Onions Grown in South Texas; Change in Regulatory Period, 47048-47050 [E9-22115]
Download as PDF
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
47048
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 177 / Tuesday, September 15, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
shipments were around 3.3 million
cartons. Based on the average f.o.b.
price, a majority of Florida white
seedless grapefruit handlers could be
considered small businesses under
SBA’s definition. In addition, based on
production and grower prices reported
by the National Agricultural Statistics
Service, and the total number of Florida
citrus producers, the average annual
producer revenue is less than $750,000.
Information from the Foreign
Agricultural Service, USDA, indicates
that the dollar value of imported fresh
grapefruit ranged from approximately
$2.14 million in 2006 to $2.06 million
in 2008. Using these values, all
importers would have annual receipts of
less than $7 million for grapefruit.
Therefore, the majority of handlers,
producers and importers of white
seedless grapefruit may be classified as
small entities.
This rule continues in effect the
action that relaxed the minimum size
requirement for white seedless
grapefruit grown in Florida and
imported white seedless grapefruit. This
rule relaxes the minimum size
requirement for domestic and import
shipments from 39⁄16 inches to 35⁄16
inches. This change maximizes fresh
white seedless grapefruit shipments and
provides greater flexibility to handlers
and importers. This rule amends the
provisions of §§ 905.306 and 944.106.
Authority for the change in the order’s
rules and regulations is provided in
§ 905.52. The change in the import
regulation is required under section 8e
of the Act.
This action is not expected to increase
costs associated with the order
requirements or the grapefruit import
regulation. Rather, this action represents
a cost savings for handlers and has the
potential to increase industry returns.
This change makes the minimum size
requirement the same for both the
domestic and export markets. Having
the same minimum size requirement for
both domestic and export shipments
makes it easier to move fruit to available
markets without having to repack fruit
to meet the differing size requirements.
This reduces costs and provides greater
flexibility for handlers. Importers also
benefit from this change, as a greater
volume of fruit is available for shipment
to the United States. The opportunities
and benefits of this rule are equally
available to all grapefruit handlers,
growers, and importers, regardless of
their size.
This rule will not impose any
additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large
grapefruit handlers. As with all Federal
marketing order programs, reports and
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:49 Sep 14, 2009
Jkt 217001
forms are periodically reviewed to
reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public
sector agencies. In addition, USDA has
not identified any relevant Federal rules
that duplicate, overlap or conflict with
this rule.
Further, the Committee’s meeting was
widely publicized throughout the
Florida citrus industry and all interested
persons were invited to attend the
meeting and participate in Committee
deliberations. Like all Committee
meetings, the December 16, 2008,
meeting was a public meeting and all
entities, both large and small, were able
to express their views on this issue.
Comments on the interim final rule
were required to be received on or
before April 8, 2009. No comments were
received. Therefore, for the reasons
given in the interim final rule, we are
adopting the interim final rule as a final
rule, without change.
To view the interim final rule, go to:
https://www.regulations.gov/search/
Regs/home.html#searchResults?Ne=
11+8+8053+8098+8074+8066+8084+1&
Ntt=AMS–FV–09–0002&Ntk=All&Ntx=
mode+matchall&N=0.
This action also affirms information
contained in the interim final rule
concerning Executive Orders 12866 and
12988, the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. Chapter 35), and the E-Gov Act
(44 U.S.C. 101).
In accordance with section 8e of the
Act, the United States Trade
Representative has concurred with the
issuance of this final rule.
After consideration of all relevant
material presented, it is found that
finalizing the interim final rule, without
change, as published in the Federal
Register (74 FR 15641, April 7, 2009)
will tend to effectuate the declared
policy of the Act.
List of Subjects
7 CFR Part 905
Grapefruit, Marketing agreements,
Oranges, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Tangelos, Tangerines.
7 CFR Part 944
Avocados, Food grades and standards,
Grapefruit, Grapes, Imports, Kiwifruit,
Limes, Olives, Oranges.
PARTS 905 AND 944—[AMENDED]
Accordingly, the interim final rule
that amended 7 CFR parts 905 and 944
and that was published at 74 FR 15641
on April 7, 2009, is adopted as a final
rule, without change.
■
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Dated: September 9, 2009.
