Office of Biotechnology Activities; Recombinant DNA Research: Actions Under the NIH Guidelines for Research Involving Recombinant DNA Molecules (NIH Guidelines), 48275-48280 [E9-22693]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 22, 2009 / Notices
WRRHC is a successful community
health center that provides services to
10 counties within Arkansas and has
over 22 years of experience in managing
State and federally funded programs,
including three previous Rural Health
Services Outreach grants. The
comprehensive services that WRRHC
provides and their ability to expand
their service area will enable WRRHC to
maintain the current scope of service
and activities as originally awarded
under the grant to Siloam Springs
Memorial Hospital. This replacement
award will help ensure the continued
improvement of health care systems in
the targeted service area. WRRHC has a
demonstrated record of sound
stewardship of Federal funds and can
effectively serve as the network lead for
the remainder period of support in a
manner which minimizes any
disruption of services provided by the
network. Consequently, White River
Rural Health Center has been designated
the replacement award recipient.
HRSA is unaware of any other entity
that both meets the statutory eligibility
requirements and has the ability to carry
out these activities.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom
Morris, Associate Administrator, Office
of Rural Health Policy, Health Resources
and Services Administration, 5600
Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857;
phone 301–443–0835;
tmorris@hrsa.hhs.gov.
Dated: September 16, 2009.
Mary K. Wakefield,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. E9–22815 Filed 9–21–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4165–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health
Office of Biotechnology Activities;
Recombinant DNA Research: Actions
Under the NIH Guidelines for Research
Involving Recombinant DNA Molecules
(NIH Guidelines)
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY: National Institutes of Health
(NIH), Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS).
ACTION: Notice of changes to the NIH
Guidelines.
SUMMARY: Concerns about the
emergence of a pandemic influenza
virus have spurred research on
influenza viruses that have either
caused pandemics or are believed to
have the potential to cause a pandemic.
These viruses include human H2N2
virus, which circulated from 1957–1968,
VerDate Nov<24>2008
21:23 Sep 21, 2009
Jkt 217001
the 1918–1919 H1N1, which caused the
deadliest pandemic in the past century,
and the Highly Pathogenic Avian
Influenza (HPAI) H5N1 virus that is
thought to have pandemic potential.
The public health benefits of this
research include developing a better
understanding of the pathogenicity of
pandemic influenza viruses, their
virulence mechanisms, mechanisms of
host adaptation, and ultimately the
development of vaccines and antiviral
drugs. These benefits are balanced
against the potential risks that might
include the inadvertent release of a
highly transmissible and potentially
virulent influenza virus. Consequently,
explicit and uniform biosafety
containment practices are critical to the
safe conduct of research with these
agents. The NIH Guidelines provide a
framework for assessing the risks of
such research. However, after extensive
consultation with the NIH Recombinant
DNA Advisory Committee (RAC),
experts in biosafety and influenza, the
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC), and the U.S.
Department of Agriculture (USDA), the
NIH Office of Biotechnology Activities
(OBA) concluded that more specific
guidance in the NIH Guidelines is
warranted to promote uniform biosafety
practices for recombinant research with
these viruses.
The resulting amendments are ‘‘Minor
Actions’’ under Section IV–C–1–(b)–2 of
the NIH Guidelines and, therefore, will
be implemented immediately upon
publication in the Federal Register.
While a Minor Action only requires
consultation with the RAC chair and
one or more RAC members, as
necessary, as noted above, these changes
were developed after extensive
consultation with the full RAC and
other experts and were discussed at
three public RAC meetings. The RAC
voted on March 4, 2009 to recommend
these changes. They are being published
to inform the scientific and biosafety
communities, as well as to solicit
continued scientific input should
further revisions be needed.
The NIH Guidelines are being
changed to provide the following
biosafety guidance for research with
potentially pandemic influenza viruses:
• Designation of human H2N2 viruses
that circulated from 1957–1968 (human
H2N2 (1957–1968)), the fully
reconstructed 1918–1919 H1N1
influenza virus (1918 H1N1), and
Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza
(HPAI) H5N1 within the Goose/
Guangdong/96-like H5 lineage (HPAI
H5N1) as Risk Group 3 agents. Risk
Group 3 agents have the potential to
cause serious or lethal disease in
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
48275
humans for which preventative and
therapeutic measures may be available.
Up until this revision, all influenza
viruses (Orthomyxoviruses) were Risk
Group 2 agents, which are agents that
are associated with human disease that
is rarely serious and for which
preventative and therapeutic agents are
often available.
• Requirement for enhanced biosafety
practices, including the use of powered
air purifying respirators (PAPRs) and
other personal protective equipment to
prevent laboratory worker exposure and
minimize the risk of spread outside of
the laboratory.
• Guidance on the containment for
research with influenza viruses
generated by recombinant methods (e.g.,
generation by reverse genetics of
chimeric viruses with reassorted
segments, introduction of specific
mutations) containing one or more
genes and/or segments from human
H2N2 (1957–1968), 1918 H1N1 or HPAI
H5N1. For 1918 H1N1, the NIH
Guidelines will require Biosafety Level
3 enhanced containment for all
influenza viruses that contain one of
more genes and/or segments from 1918
H1N1 because of the uncertainty about
the virulence factors for this agent.
• Guidance on occupational health
practices, including policies regarding
the use of prophylactic antiviral agents
and isolation of laboratory workers who
are exposed to one of these viruses.
DATES: The public is encouraged to
submit written comments on this action.
Comments may be submitted to OBA in
paper or electronic form at the OBA
mailing, fax, and e-mail addresses
shown below under the heading FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. All
comments should be submitted by
September 22, 2010. All written
comments received in response to this
notice will be available for public
inspection in the NIH OBA office, 6705
Rockledge Drive, Suite 750, MSC 7985,
Bethesda, MD 20892–7985, weekdays
between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 5
p.m. and may be posted to OBA’s Web
site.
If you have
questions, or require additional
information about these changes, please
contact OBA by e-mail at
oba@od.nih.gov, or telephone at 301–
496–9838. Comments may be submitted
to the same e-mail address or by fax at
301–496–9839 or by mail to the Office
of Biotechnology Activities, National
Institutes of Health, 6705 Rockledge
Drive, Suite 750, MSC 7985, Bethesda,
Maryland 20892–7985. Background
information may be obtained by
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\22SEN1.SGM
22SEN1
48276
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 22, 2009 / Notices
contacting NIH OBA by e-mail at
oba@od.nih.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
Background
Recently, NIH support for research
with influenza viruses involving
recombinant DNA technology has
significantly increased. The
development of new laboratory
methods, such as reverse genetics, has
allowed for easier and more rapid
generation of infectious influenza
viruses from DNA plasmids, e.g.
reassortant viruses. An increasing
proportion of such research has focused
on pandemic or potentially pandemic
viruses. These include previously
pandemic viruses that are not currently
circulating in the human population,
such as the human H2N2 virus that
caused a pandemic resulting in
approximately 66,000 excess deaths in
the U.S. in 1957 and the 1918 H1N1
virus, which caused 20–40 million
excess deaths worldwide. Another focus
of research is currently circulating
highly pathogenic avian influenza
viruses (HPAI) that may have potential
to cause a human pandemic if efficient
human-to-human transmission were to
develop. Over 400 cases worldwide of
human infection with the HPAI H5N1
virus have been reported to date with
approximately 60% mortality rate;
however, evidence of human-to-human
transmission has been limited to small,
familial clusters.
The public health benefits of research
on potentially pandemic influenza
viruses include identification of viral
proteins that contribute to host
adaptation and virulence to increase
understanding of the pathogenicity of
influenza viruses during pandemics,
development of vaccine candidates, and
identification of targets for antiviral
drugs. While research into influenza
viral virulence mechanisms and the
development of vaccines and antiviral
drugs are public health priorities, it is
equally important that the research be
performed under appropriate
biocontainment to protect the health of
laboratory researchers and the public.
There are currently other biosafety
requirements for certain types of
research with these viruses. The CDC/
NIH Biosafety in Microbiological and
Biomedical Laboratories (5th edition)
(BMBL) recommends Biosafety Level 3
with additional personal protection
equipment designed to minimize the
risk of laboratory acquired infection for
research with the reconstructed
replication competent forms of 1918
H1N1 (i.e. Biosafety Level 3 enhanced).
Reconstructed replication competent
VerDate Nov<24>2008
21:23 Sep 21, 2009
Jkt 217001
forms of 1918 pandemic influenza virus
H1N1 were designated HHS/CDC Select
Agents in 2005 (70 FR 61047). The
BMBL also recommends Biosafety Level
3 containment level for research with
the full human H2N2 virus (1957–1968)
with enhancements designed to prevent
laboratory acquired respiratory
infection.
HPAI H5N1 influenza viruses are
USDA Select Agents (9 CFR 121.3(b)).
The USDA’s Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service (APHIS) regulates as
a Select Agent avian influenza viruses
(and constructs thereof pursuant to 9
CFR 121.3(c)(3)) that demonstrate a high
pathogenicity index in chickens,
contain a specific poly-basic amino acid
motif at the hemagglutinin (HA) gene
cleavage site (or have an amino acid
sequence at the cleavage site of the HA
gene that is compatible with other
highly pathogenic avian influenza
viruses) and show growth
characteristics of influenza virus in the
presence and absence of trypsin. Avian
influenza viruses that demonstrate
evidence of attenuation in poultry can
be excluded pursuant to 9 CFR 121.3(e).
