Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP); Allotment Methodology and States' Fiscal Year 2009 CHIP Allotments, 47517-47536 [E9-22162]
Download as PDF
47517
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 178 / Wednesday, September 16, 2009 / Proposed Rules
measuring only those thiram residues
convertible to and expressed in terms of
the degradate carbon disulfide.
Parts per
million
Commodity
Apple .................
Peach ................
Strawberry ........
Expiration/
Revocation
Date
6.0
7.0
6.0
9/11/10
None
None
*
*
*
*
*
5. Section 180.176 is amended by
revising paragraph (a) and adding
paragraph (c) to read as follows:
§180.176 Mancozeb; tolerances for
residues.
(a) General. Tolerances are
established for residues of mancozeb (a
coordination product of zinc ion and
maneb (manganese
ethylenebisdithiocarbamate)), including
its metabolites and degradates, in or on
the commodities in the table in this
paragraph. Compliance with the
tolerance levels specified in this
paragraph is to be determined by
measuring only those mancozeb
residues convertible to and expressed in
terms of the degradate carbon disulfide.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
Commodity
Parts per
million
Apple .........................................
Asparagus .................................
Banana .....................................
Barley, bran ..............................
Barley, flour ..............................
Barley, grain .............................
Barley, pearled barley ..............
Barley, straw .............................
Beet, sugar, dried pulp .............
Beet, sugar, roots .....................
Beet, sugar, tops ......................
Cattle, kidney ............................
Cattle, liver ................................
Corn, field, forage .....................
Corn, field, grain .......................
Corn, field, stover .....................
Corn, pop, grain ........................
Corn, pop, stover ......................
Corn, sweet, forage ..................
Corn, sweet, kernel plus cob
with husks removed ..............
Corn, sweet, stover ..................
Cotton, undelinted seed ...........
Crabapple .................................
Cranberry ..................................
Fennel .......................................
Flax, seed .................................
Goat, kidney .............................
Goat, liver .................................
Grape ........................................
Hog, kidney ...............................
Hog, liver ..................................
Horse, kidney ............................
Horse, liver ...............................
Oat, flour ...................................
Oat, grain ..................................
Oat, groats/rolled oats ..............
Oat, straw .................................
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:11 Sep 15, 2009
0.6
0.1
2
20
20
5
20
25
3.0
1.2
60
0.5
0.5
40
0.1
15
0.06
40
70
this paragraph is to be determined by
measuring only those metiram residues
convertible to and expressed in terms of
1.5 the degradate carbon disulfide.
Parts per
million
Commodity
Onion, bulb ...............................
Papaya ......................................
Peanut ......................................
Peanut, hay ..............................
Pear ..........................................
Potato .......................................
Poultry, kidney ..........................
Poultry, liver ..............................
Quince ......................................
Rice, grain ................................
Rice, straw ................................
Rye, bran ..................................
Rye, grain .................................
Rye, straw .................................
Sheep, kidney ...........................
Sheep, liver ...............................
Sorghum, grain, forage .............
Sorghum, grain, grain ...............
Sorghum, grain, stover .............
Tomato ......................................
Vegetable, cucurbit, group 9 ....
Wheat, bran ..............................
Wheat, flour ..............................
Wheat, germ .............................
Wheat, grain .............................
Wheat, middlings ......................
Wheat, shorts ...........................
Wheat, straw .............................
10
0.1
65
0.6
0.2
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.06
0.15
20
5
25
0.5
0.5
0.15
0.25
0.15
2.5
2
20
20
20
5
20
20
25
Jkt 217001
Apple .........................................
Apple, wet pomace ...................
Potato .......................................
*
*
§ 180.319
*
*
0.5
2
0.2
*
[Amended]
7. Section 180.319 is amended by
removing the entry for the substance
‘‘Coordination product of zinc ion and
maneb’’ from the table.
[FR Doc. E9–22302 Filed 9–15–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–S
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services
42 CFR Part 457
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Tolerances with regional
registrations. A tolerance with regional
registrations is established for residues
of the fungicide mancozeb, (a
coordination product of zinc ion and
maneb (manganese
ethylenebisdithiocarbamate)), including
its metabolites and degradates, in or on
the commodity in the table in this
paragraph. Compliance with the
tolerance levels specified in this
paragraph is to be determined by
measuring only those mancozeb
residues convertible to and expressed in
terms of the degradate carbon disulfide.
Parts per
million
Commodity
Carrot, roots ..............................
1
*
*
*
*
6. Section 180.217 is amended by
0.1
40 revising the section heading and
0.5 paragraph (a) to read as follows:
0.6
5
2.5
0.15
0.5
0.5
1.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
20
5
20
25
Parts per
million
Commodity
*
§180.217
Metiram; tolerances for residues.
(a) General. Tolerances are
established for residues of metiram (a
mixture of 5.2 parts by weight of
ammoniates of (ethylenebis
(dithiocarbamato)) zinc with 1 part by
weight ethylenebis (dithiocarbamic
acid) bimolecular and trimolecular
cyclic anhydrosulfides and disulfides],
including its metabolites and
degradates, in or on the commodities in
the table in this paragraph. Compliance
with the tolerance levels specified in
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
[CMS–2291–P]
RIN 0938–AP53
Children’s Health Insurance Program
(CHIP); Allotment Methodology and
States’ Fiscal Year 2009 CHIP
Allotments
AGENCY: Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
SUMMARY: This proposed rule describes
the implementation of certain funding
provisions under title XXI of the Social
Security Act (the Act), the Children’s
Health Insurance Program (CHIP), as
amended by the Children’s Health
Insurance Program Reauthorization Act
of 2009 (CHIPRA), by the Medicare,
Medicaid, and SCHIP Extension Act of
2007 (MMSEA), and by other related
CHIP legislation. Specifically, this
proposed rule addresses methodologies
and procedures for determining States’
FY 2009 through FY 2013 allotments
and payments in accordance with
sections 2104 and 2105 of the Act, as
amended by CHIPRA.
DATES: To be assured consideration,
comments must be received at one of
the addresses provided below, no later
than 5 p.m. eastern standard time (e.s.t.)
on November 16, 2009.
ADDRESSES: In commenting, please refer
to file code CMS–2291–P. Because of
staff and resource limitations, we cannot
accept comments by facsimile (FAX)
transmission.
E:\FR\FM\16SEP1.SGM
16SEP1
47518
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 178 / Wednesday, September 16, 2009 / Proposed Rules
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
You may submit comments in one of
four ways (please choose only one of the
ways listed):
1. Electronically. You may submit
electronic comments on this regulation
to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the instructions under the ‘‘More Search
Options’’ tab.
2. By regular mail. You may mail
written comments to the following
address ONLY:
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services, Department of Health and
Human Services, Attention: CMS–
2291–P, P.O. Box 8010, Baltimore,
MD 21244–8010.
Please allow sufficient time for mailed
comments to be received before the
close of the comment period.
3. By express or overnight mail. You
may send written comments to the
following address ONLY:
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services, Department of Health and
Human Services, Attention: CMS–
2291–P, Mail Stop C4–26–05, 7500
Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD
21244–1850.
4. By hand or courier. If you prefer,
you may deliver (by hand or courier)
your written comments before the close
of the comment period to either of the
following addresses:
a. For delivery in Washington, DC—
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services, Department of Health and
Human Services, Room 445–G, Hubert
H. Humphrey Building, 200
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20201.
(Because access to the interior of the
Hubert H. Humphrey Building is not
readily available to persons without
Federal government identification,
commenters are encouraged to leave
their comments in the CMS drop slots
located in the main lobby of the
building. A stamp-in clock is available
for persons wishing to retain a proof of
filing by stamping in and retaining an
extra copy of the comments being filed.)
b. For delivery in Baltimore, MD—
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services, Department of Health and
Human Services, 7500 Security
Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21244–
1850.
If you intend to deliver your
comments to the Baltimore address,
please call telephone number (410) 786–
7195 in advance to schedule your
arrival with one of our staff members.
Comments mailed to the addresses
indicated as appropriate for hand or
courier delivery may be delayed and
received after the comment period.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:46 Sep 15, 2009
Jkt 217001
Submission of comments on
paperwork requirements. You may
submit comments on this document’s
paperwork requirements by following
the instructions at the end of the
‘‘Collection of Information
Requirements’’ section in this
document.
For information on viewing public
comments, see the beginning of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Richard Strauss, (410) 786–2019.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Inspection of Public Comments: All
comments received before the close of
the comment period are available for
viewing by the public, including any
personally identifiable or confidential
business information that is included in
a comment. We post all comments
received before the close of the
comment period on the following Web
site as soon as possible after they have
been received: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the search
instructions on that Web site to view
public comments.
Comments received timely will also
be available for public inspection as
they are received, generally beginning
approximately 3 weeks after publication
of a document, at the headquarters of
the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services, 7500 Security Boulevard,
Baltimore, Maryland 21244, Monday
through Friday of each week from 8:30
a.m. to 4 p.m. To schedule an
appointment to view public comments,
phone 1–800–743–3951.
I. Background
A. Availability and Redistribution of
Children’s Health Insurance Program
(CHIP) Fiscal Year Allotments Prior to
CHIPRA
Title XXI of the Social Security Act
(the Act) sets forth the Children’s Health
Insurance Program (CHIP) to enable
States, the District of Columbia, and
specified Commonwealths and
Territories to initiate and expand health
insurance coverage to uninsured, lowincome children. The 50 States, the
District of Columbia, and the
Commonwealths and Territories may
implement the CHIP through a separate
child health program under title XXI of
the Act, an expanded Medicaid program
under title XIX of the Act, or a
combination of both.
Federal funds appropriated for title
XXI are limited, and the law specifies a
formula and methodology to divide the
total annual appropriation into
individual allotments available for each
State, the District of Columbia, and each
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
U.S. Territory and Commonwealth with
an approved child health plan.
Section 2104(b) of the Act requires
States, the District of Columbia, and
U.S. Territories and Commonwealths to
have an approved child health plan for
the fiscal year in order for the Secretary
to provide an allotment for that fiscal
year.
Before the enactment of the Children’s
Health Insurance Program
Reauthorization Act of 2009 (CHIPRA,
Pub. L. 111–3, enacted on February 4,
2009), section 2104(e) of the Act
specified that in general the CHIP
allotments for a Federal fiscal year were
available for payment to States for their
expenditures under an approved State
child health plan for an initial 3-fiscal
year period of availability, including the
fiscal year for which the allotment was
provided.
In general, before the enactment of
CHIPRA, section 2104(f) of the Act
specified that the amounts of States’
allotments which were not expended
during the initial 3-year period of
availability were to be redistributed to
those States that had fully spent these
fiscal year allotments during this period
of availability in accordance with an
appropriate procedure determined by
the Secretary. Furthermore, section
2104(e) of the Act specified that the
amounts of the redistributed allotments
continued to be available for
expenditure by the States receiving
these redistributions to the end of the
fiscal year in which these funds were
redistributed.
B. Funding of CHIP Allotments Before
the Enactment of CHIPRA
Section 4901 of the Balanced Budget
Act of 1997 (BBA, Pub. L. 105–33,
enacted on August 5, 1997) established
title XXI of the Social Security Act (the
Act). In conjunction with further
amendments of title XXI of the Act
described later, appropriations for CHIP
were made available to provide
allotments to States for their CHIPs and
related Medicaid program expenditures
through March 31, 2009. With the
enactment of the CHIPRA, title XXI was
amended to provide funding for the
CHIP through FY 2013.
Under the initial BBA, sections
2104(a)(1) through (10) of the Act
appropriated funding for States’ CHIPs
for each fiscal year over a ten fiscal year
period from 1998 through 2007. The
funding for each fiscal year varied from
$4.295 billion for FY 1998 up to $5.0
billion for FY 2007. Furthermore, under
section 2104(c)(4) of the Act, additional
appropriations were provided for each
of fiscal years 1999 through 2007 to
provide additional allotment amounts
E:\FR\FM\16SEP1.SGM
16SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 178 / Wednesday, September 16, 2009 / Proposed Rules
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
particularly for the Commonwealths and
Territories.
C. Enactment of Continuing
Appropriations and Medicare,
Medicaid, and SCHIP Extension Act of
2007
Continuing appropriation legislation
(Pub. L. 110–92 enacted on September
29, 2007), contained provisions to
extend funding under the CHIP through
November 16, 2007. In particular,
section 136(a) of Public Law 110–92
appropriated $5 billion for the purposes
of providing FY 2008 allotments to the
50 States, the District of Columbia, and
the Commonwealths and Territories.
Additionally, $40 million was
appropriated by this section to provide
additional allotments to the
Commonwealths and Territories in FY
2008.
Section 136(b) of Public Law 110–92
provided that the FY 2008 allotments be
determined in accordance with the same
methodology as previous CHIP fiscal
year allotments were determined.
Section 136(c) of Public Law 110–92
amended the CHIP statute to add a new
section 2104(i) of the Act to provide for
the redistribution in FY 2008 of the
unexpended FY 2005 allotments
remaining at the end of FY 2007 to those
50 States or the District of Columbia that
had estimated shortfalls in FY 2008.
Finally, section 106 of Public Law 110–
92 provided that the FY 2008 allotment
funds were only available for States’
CHIP expenditures for assistance
provided through November 16, 2007.
Subsequent to the enactment of Public
Law 110–92, further continuing
appropriation legislation was enacted
which extended the dates through
which the FY 2008 allotment funds
were available as provided in section
106 of Public Law 110–92; in particular,
Public Law 110–116 (enacted on
November 13, 2007), Public Law 110–
137 (enacted on December 14, 2007),
and Public Law 110–149 (enacted on
December 21, 2007) extended the dates
to December 14, 2007, December 21,
2007, and December 31, 2007,
respectively.
Section 201 of the Medicare,
Medicaid, and SCHIP Extension Act of
2007 (MMSEA, Pub. L. 110–173,
enacted on December 29, 2007)
amended section 2104(a) of the CHIP
statute to explicitly provide funding for
CHIP allotments in the amount of $5
billion for each of FYs 2008 and 2009
for the 50 States and the District of
Columbia and the Commonwealths and
Territories, and for $40 million for the
Commonwealths and Territories for
each of FY 2008 and FY 2009. These
allotments would be determined in
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:46 Sep 15, 2009
Jkt 217001
accordance with the existing
methodology in CHIP statute for fiscal
years before FY 2008. The funding
provided for FY 2008 under the
continuing appropriation legislation
discussed above and enacted before
MMSEA would no longer be available
(and thus expenditures for FY 2008
would be paid from the allotments as
provided under MMSEA). MMSEA
provided that the FY 2008 and FY 2009
allotment funds were only available for
States’ expenditures through March 31,
2009.
Section 201 of MMSEA amended the
CHIP statute to add section 2104(j) of
the Act which appropriated $1.6 billion
for the purpose of providing additional
allotments to eliminate States’ CHIP
shortfalls in FY 2008.
The provisions of MMSEA were
implemented and described in the
Federal Register dated May 23, 2008
(30112, Vol. 73, No. 101).
D. Enactment of CHIPRA
Section 101 of the CHIPRA amended
section 2104(a) of the Act to appropriate
funding for each fiscal year FY 2009
through FY 2012, and for two semiannual periods in FY 2013, October 1,
2012 through March 31, 2013 and April
1, 2013 through September 30, 2013, for
the purpose of providing allotments to
States for each of those fiscal years or
fiscal year periods. Furthermore, section
108 of CHIPRA provided additional
funding for State allotments for the
period October 1, 2012 through March
31, 2013 (the first half of FY 2013).
Finally, section 3(c) of CHIPRA provides
for the coordination of funding for the
CHIP in FY 2009 as previously provided
under section 201 of MMSEA.
In particular, section 3(c) of CHIPRA
requires the Federal government to
rescind any of the following previously
appropriated amounts that were not
allotted or obligated before April 1,
2009:
• Section 2104(a)(11) of the Act for
purposes of providing State CHIP
allotments for FY 2009 for States’
expenditures through March 31, 2009.
• Section 2104(k) of the Act for
purposes of the redistribution of
unexpended FY 2006 allotments in FY
2009 to address States’ funding
shortfalls in FY 2009.
• Section 2104(l) of the Act for
purposes of providing additional
allotments for States’ expenditures in
FY 2009 to fund States’ shortfalls for
their expenditures through March 31,
2009.
Furthermore, any amounts provided
for FY 2009 CHIP allotments under
section 2104(a)(12) as appropriated
through the amendments made by
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
47519
CHIPRA must be reduced by the
amounts that were obligated before
April 1, 2009 under sections
2104(a)(11), 2104(k), or 2104(l) of the
Act, as amended by section 201 of
MMSEA (which refer to States’ FY 2009
CHIP allotments, amounts of
unexpended FY 2006 allotments
redistributed in FY 2009, and the
amounts of additional FY 2009
allotments to address States’ CHIP
funding shortfalls through March 31,
2009, respectively).
The rescission of these unobligated
amounts as well as the reduction in the
FY 2009 allotment for the amounts that
were obligated before April 1, 2009
ensure that States do not receive FY
2009 allotments as determined under
the CHIPRA in excess of the total
amount provided under section
2104(a)(12) of the Act for FY 2009, as
amended by CHIPRA.
E. Expenditures, Authority for
Qualifying States To Use Available
CHIP Allotments for Medicaid
Expenditures
Under section 2105(a)(1)(A) through
(D) and (a)(2) of the Act, and before
enactment of Public Law 108–74
(Extension of Availability of CHIP
Allotment Act, enacted on August 15,
2003), only Federal payments for the
following Medicaid and CHIP
expenditures were applied against
States’ available CHIP allotments: (1)
Medical assistance provided under title
XIX (Medicaid) to targeted low-income
children in a CHIP-related Medicaid
expansion, for which the CHIP
enhanced Federal medical assistance
percentage (CHIP EFMAP) rate is
available; (2) medical assistance
provided on behalf of a child during a
period of presumptive eligibility under
section 1920A of the Act (these funds
are matched at the regular Medicaid
Federal medical assistance percentage
(FMAP) rate); (3) child health assistance
to targeted low-income children that
meets minimum benefit requirements
under CHIP; and (4) certain other types
of expenditures in CHIP that are subject
to the 10-percent limit on non-primary
expenditures (including other child
health assistance for targeted lowincome children, health services
initiatives, outreach, and administrative
costs).