Rayne Pegg,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. E9–22114 Filed 9–14–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 959
[Doc. No. AMS–FV–09–0012; FV09–959–1
FIR]
Onions Grown in South Texas; Change
in Regulatory Period
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Affirmation of interim final rule
as final rule.
SUMMARY: The Department of
Agriculture (USDA) is adopting, as a
final rule, without change, an interim
final rule that revised the regulatory
period during which minimum grade,
size, quality, and maturity requirements
are in effect for onions grown in South
Texas under Marketing Order No. 959
(order). The interim final rule shortened
the regulatory period from March 1
through July 15 to March 1 through June
4. The relaxation in the interim final
rule was necessary to enable producers
and handlers to compete more
effectively in the marketplace.
DATES: Effective Date: Effective
September 16, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Belinda G. Garza, Regional Manager,
Texas Marketing Field Office, Marketing
Order Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA;
Telephone: (956) 682–2833, Fax: (956)
682–5942; or E-mail:
Belinda.Garza@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may obtain
information on complying with this and
other marketing order regulations by
viewing a guide at the following Web
site: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
AMSv1.0/ams.fetchTemplateData.do?
template=TemplateN&page=Marketing
OrdersSmallBusinessGuide; or by
contacting Jay Guerber, Marketing Order
Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW., STOP
0237, Washington, DC 20250–0237;
Telephone: (202) 720–2491, Fax: (202)
720–8938, or E-mail:
Jay.Guerber@ams.usda.gov.
This rule
is issued under Marketing Order No.
959, as amended (7 CFR part 959),
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\15SER1.SGM
15SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 177 / Tuesday, September 15, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
regulating the handling of onions grown
in South Texas, hereinafter referred to
as the ‘‘order.’’ The order is effective
under the Agricultural Marketing
Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7
U.S.C. 601–674), hereinafter referred to
as the ‘‘Act.’’
Section 8e of the Act provides that
whenever certain specified
commodities, including onions, are
regulated under a Federal marketing
order, imports of these commodities
into the United States are prohibited
unless they meet the same or
comparable grade, size, quality, or
maturity requirements as those in effect
for the domestically produced
commodities. The interim final rule had
no impact on the import regulation for
onions.
USDA is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order
12866.
The handling of onions grown in
South Texas is regulated by 7 CFR part
959. Section 959.322 of the order’s rules
and regulations provides that the
handling of South Texas onions shall be
subject to specified grade, size, and
inspection requirements. That section
also prescribes the time period during
which such regulatory requirements for
South Texas onions are in effect.
Previously, the regulatory period during
which regulations were in effect ran
from March 1 to July 15.
In an interim final rule published in
the Federal Register on April 24, 2009,
and effective on April 25, 2009 (74 FR
18621, Doc. No. AMS–FV–09–0012,
FV09–959–1 IFR), § 959.322 was
amended by changing the ending date of
the regulatory period to June 4, except
that onions handled from June 5
through July 15 would continue to be
inspected. Relaxing the regulation helps
shippers in districts with later
production compete in the market with
shippers from non-regulated production
areas. Continuing the inspection
requirement through July 15 allows the
South Texas Onion Committee
(Committee) to continue collecting
assessments through the end of the
onion season in order to consistently
fund onion promotion and research
projects under the order.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5
U.S.C. 601–612), the Agricultural
Marketing Service (AMS) has
considered the economic impact of this
action on small entities. Accordingly,
AMS has prepared this final regulatory
flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:49 Sep 14, 2009
Jkt 217001
business subject to such actions in order
that small businesses will not be unduly
or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
Act, and rules issued thereunder, are
unique in that they are brought about
through group action of essentially
small entities acting on their own
behalf.
Industry Information
There are approximately 84 producers
of onions in the production area and
approximately 31 handlers subject to
regulation under the order. Small
agricultural producers are defined by
the Small Business Administration
(SBA) (13 CFR 121.201) as those having
annual receipts of less than $750,000.
Small agricultural service firms are
defined as those having annual receipts
of less than $7,000,000.
Most of the South Texas handlers are
vertically integrated corporations
involved in producing, shipping, and
marketing onions. For the 2007–08
marketing year, the industry’s 31
handlers shipped onions produced on
10,978 acres with the average and
median volume handled being 202,245
and 176,551 fifty-pound equivalents,
respectively. In terms of production
value, total revenues for the 31 handlers
were estimated to be $174.7 million,
with average and median revenues
being $5.64 million and $4.92 million,
respectively.