The biosafety containment level
recommended for most Select Agent
research with these viruses is a
minimum of Biosafety Level 3 enhanced
or Animal Biosafety Level 3 (ABSL3)
enhanced. Influenza viruses containing
genes from highly pathogenic avian
influenza virus that are not classified as
Select Agents by USDA are still
regulated by that agency through
‘‘permitting’’ regulations (9 CFR 122),
which govern imports and interstate
movements of the viruses.
The current (April 2002) NIH
Guidelines classify influenza viruses A,
B, and C as Risk Group 2 agents in
Appendix B. No distinction is made
between potentially pandemic strains of
influenza and other lower risk influenza
viruses. According to the NIH
Guidelines, an initial risk assessment is
based on the Risk Group (RG) of the
parent agent; however, appropriate
containment is set following
consideration of the specific agent and
how it is to be manipulated. The NIH
Guidelines emphasize that containment
levels for recombinant research may be
raised or lowered relative to the RG
classification of the parent agent after a
comprehensive risk assessment.
Up until today, the NIH Guidelines
had not been amended to address
specifically recombinant influenza
viruses that contain genes and/or
segments from human H2N2 (1957–
1968), 1918 H1N1 and HPAI H5N1
viruses. Therefore, to clarify and
augment the current biosafety guidance
in the NIH Guidelines for research with
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
potentially pandemic influenza viruses,
and to harmonize with the BMBL and
other regulatory policies, NIH/OBA in
consultation with the RAC and outside
experts, including the CDC and USDA,
reviewed and revised the Risk Group
designations for potentially pandemic
influenza viruses human H2N2 (1957–
1968), 1918 H1N1, and HPAI H5N1 and
developed additional containment and
occupational health guidance for
research involving recombinant
influenza viruses containing genes from
these influenza viruses.
In determining the Risk Group (RG)
classification for human H2N2 (1957–
1968), 1918 H1N1 and HPAI H5N1, the
RAC considered the definition of risk
groups in Appendix B. Risk Group 3
agents are those ‘‘that are associated
with serious or lethal disease for which
preventative or therapeutic
interventions may be available (high
individual risk but low community
risk).’’ Each strain was considered to be
a risk for serious or lethal disease,
although it was recognized that the case
fatality rate for HPAI H5N1 is very high,
over 50 percent, whereas the case
fatality rate for 1918 H1N1 is
considerably lower in the range of 1–2
percent. Human H2N2 caused a much
milder pandemic compared to 1918
H1N1, but because it has not circulated
for over forty years, a large population
will likely not have immunity to the
virus and therefore is at risk of serious
disease. ‘‘Preventative or therapeutic
interventions may be available’’ for
infection with each of these viruses as
there is evidence that the antiviral
agents used against seasonal influenza
are effective for prophylactic and
therapeutic use for each virus and
antibiotics are available for secondary
bacterial pneumonias should they
develop. Virus specific vaccines are not
currently available to prevent infection.
However, they are being developed and
stockpiled for HPAI H5N1, and sources
exist for the possible development of
1918 H1N1 or human H2N2 (1957–
1968) vaccines for laboratory workers
who might be exposed or in the unlikely
event of a release of the virus into the
general population. In the case of
human H2N2 (1957–1968), some preexisting immunity is likely in the
population that was exposed to human
H2N2 while these viruses circulated
from 1957–1968 or from cross-reactivity
with N2 in the currently circulating
H3N2 strain. For 1918 H1N1, partial
immunoprotection may exist from
previous exposure or vaccination with
recently circulating H1N1 strains, but
definitive data are lacking. An
important additional consideration for
E:\FR\FM\22SEN1.SGM
22SEN1
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 22, 2009 / Notices
HPAI H5N1 RG classification was that,
while the individual risk of serious or
lethal disease is quite high, the
community risk is currently considered
low, as there is only limited evidence
for human-to-human transmission.
Based on these considerations,
influenza viruses 1918 H1N1, human
H2N2 (1957–1968), and highly
pathogenic avian influenza H5N1
viruses within the Goose/Guangdong/
96-like H5 lineage will be classified as
Risk Group 3 agents in Appendix B–III–
D. All viruses within HPAI H5N1
lineages that have been associated with
human disease, whether it is mild or
severe and fatal, will be classified as
RG3 agents. Thus BL3 enhanced
containment will apply to a virus
evolving from the current lineages that
causes milder disease in humans, which
could indicate adaptation to the human
host.
Because the generation of influenza
viruses by reassorting RNA segments by
recombinant techniques (i.e., reverse
genetics) does not take place in a single
host-vector system, OBA has received
questions about which sections of the
NIH Guidelines apply to such research
with influenza viruses. Sections III–D–
1 or III–D–2 (research that falls under
Section III–D requires Institutional
Biosafety Committee approval before
initiation) refer to specific host-vector
systems and, therefore, do not
specifically address this research. To
clarify this, an additional section has
been added: Section III–D–7–
Experiments Involving Influenza
Viruses. This section will apply to
recombinant research with influenza
viruses (e.g., chimeric viruses with
reassorted segments generated by
reverse genetics, viruses in which
specific mutations are introduced).
Additional biosafety guidance for
research with 1918 H1N1, HPAI H5N1
within the Goose/Guangdong/96-like H5
lineage and human H2N2 (1957–1968)
has been included in Appendix G–II–C–
5. Biosafety Level 3 Enhanced for
Research Involving Risk Group 3
Influenza Viruses. In addition to the
standard BL3 containment and
practices, the RAC recommended
specific enhancements for research with
these viruses including personal
protective equipment (e.g., powered airpurifying respirators, protective suits),
practices and procedures (e.g., clothing
changes, showers when appropriate). In
addition, the RAC made specific
recommendations on training for these
enhanced practices. Guidance is also
provided for avoidance of inadvertent
cross-contamination during research. To
address the potential public health risks
of a laboratory exposure, this section
VerDate Nov<24>2008
21:23 Sep 21, 2009
Jkt 217001
also includes recommendations for
development of a detailed occupational
health plan for research with each virus,
including how to respond to known
laboratory exposures or development of
an influenza-like illness in laboratory
workers. The community risk from an
inadvertent laboratory release of a virus
with human H2N2 (1957–1968) or 1918
H1N1 is expected to be higher than for
HPAI H5N1. Consequently, the
occupational health recommendations
for the response to a known laboratory
exposure differ depending on whether
the exposure was to HPAI H5N1, a virus
that currently does not efficiently
transmit human-to-human, or to either
human H2N2 (1957–1968) or 1918
H1N1, both of which have previously
caused pandemics, therefore
demonstrating efficient human-tohuman transmission. These
recommendations regarding
occupational health are also included in
Appendix G–II–C–5.
During development of the
occupational health recommendations,
the RAC discussed the use of preexposure prophylaxis with antiviral
agents (e.g., oseltamivir) for research
with 1918 H1N1. Initially, the RAC had
proposed recommending a practice that
is in place at the CDC (the first lab to
work with 1918 H1N1), namely that
researchers working with 1918 H1N1
take pre-exposure prophylaxis with the
antiviral oseltamivir for their protection,
and to further limit the risk to the
public. In addition, the
Intragovernmental Select Agents and
Toxins Technical Advisory Committee
(ISATTAC), an advisory body to the
USDA and CDC Select Agent Programs,
recommended that the CDC Select
Agent Program require pre-exposure
prophylaxis for research with 1918
H1N1 at BL3 enhanced but not at BL4
containment. This recommendation was
adopted by the CDC Select Agent
Program. However, as research on 1918
H1N1 progressed and more was learned
about the virus, other influenza
researchers expressed concerns that the
risks of long-term use of antiviral drugs
would not be balanced by potential
benefit to the investigator or the public.
To address this issue, the RAC and
ISATTAC convened a Safety
Symposium on Public Health and
Biosafety Practices for Research with
1918 H1N1 Influenza Virus on
December 2, 2008 (a Webcast of the
meeting is available at https://
oba.od.nih.gov/rdna_rac/
rac_past_meetings_2000.html). The
discussion at the safety symposium
focused on the scientific data regarding
the efficacy of prophylactic
administration and use of oseltamivir
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
48277
for extended periods of time, as well as
public health and ethical issues. The
RAC concluded that while prophylaxis
can reduce the likelihood of an
individual laboratory worker developing
symptoms or complications should they
become infected, it will not eliminate
the risk of transmission to the
community. Further, although the
medications are generally safe, there are
risks, and data on long-term use (beyond
6 weeks) are limited. Therefore, the RAC
concluded that the data do not support
mandating pre-exposure prophylaxis.
Instead, the RAC recommended that the
use of antiviral agents as pre-exposure
prophylaxis be discussed with
laboratory workers and used on a caseby-case basis, after a risk assessment
and appropriate counseling of the
laboratory worker about the risks and
potential benefits. Antiviral agents are
recommended for post-exposure
prophylaxis after medical evaluation.