Section 1(b) of Public Law 108–74, as
amended by Public Law 108–127 (Social
Security Act, Technical corrections,
enacted November 17, 2003), added new
section 2105(g) to the Act under which
certain ‘‘qualifying States’’ that met
prescribed criteria could elect to use up
to 20 percent of any of the States’
available CHIP allotments for FY 1998,
E:\FR\FM\16SEP1.SGM
16SEP1
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
47520
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 178 / Wednesday, September 16, 2009 / Proposed Rules
1999, 2000, or 2001 to increase the
FMAP rate for certain regular Medicaid
expenditures to the EFMAP rate
available under CHIP. These
expenditures were for children under 19
years of age whose family income
exceeds 150 percent of the Federal
poverty line and who are eligible under
the States’ Medicaid program. As
described in the Federal Register
published on July 23, 2004 (69 FR
44013), if a qualified State submitted
both 20 percent allowance expenditures
and other ‘‘regular’’ CHIP expenditures
at the same time in a quarter, the 20
percent allowance expenditures would
be applied first against the available
fiscal year reallotments. However, the
20 percent allowance expenditures
could be applied only against the
specified fiscal year allotment funds
(upon which the 20 percent allowances
were based) and which would remain
available. Under section
2104(g)(1)(B)(iii) of the Act, the amounts
of States’ FY 2001 reallotments would
only be available through the end of FY
2005; therefore, the FY 2001 20 percent
allowances for the qualifying States are
only available through the end of FY
2005.
Section 6103 of the Deficit Reduction
Act of 2005 (Pub. L. 109–171, enacted
on February 8, 2006) amended section
2105(g) of the Act to provide for
continued authority for qualifying States
to use a portion of their available FY
2004 and FY 2005 CHIP allotments for
payments to supplement the Medicaid
FMAP that result in total Federal
participation at the EFMAP rate (as
determined under section 2105(b) of the
Act) for certain expenditures made
under the Medicaid program.
Section 201(b) of the National
Institutes of Health Reform Act of 2006
and section 201(b) of MMSEA amended
section 2105(g) of the Act to provide for
continued authority for such payments
to qualifying States for FYs 2006
through 2009.
Finally, section 107 of CHIPRA
amended title XXI of the Act to add a
new paragraph (4) of section 2105(g) of
the Act; under this new provision,
qualifying states at their option may use
up to their entire fiscal year allotments
for each of fiscal years 2009 through
2013, to the extent such allotments
remain available to the State under the
Act, in an amount equal to the
additional amount that would have been
paid to the State if the EFMAP as
determined under section 2104(b) of the
Act was substituted for the FMAP
defined in section 1905(b) of the Act.
The CHIPRA amendments to the
qualifying State provision provide that
the indicated amounts of such
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:46 Sep 15, 2009
Jkt 217001
allotments are available for certain
expenditures of the qualifying States as
described in section 2105(g)(4)(B) of the
Act, as amended by CHIPRA. In
particular, these are expenditures made
by such States on or after February 5,
2009 for children whose family income
equals or exceeds 133 percent of the
Federal poverty line but does not exceed
the Medicaid applicable income level.
As indicated above, this is a change
from what was in effect previously; that
is, before CHIPRA, the income level was
150 percent of the Federal poverty line.
II. Provisions of This Proposed Rule
For the reasons described in section I
of this preamble, the purpose of this
proposed rule would:
• Set forth the methodology and
procedures for determining the CHIP
allotments for FY 2009 through FY 2013
for the 50 States and the District of
Columbia, and the U.S. Commonwealths
and Territories as provided under
section 2104(m) of the Act.
• Describe the methodology and
process used to coordinate the funding
provided previously to States under
MMSEA, as described in the May 23,
2008 Federal Register (page 30112, Vol.
73, No. 101), under the provisions of
section 2104(a)(11) of the Act related to
States’ FY 2009 allotments provided to
States before CHIPRA, section 2104(k) of
the Act related to the redistribution of
States’ unexpended FY 2006 allotments
to address States’ shortfalls in FY 2009,
and section 2104(l) of the Act related to
funding States’ shortfalls in FY 2009 for
their expenditures through March 31,
2009.
• Set forth the FY 2009 allotments as
determined in accordance with such
methodologies and procedures.
• Describe the implementation of the
continued authority under section
2104(g)(4) of the Act as amended by
CHIPRA for ‘‘qualifying States’’ to elect
to receive their available CHIP
allotments for FY 2009 through FY 2013
CHIP as increased Federal matching
funds for certain expenditures in their
Medicaid programs.
• Describe the retrospective
adjustment for the FY 2008 shortfall
funding as provided under section
2104(j) of the Act.
To incorporate the policies and
implement the statutory provisions as
described above, we are proposing the
following revisions:
• In 42 CFR § 457.600(a), we are
proposing to remove the date ‘‘2007’’
and add in its place ‘‘2013’’ of this
regulation.
• In § 457.608, we are proposing to
revise the heading ‘‘Process and
calculation of State allotments for a
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
fiscal year’’ to read ‘‘Process and
calculation of State allotments prior to
FY 2009’’ of this regulation.
• In part 457 subpart F, we are
proposing to add § 457.609, ‘‘Process
and calculation of State allotments for a
fiscal year after FY 2008’’, which would
implement the new funding amounts
available for States’ CHIP allotments for
FY 2009 through FY 2013.
• In § 457.610, we are proposing to
revise the heading ‘‘Period of
availability for State allotments for a
fiscal year’’ to read ‘‘Period of
availability for State allotments prior to
FY 2009’’ of this regulation. In the first
line of the paragraph for this section, we
are also proposing to remove the words
‘‘for a fiscal year’’ and add in its place
‘‘prior to FY 2009’’ of this regulation.
• In part 457 subpart F, we are
proposing to add § 457.611, ‘‘Period of
availability for State allotments for a
fiscal year after FY 2008’’, which would
reflect the 3 fiscal year and 2 fiscal year
periods of availability, as applicable to
fiscal years before FY 2009 and effective
for FY 2009 and subsequent fiscal years,
respectively.
A. Methodology and Procedures for
Determining the CHIP Allotments for FY
2009 Through FY 2013 for the 50 States
and the District of Columbia, and the
U.S. Commonwealths and Territories
1. Reauthorization Funding for the CHIP
Section 101 of CHIPRA provides the
reauthorization funding for providing
States’ allotments for FY 2009 through
FY 2013. In particular, section 101 of
CHIPRA amended section 2104(a) of the
Act to revise paragraph (11) for FY 2008,
and adds new paragraphs (12) through
(16) to provide appropriations for FY
2009 through FY 2013, respectively. In
particular, under the amendments made
by CHIPRA the appropriated amounts
available for allotments for these fiscal
years, respectively are: $10,562,000,000
for FY 2009 (before CHIPRA the amount
for FY 2009 was $5,000,000,000);
$12,520,000,000 for FY 2010;
$13,459,000,000 for FY 2011;
$14,982,000,000 for FY 2012, and
$2,850,000,000 for each of the first and
second half of FY 2013. Also, section
108 of CHIPRA provided for a one-time
appropriation of $11,706,000,000 for
allotments for the first half of FY 2013.
Therefore, the total appropriation for
providing allotments during FY 2013 is
$17,406,000,000.
2. Methodology for Determining State’s
Fiscal Year Allotments
a. CHIPRA provision of 2009. Section
102 of CHIPRA adds a new section
2104(m) of the Act which sets forth the
E:\FR\FM\16SEP1.SGM
16SEP1
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 178 / Wednesday, September 16, 2009 / Proposed Rules
methodology for determining States’
CHIP allotments for each of FY 2009
through FY 2013. In general, the States’
fiscal year allotments are provided from
the appropriation for the respective
fiscal year allotment, subject to a
proration adjustment, described in
section II.A.2.g. of this proposed rule.
b. FY 2009 Allotments. The FY 2009
allotments for the 50 States and the
District of Columbia, and the
Commonwealths and Territories, are
provided from the FY 2009
appropriation of $10,562,000,000, and
are subject to a proration adjustment
described in II.A.2.g. of this proposed
rule, if necessary. The FY 2009 CHIP
allotments for the 50 States and the
District of Columbia are determined
under a different methodology than is
used for the determining the FY 2009
allotments for the Commonwealths and
Territories.
The FY 2009 allotment for the 50
States and the District of Columbia is
determined as 110 percent of the highest
of the following three amounts:
• The total Federal payments to the
State from the States’ available CHIP
allotments in FY 2008 as reported by the
State and certified to the Secretary
through the November 2008 submission
of the quarterly expenditure reports,
Forms CMS–21 and CMS–64, multiplied
by the allotment increase factor
described in section II. A. 2.h. of this
proposed rule;
• The amount allotted to the State for
FY 2008, multiplied by the allotment
increase factor described in section
II.A.2.h. of this proposed rule.
• The projected total Federal
payments to the State under title XXI of
the Act for FY 2009, determined based
on the February submission of
projections of expenditures as certified
by the State to CMS no later than March
31, 2009. These projections may include
certain amounts of Medicaid
expenditures for certain ‘‘qualifying
states’’ described in section 2105(g) of
the Act.
With respect to the last item related
to projected total Federal payments for
FY 2009 under title XXI, section 107 of
CHIPRA added a new paragraph section
2105(g)(4) of the Act to allow States to
use up to 100 percent of their FY 2009
allotments for these expenditures. This
provision is further described in section
II.E. of this proposed rule.
The FY 2009 allotment for the
Commonwealths and Territories is
determined as the highest amount of the
Federal payments made to the
Commonwealth or Territory under title
XXI of the Act in any of the fiscal years
for the period of FY 1999 through FY
2008, multiplied by the allotment
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:46 Sep 15, 2009
Jkt 217001
increase factor described in section
II.A.2.h. of this proposed rule, plus an
additional amount. The additional
amount is equal to $40,000,000, as
appropriated under section
2104(c)(4)(B) of the Act, multiplied by
the following percentage provided
under section 2104(c)(2) of the Act for
the indicated jurisdiction: 91.6 percent
for Puerto Rico; 3.5 percent for Guam;
2.6 percent for the Virgin Islands; 1.2
percent for American Samoa; and 1.1
percent for the Northern Mariana
Islands.
c. FY 2010 Allotments. The FY 2010
allotments for the 50 States and the
District of Columbia, and the
Commonwealths and Territories, are
provided from the FY 2010
appropriation of $12,520,000,000, and
are subject to a proration adjustment if
necessary, described in section II.A.2.g.
of this proposed rule. Under the
CHIPRA, the FY 2010 allotment for each
State will be determined by multiplying
the allotment increase factor for FY
2010 for the State, by the sum of: The
State’s FY 2009 allotment; the amount
of the final FY 2006 redistributed
allotments paid to the State as
determined under section 2104(k) of the
Act, and subject to any final
retrospective adjustment to such
amount determined under section
2104(k)(5) of the Act; the amount of the
final additional FY 2009 allotments paid
to the State as determined under section
2104(l) of the Act, and subject to any
final retrospective adjustment to such
amount determined under section
2104(l)(5) of the Act; and the amount of
any contingency fund payment made to
the State for FY 2010, as determined
under section 2104(n) of the Act.
For the 50 States and the District of
Columbia, under section 2104(m)(6) of
the Act, the FY 2010 allotment may
include additional amounts in
situations where such States have
submitted an expansion allotment
adjustment request before August 31,
2009.
For the Commonwealths and
Territories, in accounting for the
amounts of the FY 2009 allotments for
purposes of determining the FY 2010
allotments, the component of the FY
2009 allotment for such jurisdictions
relating to the additional $40 million
referenced in section 2104(c)(4) of the
Act, is not included. This is because
section 2104(m)(2)(A)(i)(I) of the Act, as
amended by CHIPRA, references the FY
2009 allotment as determined in section
2104(m)(1) of the Act; that section in
turn provides for determining the FY
2009 allotments from the amounts
appropriated in section 2104(a)(12) of
the Act. That is, such section 2104(m)(1)
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
47521
of the Act does not include the
additional $40 million which is
separately appropriated and available
only for the jurisdictions in determining
their FY 2009 allotments. Therefore, the
component of the jurisdictions’ FY 2009
allotment related to the additional $40
million would not be included in
determining the amount of the
jurisdictions’ FY 2010 allotments.
d. FY 2011 Allotments. The FY 2011
allotments for the 50 States and the
District of Columbia, and the
Commonwealths and Territories, are
provided from the FY 2011
appropriation ($13,459,000,000). The
amounts of these allotments are subject
to a proration adjustment described in
section II.A.2.g of this proposed rule, if
necessary. Section 2104(m)(2)(A)(ii) of
the CHIPRA amendments refers to a
‘‘rebasing’’ process for determining the
FY 2011 allotments; this requirement
means that the States’ payments rather
than their allotments for FY 2010 must
be considered in calculating the FY
2011 allotments. In particular the FY
2011 allotments are determined by
multiplying the increase factor for FY
2011 by the sum of: Any Federal
payments made from the States’
available allotments in FY 2010; any
amounts provided as redistributed
allotments in FY 2010 to the State; and
any Federal payments attributable to
any contingency fund payments made to
the State for FY 2010 determined under
Section 2104(n) of the Act.
e. FY 2012 Allotments. The FY 2012
allotments for the 50 States and the
District of Columbia, and the
Commonwealths and Territories, are
provided from the FY 2012
appropriation of $14,982,000,000, and
are subject to a proration adjustment
described in II.A.2.g.of this proposed
rule, if necessary. Under the CHIPRA,
the FY 2012 allotment for each State
will be determined by multiplying the
allotment increase factor for FY 2012 for
the State, by the sum of: the State’s FY
2011 allotment and any contingency
fund payment made to the State for FY
2011, as determined under section
2104(n) of the Act.
For the 50 States and the District of
Columbia, under section 2104(m)(6) of
the Act, the FY 2012 allotment may
include additional amounts in
situations where such States have
submitted an expansion allotment
adjustment request before August 31,
2011.
f. FY 2013 Allotments. The FY 2013
allotments for the 50 States and the
District of Columbia, and the
Commonwealths and Territories, are
comprised of two components related to
the first half of FY 2013 (that is, the
E:\FR\FM\16SEP1.SGM
16SEP1
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
47522
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 178 / Wednesday, September 16, 2009 / Proposed Rules
period of October 1, 2012 through
March 31, 2013) and second half of FY
2013 (that is, April 1, 2012 through
September 30, 2013). The FY 2013
allotments for the first and second half
of FY 2013 are subject to a proration
adjustment described in section II.A.2.g
of this proposed rule, as applicable.
The allotments for the first half of FY
2013 are provided from a total available
appropriation of $14,556,000,000,
comprised of $2,850,000,000
appropriated under section
2104(a)(16)(A) of the Act, and
$11,706,000,000 appropriated under
section 108 of CHIPRA. The allotments
for the first half of FY 2013 is equal to
the ‘‘first half ratio’’ multiplied by: the
allotment increase factor for FY 2013
multiplied by the sum of: any Federal
payments made from the States’
available allotments in FY 2012; any
amounts provided as redistributed
allotments in FY 2012 to the State; and
any Federal payments attributable to
any contingency fund payments made to
the State for FY 2012 as determined
under Section 2104(n) of the Act. For
this purpose, the first half ratio is the
percentage determined by dividing
$14,556,000,000 (calculated as the sum
of $2,850,000,000 (the appropriation for
the first half of FY 2013) and
$11,706,000,000 (the one-time
appropriation for the first half of the FY
2013)) by $17,406,000,000 (calculated as
$2,850,000,000, the appropriation for
the second half of FY 2013) plus the
$14,556,000,000 amount).
The allotments for the second half of
FY 2013 are provided from a total
available appropriation of
$2,850,000,000, appropriated under
section 2104(a)(16)(B) of the Act. The
allotments for the second half of FY
2013 is equal to $2,850,000,000
multiplied by a percentage equal to the
amount of the allotment for the State for
the first half of FY 2013 divided by the
sum of all such first half of FY 2013
allotments for all States.
(g) Proration Rule. Under section
2104(m)(4) of the Act, as amended by
CHIPRA, if the amount of States’
allotments for a fiscal year (as
determined in accordance with the
provisions described of this proposed
rule, or in the case of FY 2013, the
amount of an allotment for each half of
the fiscal year) exceeds the total
appropriations available for such
periods, the total allotments for each of
these periods will be reduced on a
proportional basis. The total amount
available nationally for the period is
multiplied by a proration percentage
determined by dividing the amount
determined for the period by the sum of
such amounts.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:46 Sep 15, 2009
Jkt 217001
h. The allotment increase factor for a
fiscal year. Under Section 2104(m)(5) of
the Act, the allotment increase factor for
a fiscal year is equal to the product of
two amounts for the fiscal year: the per
capita health care growth factor and the
Child Population growth factor.
For this purpose, in general, the per
capita health care growth factor for a
fiscal year is equal to 1 plus the
percentage increase in the projected per
capita amount of the National Health
Expenditures from the calendar year in
which the previous fiscal year ends to
the calendar year in which the fiscal
year involved ends, as most recently
published by CMS before the beginning
of the fiscal year involved.