The South Texas onion industry is
characterized by producers and
handlers whose farming operations
generally involve more than one
commodity, and whose income from
farming operations is not exclusively
dependent on the production of onions.
Alternative crops provide an
opportunity to utilize many of the same
facilities and equipment not in use
when the onion production season is
complete. For this reason, typical onion
producers and handlers either produce
multiple crops or alternate crops within
a single year.
Based on the SBA’s definition of
small entities, the Committee estimates
that all of the 31 handlers regulated by
the order would be considered small
entities if only their onion revenues are
considered. However, revenues from
other farming enterprises could result in
a number of these handlers being above
the $7,000,000 annual receipt threshold.
All of the 84 producers may be
classified as small entities based on the
SBA definition if only their revenue
from onions is considered.
This rule continues in effect the
action that shortened the ending date of
the order’s regulatory period for Texas
onions shipped to the fresh market from
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
47049
July 15 to June 4 of each year. This
action, which was unanimously
recommended by the Committee,
shortened the regulatory period during
which minimum grade, size, quality,
and maturity requirements are in effect
for onions grown under the order.
Authorization to implement such
regulations is provided in § 959.52(b) of
the order. Regulatory requirements
authorized under this section are
provided in § 959.322.
The interim final rule provided that
fresh onion shipments from the South
Texas onion production areas meet
minimum grade, size, quality, and
maturity requirements from March 1
through June 4 of each year. Inspection
requirements will continue through July
15. Previously, regulations required that
onions grown in the production area
meet order requirements from March 1
through July 15 of each year. Prior to the
2007 marketing season, the regulatory
period was from March 1 through June
4. In 2007, the regulatory period was
extended from June 4 to July 15. At that
time, the Committee believed that
applying quality requirements for a
longer time period was necessary to
accommodate an extended growing
season.
After two seasons’ experience, District
2 producers and handlers requested that
the Committee reconsider the previous
regulatory extension. Onions subject to
quality requirements under the order
from June 5 to July 15 had been
competing in the market with nonregulated onions from growing areas
outside the order. Relaxing the
requirements by changing the ending
date of the regulatory period back to
June 4 relieves District 2 handlers of the
resulting inequity and enables them to
be more competitive with shippers from
other production areas.
Under the order, the Committee
collects assessments from handlers
based on inspection of onions to be
shipped to market. The Committee’s
recommendation to continue the
inspection requirement to July 15 allows
the Committee to continue to collect
assessments through the end of the
season. This revenue will continue to be
used by the Committee to fund its
operations, including consistent funding
for onion promotion and research
projects under the order.
One alternative to such action would
have been to not change the regulatory
period back to June 4. However, the
Committee believed that leaving the
quality requirements in place for the
entire season would not have been as
beneficial for those shipping onions in
the latter part of the season.
E:\FR\FM\15SER1.SGM
15SER1
47050
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 177 / Tuesday, September 15, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
This rule does not impose any
additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large
onion handlers. As with all Federal
marketing order programs, reports and
forms are periodically reviewed to
reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public
sector agencies.
In addition, as noted in the initial
regulatory flexibility analysis, USDA
has not identified any relevant Federal
rules that duplicate, overlap, or conflict
with this rule.
Further, the Committee’s meeting was
widely publicized throughout the South
Texas onion industry and all interested
persons were invited to attend the
meeting and participate in Committee
deliberations. All Committee meetings
are public meetings and all entities,
both large and small, are able to express
their views.
This action also affirms information
contained in the interim final rule
concerning Executive Orders 12866 and
12988, the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. Chapter 35), and the E-Gov Act
(44 U.S.C. 101).
Comments on the interim final rule
were required to be received on or
before June 23, 2009. No comments
were received. Therefore, for the reasons
given in the interim final rule, we are
adopting the interim final rule as a final
rule, without change.
To view the interim final rule, go to
https://www.regulations.gov/fdmspublic/
component/
main?main=DocketDetail&d=AMS-FV09-0012.