While most research with these
viruses will be conducted at BL3 with
specific enhanced practices, the RAC
also considered whether certain
research could be safely conducted at
lower containment. After consulting
with experts in influenza virology, the
RAC concluded that due to the
multigenic determinants of virulence
observed in influenza viruses, it is
difficult to predict the phenotype of
recombinant influenza viruses created
by reassorting segments from multiple
strains of influenza viruses. As the
current data are insufficient to generate
a predictive framework upon which to
base the risk assessment, a case-by-case
evaluation is more appropriate.
Section III–D–7 will specify when an
IBC may determine containment for
certain research (e.g., research with H2
HA in cold-adapted, live attenuated
vaccine strains, or research with
chimeric influenza viruses containing a
minority of genes and/or segments from
HPAI H5N1) and when requests to
lower containment must be considered
by the NIH (e.g., research with
recombinant viruses containing any
gene and/or segment from 1918 H1N1).
Because the revisions outlined herein
are considered Minor Actions as defined
in Section IV–C–1–b–(2) of the NIH
Guidelines, public and Federal Agency
comment is not required and the
changes are to be implemented
immediately. However, in order to
promote transparency and to gather
ongoing input from scientific
community, OBA is publishing these
changes in the Federal Register with
opportunity for public comment. The
NIH Guidelines are intended to be an
evolving document that may be
modified to address new developments
E:\FR\FM\22SEN1.SGM
22SEN1
48278
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 22, 2009 / Notices
in research. As the influenza virology
field advances, new data will emerge to
inform risk assessments for research
with these viruses. The public is
encouraged to submit written
comments, in particular on the
following question regarding
containment for 1918 H1N1:
• What data can be used to
confidently predict an influenza virus
containing one or more genes from the
1918 H1N1 virus can be worked with
safely at biosafety containment level
lower than Biosafety level 3 enhanced?
Are there animal models of infection
that are consistent and predictive of
attenuation or loss of virulence in
humans? What data should be used to
assess attenuation in animal model(s)?
What criteria should be used to evaluate
a request for reduction of containment?
When data are available to answer
these questions, or new data emerges
regarding other aspects of these changes,
the framework will be reevaluated.
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
Amendments to the NIH Guidelines
In order to ensure that biosafety
considerations for research with human
H2N2 (1957–1968), 1918 H1N1 and
HPAI H5N1 are addressed
appropriately, the NIH/OBA has made
the following changes to the NIH
Guidelines:
Section III–D–7. Experiments Involving
Influenza Viruses
This section will apply to
recombinant experiments with
influenza viruses that contain genes
and/or segments from human H2N2
(1957–1968), HPAI H5N1, and 1918
H1N1 (e.g., chimeric viruses with
reassorted segments generated by
reverse genetics, viruses in which
specific mutations are introduced).
Because the generation of viruses by
reassortment of RNA segments does not
involve a single host-vector system,
such experiments do not fit neatly into
Sections III–D–1 or III–D–2. The new
Section III–D–7 states: ‘‘Experiments
with influenza viruses generated by
recombinant methods (e.g., generation
by reverse genetics of chimeric viruses
with reassorted segments, introduction
of specific mutations) shall be
conducted at the biosafety level
containment corresponding to the risk
group of the virus that was the source
of the majority of segments in the
recombinant virus (e.g., experiments
with viruses containing a majority of
segments from a RG3 virus shall be
conducted at BL3). Experiments with
influenza viruses containing genes or
segments from 1918–1919 H1N1 (1918
H1N1), human H2N2 (1957–1968) and
highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1
VerDate Nov<24>2008
21:23 Sep 21, 2009
Jkt 217001
strains within the Goose/Guangdong/96like H5 lineage (HPAI H5N1) shall be
conducted at BL3 enhanced
containment (see Appendix G–II–C–5,
Biosafety Level 3 Enhanced for Research
Involving Risk Group 3 Influenza
Viruses) unless indicated below.’’
Section III–D–7–a. Human H2N2
(1957–1968). Experiments with
influenza viruses containing the H2
hemagglutinin (HA) segment shall be
conducted at BL3 enhanced (see
Appendix G–II–C–5, Biosafety Level 3
Enhanced for Research Involving Risk
Group 3 Influenza Viruses).
Experiments with the H2 HA gene in
cold-adapted, live attenuated vaccine
strains (e.g., A/Ann Arbor/6/60 H2N2)
may be conducted at BL2 containment
provided segments with mutations
conferring temperature sensitivity and
attenuation are not altered in the
recombinant virus. Experiments with
Risk Group 2 influenza viruses
containing genes from human H2N2
(1957–1968) other than the HA gene can
be worked on at BL2.
Section III–D–7–b. Highly Pathogenic
Avian Influenza H5N1 strains within the
Goose/Guangdong/96-like H5 lineage
(HPAI H5N1). Experiments involving
influenza viruses containing a majority
of genes and/or segments from a HPAI
H5N1 influenza virus shall be
conducted at BL3 enhanced
containment, (see Appendix G–II–C–5,
Biosafety Level 3 Enhanced for Research
Involving Risk Group 3 Influenza
Viruses). Experiments involving
influenza viruses containing a minority
of genes and/or segments from a HPAI
H5N1 influenza virus shall be
conducted at BL3 enhanced unless a
risk assessment performed by the IBC
determines that they can be conducted
safely at biosafety level 2 and after they
have been excluded pursuant to 9 CFR
121.3(e). OBA is available to IBCs to
provide consultation with the RAC and
influenza virus experts when risk
assessments are being made to
determine the appropriate
biocontainment for experiments with
influenza viruses containing a minority
of gene/segments from HPAI H5N1.
Such experiments may be performed at
BL3 enhanced containment or
containment may be lowered to
biosafety level 2, the level of
containment for most research with
other influenza viruses. (USDA/APHIS
regulations and decisions on lowering
containment also apply.) In deciding to
lower containment, the IBC should
consider whether, in at least two animal
models (e.g., ferret, mouse, Syrian
golden hamster, cotton rat, non-human
primates), there is evidence that the
resulting influenza virus shows reduced
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
replication and virulence compared to
the parental RG3 virus at relevant doses.
This should be determined by
measuring biological indices
appropriate for the specific animal
model (e.g., severe weight loss, elevated
temperature, mortality or neurological
symptoms).
Section III–D–7–c. 1918 H1N1.
Experiments involving influenza viruses
containing any gene or segment from
1918 H1N1 shall be conducted at BL3
enhanced containment (see Appendix
G–II–C–5, Biosafety Level 3 Enhanced
for Research Involving Risk Group 3
Influenza Viruses).
Section III–D–7-d. Antiviral
Susceptibility and Containment. The
availability of antiviral drugs as
preventive and therapeutic measures is
an important safeguard for experiments
with 1918 H1N1, HPAI H5N1, and
human H2N2 (1957–1968). If an
influenza virus containing genes from
one of these viruses is resistant to both
classes of current antiviral agents,
adamantanes and neuraminidase
inhibitors, higher containment may be
required based on the risk assessment
considering transmissibility to humans,
virulence, pandemic potential,
alternative antiviral agents if available,
etc. Experiments with 1918 H1N1,
human H2N2 (1957–1968) or HPAI
H5N1 that are designed to create
resistance to neuraminidase inhibitors
or other effective antiviral agents
(including investigational antiviral
agents being developed for influenza)
would be subject to Section III–A–1
(Major Actions) and require RAC review
and NIH Director approval. As per
Section I–A–1 of the NIH Guidelines, if
the agent is a Select Agent, the NIH will
defer to the appropriate Federal agency
(HHS or USDA Select Agent Divisions)
on such experiments.
Appendix B. Classification of Human
Etiologic Agents on the Basis of Hazard
Currently all influenza viruses types
A, B, and C are classified as Risk Group
2 agents. Appendix B–II–D currently
states:
Appendix B–II–D. Risk Group 2
(RG2)—Viruses
Orthomyxoviruses
—Influenza viruses types A, B, and C.
—Other, tick-borne orthomyxoviruses as
listed in the reference source (see
Section V–C, Footnotes and Reference
of Sections I through IV).
The revised Appendix B–II–D states:
E:\FR\FM\22SEN1.SGM
22SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 22, 2009 / Notices
Orthomyxoviruses
—Influenza viruses types A, B, and C
(except those listed in Appendix B–
III–D (RG3)).
—Tick-borne orthomyxoviruses.
The phrase ‘‘as listed in the reference
source (see Section V–C, Footnotes and
References of Sections I through IV)’’
will be deleted from the revised
Appendix B–II–D due to the fact that
tick-borne orthomyxoviruses are not
listed in the current version of the
reference source.
The following is added to Appendix
B–III–D. Risk Group 3 (RG3)—Viruses
and Prions
Orthomyxoviruses
—Influenza viruses 1918–1919 H1N1
(1918 H1N1), human H2N2 (1957–
1968), and highly pathogenic avian
influenza H5N1 strains within the
Goose/Guangdong/96-like H5 lineage
(HPAI H5N1).
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
Appendix G–II–C–5. Biosafety Level 3
Enhanced for Research Involving Risk
Group 3 Influenza Viruses
Appendix G–II–C–5 provides
additional and specific biosafety
guidance for research with 1918 H1N1,
human H2N2 (1957–1968), and HPAI
H5N1 viruses and is intended to
supplement the guidance provided in
Appendix G. Physical Containment and
Appendix Q. Physical and Biological
Containment for Recombinant DNA
Research Involving Animals, which
applies to large research animals. Any
enhancements to standard BL3 facilities,
practices, and procedures that are
described in Appendix G–II–C–5–a shall
be considered specific for research with
the Risk Group 3 influenza viruses. Risk
assessments for research with other
agents may also determine that
enhancements to standard containment
are necessary, but such enhancements
must be determined for the specific
agents and experiments being proposed.