In general, for the 50 States and the
District of Columbia, the child
population growth factor for a fiscal
year is equal to 1 plus the percentage
increase (if any) in the population of
children in the State from July 1 in the
previous fiscal year to July 1 in the
fiscal year involved, as determined by
CMS based on the most recent
published estimates of the Census
Bureau available before the beginning of
the fiscal year involved plus 1
percentage point. In the determination
of the child population growth factor,
the CHIP legislation refers to ‘‘the
percentage increase (if any)’’ of the
population of children in the State. In
this regard, child population growth
factor refers only to increases in the
population of children. Thus, if there
was a decrease in the population of
children over the indicated period, the
child population growth factor for such
state would be 0.0 percent plus one
percentage point; that is, negative
growth in the children population
would not result in the growth factor
being less than 101 percent.
Because of concerns about availability
of data to determine the child
population growth factor for the
Commonwealths and the Territories,
section 2104(m)(1)(B) of the Act
explicitly required that the term
‘‘United States’’ be substituted for the
term ‘‘the State’’. For fiscal years after
FY 2009, that exception does not apply,
and we will determine the child
population growth factor for the
Commonwealths and the Territories,
based on the most recent published
estimates of the Census Bureau. In
accordance with section 602(b) of the
CHIPRA, which added a new section
2109(b)(2)(B) of the Act, we will be
working with the Secretary of the
Commerce Department on appropriate
adjustments to improve the Current
Population Survey (CPS), or develop
other data, to determine the child
population growth factor.
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
i. CHIP Fiscal Year Allotment Process.
As described above, the determination
of the allotments for each fiscal year
potentially involves the collection of
relevant data, such as related to the
allotment increase factor, or the
consideration of additional information
later or after the end of the fiscal year;
for example, the determination of the
FY 2010 and FY 2012 allotments allows
States to receive increases in their CHIP
allotments to reflect the submission of
certain expansions to their CHIP
programs. In that regard, we are
incorporating into the CHIP regulation a
process, under which the Secretary may
elect to publish preliminary fiscal year
allotments. Consequently, under this
process at the time the updated
allotment amounts became available the
Secretary would publish a final notice.
For example, under the CHIPRA
legislation, in the determination of the
FY 2010 and FY 2012 allotments, States
can amend their CHIP programs to
provide for expansions; the increase in
expenditures for such expansions would
serve to increase the amount of the State
fiscal year allotments associated with
the year of such expansions. As
determined by the Secretary, the CHIP
allotments for a fiscal year may need to
be published first as Preliminary
Allotments and then later as Final
Allotments in the Federal Register. The
proposed rule provides for the potential
for a preliminary and final allotment to
be determined.
B. Coordination of CHIP Funding for FY
2009
Before the enactment of CHIPRA,
section 2104(a)(11) of the Act, as
amended by MMSEA, appropriated $5
billion for purposes of providing FY
2009 allotments for States. Under the
CHIP statute as amended by MMSEA
and before the enactment of CHIPRA,
such funds were potentially available
for allotment and obligation to States for
their CHIP related expenditures in FY
2009 through March 31, 2009.
Furthermore, section 2104(k) of the Act
and section 2104(l) of the Act, as
amended by MMSEA, provided for
redistribution of the unexpended FY
2006 allotments in FY 2009, and for
additional FY 2009 shortfall allotments
in FY 2009, respectively. However,
section 3(c)(1) of CHIPRA provides for
a rescission of amounts of these funds
that were not obligated before April 1,
2009. Furthermore, section 3(c)(2) of
CHIPRA requires that the FY 2009
allotments, as determined under section
2104(m)(1) of the Act (as amended by
CHIPRA), be reduced by the following
amounts that were appropriated and
obligated before April 1, 2009. Amounts
E:\FR\FM\16SEP1.SGM
16SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 178 / Wednesday, September 16, 2009 / Proposed Rules
appropriated and obligated before April
1, 2009 include the amounts of the FY
2009 allotments appropriated under
section 2104(a)(11) of the Act, as
amended by MMSEA and before the
enactment of CHIPRA; amounts of FY
2006 redistributed allotments, provided
under section 2104(k) of the Act; and,
the amounts of the FY 2009 shortfall
allotments, provided under section
2104(l) of the Act. This coordination
ensures that States’ FY 2009 CHIP
funding does not exceed the final FY
2009 CHIP allotments as determined
under the CHIPRA.
C. FY 2009 Allotments Determined in
Accordance With Such Methodologies
and Procedures
In accordance with the methodology
described in section II.A. of this
proposed rule relating to the calculation
of the fiscal year CHIP allotments, and
in section II.B. of this proposed rule
relating to the coordination of CHIP
funding, we have calculated the FY
2009 allotments for the States. That
calculation is contained in three tables
described in section III. of this proposed
rule; Table 1 provides the calculation of
the allotment increase factor for FY
2009, Table 2 provides the calculation
of the FY 2009 allotment, and Table 3
provides the coordination of funds in
FY 2009.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
D. Period of Availability for CHIP
Allotments
Section 105 of CHIPRA amended
section 2105(e) of the Act to revise the
period of availability for expenditure by
States of their CHIP fiscal year
allotments. Before the enactment of
CHIPRA, States’ CHIP fiscal year
allotments were available for
expenditure by the State for 3 fiscal
years, the fiscal year and the subsequent
2 fiscal years. With the enactment of
CHIPRA, section 2105(e) of the Act now
provides that each of the States’ fiscal
year allotments for FY 1998 through FY
2008, are available for the expenditure
by the State for 3 fiscal years. Finally,
section 2104(e) of the Act as amended
by CHIPRA now indicates that States’
fiscal year allotments for FY 2009 and
each succeeding fiscal year are available
for expenditure by the States for 2 fiscal
years, the current fiscal year and the
immediately subsequent fiscal year. In
this proposed rule, we have amended
the CHIP regulations at § 457.611 to
reflect the 3 fiscal year and 2 fiscal year
periods of availability, as applicable to
fiscal years before FY 2009 and effective
for FY 2009 and subsequent fiscal years,
respectively.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:46 Sep 15, 2009
Jkt 217001
E. Continuing Authority for Qualifying
States To Use FY 2009 Through FY 2013
Allotments for Certain Medicaid
Expenditures
Section 107 of CHIPRA amended the
CHIP statute to add a new section
2105(g)(4) of the Act to allow certain
‘‘qualifying states’’ described in section
2105(g) of the Act to elect to use up to
100 percent of their available CHIP
fiscal year allotments for FY 2009 and
following fiscal years for certain
expenditures in Medicaid. Before the
enactment of CHIPRA, States were only
able to use up to 20 percent of their
available fiscal year CHIP allotments for
the applicable Medicaid expenditures.
With the enactment of CHIPRA,
beginning with the FY 2009 allotment,
States can use up to 100 percent of their
FY 2009 and following fiscal year
allotments for the States’ qualifying
expenditures. In that case, only the
Federal share portion of the
expenditures which is above the amount
that the State would have received
under Medicaid would be applied
against the CHIP allotment.
Note, under section 5001 of the
American Recovery and Reinvestment
Act of 2009 (ARRA, Pub. L. 111–5,
enacted on February 17, 2009) the
FMAP under the Medicaid program has
been increased during the 9-quarter
period October 1, 2009 through
December 31, 2010. Because of this
increase, the amount of the Federal
share funds that will be applied against
the CHIP qualifying States’ FY 2009
(and following) allotments will be
reduced. For example, a qualifying
State’s regular Medicaid FMAP rate in
FY 2009 is 50 percent, its increased
FMAP under ARRA in Medicaid is
60.00 percent, and its CHIP EFMAP is
65.00 percent. This qualifying State
would be able to claim the ‘‘qualifying’’
expenditures in FY 2009 at the 65.00
percent EFMAP rate in CHIP, and only
5 percent of such expenditures would
apply against the State’s FY 2009
allotment, calculated as 65.00 percent
(CHIP EFMAP) minus 60.00 percent
(increased FMAP under ARRA)
claimable under the Medicaid program.
In the same example (and assuming the
same FMAP for Medicaid and enhanced
FMAP in CHIP), after December 31,
2010 15.00 percent of the qualifying
expenditure in FY 2011 would apply
against the State’s FY 2011 CHIP
allotment, calculated as 65.00 percent
(CHIP EFMAP) minus 50.00 percent
(regular FMAP) claimable under the
Medicaid program. We have amended
the CHIP regulations to reflect this
provision.
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
47523
F. Retrospective Adjustment of FY 2008
Shortfall Allotments
Section 2104(j)(5) of the Act, as
amended by MMSEA provides for a
potential retrospective adjustment with
respect to the amounts of States’ FY
2008 shortfall allotments provided to
them in FY 2008 and based on
expenditure reports for FY 2008
submitted and certified by States to
CMS no later than November 30, 2008.
Under section 2104(j)(2) and (3)(A) of
the Act, additional FY 2008 shortfall
allotments were made available only to
those 50 States and the District of
Columbia that were initially determined
to have a shortfall in CHIP funding in
FY 2008 based on their FY 2008
expenditure projections as submitted
and certified by the States by November
30, 2007. For those States, under section
2104(j)(5) of the Act, the retrospective
adjustment to the amounts of their
additional FY 2008 shortfall allotments
is based on the FY 2008 expenditure
projections submitted and certified by
such States by November 30, 2008.
Through the end of FY 2008 and
based on States’ estimated FY 2008
CHIP expenditures, we had provided
approximately $1,201 million in total
additional FY 2008 shortfall allotments
to States to address their projected
shortfalls in FY 2008. However, based
on the States’ actual FY 2008
expenditures, as submitted through
November 30, 2008, the final States’
shortfalls in FY 2008 were only
approximately $995 million. That is, of
those States who overestimated their
projected shortfalls, final shortfalls for
FY 2008 were about $232 million less
than were previously estimated, and for
States that underestimated their
shortfalls, their actual shortfalls were
about $26 million higher. Thus, the final
net shortfall for States was about $995
million ($1,201 million minus $232
million plus $26 million). Table 4 in
this notice presents the final FY 2008
shortfall allotments after applying the
retrospective adjustment under section
2104(j)(5) of the Act.
G. Retrospective Adjustment of FY 2009
Shortfall Allotments
Section 2104(l)(5) of the Act, as
amended by MMSEA provides for a
potential retrospective adjustment with
respect to the amounts of States’ FY
2009 shortfall allotments provided to
them in FY 2009 prior to April 1, 2009
based on expenditure reports for the
first two quarters of FY 2009 as
submitted and certified by States to
CMS no later than May 31, 2009.
Under section 2104(l)(2) and (3)(A) of
the Act, additional FY 2009 shortfall
E:\FR\FM\16SEP1.SGM
16SEP1
47524
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 178 / Wednesday, September 16, 2009 / Proposed Rules
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
allotments were made available to those
States that were initially determined to
have a shortfall in CHIP funding in FY
2009 based on their expenditure
projections for the first two quarters of
FY 2009 as submitted and certified by
the States by November 30, 2008. For
those States, under section 2104(l)(5) of
the Act, the retrospective adjustment to
the amounts of their additional FY 2009
shortfall allotments is based on the FY
2009 expenditures for the first two
quarters of FY 2009 as submitted and
certified by such States by May 31,
2009.
Prior to April 1, 2009, and based on
States’ estimated FY 2009 CHIP
expenditures through the end of the
second quarter of FY 2009, we had
provided approximately $267 million in
total additional FY 2009 shortfall
allotments to States to address their
projected shortfalls in FY 2009 through
the end of the second quarter FY 2009
in that amount. However, based on the
States’ actual FY 2009 expenditures for
the first two quarters of FY 2009, as
submitted through May 31, 2009, the
final States’ shortfalls in FY 2009
through the second quarter of FY 2009
for the shortfall States were only
approximately $210 million. That is, for
the shortfall States initially receiving
the additional FY 2009 shortfall
allotments, based on their actual FY
2009 reported expenditures for the first
two quarters of FY 2009, their final
shortfalls for the first two quarters of FY
2009 were about $58 million less than
was previously estimated. Table 5 in
this notice presents the final FY 2009
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:46 Sep 15, 2009
Jkt 217001
shortfall allotments after applying the
retrospective adjustment under section
2104(l)(5) of the Act. Also, Column D in
Table 3 reflects these final retrospective
adjustment FY 2009 shortfall
allotments.
III. Tables
Following are the keys and associated
tables for the CHIP funding provisions
as discussed in previous sections:
Table 1—Allotment Increase Factor for
2009
Table 2—FY 2009 Children’s Health
Insurance Program Allotments under
the Children’s Health Insurance
Program Reauthorization Act Of 2009
Table 3—Coordination of CHIP Funding
for Fiscal Year 2009
Table 4—Retrospective Adjustment for
the FY 2008 Shortfall Funding
A. TABLE 1—ALLOTMENT INCREASE
FACTOR FOR 2009
Key to Table 1
Column/Description
Column A = State. Column A contains
the name of the State, District of
Columbia, U.S. Commonwealth or
Territory.
Column B = PCNHE 2008, PCNHE
2009, PCHCG Factor. Column B
contains the calculation of the Per
Capita Health Care Growth (PCHCG)
Factor for FY 2009, determined as 1
plus the percentage increase in the Per
Capita National Health Expenditures
(PCNHE) from calendar year 2008 to
calendar year 2009.
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Columns C through F = Calculation of
the Child Population Growth Factor
(CPGF) for FY 2009:
Column C = July 1, 2008 Child
Population. Column C contains the
population of children in each State or
the United States as of July 1, 2008, as
provided by the most recent published
data of the Census Bureau before the
beginning of FY 2009.
Column D = July 1, 2009 Child
Population. Column D contains the
population of children in each State or
the United States as of July 1, 2009, as
provided by the most recent published
data of the Census Bureau before the
beginning of FY 2009.
Column E = Percent Increase 2008–
2009. Column E contains the percentage
increase, if any, of the population of
children in each State, or the United
States, from July 1, 2008 to July 1, 2009,
calculated as the difference between the
number in Column D minus the number
in Column C divided by the number in
Column C.
Column F = Child Population Growth
Factor. Column F contains the CPGF for
the 50 States and the District of
Columbia, determined as the 1.01 plus
the percent in Column E for the State.
For the Commonwealths and Territories
the CPGF is determined as 1.01 plus the
percentage in Column E for the United
States.
Column G = FY 2009 Allotment
Increase Factor. Column G contains the
FY 2009 Allotment Increase Factor,
calculated as the PCHCG factor in
Column B multiplied by the CPGF
percent in Column F.
E:\FR\FM\16SEP1.SGM
16SEP1
B. Table 2—FY 2009 Children’s Health
Insurance Program Allotments Under
the Children’s Health Insurance
Program Reauthorization Act of 2009
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
Key to Table 2
Column/Description
Column A = State. Column A contains
the name of the State, District of
Columbia, U.S. Commonwealth or
Territory.
Column B = FY 2008 Total Federal
CHIP Payments. Column B contains, for
the 50 States and the District of
Columbia only, the total Federal
payments applied to the States’
available CHIP allotment funds in FY
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:46 Sep 15, 2009
Jkt 217001
2008, based on the States’ expenditure
reports submitted through November 30,
2008. For the Commonwealths and
Territories, the entry in this Column is
‘‘na.’’
Column C = FY 2008 CHIP
Allotments. Column C contains for the
50 States and the District of Columbia
only, the States’ final FY 2008 CHIP
Allotments, as published in the May 23,
2008 Federal Register (30112, Vol. 73,
No. 101). For the Commonwealths and
Territories, Column C contains the
maximum amount of the Federal
payments for each of the jurisdictions as
was applied against the jurisdiction’s
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
47525
available CHIP funds in each of the
fiscal years FY 1999 through 2008.
Column D = FY 2009 Allotment
Increase Factor. Column D contains the
Allotment Increase Factor for each State
as contained in Column G of Table 1.
Column E = FY 2008 Tot. Fed Pmts
× Incr. Factor. Column E contains, for
the 50 States and the District of
Columbia only, the product of the FY
2008 total Federal CHIP payments in
Column B multiplied by the amount of
the FY 2009 Allotment Increase Factor
in Column D. Column E contains, for
the Territories and Commonwealths, the
product of the amount in Column C
(containing the maximum amount of
E:\FR\FM\16SEP1.SGM
16SEP1
EP16SE09.000
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 178 / Wednesday, September 16, 2009 / Proposed Rules
47526
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 178 / Wednesday, September 16, 2009 / Proposed Rules
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Payments in the FY 1999
through FY 2008) multiplied by the
amount in Column D (the allotment
increase period).
Column F = FY 2008 Allotments ×
Incr. Factor. Column F contains, for the
50 States and the District of Columbia
only, the product of the FY 2008 CHIP
allotments in Column C multiplied by
the amount of the FY 2009 Allotment
Increase Factor in Column D. Column F
contains, for each of the
Commonwealths and Territories, the
percentage for each jurisdiction,
respectively, from section 2104(a)(3) the
percent allocation.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:46 Sep 15, 2009
Jkt 217001
Column G = FY 2009 Projected
Expenditures. Column G contains, for
the 50 States and the District of
Columbia only; the amounts of each
State’s projected CHIP Federal payments
as submitted by the States on their
February 2009 quarterly expenditure
reports no later than March 31, 2009.
Column G contains, for each of the
Commonwealths and Territories, the
portion of the additional $40 million in
allotment funds available to such
jurisdiction for FY 2009, determined as
the product of the percentage in Column
F for the Jurisdiction multiplied by $40
million.
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Column H = Maximum of Col. E, F,
G. Column H contains, for the 50 States
and the District of Columbia only, the
maximum of the amounts in Columns E,
F, and G.
Column I = FY 2009 Allotments.
Column I contains, for the 50 States and
the District of Columbia, the FY 2009
CHIP allotment, determined as 110
percent multiplied by the amount in
Column H. Column I contains for the
Commonwealths and Territories, the FY
2009 CHIP allotment, determined as the
sum of the amount in Column E and the
amount in Column G, for each
jurisdiction.
E:\FR\FM\16SEP1.SGM
16SEP1
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
C. Table 3—Coordination of CHIP
Funding for Fiscal Year 2009
Table 3 contains the amounts of each
States’ FY 2009 CHIP allotment, as
contained in Column I on Table 2,
reduced by certain amounts of CHIP
allotment funds already available to the
State in FY 2009, as required under
section 3(c) of CHIPRA.