After consideration of all relevant
material presented, it is found that
finalizing the interim final rule, without
change, as published in the Federal
Register (74 FR 18621; April 24, 2009)
will tend to effectuate the declared
policy of the Act.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 959
Marketing agreements, Onions,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
PART 959—[AMENDED]
Accordingly, the interim final rule
amending 7 CFR part 959 which was
published at 74 FR 18621 on April 24,
2009, is adopted as a final rule without
change.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
■
Dated: September 9, 2009.
Rayne Pegg,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. E9–22115 Filed 9–14–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:49 Sep 14, 2009
Jkt 217001
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE
CORPORATION
12 CFR Part 329
RIN 3064–AD46
Interest on Deposits
AGENCY: Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation (FDIC).
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: The Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation (FDIC) is
amending its regulations to eliminate
restrictions on certain kinds of transfers
from savings deposits for state chartered
banks that are not members of the
Federal Reserve System and insured
branches of foreign banks. The Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve
System (the FRB) has already amended
its regulations to eliminate these
restrictions for member banks. Because
this change is ministerial, the FDIC has
determined for good cause that public
notice and comment is unnecessary and
impracticable under the Administrative
Procedure Act (the APA) and is
implementing this change by means of
a final rule without notice and
comment.
DATES: This rule is effective on
September 15, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mark Mellon, Counsel, Legal Division,
(202) 898–3884 or Samuel Frumkin,
Senior Policy Analyst (Compliance),
Compliance Policy Section, Division of
Supervision and Consumer Protection,
(202) 898–6602, 550 17th Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20429.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
A. FRB Amendments to Regulation D
On May 20, 2009, the FRB announced
the approval of final amendments to 12
CFR part 204, Reserve Requirements of
Depository Institutions (Regulation D).
Among other changes, the amendments
will eliminate restrictions on certain
types of transfers that consumers can
make from savings deposits. See 74 FR
25629 (May 29, 2009). The changes were
effective 30 days from the date of
publication in the Federal Register, that
is, July 2, 2009.
Prior to the FRB amendments,
Regulation D limited the number of
‘‘convenient’’ transfers and withdrawals
from savings deposits to not more than
six per month. Within this overall limit
of six, not more than three transfers or
withdrawals could be made by check,
debit card, or similar order made by the
depositor and payable to third parties
(the three transfer sublimit). Under the
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
FRB final amendments, the permissible
monthly number of transfers or
withdrawals from savings deposits by
check, debit card, or similar order
payable to third parties has been
increased from three to six. In other
words, while the FRB has decided to
retain the overall six-transfer limit for
savings deposits, it has eliminated the
three-transfer sublimit within the
overall limit that applied to transfers or
withdrawals from savings deposits by
check, debit card, or similar order
payable to third parties. The FRB
decided to eliminate the three transfer
sublimit because distinctions between
such transfers and other types of preauthorized or automatic transfers
subject to the six-per-month limit were
no longer logical in light of
technological advances. See 74 FR
25631.
B. FDIC Responsibilities Under Section
18(g) of the Federal Deposit Insurance
(FDI) Act
Section 18(g) of the FDI Act (12 U.S.C.
1828(g)) provides that the Board of
Directors of the FDIC shall by regulation
prohibit the payment of interest or
dividends on demand deposits in
insured nonmember banks and in
insured branches of foreign banks.
Accordingly, the FDIC promulgated
regulations prohibiting the payment of
interest or dividends on demand
deposits at 12 CFR part 329. See 51 FR
10808 (Mar. 31, 1986). Section 18(g) of
the FDI Act also provides that the FDIC
shall make such exceptions to this
prohibition as are prescribed with
respect to demand deposits in member
banks by section 19 of the Federal
Reserve Act, as amended, or by
regulation of the FRB.
Generally, member banks, state
nonmember banks and insured branches
of foreign banks are subject to the
statutory prohibition and exceptions to
that prohibition, although under
different statutes and regulations. From
time to time the FRB issues or
authorizes a new exception to the
prohibition applicable to member banks,
and the FDIC later issues or authorizes
a similar exception affecting state
nonmember banks and insured branches
of foreign banks, as is the case in this
particular rulemaking. Note, however,
that under section 329.3 of part 329,
state nonmember banks and insured
branches of foreign banks are already
subject to the same exceptions to the
prohibition that member banks are
subject to, regardless of whether the
FDIC has issued or authorized the
specific exception. See 63 FR 8341 (Feb.