Influenza viruses that contain the
hemagglutinin gene from a HPAI avian
influenza are Select Agents and research
with such viruses is regulated by the
USDA. The fully reconstructed 1918
H1N1 virus is a Select Agent regulated
by the HHS/CDC and certain
experiments with genes and/or
segments from 1918 may be regulated by
HHS/CDC. Therefore, additional
containment practices may apply and
OBA will defer to the regulatory
decisions of these agencies. Research
with reassortant influenza viruses
containing segments or genes from HPAI
H5N1 will also require a permit from
USDA/APHIS specifying containment
and may require additional practices
VerDate Nov<24>2008
21:23 Sep 21, 2009
Jkt 217001
beyond those described in the NIH
Guidelines.
Appendix G–II–C–5–a. Containment,
Practices, and Training for Research
with Risk Group 3 Influenza Viruses
(BL3 Enhanced)
Appendix G–II–C–5–a–(1). In addition
to standard BL3 practices, the following
additional personal protective
equipment and practices shall be used:
(1) Powered Air-purifying Respirators
(PAPR) are worn.
(2) Street clothes are changed to
protective suit (e.g., wrap-back
disposable gown, olefin protective suit).
(3) Double gloves are worn.
(4) Appropriate shoe coverings are
worn (e.g., double disposable shoe
coverings, single disposable shoe
coverings if worn with footwear
dedicated to BL3 enhanced laboratory
use, or impervious boots or shoes of
rubber or other suitable material that
can be decontaminated).
(5) Showers prior to exiting the
laboratory should be considered
depending on risk assessment of
research activities.
Appendix G–II–C–5–a–(2). As proper
training of laboratory workers is an
essential component of biosafety,
retraining and periodic reassessments
(at least annually) in BL3 enhanced
practices, especially the proper use of
respiratory equipment, such as PAPRs,
and clothing changes is required.
Appendix G–II–C–5–a–(3). Reporting
of all spills and accidents, even if
relatively minor, is required as
described in Appendix G–II–C–2–q.
Appendix G–II–C–5–a–(4). To avoid
inadvertent cross contamination of 1918
H1N1, HPAI H5N1 or human H2N2
(1957–1968):
(1) Containment facilities and
practices appropriate for highest risk
group virus shall be used at all times
with lower risk group viruses, when
studied in the same laboratory room.
(2) Tissue cultures with these viruses
shall be conducted at separate times
(temporal spacing) in the same room.
(3) Separate reagents shall be used to
minimize risk of cross contamination.
(4) A laboratory worker shall not
perform concurrent influenza virus
experiments that carry the risk of
unintended reassortment among 1918
H1N1, human H2N2 (1957–1968), HPAI
H5N1 and other human influenza
viruses.
(5) Two or more laboratory workers
shall not perform within the same work
area simultaneous influenza virus
experiments that carry the risk of
unintended segment reassortment
between 1918 H1N1, or HPAI H5N1, or
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
48279
human H2N2 (1957–1968) and other
human influenza viruses.
(6) Between experiments good
biosafety decontamination practices
(e.g., surface and biosafety cabinet
surface decontamination according to
standard BL3 procedures) shall be used
and there shall be a thirty minute wait
period after decontamination before
equipment is used for experiments with
any other influenza A viruses.
(7) Between experiments, in addition
to decontamination of the work area,
clothing changes and PAPR disinfection
shall be performed prior to handling a
different influenza virus in the same
work area. (Shower-out capability may
be required by USDA/APHIS for certain
experiments with HPAI H5N1.)
Appendix G–II–C–5–a–(5). Continued
susceptibility of the reassortant
influenza viruses containing genes and/
or segments from 1918 H1N1, HPAI
H5N1, and human H2N2 (1957–1968) to
antiviral agents shall be established by
sequence analysis or suitable biological
assays. After manipulation of genes that
influence sensitivity to antiviral agents,
susceptibility to these agents shall be
reconfirmed.
Appendix G–II–C–5–b. Containment for
Animal Research
Guidance provided in Appendix G–
II–C and Appendix Q–II–C is applicable
with the following emphasis on
standard BL3 or BL3–N containment or
additional enhancements.
Appendix G–II–C–5–b–(1). Research
with small animals shall be conducted
in a class II biosafety cabinet. Small
animals such as rodents (e.g. mice,
hamsters, rats, guinea pigs) can be
housed within a negative pressure BL3
animal suite using high-density
individually vented caging (IVC)
systems that independently supply
HEPA-filtered and directional air
circulation. Other animals (e.g. rabbits,
ferrets) that are of a size or have growth
or caging requirements that preclude the
use of high-density IVC systems are to
be housed in negative pressure
bioisolators.
Appendix G–II–C–5–b–(2). Large
animals such as non-human primates
shall be housed in primary barrier
environments according to BL3–N
containment requirements (see Section
Q–II–c).
Appendix G–II–C–5–b–(3). Specialized
training and proven competency in all
assigned practices and procedures shall
be required for laboratory staff,
including staff involved in animal care.
Appendix G–II–C–5–b–(4). For HPAI
H5N1 research, the NIH Guidelines
defer to USDA/APHIS recommendations
E:\FR\FM\22SEN1.SGM
22SEN1
48280
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 22, 2009 / Notices
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
for biocontainment practices for loose
housed animals.
Appendix G–II–C–5–c. Occupational
Health
A detailed occupational health plan
shall be developed in advance of
working with these agents in
consultation, as needed, with
individuals with the appropriate
clinical expertise. In addition, the
appropriate public health authority
shall be consulted (e.g. local public
health officials) on the plan and a mock
drill of this plan shall be undertaken
periodically. The plan should include
an incident reporting system and
laboratory workers shall report all
incidents.
Appendix G–II–C–5–c–(1). Laboratory
workers shall be provided with medical
cards which include, at a minimum, the
following information: characterization
of the influenza virus to which they
have been potentially exposed, and 24hour contact numbers for the principal
investigator and institution’s
occupational health care provider(s).
Appendix G–II–C–5–c–(2). A detailed
occupational health plan shall include:
(1) Unless there is a medical
contraindication to vaccination (e.g.
severe egg allergy) annual seasonal
influenza vaccination as prerequisite for
research to reduce risk of influenza like
illness requiring isolation and tests to
rule out infection with experimental
virus and possible co-infection with
circulating influenza strains.
(2) Virus specific vaccination, if
available, should be offered;
(3) Reporting of all respiratory
symptoms and/or fever (i.e. influenza
like illnesses); and
(4) 24-hour access to a medical facility
that is prepared to implement
appropriate respiratory isolation to
prevent transmission and is able to
provide appropriate antiviral agents.
Real-time reverse transcriptionpolymerase chain reaction (RT–PCR)
procedures should be used to
discriminate these viruses from
currently circulating human influenza
viruses. For exposures to viruses
containing genes from 1918 H1N1 or the
HA gene from human H2N2 (1957–
1968), specimens shall be sent to the
CDC for testing (RT–PCR and
confirmatory sequencing).
Appendix G–II–C–5–c–(3). In
preparing to perform research with 1918
H1N1, human H2N2 (1957–1968), or
HPAI H5N1, principal investigators
should develop a clear plan specifying
who will be contacted in the event of a
potential exposure (during and after
work hours) to conduct a risk
assessment and make decisions as to the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
21:23 Sep 21, 2009
Jkt 217001
required response, including the need
for and extent of isolation of the
exposed worker. After any kind of
potential exposure, a rapid risk
assessment shall be performed by the
principal investigator, health and
biosafety officials and subsequent
actions should depend on the appraised
level of risk of respiratory infection for
the individual and potential for
transmission to others. A laboratory
worker performing research with either
an influenza virus containing the HA
gene from human H2N2 or an influenza
virus containing genes and/or segments
from 1918 H1N1, shall be informed in
advance that, in the case of a known
laboratory exposure with a high risk for
infection, e.g., involving the upper or
lower respiratory tract or mucous
membranes, the laboratory worker will
need to be isolated in a predetermined
facility, rather than home isolation,
until infection can be ruled out by
testing (e.g., negative RT–PCR for 1918
H1N1 or human H2N2 (1957–1968)) of
appropriately timed specimens.
Laboratory workers shall be informed in
advance that in the case of a known
laboratory exposure to highly
pathogenic avian influenza H5N1
strains within the Goose/Guangdong/96like H5 lineage with high risk for
infection, they should be prepared to
self isolate (for example at home) until
infection can be ruled out by testing
(e.g., negative RT–PCR for HPAI H5N1)
of appropriately timed specimens. The
action taken for other types of exposures
should be based on the risk assessment.
In addition, based on the risk
assessment: (1) Treatment with
appropriate antiviral agents shall be
initiated, and (2) the appropriate public
health authorities shall be notified.
