
manufacturing capability.
Participation in standards or roadmap planning activities could be
considered part of the scope of work for the Manufacturing Development
Facility awardees.
Anticipated Award and Financial Information, if a Funding Opportunity
Results From This RFI
Total Estimated Cost of the Project: $125,000,000-$200,000,000 (DOE
and Cost share) depending on mix of models selected.
Total DOE Funding Anticipated: $100,000,000.
Initial Funding: $30,000,000.
Anticipated Level of Required Cost Share:
University Led Collaborative Consortia, 20%.
Collaborative Industry Led Consortia, 50%.
Manufacturing Development Facilities, 50%.
Fiscal Year of Initial Funding: FY10.
Estimated Project Period of Awards:
University-Led Consortia, 5 years.
Collaborative Industry-Led Consortia, 5 years.
Manufacturing Development Facilities, 1-3 years.
Qualifications or Restricted Eligibility:
The University-Led Consortia are restricted to domestic
universities. Industry participants for the Collaborative Industry-Led
Consortia must have United States-based PV research facilities and
demonstrated intent for United States manufacturing within 3 years. All
other participants must be United States-based organizations.
DOE Laboratory Involvement:
National laboratories may not apply as prime applicants, but may
apply as team members.
Request for Information Guidelines
Respondents are asked to specifically comment on the questions
below. Respondents are also encouraged to comment on the general
concept, potential benefits or obstacles, the overall merits of this
idea, alternatives, and the relative priority of this activity. DOE
will evaluate responses to this RFI to determine the best approach to
move forward.
[[Page 48533]]
Questions
(1) Concept:
Please comment on the three models comprising the PV
Manufacturing Initiative. How well is the problem framed, and are the
models identified correct possible solutions? Will the models
identified accomplish the goals of the Initiative? Are there other,
more expedient approaches to achieving the goals? Should the models be
modified? Do any of the models have higher priority? Are there other
models that have not been discussed that should also be considered?
What PV technologies would most likely succeed using these
or other models?
What are the most likely organizational barriers that may
arise (e.g. IP sharing issues), and are there solutions DOE should
consider?
(2) Benefits:
What do you see as the greatest contributions the PV
Manufacturing Initiative can make to establish a strong manufacturing
base and supply chain for the United States PV industry?
(3) Eligibility:
Do you agree with the eligibility criteria for the leads
and participants for the University-Led Consortia? What about the
Collaborative Industry-Led Consortia? Manufacturing Development
Facilities?
Should ``for profit'' consortia be considered or only non-
profit entities?
Should there be a minimum number of partners required by
DOE for award or could a consortium be contained within one institution
with far-reaching activity?
(4) Funding:
Would it be better to fund more awards at lower levels or
fewer awards at higher levels?
Does the level of funding seem appropriate given the
amount and type of work anticipated?
Does the level of cost share seem appropriate?
DOE will not pay for information provided under this Request for
Information (RFI), and there is no guarantee that a project will be
supported as a result of this RFI. This RFI is not accepting
applications for financial assistance or financial incentives.
A response to this RFI will not be viewed as a binding commitment
to develop or pursue the project or ideas discussed. DOE may also
decide at a later date to issue Funding Opportunity Announcements
(FOAs), based on consideration of the input received from this RFI or
to not issue this opportunity at all.
Respondents are requested to provide the following information at
the start of their response to this RFI:
Company/institutional name,
Company/institutional contact,
Type of Business or Institution,
Address, phone number, and e-mail address,
Brief description of the operations and mission of
business or institution (several sentences will suffice).
All responses to this RFI must be delivered electronically in
Microsoft Word (.doc) format as an attachment to an e-mail sent to the
following e-mail address: PVManufInit@go.doe.gov. E-mails should have
the subject line ``PV Manufacturing Initiative Response''. Any
questions about the content of this RFI must be sent to the following
e-mail address: PVManufInit@go.doe.gov. E-mails should have the subject
line ``Question''.
Responses to this RFI must be submitted by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time
on September 30, 2009. Responses should be limited to 5 pages. However,
more than one response is allowed per respondent. Please identify your
answers by responding to a specific question if possible.
We welcome other comments as well. Identifying the comment with the
item to which it refers will facilitate aggregating all the responses.
Any information obtained as a result of this RFI is intended to be used
by the Government on a non-attribution basis for program planning and
procurement strategy development. Information or data that is
restricted in any way or limited for use by the Government is not
solicited and will not be considered. Please do not respond with any
information that you deem proprietary or confidential. Responses to
this RFI are not confidential and may be published publically on a non-
attribution basis. DOE has no obligation to respond to those who submit
comments, and/or give any feedback on any decision made based on the
comments received, as there is potential for a future Funding
Opportunity relative to this subject.
DOE thanks you for your assistance and comments in helping
accomplish its mission.
Issued in Golden, CO, on September 4, 2009.
Andrea K. Lucero,
Contracting Officer.
[FR Doc. E9-22930 Filed 9-22-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P