19, 1998).
E:\FR\FM\15SER1.SGM
15SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 177 (Tuesday, September 15, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 47048-47050]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-22115]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 959
[Doc. No. AMS-FV-09-0012; FV09-959-1 FIR]
Onions Grown in South Texas; Change in Regulatory Period
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Affirmation of interim final rule as final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is adopting, as a final
rule, without change, an interim final rule that revised the regulatory
period during which minimum grade, size, quality, and maturity
requirements are in effect for onions grown in South Texas under
Marketing Order No. 959 (order). The interim final rule shortened the
regulatory period from March 1 through July 15 to March 1 through June
4. The relaxation in the interim final rule was necessary to enable
producers and handlers to compete more effectively in the marketplace.
DATES: Effective Date: Effective September 16, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Belinda G. Garza, Regional Manager,
Texas Marketing Field Office, Marketing Order Administration Branch,
Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA; Telephone: (956) 682-2833,
Fax: (956) 682-5942; or E-mail: Belinda.Garza@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may obtain information on complying with this and
other marketing order regulations by viewing a guide at the following
Web site: https://www.ams.usda.gov/AMSv1.0/ams.fetchTemplateData.do?template=TemplateN&page=MarketingOrdersSmallBusinessGuide; or by contacting Jay Guerber, Marketing Order
Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237;
Telephone: (202) 720-2491, Fax: (202) 720-8938, or E-mail:
Jay.Guerber@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule is issued under Marketing Order
No. 959, as amended (7 CFR part 959),
[[Page 47049]]
regulating the handling of onions grown in South Texas, hereinafter
referred to as the ``order.'' The order is effective under the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-
674), hereinafter referred to as the ``Act.''
Section 8e of the Act provides that whenever certain specified
commodities, including onions, are regulated under a Federal marketing
order, imports of these commodities into the United States are
prohibited unless they meet the same or comparable grade, size,
quality, or maturity requirements as those in effect for the
domestically produced commodities. The interim final rule had no impact
on the import regulation for onions.
USDA is issuing this rule in conformance with Executive Order
12866.
The handling of onions grown in South Texas is regulated by 7 CFR
part 959. Section 959.322 of the order's rules and regulations provides
that the handling of South Texas onions shall be subject to specified
grade, size, and inspection requirements. That section also prescribes
the time period during which such regulatory requirements for South
Texas onions are in effect. Previously, the regulatory period during
which regulations were in effect ran from March 1 to July 15.
In an interim final rule published in the Federal Register on April
24, 2009, and effective on April 25, 2009 (74 FR 18621, Doc. No. AMS-
FV-09-0012, FV09-959-1 IFR), Sec. 959.322 was amended by changing the
ending date of the regulatory period to June 4, except that onions
handled from June 5 through July 15 would continue to be inspected.
Relaxing the regulation helps shippers in districts with later
production compete in the market with shippers from non-regulated
production areas. Continuing the inspection requirement through July 15
allows the South Texas Onion Committee (Committee) to continue
collecting assessments through the end of the onion season in order to
consistently fund onion promotion and research projects under the
order.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-612), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
has considered the economic impact of this action on small entities.
Accordingly, AMS has prepared this final regulatory flexibility
analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued
pursuant to the Act, and rules issued thereunder, are unique in that
they are brought about through group action of essentially small
entities acting on their own behalf.
Industry Information
There are approximately 84 producers of onions in the production
area and approximately 31 handlers subject to regulation under the
order. Small agricultural producers are defined by the Small Business
Administration (SBA) (13 CFR 121.201) as those having annual receipts
of less than $750,000. Small agricultural service firms are defined as
those having annual receipts of less than $7,000,000.
Most of the South Texas handlers are vertically integrated
corporations involved in producing, shipping, and marketing onions. For
the 2007-08 marketing year, the industry's 31 handlers shipped onions
produced on 10,978 acres with the average and median volume handled
being 202,245 and 176,551 fifty-pound equivalents, respectively. In
terms of production value, total revenues for the 31 handlers were
estimated to be $174.7 million, with average and median revenues being
$5.64 million and $4.92 million, respectively.