Appendix G–II–C–5–c–(4). Influenzalike illness. If a laboratory worker, who
had recent exposure (within ten days) to
influenza viruses containing the human
H2N2 HA gene or any gene from the
1918 H1N1 or HPAI H5N1 viruses, or to
animals exposed to such viruses,
demonstrates symptoms and/or signs of
influenza infection (e.g., fever/chills,
cough, myalgias, headache), then the lab
worker shall report by phone to the
supervisor/principal investigator and
other individuals identified in the
occupational health plan. The
laboratory worker shall be transported
to a healthcare facility that can provide
adequate respiratory isolation,
appropriate medical therapy, and testing
to determine whether the infection is
due to a recombinant influenza virus.
The appropriate public health
authorities shall be informed whenever
a suspected case is isolated.
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Appendix G–II–C–5–c–(5). For 1918
H1N1 research, the use of antiviral
agents (e.g., oseltamivir) for preexposure prophylaxis shall be discussed
with laboratory workers in advance
including a discussion of the data on the
safety of long term exposure to these
agents and their ability to reduce the
risk of clinical disease and the limits of
the data regarding protection of close
contacts and the community.
Appendix G–II–C–5–c–(6). Antiviral
agents for post-exposure prophylaxis
shall be provided only after medical
evaluation. Home supplies shall not be
provided in advance for research with
1918 H1N1 or influenza viruses
containing the HA gene from human
H2N2.
Dated: September 15, 2009.
Jacqueline Corrigan-Curay,
Acting Director, Office of Biotechnology
Activities, National Institutes of Health.
[FR Doc. E9–22693 Filed 9–21–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Application To Establish a
Centralized Examination Station
AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP), Department of
Homeland Security.
ACTION: 60-Day notice and request for
comments; Extension of an existing
collection of information: 1651–0061.
SUMMARY: As part of its continuing effort
to reduce paperwork and respondent
burden, CBP invites the general public
and other Federal agencies to comment
on an information collection
requirement concerning the Application
to Establish a Centralized Examination
Station (CES). This request for comment
is being made pursuant to the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub.
L. 104–13; 44 U.S.C. 3505(c)(2)).
DATES: Written comments should be
received on or before November 23,
2009, to be assured of consideration.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments
to U.S. Customs and Border Protection,
Attn: Tracey Denning, Office of
Regulations and Rulings, 799 9th Street,
NW., 7th Floor, Washington, DC 20229–
1177.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information
should be directed to Tracey Denning,
U.S. Customs and Border Protection,
Office of Regulations and Rulings, 799
E:\FR\FM\22SEN1.SGM
22SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 182 (Tuesday, September 22, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48275-48280]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-22693]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health
Office of Biotechnology Activities; Recombinant DNA Research:
Actions Under the NIH Guidelines for Research Involving Recombinant DNA
Molecules (NIH Guidelines)
AGENCY: National Institutes of Health (NIH), Department of Health and
Human Services (HHS).
ACTION: Notice of changes to the NIH Guidelines.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Concerns about the emergence of a pandemic influenza virus
have spurred research on influenza viruses that have either caused
pandemics or are believed to have the potential to cause a pandemic.
These viruses include human H2N2 virus, which circulated from 1957-
1968, the 1918-1919 H1N1, which caused the deadliest pandemic in the
past century, and the Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI) H5N1
virus that is thought to have pandemic potential. The public health
benefits of this research include developing a better understanding of
the pathogenicity of pandemic influenza viruses, their virulence
mechanisms, mechanisms of host adaptation, and ultimately the
development of vaccines and antiviral drugs. These benefits are
balanced against the potential risks that might include the inadvertent
release of a highly transmissible and potentially virulent influenza
virus. Consequently, explicit and uniform biosafety containment
practices are critical to the safe conduct of research with these
agents. The NIH Guidelines provide a framework for assessing the risks
of such research. However, after extensive consultation with the NIH
Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee (RAC), experts in biosafety and
influenza, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and
the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), the NIH Office of
Biotechnology Activities (OBA) concluded that more specific guidance in
the NIH Guidelines is warranted to promote uniform biosafety practices
for recombinant research with these viruses.
The resulting amendments are ``Minor Actions'' under Section IV-C-
1-(b)-2 of the NIH Guidelines and, therefore, will be implemented
immediately upon publication in the Federal Register. While a Minor
Action only requires consultation with the RAC chair and one or more
RAC members, as necessary, as noted above, these changes were developed
after extensive consultation with the full RAC and other experts and
were discussed at three public RAC meetings. The RAC voted on March 4,
2009 to recommend these changes. They are being published to inform the
scientific and biosafety communities, as well as to solicit continued
scientific input should further revisions be needed.
The NIH Guidelines are being changed to provide the following
biosafety guidance for research with potentially pandemic influenza
viruses:
Designation of human H2N2 viruses that circulated from
1957-1968 (human H2N2 (1957-1968)), the fully reconstructed 1918-1919
H1N1 influenza virus (1918 H1N1), and Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza
(HPAI) H5N1 within the Goose/Guangdong/96-like H5 lineage (HPAI H5N1)
as Risk Group 3 agents. Risk Group 3 agents have the potential to cause
serious or lethal disease in humans for which preventative and
therapeutic measures may be available. Up until this revision, all
influenza viruses (Orthomyxoviruses) were Risk Group 2 agents, which
are agents that are associated with human disease that is rarely
serious and for which preventative and therapeutic agents are often
available.
Requirement for enhanced biosafety practices, including
the use of powered air purifying respirators (PAPRs) and other personal
protective equipment to prevent laboratory worker exposure and minimize
the risk of spread outside of the laboratory.
Guidance on the containment for research with influenza
viruses generated by recombinant methods (e.g., generation by reverse
genetics of chimeric viruses with reassorted segments, introduction of
specific mutations) containing one or more genes and/or segments from
human H2N2 (1957-1968), 1918 H1N1 or HPAI H5N1. For 1918 H1N1, the NIH
Guidelines will require Biosafety Level 3 enhanced containment for all
influenza viruses that contain one of more genes and/or segments from
1918 H1N1 because of the uncertainty about the virulence factors for
this agent.
Guidance on occupational health practices, including
policies regarding the use of prophylactic antiviral agents and
isolation of laboratory workers who are exposed to one of these
viruses.
DATES: The public is encouraged to submit written comments on this
action. Comments may be submitted to OBA in paper or electronic form at
the OBA mailing, fax, and e-mail addresses shown below under the
heading FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. All comments should be
submitted by September 22, 2010. All written comments received in
response to this notice will be available for public inspection in the
NIH OBA office, 6705 Rockledge Drive, Suite 750, MSC 7985, Bethesda, MD
20892-7985, weekdays between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m. and may
be posted to OBA's Web site.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: If you have questions, or require additional
information about these changes, please contact OBA by e-mail at
oba@od.nih.gov, or telephone at 301-496-9838. Comments may be submitted
to the same e-mail address or by fax at 301-496-9839 or by mail to the
Office of Biotechnology Activities, National Institutes of Health, 6705
Rockledge Drive, Suite 750, MSC 7985, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-7985.
Background information may be obtained by
[[Page 48276]]
contacting NIH OBA by e-mail at oba@od.nih.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Recently, NIH support for research with influenza viruses involving
recombinant DNA technology has significantly increased. The development
of new laboratory methods, such as reverse genetics, has allowed for
easier and more rapid generation of infectious influenza viruses from
DNA plasmids, e.g. reassortant viruses. An increasing proportion of
such research has focused on pandemic or potentially pandemic viruses.
These include previously pandemic viruses that are not currently
circulating in the human population, such as the human H2N2 virus that
caused a pandemic resulting in approximately 66,000 excess deaths in
the U.S. in 1957 and the 1918 H1N1 virus, which caused 20-40 million
excess deaths worldwide. Another focus of research is currently
circulating highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses (HPAI) that may
have potential to cause a human pandemic if efficient human-to-human
transmission were to develop. Over 400 cases worldwide of human
infection with the HPAI H5N1 virus have been reported to date with
approximately 60% mortality rate; however, evidence of human-to-human
transmission has been limited to small, familial clusters.
The public health benefits of research on potentially pandemic
influenza viruses include identification of viral proteins that
contribute to host adaptation and virulence to increase understanding
of the pathogenicity of influenza viruses during pandemics, development
of vaccine candidates, and identification of targets for antiviral
drugs. While research into influenza viral virulence mechanisms and the
development of vaccines and antiviral drugs are public health
priorities, it is equally important that the research be performed
under appropriate biocontainment to protect the health of laboratory
researchers and the public.
There are currently other biosafety requirements for certain types
of research with these viruses. The CDC/NIH Biosafety in
Microbiological and Biomedical Laboratories (5th edition) (BMBL)
recommends Biosafety Level 3 with additional personal protection
equipment designed to minimize the risk of laboratory acquired
infection for research with the reconstructed replication competent
forms of 1918 H1N1 (i.e. Biosafety Level 3 enhanced). Reconstructed
replication competent forms of 1918 pandemic influenza virus H1N1 were
designated HHS/CDC Select Agents in 2005 (70 FR 61047). The BMBL also
recommends Biosafety Level 3 containment level for research with the
full human H2N2 virus (1957-1968) with enhancements designed to prevent
laboratory acquired respiratory infection.