Key to Table 3
Column/Description
Column A = State. Column A contains
the name of the State.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:46 Sep 15, 2009
Jkt 217001
Column B = FY 2009 Pre-CHIPRA
Allotment Grants Issued Before April 1,
2009. Column B contains the amount if
any of the State’s FY 2009 allotment that
was actually provided to the State in a
grant award from such allotment before
April 1, 2009, as determined under
section 2104(a) of the Act before the
enactment of CHIPRA, as published in
the Federal Register on May 23, 2008
(30112, Vol. 73, No. 101).
Column C = FY 2006 Unexpended
Allotments Redistributed in FY 2009
Before April 1, 2009. Column C contains
the total amount, if any, that the State
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
47527
received from the amounts of States’
unexpended FY 2006 allotments
remaining at the end of FY 2008, and
redistributed in FY 2009 before April 1,
2009, determined in accordance with
the provisions of section 2104(k) of the
Act.
Column D = FY 2009 Shortfall
Allotments After Retrospective
Adjustment. Column D contains the
final amount if any, that the State
received as an additional shortfall
allotment for the first two quarters of FY
2009, as determined under the
retrospective adjustment provision of
E:\FR\FM\16SEP1.SGM
16SEP1
EP16SE09.001
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 178 / Wednesday, September 16, 2009 / Proposed Rules
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 178 / Wednesday, September 16, 2009 / Proposed Rules
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
section 2104(l)(5) of the Act. Refer to
Table 5 for further information
regarding the determination of the
amounts of the FY 2009 shortfall
allotments under the retrospective
adjustment.
Column E = Total FY 2009 PreCHIPRA Allotment Funds. Column E
contains the total amount if any, that the
State received as CHIP allotment funds
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:46 Sep 15, 2009
Jkt 217001
in FY 2009 before April 1, 2009,
determined as the sum of the amounts,
if any, in Columns B, C, and D, for each
State.
Column F = FY 2009 Total Allotments
Determined Under CHIPRA. Column F
contains the total FY 2009 CHIP
allotment determined under CHIPRA, as
contained in Column I in Table 2.
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4725
Column G = FY 2009 Allotments
Under CHIPRA Balance Effective April
1, 2009. Column G contains the balance
of the FY 2009 CHIP allotment after the
reduction by the amounts of the FY
2009 allotment funds provided in FY
2009, determined as the amount in
Column F minus the amount in Column
E.
E:\FR\FM\16SEP1.SGM
16SEP1
EP16SE09.002
47528
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 178 / Wednesday, September 16, 2009 / Proposed Rules
D. Table 4—Retrospective Adjustment
for the FY 2008 Shortfall Allotments
Table 4 contains the final
retrospective adjustment determination
with respect to the amounts of the
additional shortfall allotments provided
to States to eliminate their CHIP funding
shortfalls in FY 2008, in accordance
with the provisions of section 2104(j)(5)
of the Act. Under section 2104(j)(2) and
(3)(A) of the Act, additional FY 2008
shortfall allotments were made available
only to those 50 States and the District
of Columbia that were determined to
have a shortfall in CHIP funding in FY
2008 based on their FY 2008
expenditure projections as submitted
and certified by the States by November
30, 2007. For those States, under section
2104(j)(5) of the Act, the retrospective
adjustment to the amounts of their
additional FY 2008 shortfall allotments
is based on the FY 2008 expenditure
projections submitted and certified by
such States by November 30, 2008.
Key to Table 4
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
Column/Description
Column A = State. Column A contains
the name of the State.
Column B = FY 2008 Actual
Expenditures 11/30/08. Column B
contains the total Federal share amount
of the CHIP expenditures reported by
the States for FY 2008, as contained on
the States’ expenditure reports
submitted and certified by the States by
November 30, 2008.
Column C = FY 2006 Carryover
Allotments into FY 08. Column C
contains the amounts of the States’
unused FY 2006 allotments remaining at
the end of FY 2007, if any, and carried
over into FY 2008.
Column D = FY 2007 Carryover
Allotments into FY 08. Column D
contains the amounts of the States’
unused FY 2007 allotments remaining at
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:46 Sep 15, 2009
Jkt 217001
the end of FY 2007, if any, and carried
over into FY 2008.
Column E = FY 2008 Allotments.
Column E contains the amounts of the
States’ FY 2008 allotments, as published
in the May 23, 2008 Federal Register
(30112, Vol. 73, No. 101).
Column F = FY 2005 Redistribution
Based on November 30, 2007 Estimates.
Column F contains the amounts of the
FY 2005 redistributed allotments issued
to the State in FY 2008, if any, as based
on the States’ estimates of CHIP funding
needed for FY 2008 submitted and
certified by the State by November 30,
2007.
Column G = Total Avail. Allotments
in FY 2008. Column G contains the total
amount of CHIP funds available to the
State in FY 2008 without consideration
of the issuance of any additional FY
2008 shortfall allotments, determined as
the sum of the amounts, if any, in
Columns C, D, E, and F.
Column H = Retro. Adjusted Shortfall
in FY 2008. Column H contains the
retrospective adjustment amount of
States’ shortfall in CHIP funding for FY
2008. This amount is based on the
States’ actual FY 2008 CHIP
expenditures as submitted and certified
by the State by November 30, 2008 and
the actually available CHIP funds
without any additional FY 2008
shortfall allotments. The retrospective
adjustment is applicable only for States
that were determined to have a shortfall
in CHIP funding in FY 2008 based on
their FY 2008 expenditure projections
submitted and certified by November
30, 2007; such States are those with an
FY 2008 shortfall amount shown in
Column I. For such States, the amount
of the retrospective adjustment shortfall
amount in Column H is calculated as
the difference between the amounts of
the States’ projected Federal share CHIP
expenditures for FY 2008 in Column B
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
47529
and the amounts of the States’ available
allotments funds in FY 2008 Column G.
Column I = Total FY 2008 SF
Allotment Grants Issued in FY 2008.
Column I contains the total amounts of
the additional FY 2008 shortfall
allotments actually issued to the State in
FY 2008 to address States’ CHIP funding
shortfalls in FY 2008.
Column J = FY 2008 Excess SF
Allotments Provided In FY 2008.
Column J contains the amounts of the
States’ excess additional FY 2008
shortfall allotments provided in FY
2008, as determined under the
retrospective adjustment provision. For
States that received additional FY 2008
shortfall allotments, the amounts in
Column J represent the amount of the
FY 2008 shortfall allotments provided
in FY 2008 that were greater than were
needed to address such States’ CHIP
funding shortfalls in FY 2008. The
amounts in Column J are calculated as
the difference between the actual
additional FY 2008 shortfall allotments
in Column I and the amounts of the
States’ retrospectively adjusted FY 2008
shortfall in Column H.
Column K = Additional FY 2008 SF
Allotments Needed for FY 2008.
Column K contains the amounts of the
additional FY 2008 shortfall allotments
needed by FY 2008 shortfall States as
determined under the retrospective
adjustment provision. For States that
received such shortfall allotments in FY
2008, the amounts in Column K
represent the amount of the additional
FY 2008 shortfall allotments needed in
FY 2008 that were greater than were
provided to address such States’ CHIP
funding shortfalls in FY 2008. The
amounts in Column K are calculated as
the difference between the amounts of
the States’ retrospectively adjusted FY
2008 shortfall in Column H and the
actual FY 2008 shortfall allotments
provided to the States in Column I.
E:\FR\FM\16SEP1.SGM
16SEP1
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 178 / Wednesday, September 16, 2009 / Proposed Rules
16:46 Sep 15, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\16SEP1.SGM
16SEP1
EP16SE09.003
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
47530
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 178 / Wednesday, September 16, 2009 / Proposed Rules
E. Table 5—Retrospective Adjustment
for the FY 2009 Shortfall Funding
Table 5 contains the final
retrospective adjustment determination
with respect to the amounts of the
additional shortfall allotments provided
to States to eliminate their CHIP funding
shortfalls for the first two quarters of FY
2009, in accordance with the provisions
of section 2104(l)(5) of the Act. Under
section 2104(l)(2) and (3)(A) of the Act,
additional FY 2009 shortfall allotments
were initially made available only to
those States that were projected to have
a shortfall in CHIP funding for the first
two quarters of FY 2009 based on their
FY 2009 expenditure projections as
submitted and certified by the States by
November 30, 2008. For those States,
under section 2104(l)(5) of the Act, the
retrospective adjustment to the amounts
of their additional FY 2009 shortfall
allotments are based on the FY 2009
expenditures for the first two quarters of
FY 2009 as submitted and certified by
such States by May 31, 2009.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
Key to Table 5
Column/Description
Column A = State. Column A contains
the name of the State.
Column B = FY 09 Actual Expends.
Thru 3/31/09 Reported By 5/31/09.
Column B contains the total Federal
share amount of the CHIP expenditures
reported by the States for the first two
quarters of FY 2009 (the period ending
March 31, 2009), as contained on the
States’ expenditure reports submitted
and certified by the States by May 31,
2009.
Column C = FY 07 Carryover
Allotments into FY 09. Column C
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:46 Sep 15, 2009
Jkt 217001
contains the amounts of the States’
unused FY 2007 allotments remaining at
the end of FY 2008, if any, and carried
over into FY 2009.
Column D = FY 08 Carryover
Allotments into FY 09. Column D
contains the amounts of the States’
unused FY 2008 allotments remaining at
the end of FY 2008, if any, and carried
over into FY 2009.
Column E = FY 09 Pre-CHIPRA Allot.
Grants. Column E contains the amounts
of the States’ FY 2009 allotment grants
as issued to States prior to April 1, 2009
from the FY 2009 allotments as
determined under the CHIP statute in
effect prior to the enactment of CHIPRA,
as published in the May 23, 2008
Federal Register (30112, Vol. 73, No.
101).
Column F = FY 2006 Redistribution
Based on 11/30/08 Estimates. Column F
contains the amounts of the FY 2006
redistributed allotments issued to the
State in FY 2009, if any, as based on the
States’ estimates of CHIP funding
needed for FY 2009 submitted and
certified by the State by November 30,
2008.
Column G = Total Avail. Allotments
in FY 2009. Column G contains the total
amount of CHIP funds available to the
State in FY 2009 without consideration
of the issuance of any additional FY
2009 shortfall allotments, determined as
the sum of the amounts, if any, in
Columns C, D, E, and F.
Column H = Retro. Adjusted Shortfall
FY 2009 Thru 3/31/09. Column H
contains the retrospective adjustment
amount of States’ shortfalls in CHIP
funding through the end of March 31,
2009, based on the States’ actual FY
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
47531
2009 CHIP expenditures for the first two
quarters of FY 2009 as submitted and
certified by the State by May 31, 2009
and the actually available CHIP funds
not including any additional FY 2009
shortfall allotments. The amount of the
retrospective adjustment shortfall
amount in Column H is calculated as
the difference between the amounts of
the States’ projected Federal share CHIP
expenditures for the first two quarters of
FY 2009 in Column B and the amounts
of the States’ available allotments funds
in FY 2009 Column G.
Column I = Total FY 2009 SF
Allotments Issued in FY 2009. Column
I contains the total amounts of the
additional FY 2009 shortfall allotments
actually issued to the State in the first
two quarters of FY 2009 prior to April
1, 2009 to address States’ CHIP funding
shortfalls for the first two quarters of FY
2009.
Column J = FY 2009 Excess SF
Allotments Provided In FY 2009.
Column J contains the amounts of the
States’ excess additional FY 2009
shortfall allotments provided in FY
2009, as determined under the
retrospective adjustment provision. For
States that received additional FY 2009
shortfall allotments, the amounts in
Column J represent the amount of the
FY 2009 shortfall allotments provided
in FY 2009 that were greater than were
needed to address such States’ CHIP
funding shortfalls in FY 2009. The
amounts in Column J are calculated as
the difference between the actual
additional FY 2009 shortfall allotments
in Column I and the amounts of the
States’ retrospectively adjusted FY 2009
shortfall in Column H.
E:\FR\FM\16SEP1.SGM
16SEP1
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 178 / Wednesday, September 16, 2009 / Proposed Rules
16:46 Sep 15, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\16SEP1.SGM
16SEP1
EP16SE09.004
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
47532
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 178 / Wednesday, September 16, 2009 / Proposed Rules
IV. Response to Comments
Because of the large number of public
comments we normally receive on
Federal Register documents, we are not
able to acknowledge or respond to them
individually. We will consider all
comments we receive by the date and
time specified in the DATES section of
this preamble, and, when we proceed
with a subsequent document, we will
respond to the comments in the
preamble to that document.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
V. Collection of Information
Requirements
This document does not impose any
information collection and
recordkeeping requirements.
Consequently, it need not be reviewed
by the Office of Management and
Budget under the authority of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 35).
VI. Regulatory Impact Analysis
We have examined the impacts of this
rule as required by Executive Order
12866 on Regulatory Planning and
Review (September 30, 1993), the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
(September 19, 1980, Pub. L. 96–354),
section 1102(b) of the Social Security
Act, section 202 of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L.
104–4), Executive Order 13132 on
Federalism (August 4, 1999), and the
Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C.
804(2)).
Executive Order 12866 directs
agencies to assess all costs and benefits
of available regulatory alternatives and,
if regulation is necessary, to select
regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential
economic, environmental, public health
and safety effects, distributive impacts,
and equity). A regulatory impact
analysis (RIA) must be prepared for
major rules with economically
significant effects ($100 million or more
in any 1 year). We have determined that
this proposed rule is economically
significant, since it provides the
methodologies under which State
allotments for FY 2009 through FY 2013
were calculated and will be in the
future. In particular, this rule
implements the CHIP statute as
amended by CHIPRA, under which
approximately up to $44 billion in
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:46 Sep 15, 2009
Jkt 217001
additional Federal funds may be made
available for fiscal years FY 2009
through FY 2013 in addition to the
amount of funds previously
appropriated for States’ CHIPs in
accordance with the methodology
established in the CHIP statute. This
proposed rule also includes the actual
State fiscal year CHIP allotments for FY
2009 determined in accordance with the
methodology set out in this proposed
rule. The methodologies for determining
the States’ CHIP allotments was
established in accordance with the
methodologies specified in statute and
does not put forward any discretionary
administrative policies for determining
such allotments. Therefore, we have
determined that there are no policy
options that require an analysis beyond
that which is presented in section II of
this proposed rule.
The RFA requires agencies to analyze
options for regulatory relief of small
businesses, if a rule has a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. For purposes
of the RFA, small entities include small
businesses, nonprofit organizations, and
small governmental jurisdictions. Most
hospitals and most other providers and
suppliers are small entities, either by
nonprofit status or by having revenues
of less than $7 million to $34.5 million
in any 1 year. Individuals and States are
not included in the definition of a small
entity. We are not preparing an analysis
for the RFA because we have
determined that this proposed rule
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
In addition, section 1102(b) of the Act
requires us to prepare a regulatory
impact analysis if a rule may have a
significant impact on the operations of
a substantial number of small rural
hospitals. This analysis must conform to
the provisions of section 603 of the
RFA. For purposes of section 1102(b) of
the Act, we define a small rural hospital
as a hospital that is located outside of
a Core-Based Statistical Area and has
fewer than 100 beds. We are not
preparing an analysis for section 1102(b)
of the Act because we have determined
that this proposed rule would not have
a significant impact on the operations of
a substantial number of small rural
hospitals.
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
47533
Section 202 of the UMRA also
requires that agencies assess anticipated
costs and benefits before issuing any
rule whose mandates require spending
in any 1 year of $100 million in 1995
dollars, updated annually for inflation.
That threshold level is currently
approximately $133 million. This
proposed rule would not create an
unfunded mandate on States, tribal, or
local governments in the aggregate, or
by the private sector in the amount of
$133 million in any one year. Therefore,
we are not required to perform an
assessment of the costs and benefits of
this rule.
Executive Order 13132 establishes
certain requirements that an agency
must meet when it publishes a proposed
rule (and subsequent final rule) that
imposes substantial direct requirement
costs on State and local governments,
preempts State law, or otherwise has
Federalism implications. We have
determined that this proposed rule
would not significantly affect States’
rights, roles, and responsibilities.
Low-income children would benefit
from payments under this program
through increased opportunities for
health insurance coverage. We believe
this proposed rule would have an
overall positive impact by informing
States, the District of Columbia, and
Commonwealths and Territories of the
extent to which they are permitted to
expend funds under their child health
plans using the additional funds
provided by the FY 2009 allotment
amounts.
Accounting Statement: As required by
OMB Circular A–4 (available at https://
www.whitehouse.gov/omb/circulars/
a004/a-4.pdf), in Table 6, we have
prepared an accounting statement
showing the classification of the
expenditures associated with the
provisions of this rule. This table
provides our best impact estimate of the
rule, as it implements the CHIP statute
as amended by CHIPRA, under which
approximately up to $44 billion in
additional Federal funds may be made
available for fiscal years FY 2009
through FY 2013, in addition to the
amount of funds previously
appropriated for States’ CHIPs. All
expenditures are classified as transfers
from the Federal Government to States.
E:\FR\FM\16SEP1.SGM
16SEP1
47534
In accordance with the provisions of
Executive Order 12866, this proposed
rule was reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget.
List of Subjects in 42 CFR Part 457
Administrative practice and
procedure, Grant programs—health,
Health insurance, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services proposes to amend
42 CFR chapter IV as set forth below:
PART 457—ALLOTMENTS AND
GRANTS TO STATES
1. The authority citation for part 457
continues to read as follows:
Authority: Section 1102 of the Social
Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1302).
Subpart F—Payments to States
§ 457.600
[Amended]
2. Amend § 457.600(a) by removing
the date ‘‘2007’’ and adding in its place
‘‘2013’’.