The South Texas onion industry is characterized by producers and
handlers whose farming operations generally involve more than one
commodity, and whose income from farming operations is not exclusively
dependent on the production of onions. Alternative crops provide an
opportunity to utilize many of the same facilities and equipment not in
use when the onion production season is complete. For this reason,
typical onion producers and handlers either produce multiple crops or
alternate crops within a single year.
Based on the SBA's definition of small entities, the Committee
estimates that all of the 31 handlers regulated by the order would be
considered small entities if only their onion revenues are considered.
However, revenues from other farming enterprises could result in a
number of these handlers being above the $7,000,000 annual receipt
threshold. All of the 84 producers may be classified as small entities
based on the SBA definition if only their revenue from onions is
considered.
This rule continues in effect the action that shortened the ending
date of the order's regulatory period for Texas onions shipped to the
fresh market from July 15 to June 4 of each year. This action, which
was unanimously recommended by the Committee, shortened the regulatory
period during which minimum grade, size, quality, and maturity
requirements are in effect for onions grown under the order.
Authorization to implement such regulations is provided in Sec.
959.52(b) of the order. Regulatory requirements authorized under this
section are provided in Sec. 959.322.
The interim final rule provided that fresh onion shipments from the
South Texas onion production areas meet minimum grade, size, quality,
and maturity requirements from March 1 through June 4 of each year.
Inspection requirements will continue through July 15. Previously,
regulations required that onions grown in the production area meet
order requirements from March 1 through July 15 of each year. Prior to
the 2007 marketing season, the regulatory period was from March 1
through June 4. In 2007, the regulatory period was extended from June 4
to July 15. At that time, the Committee believed that applying quality
requirements for a longer time period was necessary to accommodate an
extended growing season.
After two seasons' experience, District 2 producers and handlers
requested that the Committee reconsider the previous regulatory
extension. Onions subject to quality requirements under the order from
June 5 to July 15 had been competing in the market with non-regulated
onions from growing areas outside the order. Relaxing the requirements
by changing the ending date of the regulatory period back to June 4
relieves District 2 handlers of the resulting inequity and enables them
to be more competitive with shippers from other production areas.
Under the order, the Committee collects assessments from handlers
based on inspection of onions to be shipped to market. The Committee's
recommendation to continue the inspection requirement to July 15 allows
the Committee to continue to collect assessments through the end of the
season. This revenue will continue to be used by the Committee to fund
its operations, including consistent funding for onion promotion and
research projects under the order.
One alternative to such action would have been to not change the
regulatory period back to June 4. However, the Committee believed that
leaving the quality requirements in place for the entire season would
not have been as beneficial for those shipping onions in the latter
part of the season.
[[Page 47050]]
This rule does not impose any additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large onion handlers. As with all
Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are periodically
reviewed to reduce information requirements and duplication by industry
and public sector agencies.
In addition, as noted in the initial regulatory flexibility
analysis, USDA has not identified any relevant Federal rules that
duplicate, overlap, or conflict with this rule.
Further, the Committee's meeting was widely publicized throughout
the South Texas onion industry and all interested persons were invited
to attend the meeting and participate in Committee deliberations. All
Committee meetings are public meetings and all entities, both large and
small, are able to express their views.
This action also affirms information contained in the interim final
rule concerning Executive Orders 12866 and 12988, the Paperwork
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), and the E-Gov Act (44 U.S.C.
101).
Comments on the interim final rule were required to be received on
or before June 23, 2009. No comments were received. Therefore, for the
reasons given in the interim final rule, we are adopting the interim
final rule as a final rule, without change.
To view the interim final rule, go to https://www.regulations.gov/fdmspublic/component/main?main=DocketDetail&d=AMS-FV-09-0012.
After consideration of all relevant material presented, it is found
that finalizing the interim final rule, without change, as published in
the Federal Register (74 FR 18621; April 24, 2009) will tend to
effectuate the declared policy of the Act.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 959
Marketing agreements, Onions, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
PART 959--[AMENDED]
0
Accordingly, the interim final rule amending 7 CFR part 959 which was
published at 74 FR 18621 on April 24, 2009, is adopted as a final rule
without change.
Dated: September 9, 2009.
Rayne Pegg,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. E9-22115 Filed 9-14-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P