HPAI H5N1 influenza viruses are USDA Select Agents (9 CFR
121.3(b)). The USDA's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
(APHIS) regulates as a Select Agent avian influenza viruses (and
constructs thereof pursuant to 9 CFR 121.3(c)(3)) that demonstrate a
high pathogenicity index in chickens, contain a specific poly-basic
amino acid motif at the hemagglutinin (HA) gene cleavage site (or have
an amino acid sequence at the cleavage site of the HA gene that is
compatible with other highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses) and
show growth characteristics of influenza virus in the presence and
absence of trypsin. Avian influenza viruses that demonstrate evidence
of attenuation in poultry can be excluded pursuant to 9 CFR 121.3(e).
The biosafety containment level recommended for most Select Agent
research with these viruses is a minimum of Biosafety Level 3 enhanced
or Animal Biosafety Level 3 (ABSL3) enhanced. Influenza viruses
containing genes from highly pathogenic avian influenza virus that are
not classified as Select Agents by USDA are still regulated by that
agency through ``permitting'' regulations (9 CFR 122), which govern
imports and interstate movements of the viruses.
The current (April 2002) NIH Guidelines classify influenza viruses
A, B, and C as Risk Group 2 agents in Appendix B. No distinction is
made between potentially pandemic strains of influenza and other lower
risk influenza viruses. According to the NIH Guidelines, an initial
risk assessment is based on the Risk Group (RG) of the parent agent;
however, appropriate containment is set following consideration of the
specific agent and how it is to be manipulated. The NIH Guidelines
emphasize that containment levels for recombinant research may be
raised or lowered relative to the RG classification of the parent agent
after a comprehensive risk assessment.
Up until today, the NIH Guidelines had not been amended to address
specifically recombinant influenza viruses that contain genes and/or
segments from human H2N2 (1957-1968), 1918 H1N1 and HPAI H5N1 viruses.
Therefore, to clarify and augment the current biosafety guidance in the
NIH Guidelines for research with potentially pandemic influenza
viruses, and to harmonize with the BMBL and other regulatory policies,
NIH/OBA in consultation with the RAC and outside experts, including the
CDC and USDA, reviewed and revised the Risk Group designations for
potentially pandemic influenza viruses human H2N2 (1957-1968), 1918
H1N1, and HPAI H5N1 and developed additional containment and
occupational health guidance for research involving recombinant
influenza viruses containing genes from these influenza viruses.
In determining the Risk Group (RG) classification for human H2N2
(1957-1968), 1918 H1N1 and HPAI H5N1, the RAC considered the definition
of risk groups in Appendix B. Risk Group 3 agents are those ``that are
associated with serious or lethal disease for which preventative or
therapeutic interventions may be available (high individual risk but
low community risk).'' Each strain was considered to be a risk for
serious or lethal disease, although it was recognized that the case
fatality rate for HPAI H5N1 is very high, over 50 percent, whereas the
case fatality rate for 1918 H1N1 is considerably lower in the range of
1-2 percent. Human H2N2 caused a much milder pandemic compared to 1918
H1N1, but because it has not circulated for over forty years, a large
population will likely not have immunity to the virus and therefore is
at risk of serious disease. ``Preventative or therapeutic interventions
may be available'' for infection with each of these viruses as there is
evidence that the antiviral agents used against seasonal influenza are
effective for prophylactic and therapeutic use for each virus and
antibiotics are available for secondary bacterial pneumonias should
they develop. Virus specific vaccines are not currently available to
prevent infection. However, they are being developed and stockpiled for
HPAI H5N1, and sources exist for the possible development of 1918 H1N1
or human H2N2 (1957-1968) vaccines for laboratory workers who might be
exposed or in the unlikely event of a release of the virus into the
general population. In the case of human H2N2 (1957-1968), some pre-
existing immunity is likely in the population that was exposed to human
H2N2 while these viruses circulated from 1957-1968 or from cross-
reactivity with N2 in the currently circulating H3N2 strain. For 1918
H1N1, partial immunoprotection may exist from previous exposure or
vaccination with recently circulating H1N1 strains, but definitive data
are lacking. An important additional consideration for
[[Page 48277]]
HPAI H5N1 RG classification was that, while the individual risk of
serious or lethal disease is quite high, the community risk is
currently considered low, as there is only limited evidence for human-
to-human transmission. Based on these considerations, influenza viruses
1918 H1N1, human H2N2 (1957-1968), and highly pathogenic avian
influenza H5N1 viruses within the Goose/Guangdong/96-like H5 lineage
will be classified as Risk Group 3 agents in Appendix B-III-D. All
viruses within HPAI H5N1 lineages that have been associated with human
disease, whether it is mild or severe and fatal, will be classified as
RG3 agents. Thus BL3 enhanced containment will apply to a virus
evolving from the current lineages that causes milder disease in
humans, which could indicate adaptation to the human host.
Because the generation of influenza viruses by reassorting RNA
segments by recombinant techniques (i.e., reverse genetics) does not
take place in a single host-vector system, OBA has received questions
about which sections of the NIH Guidelines apply to such research with
influenza viruses. Sections III-D-1 or III-D-2 (research that falls
under Section III-D requires Institutional Biosafety Committee approval
before initiation) refer to specific host-vector systems and,
therefore, do not specifically address this research. To clarify this,
an additional section has been added: Section III-D-7-Experiments
Involving Influenza Viruses. This section will apply to recombinant
research with influenza viruses (e.g., chimeric viruses with reassorted
segments generated by reverse genetics, viruses in which specific
mutations are introduced).
Additional biosafety guidance for research with 1918 H1N1, HPAI
H5N1 within the Goose/Guangdong/96-like H5 lineage and human H2N2
(1957-1968) has been included in Appendix G-II-C-5. Biosafety Level 3
Enhanced for Research Involving Risk Group 3 Influenza Viruses. In
addition to the standard BL3 containment and practices, the RAC
recommended specific enhancements for research with these viruses
including personal protective equipment (e.g., powered air-purifying
respirators, protective suits), practices and procedures (e.g.,
clothing changes, showers when appropriate). In addition, the RAC made
specific recommendations on training for these enhanced practices.
Guidance is also provided for avoidance of inadvertent cross-
contamination during research. To address the potential public health
risks of a laboratory exposure, this section also includes
recommendations for development of a detailed occupational health plan
for research with each virus, including how to respond to known
laboratory exposures or development of an influenza-like illness in
laboratory workers. The community risk from an inadvertent laboratory
release of a virus with human H2N2 (1957-1968) or 1918 H1N1 is expected
to be higher than for HPAI H5N1. Consequently, the occupational health
recommendations for the response to a known laboratory exposure differ
depending on whether the exposure was to HPAI H5N1, a virus that
currently does not efficiently transmit human-to-human, or to either
human H2N2 (1957-1968) or 1918 H1N1, both of which have previously
caused pandemics, therefore demonstrating efficient human-to-human
transmission. These recommendations regarding occupational health are
also included in Appendix G-II-C-5.
During development of the occupational health recommendations, the
RAC discussed the use of pre-exposure prophylaxis with antiviral agents
(e.g., oseltamivir) for research with 1918 H1N1. Initially, the RAC had
proposed recommending a practice that is in place at the CDC (the first
lab to work with 1918 H1N1), namely that researchers working with 1918
H1N1 take pre-exposure prophylaxis with the antiviral oseltamivir for
their protection, and to further limit the risk to the public. In
addition, the Intragovernmental Select Agents and Toxins Technical
Advisory Committee (ISATTAC), an advisory body to the USDA and CDC
Select Agent Programs, recommended that the CDC Select Agent Program
require pre-exposure prophylaxis for research with 1918 H1N1 at BL3
enhanced but not at BL4 containment. This recommendation was adopted by
the CDC Select Agent Program. However, as research on 1918 H1N1
progressed and more was learned about the virus, other influenza
researchers expressed concerns that the risks of long-term use of
antiviral drugs would not be balanced by potential benefit to the
investigator or the public.
To address this issue, the RAC and ISATTAC convened a Safety
Symposium on Public Health and Biosafety Practices for Research with
1918 H1N1 Influenza Virus on December 2, 2008 (a Webcast of the meeting
is available at https://oba.od.nih.gov/rdna_rac/rac_past_meetings_2000.html). The discussion at the safety symposium focused on the
scientific data regarding the efficacy of prophylactic administration
and use of oseltamivir for extended periods of time, as well as public
health and ethical issues. The RAC concluded that while prophylaxis can
reduce the likelihood of an individual laboratory worker developing
symptoms or complications should they become infected, it will not
eliminate the risk of transmission to the community. Further, although
the medications are generally safe, there are risks, and data on long-
term use (beyond 6 weeks) are limited. Therefore, the RAC concluded
that the data do not support mandating pre-exposure prophylaxis.
Instead, the RAC recommended that the use of antiviral agents as pre-
exposure prophylaxis be discussed with laboratory workers and used on a
case-by-case basis, after a risk assessment and appropriate counseling
of the laboratory worker about the risks and potential benefits.
Antiviral agents are recommended for post-exposure prophylaxis after
medical evaluation.
While most research with these viruses will be conducted at BL3
with specific enhanced practices, the RAC also considered whether
certain research could be safely conducted at lower containment. After
consulting with experts in influenza virology, the RAC concluded that
due to the multigenic determinants of virulence observed in influenza
viruses, it is difficult to predict the phenotype of recombinant
influenza viruses created by reassorting segments from multiple strains
of influenza viruses. As the current data are insufficient to generate
a predictive framework upon which to base the risk assessment, a case-
by-case evaluation is more appropriate.