§ 457.608
[Amended]
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
3. Amend the section heading in
§ 457.608 by removing the words ‘‘for a
fiscal year’’ and adding in its place
‘‘prior to FY 2009’’.
4. Add a new § 457.609 to subpart F
to read as follows:
§ 457.609 Process and calculation of State
allotments for a fiscal year after FY 2008.
(a) General. For each of the 50 States
and the District of Columbia and for
each Commonwealth and Territory with
an approved State child health plan, the
State allotments for FY 2009 through FY
2013 are determined by CMS as
described in paragraphs (b) through (g)
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:46 Sep 15, 2009
Jkt 217001
of this section. Unless otherwise
indicated in this section, the reference
to ‘‘State’’ refers to the 50 States and the
District of Columbia and the
Commonwealths and Territories
(American Samoa, Guam, the Northern
Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico, and the
Virgin Islands).
(b) Amounts available for allotment.
The total amounts available for
allotment for each fiscal year are as
follows:
(1) FY 2009, $10,562,000,000.
(2) FY 2010, $12,520,000,000.
(3) FY 2011, $13,459,000,000.
(4) FY 2012, $14,982,000,000.
(5) FY 2013, for the period beginning
October 1, 2012 and ending March 31,
2013, the following amounts are as
follows:
(i) $2,850,000,000.
(ii) $11,706,000,000.
(6) FY 2013, for the period beginning
April 1, 2013 and ending on September
30, 2013, $2,850,000,000.
(c) Determination of a State allotment
for FY 2009. (1) For the 50 States and
the District of Columbia. From the
amount in paragraph (b)(1) of this
section as appropriated for the fiscal
year under section 2104(a) of the Act,
subject to paragraph (e) of this section
related to proration, and paragraph
(b)(3) of this section relating to
coordination of funding, the allotment
for FY 2009 is equal to 110 percent of
the highest of the following amounts for
each State and the District of Columbia:
(i) The total Federal payments to the
State under title XXI of the Act for FY
2008 as reported by the State and
certified to the Secretary through the
November 2008 submission of the
quarterly expenditure reports, Forms
CMS–21 and CMS–64, multiplied by the
allotment increase factor determined
under paragraph (f) of this section.
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(ii) The amount allotted to the State
for FY 2008, multiplied by the allotment
increase factor determined under
paragraph (f) of this section.
(iii) The projected total Federal
payments to the State under title XXI of
the Act for FY 2009, subject to
paragraph (c)(1)(iv) of this section, as
determined based on the February 2009
projections certified by the State to CMS
by no later than March 31, 2009.
(iv) In the case of a State described in
section 2105(g) of the Act and electing
the option under paragraph (4) of such
section, for purposes of the projections
described in paragraph (c)(1)(iii) of this
section, such projections would include
an amount equal to the difference
between the following amounts:
(A) The amount of Federal payments
for the expenditures described in
section 2104(g)(4)(B) of the Act made
after February 4, 2009 that would have
been paid to the State if claimed at the
enhanced Federal medical assistance
percentage determined under section
2105(b) of the Act.
(B) The amount of Federal payments
for the expenditures described in
section 2104(g)(4)(B) of the Act made
after February 4, 2009 that would have
been paid to the State if claimed at the
Federal medical assistance percentage
defined in section 1905(b) of the Act;
during the recession adjustment period
described in section 5001(h) of the
American Recovery and Reinvestment
Act of 2009 (ARRA), the Federal
medical assistance percentage is as
determined for the State under section
5001 of ARRA.
(2) For the Commonwealths or
Territories.
(i) From the amount in paragraph
(b)(1) of this section, as appropriated for
the FY 2009 under section 2104(a) of the
E:\FR\FM\16SEP1.SGM
16SEP1
EP16SE09.005
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 178 / Wednesday, September 16, 2009 / Proposed Rules
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 178 / Wednesday, September 16, 2009 / Proposed Rules
Act, subject to paragraph (e) of this
section related to proration, and
paragraph (c)(3) of this section relating
to coordination of funding, an amount
equal to the highest amount of Federal
payments made to the Commonwealth
or Territory under title XXI of the Social
Security Act for any fiscal year
occurring during the period for FY 1999
through FY 2008, multiplied by the
allotment increase factor determined
under paragraph (f) of this section, plus
the additional amount for the fiscal year
specified in paragraph (c)(2)(ii) of this
section
(ii) Additional Amounts for FY 2009.
From the amount appropriated for the
fiscal year under section 2104(c)(4)(B) of
the Act, the additional amount for each
Commonwealth or Territory is equal to
$40,000,000 multiplied by the following
percentage as specified in section
2104(c)(2) of the Act:
(A) For Puerto Rico, 91.6 percent.
(B) For Guam, 3.5 percent.
(C) For the Virgin Islands, 2.6 percent.
(D) For American Samoa, 1.2 percent.
(E) For the Northern Mariana Islands,
1.1 percent.
(3) Coordination of CHIP Funding for
FY 2009. The amount of the CHIP
allotment for FY 2009 available for
payment for a States’ expenditures may
be reduced by the amounts appropriated
and obligated before April 1, 2009 for
States’ FY 2009 allotments, FY 2006
allotments redistributed to the State in
FY 2009 determined under section
2104(k) of the Act, and the amounts of
additional FY 2009 shortfall allotments
determined under section 2104(l) of the
Act.
(d) Determination of a State allotment
for FY 2010 through FY 2013. (1)
General. Subject to the provisions of
paragraph (e) of this section relating to
proration and paragraph (g) of the
section relating to increases in a fiscal
year allotment for approved program
expansions, the State allotments for FY
2010 through FY 2013 are determined as
follows.
(2) Determination of a State Allotment
for FY 2010. (i) For the 50 States and the
District of Columbia, and for the
Commonwealths and Territories subject
to paragraph (d)(2)(ii) of this section, the
State allotment for FY 2010 is equal to
the product of the following:
(A) The sum of:
(1) The State Allotment for FY 2009,
as determined under paragraph (c) of
the section.
(2) The amount of any Federal
payments made as redistributions of
unexpended FY 2006 allotments under
section 2104(k) of the Act.
(3) The amount of any Federal
payments made as additional FY 2009
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:46 Sep 15, 2009
Jkt 217001
allotments under section 2104(l) of the
Act.
(4) The amount of any Federal
payments made as contingency fund
payments for FY 2009 under section
2104(n) of the Act.
(B) The State allotment increase factor
for FY 2010 as determined under
paragraph (f) of the section.
(ii) In determining the amount of the
FY 2010 allotment for each
Commonwealth and Territory, for
purposes of determining the amount of
the FY 2009 allotment under paragraph
(d)(2)(i)(A)(1) of this section, the amount
of such FY 2009 allotment will not
include the additional amount
determined under paragraph (c)(2)(ii).
(3) Determination of a State Allotment
for FY 2011. For the 50 States and the
District of Columbia, and the
Commonwealths and Territories, the
State allotment for FY 2011 is equal to
the product of:
(i) The amount of Federal payments
attributable and countable toward the
available State allotments in FY 2010,
including—
(A) Any amount redistributed to the
State in FY 2010, and
(B) Any Federal payments made as
contingency fund payments for FY 2010
under section 2104(n) of the Act.
(ii) The State allotment increase factor
for FY 2011 as determined under
paragraph (f) of the section.
(4) Determination of a State Allotment
for FY 2012. For the 50 States and the
District of Columbia, and the
Commonwealths and Territories, the
State allotment for FY 2012 is equal to
the product of:
(i) The sum of:
(A) The State Allotment for FY 2011,
as determined under paragraph (d)(3) of
this section.
(B) The amount of any Federal
payments made as contingency fund
payments for FY 2011 under section
2104(n) of the Act.
(ii) The State allotment increase factor
for FY 2012 as determined under
paragraph (f) of this section.
(5) Determination of a State Allotment
for FY 2013.
(i) General. There are two State
allotments for FY 2013; one for the
period beginning October 1, 2012 and
ending March 31, 2013 and the second
beginning April 1, 2013 and ending
September 30, 2013. These State
allotments are determined for each of
the 50 States and the District of
Columbia, and the Commonwealths and
Territories.
(ii) The State allotment for FY 2013
for the period October 1, 2012 and
ending March 31, 2013 is determined as
the product of the following:
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
47535
(A) The first half ratio determined as
the amount in paragraph (d)(5)(A)(1) of
this section divided by the amount in
paragraph (d)(5)(A)(2) of this section.
(1) $14,556,000,000 (calculated as the
sum of the two amounts in paragraph
(b)(5) of this section, $2,850,000,000
(appropriated in section 2104(a)(16)(A)
of the Act) and $11,706,000,000
(appropriated in section 108 of Public
Law 111–3)).
(2) $17,406,000,000, determined as
the sum of the amount determined
under paragraph (d)(5)(A)(1) of this
section, $14,556,000,000, and
$2,850,000,000, the amount in
paragraph (b)(6) of this section, as
appropriated in section 2104(a)(16)(B) of
the Act.
(B) The product of:
(1) The amount of Federal payments
attributable and countable toward the
total amount of available State
allotments in FY 2012, including—
(i) Any amount redistributed to the
State in FY 2012; and
(ii) Any Federal payments made as
contingency fund payments for FY 2012
under section 2104(n) of the Act.
(2) The State allotment increase factor
for FY 2013 as determined under
paragraph (f) of this section.
(iii) The State allotment for FY 2013
for the period April 1, 2013 and ending
September 31, 2013 is determined as the
product of the following:
(A) $2,850,000,000, the amount in
paragraph (b)(6) of this section, as
appropriated in section 2104(a)(16)(B) of
the Act; and
(B) The ratio determined as the
amount in paragraph (d)(5)(iii)(B)(1) of
this section divided by the amount in
paragraph (d)(5)(iii)(B)(2) of this section.
(1) The amount of the State allotment
determined under paragraph (d)(5)(ii) of
this section.
(2) The total of all the State allotments
determined under paragraph (d)(5)(ii) of
this section.
(e) Proration. (1) If for a fiscal year the
sum of the State allotments for the 50
States and the District of Columbia, and
the State allotments for the
Commonwealths and Territories (not
including the additional amount for FY
2009 determined under paragraph
(c)(2)(ii) of this section), exceeds the
total amount available for allotment for
the fiscal year under paragraph (b) of
this section, the amount of the allotment
for each of the 50 States and the District
of Columbia, and for each of the
Commonwealths and Territories (not
including the additional amount for FY
2009 determined under paragraph
(c)(2)(ii) of this section) will be reduced
on a proportional basis as indicated in
paragraph (e)(2) of this section.
E:\FR\FM\16SEP1.SGM
16SEP1
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
47536
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 178 / Wednesday, September 16, 2009 / Proposed Rules
(2) The amount of the allotment for
each of the 50 States and the District of
Columbia, and for each of the
Commonwealths and Territories (not
including the additional amount for FY
2009 determined under paragraph
(c)(2)(ii) of this section) is equal to the
product of:
(i) The percentage determined by
dividing the amount in paragraph
(e)(2)(i)(A) by the amount in paragraph
(e)(2)(i)(B) of this section.
(A) The amount of the State allotment
for each of the 50 States and the District
of Columbia, and for each of the
Commonwealths and Territories (not
including the additional amount for FY
2009 determined under paragraph
(c)(2)(ii) of this section).
(B) The sum of the amounts for each
of the 50 States and the District of
Columbia, and the Commonwealths and
Territories in paragraph (e)(2)(i) of this
section.
(ii) The total amount available for
allotment for the fiscal year under
paragraph (b) of this section
(f) Allotment increase factor. The
allotment increase factor for a fiscal year
is equal to the product of the following:
(1) Per capita health care growth
factor. The per capita health care growth
factor for a fiscal year is equal to 1 plus
the percentage increase in the projected
per capita amount of the National
Health Expenditures from the calendar
year in which the previous fiscal year
ends to the calendar year in which the
fiscal year involved ends, as most
recently published by CMS before the
beginning of the fiscal year involved.
(2) Child Population Growth Factor.
The child population growth factor for
a fiscal year is equal to 1 plus the
percentage increase (if any) in the
population of children in the State from
July 1 in the previous fiscal year to July
1 in the fiscal year involved, as
determined by CMS based on the most
recent published estimates of the
Census Bureau available before the
beginning of the fiscal year involved
plus 1 percentage point. For purposes of
determining the Child Population
Growth Factor for FY 2009 for the
Commonwealths and Territories only, in
applying the previous sentence, ‘‘United
States’’ is substituted for ‘‘the State’’.
(g) Increase in State allotment for the
50 States and the District of Columbia
for FY 2010 through FY 2013 to account
for approved program expansions. In
the case of the 50 States and the District
of Columbia, the State allotment for FY
2010 through FY 2013, as determined in
accordance with the provisions of this
section, may be increased under the
following conditions and amounts:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:46 Sep 15, 2009
Jkt 217001
(1) The State has submitted to the
Secretary, and has approved by the
Secretary a State plan amendment or
waiver request relating to an expansion
of eligibility for children or benefits
under title XXI of the Act that becomes
effective for a fiscal year (beginning
with FY 2010 and ending with FY
2013); and
(2) The State has submitted to the
Secretary, before the August 31
preceding the beginning of the fiscal
year, a request for an expansion
allotment adjustment under this
paragraph for such fiscal year that
specifies—
(i) The additional expenditures that
are attributable to the eligibility or
benefit expansion provided under the
amendment or waiver described in
paragraph (g)(1) of this section, as
certified by the State and submitted to
the Secretary by not later than August
31 preceding the beginning of the fiscal
year; and
(ii) The extent to which such
additional expenditures are projected to
exceed the allotment of the State or
District for the year.
(3) Subject to paragraph (e) of this
section relating to proration, the amount
of the allotment of the State or District
under this subsection for such fiscal
year shall be increased by the excess
amount described in paragraph (g)(2)(i).
A State or District may only obtain an
increase under paragraph (g)(2)(ii) of
this section for an allotment for FY 2010
or FY 2012.
(h) CHIP Fiscal Year Allotment
Process. As determined by the
Secretary, the CHIP allotments for a
fiscal year may be published as
Preliminary Allotments or Final
Allotments in the Federal Register.
§ 457.610
[Amended]
5. Amend the section heading for
§ 457.610 by—
A. Amending the section heading by
removing the words ‘‘for a fiscal year’’
and adding in its place ‘‘prior to FY
2009’’.
B. Removing the words ‘‘for a fiscal
year’’ and add in its place add ‘‘prior to
FY 2009’’in the first line of the
paragraph.
6. Add a new § 457.611 to subpart F
to read as follows:
§ 457.611 Period of availability for State
allotments for a fiscal year after FY 2008.
The amount of a final allotment for a
fiscal year after FY 2008, as determined
under § 457.609 and reduced to reflect
certain Medicaid expenditures in
accordance with § 457.616, remains
available until expended for Federal
payments based on expenditures
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
claimed during a 2-year period of
availability, beginning with the fiscal
year of the final allotment and ending
with the end of the succeeding fiscal
year following the fiscal year.
Authority: (Section 1102 of the Social
Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1302)
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program No. 93.778, Medical Assistance
Program)
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program No. 93.767, State Children’s Health
Insurance Program))
Dated: June 19, 2009.
Charlene Frizzera,
Acting Administrator, Centers for Medicare
& Medicaid Services.
Approved: July 29, 2009.
Kathleen Sebelius,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9–22162 Filed 9–15–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 17
[Docket No. FWS–R1–ES–2008–0073;
14420–1113–0000–C6]
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants; 12-Month Finding on a
Petition to Remove the Bliss Rapids
Snail (Taylorconcha serpenticola)
From the List of Endangered and
Threatened Wildlife
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of 12-month petition
finding.
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), announce a
12-month finding on a petition to
remove the Bliss Rapids snail
(Taylorconcha serpenticola) from the
Federal List of Endangered and
Threatened Wildlife (List) pursuant to
the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (Act) (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
Based on a thorough review of the best
scientific and commercial data
available, the species continues to be
restricted to a small geographic area in
the middle-Snake River, Idaho, where it
is dependent upon cool-water spring
outflows. Although some threats
identified at the time of listing in 1992
no longer exist or have been moderated,
ground water depletion and impaired
water quality still threaten the Bliss
Rapids snail. In addition, there are
significant uncertainties about the
effects of hydropower operations and
New Zealand mudsnails on the
E:\FR\FM\16SEP1.SGM
16SEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 178 (Wednesday, September 16, 2009)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 47517-47536]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-22162]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
42 CFR Part 457
[CMS-2291-P]
RIN 0938-AP53
Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP); Allotment Methodology
and States' Fiscal Year 2009 CHIP Allotments
AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This proposed rule describes the implementation of certain
funding provisions under title XXI of the Social Security Act (the
Act), the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP), as amended by the
Children's Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2009
(CHIPRA), by the Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP Extension Act of 2007
(MMSEA), and by other related CHIP legislation. Specifically, this
proposed rule addresses methodologies and procedures for determining
States' FY 2009 through FY 2013 allotments and payments in accordance
with sections 2104 and 2105 of the Act, as amended by CHIPRA.
DATES: To be assured consideration, comments must be received at one of
the addresses provided below, no later than 5 p.m. eastern standard
time (e.s.t.) on November 16, 2009.
ADDRESSES: In commenting, please refer to file code CMS-2291-P. Because
of staff and resource limitations, we cannot accept comments by
facsimile (FAX) transmission.
[[Page 47518]]
You may submit comments in one of four ways (please choose only one
of the ways listed):
1. Electronically. You may submit electronic comments on this
regulation to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions under
the ``More Search Options'' tab.
2. By regular mail. You may mail written comments to the following
address ONLY:
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Department of Health and
Human Services, Attention: CMS-2291-P, P.O. Box 8010, Baltimore, MD
21244-8010.
Please allow sufficient time for mailed comments to be received
before the close of the comment period.