Section III-D-7 will specify when an IBC may determine containment
for certain research (e.g., research with H2 HA in cold-adapted, live
attenuated vaccine strains, or research with chimeric influenza viruses
containing a minority of genes and/or segments from HPAI H5N1) and when
requests to lower containment must be considered by the NIH (e.g.,
research with recombinant viruses containing any gene and/or segment
from 1918 H1N1).
Because the revisions outlined herein are considered Minor Actions
as defined in Section IV-C-1-b-(2) of the NIH Guidelines, public and
Federal Agency comment is not required and the changes are to be
implemented immediately. However, in order to promote transparency and
to gather ongoing input from scientific community, OBA is publishing
these changes in the Federal Register with opportunity for public
comment. The NIH Guidelines are intended to be an evolving document
that may be modified to address new developments
[[Page 48278]]
in research. As the influenza virology field advances, new data will
emerge to inform risk assessments for research with these viruses. The
public is encouraged to submit written comments, in particular on the
following question regarding containment for 1918 H1N1:
What data can be used to confidently predict an influenza
virus containing one or more genes from the 1918 H1N1 virus can be
worked with safely at biosafety containment level lower than Biosafety
level 3 enhanced? Are there animal models of infection that are
consistent and predictive of attenuation or loss of virulence in
humans? What data should be used to assess attenuation in animal
model(s)? What criteria should be used to evaluate a request for
reduction of containment?
When data are available to answer these questions, or new data
emerges regarding other aspects of these changes, the framework will be
reevaluated.
Amendments to the NIH Guidelines
In order to ensure that biosafety considerations for research with
human H2N2 (1957-1968), 1918 H1N1 and HPAI H5N1 are addressed
appropriately, the NIH/OBA has made the following changes to the NIH
Guidelines:
Section III-D-7. Experiments Involving Influenza Viruses
This section will apply to recombinant experiments with influenza
viruses that contain genes and/or segments from human H2N2 (1957-1968),
HPAI H5N1, and 1918 H1N1 (e.g., chimeric viruses with reassorted
segments generated by reverse genetics, viruses in which specific
mutations are introduced). Because the generation of viruses by
reassortment of RNA segments does not involve a single host-vector
system, such experiments do not fit neatly into Sections III-D-1 or
III-D-2. The new Section III-D-7 states: ``Experiments with influenza
viruses generated by recombinant methods (e.g., generation by reverse
genetics of chimeric viruses with reassorted segments, introduction of
specific mutations) shall be conducted at the biosafety level
containment corresponding to the risk group of the virus that was the
source of the majority of segments in the recombinant virus (e.g.,
experiments with viruses containing a majority of segments from a RG3
virus shall be conducted at BL3). Experiments with influenza viruses
containing genes or segments from 1918-1919 H1N1 (1918 H1N1), human
H2N2 (1957-1968) and highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 strains
within the Goose/Guangdong/96-like H5 lineage (HPAI H5N1) shall be
conducted at BL3 enhanced containment (see Appendix G-II-C-5, Biosafety
Level 3 Enhanced for Research Involving Risk Group 3 Influenza Viruses)
unless indicated below.''
Section III-D-7-a. Human H2N2 (1957-1968). Experiments with
influenza viruses containing the H2 hemagglutinin (HA) segment shall be
conducted at BL3 enhanced (see Appendix G-II-C-5, Biosafety Level 3
Enhanced for Research Involving Risk Group 3 Influenza Viruses).
Experiments with the H2 HA gene in cold-adapted, live attenuated
vaccine strains (e.g., A/Ann Arbor/6/60 H2N2) may be conducted at BL2
containment provided segments with mutations conferring temperature
sensitivity and attenuation are not altered in the recombinant virus.
Experiments with Risk Group 2 influenza viruses containing genes from
human H2N2 (1957-1968) other than the HA gene can be worked on at BL2.
Section III-D-7-b. Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza H5N1 strains
within the Goose/Guangdong/96-like H5 lineage (HPAI H5N1). Experiments
involving influenza viruses containing a majority of genes and/or
segments from a HPAI H5N1 influenza virus shall be conducted at BL3
enhanced containment, (see Appendix G-II-C-5, Biosafety Level 3
Enhanced for Research Involving Risk Group 3 Influenza Viruses).
Experiments involving influenza viruses containing a minority of genes
and/or segments from a HPAI H5N1 influenza virus shall be conducted at
BL3 enhanced unless a risk assessment performed by the IBC determines
that they can be conducted safely at biosafety level 2 and after they
have been excluded pursuant to 9 CFR 121.3(e). OBA is available to IBCs
to provide consultation with the RAC and influenza virus experts when
risk assessments are being made to determine the appropriate
biocontainment for experiments with influenza viruses containing a
minority of gene/segments from HPAI H5N1. Such experiments may be
performed at BL3 enhanced containment or containment may be lowered to
biosafety level 2, the level of containment for most research with
other influenza viruses. (USDA/APHIS regulations and decisions on
lowering containment also apply.) In deciding to lower containment, the
IBC should consider whether, in at least two animal models (e.g.,
ferret, mouse, Syrian golden hamster, cotton rat, non-human primates),
there is evidence that the resulting influenza virus shows reduced
replication and virulence compared to the parental RG3 virus at
relevant doses. This should be determined by measuring biological
indices appropriate for the specific animal model (e.g., severe weight
loss, elevated temperature, mortality or neurological symptoms).
Section III-D-7-c. 1918 H1N1. Experiments involving influenza
viruses containing any gene or segment from 1918 H1N1 shall be
conducted at BL3 enhanced containment (see Appendix G-II-C-5, Biosafety
Level 3 Enhanced for Research Involving Risk Group 3 Influenza
Viruses).
Section III-D-7-d. Antiviral Susceptibility and Containment. The
availability of antiviral drugs as preventive and therapeutic measures
is an important safeguard for experiments with 1918 H1N1, HPAI H5N1,
and human H2N2 (1957-1968). If an influenza virus containing genes from
one of these viruses is resistant to both classes of current antiviral
agents, adamantanes and neuraminidase inhibitors, higher containment
may be required based on the risk assessment considering
transmissibility to humans, virulence, pandemic potential, alternative
antiviral agents if available, etc. Experiments with 1918 H1N1, human
H2N2 (1957-1968) or HPAI H5N1 that are designed to create resistance to
neuraminidase inhibitors or other effective antiviral agents (including
investigational antiviral agents being developed for influenza) would
be subject to Section III-A-1 (Major Actions) and require RAC review
and NIH Director approval. As per Section I-A-1 of the NIH Guidelines,
if the agent is a Select Agent, the NIH will defer to the appropriate
Federal agency (HHS or USDA Select Agent Divisions) on such
experiments.
Appendix B. Classification of Human Etiologic Agents on the Basis of
Hazard
Currently all influenza viruses types A, B, and C are classified as
Risk Group 2 agents. Appendix B-II-D currently states:
Appendix B-II-D. Risk Group 2 (RG2)--Viruses
Orthomyxoviruses
--Influenza viruses types A, B, and C.
--Other, tick-borne orthomyxoviruses as listed in the reference source
(see Section V-C, Footnotes and Reference of Sections I through IV).
The revised Appendix B-II-D states:
[[Page 48279]]
Orthomyxoviruses
--Influenza viruses types A, B, and C (except those listed in Appendix
B-III-D (RG3)).
--Tick-borne orthomyxoviruses.
The phrase ``as listed in the reference source (see Section V-C,
Footnotes and References of Sections I through IV)'' will be deleted
from the revised Appendix B-II-D due to the fact that tick-borne
orthomyxoviruses are not listed in the current version of the reference
source.
The following is added to Appendix B-III-D. Risk Group 3 (RG3)--
Viruses and Prions
Orthomyxoviruses
--Influenza viruses 1918-1919 H1N1 (1918 H1N1), human H2N2 (1957-1968),
and highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 strains within the Goose/
Guangdong/96-like H5 lineage (HPAI H5N1).
Appendix G-II-C-5. Biosafety Level 3 Enhanced for Research Involving
Risk Group 3 Influenza Viruses
Appendix G-II-C-5 provides additional and specific biosafety
guidance for research with 1918 H1N1, human H2N2 (1957-1968), and HPAI
H5N1 viruses and is intended to supplement the guidance provided in
Appendix G. Physical Containment and Appendix Q. Physical and
Biological Containment for Recombinant DNA Research Involving Animals,
which applies to large research animals. Any enhancements to standard
BL3 facilities, practices, and procedures that are described in
Appendix G-II-C-5-a shall be considered specific for research with the
Risk Group 3 influenza viruses. Risk assessments for research with
other agents may also determine that enhancements to standard
containment are necessary, but such enhancements must be determined for
the specific agents and experiments being proposed.
Influenza viruses that contain the hemagglutinin gene from a HPAI
avian influenza are Select Agents and research with such viruses is
regulated by the USDA. The fully reconstructed 1918 H1N1 virus is a
Select Agent regulated by the HHS/CDC and certain experiments with
genes and/or segments from 1918 may be regulated by HHS/CDC. Therefore,
additional containment practices may apply and OBA will defer to the
regulatory decisions of these agencies. Research with reassortant
influenza viruses containing segments or genes from HPAI H5N1 will also
require a permit from USDA/APHIS specifying containment and may require
additional practices beyond those described in the NIH Guidelines.