3. By express or overnight mail. You may send written comments to
the following address ONLY:
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Department of Health and
Human Services, Attention: CMS-2291-P, Mail Stop C4-26-05, 7500
Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21244-1850.
4. By hand or courier. If you prefer, you may deliver (by hand or
courier) your written comments before the close of the comment period
to either of the following addresses:
a. For delivery in Washington, DC--
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Department of Health and
Human Services, Room 445-G, Hubert H. Humphrey Building, 200
Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20201.
(Because access to the interior of the Hubert H. Humphrey Building
is not readily available to persons without Federal government
identification, commenters are encouraged to leave their comments in
the CMS drop slots located in the main lobby of the building. A stamp-
in clock is available for persons wishing to retain a proof of filing
by stamping in and retaining an extra copy of the comments being
filed.)
b. For delivery in Baltimore, MD--
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Department of Health and
Human Services, 7500 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21244-1850.
If you intend to deliver your comments to the Baltimore address,
please call telephone number (410) 786-7195 in advance to schedule your
arrival with one of our staff members.
Comments mailed to the addresses indicated as appropriate for hand
or courier delivery may be delayed and received after the comment
period.
Submission of comments on paperwork requirements. You may submit
comments on this document's paperwork requirements by following the
instructions at the end of the ``Collection of Information
Requirements'' section in this document.
For information on viewing public comments, see the beginning of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard Strauss, (410) 786-2019.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Inspection of Public Comments: All comments received before the
close of the comment period are available for viewing by the public,
including any personally identifiable or confidential business
information that is included in a comment. We post all comments
received before the close of the comment period on the following Web
site as soon as possible after they have been received: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the search instructions on that Web site to
view public comments.
Comments received timely will also be available for public
inspection as they are received, generally beginning approximately 3
weeks after publication of a document, at the headquarters of the
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, 7500 Security Boulevard,
Baltimore, Maryland 21244, Monday through Friday of each week from 8:30
a.m. to 4 p.m. To schedule an appointment to view public comments,
phone 1-800-743-3951.
I. Background
A. Availability and Redistribution of Children's Health Insurance
Program (CHIP) Fiscal Year Allotments Prior to CHIPRA
Title XXI of the Social Security Act (the Act) sets forth the
Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) to enable States, the
District of Columbia, and specified Commonwealths and Territories to
initiate and expand health insurance coverage to uninsured, low-income
children. The 50 States, the District of Columbia, and the
Commonwealths and Territories may implement the CHIP through a separate
child health program under title XXI of the Act, an expanded Medicaid
program under title XIX of the Act, or a combination of both.
Federal funds appropriated for title XXI are limited, and the law
specifies a formula and methodology to divide the total annual
appropriation into individual allotments available for each State, the
District of Columbia, and each U.S. Territory and Commonwealth with an
approved child health plan.
Section 2104(b) of the Act requires States, the District of
Columbia, and U.S. Territories and Commonwealths to have an approved
child health plan for the fiscal year in order for the Secretary to
provide an allotment for that fiscal year.
Before the enactment of the Children's Health Insurance Program
Reauthorization Act of 2009 (CHIPRA, Pub. L. 111-3, enacted on February
4, 2009), section 2104(e) of the Act specified that in general the CHIP
allotments for a Federal fiscal year were available for payment to
States for their expenditures under an approved State child health plan
for an initial 3-fiscal year period of availability, including the
fiscal year for which the allotment was provided.
In general, before the enactment of CHIPRA, section 2104(f) of the
Act specified that the amounts of States' allotments which were not
expended during the initial 3-year period of availability were to be
redistributed to those States that had fully spent these fiscal year
allotments during this period of availability in accordance with an
appropriate procedure determined by the Secretary. Furthermore, section
2104(e) of the Act specified that the amounts of the redistributed
allotments continued to be available for expenditure by the States
receiving these redistributions to the end of the fiscal year in which
these funds were redistributed.
B. Funding of CHIP Allotments Before the Enactment of CHIPRA
Section 4901 of the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 (BBA, Pub. L. 105-
33, enacted on August 5, 1997) established title XXI of the Social
Security Act (the Act). In conjunction with further amendments of title
XXI of the Act described later, appropriations for CHIP were made
available to provide allotments to States for their CHIPs and related
Medicaid program expenditures through March 31, 2009. With the
enactment of the CHIPRA, title XXI was amended to provide funding for
the CHIP through FY 2013.
Under the initial BBA, sections 2104(a)(1) through (10) of the Act
appropriated funding for States' CHIPs for each fiscal year over a ten
fiscal year period from 1998 through 2007. The funding for each fiscal
year varied from $4.295 billion for FY 1998 up to $5.0 billion for FY
2007. Furthermore, under section 2104(c)(4) of the Act, additional
appropriations were provided for each of fiscal years 1999 through 2007
to provide additional allotment amounts
[[Page 47519]]
particularly for the Commonwealths and Territories.
C. Enactment of Continuing Appropriations and Medicare, Medicaid, and
SCHIP Extension Act of 2007
Continuing appropriation legislation (Pub. L. 110-92 enacted on
September 29, 2007), contained provisions to extend funding under the
CHIP through November 16, 2007. In particular, section 136(a) of Public
Law 110-92 appropriated $5 billion for the purposes of providing FY
2008 allotments to the 50 States, the District of Columbia, and the
Commonwealths and Territories. Additionally, $40 million was
appropriated by this section to provide additional allotments to the
Commonwealths and Territories in FY 2008.
Section 136(b) of Public Law 110-92 provided that the FY 2008
allotments be determined in accordance with the same methodology as
previous CHIP fiscal year allotments were determined. Section 136(c) of
Public Law 110-92 amended the CHIP statute to add a new section 2104(i)
of the Act to provide for the redistribution in FY 2008 of the
unexpended FY 2005 allotments remaining at the end of FY 2007 to those
50 States or the District of Columbia that had estimated shortfalls in
FY 2008. Finally, section 106 of Public Law 110-92 provided that the FY
2008 allotment funds were only available for States' CHIP expenditures
for assistance provided through November 16, 2007.
Subsequent to the enactment of Public Law 110-92, further
continuing appropriation legislation was enacted which extended the
dates through which the FY 2008 allotment funds were available as
provided in section 106 of Public Law 110-92; in particular, Public Law
110-116 (enacted on November 13, 2007), Public Law 110-137 (enacted on
December 14, 2007), and Public Law 110-149 (enacted on December 21,
2007) extended the dates to December 14, 2007, December 21, 2007, and
December 31, 2007, respectively.
Section 201 of the Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP Extension Act of
2007 (MMSEA, Pub. L. 110-173, enacted on December 29, 2007) amended
section 2104(a) of the CHIP statute to explicitly provide funding for
CHIP allotments in the amount of $5 billion for each of FYs 2008 and
2009 for the 50 States and the District of Columbia and the
Commonwealths and Territories, and for $40 million for the
Commonwealths and Territories for each of FY 2008 and FY 2009. These
allotments would be determined in accordance with the existing
methodology in CHIP statute for fiscal years before FY 2008. The
funding provided for FY 2008 under the continuing appropriation
legislation discussed above and enacted before MMSEA would no longer be
available (and thus expenditures for FY 2008 would be paid from the
allotments as provided under MMSEA). MMSEA provided that the FY 2008
and FY 2009 allotment funds were only available for States'
expenditures through March 31, 2009.
Section 201 of MMSEA amended the CHIP statute to add section
2104(j) of the Act which appropriated $1.6 billion for the purpose of
providing additional allotments to eliminate States' CHIP shortfalls in
FY 2008.
The provisions of MMSEA were implemented and described in the
Federal Register dated May 23, 2008 (30112, Vol. 73, No. 101).
D. Enactment of CHIPRA
Section 101 of the CHIPRA amended section 2104(a) of the Act to
appropriate funding for each fiscal year FY 2009 through FY 2012, and
for two semi-annual periods in FY 2013, October 1, 2012 through March
31, 2013 and April 1, 2013 through September 30, 2013, for the purpose
of providing allotments to States for each of those fiscal years or
fiscal year periods. Furthermore, section 108 of CHIPRA provided
additional funding for State allotments for the period October 1, 2012
through March 31, 2013 (the first half of FY 2013). Finally, section
3(c) of CHIPRA provides for the coordination of funding for the CHIP in
FY 2009 as previously provided under section 201 of MMSEA.
In particular, section 3(c) of CHIPRA requires the Federal
government to rescind any of the following previously appropriated
amounts that were not allotted or obligated before April 1, 2009:
Section 2104(a)(11) of the Act for purposes of providing
State CHIP allotments for FY 2009 for States' expenditures through
March 31, 2009.
Section 2104(k) of the Act for purposes of the
redistribution of unexpended FY 2006 allotments in FY 2009 to address
States' funding shortfalls in FY 2009.
Section 2104(l) of the Act for purposes of providing
additional allotments for States' expenditures in FY 2009 to fund
States' shortfalls for their expenditures through March 31, 2009.
Furthermore, any amounts provided for FY 2009 CHIP allotments under
section 2104(a)(12) as appropriated through the amendments made by
CHIPRA must be reduced by the amounts that were obligated before April
1, 2009 under sections 2104(a)(11), 2104(k), or 2104(l) of the Act, as
amended by section 201 of MMSEA (which refer to States' FY 2009 CHIP
allotments, amounts of unexpended FY 2006 allotments redistributed in
FY 2009, and the amounts of additional FY 2009 allotments to address
States' CHIP funding shortfalls through March 31, 2009, respectively).
The rescission of these unobligated amounts as well as the
reduction in the FY 2009 allotment for the amounts that were obligated
before April 1, 2009 ensure that States do not receive FY 2009
allotments as determined under the CHIPRA in excess of the total amount
provided under section 2104(a)(12) of the Act for FY 2009, as amended
by CHIPRA.
E. Expenditures, Authority for Qualifying States To Use Available CHIP
Allotments for Medicaid Expenditures
Under section 2105(a)(1)(A) through (D) and (a)(2) of the Act, and
before enactment of Public Law 108-74 (Extension of Availability of
CHIP Allotment Act, enacted on August 15, 2003), only Federal payments
for the following Medicaid and CHIP expenditures were applied against
States' available CHIP allotments: (1) Medical assistance provided
under title XIX (Medicaid) to targeted low-income children in a CHIP-
related Medicaid expansion, for which the CHIP enhanced Federal medical
assistance percentage (CHIP EFMAP) rate is available; (2) medical
assistance provided on behalf of a child during a period of presumptive
eligibility under section 1920A of the Act (these funds are matched at
the regular Medicaid Federal medical assistance percentage (FMAP)
rate); (3) child health assistance to targeted low-income children that
meets minimum benefit requirements under CHIP; and (4) certain other
types of expenditures in CHIP that are subject to the 10-percent limit
on non-primary expenditures (including other child health assistance
for targeted low-income children, health services initiatives,
outreach, and administrative costs).
Section 1(b) of Public Law 108-74, as amended by Public Law 108-127
(Social Security Act, Technical corrections, enacted November 17,
2003), added new section 2105(g) to the Act under which certain
``qualifying States'' that met prescribed criteria could elect to use
up to 20 percent of any of the States' available CHIP allotments for FY
1998,
[[Page 47520]]
1999, 2000, or 2001 to increase the FMAP rate for certain regular
Medicaid expenditures to the EFMAP rate available under CHIP. These
expenditures were for children under 19 years of age whose family
income exceeds 150 percent of the Federal poverty line and who are
eligible under the States' Medicaid program. As described in the
Federal Register published on July 23, 2004 (69 FR 44013), if a
qualified State submitted both 20 percent allowance expenditures and
other ``regular'' CHIP expenditures at the same time in a quarter, the
20 percent allowance expenditures would be applied first against the
available fiscal year reallotments. However, the 20 percent allowance
expenditures could be applied only against the specified fiscal year
allotment funds (upon which the 20 percent allowances were based) and
which would remain available. Under section 2104(g)(1)(B)(iii) of the
Act, the amounts of States' FY 2001 reallotments would only be
available through the end of FY 2005; therefore, the FY 2001 20 percent
allowances for the qualifying States are only available through the end
of FY 2005.
Section 6103 of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 (Pub. L. 109-171,
enacted on February 8, 2006) amended section 2105(g) of the Act to
provide for continued authority for qualifying States to use a portion
of their available FY 2004 and FY 2005 CHIP allotments for payments to
supplement the Medicaid FMAP that result in total Federal participation
at the EFMAP rate (as determined under section 2105(b) of the Act) for
certain expenditures made under the Medicaid program.
Section 201(b) of the National Institutes of Health Reform Act of
2006 and section 201(b) of MMSEA amended section 2105(g) of the Act to
provide for continued authority for such payments to qualifying States
for FYs 2006 through 2009.
Finally, section 107 of CHIPRA amended title XXI of the Act to add
a new paragraph (4) of section 2105(g) of the Act; under this new
provision, qualifying states at their option may use up to their entire
fiscal year allotments for each of fiscal years 2009 through 2013, to
the extent such allotments remain available to the State under the Act,
in an amount equal to the additional amount that would have been paid
to the State if the EFMAP as determined under section 2104(b) of the
Act was substituted for the FMAP defined in section 1905(b) of the Act.
The CHIPRA amendments to the qualifying State provision provide that
the indicated amounts of such allotments are available for certain
expenditures of the qualifying States as described in section
2105(g)(4)(B) of the Act, as amended by CHIPRA. In particular, these
are expenditures made by such States on or after February 5, 2009 for
children whose family income equals or exceeds 133 percent of the
Federal poverty line but does not exceed the Medicaid applicable income
level. As indicated above, this is a change from what was in effect
previously; that is, before CHIPRA, the income level was 150 percent of
the Federal poverty line.
II. Provisions of This Proposed Rule
For the reasons described in section I of this preamble, the
purpose of this proposed rule would:
Set forth the methodology and procedures for determining
the CHIP allotments for FY 2009 through FY 2013 for the 50 States and
the District of Columbia, and the U.S. Commonwealths and Territories as
provided under section 2104(m) of the Act.
Describe the methodology and process used to coordinate
the funding provided previously to States under MMSEA, as described in
the May 23, 2008 Federal Register (page 30112, Vol. 73, No. 101), under
the provisions of section 2104(a)(11) of the Act related to States' FY
2009 allotments provided to States before CHIPRA, section 2104(k) of
the Act related to the redistribution of States' unexpended FY 2006
allotments to address States' shortfalls in FY 2009, and section
2104(l) of the Act related to funding States' shortfalls in FY 2009 for
their expenditures through March 31, 2009.
Set forth the FY 2009 allotments as determined in
accordance with such methodologies and procedures.
Describe the implementation of the continued authority
under section 2104(g)(4) of the Act as amended by CHIPRA for
``qualifying States'' to elect to receive their available CHIP
allotments for FY 2009 through FY 2013 CHIP as increased Federal
matching funds for certain expenditures in their Medicaid programs.
Describe the retrospective adjustment for the FY 2008
shortfall funding as provided under section 2104(j) of the Act.
To incorporate the policies and implement the statutory provisions
as described above, we are proposing the following revisions:
In 42 CFR Sec. 457.600(a), we are proposing to remove the
date ``2007'' and add in its place ``2013'' of this regulation.
In Sec. 457.608, we are proposing to revise the heading
``Process and calculation of State allotments for a fiscal year'' to
read ``Process and calculation of State allotments prior to FY 2009''
of this regulation.
In part 457 subpart F, we are proposing to add Sec.
457.609, ``Process and calculation of State allotments for a fiscal
year after FY 2008'', which would implement the new funding amounts
available for States' CHIP allotments for FY 2009 through FY 2013.
In Sec. 457.610, we are proposing to revise the heading
``Period of availability for State allotments for a fiscal year'' to
read ``Period of availability for State allotments prior to FY 2009''
of this regulation. In the first line of the paragraph for this
section, we are also proposing to remove the words ``for a fiscal
year'' and add in its place ``prior to FY 2009'' of this regulation.
In part 457 subpart F, we are proposing to add Sec.
457.611, ``Period of availability for State allotments for a fiscal
year after FY 2008'', which would reflect the 3 fiscal year and 2
fiscal year periods of availability, as applicable to fiscal years
before FY 2009 and effective for FY 2009 and subsequent fiscal years,
respectively.
A. Methodology and Procedures for Determining the CHIP Allotments for
FY 2009 Through FY 2013 for the 50 States and the District of Columbia,
and the U.S. Commonwealths and Territories
1. Reauthorization Funding for the CHIP
Section 101 of CHIPRA provides the reauthorization funding for
providing States' allotments for FY 2009 through FY 2013. In
particular, section 101 of CHIPRA amended section 2104(a) of the Act to
revise paragraph (11) for FY 2008, and adds new paragraphs (12) through
(16) to provide appropriations for FY 2009 through FY 2013,
respectively. In particular, under the amendments made by CHIPRA the
appropriated amounts available for allotments for these fiscal years,
respectively are: $10,562,000,000 for FY 2009 (before CHIPRA the amount
for FY 2009 was $5,000,000,000); $12,520,000,000 for FY 2010;
$13,459,000,000 for FY 2011; $14,982,000,000 for FY 2012, and
$2,850,000,000 for each of the first and second half of FY 2013. Also,
section 108 of CHIPRA provided for a one-time appropriation of
$11,706,000,000 for allotments for the first half of FY 2013.
Therefore, the total appropriation for providing allotments during FY
2013 is $17,406,000,000.
2. Methodology for Determining State's Fiscal Year Allotments
a. CHIPRA provision of 2009. Section 102 of CHIPRA adds a new
section 2104(m) of the Act which sets forth the
[[Page 47521]]
methodology for determining States' CHIP allotments for each of FY 2009
through FY 2013. In general, the States' fiscal year allotments are
provided from the appropriation for the respective fiscal year
allotment, subject to a proration adjustment, described in section
II.A.2.g. of this proposed rule.
b. FY 2009 Allotments. The FY 2009 allotments for the 50 States and
the District of Columbia, and the Commonwealths and Territories, are
provided from the FY 2009 appropriation of $10,562,000,000, and are
subject to a proration adjustment described in II.A.2.g. of this
proposed rule, if necessary. The FY 2009 CHIP allotments for the 50
States and the District of Columbia are determined under a different
methodology than is used for the determining the FY 2009 allotments for
the Commonwealths and Territories.