Appendix G-II-C-5-a. Containment, Practices, and Training for Research
with Risk Group 3 Influenza Viruses (BL3 Enhanced)
Appendix G-II-C-5-a-(1). In addition to standard BL3 practices, the
following additional personal protective equipment and practices shall
be used:
(1) Powered Air-purifying Respirators (PAPR) are worn.
(2) Street clothes are changed to protective suit (e.g., wrap-back
disposable gown, olefin protective suit).
(3) Double gloves are worn.
(4) Appropriate shoe coverings are worn (e.g., double disposable
shoe coverings, single disposable shoe coverings if worn with footwear
dedicated to BL3 enhanced laboratory use, or impervious boots or shoes
of rubber or other suitable material that can be decontaminated).
(5) Showers prior to exiting the laboratory should be considered
depending on risk assessment of research activities.
Appendix G-II-C-5-a-(2). As proper training of laboratory workers
is an essential component of biosafety, retraining and periodic
reassessments (at least annually) in BL3 enhanced practices, especially
the proper use of respiratory equipment, such as PAPRs, and clothing
changes is required.
Appendix G-II-C-5-a-(3). Reporting of all spills and accidents,
even if relatively minor, is required as described in Appendix G-II-C-
2-q.
Appendix G-II-C-5-a-(4). To avoid inadvertent cross contamination
of 1918 H1N1, HPAI H5N1 or human H2N2 (1957-1968):
(1) Containment facilities and practices appropriate for highest
risk group virus shall be used at all times with lower risk group
viruses, when studied in the same laboratory room.
(2) Tissue cultures with these viruses shall be conducted at
separate times (temporal spacing) in the same room.
(3) Separate reagents shall be used to minimize risk of cross
contamination.
(4) A laboratory worker shall not perform concurrent influenza
virus experiments that carry the risk of unintended reassortment among
1918 H1N1, human H2N2 (1957-1968), HPAI H5N1 and other human influenza
viruses.
(5) Two or more laboratory workers shall not perform within the
same work area simultaneous influenza virus experiments that carry the
risk of unintended segment reassortment between 1918 H1N1, or HPAI
H5N1, or human H2N2 (1957-1968) and other human influenza viruses.
(6) Between experiments good biosafety decontamination practices
(e.g., surface and biosafety cabinet surface decontamination according
to standard BL3 procedures) shall be used and there shall be a thirty
minute wait period after decontamination before equipment is used for
experiments with any other influenza A viruses.
(7) Between experiments, in addition to decontamination of the work
area, clothing changes and PAPR disinfection shall be performed prior
to handling a different influenza virus in the same work area. (Shower-
out capability may be required by USDA/APHIS for certain experiments
with HPAI H5N1.)
Appendix G-II-C-5-a-(5). Continued susceptibility of the
reassortant influenza viruses containing genes and/or segments from
1918 H1N1, HPAI H5N1, and human H2N2 (1957-1968) to antiviral agents
shall be established by sequence analysis or suitable biological
assays. After manipulation of genes that influence sensitivity to
antiviral agents, susceptibility to these agents shall be reconfirmed.
Appendix G-II-C-5-b. Containment for Animal Research
Guidance provided in Appendix G-II-C and Appendix Q-II-C is
applicable with the following emphasis on standard BL3 or BL3-N
containment or additional enhancements.
Appendix G-II-C-5-b-(1). Research with small animals shall be
conducted in a class II biosafety cabinet. Small animals such as
rodents (e.g. mice, hamsters, rats, guinea pigs) can be housed within a
negative pressure BL3 animal suite using high-density individually
vented caging (IVC) systems that independently supply HEPA-filtered and
directional air circulation. Other animals (e.g. rabbits, ferrets) that
are of a size or have growth or caging requirements that preclude the
use of high-density IVC systems are to be housed in negative pressure
bioisolators.
Appendix G-II-C-5-b-(2). Large animals such as non-human primates
shall be housed in primary barrier environments according to BL3-N
containment requirements (see Section Q-II-c).
Appendix G-II-C-5-b-(3). Specialized training and proven competency
in all assigned practices and procedures shall be required for
laboratory staff, including staff involved in animal care.
Appendix G-II-C-5-b-(4). For HPAI H5N1 research, the NIH Guidelines
defer to USDA/APHIS recommendations
[[Page 48280]]
for biocontainment practices for loose housed animals.
Appendix G-II-C-5-c. Occupational Health
A detailed occupational health plan shall be developed in advance
of working with these agents in consultation, as needed, with
individuals with the appropriate clinical expertise. In addition, the
appropriate public health authority shall be consulted (e.g. local
public health officials) on the plan and a mock drill of this plan
shall be undertaken periodically. The plan should include an incident
reporting system and laboratory workers shall report all incidents.
Appendix G-II-C-5-c-(1). Laboratory workers shall be provided with
medical cards which include, at a minimum, the following information:
characterization of the influenza virus to which they have been
potentially exposed, and 24-hour contact numbers for the principal
investigator and institution's occupational health care provider(s).
Appendix G-II-C-5-c-(2). A detailed occupational health plan shall
include:
(1) Unless there is a medical contraindication to vaccination (e.g.
severe egg allergy) annual seasonal influenza vaccination as
prerequisite for research to reduce risk of influenza like illness
requiring isolation and tests to rule out infection with experimental
virus and possible co-infection with circulating influenza strains.
(2) Virus specific vaccination, if available, should be offered;
(3) Reporting of all respiratory symptoms and/or fever (i.e.
influenza like illnesses); and
(4) 24-hour access to a medical facility that is prepared to
implement appropriate respiratory isolation to prevent transmission and
is able to provide appropriate antiviral agents. Real-time reverse
transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) procedures should be
used to discriminate these viruses from currently circulating human
influenza viruses. For exposures to viruses containing genes from 1918
H1N1 or the HA gene from human H2N2 (1957-1968), specimens shall be
sent to the CDC for testing (RT-PCR and confirmatory sequencing).
Appendix G-II-C-5-c-(3). In preparing to perform research with 1918
H1N1, human H2N2 (1957-1968), or HPAI H5N1, principal investigators
should develop a clear plan specifying who will be contacted in the
event of a potential exposure (during and after work hours) to conduct
a risk assessment and make decisions as to the required response,
including the need for and extent of isolation of the exposed worker.
After any kind of potential exposure, a rapid risk assessment shall be
performed by the principal investigator, health and biosafety officials
and subsequent actions should depend on the appraised level of risk of
respiratory infection for the individual and potential for transmission
to others. A laboratory worker performing research with either an
influenza virus containing the HA gene from human H2N2 or an influenza
virus containing genes and/or segments from 1918 H1N1, shall be
informed in advance that, in the case of a known laboratory exposure
with a high risk for infection, e.g., involving the upper or lower
respiratory tract or mucous membranes, the laboratory worker will need
to be isolated in a predetermined facility, rather than home isolation,
until infection can be ruled out by testing (e.g., negative RT-PCR for
1918 H1N1 or human H2N2 (1957-1968)) of appropriately timed specimens.
Laboratory workers shall be informed in advance that in the case of a
known laboratory exposure to highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1
strains within the Goose/Guangdong/96-like H5 lineage with high risk
for infection, they should be prepared to self isolate (for example at
home) until infection can be ruled out by testing (e.g., negative RT-
PCR for HPAI H5N1) of appropriately timed specimens. The action taken
for other types of exposures should be based on the risk assessment. In
addition, based on the risk assessment: (1) Treatment with appropriate
antiviral agents shall be initiated, and (2) the appropriate public
health authorities shall be notified.
Appendix G-II-C-5-c-(4). Influenza-like illness. If a laboratory
worker, who had recent exposure (within ten days) to influenza viruses
containing the human H2N2 HA gene or any gene from the 1918 H1N1 or
HPAI H5N1 viruses, or to animals exposed to such viruses, demonstrates
symptoms and/or signs of influenza infection (e.g., fever/chills,
cough, myalgias, headache), then the lab worker shall report by phone
to the supervisor/principal investigator and other individuals
identified in the occupational health plan. The laboratory worker shall
be transported to a healthcare facility that can provide adequate
respiratory isolation, appropriate medical therapy, and testing to
determine whether the infection is due to a recombinant influenza
virus. The appropriate public health authorities shall be informed
whenever a suspected case is isolated.
Appendix G-II-C-5-c-(5). For 1918 H1N1 research, the use of
antiviral agents (e.g., oseltamivir) for pre-exposure prophylaxis shall
be discussed with laboratory workers in advance including a discussion
of the data on the safety of long term exposure to these agents and
their ability to reduce the risk of clinical disease and the limits of
the data regarding protection of close contacts and the community.
Appendix G-II-C-5-c-(6). Antiviral agents for post-exposure
prophylaxis shall be provided only after medical evaluation. Home
supplies shall not be provided in advance for research with 1918 H1N1
or influenza viruses containing the HA gene from human H2N2.
Dated: September 15, 2009.
Jacqueline Corrigan-Curay,
Acting Director, Office of Biotechnology Activities, National
Institutes of Health.
[FR Doc. E9-22693 Filed 9-21-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P