The FY 2009 allotment for the 50 States and the District of
Columbia is determined as 110 percent of the highest of the following
three amounts:
The total Federal payments to the State from the States'
available CHIP allotments in FY 2008 as reported by the State and
certified to the Secretary through the November 2008 submission of the
quarterly expenditure reports, Forms CMS-21 and CMS-64, multiplied by
the allotment increase factor described in section II. A. 2.h. of this
proposed rule;
The amount allotted to the State for FY 2008, multiplied
by the allotment increase factor described in section II.A.2.h. of this
proposed rule.
The projected total Federal payments to the State under
title XXI of the Act for FY 2009, determined based on the February
submission of projections of expenditures as certified by the State to
CMS no later than March 31, 2009. These projections may include certain
amounts of Medicaid expenditures for certain ``qualifying states''
described in section 2105(g) of the Act.
With respect to the last item related to projected total Federal
payments for FY 2009 under title XXI, section 107 of CHIPRA added a new
paragraph section 2105(g)(4) of the Act to allow States to use up to
100 percent of their FY 2009 allotments for these expenditures. This
provision is further described in section II.E. of this proposed rule.
The FY 2009 allotment for the Commonwealths and Territories is
determined as the highest amount of the Federal payments made to the
Commonwealth or Territory under title XXI of the Act in any of the
fiscal years for the period of FY 1999 through FY 2008, multiplied by
the allotment increase factor described in section II.A.2.h. of this
proposed rule, plus an additional amount. The additional amount is
equal to $40,000,000, as appropriated under section 2104(c)(4)(B) of
the Act, multiplied by the following percentage provided under section
2104(c)(2) of the Act for the indicated jurisdiction: 91.6 percent for
Puerto Rico; 3.5 percent for Guam; 2.6 percent for the Virgin Islands;
1.2 percent for American Samoa; and 1.1 percent for the Northern
Mariana Islands.
c. FY 2010 Allotments. The FY 2010 allotments for the 50 States and
the District of Columbia, and the Commonwealths and Territories, are
provided from the FY 2010 appropriation of $12,520,000,000, and are
subject to a proration adjustment if necessary, described in section
II.A.2.g. of this proposed rule. Under the CHIPRA, the FY 2010
allotment for each State will be determined by multiplying the
allotment increase factor for FY 2010 for the State, by the sum of: The
State's FY 2009 allotment; the amount of the final FY 2006
redistributed allotments paid to the State as determined under section
2104(k) of the Act, and subject to any final retrospective adjustment
to such amount determined under section 2104(k)(5) of the Act; the
amount of the final additional FY 2009 allotments paid to the State as
determined under section 2104(l) of the Act, and subject to any final
retrospective adjustment to such amount determined under section
2104(l)(5) of the Act; and the amount of any contingency fund payment
made to the State for FY 2010, as determined under section 2104(n) of
the Act.
For the 50 States and the District of Columbia, under section
2104(m)(6) of the Act, the FY 2010 allotment may include additional
amounts in situations where such States have submitted an expansion
allotment adjustment request before August 31, 2009.
For the Commonwealths and Territories, in accounting for the
amounts of the FY 2009 allotments for purposes of determining the FY
2010 allotments, the component of the FY 2009 allotment for such
jurisdictions relating to the additional $40 million referenced in
section 2104(c)(4) of the Act, is not included. This is because section
2104(m)(2)(A)(i)(I) of the Act, as amended by CHIPRA, references the FY
2009 allotment as determined in section 2104(m)(1) of the Act; that
section in turn provides for determining the FY 2009 allotments from
the amounts appropriated in section 2104(a)(12) of the Act. That is,
such section 2104(m)(1) of the Act does not include the additional $40
million which is separately appropriated and available only for the
jurisdictions in determining their FY 2009 allotments. Therefore, the
component of the jurisdictions' FY 2009 allotment related to the
additional $40 million would not be included in determining the amount
of the jurisdictions' FY 2010 allotments.
d. FY 2011 Allotments. The FY 2011 allotments for the 50 States and
the District of Columbia, and the Commonwealths and Territories, are
provided from the FY 2011 appropriation ($13,459,000,000). The amounts
of these allotments are subject to a proration adjustment described in
section II.A.2.g of this proposed rule, if necessary. Section
2104(m)(2)(A)(ii) of the CHIPRA amendments refers to a ``rebasing''
process for determining the FY 2011 allotments; this requirement means
that the States' payments rather than their allotments for FY 2010 must
be considered in calculating the FY 2011 allotments. In particular the
FY 2011 allotments are determined by multiplying the increase factor
for FY 2011 by the sum of: Any Federal payments made from the States'
available allotments in FY 2010; any amounts provided as redistributed
allotments in FY 2010 to the State; and any Federal payments
attributable to any contingency fund payments made to the State for FY
2010 determined under Section 2104(n) of the Act.
e. FY 2012 Allotments. The FY 2012 allotments for the 50 States and
the District of Columbia, and the Commonwealths and Territories, are
provided from the FY 2012 appropriation of $14,982,000,000, and are
subject to a proration adjustment described in II.A.2.g.of this
proposed rule, if necessary. Under the CHIPRA, the FY 2012 allotment
for each State will be determined by multiplying the allotment increase
factor for FY 2012 for the State, by the sum of: the State's FY 2011
allotment and any contingency fund payment made to the State for FY
2011, as determined under section 2104(n) of the Act.
For the 50 States and the District of Columbia, under section
2104(m)(6) of the Act, the FY 2012 allotment may include additional
amounts in situations where such States have submitted an expansion
allotment adjustment request before August 31, 2011.
f. FY 2013 Allotments. The FY 2013 allotments for the 50 States and
the District of Columbia, and the Commonwealths and Territories, are
comprised of two components related to the first half of FY 2013 (that
is, the
[[Page 47522]]
period of October 1, 2012 through March 31, 2013) and second half of FY
2013 (that is, April 1, 2012 through September 30, 2013). The FY 2013
allotments for the first and second half of FY 2013 are subject to a
proration adjustment described in section II.A.2.g of this proposed
rule, as applicable.
The allotments for the first half of FY 2013 are provided from a
total available appropriation of $14,556,000,000, comprised of
$2,850,000,000 appropriated under section 2104(a)(16)(A) of the Act,
and $11,706,000,000 appropriated under section 108 of CHIPRA. The
allotments for the first half of FY 2013 is equal to the ``first half
ratio'' multiplied by: the allotment increase factor for FY 2013
multiplied by the sum of: any Federal payments made from the States'
available allotments in FY 2012; any amounts provided as redistributed
allotments in FY 2012 to the State; and any Federal payments
attributable to any contingency fund payments made to the State for FY
2012 as determined under Section 2104(n) of the Act. For this purpose,
the first half ratio is the percentage determined by dividing
$14,556,000,000 (calculated as the sum of $2,850,000,000 (the
appropriation for the first half of FY 2013) and $11,706,000,000 (the
one-time appropriation for the first half of the FY 2013)) by
$17,406,000,000 (calculated as $2,850,000,000, the appropriation for
the second half of FY 2013) plus the $14,556,000,000 amount).
The allotments for the second half of FY 2013 are provided from a
total available appropriation of $2,850,000,000, appropriated under
section 2104(a)(16)(B) of the Act. The allotments for the second half
of FY 2013 is equal to $2,850,000,000 multiplied by a percentage equal
to the amount of the allotment for the State for the first half of FY
2013 divided by the sum of all such first half of FY 2013 allotments
for all States.
(g) Proration Rule. Under section 2104(m)(4) of the Act, as amended
by CHIPRA, if the amount of States' allotments for a fiscal year (as
determined in accordance with the provisions described of this proposed
rule, or in the case of FY 2013, the amount of an allotment for each
half of the fiscal year) exceeds the total appropriations available for
such periods, the total allotments for each of these periods will be
reduced on a proportional basis. The total amount available nationally
for the period is multiplied by a proration percentage determined by
dividing the amount determined for the period by the sum of such
amounts.
h. The allotment increase factor for a fiscal year. Under Section
2104(m)(5) of the Act, the allotment increase factor for a fiscal year
is equal to the product of two amounts for the fiscal year: the per
capita health care growth factor and the Child Population growth
factor.
For this purpose, in general, the per capita health care growth
factor for a fiscal year is equal to 1 plus the percentage increase in
the projected per capita amount of the National Health Expenditures
from the calendar year in which the previous fiscal year ends to the
calendar year in which the fiscal year involved ends, as most recently
published by CMS before the beginning of the fiscal year involved.
In general, for the 50 States and the District of Columbia, the
child population growth factor for a fiscal year is equal to 1 plus the
percentage increase (if any) in the population of children in the State
from July 1 in the previous fiscal year to July 1 in the fiscal year
involved, as determined by CMS based on the most recent published
estimates of the Census Bureau available before the beginning of the
fiscal year involved plus 1 percentage point. In the determination of
the child population growth factor, the CHIP legislation refers to
``the percentage increase (if any)'' of the population of children in
the State. In this regard, child population growth factor refers only
to increases in the population of children. Thus, if there was a
decrease in the population of children over the indicated period, the
child population growth factor for such state would be 0.0 percent plus
one percentage point; that is, negative growth in the children
population would not result in the growth factor being less than 101
percent.
Because of concerns about availability of data to determine the
child population growth factor for the Commonwealths and the
Territories, section 2104(m)(1)(B) of the Act explicitly required that
the term ``United States'' be substituted for the term ``the State''.
For fiscal years after FY 2009, that exception does not apply, and we
will determine the child population growth factor for the Commonwealths
and the Territories, based on the most recent published estimates of
the Census Bureau. In accordance with section 602(b) of the CHIPRA,
which added a new section 2109(b)(2)(B) of the Act, we will be working
with the Secretary of the Commerce Department on appropriate
adjustments to improve the Current Population Survey (CPS), or develop
other data, to determine the child population growth factor.
i. CHIP Fiscal Year Allotment Process. As described above, the
determination of the allotments for each fiscal year potentially
involves the collection of relevant data, such as related to the
allotment increase factor, or the consideration of additional
information later or after the end of the fiscal year; for example, the
determination of the FY 2010 and FY 2012 allotments allows States to
receive increases in their CHIP allotments to reflect the submission of
certain expansions to their CHIP programs. In that regard, we are
incorporating into the CHIP regulation a process, under which the
Secretary may elect to publish preliminary fiscal year allotments.
Consequently, under this process at the time the updated allotment
amounts became available the Secretary would publish a final notice.
For example, under the CHIPRA legislation, in the determination of the
FY 2010 and FY 2012 allotments, States can amend their CHIP programs to
provide for expansions; the increase in expenditures for such
expansions would serve to increase the amount of the State fiscal year
allotments associated with the year of such expansions. As determined
by the Secretary, the CHIP allotments for a fiscal year may need to be
published first as Preliminary Allotments and then later as Final
Allotments in the Federal Register. The proposed rule provides for the
potential for a preliminary and final allotment to be determined.
B. Coordination of CHIP Funding for FY 2009
Before the enactment of CHIPRA, section 2104(a)(11) of the Act, as
amended by MMSEA, appropriated $5 billion for purposes of providing FY
2009 allotments for States. Under the CHIP statute as amended by MMSEA
and before the enactment of CHIPRA, such funds were potentially
available for allotment and obligation to States for their CHIP related
expenditures in FY 2009 through March 31, 2009. Furthermore, section
2104(k) of the Act and section 2104(l) of the Act, as amended by MMSEA,
provided for redistribution of the unexpended FY 2006 allotments in FY
2009, and for additional FY 2009 shortfall allotments in FY 2009,
respectively. However, section 3(c)(1) of CHIPRA provides for a
rescission of amounts of these funds that were not obligated before
April 1, 2009. Furthermore, section 3(c)(2) of CHIPRA requires that the
FY 2009 allotments, as determined under section 2104(m)(1) of the Act
(as amended by CHIPRA), be reduced by the following amounts that were
appropriated and obligated before April 1, 2009. Amounts
[[Page 47523]]
appropriated and obligated before April 1, 2009 include the amounts of
the FY 2009 allotments appropriated under section 2104(a)(11) of the
Act, as amended by MMSEA and before the enactment of CHIPRA; amounts of
FY 2006 redistributed allotments, provided under section 2104(k) of the
Act; and, the amounts of the FY 2009 shortfall allotments, provided
under section 2104(l) of the Act. This coordination ensures that
States' FY 2009 CHIP funding does not exceed the final FY 2009 CHIP
allotments as determined under the CHIPRA.
C. FY 2009 Allotments Determined in Accordance With Such Methodologies
and Procedures
In accordance with the methodology described in section II.A. of
this proposed rule relating to the calculation of the fiscal year CHIP
allotments, and in section II.B. of this proposed rule relating to the
coordination of CHIP funding, we have calculated the FY 2009 allotments
for the States. That calculation is contained in three tables described
in section III. of this proposed rule; Table 1 provides the calculation
of the allotment increase factor for FY 2009, Table 2 provides the
calculation of the FY 2009 allotment, and Table 3 provides the
coordination of funds in FY 2009.
D. Period of Availability for CHIP Allotments
Section 105 of CHIPRA amended section 2105(e) of the Act to revise
the period of availability for expenditure by States of their CHIP
fiscal year allotments. Before the enactment of CHIPRA, States' CHIP
fiscal year allotments were available for expenditure by the State for
3 fiscal years, the fiscal year and the subsequent 2 fiscal years. With
the enactment of CHIPRA, section 2105(e) of the Act now provides that
each of the States' fiscal year allotments for FY 1998 through FY 2008,
are available for the expenditure by the State for 3 fiscal years.
Finally, section 2104(e) of the Act as amended by CHIPRA now indicates
that States' fiscal year allotments for FY 2009 and each succeeding
fiscal year are available for expenditure by the States for 2 fiscal
years, the current fiscal year and the immediately subsequent fiscal
year. In this proposed rule, we have amended the CHIP regulations at
Sec. 457.611 to reflect the 3 fiscal year and 2 fiscal year periods of
availability, as applicable to fiscal years before FY 2009 and
effective for FY 2009 and subsequent fiscal years, respectively.
E. Continuing Authority for Qualifying States To Use FY 2009 Through FY
2013 Allotments for Certain Medicaid Expenditures
Section 107 of CHIPRA amended the CHIP statute to add a new section
2105(g)(4) of the Act to allow certain ``qualifying states'' described
in section 2105(g) of the Act to elect to use up to 100 percent of
their available CHIP fiscal year allotments for FY 2009 and following
fiscal years for certain expenditures in Medicaid. Before the enactment
of CHIPRA, States were only able to use up to 20 percent of their
available fiscal year CHIP allotments for the applicable Medicaid
expenditures. With the enactment of CHIPRA, beginning with the FY 2009
allotment, States can use up to 100 percent of their FY 2009 and
following fiscal year allotments for the States' qualifying
expenditures. In that case, only the Federal share portion of the
expenditures which is above the amount that the State would have
received under Medicaid would be applied against the CHIP allotment.
Note, under section 5001 of the American Recovery and Reinvestment
Act of 2009 (ARRA, Pub. L. 111-5, enacted on February 17, 2009) the
FMAP under the Medicaid program has been increased during the 9-quarter
period October 1, 2009 through December 31, 2010. Because of this
increase, the amount of the Federal share funds that will be applied
against the CHIP qualifying States' FY 2009 (and following) allotments
will be reduced. For example, a qualifying State's regular Medicaid
FMAP rate in FY 2009 is 50 percent, its increased FMAP under ARRA in
Medicaid is 60.00 percent, and its CHIP EFMAP is 65.00 percent. This
qualifying State would be able to claim the ``qualifying'' expenditures
in FY 2009 at the 65.00 percent EFMAP rate in CHIP, and only 5 percent
of such expenditures would apply against the State's FY 2009 allotment,
calculated as 65.00 percent (CHIP EFMAP) minus 60.00 percent (increased
FMAP under ARRA) claimable under the Medicaid program. In the same
example (and assuming the same FMAP for Medicaid and enhanced FMAP in
CHIP), after December 31, 2010 15.00 percent of the qualifying
expenditure in FY 2011 would apply against the State's FY 2011 CHIP
allotment, calculated as 65.00 percent (CHIP EFMAP) minus 50.00 percent
(regular FMAP) claimable under the Medicaid program. We have amended
the CHIP regulations to reflect this provision.
F. Retrospective Adjustment of FY 2008 Shortfall Allotments
Section 2104(j)(5) of the Act, as amended by MMSEA provides for a
potential retrospective adjustment with respect to the amounts of
States' FY 2008 shortfall allotments provided to them in FY 2008 and
based on expenditure reports for FY 2008 submitted and certified by
States to CMS no later than November 30, 2008.
Under section 2104(j)(2) and (3)(A) of the Act, additional FY 2008
shortfall allotments were made available only to those 50 States and
the District of Columbia that were initially determined to have a
shortfall in CHIP funding in FY 2008 based on their FY 2008 expenditure
projections as submitted and certified by the States by November 30,
2007. For those States, under section 2104(j)(5) of the Act, the
retrospective adjustment to the amounts of their additional FY 2008
shortfall allotments is based on the FY 2008 expenditure projections
submitted and certified by such States by November 30, 2008.
Through the end of FY 2008 and based on States' estimated FY 2008
CHIP expenditures, we had provided approximately $1,201 million in
total additional FY 2008 shortfall allotments to States to address
their projected shortfalls in FY 2008. However, based on the States'
actual FY 2008 expenditures, as submitted through November 30, 2008,
the final States' shortfalls in FY 2008 were only approximately $995
million. That is, of those States who overestimated their projected
shortfalls, final shortfalls for FY 2008 were about $232 million less
than were previously estimated, and for States that underestimated
their shortfalls, their actual shortfalls were about $26 million
higher. Thus, the final net shortfall for States was about $995 million
($1,201 million minus $232 million plus $26 million). Table 4 in this
notice presents the final FY 2008 shortfall allotments after applying
the retrospective adjustment under section 2104(j)(5) of the Act.
G. Retrospective Adjustment of FY 2009 Shortfall Allotments
Section 2104(l)(5) of the Act, as amended by MMSEA provides for a
potential retrospective adjustment with respect to the amounts of
States' FY 2009 shortfall allotments provided to them in FY 2009 prior
to April 1, 2009 based on expenditure reports for the first two
quarters of FY 2009 as submitted and certified by States to CMS no
later than May 31, 2009.
Under section 2104(l)(2) and (3)(A) of the Act, additional FY 2009
shortfall
[[Page 47524]]
allotments were made available to those States that were initially
determined to have a shortfall in CHIP funding in FY 2009 based on
their expenditure projections for the first two quarters of FY 2009 as
submitted and certified by the States by November 30, 2008. For those
States, under section 2104(l)(5) of the Act, the retrospective
adjustment to the amounts of their additional FY 2009 shortfall
allotments is based on the FY 2009 expenditures for the first two
quarters of FY 2009 as submitted and certified by such States by May
31, 2009.
Prior to April 1, 2009, and based on States' estimated FY 2009 CHIP
expenditures through the end of the second quarter of FY 2009, we had
provided approximately $267 million in total additional FY 2009
shortfall allotments to States to address their projected shortfalls in
FY 2009 through the end of the second quarter FY 2009 in that amount.
However, based on the States' actual FY 2009 expenditures for the first
two quarters of FY 2009, as submitted through May 31, 2009, the final
States' shortfalls in FY 2009 through the second quarter of FY 2009 for
the shortfall States were only approximately $210 million. That is, for
the shortfall States initially receiving the additional FY 2009
shortfall allotments, based on their actual FY 2009 reported
expenditures for the first two quarters of FY 2009, their final
shortfalls for the first two quarters of FY 2009 were about $58 million
less than was previously estimated. Table 5 in this notice presents the
final FY 2009 shortfall allotments after applying the retrospective
adjustment under section 2104(l)(5) of the Act. Also, Column D in Table
3 reflects these final retrospective adjustment FY 2009 shortfall
allotments.
III. Tables
Following are the keys and associated tables for the CHIP funding
provisions as discussed in previous sections:
Table 1--Allotment Increase Factor for 2009
Table 2--FY 2009 Children's Health Insurance Program Allotments under
the Children's Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act Of 2009
Table 3--Coordination of CHIP Funding for Fiscal Year 2009
Table 4--Retrospective Adjustment for the FY 2008 Shortfall Funding
A. TABLE 1--ALLOTMENT INCREASE FACTOR FOR 2009
Key to Table 1
Column/Description
Column A = State. Column A contains the name of the State, District
of Columbia, U.S. Commonwealth or Territory.
Column B = PCNHE 2008, PCNHE 2009, PCHCG Factor. Column B contains
the calculation of the Per Capita Health Care Growth (PCHCG) Factor for
FY 2009, determined as 1 plus the percentage increase in the Per Capita
National Health Expenditures (PCNHE) from calendar year 2008 to
calendar year 2009.
Columns C through F = Calculation of the Child Population Growth
Factor (CPGF) for FY 2009:
Column C = July 1, 2008 Child Population. Column C contains the
population of children in each State or the United States as of July 1,
2008, as provided by the most recent published data of the Census
Bureau before the beginning of FY 2009.
Column D = July 1, 2009 Child Population. Column D contains the
population of children in each State or the United States as of July 1,
2009, as provided by the most recent published data of the Census
Bureau before the beginning of FY 2009.
Column E = Percent Increase 2008-2009. Column E contains the
percentage increase, if any, of the population of children in each
State, or the United States, from July 1, 2008 to July 1, 2009,
calculated as the difference between the number in Column D minus the
number in Column C divided by the number in Column C.
Column F = Child Population Growth Factor. Column F contains the
CPGF for the 50 States and the District of Columbia, determined as the
1.01 plus the percent in Column E for the State. For the Commonwealths
and Territories the CPGF is determined as 1.01 plus the percentage in
Column E for the United States.
Column G = FY 2009 Allotment Increase Factor. Column G contains the
FY 2009 Allotment Increase Factor, calculated as the PCHCG factor in
Column B multiplied by the CPGF percent in Column F.
[[Page 47525]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP16SE09.000
B. Table 2--FY 2009 Children's Health Insurance Program Allotments
Under the Children's Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of
2009
Key to Table 2
Column/Description
Column A = State. Column A contains the name of the State, District
of Columbia, U.S. Commonwealth or Territory.
Column B = FY 2008 Total Federal CHIP Payments. Column B contains,
for the 50 States and the District of Columbia only, the total Federal
payments applied to the States' available CHIP allotment funds in FY
2008, based on the States' expenditure reports submitted through
November 30, 2008. For the Commonwealths and Territories, the entry in
this Column is ``na.''
Column C = FY 2008 CHIP Allotments. Column C contains for the 50
States and the District of Columbia only, the States' final FY 2008
CHIP Allotments, as published in the May 23, 2008 Federal Register
(30112, Vol. 73, No. 101). For the Commonwealths and Territories,
Column C contains the maximum amount of the Federal payments for each
of the jurisdictions as was applied against the jurisdiction's
available CHIP funds in each of the fiscal years FY 1999 through 2008.
Column D = FY 2009 Allotment Increase Factor. Column D contains the
Allotment Increase Factor for each State as contained in Column G of
Table 1.
Column E = FY 2008 Tot. Fed Pmts x Incr. Factor. Column E contains,
for the 50 States and the District of Columbia only, the product of the
FY 2008 total Federal CHIP payments in Column B multiplied by the
amount of the FY 2009 Allotment Increase Factor in Column D. Column E
contains, for the Territories and Commonwealths, the product of the
amount in Column C (containing the maximum amount of
[[Page 47526]]
Federal Payments in the FY 1999 through FY 2008) multiplied by the
amount in Column D (the allotment increase period).
Column F = FY 2008 Allotments x Incr. Factor. Column F contains,
for the 50 States and the District of Columbia only, the product of the
FY 2008 CHIP allotments in Column C multiplied by the amount of the FY
2009 Allotment Increase Factor in Column D. Column F contains, for each
of the Commonwealths and Territories, the percentage for each
jurisdiction, respectively, from section 2104(a)(3) the percent
allocation.
Column G = FY 2009 Projected Expenditures. Column G contains, for
the 50 States and the District of Columbia only; the amounts of each
State's projected CHIP Federal payments as submitted by the States on
their February 2009 quarterly expenditure reports no later than March
31, 2009. Column G contains, for each of the Commonwealths and
Territories, the portion of the additional $40 million in allotment
funds available to such jurisdiction for FY 2009, determined as the
product of the percentage in Column F for the Jurisdiction multiplied
by $40 million.
Column H = Maximum of Col. E, F, G. Column H contains, for the 50
States and the District of Columbia only, the maximum of the amounts in
Columns E, F, and G.
Column I = FY 2009 Allotments. Column I contains, for the 50 States
and the District of Columbia, the FY 2009 CHIP allotment, determined as
110 percent multiplied by the amount in Column H. Column I contains for
the Commonwealths and Territories, the FY 2009 CHIP allotment,
determined as the sum of the amount in Column E and the amount in
Column G, for each jurisdiction.
[[Page 47527]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP16SE09.001
C. Table 3--Coordination of CHIP Funding for Fiscal Year 2009
Table 3 contains the amounts of each States' FY 2009 CHIP
allotment, as contained in Column I on Table 2, reduced by certain
amounts of CHIP allotment funds already available to the State in FY
2009, as required under section 3(c) of CHIPRA.
Key to Table 3
Column/Description
Column A = State. Column A contains the name of the State.
Column B = FY 2009 Pre-CHIPRA Allotment Grants Issued Before April
1, 2009. Column B contains the amount if any of the State's FY 2009
allotment that was actually provided to the State in a grant award from
such allotment before April 1, 2009, as determined under section
2104(a) of the Act before the enactment of CHIPRA, as published in the
Federal Register on May 23, 2008 (30112, Vol. 73, No. 101).
Column C = FY 2006 Unexpended Allotments Redistributed in FY 2009
Before April 1, 2009. Column C contains the total amount, if any, that
the State received from the amounts of States' unexpended FY 2006
allotments remaining at the end of FY 2008, and redistributed in FY
2009 before April 1, 2009, determined in accordance with the provisions
of section 2104(k) of the Act.
Column D = FY 2009 Shortfall Allotments After Retrospective
Adjustment. Column D contains the final amount if any, that the State
received as an additional shortfall allotment for the first two
quarters of FY 2009, as determined under the retrospective adjustment
provision of
[[Page 47528]]
section 2104(l)(5) of the Act. Refer to Table 5 for further information
regarding the determination of the amounts of the FY 2009 shortfall
allotments under the retrospective adjustment.
Column E = Total FY 2009 Pre-CHIPRA Allotment Funds. Column E
contains the total amount if any, that the State received as CHIP
allotment funds in FY 2009 before April 1, 2009, determined as the sum
of the amounts, if any, in Columns B, C, and D, for each State.
Column F = FY 2009 Total Allotments Determined Under CHIPRA. Column
F contains the total FY 2009 CHIP allotment determined under CHIPRA, as
contained in Column I in Table 2.
Column G = FY 2009 Allotments Under CHIPRA Balance Effective April
1, 2009. Column G contains the balance of the FY 2009 CHIP allotment
after the reduction by the amounts of the FY 2009 allotment funds
provided in FY 2009, determined as the amount in Column F minus the
amount in Column E.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP16SE09.002
[[Page 47529]]
D. Table 4--Retrospective Adjustment for the FY 2008 Shortfall
Allotments
Table 4 contains the final retrospective adjustment determination
with respect to the amounts of the additional shortfall allotments
provided to States to eliminate their CHIP funding shortfalls in FY
2008, in accordance with the provisions of section 2104(j)(5) of the
Act. Under section 2104(j)(2) and (3)(A) of the Act, additional FY 2008
shortfall allotments were made available only to those 50 States and
the District of Columbia that were determined to have a shortfall in
CHIP funding in FY 2008 based on their FY 2008 expenditure projections
as submitted and certified by the States by November 30, 2007. For
those States, under section 2104(j)(5) of the Act, the retrospective
adjustment to the amounts of their additional FY 2008 shortfall
allotments is based on the FY 2008 expenditure projections submitted
and certified by such States by November 30, 2008.
Key to Table 4
Column/Description
Column A = State. Column A contains the name of the State.
Column B = FY 2008 Actual Expenditures 11/30/08. Column B contains
the total Federal share amount of the CHIP expenditures reported by the
States for FY 2008, as contained on the States' expenditure reports
submitted and certified by the States by November 30, 2008.
Column C = FY 2006 Carryover Allotments into FY 08. Column C
contains the amounts of the States' unused FY 2006 allotments remaining
at the end of FY 2007, if any, and carried over into FY 2008.
Column D = FY 2007 Carryover Allotments into FY 08. Column D
contains the amounts of the States' unused FY 2007 allotments remaining
at the end of FY 2007, if any, and carried over into FY 2008.
Column E = FY 2008 Allotments. Column E contains the amounts of the
States' FY 2008 allotments, as published in the May 23, 2008 Federal
Register (30112, Vol. 73, No. 101).
Column F = FY 2005 Redistribution Based on November 30, 2007
Estimates. Column F contains the amounts of the FY 2005 redistributed
allotments issued to the State in FY 2008, if any, as based on the
States' estimates of CHIP funding needed for FY 2008 submitted and
certified by the State by November 30, 2007.
Column G = Total Avail. Allotments in FY 2008. Column G contains
the total amount of CHIP funds available to the State in FY 2008
without consideration of the issuance of any additional FY 2008
shortfall allotments, determined as the sum of the amounts, if any, in
Columns C, D, E, and F.
Column H = Retro. Adjusted Shortfall in FY 2008. Column H contains
the retrospective adjustment amount of States' shortfall in CHIP
funding for FY 2008. This amount is based on the States' actual FY 2008
CHIP expenditures as submitted and certified by the State by November
30, 2008 and the actually available CHIP funds without any additional
FY 2008 shortfall allotments. The retrospective adjustment is
applicable only for States that were determined to have a shortfall in
CHIP funding in FY 2008 based on their FY 2008 expenditure projections
submitted and certified by November 30, 2007; such States are those
with an FY 2008 shortfall amount shown in Column I. For such States,
the amount of the retrospective adjustment shortfall amount in Column H
is calculated as the difference between the amounts of the States'
projected Federal share CHIP expenditures for FY 2008 in Column B and
the amounts of the States' available allotments funds in FY 2008 Column
G.
Column I = Total FY 2008 SF Allotment Grants Issued in FY 2008.
Column I contains the total amounts of the additional FY 2008 shortfall
allotments actually issued to the State in FY 2008 to address States'
CHIP funding shortfalls in FY 2008.
Column J = FY 2008 Excess SF Allotments Provided In FY 2008. Column
J contains the amounts of the States' excess additional FY 2008
shortfall allotments provided in FY 2008, as determined under the
retrospective adjustment provision. For States that received additional
FY 2008 shortfall allotments, the amounts in Column J represent the
amount of the FY 2008 shortfall allotments provided in FY 2008 that
were greater than were needed to address such States' CHIP funding
shortfalls in FY 2008. The amounts in Column J are calculated as the
difference between the actual additional FY 2008 shortfall allotments
in Column I and the amounts of the States' retrospectively adjusted FY
2008 shortfall in Column H.
Column K = Additional FY 2008 SF Allotments Needed for FY 2008.
Column K contains the amounts of the additional FY 2008 shortfall
allotments needed by FY 2008 shortfall States as determined under the
retrospective adjustment provision. For States that received such
shortfall allotments in FY 2008, the amounts in Column K represent the
amount of the additional FY 2008 shortfall allotments needed in FY 2008
that were greater than were provided to address such States' CHIP
funding shortfalls in FY 2008. The amounts in Column K are calculated
as the difference between the amounts of the States' retrospectively
adjusted FY 2008 shortfall in Column H and the actual FY 2008 shortfall
allotments provided to the States in Column I.
[[Page 47530]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP16SE09.003
[[Page 47531]]
E. Table 5--Retrospective Adjustment for the FY 2009 Shortfall Funding
Table 5 contains the final retrospective adjustment determination
with respect to the amounts of the additional shortfall allotments
provided to States to eliminate their CHIP funding shortfalls for the
first two quarters of FY 2009, in accordance with the provisions of
section 2104(l)(5) of the Act. Under section 2104(l)(2) and (3)(A) of
the Act, additional FY 2009 shortfall allotments were initially made
available only to those States that were projected to have a shortfall
in CHIP funding for the first two quarters of FY 2009 based on their FY
2009 expenditure projections as submitted and certified by the States
by November 30, 2008. For those States, under section 2104(l)(5) of the
Act, the retrospective adjustment to the amounts of their additional FY
2009 shortfall allotments are based on the FY 2009 expenditures for the
first two quarters of FY 2009 as submitted and certified by such States
by May 31, 2009.
Key to Table 5
Column/Description
Column A = State. Column A contains the name of the State.
Column B = FY 09 Actual Expends. Thru 3/31/09 Reported By 5/31/09.
Column B contains the total Federal share amount of the CHIP
expenditures reported by the States for the first two quarters of FY
2009 (the period ending March 31, 2009), as contained on the States'
expenditure reports submitted and certified by the States by May 31,
2009.
Column C = FY 07 Carryover Allotments into FY 09. Column C contains
the amounts of the States' unused FY 2007 allotments remaining at the
end of FY 2008, if any, and carried over into FY 2009.
Column D = FY 08 Carryover Allotments into FY 09. Column D contains
the amounts of the States' unused FY 2008 allotments remaining at the
end of FY 2008, if any, and carried over into FY 2009.
Column E = FY 09 Pre-CHIPRA Allot. Grants. Column E contains the
amounts of the States' FY 2009 allotment grants as issued to States
prior to April 1, 2009 from the FY 2009 allotments as determined under
the CHIP statute in effect prior to the enactment of CHIPRA, as
published in the May 23, 2008 Federal Register (30112, Vol. 73, No.
101).
Column F = FY 2006 Redistribution Based on 11/30/08 Estimates.
Column F contains the amounts of the FY 2006 redistributed allotments
issued to the State in FY 2009, if any, as based on the States'
estimates of CHIP funding needed for FY 2009 submitted and certified by
the State by November 30, 2008.
Column G = Total Avail. Allotments in FY 2009. Column G contains
the total amount of CHIP funds available to the State in FY 2009
without consideration of the issuance of any additional FY 2009
shortfall allotments, determined as the sum of the amounts, if any, in
Columns C, D, E, and F.
Column H = Retro. Adjusted Shortfall FY 2009 Thru 3/31/09. Column H
contains the retrospective adjustment amount of States' shortfalls in
CHIP funding through the end of March 31, 2009, based on the States'
actual FY 2009 CHIP expenditures for the first two quarters of FY 2009
as submitted and certified by the State by May 31, 2009 and the
actually available CHIP funds not including any additional FY 2009
shortfall allotments. The amount of the retrospective adjustment
shortfall amount in Column H is calculated as the difference between
the amounts of the States' projected Federal share CHIP expenditures
for the first two quarters of FY 2009 in Column B and the amounts of
the States' available allotments funds in FY 2009 Column G.
Column I = Total FY 2009 SF Allotments Issued in FY 2009. Column I
contains the total amounts of the additional FY 2009 shortfall
allotments actually